{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Chair","value":"Chair"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":2839},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Atlanta's John Marshall Law School","value":2830},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Bond University","value":2841},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP Law School","value":3237},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Bucerius Law School, Germany","value":2898},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"Chicago-Kent College of Law","value":3050},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"College of Law, Guildford, UK","value":2646},{"name":"College of Law, London, UK","value":2647},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"Delhi University","value":3099},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Durham University","value":2708},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University","value":2936},{"name":"ELTE University Budapest","value":2969},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce School of Law","value":2259},{"name":"Free University Berlin","value":2903},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"Fudan University","value":2986},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Guildhall University, London","value":2863},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"Inns of Court School of Law, UK","value":2649},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany","value":2653},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"King Saud University College of Law \u0026 Political Sciences","value":2823},{"name":"King's College London","value":2987},{"name":"King's College, University of London, UK","value":2654},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Leiden University","value":2926},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"Liverpool University, UK","value":2657},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"London School of Economics and Political Science, UK","value":2658},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich","value":3105},{"name":"Lund University","value":3084},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":2660},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":3047},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":2715},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Oxford University, UK","value":2669},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queen's University Faculty of Law","value":2801},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":2725},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Sciences Po Paris","value":2925},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Manchester","value":2845},{"name":"The University of Melbourne","value":2836},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2752},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":3168},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá Colombia","value":2677},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Iberoamericana","value":2915},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit","value":3213},{"name":"Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium","value":2679},{"name":"Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne","value":2680},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University College London, UK","value":2760},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Augsburg","value":2779},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of Bonn, Germany","value":2682},{"name":"University of Bristol, UK","value":2761},{"name":"University of Buenos Aires, Argentina","value":2683},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Cambridge, UK","value":2684},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Cape Town, South Africa","value":2854},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Cologne, Germany","value":2885},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of Deusto, Spain","value":2685},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of East London","value":2963},{"name":"University of Exeter, UK","value":2770},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3112},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Hamburg, Germany","value":2688},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law","value":2202},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kent at Canterbury, UK","value":2690},{"name":"University of Kent","value":2849},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Law","value":2954},{"name":"University of Leeds School of Law","value":2850},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Lima","value":2859},{"name":"University of London","value":2692},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2739},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":3064},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of New South Wales","value":2871},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Nottingham, England","value":2881},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Otago, New Zealand","value":2694},{"name":"University of Paris II, Pantheon-Assas, France","value":2695},{"name":"University of Paris, Pantheon Sorbonne","value":3190},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of Sheffield","value":2805},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Sydney, Australia","value":2700},{"name":"University of Tasmania","value":2835},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Tokyo","value":3153},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Turku","value":3083},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Vienna School of Law","value":2701},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Warwick, UK","value":2771},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Western Australia","value":2949},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2755},{"name":"University of Wollongong, Australia","value":2873},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"University Toulouse Capitol","value":3109},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":"Immobilier","value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"14","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"K","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":451191,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7479,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRachael Kent helps clients navigate high‑stakes international disputes, leading teams in complex commercial and investment arbitrations across industries and jurisdictions. She guides clients through every stage of the dispute process, delivering pragmatic strategy and tenacious advocacy to resolve disputes and protect critical business and investment interests.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of experience, Rachael advises companies, investors, and sovereign entities on high‑stakes commercial and investment disputes worldwide. She has represented clients in complex arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, including the ICC, ICSID, AAA/ICDR, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, and WIPO.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRachael steers clients through all stages of the dispute process, formulating strategy, navigating complex procedural issues, and delivering strong advocacy to protect critical investments and commercial interests. She has been described by clients and peers as \u0026ldquo;one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;impeccable judgment and strategic acumen.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer matters involve disputes with significant financial exposure and technical complexity, often arising from long‑term contracts, collaboration and joint venture agreements, and agreements involving intellectual property rights. Rachael has particular experience representing life sciences and technology companies in high-value arbitrations arising under joint venture, co-development, and IP license agreements. She also works closely with clients in sectors such as energy, aerospace, and construction, where disputes frequently combine legal, technical, and commercial considerations. She distills complex issues into practical guidance, helping clients achieve their commercial objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"rachael-kent","email":"rkent@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in Singapore arising under a license agreement, with claims and counterclaims exceeding $500 million in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global clean energy company in an ICC arbitration seated in California involving warranty claims under a supply agreement for a critical component in an energy storage product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a UK investor in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the People\u0026rsquo;s Republic of China arising out of the expropriation of land use rights and unfair treatment of the claimant\u0026rsquo;s investment and in related enforcement proceedings to confirm the favorable award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in London, using expedited procedures, arising out of a joint venture agreement and IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global energy services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris related to disputes under contracts for oil drilling services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global consumer technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement for standard essential patents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Ministry of Public Works of a Middle Eastern state in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore arising out of a $400 million construction project in the transportation sector.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an investment arbitration against a Latin American state involving claims for denial of justice arising from a national court judgment and in related set-aside proceedings, which confirmed the favorable award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an aerospace and defense technology company in a dispute under a long-term development and supply agreement related to the supply of military aircraft.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global medical device company in a AAA arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major consumer health products company in a JAMS arbitration seated in Chicago arising under an IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York arising out of an IP license agreement and involving claims related to licensed patents and know-how.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a state party in an LCIA arbitration seated in London involving disputes related to the development of a substantial oil and gas field and the construction of gas processing facilities, with more than $30 billion in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global technology company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York involving disputes under a patent license agreement related to the semiconductor industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in a WIPO arbitration seated in Switzerland arising under an IP license agreement and involving claims with a value exceeding $2 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading global retail company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong arising out of the acquisition of a subsidiary in China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading defense technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in Brussels involving disputes under a software development agreement related to a military aircraft program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading mining company in an ICSID arbitration against an Asian state involving claims related to violation of a stabilization clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major global manufacturing company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong involving disputes arising out of the acquisition of a computer business in Taiwan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading financial services company in multiple ad hoc arbitrations seated in Bermuda under excess coverage professional liability insurance policies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major US financial services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris arising out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement, with claims for breach of representations and warranties and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major global manufacturing company in an ICC arbitration seated in Zurich involving disputes related to a services contract for the design of consumer electronics products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major European telecommunications company in multiple VIAC arbitrations seated in Vienna involving the ownership of an Eastern European joint venture company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kent","nick_name":"Rachael","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Rachael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":613,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1998-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked for Arbitration (International), Global Market Leaders","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"Ranked for International Arbitration. Sources report that she is “a world-class lawyer and advocate” and “one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,” with “impeccable judgment and strategic acumen” and “a uniquely measured and diplomatic style that is exceptionally persuasive.” ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2012 – 2026"},{"title":"Recommended as a Leading Partner for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 United States"},{"title":"Selected for recognition as a leading arbitration practitioner in the 2017–2026 editions of Lexology Index: Arbitration, including in the inaugural edition of Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders 2017—a guide profiling the foremost practitioners in the arbitration community. Sources report that she is a “highly reputable” and “amazingly able” lawyer and “established leader” in international arbitration, “strongly recommended” for her excellence in complex commercial and investment disputes","detail":"Lexology Index: Arbitration and Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders"},{"title":"Named a Washington, D.C. Lawyer of the Year for her international arbitration practice","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2023"},{"title":"Consistently recognized as a “Litigation Star”","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRachael Kent helps clients navigate high‑stakes international disputes, leading teams in complex commercial and investment arbitrations across industries and jurisdictions. She guides clients through every stage of the dispute process, delivering pragmatic strategy and tenacious advocacy to resolve disputes and protect critical business and investment interests.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of experience, Rachael advises companies, investors, and sovereign entities on high‑stakes commercial and investment disputes worldwide. She has represented clients in complex arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, including the ICC, ICSID, AAA/ICDR, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, and WIPO.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRachael steers clients through all stages of the dispute process, formulating strategy, navigating complex procedural issues, and delivering strong advocacy to protect critical investments and commercial interests. She has been described by clients and peers as \u0026ldquo;one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;impeccable judgment and strategic acumen.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer matters involve disputes with significant financial exposure and technical complexity, often arising from long‑term contracts, collaboration and joint venture agreements, and agreements involving intellectual property rights. Rachael has particular experience representing life sciences and technology companies in high-value arbitrations arising under joint venture, co-development, and IP license agreements. She also works closely with clients in sectors such as energy, aerospace, and construction, where disputes frequently combine legal, technical, and commercial considerations. She distills complex issues into practical guidance, helping clients achieve their commercial objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in Singapore arising under a license agreement, with claims and counterclaims exceeding $500 million in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global clean energy company in an ICC arbitration seated in California involving warranty claims under a supply agreement for a critical component in an energy storage product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a UK investor in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the People\u0026rsquo;s Republic of China arising out of the expropriation of land use rights and unfair treatment of the claimant\u0026rsquo;s investment and in related enforcement proceedings to confirm the favorable award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in London, using expedited procedures, arising out of a joint venture agreement and IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global energy services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris related to disputes under contracts for oil drilling services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global consumer technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement for standard essential patents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Ministry of Public Works of a Middle Eastern state in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore arising out of a $400 million construction project in the transportation sector.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an investment arbitration against a Latin American state involving claims for denial of justice arising from a national court judgment and in related set-aside proceedings, which confirmed the favorable award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an aerospace and defense technology company in a dispute under a long-term development and supply agreement related to the supply of military aircraft.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global medical device company in a AAA arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major consumer health products company in a JAMS arbitration seated in Chicago arising under an IP license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York arising out of an IP license agreement and involving claims related to licensed patents and know-how.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a state party in an LCIA arbitration seated in London involving disputes related to the development of a substantial oil and gas field and the construction of gas processing facilities, with more than $30 billion in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global technology company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York involving disputes under a patent license agreement related to the semiconductor industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company in a WIPO arbitration seated in Switzerland arising under an IP license agreement and involving claims with a value exceeding $2 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading global retail company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong arising out of the acquisition of a subsidiary in China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading defense technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in Brussels involving disputes under a software development agreement related to a military aircraft program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading mining company in an ICSID arbitration against an Asian state involving claims related to violation of a stabilization clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major global manufacturing company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong involving disputes arising out of the acquisition of a computer business in Taiwan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading financial services company in multiple ad hoc arbitrations seated in Bermuda under excess coverage professional liability insurance policies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major US financial services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris arising out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement, with claims for breach of representations and warranties and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major global manufacturing company in an ICC arbitration seated in Zurich involving disputes related to a services contract for the design of consumer electronics products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major European telecommunications company in multiple VIAC arbitrations seated in Vienna involving the ownership of an Eastern European joint venture company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked for Arbitration (International), Global Market Leaders","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"Ranked for International Arbitration. Sources report that she is “a world-class lawyer and advocate” and “one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,” with “impeccable judgment and strategic acumen” and “a uniquely measured and diplomatic style that is exceptionally persuasive.” ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2012 – 2026"},{"title":"Recommended as a Leading Partner for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 United States"},{"title":"Selected for recognition as a leading arbitration practitioner in the 2017–2026 editions of Lexology Index: Arbitration, including in the inaugural edition of Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders 2017—a guide profiling the foremost practitioners in the arbitration community. Sources report that she is a “highly reputable” and “amazingly able” lawyer and “established leader” in international arbitration, “strongly recommended” for her excellence in complex commercial and investment disputes","detail":"Lexology Index: Arbitration and Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders"},{"title":"Named a Washington, D.C. Lawyer of the Year for her international arbitration practice","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2023"},{"title":"Consistently recognized as a “Litigation Star”","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13551}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-06-17T15:20:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-17T15:20:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Kent{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked for Arbitration (International), Global Market Leaders\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked for International Arbitration. Sources report that she is “a world-class lawyer and advocate” and “one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,” with “impeccable judgment and strategic acumen” and “a uniquely measured and diplomatic style that is exceptionally persuasive.” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2012 – 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended as a Leading Partner for International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 United States\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected for recognition as a leading arbitration practitioner in the 2017–2026 editions of Lexology Index: Arbitration, including in the inaugural edition of Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders 2017—a guide profiling the foremost practitioners in the arbitration community. Sources report that she is a “highly reputable” and “amazingly able” lawyer and “established leader” in international arbitration, “strongly recommended” for her excellence in complex commercial and investment disputes\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lexology Index: Arbitration and Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Washington, D.C. Lawyer of the Year for her international arbitration practice\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Consistently recognized as a “Litigation Star”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in Singapore arising under a license agreement, with claims and counterclaims exceeding $500 million in dispute.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global clean energy company in an ICC arbitration seated in California involving warranty claims under a supply agreement for a critical component in an energy storage product.{{ FIELD }}Represented a UK investor in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the People’s Republic of China arising out of the expropriation of land use rights and unfair treatment of the claimant’s investment and in related enforcement proceedings to confirm the favorable award.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in London, using expedited procedures, arising out of a joint venture agreement and IP license agreement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global energy services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris related to disputes under contracts for oil drilling services.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global consumer technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement for standard essential patents.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Ministry of Public Works of a Middle Eastern state in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore arising out of a $400 million construction project in the transportation sector.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an investment arbitration against a Latin American state involving claims for denial of justice arising from a national court judgment and in related set-aside proceedings, which confirmed the favorable award.{{ FIELD }}Represented an aerospace and defense technology company in a dispute under a long-term development and supply agreement related to the supply of military aircraft.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global medical device company in a AAA arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major consumer health products company in a JAMS arbitration seated in Chicago arising under an IP license agreement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York arising out of an IP license agreement and involving claims related to licensed patents and know-how.{{ FIELD }}Represented a state party in an LCIA arbitration seated in London involving disputes related to the development of a substantial oil and gas field and the construction of gas processing facilities, with more than $30 billion in dispute.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global technology company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York involving disputes under a patent license agreement related to the semiconductor industry.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company in a WIPO arbitration seated in Switzerland arising under an IP license agreement and involving claims with a value exceeding $2 billion.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading global retail company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong arising out of the acquisition of a subsidiary in China.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading defense technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in Brussels involving disputes under a software development agreement related to a military aircraft program.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading mining company in an ICSID arbitration against an Asian state involving claims related to violation of a stabilization clause.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major global manufacturing company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong involving disputes arising out of the acquisition of a computer business in Taiwan.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading financial services company in multiple ad hoc arbitrations seated in Bermuda under excess coverage professional liability insurance policies.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major US financial services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris arising out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement, with claims for breach of representations and warranties and fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major global manufacturing company in an ICC arbitration seated in Zurich involving disputes related to a services contract for the design of consumer electronics products.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major European telecommunications company in multiple VIAC arbitrations seated in Vienna involving the ownership of an Eastern European joint venture company.{{ FIELD }}Rachael Kent helps clients navigate high‑stakes international disputes, leading teams in complex commercial and investment arbitrations across industries and jurisdictions. She guides clients through every stage of the dispute process, delivering pragmatic strategy and tenacious advocacy to resolve disputes and protect critical business and investment interests.\nWith more than 25 years of experience, Rachael advises companies, investors, and sovereign entities on high‑stakes commercial and investment disputes worldwide. She has represented clients in complex arbitrations under the rules of all major arbitral institutions, including the ICC, ICSID, AAA/ICDR, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, and WIPO. \nRachael steers clients through all stages of the dispute process, formulating strategy, navigating complex procedural issues, and delivering strong advocacy to protect critical investments and commercial interests. She has been described by clients and peers as “one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,” with “impeccable judgment and strategic acumen.”\nHer matters involve disputes with significant financial exposure and technical complexity, often arising from long‑term contracts, collaboration and joint venture agreements, and agreements involving intellectual property rights. Rachael has particular experience representing life sciences and technology companies in high-value arbitrations arising under joint venture, co-development, and IP license agreements. She also works closely with clients in sectors such as energy, aerospace, and construction, where disputes frequently combine legal, technical, and commercial considerations. She distills complex issues into practical guidance, helping clients achieve their commercial objectives.\n  Partner Ranked for Arbitration (International), Global Market Leaders Chambers Global Ranked for International Arbitration. Sources report that she is “a world-class lawyer and advocate” and “one of the best arbitration advocates in international arbitration worldwide,” with “impeccable judgment and strategic acumen” and “a uniquely measured and diplomatic style that is exceptionally persuasive.”  Chambers USA, 2012 – 2026 Recommended as a Leading Partner for International Arbitration Legal 500 United States Selected for recognition as a leading arbitration practitioner in the 2017–2026 editions of Lexology Index: Arbitration, including in the inaugural edition of Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders 2017—a guide profiling the foremost practitioners in the arbitration community. Sources report that she is a “highly reputable” and “amazingly able” lawyer and “established leader” in international arbitration, “strongly recommended” for her excellence in complex commercial and investment disputes Lexology Index: Arbitration and Who’s Who Legal: Arbitration - Future Leaders Named a Washington, D.C. Lawyer of the Year for her international arbitration practice Best Lawyers in America, 2023 Consistently recognized as a “Litigation Star” Benchmark Litigation Georgetown University  Duke University Duke University School of Law District of Columbia Maryland England and Wales (Registered Foreign Lawyer) Institute for Transnational Arbitration, Senior Vice Chair WIPO Mediation and Arbitration Advisory Committee Taught courses on international arbitration at the Georgetown University Law Center, the Duke University School of Law, the University of Michigan Law School, and Pepperdine Law School Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in Singapore arising under a license agreement, with claims and counterclaims exceeding $500 million in dispute. Represented a global clean energy company in an ICC arbitration seated in California involving warranty claims under a supply agreement for a critical component in an energy storage product. Represented a UK investor in an UNCITRAL arbitration against the People’s Republic of China arising out of the expropriation of land use rights and unfair treatment of the claimant’s investment and in related enforcement proceedings to confirm the favorable award. Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration seated in London, using expedited procedures, arising out of a joint venture agreement and IP license agreement. Represented a global energy services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris related to disputes under contracts for oil drilling services. Represented a global consumer technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement for standard essential patents. Represented the Ministry of Public Works of a Middle Eastern state in a SIAC arbitration seated in Singapore arising out of a $400 million construction project in the transportation sector. Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an investment arbitration against a Latin American state involving claims for denial of justice arising from a national court judgment and in related set-aside proceedings, which confirmed the favorable award. Represented an aerospace and defense technology company in a dispute under a long-term development and supply agreement related to the supply of military aircraft. Represented a global medical device company in a AAA arbitration seated in New York arising under an IP license agreement. Represented a major consumer health products company in a JAMS arbitration seated in Chicago arising under an IP license agreement. Represented a global pharmaceutical company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York arising out of an IP license agreement and involving claims related to licensed patents and know-how. Represented a state party in an LCIA arbitration seated in London involving disputes related to the development of a substantial oil and gas field and the construction of gas processing facilities, with more than $30 billion in dispute. Represented a global technology company in an ICDR arbitration seated in New York involving disputes under a patent license agreement related to the semiconductor industry. Represented a global pharmaceutical company in a WIPO arbitration seated in Switzerland arising under an IP license agreement and involving claims with a value exceeding $2 billion. Represented a leading global retail company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong arising out of the acquisition of a subsidiary in China. Represented a leading defense technology company in an ICC arbitration seated in Brussels involving disputes under a software development agreement related to a military aircraft program. Represented a leading mining company in an ICSID arbitration against an Asian state involving claims related to violation of a stabilization clause. Represented a major global manufacturing company in an HKIAC arbitration seated in Hong Kong involving disputes arising out of the acquisition of a computer business in Taiwan. Represented a leading financial services company in multiple ad hoc arbitrations seated in Bermuda under excess coverage professional liability insurance policies. Represented a major US financial services company in an ICC arbitration seated in Paris arising out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement, with claims for breach of representations and warranties and fraud. Represented a major global manufacturing company in an ICC arbitration seated in Zurich involving disputes related to a services contract for the design of consumer electronics products. Represented a major European telecommunications company in multiple VIAC arbitrations seated in Vienna involving the ownership of an Eastern European joint venture company.","searchable_name":"Rachael D. Kent","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":451111,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7480,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMarleen Krueger advises clients on international commercial and investment arbitration across jurisdictions and industries. She acts as counsel and arbitrator in proceedings seated in both civil and common law forums worldwide, including Germany, England, France, New York, Peru, South Korea, Japan, and Switzerland. Marleen represents private and government clients across sectors, including energy, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, construction, intellectual property, technology, and automotive.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen regularly works with both private companies and state‑owned entities and is well positioned to handle sensitive, cross‑border matters. Her ability to operate across legal systems and coordinate international teams enables clients to manage multi‑forum disputes with consistency and control.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen has advised clients in arbitrations conducted under a variety of arbitral rules, including ICC, LCIA, DIS, SIAC, and UNCITRAL.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBy combining deep experience in arbitration with sector knowledge across energy, construction, technology, and life sciences, Marleen helps clients anticipate challenges, mitigate exposure, and protect critical assets. She brings a practical, solutions‑driven approach to complex disputes, keeping matters focused on outcomes that support broader business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen is a regular guest lecturer on international arbitration at institutions in Europe and the United States, including the University of W\u0026uuml;rzburg, SOAS University of London, and Pepperdine University.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"marleen-krueger","email":"mkrueger@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Middle Eastern state entity in a consolidated LCIA dispute against a UK-domiciled international energy company relating to the termination of two Production Sharing Contracts in the Middle Eastern state of our client. Seated in London, subject to English law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational plant and equipment supplier for the energy and construction industry in an ICC arbitration relating to a delayed hydropower project in Peru. Seated in Lima, subject to Peruvian law. The tribunal issued an award in favor of our client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Southeast Asian state-owned oil and gas company in an ICC arbitration against another Southeast Asian oil and gas company relating to taxation and abandonment obligations arising from a Production Sharing Contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the German branch of a global oil and gas service company in two DIS arbitrations and set-aside proceedings against an oil and gas storage company relating to alleged defects in subsurface equipment. Seated in Hanover, subject to German law. The dispute was settled on terms favorable to our client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global biotechnology company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a joint venture with a Korean company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Krueger","nick_name":"Marleen","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Marleen","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Highlighted as a “Next Generation Partner” for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2026"},{"title":"Recognized","detail":"Legal Business “The Next Generation of Arbitration”, 2022"},{"title":"Named on the Global Leading Litigators list","detail":"Lawdragon 500, 2024 – 2026 (recognizes lawyers who specialize in international arbitration, public international litigation and global controversies)"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/marleen-krueger-45a7b39a/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMarleen Krueger advises clients on international commercial and investment arbitration across jurisdictions and industries. She acts as counsel and arbitrator in proceedings seated in both civil and common law forums worldwide, including Germany, England, France, New York, Peru, South Korea, Japan, and Switzerland. Marleen represents private and government clients across sectors, including energy, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, construction, intellectual property, technology, and automotive.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen regularly works with both private companies and state‑owned entities and is well positioned to handle sensitive, cross‑border matters. Her ability to operate across legal systems and coordinate international teams enables clients to manage multi‑forum disputes with consistency and control.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen has advised clients in arbitrations conducted under a variety of arbitral rules, including ICC, LCIA, DIS, SIAC, and UNCITRAL.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBy combining deep experience in arbitration with sector knowledge across energy, construction, technology, and life sciences, Marleen helps clients anticipate challenges, mitigate exposure, and protect critical assets. She brings a practical, solutions‑driven approach to complex disputes, keeping matters focused on outcomes that support broader business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMarleen is a regular guest lecturer on international arbitration at institutions in Europe and the United States, including the University of W\u0026uuml;rzburg, SOAS University of London, and Pepperdine University.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Middle Eastern state entity in a consolidated LCIA dispute against a UK-domiciled international energy company relating to the termination of two Production Sharing Contracts in the Middle Eastern state of our client. Seated in London, subject to English law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational plant and equipment supplier for the energy and construction industry in an ICC arbitration relating to a delayed hydropower project in Peru. Seated in Lima, subject to Peruvian law. The tribunal issued an award in favor of our client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Southeast Asian state-owned oil and gas company in an ICC arbitration against another Southeast Asian oil and gas company relating to taxation and abandonment obligations arising from a Production Sharing Contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the German branch of a global oil and gas service company in two DIS arbitrations and set-aside proceedings against an oil and gas storage company relating to alleged defects in subsurface equipment. Seated in Hanover, subject to German law. The dispute was settled on terms favorable to our client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global biotechnology company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a joint venture with a Korean company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Highlighted as a “Next Generation Partner” for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2026"},{"title":"Recognized","detail":"Legal Business “The Next Generation of Arbitration”, 2022"},{"title":"Named on the Global Leading Litigators list","detail":"Lawdragon 500, 2024 – 2026 (recognizes lawyers who specialize in international arbitration, public international litigation and global controversies)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13546}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-06-15T11:06:09.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-15T11:06:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Krueger{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Highlighted as a “Next Generation Partner” for International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal Business “The Next Generation of Arbitration”, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named on the Global Leading Litigators list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500, 2024 – 2026 (recognizes lawyers who specialize in international arbitration, public international litigation and global controversies)\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented a Middle Eastern state entity in a consolidated LCIA dispute against a UK-domiciled international energy company relating to the termination of two Production Sharing Contracts in the Middle Eastern state of our client. Seated in London, subject to English law.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational plant and equipment supplier for the energy and construction industry in an ICC arbitration relating to a delayed hydropower project in Peru. Seated in Lima, subject to Peruvian law. The tribunal issued an award in favor of our client.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Southeast Asian state-owned oil and gas company in an ICC arbitration against another Southeast Asian oil and gas company relating to taxation and abandonment obligations arising from a Production Sharing Contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented the German branch of a global oil and gas service company in two DIS arbitrations and set-aside proceedings against an oil and gas storage company relating to alleged defects in subsurface equipment. Seated in Hanover, subject to German law. The dispute was settled on terms favorable to our client.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global biotechnology company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a joint venture with a Korean company.{{ FIELD }}Marleen Krueger advises clients on international commercial and investment arbitration across jurisdictions and industries. She acts as counsel and arbitrator in proceedings seated in both civil and common law forums worldwide, including Germany, England, France, New York, Peru, South Korea, Japan, and Switzerland. Marleen represents private and government clients across sectors, including energy, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, construction, intellectual property, technology, and automotive.\nMarleen regularly works with both private companies and state‑owned entities and is well positioned to handle sensitive, cross‑border matters. Her ability to operate across legal systems and coordinate international teams enables clients to manage multi‑forum disputes with consistency and control.\nMarleen has advised clients in arbitrations conducted under a variety of arbitral rules, including ICC, LCIA, DIS, SIAC, and UNCITRAL.\nBy combining deep experience in arbitration with sector knowledge across energy, construction, technology, and life sciences, Marleen helps clients anticipate challenges, mitigate exposure, and protect critical assets. She brings a practical, solutions‑driven approach to complex disputes, keeping matters focused on outcomes that support broader business objectives.\nMarleen is a regular guest lecturer on international arbitration at institutions in Europe and the United States, including the University of Würzburg, SOAS University of London, and Pepperdine University. Partner Highlighted as a “Next Generation Partner” for International Arbitration Legal 500 UK, 2026 Recognized Legal Business “The Next Generation of Arbitration”, 2022 Named on the Global Leading Litigators list Lawdragon 500, 2024 – 2026 (recognizes lawyers who specialize in international arbitration, public international litigation and global controversies) Humboldt University of Berlin Humboldt University of Berlin Humboldt University of Berlin Humboldt University of Berlin Court of Berlin  Germany England and Wales (Registered European Lawyer) Represented a Middle Eastern state entity in a consolidated LCIA dispute against a UK-domiciled international energy company relating to the termination of two Production Sharing Contracts in the Middle Eastern state of our client. Seated in London, subject to English law. Represented a multinational plant and equipment supplier for the energy and construction industry in an ICC arbitration relating to a delayed hydropower project in Peru. Seated in Lima, subject to Peruvian law. The tribunal issued an award in favor of our client. Represented a Southeast Asian state-owned oil and gas company in an ICC arbitration against another Southeast Asian oil and gas company relating to taxation and abandonment obligations arising from a Production Sharing Contract. Represented the German branch of a global oil and gas service company in two DIS arbitrations and set-aside proceedings against an oil and gas storage company relating to alleged defects in subsurface equipment. Seated in Hanover, subject to German law. The dispute was settled on terms favorable to our client. Representing a global biotechnology company in an ICC arbitration arising out of a joint venture with a Korean company.","searchable_name":"Marleen Krueger","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443596,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3516,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Charity Kirby is a Senior Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s London office, with a practice spanning High Court litigation and commercial arbitration. Charity acts for clients involved in proceedings in a variety of forums, whether before the English High Court, the English Court of Appeal or Arbitral Tribunals under major international arbitration rules (ICC, LCIA, UNCITRAL, ICSID, Premier League Rules) and in London based ad-hoc arbitrations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharity\u0026rsquo;s broad practice involves representing clients in a range of industries. In recent years her clients have most frequently operated in the energy sector, financial services and, increasingly, the sports industry. Charity regularly handles complex disputes, requiring innovative solutions to novel legal issues. Recent experience includes claims in fraud, enforcement action, injunctive relief, breach of contract and sporting governing body rule infringements. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharity is one of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s representatives on the panel for the Professional Tennis Players\u0026rsquo; Association\u0026rsquo;s Athlete Counsel \u0026amp; Equity (ACE) Program. Through the ACE Program, Charity provides pro bono legal support to tennis players facing complex legal challenges, especially anti-doping and anti-corruption issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the first graduates of the London office\u0026rsquo;s training contract program, Charity has spent the entirety of her legal career with King \u0026amp; Spalding, including a secondment to an investment bank in 2021.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charity-kirby","email":"ckirby@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;brand\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in proceedings against a sporting governing body regarding sponsorship rights\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindividual defendant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the successful defence of a US$350 million fraud claim, ongoing for more than ten years and culminating in a 12 week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a global\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esportswear\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million pound dispute against a Premier League football club\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining anti-enforcement and anti-anti-suit injunctions against Russian defendants to block international enforcement of Russian court judgments imposing fines of two undecillion roubles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erespondent State\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration for alleged breaches of a bilateral investment treaty valued at approximately USD 6 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eathletes\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute with the International Olympic Committee regarding the application of the Olympic Medal Reallocation Process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esovereign-wealth fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million fraud proceeding before the High Court and the Court of Appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for an oil and gas trading company in various UNCITRAL arbitrations and in High Court proceedings regarding or arising out of the non-performance of contracts for the delivery of LNG by a State provider.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational oil and gas company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in proceedings before the English High Court and the Court of Appeal regarding claims connected to a production sharing contract in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing in an ad-hoc arbitration, seated in London, focusing on illegality and piercing the corporate veil in a case related to the shipping industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the investor in the enforcement of a $1.2 billion award rendered pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kirby","nick_name":"Charity","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charity","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Charity Kirby is a Senior Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s London office, with a practice spanning High Court litigation and commercial arbitration. Charity acts for clients involved in proceedings in a variety of forums, whether before the English High Court, the English Court of Appeal or Arbitral Tribunals under major international arbitration rules (ICC, LCIA, UNCITRAL, ICSID, Premier League Rules) and in London based ad-hoc arbitrations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharity\u0026rsquo;s broad practice involves representing clients in a range of industries. In recent years her clients have most frequently operated in the energy sector, financial services and, increasingly, the sports industry. Charity regularly handles complex disputes, requiring innovative solutions to novel legal issues. Recent experience includes claims in fraud, enforcement action, injunctive relief, breach of contract and sporting governing body rule infringements. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharity is one of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s representatives on the panel for the Professional Tennis Players\u0026rsquo; Association\u0026rsquo;s Athlete Counsel \u0026amp; Equity (ACE) Program. Through the ACE Program, Charity provides pro bono legal support to tennis players facing complex legal challenges, especially anti-doping and anti-corruption issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the first graduates of the London office\u0026rsquo;s training contract program, Charity has spent the entirety of her legal career with King \u0026amp; Spalding, including a secondment to an investment bank in 2021.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;brand\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in proceedings against a sporting governing body regarding sponsorship rights\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindividual defendant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the successful defence of a US$350 million fraud claim, ongoing for more than ten years and culminating in a 12 week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a global\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esportswear\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million pound dispute against a Premier League football club\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining anti-enforcement and anti-anti-suit injunctions against Russian defendants to block international enforcement of Russian court judgments imposing fines of two undecillion roubles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erespondent State\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration for alleged breaches of a bilateral investment treaty valued at approximately USD 6 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eathletes\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute with the International Olympic Committee regarding the application of the Olympic Medal Reallocation Process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esovereign-wealth fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million fraud proceeding before the High Court and the Court of Appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for an oil and gas trading company in various UNCITRAL arbitrations and in High Court proceedings regarding or arising out of the non-performance of contracts for the delivery of LNG by a State provider.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational oil and gas company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in proceedings before the English High Court and the Court of Appeal regarding claims connected to a production sharing contract in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing in an ad-hoc arbitration, seated in London, focusing on illegality and piercing the corporate veil in a case related to the shipping industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the investor in the enforcement of a $1.2 billion award rendered pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":965}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-01T17:25:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-01T17:25:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Kirby{{ FIELD }}Representing a global brand in proceedings against a sporting governing body regarding sponsorship rights{{ FIELD }}Acting for an individual defendant in the successful defence of a US$350 million fraud claim, ongoing for more than ten years and culminating in a 12 week trial{{ FIELD }}Advising a global sportswear manufacturer in a multi-million pound dispute against a Premier League football club{{ FIELD }}Acting for a global technology company in obtaining anti-enforcement and anti-anti-suit injunctions against Russian defendants to block international enforcement of Russian court judgments imposing fines of two undecillion roubles.{{ FIELD }}Acting for the respondent State in an ICSID arbitration for alleged breaches of a bilateral investment treaty valued at approximately USD 6 billion{{ FIELD }}Advising athletes in a dispute with the International Olympic Committee regarding the application of the Olympic Medal Reallocation Process.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a sovereign-wealth fund in a $500 million fraud proceeding before the High Court and the Court of Appeal.{{ FIELD }}Acting for an oil and gas trading company in various UNCITRAL arbitrations and in High Court proceedings regarding or arising out of the non-performance of contracts for the delivery of LNG by a State provider.{{ FIELD }}Representing an international oil and gas company in proceedings before the English High Court and the Court of Appeal regarding claims connected to a production sharing contract in Iraq.{{ FIELD }}Acting in an ad-hoc arbitration, seated in London, focusing on illegality and piercing the corporate veil in a case related to the shipping industry.{{ FIELD }}Acting for the investor in the enforcement of a $1.2 billion award rendered pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty.{{ FIELD }} \n Charity Kirby is a Senior Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s London office, with a practice spanning High Court litigation and commercial arbitration. Charity acts for clients involved in proceedings in a variety of forums, whether before the English High Court, the English Court of Appeal or Arbitral Tribunals under major international arbitration rules (ICC, LCIA, UNCITRAL, ICSID, Premier League Rules) and in London based ad-hoc arbitrations. \nCharity’s broad practice involves representing clients in a range of industries. In recent years her clients have most frequently operated in the energy sector, financial services and, increasingly, the sports industry. Charity regularly handles complex disputes, requiring innovative solutions to novel legal issues. Recent experience includes claims in fraud, enforcement action, injunctive relief, breach of contract and sporting governing body rule infringements.   \nCharity is one of King \u0026amp; Spalding’s representatives on the panel for the Professional Tennis Players’ Association’s Athlete Counsel \u0026amp; Equity (ACE) Program. Through the ACE Program, Charity provides pro bono legal support to tennis players facing complex legal challenges, especially anti-doping and anti-corruption issues.\nOne of the first graduates of the London office’s training contract program, Charity has spent the entirety of her legal career with King \u0026amp; Spalding, including a secondment to an investment bank in 2021. Senior Associate Law Society of England \u0026amp; Wales Law Society of Enland \u0026amp; Wales (Admitted 1/4/2016; Reg. # 594053) Representing a global brand in proceedings against a sporting governing body regarding sponsorship rights Acting for an individual defendant in the successful defence of a US$350 million fraud claim, ongoing for more than ten years and culminating in a 12 week trial Advising a global sportswear manufacturer in a multi-million pound dispute against a Premier League football club Acting for a global technology company in obtaining anti-enforcement and anti-anti-suit injunctions against Russian defendants to block international enforcement of Russian court judgments imposing fines of two undecillion roubles. Acting for the respondent State in an ICSID arbitration for alleged breaches of a bilateral investment treaty valued at approximately USD 6 billion Advising athletes in a dispute with the International Olympic Committee regarding the application of the Olympic Medal Reallocation Process. Acting for a sovereign-wealth fund in a $500 million fraud proceeding before the High Court and the Court of Appeal. Acting for an oil and gas trading company in various UNCITRAL arbitrations and in High Court proceedings regarding or arising out of the non-performance of contracts for the delivery of LNG by a State provider. Representing an international oil and gas company in proceedings before the English High Court and the Court of Appeal regarding claims connected to a production sharing contract in Iraq. Acting in an ad-hoc arbitration, seated in London, focusing on illegality and piercing the corporate veil in a case related to the shipping industry. Acting for the investor in the enforcement of a $1.2 billion award rendered pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty.","searchable_name":"Charity Kirby","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":432495,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6494,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePeter\u0026nbsp;Kim is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office. Peter helps clients navigate through\u0026nbsp;a broad range of complex disputes in response to significant cross-border risk, in addition to government regulatory matters, corporate internal investigations, and related civil litigation.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter specializes in representing companies in complex international\u0026nbsp;disputes involving\u0026nbsp;multiple jurisdictions around the world. He\u0026nbsp;provides clients with comprehensive\u0026nbsp;global litigation strategy, crisis management, and risk mitigation advice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Peter\u0026nbsp;advises companies in connection with government regulatory and corporate internal investigations and has represented clients\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation brought by the DOJ, State AGs, and other agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was\u0026nbsp;a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and a recipient of the Parker School Certificate for Achievement in International and Comparative Law. At Columbia, Peter served as\u0026nbsp;Executive Editor of the \u003cem\u003eColumbia Journal of Transnational Law\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;He received his\u0026nbsp;M.A. from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and his B.A. from Columbia University. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Peter practiced in the New York office of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter is admitted to practice in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"peter-kim","email":"pkim@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvising and representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;with global litigation and risk mitigation strategy across multiple jurisdictions in matters relating to Russia and the international response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on multiple internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on key strategic regulatory risks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues involving trade secret exfiltration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising and representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor corporate clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in civil litigation and commercial and investment arbitration under the AAA, ICC, JAMS, and UNCITRAL rules in high-stakes breach-of-contract, post-M\u0026amp;A, construction, and investment treaty disputes.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3249}]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kim","nick_name":"Peter","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Peter","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"C. Y.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/petercykim/","seodescription":"Peter Kim is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026 Government Investigations practice in King \u0026 Spalding's New York office. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePeter\u0026nbsp;Kim is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office. Peter helps clients navigate through\u0026nbsp;a broad range of complex disputes in response to significant cross-border risk, in addition to government regulatory matters, corporate internal investigations, and related civil litigation.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter specializes in representing companies in complex international\u0026nbsp;disputes involving\u0026nbsp;multiple jurisdictions around the world. He\u0026nbsp;provides clients with comprehensive\u0026nbsp;global litigation strategy, crisis management, and risk mitigation advice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Peter\u0026nbsp;advises companies in connection with government regulatory and corporate internal investigations and has represented clients\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation brought by the DOJ, State AGs, and other agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was\u0026nbsp;a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and a recipient of the Parker School Certificate for Achievement in International and Comparative Law. At Columbia, Peter served as\u0026nbsp;Executive Editor of the \u003cem\u003eColumbia Journal of Transnational Law\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;He received his\u0026nbsp;M.A. from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and his B.A. from Columbia University. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Peter practiced in the New York office of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePeter is admitted to practice in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvising and representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;with global litigation and risk mitigation strategy across multiple jurisdictions in matters relating to Russia and the international response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on multiple internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on key strategic regulatory risks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues involving trade secret exfiltration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising and representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor corporate clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in civil litigation and commercial and investment arbitration under the AAA, ICC, JAMS, and UNCITRAL rules in high-stakes breach-of-contract, post-M\u0026amp;A, construction, and investment treaty disputes.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10553}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-07-25T13:54:48.000Z","updated_at":"2025-07-25T13:54:48.000Z","searchable_text":"Kim{{ FIELD }}Advising and representing major global technology companies with global litigation and risk mitigation strategy across multiple jurisdictions in matters relating to Russia and the international response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.{{ FIELD }}Advising a major global technology company on multiple internal investigations.{{ FIELD }}Advising a major global technology company on key strategic regulatory risks.{{ FIELD }}Advising a major global technology company on referrals to law enforcement in issues involving trade secret exfiltration.{{ FIELD }}Advising and representing multiple major corporate clients in civil litigation and commercial and investment arbitration under the AAA, ICC, JAMS, and UNCITRAL rules in high-stakes breach-of-contract, post-M\u0026amp;A, construction, and investment treaty disputes.{{ FIELD }}Peter Kim is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office. Peter helps clients navigate through a broad range of complex disputes in response to significant cross-border risk, in addition to government regulatory matters, corporate internal investigations, and related civil litigation. \nPeter specializes in representing companies in complex international disputes involving multiple jurisdictions around the world. He provides clients with comprehensive global litigation strategy, crisis management, and risk mitigation advice.\nAdditionally, Peter advises companies in connection with government regulatory and corporate internal investigations and has represented clients in investigations and litigation brought by the DOJ, State AGs, and other agencies.\nPeter received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and a recipient of the Parker School Certificate for Achievement in International and Comparative Law. At Columbia, Peter served as Executive Editor of the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. He received his M.A. from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and his B.A. from Columbia University. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Peter practiced in the New York office of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.\nPeter is admitted to practice in New York. Peter Kim lawyer Associate Columbia University Columbia University Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Johns Hopkins University  New York Advising and representing major global technology companies with global litigation and risk mitigation strategy across multiple jurisdictions in matters relating to Russia and the international response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Advising a major global technology company on multiple internal investigations. Advising a major global technology company on key strategic regulatory risks. Advising a major global technology company on referrals to law enforcement in issues involving trade secret exfiltration. Advising and representing multiple major corporate clients in civil litigation and commercial and investment arbitration under the AAA, ICC, JAMS, and UNCITRAL rules in high-stakes breach-of-contract, post-M\u0026amp;A, construction, and investment treaty disputes.","searchable_name":"Peter C. Y. Kim","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}