{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"1","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":427665,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1344,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"ehren-halse","email":"ehalse@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":19,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":20,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":21,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Halse","nick_name":"Ehren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ehren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5486}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Halse{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\\\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.{{ FIELD }}Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.{{ FIELD }}Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).{{ FIELD }}Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.{{ FIELD }}Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.{{ FIELD }}Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.{{ FIELD }}Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.{{ FIELD }}Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids.{{ FIELD }}Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.{{ FIELD }}Ehren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\n\nIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\nPublications\n\n“Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,” Financial Fraud Law Report, Gary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\n“FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,” The Compliance Reporter’s ‘Adopting Best Practice In Compliance’, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\n “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,” Bloomberg Law Reports, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\n Partner Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center California District of Columbia Maryland Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols. Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud. Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities. Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ). Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion. Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance. Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs. Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials. Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids. Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.","searchable_name":"Ehren Halse","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5780,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"laura-harris","email":"lharris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":113,"guid":"113.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Harris","nick_name":"Laura","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Laura","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1904,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9299}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Harris{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats{{ FIELD }}Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates{{ FIELD }}Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer{{ FIELD }}Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive{{ FIELD }}Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR{{ FIELD }}Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.{{ FIELD }}Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets{{ FIELD }}Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims{{ FIELD }}Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment{{ FIELD }}Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation{{ FIELD }}Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action{{ FIELD }}Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games{{ FIELD }}Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA{{ FIELD }}Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates{{ FIELD }}Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital{{ FIELD }}Laura Harris’s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.  She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation. \nHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.\nLaura’s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\nLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.  Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C. Partner Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars 2015-2020 Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Stanford University Stanford Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants. Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement. Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF. Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital","searchable_name":"Laura Harris","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442846,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5950,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-hill","email":"bhill@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3189}]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hill","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2224,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Brian is a partner in King \u0026 Spalding’s international trade group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8877}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Hill{{ FIELD }}Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology{{ FIELD }}Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology{{ FIELD }}Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine{{ FIELD }}Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.{{ FIELD }}K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint{{ FIELD }}Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung{{ FIELD }}Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity{{ FIELD }}Brian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.  By focusing on clients’ key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases. \nBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\nBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a “Next Generation Partner” by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\nFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others. In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\nBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.  Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.  Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC. Brian Hill lawyer Partner University of Delaware  University of Maryland-Baltimore University of Maryland School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey District of Columbia New Jersey New York International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc. K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity","searchable_name":"Brian Hill","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427003,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6073,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Schuller Hitchcock\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.\u0026nbsp; Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner\u0026nbsp;in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S.\u0026nbsp;Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors\u0026nbsp;successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.\u0026nbsp; Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.\u0026nbsp; She served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.\u0026nbsp; Amy also served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state\u0026rsquo;s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.\u0026nbsp; She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amy-hitchcock","email":"ahitchcock@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 916 541 1588","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWith former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Soccer Federation\u003c/strong\u003e. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServes as Fraud Special Counsel\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eappointed by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOffice of the California Governor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation\u0026rsquo;s findings and recommendations were deemed a \u0026ldquo;game-changer\u0026rdquo; by compliance and ethics leadership.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational eCommerce retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea multi-state health system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental regulatory action\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to insider threats and data incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hitchcock","nick_name":"Amy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2005-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Schuller","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Special Achievement Team Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/amy-schuller-hitchcock-9b319715/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Schuller Hitchcock\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.\u0026nbsp; Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner\u0026nbsp;in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S.\u0026nbsp;Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors\u0026nbsp;successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.\u0026nbsp; Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.\u0026nbsp; She served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.\u0026nbsp; Amy also served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state\u0026rsquo;s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.\u0026nbsp; She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWith former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Soccer Federation\u003c/strong\u003e. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServes as Fraud Special Counsel\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eappointed by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOffice of the California Governor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation\u0026rsquo;s findings and recommendations were deemed a \u0026ldquo;game-changer\u0026rdquo; by compliance and ethics leadership.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational eCommerce retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea multi-state health system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental regulatory action\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to insider threats and data incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Special Achievement Team Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9168}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:13.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:13.000Z","searchable_text":"Hitchcock{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2020 Special Achievement Team Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General\"}{{ FIELD }}With former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.{{ FIELD }}Serves as Fraud Special Counsel appointed by the Office of the California Governor to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.{{ FIELD }}Conducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a major retailer, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation’s findings and recommendations were deemed a “game-changer” by compliance and ethics leadership.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a multinational eCommerce retailer and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major retailer in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.{{ FIELD }}Representing a multi-state health system in environmental regulatory action jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.{{ FIELD }}Advising one of the world’s largest technology companies responding to insider threats and data incidents.{{ FIELD }}Advising multiple clients on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.{{ FIELD }}Represented technology company responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.{{ FIELD }}Amy Schuller Hitchcock’s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.  Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.  Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.   \nAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.  She served as the Eastern District of California’s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ’s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.  Amy also served as the Eastern District of California’s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state’s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.  She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\nPrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters. Partner 2020 Special Achievement Team Award U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General Dartmouth College  University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California With former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport. Serves as Fraud Special Counsel appointed by the Office of the California Governor to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments. Conducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a major retailer, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation’s findings and recommendations were deemed a “game-changer” by compliance and ethics leadership. Conducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a multinational eCommerce retailer and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA. Representing a major retailer in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys. Representing a multi-state health system in environmental regulatory action jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices. Advising one of the world’s largest technology companies responding to insider threats and data incidents. Advising multiple clients on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material. Represented technology company responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.","searchable_name":"Amy Schuller Hitchcock","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443953,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6776,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e, and oil and gas disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.\u0026nbsp; His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas. \u0026nbsp;In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn. \u0026nbsp;He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-hill","email":"rhill@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoffshore drilling company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to a dispute involving an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ehydrocarbon project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emunicipal utility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esolar facility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein North Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer employee\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003edefrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ejury verdict\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof $15,618,873.47 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraud damages\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand, after\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebifurcated trial\u003c/strong\u003e, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epunitive damages\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erelator\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein multi-million-dollar settlement\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecase involving\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraudulent small business subcontracting\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon military bases.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hill","nick_name":"Bobby","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Patrick E. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2022 - 2022"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Barbara Lynn, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","years_held":"2023 - 2024"}],"first_name":"Bobby","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertmaddenhill/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e, and oil and gas disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.\u0026nbsp; His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas. \u0026nbsp;In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn. \u0026nbsp;He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoffshore drilling company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to a dispute involving an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ehydrocarbon project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emunicipal utility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esolar facility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein North Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer employee\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003edefrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ejury verdict\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof $15,618,873.47 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraud damages\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand, after\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebifurcated trial\u003c/strong\u003e, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epunitive damages\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erelator\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein multi-million-dollar settlement\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecase involving\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraudulent small business subcontracting\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon military bases.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11939}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:53.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:53.000Z","searchable_text":"Hill{{ FIELD }}Representing an offshore drilling company relating to a dispute involving an international hydrocarbon project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a municipal utility in a dispute relating to the construction of a solar facility in North Texas.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former employee defrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a jury verdict of $15,618,873.47 in fraud damages and, after bifurcated trial, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in punitive damages.{{ FIELD }}Represented relator in multi-million-dollar settlement False Claims Act case involving fraudulent small business subcontracting on military bases.{{ FIELD }}Bobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, qui tam, and oil and gas disputes.  He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.  His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas.  In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\nFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.  He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn.  He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law.  \nBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society. \nBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\nHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.  Associate The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Texas American Bar Association Federal Bar Association Dallas Bar Association Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit Higginbotham Inn of Court, former Associate and Pupil NDTX Bench Bar Planning Committee Judicial Clerk, Patrick E. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Honorable Barbara Lynn, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Representing an offshore drilling company relating to a dispute involving an international hydrocarbon project. Representing a municipal utility in a dispute relating to the construction of a solar facility in North Texas. Represented a former employee defrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a jury verdict of $15,618,873.47 in fraud damages and, after bifurcated trial, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in punitive damages. Represented relator in multi-million-dollar settlement False Claims Act case involving fraudulent small business subcontracting on military bases.","searchable_name":"Bobby Hill","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}