In January 2021, the Supreme Court denied Jack Daniel’s petition seeking review of the Ninth Circuit decision in VIP Products LLC v. Jack Daniel’s Properties, in which the Ninth Circuit set a high bar for brand owners seeking to challenge parody novelty products under trademark infringement and dilution theories. Similar disputes arise in the EU. With the growth of economic globalization as well as e-commerce, food and beverage brand owners have been increasingly challenged by trademark infringement and parody. You are invited to join our discussion on the following issues:
- Recent developments in U.S. parody cases, including U.S. courts’ increasing deferral to First Amendment freedom of expression protections for parodists in analyzing brand owner claims
- Parody in litigation in the EU
- Practical advice for trademark disputes involving parody
For questions, contact Miriam Hedke at email@example.com.
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION CREDIT
King & Spalding is an accredited provider of CLE credit in California, Georgia, Illinois, New York and Texas. We can issue reciprocal credit for attorneys licensed in Connecticut, Florida, and New Jersey. We will apply for credit in Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia (subject to MCLE Board approval). For jurisdictions not listed, attendees are provided with a Universal Certificate of Attendance. New York licensed attorneys: Transitional/Appropriate for newly-admitted and experienced attorneys. Financial aid is available for qualifying lawyers. For CLE-related questions, please contact Gisel Arias, firstname.lastname@example.org. King & Spalding, 1180 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA 30309. CA Provider #10947.