{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"13","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"D","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":445859,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7310,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eIP litigation\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003espanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ahtoosa-dale","email":"adale@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePatent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;issues, the case settled days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFreshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSieler v. Atieva Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMatch Group v. Muzmatch Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd\u0026rsquo;s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRanieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dale","nick_name":"Ahtoosa","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas","years_held":"2016 - 2017"}],"first_name":"Ahtoosa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":181,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Intellectual Property Law","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2026"},{"title":"“Best Lawyers Under 40”","detail":"D Magazine, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized within the Top 250","detail":"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eIP litigation\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003espanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePatent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;issues, the case settled days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFreshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSieler v. Atieva Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMatch Group v. Muzmatch Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd\u0026rsquo;s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRanieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Intellectual Property Law","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2026"},{"title":"“Best Lawyers Under 40”","detail":"D Magazine, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized within the Top 250","detail":"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13342}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-16T15:51:41.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-16T15:51:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Dale{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Patent Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property – Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Best Lawyers Under 40”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"D Magazine, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized within the Top 250\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Patent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\nTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. (W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.{{ FIELD }}Hardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and Daubert issues, the case settled days before trial.{{ FIELD }}Freshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC (D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.{{ FIELD }}Sieler v. Atieva Inc. (N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.{{ FIELD }}Match Group v. Muzmatch Limited (W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.{{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation and Other Matters\nUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al. (FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party’s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd’s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney’s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.{{ FIELD }}Ranieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al. (N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.{{ FIELD }}Ahtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on IP litigation spanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries. \nAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability. \nAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\nPrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML. Partner Intellectual Property Law Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 Patent Litigation Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 Intellectual Property – Litigation Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 40 \u0026amp; Under Benchmark Litigation, 2026 “Best Lawyers Under 40” D Magazine, 2025 Recognized within the Top 250 Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025 Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Baylor University Baylor University School of Law Texas Member, Dallas Bar Association Programming Co-Chair, ChIPs USPTO Chapter Member, Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn American Inn of Court, 2022-2024 Member, Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Judicial Clerk, Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Patent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\nTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. (W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement. Hardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and Daubert issues, the case settled days before trial. Freshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC (D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled. Sieler v. Atieva Inc. (N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva. Match Group v. Muzmatch Limited (W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution. Commercial Litigation and Other Matters\nUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al. (FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party’s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd’s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney’s fees to Unbnd for the appeal. Ranieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al. (N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.","searchable_name":"Ahtoosa A. Dale","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426320,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2435,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amina-dammann","email":"adammann@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1303,"guid":"1303.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dammann","nick_name":"Amina","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amina","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":196,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4206}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","searchable_text":"Dammann{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters:{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;{{ FIELD }}Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;{{ FIELD }}S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;{{ FIELD }}Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;{{ FIELD }}Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;{{ FIELD }}Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;{{ FIELD }}JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.{{ FIELD }}AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).{{ FIELD }}King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.{{ FIELD }}Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.{{ FIELD }}Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.  She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.  Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.\nAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.  Amina  holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University. \nPublications and Awards\n•   Vacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact, 27 Review of Litigation 441–512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\n•  Die Beschwerdekammern der europäischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law Partner Frankfurt University  The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School Texas Federal Republic of Germany Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters: Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board; Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards; Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch; S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery; Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia; Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement; Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas; Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas; Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana; JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts. Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana. AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division). King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware. Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska. Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.","searchable_name":"Amina S. Dammann","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":196,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444013,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7224,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWith 15 years of experience, Amadou\u0026rsquo;s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou\u0026rsquo;s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amadou-diaw","email":"adiaw@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., \u003c/em\u003eCase No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al\u003c/em\u003e., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEasyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Diaw","nick_name":"Amadou","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amadou","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Kilkenny","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star in DC","detail":"National Law Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage ","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present"},{"title":"Outstanding Achievement Award","detail":"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/akd44/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWith 15 years of experience, Amadou\u0026rsquo;s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou\u0026rsquo;s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., \u003c/em\u003eCase No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al\u003c/em\u003e., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEasyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star in DC","detail":"National Law Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage ","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present"},{"title":"Outstanding Achievement Award","detail":"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12964}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:42.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:42.000Z","searchable_text":"Diaw{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star in DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Outstanding Achievement Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs\"}{{ FIELD }}PRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., Case No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.{{ FIELD }}AudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd., Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.{{ FIELD }}In the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.{{ FIELD }}TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.{{ FIELD }}Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.{{ FIELD }}Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.{{ FIELD }}Easyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.{{ FIELD }}With 15 years of experience, Amadou’s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou’s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou’s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind. \nAmadou’s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\nFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\nAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\nAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\nIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017. Partner Rising Star in DC National Law Journal, 2024 Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage  Legal 500 US, 2024 Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC Super Lawyers, 2017-Present Outstanding Achievement Award Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Georgetown University  University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Maryland State Bar Association National Bar Association Washington D.C. Bar Association Intellectual Property Owners Association Board of Strength in Numbers DC, Board Member Georgetown University’s Hoya Hoop Club, Secretary of the Board of Directors Hoyas Unlimited, At-Large Board Member University of Virginia School of Law Foundation, Class Agent PRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., Case No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation. AudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd., Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology. In the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology. TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology. Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration. Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration. Easyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.","searchable_name":"Amadou Kilkenny Diaw","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446759,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7325,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKyle combines his Computer Engineering knowledge with judicial work experience to provide informed intellectual property litigation assistance to clients across a wide range of industries. In addition to his patent litigation capabilities, Kyle has represented clients in various federal jurisdictions on a variety of technology, business, and civil rights disputes. Whether the dispute involves emerging technologies or foundational concepts, Kyle provides client\u0026nbsp;service grounded in excellence and integrity.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle is an associate in the business litigation practice group with a primary focus on intellectual property disputes. He has developed trial-ready skills through experiences such as taking the direct examination of witnesses at a federal bench trial, taking and defending depositions, and arguing motions. In addition to these oral advocacy skills, Kyle supports clients through exceptional legal research and writing which has\u0026nbsp;produced favorable results for clients such as walk-away dismissals. In addition to patent litigation support, Kyle provides clients with counseling on IP licensing, technology disputes, AI governance, data privacy, and regulatory compliance matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining private practice, Kyle served as a judicial term law clerk for the Honorable Roy S. Payne in the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division; a judicial extern for the Honorable Rebecca Rutherford in the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division; and a judicial intern for the Honorable Alan D Albright in the Western District of Texas Waco Division. During law school, Kyle served as editor in chief of the Texas A\u0026amp;M Journal of Property Law, graduated cum laude, and was inducted into the National Order of Scribes.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kyle-dockendorf","email":"kdockendorf@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dockendorf","nick_name":"Kyle","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas","years_held":"2023 - 2024"},{"name":"Intern, Judge Alan D Albright, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas","years_held":"2021 - 2021"},{"name":"Intern, Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","years_held":"2022 - 2022"}],"first_name":"Kyle","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1980,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2023-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKyle combines his Computer Engineering knowledge with judicial work experience to provide informed intellectual property litigation assistance to clients across a wide range of industries. In addition to his patent litigation capabilities, Kyle has represented clients in various federal jurisdictions on a variety of technology, business, and civil rights disputes. Whether the dispute involves emerging technologies or foundational concepts, Kyle provides client\u0026nbsp;service grounded in excellence and integrity.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle is an associate in the business litigation practice group with a primary focus on intellectual property disputes. He has developed trial-ready skills through experiences such as taking the direct examination of witnesses at a federal bench trial, taking and defending depositions, and arguing motions. In addition to these oral advocacy skills, Kyle supports clients through exceptional legal research and writing which has\u0026nbsp;produced favorable results for clients such as walk-away dismissals. In addition to patent litigation support, Kyle provides clients with counseling on IP licensing, technology disputes, AI governance, data privacy, and regulatory compliance matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining private practice, Kyle served as a judicial term law clerk for the Honorable Roy S. Payne in the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division; a judicial extern for the Honorable Rebecca Rutherford in the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division; and a judicial intern for the Honorable Alan D Albright in the Western District of Texas Waco Division. During law school, Kyle served as editor in chief of the Texas A\u0026amp;M Journal of Property Law, graduated cum laude, and was inducted into the National Order of Scribes.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13408}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-16T18:31:32.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-16T18:31:32.000Z","searchable_text":"Dockendorf{{ FIELD }}Kyle combines his Computer Engineering knowledge with judicial work experience to provide informed intellectual property litigation assistance to clients across a wide range of industries. In addition to his patent litigation capabilities, Kyle has represented clients in various federal jurisdictions on a variety of technology, business, and civil rights disputes. Whether the dispute involves emerging technologies or foundational concepts, Kyle provides client service grounded in excellence and integrity. \nKyle is an associate in the business litigation practice group with a primary focus on intellectual property disputes. He has developed trial-ready skills through experiences such as taking the direct examination of witnesses at a federal bench trial, taking and defending depositions, and arguing motions. In addition to these oral advocacy skills, Kyle supports clients through exceptional legal research and writing which has produced favorable results for clients such as walk-away dismissals. In addition to patent litigation support, Kyle provides clients with counseling on IP licensing, technology disputes, AI governance, data privacy, and regulatory compliance matters.\nPrior to joining private practice, Kyle served as a judicial term law clerk for the Honorable Roy S. Payne in the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division; a judicial extern for the Honorable Rebecca Rutherford in the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division; and a judicial intern for the Honorable Alan D Albright in the Western District of Texas Waco Division. During law school, Kyle served as editor in chief of the Texas A\u0026amp;M Journal of Property Law, graduated cum laude, and was inducted into the National Order of Scribes. Associate Texas A\u0026amp;M University Texas A\u0026amp;M School of Law Texas A\u0026amp;M University Texas A\u0026amp;M School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Texas The Honorable Barbara M.G. Lynn American Inn of Court Judicial Clerk, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Intern, Judge Alan D Albright, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Intern, Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","searchable_name":"Kyle Dockendorf","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447115,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6308,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJanese is an Associate of the firm's Business Litigation, Intellectual Property practice. Janese specializes in complex highly technical patent litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Janese prosecuted utility patents as a\u0026nbsp;Primary Patent Examiner at the USPTO and litigated computer patents as a judicial law clerk at the Court of Federal Claims and the Patent Trial \u0026amp; Appeal Board.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a registered Patent Attorney with a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering and experience as a Research Engineer, Janese is technically astute in electrical and computer arts, including neural networks and digital signal processing. She has over a decade of experience developing product prototypes for next generation products, bringing next generation products to market and managing entire product lines across multiple continents.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJanese narrows in on the technical issues of a case, leveraging\u0026nbsp;her 10 years of experience in private industry as an Electrical Engineer and Product Line Manager to analyze leading edge technology.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJanese has taught a Neural Networks graduate course at Christian Brothers University. She has also served as a US manufacturer representative in the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) to promote standardized product specifications for electrical apparatus.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"janese-duley","email":"jduley@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1203,"guid":"1203.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Duley","nick_name":"Janese","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Griggsby, U.S. Court of Federal Claims","years_held":"2020 - 2020"},{"name":"Intern, Maggs, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces","years_held":"2020 - 2020"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hughes, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office","years_held":"2021 - 2021"}],"first_name":"Janese","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":753,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJanese is an Associate of the firm's Business Litigation, Intellectual Property practice. Janese specializes in complex highly technical patent litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Janese prosecuted utility patents as a\u0026nbsp;Primary Patent Examiner at the USPTO and litigated computer patents as a judicial law clerk at the Court of Federal Claims and the Patent Trial \u0026amp; Appeal Board.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a registered Patent Attorney with a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering and experience as a Research Engineer, Janese is technically astute in electrical and computer arts, including neural networks and digital signal processing. She has over a decade of experience developing product prototypes for next generation products, bringing next generation products to market and managing entire product lines across multiple continents.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJanese narrows in on the technical issues of a case, leveraging\u0026nbsp;her 10 years of experience in private industry as an Electrical Engineer and Product Line Manager to analyze leading edge technology.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJanese has taught a Neural Networks graduate course at Christian Brothers University. She has also served as a US manufacturer representative in the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) to promote standardized product specifications for electrical apparatus.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11816}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-28T05:02:11.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-28T05:02:11.000Z","searchable_text":"Duley{{ FIELD }}Janese is an Associate of the firm's Business Litigation, Intellectual Property practice. Janese specializes in complex highly technical patent litigation matters.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Janese prosecuted utility patents as a Primary Patent Examiner at the USPTO and litigated computer patents as a judicial law clerk at the Court of Federal Claims and the Patent Trial \u0026amp; Appeal Board. \nAs a registered Patent Attorney with a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering and experience as a Research Engineer, Janese is technically astute in electrical and computer arts, including neural networks and digital signal processing. She has over a decade of experience developing product prototypes for next generation products, bringing next generation products to market and managing entire product lines across multiple continents. \nJanese narrows in on the technical issues of a case, leveraging her 10 years of experience in private industry as an Electrical Engineer and Product Line Manager to analyze leading edge technology. \nJanese has taught a Neural Networks graduate course at Christian Brothers University. She has also served as a US manufacturer representative in the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) to promote standardized product specifications for electrical apparatus. Associate Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law George Washington University George Washington University Law School Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Colorado District of Columbia Pauline Newman Inns of Court ChiPs Washington, D.C. Chapter Intern, Griggsby, U.S. Court of Federal Claims Intern, Maggs, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Judicial Clerk, Hughes, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office","searchable_name":"Janese Duley","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}