{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"71","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":null,"per_page":12,"people":[{"id":444836,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3981,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eErich represents energy industry clients in high-stakes commercial disputes and torts in the areas of construction and engineering, decommissioning, oil and gas royalties, environmental justice, and personal injury and property damage matters. He also represents mineral lessees and operators in disputes before federal agencies relating to decommissioning and oil and gas royalties and provides pre-litigation counseling on contractual risk allocation and compliance with Department of the Interior regulations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErich has experience in large-scale, multiparty litigation, as well as in individual actions. He practices in numerous jurisdictions, representing clients in all aspects of litigation across the country. Erich has represented public and private companies in a broad range of disputes in arbitration and federal and state court relating to breach of contract, trade secrets, securities, and RICO violations and provided litigation risk counseling and strategic advice on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues. He has also represented clients in False Claims Act and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement actions conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErich earned his Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center and served on the Journal for Poverty Law and Policy. After law school, he served as an Infantry Officer in the United States Army. Erich has deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, has published two articles in Infantry Magazine and is an alumnus of the Army\u0026rsquo;s Strategic Studies Fellowship Program.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"erich-almonte","email":"ealmonte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented owners in several construction disputes with general contractors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major energy company in natural gas royalty multi-state class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major energy company in natural gas royalty disputes against the U.S. Department of the Interior.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eAdvised major beer manufacturer on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eDefended national retailer in misappropriation of trade secret and conspiracy litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresented major technology company in securities and shareholder derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global pharmaceutical company in a FCPA enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExtensive pro bono work, including a Special Immigrant Visa application, Violence Against Women Act self-petition for immigration, veteran landlord-tenant dispute, divorce with custody, and United States Supreme Court \u003cem\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e brief on behalf of the Innocence Project regarding the application of the scientific method in determining the reliability of expert witnesses.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1143,"guid":"1143.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1237,"guid":"1237.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Almonte","nick_name":"Erich","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Erich","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2005-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eErich represents energy industry clients in high-stakes commercial disputes and torts in the areas of construction and engineering, decommissioning, oil and gas royalties, environmental justice, and personal injury and property damage matters. He also represents mineral lessees and operators in disputes before federal agencies relating to decommissioning and oil and gas royalties and provides pre-litigation counseling on contractual risk allocation and compliance with Department of the Interior regulations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErich has experience in large-scale, multiparty litigation, as well as in individual actions. He practices in numerous jurisdictions, representing clients in all aspects of litigation across the country. Erich has represented public and private companies in a broad range of disputes in arbitration and federal and state court relating to breach of contract, trade secrets, securities, and RICO violations and provided litigation risk counseling and strategic advice on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues. He has also represented clients in False Claims Act and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement actions conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErich earned his Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center and served on the Journal for Poverty Law and Policy. After law school, he served as an Infantry Officer in the United States Army. Erich has deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, has published two articles in Infantry Magazine and is an alumnus of the Army\u0026rsquo;s Strategic Studies Fellowship Program.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented owners in several construction disputes with general contractors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major energy company in natural gas royalty multi-state class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major energy company in natural gas royalty disputes against the U.S. Department of the Interior.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eAdvised major beer manufacturer on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eDefended national retailer in misappropriation of trade secret and conspiracy litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresented major technology company in securities and shareholder derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global pharmaceutical company in a FCPA enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExtensive pro bono work, including a Special Immigrant Visa application, Violence Against Women Act self-petition for immigration, veteran landlord-tenant dispute, divorce with custody, and United States Supreme Court \u003cem\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e brief on behalf of the Innocence Project regarding the application of the scientific method in determining the reliability of expert witnesses.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":693}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-07T04:54:37.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-07T04:54:37.000Z","searchable_text":"Almonte{{ FIELD }}Represented owners in several construction disputes with general contractors.{{ FIELD }}Represented major energy company in natural gas royalty multi-state class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented major energy company in natural gas royalty disputes against the U.S. Department of the Interior.  {{ FIELD }}Advised major beer manufacturer on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues.{{ FIELD }}Defended national retailer in misappropriation of trade secret and conspiracy litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented major technology company in securities and shareholder derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented global pharmaceutical company in a FCPA enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Extensive pro bono work, including a Special Immigrant Visa application, Violence Against Women Act self-petition for immigration, veteran landlord-tenant dispute, divorce with custody, and United States Supreme Court amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Innocence Project regarding the application of the scientific method in determining the reliability of expert witnesses.{{ FIELD }}Erich represents energy industry clients in high-stakes commercial disputes and torts in the areas of construction and engineering, decommissioning, oil and gas royalties, environmental justice, and personal injury and property damage matters. He also represents mineral lessees and operators in disputes before federal agencies relating to decommissioning and oil and gas royalties and provides pre-litigation counseling on contractual risk allocation and compliance with Department of the Interior regulations. \nErich has experience in large-scale, multiparty litigation, as well as in individual actions. He practices in numerous jurisdictions, representing clients in all aspects of litigation across the country. Erich has represented public and private companies in a broad range of disputes in arbitration and federal and state court relating to breach of contract, trade secrets, securities, and RICO violations and provided litigation risk counseling and strategic advice on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues. He has also represented clients in False Claims Act and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement actions conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission.\nErich earned his Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center and served on the Journal for Poverty Law and Policy. After law school, he served as an Infantry Officer in the United States Army. Erich has deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, has published two articles in Infantry Magazine and is an alumnus of the Army’s Strategic Studies Fellowship Program. Partner Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas District of Columbia Texas Represented owners in several construction disputes with general contractors. Represented major energy company in natural gas royalty multi-state class action litigation. Represented major energy company in natural gas royalty disputes against the U.S. Department of the Interior.   Advised major beer manufacturer on franchise termination litigation and relationship issues. Defended national retailer in misappropriation of trade secret and conspiracy litigation. Represented major technology company in securities and shareholder derivative litigation. Represented global pharmaceutical company in a FCPA enforcement action. Extensive pro bono work, including a Special Immigrant Visa application, Violence Against Women Act self-petition for immigration, veteran landlord-tenant dispute, divorce with custody, and United States Supreme Court amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Innocence Project regarding the application of the scientific method in determining the reliability of expert witnesses.","searchable_name":"Erich J. Almonte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442383,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1005,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRandy Butterfield helps lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta Environmental, Health and Safety Practice Group, where he concentrates his practice on environmental and toxic tort litigation as well as\u0026nbsp;emergency incident response. Randy's practice focuses in particular on assisting clients in the wake of catastrophic emergency incidents, such as explosions, fires, industrial accidents, chemical releases, spills, and other environmental and industrial calamities. In that capacity, Randy is frequently called upon in the immediate aftermath of these emergencies to provide time-critical crisis management addressing a wide range of pressing concerns, including forensic investigation; workplace safety; site security and evidence preservation; regulatory disclosures, investigation, and potential enforcement; environmental remediation; internal investigations; and insurance coverage. Recent incidents on which Randy has helped lead the response have involved over $2 billion in property damages, business losses, and insurance claims; significant personal injury lawsuits; as well as enforcement actions from federal and state regulators.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Randy has handled numerous mass joinder and class action cases involving personal injury and property damage claims, both at the trial and appellate levels. Randy has played a particularly significant role in preparing and defending the defense experts\u0026mdash;as well as deposing and critiquing plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts\u0026mdash;on a wide variety of technical topics, such as air and groundwater modeling, emission inventories, dose reconstruction, geostatistics, human health risk assessment, toxicology, epidemiology,\u0026nbsp;fate and transport,\u0026nbsp;remediation,\u0026nbsp;property valuation, and damage assessments. Over his career, Randy\u0026rsquo;s litigation matters have involved nearly every major piece of environmental legislation as well as the entire spectrum of common law tort claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has published several articles involving the potential application and use of federal and state regulatory standards in the toxic tort context. He has also co-authored a chapter on legal defenses in toxic tort cases in a treatise published by the American Bar Association as well as a chapter on administrative appeals published by LexisNexis. Randy served on the Environmental and Toxic Tort Section of the Atlanta Bar Association, including as Board Chair in 2018. Randy also served on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s Environmental Editorial Advisory Board from 2021-2022.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBooks, Articles \u0026amp; Presentations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; LexisNexis Practice Guide:\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Environmental Law\u003c/em\u003e, 2022 ed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield, moderator, Roundtable with Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearing Judges\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Litigants, Atlanta Bar Association, Toxic Tort and Environmental Law CLE, Feb. 1, 2018\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield \u0026amp; Stephen A. McCullers,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRaising the Class Action Certification Bar in Georgia:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eGeorgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, Perspectives on Georgia\u0026rsquo;s Environment (State Bar of\u0026nbsp;Georgia), Spring 2015, at 6-9\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRecent \u0026amp; Recurring Issues in Toxic Tort Cases\u003c/em\u003e, State Bar of Georgia, Toxic Tort\u0026nbsp;Litigation CLE, Mar. 2014\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; J Kevin Buster \u0026amp; Randy J. Butterfield,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCommon Defenses in Toxic Tort Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(book chapter) (ABA\u0026nbsp;2d ed. 2013)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield, Note,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRecovering Environmental Cleanup Costs Under the Resource Conservation\u0026nbsp;and Recovery Act: A Potential Solution to a Persistent Problem\u003c/em\u003e, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 689 (1997)\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"randall-butterfield","email":"rbutterfield@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eA midstream energy company in connection with investigations by Federal and State environmental agencies as well as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) into an explosion and fire at a natural gas processing facility resulting in catastrophic loss. Oversaw root cause investigation, coordinated responses to agency inquiries, and provided advice and counsel in connection with successful insurance recovery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest producers of methanol from natural gas as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with environmental investigations into spills and releases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn LNG facility in connection with government investigations by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) arising out of an explosion that resulted in operational shutdown and extensive damage to piping and other equipment and in connection with insurance coverage concerns.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn international chemical manufacturer in response to an explosion at its largest U.S. manufacturing facility, including helping to lead the emergency incident response and internal investigation as well as responding to regulatory inquiries by, among others OSHA; State and Federal environmental agencies; the CSB; and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe country\u0026rsquo;s largest specialty paper company following the catastrophic explosion of two continuous pulp digesters. Helped lead the team handling the emergency response, including handling the root cause investigation, successfully resolving investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OSHA, CSB, and numerous state regulatory agencies, and securing a significant settlement of its insurance claim.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA worldwide mining and petroleum company as standby incident response counsel.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn engineering and construction company in connection with a trench collapse resulting in a fatality, including responding to OSHA\u0026rsquo;s resulting investigation and implementing a nationwide safety audit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA carbon capture company in connection with building collapse resulting in extensive damages to multiple rail cars. Led root cause investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA water and wastewater treatment provider in connection with a civil and criminal investigation into wastewater treatment plant compliance involving allegations of falsification of records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of the largest specialty pulp and paper manufacturers in the United States in connection with investigations by EPA, OSHA, and various state and local agencies arising out of a catastrophic explosion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical facility following release of trichlorosilane during line break that resulted in serious injuries to contractors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical facility in connection with explosion caused by the failure of an expansion joint, resulting in numerous injuries and one fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA medical sterilization company in pending litigation involving air emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its facility in Colorado.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA world-leading manufacturer to defend the claims of 3,000 plaintiffs stemming from air emissions of lead, arsenic, and other substances from a polymetallic smelter in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved regulatory enforcement actions against a Fortune 100 company involving EPA\u0026rsquo;s Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (\u0026ldquo;RRP\u0026rdquo;) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (\u0026ldquo;TSCA\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA large paper manufacturer following a catastrophic fire at its New Jersey production facility. Helped lead the core team that successfully resolved all State and Federal regulatory investigations and secured a significant settlement of its insurance claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRayonier Performance Fibers in securing renewal of the NPDES discharge permit for its Jesup pulp mill, the world's largest producer of cellulose specialty products. The permit had been reversed by the administrative law judge, who imposed a novel and unreasonable construction of the narrative water quality standard. That erroneous decision, which threatened the permitting program for all industrial and municipal dischargers in Georgia, was reversed on appeal, ultimately leading to affirmance of the renewed permit.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC\u003c/em\u003e, 816 S.E.2d 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018), cert. denied (Aug. 5, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRayonier Performance Fibers in a citizen suit alleging that the pulp mill was violating its NPDES discharge permit. District court granted summary judgment in favor of Rayonier on all counts.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. CV 214-44, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42849 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2015).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSea Island Company in securing, and successfully defending to an Administrative Law Judge and then to Superior Court, the state Shore Protection Act permit for a controversial beach nourishment, dune construction, and groin project along three miles of beachfront property. In subsequent related litigation brought in federal court, obtained summary judgment upholding the contested permits.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng\u0026rsquo;rs\u003c/em\u003e, No. CV 418-251, 2020 WL 5837650 (S.D. Ga. Sept. 30, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA large electric utility company in toxic tort litigation involving approximately 150 residents living near Plant Scherer, one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the country. Following oral argument on an early motion to dismiss, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA carbon black manufacturer in mass joinder actions filed in West Virginia by hundreds of current and former neighbors, asserting nuisance, trespass, negligence and medical monitoring claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense contractors in a putative personal injury and property damage class action seeking some $200 million for alleged exposure to lead, PCBs, and other chemicals associated with historic forge and foundry operations in Anniston, Alabama. Cases ultimately resolved in nuisance value settlements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe City of Atlanta and other local governments in the tri-state \u0026ldquo;water wars\u0026rdquo; litigation involving Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, including the successful defense of Florida\u0026rsquo;s claims that the operation of Georgia reservoirs on the Chattahoochee River have harmed endangered species.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical manufacturer against claims related to the contamination of a former fertilizer manufacturing facility. Following extensive fact and expert discovery, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the company on all claims, a decision later affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Fortune 50 energy company in the appeal of a $27 million jury verdict in a \u0026ldquo;dram shop\u0026rdquo; case asserting agency liability based upon the use of brand standards for independent service stations. The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict and rendered judgment in favor of the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical manufacturer in a mixture of class actions and individual lawsuits filed in state and federal courts concerning alleged mercury and PCB contamination from the company\u0026rsquo;s former chlor-alkali plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMore than a dozen manufacturers, distributors, or sellers of welding products in several Georgia cases brought on behalf of approximately 500 plaintiffs who alleged personal injury due to inhalation of manganese particles produced by the welding process.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Butterfield","nick_name":"Randy","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Chief Judge Robert L. Echols, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee","years_held":"1997 - 1999"}],"first_name":"Randall","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Law360 Selects Nine from King \u0026 Spalding to Serve on 2021 Editorial Advisory Boards","detail":"Law 360, April 2021"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/randy-butterfield-237ab87/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRandy Butterfield helps lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta Environmental, Health and Safety Practice Group, where he concentrates his practice on environmental and toxic tort litigation as well as\u0026nbsp;emergency incident response. Randy's practice focuses in particular on assisting clients in the wake of catastrophic emergency incidents, such as explosions, fires, industrial accidents, chemical releases, spills, and other environmental and industrial calamities. In that capacity, Randy is frequently called upon in the immediate aftermath of these emergencies to provide time-critical crisis management addressing a wide range of pressing concerns, including forensic investigation; workplace safety; site security and evidence preservation; regulatory disclosures, investigation, and potential enforcement; environmental remediation; internal investigations; and insurance coverage. Recent incidents on which Randy has helped lead the response have involved over $2 billion in property damages, business losses, and insurance claims; significant personal injury lawsuits; as well as enforcement actions from federal and state regulators.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Randy has handled numerous mass joinder and class action cases involving personal injury and property damage claims, both at the trial and appellate levels. Randy has played a particularly significant role in preparing and defending the defense experts\u0026mdash;as well as deposing and critiquing plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts\u0026mdash;on a wide variety of technical topics, such as air and groundwater modeling, emission inventories, dose reconstruction, geostatistics, human health risk assessment, toxicology, epidemiology,\u0026nbsp;fate and transport,\u0026nbsp;remediation,\u0026nbsp;property valuation, and damage assessments. Over his career, Randy\u0026rsquo;s litigation matters have involved nearly every major piece of environmental legislation as well as the entire spectrum of common law tort claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has published several articles involving the potential application and use of federal and state regulatory standards in the toxic tort context. He has also co-authored a chapter on legal defenses in toxic tort cases in a treatise published by the American Bar Association as well as a chapter on administrative appeals published by LexisNexis. Randy served on the Environmental and Toxic Tort Section of the Atlanta Bar Association, including as Board Chair in 2018. Randy also served on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s Environmental Editorial Advisory Board from 2021-2022.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBooks, Articles \u0026amp; Presentations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; LexisNexis Practice Guide:\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Environmental Law\u003c/em\u003e, 2022 ed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield, moderator, Roundtable with Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearing Judges\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Litigants, Atlanta Bar Association, Toxic Tort and Environmental Law CLE, Feb. 1, 2018\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield \u0026amp; Stephen A. McCullers,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRaising the Class Action Certification Bar in Georgia:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eGeorgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, Perspectives on Georgia\u0026rsquo;s Environment (State Bar of\u0026nbsp;Georgia), Spring 2015, at 6-9\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRecent \u0026amp; Recurring Issues in Toxic Tort Cases\u003c/em\u003e, State Bar of Georgia, Toxic Tort\u0026nbsp;Litigation CLE, Mar. 2014\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; J Kevin Buster \u0026amp; Randy J. Butterfield,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCommon Defenses in Toxic Tort Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(book chapter) (ABA\u0026nbsp;2d ed. 2013)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Randy J. Butterfield, Note,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRecovering Environmental Cleanup Costs Under the Resource Conservation\u0026nbsp;and Recovery Act: A Potential Solution to a Persistent Problem\u003c/em\u003e, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 689 (1997)\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eA midstream energy company in connection with investigations by Federal and State environmental agencies as well as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) into an explosion and fire at a natural gas processing facility resulting in catastrophic loss. Oversaw root cause investigation, coordinated responses to agency inquiries, and provided advice and counsel in connection with successful insurance recovery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest producers of methanol from natural gas as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with environmental investigations into spills and releases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn LNG facility in connection with government investigations by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) arising out of an explosion that resulted in operational shutdown and extensive damage to piping and other equipment and in connection with insurance coverage concerns.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn international chemical manufacturer in response to an explosion at its largest U.S. manufacturing facility, including helping to lead the emergency incident response and internal investigation as well as responding to regulatory inquiries by, among others OSHA; State and Federal environmental agencies; the CSB; and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe country\u0026rsquo;s largest specialty paper company following the catastrophic explosion of two continuous pulp digesters. Helped lead the team handling the emergency response, including handling the root cause investigation, successfully resolving investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OSHA, CSB, and numerous state regulatory agencies, and securing a significant settlement of its insurance claim.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA worldwide mining and petroleum company as standby incident response counsel.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn engineering and construction company in connection with a trench collapse resulting in a fatality, including responding to OSHA\u0026rsquo;s resulting investigation and implementing a nationwide safety audit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA carbon capture company in connection with building collapse resulting in extensive damages to multiple rail cars. Led root cause investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA water and wastewater treatment provider in connection with a civil and criminal investigation into wastewater treatment plant compliance involving allegations of falsification of records.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of the largest specialty pulp and paper manufacturers in the United States in connection with investigations by EPA, OSHA, and various state and local agencies arising out of a catastrophic explosion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical facility following release of trichlorosilane during line break that resulted in serious injuries to contractors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical facility in connection with explosion caused by the failure of an expansion joint, resulting in numerous injuries and one fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA medical sterilization company in pending litigation involving air emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its facility in Colorado.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA world-leading manufacturer to defend the claims of 3,000 plaintiffs stemming from air emissions of lead, arsenic, and other substances from a polymetallic smelter in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved regulatory enforcement actions against a Fortune 100 company involving EPA\u0026rsquo;s Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (\u0026ldquo;RRP\u0026rdquo;) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (\u0026ldquo;TSCA\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA large paper manufacturer following a catastrophic fire at its New Jersey production facility. Helped lead the core team that successfully resolved all State and Federal regulatory investigations and secured a significant settlement of its insurance claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRayonier Performance Fibers in securing renewal of the NPDES discharge permit for its Jesup pulp mill, the world's largest producer of cellulose specialty products. The permit had been reversed by the administrative law judge, who imposed a novel and unreasonable construction of the narrative water quality standard. That erroneous decision, which threatened the permitting program for all industrial and municipal dischargers in Georgia, was reversed on appeal, ultimately leading to affirmance of the renewed permit.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC\u003c/em\u003e, 816 S.E.2d 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018), cert. denied (Aug. 5, 2019).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRayonier Performance Fibers in a citizen suit alleging that the pulp mill was violating its NPDES discharge permit. District court granted summary judgment in favor of Rayonier on all counts.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. CV 214-44, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42849 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2015).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSea Island Company in securing, and successfully defending to an Administrative Law Judge and then to Superior Court, the state Shore Protection Act permit for a controversial beach nourishment, dune construction, and groin project along three miles of beachfront property. In subsequent related litigation brought in federal court, obtained summary judgment upholding the contested permits.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltamaha Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng\u0026rsquo;rs\u003c/em\u003e, No. CV 418-251, 2020 WL 5837650 (S.D. Ga. Sept. 30, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA large electric utility company in toxic tort litigation involving approximately 150 residents living near Plant Scherer, one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the country. Following oral argument on an early motion to dismiss, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA carbon black manufacturer in mass joinder actions filed in West Virginia by hundreds of current and former neighbors, asserting nuisance, trespass, negligence and medical monitoring claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense contractors in a putative personal injury and property damage class action seeking some $200 million for alleged exposure to lead, PCBs, and other chemicals associated with historic forge and foundry operations in Anniston, Alabama. Cases ultimately resolved in nuisance value settlements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe City of Atlanta and other local governments in the tri-state \u0026ldquo;water wars\u0026rdquo; litigation involving Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, including the successful defense of Florida\u0026rsquo;s claims that the operation of Georgia reservoirs on the Chattahoochee River have harmed endangered species.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical manufacturer against claims related to the contamination of a former fertilizer manufacturing facility. Following extensive fact and expert discovery, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the company on all claims, a decision later affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA Fortune 50 energy company in the appeal of a $27 million jury verdict in a \u0026ldquo;dram shop\u0026rdquo; case asserting agency liability based upon the use of brand standards for independent service stations. The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict and rendered judgment in favor of the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA chemical manufacturer in a mixture of class actions and individual lawsuits filed in state and federal courts concerning alleged mercury and PCB contamination from the company\u0026rsquo;s former chlor-alkali plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMore than a dozen manufacturers, distributors, or sellers of welding products in several Georgia cases brought on behalf of approximately 500 plaintiffs who alleged personal injury due to inhalation of manganese particles produced by the welding process.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Law360 Selects Nine from King \u0026 Spalding to Serve on 2021 Editorial Advisory Boards","detail":"Law 360, April 2021"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":757}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Butterfield{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Law360 Selects Nine from King \u0026amp; Spalding to Serve on 2021 Editorial Advisory Boards\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law 360, April 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}A midstream energy company in connection with investigations by Federal and State environmental agencies as well as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) into an explosion and fire at a natural gas processing facility resulting in catastrophic loss. Oversaw root cause investigation, coordinated responses to agency inquiries, and provided advice and counsel in connection with successful insurance recovery.{{ FIELD }}One of the world’s largest producers of methanol from natural gas as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with environmental investigations into spills and releases.{{ FIELD }}An LNG facility in connection with government investigations by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) arising out of an explosion that resulted in operational shutdown and extensive damage to piping and other equipment and in connection with insurance coverage concerns.{{ FIELD }}A Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio.{{ FIELD }}An international chemical manufacturer in response to an explosion at its largest U.S. manufacturing facility, including helping to lead the emergency incident response and internal investigation as well as responding to regulatory inquiries by, among others OSHA; State and Federal environmental agencies; the CSB; and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).{{ FIELD }}The country’s largest specialty paper company following the catastrophic explosion of two continuous pulp digesters. Helped lead the team handling the emergency response, including handling the root cause investigation, successfully resolving investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OSHA, CSB, and numerous state regulatory agencies, and securing a significant settlement of its insurance claim.{{ FIELD }}A worldwide mining and petroleum company as standby incident response counsel.{{ FIELD }}An engineering and construction company in connection with a trench collapse resulting in a fatality, including responding to OSHA’s resulting investigation and implementing a nationwide safety audit.{{ FIELD }}A carbon capture company in connection with building collapse resulting in extensive damages to multiple rail cars. Led root cause investigation.{{ FIELD }}A water and wastewater treatment provider in connection with a civil and criminal investigation into wastewater treatment plant compliance involving allegations of falsification of records.{{ FIELD }}One of the largest specialty pulp and paper manufacturers in the United States in connection with investigations by EPA, OSHA, and various state and local agencies arising out of a catastrophic explosion.{{ FIELD }}A chemical facility following release of trichlorosilane during line break that resulted in serious injuries to contractors.{{ FIELD }}A chemical facility in connection with explosion caused by the failure of an expansion joint, resulting in numerous injuries and one fatality.{{ FIELD }}A medical sterilization company in pending litigation involving air emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its facility in Colorado.{{ FIELD }}A world-leading manufacturer to defend the claims of 3,000 plaintiffs stemming from air emissions of lead, arsenic, and other substances from a polymetallic smelter in Peru.{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolved regulatory enforcement actions against a Fortune 100 company involving EPA’s Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (“RRP”) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”).{{ FIELD }}A large paper manufacturer following a catastrophic fire at its New Jersey production facility. Helped lead the core team that successfully resolved all State and Federal regulatory investigations and secured a significant settlement of its insurance claims.{{ FIELD }}Rayonier Performance Fibers in securing renewal of the NPDES discharge permit for its Jesup pulp mill, the world's largest producer of cellulose specialty products. The permit had been reversed by the administrative law judge, who imposed a novel and unreasonable construction of the narrative water quality standard. That erroneous decision, which threatened the permitting program for all industrial and municipal dischargers in Georgia, was reversed on appeal, ultimately leading to affirmance of the renewed permit. Altamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC, 816 S.E.2d 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018), cert. denied (Aug. 5, 2019).{{ FIELD }}Rayonier Performance Fibers in a citizen suit alleging that the pulp mill was violating its NPDES discharge permit. District court granted summary judgment in favor of Rayonier on all counts. Altamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier, Inc., No. CV 214-44, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42849 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2015).{{ FIELD }}Sea Island Company in securing, and successfully defending to an Administrative Law Judge and then to Superior Court, the state Shore Protection Act permit for a controversial beach nourishment, dune construction, and groin project along three miles of beachfront property. In subsequent related litigation brought in federal court, obtained summary judgment upholding the contested permits. Altamaha Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. CV 418-251, 2020 WL 5837650 (S.D. Ga. Sept. 30, 2020).{{ FIELD }}A large electric utility company in toxic tort litigation involving approximately 150 residents living near Plant Scherer, one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the country. Following oral argument on an early motion to dismiss, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims.{{ FIELD }}A carbon black manufacturer in mass joinder actions filed in West Virginia by hundreds of current and former neighbors, asserting nuisance, trespass, negligence and medical monitoring claims.{{ FIELD }}Defense contractors in a putative personal injury and property damage class action seeking some $200 million for alleged exposure to lead, PCBs, and other chemicals associated with historic forge and foundry operations in Anniston, Alabama. Cases ultimately resolved in nuisance value settlements.{{ FIELD }}The City of Atlanta and other local governments in the tri-state “water wars” litigation involving Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, including the successful defense of Florida’s claims that the operation of Georgia reservoirs on the Chattahoochee River have harmed endangered species.{{ FIELD }}A chemical manufacturer against claims related to the contamination of a former fertilizer manufacturing facility. Following extensive fact and expert discovery, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the company on all claims, a decision later affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.{{ FIELD }}A Fortune 50 energy company in the appeal of a $27 million jury verdict in a “dram shop” case asserting agency liability based upon the use of brand standards for independent service stations. The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict and rendered judgment in favor of the company.{{ FIELD }}A chemical manufacturer in a mixture of class actions and individual lawsuits filed in state and federal courts concerning alleged mercury and PCB contamination from the company’s former chlor-alkali plant.{{ FIELD }}More than a dozen manufacturers, distributors, or sellers of welding products in several Georgia cases brought on behalf of approximately 500 plaintiffs who alleged personal injury due to inhalation of manganese particles produced by the welding process.{{ FIELD }}Randy Butterfield helps lead the firm’s Atlanta Environmental, Health and Safety Practice Group, where he concentrates his practice on environmental and toxic tort litigation as well as emergency incident response. Randy's practice focuses in particular on assisting clients in the wake of catastrophic emergency incidents, such as explosions, fires, industrial accidents, chemical releases, spills, and other environmental and industrial calamities. In that capacity, Randy is frequently called upon in the immediate aftermath of these emergencies to provide time-critical crisis management addressing a wide range of pressing concerns, including forensic investigation; workplace safety; site security and evidence preservation; regulatory disclosures, investigation, and potential enforcement; environmental remediation; internal investigations; and insurance coverage. Recent incidents on which Randy has helped lead the response have involved over $2 billion in property damages, business losses, and insurance claims; significant personal injury lawsuits; as well as enforcement actions from federal and state regulators.\nIn addition, Randy has handled numerous mass joinder and class action cases involving personal injury and property damage claims, both at the trial and appellate levels. Randy has played a particularly significant role in preparing and defending the defense experts—as well as deposing and critiquing plaintiffs’ experts—on a wide variety of technical topics, such as air and groundwater modeling, emission inventories, dose reconstruction, geostatistics, human health risk assessment, toxicology, epidemiology, fate and transport, remediation, property valuation, and damage assessments. Over his career, Randy’s litigation matters have involved nearly every major piece of environmental legislation as well as the entire spectrum of common law tort claims.\nRandy has published several articles involving the potential application and use of federal and state regulatory standards in the toxic tort context. He has also co-authored a chapter on legal defenses in toxic tort cases in a treatise published by the American Bar Association as well as a chapter on administrative appeals published by LexisNexis. Randy served on the Environmental and Toxic Tort Section of the Atlanta Bar Association, including as Board Chair in 2018. Randy also served on Law360’s Environmental Editorial Advisory Board from 2021-2022.\nBooks, Articles \u0026amp; Presentations\n• LexisNexis Practice Guide: Georgia Environmental Law, 2022 ed.\n• Randy J. Butterfield, moderator, Roundtable with Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearing Judges \u0026amp; Litigants, Atlanta Bar Association, Toxic Tort and Environmental Law CLE, Feb. 1, 2018\n• Randy J. Butterfield \u0026amp; Stephen A. McCullers, Raising the Class Action Certification Bar in Georgia: Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, Perspectives on Georgia’s Environment (State Bar of Georgia), Spring 2015, at 6-9\n• Randy J. Butterfield, Recent \u0026amp; Recurring Issues in Toxic Tort Cases, State Bar of Georgia, Toxic Tort Litigation CLE, Mar. 2014\n• J Kevin Buster \u0026amp; Randy J. Butterfield, Common Defenses in Toxic Tort Litigation (book chapter) (ABA 2d ed. 2013)\n• Randy J. Butterfield, Note, Recovering Environmental Cleanup Costs Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act: A Potential Solution to a Persistent Problem, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 689 (1997) Partner Law360 Selects Nine from King \u0026amp; Spalding to Serve on 2021 Editorial Advisory Boards Law 360, April 2021 Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Texas Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia State Bar of Georgia, Environmental Law Section Atlanta Bar Association, Environmental and Toxic Tort Section (past President) American Bar Association, Section on Natural Resources, Energy and Environmental Law Defense Research Institute (DRI) Law Clerk, Chief Judge Robert L. Echols, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee A midstream energy company in connection with investigations by Federal and State environmental agencies as well as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) into an explosion and fire at a natural gas processing facility resulting in catastrophic loss. Oversaw root cause investigation, coordinated responses to agency inquiries, and provided advice and counsel in connection with successful insurance recovery. One of the world’s largest producers of methanol from natural gas as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with environmental investigations into spills and releases. An LNG facility in connection with government investigations by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) arising out of an explosion that resulted in operational shutdown and extensive damage to piping and other equipment and in connection with insurance coverage concerns. A Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. An international chemical manufacturer in response to an explosion at its largest U.S. manufacturing facility, including helping to lead the emergency incident response and internal investigation as well as responding to regulatory inquiries by, among others OSHA; State and Federal environmental agencies; the CSB; and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). The country’s largest specialty paper company following the catastrophic explosion of two continuous pulp digesters. Helped lead the team handling the emergency response, including handling the root cause investigation, successfully resolving investigations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OSHA, CSB, and numerous state regulatory agencies, and securing a significant settlement of its insurance claim. A worldwide mining and petroleum company as standby incident response counsel. An engineering and construction company in connection with a trench collapse resulting in a fatality, including responding to OSHA’s resulting investigation and implementing a nationwide safety audit. A carbon capture company in connection with building collapse resulting in extensive damages to multiple rail cars. Led root cause investigation. A water and wastewater treatment provider in connection with a civil and criminal investigation into wastewater treatment plant compliance involving allegations of falsification of records. One of the largest specialty pulp and paper manufacturers in the United States in connection with investigations by EPA, OSHA, and various state and local agencies arising out of a catastrophic explosion. A chemical facility following release of trichlorosilane during line break that resulted in serious injuries to contractors. A chemical facility in connection with explosion caused by the failure of an expansion joint, resulting in numerous injuries and one fatality. A medical sterilization company in pending litigation involving air emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO) from its facility in Colorado. A world-leading manufacturer to defend the claims of 3,000 plaintiffs stemming from air emissions of lead, arsenic, and other substances from a polymetallic smelter in Peru. Successfully resolved regulatory enforcement actions against a Fortune 100 company involving EPA’s Lead Renovation, Repair and Painting (“RRP”) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”). A large paper manufacturer following a catastrophic fire at its New Jersey production facility. Helped lead the core team that successfully resolved all State and Federal regulatory investigations and secured a significant settlement of its insurance claims. Rayonier Performance Fibers in securing renewal of the NPDES discharge permit for its Jesup pulp mill, the world's largest producer of cellulose specialty products. The permit had been reversed by the administrative law judge, who imposed a novel and unreasonable construction of the narrative water quality standard. That erroneous decision, which threatened the permitting program for all industrial and municipal dischargers in Georgia, was reversed on appeal, ultimately leading to affirmance of the renewed permit. Altamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC, 816 S.E.2d 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018), cert. denied (Aug. 5, 2019). Rayonier Performance Fibers in a citizen suit alleging that the pulp mill was violating its NPDES discharge permit. District court granted summary judgment in favor of Rayonier on all counts. Altamaha Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Rayonier, Inc., No. CV 214-44, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42849 (S.D. Ga. Mar. 31, 2015). Sea Island Company in securing, and successfully defending to an Administrative Law Judge and then to Superior Court, the state Shore Protection Act permit for a controversial beach nourishment, dune construction, and groin project along three miles of beachfront property. In subsequent related litigation brought in federal court, obtained summary judgment upholding the contested permits. Altamaha Riverkeeper v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. CV 418-251, 2020 WL 5837650 (S.D. Ga. Sept. 30, 2020). A large electric utility company in toxic tort litigation involving approximately 150 residents living near Plant Scherer, one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the country. Following oral argument on an early motion to dismiss, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims. A carbon black manufacturer in mass joinder actions filed in West Virginia by hundreds of current and former neighbors, asserting nuisance, trespass, negligence and medical monitoring claims. Defense contractors in a putative personal injury and property damage class action seeking some $200 million for alleged exposure to lead, PCBs, and other chemicals associated with historic forge and foundry operations in Anniston, Alabama. Cases ultimately resolved in nuisance value settlements. The City of Atlanta and other local governments in the tri-state “water wars” litigation involving Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, including the successful defense of Florida’s claims that the operation of Georgia reservoirs on the Chattahoochee River have harmed endangered species. A chemical manufacturer against claims related to the contamination of a former fertilizer manufacturing facility. Following extensive fact and expert discovery, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the company on all claims, a decision later affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. A Fortune 50 energy company in the appeal of a $27 million jury verdict in a “dram shop” case asserting agency liability based upon the use of brand standards for independent service stations. The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed the jury verdict and rendered judgment in favor of the company. A chemical manufacturer in a mixture of class actions and individual lawsuits filed in state and federal courts concerning alleged mercury and PCB contamination from the company’s former chlor-alkali plant. More than a dozen manufacturers, distributors, or sellers of welding products in several Georgia cases brought on behalf of approximately 500 plaintiffs who alleged personal injury due to inhalation of manganese particles produced by the welding process.","searchable_name":"Randall J. Butterfield (Randy)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426320,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2435,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amina-dammann","email":"adammann@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1303,"guid":"1303.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dammann","nick_name":"Amina","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amina","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":196,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4206}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","searchable_text":"Dammann{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters:{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;{{ FIELD }}Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;{{ FIELD }}S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;{{ FIELD }}Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;{{ FIELD }}Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;{{ FIELD }}Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;{{ FIELD }}JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.{{ FIELD }}AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).{{ FIELD }}King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.{{ FIELD }}Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.{{ FIELD }}Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.  She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.  Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.\nAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.  Amina  holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University. \nPublications and Awards\n•   Vacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact, 27 Review of Litigation 441–512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\n•  Die Beschwerdekammern der europäischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law Partner Frankfurt University  The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School Texas Federal Republic of Germany Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters: Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board; Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards; Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch; S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery; Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia; Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement; Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas; Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas; Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana; JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts. Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana. AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division). King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware. Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska. Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.","searchable_name":"Amina S. Dammann","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":196,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":435271,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1973,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Donovan specializes in congressional, state attorneys general and parallel government investigations. A former Chief Investigative Counsel in the Senate, Dan co-chairs\u0026nbsp;our Government Advocacy and Congressional Investigations practices perennially recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e: \u0026ldquo;King \u0026amp; Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice, with several dedicated members working exclusively in this area.\u0026rdquo; Dan is ranked Band 1 for Congressional Investigations by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003eand Tier 1 \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;has two decades of crisis management experience with government investigations, involving significant legal, public relations and political risks.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan represents leading companies, individuals, trade associations, and nonprofit entities and provides effective crisis management counsel. He works at the forefront of controversial and politicized national and state policy issues that frequently lead to investigations and litigation, including congressional, multi-state and federal agency enforcement actions. Particularly experienced in anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas, Dan prepares clients for high-profile hearings and guides them through the unique challenges presented by congressional and parallel government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Dan served as Senior Investigative Counsel to Senator Charles Grassley, then Chairman of the Committee on Finance. While serving in the U.S. Senate, Dan managed congressional investigations and oversight hearings. In this role, Dan directed investigations focused on statutory and regulatory compliance, including drug and device safety, drug pricing, and waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs. He also handled policy and legislative matters, including the False Claims Act, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Medicare and Medicaid programs, and related statutes. Dan also served as Chief Investigative Counsel to the Senate Committee on Small Business, where he managed consumer fraud and small business protection investigations and hearings. He began his congressional career as a Staff Assistant on the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, chaired by Senator Fred Thompson, working on the special investigation into the 1996 federal election campaigns.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan also provides strategic policy and legislative counsel, and is a frequent speaker on congressional oversight and investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-donovan","email":"ddonovan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eExperience representing numerous clients under investigation by Republican-controlled Senate and House Committees, including Senate Banking, Commerce, Finance, HELP, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Special Committee on Aging, and House Education and the Workforce, Energy \u0026amp; Commerce, Financial Services, Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Select Committee on CCP, and Ways \u0026amp; Means, among others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProviding advice and counsel with respect to congressional oversight activity to leading companies in private sector industries, including accounting, auto, banking, consulting, defense, energy, fashion, food, healthcare provider, higher education, insurance, medical device, pharmaceutical, private equity, and tech, among others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea variety of clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations relating to allegations of government fraud, food and product safety and recalls, cybersecurity breaches, product pricing, clinical research, off-label promotion, direct-to-consumer advertising, payments to physicians, and financial conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional and state attorneys general drug pricing investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea variety of clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on healthcare policy and legislative issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with the Select Panel on Infant Lives (authorized under the House Energy and Commerce Committee) investigation relating to fetal tissue research.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea global financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Big Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University\u0026rsquo;s handling of federal funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act enactment and implementation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emedical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with House and Senate committee investigations into 510(k) regulatory issues, direct-to-consumer advertising, and payments to physicians.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea leading clean energy technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a Senate investigation into Department of Energy grant program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act implementation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea coalition of food product companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional inquiries relating to food safety and regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea medical society\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with Senate committee investigations in payments to physicians.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented individuals in connection with House and Senate committee inquiries and ethics investigations.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3464}]},"expertise":[{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Donovan","nick_name":"Dan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"F.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Relations: Congressional Investigations - USA - Nationwide","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021-2024"},{"title":"“[Daniel] provides superb service and is an absolutely indispensable partner. He is incredibly responsive.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Tier 1 Government Relations: Congressional Investigations","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"“Life Sciences Star” White-Collar/Govt. Investigations","detail":"LMG Life Sciences, 2024"},{"title":"GIR 100","detail":"Global Investigations Review, 2024"},{"title":"Tier 1 for Government Relations Practice","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"“[W]e have complete confidence in his ability to manage complex issues and communicate with our senior leaders.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"“King \u0026 Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice.”","detail":"Chambers USA, 2008-2024"},{"title":"“Daniel is an expert in Congressional investigations and is always able to keep a calm head”","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021-2024"},{"title":"“Daniel provides extremely good insight into the Congressional process and can convey it to high-level executives.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"“[A]ctive in high-profile congressional investigations, and includes ... experts such as Daniel Donovan”","detail":"Legal 500 US"},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding has “a strong track in congressional investigations … Daniel Donovan is a key contact”","detail":"Legal 500 US"},{"title":"Nationwide Government Relations Practice Ranking","detail":"Chambers USA 2008-2024"},{"title":"Leading Government Relations Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2020-2024"},{"title":"Crisis Management and Government Oversight Practice Award","detail":"National Law Journal 2021"},{"title":"“Law Firm of the Year” for Government Relations","detail":"US News \u0026 World Report"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-donovan-214322a/","seodescription":"Dan Donovan specializes in congressional, state attorneys general and parallel government investigations. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Donovan specializes in congressional, state attorneys general and parallel government investigations. A former Chief Investigative Counsel in the Senate, Dan co-chairs\u0026nbsp;our Government Advocacy and Congressional Investigations practices perennially recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e: \u0026ldquo;King \u0026amp; Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice, with several dedicated members working exclusively in this area.\u0026rdquo; Dan is ranked Band 1 for Congressional Investigations by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003eand Tier 1 \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;has two decades of crisis management experience with government investigations, involving significant legal, public relations and political risks.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan represents leading companies, individuals, trade associations, and nonprofit entities and provides effective crisis management counsel. He works at the forefront of controversial and politicized national and state policy issues that frequently lead to investigations and litigation, including congressional, multi-state and federal agency enforcement actions. Particularly experienced in anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas, Dan prepares clients for high-profile hearings and guides them through the unique challenges presented by congressional and parallel government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Dan served as Senior Investigative Counsel to Senator Charles Grassley, then Chairman of the Committee on Finance. While serving in the U.S. Senate, Dan managed congressional investigations and oversight hearings. In this role, Dan directed investigations focused on statutory and regulatory compliance, including drug and device safety, drug pricing, and waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs. He also handled policy and legislative matters, including the False Claims Act, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Medicare and Medicaid programs, and related statutes. Dan also served as Chief Investigative Counsel to the Senate Committee on Small Business, where he managed consumer fraud and small business protection investigations and hearings. He began his congressional career as a Staff Assistant on the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, chaired by Senator Fred Thompson, working on the special investigation into the 1996 federal election campaigns.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan also provides strategic policy and legislative counsel, and is a frequent speaker on congressional oversight and investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eExperience representing numerous clients under investigation by Republican-controlled Senate and House Committees, including Senate Banking, Commerce, Finance, HELP, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Special Committee on Aging, and House Education and the Workforce, Energy \u0026amp; Commerce, Financial Services, Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Select Committee on CCP, and Ways \u0026amp; Means, among others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProviding advice and counsel with respect to congressional oversight activity to leading companies in private sector industries, including accounting, auto, banking, consulting, defense, energy, fashion, food, healthcare provider, higher education, insurance, medical device, pharmaceutical, private equity, and tech, among others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea variety of clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with investigations relating to allegations of government fraud, food and product safety and recalls, cybersecurity breaches, product pricing, clinical research, off-label promotion, direct-to-consumer advertising, payments to physicians, and financial conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional and state attorneys general drug pricing investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea variety of clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on healthcare policy and legislative issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with the Select Panel on Infant Lives (authorized under the House Energy and Commerce Committee) investigation relating to fetal tissue research.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea global financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Big Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University\u0026rsquo;s handling of federal funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act enactment and implementation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emedical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with House and Senate committee investigations into 510(k) regulatory issues, direct-to-consumer advertising, and payments to physicians.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea leading clean energy technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a Senate investigation into Department of Energy grant program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act implementation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea coalition of food product companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with congressional inquiries relating to food safety and regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea medical society\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with Senate committee investigations in payments to physicians.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented individuals in connection with House and Senate committee inquiries and ethics investigations.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Relations: Congressional Investigations - USA - Nationwide","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021-2024"},{"title":"“[Daniel] provides superb service and is an absolutely indispensable partner. He is incredibly responsive.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Tier 1 Government Relations: Congressional Investigations","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"“Life Sciences Star” White-Collar/Govt. Investigations","detail":"LMG Life Sciences, 2024"},{"title":"GIR 100","detail":"Global Investigations Review, 2024"},{"title":"Tier 1 for Government Relations Practice","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"“[W]e have complete confidence in his ability to manage complex issues and communicate with our senior leaders.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"“King \u0026 Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice.”","detail":"Chambers USA, 2008-2024"},{"title":"“Daniel is an expert in Congressional investigations and is always able to keep a calm head”","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021-2024"},{"title":"“Daniel provides extremely good insight into the Congressional process and can convey it to high-level executives.”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"“[A]ctive in high-profile congressional investigations, and includes ... experts such as Daniel Donovan”","detail":"Legal 500 US"},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding has “a strong track in congressional investigations … Daniel Donovan is a key contact”","detail":"Legal 500 US"},{"title":"Nationwide Government Relations Practice Ranking","detail":"Chambers USA 2008-2024"},{"title":"Leading Government Relations Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2020-2024"},{"title":"Crisis Management and Government Oversight Practice Award","detail":"National Law Journal 2021"},{"title":"“Law Firm of the Year” for Government Relations","detail":"US News \u0026 World Report"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9964}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-08-14T15:45:04.000Z","updated_at":"2025-08-14T15:45:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Donovan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 1 Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Relations: Congressional Investigations - USA - Nationwide\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2021-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“[Daniel] provides superb service and is an absolutely indispensable partner. He is incredibly responsive.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1 Government Relations: Congressional Investigations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Life Sciences Star” White-Collar/Govt. Investigations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LMG Life Sciences, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"GIR 100\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Investigations Review, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1 for Government Relations Practice\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“[W]e have complete confidence in his ability to manage complex issues and communicate with our senior leaders.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“King \u0026amp; Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2008-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Daniel is an expert in Congressional investigations and is always able to keep a calm head”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2021-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Daniel provides extremely good insight into the Congressional process and can convey it to high-level executives.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“[A]ctive in high-profile congressional investigations, and includes ... experts such as Daniel Donovan”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"King \u0026amp; Spalding has “a strong track in congressional investigations … Daniel Donovan is a key contact”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Nationwide Government Relations Practice Ranking\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2008-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Government Relations Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2020-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Crisis Management and Government Oversight Practice Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Law Firm of the Year” for Government Relations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"US News \u0026amp; World Report\"}{{ FIELD }}Experience representing numerous clients under investigation by Republican-controlled Senate and House Committees, including Senate Banking, Commerce, Finance, HELP, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Special Committee on Aging, and House Education and the Workforce, Energy \u0026amp; Commerce, Financial Services, Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Select Committee on CCP, and Ways \u0026amp; Means, among others.{{ FIELD }}Providing advice and counsel with respect to congressional oversight activity to leading companies in private sector industries, including accounting, auto, banking, consulting, defense, energy, fashion, food, healthcare provider, higher education, insurance, medical device, pharmaceutical, private equity, and tech, among others.{{ FIELD }}Representing a variety of clients in connection with investigations relating to allegations of government fraud, food and product safety and recalls, cybersecurity breaches, product pricing, clinical research, off-label promotion, direct-to-consumer advertising, payments to physicians, and financial conflicts of interest.{{ FIELD }}Representing multiple pharmaceutical companies in connection with congressional and state attorneys general drug pricing investigations.{{ FIELD }}Representing a variety of clients on healthcare policy and legislative issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major university and pharmaceutical company in connection with the Select Panel on Infant Lives (authorized under the House Energy and Commerce Committee) investigation relating to fetal tissue research.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global financial institution in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Big Four accounting firm in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University’s handling of federal funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple pharmaceutical companies in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act enactment and implementation.{{ FIELD }}Represented medical device companies in connection with House and Senate committee investigations into 510(k) regulatory issues, direct-to-consumer advertising, and payments to physicians.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading clean energy technology company in connection with a Senate investigation into Department of Energy grant program.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in connection with congressional investigations.{{ FIELD }}Represented a health insurer in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act implementation.{{ FIELD }}Represented a coalition of food product companies in connection with congressional inquiries relating to food safety and regulatory issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical society in connection with Senate committee investigations in payments to physicians.{{ FIELD }}Represented individuals in connection with House and Senate committee inquiries and ethics investigations.{{ FIELD }}Dan Donovan specializes in congressional, state attorneys general and parallel government investigations. A former Chief Investigative Counsel in the Senate, Dan co-chairs our Government Advocacy and Congressional Investigations practices perennially recognized by Chambers USA: “King \u0026amp; Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice, with several dedicated members working exclusively in this area.” Dan is ranked Band 1 for Congressional Investigations by Chambers USA and Tier 1 Legal 500 US.  He has two decades of crisis management experience with government investigations, involving significant legal, public relations and political risks.\nDan represents leading companies, individuals, trade associations, and nonprofit entities and provides effective crisis management counsel. He works at the forefront of controversial and politicized national and state policy issues that frequently lead to investigations and litigation, including congressional, multi-state and federal agency enforcement actions. Particularly experienced in anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas, Dan prepares clients for high-profile hearings and guides them through the unique challenges presented by congressional and parallel government investigations.\nBefore joining the firm, Dan served as Senior Investigative Counsel to Senator Charles Grassley, then Chairman of the Committee on Finance. While serving in the U.S. Senate, Dan managed congressional investigations and oversight hearings. In this role, Dan directed investigations focused on statutory and regulatory compliance, including drug and device safety, drug pricing, and waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs. He also handled policy and legislative matters, including the False Claims Act, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Medicare and Medicaid programs, and related statutes. Dan also served as Chief Investigative Counsel to the Senate Committee on Small Business, where he managed consumer fraud and small business protection investigations and hearings. He began his congressional career as a Staff Assistant on the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, chaired by Senator Fred Thompson, working on the special investigation into the 1996 federal election campaigns.\nDan also provides strategic policy and legislative counsel, and is a frequent speaker on congressional oversight and investigations. Daniel Donovan lawyer Partner Band 1 Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Relations: Congressional Investigations - USA - Nationwide Chambers USA, 2021-2024 “[Daniel] provides superb service and is an absolutely indispensable partner. He is incredibly responsive.” Chambers USA Tier 1 Government Relations: Congressional Investigations Legal 500 US, 2024 “Life Sciences Star” White-Collar/Govt. Investigations LMG Life Sciences, 2024 GIR 100 Global Investigations Review, 2024 Tier 1 for Government Relations Practice Best Lawyers, 2024 “[W]e have complete confidence in his ability to manage complex issues and communicate with our senior leaders.” Chambers USA “King \u0026amp; Spalding is best known for its impressive congressional investigations practice.” Chambers USA, 2008-2024 “Daniel is an expert in Congressional investigations and is always able to keep a calm head” Chambers USA, 2021-2024 “Daniel provides extremely good insight into the Congressional process and can convey it to high-level executives.” Chambers USA “[A]ctive in high-profile congressional investigations, and includes ... experts such as Daniel Donovan” Legal 500 US King \u0026amp; Spalding has “a strong track in congressional investigations … Daniel Donovan is a key contact” Legal 500 US Nationwide Government Relations Practice Ranking Chambers USA 2008-2024 Leading Government Relations Lawyer Legal 500 US, 2020-2024 Crisis Management and Government Oversight Practice Award National Law Journal 2021 “Law Firm of the Year” for Government Relations US News \u0026amp; World Report University of Rochester  American University Washington College of Law District of Columbia Maryland Experience representing numerous clients under investigation by Republican-controlled Senate and House Committees, including Senate Banking, Commerce, Finance, HELP, Homeland Security, Judiciary, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Special Committee on Aging, and House Education and the Workforce, Energy \u0026amp; Commerce, Financial Services, Judiciary, Oversight and Reform, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Select Committee on CCP, and Ways \u0026amp; Means, among others. Providing advice and counsel with respect to congressional oversight activity to leading companies in private sector industries, including accounting, auto, banking, consulting, defense, energy, fashion, food, healthcare provider, higher education, insurance, medical device, pharmaceutical, private equity, and tech, among others. Representing a variety of clients in connection with investigations relating to allegations of government fraud, food and product safety and recalls, cybersecurity breaches, product pricing, clinical research, off-label promotion, direct-to-consumer advertising, payments to physicians, and financial conflicts of interest. Representing multiple pharmaceutical companies in connection with congressional and state attorneys general drug pricing investigations. Representing a variety of clients on healthcare policy and legislative issues. Represented a major university and pharmaceutical company in connection with the Select Panel on Infant Lives (authorized under the House Energy and Commerce Committee) investigation relating to fetal tissue research. Represented a global financial institution in connection with an investigation by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, regarding international tax matters. Represented a Big Four accounting firm in a Senate Finance Committee investigation of a University’s handling of federal funds. Represented multiple pharmaceutical companies in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act enactment and implementation. Represented medical device companies in connection with House and Senate committee investigations into 510(k) regulatory issues, direct-to-consumer advertising, and payments to physicians. Represented a leading clean energy technology company in connection with a Senate investigation into Department of Energy grant program. Represented a major oil company in connection with congressional investigations. Represented a health insurer in House and Senate investigations related to Affordable Care Act implementation. Represented a coalition of food product companies in connection with congressional inquiries relating to food safety and regulatory issues. Represented a medical society in connection with Senate committee investigations in payments to physicians. Represented individuals in connection with House and Senate committee inquiries and ethics investigations.","searchable_name":"Daniel F. Donovan (Dan)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446136,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3872,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJoe Eisert has worked on high-stakes environmental, workplace safety, and\u0026nbsp;product safety matters for over 20 years. A partner in our Environmental, Health and Safety practice, Joe represents clients on a wide range of enforcement, litigation, incident response, transactional and compliance matters. His strong technical background and broad experience enable him to effectively represent clients in a variety of matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe counsels clients in environmental and product safety enforcement, litigation, transactional support, and counseling matters relating to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), as well as state and international regulatory bodies and state attorneys general.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also represents clients in corporate transactions, compliance counseling, rulemakings, enforcement actions and related litigation involving emissions from stationary and mobile sources, climate change regulation and other environmental matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the area of product safety, Joe works with clients on compliance counseling, rulemakings, recalls and recall avoidance, investigations, penalty cases and related litigation concerning a variety of consumer and commercial products.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple areas, including environmental and products liability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe was a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Environmental Editorial Advisory Board for 2011\u0026ndash;2013.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joseph-eisert","email":"jeisert@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eOutside counsel for industrial company's global workplace safety assessment involving hundreds of locations, numerous PSM facilities, and a safety culture assessment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncident response counsel for numerous industrial, refinery, and offshore incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted PSM, RMP, and emergency response assessments for multiple companies in the U.S. and abroad.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved enforcement actions, related litigation, and claims totaling over $880 million brought by EPA, CARB, DOJ, the California Attorney General and others in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved numerous \u003cstrong\u003eState Attorney General environmental and consumer protection claims\u003c/strong\u003e totaling over $1 billion in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved DOJ and EPA enforcement matter for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by \u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003emajor\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003echemical manufacturing facility\u003c/strong\u003e with no civil penalty or injunctive relief imposed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003eclients on numerous transactions involving manufacturing, energy, retail and consumer products.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eindustrial trade association\u003c/strong\u003e in an eight-year-long RTR rulemaking by the EPA that resulted in economically and technically feasible final rules for manufacturing facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting numerous vehicle manufacturers in EPA, ARB, and state regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProviding \u003cstrong\u003eclients\u003c/strong\u003e environmental support for corporate transactions, including coordinating environmental due diligence, supervising consultants and technical experts, counseling clients on liability and risk allocation issues, and drafting and negotiating contract language.\u0026nbsp; Several years corporate transactional experience ranging from company formation to private and public M\u0026amp;A, asset deals, and securities offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eBP\u003c/strong\u003e in defense of civil litigation brought by the DOJ and others seeking recovery from BP for injury, costs and environmental civil penalties attributable to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea client\u003c/strong\u003e in multiyear investigation and litigation by State Attorney General involving inquiry into core business practices and assertions of multi-billion dollar liability and five consumer class actions raising similar claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003etrade association\u003c/strong\u003e in rulemakings and counseling on various environmental, health, and safety matters, including climate change regulation, MACT rulemakings, PM2.5 NAAQS, New Source Review and OSHA rulemakings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono \u003cstrong\u003emultiple veterans\u003c/strong\u003e at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":50}]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":131,"guid":"131.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1508,"guid":"1508.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Eisert","nick_name":"Joseph","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Joseph","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":752,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1997-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 5 Environment","detail":" Chambers 2021-2025 - Chambers USA"},{"title":"Ranked: Environment: Litigation (Tier 2), Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Dev","detail":"Legal 500"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-eisert-6a58ba5","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJoe Eisert has worked on high-stakes environmental, workplace safety, and\u0026nbsp;product safety matters for over 20 years. A partner in our Environmental, Health and Safety practice, Joe represents clients on a wide range of enforcement, litigation, incident response, transactional and compliance matters. His strong technical background and broad experience enable him to effectively represent clients in a variety of matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe counsels clients in environmental and product safety enforcement, litigation, transactional support, and counseling matters relating to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), as well as state and international regulatory bodies and state attorneys general.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also represents clients in corporate transactions, compliance counseling, rulemakings, enforcement actions and related litigation involving emissions from stationary and mobile sources, climate change regulation and other environmental matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the area of product safety, Joe works with clients on compliance counseling, rulemakings, recalls and recall avoidance, investigations, penalty cases and related litigation concerning a variety of consumer and commercial products.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple areas, including environmental and products liability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoe was a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Environmental Editorial Advisory Board for 2011\u0026ndash;2013.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eOutside counsel for industrial company's global workplace safety assessment involving hundreds of locations, numerous PSM facilities, and a safety culture assessment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncident response counsel for numerous industrial, refinery, and offshore incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted PSM, RMP, and emergency response assessments for multiple companies in the U.S. and abroad.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved enforcement actions, related litigation, and claims totaling over $880 million brought by EPA, CARB, DOJ, the California Attorney General and others in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved numerous \u003cstrong\u003eState Attorney General environmental and consumer protection claims\u003c/strong\u003e totaling over $1 billion in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved DOJ and EPA enforcement matter for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by \u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003emajor\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003echemical manufacturing facility\u003c/strong\u003e with no civil penalty or injunctive relief imposed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003eclients on numerous transactions involving manufacturing, energy, retail and consumer products.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eindustrial trade association\u003c/strong\u003e in an eight-year-long RTR rulemaking by the EPA that resulted in economically and technically feasible final rules for manufacturing facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting numerous vehicle manufacturers in EPA, ARB, and state regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProviding \u003cstrong\u003eclients\u003c/strong\u003e environmental support for corporate transactions, including coordinating environmental due diligence, supervising consultants and technical experts, counseling clients on liability and risk allocation issues, and drafting and negotiating contract language.\u0026nbsp; Several years corporate transactional experience ranging from company formation to private and public M\u0026amp;A, asset deals, and securities offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eBP\u003c/strong\u003e in defense of civil litigation brought by the DOJ and others seeking recovery from BP for injury, costs and environmental civil penalties attributable to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea client\u003c/strong\u003e in multiyear investigation and litigation by State Attorney General involving inquiry into core business practices and assertions of multi-billion dollar liability and five consumer class actions raising similar claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003etrade association\u003c/strong\u003e in rulemakings and counseling on various environmental, health, and safety matters, including climate change regulation, MACT rulemakings, PM2.5 NAAQS, New Source Review and OSHA rulemakings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono \u003cstrong\u003emultiple veterans\u003c/strong\u003e at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 5 Environment","detail":" Chambers 2021-2025 - Chambers USA"},{"title":"Ranked: Environment: Litigation (Tier 2), Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Dev","detail":"Legal 500"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5651}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-24T21:15:01.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-24T21:15:01.000Z","searchable_text":"Eisert{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Band 5 Environment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" Chambers 2021-2025 - Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked: Environment: Litigation (Tier 2), Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Dev\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}Outside counsel for industrial company's global workplace safety assessment involving hundreds of locations, numerous PSM facilities, and a safety culture assessment.{{ FIELD }}Incident response counsel for numerous industrial, refinery, and offshore incidents.{{ FIELD }}Conducted PSM, RMP, and emergency response assessments for multiple companies in the U.S. and abroad.{{ FIELD }}Resolved enforcement actions, related litigation, and claims totaling over $880 million brought by EPA, CARB, DOJ, the California Attorney General and others in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.{{ FIELD }}Resolved numerous State Attorney General environmental and consumer protection claims totaling over $1 billion in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws.{{ FIELD }}Resolved DOJ and EPA enforcement matter for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by a major chemical manufacturing facility with no civil penalty or injunctive relief imposed.{{ FIELD }}Advised clients on numerous transactions involving manufacturing, energy, retail and consumer products.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented an industrial trade association in an eight-year-long RTR rulemaking by the EPA that resulted in economically and technically feasible final rules for manufacturing facilities.{{ FIELD }}Representing numerous vehicle manufacturers in EPA, ARB, and state regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and related litigation.{{ FIELD }}Providing clients environmental support for corporate transactions, including coordinating environmental due diligence, supervising consultants and technical experts, counseling clients on liability and risk allocation issues, and drafting and negotiating contract language.  Several years corporate transactional experience ranging from company formation to private and public M\u0026amp;A, asset deals, and securities offerings.{{ FIELD }}Represented BP in defense of civil litigation brought by the DOJ and others seeking recovery from BP for injury, costs and environmental civil penalties attributable to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico.{{ FIELD }}Represented a client in multiyear investigation and litigation by State Attorney General involving inquiry into core business practices and assertions of multi-billion dollar liability and five consumer class actions raising similar claims.{{ FIELD }}Representing a trade association in rulemakings and counseling on various environmental, health, and safety matters, including climate change regulation, MACT rulemakings, PM2.5 NAAQS, New Source Review and OSHA rulemakings.{{ FIELD }}Represented pro bono multiple veterans at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.{{ FIELD }}Joe Eisert has worked on high-stakes environmental, workplace safety, and product safety matters for over 20 years. A partner in our Environmental, Health and Safety practice, Joe represents clients on a wide range of enforcement, litigation, incident response, transactional and compliance matters. His strong technical background and broad experience enable him to effectively represent clients in a variety of matters.\nJoe counsels clients in environmental and product safety enforcement, litigation, transactional support, and counseling matters relating to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), as well as state and international regulatory bodies and state attorneys general.\nHe also represents clients in corporate transactions, compliance counseling, rulemakings, enforcement actions and related litigation involving emissions from stationary and mobile sources, climate change regulation and other environmental matters.\nIn the area of product safety, Joe works with clients on compliance counseling, rulemakings, recalls and recall avoidance, investigations, penalty cases and related litigation concerning a variety of consumer and commercial products.\nJoe has been recognized by Legal 500 in multiple areas, including environmental and products liability.\nJoe was a member of the Law360 Environmental Editorial Advisory Board for 2011–2013. Joseph A Eisert Partner Ranked Band 5 Environment  Chambers 2021-2025 - Chambers USA Ranked: Environment: Litigation (Tier 2), Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action; Pharmaceuticals and Medical Dev Legal 500 United States Naval Academy  George Mason University George Mason University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Outside counsel for industrial company's global workplace safety assessment involving hundreds of locations, numerous PSM facilities, and a safety culture assessment. Incident response counsel for numerous industrial, refinery, and offshore incidents. Conducted PSM, RMP, and emergency response assessments for multiple companies in the U.S. and abroad. Resolved enforcement actions, related litigation, and claims totaling over $880 million brought by EPA, CARB, DOJ, the California Attorney General and others in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws. Resolved numerous State Attorney General environmental and consumer protection claims totaling over $1 billion in connection with the importation and sale of diesel vehicles allegedly in violation of environmental laws. Resolved DOJ and EPA enforcement matter for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act by a major chemical manufacturing facility with no civil penalty or injunctive relief imposed. Advised clients on numerous transactions involving manufacturing, energy, retail and consumer products. Successfully represented an industrial trade association in an eight-year-long RTR rulemaking by the EPA that resulted in economically and technically feasible final rules for manufacturing facilities. Representing numerous vehicle manufacturers in EPA, ARB, and state regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, and related litigation. Providing clients environmental support for corporate transactions, including coordinating environmental due diligence, supervising consultants and technical experts, counseling clients on liability and risk allocation issues, and drafting and negotiating contract language.  Several years corporate transactional experience ranging from company formation to private and public M\u0026amp;A, asset deals, and securities offerings. Represented BP in defense of civil litigation brought by the DOJ and others seeking recovery from BP for injury, costs and environmental civil penalties attributable to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico. Represented a client in multiyear investigation and litigation by State Attorney General involving inquiry into core business practices and assertions of multi-billion dollar liability and five consumer class actions raising similar claims. Representing a trade association in rulemakings and counseling on various environmental, health, and safety matters, including climate change regulation, MACT rulemakings, PM2.5 NAAQS, New Source Review and OSHA rulemakings. Represented pro bono multiple veterans at the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.","searchable_name":"Joseph A. Eisert","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443282,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5125,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarter George focuses his practice on\u0026nbsp;representing Fortune 100 and other entities\u0026nbsp;in a wide range of complex litigation, including commercial disputes, toxic tort, automotive,\u0026nbsp;and other product liability and tort cases.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;has been a part of multiple trial teams in cases that have gone to verdict, and\u0026nbsp;he frequently\u0026nbsp;secures dismissals and summary adjudication in high-stakes civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Carter has\u0026nbsp;extensive deposition,\u0026nbsp;motion practice, alternative dispute resolution\u0026nbsp;and case management\u0026nbsp;experience, and he regularly\u0026nbsp;prepares company representatives for deposition.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarter also maintains a diverse pro bono practice, is a mentor to\u0026nbsp;summer associates,\u0026nbsp;and previously served on the Firmwide\u0026nbsp;Associates Committee.\u0026nbsp; Carter is a member of the Law Council\u0026nbsp;for Washington and Lee University School of Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Carter practiced at a Los Angeles litigation boutique handling all aspects of general commercial litigation\u0026nbsp;and white collar matters involving\u0026nbsp;cryptocurrency, corporate fraud and copyright disputes.\u0026nbsp; Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Irene C. Berger\u0026nbsp;in the Southern District of West Virginia, and during law school he externed at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Robert B. King.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"carter-george","email":"cgeorge@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc-related litigation. Obtained several dismissals and summary judgment of personal injury claims, including grant of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion. Helped secure complete defense verdicts at trial and successfully opposed subsequent motion for new trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epop culture collectibles company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in commercial dispute involving importation of goods from abroad.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained time served sentence for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epro bono client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in supervised release revocation proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple Song-Beverly matters. Obtained numerous dismissals and summary adjudication of fraud claims and negotiated resolution on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal industrial entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in personal injury action regarding allegations of latent multi-year injury to several plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Viking Group, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in products liability claims. Resolved matters on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecomputer security researcher\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in criminal matter involving malware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edigital agency\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Secured advantageous resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternet-based television provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in landmark litigation over Section 111 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Resolved national litigation on beneficial terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pioneering\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ee-cigarette company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in commercial dispute involving claims of self-dealing, unjust enrichment and corporate waste. Resolved matter on favorable terms before trial.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3307}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"George","nick_name":"Carter","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Honorable Robert Bruce King, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","years_held":"1/13-5/13"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Irene C. Berger, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia","years_held":"9/13-9/15"}],"first_name":"Carter","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2484,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"L.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch - Commercial Litigation ","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2024-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2026"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Carter L. George is a partner in our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarter George focuses his practice on\u0026nbsp;representing Fortune 100 and other entities\u0026nbsp;in a wide range of complex litigation, including commercial disputes, toxic tort, automotive,\u0026nbsp;and other product liability and tort cases.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;has been a part of multiple trial teams in cases that have gone to verdict, and\u0026nbsp;he frequently\u0026nbsp;secures dismissals and summary adjudication in high-stakes civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Carter has\u0026nbsp;extensive deposition,\u0026nbsp;motion practice, alternative dispute resolution\u0026nbsp;and case management\u0026nbsp;experience, and he regularly\u0026nbsp;prepares company representatives for deposition.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarter also maintains a diverse pro bono practice, is a mentor to\u0026nbsp;summer associates,\u0026nbsp;and previously served on the Firmwide\u0026nbsp;Associates Committee.\u0026nbsp; Carter is a member of the Law Council\u0026nbsp;for Washington and Lee University School of Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Carter practiced at a Los Angeles litigation boutique handling all aspects of general commercial litigation\u0026nbsp;and white collar matters involving\u0026nbsp;cryptocurrency, corporate fraud and copyright disputes.\u0026nbsp; Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Irene C. Berger\u0026nbsp;in the Southern District of West Virginia, and during law school he externed at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Robert B. King.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc-related litigation. Obtained several dismissals and summary judgment of personal injury claims, including grant of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion. Helped secure complete defense verdicts at trial and successfully opposed subsequent motion for new trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epop culture collectibles company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in commercial dispute involving importation of goods from abroad.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained time served sentence for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epro bono client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in supervised release revocation proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple Song-Beverly matters. Obtained numerous dismissals and summary adjudication of fraud claims and negotiated resolution on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal industrial entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in personal injury action regarding allegations of latent multi-year injury to several plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Viking Group, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in products liability claims. Resolved matters on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecomputer security researcher\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in criminal matter involving malware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edigital agency\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Secured advantageous resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternet-based television provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in landmark litigation over Section 111 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Resolved national litigation on beneficial terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pioneering\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ee-cigarette company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in commercial dispute involving claims of self-dealing, unjust enrichment and corporate waste. Resolved matter on favorable terms before trial.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch - Commercial Litigation ","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2024-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2026"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5762},{"id":5762}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-26T18:35:48.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-26T18:35:48.000Z","searchable_text":"George{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch - Commercial Litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2024-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc-related litigation. Obtained several dismissals and summary judgment of personal injury claims, including grant of forum non conveniens motion. Helped secure complete defense verdicts at trial and successfully opposed subsequent motion for new trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented pop culture collectibles company in commercial dispute involving importation of goods from abroad.{{ FIELD }}Obtained time served sentence for pro bono client in supervised release revocation proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Represented General Motors in multiple Song-Beverly matters. Obtained numerous dismissals and summary adjudication of fraud claims and negotiated resolution on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented global industrial entity in personal injury action regarding allegations of latent multi-year injury to several plaintiffs.{{ FIELD }}Represented The Viking Group, Inc. in products liability claims. Resolved matters on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented leading computer security researcher in criminal matter involving malware.{{ FIELD }}Represented global digital agency in adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Secured advantageous resolution.{{ FIELD }}Represented Internet-based television provider in landmark litigation over Section 111 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Resolved national litigation on beneficial terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented pioneering e-cigarette company in commercial dispute involving claims of self-dealing, unjust enrichment and corporate waste. Resolved matter on favorable terms before trial.{{ FIELD }}Carter George focuses his practice on representing Fortune 100 and other entities in a wide range of complex litigation, including commercial disputes, toxic tort, automotive, and other product liability and tort cases.  He has been a part of multiple trial teams in cases that have gone to verdict, and he frequently secures dismissals and summary adjudication in high-stakes civil litigation.  Carter has extensive deposition, motion practice, alternative dispute resolution and case management experience, and he regularly prepares company representatives for deposition.  \nCarter also maintains a diverse pro bono practice, is a mentor to summer associates, and previously served on the Firmwide Associates Committee.  Carter is a member of the Law Council for Washington and Lee University School of Law.  \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Carter practiced at a Los Angeles litigation boutique handling all aspects of general commercial litigation and white collar matters involving cryptocurrency, corporate fraud and copyright disputes.  Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Irene C. Berger in the Southern District of West Virginia, and during law school he externed at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Robert B. King.   Carter George lawyer Partner Rising Star Super Lawyers, 2024 Ones to Watch, Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026 Ones to Watch - Commercial Litigation  Best Lawyers in America, 2024-2026 Ones to Watch, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants Best Lawyers in America, 2026 University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law Washington and Lee University Washington and Lee University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California New York U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California Intern, Honorable Robert Bruce King, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Law Clerk, Honorable Irene C. Berger, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Represented Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc-related litigation. Obtained several dismissals and summary judgment of personal injury claims, including grant of forum non conveniens motion. Helped secure complete defense verdicts at trial and successfully opposed subsequent motion for new trial. Represented pop culture collectibles company in commercial dispute involving importation of goods from abroad. Obtained time served sentence for pro bono client in supervised release revocation proceedings. Represented General Motors in multiple Song-Beverly matters. Obtained numerous dismissals and summary adjudication of fraud claims and negotiated resolution on favorable terms. Represented global industrial entity in personal injury action regarding allegations of latent multi-year injury to several plaintiffs. Represented The Viking Group, Inc. in products liability claims. Resolved matters on favorable terms. Represented leading computer security researcher in criminal matter involving malware. Represented global digital agency in adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court. Secured advantageous resolution. Represented Internet-based television provider in landmark litigation over Section 111 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Resolved national litigation on beneficial terms. Represented pioneering e-cigarette company in commercial dispute involving claims of self-dealing, unjust enrichment and corporate waste. Resolved matter on favorable terms before trial.","searchable_name":"Carter L. George","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447512,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5644,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKarl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003edistinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\"\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;\"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and\u0026nbsp;\"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute.\u0026nbsp;He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management\u003c/em\u003e, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also\u0026nbsp;dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications.\u0026nbsp;He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"karl-heisler","email":"kheisler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Air Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Water Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eUnited States v. United Water Services\u003c/em\u003e, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eResource Conservation and Recovery Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGarrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining\u003c/em\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-style: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e and \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecovery, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(S.D. Ohio 2023)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eFederal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMaritime\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWorkplace Safety\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExtended Producer Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR\u0026nbsp;laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR\u0026nbsp;programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant\u0026rsquo;s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state\u0026nbsp;EPR laws throughout the Midwest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Transactions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1488,"guid":"1488.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1508,"guid":"1508.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1269,"guid":"1269.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Heisler","nick_name":"Karl","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Karl","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Editorial Board, Virginia Journal of International Law","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2002-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer","detail":"Lawdragon (2026)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026 Safety","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)"},{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental","detail":"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner","detail":"Benchmark Litigation (2016)"},{"title":"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Super Lawyers (2013)"},{"title":"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental","detail":"Law360 (2013)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKarl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003edistinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\"\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;\"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and\u0026nbsp;\"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute.\u0026nbsp;He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of \u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management\u003c/em\u003e, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also\u0026nbsp;dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications.\u0026nbsp;He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Air Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClean Water Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eUnited States v. United Water Services\u003c/em\u003e, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eResource Conservation and Recovery Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGarrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining\u003c/em\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-style: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cem\u003e and \u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecovery, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(S.D. Ohio 2023)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eFederal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMaritime\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWorkplace Safety\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExtended Producer Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR\u0026nbsp;laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR\u0026nbsp;programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant\u0026rsquo;s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state\u0026nbsp;EPR laws throughout the Midwest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEnvironmental Transactions\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer","detail":"Lawdragon (2026)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026 Safety","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year","detail":"Chambers USA (2024)"},{"title":"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)"},{"title":"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental","detail":"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)"},{"title":"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner","detail":"Benchmark Litigation (2016)"},{"title":"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Super Lawyers (2013)"},{"title":"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental","detail":"Law360 (2013)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7343},{"id":7343}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-04-14T14:46:19.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-14T14:46:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Heisler{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon (2026)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026amp; Safety\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2024 - 2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation (2016)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C. \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers (2013)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Law360 Rising Star - Environmental\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 (2013)\"}{{ FIELD }}Clean Air Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida{{ FIELD }}Clean Water Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges{{ FIELD }}Representation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico{{ FIELD }}Representation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County{{ FIELD }}Representation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in United States v. United Water Services, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012){{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast{{ FIELD }}Resource Conservation and Recovery Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit{{ FIELD }}Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc., et al. (S.D. Ohio 2023){{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling{{ FIELD }}Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program{{ FIELD }}Representation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns{{ FIELD }}Maritime{{ FIELD }}Representation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book{{ FIELD }}Workplace Safety{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world’s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world{{ FIELD }}Extended Producer Responsibility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws{{ FIELD }}Representation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging{{ FIELD }}Representation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs{{ FIELD }}Representation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant’s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state EPR laws throughout the Midwest{{ FIELD }}Provide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims{{ FIELD }}Environmental Transactions{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility{{ FIELD }}Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations{{ FIELD }}Representation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms{{ FIELD }}Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions{{ FIELD }}Representation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property{{ FIELD }}Karl Heisler is a nationally-recognized environmental lawyer in enforcement defense. Karl has managed the legal fallout from a wide array of environmental and workplace safety incidents, ranging from fires and explosions to pipeline releases and the abandonment of hazardous waste. He has over two decades of experience responding to governmental investigations involving the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. He is a prolific speaker on environmental law and incident response.\nChambers USA distinguished Karl as \"exceptionally proactive,\" with \"strategic thinking\" and \"the ability to understand the complex and translate it.\" Legal 500 USA characterized him as a \"true partner to his clients\" and \"highly strategic,\" with a \"singular ability to clarify the inordinately opaque and confusing nature of environmental laws for the unanointed.\" Lawdragon recognized him as a \"Leading Environmental Lawyer.\" Benchmark Litigation recognized him as having an \"unparalleled ability to master the facts and an encyclopedic mastery of environmental law.\"  \nAs a respected thought leader, Karl is frequently called upon to comment, write or speak about environmental enforcement and incident response for publications and organizations including Law360, Thomson Reuters, Resource Recycling, Inc., American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the American Bar Association, the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, the Association of Corporate Counsel, Lawline, the Environmental Law Institute, the Practising Law Institute and the American Law Institute. He has written or spoken about managing the first 48 hours of an incident, incident response for public information officers, responding to hazardous waste abandonments, hurricane readiness and response, climate risk disclosure, environmental due diligence, the environmental aspects of commercial and real estate transactions, the design and implementation of environmental compliance programs, the regulation of electronic waste, cybersecurity in the energy and transportation sectors, evidence preservation, and preparing for a government inspection. He wrote the introductory chapter for Inside the Minds: Environmental Law Enforcement and Compliance, published by Thomson Reuters/Aspatore, and co-authored the chapter entitled \"Environmental Criminal Enforcement: A Primer for the Real Estate Practitioner\" in the Fifth Edition of Environmental Aspects of Real Estate and Commercial Transactions: Acquisitions, Development, and Liability Management, which is one of the ABA's most widely read publications.\nKarl is a cutting-edge practitioner in extended producer responsibility laws extending to paper and plastic packaging, batteries, electronics recycling, and other product stewardship. His EPR clients include retail companies, pharmaceutical companies, food manufacturers, lawn and garden service providers, and waste management service providers. He also dedicates a significant portion of his practice to environmental transactions. He provides advice and counsel on environmental due diligence and the availability of transactional defenses, and he routinely negotiates representations, warranties, and indemnifications. He has assisted with the acquisitions and divestitures of several entities subject to government investigations arising out of environmental and workplace safety incidents. For over a decade, Karl has taught the environmental transactions course for the Environmental Law Institute, a leader in non-partisan research and environmental education.\nHis clients include public and private entities in the energy, chemical manufacturing, construction and waste management industries, as well as lenders, private equity and real estate firms with interests in these industries.\n  Partner Lawdragon 500 Leading Environmental Lawyer Lawdragon (2026) Chambers USA Band 1 (Firmwide), Nationwide Environmental Health \u0026amp; Safety Chambers USA (2024) Chambers USA Environmental Law Firm of the Year Chambers USA (2024) Chambers USA Band 3 (Individual), Environment: Litigation-Illinois Chambers USA (2024 - 2025) Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Environmental Lawyers Lawdragon Inc. (2021, 2023-2025) Legal 500 Recommended Practitioner, Environmental Legal 500 USA (2018-2020, 2023-2025) Benchmark Litigation Recognized Practitioner Benchmark Litigation (2016) Super Lawyers Rising Star - Washington, D.C.  Super Lawyers (2013) Law360 Rising Star - Environmental Law360 (2013) University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Illinois Virginia Illinois State Bar Association ABA, Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources and Criminal Justice Section District of Columbia Bar, Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Section The Chicago Bar Association Clean Air Act Representation of an international oil and natural gas company in connection with government investigations by EPA, OSHA, and CSB into multiple worker fatalities at an Ohio oil refinery and associated root cause analysis Representation of a global upstream energy company in connection with government investigations by EPA and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission into a natural gas release on the Alaska North Slope and associated root cause analysis Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of the Clean Air Act's risk management plan RAGAGEP provision, as well as the application of API standards and recommended practices; secured declination of criminal charges Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart J to flaring operations at a California oil refinery Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with federal and state civil, criminal and administrative investigations arising out of the application of NSPS Subpart Kb to alleged storage vessels at upstream production facilities in the Cook Inlet, Alaska Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a variety of Title V regulatory concerns affecting Alaska offshore drilling platforms Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the drafting of an incident response playbook for lawyers who may be called upon to respond to a fire, explosion, spill or other incidents Representation of a global investment trading company in connection with a federal criminal investigation arising out of the application of NESHAP asbestos work practice standards to the renovation of a 450+ unit residential complex in St. Petersburg, Florida Clean Water Act Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the U.S. Coast Guard, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and various state and local agencies into a pipeline release to waters from a California oil refinery and associated root cause analysis; secured declination of criminal charges Representation of an offshore, midstream energy company in connection with an NTSB investigation arising out of a crude oil release from an underwater pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico Representation of a pesticide chemicals formulating and packaging company in connection with a wastewater permit challenge in Iowa District Court for Lee County Representation of leading industrial equipment rental company in connection with a Las Vegas-area local environmental investigation arising out of alleged oil discharges into a storm drain Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States as standby incident response counsel, including in connection with multiple EPA, PHMSA, NTSB and state environmental investigations into releases from underground petroleum pipelines Representation of one of the world's largest providers of wastewater management solutions in connection with a federal criminal investigation and prosecution arising out of a chlorine release. Served on the team that secured an across-the-board acquittal of a 26-count criminal indictment in United States v. United Water Services, Inc. (N.D. Ind. 2012) Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a post-Deepwater federal criminal investigation into alleged violations of the Clean Water Act on an offshore oil and gas platform in the Gulf of Mexico Representation of a Fortune 200 leading processer and marketer of fresh pork and packaged meats in connection with a federal criminal investigation into allegations of unpermitted discharges of process wastewater. Provided advice and counsel in connection with the design and construction of a state-of-the-art wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with federal civil and criminal investigations arising out of an alleged failure to operate pollution control equipment at a wastewater treatment facility Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with a pilot study relating to the design and construction of a wastewater treatment system and associated NPDES permitting concerns, including the applicability of the RCRA wastewater treatment unit exemption Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged dumping of hazardous materials down a storm drain as part of a scheme involving the false production of biodiesel Representation of a leading construction materials and services company in connection with a federal criminal investigation into stormwater management practices at multiple facilities located throughout the Northeast Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with an Ohio EPA investigation arising out of a tenant's abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste Representation of a Fortune 500 natural gas utility in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged release of a natural gas odorant Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with a federal criminal investigation into shipments of byproducts, co-products and co-products used as fuels Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with federal civil investigations at a pesticide chemical formulating and packaging facility Representation of a global leader in the manufacture and distribution of water treatment chemicals in connection with a federal criminal investigation into the alleged storage of hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a permit Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the February 2023 Norfolk Southern freight train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with CERCLA litigation in Ohio federal court arising out of the abandonment of millions of pounds of hazardous electronic waste, securing over $16 million in cost recovery from over 50 potentially responsible parties in Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc., et al. (S.D. Ohio 2023) Representation of one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers in connection with threatened CERCLA litigation in Indiana arising out of metals recycling Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the largest federal civil and criminal investigations in the history of the FIFRA program Representation of a specialty chemical manufacturer in connection with FIFRA pesticide registration concerns Maritime Representation of a senior crew member of the F/V Pacific Breeze, a fishing vessel operating in the South Pacific, in connection with allegations arising under MARPOL and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships by failing to maintain an accurate Oil Record Book Workplace Safety Representation of one of the world’s largest natural resource companies in connection with a near-miss incident arising from a major fire at a U.S. zinc recycling facility Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with civil, criminal and administrative investigations by the CSB and various state and local agencies into an explosion and fire at a California oil refinery Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with a mechanical integrity review of fixed equipment inspection and maintenance programs for oil refineries located throughout the United States, Canada and South Africa Representation of one of the largest independent midstream energy companies in North America in connection with a federal criminal investigation into an explosion and fire at a hazardous materials recycling center Representation of one of the world's largest integrated producers of polymers and fibers in connection with an internal investigation into the OSHA recordability of alleged exposure to a chemical manufactured by less than 10 facilities in the world Extended Producer Responsibility Representation of a Fortune 500 company as lead regulatory counsel in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastics packaging and lithium-ion batteries; assisted in public outreach and advocacy and provide consultation to state lobbying teams Representation of a leading lawn and garden services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR programs affecting paper and plastic packaging and lithium-ion batteries and electronics waste laws Representation of a pharmaceutical company and marketer of leading aesthetics brands and products in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastics packaging Representation of a Fortune 500 waste management services provider in connection with existing and proposed state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging Representation of an industry-leading manufacturer and marketer of specialty food products for retail and foodservice markets with nearly $2 billion in revenue in connection with state EPR laws affecting paper and plastic packaging and food serviceware Representation of one of the world's largest retailers in connection with state battery takeback programs Representation of major U.S. automakers in connection with existing and proposed EPR programs affecting electric vehicle batteries, including end-of-life, defective, and recalled batteries Representation of a leading credit and asset-based investor group in connection with a state environmental investigation arising out of a tenant’s abandonment of millions of pounds of cathode ray tubes and related electronic waste collected pursuant to state EPR laws throughout the Midwest Provide advice and counsel to several clients in multiple industries regarding environmental, social and governance policies, including in connection with potential greenwashing claims Environmental Transactions Representation of a Fortune 50 energy company in connection with the divestiture of $600 million in oil and gas assets subject to pending administrative, civil and criminal investigations Representation of a global leader in specialty chemicals in connection with the divestiture of a specialty-batch chemical manufacturing facility subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the potential acquisition of a fertilizer manufacturing facility Representation of a leading lawn and garden manufacturer in connection with the divestiture of product lines subject to pending federal civil and criminal investigations Representation of an aerospace conglomerate in connection with the provision of engineering consulting services to offshore oil and gas platforms Representation of one of the largest pipeline companies in the United States in connection with multiple access and indemnity agreements, due diligence efforts, and real estate acquisitions Representation of a commercial real estate investment firm in connection with a lender's request for an environmental opinion relating to a utility's obligations to remediate a transformer leak on the acquired property","searchable_name":"Karl R. Heisler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6966,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charly-helleputte","email":"chelleputte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1220,"guid":"1220.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Helleputte","nick_name":"Charly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-albert-charly-helleputte-a103931/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12700}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Helleputte{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *{{ FIELD }}Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. *{{ FIELD }}Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *{{ FIELD }}From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. *{{ FIELD }}Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *{{ FIELD }}Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *{{ FIELD }}Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *{{ FIELD }}Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *{{ FIELD }}Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *{{ FIELD }}Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *{{ FIELD }}Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *{{ FIELD }}Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *{{ FIELD }}Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. * {{ FIELD }}Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Charly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks—such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR—is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.\nCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\nBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus). Partner Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium 2019 Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Candidat en Droit  Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit  Solvay Business School  Paris Brussels European Advisory Board Member, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) ENISA, the European Union Cybersecurity Agency American Chamber in Europe (AmCham), EU chapter W@Privacy Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. * Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. * Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. * Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. * Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. * Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. * Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. * From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. * Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. * Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. * Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. * Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. * Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. * Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. * Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. * Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. * Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. * Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. * Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. * Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. * Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. * Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. * Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. * Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. * Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. * Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. * Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. * Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. * Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. * Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. * Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. * Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. * Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. * Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *  Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.","searchable_name":"Charly Helleputte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443236,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5574,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDoug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation. \u0026nbsp;Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.\u0026nbsp; As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.\u0026nbsp; A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026). \u0026nbsp;Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"doug-henderson","email":"dhenderson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions\u0026mdash;the jury entered a \u0026ldquo;not\u0026rdquo; negligent verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts\u0026mdash;with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1184,"guid":"1184.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1205,"guid":"1205.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Henderson","nick_name":"Douglas","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Douglas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2210,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1993-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers","detail":"2014, 2018"},{"title":"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer","detail":"2015"},{"title":"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019"},{"title":"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026 Politics and Atlanta Magazine","detail":"2004-2017"},{"title":"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia","detail":"SuperLawyers"},{"title":"Georgia, Environment ","detail":"Chambers USA 2005-2018"},{"title":"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia","detail":"Daily Report"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDoug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation. \u0026nbsp;Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.\u0026nbsp; As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.\u0026nbsp; A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026). \u0026nbsp;Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions\u0026mdash;the jury entered a \u0026ldquo;not\u0026rdquo; negligent verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts\u0026mdash;with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers","detail":"2014, 2018"},{"title":"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer","detail":"2015"},{"title":"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019"},{"title":"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026 Politics and Atlanta Magazine","detail":"2004-2017"},{"title":"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia","detail":"SuperLawyers"},{"title":"Georgia, Environment ","detail":"Chambers USA 2005-2018"},{"title":"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia","detail":"Daily Report"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13205}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-24T19:25:55.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-24T19:25:55.000Z","searchable_text":"Henderson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2014, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026amp; Politics and Atlanta Magazine\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2004-2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"SuperLawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia, Environment \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2005-2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Report\"}{{ FIELD }}First chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions—the jury entered a “not” negligent verdict.{{ FIELD }}First chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts—with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.{{ FIELD }}First chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.{{ FIELD }}First chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.{{ FIELD }}Environmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.{{ FIELD }}First chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.{{ FIELD }}First chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.{{ FIELD }}Represented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.{{ FIELD }}Environmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.{{ FIELD }}Doug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation.  Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.  Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines. \nDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.  As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.  Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.  A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\nDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026).  Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.  In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.  Partner Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers 2014, 2018 Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer 2015 Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental  The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019 Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026amp; Politics and Atlanta Magazine 2004-2017 Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia SuperLawyers Georgia, Environment  Chambers USA 2005-2018 Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia Daily Report George Washington University George Washington University Law School University of Kentucky University of Kentucky College of Law Georgia Institute of Technology  University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia Member, Judicial Procedure Committee, State Bar of Georgia, 1997 – 2006 Chair, State Bar of Georgia, Environmental Law Section, 1999 – 2000 Chair, State Bar of Georgia, Agricultural Law Section, 2000 - 2005 First chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions—the jury entered a “not” negligent verdict. First chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts—with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments. Lead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions. Lead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans. Lead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama. Lead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility. First chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination. First chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act. Environmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation Lead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states. Lead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units. Lead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization. First chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement. Lead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill. Lead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA. First chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility. Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation. Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation. Represented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations. Acted as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal. Environmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.","searchable_name":"Douglas A. Henderson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426401,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3250,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJo\u0026euml;lle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.\u0026nbsp; She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.\u0026nbsp; She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.\u0026nbsp; Jo\u0026euml;lle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.\u0026nbsp; Her experience\u0026nbsp;encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.\u0026nbsp; She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joelle-herschtel","email":"jherschtel@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eHandling\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elitigation cases\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting clients with the implementation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edomestic and European environmental regulations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindustrial activity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Jo\u0026euml;lle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting companies in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindustrial or infrastructure projects,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipating in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eM\u0026amp;A and real estate operations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(environmental warranties and audits).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":68}]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1508,"guid":"1508.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Herschtel","nick_name":"Joëlle","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Joëlle","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism","detail":"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016"},{"title":"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France","detail":"Chambers Europe, 2020"},{"title":"Ranked in the EMEA guide ","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJo\u0026euml;lle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.\u0026nbsp; She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.\u0026nbsp; She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.\u0026nbsp; Jo\u0026euml;lle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.\u0026nbsp; Her experience\u0026nbsp;encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.\u0026nbsp; She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eHandling\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elitigation cases\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting clients with the implementation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edomestic and European environmental regulations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindustrial activity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Jo\u0026euml;lle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting companies in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindustrial or infrastructure projects,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipating in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eM\u0026amp;A and real estate operations\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(environmental warranties and audits).\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism","detail":"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016"},{"title":"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France","detail":"Chambers Europe, 2020"},{"title":"Ranked in the EMEA guide ","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12227}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Herschtel{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Europe, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in the EMEA guide \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Handling litigation cases before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances).{{ FIELD }}Assisting clients with the implementation of domestic and European environmental regulations ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials).{{ FIELD }}Advising clients in industrial activity closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Joëlle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource.{{ FIELD }}Assisting companies in industrial or infrastructure projects, from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation).{{ FIELD }}Participating in M\u0026amp;A and real estate operations (environmental warranties and audits).{{ FIELD }}Joëlle Herschtel is a partner based in the Paris office.  She has developed an environmental and toxic tort practice that encompasses both litigation and counseling in environmental, climate change, toxic tort and energy law.  She handles a wide range of litigation cases before French administrative, civil and criminal courts in these fields.  Joëlle also assists clients with the implementation of European and French environmental and product safety regulations.  Her experience encompasses legal assistance in the management of private and public infrastructure projects as well as remediation and requalification of industrial sites.  She also regularly participates in M\u0026amp;A operations and environmental audits. Joëlle Herschtel Partner Joëlle Herschtel is noted for her expertise, availability and pragmatism CHAMBERS EUROPE, 2020 Recognized as a Best Lawyer of the Year for Environmental Law in France Best Lawyers, 2021, 2016 Ranked in band 1 for environmental law in France Chambers Europe, 2020 Ranked in the EMEA guide  Legal 500, 2020 University of Paris X - Nanterre, France  Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris  Paris Bar Handling litigation cases before administrative (permit defenses, appeals, etc.), civil (clean-up costs recovery, toxic tort and nuisance cases, product liability, etc.) and criminal (water pollution, infringement of environmental regulations, waste, etc.) courts as well as before the European Court of Justice (greenhouse gas allowances). Assisting clients with the implementation of domestic and European environmental regulations ranking from the regulations applicable to classified facilities, waste or mines and quarries to very specific regulations concerning, for example, the emission trading scheme (greenhouse gas) or chemicals (REACH, CLP, RoHS, biocidal products, nanomaterials). Advising clients in industrial activity closing down, clean-up of contaminated sites and brownfields requalification, including the management of potential health risks to local residents and of environmental threats to water, air and the biodiversity. Joëlle has also developed specific and recognized experience in the field of waste management, working on a variety of subjects ranging from waste-generating material being put into circulation to the reuse of waste as a resource. Assisting companies in industrial or infrastructure projects, from their conception (audit of applications for permits, obtaining permits and contractual elaboration) to their realization (compliance audits, industrial risk management and regulations implementation). Participating in M\u0026amp;A and real estate operations (environmental warranties and audits).","searchable_name":"Joëlle Herschtel","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446558,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5584,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNicholas Howell is a first-chair trial lawyer who defends companies in high-stakes environmental and toxic tort litigation across the country. He has tried multiple cases to verdict in federal and state courts and in administrative proceedings, securing defense wins in personal injury, toxic exposure, and environmental permitting disputes.\u0026nbsp;Nicholas defends clients in class actions, mass torts, and individual personal injury claims arising from alleged exposure to hazardous substances and environmental contaminants. He also represents industrial clients in actions brought by state attorneys general, including statewide claims for natural resource damages tied to alleged contamination of surface water, groundwater, soil, and air. In addition to litigation, he guides companies through incident response and internal investigations involving OSHA, worker safety, and whistleblower allegations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWidely recognized for his expertise, Nicholas is ranked by Chambers USA as an \u0026ldquo;Up and Coming\u0026rdquo; lawyer in environmental law and has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for Environmental Law. He is a frequent author and speaker on trial strategy, toxic tort trends, and emerging contaminants, and has held multiple leadership roles within the State Bar of Georgia\u0026rsquo;s Environmental Law Section, serving as an officer for five years and as President in 2023.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Nicholas served as a law clerk to the Honorable J. Randal Hall of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in Augusta, Georgia. He also worked as an Associate at a large international law firm in Atlanta, Georgia, focusing on environmental, toxic tort litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"nicholas-howell","email":"nhowell@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObtained full defense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in six-week long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in month-long jury trial defending medical device manufacturer against claims that its permitted emissions of ethylene oxide caused nearby residents to develop cancer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in month-long jury trial, successfully resolving all claims brought by residents near manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefeated class certification\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and obtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecomplete dismissal of all claims\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;brought on behalf of class of residents near medical manufacturing and sterilization facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an international medical device manufacturer and sterilizer against the State of Georgia in a lawsuit seeking a shutdown of its sterilization operations due to use of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eethylene oxide\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;trial counsel in a federal jury trial in the Northern District of Georgia involving allegations of violations of the Clean Water Act. This was the first NPDES stormwater citizen-suit tried to verdict in Georgia in almost a decade.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefeated class certification\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal court class action involving more than 200 putative class members against an automotive parts manufacturer for claims of chemical exposure and property damage from groundwater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eelectric utility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in appeal of Clean Water Act NPDES wastewater discharge permit for coal-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a manufacturer in a suit alleging\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental property damage claims\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to vapor intrusion of volatile organic compounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended national scrap metal recycler in disputes related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge industrial fire\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and related state and local regulatory violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;trial counsel\u0026nbsp;in federal bench trial in the Southern District of Florida in a lawsuit involving\u0026nbsp;international retail chain.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended two\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational grocery retail chains\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal district and appellate courts in a restrictive covenant property dispute involving claims for lost profits in excess of $70 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAm Law 100 firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dispute alleging claims for legal malpractice totaling over $100 million.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Howell","nick_name":"Nicholas","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable J. Randal Hall, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Nicholas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Up and Coming: Environmental Law","detail":"Chambers, 2025"},{"title":"Up and Coming, Environmental Law ","detail":"Chambers, 2024"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2022"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2020"},{"title":"Emerging Leaders Initiative ","detail":"Environmental Law Institute, 2021"},{"title":"Class of 2020 ","detail":"Conservative Policy Leadership Institute"},{"title":"Leadership Academy ","detail":"State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division, 2017"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNicholas Howell is a first-chair trial lawyer who defends companies in high-stakes environmental and toxic tort litigation across the country. He has tried multiple cases to verdict in federal and state courts and in administrative proceedings, securing defense wins in personal injury, toxic exposure, and environmental permitting disputes.\u0026nbsp;Nicholas defends clients in class actions, mass torts, and individual personal injury claims arising from alleged exposure to hazardous substances and environmental contaminants. He also represents industrial clients in actions brought by state attorneys general, including statewide claims for natural resource damages tied to alleged contamination of surface water, groundwater, soil, and air. In addition to litigation, he guides companies through incident response and internal investigations involving OSHA, worker safety, and whistleblower allegations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWidely recognized for his expertise, Nicholas is ranked by Chambers USA as an \u0026ldquo;Up and Coming\u0026rdquo; lawyer in environmental law and has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for Environmental Law. He is a frequent author and speaker on trial strategy, toxic tort trends, and emerging contaminants, and has held multiple leadership roles within the State Bar of Georgia\u0026rsquo;s Environmental Law Section, serving as an officer for five years and as President in 2023.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Nicholas served as a law clerk to the Honorable J. Randal Hall of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in Augusta, Georgia. He also worked as an Associate at a large international law firm in Atlanta, Georgia, focusing on environmental, toxic tort litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObtained full defense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in six-week long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in month-long jury trial defending medical device manufacturer against claims that its permitted emissions of ethylene oxide caused nearby residents to develop cancer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLead trial counsel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in month-long jury trial, successfully resolving all claims brought by residents near manufacturing facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefeated class certification\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and obtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecomplete dismissal of all claims\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;brought on behalf of class of residents near medical manufacturing and sterilization facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an international medical device manufacturer and sterilizer against the State of Georgia in a lawsuit seeking a shutdown of its sterilization operations due to use of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eethylene oxide\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;trial counsel in a federal jury trial in the Northern District of Georgia involving allegations of violations of the Clean Water Act. This was the first NPDES stormwater citizen-suit tried to verdict in Georgia in almost a decade.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefeated class certification\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal court class action involving more than 200 putative class members against an automotive parts manufacturer for claims of chemical exposure and property damage from groundwater.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eelectric utility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in appeal of Clean Water Act NPDES wastewater discharge permit for coal-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a manufacturer in a suit alleging\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eenvironmental property damage claims\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to vapor intrusion of volatile organic compounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended national scrap metal recycler in disputes related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge industrial fire\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and related state and local regulatory violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edefense verdict\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as\u0026nbsp;trial counsel\u0026nbsp;in federal bench trial in the Southern District of Florida in a lawsuit involving\u0026nbsp;international retail chain.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended two\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational grocery retail chains\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal district and appellate courts in a restrictive covenant property dispute involving claims for lost profits in excess of $70 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAm Law 100 firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dispute alleging claims for legal malpractice totaling over $100 million.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Up and Coming: Environmental Law","detail":"Chambers, 2025"},{"title":"Up and Coming, Environmental Law ","detail":"Chambers, 2024"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2022"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2021"},{"title":"One to Watch: Environmental Law ","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2020"},{"title":"Emerging Leaders Initiative ","detail":"Environmental Law Institute, 2021"},{"title":"Class of 2020 ","detail":"Conservative Policy Leadership Institute"},{"title":"Leadership Academy ","detail":"State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division, 2017"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7350}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-06T22:19:40.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06T22:19:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Howell{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Up and Coming: Environmental Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Up and Coming, Environmental Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Environmental Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Environmental Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Environmental Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Environmental Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Environmental Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Emerging Leaders Initiative \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Environmental Law Institute, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Class of 2020 \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Conservative Policy Leadership Institute\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leadership Academy \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}Obtained full defense verdict as lead trial counsel in six-week long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel in month-long jury trial defending medical device manufacturer against claims that its permitted emissions of ethylene oxide caused nearby residents to develop cancer{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel in month-long jury trial, successfully resolving all claims brought by residents near manufacturing facility{{ FIELD }}Successfully defeated class certification and obtained complete dismissal of all claims brought on behalf of class of residents near medical manufacturing and sterilization facility{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended an international medical device manufacturer and sterilizer against the State of Georgia in a lawsuit seeking a shutdown of its sterilization operations due to use of ethylene oxide.{{ FIELD }}Obtained defense verdict as trial counsel in a federal jury trial in the Northern District of Georgia involving allegations of violations of the Clean Water Act. This was the first NPDES stormwater citizen-suit tried to verdict in Georgia in almost a decade.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defeated class certification in a federal court class action involving more than 200 putative class members against an automotive parts manufacturer for claims of chemical exposure and property damage from groundwater.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended an electric utility in appeal of Clean Water Act NPDES wastewater discharge permit for coal-fired power plant.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a manufacturer in a suit alleging environmental property damage claims related to vapor intrusion of volatile organic compounds.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended national scrap metal recycler in disputes related to large industrial fire and related state and local regulatory violations.{{ FIELD }}Obtained defense verdict as trial counsel in federal bench trial in the Southern District of Florida in a lawsuit involving international retail chain. {{ FIELD }}Successfully defended two national grocery retail chains in federal district and appellate courts in a restrictive covenant property dispute involving claims for lost profits in excess of $70 million.{{ FIELD }}Represented Am Law 100 firm in dispute alleging claims for legal malpractice totaling over $100 million.{{ FIELD }}Nicholas Howell is a first-chair trial lawyer who defends companies in high-stakes environmental and toxic tort litigation across the country. He has tried multiple cases to verdict in federal and state courts and in administrative proceedings, securing defense wins in personal injury, toxic exposure, and environmental permitting disputes. Nicholas defends clients in class actions, mass torts, and individual personal injury claims arising from alleged exposure to hazardous substances and environmental contaminants. He also represents industrial clients in actions brought by state attorneys general, including statewide claims for natural resource damages tied to alleged contamination of surface water, groundwater, soil, and air. In addition to litigation, he guides companies through incident response and internal investigations involving OSHA, worker safety, and whistleblower allegations. \nWidely recognized for his expertise, Nicholas is ranked by Chambers USA as an “Up and Coming” lawyer in environmental law and has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch for Environmental Law. He is a frequent author and speaker on trial strategy, toxic tort trends, and emerging contaminants, and has held multiple leadership roles within the State Bar of Georgia’s Environmental Law Section, serving as an officer for five years and as President in 2023.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Nicholas served as a law clerk to the Honorable J. Randal Hall of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia in Augusta, Georgia. He also worked as an Associate at a large international law firm in Atlanta, Georgia, focusing on environmental, toxic tort litigation. Partner Up and Coming: Environmental Law Chambers, 2025 Up and Coming, Environmental Law  Chambers, 2024 One to Watch: Environmental Law  Best Lawyers, 2024 One to Watch: Environmental Law Best Lawyers, 2023 One to Watch: Environmental Law  Best Lawyers, 2022 One to Watch: Environmental Law  Best Lawyers, 2021 One to Watch: Environmental Law  Best Lawyers, 2020 Emerging Leaders Initiative  Environmental Law Institute, 2021 Class of 2020  Conservative Policy Leadership Institute Leadership Academy  State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division, 2017 Furman University  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Georgia State Bar of Georgia Environmental Law Section, State Bar of Georgia, Former Chair University of Georgia School of Law Young Alumni Committee, Former President Atlanta Children's Shelter Young Professionals Advisory Committee, Former Board Member Conservative Policy Leadership Institute, Class of 2020 State Bar of Georgia Young Lawyers Division Leadership Academy, Class of 2017 Law Clerk, Honorable J. Randal Hall, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Obtained full defense verdict as lead trial counsel in six-week long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions Lead trial counsel in month-long jury trial defending medical device manufacturer against claims that its permitted emissions of ethylene oxide caused nearby residents to develop cancer Lead trial counsel in month-long jury trial, successfully resolving all claims brought by residents near manufacturing facility Successfully defeated class certification and obtained complete dismissal of all claims brought on behalf of class of residents near medical manufacturing and sterilization facility Successfully defended an international medical device manufacturer and sterilizer against the State of Georgia in a lawsuit seeking a shutdown of its sterilization operations due to use of ethylene oxide. Obtained defense verdict as trial counsel in a federal jury trial in the Northern District of Georgia involving allegations of violations of the Clean Water Act. This was the first NPDES stormwater citizen-suit tried to verdict in Georgia in almost a decade. Successfully defeated class certification in a federal court class action involving more than 200 putative class members against an automotive parts manufacturer for claims of chemical exposure and property damage from groundwater. Successfully defended an electric utility in appeal of Clean Water Act NPDES wastewater discharge permit for coal-fired power plant. Successfully defended a manufacturer in a suit alleging environmental property damage claims related to vapor intrusion of volatile organic compounds. Successfully defended national scrap metal recycler in disputes related to large industrial fire and related state and local regulatory violations. Obtained defense verdict as trial counsel in federal bench trial in the Southern District of Florida in a lawsuit involving international retail chain.  Successfully defended two national grocery retail chains in federal district and appellate courts in a restrictive covenant property dispute involving claims for lost profits in excess of $70 million. Represented Am Law 100 firm in dispute alleging claims for legal malpractice totaling over $100 million.","searchable_name":"Nicholas H. Howell","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442765,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5371,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePeter Hsiao has 40\u0026nbsp;years of experience as a first-chair\u0026nbsp;trial lawyer.\u0026nbsp; He was named Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year in Los Angeles by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers in America,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and one of 16 lawyers named as a Distinguished Environmental Advocate by the American Bar Association.\u0026nbsp; He is one of seven lawyers in the U.S. designated as a Global Leader in Environmental Law by Who's Who Legal.\u0026nbsp; The\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;identifies him as a Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law, and he is named by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers (in its highest Tier 1), Legal 500, Lawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e as one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s best environmental lawyers.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Hsiao is head of the West Coast Environmental, Health \u0026amp; Safety Practice, awarded Environmental Law Firm of the Year\u0026nbsp;by Chambers and Partners in 2024.\u0026nbsp; Drawing upon his chemical engineering background, he is one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s leading attorneys in environmental, natural resources, climate change and toxic tort law.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow and former Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Board of Regents of the American College of Environmental Lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He is also former Chair of the State Bar of California's Environmental Law Section and a former member of the ABA's Standing Committee on Environmental Law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe served as senior trial lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles. \u0026nbsp;He was lead trial counsel for the EPA and other agencies, and received the Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s Special Commendation Award, the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office Special Achievement Award, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award. \u0026nbsp;He was appointed as a judge\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro tem\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for the Los Angeles Municipal Court and served as a mediator for environmental cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Hsiao is the editor of the California Environmental and Natural Resources Law Handbook. \u0026nbsp;He is past-president of the Board of Directors for the Los Angeles County Bar Association's Counsel for Justice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He is a life fellow of the American Bar Foundation, former chair of the State Bar of California Committee on Legal Services to the Poor, and recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;legal services.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;with a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Utah in 1982.\u0026nbsp; He received the Outstanding Student Award from the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. He received a J.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1985, where he won the McBaine Advocacy Award.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"peter-hsiao","email":"phsiao@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eMattel, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e before U.S. Supreme Court in case arising from contaminated property dispute in Beaverton, Oregon at site of former View Master facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eIMC Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in defending criminal action regarding alleged illegal take of migratory birds from exposure to process ponds. Negotiated settlement and first-ever wildlife mitigation plan with California Department of Fish and Game under Fish and Game Code Section 3007.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eKano Laboratories \u003c/strong\u003ein an enforcement action by the California Air Resources Board regarding emissive content and labeling of adhesive coatings.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eMattel, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in relation to volatile organic compound control measures and spray booth issues before South Coast Air Quality Management District.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as \u003cstrong\u003ePort's\u003c/strong\u003e lead trial counsel in federal court action against citizens group challenging validity of Clean Water Act Section 404 permit and NEPA process for China Shipping Terminal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained court ordered dismissal of all charges against \u003cstrong\u003eThomas Crane Trucking Company\u003c/strong\u003e in a felony action alleging violations of federal and state law from oil production and servicing operations in the Bolsa Chica area.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead outside counsel for \u003cstrong\u003eShea Homes\u003c/strong\u003e for stormwater enforcement actions by RWQCB and municipal agencies. Assisted in preparation of SWPPPs and provided counseling and training on wide range of compliance issues and negotiated with citizens' group regarding alleged stormwater releases to Malibu Creek.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided legal counsel to the \u003cstrong\u003ePort of Los Angeles\u003c/strong\u003e regarding storm water pollution control issues, including advising on the development of new wharf facilities at Pier 100.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eKey Energy Services\u003c/strong\u003e in toxic tort litigation for alleged contamination from TPH and other chemicals in residential neighborhood development in Santa Maria, California. Represented client on appeals to State Water Resources Control Board of orders regarding responsible party status.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of criminal charges against \u003cstrong\u003eLodi Memorial Hospital\u003c/strong\u003e related to alleged asbestos removal practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eEast Bay Regional Park District\u003c/strong\u003e in a CERCLA case involving a former landfill. Obtained a ruling allocating 95% of the costs to Waste Management, the former owner of the landfill, and only 5% to the Park District, as the site\u0026rsquo;s current owner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel in federal court action \u003cstrong\u003eCity and County of San Francisco v. Atlantic Richfield, \u003c/strong\u003eet al., to clean up historical contamination by numerous tenants at airport. The over $140 million settlement was the largest environmental settlement in California in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for the nation's leading diesel engine manufacturers \u003cstrong\u003eCummins Engine Company, Inc., John Deere Construction Equipment Company, Detroit Diesel Corp., and Caterpillar, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e., in the first defense judgment achieved after trial in a Proposition 65 action.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel to address the nation's largest source of particulate air emissions, the \u003cstrong\u003eOwens Dry Lake Bed\u003c/strong\u003e.\u0026nbsp; Obtained judgment after trial against Department of Water and Power, and settlement in administrative adjudication before California Air Resources Board.\u0026nbsp; The resulting settlement led to a new State Implementation Plan and shallow flooding of the lake bed. This settlement had a total value in excess of $100 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for \u003cstrong\u003eUnion Pacific Corporation \u003c/strong\u003efor the cleanup of the McCormick and Baxter Superfund site due to contamination.\u0026nbsp; Negotiated a favorable settlement of past cost and future work under a consent decree with U.S. EPA and California Department of Toxic Substances Control.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for \u003cstrong\u003e3M Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e to defend against Superfund action by the State of California regarding the Cal Compact landfill site in Long Beach, California (State of California v. Atlantic Richfield).\u0026nbsp; Case resulted in favorable settlement for 3M.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3903}]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":984,"guid":"984.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":19,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":20,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1205,"guid":"1205.smart_tags","index":21,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":22,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":23,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":24,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":131,"guid":"131.capabilities","index":25,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1488,"guid":"1488.smart_tags","index":26,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hsiao","nick_name":"Peter","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Peter","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2159,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1985-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Distinguished Environmental Advocate","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"Los Angeles Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2016"},{"title":"Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law","detail":"National Law Journal, 2015"},{"title":"One of the Nation’s Best Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Chambers and Partners, 2013-2024"},{"title":"One of the Best Environmental Lawyers in the United States","detail":"Legal 500 and PLC 3000"},{"title":"Leading Cross-Border Environmental Attorney","detail":"International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers"},{"title":"One of the Top Environmental Lawyers in Los Angeles","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Department of Justice’s Special Commendation Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Justice"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Achievement Award","detail":"U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award","detail":"U.S. Fish \u0026 Wildlife Service"},{"title":"Recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services","detail":"State Bar of California"},{"title":"“Peter Hsiao impresses with his ‘extremely broad experience in all types of environmental issue,’ leveraging his experience as a chemical engineer when advising on disputes. His expert trial practice is particularly highlighted, with one client noting: ‘To hear him address a court is pure art.’”","detail":"Chambers USA 2015"},{"title":"\"A standout for Proposition 65 work. Extremely knowledgeable and practical on how he'll manage the litigation.\"","detail":"Chambers 2024"},{"title":"\"He's absolutely amazing, it's a personalized service, his devotion to timeliness and attention to detail is wonderful.\"","detail":"Chambers, 2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-hsiao-b7a0492/","seodescription":"Peter Hsiao is a lawyer of our Government Matters \u0026 Regulation Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePeter Hsiao has 40\u0026nbsp;years of experience as a first-chair\u0026nbsp;trial lawyer.\u0026nbsp; He was named Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year in Los Angeles by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers in America,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and one of 16 lawyers named as a Distinguished Environmental Advocate by the American Bar Association.\u0026nbsp; He is one of seven lawyers in the U.S. designated as a Global Leader in Environmental Law by Who's Who Legal.\u0026nbsp; The\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;identifies him as a Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law, and he is named by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers (in its highest Tier 1), Legal 500, Lawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e as one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s best environmental lawyers.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Hsiao is head of the West Coast Environmental, Health \u0026amp; Safety Practice, awarded Environmental Law Firm of the Year\u0026nbsp;by Chambers and Partners in 2024.\u0026nbsp; Drawing upon his chemical engineering background, he is one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s leading attorneys in environmental, natural resources, climate change and toxic tort law.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow and former Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Board of Regents of the American College of Environmental Lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He is also former Chair of the State Bar of California's Environmental Law Section and a former member of the ABA's Standing Committee on Environmental Law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe served as senior trial lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles. \u0026nbsp;He was lead trial counsel for the EPA and other agencies, and received the Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s Special Commendation Award, the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office Special Achievement Award, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award. \u0026nbsp;He was appointed as a judge\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro tem\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for the Los Angeles Municipal Court and served as a mediator for environmental cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Hsiao is the editor of the California Environmental and Natural Resources Law Handbook. \u0026nbsp;He is past-president of the Board of Directors for the Los Angeles County Bar Association's Counsel for Justice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He is a life fellow of the American Bar Foundation, former chair of the State Bar of California Committee on Legal Services to the Poor, and recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;legal services.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;with a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Utah in 1982.\u0026nbsp; He received the Outstanding Student Award from the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. He received a J.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1985, where he won the McBaine Advocacy Award.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eMattel, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e before U.S. Supreme Court in case arising from contaminated property dispute in Beaverton, Oregon at site of former View Master facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eIMC Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in defending criminal action regarding alleged illegal take of migratory birds from exposure to process ponds. Negotiated settlement and first-ever wildlife mitigation plan with California Department of Fish and Game under Fish and Game Code Section 3007.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eKano Laboratories \u003c/strong\u003ein an enforcement action by the California Air Resources Board regarding emissive content and labeling of adhesive coatings.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eMattel, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in relation to volatile organic compound control measures and spray booth issues before South Coast Air Quality Management District.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as \u003cstrong\u003ePort's\u003c/strong\u003e lead trial counsel in federal court action against citizens group challenging validity of Clean Water Act Section 404 permit and NEPA process for China Shipping Terminal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained court ordered dismissal of all charges against \u003cstrong\u003eThomas Crane Trucking Company\u003c/strong\u003e in a felony action alleging violations of federal and state law from oil production and servicing operations in the Bolsa Chica area.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead outside counsel for \u003cstrong\u003eShea Homes\u003c/strong\u003e for stormwater enforcement actions by RWQCB and municipal agencies. Assisted in preparation of SWPPPs and provided counseling and training on wide range of compliance issues and negotiated with citizens' group regarding alleged stormwater releases to Malibu Creek.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided legal counsel to the \u003cstrong\u003ePort of Los Angeles\u003c/strong\u003e regarding storm water pollution control issues, including advising on the development of new wharf facilities at Pier 100.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eKey Energy Services\u003c/strong\u003e in toxic tort litigation for alleged contamination from TPH and other chemicals in residential neighborhood development in Santa Maria, California. Represented client on appeals to State Water Resources Control Board of orders regarding responsible party status.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of criminal charges against \u003cstrong\u003eLodi Memorial Hospital\u003c/strong\u003e related to alleged asbestos removal practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eEast Bay Regional Park District\u003c/strong\u003e in a CERCLA case involving a former landfill. Obtained a ruling allocating 95% of the costs to Waste Management, the former owner of the landfill, and only 5% to the Park District, as the site\u0026rsquo;s current owner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel in federal court action \u003cstrong\u003eCity and County of San Francisco v. Atlantic Richfield, \u003c/strong\u003eet al., to clean up historical contamination by numerous tenants at airport. The over $140 million settlement was the largest environmental settlement in California in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for the nation's leading diesel engine manufacturers \u003cstrong\u003eCummins Engine Company, Inc., John Deere Construction Equipment Company, Detroit Diesel Corp., and Caterpillar, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e., in the first defense judgment achieved after trial in a Proposition 65 action.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel to address the nation's largest source of particulate air emissions, the \u003cstrong\u003eOwens Dry Lake Bed\u003c/strong\u003e.\u0026nbsp; Obtained judgment after trial against Department of Water and Power, and settlement in administrative adjudication before California Air Resources Board.\u0026nbsp; The resulting settlement led to a new State Implementation Plan and shallow flooding of the lake bed. This settlement had a total value in excess of $100 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for \u003cstrong\u003eUnion Pacific Corporation \u003c/strong\u003efor the cleanup of the McCormick and Baxter Superfund site due to contamination.\u0026nbsp; Negotiated a favorable settlement of past cost and future work under a consent decree with U.S. EPA and California Department of Toxic Substances Control.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for \u003cstrong\u003e3M Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e to defend against Superfund action by the State of California regarding the Cal Compact landfill site in Long Beach, California (State of California v. Atlantic Richfield).\u0026nbsp; Case resulted in favorable settlement for 3M.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Distinguished Environmental Advocate","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"Los Angeles Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2016"},{"title":"Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law","detail":"National Law Journal, 2015"},{"title":"One of the Nation’s Best Environmental Lawyers","detail":"Chambers and Partners, 2013-2024"},{"title":"One of the Best Environmental Lawyers in the United States","detail":"Legal 500 and PLC 3000"},{"title":"Leading Cross-Border Environmental Attorney","detail":"International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers"},{"title":"One of the Top Environmental Lawyers in Los Angeles","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Department of Justice’s Special Commendation Award","detail":"U.S. Department of Justice"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Achievement Award","detail":"U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California"},{"title":"Awarded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award","detail":"U.S. Fish \u0026 Wildlife Service"},{"title":"Recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services","detail":"State Bar of California"},{"title":"“Peter Hsiao impresses with his ‘extremely broad experience in all types of environmental issue,’ leveraging his experience as a chemical engineer when advising on disputes. His expert trial practice is particularly highlighted, with one client noting: ‘To hear him address a court is pure art.’”","detail":"Chambers USA 2015"},{"title":"\"A standout for Proposition 65 work. Extremely knowledgeable and practical on how he'll manage the litigation.\"","detail":"Chambers 2024"},{"title":"\"He's absolutely amazing, it's a personalized service, his devotion to timeliness and attention to detail is wonderful.\"","detail":"Chambers, 2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6348},{"id":6348}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:44.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:44.000Z","searchable_text":"Hsiao{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Distinguished Environmental Advocate\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Bar Association\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of the Nation’s Best Environmental Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers and Partners, 2013-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of the Best Environmental Lawyers in the United States\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 and PLC 3000\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Cross-Border Environmental Attorney\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of the Top Environmental Lawyers in Los Angeles\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Awarded the U.S. Department of Justice’s Special Commendation Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Department of Justice\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Awarded the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Achievement Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Awarded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Fish \u0026amp; Wildlife Service\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"State Bar of California\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Peter Hsiao impresses with his ‘extremely broad experience in all types of environmental issue,’ leveraging his experience as a chemical engineer when advising on disputes. His expert trial practice is particularly highlighted, with one client noting: ‘To hear him address a court is pure art.’”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"A standout for Proposition 65 work. Extremely knowledgeable and practical on how he'll manage the litigation.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He's absolutely amazing, it's a personalized service, his devotion to timeliness and attention to detail is wonderful.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Mattel, Inc. before U.S. Supreme Court in case arising from contaminated property dispute in Beaverton, Oregon at site of former View Master facility.{{ FIELD }}Represented IMC Corporation in defending criminal action regarding alleged illegal take of migratory birds from exposure to process ponds. Negotiated settlement and first-ever wildlife mitigation plan with California Department of Fish and Game under Fish and Game Code Section 3007.{{ FIELD }}Represented Kano Laboratories in an enforcement action by the California Air Resources Board regarding emissive content and labeling of adhesive coatings. {{ FIELD }}Represented Mattel, Inc. in relation to volatile organic compound control measures and spray booth issues before South Coast Air Quality Management District.{{ FIELD }}Served as Port's lead trial counsel in federal court action against citizens group challenging validity of Clean Water Act Section 404 permit and NEPA process for China Shipping Terminal.{{ FIELD }}Obtained court ordered dismissal of all charges against Thomas Crane Trucking Company in a felony action alleging violations of federal and state law from oil production and servicing operations in the Bolsa Chica area.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead outside counsel for Shea Homes for stormwater enforcement actions by RWQCB and municipal agencies. Assisted in preparation of SWPPPs and provided counseling and training on wide range of compliance issues and negotiated with citizens' group regarding alleged stormwater releases to Malibu Creek.{{ FIELD }}Provided legal counsel to the Port of Los Angeles regarding storm water pollution control issues, including advising on the development of new wharf facilities at Pier 100.{{ FIELD }}Represented Key Energy Services in toxic tort litigation for alleged contamination from TPH and other chemicals in residential neighborhood development in Santa Maria, California. Represented client on appeals to State Water Resources Control Board of orders regarding responsible party status.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of criminal charges against Lodi Memorial Hospital related to alleged asbestos removal practices.{{ FIELD }}Represented the East Bay Regional Park District in a CERCLA case involving a former landfill. Obtained a ruling allocating 95% of the costs to Waste Management, the former owner of the landfill, and only 5% to the Park District, as the site’s current owner.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel in federal court action City and County of San Francisco v. Atlantic Richfield, et al., to clean up historical contamination by numerous tenants at airport. The over $140 million settlement was the largest environmental settlement in California in 2006.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for the nation's leading diesel engine manufacturers Cummins Engine Company, Inc., John Deere Construction Equipment Company, Detroit Diesel Corp., and Caterpillar, Inc., in the first defense judgment achieved after trial in a Proposition 65 action. {{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel to address the nation's largest source of particulate air emissions, the Owens Dry Lake Bed.  Obtained judgment after trial against Department of Water and Power, and settlement in administrative adjudication before California Air Resources Board.  The resulting settlement led to a new State Implementation Plan and shallow flooding of the lake bed. This settlement had a total value in excess of $100 million.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for Union Pacific Corporation for the cleanup of the McCormick and Baxter Superfund site due to contamination.  Negotiated a favorable settlement of past cost and future work under a consent decree with U.S. EPA and California Department of Toxic Substances Control.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for 3M Corporation to defend against Superfund action by the State of California regarding the Cal Compact landfill site in Long Beach, California (State of California v. Atlantic Richfield).  Case resulted in favorable settlement for 3M.{{ FIELD }}Peter Hsiao has 40 years of experience as a first-chair trial lawyer.  He was named Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year in Los Angeles by Best Lawyers in America, and one of 16 lawyers named as a Distinguished Environmental Advocate by the American Bar Association.  He is one of seven lawyers in the U.S. designated as a Global Leader in Environmental Law by Who's Who Legal.  The National Law Journal identifies him as a Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law, and he is named by Chambers (in its highest Tier 1), Legal 500, Lawdragon and Super Lawyers as one of the nation’s best environmental lawyers. \nMr. Hsiao is head of the West Coast Environmental, Health \u0026amp; Safety Practice, awarded Environmental Law Firm of the Year by Chambers and Partners in 2024.  Drawing upon his chemical engineering background, he is one of the nation’s leading attorneys in environmental, natural resources, climate change and toxic tort law.  He is a Fellow and former Chair of the Board of Regents of the American College of Environmental Lawyers.  He is also former Chair of the State Bar of California's Environmental Law Section and a former member of the ABA's Standing Committee on Environmental Law.  \nHe served as senior trial lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles.  He was lead trial counsel for the EPA and other agencies, and received the Department of Justice’s Special Commendation Award, the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Achievement Award, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award.  He was appointed as a judge pro tem for the Los Angeles Municipal Court and served as a mediator for environmental cases.\nMr. Hsiao is the editor of the California Environmental and Natural Resources Law Handbook.  He is past-president of the Board of Directors for the Los Angeles County Bar Association's Counsel for Justice.   He is a life fellow of the American Bar Foundation, former chair of the State Bar of California Committee on Legal Services to the Poor, and recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services.\nHe graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. in chemical engineering from the University of Utah in 1982.  He received the Outstanding Student Award from the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. He received a J.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1985, where he won the McBaine Advocacy Award. Peter Hsiao lawyer Partner Distinguished Environmental Advocate American Bar Association Los Angeles Environmental Litigation Attorney of the Year Best Lawyers in America, 2016 Trailblazer in Energy and Environmental Law National Law Journal, 2015 One of the Nation’s Best Environmental Lawyers Chambers and Partners, 2013-2024 One of the Best Environmental Lawyers in the United States Legal 500 and PLC 3000 Leading Cross-Border Environmental Attorney International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers One of the Top Environmental Lawyers in Los Angeles Los Angeles Business Journal Awarded the U.S. Department of Justice’s Special Commendation Award U.S. Department of Justice Awarded the U.S. Attorney’s Office Special Achievement Award U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California Awarded the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Golden Eagle Award U.S. Fish \u0026amp; Wildlife Service Recipient of the Wiley W. Manuel Award for pro bono legal services State Bar of California “Peter Hsiao impresses with his ‘extremely broad experience in all types of environmental issue,’ leveraging his experience as a chemical engineer when advising on disputes. His expert trial practice is particularly highlighted, with one client noting: ‘To hear him address a court is pure art.’” Chambers USA 2015 \"A standout for Proposition 65 work. Extremely knowledgeable and practical on how he'll manage the litigation.\" Chambers 2024 \"He's absolutely amazing, it's a personalized service, his devotion to timeliness and attention to detail is wonderful.\" Chambers, 2024 University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law Supreme Court of the United States California Life Fellow, American Bar Foundation Member, Environmental Law Section, Los Angeles County Bar Association Member, ABA Section on Environment, Energy and Resources Former Chair, ABA Marine Resources Committee Fellow and Past Chair of the Board of Regents of the American College of Environmental Lawyers Former Member, American Chemical Society Former President, Board of Directors of the Los Angeles County Bar Association Counsel for Justice Former Chair, State Bar of California Committee on Legal Services to the Poor Former Member and Newsletter Author, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Former Member, American Bar Association Standing Committee on Environmental Law Former Chair, Environmental Law Section of the State Bar of California Former President of Board of Directors, Los Angeles County Bar Association's Counsel for Justice Successfully defended Mattel, Inc. before U.S. Supreme Court in case arising from contaminated property dispute in Beaverton, Oregon at site of former View Master facility. Represented IMC Corporation in defending criminal action regarding alleged illegal take of migratory birds from exposure to process ponds. Negotiated settlement and first-ever wildlife mitigation plan with California Department of Fish and Game under Fish and Game Code Section 3007. Represented Kano Laboratories in an enforcement action by the California Air Resources Board regarding emissive content and labeling of adhesive coatings.  Represented Mattel, Inc. in relation to volatile organic compound control measures and spray booth issues before South Coast Air Quality Management District. Served as Port's lead trial counsel in federal court action against citizens group challenging validity of Clean Water Act Section 404 permit and NEPA process for China Shipping Terminal. Obtained court ordered dismissal of all charges against Thomas Crane Trucking Company in a felony action alleging violations of federal and state law from oil production and servicing operations in the Bolsa Chica area. Served as lead outside counsel for Shea Homes for stormwater enforcement actions by RWQCB and municipal agencies. Assisted in preparation of SWPPPs and provided counseling and training on wide range of compliance issues and negotiated with citizens' group regarding alleged stormwater releases to Malibu Creek. Provided legal counsel to the Port of Los Angeles regarding storm water pollution control issues, including advising on the development of new wharf facilities at Pier 100. Represented Key Energy Services in toxic tort litigation for alleged contamination from TPH and other chemicals in residential neighborhood development in Santa Maria, California. Represented client on appeals to State Water Resources Control Board of orders regarding responsible party status. Obtained dismissal of criminal charges against Lodi Memorial Hospital related to alleged asbestos removal practices. Represented the East Bay Regional Park District in a CERCLA case involving a former landfill. Obtained a ruling allocating 95% of the costs to Waste Management, the former owner of the landfill, and only 5% to the Park District, as the site’s current owner. Served as lead trial counsel in federal court action City and County of San Francisco v. Atlantic Richfield, et al., to clean up historical contamination by numerous tenants at airport. The over $140 million settlement was the largest environmental settlement in California in 2006. Served as lead trial counsel for the nation's leading diesel engine manufacturers Cummins Engine Company, Inc., John Deere Construction Equipment Company, Detroit Diesel Corp., and Caterpillar, Inc., in the first defense judgment achieved after trial in a Proposition 65 action.  Served as lead trial counsel to address the nation's largest source of particulate air emissions, the Owens Dry Lake Bed.  Obtained judgment after trial against Department of Water and Power, and settlement in administrative adjudication before California Air Resources Board.  The resulting settlement led to a new State Implementation Plan and shallow flooding of the lake bed. This settlement had a total value in excess of $100 million. Served as lead counsel for Union Pacific Corporation for the cleanup of the McCormick and Baxter Superfund site due to contamination.  Negotiated a favorable settlement of past cost and future work under a consent decree with U.S. EPA and California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Served as lead trial counsel for 3M Corporation to defend against Superfund action by the State of California regarding the Cal Compact landfill site in Long Beach, California (State of California v. Atlantic Richfield).  Case resulted in favorable settlement for 3M.","searchable_name":"Peter Hsiao","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}