{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"5","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"K","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":443946,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6689,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBarry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC\u0026rsquo;s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a\u0026nbsp;variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"barry-kamar","email":"bkamar@kslaw.com ","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eProject44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent national financial services company in DOJ investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eerinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRetractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary\u0026rsquo;s conduct.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kamar","nick_name":"Barry","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Barry","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America ","detail":"2024 "}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBarry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC\u0026rsquo;s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a\u0026nbsp;variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eProject44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent national financial services company in DOJ investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eerinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRetractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary\u0026rsquo;s conduct.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America ","detail":"2024 "}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11683}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Kamar{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024 \"}{{ FIELD }}Project44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute{{ FIELD }}Skillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor{{ FIELD }}Advise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation{{ FIELD }}Represent national financial services company in DOJ investigation{{ FIELD }}Represent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter{{ FIELD }}Represent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls{{ FIELD }}IRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.{{ FIELD }}erinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.{{ FIELD }}Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.{{ FIELD }}Representation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary’s conduct.{{ FIELD }}Barry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.\nA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC’s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\nPrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\nBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\nA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish. Partner The Best Lawyers in America  2024  University of Texas  The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Florida New York Federal Bar Association Vice-Chair, Federal Committee, Miami-Dade Bar Association Trial Lawyers, Criminal Law, and Business Law Sections, The Florida Bar Economic Club of Miami Project44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute Skillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor Advise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation Represent national financial services company in DOJ investigation Represent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter Represent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls IRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency. erinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings. Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices. Representation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary’s conduct.","searchable_name":"Barry Kamar","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443889,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6259,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamantha\u0026rsquo;s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.\u0026nbsp; She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.\u0026nbsp; Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.\u0026nbsp; Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"samantha-kavanaugh","email":"skavanaugh@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSecurities Class Action Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an investment bank.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kavanaugh","nick_name":"Samantha","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Samantha","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1996-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 1","detail":"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/samantha-kavanaugh-2377114/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamantha\u0026rsquo;s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.\u0026nbsp; She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.\u0026nbsp; Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.\u0026nbsp; Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSecurities Class Action Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an investment bank.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 1","detail":"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9670}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:00:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:00:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Kavanaugh{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Band 1\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida\"}{{ FIELD }}Securities Class Action Defense\nDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.{{ FIELD }}Defended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against an investment bank.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.{{ FIELD }}Other Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\nRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\nRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.{{ FIELD }}Other Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\nRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.{{ FIELD }}Internal Investigations\nRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\nRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\nRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\nRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.{{ FIELD }}Other Litigation\nRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\nRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\nRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\nRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\nRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\nRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\nRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\nRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.{{ FIELD }}Samantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.  She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.\nSamantha’s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.  She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.  Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.  Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies. Partner Ranked Band 1 Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida George Mason University George Mason University School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida The Florida Bar, Member Dade County Bar Association, Member Securities Class Action Defense\nDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company. Defended federal securities class action against global technology distributor. Defended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company. Defended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company. Defended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development. Defended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry. Defended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry. Defended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company. Defended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company. Defended federal securities class action against an investment bank. Defended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors. Defended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors. Other Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\nRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\nRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations. Other Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\nRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers. Internal Investigations\nRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\nRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\nRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\nRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee. Other Litigation\nRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\nRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\nRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\nRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\nRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\nRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\nRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\nRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.","searchable_name":"Samantha Kavanaugh","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426547,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4105,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrandon Keel is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Business Litigation Group, where he represents clients in a variety of complex commercial litigation, focusing primarily on class actions, securities litigation, and other shareholder disputes. Brandon has represented clients through all stages of litigation in a broad array of commercial matters, including securities and consumer class actions, shareholder derivative lawsuits, contract disputes, post-closing M\u0026amp;A disputes, and business torts.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brandon was a litigation associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher \u0026amp; Flom LLP, where he represented a number of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes commercial litigation. During his time at Skadden, he helped secure dismissals of numerous putative consumer class action lawsuits against one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s leading food and beverage companies. He also represented clients in substantial litigation arising out of the financial crisis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrandon has served on the firm\u0026rsquo;s hiring committee and is active in the firm\u0026rsquo;s efforts to recruit new attorneys. He is a member of the Georgia and Illinois bars, as well as the Atlanta Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eCFPB Proposes Rule Prohibiting Class Action Waivers And Requiring Reporting Of Arbitration Information\u003c/em\u003e, Client Alert, May 11, 2016.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eProfiting Under the Veil of Compensation: Wills v. Foster and the Application of the Collateral Source Rule to Medicare and Medicaid\u003c/em\u003e, 58 DePaul L. Rev. 789 (2009)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brandon-keel","email":"bkeel@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting SCANA Corporation in various litigation matters arising out of the abandonment of SCANA\u0026rsquo;s new nuclear power development at the V.C. Summer nuclear station in South Carolina, including the defense of ratepayer class actions, securities class action litigation, shareholder derivative lawsuits, and a regulatory proceeding in which SCANA achieved approval for a proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Equifax, Inc. in securities class action litigation and related government investigations arising out of the data breach announced in September 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Quorum Health Corporation, an owner and operator of acute care hospitals, and its former officers in defense of securities class action and derivative litigation relating to Quorum\u0026rsquo;s spin-off from its former parent company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation relating to the company\u0026rsquo;s 2018 initial public offering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Tivity Health, Inc., a provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., an owner and operater of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Aeterna Zentaris, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and certain of its former officers in securities class action litigation arising out of the FDA\u0026rsquo;s rejection of the company\u0026rsquo;s New Drug Application.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a leading company in the payment processing industry in connection with class action litigation brought on behalf of merchants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international airline in defense of a commercial dispute for alleged breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading food and beverage companies in defense of various consumer class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1204,"guid":"1204.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Keel","nick_name":"Brandon","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brandon","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":565,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrandon Keel is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Business Litigation Group, where he represents clients in a variety of complex commercial litigation, focusing primarily on class actions, securities litigation, and other shareholder disputes. Brandon has represented clients through all stages of litigation in a broad array of commercial matters, including securities and consumer class actions, shareholder derivative lawsuits, contract disputes, post-closing M\u0026amp;A disputes, and business torts.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brandon was a litigation associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher \u0026amp; Flom LLP, where he represented a number of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes commercial litigation. During his time at Skadden, he helped secure dismissals of numerous putative consumer class action lawsuits against one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s leading food and beverage companies. He also represented clients in substantial litigation arising out of the financial crisis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrandon has served on the firm\u0026rsquo;s hiring committee and is active in the firm\u0026rsquo;s efforts to recruit new attorneys. He is a member of the Georgia and Illinois bars, as well as the Atlanta Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eCFPB Proposes Rule Prohibiting Class Action Waivers And Requiring Reporting Of Arbitration Information\u003c/em\u003e, Client Alert, May 11, 2016.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eProfiting Under the Veil of Compensation: Wills v. Foster and the Application of the Collateral Source Rule to Medicare and Medicaid\u003c/em\u003e, 58 DePaul L. Rev. 789 (2009)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting SCANA Corporation in various litigation matters arising out of the abandonment of SCANA\u0026rsquo;s new nuclear power development at the V.C. Summer nuclear station in South Carolina, including the defense of ratepayer class actions, securities class action litigation, shareholder derivative lawsuits, and a regulatory proceeding in which SCANA achieved approval for a proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Equifax, Inc. in securities class action litigation and related government investigations arising out of the data breach announced in September 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Quorum Health Corporation, an owner and operator of acute care hospitals, and its former officers in defense of securities class action and derivative litigation relating to Quorum\u0026rsquo;s spin-off from its former parent company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation relating to the company\u0026rsquo;s 2018 initial public offering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Tivity Health, Inc., a provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., an owner and operater of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Aeterna Zentaris, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and certain of its former officers in securities class action litigation arising out of the FDA\u0026rsquo;s rejection of the company\u0026rsquo;s New Drug Application.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a leading company in the payment processing industry in connection with class action litigation brought on behalf of merchants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international airline in defense of a commercial dispute for alleged breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading food and beverage companies in defense of various consumer class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11795}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:54:35.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:54:35.000Z","searchable_text":"Keel{{ FIELD }}Representing SCANA Corporation in various litigation matters arising out of the abandonment of SCANA’s new nuclear power development at the V.C. Summer nuclear station in South Carolina, including the defense of ratepayer class actions, securities class action litigation, shareholder derivative lawsuits, and a regulatory proceeding in which SCANA achieved approval for a proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy.{{ FIELD }}Representing Equifax, Inc. in securities class action litigation and related government investigations arising out of the data breach announced in September 2017.{{ FIELD }}Representing Quorum Health Corporation, an owner and operator of acute care hospitals, and its former officers in defense of securities class action and derivative litigation relating to Quorum’s spin-off from its former parent company.{{ FIELD }}Representing U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation relating to the company’s 2018 initial public offering.{{ FIELD }}Representing Tivity Health, Inc., a provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., an owner and operater of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Aeterna Zentaris, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and certain of its former officers in securities class action litigation arising out of the FDA’s rejection of the company’s New Drug Application.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading company in the payment processing industry in connection with class action litigation brought on behalf of merchants.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international airline in defense of a commercial dispute for alleged breach of contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the world’s leading food and beverage companies in defense of various consumer class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Brandon Keel is a partner in the firm’s Business Litigation Group, where he represents clients in a variety of complex commercial litigation, focusing primarily on class actions, securities litigation, and other shareholder disputes. Brandon has represented clients through all stages of litigation in a broad array of commercial matters, including securities and consumer class actions, shareholder derivative lawsuits, contract disputes, post-closing M\u0026amp;A disputes, and business torts. \nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brandon was a litigation associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher \u0026amp; Flom LLP, where he represented a number of Fortune 500 companies in high-stakes commercial litigation. During his time at Skadden, he helped secure dismissals of numerous putative consumer class action lawsuits against one of the nation’s leading food and beverage companies. He also represented clients in substantial litigation arising out of the financial crisis.\nBrandon has served on the firm’s hiring committee and is active in the firm’s efforts to recruit new attorneys. He is a member of the Georgia and Illinois bars, as well as the Atlanta Bar Association.\nPublications\n\nCFPB Proposes Rule Prohibiting Class Action Waivers And Requiring Reporting Of Arbitration Information, Client Alert, May 11, 2016.\nProfiting Under the Veil of Compensation: Wills v. Foster and the Application of the Collateral Source Rule to Medicare and Medicaid, 58 DePaul L. Rev. 789 (2009)\n\n  Partner University of Colorado at Boulder University of Colorado School of Law DePaul University DePaul University College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Illinois Representing SCANA Corporation in various litigation matters arising out of the abandonment of SCANA’s new nuclear power development at the V.C. Summer nuclear station in South Carolina, including the defense of ratepayer class actions, securities class action litigation, shareholder derivative lawsuits, and a regulatory proceeding in which SCANA achieved approval for a proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy. Representing Equifax, Inc. in securities class action litigation and related government investigations arising out of the data breach announced in September 2017. Representing Quorum Health Corporation, an owner and operator of acute care hospitals, and its former officers in defense of securities class action and derivative litigation relating to Quorum’s spin-off from its former parent company. Representing U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation relating to the company’s 2018 initial public offering. Representing Tivity Health, Inc., a provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative litigation. Representing Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., an owner and operater of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its directors and officers in securities class action litigation. Representing Aeterna Zentaris, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, and certain of its former officers in securities class action litigation arising out of the FDA’s rejection of the company’s New Drug Application. Representing a leading company in the payment processing industry in connection with class action litigation brought on behalf of merchants. Represented an international airline in defense of a commercial dispute for alleged breach of contract. Represented one of the world’s leading food and beverage companies in defense of various consumer class action litigation.","searchable_name":"Brandon R. Keel","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445242,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6425,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Kirsch is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office. He is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on complex securities, white collar, commercial and antitrust litigation. He is routinely named one of the leading litigators in the United States. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark is ranked for Securities Litigation nationwide and in New York by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA: America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Lawyers for Business\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; The 2022 edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e states that clients say he is \u0026ldquo;a very strategic thinker with a great demeanor in litigation, as well as providing good client service,\u0026rdquo; and that \u0026ldquo;he has incredible judgment, is very good on his feet and always prepared.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The 2021 edition shares that clients believe he is \u0026ldquo;an amazingly quick study, and great at strategic decision-making.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The 2020 edition notes that clients say Mark is \u0026ldquo;a brilliant lawyer and a great strategist, with excellent client service\u0026rdquo; and that \u0026ldquo;his way of handling cases and his ability to combine legal knowledge with the business risks is absolutely excellent.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; A client also comments that he has \u0026ldquo;fantastic cross-examination skills.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; Prior recent editions of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e refer to Mark as \u0026ldquo;one of the most extraordinary litigators I\u0026rsquo;ve seen,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;a very deep thinker who is always incredibly well prepared,\u0026rdquo; and who \u0026ldquo;does a fantastic job when arguing cases,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;is at the vanguard of the US securities litigation market and enjoys a stunning reputation,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;a force to be reckoned with,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;a great strategist who\u0026rsquo;s detail-oriented and fantastic on his feet,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;very good at strategy and very responsive to client needs,\u0026rdquo; and who is \u0026ldquo;extremely pleasant to deal with.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; He is also recognized as a leading securities litigation attorney by \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 United States\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; Mark is named as a leading commercial litigation attorney by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e Guide to America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; In both 2019 and 2016, Law360 named Mark as one of five Securities Litigation MVPs nationwide.\u0026nbsp; In addition, he was named to \u003cem\u003eCity \u0026amp; State\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ldquo;50 Over 50\u0026rdquo; list of the most distinguished public servants in New York in 2020, a \u0026ldquo;Life Sciences Star\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eLMG Life Sciences 2017\u003c/em\u003e, and selected by \u003cem\u003eThe Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e as one of its \u0026ldquo;Global Hot 100 Attorneys\u0026rdquo; in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the American Friends of Hebrew University.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom 1991 to 1995, he served as Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York, focusing on complex financial crimes.\u0026nbsp; In 1994, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno personally awarded Mr. Kirsch the Justice Department Director\u0026rsquo;s Award for Superior Achievement as an Assistant U.S. Attorney.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark was previously a partner at Gibson, Dunn \u0026amp; Crutcher where he served on the Executive Committee, as Co-Partner in Charge of the New York Office, and as Global Co-Chair of Gibson Dunn\u0026rsquo;s litigation practice. Prior to that, he was a partner at Clifford Chance where he served as Global Chair of the Litigation Practice and as a member of the Global Management Committee.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark received his Juris Doctor from Yale University Law School, where he was Articles Editor of the Yale Law \u0026amp; Policy Review, and his Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from Cornell University.\u0026nbsp; He clerked for the Honorable John M. Walker, Jr. in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mark-kirsch","email":"mkirsch@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRio Tinto\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, the world\u0026rsquo;s second largest mining company, in an SEC suit alleging violations of Section 10(b), 17(a), internal controls requirements and books and records requirements, concerning the timing of a more than $3 billion impairment taken in connection with a mining project in Mozambique. Prior to trial the SEC dropped the 10(b), 17(a) and all scienter-based charges, settling for non-scienter books and records violations, a historic outcome for Rio Tinto.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRio Tinto\u003c/strong\u003e in defeating a Section 10(b) class action based on the same conduct as in the SEC case. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal by the District Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVale S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;in massive class actions relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil. Defeated class certification in one class action, effectively ending it, and obtained dismissal of a second that was affirmed by the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eVale S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in another massive class action resulting from the collapse of the Brumadinho dam in Brazil. (Case still pending.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented half the board of directors of \u003cstrong\u003eAeroJet RocketDyne\u003c/strong\u003e against the other half of the board in a proxy fight, including trial to verdict in Delaware Chancery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBlackRock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a major suit\u0026nbsp;in Virgin Islands Superior Court by shareholders of two public companies alleging BlackRock fraudulently drove down the share price of the companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFanDuel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in an action in New York State court brought by common shareholders challenging distribution of $550 million in merger proceeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a large arbitration brought by a corporate entity alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with the sale of a large energy asset.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFareva S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e, a large European manufacturer, in a breach of contract suit brought by LG and Avon the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGerald Metals\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, the largest privately owned metals trading firm in the world, in litigation in Connecticut Superior Court brought by former senior executives and shareholders alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with shareholding and other agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUBS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in class actions alleging that primary dealers of the New York Federal Reserve Bank price-fixed the auction market for U.S. Treasury securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUBS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple LIBOR-related actions alleging price fixing, including cases where class certification was denied in connection with three separate putative classes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a complete trial verdict for global investment adviser \u003cstrong\u003eInvestcorp\u003c/strong\u003e in a case brought by hedge fund Kortright Partners for $250 million for negligent misrepresentation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a significant trial verdict for a \u003cstrong\u003eSusquehanna fund and two senior executives\u003c/strong\u003e after a bench trial asserting fraud claims in the $115 million sale of Plimus to Great Hill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained complete dismissal of a shareholder class action for\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAmTrust Financial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, a Fortune 500 insurer, alleging violations of Section 11 of the 1933 Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, despite the Company\u0026rsquo;s restatement of financials and a disclosed SEC investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as the co-lead lawyer for \u003cstrong\u003eLynn Tilton\u003c/strong\u003e, the \u0026ldquo;Diva of Distressed,\u0026rdquo; and defeated the SEC after a three-week trial in the SEC\u0026rsquo;s ALJ court, where the ALJ dismissed all fraud and negligence charges against Ms. Tilton.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a rare reversal of a denial of summary judgment from the New York Appellate Division, on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eTrust Company of the West\u003c/strong\u003e, on grounds the plaintiff hedge fund failed to establish loss causation in a case where TCW was the collateral manager for a large portfolio of mortgage-backed securities that failed to perform in the wake of the global financial crisis. TCW successfully argued the financial crisis caused the loss, not TCW\u0026rsquo;s management.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained affirmance by the New Jersey Appellate Division of a dismissal from the bench after oral argument of a complaint against \u003cstrong\u003eMerck\u003c/strong\u003e challenging its tax disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong\u003eCorvex Management\u003c/strong\u003e and \u003cstrong\u003eThe Related Companies\u003c/strong\u003e in a two-week arbitration (the result of which was publicly disclosed) that resulted in invalidating all material anti-shareholder defenses of CommonWealth REIT, whose Trustees Corvex/Related ultimately removed in a consent solicitation.\u0026nbsp; Many major media outlets described the outcome as a \u0026ldquo;major victory\u0026rdquo; for Corvex/Related.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the voluntary dismissal of a putative class action on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eGoldman Sachs, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, UBS and BNY Mellon Capital Markets\u003c/strong\u003e \u0026ndash; after three years of litigation \u0026ndash; arising from BNYM\u0026rsquo;s foreign exchange business, alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $2 billion of securities for BNYM.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong\u003eGoldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland\u003c/strong\u003e in a putative class action alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $900 million of notes for MF Global Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved favorably for \u003cstrong\u003eMoody\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e the two most significant cases it had faced concerning ratings of structured investment vehicles.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with a securities fraud claim for $13.2 billion brought by Parmalat investors after Parmalat\u0026rsquo;s collapse.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the team that achieved five significant victories for \u003cstrong\u003eAllianceBernstein\u003c/strong\u003e in securities litigation arising out of the Enron collapse, including a seven-week state court jury trial in which Alliance defeated the Florida state pension fund\u0026rsquo;s attempt to recover $3.2 billion in losses the fund sustained in Enron and other stocks, and AllianceBernstein won its damages counterclaim and costs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;selected the trial victory as one of its \u0026ldquo;Top 10 Defense Verdicts of 2006.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eAllianceBernstein\u003c/strong\u003e in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNewby\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;securities class action in Houston, in which Enron shareholders and bondholders sought over $1 billion in damages against the company. Obtained summary judgment for AllianceBernstein and costs against plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel, a victory written about twice by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWall Street Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in editorials.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kirsch","nick_name":"Mark","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable John M. Waker, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"1987 - 1988"}],"first_name":"Mark","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2605,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1987-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-kirsch-525a3610/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Kirsch is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office. He is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on complex securities, white collar, commercial and antitrust litigation. He is routinely named one of the leading litigators in the United States. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark is ranked for Securities Litigation nationwide and in New York by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA: America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Lawyers for Business\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; The 2022 edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e states that clients say he is \u0026ldquo;a very strategic thinker with a great demeanor in litigation, as well as providing good client service,\u0026rdquo; and that \u0026ldquo;he has incredible judgment, is very good on his feet and always prepared.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The 2021 edition shares that clients believe he is \u0026ldquo;an amazingly quick study, and great at strategic decision-making.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The 2020 edition notes that clients say Mark is \u0026ldquo;a brilliant lawyer and a great strategist, with excellent client service\u0026rdquo; and that \u0026ldquo;his way of handling cases and his ability to combine legal knowledge with the business risks is absolutely excellent.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; A client also comments that he has \u0026ldquo;fantastic cross-examination skills.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; Prior recent editions of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e refer to Mark as \u0026ldquo;one of the most extraordinary litigators I\u0026rsquo;ve seen,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;a very deep thinker who is always incredibly well prepared,\u0026rdquo; and who \u0026ldquo;does a fantastic job when arguing cases,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;is at the vanguard of the US securities litigation market and enjoys a stunning reputation,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;a force to be reckoned with,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;a great strategist who\u0026rsquo;s detail-oriented and fantastic on his feet,\u0026rdquo; is \u0026ldquo;very good at strategy and very responsive to client needs,\u0026rdquo; and who is \u0026ldquo;extremely pleasant to deal with.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; He is also recognized as a leading securities litigation attorney by \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 United States\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; Mark is named as a leading commercial litigation attorney by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e Guide to America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; In both 2019 and 2016, Law360 named Mark as one of five Securities Litigation MVPs nationwide.\u0026nbsp; In addition, he was named to \u003cem\u003eCity \u0026amp; State\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ldquo;50 Over 50\u0026rdquo; list of the most distinguished public servants in New York in 2020, a \u0026ldquo;Life Sciences Star\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eLMG Life Sciences 2017\u003c/em\u003e, and selected by \u003cem\u003eThe Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e as one of its \u0026ldquo;Global Hot 100 Attorneys\u0026rdquo; in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the American Friends of Hebrew University.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom 1991 to 1995, he served as Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York, focusing on complex financial crimes.\u0026nbsp; In 1994, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno personally awarded Mr. Kirsch the Justice Department Director\u0026rsquo;s Award for Superior Achievement as an Assistant U.S. Attorney.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark was previously a partner at Gibson, Dunn \u0026amp; Crutcher where he served on the Executive Committee, as Co-Partner in Charge of the New York Office, and as Global Co-Chair of Gibson Dunn\u0026rsquo;s litigation practice. Prior to that, he was a partner at Clifford Chance where he served as Global Chair of the Litigation Practice and as a member of the Global Management Committee.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark received his Juris Doctor from Yale University Law School, where he was Articles Editor of the Yale Law \u0026amp; Policy Review, and his Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from Cornell University.\u0026nbsp; He clerked for the Honorable John M. Walker, Jr. in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRio Tinto\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, the world\u0026rsquo;s second largest mining company, in an SEC suit alleging violations of Section 10(b), 17(a), internal controls requirements and books and records requirements, concerning the timing of a more than $3 billion impairment taken in connection with a mining project in Mozambique. Prior to trial the SEC dropped the 10(b), 17(a) and all scienter-based charges, settling for non-scienter books and records violations, a historic outcome for Rio Tinto.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRio Tinto\u003c/strong\u003e in defeating a Section 10(b) class action based on the same conduct as in the SEC case. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal by the District Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVale S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u0026nbsp;in massive class actions relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil. Defeated class certification in one class action, effectively ending it, and obtained dismissal of a second that was affirmed by the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eVale S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in another massive class action resulting from the collapse of the Brumadinho dam in Brazil. (Case still pending.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented half the board of directors of \u003cstrong\u003eAeroJet RocketDyne\u003c/strong\u003e against the other half of the board in a proxy fight, including trial to verdict in Delaware Chancery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBlackRock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a major suit\u0026nbsp;in Virgin Islands Superior Court by shareholders of two public companies alleging BlackRock fraudulently drove down the share price of the companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFanDuel\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in an action in New York State court brought by common shareholders challenging distribution of $550 million in merger proceeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor global bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a large arbitration brought by a corporate entity alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with the sale of a large energy asset.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFareva S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e, a large European manufacturer, in a breach of contract suit brought by LG and Avon the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGerald Metals\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, the largest privately owned metals trading firm in the world, in litigation in Connecticut Superior Court brought by former senior executives and shareholders alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with shareholding and other agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUBS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in class actions alleging that primary dealers of the New York Federal Reserve Bank price-fixed the auction market for U.S. Treasury securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUBS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple LIBOR-related actions alleging price fixing, including cases where class certification was denied in connection with three separate putative classes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a complete trial verdict for global investment adviser \u003cstrong\u003eInvestcorp\u003c/strong\u003e in a case brought by hedge fund Kortright Partners for $250 million for negligent misrepresentation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a significant trial verdict for a \u003cstrong\u003eSusquehanna fund and two senior executives\u003c/strong\u003e after a bench trial asserting fraud claims in the $115 million sale of Plimus to Great Hill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained complete dismissal of a shareholder class action for\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: normal !msorm;\"\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAmTrust Financial\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, a Fortune 500 insurer, alleging violations of Section 11 of the 1933 Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, despite the Company\u0026rsquo;s restatement of financials and a disclosed SEC investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as the co-lead lawyer for \u003cstrong\u003eLynn Tilton\u003c/strong\u003e, the \u0026ldquo;Diva of Distressed,\u0026rdquo; and defeated the SEC after a three-week trial in the SEC\u0026rsquo;s ALJ court, where the ALJ dismissed all fraud and negligence charges against Ms. Tilton.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a rare reversal of a denial of summary judgment from the New York Appellate Division, on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eTrust Company of the West\u003c/strong\u003e, on grounds the plaintiff hedge fund failed to establish loss causation in a case where TCW was the collateral manager for a large portfolio of mortgage-backed securities that failed to perform in the wake of the global financial crisis. TCW successfully argued the financial crisis caused the loss, not TCW\u0026rsquo;s management.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained affirmance by the New Jersey Appellate Division of a dismissal from the bench after oral argument of a complaint against \u003cstrong\u003eMerck\u003c/strong\u003e challenging its tax disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong\u003eCorvex Management\u003c/strong\u003e and \u003cstrong\u003eThe Related Companies\u003c/strong\u003e in a two-week arbitration (the result of which was publicly disclosed) that resulted in invalidating all material anti-shareholder defenses of CommonWealth REIT, whose Trustees Corvex/Related ultimately removed in a consent solicitation.\u0026nbsp; Many major media outlets described the outcome as a \u0026ldquo;major victory\u0026rdquo; for Corvex/Related.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the voluntary dismissal of a putative class action on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eGoldman Sachs, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, UBS and BNY Mellon Capital Markets\u003c/strong\u003e \u0026ndash; after three years of litigation \u0026ndash; arising from BNYM\u0026rsquo;s foreign exchange business, alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $2 billion of securities for BNYM.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong\u003eGoldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland\u003c/strong\u003e in a putative class action alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $900 million of notes for MF Global Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved favorably for \u003cstrong\u003eMoody\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e the two most significant cases it had faced concerning ratings of structured investment vehicles.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with a securities fraud claim for $13.2 billion brought by Parmalat investors after Parmalat\u0026rsquo;s collapse.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the team that achieved five significant victories for \u003cstrong\u003eAllianceBernstein\u003c/strong\u003e in securities litigation arising out of the Enron collapse, including a seven-week state court jury trial in which Alliance defeated the Florida state pension fund\u0026rsquo;s attempt to recover $3.2 billion in losses the fund sustained in Enron and other stocks, and AllianceBernstein won its damages counterclaim and costs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;selected the trial victory as one of its \u0026ldquo;Top 10 Defense Verdicts of 2006.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eAllianceBernstein\u003c/strong\u003e in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNewby\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;securities class action in Houston, in which Enron shareholders and bondholders sought over $1 billion in damages against the company. Obtained summary judgment for AllianceBernstein and costs against plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel, a victory written about twice by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWall Street Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in editorials.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9950}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-23T22:00:07.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-23T22:00:07.000Z","searchable_text":"Kirsch{{ FIELD }}Represent Rio Tinto, the world’s second largest mining company, in an SEC suit alleging violations of Section 10(b), 17(a), internal controls requirements and books and records requirements, concerning the timing of a more than $3 billion impairment taken in connection with a mining project in Mozambique. Prior to trial the SEC dropped the 10(b), 17(a) and all scienter-based charges, settling for non-scienter books and records violations, a historic outcome for Rio Tinto.{{ FIELD }}Represented Rio Tinto in defeating a Section 10(b) class action based on the same conduct as in the SEC case. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal by the District Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented Vale S.A. in massive class actions relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil. Defeated class certification in one class action, effectively ending it, and obtained dismissal of a second that was affirmed by the Second Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Represented Vale S.A. in another massive class action resulting from the collapse of the Brumadinho dam in Brazil. (Case still pending.){{ FIELD }}Successfully represented half the board of directors of AeroJet RocketDyne against the other half of the board in a proxy fight, including trial to verdict in Delaware Chancery.{{ FIELD }}Defending BlackRock in a major suit in Virgin Islands Superior Court by shareholders of two public companies alleging BlackRock fraudulently drove down the share price of the companies.{{ FIELD }}Defending FanDuel and its directors in an action in New York State court brought by common shareholders challenging distribution of $550 million in merger proceeds.{{ FIELD }}Defending a major global bank in a large arbitration brought by a corporate entity alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with the sale of a large energy asset.{{ FIELD }}Defending Fareva S.A., a large European manufacturer, in a breach of contract suit brought by LG and Avon the Southern District of New York.{{ FIELD }}Gerald Metals, the largest privately owned metals trading firm in the world, in litigation in Connecticut Superior Court brought by former senior executives and shareholders alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with shareholding and other agreements.{{ FIELD }}Defended UBS in class actions alleging that primary dealers of the New York Federal Reserve Bank price-fixed the auction market for U.S. Treasury securities.{{ FIELD }}Defended UBS in multiple LIBOR-related actions alleging price fixing, including cases where class certification was denied in connection with three separate putative classes.{{ FIELD }}Won a complete trial verdict for global investment adviser Investcorp in a case brought by hedge fund Kortright Partners for $250 million for negligent misrepresentation.{{ FIELD }}Won a significant trial verdict for a Susquehanna fund and two senior executives after a bench trial asserting fraud claims in the $115 million sale of Plimus to Great Hill.{{ FIELD }}Obtained complete dismissal of a shareholder class action for AmTrust Financial, a Fortune 500 insurer, alleging violations of Section 11 of the 1933 Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, despite the Company’s restatement of financials and a disclosed SEC investigation.{{ FIELD }}Served as the co-lead lawyer for Lynn Tilton, the “Diva of Distressed,” and defeated the SEC after a three-week trial in the SEC’s ALJ court, where the ALJ dismissed all fraud and negligence charges against Ms. Tilton.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a rare reversal of a denial of summary judgment from the New York Appellate Division, on behalf of Trust Company of the West, on grounds the plaintiff hedge fund failed to establish loss causation in a case where TCW was the collateral manager for a large portfolio of mortgage-backed securities that failed to perform in the wake of the global financial crisis. TCW successfully argued the financial crisis caused the loss, not TCW’s management.{{ FIELD }}Obtained affirmance by the New Jersey Appellate Division of a dismissal from the bench after oral argument of a complaint against Merck challenging its tax disclosures.{{ FIELD }}Defended Corvex Management and The Related Companies in a two-week arbitration (the result of which was publicly disclosed) that resulted in invalidating all material anti-shareholder defenses of CommonWealth REIT, whose Trustees Corvex/Related ultimately removed in a consent solicitation.  Many major media outlets described the outcome as a “major victory” for Corvex/Related.{{ FIELD }}Obtained the voluntary dismissal of a putative class action on behalf of Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, UBS and BNY Mellon Capital Markets – after three years of litigation – arising from BNYM’s foreign exchange business, alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $2 billion of securities for BNYM.{{ FIELD }}Defended Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland in a putative class action alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $900 million of notes for MF Global Holdings.{{ FIELD }}Resolved favorably for Moody’s the two most significant cases it had faced concerning ratings of structured investment vehicles. {{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment for Citigroup in connection with a securities fraud claim for $13.2 billion brought by Parmalat investors after Parmalat’s collapse.{{ FIELD }}Led the team that achieved five significant victories for AllianceBernstein in securities litigation arising out of the Enron collapse, including a seven-week state court jury trial in which Alliance defeated the Florida state pension fund’s attempt to recover $3.2 billion in losses the fund sustained in Enron and other stocks, and AllianceBernstein won its damages counterclaim and costs.  The National Law Journal selected the trial victory as one of its “Top 10 Defense Verdicts of 2006.”{{ FIELD }}Represented AllianceBernstein in the Newby securities class action in Houston, in which Enron shareholders and bondholders sought over $1 billion in damages against the company. Obtained summary judgment for AllianceBernstein and costs against plaintiffs’ counsel, a victory written about twice by the Wall Street Journal in editorials.{{ FIELD }}Mark Kirsch is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s New York office. He is an experienced trial lawyer whose practice focuses on complex securities, white collar, commercial and antitrust litigation. He is routinely named one of the leading litigators in the United States. \nMark is ranked for Securities Litigation nationwide and in New York by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business.  The 2022 edition of Chambers USA states that clients say he is “a very strategic thinker with a great demeanor in litigation, as well as providing good client service,” and that “he has incredible judgment, is very good on his feet and always prepared.”  The 2021 edition shares that clients believe he is “an amazingly quick study, and great at strategic decision-making.”  The 2020 edition notes that clients say Mark is “a brilliant lawyer and a great strategist, with excellent client service” and that “his way of handling cases and his ability to combine legal knowledge with the business risks is absolutely excellent.”  A client also comments that he has “fantastic cross-examination skills.”  Prior recent editions of Chambers USA refer to Mark as “one of the most extraordinary litigators I’ve seen,” “a very deep thinker who is always incredibly well prepared,” and who “does a fantastic job when arguing cases,” “is at the vanguard of the US securities litigation market and enjoys a stunning reputation,” is “a force to be reckoned with,” is “a great strategist who’s detail-oriented and fantastic on his feet,” is “very good at strategy and very responsive to client needs,” and who is “extremely pleasant to deal with.”  He is also recognized as a leading securities litigation attorney by The Legal 500 United States.  Mark is named as a leading commercial litigation attorney by The Best Lawyers in America®, and Benchmark Litigation’s Guide to America’s Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys recognized him as a “Litigation Star.”  In both 2019 and 2016, Law360 named Mark as one of five Securities Litigation MVPs nationwide.  In addition, he was named to City \u0026amp; State’s “50 Over 50” list of the most distinguished public servants in New York in 2020, a “Life Sciences Star” by LMG Life Sciences 2017, and selected by The Lawyer as one of its “Global Hot 100 Attorneys” in 2006.\nMark currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the American Friends of Hebrew University.\nFrom 1991 to 1995, he served as Assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of New York, focusing on complex financial crimes.  In 1994, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno personally awarded Mr. Kirsch the Justice Department Director’s Award for Superior Achievement as an Assistant U.S. Attorney.\nMark was previously a partner at Gibson, Dunn \u0026amp; Crutcher where he served on the Executive Committee, as Co-Partner in Charge of the New York Office, and as Global Co-Chair of Gibson Dunn’s litigation practice. Prior to that, he was a partner at Clifford Chance where he served as Global Chair of the Litigation Practice and as a member of the Global Management Committee.\nMark received his Juris Doctor from Yale University Law School, where he was Articles Editor of the Yale Law \u0026amp; Policy Review, and his Bachelor of Arts degree with distinction from Cornell University.  He clerked for the Honorable John M. Walker, Jr. in New York. Partner Cornell University Cornell Law School Yale University Yale Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Tax Court New York Board of Trustees of the American Friends of Hebrew University Judicial Clerk, Honorable John M. Waker, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Represent Rio Tinto, the world’s second largest mining company, in an SEC suit alleging violations of Section 10(b), 17(a), internal controls requirements and books and records requirements, concerning the timing of a more than $3 billion impairment taken in connection with a mining project in Mozambique. Prior to trial the SEC dropped the 10(b), 17(a) and all scienter-based charges, settling for non-scienter books and records violations, a historic outcome for Rio Tinto. Represented Rio Tinto in defeating a Section 10(b) class action based on the same conduct as in the SEC case. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal by the District Court. Represented Vale S.A. in massive class actions relating to the collapse of the Fundao dam in Brazil. Defeated class certification in one class action, effectively ending it, and obtained dismissal of a second that was affirmed by the Second Circuit. Represented Vale S.A. in another massive class action resulting from the collapse of the Brumadinho dam in Brazil. (Case still pending.) Successfully represented half the board of directors of AeroJet RocketDyne against the other half of the board in a proxy fight, including trial to verdict in Delaware Chancery. Defending BlackRock in a major suit in Virgin Islands Superior Court by shareholders of two public companies alleging BlackRock fraudulently drove down the share price of the companies. Defending FanDuel and its directors in an action in New York State court brought by common shareholders challenging distribution of $550 million in merger proceeds. Defending a major global bank in a large arbitration brought by a corporate entity alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with the sale of a large energy asset. Defending Fareva S.A., a large European manufacturer, in a breach of contract suit brought by LG and Avon the Southern District of New York. Gerald Metals, the largest privately owned metals trading firm in the world, in litigation in Connecticut Superior Court brought by former senior executives and shareholders alleging breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract in connection with shareholding and other agreements. Defended UBS in class actions alleging that primary dealers of the New York Federal Reserve Bank price-fixed the auction market for U.S. Treasury securities. Defended UBS in multiple LIBOR-related actions alleging price fixing, including cases where class certification was denied in connection with three separate putative classes. Won a complete trial verdict for global investment adviser Investcorp in a case brought by hedge fund Kortright Partners for $250 million for negligent misrepresentation. Won a significant trial verdict for a Susquehanna fund and two senior executives after a bench trial asserting fraud claims in the $115 million sale of Plimus to Great Hill. Obtained complete dismissal of a shareholder class action for AmTrust Financial, a Fortune 500 insurer, alleging violations of Section 11 of the 1933 Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, despite the Company’s restatement of financials and a disclosed SEC investigation. Served as the co-lead lawyer for Lynn Tilton, the “Diva of Distressed,” and defeated the SEC after a three-week trial in the SEC’s ALJ court, where the ALJ dismissed all fraud and negligence charges against Ms. Tilton. Obtained a rare reversal of a denial of summary judgment from the New York Appellate Division, on behalf of Trust Company of the West, on grounds the plaintiff hedge fund failed to establish loss causation in a case where TCW was the collateral manager for a large portfolio of mortgage-backed securities that failed to perform in the wake of the global financial crisis. TCW successfully argued the financial crisis caused the loss, not TCW’s management. Obtained affirmance by the New Jersey Appellate Division of a dismissal from the bench after oral argument of a complaint against Merck challenging its tax disclosures. Defended Corvex Management and The Related Companies in a two-week arbitration (the result of which was publicly disclosed) that resulted in invalidating all material anti-shareholder defenses of CommonWealth REIT, whose Trustees Corvex/Related ultimately removed in a consent solicitation.  Many major media outlets described the outcome as a “major victory” for Corvex/Related. Obtained the voluntary dismissal of a putative class action on behalf of Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, UBS and BNY Mellon Capital Markets – after three years of litigation – arising from BNYM’s foreign exchange business, alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $2 billion of securities for BNYM. Defended Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Deutsche Bank and Royal Bank of Scotland in a putative class action alleging violation of the federal securities laws in connection with underwriting $900 million of notes for MF Global Holdings. Resolved favorably for Moody’s the two most significant cases it had faced concerning ratings of structured investment vehicles.  Obtained summary judgment for Citigroup in connection with a securities fraud claim for $13.2 billion brought by Parmalat investors after Parmalat’s collapse. Led the team that achieved five significant victories for AllianceBernstein in securities litigation arising out of the Enron collapse, including a seven-week state court jury trial in which Alliance defeated the Florida state pension fund’s attempt to recover $3.2 billion in losses the fund sustained in Enron and other stocks, and AllianceBernstein won its damages counterclaim and costs.  The National Law Journal selected the trial victory as one of its “Top 10 Defense Verdicts of 2006.” Represented AllianceBernstein in the Newby securities class action in Houston, in which Enron shareholders and bondholders sought over $1 billion in damages against the company. Obtained summary judgment for AllianceBernstein and costs against plaintiffs’ counsel, a victory written about twice by the Wall Street Journal in editorials.","searchable_name":"Mark A. Kirsch","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442758,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5296,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLiv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.\u0026nbsp; Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.\u0026nbsp; Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.\u0026nbsp; Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"\u0026nbsp; Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv\u0026rsquo;s practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing\u0026nbsp;claims asserted under the laws of California\u0026nbsp;(including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).\u0026nbsp; She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp; She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.\u0026nbsp; She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.\u0026nbsp; Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"livia-kiser","email":"lkiser@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ede minimis\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;amount after recall implemented.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of Ford.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide \u0026ldquo;enhanced\u0026rdquo; notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3191}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kiser","nick_name":"Liv","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Livia","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers ","detail":"Leading Lawyers"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u003eRail and Road: Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Stand-Out Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters 2024"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law ","detail":"Chicago Lawyer"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law","detail":"Best Lawyers In America"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\"","detail":"Leading Lawyers Network"},{"title":"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026 Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law","detail":"Illinois Super Lawyer"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/livia-kiser-9a1b675/","seodescription":"Livia M. Kiser (Liv) is a lawyer of our Business Litigation Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLiv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.\u0026nbsp; Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.\u0026nbsp; Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.\u0026nbsp; Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"\u0026nbsp; Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv\u0026rsquo;s practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing\u0026nbsp;claims asserted under the laws of California\u0026nbsp;(including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).\u0026nbsp; She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp; She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.\u0026nbsp; She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.\u0026nbsp; Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ede minimis\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;amount after recall implemented.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of Ford.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide \u0026ldquo;enhanced\u0026rdquo; notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers ","detail":"Leading Lawyers"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u003eRail and Road: Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Stand-Out Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters 2024"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law ","detail":"Chicago Lawyer"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law","detail":"Best Lawyers In America"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\"","detail":"Leading Lawyers Network"},{"title":"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026 Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law","detail":"Illinois Super Lawyer"}]},"ja":{"matters":[""]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6111}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:28.000Z","searchable_text":"Kiser{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u0026gt;Rail and Road: Litigation and Regulation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Stand-Out Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's Chicago Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chicago Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's Chicago Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers In America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a \\\"Leading Lawyer\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyers Network\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026amp; Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Illinois Super Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for de minimis amount after recall implemented.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.{{ FIELD }}In a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court’s dismissal of Ford.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide “enhanced” notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.{{ FIELD }}Liv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.  A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\nLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.  Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.  Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.\nLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.  Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"  Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv’s practice.\nLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing claims asserted under the laws of California (including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).  She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.  She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\" \nLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.  She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.  Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.   Livia Kiser lawyer Partner Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers Lawdragon Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers  Leading Lawyers Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America Chambers Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u0026gt;Rail and Road: Litigation and Regulation Legal 500 Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products Legal 500 Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport Legal 500 Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List Chambers Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers Lawdragon Stand-Out Lawyer  Thomson Reuters 2024 Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense  Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense Legal 500 Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List Crain's Chicago Business Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law  Chicago Lawyer Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law Crain's Chicago Business Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory  Legal 500 Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law Best Lawyers In America Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\" Leading Lawyers Network Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026amp; Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law Illinois Super Lawyer University of Illinois  Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Illinois Member, American Bar Association, Litigation Section Member, Illinois State Bar Association Member, The State Bar of California Lead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for de minimis amount after recall implemented. Lead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment. Lead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading. Co-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota. In a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court’s dismissal of Ford. Lead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide “enhanced” notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff. Lead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.","searchable_name":"Livia M. Kiser (Liv)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443942,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6678,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire\u0026rsquo;s.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-kupfer","email":"dkupfer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others \u0026ldquo;determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross\u0026rsquo;s flagship private equity funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Moody\u0026rsquo;s in a Department of Justice investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Fidelity National Financial\u0026rsquo;s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire\u0026rsquo;s.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1064,"guid":"1064.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kupfer","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2011 - 2012"}],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":722,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named a Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-kupfer-08710134/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire\u0026rsquo;s.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others \u0026ldquo;determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross\u0026rsquo;s flagship private equity funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Moody\u0026rsquo;s in a Department of Justice investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Fidelity National Financial\u0026rsquo;s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire\u0026rsquo;s.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named a Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11629}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:42.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:42.000Z","searchable_text":"Kupfer{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others “determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.”{{ FIELD }}Represented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross’s flagship private equity funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.{{ FIELD }}Represented Moody’s in a Department of Justice investigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented Fidelity National Financial’s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.{{ FIELD }}Represented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.{{ FIELD }}Represented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire’s.{{ FIELD }}David H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire’s.\nDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\nDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Partner Named a Rising Star Super Lawyers, 2020-2023 Touro College  Fordham University Fordham University School of Law Florida New Jersey New York New York City Bar Association UJA Young Leadership Committee Law Clerk, Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Representing Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others “determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.” Represented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross’s flagship private equity funds. Represented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud. Represented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities. Represented Moody’s in a Department of Justice investigation. Represented Fidelity National Financial’s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds. Represented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial. Represented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices. Represented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash. Represented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney. Represented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire’s.","searchable_name":"David Kupfer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444653,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5142,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Kearney is a seasoned litigator and trial lawyer with extensive experience in environmental and regulatory compliance, climate change and adaptation, product liability,\u0026nbsp;personal injury and commercial litigation, including mass tort and class action defense in the oil \u0026amp; gas, tobacco, consumer product, medical device, construction, private equity, real estate and transportation industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan is a dedicated advocate for his clients, investing in creative strategies with a results-driven approach that has achieved nine complete defense verdicts for his trial teams in the last seven\u0026nbsp;years, in addition to dozens of favorable resolutions and outright dismissals pre-trial.\u0026nbsp; He prides himself on obtaining optimal client outcomes, working to defy odds in some of the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions across the country.\u0026nbsp; Ryan's recent work includes defending clients in environmental and regulatory citizen suits, dozens of product liability and wrongful death actions, medical device cases related to surgical mesh products, commercial litigation in the private equity and real estate industries, and construction, transportation and other products litigation\u0026nbsp;cases involving catastrophic injuries suffered in workplace and automotive settings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan has considerable experience in all stages of litigation, having taken or defended hundreds of depositions and managed countless cases through difficult discovery tracks, motion practice, mediation, trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp; He is routinely called upon to help defend clients in some of their most high-stakes litigation involving sensitive client information and sympathetic plaintiffs in environmental and regulatory compliance, wrongful death, traumatic brain injury and disfigurement cases.\u0026nbsp; Ryan regularly works with in-house counsel to develop strategy, discovery and case management plans from the early stages of litigation through trial.\u0026nbsp; Ryan is particularly skilled in\u0026nbsp;the development, presentation and defense of company witnesses in deposition and trial testimony.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;is also a skilled writer and oral advocate, with a wide range of success in new and developing areas of the law.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ryan-kearney","email":"rkearney@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":984,"guid":"984.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1205,"guid":"1205.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kearney","nick_name":"Ryan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ryan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":722,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"T.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Kearney is a seasoned litigator and trial lawyer with extensive experience in environmental and regulatory compliance, climate change and adaptation, product liability,\u0026nbsp;personal injury and commercial litigation, including mass tort and class action defense in the oil \u0026amp; gas, tobacco, consumer product, medical device, construction, private equity, real estate and transportation industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan is a dedicated advocate for his clients, investing in creative strategies with a results-driven approach that has achieved nine complete defense verdicts for his trial teams in the last seven\u0026nbsp;years, in addition to dozens of favorable resolutions and outright dismissals pre-trial.\u0026nbsp; He prides himself on obtaining optimal client outcomes, working to defy odds in some of the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions across the country.\u0026nbsp; Ryan's recent work includes defending clients in environmental and regulatory citizen suits, dozens of product liability and wrongful death actions, medical device cases related to surgical mesh products, commercial litigation in the private equity and real estate industries, and construction, transportation and other products litigation\u0026nbsp;cases involving catastrophic injuries suffered in workplace and automotive settings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan has considerable experience in all stages of litigation, having taken or defended hundreds of depositions and managed countless cases through difficult discovery tracks, motion practice, mediation, trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp; He is routinely called upon to help defend clients in some of their most high-stakes litigation involving sensitive client information and sympathetic plaintiffs in environmental and regulatory compliance, wrongful death, traumatic brain injury and disfigurement cases.\u0026nbsp; Ryan regularly works with in-house counsel to develop strategy, discovery and case management plans from the early stages of litigation through trial.\u0026nbsp; Ryan is particularly skilled in\u0026nbsp;the development, presentation and defense of company witnesses in deposition and trial testimony.\u0026nbsp; He\u0026nbsp;is also a skilled writer and oral advocate, with a wide range of success in new and developing areas of the law.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5838}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T15:57:05.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T15:57:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Kearney{{ FIELD }}Ryan Kearney is a seasoned litigator and trial lawyer with extensive experience in environmental and regulatory compliance, climate change and adaptation, product liability, personal injury and commercial litigation, including mass tort and class action defense in the oil \u0026amp; gas, tobacco, consumer product, medical device, construction, private equity, real estate and transportation industries.\nRyan is a dedicated advocate for his clients, investing in creative strategies with a results-driven approach that has achieved nine complete defense verdicts for his trial teams in the last seven years, in addition to dozens of favorable resolutions and outright dismissals pre-trial.  He prides himself on obtaining optimal client outcomes, working to defy odds in some of the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions across the country.  Ryan's recent work includes defending clients in environmental and regulatory citizen suits, dozens of product liability and wrongful death actions, medical device cases related to surgical mesh products, commercial litigation in the private equity and real estate industries, and construction, transportation and other products litigation cases involving catastrophic injuries suffered in workplace and automotive settings.\nRyan has considerable experience in all stages of litigation, having taken or defended hundreds of depositions and managed countless cases through difficult discovery tracks, motion practice, mediation, trial and appeals.  He is routinely called upon to help defend clients in some of their most high-stakes litigation involving sensitive client information and sympathetic plaintiffs in environmental and regulatory compliance, wrongful death, traumatic brain injury and disfigurement cases.  Ryan regularly works with in-house counsel to develop strategy, discovery and case management plans from the early stages of litigation through trial.  Ryan is particularly skilled in the development, presentation and defense of company witnesses in deposition and trial testimony.  He is also a skilled writer and oral advocate, with a wide range of success in new and developing areas of the law. Counsel Lehigh University  Fordham University Fordham University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado Florida Georgia New Jersey Nevada New York","searchable_name":"Ryan T. Kearney","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436469,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5025,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexandra Kennedy-Breit is a litigation associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice.\u0026nbsp; Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on the pharmaceutical industry.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is experienced in assisting clients manage large-scale consumer and regulatory litigation.\u0026nbsp; She is trusted by clients, and has significant experience working \u0026ldquo;in-house\u0026rdquo; with them to provide critical assistance in anticipation of litigation and once it has commenced.\u0026nbsp; She has counselled a broad range of clients, including pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, automobile manufacturers and private and retail banks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Alex was a senior associate at Clayton Utz \u0026ndash; one of Australia\u0026rsquo;s top law firms.\u0026nbsp; There, she gained extensive experience in class actions and other complex civil litigation, as well as regulatory proceedings.\u0026nbsp; She also has significant experience in the design, implementation and management of internal consumer remediation schemes, as well as providing regulatory and pricing advice for pharmaceutical companies.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alexandra-kennedy-breit","email":"akennedy-breit@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e and its local subsidiary in one of the largest class actions before the Australian courts, in the defense of claims by hundreds of group members who alleged they suffered cardiovascular injuries as a result of their consumption of the client's drug.\u0026nbsp; This included successfully defending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a class action involving a class of drugs prescribed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003eautomobile manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in regulatory proceedings and numerous class actions commenced in relation to emissions issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003eretail bank\u003c/strong\u003e in regulatory proceedings, a class action and other ancillary litigation in relation to the collapse of a financial advisory business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a \u003cstrong\u003eretail bank\u003c/strong\u003e in designing, developing and implementing and internal remediation program to resolve a large number of customer disputes arising from financial planning advice provided by the bank\u0026rsquo;s financial planning businesses.\u0026nbsp; This included responding to a variety of regulatory notices.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kennedy-Breit","nick_name":"Alex","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alexandra","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"LL.M.","honors":"Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandra-kennedy-breit-a2b57629/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexandra Kennedy-Breit is a litigation associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice.\u0026nbsp; Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on the pharmaceutical industry.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlex is experienced in assisting clients manage large-scale consumer and regulatory litigation.\u0026nbsp; She is trusted by clients, and has significant experience working \u0026ldquo;in-house\u0026rdquo; with them to provide critical assistance in anticipation of litigation and once it has commenced.\u0026nbsp; She has counselled a broad range of clients, including pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, automobile manufacturers and private and retail banks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Alex was a senior associate at Clayton Utz \u0026ndash; one of Australia\u0026rsquo;s top law firms.\u0026nbsp; There, she gained extensive experience in class actions and other complex civil litigation, as well as regulatory proceedings.\u0026nbsp; She also has significant experience in the design, implementation and management of internal consumer remediation schemes, as well as providing regulatory and pricing advice for pharmaceutical companies.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e and its local subsidiary in one of the largest class actions before the Australian courts, in the defense of claims by hundreds of group members who alleged they suffered cardiovascular injuries as a result of their consumption of the client's drug.\u0026nbsp; This included successfully defending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a class action involving a class of drugs prescribed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003eautomobile manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in regulatory proceedings and numerous class actions commenced in relation to emissions issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003eretail bank\u003c/strong\u003e in regulatory proceedings, a class action and other ancillary litigation in relation to the collapse of a financial advisory business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a \u003cstrong\u003eretail bank\u003c/strong\u003e in designing, developing and implementing and internal remediation program to resolve a large number of customer disputes arising from financial planning advice provided by the bank\u0026rsquo;s financial planning businesses.\u0026nbsp; This included responding to a variety of regulatory notices.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5911}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:18.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:18.000Z","searchable_text":"Kennedy-Breit{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical manufacturer and its local subsidiary in one of the largest class actions before the Australian courts, in the defense of claims by hundreds of group members who alleged they suffered cardiovascular injuries as a result of their consumption of the client's drug.  This included successfully defending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.{{ FIELD }}Represented a pharmaceutical manufacturer in a class action involving a class of drugs prescribed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.{{ FIELD }}Represented an automobile manufacturer in regulatory proceedings and numerous class actions commenced in relation to emissions issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented a retail bank in regulatory proceedings, a class action and other ancillary litigation in relation to the collapse of a financial advisory business.{{ FIELD }}Assisted a retail bank in designing, developing and implementing and internal remediation program to resolve a large number of customer disputes arising from financial planning advice provided by the bank’s financial planning businesses.  This included responding to a variety of regulatory notices.{{ FIELD }}Alexandra Kennedy-Breit is a litigation associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Trial and Global Disputes practice.  Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, with an emphasis on the pharmaceutical industry.\nAlex is experienced in assisting clients manage large-scale consumer and regulatory litigation.  She is trusted by clients, and has significant experience working “in-house” with them to provide critical assistance in anticipation of litigation and once it has commenced.  She has counselled a broad range of clients, including pharmaceutical companies, medical device manufacturers, automobile manufacturers and private and retail banks.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Alex was a senior associate at Clayton Utz – one of Australia’s top law firms.  There, she gained extensive experience in class actions and other complex civil litigation, as well as regulatory proceedings.  She also has significant experience in the design, implementation and management of internal consumer remediation schemes, as well as providing regulatory and pricing advice for pharmaceutical companies. Senior Associate University of New South Wales  University of New South Wales  Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California High Court of Australia Supreme Court of New South Wales State Bar of California American Health Lawyers Association Law Society of New South Wales DRI Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles Represented a global pharmaceutical manufacturer and its local subsidiary in one of the largest class actions before the Australian courts, in the defense of claims by hundreds of group members who alleged they suffered cardiovascular injuries as a result of their consumption of the client's drug.  This included successfully defending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia. Represented a pharmaceutical manufacturer in a class action involving a class of drugs prescribed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Represented an automobile manufacturer in regulatory proceedings and numerous class actions commenced in relation to emissions issues. Represented a retail bank in regulatory proceedings, a class action and other ancillary litigation in relation to the collapse of a financial advisory business. Assisted a retail bank in designing, developing and implementing and internal remediation program to resolve a large number of customer disputes arising from financial planning advice provided by the bank’s financial planning businesses.  This included responding to a variety of regulatory notices.","searchable_name":"Alexandra Kennedy-Breit (Alex)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443272,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5537,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJonathan Kaufman is\u0026nbsp;an Associate in\u0026nbsp;the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group.\u0026nbsp;His practice focuses on\u0026nbsp;high-stakes commercial litigation, including\u0026nbsp;class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJonathan graduated with honors from the University of Georgia School of Law, where he served as Executive Symposium Editor for the Georgia Law Review, participated in the Appellate Litigation Clinic, and was a member of the\u0026nbsp;Lumpkin Inn of Court. During his third year, he and his two teammates won the 70th Annual National Moot Court Competition. Upon graduation, Jonathan was inducted into the Order of\u0026nbsp;Barristers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Jonathan served as a law clerk to Chief Judge J. Randal Hall of\u0026nbsp;the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia and as an inaugural law clerk to Judge\u0026nbsp;Walter W. Davis of\u0026nbsp;the Georgia State-wide Business Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore law school, Jonathan earned his B.A. in Spanish and Political Science from the University of South Carolina, with honors from the South Carolina Honors College.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jonathan-kaufman","email":"jkaufman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kaufman","nick_name":"Jonathan","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. J. Randal Hall, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia","years_held":"2021 - 2022"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Walter W. Davis, Georgia State-wide Business Court","years_held":"2020 - 2021"}],"first_name":"Jonathan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2020-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJonathan Kaufman is\u0026nbsp;an Associate in\u0026nbsp;the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group.\u0026nbsp;His practice focuses on\u0026nbsp;high-stakes commercial litigation, including\u0026nbsp;class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJonathan graduated with honors from the University of Georgia School of Law, where he served as Executive Symposium Editor for the Georgia Law Review, participated in the Appellate Litigation Clinic, and was a member of the\u0026nbsp;Lumpkin Inn of Court. During his third year, he and his two teammates won the 70th Annual National Moot Court Competition. Upon graduation, Jonathan was inducted into the Order of\u0026nbsp;Barristers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Jonathan served as a law clerk to Chief Judge J. Randal Hall of\u0026nbsp;the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia and as an inaugural law clerk to Judge\u0026nbsp;Walter W. Davis of\u0026nbsp;the Georgia State-wide Business Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore law school, Jonathan earned his B.A. in Spanish and Political Science from the University of South Carolina, with honors from the South Carolina Honors College.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10121}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-25T21:57:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-25T21:57:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Kaufman{{ FIELD }}Jonathan Kaufman is an Associate in the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group. His practice focuses on high-stakes commercial litigation, including class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes. \nJonathan graduated with honors from the University of Georgia School of Law, where he served as Executive Symposium Editor for the Georgia Law Review, participated in the Appellate Litigation Clinic, and was a member of the Lumpkin Inn of Court. During his third year, he and his two teammates won the 70th Annual National Moot Court Competition. Upon graduation, Jonathan was inducted into the Order of Barristers.\nPrior to joining the firm, Jonathan served as a law clerk to Chief Judge J. Randal Hall of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia and as an inaugural law clerk to Judge Walter W. Davis of the Georgia State-wide Business Court.\nBefore law school, Jonathan earned his B.A. in Spanish and Political Science from the University of South Carolina, with honors from the South Carolina Honors College. Associate University of South Carolina  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Georgia New York Law Clerk, Hon. J. Randal Hall, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Law Clerk, Hon. Walter W. Davis, Georgia State-wide Business Court","searchable_name":"Jonathan M. Kaufman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":433003,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6528,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMK Kennedy helps clients with complex litigation and intellectual property matters. She strives to utilize her experience and knowledge of intellectual property\u0026nbsp;to provide value and strategic options\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;clients in and out\u0026nbsp;of the courtroom. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMK Kennedy deals with all aspects of intellectual property with a specialization in litigation. Through her background in patent prosecution, she has a deep understanding of patents and their file histories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, MK worked as a registered\u0026nbsp;patent agent\u0026nbsp;and externed for\u0026nbsp;Judge\u0026nbsp;Leigh Martin May of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMK received her law degree from the Georgia State College of Law where she graduated \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e and was inducted into the Order of the Coif. During her time at Georgia State, she worked in the Georgia State Office of Legal Affairs with the technology transfer team doing technical and market research on a variety of inventions. Through her IP courseload and extracurriculars, MK\u0026nbsp;received a Certificate of Intellectual Property and led a team of\u0026nbsp;students to win the National Patent Drafting Competition hosted by the USPTO. She also served as the\u0026nbsp;Managing Editor for the \u003cem\u003eGeorgia State University Law Review \u003c/em\u003eand as the Programming Manager for the Intellectual Property Law Society. She was a student pupil of the IP Inn of Court and a member of the Georgia State College of Law Moot Court Team.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, MK graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering,\u0026nbsp;a minor in Industrial Design, and an Intellectual Property Certificate.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mary-kennedy","email":"mkennedy@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kennedy","nick_name":"MK","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":761,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Katherine","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMK Kennedy helps clients with complex litigation and intellectual property matters. She strives to utilize her experience and knowledge of intellectual property\u0026nbsp;to provide value and strategic options\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;clients in and out\u0026nbsp;of the courtroom. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMK Kennedy deals with all aspects of intellectual property with a specialization in litigation. Through her background in patent prosecution, she has a deep understanding of patents and their file histories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, MK worked as a registered\u0026nbsp;patent agent\u0026nbsp;and externed for\u0026nbsp;Judge\u0026nbsp;Leigh Martin May of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMK received her law degree from the Georgia State College of Law where she graduated \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e and was inducted into the Order of the Coif. During her time at Georgia State, she worked in the Georgia State Office of Legal Affairs with the technology transfer team doing technical and market research on a variety of inventions. Through her IP courseload and extracurriculars, MK\u0026nbsp;received a Certificate of Intellectual Property and led a team of\u0026nbsp;students to win the National Patent Drafting Competition hosted by the USPTO. She also served as the\u0026nbsp;Managing Editor for the \u003cem\u003eGeorgia State University Law Review \u003c/em\u003eand as the Programming Manager for the Intellectual Property Law Society. She was a student pupil of the IP Inn of Court and a member of the Georgia State College of Law Moot Court Team.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, MK graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering,\u0026nbsp;a minor in Industrial Design, and an Intellectual Property Certificate.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12394}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-07-31T20:42:13.000Z","updated_at":"2025-07-31T20:42:13.000Z","searchable_text":"Kennedy{{ FIELD }}MK Kennedy helps clients with complex litigation and intellectual property matters. She strives to utilize her experience and knowledge of intellectual property to provide value and strategic options to clients in and out of the courtroom. \nMK Kennedy deals with all aspects of intellectual property with a specialization in litigation. Through her background in patent prosecution, she has a deep understanding of patents and their file histories.\nPrior to joining the firm, MK worked as a registered patent agent and externed for Judge Leigh Martin May of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. \nMK received her law degree from the Georgia State College of Law where she graduated summa cum laude and was inducted into the Order of the Coif. During her time at Georgia State, she worked in the Georgia State Office of Legal Affairs with the technology transfer team doing technical and market research on a variety of inventions. Through her IP courseload and extracurriculars, MK received a Certificate of Intellectual Property and led a team of students to win the National Patent Drafting Competition hosted by the USPTO. She also served as the Managing Editor for the Georgia State University Law Review and as the Programming Manager for the Intellectual Property Law Society. She was a student pupil of the IP Inn of Court and a member of the Georgia State College of Law Moot Court Team. \nPrior to law school, MK graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering, a minor in Industrial Design, and an Intellectual Property Certificate.   Associate Georgia Institute of Technology  Georgia State University Georgia State University College of Law U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Georgia","searchable_name":"Mary Katherine Kennedy (MK)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446764,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7322,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew is experienced in complex commercial and intellectual property disputes.\u0026nbsp;He represents clients in high stakes matters involving patent, trade secrets, and contract disputes. He approaches litigation with a court-tested perspective and a sharp focus on the issues that drive outcomes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew clerked for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas\u0026nbsp;and practiced intellectual property and complex commercial litigation in the Dallas office of another global law firm. During law school, Andrew interned for state appellate and federal district courts, represented journalists and media groups in\u0026nbsp;SMU's First Amendment Clinic, and won a moot court competition. Andrew also has an undergraduate degree in creative writing.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"nicholas-killian","email":"akillian@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 469 416 5723","matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":5059}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Killian","nick_name":"Nicholas","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. W. David Counts, III, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas","years_held":"2023 - 2025"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. Amos Louis Mazzant, III, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas","years_held":"2020 - 2020"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. Dennise Garcia, Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)","years_held":"2021 - 2021"}],"first_name":"Nicholas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1852,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Andrew","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew is experienced in complex commercial and intellectual property disputes.\u0026nbsp;He represents clients in high stakes matters involving patent, trade secrets, and contract disputes. He approaches litigation with a court-tested perspective and a sharp focus on the issues that drive outcomes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew clerked for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas\u0026nbsp;and practiced intellectual property and complex commercial litigation in the Dallas office of another global law firm. During law school, Andrew interned for state appellate and federal district courts, represented journalists and media groups in\u0026nbsp;SMU's First Amendment Clinic, and won a moot court competition. Andrew also has an undergraduate degree in creative writing.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13417}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-16T18:35:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-16T18:35:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Killian{{ FIELD }}Andrew is experienced in complex commercial and intellectual property disputes. He represents clients in high stakes matters involving patent, trade secrets, and contract disputes. He approaches litigation with a court-tested perspective and a sharp focus on the issues that drive outcomes. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew clerked for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas and practiced intellectual property and complex commercial litigation in the Dallas office of another global law firm. During law school, Andrew interned for state appellate and federal district courts, represented journalists and media groups in SMU's First Amendment Clinic, and won a moot court competition. Andrew also has an undergraduate degree in creative writing.  Nicholas Andrew Killian lawyer Associate Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Texas Judicial Clerk, Hon. W. David Counts, III, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Intern, Hon. Amos Louis Mazzant, III, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Intern, Hon. Dennise Garcia, Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)","searchable_name":"Nicholas Andrew Killian","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446510,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6721,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Klain is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office and a member of the Business Litigation practice group.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie\u0026nbsp;earned\u0026nbsp;her Juris Doctor in 2025 from Columbia Law School, where she received academic honors.\u0026nbsp;She was also recognized with\u0026nbsp;the Parker Certificate of Achievement in International and Comparative Law and\u0026nbsp;was named\u0026nbsp;a Class of 2025 Public Interest Honoree. Katie received her Bachelor of Arts,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, with departmental honors in Political Science\u0026nbsp;from Barnard College, Columbia University, in 2020.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is admitted to practice in the State of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"katiana-klain","email":"kklain@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Klain","nick_name":"","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Katie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2025-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Klain is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office and a member of the Business Litigation practice group.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie\u0026nbsp;earned\u0026nbsp;her Juris Doctor in 2025 from Columbia Law School, where she received academic honors.\u0026nbsp;She was also recognized with\u0026nbsp;the Parker Certificate of Achievement in International and Comparative Law and\u0026nbsp;was named\u0026nbsp;a Class of 2025 Public Interest Honoree. Katie received her Bachelor of Arts,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, with departmental honors in Political Science\u0026nbsp;from Barnard College, Columbia University, in 2020.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is admitted to practice in the State of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13185}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-05T16:02:20.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-05T16:02:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Klain{{ FIELD }}Katie Klain is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s New York office and a member of the Business Litigation practice group. \nKatie earned her Juris Doctor in 2025 from Columbia Law School, where she received academic honors. She was also recognized with the Parker Certificate of Achievement in International and Comparative Law and was named a Class of 2025 Public Interest Honoree. Katie received her Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, with departmental honors in Political Science from Barnard College, Columbia University, in 2020.\nKatie is admitted to practice in the State of New York. Associate Barnard College  Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York","searchable_name":"Katie Klain","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}