People
Jim Brogan focuses his practice in representing technology and life sciences companies in high-stakes patent trials. He has successfully represented clients in cases and trials in most of the key patent litigation venues in the United States including in the Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware, Eastern District of Virginia, Northern District of Illinois, Northern, Central, and Southern Districts of California, and the International Trade Commission (“ITC”). He also has experience working with clients before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) and has had success before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Jim represents clients ranging from startups to established corporations, including Gevo, Enfish, Innolux, Hon Hai Precision Industries, Picolight, ACQIS Technology, and Monolithic Power Systems.
Jim regularly works to find solutions to his clients’ patent disputes in the early stages of litigation by understanding and focusing on the strategy that will best align with their needs. As an example, he recently secured a favorable summary determination for Innolux in an ITC Section 337 Investigation concerning LCD panels.
Jim has been recognized by various national legal guides including Chambers USA, Legal 500, Managing Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Management, as well as some local publications like 5280 Denver Magazine for his expertise and work in intellectual property and patent litigation.
Jim is an adjunct professor at the University of Denver’s Sturm College of Law, where he teaches a patent litigation course. He is also a frequent presenter on patent-litigation and -prosecution topics. Jim is a co-founder of the Rocky Mountain Intellectual Property Institute, which is an annual continuing legal education event in Denver, and he has presented on several topics involving patent ligation, infringement risk, claim construction and patent litigation budgeting over the years.
J.D., University of Houston Law Center
B.S. Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University
California
Colorado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
American Bar Association
American Intellectual Property Law Assoc.-Co-Chairman of the FDA Plants & Agriculture Subcommittee
California Bar Association
Colorado Bar Association
Orange County Barristers
June 25, 2024
Managing IP Recommends Multiple King & Spalding IP Practices, Individuals in its Annual Guide
February 13, 2024
King & Spalding Secures Victory for BASF in Delaware Antitrust Suit
November 6, 2023
Former Justice Lee Yeakel, Tom Friel, Jim Brogan and Ojeiku Aisiku counsel Staton Techiya in a patent dispute against Samsung
Patent Defense Cases:
Butamax v. Gevo (D. Del.) – counsel for Gevo in a patent infringement action involving metabolically engineered micro-organisms for biofuel production.
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (ITC) – counsel for Qualcomm in a patent infringement litigation involving wireless communications.
Mondis Technology v. Chimei Innolux and Innolux (E.D. Tx. and ITC) – counsel for Chimei Innolux and Innolux in a patent infringement action involving video displays.
See more
March 24, 2022
Potential Remedies for Russia’s Suspension of Foreign Investors’ Intellectual Property Rights
June 25, 2024
Managing IP Recommends Multiple King & Spalding IP Practices, Individuals in its Annual Guide
February 13, 2024
King & Spalding Secures Victory for BASF in Delaware Antitrust Suit
November 6, 2023
Former Justice Lee Yeakel, Tom Friel, Jim Brogan and Ojeiku Aisiku counsel Staton Techiya in a patent dispute against Samsung
Patent Defense Cases:
Butamax v. Gevo (D. Del.) – counsel for Gevo in a patent infringement action involving metabolically engineered micro-organisms for biofuel production.
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (ITC) – counsel for Qualcomm in a patent infringement litigation involving wireless communications.
Mondis Technology v. Chimei Innolux and Innolux (E.D. Tx. and ITC) – counsel for Chimei Innolux and Innolux in a patent infringement action involving video displays.
See more
March 24, 2022
Potential Remedies for Russia’s Suspension of Foreign Investors’ Intellectual Property Rights
June 25, 2024
Managing IP Recommends Multiple King & Spalding IP Practices, Individuals in its Annual Guide
February 13, 2024
King & Spalding Secures Victory for BASF in Delaware Antitrust Suit
November 6, 2023
Former Justice Lee Yeakel, Tom Friel, Jim Brogan and Ojeiku Aisiku counsel Staton Techiya in a patent dispute against Samsung
J.D., University of Houston Law Center
B.S. Electrical Engineering, Southern Methodist University
California
Colorado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
American Bar Association
American Intellectual Property Law Assoc.-Co-Chairman of the FDA Plants & Agriculture Subcommittee
California Bar Association
Colorado Bar Association
Orange County Barristers