{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"cg-2","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":427665,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1344,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"ehren-halse","email":"ehalse@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":19,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":20,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":21,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Halse","nick_name":"Ehren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ehren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5486}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Halse{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\\\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.{{ FIELD }}Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.{{ FIELD }}Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).{{ FIELD }}Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.{{ FIELD }}Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.{{ FIELD }}Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.{{ FIELD }}Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.{{ FIELD }}Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids.{{ FIELD }}Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.{{ FIELD }}Ehren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\n\nIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\nPublications\n\n“Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,” Financial Fraud Law Report, Gary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\n“FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,” The Compliance Reporter’s ‘Adopting Best Practice In Compliance’, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\n “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,” Bloomberg Law Reports, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\n Partner Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center California District of Columbia Maryland Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols. Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud. Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities. Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ). Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion. Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance. Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs. Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials. Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids. Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.","searchable_name":"Ehren Halse","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445483,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3538,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries\u0026mdash;both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt served nearly three years with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department\u0026rsquo;s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore his government service, Matt had\u0026nbsp;over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt\u0026rsquo;s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s work for clients in the digital assets space.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"matthew-hanson","email":"mhanson@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 202 417 1883","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCompanies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCongressional Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to \u0026ldquo;Big Tech\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFinancial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSenior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Justice Programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResponded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities and White-Collar Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTurnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBroker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTelecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVariety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Assets and Emerging Technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hanson","nick_name":"Matthew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"B.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-hanson-1286b516","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries\u0026mdash;both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt served nearly three years with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department\u0026rsquo;s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore his government service, Matt had\u0026nbsp;over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt\u0026rsquo;s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s work for clients in the digital assets space.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCompanies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCongressional Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to \u0026ldquo;Big Tech\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFinancial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSenior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Justice Programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResponded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities and White-Collar Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTurnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBroker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTelecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVariety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Assets and Emerging Technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12886}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-02T20:11:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-02T20:11:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Hanson{{ FIELD }}Companies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement{{ FIELD }}Companies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations{{ FIELD }}Multiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests{{ FIELD }}Companies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations{{ FIELD }}Congressional Investigations{{ FIELD }}Global technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to “Big Tech”{{ FIELD }}Global technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee{{ FIELD }}Financial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce{{ FIELD }}Senior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees{{ FIELD }}Prepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ’s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs{{ FIELD }}Responded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement{{ FIELD }}DOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP{{ FIELD }}Securities and White-Collar Investigations{{ FIELD }}Publicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud{{ FIELD }}Turnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees{{ FIELD }}Multinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures{{ FIELD }}Conducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws{{ FIELD }}Advised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules{{ FIELD }}Broker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades{{ FIELD }}Global technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues{{ FIELD }}Telecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation{{ FIELD }}Variety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation{{ FIELD }}Digital Assets and Emerging Technology{{ FIELD }}Digital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Served as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function{{ FIELD }}Provided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk{{ FIELD }}Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice. \nMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries—both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\nMatt served nearly three years with DOJ’s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ’s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department’s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\nBefore his government service, Matt had over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt’s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm’s work for clients in the digital assets space.\nBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets. Partner University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia American Bar Association Companies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement Companies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations Multiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests Companies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations Congressional Investigations Global technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to “Big Tech” Global technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee Financial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Senior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees Prepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ’s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs Responded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement DOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP Securities and White-Collar Investigations Publicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud Turnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees Multinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures Conducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws Advised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules Broker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades Global technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues Telecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation Variety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation Digital Assets and Emerging Technology Digital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation Served as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function Provided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk","searchable_name":"Matthew B. Hanson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442912,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1390,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTom Hawk specializes in healthcare mergers and acquisitions, other transactions, and regulatory compliance matters. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Tom represents health industry clients and financial institutions in a variety of transactions and related matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom counsels for-profit and tax-exempt health industry companies and investors, such as financial institutions, on transactions involving healthcare and life science businesses, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and general contracting issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom also advises health systems, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, pharmacy benefit managers, physicians and physician organizations, and managed care organizations, on an array of federal and state regulatory matters. These include navigating changes caused by healthcare reform; fraud and abuse compliance; False Claims Act issues; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and state health information privacy laws; Stark Law compliance; accountable care organization formation; managed care contracting; and various certificate of need issues.\u0026nbsp; Tom is ranked by CHAMBERS USA, the preeminent evaluator of lawyers and law firm practices.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"thomas-hawk","email":"thawk@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":75}]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hawk","nick_name":"Tom","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Thomas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"III","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/thomashawkiii/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTom Hawk specializes in healthcare mergers and acquisitions, other transactions, and regulatory compliance matters. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Tom represents health industry clients and financial institutions in a variety of transactions and related matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom counsels for-profit and tax-exempt health industry companies and investors, such as financial institutions, on transactions involving healthcare and life science businesses, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and general contracting issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom also advises health systems, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, pharmacy benefit managers, physicians and physician organizations, and managed care organizations, on an array of federal and state regulatory matters. These include navigating changes caused by healthcare reform; fraud and abuse compliance; False Claims Act issues; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and state health information privacy laws; Stark Law compliance; accountable care organization formation; managed care contracting; and various certificate of need issues.\u0026nbsp; Tom is ranked by CHAMBERS USA, the preeminent evaluator of lawyers and law firm practices.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11842}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-14T21:14:48.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-14T21:14:48.000Z","searchable_text":"Hawk{{ FIELD }}Tom Hawk specializes in healthcare mergers and acquisitions, other transactions, and regulatory compliance matters. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Tom represents health industry clients and financial institutions in a variety of transactions and related matters.\nTom counsels for-profit and tax-exempt health industry companies and investors, such as financial institutions, on transactions involving healthcare and life science businesses, including mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and general contracting issues.\nTom also advises health systems, hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, pharmacy benefit managers, physicians and physician organizations, and managed care organizations, on an array of federal and state regulatory matters. These include navigating changes caused by healthcare reform; fraud and abuse compliance; False Claims Act issues; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and state health information privacy laws; Stark Law compliance; accountable care organization formation; managed care contracting; and various certificate of need issues.  Tom is ranked by CHAMBERS USA, the preeminent evaluator of lawyers and law firm practices. Thomas H Hawk Partner Wake Forest University Wake Forest University School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia State Bar of Georgia American Bar Association; American Health Lawyers Association; Georgia Academy of Healthcare Attorneys (Board of Directors)","searchable_name":"Thomas H. Hawk III (Tom)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442778,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5430,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmanda Hayes-Kibreab specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution on behalf of providers, with an emphasis on managed care litigation. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Amanda applies a practical and creative approach to her matters to achieve favorable results for her clients.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a healthcare litigator, Amanda has extensive experience managing large multi-party, multi-million dollar disputes, litigating business contract and tort disputes, prosecuting and defending actions brought by large healthcare payors against hospital providers, heading up international white collar crime investigations for global healthcare device manufacturers, and providing advice on healthcare law and reform topics. She represents hospitals and hospital systems, provider groups, surgery centers, individual physicians, and other healthcare entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda advises clients on the full scope of health care law including the Affordable Care Act, Covered California\u0026rsquo;s health care exchange, Sequestration, California\u0026rsquo;s Health and Safety Code, the Knox Keene Act, the False Claims Act, Employment Law, ERISA litigation, RICO actions, HIPAA, Healthcare Reform, and numerous other substantive areas relevant to our clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe regularly appears in federal and state trial and appellate courts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in various types of commercial litigation actions including contract disputes, commercial torts, unfair business practices, fraud allegations, real estate disputes, intellectual property disputes, and real estate disputes. She has extensive experience successfully defending hospitals from class action lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExperienced in white-collar criminal defense, Amanda has conducted numerous internal investigations to analyze potential violations of federal and state laws for corporations under investigation by the government or to evaluate possible voluntary disclosure.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda is a member of the healthcare law section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the California Society of Healthcare Attorneys, and the American Health Lawyers Association. She was named a Southern California Super Lawyer in 2018.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amanda-hayes-kibreab","email":"ahayes-kibreab@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented hospital systems in challenging sequestration pass through cuts by Medicare Advantage plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented hospital system in managed care contract dispute with national payor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client hospitals in a number of disputes with payors relating to non-contracted (out-of-network) claims, resulting in collections of more than $10 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client physical therapy provider in a dispute and negotiations with a payor, resulting in a new provider agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented global healthcare device manufacture in conducting worldwide internal investigation into practices under investigation by the U.S. government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented international product manufacturer in dispute with destination port and shipping company over mishandling of product shipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client medical group in contractual dispute with hospital.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":740,"guid":"740.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1187,"guid":"1187.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hayes-Kibreab","nick_name":"Amanda","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amanda","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2162,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2002-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"L.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyer","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Southern California Rising Stars","detail":"Super Lawyers Magazine 2013, 2015 and 2016"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/amanda-hayes-kibreab-60375474/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmanda Hayes-Kibreab specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution on behalf of providers, with an emphasis on managed care litigation. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Amanda applies a practical and creative approach to her matters to achieve favorable results for her clients.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a healthcare litigator, Amanda has extensive experience managing large multi-party, multi-million dollar disputes, litigating business contract and tort disputes, prosecuting and defending actions brought by large healthcare payors against hospital providers, heading up international white collar crime investigations for global healthcare device manufacturers, and providing advice on healthcare law and reform topics. She represents hospitals and hospital systems, provider groups, surgery centers, individual physicians, and other healthcare entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda advises clients on the full scope of health care law including the Affordable Care Act, Covered California\u0026rsquo;s health care exchange, Sequestration, California\u0026rsquo;s Health and Safety Code, the Knox Keene Act, the False Claims Act, Employment Law, ERISA litigation, RICO actions, HIPAA, Healthcare Reform, and numerous other substantive areas relevant to our clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe regularly appears in federal and state trial and appellate courts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in various types of commercial litigation actions including contract disputes, commercial torts, unfair business practices, fraud allegations, real estate disputes, intellectual property disputes, and real estate disputes. She has extensive experience successfully defending hospitals from class action lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eExperienced in white-collar criminal defense, Amanda has conducted numerous internal investigations to analyze potential violations of federal and state laws for corporations under investigation by the government or to evaluate possible voluntary disclosure.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda is a member of the healthcare law section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the California Society of Healthcare Attorneys, and the American Health Lawyers Association. She was named a Southern California Super Lawyer in 2018.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented hospital systems in challenging sequestration pass through cuts by Medicare Advantage plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented hospital system in managed care contract dispute with national payor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client hospitals in a number of disputes with payors relating to non-contracted (out-of-network) claims, resulting in collections of more than $10 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client physical therapy provider in a dispute and negotiations with a payor, resulting in a new provider agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented global healthcare device manufacture in conducting worldwide internal investigation into practices under investigation by the U.S. government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented international product manufacturer in dispute with destination port and shipping company over mishandling of product shipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented client medical group in contractual dispute with hospital.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyer","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Southern California Rising Stars","detail":"Super Lawyers Magazine 2013, 2015 and 2016"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12958}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:57.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:57.000Z","searchable_text":"Hayes-Kibreab{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Southern California Super Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Southern California Rising Stars\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers Magazine 2013, 2015 and 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented hospital systems in challenging sequestration pass through cuts by Medicare Advantage plans.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented hospital system in managed care contract dispute with national payor.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented client hospitals in a number of disputes with payors relating to non-contracted (out-of-network) claims, resulting in collections of more than $10 million.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented client physical therapy provider in a dispute and negotiations with a payor, resulting in a new provider agreement.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented global healthcare device manufacture in conducting worldwide internal investigation into practices under investigation by the U.S. government.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented international product manufacturer in dispute with destination port and shipping company over mishandling of product shipment.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented client medical group in contractual dispute with hospital.{{ FIELD }}Amanda Hayes-Kibreab specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration and dispute resolution on behalf of providers, with an emphasis on managed care litigation. As a partner in our Healthcare practice, Amanda applies a practical and creative approach to her matters to achieve favorable results for her clients.\nAs a healthcare litigator, Amanda has extensive experience managing large multi-party, multi-million dollar disputes, litigating business contract and tort disputes, prosecuting and defending actions brought by large healthcare payors against hospital providers, heading up international white collar crime investigations for global healthcare device manufacturers, and providing advice on healthcare law and reform topics. She represents hospitals and hospital systems, provider groups, surgery centers, individual physicians, and other healthcare entities.\nAmanda advises clients on the full scope of health care law including the Affordable Care Act, Covered California’s health care exchange, Sequestration, California’s Health and Safety Code, the Knox Keene Act, the False Claims Act, Employment Law, ERISA litigation, RICO actions, HIPAA, Healthcare Reform, and numerous other substantive areas relevant to our clients.\nShe regularly appears in federal and state trial and appellate courts on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in various types of commercial litigation actions including contract disputes, commercial torts, unfair business practices, fraud allegations, real estate disputes, intellectual property disputes, and real estate disputes. She has extensive experience successfully defending hospitals from class action lawsuits.\nExperienced in white-collar criminal defense, Amanda has conducted numerous internal investigations to analyze potential violations of federal and state laws for corporations under investigation by the government or to evaluate possible voluntary disclosure.\nAmanda is a member of the healthcare law section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association, the California Society of Healthcare Attorneys, and the American Health Lawyers Association. She was named a Southern California Super Lawyer in 2018.   Partner Southern California Super Lawyer 2018 Southern California Rising Stars Super Lawyers Magazine 2013, 2015 and 2016 University of Southern California USC Gould School of Law University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law California American Health Lawyers Association Healthcare Financial Management Association California Society of Healthcare Attorneys Los Angeles County Bar Association, Member, Health Care Section Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Successfully represented hospital systems in challenging sequestration pass through cuts by Medicare Advantage plans. Successfully represented hospital system in managed care contract dispute with national payor. Successfully represented client hospitals in a number of disputes with payors relating to non-contracted (out-of-network) claims, resulting in collections of more than $10 million. Successfully represented client physical therapy provider in a dispute and negotiations with a payor, resulting in a new provider agreement. Successfully represented global healthcare device manufacture in conducting worldwide internal investigation into practices under investigation by the U.S. government. Successfully represented international product manufacturer in dispute with destination port and shipping company over mishandling of product shipment. Successfully represented client medical group in contractual dispute with hospital.","searchable_name":"Amanda L. Hayes-Kibreab","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447512,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5644,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKarl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003edistinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\"\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;\"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and\u0026nbsp;\"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute.\u0026nbsp;He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management\u003c/em\u003e, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also\u0026nbsp;dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications.\u0026nbsp;He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"karl-heisler","email":"kheisler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Air Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Water Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eUnited States v. United Water Services\u003c/em\u003e, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eResource Conservation and Recovery Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGarrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining\u003c/em\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-style: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e and \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecovery, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(S.D. Ohio 2023)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eFederal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMaritime\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWorkplace Safety\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExtended Producer Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR\u0026nbsp;laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR\u0026nbsp;programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant\u0026rsquo;s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state\u0026nbsp;EPR laws throughout the Midwest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Transactions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1488,"guid":"1488.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1508,"guid":"1508.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1269,"guid":"1269.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Heisler","nick_name":"Karl","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Karl","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Editorial Board, Virginia Journal of International Law","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2002-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer","detail":"Lawdragon (2026)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026 Safety","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)"},{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental","detail":"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner","detail":"Benchmark Litigation (2016)"},{"title":"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Super Lawyers (2013)"},{"title":"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental","detail":"Law360 (2013)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKarl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003edistinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\"\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;\"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and\u0026nbsp;\"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute.\u0026nbsp;He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management\u003c/em\u003e, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also\u0026nbsp;dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications.\u0026nbsp;He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Air Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Water Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eUnited States v. United Water Services\u003c/em\u003e, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eResource Conservation and Recovery Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGarrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining\u003c/em\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-style: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e and \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecovery, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(S.D. Ohio 2023)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eFederal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMaritime\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWorkplace Safety\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExtended Producer Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR\u0026nbsp;laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR\u0026nbsp;programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant\u0026rsquo;s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state\u0026nbsp;EPR laws throughout the Midwest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Transactions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer","detail":"Lawdragon (2026)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026 Safety","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)"},{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental","detail":"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner","detail":"Benchmark Litigation (2016)"},{"title":"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Super Lawyers (2013)"},{"title":"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental","detail":"Law360 (2013)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7343},{"id":7343}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-04-14T14:46:19.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-14T14:46:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Heisler{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon (2026)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026amp; Safety\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation (2016)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers (2013)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 (2013)\"}{{ FIELD }}Clean Air Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida{{ FIELD }}Clean Water Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges{{ FIELD }}Representation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico{{ FIELD }}Representation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County{{ FIELD }}Representation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in United States v. United Water Services, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012){{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast{{ FIELD }}Resource Conservation and Recovery Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit{{ FIELD }}Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc., et al. (S.D. Ohio 2023){{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling{{ FIELD }}Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program{{ FIELD }}Representation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns{{ FIELD }}Maritime{{ FIELD }}Representation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book{{ FIELD }}Workplace Safety{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world’s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world{{ FIELD }}Extended Producer Responsibility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws{{ FIELD }}Representation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging{{ FIELD }}Representation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs{{ FIELD }}Representation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant’s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state EPR laws throughout the Midwest{{ FIELD }}Provide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims{{ FIELD }}Environmental Transactions{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions{{ FIELD }}Representation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property{{ FIELD }}Karl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\nChambers USA distinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\" with \"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\" Legal 500 USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and \"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" Lawdragon recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\" Benchmark Litigation recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"  \nAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute. He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for Inside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of Environmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\nKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications. He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\nHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\n  Partner Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer Lawdragon (2026) Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026amp; Safety Chambers USA (2024) Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year Chambers USA (2024) Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois Chambers USA (2024 - 2025) Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025) Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025) Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner Benchmark Litigation (2016) Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C.  Super Lawyers (2013) Law360 Rising Star - Environmental Law360 (2013) University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Illinois Virginia Illinois State Bar Association ABA, Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources and Criminal Justice Section District of Columbia Bar, Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Section The Chicago Bar Association Clean Air Act Representation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis Representation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents Representation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida Clean Water Act Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges Representation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico Representation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County Representation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines Representation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in United States v. United Water Services, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012) Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico Representation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel Representation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste Representation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc., et al. (S.D. Ohio 2023) Representation of one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program Representation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns Maritime Representation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book Workplace Safety Representation of one of the world’s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world Extended Producer Responsibility Representation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams Representation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws Representation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging Representation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging Representation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware Representation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs Representation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant’s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state EPR laws throughout the Midwest Provide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims Environmental Transactions Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations Representation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions Representation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property","searchable_name":"Karl R. Heisler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6966,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charly-helleputte","email":"chelleputte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1220,"guid":"1220.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Helleputte","nick_name":"Charly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-albert-charly-helleputte-a103931/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12700}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Helleputte{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *{{ FIELD }}Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. *{{ FIELD }}Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *{{ FIELD }}From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. *{{ FIELD }}Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *{{ FIELD }}Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *{{ FIELD }}Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *{{ FIELD }}Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *{{ FIELD }}Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *{{ FIELD }}Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *{{ FIELD }}Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *{{ FIELD }}Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *{{ FIELD }}Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. * {{ FIELD }}Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Charly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks—such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR—is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.\nCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\nBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus). Partner Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium 2019 Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Candidat en Droit  Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit  Solvay Business School  Paris Brussels European Advisory Board Member, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) ENISA, the European Union Cybersecurity Agency American Chamber in Europe (AmCham), EU chapter W@Privacy Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. * Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. * Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. * Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. * Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. * Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. * Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. * From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. * Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. * Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. * Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. * Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. * Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. * Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. * Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. * Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. * Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. * Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. * Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. * Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. * Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. * Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. * Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. * Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. * Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. * Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. * Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. * Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. * Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. * Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. * Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. * Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. * Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. * Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *  Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.","searchable_name":"Charly Helleputte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426401,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3250,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJo\u0026euml;lle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.\u0026nbsp; She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.\u0026nbsp; She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.\u0026nbsp; Jo\u0026euml;lle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.\u0026nbsp; Her experience\u0026nbsp;encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.\u0026nbsp; She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joelle-herschtel","email":"jherschtel@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eHandling\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elitigation cases\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting clients with the implementation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edomestic and European environmental regulations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindustrial activity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Jo\u0026euml;lle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting companies in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindustrial or infrastructure projects,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipating in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eM\u0026amp;A and real estate operations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(environmental warranties and audits).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":68}]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1508,"guid":"1508.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Herschtel","nick_name":"Joëlle","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Joëlle","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism","detail":"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016"},{"title":"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France","detail":"Chambers Europe, 2020"},{"title":"Ranked in the EMEA guide ","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJo\u0026euml;lle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.\u0026nbsp; She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.\u0026nbsp; She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.\u0026nbsp; Jo\u0026euml;lle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.\u0026nbsp; Her experience\u0026nbsp;encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.\u0026nbsp; She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eHandling\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elitigation cases\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting clients with the implementation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edomestic and European environmental regulations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindustrial activity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Jo\u0026euml;lle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting companies in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindustrial or infrastructure projects,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipating in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eM\u0026amp;A and real estate operations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(environmental warranties and audits).\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism","detail":"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016"},{"title":"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France","detail":"Chambers Europe, 2020"},{"title":"Ranked in the EMEA guide ","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12227}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Herschtel{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Europe, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in the EMEA guide \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Handling litigation cases before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).{{ FIELD }}Assisting clients with the implementation of domestic and European environmental regulations ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).{{ FIELD }}Advising clients in industrial activity closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Joëlle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.{{ FIELD }}Assisting companies in industrial or infrastructure projects, from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).{{ FIELD }}Participating in M\u0026amp;A and real estate operations (environmental warranties and audits).{{ FIELD }}Joëlle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.  She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.  She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.  Joëlle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.  Her experience encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.  She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits. Joëlle Herschtel Partner Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020 Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016 Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France Chambers Europe, 2020 Ranked in the EMEA guide  Legal 500, 2020 University of Paris X - Nanterre, France  Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris  Paris Bar Handling litigation cases before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances). Assisting clients with the implementation of domestic and European environmental regulations ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials). Advising clients in industrial activity closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Joëlle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource. Assisting companies in industrial or infrastructure projects, from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation). Participating in M\u0026amp;A and real estate operations (environmental warranties and audits).","searchable_name":"Joëlle Herschtel","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442315,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":40,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTed Hester, senior partner in our Government Advocacy practice, represents organizations being investigated by congressional committees and counsels businesses on crisis management. Quoting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026ldquo;\u0026lsquo;a deliberate, careful and creative thinker,\u0026rsquo; Ted Hester draws praise for his attention to detail and impressive grasp of the legal, business, political and public relations implications of situations.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTed has represented a wide variety of clients that have received inquiries from Congress, including a number of investigations that have required the preparation and defense of corporate executives testifying before Congressional committees. His clients have included leading pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, financial institutions, accounting and consulting firms, oil industry and telecommunications companies, sports national governing bodies, automobile manufacturers and a major utility holding company. He gives advice and consultation to clients on working with Congress and government agencies. More broadly, he helps clients prepare for and manage corporate crises, including crisis communications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;describes King \u0026amp; Spalding as \u0026ldquo;particularly prominent in the field of Congressional Investigations\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;always \u0026lsquo;spot on in its strategic advice.\u0026rsquo;\u0026rdquo; Ted has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as \u0026ldquo;one of the foremost congressional investigations experts in the market.\u0026rdquo; Quoting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e: \"He draws praise for his strategic nous, with clients commenting: \"He is phenomenal. He is fair, reasonable, compassionate, and incredibly pleasant, in addition to being intelligent, strategic and well-versed in the applicable subject matter.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTed has been recognized annually by both\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;since 2008.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"theodore-hester","email":"thester@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyota\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and hearings by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee relating to allegations of unintended acceleration and recalls of certain vehicles with Takata air bag inflators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel with respect to congressional drug pricing investigations to leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epreeminent industry consultant\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal electronics manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional interest in safety recalls of its product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enumerous pharmaceutical and medical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before multiple House and Senate committees in connection with investigations relating to the interaction of these companies with the FDA in the drug and device approval process, the disclosure by those companies of clinical trial data, their release of product performance data, their marketing practices, including drug pricing issues, off label use, direct-to-consumer advertising, and sampling programs, and their relationships with physicians, professional organizations and academic institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethree sports national governing bodies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in congressional investigations relating to allegations of sexual abuse.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea national governing body\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a House Oversight Committee investigation of its tax exempt status.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading oil producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its interaction with Congress relating to its response to a major oil spill at a deep water drilling site.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor utility holding company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee of allegations of conflicts of interest between an industry association and an Executive agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading telecommunications\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecompanies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional inquiries regarding the diverse issues of foreign intelligence surveillance and customer service issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Department of Agriculture\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a congressional investigation relating to the presence of salmonella in peanut butter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational pharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation relating to the safety of infant formula.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University\u0026rsquo;s handling of federal funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal consulting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigation of executive compensation practices, and a House Financial Services Committee hearing on federal oversight of insurance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealth insurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Commerce Committee investigation of out-of-network coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor government contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations of conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealthcare products manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation of active pharmaceutical ingredients imported from China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebeverage manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee inquiry relating to chemical or microbiological contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMedicare insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a request for information from the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Aging Committee regarding marketing practices in the Medicare Advantage program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enationwide retail grocery chain\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation of meat packaging.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations relating to the use of its products in V.A. hospitals by both the House and Senate Veterans\u0026rsquo; Affairs Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproperty casualty insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a House Financial Services Committee investigation about insurance coverage issues growing out of losses sustained from Hurricane Katrina.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor parcel carrier\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate\u0026rsquo;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations relating to the shipment of counterfeit or unsafe pharmaceuticals ordered over the internet.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePurdue Pharma\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with five separate congressional hearings and a two-year investigation by the Government Accountability Office on the abuse and diversion of the company's pain medication, OxyContin\u0026reg;.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBridgestone/Firestone, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in connection with congressional investigations into rollover accidents by both the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndependent Review Committee of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations of the Foundation and the National Park Service by the Senate Finance Committee and the Department of the Interior Inspector General.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of Medicare reimbursement issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Amateur Athletic Foundation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;the entity that organized Atlanta's bid for the 1996 Summer Olympic Games, before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in an investigation focused on the Olympic bid process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enation's leading supplier of flu vaccine\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to healthcare providers in an investigation relating to the distribution of flu vaccine.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":67}]},"expertise":[{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1097,"guid":"1097.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hester","nick_name":"Ted","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Theodore","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/ted-hester-54075864/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTed Hester, senior partner in our Government Advocacy practice, represents organizations being investigated by congressional committees and counsels businesses on crisis management. Quoting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, \u0026ldquo;\u0026lsquo;a deliberate, careful and creative thinker,\u0026rsquo; Ted Hester draws praise for his attention to detail and impressive grasp of the legal, business, political and public relations implications of situations.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTed has represented a wide variety of clients that have received inquiries from Congress, including a number of investigations that have required the preparation and defense of corporate executives testifying before Congressional committees. His clients have included leading pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, financial institutions, accounting and consulting firms, oil industry and telecommunications companies, sports national governing bodies, automobile manufacturers and a major utility holding company. He gives advice and consultation to clients on working with Congress and government agencies. More broadly, he helps clients prepare for and manage corporate crises, including crisis communications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;describes King \u0026amp; Spalding as \u0026ldquo;particularly prominent in the field of Congressional Investigations\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;always \u0026lsquo;spot on in its strategic advice.\u0026rsquo;\u0026rdquo; Ted has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as \u0026ldquo;one of the foremost congressional investigations experts in the market.\u0026rdquo; Quoting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e: \"He draws praise for his strategic nous, with clients commenting: \"He is phenomenal. He is fair, reasonable, compassionate, and incredibly pleasant, in addition to being intelligent, strategic and well-versed in the applicable subject matter.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTed has been recognized annually by both\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;since 2008.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyota\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and hearings by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee relating to allegations of unintended acceleration and recalls of certain vehicles with Takata air bag inflators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel with respect to congressional drug pricing investigations to leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epreeminent industry consultant\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal electronics manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional interest in safety recalls of its product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enumerous pharmaceutical and medical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before multiple House and Senate committees in connection with investigations relating to the interaction of these companies with the FDA in the drug and device approval process, the disclosure by those companies of clinical trial data, their release of product performance data, their marketing practices, including drug pricing issues, off label use, direct-to-consumer advertising, and sampling programs, and their relationships with physicians, professional organizations and academic institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethree sports national governing bodies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in congressional investigations relating to allegations of sexual abuse.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea national governing body\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a House Oversight Committee investigation of its tax exempt status.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading oil producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its interaction with Congress relating to its response to a major oil spill at a deep water drilling site.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor utility holding company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee of allegations of conflicts of interest between an industry association and an Executive agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading telecommunications\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecompanies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional inquiries regarding the diverse issues of foreign intelligence surveillance and customer service issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Department of Agriculture\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a congressional investigation relating to the presence of salmonella in peanut butter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational pharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation relating to the safety of infant formula.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University\u0026rsquo;s handling of federal funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal consulting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigation of executive compensation practices, and a House Financial Services Committee hearing on federal oversight of insurance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealth insurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Commerce Committee investigation of out-of-network coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor government contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations of conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealthcare products manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation of active pharmaceutical ingredients imported from China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebeverage manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee inquiry relating to chemical or microbiological contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMedicare insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a request for information from the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Aging Committee regarding marketing practices in the Medicare Advantage program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enationwide retail grocery chain\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation of meat packaging.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations relating to the use of its products in V.A. hospitals by both the House and Senate Veterans\u0026rsquo; Affairs Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproperty casualty insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a House Financial Services Committee investigation about insurance coverage issues growing out of losses sustained from Hurricane Katrina.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor parcel carrier\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate\u0026rsquo;s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations relating to the shipment of counterfeit or unsafe pharmaceuticals ordered over the internet.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePurdue Pharma\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with five separate congressional hearings and a two-year investigation by the Government Accountability Office on the abuse and diversion of the company's pain medication, OxyContin\u0026reg;.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBridgestone/Firestone, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in connection with congressional investigations into rollover accidents by both the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndependent Review Committee of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations of the Foundation and the National Park Service by the Senate Finance Committee and the Department of the Interior Inspector General.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of Medicare reimbursement issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Amateur Athletic Foundation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;the entity that organized Atlanta's bid for the 1996 Summer Olympic Games, before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in an investigation focused on the Olympic bid process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enation's leading supplier of flu vaccine\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to healthcare providers in an investigation relating to the distribution of flu vaccine.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":911}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Hester{{ FIELD }}Representation of Toyota in investigations and hearings by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee relating to allegations of unintended acceleration and recalls of certain vehicles with Takata air bag inflators.{{ FIELD }}Provide advice and counsel with respect to congressional drug pricing investigations to leading pharmaceutical manufacturers and a preeminent industry consultant.{{ FIELD }}Provide advice and counsel to a global electronics manufacturer in connection with congressional interest in safety recalls of its product.{{ FIELD }}Represented numerous pharmaceutical and medical device companies before multiple House and Senate committees in connection with investigations relating to the interaction of these companies with the FDA in the drug and device approval process, the disclosure by those companies of clinical trial data, their release of product performance data, their marketing practices, including drug pricing issues, off label use, direct-to-consumer advertising, and sampling programs, and their relationships with physicians, professional organizations and academic institutions.{{ FIELD }}Represented three sports national governing bodies in congressional investigations relating to allegations of sexual abuse.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national governing body in a House Oversight Committee investigation of its tax exempt status.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading oil producer in its interaction with Congress relating to its response to a major oil spill at a deep water drilling site.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major utility holding company in an investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee of allegations of conflicts of interest between an industry association and an Executive agency.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global financial institution in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.{{ FIELD }}Represented leading telecommunications companies in connection with congressional inquiries regarding the diverse issues of foreign intelligence surveillance and customer service issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Georgia Department of Agriculture in a congressional investigation relating to the presence of salmonella in peanut butter.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational pharmaceutical manufacturer in a House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation relating to the safety of infant formula.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Big Four accounting firm in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University’s handling of federal funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global consulting firm in connection with an Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigation of executive compensation practices, and a House Financial Services Committee hearing on federal oversight of insurance.{{ FIELD }}Represented a health insurer in a Senate Commerce Committee investigation of out-of-network coverage.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major government contractor in connection with investigations of conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.{{ FIELD }}Represented a healthcare products manufacturer in connection with an investigation of active pharmaceutical ingredients imported from China.{{ FIELD }}Represented a beverage manufacturer in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee inquiry relating to chemical or microbiological contamination.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Medicare insurance company in connection with a request for information from the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Aging Committee regarding marketing practices in the Medicare Advantage program.{{ FIELD }}Represented a nationwide retail grocery chain in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation of meat packaging.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in investigations relating to the use of its products in V.A. hospitals by both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.{{ FIELD }}Represented a property casualty insurance company in connection with a House Financial Services Committee investigation about insurance coverage issues growing out of losses sustained from Hurricane Katrina.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major parcel carrier before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations relating to the shipment of counterfeit or unsafe pharmaceuticals ordered over the internet.{{ FIELD }}Represented Purdue Pharma in connection with five separate congressional hearings and a two-year investigation by the Government Accountability Office on the abuse and diversion of the company's pain medication, OxyContin®.{{ FIELD }}Represented Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. in connection with congressional investigations into rollover accidents by both the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Independent Review Committee of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation in connection with investigations of the Foundation and the National Park Service by the Senate Finance Committee and the Department of the Interior Inspector General.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of Medicare reimbursement issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Georgia Amateur Athletic Foundation, the entity that organized Atlanta's bid for the 1996 Summer Olympic Games, before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in an investigation focused on the Olympic bid process.{{ FIELD }}Represented the nation's leading supplier of flu vaccine to healthcare providers in an investigation relating to the distribution of flu vaccine.{{ FIELD }}Ted Hester, senior partner in our Government Advocacy practice, represents organizations being investigated by congressional committees and counsels businesses on crisis management. Quoting Chambers USA, “‘a deliberate, careful and creative thinker,’ Ted Hester draws praise for his attention to detail and impressive grasp of the legal, business, political and public relations implications of situations.”\nTed has represented a wide variety of clients that have received inquiries from Congress, including a number of investigations that have required the preparation and defense of corporate executives testifying before Congressional committees. His clients have included leading pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, financial institutions, accounting and consulting firms, oil industry and telecommunications companies, sports national governing bodies, automobile manufacturers and a major utility holding company. He gives advice and consultation to clients on working with Congress and government agencies. More broadly, he helps clients prepare for and manage corporate crises, including crisis communications.\nChambers USA describes King \u0026amp; Spalding as “particularly prominent in the field of Congressional Investigations” and “always ‘spot on in its strategic advice.’” Ted has been recognized by Chambers USA as “one of the foremost congressional investigations experts in the market.” Quoting Chambers USA: \"He draws praise for his strategic nous, with clients commenting: \"He is phenomenal. He is fair, reasonable, compassionate, and incredibly pleasant, in addition to being intelligent, strategic and well-versed in the applicable subject matter.”\nTed has been recognized annually by both Chambers USA and The Best Lawyers in America since 2008. Theodore M Hester Partner University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School District of Columbia Georgia American Bar Association District of Columbia Bar Board of Directors, Ethics Resource Center Board of Directors, Children's National Medical Center State Bar of Georgia (Out-of-State Representative, Board of Governors, 1991-1997 and President, Younger Lawyers Section, 1978-1979) National Association of Bond Lawyers (President, 1989-1990) Representation of Toyota in investigations and hearings by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee relating to allegations of unintended acceleration and recalls of certain vehicles with Takata air bag inflators. Provide advice and counsel with respect to congressional drug pricing investigations to leading pharmaceutical manufacturers and a preeminent industry consultant. Provide advice and counsel to a global electronics manufacturer in connection with congressional interest in safety recalls of its product. Represented numerous pharmaceutical and medical device companies before multiple House and Senate committees in connection with investigations relating to the interaction of these companies with the FDA in the drug and device approval process, the disclosure by those companies of clinical trial data, their release of product performance data, their marketing practices, including drug pricing issues, off label use, direct-to-consumer advertising, and sampling programs, and their relationships with physicians, professional organizations and academic institutions. Represented three sports national governing bodies in congressional investigations relating to allegations of sexual abuse. Represented a national governing body in a House Oversight Committee investigation of its tax exempt status. Represented a leading oil producer in its interaction with Congress relating to its response to a major oil spill at a deep water drilling site. Represented a major utility holding company in an investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee of allegations of conflicts of interest between an industry association and an Executive agency. Represented a global financial institution in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters. Represented leading telecommunications companies in connection with congressional inquiries regarding the diverse issues of foreign intelligence surveillance and customer service issues. Represented the Georgia Department of Agriculture in a congressional investigation relating to the presence of salmonella in peanut butter. Represented a multinational pharmaceutical manufacturer in a House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation relating to the safety of infant formula. Represented a Big Four accounting firm in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University’s handling of federal funds. Represented a global consulting firm in connection with an Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigation of executive compensation practices, and a House Financial Services Committee hearing on federal oversight of insurance. Represented a health insurer in a Senate Commerce Committee investigation of out-of-network coverage. Represented a major government contractor in connection with investigations of conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. Represented a healthcare products manufacturer in connection with an investigation of active pharmaceutical ingredients imported from China. Represented a beverage manufacturer in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee inquiry relating to chemical or microbiological contamination. Represented a Medicare insurance company in connection with a request for information from the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Aging Committee regarding marketing practices in the Medicare Advantage program. Represented a nationwide retail grocery chain in an Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee investigation of meat packaging. Represented a medical device manufacturer in investigations relating to the use of its products in V.A. hospitals by both the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees. Represented a property casualty insurance company in connection with a House Financial Services Committee investigation about insurance coverage issues growing out of losses sustained from Hurricane Katrina. Represented a major parcel carrier before the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations relating to the shipment of counterfeit or unsafe pharmaceuticals ordered over the internet. Represented Purdue Pharma in connection with five separate congressional hearings and a two-year investigation by the Government Accountability Office on the abuse and diversion of the company's pain medication, OxyContin®. Represented Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. in connection with congressional investigations into rollover accidents by both the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee. Represented the Independent Review Committee of the Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation in connection with investigations of the Foundation and the National Park Service by the Senate Finance Committee and the Department of the Interior Inspector General. Represented a medical device manufacturer in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of Medicare reimbursement issues. Represented the Georgia Amateur Athletic Foundation, the entity that organized Atlanta's bid for the 1996 Summer Olympic Games, before the House Energy and Commerce Committee in an investigation focused on the Olympic bid process. Represented the nation's leading supplier of flu vaccine to healthcare providers in an investigation relating to the distribution of flu vaccine.","searchable_name":"Theodore M. Hester (Ted)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436370,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2445,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Hettich is a\u0026nbsp;partner\u0026nbsp; with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.\u0026nbsp; He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims \u0026ndash; with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in\u0026nbsp;Federal court under standards created by the APA.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in \u003cem\u003eEmpire Health v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients. \u0026nbsp;In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan completed his six-year term\u0026nbsp;as \u0026nbsp;Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-hettich","email":"dhettich@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hettich","nick_name":"Dan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Band 3","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"ABA Fellows","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"The Legal500 NextGeneration","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40","detail":"Law360, 2016 and 2015"},{"title":"Top Litigator under 40 ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018"},{"title":"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law ","detail":"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Hettich is a\u0026nbsp;partner\u0026nbsp; with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.\u0026nbsp; He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims \u0026ndash; with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in\u0026nbsp;Federal court under standards created by the APA.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in \u003cem\u003eEmpire Health v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients. \u0026nbsp;In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan completed his six-year term\u0026nbsp;as \u0026nbsp;Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Band 3","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"ABA Fellows","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"The Legal500 NextGeneration","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40","detail":"Law360, 2016 and 2015"},{"title":"Top Litigator under 40 ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018"},{"title":"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law ","detail":"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":912}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:50:56.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:50:56.000Z","searchable_text":"Hettich{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Band 3\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers \u0026amp; Partners\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"ABA Fellows\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Bar Association\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Legal500 NextGeneration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2016 and 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Litigator under 40 \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013\"}{{ FIELD }}Dan Hettich is a partner  with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.  He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims – with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in Federal court under standards created by the APA.\nDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in Empire Health v. Becerra where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients.  In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit’s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\nIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\nDan completed his six-year term as  Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\nDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation’s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\nDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics. Partner Chambers Band 3 Chambers \u0026amp; Partners ABA Fellows American Bar Association The Legal500 NextGeneration Legal 500 Top U.S. Lawyers under 40 Law360, 2016 and 2015 Top Litigator under 40  Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018 Pro Bono Champion: Health Law  American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013 Fordham University Fordham University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia New Jersey New York American Bar Association, Health Law Section American Health Lawyers Association Georgetown University Hospital's Ethics Committee Fellow, American Bar Foundation, 2017","searchable_name":"Daniel J. Hettich (Dan)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442846,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5950,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-hill","email":"bhill@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3189}]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hill","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2224,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Brian is a partner in King \u0026 Spalding’s international trade group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8877}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Hill{{ FIELD }}Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology{{ FIELD }}Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology{{ FIELD }}Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine{{ FIELD }}Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.{{ FIELD }}K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint{{ FIELD }}Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung{{ FIELD }}Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity{{ FIELD }}Brian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.  By focusing on clients’ key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases. \nBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\nBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a “Next Generation Partner” by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\nFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others. In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\nBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.  Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.  Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC. Brian Hill lawyer Partner University of Delaware  University of Maryland-Baltimore University of Maryland School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey District of Columbia New Jersey New York International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc. K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity","searchable_name":"Brian Hill","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427003,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6073,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Schuller Hitchcock\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.\u0026nbsp; Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner\u0026nbsp;in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S.\u0026nbsp;Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors\u0026nbsp;successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.\u0026nbsp; Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.\u0026nbsp; She served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.\u0026nbsp; Amy also served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state\u0026rsquo;s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.\u0026nbsp; She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amy-hitchcock","email":"ahitchcock@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 916 541 1588","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWith former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Soccer Federation\u003c/strong\u003e. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServes as Fraud Special Counsel\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eappointed by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOffice of the California Governor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation\u0026rsquo;s findings and recommendations were deemed a \u0026ldquo;game-changer\u0026rdquo; by compliance and ethics leadership.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational eCommerce retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea multi-state health system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental regulatory action\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to insider threats and data incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hitchcock","nick_name":"Amy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2005-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Schuller","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Special Achievement Team Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/amy-schuller-hitchcock-9b319715/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Schuller Hitchcock\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.\u0026nbsp; Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner\u0026nbsp;in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S.\u0026nbsp;Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors\u0026nbsp;successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.\u0026nbsp; Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.\u0026nbsp; She served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.\u0026nbsp; Amy also served as the Eastern District of California\u0026rsquo;s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state\u0026rsquo;s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.\u0026nbsp; She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWith former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Soccer Federation\u003c/strong\u003e. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServes as Fraud Special Counsel\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eappointed by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOffice of the California Governor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation\u0026rsquo;s findings and recommendations were deemed a \u0026ldquo;game-changer\u0026rdquo; by compliance and ethics leadership.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational eCommerce retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea multi-state health system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental regulatory action\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to insider threats and data incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Special Achievement Team Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9168}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:13.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:13.000Z","searchable_text":"Hitchcock{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2020 Special Achievement Team Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General\"}{{ FIELD }}With former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport.{{ FIELD }}Serves as Fraud Special Counsel appointed by the Office of the California Governor to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments.{{ FIELD }}Conducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a major retailer, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation’s findings and recommendations were deemed a “game-changer” by compliance and ethics leadership.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a multinational eCommerce retailer and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major retailer in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys.{{ FIELD }}Representing a multi-state health system in environmental regulatory action jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices.{{ FIELD }}Advising one of the world’s largest technology companies responding to insider threats and data incidents.{{ FIELD }}Advising multiple clients on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material.{{ FIELD }}Represented technology company responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.{{ FIELD }}Amy Schuller Hitchcock’s practice focuses on internal investigations, government investigations, compliance counseling, and complex white-collar criminal defense.  Amy joins King \u0026amp; Spalding as a Partner in its Special Matters and Government Investigations practice after serving as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Eastern District of California, experience that she leverages to help clients across sectors successfully navigate, resolve, and prevent criminal matters.  Amy also has extensive experience conducting cross-border internal investigations and compliance counseling for multinational corporations.   \nAs an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Amy investigated and prosecuted federal offenses including fraud, tax violations, cybercrime, and public corruption.  She served as the Eastern District of California’s Elder Justice Coordinator, implementing the DOJ’s national initiative to combat financial abuse and fraud against elders.  Amy also served as the Eastern District of California’s Unemployment Insurance Fraud Coordinator, where she had a central role in coordinating the District and state’s efforts to combat Pandemic Unemployment Assistance fraud and CARES Act fraud.  She recently received recognition from the U.S. Department of Labor for her achievements.\nPrior to her government service, Amy conducted international and domestic internal investigations for multinational corporations, including investigations in Asia, Africa, South America, Canada, and the European Union. She also defended individuals and corporations in a variety of criminal matters, with a particular focus on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and criminal antitrust matters. Partner 2020 Special Achievement Team Award U.S. Department of Labor Inspector General Dartmouth College  University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California With former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, conducted an independent investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The widely-publicized investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations which lead to systemic change across the sport. Serves as Fraud Special Counsel appointed by the Office of the California Governor to address and combat pandemic benefit fraud perpetrated on the California Employment Development Department. Our work and coordination with federal, state, and local authorities has facilitated the prosecution of dozens of cases and helped recover billions in fraudulently-obtained unemployment insurance payments. Conducted a large-scale internal investigation into corporate bribery and conflicts of interest for a major retailer, consulting on parallel vendor litigation. The investigation’s findings and recommendations were deemed a “game-changer” by compliance and ethics leadership. Conducted an internal investigation into whistleblower allegations for a multinational eCommerce retailer and responded to subsequent OSHA complaint, resulting in dismissal of the claim by OSHA. Representing a major retailer in consumer protection investigation jointly brought by multiple California District Attorneys. Representing a multi-state health system in environmental regulatory action jointly brought by the California Attorney General and multiple California District Attorneys offices. Advising one of the world’s largest technology companies responding to insider threats and data incidents. Advising multiple clients on referrals to law enforcement in issues ranging from trade secret theft, to fraud, to online child exploitation material. Represented technology company responding to various congressional investigations, including inquiries by the House Judiciary Committee and House Select Committee.","searchable_name":"Amy Schuller Hitchcock","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":435804,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7225,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience\u0026mdash;including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)\u0026mdash;David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government\u0026rsquo;s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers\u0026mdash;turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-hoskins","email":"dhoskins@kslaw.com ","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hoskins","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":176,"law_schools":[{"id":3042,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1999-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). ","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)","detail":" 2007"},{"title":"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award ","detail":"multiple awards"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience\u0026mdash;including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)\u0026mdash;David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government\u0026rsquo;s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers\u0026mdash;turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). ","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)","detail":" 2007"},{"title":"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award ","detail":"multiple awards"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12973}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-08-27T16:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-08-27T16:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Hoskins{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" 2007\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"multiple awards\"}{{ FIELD }}David Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience—including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)—David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.\nDavid’s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government’s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers—turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\nIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\nDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\nBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\nDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage. Partner Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.).  2012 Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team 2012 Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)  2007 Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award  multiple awards University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law District of Columbia","searchable_name":"David Hoskins","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":176,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}