{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"5","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"W","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":445537,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7309,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChad Walker is an accomplished trial lawyer who has substantial experience successfully handling patent cases and complex commercial litigation disputes including\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e/whistleblower cases in jurisdictions throughout Texas and the United States.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChad has participated in numerous trials, including serving as lead trial counsel in six trials. He also provides mediation services, having completed a mediation program at the Straus Institute at the Pepperdine School of Law. Chad has been selected by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a \u0026ldquo;Rising Star\u0026rdquo; numerous times.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChad\u0026rsquo;s previous legal experience includes a position as a law clerk for the Honorable Philip R. Martinez, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (2005\u0026ndash;2006); legal intern for The Honorable Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips of the Texas Supreme Court (2003); and a legal intern for Russell D. Hunt, Sr., a criminal defense attorney in Waco, Texas (2001). He has technical experience as a co-op engineer in the Software Engineering Group for Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (2001), and a co-op engineer in the Systems Engineering Group (2000).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"chad-walker","email":"cwalker@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented dozens of defendants against patent litigation claims, with a focus on Eastern District of Texas cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for a defendant healthcare provider in a declined False Claims Act case in the Eastern District of Texas. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/texas-heart-hospital-and-wholly-owned-subsidiary-thhbp-management-company-llc-pay-48-million\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States Ex. Rel. Magee v. Texas Heart Hospital of the Southwest LLP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ndash; Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sc/pr/labcorp-pay-united-states-19-million-settle-allegations-under-false-claims-act#:~:text=District%20of%20South%20Carolina%20%7C%20Labcorp,United%20States%20Department%20of%20Justice\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States Ex. Rel Lutz v. LabCorp\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ndash; Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.texastribune.org/2012/01/19/state-settles-largest-ever-medicaid-fraud-suit/#:~:text=In%20the%20state's%20largest%2Dever,for%20the%20state's%20poorest%20patients\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eState of Texas Ex Rel. Allen Jones v. Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Texas State Court) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Relator in Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act case. Settled during trial for the largest Medicaid fraud settlement in Texas history.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Walker","nick_name":"Chad","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Philip R. Martinez, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas","years_held":"2005 - 2006"},{"name":"Intern, Honorable Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips, Texas Supreme Court","years_held":"2003 - 2003"}],"first_name":"Chad","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":176,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with high honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2005-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"B.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” – Recognized for Commercial Litigation, Patent, and Whistleblower","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Litigation – Intellectual Property","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2025-2026"},{"title":"Patent Law","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2026"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/chadbwalker/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChad Walker is an accomplished trial lawyer who has substantial experience successfully handling patent cases and complex commercial litigation disputes including\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e/whistleblower cases in jurisdictions throughout Texas and the United States.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChad has participated in numerous trials, including serving as lead trial counsel in six trials. He also provides mediation services, having completed a mediation program at the Straus Institute at the Pepperdine School of Law. Chad has been selected by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a \u0026ldquo;Rising Star\u0026rdquo; numerous times.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChad\u0026rsquo;s previous legal experience includes a position as a law clerk for the Honorable Philip R. Martinez, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (2005\u0026ndash;2006); legal intern for The Honorable Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips of the Texas Supreme Court (2003); and a legal intern for Russell D. Hunt, Sr., a criminal defense attorney in Waco, Texas (2001). He has technical experience as a co-op engineer in the Software Engineering Group for Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (2001), and a co-op engineer in the Systems Engineering Group (2000).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented dozens of defendants against patent litigation claims, with a focus on Eastern District of Texas cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for a defendant healthcare provider in a declined False Claims Act case in the Eastern District of Texas. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/texas-heart-hospital-and-wholly-owned-subsidiary-thhbp-management-company-llc-pay-48-million\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States Ex. Rel. Magee v. Texas Heart Hospital of the Southwest LLP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ndash; Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.justice.gov/usao-sc/pr/labcorp-pay-united-states-19-million-settle-allegations-under-false-claims-act#:~:text=District%20of%20South%20Carolina%20%7C%20Labcorp,United%20States%20Department%20of%20Justice\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States Ex. Rel Lutz v. LabCorp\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ndash; Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.texastribune.org/2012/01/19/state-settles-largest-ever-medicaid-fraud-suit/#:~:text=In%20the%20state's%20largest%2Dever,for%20the%20state's%20poorest%20patients\"\u003e\u003cem\u003eState of Texas Ex Rel. Allen Jones v. Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Texas State Court) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Relator in Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act case. Settled during trial for the largest Medicaid fraud settlement in Texas history.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” – Recognized for Commercial Litigation, Patent, and Whistleblower","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Litigation – Intellectual Property","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2025-2026"},{"title":"Patent Law","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2026"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13345}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-03T16:05:02.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-03T16:05:02.000Z","searchable_text":"Walker{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Litigators in America” – Recognized for Commercial Litigation, Patent, and Whistleblower\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation – Intellectual Property\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2025-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Patent Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented dozens of defendants against patent litigation claims, with a focus on Eastern District of Texas cases.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for a defendant healthcare provider in a declined False Claims Act case in the Eastern District of Texas. Successfully settled prior to trial.{{ FIELD }}United States Ex. Rel. Magee v. Texas Heart Hospital of the Southwest LLP – Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.{{ FIELD }}United States Ex. Rel Lutz v. LabCorp – Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial.{{ FIELD }}State of Texas Ex Rel. Allen Jones v. Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson (Texas State Court) – Counsel for Relator in Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act case. Settled during trial for the largest Medicaid fraud settlement in Texas history.{{ FIELD }}Chad Walker is an accomplished trial lawyer who has substantial experience successfully handling patent cases and complex commercial litigation disputes including qui tam/whistleblower cases in jurisdictions throughout Texas and the United States.\nChad has participated in numerous trials, including serving as lead trial counsel in six trials. He also provides mediation services, having completed a mediation program at the Straus Institute at the Pepperdine School of Law. Chad has been selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star” numerous times.\nChad’s previous legal experience includes a position as a law clerk for the Honorable Philip R. Martinez, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (2005–2006); legal intern for The Honorable Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips of the Texas Supreme Court (2003); and a legal intern for Russell D. Hunt, Sr., a criminal defense attorney in Waco, Texas (2001). He has technical experience as a co-op engineer in the Software Engineering Group for Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control (2001), and a co-op engineer in the Systems Engineering Group (2000). Partner “500 Leading Litigators in America” – Recognized for Commercial Litigation, Patent, and Whistleblower Lawdragon, 2026 Litigation – Intellectual Property The Best Lawyers in America®, 2025-2026 Patent Law The Best Lawyers in America®, 2026 Baylor University Baylor University School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Texas Member, State Bar of Texas, Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Law Clerk, Honorable Philip R. Martinez, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Intern, Honorable Chief Justice Thomas R. Phillips, Texas Supreme Court Successfully represented dozens of defendants against patent litigation claims, with a focus on Eastern District of Texas cases. Counsel for a defendant healthcare provider in a declined False Claims Act case in the Eastern District of Texas. Successfully settled prior to trial. United States Ex. Rel. Magee v. Texas Heart Hospital of the Southwest LLP – Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial. United States Ex. Rel Lutz v. LabCorp – Counsel for Relators in kickback case. Successfully settled prior to trial. State of Texas Ex Rel. Allen Jones v. Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson (Texas State Court) – Counsel for Relator in Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act case. Settled during trial for the largest Medicaid fraud settlement in Texas history.","searchable_name":"Chad B. Walker","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":176,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442865,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6149,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Wallach has more than 20 years of experience representing clients in international arbitration and litigation. His practice is focused on high-value, complex construction and commercial disputes. David has worked in a broad array of industries, including oil and gas, green energy, electric vehicle manufacturing, agriculture, retail, and pharmaceuticals. David has handled matters arising from projects in Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is skilled in all phases of arbitration and litigation and has extensive experience working with local experts and counsel in cross-border disputes to navigate difficult issues of foreign law and procedure. David is also experienced in seeking and opposing discovery in the United States under 28 U.S.C. \u0026sect; 1782 for use in foreign litigation and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is a member of the International Law Section of the San Francisco Bar Association, the ABA Construction Law Forum, and a frequent author on international law issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Arbitration of International Disputes,\u0026rdquo; The Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Guide, Thomson/West (forthcoming)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Emergence of Early Disposition Procedures in International Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Arbitration International (2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Alien Tort Statute\u0026rdquo; International Aspects of U.S. Litigation: A Practitioner\u0026rsquo;s Deskbook, ABA (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Irrationality of Universal Civil Jurisdiction,\u0026rdquo; Georgetown Journal of International Law (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Alien Tort Statute and the Limits of Individual Accountability in International Law,\u0026rdquo; Stanford Journal of International Law (2010)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"david-wallach","email":"dwallach@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAchieved multi-billion dollar victory for international energy company in international arbitration and related U.S. litigation, defeating dozens of contractor claims arising in connection with construction of an LNG facility in Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an international energy company from hundreds of millions of dollars in contractor claims in an international arbitration arising from construction of a network of subsea pipelines in Nigeria for the harvesting and transportation of natural gas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major oil and gas company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against its joint venture partner for wrongfully diverting revenue from the parties' LNG business to an affiliate performing services for the joint venture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Saudi Arabian company in an LCIA arbitration brought by its U.S. partner in a Saudi joint venture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully advised a major German engineering conglomerate in defeating an emergency application under the ICC Rules seeking to halt the construction of a $4.5 billion hydroelectric plant in West Africa and to transfer management of the project to a company led by the daughter of the country's former president.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a consortium of international energy companies from in international arbitration involving claims by a contractor arising from the construction of an LNG facility in west Africa.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a class action lawsuit originally brought by 65,000 Nigerians seeking $5 billion on the claim that a natural gas well blowout six miles offshore caused widespread health and fishing impacts to an area roughly the size of New Jersey.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnocal Corporation (\"Unocal\")\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(now a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation) in a Ninth Circuit appeal from an adverse ruling in a case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (\"FSIA\").\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFirestone Natural Rubber Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in Seventh Circuit appeal of summary judgment in widely publicized case under Alien Tort Statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(now known as Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.) before the U.S. Supreme Court in dispute under 340B Drug Pricing Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in discovery against former opposing counsel in long-running litigation in Ecuador and BIT Arbitration against Republic of Ecuador in contentious litigation in Ecuador in which the plaintiffs have alleged billions of dollars in damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCorporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in highly publicized Alien Tort Statute case, resulting in a defense verdict on all counts.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3211}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Wallach","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2159,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2004-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-wallach-aa8b4a5/","seodescription":"David Wallach has more than 20 years of experience representing clients in international arbitration and litigation. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Wallach has more than 20 years of experience representing clients in international arbitration and litigation. His practice is focused on high-value, complex construction and commercial disputes. David has worked in a broad array of industries, including oil and gas, green energy, electric vehicle manufacturing, agriculture, retail, and pharmaceuticals. David has handled matters arising from projects in Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is skilled in all phases of arbitration and litigation and has extensive experience working with local experts and counsel in cross-border disputes to navigate difficult issues of foreign law and procedure. David is also experienced in seeking and opposing discovery in the United States under 28 U.S.C. \u0026sect; 1782 for use in foreign litigation and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is a member of the International Law Section of the San Francisco Bar Association, the ABA Construction Law Forum, and a frequent author on international law issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Arbitration of International Disputes,\u0026rdquo; The Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Guide, Thomson/West (forthcoming)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Emergence of Early Disposition Procedures in International Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Arbitration International (2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Alien Tort Statute\u0026rdquo; International Aspects of U.S. Litigation: A Practitioner\u0026rsquo;s Deskbook, ABA (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Irrationality of Universal Civil Jurisdiction,\u0026rdquo; Georgetown Journal of International Law (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Alien Tort Statute and the Limits of Individual Accountability in International Law,\u0026rdquo; Stanford Journal of International Law (2010)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAchieved multi-billion dollar victory for international energy company in international arbitration and related U.S. litigation, defeating dozens of contractor claims arising in connection with construction of an LNG facility in Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an international energy company from hundreds of millions of dollars in contractor claims in an international arbitration arising from construction of a network of subsea pipelines in Nigeria for the harvesting and transportation of natural gas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major oil and gas company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against its joint venture partner for wrongfully diverting revenue from the parties' LNG business to an affiliate performing services for the joint venture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Saudi Arabian company in an LCIA arbitration brought by its U.S. partner in a Saudi joint venture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully advised a major German engineering conglomerate in defeating an emergency application under the ICC Rules seeking to halt the construction of a $4.5 billion hydroelectric plant in West Africa and to transfer management of the project to a company led by the daughter of the country's former president.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a consortium of international energy companies from in international arbitration involving claims by a contractor arising from the construction of an LNG facility in west Africa.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a class action lawsuit originally brought by 65,000 Nigerians seeking $5 billion on the claim that a natural gas well blowout six miles offshore caused widespread health and fishing impacts to an area roughly the size of New Jersey.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnocal Corporation (\"Unocal\")\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(now a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation) in a Ninth Circuit appeal from an adverse ruling in a case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (\"FSIA\").\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFirestone Natural Rubber Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in Seventh Circuit appeal of summary judgment in widely publicized case under Alien Tort Statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(now known as Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.) before the U.S. Supreme Court in dispute under 340B Drug Pricing Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in discovery against former opposing counsel in long-running litigation in Ecuador and BIT Arbitration against Republic of Ecuador in contentious litigation in Ecuador in which the plaintiffs have alleged billions of dollars in damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCorporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in highly publicized Alien Tort Statute case, resulting in a defense verdict on all counts.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9199}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:59:05.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:59:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Wallach{{ FIELD }}Achieved multi-billion dollar victory for international energy company in international arbitration and related U.S. litigation, defeating dozens of contractor claims arising in connection with construction of an LNG facility in Australia.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended an international energy company from hundreds of millions of dollars in contractor claims in an international arbitration arising from construction of a network of subsea pipelines in Nigeria for the harvesting and transportation of natural gas.{{ FIELD }}Represented major oil and gas company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against its joint venture partner for wrongfully diverting revenue from the parties' LNG business to an affiliate performing services for the joint venture.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Saudi Arabian company in an LCIA arbitration brought by its U.S. partner in a Saudi joint venture.{{ FIELD }}Successfully advised a major German engineering conglomerate in defeating an emergency application under the ICC Rules seeking to halt the construction of a $4.5 billion hydroelectric plant in West Africa and to transfer management of the project to a company led by the daughter of the country's former president.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a consortium of international energy companies from in international arbitration involving claims by a contractor arising from the construction of an LNG facility in west Africa.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Chevron Corporation in a class action lawsuit originally brought by 65,000 Nigerians seeking $5 billion on the claim that a natural gas well blowout six miles offshore caused widespread health and fishing impacts to an area roughly the size of New Jersey.{{ FIELD }}Represented Unocal Corporation (\"Unocal\") (now a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation) in a Ninth Circuit appeal from an adverse ruling in a case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (\"FSIA\").{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Firestone Natural Rubber Company in Seventh Circuit appeal of summary judgment in widely publicized case under Alien Tort Statute.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. (now known as Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.) before the U.S. Supreme Court in dispute under 340B Drug Pricing Program.{{ FIELD }}Represented Chevron Corporation in discovery against former opposing counsel in long-running litigation in Ecuador and BIT Arbitration against Republic of Ecuador in contentious litigation in Ecuador in which the plaintiffs have alleged billions of dollars in damages.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Chevron Corporation in highly publicized Alien Tort Statute case, resulting in a defense verdict on all counts.{{ FIELD }}David Wallach has more than 20 years of experience representing clients in international arbitration and litigation. His practice is focused on high-value, complex construction and commercial disputes. David has worked in a broad array of industries, including oil and gas, green energy, electric vehicle manufacturing, agriculture, retail, and pharmaceuticals. David has handled matters arising from projects in Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.\nDavid is skilled in all phases of arbitration and litigation and has extensive experience working with local experts and counsel in cross-border disputes to navigate difficult issues of foreign law and procedure. David is also experienced in seeking and opposing discovery in the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for use in foreign litigation and international arbitration.\nDavid is a member of the International Law Section of the San Francisco Bar Association, the ABA Construction Law Forum, and a frequent author on international law issues.\nPublications\n\n“Arbitration of International Disputes,” The Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice Guide, Thomson/West (forthcoming)\n“The Emergence of Early Disposition Procedures in International Arbitration,” Arbitration International (2021)\n“The Alien Tort Statute” International Aspects of U.S. Litigation: A Practitioner’s Deskbook, ABA (2017)\n“The Irrationality of Universal Civil Jurisdiction,” Georgetown Journal of International Law (2015)\n“The Alien Tort Statute and the Limits of Individual Accountability in International Law,” Stanford Journal of International Law (2010)\n David Wallach lawyer Partner Colorado College  University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law California ABA Construction Law Forum San Francisco Bar Association - International Law Section Achieved multi-billion dollar victory for international energy company in international arbitration and related U.S. litigation, defeating dozens of contractor claims arising in connection with construction of an LNG facility in Australia. Successfully defended an international energy company from hundreds of millions of dollars in contractor claims in an international arbitration arising from construction of a network of subsea pipelines in Nigeria for the harvesting and transportation of natural gas. Represented major oil and gas company in an UNCITRAL arbitration against its joint venture partner for wrongfully diverting revenue from the parties' LNG business to an affiliate performing services for the joint venture. Represented a Saudi Arabian company in an LCIA arbitration brought by its U.S. partner in a Saudi joint venture. Successfully advised a major German engineering conglomerate in defeating an emergency application under the ICC Rules seeking to halt the construction of a $4.5 billion hydroelectric plant in West Africa and to transfer management of the project to a company led by the daughter of the country's former president. Successfully defended a consortium of international energy companies from in international arbitration involving claims by a contractor arising from the construction of an LNG facility in west Africa. Successfully represented Chevron Corporation in a class action lawsuit originally brought by 65,000 Nigerians seeking $5 billion on the claim that a natural gas well blowout six miles offshore caused widespread health and fishing impacts to an area roughly the size of New Jersey. Represented Unocal Corporation (\"Unocal\") (now a subsidiary of Chevron Corporation) in a Ninth Circuit appeal from an adverse ruling in a case involving the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (\"FSIA\"). Successfully represented Firestone Natural Rubber Company in Seventh Circuit appeal of summary judgment in widely publicized case under Alien Tort Statute. Successfully represented TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. (now known as Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.) before the U.S. Supreme Court in dispute under 340B Drug Pricing Program. Represented Chevron Corporation in discovery against former opposing counsel in long-running litigation in Ecuador and BIT Arbitration against Republic of Ecuador in contentious litigation in Ecuador in which the plaintiffs have alleged billions of dollars in damages. Successfully represented Chevron Corporation in highly publicized Alien Tort Statute case, resulting in a defense verdict on all counts.","searchable_name":"David Wallach","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443983,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6934,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Watford is a partner in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding, where he is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s business litigation practice and appellate, constitutional and administrative law group.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Paul served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 11 years. During his tenure on the court, he authored published opinions addressing numerous areas of federal and state law, including arbitration, bankruptcy, class actions, constitutional, copyright, environmental, immigration, labor and employment, securities, and tax. In one of Paul\u0026rsquo;s more notable rulings, he authored the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s \u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e decision in \u003cem\u003eCity of Los Angeles v. Patel\u003c/em\u003e (2013), a case in which the court struck down, 7-4, a Los Angeles city ordinance authorizing police to conduct surprise inspections of hotel and motel guest registries without obtaining the owners\u0026rsquo; consent or a search warrant. The following year, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision invalidating the ordinance in a 5-4 vote.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter graduating from law school in 1994, Paul served as a law clerk to the Honorable Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The following year, from 1995 to 1996, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court of the United States of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul became an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California in 1997. Serving in the Criminal Division, he prosecuted a wide range of federal criminal cases, including complex white collar criminal cases as a member of the Major Frauds Section. While serving in the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, Paul tried seven cases to verdict before a jury.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"paul-watford","email":"pwatford@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Watford","nick_name":"Paul","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Paul","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2162,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif, Editor, UCLA Law Review","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named as one of the “500 Leading Litigators in America”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-watford-33998329a/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Watford is a partner in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding, where he is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s business litigation practice and appellate, constitutional and administrative law group.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Paul served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 11 years. During his tenure on the court, he authored published opinions addressing numerous areas of federal and state law, including arbitration, bankruptcy, class actions, constitutional, copyright, environmental, immigration, labor and employment, securities, and tax. In one of Paul\u0026rsquo;s more notable rulings, he authored the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s \u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e decision in \u003cem\u003eCity of Los Angeles v. Patel\u003c/em\u003e (2013), a case in which the court struck down, 7-4, a Los Angeles city ordinance authorizing police to conduct surprise inspections of hotel and motel guest registries without obtaining the owners\u0026rsquo; consent or a search warrant. The following year, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision invalidating the ordinance in a 5-4 vote.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter graduating from law school in 1994, Paul served as a law clerk to the Honorable Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The following year, from 1995 to 1996, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court of the United States of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul became an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California in 1997. Serving in the Criminal Division, he prosecuted a wide range of federal criminal cases, including complex white collar criminal cases as a member of the Major Frauds Section. While serving in the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, Paul tried seven cases to verdict before a jury.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Named as one of the “500 Leading Litigators in America”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12540}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:17.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:17.000Z","searchable_text":"Watford{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named as one of the “500 Leading Litigators in America”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2024-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Paul Watford is a partner in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding, where he is a member of the firm’s business litigation practice and appellate, constitutional and administrative law group.\nPrior to joining the firm, Paul served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for 11 years. During his tenure on the court, he authored published opinions addressing numerous areas of federal and state law, including arbitration, bankruptcy, class actions, constitutional, copyright, environmental, immigration, labor and employment, securities, and tax. In one of Paul’s more notable rulings, he authored the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in City of Los Angeles v. Patel (2013), a case in which the court struck down, 7-4, a Los Angeles city ordinance authorizing police to conduct surprise inspections of hotel and motel guest registries without obtaining the owners’ consent or a search warrant. The following year, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s decision invalidating the ordinance in a 5-4 vote.\nAfter graduating from law school in 1994, Paul served as a law clerk to the Honorable Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The following year, from 1995 to 1996, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the Supreme Court of the United States of America.\nPaul became an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California in 1997. Serving in the Criminal Division, he prosecuted a wide range of federal criminal cases, including complex white collar criminal cases as a member of the Major Frauds Section. While serving in the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Paul tried seven cases to verdict before a jury. Partner Named as one of the “500 Leading Litigators in America” Lawdragon, 2024-2025 University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Member, Board of Trustees, Norton Simon Museum of Art, 2019-present Member, Board of Trustees, Campaign Legal Center, 2024-present Member, Board of Directors, The Appellate Project, 2024-present Member, Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, 2019-2023 Inaugural Distinguished Jurist in Residence, Southwestern Law School, 2022-2023 Lecturer in Law, University of Southern California, Gould School of Law, 2007-2009 Board Member, Neighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County, 2007-2012 Member, American Bar Association (ABA) Amicus Curiae Committee, 2007-2010 Co-chair, ABA Litigation Section's Appellate Practice Committee, 2005-2008","searchable_name":"Paul Watford","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426999,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6072,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Weeks has a litigation practice that focuses on complex civil litigation in federal and state courts throughout the country.\u0026nbsp; He has\u0026nbsp;extensive experience representing clients on both the plaintiff and defense side from\u0026nbsp;industries that include financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, and agribusiness.\u0026nbsp; Paul's cases have involved contract,\u0026nbsp;antitrust, mass tort, securities, and consumer protection claims, among others, in some of the most cutting-edge\u0026nbsp;litigation of recent years.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul brings a creative approach to difficult litigation issues and excels at developing litigation strategies\u0026nbsp;to serve his clients'\u0026nbsp; objectives.\u0026nbsp; His focus on approaching\u0026nbsp;issues from every angle has produced\u0026nbsp;novel arguments resulting\u0026nbsp;in expedited and decisive wins for his clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe American Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigator of the Week\u0026rdquo; winner or runner-up on multiple occasions in recent years.\u0026nbsp; After law school, Paul served as a law clerk to Judge Anthony J. Trenga of\u0026nbsp;the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,\u0026nbsp;in Alexandria, Virginia, known as the \u0026ldquo;Rocket Docket\u0026rdquo; for its expeditious disposition of cases.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"paul-weeks","email":"pweeks@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1179,"guid":"1179.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Weeks","nick_name":"Paul","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Anthony J. Trenga, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia","years_held":"2016 - 2017"}],"first_name":"Paul","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":753,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with highest honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Weeks has a litigation practice that focuses on complex civil litigation in federal and state courts throughout the country.\u0026nbsp; He has\u0026nbsp;extensive experience representing clients on both the plaintiff and defense side from\u0026nbsp;industries that include financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, and agribusiness.\u0026nbsp; Paul's cases have involved contract,\u0026nbsp;antitrust, mass tort, securities, and consumer protection claims, among others, in some of the most cutting-edge\u0026nbsp;litigation of recent years.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul brings a creative approach to difficult litigation issues and excels at developing litigation strategies\u0026nbsp;to serve his clients'\u0026nbsp; objectives.\u0026nbsp; His focus on approaching\u0026nbsp;issues from every angle has produced\u0026nbsp;novel arguments resulting\u0026nbsp;in expedited and decisive wins for his clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe American Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigator of the Week\u0026rdquo; winner or runner-up on multiple occasions in recent years.\u0026nbsp; After law school, Paul served as a law clerk to Judge Anthony J. Trenga of\u0026nbsp;the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,\u0026nbsp;in Alexandria, Virginia, known as the \u0026ldquo;Rocket Docket\u0026rdquo; for its expeditious disposition of cases.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9785}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:12.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Weeks{{ FIELD }}Paul Weeks has a litigation practice that focuses on complex civil litigation in federal and state courts throughout the country.  He has extensive experience representing clients on both the plaintiff and defense side from industries that include financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, and agribusiness.  Paul's cases have involved contract, antitrust, mass tort, securities, and consumer protection claims, among others, in some of the most cutting-edge litigation of recent years. \nPaul brings a creative approach to difficult litigation issues and excels at developing litigation strategies to serve his clients'  objectives.  His focus on approaching issues from every angle has produced novel arguments resulting in expedited and decisive wins for his clients.  The American Lawyer has recognized him as a “Litigator of the Week” winner or runner-up on multiple occasions in recent years.  After law school, Paul served as a law clerk to Judge Anthony J. Trenga of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, in Alexandria, Virginia, known as the “Rocket Docket” for its expeditious disposition of cases. Partner Clemson University  George Washington University George Washington University Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia Law Clerk, Hon. Anthony J. Trenga, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia","searchable_name":"Paul Weeks","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443996,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6955,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEric White is a partner based in the Chicago office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents clients, including chemical, pharmaceutical, energy, and technology companies, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial litigation across the country.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEric has experience as national coordinating and trial counsel in mediagenic mass and class actions, as well as individual actions.\u0026nbsp; Eric also represents clients in sensitive, high-profile investigations. He was recently named to\u003cem\u003e Lawdragon's\u003c/em\u003e 2025 lists of \"500 Leading Litigators in America\" and \u0026ldquo;500 Leading Environmental Lawyers\u0026rdquo; and was recognized by Crain's Chicago Business as a \"Notable Black Leader and Executive\" and named to its 2024 \"40 Under 40\" list\u003cbr /\u003e \u003cbr /\u003e Eric also has represented many pro bono clients, including the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in its investigation of race-based policing practices of the Minneapolis Police Department in the wake of the murder of George Floyd. He recently first chaired a Section 1983 federal jury trial, and secured a unanimous jury verdict on liability, compensatory and punitive damages against a prison warden.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEric draws upon his experience as a sixth-grade teacher in a low-performing urban school during all aspects of his work, from making complex concepts easily understandable for jurors and stakeholders to leaning into highly-charged environments with grit and empathy.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"eric-white","email":"ewhite@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduct Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eMDL pending in the Northern District of California and the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Cases\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePFAS \u003c/em\u003eLitigation - Represented chemical manufacturer in environmental and products liability litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multinational food processing company in environmental litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of \u003c/em\u003eMexico - National coordinating and trial counsel for BP in a portfolio of nearly 900 personal injury/ toxic tort lawsuits pending in federal court, obtaining hundreds of \u003cem\u003eDaubert \u003c/em\u003eand summary judgment victories.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAbbott Laboratories \u003c/em\u003e- National counsel for Abbott in opioids litigation around the country, successfully obtaining dismissals including at state supreme courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComplex Commercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBP Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Litigation - \u003c/em\u003eTrial counsel for BP in complete defense jury verdict in South Carolina state court, defeating fraud and unfair trade practices act claims related to its recovery of money from state trust fund for remediating environmental contamination at its current and former service stations. National counsel for BP in similar multi-state litigation and government investigations alleging fraud, unjust enrichment, and statutory violations, successfully obtaining summary judgment victories and dispositive rulings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMiller UK v. Caterpillar \u003c/em\u003elnc.- Litigation counsel for plaintiff in a suit that resulted in the successful jury trial against Caterpillar Inc. in connection with Caterpillar's breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, culminating in a US$73.6 million verdict for Miller UK Ltd. The award in the five-year battle was believed to be the largest trade secret- misappropriation verdict in Illinois history at the time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhiladelphia Energy Solutions\u003c/em\u003e - Represented the East Coast's largest refinery in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a catastrophic explosion. Part of the case settled favorably before trial, and the remainder also settled favorably during trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Bracket Holding - Litigation \u003c/em\u003ecounsel for plaintiff Bracket Holding Corp that resulted in a jury verdict of US$82.1 million. The jury found defendants committed fraud in selling a clinical trial software business by misrepresenting the financial condition of the company, causing Bracket to overpay for the company and suffer a substantial shortfall in working capital.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUniversal American v. Partners Healthcare Solutions Holdings, LP et al\u003c/em\u003e.- Defended GTCR in breach of contract and fraud case seeking over US$200 million in damages in connection with the sale of its portfolio company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInvestigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConducted independent investigation for the University of Illinois into the management of sports injuries, scholarship renewals, and other player treatment issues on the football and women's basketball teams.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted independent investigation and advised Board of beverage company related to allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation against a senior executive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted race-based pattern and practice investigation of the Minneapolis Police Department after the murder of George Floyd.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented institutions of higher education in investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Education related to allegations of discrimination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAntitrust\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation - \u003c/em\u003eCounsel for Health Care Service Corporation in a series of putative class action lawsuits filed across the country, challenging the structure of the Blue System of health insurance under antitrust laws.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"White","nick_name":"Eric","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Eric","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Energy Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024"},{"title":"500 Leading Environmental Lawyers – The Green 500","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"},{"title":"X – The Next Generation","detail":"Lawdragon, 2023"},{"title":"Next Generation Award","detail":"Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), 2024"},{"title":"Notable Black Leader and Executive","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2022 and 2024"},{"title":"40 Under 40 list","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2024"},{"title":"40 Best LGBTQ+ Lawyers Under 40","detail":"National LGBTQ+ Bar Association, 2022"},{"title":"40 Under 40: Nation’s Best Advocates","detail":"National Bar Association, 2022"},{"title":"University of Florida Hall of Fame Inductee","detail":"2007"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/eric-lansing-white-2a34b723/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEric White is a partner based in the Chicago office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents clients, including chemical, pharmaceutical, energy, and technology companies, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial litigation across the country.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEric has experience as national coordinating and trial counsel in mediagenic mass and class actions, as well as individual actions.\u0026nbsp; Eric also represents clients in sensitive, high-profile investigations. He was recently named to\u003cem\u003e Lawdragon's\u003c/em\u003e 2025 lists of \"500 Leading Litigators in America\" and \u0026ldquo;500 Leading Environmental Lawyers\u0026rdquo; and was recognized by Crain's Chicago Business as a \"Notable Black Leader and Executive\" and named to its 2024 \"40 Under 40\" list\u003cbr /\u003e \u003cbr /\u003e Eric also has represented many pro bono clients, including the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in its investigation of race-based policing practices of the Minneapolis Police Department in the wake of the murder of George Floyd. He recently first chaired a Section 1983 federal jury trial, and secured a unanimous jury verdict on liability, compensatory and punitive damages against a prison warden.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEric draws upon his experience as a sixth-grade teacher in a low-performing urban school during all aspects of his work, from making complex concepts easily understandable for jurors and stakeholders to leaning into highly-charged environments with grit and empathy.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduct Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eMDL pending in the Northern District of California and the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Cases\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePFAS \u003c/em\u003eLitigation - Represented chemical manufacturer in environmental and products liability litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multinational food processing company in environmental litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of \u003c/em\u003eMexico - National coordinating and trial counsel for BP in a portfolio of nearly 900 personal injury/ toxic tort lawsuits pending in federal court, obtaining hundreds of \u003cem\u003eDaubert \u003c/em\u003eand summary judgment victories.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAbbott Laboratories \u003c/em\u003e- National counsel for Abbott in opioids litigation around the country, successfully obtaining dismissals including at state supreme courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComplex Commercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBP Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Litigation - \u003c/em\u003eTrial counsel for BP in complete defense jury verdict in South Carolina state court, defeating fraud and unfair trade practices act claims related to its recovery of money from state trust fund for remediating environmental contamination at its current and former service stations. National counsel for BP in similar multi-state litigation and government investigations alleging fraud, unjust enrichment, and statutory violations, successfully obtaining summary judgment victories and dispositive rulings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMiller UK v. Caterpillar \u003c/em\u003elnc.- Litigation counsel for plaintiff in a suit that resulted in the successful jury trial against Caterpillar Inc. in connection with Caterpillar's breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, culminating in a US$73.6 million verdict for Miller UK Ltd. The award in the five-year battle was believed to be the largest trade secret- misappropriation verdict in Illinois history at the time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhiladelphia Energy Solutions\u003c/em\u003e - Represented the East Coast's largest refinery in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a catastrophic explosion. Part of the case settled favorably before trial, and the remainder also settled favorably during trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Bracket Holding - Litigation \u003c/em\u003ecounsel for plaintiff Bracket Holding Corp that resulted in a jury verdict of US$82.1 million. The jury found defendants committed fraud in selling a clinical trial software business by misrepresenting the financial condition of the company, causing Bracket to overpay for the company and suffer a substantial shortfall in working capital.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUniversal American v. Partners Healthcare Solutions Holdings, LP et al\u003c/em\u003e.- Defended GTCR in breach of contract and fraud case seeking over US$200 million in damages in connection with the sale of its portfolio company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInvestigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConducted independent investigation for the University of Illinois into the management of sports injuries, scholarship renewals, and other player treatment issues on the football and women's basketball teams.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted independent investigation and advised Board of beverage company related to allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation against a senior executive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted race-based pattern and practice investigation of the Minneapolis Police Department after the murder of George Floyd.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented institutions of higher education in investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Education related to allegations of discrimination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAntitrust\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation - \u003c/em\u003eCounsel for Health Care Service Corporation in a series of putative class action lawsuits filed across the country, challenging the structure of the Blue System of health insurance under antitrust laws.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Energy Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024"},{"title":"500 Leading Environmental Lawyers – The Green 500","detail":"Lawdragon, 2024-2025"},{"title":"X – The Next Generation","detail":"Lawdragon, 2023"},{"title":"Next Generation Award","detail":"Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), 2024"},{"title":"Notable Black Leader and Executive","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2022 and 2024"},{"title":"40 Under 40 list","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2024"},{"title":"40 Best LGBTQ+ Lawyers Under 40","detail":"National LGBTQ+ Bar Association, 2022"},{"title":"40 Under 40: Nation’s Best Advocates","detail":"National Bar Association, 2022"},{"title":"University of Florida Hall of Fame Inductee","detail":"2007"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12611}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:28.000Z","searchable_text":"White{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2024-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Energy Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Environmental Lawyers – The Green 500\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2024-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"X – The Next Generation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Next Generation Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable Black Leader and Executive\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2022 and 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 Under 40 list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain’s Chicago Business, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 Best LGBTQ+ Lawyers Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National LGBTQ+ Bar Association, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 Under 40: Nation’s Best Advocates\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Bar Association, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"University of Florida Hall of Fame Inductee\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2007\"}{{ FIELD }}Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\nCo-Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation MDL pending in the Northern District of California and the In re Social Media Cases JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.{{ FIELD }}PFAS Litigation - Represented chemical manufacturer in environmental and products liability litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.{{ FIELD }}Represented multinational food processing company in environmental litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries.{{ FIELD }}In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico - National coordinating and trial counsel for BP in a portfolio of nearly 900 personal injury/ toxic tort lawsuits pending in federal court, obtaining hundreds of Daubert and summary judgment victories.{{ FIELD }}Abbott Laboratories - National counsel for Abbott in opioids litigation around the country, successfully obtaining dismissals including at state supreme courts.{{ FIELD }}Complex Commercial Litigation\nBP Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Litigation - Trial counsel for BP in complete defense jury verdict in South Carolina state court, defeating fraud and unfair trade practices act claims related to its recovery of money from state trust fund for remediating environmental contamination at its current and former service stations. National counsel for BP in similar multi-state litigation and government investigations alleging fraud, unjust enrichment, and statutory violations, successfully obtaining summary judgment victories and dispositive rulings.{{ FIELD }}Miller UK v. Caterpillar lnc.- Litigation counsel for plaintiff in a suit that resulted in the successful jury trial against Caterpillar Inc. in connection with Caterpillar's breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, culminating in a US$73.6 million verdict for Miller UK Ltd. The award in the five-year battle was believed to be the largest trade secret- misappropriation verdict in Illinois history at the time.{{ FIELD }}Philadelphia Energy Solutions - Represented the East Coast's largest refinery in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a catastrophic explosion. Part of the case settled favorably before trial, and the remainder also settled favorably during trial.{{ FIELD }}In re Bracket Holding - Litigation counsel for plaintiff Bracket Holding Corp that resulted in a jury verdict of US$82.1 million. The jury found defendants committed fraud in selling a clinical trial software business by misrepresenting the financial condition of the company, causing Bracket to overpay for the company and suffer a substantial shortfall in working capital.{{ FIELD }}Universal American v. Partners Healthcare Solutions Holdings, LP et al.- Defended GTCR in breach of contract and fraud case seeking over US$200 million in damages in connection with the sale of its portfolio company.{{ FIELD }}Investigations\nConducted independent investigation for the University of Illinois into the management of sports injuries, scholarship renewals, and other player treatment issues on the football and women's basketball teams.{{ FIELD }}Conducted independent investigation and advised Board of beverage company related to allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation against a senior executive.{{ FIELD }}Conducted race-based pattern and practice investigation of the Minneapolis Police Department after the murder of George Floyd.{{ FIELD }}Represented institutions of higher education in investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Education related to allegations of discrimination.{{ FIELD }}Antitrust\nIn re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation - Counsel for Health Care Service Corporation in a series of putative class action lawsuits filed across the country, challenging the structure of the Blue System of health insurance under antitrust laws.{{ FIELD }}Eric White is a partner based in the Chicago office and a member of the firm’s Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. He represents clients, including chemical, pharmaceutical, energy, and technology companies, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial litigation across the country.\nEric has experience as national coordinating and trial counsel in mediagenic mass and class actions, as well as individual actions.  Eric also represents clients in sensitive, high-profile investigations. He was recently named to Lawdragon's 2025 lists of \"500 Leading Litigators in America\" and “500 Leading Environmental Lawyers” and was recognized by Crain's Chicago Business as a \"Notable Black Leader and Executive\" and named to its 2024 \"40 Under 40\" list  Eric also has represented many pro bono clients, including the Minnesota Department of Human Rights in its investigation of race-based policing practices of the Minneapolis Police Department in the wake of the murder of George Floyd. He recently first chaired a Section 1983 federal jury trial, and secured a unanimous jury verdict on liability, compensatory and punitive damages against a prison warden.\nEric draws upon his experience as a sixth-grade teacher in a low-performing urban school during all aspects of his work, from making complex concepts easily understandable for jurors and stakeholders to leaning into highly-charged environments with grit and empathy. Partner 500 Leading Litigators in America  Lawdragon, 2024-2025 500 Leading Energy Lawyers Lawdragon, 2024 500 Leading Environmental Lawyers – The Green 500 Lawdragon, 2024-2025 X – The Next Generation Lawdragon, 2023 Next Generation Award Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), 2024 Notable Black Leader and Executive Crain’s Chicago Business, 2022 and 2024 40 Under 40 list Crain’s Chicago Business, 2024 40 Best LGBTQ+ Lawyers Under 40 National LGBTQ+ Bar Association, 2022 40 Under 40: Nation’s Best Advocates National Bar Association, 2022 University of Florida Hall of Fame Inductee 2007 University of Florida Levin College of Law Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Illinois Texas Secretary and Director, Nourishing Hope Board of Directors Member, Northwestern Law Bluhm Legal Clinic Advisory Board Fellow, Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Former Member, Teach for America Chicago-Northwest Indiana Auxiliary Board and Leadership Circle Former Member, Chicago Committee for Minorities in Large Law Firms Associate Board Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\nCo-Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation MDL pending in the Northern District of California and the In re Social Media Cases JCCP pending in Los Angeles County. PFAS Litigation - Represented chemical manufacturer in environmental and products liability litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries. Represented multinational food processing company in environmental litigation alleging groundwater contamination and personal injuries. In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico - National coordinating and trial counsel for BP in a portfolio of nearly 900 personal injury/ toxic tort lawsuits pending in federal court, obtaining hundreds of Daubert and summary judgment victories. Abbott Laboratories - National counsel for Abbott in opioids litigation around the country, successfully obtaining dismissals including at state supreme courts. Complex Commercial Litigation\nBP Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Litigation - Trial counsel for BP in complete defense jury verdict in South Carolina state court, defeating fraud and unfair trade practices act claims related to its recovery of money from state trust fund for remediating environmental contamination at its current and former service stations. National counsel for BP in similar multi-state litigation and government investigations alleging fraud, unjust enrichment, and statutory violations, successfully obtaining summary judgment victories and dispositive rulings. Miller UK v. Caterpillar lnc.- Litigation counsel for plaintiff in a suit that resulted in the successful jury trial against Caterpillar Inc. in connection with Caterpillar's breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, culminating in a US$73.6 million verdict for Miller UK Ltd. The award in the five-year battle was believed to be the largest trade secret- misappropriation verdict in Illinois history at the time. Philadelphia Energy Solutions - Represented the East Coast's largest refinery in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a catastrophic explosion. Part of the case settled favorably before trial, and the remainder also settled favorably during trial. In re Bracket Holding - Litigation counsel for plaintiff Bracket Holding Corp that resulted in a jury verdict of US$82.1 million. The jury found defendants committed fraud in selling a clinical trial software business by misrepresenting the financial condition of the company, causing Bracket to overpay for the company and suffer a substantial shortfall in working capital. Universal American v. Partners Healthcare Solutions Holdings, LP et al.- Defended GTCR in breach of contract and fraud case seeking over US$200 million in damages in connection with the sale of its portfolio company. Investigations\nConducted independent investigation for the University of Illinois into the management of sports injuries, scholarship renewals, and other player treatment issues on the football and women's basketball teams. Conducted independent investigation and advised Board of beverage company related to allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation against a senior executive. Conducted race-based pattern and practice investigation of the Minneapolis Police Department after the murder of George Floyd. Represented institutions of higher education in investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Education related to allegations of discrimination. Antitrust\nIn re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation - Counsel for Health Care Service Corporation in a series of putative class action lawsuits filed across the country, challenging the structure of the Blue System of health insurance under antitrust laws.","searchable_name":"Eric White","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446916,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7303,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDanielle Williams is a high-stakes business litigation lawyer. She handles significant, high-profile disputes for publicly traded and privately held companies involving material damages demands. Over her career, she has represented clients in high‑stakes matters in federal and state courts across the country and in arbitrations in patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement, breach of contract, antitrust, and environmental matters. Her patent infringement cases have been concentrated in the top patent litigation courts in the country and span a variety of technologies and industries including financial services, high tech, semiconductors, telecommunications, software, mobile applications, and consumer products.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost recently, she helped lead the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing and earned her Am Law Litigator of the Week recognition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilding on her MBA, Danielle is one of the firm\u0026rsquo;s go-to attorneys for damages issues. She regularly is brought in to develop damages strategy at all stages of cases, including at trial.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle is regularly recognized as a leading lawyer in industry publications and has been ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026copy; for Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation since 2016 and Patent Litigation since 2017. She was recognized as an\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Global Leader in 2026. She was listed in the 2022\u0026ndash;2025\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewhich commented that she is a \u0026ldquo;zealous litigator\u0026hellip;with an abundance of trial experience\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;knows how to address key issues and make all the right strategic plays.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle previously served as managing partner of a major Am Law 50 office and co‑chaired a global IP practice. She co‑founded the ChIPs Carolinas Chapter and has driven initiatives that strengthened pipelines across the profession.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutside of the law, she has served on many boards, including National Sports Media Association, Wake Forest University\u0026rsquo;s Face to Face, Salem Academy and College, NextNow for UNC School of Arts, and Brenner Children\u0026rsquo;s Hospital, among others.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle has first-chaired, led, and consulted in numerous litigations in multiple venues, including the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals; the 11\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026nbsp;Circuit Court of Appeals; the United States International Trade Commission (ITC); the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); Federal District Courts in North Carolina (W.D.N.C., M.D.N.C., E.D.N.C.), Georgia (N.D. Ga.), California (N.D. Cal., C.D. Cal.), Texas (E.D. Tex., N.D. Tex. and W.D. Tex. including Waco), Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, Colorado, New Jersey, New York; as well as arbitrations before the ICC and AAA.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"danielle-williams-2","email":"dwilliams@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Williams","nick_name":"Danielle","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Danielle","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2471,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1996-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Litigator of the Week for the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing","detail":"The American Lawyer, December 19, 2025"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week Runner-Up for securing a preliminary injunction against NASCAR in the monopolization case brought on behalf of Michael Jordan and Denny Hamlin’s racing team, 23XI Racing, and Front Row Motorsports Inc.","detail":"The American Lawyer, December 20, 2024"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week First Runner-Up for a defense verdict for U.S. Well Services LLC in a patent showdown with electric fracking rival Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Not only did jurors in Waco, Texas, find that U.S. Well Services did not infringe upon any of the three patents Halliburton asserted at trial, but they also found two of those patents invalid due to obviousness","detail":"The American Lawyer, September 1, 2023"},{"title":"IAM Patent 1000","detail":"IAM, 2022–2025"},{"title":"Global Leader","detail":"IAM, 2024–2025"},{"title":"Trade Secrets and Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer,” Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2024–2025"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2016–2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2017-2026"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP \u0026 Patent Litigation","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025 "},{"title":"“Women in Business Award” ","detail":"Charlotte Business Journal, 2025"},{"title":"Women, Influence \u0026 Power in Law’s “Managing Partner of the Year”","detail":"Corporate Counsel, 2024"},{"title":"North Carolina Pro Bono Honor Society","detail":"2016-2018, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDanielle Williams is a high-stakes business litigation lawyer. She handles significant, high-profile disputes for publicly traded and privately held companies involving material damages demands. Over her career, she has represented clients in high‑stakes matters in federal and state courts across the country and in arbitrations in patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement, breach of contract, antitrust, and environmental matters. Her patent infringement cases have been concentrated in the top patent litigation courts in the country and span a variety of technologies and industries including financial services, high tech, semiconductors, telecommunications, software, mobile applications, and consumer products.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMost recently, she helped lead the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing and earned her Am Law Litigator of the Week recognition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilding on her MBA, Danielle is one of the firm\u0026rsquo;s go-to attorneys for damages issues. She regularly is brought in to develop damages strategy at all stages of cases, including at trial.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle is regularly recognized as a leading lawyer in industry publications and has been ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026copy; for Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation since 2016 and Patent Litigation since 2017. She was recognized as an\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Global Leader in 2026. She was listed in the 2022\u0026ndash;2025\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewhich commented that she is a \u0026ldquo;zealous litigator\u0026hellip;with an abundance of trial experience\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;knows how to address key issues and make all the right strategic plays.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle previously served as managing partner of a major Am Law 50 office and co‑chaired a global IP practice. She co‑founded the ChIPs Carolinas Chapter and has driven initiatives that strengthened pipelines across the profession.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutside of the law, she has served on many boards, including National Sports Media Association, Wake Forest University\u0026rsquo;s Face to Face, Salem Academy and College, NextNow for UNC School of Arts, and Brenner Children\u0026rsquo;s Hospital, among others.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDanielle has first-chaired, led, and consulted in numerous litigations in multiple venues, including the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals; the 11\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e\u0026nbsp;Circuit Court of Appeals; the United States International Trade Commission (ITC); the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); Federal District Courts in North Carolina (W.D.N.C., M.D.N.C., E.D.N.C.), Georgia (N.D. Ga.), California (N.D. Cal., C.D. Cal.), Texas (E.D. Tex., N.D. Tex. and W.D. Tex. including Waco), Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, Colorado, New Jersey, New York; as well as arbitrations before the ICC and AAA.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Litigator of the Week for the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing","detail":"The American Lawyer, December 19, 2025"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week Runner-Up for securing a preliminary injunction against NASCAR in the monopolization case brought on behalf of Michael Jordan and Denny Hamlin’s racing team, 23XI Racing, and Front Row Motorsports Inc.","detail":"The American Lawyer, December 20, 2024"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week First Runner-Up for a defense verdict for U.S. Well Services LLC in a patent showdown with electric fracking rival Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Not only did jurors in Waco, Texas, find that U.S. Well Services did not infringe upon any of the three patents Halliburton asserted at trial, but they also found two of those patents invalid due to obviousness","detail":"The American Lawyer, September 1, 2023"},{"title":"IAM Patent 1000","detail":"IAM, 2022–2025"},{"title":"Global Leader","detail":"IAM, 2024–2025"},{"title":"Trade Secrets and Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer,” Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2024–2025"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2016–2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2017-2026"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP \u0026 Patent Litigation","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025 "},{"title":"“Women in Business Award” ","detail":"Charlotte Business Journal, 2025"},{"title":"Women, Influence \u0026 Power in Law’s “Managing Partner of the Year”","detail":"Corporate Counsel, 2024"},{"title":"North Carolina Pro Bono Honor Society","detail":"2016-2018, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13429}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-20T20:43:04.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-20T20:43:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Williams{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week for the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer, December 19, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week Runner-Up for securing a preliminary injunction against NASCAR in the monopolization case brought on behalf of Michael Jordan and Denny Hamlin’s racing team, 23XI Racing, and Front Row Motorsports Inc.\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer, December 20, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week First Runner-Up for a defense verdict for U.S. Well Services LLC in a patent showdown with electric fracking rival Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Not only did jurors in Waco, Texas, find that U.S. Well Services did not infringe upon any of the three patents Halliburton asserted at trial, but they also found two of those patents invalid due to obviousness\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer, September 1, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"IAM Patent 1000\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IAM, 2022–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Global Leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IAM, 2024–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Trade Secrets and Patents\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"WIPR Leaders, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Key Lawyer,” Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US, 2024–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2016–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Patent Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2017-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP \u0026amp; Patent Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2025 \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Women in Business Award” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Charlotte Business Journal, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Women, Influence \u0026amp; Power in Law’s “Managing Partner of the Year”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Corporate Counsel, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"North Carolina Pro Bono Honor Society\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2016-2018, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Danielle Williams is a high-stakes business litigation lawyer. She handles significant, high-profile disputes for publicly traded and privately held companies involving material damages demands. Over her career, she has represented clients in high‑stakes matters in federal and state courts across the country and in arbitrations in patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement, breach of contract, antitrust, and environmental matters. Her patent infringement cases have been concentrated in the top patent litigation courts in the country and span a variety of technologies and industries including financial services, high tech, semiconductors, telecommunications, software, mobile applications, and consumer products.\nMost recently, she helped lead the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing and earned her Am Law Litigator of the Week recognition.\nBuilding on her MBA, Danielle is one of the firm’s go-to attorneys for damages issues. She regularly is brought in to develop damages strategy at all stages of cases, including at trial.\nDanielle is regularly recognized as a leading lawyer in industry publications and has been ranked in The Best Lawyers in America© for Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation since 2016 and Patent Litigation since 2017. She was recognized as an IAM Global Leader in 2026. She was listed in the 2022–2025 IAM Patent 1000, which commented that she is a “zealous litigator…with an abundance of trial experience” who “knows how to address key issues and make all the right strategic plays.”\nDanielle previously served as managing partner of a major Am Law 50 office and co‑chaired a global IP practice. She co‑founded the ChIPs Carolinas Chapter and has driven initiatives that strengthened pipelines across the profession.\nOutside of the law, she has served on many boards, including National Sports Media Association, Wake Forest University’s Face to Face, Salem Academy and College, NextNow for UNC School of Arts, and Brenner Children’s Hospital, among others.\nDanielle has first-chaired, led, and consulted in numerous litigations in multiple venues, including the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals; the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals; the United States International Trade Commission (ITC); the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO); Federal District Courts in North Carolina (W.D.N.C., M.D.N.C., E.D.N.C.), Georgia (N.D. Ga.), California (N.D. Cal., C.D. Cal.), Texas (E.D. Tex., N.D. Tex. and W.D. Tex. including Waco), Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, Colorado, New Jersey, New York; as well as arbitrations before the ICC and AAA. Partner Litigator of the Week for the antitrust trial brought by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports against NASCAR, a case that reshaped the sport of premier stock car racing The American Lawyer, December 19, 2025 Litigator of the Week Runner-Up for securing a preliminary injunction against NASCAR in the monopolization case brought on behalf of Michael Jordan and Denny Hamlin’s racing team, 23XI Racing, and Front Row Motorsports Inc. The American Lawyer, December 20, 2024 Litigator of the Week First Runner-Up for a defense verdict for U.S. Well Services LLC in a patent showdown with electric fracking rival Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Not only did jurors in Waco, Texas, find that U.S. Well Services did not infringe upon any of the three patents Halliburton asserted at trial, but they also found two of those patents invalid due to obviousness The American Lawyer, September 1, 2023 IAM Patent 1000 IAM, 2022–2025 Global Leader IAM, 2024–2025 Trade Secrets and Patents WIPR Leaders, 2025 “Key Lawyer,” Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation The Legal 500 US, 2024–2025 Commercial Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation The Best Lawyers in America®, 2016–2026 Patent Litigation The Best Lawyers in America®, 2017-2026 “500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP \u0026amp; Patent Litigation Lawdragon, 2026 “500 Leading Global IP Lawyers” Lawdragon, 2025  “Women in Business Award”  Charlotte Business Journal, 2025 Women, Influence \u0026amp; Power in Law’s “Managing Partner of the Year” Corporate Counsel, 2024 North Carolina Pro Bono Honor Society 2016-2018, 2020 Wake Forest University Wake Forest University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Georgia North Carolina Co-Founder and Board Member, ChIPs, Carolina Chapter, 2022- present Advisory Board, Wake Forest University’s Face to Face Speaker series, 2020-present Board Member, National Sports Media Association, 2017-2021 Board of Trustees, Forsyth Country Day School, 2015- 2021 Advisory Board, Brenner Children’s Hospital, 2003-2015","searchable_name":"Danielle Williams","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442815,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5739,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Willingham focuses on white-collar criminal defense and complex litigation matters. He has represented numerous individuals and entities facing governmental investigations and other complex litigation issues in both state and federal courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; David has deep experience in dealing with high-profile cases, having prosecuted and defended many matters of public interest, including those involving health care fraud, financial fraud and money laundering charges. He has handled numerous parallel investigations with the SEC and other regulatory bodies, as well as numerous successful appeals before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to entering private practice, David was the Deputy Chief of the Major Frauds Section of the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in the Central District of California. In that capacity, he spent two years supervising the subsection responsible for all health-care-fraud-related prosecutions within the district.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has been designated as a leader by Chambers USA, Martindale-Hubbell, and other publications. Five\u0026nbsp;times, from 2016-2019 and 2021, David was honored as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 Lawyers by the state\u0026rsquo;s leading legal publication. David is also a nationally recognized speaker, often speaking at events around the country on issues facing litigators and judicial officers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is also a respected member of the legal community. He previously served as the president of the Federal Bar Association of Los Angeles, and the co-chair of the Lawyer Representatives for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the past, David has also served as co-chair of the ABA\u0026rsquo;s National Committee on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the ABA\u0026rsquo;s Securities Fraud Committee, and the ABA\u0026rsquo;s Financial Institution Fraud Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-willingham","email":"dwillingham@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead trial counsel for the founder of a hedge fund in an SEC administrative proceeding alleging fraud against the founder and his fund in connection with investment decisions made by his investors. Earning national recognition for the result, Dave received a rare directed verdict against the SEC following trial for much of the case, and the ALJ later dismissed the SEC\u0026rsquo;s remaining fraud theories against his client. Dave was tapped for this representation after earning a complete dismissal at trial for the client in a previous proceeding\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead trial counsel for a health care company in a matter where plaintiffs alleged over $100M in damages as a result of alleged employment discrimination by the company.\u0026nbsp; The trial team successfully convinced the court to bifurcate all claims, which led to a defense victory at the initial trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved an extraordinary resolution after more than 6 years of litigation for RD Legal Funding and its CEO in a matter against the CFPB and the New York AG. RD Legal Funding settled this critical matter for a mere $1 civil penalty and no admission of liability and no other penalty to the clients. That result is unprecedented in the financial services sector in a contested litigation. This result follows a groundbreaking ruling in 2018 which held that CFPB is an unconstitutionally structured entity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeads the defense of the former CEO of Ontrak who was recently charged with insider trading by the Department of Justice. The case was touted by DOJ as a groundbreaking prosecution focused on alleged malfeasance by Peizer in connection with the implementation of a 10b(5) trading plan \u0026ndash; the first prosecution of its kind. This case has made national news and is another example of David being at the top of the list for the most sensitive cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel in the defense of a medical professional who was arrested and nationally publicized as part of the opioid problem in the U.S. in February 2019 \u0026ndash; dubbed Operation Hypocritical Oath. After a series of defense presentations, the government reversed course and agreed to divert and eventually dismiss the case against his client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the charged parents in the high-profile \u0026ldquo;Varsity Blues\u0026rdquo; investigation conducted out of the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Boston. June 28, 2022, his client received a sentence of no prison time. The case has brought additional national attention to King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s California White Collar practice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently serves as lead counsel for Kimora Lee Simmons in a $200 million dispute with her ex-husband Russell Simmons over alleged fraud in connection with the purchase and transfer shares in the energy drink company Celsius relating to the 1MBD prosecution in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHas successfully defended dozens of health care executives, professionals and entities in federal investigations into alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and civil False Claims Act matters in courts around the country\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently made national news for convincing a federal judge in New York to dismiss a case against his client and find that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutionally structured\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense before the SEC and DOJ of the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender during the Financial Crisis. \u0026nbsp;After several presentations to both agencies, Dave earned a full declination for his client, despite the fact that the SEC pursued a case against the lender\u0026rsquo;s chairman and two subordinates to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently won a significant verdict in a trade-secret civil trial in Los Angeles Superior Court. Representing the plaintiff, Dave convinced the jury to render a unanimous verdict on the trade-secret claim against his client\u0026rsquo;s former controller and two competitor companies. The verdict was for $6,154,810.40\u0026mdash;literally every penny requested as damages during the trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the branch manager of a Los Angeles bank that predominantly services Los Angeles\u0026rsquo;s Chinese community in a federal AML/Bank Secrecy Act prosecution. The case was investigated as part of a sting operation targeting the Asian-American and Asian immigrant community in the San Gabriel Valley and was one of the very few AML/BSA cases nationwide to go to trial.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a company in an AML/Black Market Peso investigation. Hired following the execution of search warrants at the business and seizure of substantial assets. Matter concluded with no prosecution and return of most seized funds to the business and its owners\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an individual in an investigation of bank and a high-level executive in AML matter by the Department of Justice. Matter resolved with a non-prosecution agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the owner of an online gold trading platform in AML investigation (an unlicensed money transfer investigation) brought by United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Los Angeles\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of the target of the multiyear investigation by the FTC and the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Cleveland. The Department of Justice twice informed the firm that it intended to indict the client. However, following a series of vigorous presentations, the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office declined to bring any charges whatsoever\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of a federal securities claim levied against a partner at a major national law firm. Dave succeeded in convincing the federal court in Los Angeles to dismiss the entire complaint against the client, with prejudice, at the outset of the matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently led the defense of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company in an investigation by the SEC of insider-trading allegations. The matter was concluded with no action by the SEC as to Dave\u0026rsquo;s client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the former chief credit officer of First Bank of Beverly Hills, who was sued in Los Angeles Federal Court by the FDIC for negligence and fraud in connection with his tenure at the bank. The matter was recently settled and dismissed, with no judgment or bar against Dave\u0026rsquo;s client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead counsel in a federal breach of contract and declaratory relief action in the Central District of California in a battle between two telecom heavyweights. After receipt of the motion for summary judgment, the opposing client withdrew half of its allegations, and the matter settled very favorably for the firm\u0026rsquo;s clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead counsel for the defense of a nationally recognized service company sued in California courts for a class action alleging violations of consumer protection laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEarned a final arbitration award of more than $34 million in a case that involved two large, multinational corporations following a lengthy and hotly contested arbitration. In this high-stakes litigation, the trial team convinced the arbitrator to award 100 percent of the damages, fees, and costs they requested on behalf of their client at the arbitration\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a manager of a $5-billion fund who was accused of engaging in an illegal kickback scheme in a highly publicized matter stemming from the SEC\u0026rsquo;s investigation into CALPERs. After a tenacious defense and presentation on behalf of his client, the SEC terminated its investigation and brought no charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently represented a senior executive of a multinational corporation faced with intensive scrutiny for conduct occurring in several overseas jurisdictions in a highly publicized investigation by the Department of Justice and others under the FCPA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of the individual charged with taking clandestine video of Erin Andrews, an international media figure and sports reporter for ESPN, in a case that garnered national media attention\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Willingham","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"K.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top 100 Lawyers in LA","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2025"},{"title":"Top-Tier Rankings in Legal 500 United States","detail":"2024 Guide"},{"title":"Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations","detail":"Chambers USA, California (2015-2025)"},{"title":"David is a dynamic advocate. He hears the courtroom, understands it and delivers a magical product within it. ","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top White Collar Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal - 2020 - 2024"},{"title":"Top 100 Lawyer in California, Daily Journal","detail":"2016-2023"},{"title":"Top Litigator \u0026 Trial Lawyer, L.A. Business Journal","detail":"2019"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in White Collar \u0026 Government Investigations","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in America","detail":"2009–present"},{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyers","detail":"2011-present"},{"title":"Southern California Rising Star","detail":"2005-2010"},{"title":"Daily Journal Top 20 Lawyers Under 40","detail":"2010"},{"title":"AV Preeminent attorney in California","detail":"Rated by Martindale-Hubbell"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Willingham focuses on white-collar criminal defense and complex litigation matters. He has represented numerous individuals and entities facing governmental investigations and other complex litigation issues in both state and federal courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; David has deep experience in dealing with high-profile cases, having prosecuted and defended many matters of public interest, including those involving health care fraud, financial fraud and money laundering charges. He has handled numerous parallel investigations with the SEC and other regulatory bodies, as well as numerous successful appeals before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to entering private practice, David was the Deputy Chief of the Major Frauds Section of the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in the Central District of California. In that capacity, he spent two years supervising the subsection responsible for all health-care-fraud-related prosecutions within the district.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has been designated as a leader by Chambers USA, Martindale-Hubbell, and other publications. Five\u0026nbsp;times, from 2016-2019 and 2021, David was honored as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 Lawyers by the state\u0026rsquo;s leading legal publication. David is also a nationally recognized speaker, often speaking at events around the country on issues facing litigators and judicial officers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid is also a respected member of the legal community. He previously served as the president of the Federal Bar Association of Los Angeles, and the co-chair of the Lawyer Representatives for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the past, David has also served as co-chair of the ABA\u0026rsquo;s National Committee on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the ABA\u0026rsquo;s Securities Fraud Committee, and the ABA\u0026rsquo;s Financial Institution Fraud Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead trial counsel for the founder of a hedge fund in an SEC administrative proceeding alleging fraud against the founder and his fund in connection with investment decisions made by his investors. Earning national recognition for the result, Dave received a rare directed verdict against the SEC following trial for much of the case, and the ALJ later dismissed the SEC\u0026rsquo;s remaining fraud theories against his client. Dave was tapped for this representation after earning a complete dismissal at trial for the client in a previous proceeding\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead trial counsel for a health care company in a matter where plaintiffs alleged over $100M in damages as a result of alleged employment discrimination by the company.\u0026nbsp; The trial team successfully convinced the court to bifurcate all claims, which led to a defense victory at the initial trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved an extraordinary resolution after more than 6 years of litigation for RD Legal Funding and its CEO in a matter against the CFPB and the New York AG. RD Legal Funding settled this critical matter for a mere $1 civil penalty and no admission of liability and no other penalty to the clients. That result is unprecedented in the financial services sector in a contested litigation. This result follows a groundbreaking ruling in 2018 which held that CFPB is an unconstitutionally structured entity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeads the defense of the former CEO of Ontrak who was recently charged with insider trading by the Department of Justice. The case was touted by DOJ as a groundbreaking prosecution focused on alleged malfeasance by Peizer in connection with the implementation of a 10b(5) trading plan \u0026ndash; the first prosecution of its kind. This case has made national news and is another example of David being at the top of the list for the most sensitive cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel in the defense of a medical professional who was arrested and nationally publicized as part of the opioid problem in the U.S. in February 2019 \u0026ndash; dubbed Operation Hypocritical Oath. After a series of defense presentations, the government reversed course and agreed to divert and eventually dismiss the case against his client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the charged parents in the high-profile \u0026ldquo;Varsity Blues\u0026rdquo; investigation conducted out of the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Boston. June 28, 2022, his client received a sentence of no prison time. The case has brought additional national attention to King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s California White Collar practice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently serves as lead counsel for Kimora Lee Simmons in a $200 million dispute with her ex-husband Russell Simmons over alleged fraud in connection with the purchase and transfer shares in the energy drink company Celsius relating to the 1MBD prosecution in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHas successfully defended dozens of health care executives, professionals and entities in federal investigations into alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and civil False Claims Act matters in courts around the country\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently made national news for convincing a federal judge in New York to dismiss a case against his client and find that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutionally structured\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense before the SEC and DOJ of the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender during the Financial Crisis. \u0026nbsp;After several presentations to both agencies, Dave earned a full declination for his client, despite the fact that the SEC pursued a case against the lender\u0026rsquo;s chairman and two subordinates to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently won a significant verdict in a trade-secret civil trial in Los Angeles Superior Court. Representing the plaintiff, Dave convinced the jury to render a unanimous verdict on the trade-secret claim against his client\u0026rsquo;s former controller and two competitor companies. The verdict was for $6,154,810.40\u0026mdash;literally every penny requested as damages during the trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the branch manager of a Los Angeles bank that predominantly services Los Angeles\u0026rsquo;s Chinese community in a federal AML/Bank Secrecy Act prosecution. The case was investigated as part of a sting operation targeting the Asian-American and Asian immigrant community in the San Gabriel Valley and was one of the very few AML/BSA cases nationwide to go to trial.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a company in an AML/Black Market Peso investigation. Hired following the execution of search warrants at the business and seizure of substantial assets. Matter concluded with no prosecution and return of most seized funds to the business and its owners\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended an individual in an investigation of bank and a high-level executive in AML matter by the Department of Justice. Matter resolved with a non-prosecution agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the owner of an online gold trading platform in AML investigation (an unlicensed money transfer investigation) brought by United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Los Angeles\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of the target of the multiyear investigation by the FTC and the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Cleveland. The Department of Justice twice informed the firm that it intended to indict the client. However, following a series of vigorous presentations, the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office declined to bring any charges whatsoever\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of a federal securities claim levied against a partner at a major national law firm. Dave succeeded in convincing the federal court in Los Angeles to dismiss the entire complaint against the client, with prejudice, at the outset of the matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently led the defense of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company in an investigation by the SEC of insider-trading allegations. The matter was concluded with no action by the SEC as to Dave\u0026rsquo;s client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the former chief credit officer of First Bank of Beverly Hills, who was sued in Los Angeles Federal Court by the FDIC for negligence and fraud in connection with his tenure at the bank. The matter was recently settled and dismissed, with no judgment or bar against Dave\u0026rsquo;s client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead counsel in a federal breach of contract and declaratory relief action in the Central District of California in a battle between two telecom heavyweights. After receipt of the motion for summary judgment, the opposing client withdrew half of its allegations, and the matter settled very favorably for the firm\u0026rsquo;s clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently served as lead counsel for the defense of a nationally recognized service company sued in California courts for a class action alleging violations of consumer protection laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEarned a final arbitration award of more than $34 million in a case that involved two large, multinational corporations following a lengthy and hotly contested arbitration. In this high-stakes litigation, the trial team convinced the arbitrator to award 100 percent of the damages, fees, and costs they requested on behalf of their client at the arbitration\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a manager of a $5-billion fund who was accused of engaging in an illegal kickback scheme in a highly publicized matter stemming from the SEC\u0026rsquo;s investigation into CALPERs. After a tenacious defense and presentation on behalf of his client, the SEC terminated its investigation and brought no charges\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecently represented a senior executive of a multinational corporation faced with intensive scrutiny for conduct occurring in several overseas jurisdictions in a highly publicized investigation by the Department of Justice and others under the FCPA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of the individual charged with taking clandestine video of Erin Andrews, an international media figure and sports reporter for ESPN, in a case that garnered national media attention\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Top 100 Lawyers in LA","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2025"},{"title":"Top-Tier Rankings in Legal 500 United States","detail":"2024 Guide"},{"title":"Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations","detail":"Chambers USA, California (2015-2025)"},{"title":"David is a dynamic advocate. He hears the courtroom, understands it and delivers a magical product within it. ","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top White Collar Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal - 2020 - 2024"},{"title":"Top 100 Lawyer in California, Daily Journal","detail":"2016-2023"},{"title":"Top Litigator \u0026 Trial Lawyer, L.A. Business Journal","detail":"2019"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in White Collar \u0026 Government Investigations","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in America","detail":"2009–present"},{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyers","detail":"2011-present"},{"title":"Southern California Rising Star","detail":"2005-2010"},{"title":"Daily Journal Top 20 Lawyers Under 40","detail":"2010"},{"title":"AV Preeminent attorney in California","detail":"Rated by Martindale-Hubbell"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8086}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:05.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Willingham{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 100 Lawyers in LA\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top-Tier Rankings in Legal 500 United States\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024 Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, California (2015-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"David is a dynamic advocate. He hears the courtroom, understands it and delivers a magical product within it. \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top White Collar Lawyer in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal - 2020 - 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 100 Lawyer in California, Daily Journal\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2016-2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Litigator \u0026amp; Trial Lawyer, L.A. Business Journal\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in White Collar \u0026amp; Government Investigations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2009–present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Southern California Super Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2011-present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Southern California Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2005-2010\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal Top 20 Lawyers Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2010\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"AV Preeminent attorney in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Rated by Martindale-Hubbell\"}{{ FIELD }}Recently served as lead trial counsel for the founder of a hedge fund in an SEC administrative proceeding alleging fraud against the founder and his fund in connection with investment decisions made by his investors. Earning national recognition for the result, Dave received a rare directed verdict against the SEC following trial for much of the case, and the ALJ later dismissed the SEC’s remaining fraud theories against his client. Dave was tapped for this representation after earning a complete dismissal at trial for the client in a previous proceeding{{ FIELD }}Recently served as lead trial counsel for a health care company in a matter where plaintiffs alleged over $100M in damages as a result of alleged employment discrimination by the company.  The trial team successfully convinced the court to bifurcate all claims, which led to a defense victory at the initial trial{{ FIELD }}Achieved an extraordinary resolution after more than 6 years of litigation for RD Legal Funding and its CEO in a matter against the CFPB and the New York AG. RD Legal Funding settled this critical matter for a mere $1 civil penalty and no admission of liability and no other penalty to the clients. That result is unprecedented in the financial services sector in a contested litigation. This result follows a groundbreaking ruling in 2018 which held that CFPB is an unconstitutionally structured entity.{{ FIELD }}Leads the defense of the former CEO of Ontrak who was recently charged with insider trading by the Department of Justice. The case was touted by DOJ as a groundbreaking prosecution focused on alleged malfeasance by Peizer in connection with the implementation of a 10b(5) trading plan – the first prosecution of its kind. This case has made national news and is another example of David being at the top of the list for the most sensitive cases.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel in the defense of a medical professional who was arrested and nationally publicized as part of the opioid problem in the U.S. in February 2019 – dubbed Operation Hypocritical Oath. After a series of defense presentations, the government reversed course and agreed to divert and eventually dismiss the case against his client.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the charged parents in the high-profile “Varsity Blues” investigation conducted out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston. June 28, 2022, his client received a sentence of no prison time. The case has brought additional national attention to King \u0026amp; Spalding’s California White Collar practice.{{ FIELD }}Currently serves as lead counsel for Kimora Lee Simmons in a $200 million dispute with her ex-husband Russell Simmons over alleged fraud in connection with the purchase and transfer shares in the energy drink company Celsius relating to the 1MBD prosecution in New York.{{ FIELD }}Has successfully defended dozens of health care executives, professionals and entities in federal investigations into alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and civil False Claims Act matters in courts around the country{{ FIELD }}Recently made national news for convincing a federal judge in New York to dismiss a case against his client and find that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutionally structured{{ FIELD }}Led the defense before the SEC and DOJ of the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender during the Financial Crisis.  After several presentations to both agencies, Dave earned a full declination for his client, despite the fact that the SEC pursued a case against the lender’s chairman and two subordinates to the client{{ FIELD }}Recently won a significant verdict in a trade-secret civil trial in Los Angeles Superior Court. Representing the plaintiff, Dave convinced the jury to render a unanimous verdict on the trade-secret claim against his client’s former controller and two competitor companies. The verdict was for $6,154,810.40—literally every penny requested as damages during the trial{{ FIELD }}Defended the branch manager of a Los Angeles bank that predominantly services Los Angeles’s Chinese community in a federal AML/Bank Secrecy Act prosecution. The case was investigated as part of a sting operation targeting the Asian-American and Asian immigrant community in the San Gabriel Valley and was one of the very few AML/BSA cases nationwide to go to trial. {{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a company in an AML/Black Market Peso investigation. Hired following the execution of search warrants at the business and seizure of substantial assets. Matter concluded with no prosecution and return of most seized funds to the business and its owners{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended an individual in an investigation of bank and a high-level executive in AML matter by the Department of Justice. Matter resolved with a non-prosecution agreement{{ FIELD }}Defended the owner of an online gold trading platform in AML investigation (an unlicensed money transfer investigation) brought by United States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles{{ FIELD }}Led the defense of the target of the multiyear investigation by the FTC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Cleveland. The Department of Justice twice informed the firm that it intended to indict the client. However, following a series of vigorous presentations, the U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to bring any charges whatsoever{{ FIELD }}Led the defense of a federal securities claim levied against a partner at a major national law firm. Dave succeeded in convincing the federal court in Los Angeles to dismiss the entire complaint against the client, with prejudice, at the outset of the matter{{ FIELD }}Recently led the defense of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company in an investigation by the SEC of insider-trading allegations. The matter was concluded with no action by the SEC as to Dave’s client{{ FIELD }}Represented the former chief credit officer of First Bank of Beverly Hills, who was sued in Los Angeles Federal Court by the FDIC for negligence and fraud in connection with his tenure at the bank. The matter was recently settled and dismissed, with no judgment or bar against Dave’s client{{ FIELD }}Recently served as lead counsel in a federal breach of contract and declaratory relief action in the Central District of California in a battle between two telecom heavyweights. After receipt of the motion for summary judgment, the opposing client withdrew half of its allegations, and the matter settled very favorably for the firm’s clients{{ FIELD }}Recently served as lead counsel for the defense of a nationally recognized service company sued in California courts for a class action alleging violations of consumer protection laws{{ FIELD }}Earned a final arbitration award of more than $34 million in a case that involved two large, multinational corporations following a lengthy and hotly contested arbitration. In this high-stakes litigation, the trial team convinced the arbitrator to award 100 percent of the damages, fees, and costs they requested on behalf of their client at the arbitration{{ FIELD }}Defended a manager of a $5-billion fund who was accused of engaging in an illegal kickback scheme in a highly publicized matter stemming from the SEC’s investigation into CALPERs. After a tenacious defense and presentation on behalf of his client, the SEC terminated its investigation and brought no charges{{ FIELD }}Recently represented a senior executive of a multinational corporation faced with intensive scrutiny for conduct occurring in several overseas jurisdictions in a highly publicized investigation by the Department of Justice and others under the FCPA{{ FIELD }}Led the defense of the individual charged with taking clandestine video of Erin Andrews, an international media figure and sports reporter for ESPN, in a case that garnered national media attention{{ FIELD }}David Willingham focuses on white-collar criminal defense and complex litigation matters. He has represented numerous individuals and entities facing governmental investigations and other complex litigation issues in both state and federal courts around the country.  David has deep experience in dealing with high-profile cases, having prosecuted and defended many matters of public interest, including those involving health care fraud, financial fraud and money laundering charges. He has handled numerous parallel investigations with the SEC and other regulatory bodies, as well as numerous successful appeals before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.\nPrior to entering private practice, David was the Deputy Chief of the Major Frauds Section of the United States Attorney’s Office in the Central District of California. In that capacity, he spent two years supervising the subsection responsible for all health-care-fraud-related prosecutions within the district.\nDavid has been designated as a leader by Chambers USA, Martindale-Hubbell, and other publications. Five times, from 2016-2019 and 2021, David was honored as one of California’s Top 100 Lawyers by the state’s leading legal publication. David is also a nationally recognized speaker, often speaking at events around the country on issues facing litigators and judicial officers.\nDavid is also a respected member of the legal community. He previously served as the president of the Federal Bar Association of Los Angeles, and the co-chair of the Lawyer Representatives for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference.\nIn the past, David has also served as co-chair of the ABA’s National Committee on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the ABA’s Securities Fraud Committee, and the ABA’s Financial Institution Fraud Committee. Partner Top 100 Lawyers in LA Los Angeles Business Journal 2025 Top-Tier Rankings in Legal 500 United States 2024 Guide Band 1, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations Chambers USA, California (2015-2025) David is a dynamic advocate. He hears the courtroom, understands it and delivers a magical product within it.  Chambers USA (2022) Top White Collar Lawyer in California Daily Journal - 2020 - 2024 Top 100 Lawyer in California, Daily Journal 2016-2023 Top Litigator \u0026amp; Trial Lawyer, L.A. Business Journal 2019 Leading Lawyer in White Collar \u0026amp; Government Investigations Chambers USA Best Lawyers in America 2009–present Southern California Super Lawyers 2011-present Southern California Rising Star 2005-2010 Daily Journal Top 20 Lawyers Under 40 2010 AV Preeminent attorney in California Rated by Martindale-Hubbell University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law University of Southern California USC Gould School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Lawyer Representative, Ninth Circuit Judicial Conference (2013–Present); Co-Chair (2015–2017) President, Los Angeles Federal Bar Association (2015–2016) Member of the board of directors, Los Angeles Federal Bar Association (2006–present) Member, State Bar of California, Client Security Fund Commission (2005–2009) Chairperson, American Bar Association, West Coast White Collar Crime Committee (2006–2008) Board of Directors, Los Angeles Chapter, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Recently served as lead trial counsel for the founder of a hedge fund in an SEC administrative proceeding alleging fraud against the founder and his fund in connection with investment decisions made by his investors. Earning national recognition for the result, Dave received a rare directed verdict against the SEC following trial for much of the case, and the ALJ later dismissed the SEC’s remaining fraud theories against his client. Dave was tapped for this representation after earning a complete dismissal at trial for the client in a previous proceeding Recently served as lead trial counsel for a health care company in a matter where plaintiffs alleged over $100M in damages as a result of alleged employment discrimination by the company.  The trial team successfully convinced the court to bifurcate all claims, which led to a defense victory at the initial trial Achieved an extraordinary resolution after more than 6 years of litigation for RD Legal Funding and its CEO in a matter against the CFPB and the New York AG. RD Legal Funding settled this critical matter for a mere $1 civil penalty and no admission of liability and no other penalty to the clients. That result is unprecedented in the financial services sector in a contested litigation. This result follows a groundbreaking ruling in 2018 which held that CFPB is an unconstitutionally structured entity. Leads the defense of the former CEO of Ontrak who was recently charged with insider trading by the Department of Justice. The case was touted by DOJ as a groundbreaking prosecution focused on alleged malfeasance by Peizer in connection with the implementation of a 10b(5) trading plan – the first prosecution of its kind. This case has made national news and is another example of David being at the top of the list for the most sensitive cases. Served as lead counsel in the defense of a medical professional who was arrested and nationally publicized as part of the opioid problem in the U.S. in February 2019 – dubbed Operation Hypocritical Oath. After a series of defense presentations, the government reversed course and agreed to divert and eventually dismiss the case against his client. Represented one of the charged parents in the high-profile “Varsity Blues” investigation conducted out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston. June 28, 2022, his client received a sentence of no prison time. The case has brought additional national attention to King \u0026amp; Spalding’s California White Collar practice. Currently serves as lead counsel for Kimora Lee Simmons in a $200 million dispute with her ex-husband Russell Simmons over alleged fraud in connection with the purchase and transfer shares in the energy drink company Celsius relating to the 1MBD prosecution in New York. Has successfully defended dozens of health care executives, professionals and entities in federal investigations into alleged violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and civil False Claims Act matters in courts around the country Recently made national news for convincing a federal judge in New York to dismiss a case against his client and find that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unconstitutionally structured Led the defense before the SEC and DOJ of the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender during the Financial Crisis.  After several presentations to both agencies, Dave earned a full declination for his client, despite the fact that the SEC pursued a case against the lender’s chairman and two subordinates to the client Recently won a significant verdict in a trade-secret civil trial in Los Angeles Superior Court. Representing the plaintiff, Dave convinced the jury to render a unanimous verdict on the trade-secret claim against his client’s former controller and two competitor companies. The verdict was for $6,154,810.40—literally every penny requested as damages during the trial Defended the branch manager of a Los Angeles bank that predominantly services Los Angeles’s Chinese community in a federal AML/Bank Secrecy Act prosecution. The case was investigated as part of a sting operation targeting the Asian-American and Asian immigrant community in the San Gabriel Valley and was one of the very few AML/BSA cases nationwide to go to trial.  Successfully defended a company in an AML/Black Market Peso investigation. Hired following the execution of search warrants at the business and seizure of substantial assets. Matter concluded with no prosecution and return of most seized funds to the business and its owners Successfully defended an individual in an investigation of bank and a high-level executive in AML matter by the Department of Justice. Matter resolved with a non-prosecution agreement Defended the owner of an online gold trading platform in AML investigation (an unlicensed money transfer investigation) brought by United States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles Led the defense of the target of the multiyear investigation by the FTC and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Cleveland. The Department of Justice twice informed the firm that it intended to indict the client. However, following a series of vigorous presentations, the U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to bring any charges whatsoever Led the defense of a federal securities claim levied against a partner at a major national law firm. Dave succeeded in convincing the federal court in Los Angeles to dismiss the entire complaint against the client, with prejudice, at the outset of the matter Recently led the defense of the CEO of a Fortune 500 company in an investigation by the SEC of insider-trading allegations. The matter was concluded with no action by the SEC as to Dave’s client Represented the former chief credit officer of First Bank of Beverly Hills, who was sued in Los Angeles Federal Court by the FDIC for negligence and fraud in connection with his tenure at the bank. The matter was recently settled and dismissed, with no judgment or bar against Dave’s client Recently served as lead counsel in a federal breach of contract and declaratory relief action in the Central District of California in a battle between two telecom heavyweights. After receipt of the motion for summary judgment, the opposing client withdrew half of its allegations, and the matter settled very favorably for the firm’s clients Recently served as lead counsel for the defense of a nationally recognized service company sued in California courts for a class action alleging violations of consumer protection laws Earned a final arbitration award of more than $34 million in a case that involved two large, multinational corporations following a lengthy and hotly contested arbitration. In this high-stakes litigation, the trial team convinced the arbitrator to award 100 percent of the damages, fees, and costs they requested on behalf of their client at the arbitration Defended a manager of a $5-billion fund who was accused of engaging in an illegal kickback scheme in a highly publicized matter stemming from the SEC’s investigation into CALPERs. After a tenacious defense and presentation on behalf of his client, the SEC terminated its investigation and brought no charges Recently represented a senior executive of a multinational corporation faced with intensive scrutiny for conduct occurring in several overseas jurisdictions in a highly publicized investigation by the Department of Justice and others under the FCPA Led the defense of the individual charged with taking clandestine video of Erin Andrews, an international media figure and sports reporter for ESPN, in a case that garnered national media attention","searchable_name":"David K. Willingham","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446306,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5881,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHershel is a litigator whose practice focuses on antitrust/competition and complex commercial disputes. He also has extensive experience securing merger clearance in a diverse range of industries, and regularly advocates on behalf of clients before state attorneys general and federal regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice\u0026nbsp;and the Federal Trade Commission.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHershel has represented clients in a broad range of industries, including healthcare, airlines, financial services, telecommunications, and agribusiness.\u0026nbsp; Clients rely on his judgment and strategic advice in executing mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions, particularly those requiring compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and related responses to U.S. and foreign antitrust reviews. Hershel has also conducted internal corporate investigations and advised clients on a variety of issues, including the impact of potential legislation, regulatory rulemakings, compliance, the legality of pricing promotions, and e-discovery practices.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"hershel-wancjer","email":"hwancjer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's and North Dakota Attorney General's challenge to Sanford Health's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Cogent Communications on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented American Express in antitrust litigation against Visa and MasterCard in which American Express obtained a record-breaking settlement in excess of $4 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended American Express against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Sanford Health in securing antitrust clearance for its $1.8 billion acquisition of one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest providers of senior care and services\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised NASCAR in securing antitrust clearance for its $2 billion acquisition of International Speedway Corporation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a major airline in securing antitrust clearance for various transactions, including the acquisitions of equity stakes in other companies and the sale of a subsidiary\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an integrated health system in securing antitrust clearance for its consolidation with another health system into an $11 billion organization\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an integrated health system in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended an international airline in a lawsuit challenging its merger with Northwest Airlines Corp., and representing that same international airline in connection with the U.S. Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s review of that merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a foreign government in its $2.5 billion investor-state arbitration against Mobile TeleSystems, brought under the Additional Facility of the ICSID\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Wancjer","nick_name":"Hershel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Hershel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":345,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Executive Senior Editor","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/hershel-wancjer-7603061a7/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHershel is a litigator whose practice focuses on antitrust/competition and complex commercial disputes. He also has extensive experience securing merger clearance in a diverse range of industries, and regularly advocates on behalf of clients before state attorneys general and federal regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice\u0026nbsp;and the Federal Trade Commission.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHershel has represented clients in a broad range of industries, including healthcare, airlines, financial services, telecommunications, and agribusiness.\u0026nbsp; Clients rely on his judgment and strategic advice in executing mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions, particularly those requiring compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and related responses to U.S. and foreign antitrust reviews. Hershel has also conducted internal corporate investigations and advised clients on a variety of issues, including the impact of potential legislation, regulatory rulemakings, compliance, the legality of pricing promotions, and e-discovery practices.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's and North Dakota Attorney General's challenge to Sanford Health's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Cogent Communications on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented American Express in antitrust litigation against Visa and MasterCard in which American Express obtained a record-breaking settlement in excess of $4 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended American Express against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Sanford Health in securing antitrust clearance for its $1.8 billion acquisition of one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest providers of senior care and services\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised NASCAR in securing antitrust clearance for its $2 billion acquisition of International Speedway Corporation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a major airline in securing antitrust clearance for various transactions, including the acquisitions of equity stakes in other companies and the sale of a subsidiary\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an integrated health system in securing antitrust clearance for its consolidation with another health system into an $11 billion organization\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an integrated health system in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended an international airline in a lawsuit challenging its merger with Northwest Airlines Corp., and representing that same international airline in connection with the U.S. Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s review of that merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a foreign government in its $2.5 billion investor-state arbitration against Mobile TeleSystems, brought under the Additional Facility of the ICSID\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9993}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:38.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Wancjer{{ FIELD }}Served as trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's and North Dakota Attorney General's challenge to Sanford Health's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice{{ FIELD }}Represented Cogent Communications on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger{{ FIELD }}Represented American Express in antitrust litigation against Visa and MasterCard in which American Express obtained a record-breaking settlement in excess of $4 billion{{ FIELD }}Defended American Express against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act{{ FIELD }}Advised Sanford Health in securing antitrust clearance for its $1.8 billion acquisition of one of the nation’s largest providers of senior care and services{{ FIELD }}Advised NASCAR in securing antitrust clearance for its $2 billion acquisition of International Speedway Corporation{{ FIELD }}Advised a major airline in securing antitrust clearance for various transactions, including the acquisitions of equity stakes in other companies and the sale of a subsidiary{{ FIELD }}Advised an integrated health system in securing antitrust clearance for its consolidation with another health system into an $11 billion organization{{ FIELD }}Represented an integrated health system in connection with competition and related issues{{ FIELD }}Defended an international airline in a lawsuit challenging its merger with Northwest Airlines Corp., and representing that same international airline in connection with the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of that merger{{ FIELD }}Represented a foreign government in its $2.5 billion investor-state arbitration against Mobile TeleSystems, brought under the Additional Facility of the ICSID{{ FIELD }}Hershel is a litigator whose practice focuses on antitrust/competition and complex commercial disputes. He also has extensive experience securing merger clearance in a diverse range of industries, and regularly advocates on behalf of clients before state attorneys general and federal regulatory agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.\nHershel has represented clients in a broad range of industries, including healthcare, airlines, financial services, telecommunications, and agribusiness.  Clients rely on his judgment and strategic advice in executing mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions, particularly those requiring compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act and related responses to U.S. and foreign antitrust reviews. Hershel has also conducted internal corporate investigations and advised clients on a variety of issues, including the impact of potential legislation, regulatory rulemakings, compliance, the legality of pricing promotions, and e-discovery practices. Counsel University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School Case Western Reserve University Case Western Reserve University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit District of Columbia Michigan American Bar Association Served as trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's and North Dakota Attorney General's challenge to Sanford Health's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice Represented Cogent Communications on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with the proposed Comcast/Time Warner Cable merger Represented American Express in antitrust litigation against Visa and MasterCard in which American Express obtained a record-breaking settlement in excess of $4 billion Defended American Express against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act Advised Sanford Health in securing antitrust clearance for its $1.8 billion acquisition of one of the nation’s largest providers of senior care and services Advised NASCAR in securing antitrust clearance for its $2 billion acquisition of International Speedway Corporation Advised a major airline in securing antitrust clearance for various transactions, including the acquisitions of equity stakes in other companies and the sale of a subsidiary Advised an integrated health system in securing antitrust clearance for its consolidation with another health system into an $11 billion organization Represented an integrated health system in connection with competition and related issues Defended an international airline in a lawsuit challenging its merger with Northwest Airlines Corp., and representing that same international airline in connection with the U.S. Department of Justice’s review of that merger Represented a foreign government in its $2.5 billion investor-state arbitration against Mobile TeleSystems, brought under the Additional Facility of the ICSID","searchable_name":"Hershel Wancjer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444636,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4155,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAllison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She\u0026nbsp;has experience managing\u0026nbsp;cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute\u0026nbsp;coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAllison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She\u0026nbsp;has experience managing\u0026nbsp;cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute\u0026nbsp;coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAllison has handled numerous putative class actions in a variety of areas, including data privacy, auto insurance, and credit reporting. In addition to her class action work, Allison has also defended clients in contract and trademark disputes with other businesses. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Allison served as a law clerk for the Honorable Leigh Martin May in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor many years, Allison has chaired and helped organize the State Bar of Georgia YLD Intrastate Moot Court Competition. She also currently serves on the Board for the Georgia Legal Services Program. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"allison-hill","email":"awhite@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"White","nick_name":"Allison","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Leigh Martin May, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2014-2016"}],"first_name":"Allison","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Hill","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAllison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She\u0026nbsp;has experience managing\u0026nbsp;cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute\u0026nbsp;coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAllison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She\u0026nbsp;has experience managing\u0026nbsp;cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute\u0026nbsp;coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAllison has handled numerous putative class actions in a variety of areas, including data privacy, auto insurance, and credit reporting. In addition to her class action work, Allison has also defended clients in contract and trademark disputes with other businesses. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Allison served as a law clerk for the Honorable Leigh Martin May in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor many years, Allison has chaired and helped organize the State Bar of Georgia YLD Intrastate Moot Court Competition. She also currently serves on the Board for the Georgia Legal Services Program. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":913}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T15:56:02.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T15:56:02.000Z","searchable_text":"White{{ FIELD }}Allison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She has experience managing cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.\nAllison White's practice focuses on consumer class actions and other complex commercial litigation. She has experience managing cross-jurisdictional litigation by helping develop and execute coordinated strategies across dozens of federal and state courts.\nAllison has handled numerous putative class actions in a variety of areas, including data privacy, auto insurance, and credit reporting. In addition to her class action work, Allison has also defended clients in contract and trademark disputes with other businesses.  \nPrior to joining the firm, Allison served as a law clerk for the Honorable Leigh Martin May in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\nFor many years, Allison has chaired and helped organize the State Bar of Georgia YLD Intrastate Moot Court Competition. She also currently serves on the Board for the Georgia Legal Services Program.    Counsel Clemson University  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Georgia Law Clerk, The Honorable Leigh Martin May, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","searchable_name":"Allison Hill White","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445738,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5932,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Wain\u0026nbsp;is a Senior\u0026nbsp;Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes team\u0026nbsp;in the London office.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;is a solicitor-advocate and specialises in the\u0026nbsp;management and resolution of international commercial disputes both in English High Court litigation and in arbitrations under the leading institutional rules.\u0026nbsp;Elizabeth's experience spans across a wide range of industry sectors, including energy, trusts, intellectual property, healthcare, and construction, with a primary focus on aviation and sports.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth has significant in-house aviation experience, having undertaken three client secondments. In 2022, she was\u0026nbsp;featured by The Legal 500 in its Private Practice Arbitration Powerlist for the UK Region.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"elizabeth-warwick","email":"ewain@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Third Party\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a \u0026pound;363 million High Court claim against a flag carrier for breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant, a leading energy technology company\u003c/strong\u003e, in a USD 50 million ICSID arbitration against its joint venture partner for breach of the joint venture agreement including misappropriation of technical information and corporate misgovernance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eState-investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a USD 3.6 billion arbitration against shareholders of a major manufacturer of aircraft engines for alleged expropriation of investments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for one of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndia\u0026rsquo;s leading construction companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an application to the English Commercial Court for injunctive relief under s.44 of the English Arbitration Act to prevent a call on a performance bond in excess of USD 32 million, and associated ICC Emergency Arbitrator proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant\u003c/strong\u003e, a multinational financial services company, in an ICC arbitration for breach of contract with damages in excess of USD 25 million being sought.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Wain","nick_name":"Elizabeth","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Elizabeth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2646,"meta":{"degree":"Post-Graduate","honors":"with distinction","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/elizabeth-wain-n%C3%A9e-warwick-901564b/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Wain\u0026nbsp;is a Senior\u0026nbsp;Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes team\u0026nbsp;in the London office.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;is a solicitor-advocate and specialises in the\u0026nbsp;management and resolution of international commercial disputes both in English High Court litigation and in arbitrations under the leading institutional rules.\u0026nbsp;Elizabeth's experience spans across a wide range of industry sectors, including energy, trusts, intellectual property, healthcare, and construction, with a primary focus on aviation and sports.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth has significant in-house aviation experience, having undertaken three client secondments. In 2022, she was\u0026nbsp;featured by The Legal 500 in its Private Practice Arbitration Powerlist for the UK Region.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Third Party\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a \u0026pound;363 million High Court claim against a flag carrier for breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant, a leading energy technology company\u003c/strong\u003e, in a USD 50 million ICSID arbitration against its joint venture partner for breach of the joint venture agreement including misappropriation of technical information and corporate misgovernance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eState-investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a USD 3.6 billion arbitration against shareholders of a major manufacturer of aircraft engines for alleged expropriation of investments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for one of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndia\u0026rsquo;s leading construction companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an application to the English Commercial Court for injunctive relief under s.44 of the English Arbitration Act to prevent a call on a performance bond in excess of USD 32 million, and associated ICC Emergency Arbitrator proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClaimant\u003c/strong\u003e, a multinational financial services company, in an ICC arbitration for breach of contract with damages in excess of USD 25 million being sought.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9753}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-11T20:00:44.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-11T20:00:44.000Z","searchable_text":"Wain{{ FIELD }}Acting for the Claimant and Third Party in a £363 million High Court claim against a flag carrier for breach of contract.{{ FIELD }}Acting for the Claimant, a leading energy technology company, in a USD 50 million ICSID arbitration against its joint venture partner for breach of the joint venture agreement including misappropriation of technical information and corporate misgovernance.{{ FIELD }}Representing a State-investor in a USD 3.6 billion arbitration against shareholders of a major manufacturer of aircraft engines for alleged expropriation of investments.{{ FIELD }}Acting for one of India’s leading construction companies in an application to the English Commercial Court for injunctive relief under s.44 of the English Arbitration Act to prevent a call on a performance bond in excess of USD 32 million, and associated ICC Emergency Arbitrator proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Representing the Claimant, a multinational financial services company, in an ICC arbitration for breach of contract with damages in excess of USD 25 million being sought.{{ FIELD }}Elizabeth Wain is a Senior Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s International Disputes team in the London office. \nElizabeth is a solicitor-advocate and specialises in the management and resolution of international commercial disputes both in English High Court litigation and in arbitrations under the leading institutional rules. Elizabeth's experience spans across a wide range of industry sectors, including energy, trusts, intellectual property, healthcare, and construction, with a primary focus on aviation and sports. \nElizabeth has significant in-house aviation experience, having undertaken three client secondments. In 2022, she was featured by The Legal 500 in its Private Practice Arbitration Powerlist for the UK Region.\n  Senior Associate The University of Manchester  College of Law, Guildford, UK  England and Wales Acting for the Claimant and Third Party in a £363 million High Court claim against a flag carrier for breach of contract. Acting for the Claimant, a leading energy technology company, in a USD 50 million ICSID arbitration against its joint venture partner for breach of the joint venture agreement including misappropriation of technical information and corporate misgovernance. Representing a State-investor in a USD 3.6 billion arbitration against shareholders of a major manufacturer of aircraft engines for alleged expropriation of investments. Acting for one of India’s leading construction companies in an application to the English Commercial Court for injunctive relief under s.44 of the English Arbitration Act to prevent a call on a performance bond in excess of USD 32 million, and associated ICC Emergency Arbitrator proceedings. Representing the Claimant, a multinational financial services company, in an ICC arbitration for breach of contract with damages in excess of USD 25 million being sought.","searchable_name":"Elizabeth Wain","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447412,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6021,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSarah is a trial lawyer specializing in mass tort litigation, with a particular focus on emerging contaminants and environmental torts.\u0026nbsp; She also has extensive experience litigating large-scale products liability cases brought as individual cases, consolidated cases, MDLs and class actions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarah\u0026rsquo;s engaged and passionate approach to lawyering shows in her trial presentations, oral arguments, interactions with fact and expert witnesses, and strong client relationships.\u0026nbsp; This passion and energy is also reflected in Sarah\u0026rsquo;s extensive legal issues and writing experience, both in motions practice and at the appellate level.\u0026nbsp; Sarah\u0026rsquo;s litigation advisory and consulting practice involves emerging chemicals such as PFAS, ethylene oxide, and other air- and water-born substances. Sarah also has substantial experience litigating complex business disputes and both international and domestic arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarah also maintains a robust pro bono practice, with a focus on special education and immigration matters including asylum. She has earned a pro bono service award every year since joining the firm in 2021. She has also consistently been nominated for the \u0026ldquo;Mentor of the Year\u0026rdquo; award, and is committed to mentoring junior and mid-level associates.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, Sarah was a bilingual victim advocate for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and she continues to bring her advocacy and passion for helping people who cannot afford appropriate legal assistance to her practice at the firm.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"sarah-warburg-johnson","email":"swarburg-koechlin@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3924}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1303,"guid":"1303.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Warburg-Koechlin","nick_name":"Sarah","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Sarah","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Virginia","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Sarah Virginia Warburg-Koechlin is a lawyer of our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSarah is a trial lawyer specializing in mass tort litigation, with a particular focus on emerging contaminants and environmental torts.\u0026nbsp; She also has extensive experience litigating large-scale products liability cases brought as individual cases, consolidated cases, MDLs and class actions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarah\u0026rsquo;s engaged and passionate approach to lawyering shows in her trial presentations, oral arguments, interactions with fact and expert witnesses, and strong client relationships.\u0026nbsp; This passion and energy is also reflected in Sarah\u0026rsquo;s extensive legal issues and writing experience, both in motions practice and at the appellate level.\u0026nbsp; Sarah\u0026rsquo;s litigation advisory and consulting practice involves emerging chemicals such as PFAS, ethylene oxide, and other air- and water-born substances. Sarah also has substantial experience litigating complex business disputes and both international and domestic arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarah also maintains a robust pro bono practice, with a focus on special education and immigration matters including asylum. She has earned a pro bono service award every year since joining the firm in 2021. She has also consistently been nominated for the \u0026ldquo;Mentor of the Year\u0026rdquo; award, and is committed to mentoring junior and mid-level associates.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, Sarah was a bilingual victim advocate for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and she continues to bring her advocacy and passion for helping people who cannot afford appropriate legal assistance to her practice at the firm.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13451}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-07T22:05:50.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-07T22:05:50.000Z","searchable_text":"Warburg-Koechlin{{ FIELD }}Sarah is a trial lawyer specializing in mass tort litigation, with a particular focus on emerging contaminants and environmental torts.  She also has extensive experience litigating large-scale products liability cases brought as individual cases, consolidated cases, MDLs and class actions. \nSarah’s engaged and passionate approach to lawyering shows in her trial presentations, oral arguments, interactions with fact and expert witnesses, and strong client relationships.  This passion and energy is also reflected in Sarah’s extensive legal issues and writing experience, both in motions practice and at the appellate level.  Sarah’s litigation advisory and consulting practice involves emerging chemicals such as PFAS, ethylene oxide, and other air- and water-born substances. Sarah also has substantial experience litigating complex business disputes and both international and domestic arbitrations.\nSarah also maintains a robust pro bono practice, with a focus on special education and immigration matters including asylum. She has earned a pro bono service award every year since joining the firm in 2021. She has also consistently been nominated for the “Mentor of the Year” award, and is committed to mentoring junior and mid-level associates.  Before law school, Sarah was a bilingual victim advocate for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault, and she continues to bring her advocacy and passion for helping people who cannot afford appropriate legal assistance to her practice at the firm. Sarah Virginia Warburg-Koechlin lawyer Senior Associate Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center New York University New York University School of Law American University Washington College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas New York Texas","searchable_name":"Sarah Virginia Warburg-Koechlin","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446520,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7218,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarolyn Weltman is a senior associate based in the Chicago office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents clients from a variety of industries\u0026ndash;including in the chemical, life sciences, aerospace, and energy sectors\u0026ndash;facing both complex and high stakes commercial litigation throughout the country. Carolyn's practice emphasizes continuity across the life-cycle of a case, beginning with internal or government-led investigations, through discovery and motion practice, and culminating in either favorable settlement or trial.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarolyn has experience serving as counsel in both multidistrict litigation and individual cases. She has represented clients in a broad array of matters, including environmental and toxic torts, insurance litigation, and restructuring actions. Carolyn also maintains a white collar practice which focuses on investigations, proactive and reactive risk management, and corporate criminal defense.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarolyn is committed to\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono \u003c/em\u003ework, concentrating her efforts on civil rights and immigration matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"carolyn-weltman","email":"cweltman@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 440 487 7318","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduct Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a collection of 27 groundwater contamination actions brought by municipal water districts on Long Island.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCoordinating and national counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebp\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003emultidistrict litigation, involving nearly 900 personal injury and toxic torts suits. Secured hundreds of successful\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and summary judgment verdicts as a key member of the trial team.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTrial counsel in a month-long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions. All pending claims were successfully resolved following trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComplex Commercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePhiladelphia Energy Solutions\u003c/strong\u003e, formerly\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethe East Coast's largest oil refinery, in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a series of explosions in 2019. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEli Lilly \u0026amp; Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a contract dispute arising from the co-development of a novel autoimmune therapy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoeing\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein criminal inquiry brought by the DOJ related to the 2021 737 MAX deferred prosecution agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of court-mandated monitorship team for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePacific Gas and Electric Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003efollowing its conviction for the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for global biopharmaceutical company regarding alleged fraud and False Claim Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Weltman","nick_name":"Carolyn","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Steven C. Seeger, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois","years_held":"2019 - 2020"}],"first_name":"Carolyn","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2237,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Law Review","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2018-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarolyn Weltman is a senior associate based in the Chicago office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents clients from a variety of industries\u0026ndash;including in the chemical, life sciences, aerospace, and energy sectors\u0026ndash;facing both complex and high stakes commercial litigation throughout the country. Carolyn's practice emphasizes continuity across the life-cycle of a case, beginning with internal or government-led investigations, through discovery and motion practice, and culminating in either favorable settlement or trial.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarolyn has experience serving as counsel in both multidistrict litigation and individual cases. She has represented clients in a broad array of matters, including environmental and toxic torts, insurance litigation, and restructuring actions. Carolyn also maintains a white collar practice which focuses on investigations, proactive and reactive risk management, and corporate criminal defense.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarolyn is committed to\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono \u003c/em\u003ework, concentrating her efforts on civil rights and immigration matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProduct Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a collection of 27 groundwater contamination actions brought by municipal water districts on Long Island.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCoordinating and national counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebp\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003emultidistrict litigation, involving nearly 900 personal injury and toxic torts suits. Secured hundreds of successful\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and summary judgment verdicts as a key member of the trial team.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTrial counsel in a month-long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions. All pending claims were successfully resolved following trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eComplex Commercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePhiladelphia Energy Solutions\u003c/strong\u003e, formerly\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ethe East Coast's largest oil refinery, in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a series of explosions in 2019. The case settled favorably.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEli Lilly \u0026amp; Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a contract dispute arising from the co-development of a novel autoimmune therapy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoeing\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein criminal inquiry brought by the DOJ related to the 2021 737 MAX deferred prosecution agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of court-mandated monitorship team for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePacific Gas and Electric Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003efollowing its conviction for the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for global biopharmaceutical company regarding alleged fraud and False Claim Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13001}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-05T22:54:27.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-05T22:54:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Weltman{{ FIELD }}Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts{{ FIELD }}Counsel to Dow Chemical Company in a collection of 27 groundwater contamination actions brought by municipal water districts on Long Island.{{ FIELD }}Coordinating and national counsel for bp in the In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico multidistrict litigation, involving nearly 900 personal injury and toxic torts suits. Secured hundreds of successful Daubert and summary judgment verdicts as a key member of the trial team.{{ FIELD }}Trial counsel in a month-long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions. All pending claims were successfully resolved following trial.{{ FIELD }}Complex Commercial Litigation{{ FIELD }}Represented Philadelphia Energy Solutions, formerly the East Coast's largest oil refinery, in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a series of explosions in 2019. The case settled favorably.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for Eli Lilly \u0026amp; Company in a contract dispute arising from the co-development of a novel autoimmune therapy.{{ FIELD }}Government Matters{{ FIELD }}Defended Boeing in criminal inquiry brought by the DOJ related to the 2021 737 MAX deferred prosecution agreement.{{ FIELD }}Member of court-mandated monitorship team for Pacific Gas and Electric Company following its conviction for the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion.{{ FIELD }}Conducted internal investigation for global biopharmaceutical company regarding alleged fraud and False Claim Act violations.{{ FIELD }}Carolyn Weltman is a senior associate based in the Chicago office and a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents clients from a variety of industries–including in the chemical, life sciences, aerospace, and energy sectors–facing both complex and high stakes commercial litigation throughout the country. Carolyn's practice emphasizes continuity across the life-cycle of a case, beginning with internal or government-led investigations, through discovery and motion practice, and culminating in either favorable settlement or trial. \nCarolyn has experience serving as counsel in both multidistrict litigation and individual cases. She has represented clients in a broad array of matters, including environmental and toxic torts, insurance litigation, and restructuring actions. Carolyn also maintains a white collar practice which focuses on investigations, proactive and reactive risk management, and corporate criminal defense. \nCarolyn is committed to pro bono work, concentrating her efforts on civil rights and immigration matters.\n  Senior Associate The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Illinois Judicial Clerk, Hon. Steven C. Seeger, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts Counsel to Dow Chemical Company in a collection of 27 groundwater contamination actions brought by municipal water districts on Long Island. Coordinating and national counsel for bp in the In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico multidistrict litigation, involving nearly 900 personal injury and toxic torts suits. Secured hundreds of successful Daubert and summary judgment verdicts as a key member of the trial team. Trial counsel in a month-long jury trial brought by residents near a medical device manufacturing and sterilization facility alleging development of various diseases due to exposure to ethylene oxide emissions. All pending claims were successfully resolved following trial. Complex Commercial Litigation Represented Philadelphia Energy Solutions, formerly the East Coast's largest oil refinery, in a bankruptcy adversary lawsuit seeking business interruption and property damage coverage arising from a series of explosions in 2019. The case settled favorably. Counsel for Eli Lilly \u0026amp; Company in a contract dispute arising from the co-development of a novel autoimmune therapy. Government Matters Defended Boeing in criminal inquiry brought by the DOJ related to the 2021 737 MAX deferred prosecution agreement. Member of court-mandated monitorship team for Pacific Gas and Electric Company following its conviction for the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion. Conducted internal investigation for global biopharmaceutical company regarding alleged fraud and False Claim Act violations.","searchable_name":"Carolyn Weltman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}