{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"cg-3","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"C","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":445975,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3930,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexander Calfo has repeatedly won the most difficult and challenging\u0026nbsp;trials involving medical devices and pharmaceuticals, airplane crashes, automotive products liability, class actions, toxic tort, insurance coverage, and commercial business disputes. \u0026nbsp;He has been awarded five of the Top 10 winning first-chair trial verdicts in California by \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; His verdicts have also been selected Top 5 nationally by LexisNexis, and Courtroom View Network recently named another high-profile national verdict as the \u0026ldquo;Number One Impressive Defense Victory in the United States.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Los Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chose Alex as a 2022 Top 100 Lawyer for his legal skill, achievements, and exemplary leadership.\u0026nbsp; The award also recognized him as one of the first partners to join King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Los Angeles office and \u0026ldquo;has been instrumental in building the firm\u0026rsquo;s reputation as a west coast trial powerhouse.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is inducted in the prestigious American College of Trial Lawyers, the premier trial association in North America whose members are elected to the College for demonstrating the highest standards of trial advocacy, ethical conduct, professionalism, and collegiality.\u0026nbsp;He is also a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), an invitation-only group of attorneys who have the required combination of skills, integrity, and trial experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourtroom View Network has awarded Alex its Number One all-time \u0026ldquo;must watch\u0026rdquo; defense verdict for the entire state of California. \u0026nbsp;Alex was also named \u0026ldquo;Lawyer of the Year\u0026rdquo; in the \u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for exceptional legal skill and achievement. \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognizes him as a California Litigation Star and a Tier One National Product Liability Star. \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranks Alex \u0026ldquo;Among the Best in Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a recipient of The Best Lawyers in America award and, in 2024, was selected by the National Trial Lawyers as a Top 100 Trial Lawyer.\u0026nbsp;He was honored as a \"Top 25 Mass Tort and Product Liability lawyer in the United States\" by the National Trial Lawyers in 2026. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is proudly named to the Board of Trustees of Creighton University - his Law School Alma Mater.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex serves as a frequent author, speaker and presenter on a variety of trial and litigation topics.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alexander-calfo","email":"acalfo@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Calfo","nick_name":"Alexander","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alexander","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":518,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1991-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexander Calfo has repeatedly won the most difficult and challenging\u0026nbsp;trials involving medical devices and pharmaceuticals, airplane crashes, automotive products liability, class actions, toxic tort, insurance coverage, and commercial business disputes. \u0026nbsp;He has been awarded five of the Top 10 winning first-chair trial verdicts in California by \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; His verdicts have also been selected Top 5 nationally by LexisNexis, and Courtroom View Network recently named another high-profile national verdict as the \u0026ldquo;Number One Impressive Defense Victory in the United States.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Los Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chose Alex as a 2022 Top 100 Lawyer for his legal skill, achievements, and exemplary leadership.\u0026nbsp; The award also recognized him as one of the first partners to join King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Los Angeles office and \u0026ldquo;has been instrumental in building the firm\u0026rsquo;s reputation as a west coast trial powerhouse.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is inducted in the prestigious American College of Trial Lawyers, the premier trial association in North America whose members are elected to the College for demonstrating the highest standards of trial advocacy, ethical conduct, professionalism, and collegiality.\u0026nbsp;He is also a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), an invitation-only group of attorneys who have the required combination of skills, integrity, and trial experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourtroom View Network has awarded Alex its Number One all-time \u0026ldquo;must watch\u0026rdquo; defense verdict for the entire state of California. \u0026nbsp;Alex was also named \u0026ldquo;Lawyer of the Year\u0026rdquo; in the \u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for exceptional legal skill and achievement. \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognizes him as a California Litigation Star and a Tier One National Product Liability Star. \u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranks Alex \u0026ldquo;Among the Best in Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a recipient of The Best Lawyers in America award and, in 2024, was selected by the National Trial Lawyers as a Top 100 Trial Lawyer.\u0026nbsp;He was honored as a \"Top 25 Mass Tort and Product Liability lawyer in the United States\" by the National Trial Lawyers in 2026. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is proudly named to the Board of Trustees of Creighton University - his Law School Alma Mater.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex serves as a frequent author, speaker and presenter on a variety of trial and litigation topics.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5155},{"id":5155},{"id":5155}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-19T14:43:48.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-19T14:43:48.000Z","searchable_text":"Calfo{{ FIELD }}Alexander Calfo has repeatedly won the most difficult and challenging trials involving medical devices and pharmaceuticals, airplane crashes, automotive products liability, class actions, toxic tort, insurance coverage, and commercial business disputes.  He has been awarded five of the Top 10 winning first-chair trial verdicts in California by The Daily Journal.  His verdicts have also been selected Top 5 nationally by LexisNexis, and Courtroom View Network recently named another high-profile national verdict as the “Number One Impressive Defense Victory in the United States.”  The Los Angeles Business Journal chose Alex as a 2022 Top 100 Lawyer for his legal skill, achievements, and exemplary leadership.  The award also recognized him as one of the first partners to join King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Los Angeles office and “has been instrumental in building the firm’s reputation as a west coast trial powerhouse.” \nAlex is inducted in the prestigious American College of Trial Lawyers, the premier trial association in North America whose members are elected to the College for demonstrating the highest standards of trial advocacy, ethical conduct, professionalism, and collegiality. He is also a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), an invitation-only group of attorneys who have the required combination of skills, integrity, and trial experience.\nCourtroom View Network has awarded Alex its Number One all-time “must watch” defense verdict for the entire state of California.  Alex was also named “Lawyer of the Year” in the Los Angeles Business Journal for exceptional legal skill and achievement.  Benchmark Litigation recognizes him as a California Litigation Star and a Tier One National Product Liability Star.  Legal 500 U.S. ranks Alex “Among the Best in Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Actions in Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Litigation.” \nHe is a recipient of The Best Lawyers in America award and, in 2024, was selected by the National Trial Lawyers as a Top 100 Trial Lawyer. He was honored as a \"Top 25 Mass Tort and Product Liability lawyer in the United States\" by the National Trial Lawyers in 2026.  \nAlex is proudly named to the Board of Trustees of Creighton University - his Law School Alma Mater. \nAlex serves as a frequent author, speaker and presenter on a variety of trial and litigation topics. Partner Marquette University Marquette University Law School Creighton University Creighton University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado California American Bar Association Defense Research Institute American Board of Trial Advocates Los Angeles County Bar Association Center for International Studies","searchable_name":"Alexander Calfo","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447506,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6804,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew J. Calica is a partner in our New York office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents chemical and pharmaceutical companies in toxic tort, product liability and mass and class actions. Andrew also has substantial multi-district litigation experience representing financial institutions in antitrust and commodities litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew also advises clients in complex commercial disputes and on resolution strategies. Andrew\u0026rsquo;s recent engagements include representing global chemical companies in water contamination cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a co-author of several chapters in the \u003cem\u003eElectronic Discovery Deskbook\u003c/em\u003e, a treatise on electronic discovery and records management published by the Practicing Law Institute.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"andrew-calica","email":"acalica@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global chemical company in PFAS personal injury, medical monitoring, property damage, water district, customer class, and natural resource damages cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured trial victory for global bank on claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with a revolving credit agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of Commodity Exchange Act claims against global bank in LIBOR class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global pharmaceutical company in connection with N.Y. False Claims Act claim by New York Attorney General.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented brand name pharmaceutical companies as national counsel supervising cases involving 8,000 product liability plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBell v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Fullington v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Strayhorn v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2013); Eckhardt v. Qualitest (5th Cir. 2014); Huck v. Trimark (Iowa 2014); Smith v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2011); Mensing v. Wyeth (8th Cir. 2009).\u003c/em\u003e Obtained dismissal for brand name pharmaceutical company in failure to warn cases involving ingestion of generic pharmaceuticals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multi-national pharmaceutical company in a licensing dispute before the ICC International Court of Arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an owner participant in a contested bankruptcy proceeding concerning tax indemnity claims arising out of the purchase of aircraft.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in connection with an internal investigation arising out of a clinical trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading broker dealer against $500 million claims that it colluded to inflate the valuation of mortgage-backed securities held by a hedge fund customer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global bank in a commercial arbitration that involved an accounting dispute with the bank\u0026rsquo;s former subsidiary.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Calica","nick_name":"Andrew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Andrew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":512,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2004-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Product Liability Rising Star ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Star","detail":"SuperLawyers"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-calica-40607467/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew J. Calica is a partner in our New York office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents chemical and pharmaceutical companies in toxic tort, product liability and mass and class actions. Andrew also has substantial multi-district litigation experience representing financial institutions in antitrust and commodities litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew also advises clients in complex commercial disputes and on resolution strategies. Andrew\u0026rsquo;s recent engagements include representing global chemical companies in water contamination cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a co-author of several chapters in the \u003cem\u003eElectronic Discovery Deskbook\u003c/em\u003e, a treatise on electronic discovery and records management published by the Practicing Law Institute.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global chemical company in PFAS personal injury, medical monitoring, property damage, water district, customer class, and natural resource damages cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured trial victory for global bank on claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with a revolving credit agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of Commodity Exchange Act claims against global bank in LIBOR class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global pharmaceutical company in connection with N.Y. False Claims Act claim by New York Attorney General.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented brand name pharmaceutical companies as national counsel supervising cases involving 8,000 product liability plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBell v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Fullington v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Strayhorn v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2013); Eckhardt v. Qualitest (5th Cir. 2014); Huck v. Trimark (Iowa 2014); Smith v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2011); Mensing v. Wyeth (8th Cir. 2009).\u003c/em\u003e Obtained dismissal for brand name pharmaceutical company in failure to warn cases involving ingestion of generic pharmaceuticals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multi-national pharmaceutical company in a licensing dispute before the ICC International Court of Arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an owner participant in a contested bankruptcy proceeding concerning tax indemnity claims arising out of the purchase of aircraft.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in connection with an internal investigation arising out of a clinical trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading broker dealer against $500 million claims that it colluded to inflate the valuation of mortgage-backed securities held by a hedge fund customer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global bank in a commercial arbitration that involved an accounting dispute with the bank\u0026rsquo;s former subsidiary.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Product Liability Rising Star ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Star","detail":"SuperLawyers"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11993}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-13T22:05:53.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-13T22:05:53.000Z","searchable_text":"Calica{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Product Liability Rising Star \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"SuperLawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented a global chemical company in PFAS personal injury, medical monitoring, property damage, water district, customer class, and natural resource damages cases.{{ FIELD }}Secured trial victory for global bank on claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with a revolving credit agreement.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of Commodity Exchange Act claims against global bank in LIBOR class action.{{ FIELD }}Represented global pharmaceutical company in connection with N.Y. False Claims Act claim by New York Attorney General.{{ FIELD }}Represented brand name pharmaceutical companies as national counsel supervising cases involving 8,000 product liability plaintiffs.{{ FIELD }}Bell v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Fullington v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Strayhorn v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2013); Eckhardt v. Qualitest (5th Cir. 2014); Huck v. Trimark (Iowa 2014); Smith v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2011); Mensing v. Wyeth (8th Cir. 2009). Obtained dismissal for brand name pharmaceutical company in failure to warn cases involving ingestion of generic pharmaceuticals.{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multi-national pharmaceutical company in a licensing dispute before the ICC International Court of Arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Represented an owner participant in a contested bankruptcy proceeding concerning tax indemnity claims arising out of the purchase of aircraft.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in connection with an internal investigation arising out of a clinical trial.{{ FIELD }}Defended a leading broker dealer against $500 million claims that it colluded to inflate the valuation of mortgage-backed securities held by a hedge fund customer.{{ FIELD }}Defended a global bank in a commercial arbitration that involved an accounting dispute with the bank’s former subsidiary.{{ FIELD }}Andrew J. Calica is a partner in our New York office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents chemical and pharmaceutical companies in toxic tort, product liability and mass and class actions. Andrew also has substantial multi-district litigation experience representing financial institutions in antitrust and commodities litigation.\nAndrew also advises clients in complex commercial disputes and on resolution strategies. Andrew’s recent engagements include representing global chemical companies in water contamination cases.\nHe is a co-author of several chapters in the Electronic Discovery Deskbook, a treatise on electronic discovery and records management published by the Practicing Law Institute. Partner Product Liability Rising Star  Law360 New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Star SuperLawyers Wesleyan University  Cornell University Cornell Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan New York Chair Wesleyan University Annual Fund (fmr) Vice-Chair Wesleyan University Alumni Association (fmr) Chair, Wesleyan University Alumni Elected Trustee Nominating Committee (fmr) Represented a global chemical company in PFAS personal injury, medical monitoring, property damage, water district, customer class, and natural resource damages cases. Secured trial victory for global bank on claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with a revolving credit agreement. Obtained dismissal of Commodity Exchange Act claims against global bank in LIBOR class action. Represented global pharmaceutical company in connection with N.Y. False Claims Act claim by New York Attorney General. Represented brand name pharmaceutical companies as national counsel supervising cases involving 8,000 product liability plaintiffs. Bell v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Fullington v. Pfizer (8th Cir. 2013); Strayhorn v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2013); Eckhardt v. Qualitest (5th Cir. 2014); Huck v. Trimark (Iowa 2014); Smith v. Wyeth (6th Cir. 2011); Mensing v. Wyeth (8th Cir. 2009). Obtained dismissal for brand name pharmaceutical company in failure to warn cases involving ingestion of generic pharmaceuticals. Assisted a multi-national pharmaceutical company in a licensing dispute before the ICC International Court of Arbitration. Represented an owner participant in a contested bankruptcy proceeding concerning tax indemnity claims arising out of the purchase of aircraft. Represented a global pharmaceutical company in connection with an internal investigation arising out of a clinical trial. Defended a leading broker dealer against $500 million claims that it colluded to inflate the valuation of mortgage-backed securities held by a hedge fund customer. Defended a global bank in a commercial arbitration that involved an accounting dispute with the bank’s former subsidiary.","searchable_name":"Andrew Calica","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442808,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5734,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEva Canaan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.\u0026nbsp; Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.\u0026nbsp; She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.\u0026nbsp; Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts.\u0026nbsp; She has deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts and drafted\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFrye\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.\u0026nbsp; Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients\u0026rsquo; products \u0026ndash; both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"eva-canaan","email":"ecanaan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion relating to Plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main epidemiology expert.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;challenges to exclude the experts\u0026rsquo; opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion excluding plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; general and specific causation experts\u003cem\u003e. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp\u003c/em\u003e., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":607,"guid":"607.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Canaan","nick_name":"Eva","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Eva","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2619,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2003-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®","detail":"Rising Star, 2014"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEva Canaan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.\u0026nbsp; Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.\u0026nbsp; She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.\u0026nbsp; Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts.\u0026nbsp; She has deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts and drafted\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFrye\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.\u0026nbsp; Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients\u0026rsquo; products \u0026ndash; both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion relating to Plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main epidemiology expert.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;challenges to exclude the experts\u0026rsquo; opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion excluding plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; general and specific causation experts\u003cem\u003e. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp\u003c/em\u003e., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®","detail":"Rising Star, 2014"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7829}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:52.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:52.000Z","searchable_text":"Canaan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star, 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued Daubert motion relating to Plaintiffs’ main epidemiology expert. In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig., 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending Daubert challenges to exclude the experts’ opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs’ experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs’ counsel. In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019), In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed Daubert motion excluding plaintiffs’ general and specific causation experts. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.{{ FIELD }}Eva Canaan’s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.  Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and Daubert briefs in federal and state courts.\nEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.  She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.  Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs’ experts.  She has deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts and drafted Daubert and Frye briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.  Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients’ products – both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.   Partner Named New York Metro Super Lawyers® Rising Star, 2014 New York University New York University School of Law Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York New York State Bar Association - Torts, Insurance and Compensation Law Section Representing major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued Daubert motion relating to Plaintiffs’ main epidemiology expert. In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig., 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending Daubert challenges to exclude the experts’ opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs’ experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs’ counsel. In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019), In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed Daubert motion excluding plaintiffs’ general and specific causation experts. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product. Represented a major pharmaceutical company in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.","searchable_name":"Eva Canaan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5863,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christine-carletta","email":"ccarletta@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carletta","nick_name":"Christine","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","years_held":"2019 - 2020"},{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Christine","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9711}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Carletta{{ FIELD }}Christine M. Carletta is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As a member of the firm’s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients’ objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine’s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and class actions. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.   Partner Bowdoin College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois District of Columbia New York Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","searchable_name":"Christine Carletta","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447424,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5470,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous\u0026nbsp;dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, she has experience handling\u0026nbsp;fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing\u0026nbsp;witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, \u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mandie-cash","email":"mcash@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cash","nick_name":"Mandie","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, The Honorable James J. Brady, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana","years_held":"2013 - 2013"}],"first_name":"Mandie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2713,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous\u0026nbsp;dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, she has experience handling\u0026nbsp;fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing\u0026nbsp;witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, \u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7220}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-08T14:30:49.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-08T14:30:49.000Z","searchable_text":"Cash{{ FIELD }}Mandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm’s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. \nMandie has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States. Additionally, she has experience handling fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\nMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, cum laude. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011. Partner Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Louisiana Texas Houston Bar Association Houston Young Lawyers Association Intern, The Honorable James J. Brady, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana","searchable_name":"Mandie M. Cash","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447624,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":889,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Cashdan is widely regarded as\u0026nbsp;one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries.\u0026nbsp;Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003e(and other publications)\u0026nbsp;and is listed by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.\u0026nbsp; In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.\u0026nbsp; Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and\u0026nbsp;has presented oral argument\u0026nbsp;in eight\u0026nbsp;federal appellate circuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is active in legal \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is a past Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeffrey-cashdan","email":"jcashdan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRepresentative Matters:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSmurfit Westrock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eECI Management, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Snapshot\u0026rdquo; device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s motion for class certification.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Oyj\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Canada\u003c/strong\u003e, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClearwater Paper Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Electric Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMichelin North America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSonangol, E.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSprint Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Speedway Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporations and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":161}]},"expertise":[{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cashdan","nick_name":"Jeff","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Gerald B. Tjoflat, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"1990 - 1991"}],"first_name":"Jeffrey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Antitrust","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026 securities litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"American Lawyer, August 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers","detail":"LawDragon"},{"title":"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers","detail":"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026 Economists"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"Global Competition Review, February 2014"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Cashdan is widely regarded as\u0026nbsp;one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries.\u0026nbsp;Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003e(and other publications)\u0026nbsp;and is listed by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.\u0026nbsp; In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.\u0026nbsp; Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and\u0026nbsp;has presented oral argument\u0026nbsp;in eight\u0026nbsp;federal appellate circuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is active in legal \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is a past Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRepresentative Matters:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSmurfit Westrock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eECI Management, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Snapshot\u0026rdquo; device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s motion for class certification.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Oyj\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Canada\u003c/strong\u003e, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClearwater Paper Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Electric Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMichelin North America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSonangol, E.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSprint Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Speedway Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporations and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Antitrust","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026 securities litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"American Lawyer, August 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers","detail":"LawDragon"},{"title":"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers","detail":"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026 Economists"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"Global Competition Review, February 2014"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12830}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-17T19:19:21.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-17T19:19:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Cashdan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 1 Antitrust\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026amp; securities litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Lawyer, August 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LawDragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026amp; Economists\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Competition Review, February 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}Representative Matters:{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance and affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Smurfit Westrock in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for ECI Management, LLC in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for UCB S.A. and UCB, Inc. in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Kemira Chemicals Inc. in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to Progressive’s “Snapshot” device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Kemira Oyj, Kemira Chemicals Inc., and Kemira Chemicals Canada, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Clearwater Paper Corporation in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for the General Electric Company in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Michelin North America in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Sonangol, E.P. in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Sprint Corporation and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for International Speedway Corporation in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for Texaco, Inc. in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for corporations and individuals in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.{{ FIELD }}Jeff Cashdan is widely regarded as one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries. Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of Chambers USA (and other publications) and is listed by The Best Lawyers in America as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.  In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. \nJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.  Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and has presented oral argument in eight federal appellate circuits.\nJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\nJeff is active in legal pro bono and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.  Jeff is a past Chair of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\nJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm’s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees. Jeffrey S Cashdan Partner Band 1 Antitrust Chambers USA \"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026amp; securities litigation The Best Lawyers in America 500 Leading Litigators in America Lawdragon Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026 Litigator of the Week American Lawyer, August 2025 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers LawDragon Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026amp; Economists Litigator of the Week Global Competition Review, February 2014 Claremont McKenna College  University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Illinois State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Illinois State Bar Chair of Board of Directors, State Bar of Georgia, Antitrust Section, 2002-2003 Fellow, Litigation Counsel of American (an invitation-only trial lawyer honorary society) American Bar Association, Antitrust and Litigation Sections (Vice-Chair of Sherman Act Section 2 (Monopolization) Committee; Member, task force on international cartel enforcement issues; Editor, Antitrust Law Journal) Law Clerk, Hon. Gerald B. Tjoflat, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Representative Matters: Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance and affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week. Lead Counsel for Smurfit Westrock in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business. Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors. Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors. Lead Counsel for ECI Management, LLC in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software. Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs. Co-Lead Counsel for UCB S.A. and UCB, Inc. in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins. Lead Counsel for Kemira Chemicals Inc. in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate. Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to Progressive’s “Snapshot” device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification. Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud. Lead Counsel for Kemira Oyj, Kemira Chemicals Inc., and Kemira Chemicals Canada, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide. Lead Counsel for Clearwater Paper Corporation in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York. Counsel for the General Electric Company in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment. Lead Counsel for Michelin North America in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires. Lead Counsel for Sonangol, E.P. in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products. Lead Counsel for Sprint Corporation and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services. Co-Lead Counsel for International Speedway Corporation in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races. Counsel for Texaco, Inc. in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties. Lead Counsel for corporations and individuals in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.","searchable_name":"Jeffrey S. Cashdan (Jeff)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446377,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6888,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members\u0026rsquo; schemes of arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients \u0026nbsp;with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and\u0026nbsp;advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and\u0026nbsp;investigations, including workplace misconduct,\u0026nbsp;incidents and fatalities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jennifer-chambers","email":"jchambers@kslaw.com","phone":"+61 403 788 969","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003ca name=\"_GoBack\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial litigation and arbitration \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director\u0026rsquo;s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ammonia plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003ePepper Group Limited\u003c/strong\u003e on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members\u0026rsquo; scheme of arrangement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eGetSwift Limited\u003c/strong\u003e in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Investigations and Proceedings \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator\u0026rsquo;s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy Transition and Sustainability \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHuman Capital and Compliance \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelect Experience at the Bar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eTabet v Gett \u003c/em\u003e(2010) 240 CLR 537.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eRadio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 238 CLR 460.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); \u003cem\u003eWong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 236 CLR 573.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3317}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chambers","nick_name":"Jennifer","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jennifer","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended","detail":"Doyles Guide 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jennifer--chambers","seodescription":"Jennifer Chambers is a partner in our International Disputes Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members\u0026rsquo; schemes of arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients \u0026nbsp;with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and\u0026nbsp;advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and\u0026nbsp;investigations, including workplace misconduct,\u0026nbsp;incidents and fatalities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003ca name=\"_GoBack\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial litigation and arbitration \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director\u0026rsquo;s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ammonia plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003ePepper Group Limited\u003c/strong\u003e on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members\u0026rsquo; scheme of arrangement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eGetSwift Limited\u003c/strong\u003e in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Investigations and Proceedings \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator\u0026rsquo;s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy Transition and Sustainability \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHuman Capital and Compliance \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelect Experience at the Bar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eTabet v Gett \u003c/em\u003e(2010) 240 CLR 537.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eRadio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 238 CLR 460.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); \u003cem\u003eWong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 236 CLR 573.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended","detail":"Doyles Guide 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12320}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-03T05:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-03T05:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Chambers{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Doyles Guide 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}Commercial litigation and arbitration \nRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director’s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.{{ FIELD }}Advised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world’s largest ammonia plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Pepper Group Limited on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members’ scheme of arrangement.{{ FIELD }}Represented GetSwift Limited in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.{{ FIELD }}Regulatory Investigations and Proceedings \nRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.{{ FIELD }}Represented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.{{ FIELD }}Acted for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator’s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.{{ FIELD }}Class Actions\nRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.{{ FIELD }}Advised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.{{ FIELD }}Energy Transition and Sustainability \nAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.{{ FIELD }}As part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.{{ FIELD }}Human Capital and Compliance \nActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.{{ FIELD }}Advised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.{{ FIELD }}Select Experience at the Bar \nAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537.{{ FIELD }}Appeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460.{{ FIELD }}Represented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); Wong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele (2009) 236 CLR 573.{{ FIELD }}Jennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues. \nJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members’ schemes of arrangements.\nAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients  with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and investigations, including workplace misconduct, incidents and fatalities.\nJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people. Jennifer Chambers lawyer Partner Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended Doyles Guide 2025 Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024 University of Technology Sydney  University of New South Wales  High Court of Australia Supreme Court of New South Wales Federal Court of Australia Corporations Law Committee, Business Law Section of the Law Council of Australia Graduate of the Yale School of Management Executive Education Program Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration - South Pacific Taskforce Commercial litigation and arbitration \nRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract. Represented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director’s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders. Represented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds. Represented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters. Represented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets. Represented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute. Advised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements. Acted for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world’s largest ammonia plant. Represented the Pepper Group Limited on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members’ scheme of arrangement. Represented GetSwift Limited in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC. Regulatory Investigations and Proceedings \nRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project. Represented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction. Represented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator. Represented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties. Acted for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator’s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking. Class Actions\nRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria. Advised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive. Energy Transition and Sustainability \nAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC. As part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing. Human Capital and Compliance \nActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator. Represented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court. Represented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality. Advised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace. Select Experience at the Bar \nAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537. Appeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460. Represented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); Wong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele (2009) 236 CLR 573.","searchable_name":"Jennifer Chambers","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447812,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7211,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.\u0026nbsp; He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the \u0026ldquo;Attorney of the Year\u0026rdquo; by the American Lawyer. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"neel-chatterjee","email":"nchatterjee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chatterjee","nick_name":"","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, U.S. Magistrate Patricia v. Trumbull, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","years_held":"1995 - 1997"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Justice Mary Mullarkey, Colorado","years_held":"1994 - 1995"}],"first_name":"Neel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.\u0026nbsp; He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the \u0026ldquo;Attorney of the Year\u0026rdquo; by the American Lawyer. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12909}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-24T17:27:20.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-24T17:27:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Chatterjee{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Litigators in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property – Nationwide \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global 2021 and 2022 \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top IP litigator and trailblazer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}Neel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.  He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world’s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the “Attorney of the Year” by the American Lawyer. \nNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley’s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.  He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film “The Social Network.” He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\nNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\nNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being “singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,” with “the ability to think outside the box” as well as having “in depth knowledge of patent law.” In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being “knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,” with providing “practical, business-minded patent advice” and a sensitivity “to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being “sought-after” and “valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.” Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, “He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.” Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who “gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,” also remarking that “he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.” Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News — Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, “Best Lawyers” named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California’s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.  Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\nNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.  The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers. Partner Leading Litigators in America  Lawdragon 500 (2025) Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law Best Lawyers (2022-2023) Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets Chambers USA (2022-2025) Intellectual Property – Nationwide  Chambers USA (2025) United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters) Legal 500 US (2021-2024)  Intellectual Property: Patent Global 2021 and 2022  2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property  Benchmark Litigation Top IP litigator and trailblazer  Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit California California Bar Association Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Board Member Asia Pacific Fund, Board Member National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association, Board Member Served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California Bay Area Diversity Career Fair, Founder Judicial Clerk, U.S. Magistrate Patricia v. Trumbull, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judicial Clerk, Justice Mary Mullarkey, Colorado","searchable_name":"Neel Chatterjee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443936,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6649,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg\u0026rsquo;s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the \u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School\u0026rsquo;s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gregory-chernack","email":"gchernack@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.\u0026nbsp; After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis\u0026rsquo; summary judgment victory in \u003cem\u003eJohnson v. Novartis Pharm.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eCorp.\u003c/em\u003e in the Western District of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in \u003cem\u003eHill v. Novartis Pharm Corp.\u003c/em\u003e before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chernack","nick_name":"Greg","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","years_held":"1998 - 1999"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York","years_held":"1999 - 2000"}],"first_name":"Gregory","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2605,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1998-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Scott","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/greg-chernack-3691b21/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg\u0026rsquo;s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the \u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School\u0026rsquo;s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.\u0026nbsp; After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis\u0026rsquo; summary judgment victory in \u003cem\u003eJohnson v. Novartis Pharm.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eCorp.\u003c/em\u003e in the Western District of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in \u003cem\u003eHill v. Novartis Pharm Corp.\u003c/em\u003e before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11491}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:36.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:36.000Z","searchable_text":"Chernack{{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.  After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs’ claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs’ causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis’ summary judgment victory in Johnson v. Novartis Pharm. Corp. in the Western District of Texas.{{ FIELD }}Obtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri. {{ FIELD }}Obtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Hill v. Novartis Pharm Corp. before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.). {{ FIELD }}Represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.{{ FIELD }}Gregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. \nGreg’s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\nNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\nIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act. \nGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the Yale Law Journal and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School’s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School. Partner Harvard University Harvard Law School Oxford University, UK  Yale University Yale Law School Oxford University, UK  Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Arkansas District of Columbia New Jersey New York Chair, Town Council of Section 5 of the Village of Chevy Chase, Maryland Professorial Lecturer in Law, George Washington University Law School Former Chair, D.C. Public Library Foundation Law Clerk, Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Law Clerk, Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.  After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs’ claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs’ causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case. Successfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis’ summary judgment victory in Johnson v. Novartis Pharm. Corp. in the Western District of Texas. Obtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.  Obtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Hill v. Novartis Pharm Corp. before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).  Represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict. Represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.","searchable_name":"Gregory Scott Chernack (Greg)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444465,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":676,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"susan-clare","email":"sclare@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":165}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Clare","nick_name":"Susan","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia","years_held":"2005"}],"first_name":"Susan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":776}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Clare{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star for Transportation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Order of the Coif\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.{{ FIELD }}Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.{{ FIELD }}Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.{{ FIELD }}Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.{{ FIELD }}Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.{{ FIELD }}Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).{{ FIELD }}Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.{{ FIELD }}Susan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by Law 360. \nSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by The Legal 500, a Rising Star for Transportation by Law 360, a Georgia Rising Star by Super Lawyers and Atlanta Magazine, and was also named to Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List. \nWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\nShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\nIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies, consumer communications, and product recalls. Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\nSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions. Susan M Clare Partner Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South Benchmark Litigation, 2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Named a Rising Star for Transportation Law360, 2018 Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products Super Lawyers, 2013–2019 Order of the Coif  Georgia Institute of Technology  Emory University Emory University School of Law Georgia International Academy of Defense Counsel (IADC) Trial Academy, 2014 Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data. Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019. Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017. Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires. Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases. Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents. Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud. Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty. Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes. Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma. Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products. Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017). Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014). Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012). Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011). Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.","searchable_name":"Susan M. Clare","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442826,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5831,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-cooper","email":"rcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Bob","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1994 - 1996"}],"first_name":"Robert","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with distinction","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-cooper-ba696910/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8262}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation{{ FIELD }}Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China{{ FIELD }}Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice{{ FIELD }}Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation{{ FIELD }}Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers{{ FIELD }}Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants){{ FIELD }}Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion){{ FIELD }}Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act{{ FIELD }}Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor{{ FIELD }}Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger{{ FIELD }}Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations{{ FIELD }}Bob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations, and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.\nBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General. Partner Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia American Bar Association The Economic Club of Washington D.C. Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement) Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement) Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants) Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion) Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations","searchable_name":"Robert M. Cooper (Bob)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447598,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1812,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWade Coriell is\u0026nbsp;the Co-Head of our International Disputes practice group, a recent member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s ten-person Policy Committee, and a member of the Singapore International\u0026nbsp; Arbitration Centre's Court of Arbitration.\u0026nbsp; He has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record in Asia and the Americas, particularly in the energy sector. \u003cem\u003eChambers Global \u003c/em\u003eranks Wade as a global market leader in international arbitration, while\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAsia-Pacific \u003c/em\u003eranks him as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore, calling him \"an excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out\" and reporting that clients \"would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters and consider him to have become one of the pre-eminent practitioners in Singapore\u003cem\u003e.\"\u0026nbsp; The Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003enotes that Wade \"has an excellent record in oil \u0026amp; gas cases, particularly in Indonesia and the Philippines; he is in the forefront of LNG price review disputes;\" and that his \"abilities as a terrific advocate and a pragmatic advisor make him stand out among his competitors.\"[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWade has particular strength in handling high-profile matters pending simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions, often involving elements of public, investor and government relations.\u0026nbsp; Clients report to \u003cem\u003eChambers \u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;that he \"is very thorough and cuts through complex commercial issues and simplifies them in such a form that they are easily understood,\" and that \"[h]is advocacy skills are amazing.\"\u0026nbsp; Wade has handled disputes against the governments of Argentina, Armenia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Korea, Peru, the Philippines, Romania, Thailand, and Venezuela, as well as international arbitrations for commercial clients in these and numerous\u0026nbsp;other countries. His recent work includes handling four Asia-based disputes and one Latin American dispute of over $1 billion each.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWade has represented clients before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration, the American Arbitration Association, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, and other institutions.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his role on the Court of Arbitration, he also regularly serves as an arbitrator under the SIAC Rules.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince 2015, \u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e has ranked Wade annually for his strong international arbitration practice, and he is currently ranked as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore and a Band 5 practitioner globally. He also is listed in \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who, Arbitration Future Leaders, Benchmark Litigation,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eGlobal Arbitration Review 100,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eLatin Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eThe Global Arbitration Review\u003c/em\u003e has called him \"a lawyer to know.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"wade-coriell","email":"wcoriell@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean Australian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID dispute against the Republic of India, arising out of the expropriation of a gold mining project in the state of Rajasthan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth well over $1 billion in an UNCITRAL arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Philippine electricity provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under a Concession Agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $100 million award on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea consortium of sellers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Singapore-seated LNG price review arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Southeast Asian conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SIAC arbitration over share ownership in a joint venture that owns and manages the tollways in the capital of the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a baseball-style coal price review arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea coal producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the Illinois basin.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth over $4 billion in an ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etwo international oil majors\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eagainst a Southeast Asian government, arising out of a revenue-allocation dispute under a gas service contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $9.5 billion, as well as four groundbreaking interim measures awards, awards on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against Ecuador, arising out of Chevron\u0026rsquo;s claim for violation of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty as a result of the government\u0026rsquo;s involvement in a fraudulent Ecuadorian court judgment against Chevron for alleged environmental contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $1.5 billion in an AAA arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea U.S. LNG company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eagainst one of its customers, arising out of a dispute over gas volumes at a new tolling facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $360 million award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBurlington Resources\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the expropriation of an oil concession and associated counterclaims for alleged environmental contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an $85 million award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the proper tariff charged by a gas pipeline in Indonesia. The case involved the application of a contract's various representations and warranties to hold the gas transporter liable for a tariff increase decreed by Indonesia's pipeline regulators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $50 million award in an SIAC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips China\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against its counterparty in a farm-out agreement arising out of three coal-bed methane concessions in China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $30 million lost-profits award in a Geneva-seated ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Turkish electricity distribution company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the Turkish government, for breach of a privatization contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a favorable award for declaratory relief in an ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePhillips 66\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against PDVSA and one of its subsidiaries, arising out of the price protection mechanism in a long-term crude oil supply agreement for a Texas refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAustralia Pacific LNG (APLNG\u003c/strong\u003e) on an LNG SPA price review negotiation with a foundation North American customer, with a multi-billion-dollar price differential in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eShell\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the Philippines, arising out of a dispute over the tax assumption provisions in the service contract for the offshore Malampaya gas project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Philippine conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SIAC arbitration against its Indonesian joint venture partner, arising out of a dispute over shares in a Dutch venture that owns and operates the major toll roads in and around Manila.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea construction contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an LCIA arbitration, arising out of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eforce majeure\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;dispute related to an oil refinery in Kurdistan. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePT Medco E\u0026amp;P Brantas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an AAA arbitration against Lapindo Brantas, Inc., arising out of an environmental indemnification dispute related to their joint operating agreement for oil exploration and production in Indonesia. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Gold Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID claim against Armenia under the U.S.-Armenia BIT, arising from Armenia\u0026rsquo;s repudiation and violation of mining licenses issued to Global Gold for mineral exploration and exploitation in several Armenian oil fields. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. electrical contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several lawsuits and AAA arbitrations for breach of contract. The cases settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3778}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1237,"guid":"1237.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Coriell","nick_name":"Wade","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Sidney A. Fitzwater, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","years_held":"2001-2002"}],"first_name":"Wade","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Wade is well known for his strategic thinking and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible results.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade is excellent in advocacy, especially in arbitration, and provides clear and concise advice to his clients.\" ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade's ability to navigate complex legal frameworks make them an invaluable asset to any client.\" ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade has deep understanding of cross-border disputes.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Energy - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Projects - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell is a brilliant litigator.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Clients and colleagues alike consistently praise Wade's professionalism, integrity, and results-driven approach.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade is a leading expert in international arbitration, with outstanding credentials in both the US and Singapore","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade is a first-class leading practitioner, an excellent advocate and strategist.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"“Wade is the head of the team. He instills a high degree of trust, brings a wealth of experience...\"","detail":"Chamber Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell is a household name.\" ","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025"},{"title":"\"His advocacy skills are amazing, and he is incredibly persuasive as well.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2025"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell's strength is oral argumentation.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025"},{"title":"\"... He provides excellent service and quick responses, and has great commercial vision.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024"},{"title":"\"Wade is very effective in oral arguments.\" ","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024"},{"title":"\"Wade leads the King \u0026 Spalding team and is quite well known.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2024"},{"title":"\"I would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022"},{"title":"\"A dynamic oral advocate with a sharp legal mind.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022"},{"title":"\"An excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out.\"","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"A lawyer to know.\"","detail":"The Global Arbitration Review 100"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":"Who's Who"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Arbitration Future Leaders"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":"Global Arbitration Review"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Legal 500"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Latin Lawyer"},{"title":"One of Five Rising Stars in International Energy Law","detail":"Law360, 2013"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Wade Coriell is a lawyer of our International Disputes Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWade Coriell is\u0026nbsp;the Co-Head of our International Disputes practice group, a recent member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s ten-person Policy Committee, and a member of the Singapore International\u0026nbsp; Arbitration Centre's Court of Arbitration.\u0026nbsp; He has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record in Asia and the Americas, particularly in the energy sector. \u003cem\u003eChambers Global \u003c/em\u003eranks Wade as a global market leader in international arbitration, while\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAsia-Pacific \u003c/em\u003eranks him as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore, calling him \"an excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out\" and reporting that clients \"would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters and consider him to have become one of the pre-eminent practitioners in Singapore\u003cem\u003e.\"\u0026nbsp; The Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003enotes that Wade \"has an excellent record in oil \u0026amp; gas cases, particularly in Indonesia and the Philippines; he is in the forefront of LNG price review disputes;\" and that his \"abilities as a terrific advocate and a pragmatic advisor make him stand out among his competitors.\"[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWade has particular strength in handling high-profile matters pending simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions, often involving elements of public, investor and government relations.\u0026nbsp; Clients report to \u003cem\u003eChambers \u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;that he \"is very thorough and cuts through complex commercial issues and simplifies them in such a form that they are easily understood,\" and that \"[h]is advocacy skills are amazing.\"\u0026nbsp; Wade has handled disputes against the governments of Argentina, Armenia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Korea, Peru, the Philippines, Romania, Thailand, and Venezuela, as well as international arbitrations for commercial clients in these and numerous\u0026nbsp;other countries. His recent work includes handling four Asia-based disputes and one Latin American dispute of over $1 billion each.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWade has represented clients before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration, the American Arbitration Association, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, and other institutions.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his role on the Court of Arbitration, he also regularly serves as an arbitrator under the SIAC Rules.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince 2015, \u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e has ranked Wade annually for his strong international arbitration practice, and he is currently ranked as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore and a Band 5 practitioner globally. He also is listed in \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who, Arbitration Future Leaders, Benchmark Litigation,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eGlobal Arbitration Review 100,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eLatin Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003eThe Global Arbitration Review\u003c/em\u003e has called him \"a lawyer to know.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean Australian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID dispute against the Republic of India, arising out of the expropriation of a gold mining project in the state of Rajasthan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth well over $1 billion in an UNCITRAL arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Philippine electricity provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under a Concession Agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $100 million award on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea consortium of sellers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Singapore-seated LNG price review arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Southeast Asian conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SIAC arbitration over share ownership in a joint venture that owns and manages the tollways in the capital of the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a baseball-style coal price review arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea coal producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the Illinois basin.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth over $4 billion in an ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etwo international oil majors\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eagainst a Southeast Asian government, arising out of a revenue-allocation dispute under a gas service contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $9.5 billion, as well as four groundbreaking interim measures awards, awards on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against Ecuador, arising out of Chevron\u0026rsquo;s claim for violation of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty as a result of the government\u0026rsquo;s involvement in a fraudulent Ecuadorian court judgment against Chevron for alleged environmental contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $1.5 billion in an AAA arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea U.S. LNG company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eagainst one of its customers, arising out of a dispute over gas volumes at a new tolling facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $360 million award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBurlington Resources\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the expropriation of an oil concession and associated counterclaims for alleged environmental contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an $85 million award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the proper tariff charged by a gas pipeline in Indonesia. The case involved the application of a contract's various representations and warranties to hold the gas transporter liable for a tariff increase decreed by Indonesia's pipeline regulators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $50 million award in an SIAC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips China\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against its counterparty in a farm-out agreement arising out of three coal-bed methane concessions in China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a $30 million lost-profits award in a Geneva-seated ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Turkish electricity distribution company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the Turkish government, for breach of a privatization contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a favorable award for declaratory relief in an ICC arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePhillips 66\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against PDVSA and one of its subsidiaries, arising out of the price protection mechanism in a long-term crude oil supply agreement for a Texas refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAustralia Pacific LNG (APLNG\u003c/strong\u003e) on an LNG SPA price review negotiation with a foundation North American customer, with a multi-billion-dollar price differential in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eShell\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the Philippines, arising out of a dispute over the tax assumption provisions in the service contract for the offshore Malampaya gas project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Philippine conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SIAC arbitration against its Indonesian joint venture partner, arising out of a dispute over shares in a Dutch venture that owns and operates the major toll roads in and around Manila.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea construction contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an LCIA arbitration, arising out of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eforce majeure\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;dispute related to an oil refinery in Kurdistan. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePT Medco E\u0026amp;P Brantas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an AAA arbitration against Lapindo Brantas, Inc., arising out of an environmental indemnification dispute related to their joint operating agreement for oil exploration and production in Indonesia. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Gold Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID claim against Armenia under the U.S.-Armenia BIT, arising from Armenia\u0026rsquo;s repudiation and violation of mining licenses issued to Global Gold for mineral exploration and exploitation in several Armenian oil fields. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. electrical contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several lawsuits and AAA arbitrations for breach of contract. The cases settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Wade is well known for his strategic thinking and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible results.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade is excellent in advocacy, especially in arbitration, and provides clear and concise advice to his clients.\" ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade's ability to navigate complex legal frameworks make them an invaluable asset to any client.\" ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade has deep understanding of cross-border disputes.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Energy - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Projects - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner ","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell is a brilliant litigator.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Clients and colleagues alike consistently praise Wade's professionalism, integrity, and results-driven approach.\"","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"Wade is a leading expert in international arbitration, with outstanding credentials in both the US and Singapore","detail":"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade is a first-class leading practitioner, an excellent advocate and strategist.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"“Wade is the head of the team. He instills a high degree of trust, brings a wealth of experience...\"","detail":"Chamber Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell is a household name.\" ","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025"},{"title":"\"His advocacy skills are amazing, and he is incredibly persuasive as well.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2025"},{"title":"\"Wade Coriell's strength is oral argumentation.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025"},{"title":"\"... He provides excellent service and quick responses, and has great commercial vision.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024"},{"title":"\"Wade is very effective in oral arguments.\" ","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024"},{"title":"\"Wade leads the King \u0026 Spalding team and is quite well known.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2024"},{"title":"\"I would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022"},{"title":"\"A dynamic oral advocate with a sharp legal mind.\"","detail":"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022"},{"title":"\"An excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out.\"","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"A lawyer to know.\"","detail":"The Global Arbitration Review 100"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":"Who's Who"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Arbitration Future Leaders"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":"Global Arbitration Review"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Legal 500"},{"title":"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration","detail":" Latin Lawyer"},{"title":"One of Five Rising Stars in International Energy Law","detail":"Law360, 2013"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5987}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-17T16:37:30.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-17T16:37:30.000Z","searchable_text":"Coriell{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade is well known for his strategic thinking and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible results.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade is excellent in advocacy, especially in arbitration, and provides clear and concise advice to his clients.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade's ability to navigate complex legal frameworks make them an invaluable asset to any client.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade has deep understanding of cross-border disputes.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Energy - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Projects - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Wade Coriell - Leading Partner\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade Coriell is a brilliant litigator.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Clients and colleagues alike consistently praise Wade's professionalism, integrity, and results-driven approach.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Wade is a leading expert in international arbitration, with outstanding credentials in both the US and Singapore\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade is a first-class leading practitioner, an excellent advocate and strategist.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Wade is the head of the team. He instills a high degree of trust, brings a wealth of experience...\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chamber Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade Coriell is a household name.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"His advocacy skills are amazing, and he is incredibly persuasive as well.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade Coriell's strength is oral argumentation.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"... He provides excellent service and quick responses, and has great commercial vision.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade is very effective in oral arguments.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Wade leads the King \u0026amp; Spalding team and is quite well known.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"I would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"A dynamic oral advocate with a sharp legal mind.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"An excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"A lawyer to know.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Global Arbitration Review 100\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" Arbitration Future Leaders\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Arbitration Review\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" Latin Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of Five Rising Stars in International Energy Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2013\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing an Australian mining company in an ICSID dispute against the Republic of India, arising out of the expropriation of a gold mining project in the state of Rajasthan.{{ FIELD }}Won an award for declaratory relief worth well over $1 billion in an UNCITRAL arbitration on behalf of a Philippine electricity provider under a Concession Agreement.{{ FIELD }}Won a $100 million award on behalf of a consortium of sellers in a Singapore-seated LNG price review arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Won an award for declaratory relief on behalf of a Southeast Asian conglomerate in an SIAC arbitration over share ownership in a joint venture that owns and manages the tollways in the capital of the Philippines.{{ FIELD }}Won a baseball-style coal price review arbitration on behalf of a coal producer in the Illinois basin.{{ FIELD }}Won an award for declaratory relief worth over $4 billion in an ICC arbitration on behalf of two international oil majors against a Southeast Asian government, arising out of a revenue-allocation dispute under a gas service contract.{{ FIELD }}Won an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $9.5 billion, as well as four groundbreaking interim measures awards, awards on behalf of Chevron against Ecuador, arising out of Chevron’s claim for violation of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty as a result of the government’s involvement in a fraudulent Ecuadorian court judgment against Chevron for alleged environmental contamination.{{ FIELD }}Won an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $1.5 billion in an AAA arbitration on behalf of a U.S. LNG company against one of its customers, arising out of a dispute over gas volumes at a new tolling facility.{{ FIELD }}Won a $360 million award for Burlington Resources in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the expropriation of an oil concession and associated counterclaims for alleged environmental contamination.{{ FIELD }}Won an $85 million award for ConocoPhillips in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the proper tariff charged by a gas pipeline in Indonesia. The case involved the application of a contract's various representations and warranties to hold the gas transporter liable for a tariff increase decreed by Indonesia's pipeline regulators.{{ FIELD }}Won a $50 million award in an SIAC arbitration on behalf of ConocoPhillips China against its counterparty in a farm-out agreement arising out of three coal-bed methane concessions in China.{{ FIELD }}Won a $30 million lost-profits award in a Geneva-seated ICC arbitration on behalf of a Turkish electricity distribution company against the Turkish government, for breach of a privatization contract.{{ FIELD }}Won a favorable award for declaratory relief in an ICC arbitration on behalf of Phillips 66 against PDVSA and one of its subsidiaries, arising out of the price protection mechanism in a long-term crude oil supply agreement for a Texas refinery.{{ FIELD }}Advising Australia Pacific LNG (APLNG) on an LNG SPA price review negotiation with a foundation North American customer, with a multi-billion-dollar price differential in dispute.{{ FIELD }}Representing Shell in an ICSID arbitration against the Philippines, arising out of a dispute over the tax assumption provisions in the service contract for the offshore Malampaya gas project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major Philippine conglomerate in an SIAC arbitration against its Indonesian joint venture partner, arising out of a dispute over shares in a Dutch venture that owns and operates the major toll roads in and around Manila.{{ FIELD }}Represented a construction contractor in an LCIA arbitration, arising out of a force majeure dispute related to an oil refinery in Kurdistan. The case settled favorably.{{ FIELD }}Represented PT Medco E\u0026amp;P Brantas in an AAA arbitration against Lapindo Brantas, Inc., arising out of an environmental indemnification dispute related to their joint operating agreement for oil exploration and production in Indonesia. The case settled favorably.{{ FIELD }}Represented Global Gold Corporation in an ICSID claim against Armenia under the U.S.-Armenia BIT, arising from Armenia’s repudiation and violation of mining licenses issued to Global Gold for mineral exploration and exploitation in several Armenian oil fields. The case settled favorably.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major U.S. electrical contractor in several lawsuits and AAA arbitrations for breach of contract. The cases settled favorably.{{ FIELD }}Wade Coriell is the Co-Head of our International Disputes practice group, a recent member of the firm’s ten-person Policy Committee, and a member of the Singapore International  Arbitration Centre's Court of Arbitration.  He has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record in Asia and the Americas, particularly in the energy sector. Chambers Global ranks Wade as a global market leader in international arbitration, while Chambers Asia-Pacific ranks him as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore, calling him \"an excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out\" and reporting that clients \"would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters and consider him to have become one of the pre-eminent practitioners in Singapore.\"  The Legal 500 notes that Wade \"has an excellent record in oil \u0026amp; gas cases, particularly in Indonesia and the Philippines; he is in the forefront of LNG price review disputes;\" and that his \"abilities as a terrific advocate and a pragmatic advisor make him stand out among his competitors.\"\nWade has particular strength in handling high-profile matters pending simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions, often involving elements of public, investor and government relations.  Clients report to Chambers  that he \"is very thorough and cuts through complex commercial issues and simplifies them in such a form that they are easily understood,\" and that \"[h]is advocacy skills are amazing.\"  Wade has handled disputes against the governments of Argentina, Armenia, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Korea, Peru, the Philippines, Romania, Thailand, and Venezuela, as well as international arbitrations for commercial clients in these and numerous other countries. His recent work includes handling four Asia-based disputes and one Latin American dispute of over $1 billion each.\nWade has represented clients before the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration, the American Arbitration Association, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, and other institutions.  In addition to his role on the Court of Arbitration, he also regularly serves as an arbitrator under the SIAC Rules.\nSince 2015, Chambers has ranked Wade annually for his strong international arbitration practice, and he is currently ranked as a Band 1 practitioner in Singapore and a Band 5 practitioner globally. He also is listed in Legal 500, Who’s Who, Arbitration Future Leaders, Benchmark Litigation, Global Arbitration Review 100, and Latin Lawyer. The Global Arbitration Review has called him \"a lawyer to know.\"\n  Wade Coriell lawyer Partner \"Wade is well known for his strategic thinking and unwavering commitment to achieving the best possible results.\" Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 \"Wade is excellent in advocacy, especially in arbitration, and provides clear and concise advice to his clients.\"  Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026 \"Wade's ability to navigate complex legal frameworks make them an invaluable asset to any client.\"  Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 \"Wade has deep understanding of cross-border disputes.\" Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Energy - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026 Wade Coriell - Recommended Lawyer Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Projects - Foreign Firms, Singapore 2026 Wade Coriell - Leading Partner  Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026 Wade Coriell - Leading Partner Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 \"Wade Coriell is a brilliant litigator.\" Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Foreign Firms, Philippines 2026 \"Clients and colleagues alike consistently praise Wade's professionalism, integrity, and results-driven approach.\" Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 Wade is a leading expert in international arbitration, with outstanding credentials in both the US and Singapore Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, International Arbitration, Singapore 2026 \"Wade is a first-class leading practitioner, an excellent advocate and strategist.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026 “Wade is the head of the team. He instills a high degree of trust, brings a wealth of experience...\" Chamber Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2026 \"Wade Coriell is a household name.\"  Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025 \"His advocacy skills are amazing, and he is incredibly persuasive as well.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2025 \"Wade Coriell's strength is oral argumentation.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution, Philippines 2025 \"... He provides excellent service and quick responses, and has great commercial vision.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024 \"Wade is very effective in oral arguments.\"  Chambers Asia-Pacific, Dispute Resolution: Arbitration, Singapore 2024 \"Wade leads the King \u0026amp; Spalding team and is quite well known.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2024 \"I would trust him to lead our most important and sensitive international dispute matters.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022 \"A dynamic oral advocate with a sharp legal mind.\" Chambers Asia-Pacific, 2022 \"An excellent advocate whose level of experience and ability make him stand out.\" Chambers Global \"A lawyer to know.\" The Global Arbitration Review 100 A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration Who's Who A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration  Arbitration Future Leaders A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration Global Arbitration Review A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration  Legal 500 A Leading Practitioner in International Arbitration  Latin Lawyer One of Five Rising Stars in International Energy Law Law360, 2013 Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Harvard University Harvard Law School New York Texas Houston Bar Association State Bar of Texas Board Member of International Law Students Association Editorial Board Member of AAA Dispute Resolution Journal Member of SIAC Court of Arbitration Law Clerk, Sidney A. Fitzwater, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Representing an Australian mining company in an ICSID dispute against the Republic of India, arising out of the expropriation of a gold mining project in the state of Rajasthan. Won an award for declaratory relief worth well over $1 billion in an UNCITRAL arbitration on behalf of a Philippine electricity provider under a Concession Agreement. Won a $100 million award on behalf of a consortium of sellers in a Singapore-seated LNG price review arbitration. Won an award for declaratory relief on behalf of a Southeast Asian conglomerate in an SIAC arbitration over share ownership in a joint venture that owns and manages the tollways in the capital of the Philippines. Won a baseball-style coal price review arbitration on behalf of a coal producer in the Illinois basin. Won an award for declaratory relief worth over $4 billion in an ICC arbitration on behalf of two international oil majors against a Southeast Asian government, arising out of a revenue-allocation dispute under a gas service contract. Won an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $9.5 billion, as well as four groundbreaking interim measures awards, awards on behalf of Chevron against Ecuador, arising out of Chevron’s claim for violation of the U.S.-Ecuador bilateral investment treaty as a result of the government’s involvement in a fraudulent Ecuadorian court judgment against Chevron for alleged environmental contamination. Won an award for declaratory relief worth approximately $1.5 billion in an AAA arbitration on behalf of a U.S. LNG company against one of its customers, arising out of a dispute over gas volumes at a new tolling facility. Won a $360 million award for Burlington Resources in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the expropriation of an oil concession and associated counterclaims for alleged environmental contamination. Won an $85 million award for ConocoPhillips in an UNCITRAL arbitration concerning the proper tariff charged by a gas pipeline in Indonesia. The case involved the application of a contract's various representations and warranties to hold the gas transporter liable for a tariff increase decreed by Indonesia's pipeline regulators. Won a $50 million award in an SIAC arbitration on behalf of ConocoPhillips China against its counterparty in a farm-out agreement arising out of three coal-bed methane concessions in China. Won a $30 million lost-profits award in a Geneva-seated ICC arbitration on behalf of a Turkish electricity distribution company against the Turkish government, for breach of a privatization contract. Won a favorable award for declaratory relief in an ICC arbitration on behalf of Phillips 66 against PDVSA and one of its subsidiaries, arising out of the price protection mechanism in a long-term crude oil supply agreement for a Texas refinery. Advising Australia Pacific LNG (APLNG) on an LNG SPA price review negotiation with a foundation North American customer, with a multi-billion-dollar price differential in dispute. Representing Shell in an ICSID arbitration against the Philippines, arising out of a dispute over the tax assumption provisions in the service contract for the offshore Malampaya gas project. Representing a major Philippine conglomerate in an SIAC arbitration against its Indonesian joint venture partner, arising out of a dispute over shares in a Dutch venture that owns and operates the major toll roads in and around Manila. Represented a construction contractor in an LCIA arbitration, arising out of a force majeure dispute related to an oil refinery in Kurdistan. The case settled favorably. Represented PT Medco E\u0026amp;P Brantas in an AAA arbitration against Lapindo Brantas, Inc., arising out of an environmental indemnification dispute related to their joint operating agreement for oil exploration and production in Indonesia. The case settled favorably. Represented Global Gold Corporation in an ICSID claim against Armenia under the U.S.-Armenia BIT, arising from Armenia’s repudiation and violation of mining licenses issued to Global Gold for mineral exploration and exploitation in several Armenian oil fields. The case settled favorably. Represented a major U.S. electrical contractor in several lawsuits and AAA arbitrations for breach of contract. The cases settled favorably.","searchable_name":"Wade Coriell","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}