{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"5","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"F","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":445137,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7292,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Fakler advises and helps favorably resolve cases for companies in the streaming, broadcasting, media, software, and other industries to advance their business objectives. Paul offers clients representation guided by a rich understanding of the intersection between music (and other content), technology, and business. He frequently speaks and publishes on legal developments in these fields and has over twenty-five years of experience litigating seminal cases involving the application of copyright and related law to digital media.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough he helps clients with issues across many types of content, Paul has particularly deep experience resolving copyright issues relating to music, where clients operating at the cutting edge of technology require equally innovative legal representation. Paul offers creative solutions based on his deep understanding of copyright law and technology through counseling, government relations, and \u0026ndash; when necessary \u0026ndash; litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an experienced copyright lawyer, former software developer and amateur musician, he is also proficient in software copyright litigation and has been advising clients regarding copyright issues related to machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies for over a decade. He is one of the few lawyers in the country with extensive first-chair experience before the Copyright Royalty Board and other royalty rate setting venues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis experience spans many issues, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright issues implicated by the training and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDigital media and other technologies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMusic licensing and copyright royalty rate litigation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoyalty audits and payment disputes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright infringement disputes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFair use and other defenses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe DMCA and its safe harbor for online service providers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright policy matters\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGovernment affairs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation \u0026amp; Licensing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul has litigated numerous high-profile copyright cases involving digital media, copyright, and the Internet. He routinely represents digital music services, as well as other media, software, and consumer products companies, in negotiations and disputes with record labels, music publishers, and other rights holders. His clients in these groundbreaking cases have included MP3.com, Yahoo!, Veoh, MediaNet, Sirius XM Radio, Pandora Media, Bill Graham Archives, ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access, and Music Choice. Paul obtained the only two royalty rate reductions ever granted by the Copyright Royalty Board (or its predecessors) and often makes new law on issues such as the DMCA safe harbor and fair use through representing clients in bet-the-company copyright infringement litigation across many industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCounseling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients seek Paul\u0026rsquo;s counsel in copyright, trademark, right of publicity, entertainment, computer, and Internet law issues in diverse industries, including the music, motion picture, publishing, software development, data security, and digital media industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Relations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also advises on strategies for shaping copyright policy and represents clients\u0026rsquo; interest before government entities that impact the copyright ecosystem, such as Congress, the Copyright Office, and the Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients served by Paul have included Sirius XM, Pandora, Music Choice, the Orchestra Music Licensing Association, Google, the Television Music Licensing Committee, MediaNet, MP3.com, LaunchCast, Veoh Networks, and Express VPN.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"paul-fakler","email":"pfakler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003ePandora Media in group of copyright infringement cases coordinated by purported licensing collective, Word Collections, on behalf of alleged owners of the copyrights in jokes and comedy routines embodied in comedy sound recordings available on Pandora\u0026rsquo;s streaming service. In this case, the plaintiffs seek to disrupt decades of industry custom and practice by claiming that Pandora must separately license rights to the underlying jokes in addition to their existing licenses to stream the sound recordings. Paul served as head of a large, multidisciplinary team not only for Pandora\u0026rsquo;s defense of these actions, but also in counterclaims against the plaintiffs and Word Collections for violation of various antitrust laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMusic Choice, the world\u0026rsquo;s first digital music service, in litigation brought by SoundExchange, alleging underpayment of statutory license royalties for Music Choice\u0026rsquo;s commercial background music service.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeveral technology companies, from startups to a Fortune 500 semiconductor and software company, advising on the copyright issues raised by the training, commercialization, and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Television Music Licensing Committee in connection with negotiations and potential rate court litigation against various Performing Rights Organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBill Graham Archives, operator of the Wolfgang\u0026rsquo;s and Concert Vault music services, in class action copyright infringement litigation arising from allegations that the company failed to secure mechanical and synchronization licenses for on-demand streaming of its collection of live concert audio and video recordings on its websites.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital music service MediaNet in litigations brought by various songwriters and music publishers relating to mechanical license requirements, leading to favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMP3.com digital music service in various copyright infringement lawsuits brought by record labels and music publishers relating to music streaming service, including litigation of whether musical sound recordings are works made for hire under the Copyright Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eYahoo! in a copyright case brought by the recording industry, determining the eligibility of Yahoo!\u0026rsquo;s LaunchCast webcasting service for a statutory copyright license.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSymphonic rock band Trans-Siberian Orchestra in copyright infringement case relating to album art and band merchandise, leading to favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eScottish software developer in copyright infringement case brought by its competitor, one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ATM hardware and software companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProminent law firm in copyright infringement case relating to computer software used to process specialized financial transactions, successfully reversing preliminary injunction on appeal to the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublications International, Ltd. in a case brought by the makers of Beanie Babies plush toys arising out of the publication of a Beanie Babies collector\u0026rsquo;s guide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeveral Virtual Private Network (VPN) service providers, including ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access, in bet-the-industry copyright litigation brought by a group of independent movie production companies in courts throughout the country, seeking to hold VPN providers liable for the alleged movie piracy of individual consumers using VPN services. Recently negotiated favorable settlement for two VPNs, while proceeding to litigation for another.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMajor cosmetics company in connection with copyright infringement claims brought by major record and music publishing companies, based upon the posting or re-posting of videos that contain background music on social media accounts, including those by influencers and ordinary consumers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMusic Choice in connection with the current Preexisting Subscription Service license rate proceeding (SDARS IV) before the Copyright Royalty Board, as well as every prior rate proceeding for Music Choice since the creation of the CRB. Obtained the second rate decrease in the history of the CRB (and its predecessors) in same year when other licensees\u0026rsquo; rates were increased by over 40%. Recently won appeal of ancillary issue before the D.C. Circuit, obtaining rare reversal of both the Register of Copyrights and the Board.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTrade association Orchestra Music Licensing Association (\u0026ldquo;OMLA\u0026rdquo;), representing the interests of symphony orchestras in connection with various music rights and licensing issues, including Performing Rights Organization license negotiations, the Copyright Office\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;technical measures\u0026rdquo; study, and disputes regarding the creation and use of custom orchestrations of popular music by \u0026ldquo;pops\u0026rdquo; orchestras.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSirius XM Radio, Music Choice, Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, and other music licensees in connection with the Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s 2014-2015 and 2019-2021 reviews of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees. In both review proceedings, Paul\u0026rsquo;s work resulted in DOJ closing the review without making any of the harmful changes requested by ASCAP, BMI, and music publishers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVarious digital music services and other music licensees in connection with the negotiation, drafting, and enactment of the Music Modernization Act, including assisting clients in preparing for testimony at congressional hearings, lobbying, and obtaining key changes in the legislation to advance clients\u0026rsquo; interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSirius XM Satellite Radio in the Webcasting IV royalty rate proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board, resulting in the first royalty rate decrease ever granted by the Board or its predecessors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational trade association for broadcasters and Music Choice in connection with Copyright Office music licensing policy hearings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe unsecured creditors\u0026rsquo; committee in the Cengage Learning bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 filing of 2013. Developed a novel copyright strategy that placed the liens on all the debtor\u0026rsquo;s copyrights at risk, leading to a significantly increased recovery for the unsecured creditors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSylvain Sylvain, founding member of seminal proto-punk band New York Dolls, successfully obtaining cancellation of trademark registration improperly obtained by David Johansen\u0026rsquo;s personal corporation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMembers of The Allman Brothers Band in litigation against UMG Recordings, Inc. for failure to pay royalties at the correct rate for digital downloads and other digital exploitation of several classic albums by The Allman Brothers Band.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFamous artist Greg Hildebrandt, in DMCA fraudulent takedown notice litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst Niagara Insurance Brokers in $530 million trademark infringement action against First Niagara Financial Group.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBill Graham Archives LLC with respect to various copyright, trademark, right of publicity, and other intellectual property disputes relating to the operation of its Wolfgang\u0026rsquo;s Vault website and exploitation of its rights to a large collection of sound recordings, poster art, and vintage rock and roll memorabilia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDomain name registrar Register.com in obtaining a preliminary injunction, affirmed on appeal, stopping the defendant from harvesting customer data from Register.com\u0026rsquo;s WHOIS database.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn individual client in action to obtain subpoenas to trace identity of defendants who had posted defamatory statements on Internet forums.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA religious organization in a trademark action relating to the unauthorized use of the client\u0026rsquo;s trademark in a third-level domain name.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCaesar\u0026rsquo;s World, Inc. in one of the first in rem cases brought under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated preliminary injunction action brought by comedian Jackie Mason against a religious organization arising from the use of Mr. Mason\u0026rsquo;s name and likeness in a parody on a religious tract.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fakler","nick_name":"Paul","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Peter T. Fay, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"1998 - 1999"}],"first_name":"Paul","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1998-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"“Top Music Lawyer”","detail":"Billboard Magazine"},{"title":"Ranked as a leading Media and Entertainment litigator, and Copyright and Trademark lawyer","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners USA"},{"title":"Ranked","detail":"The Legal 500"},{"title":"Named a WIPR leader","detail":"World IP Review"},{"title":"Ranked a “Premier IP Star (Litigation)” in New York","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Fakler advises and helps favorably resolve cases for companies in the streaming, broadcasting, media, software, and other industries to advance their business objectives. Paul offers clients representation guided by a rich understanding of the intersection between music (and other content), technology, and business. He frequently speaks and publishes on legal developments in these fields and has over twenty-five years of experience litigating seminal cases involving the application of copyright and related law to digital media.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough he helps clients with issues across many types of content, Paul has particularly deep experience resolving copyright issues relating to music, where clients operating at the cutting edge of technology require equally innovative legal representation. Paul offers creative solutions based on his deep understanding of copyright law and technology through counseling, government relations, and \u0026ndash; when necessary \u0026ndash; litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an experienced copyright lawyer, former software developer and amateur musician, he is also proficient in software copyright litigation and has been advising clients regarding copyright issues related to machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies for over a decade. He is one of the few lawyers in the country with extensive first-chair experience before the Copyright Royalty Board and other royalty rate setting venues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis experience spans many issues, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright issues implicated by the training and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDigital media and other technologies\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMusic licensing and copyright royalty rate litigation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRoyalty audits and payment disputes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright infringement disputes\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFair use and other defenses\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe DMCA and its safe harbor for online service providers\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCopyright policy matters\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGovernment affairs\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation \u0026amp; Licensing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul has litigated numerous high-profile copyright cases involving digital media, copyright, and the Internet. He routinely represents digital music services, as well as other media, software, and consumer products companies, in negotiations and disputes with record labels, music publishers, and other rights holders. His clients in these groundbreaking cases have included MP3.com, Yahoo!, Veoh, MediaNet, Sirius XM Radio, Pandora Media, Bill Graham Archives, ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access, and Music Choice. Paul obtained the only two royalty rate reductions ever granted by the Copyright Royalty Board (or its predecessors) and often makes new law on issues such as the DMCA safe harbor and fair use through representing clients in bet-the-company copyright infringement litigation across many industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCounseling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients seek Paul\u0026rsquo;s counsel in copyright, trademark, right of publicity, entertainment, computer, and Internet law issues in diverse industries, including the music, motion picture, publishing, software development, data security, and digital media industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Relations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also advises on strategies for shaping copyright policy and represents clients\u0026rsquo; interest before government entities that impact the copyright ecosystem, such as Congress, the Copyright Office, and the Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients served by Paul have included Sirius XM, Pandora, Music Choice, the Orchestra Music Licensing Association, Google, the Television Music Licensing Committee, MediaNet, MP3.com, LaunchCast, Veoh Networks, and Express VPN.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003ePandora Media in group of copyright infringement cases coordinated by purported licensing collective, Word Collections, on behalf of alleged owners of the copyrights in jokes and comedy routines embodied in comedy sound recordings available on Pandora\u0026rsquo;s streaming service. In this case, the plaintiffs seek to disrupt decades of industry custom and practice by claiming that Pandora must separately license rights to the underlying jokes in addition to their existing licenses to stream the sound recordings. Paul served as head of a large, multidisciplinary team not only for Pandora\u0026rsquo;s defense of these actions, but also in counterclaims against the plaintiffs and Word Collections for violation of various antitrust laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMusic Choice, the world\u0026rsquo;s first digital music service, in litigation brought by SoundExchange, alleging underpayment of statutory license royalties for Music Choice\u0026rsquo;s commercial background music service.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeveral technology companies, from startups to a Fortune 500 semiconductor and software company, advising on the copyright issues raised by the training, commercialization, and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe Television Music Licensing Committee in connection with negotiations and potential rate court litigation against various Performing Rights Organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBill Graham Archives, operator of the Wolfgang\u0026rsquo;s and Concert Vault music services, in class action copyright infringement litigation arising from allegations that the company failed to secure mechanical and synchronization licenses for on-demand streaming of its collection of live concert audio and video recordings on its websites.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital music service MediaNet in litigations brought by various songwriters and music publishers relating to mechanical license requirements, leading to favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMP3.com digital music service in various copyright infringement lawsuits brought by record labels and music publishers relating to music streaming service, including litigation of whether musical sound recordings are works made for hire under the Copyright Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eYahoo! in a copyright case brought by the recording industry, determining the eligibility of Yahoo!\u0026rsquo;s LaunchCast webcasting service for a statutory copyright license.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSymphonic rock band Trans-Siberian Orchestra in copyright infringement case relating to album art and band merchandise, leading to favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eScottish software developer in copyright infringement case brought by its competitor, one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ATM hardware and software companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProminent law firm in copyright infringement case relating to computer software used to process specialized financial transactions, successfully reversing preliminary injunction on appeal to the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublications International, Ltd. in a case brought by the makers of Beanie Babies plush toys arising out of the publication of a Beanie Babies collector\u0026rsquo;s guide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeveral Virtual Private Network (VPN) service providers, including ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access, in bet-the-industry copyright litigation brought by a group of independent movie production companies in courts throughout the country, seeking to hold VPN providers liable for the alleged movie piracy of individual consumers using VPN services. Recently negotiated favorable settlement for two VPNs, while proceeding to litigation for another.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMajor cosmetics company in connection with copyright infringement claims brought by major record and music publishing companies, based upon the posting or re-posting of videos that contain background music on social media accounts, including those by influencers and ordinary consumers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMusic Choice in connection with the current Preexisting Subscription Service license rate proceeding (SDARS IV) before the Copyright Royalty Board, as well as every prior rate proceeding for Music Choice since the creation of the CRB. Obtained the second rate decrease in the history of the CRB (and its predecessors) in same year when other licensees\u0026rsquo; rates were increased by over 40%. Recently won appeal of ancillary issue before the D.C. Circuit, obtaining rare reversal of both the Register of Copyrights and the Board.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTrade association Orchestra Music Licensing Association (\u0026ldquo;OMLA\u0026rdquo;), representing the interests of symphony orchestras in connection with various music rights and licensing issues, including Performing Rights Organization license negotiations, the Copyright Office\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;technical measures\u0026rdquo; study, and disputes regarding the creation and use of custom orchestrations of popular music by \u0026ldquo;pops\u0026rdquo; orchestras.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSirius XM Radio, Music Choice, Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, and other music licensees in connection with the Department of Justice\u0026rsquo;s 2014-2015 and 2019-2021 reviews of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees. In both review proceedings, Paul\u0026rsquo;s work resulted in DOJ closing the review without making any of the harmful changes requested by ASCAP, BMI, and music publishers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVarious digital music services and other music licensees in connection with the negotiation, drafting, and enactment of the Music Modernization Act, including assisting clients in preparing for testimony at congressional hearings, lobbying, and obtaining key changes in the legislation to advance clients\u0026rsquo; interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSirius XM Satellite Radio in the Webcasting IV royalty rate proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board, resulting in the first royalty rate decrease ever granted by the Board or its predecessors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational trade association for broadcasters and Music Choice in connection with Copyright Office music licensing policy hearings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe unsecured creditors\u0026rsquo; committee in the Cengage Learning bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 filing of 2013. Developed a novel copyright strategy that placed the liens on all the debtor\u0026rsquo;s copyrights at risk, leading to a significantly increased recovery for the unsecured creditors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSylvain Sylvain, founding member of seminal proto-punk band New York Dolls, successfully obtaining cancellation of trademark registration improperly obtained by David Johansen\u0026rsquo;s personal corporation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMembers of The Allman Brothers Band in litigation against UMG Recordings, Inc. for failure to pay royalties at the correct rate for digital downloads and other digital exploitation of several classic albums by The Allman Brothers Band.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFamous artist Greg Hildebrandt, in DMCA fraudulent takedown notice litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst Niagara Insurance Brokers in $530 million trademark infringement action against First Niagara Financial Group.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBill Graham Archives LLC with respect to various copyright, trademark, right of publicity, and other intellectual property disputes relating to the operation of its Wolfgang\u0026rsquo;s Vault website and exploitation of its rights to a large collection of sound recordings, poster art, and vintage rock and roll memorabilia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDomain name registrar Register.com in obtaining a preliminary injunction, affirmed on appeal, stopping the defendant from harvesting customer data from Register.com\u0026rsquo;s WHOIS database.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAn individual client in action to obtain subpoenas to trace identity of defendants who had posted defamatory statements on Internet forums.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA religious organization in a trademark action relating to the unauthorized use of the client\u0026rsquo;s trademark in a third-level domain name.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCaesar\u0026rsquo;s World, Inc. in one of the first in rem cases brought under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated preliminary injunction action brought by comedian Jackie Mason against a religious organization arising from the use of Mr. Mason\u0026rsquo;s name and likeness in a parody on a religious tract.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"“Top Music Lawyer”","detail":"Billboard Magazine"},{"title":"Ranked as a leading Media and Entertainment litigator, and Copyright and Trademark lawyer","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners USA"},{"title":"Ranked","detail":"The Legal 500"},{"title":"Named a WIPR leader","detail":"World IP Review"},{"title":"Ranked a “Premier IP Star (Litigation)” in New York","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13303}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-20T22:04:02.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-20T22:04:02.000Z","searchable_text":"Fakler{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Top Music Lawyer”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Billboard Magazine\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked as a leading Media and Entertainment litigator, and Copyright and Trademark lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers \u0026amp; Partners USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a WIPR leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"World IP Review\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked a “Premier IP Star (Litigation)” in New York\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Managing Intellectual Property\"}{{ FIELD }}Pandora Media in group of copyright infringement cases coordinated by purported licensing collective, Word Collections, on behalf of alleged owners of the copyrights in jokes and comedy routines embodied in comedy sound recordings available on Pandora’s streaming service. In this case, the plaintiffs seek to disrupt decades of industry custom and practice by claiming that Pandora must separately license rights to the underlying jokes in addition to their existing licenses to stream the sound recordings. Paul served as head of a large, multidisciplinary team not only for Pandora’s defense of these actions, but also in counterclaims against the plaintiffs and Word Collections for violation of various antitrust laws.{{ FIELD }}Music Choice, the world’s first digital music service, in litigation brought by SoundExchange, alleging underpayment of statutory license royalties for Music Choice’s commercial background music service.{{ FIELD }}Several technology companies, from startups to a Fortune 500 semiconductor and software company, advising on the copyright issues raised by the training, commercialization, and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies.{{ FIELD }}The Television Music Licensing Committee in connection with negotiations and potential rate court litigation against various Performing Rights Organizations.{{ FIELD }}Bill Graham Archives, operator of the Wolfgang’s and Concert Vault music services, in class action copyright infringement litigation arising from allegations that the company failed to secure mechanical and synchronization licenses for on-demand streaming of its collection of live concert audio and video recordings on its websites.{{ FIELD }}Digital music service MediaNet in litigations brought by various songwriters and music publishers relating to mechanical license requirements, leading to favorable settlements.{{ FIELD }}MP3.com digital music service in various copyright infringement lawsuits brought by record labels and music publishers relating to music streaming service, including litigation of whether musical sound recordings are works made for hire under the Copyright Act.{{ FIELD }}Yahoo! in a copyright case brought by the recording industry, determining the eligibility of Yahoo!’s LaunchCast webcasting service for a statutory copyright license.{{ FIELD }}Symphonic rock band Trans-Siberian Orchestra in copyright infringement case relating to album art and band merchandise, leading to favorable settlement.{{ FIELD }}Scottish software developer in copyright infringement case brought by its competitor, one of the world’s largest ATM hardware and software companies.{{ FIELD }}Prominent law firm in copyright infringement case relating to computer software used to process specialized financial transactions, successfully reversing preliminary injunction on appeal to the Second Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Publications International, Ltd. in a case brought by the makers of Beanie Babies plush toys arising out of the publication of a Beanie Babies collector’s guide.{{ FIELD }}Several Virtual Private Network (VPN) service providers, including ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access, in bet-the-industry copyright litigation brought by a group of independent movie production companies in courts throughout the country, seeking to hold VPN providers liable for the alleged movie piracy of individual consumers using VPN services. Recently negotiated favorable settlement for two VPNs, while proceeding to litigation for another.{{ FIELD }}Major cosmetics company in connection with copyright infringement claims brought by major record and music publishing companies, based upon the posting or re-posting of videos that contain background music on social media accounts, including those by influencers and ordinary consumers.{{ FIELD }}Music Choice in connection with the current Preexisting Subscription Service license rate proceeding (SDARS IV) before the Copyright Royalty Board, as well as every prior rate proceeding for Music Choice since the creation of the CRB. Obtained the second rate decrease in the history of the CRB (and its predecessors) in same year when other licensees’ rates were increased by over 40%. Recently won appeal of ancillary issue before the D.C. Circuit, obtaining rare reversal of both the Register of Copyrights and the Board.{{ FIELD }}Trade association Orchestra Music Licensing Association (“OMLA”), representing the interests of symphony orchestras in connection with various music rights and licensing issues, including Performing Rights Organization license negotiations, the Copyright Office’s “technical measures” study, and disputes regarding the creation and use of custom orchestrations of popular music by “pops” orchestras.{{ FIELD }}Sirius XM Radio, Music Choice, Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, and other music licensees in connection with the Department of Justice’s 2014-2015 and 2019-2021 reviews of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees. In both review proceedings, Paul’s work resulted in DOJ closing the review without making any of the harmful changes requested by ASCAP, BMI, and music publishers.{{ FIELD }}Various digital music services and other music licensees in connection with the negotiation, drafting, and enactment of the Music Modernization Act, including assisting clients in preparing for testimony at congressional hearings, lobbying, and obtaining key changes in the legislation to advance clients’ interests.{{ FIELD }}Sirius XM Satellite Radio in the Webcasting IV royalty rate proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board, resulting in the first royalty rate decrease ever granted by the Board or its predecessors.{{ FIELD }}National trade association for broadcasters and Music Choice in connection with Copyright Office music licensing policy hearings.{{ FIELD }}The unsecured creditors’ committee in the Cengage Learning bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 filing of 2013. Developed a novel copyright strategy that placed the liens on all the debtor’s copyrights at risk, leading to a significantly increased recovery for the unsecured creditors.{{ FIELD }}Sylvain Sylvain, founding member of seminal proto-punk band New York Dolls, successfully obtaining cancellation of trademark registration improperly obtained by David Johansen’s personal corporation.{{ FIELD }}Members of The Allman Brothers Band in litigation against UMG Recordings, Inc. for failure to pay royalties at the correct rate for digital downloads and other digital exploitation of several classic albums by The Allman Brothers Band.{{ FIELD }}Famous artist Greg Hildebrandt, in DMCA fraudulent takedown notice litigation.{{ FIELD }}First Niagara Insurance Brokers in $530 million trademark infringement action against First Niagara Financial Group.{{ FIELD }}Bill Graham Archives LLC with respect to various copyright, trademark, right of publicity, and other intellectual property disputes relating to the operation of its Wolfgang’s Vault website and exploitation of its rights to a large collection of sound recordings, poster art, and vintage rock and roll memorabilia.{{ FIELD }}Domain name registrar Register.com in obtaining a preliminary injunction, affirmed on appeal, stopping the defendant from harvesting customer data from Register.com’s WHOIS database.{{ FIELD }}An individual client in action to obtain subpoenas to trace identity of defendants who had posted defamatory statements on Internet forums.{{ FIELD }}A religious organization in a trademark action relating to the unauthorized use of the client’s trademark in a third-level domain name.{{ FIELD }}Caesar’s World, Inc. in one of the first in rem cases brought under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act.{{ FIELD }}Defeated preliminary injunction action brought by comedian Jackie Mason against a religious organization arising from the use of Mr. Mason’s name and likeness in a parody on a religious tract.{{ FIELD }}Paul Fakler advises and helps favorably resolve cases for companies in the streaming, broadcasting, media, software, and other industries to advance their business objectives. Paul offers clients representation guided by a rich understanding of the intersection between music (and other content), technology, and business. He frequently speaks and publishes on legal developments in these fields and has over twenty-five years of experience litigating seminal cases involving the application of copyright and related law to digital media.\nAlthough he helps clients with issues across many types of content, Paul has particularly deep experience resolving copyright issues relating to music, where clients operating at the cutting edge of technology require equally innovative legal representation. Paul offers creative solutions based on his deep understanding of copyright law and technology through counseling, government relations, and – when necessary – litigation.\nAs an experienced copyright lawyer, former software developer and amateur musician, he is also proficient in software copyright litigation and has been advising clients regarding copyright issues related to machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies for over a decade. He is one of the few lawyers in the country with extensive first-chair experience before the Copyright Royalty Board and other royalty rate setting venues.\nHis experience spans many issues, including:\n\nCopyright issues implicated by the training and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning\nDigital media and other technologies\nMusic licensing and copyright royalty rate litigation\nRoyalty audits and payment disputes\nCopyright infringement disputes\nFair use and other defenses\nThe DMCA and its safe harbor for online service providers\nCopyright policy matters\nGovernment affairs\n\nLitigation \u0026amp; Licensing\nPaul has litigated numerous high-profile copyright cases involving digital media, copyright, and the Internet. He routinely represents digital music services, as well as other media, software, and consumer products companies, in negotiations and disputes with record labels, music publishers, and other rights holders. His clients in these groundbreaking cases have included MP3.com, Yahoo!, Veoh, MediaNet, Sirius XM Radio, Pandora Media, Bill Graham Archives, ExpressVPN, Private Internet Access, and Music Choice. Paul obtained the only two royalty rate reductions ever granted by the Copyright Royalty Board (or its predecessors) and often makes new law on issues such as the DMCA safe harbor and fair use through representing clients in bet-the-company copyright infringement litigation across many industries.\nCounseling\nClients seek Paul’s counsel in copyright, trademark, right of publicity, entertainment, computer, and Internet law issues in diverse industries, including the music, motion picture, publishing, software development, data security, and digital media industries.\nGovernment Relations\nHe also advises on strategies for shaping copyright policy and represents clients’ interest before government entities that impact the copyright ecosystem, such as Congress, the Copyright Office, and the Department of Justice.\nClients served by Paul have included Sirius XM, Pandora, Music Choice, the Orchestra Music Licensing Association, Google, the Television Music Licensing Committee, MediaNet, MP3.com, LaunchCast, Veoh Networks, and Express VPN. Partner “Top Music Lawyer” Billboard Magazine Ranked as a leading Media and Entertainment litigator, and Copyright and Trademark lawyer Chambers \u0026amp; Partners USA Ranked The Legal 500 Named a WIPR leader World IP Review Ranked a “Premier IP Star (Litigation)” in New York Managing Intellectual Property Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia New York Clerked for the Hon. Peter T. Fay, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit New York State Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section, Former Chair Copyright Society of the USA, Member Law Clerk, Hon. Peter T. Fay, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Pandora Media in group of copyright infringement cases coordinated by purported licensing collective, Word Collections, on behalf of alleged owners of the copyrights in jokes and comedy routines embodied in comedy sound recordings available on Pandora’s streaming service. In this case, the plaintiffs seek to disrupt decades of industry custom and practice by claiming that Pandora must separately license rights to the underlying jokes in addition to their existing licenses to stream the sound recordings. Paul served as head of a large, multidisciplinary team not only for Pandora’s defense of these actions, but also in counterclaims against the plaintiffs and Word Collections for violation of various antitrust laws. Music Choice, the world’s first digital music service, in litigation brought by SoundExchange, alleging underpayment of statutory license royalties for Music Choice’s commercial background music service. Several technology companies, from startups to a Fortune 500 semiconductor and software company, advising on the copyright issues raised by the training, commercialization, and use of artificial intelligence and other machine learning technologies. The Television Music Licensing Committee in connection with negotiations and potential rate court litigation against various Performing Rights Organizations. Bill Graham Archives, operator of the Wolfgang’s and Concert Vault music services, in class action copyright infringement litigation arising from allegations that the company failed to secure mechanical and synchronization licenses for on-demand streaming of its collection of live concert audio and video recordings on its websites. Digital music service MediaNet in litigations brought by various songwriters and music publishers relating to mechanical license requirements, leading to favorable settlements. MP3.com digital music service in various copyright infringement lawsuits brought by record labels and music publishers relating to music streaming service, including litigation of whether musical sound recordings are works made for hire under the Copyright Act. Yahoo! in a copyright case brought by the recording industry, determining the eligibility of Yahoo!’s LaunchCast webcasting service for a statutory copyright license. Symphonic rock band Trans-Siberian Orchestra in copyright infringement case relating to album art and band merchandise, leading to favorable settlement. Scottish software developer in copyright infringement case brought by its competitor, one of the world’s largest ATM hardware and software companies. Prominent law firm in copyright infringement case relating to computer software used to process specialized financial transactions, successfully reversing preliminary injunction on appeal to the Second Circuit. Publications International, Ltd. in a case brought by the makers of Beanie Babies plush toys arising out of the publication of a Beanie Babies collector’s guide. Several Virtual Private Network (VPN) service providers, including ExpressVPN and Private Internet Access, in bet-the-industry copyright litigation brought by a group of independent movie production companies in courts throughout the country, seeking to hold VPN providers liable for the alleged movie piracy of individual consumers using VPN services. Recently negotiated favorable settlement for two VPNs, while proceeding to litigation for another. Major cosmetics company in connection with copyright infringement claims brought by major record and music publishing companies, based upon the posting or re-posting of videos that contain background music on social media accounts, including those by influencers and ordinary consumers. Music Choice in connection with the current Preexisting Subscription Service license rate proceeding (SDARS IV) before the Copyright Royalty Board, as well as every prior rate proceeding for Music Choice since the creation of the CRB. Obtained the second rate decrease in the history of the CRB (and its predecessors) in same year when other licensees’ rates were increased by over 40%. Recently won appeal of ancillary issue before the D.C. Circuit, obtaining rare reversal of both the Register of Copyrights and the Board. Trade association Orchestra Music Licensing Association (“OMLA”), representing the interests of symphony orchestras in connection with various music rights and licensing issues, including Performing Rights Organization license negotiations, the Copyright Office’s “technical measures” study, and disputes regarding the creation and use of custom orchestrations of popular music by “pops” orchestras. Sirius XM Radio, Music Choice, Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra, and other music licensees in connection with the Department of Justice’s 2014-2015 and 2019-2021 reviews of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees. In both review proceedings, Paul’s work resulted in DOJ closing the review without making any of the harmful changes requested by ASCAP, BMI, and music publishers. Various digital music services and other music licensees in connection with the negotiation, drafting, and enactment of the Music Modernization Act, including assisting clients in preparing for testimony at congressional hearings, lobbying, and obtaining key changes in the legislation to advance clients’ interests. Sirius XM Satellite Radio in the Webcasting IV royalty rate proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board, resulting in the first royalty rate decrease ever granted by the Board or its predecessors. National trade association for broadcasters and Music Choice in connection with Copyright Office music licensing policy hearings. The unsecured creditors’ committee in the Cengage Learning bankruptcy, the largest Chapter 11 filing of 2013. Developed a novel copyright strategy that placed the liens on all the debtor’s copyrights at risk, leading to a significantly increased recovery for the unsecured creditors. Sylvain Sylvain, founding member of seminal proto-punk band New York Dolls, successfully obtaining cancellation of trademark registration improperly obtained by David Johansen’s personal corporation. Members of The Allman Brothers Band in litigation against UMG Recordings, Inc. for failure to pay royalties at the correct rate for digital downloads and other digital exploitation of several classic albums by The Allman Brothers Band. Famous artist Greg Hildebrandt, in DMCA fraudulent takedown notice litigation. First Niagara Insurance Brokers in $530 million trademark infringement action against First Niagara Financial Group. Bill Graham Archives LLC with respect to various copyright, trademark, right of publicity, and other intellectual property disputes relating to the operation of its Wolfgang’s Vault website and exploitation of its rights to a large collection of sound recordings, poster art, and vintage rock and roll memorabilia. Domain name registrar Register.com in obtaining a preliminary injunction, affirmed on appeal, stopping the defendant from harvesting customer data from Register.com’s WHOIS database. An individual client in action to obtain subpoenas to trace identity of defendants who had posted defamatory statements on Internet forums. A religious organization in a trademark action relating to the unauthorized use of the client’s trademark in a third-level domain name. Caesar’s World, Inc. in one of the first in rem cases brought under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. Defeated preliminary injunction action brought by comedian Jackie Mason against a religious organization arising from the use of Mr. Mason’s name and likeness in a parody on a religious tract.","searchable_name":"Paul Fakler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427597,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5016,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZach Fardon leads King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Matters practice group, serves on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Policy Committee, and is Managing Partner of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Chicago office. As part of the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations team, Zach represents companies and individuals nationwide in a broad array of sensitive white-collar defense and investigations matters. He has built a reputation as a careful, discreet problem solver and an elite trial lawyer. A former United States Attorney, Zach has extensive experience on both sides of the table in bet-the-company civil and criminal trials and government and internal investigations. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2017, Zach served as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, leading one of the top prosecutor\u0026rsquo;s offices in the country and overseeing prosecutions in areas of corporate misconduct, healthcare and securities fraud, public corruption, gangs, terrorism and other criminal and civil matters. He has tried numerous cases, including the successful corruption trial of former Illinois Governor George Ryan. Zach served for over three years on the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Advisory Committee (AGAC) and co-chaired the AGAC\u0026rsquo;s White Collar Crimes Subcommittee, working closely with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) leadership, U.S. Attorneys across the country, and other enforcement officials. He also co-chaired the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group, which includes the DOJ, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other agencies. During his years of public service, Zach received numerous awards and recognition for outstanding service, including the Chicago Crime Commission Stars of Distinction Award, the Chicago Federal Bureau of Investigation Award in Recognition of Outstanding Service and Dedication, and U.S. Department of Justice Director\u0026rsquo;s Awards for Superior Performance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt King \u0026amp; Spalding, Zach represents clients in high-stakes government investigations, internal investigations, white-collar litigation, and crisis response matters. He has guided public companies, boards of directors, major universities, government officials, and high-ranking corporate executives through sensitive matters involving fraud, public corruption, bribery, #metoo improprieties, financial improprieties, workplace violence, and data breaches, among others. Legal 500 US named Zach a \u0026ldquo;Leading Lawyer for Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense: Advice to Corporates\u0026rdquo; in its 2018 edition, making him one of only 13 lawyers nationwide to receive that designation. In addition, Chambers USA has consistently ranked him as a top White-Collar Crime and Government Investigations lawyer.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZach is a committed advocate for the greater Chicago community and, in particular, for finding long-term solutions to Chicago\u0026rsquo;s gun violence epidemic. He has served on the not-for-profit Boards of Directors of A Better Chicago, Metropolitan Family Services of Chicago, and the Legal Aid Society of Chicago, which he Chaired. He is an Adjunct Professor at Northwestern\u0026rsquo;s Pritzker School of Law, where he teaches a seminar on Chicago\u0026rsquo;s gun violence epidemic, and he currently serves on the Board of Youth Guidance and the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"zachary-fardon","email":"zfardon@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Equifax in investigations by 47 state Attorneys General who formed a multi-state group to investigate the 2017 cybersecurity incident, which impacted approximately 145.5 million U.S. consumers, and in multiple related lawsuits brought by cities and states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Chairman of the CFTC, two CFTC Commissioners, the CFTC Chief of Enforcement, and other CFTC staff in successfully convincing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss contempt proceedings against the CFTC individuals alleging improper public statements regarding the CFTC\u0026rsquo;s settlement with Kraft-Mondelez in a market manipulation case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Board of Trustees of the Teachers Retirement System of Illinois in an internal investigation into potential misconduct by its Executive Director.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Board Independent Directors of Interface Inc., the world\u0026rsquo;s largest designer and manufacturer of carpet tiles, in an independent investigation of #metoo allegations made by a whistleblower.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an independent investigation for the Cook County State\u0026rsquo;s Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office into allegations of improper outsourcing of legal services at the CCSAO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major state university in multiple sensitive matters, including #metoo allegations, COVID-19 return-to-campus issues, and investigations of improprieties in one of its sports programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major U.S. corporations in internal investigations, coordination with law enforcement investigations, and crisis response and communications in the wake of tragic workplace violence incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a major financial services institution in responding to inquiries from various state Attorney General offices and other state regulators relating to a data breach.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting multiple high-ranked corporate executives in federal criminal investigations and SEC, DOJ, and state AG investigations involving product recalls, financial improprieties, bribery, RICO allegations, FCPA violations, and Medicare fraud and kickbacks.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":10,"guid":"10.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":973,"guid":"973.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":113,"guid":"113.capabilities","index":19,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":20,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":21,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":22,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":23,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":24,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":25,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":26,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fardon","nick_name":"Zachary","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Zachary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1992-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations ","detail":"Chambers USA, Illinois (2012 \u0026 2019-2022)"},{"title":"\"Zachary is a really good strategic thinker with compassion for his clients.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer - Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US 2018"},{"title":"Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers (2016)","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":136,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZach Fardon leads King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Matters practice group, serves on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Policy Committee, and is Managing Partner of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Chicago office. As part of the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations team, Zach represents companies and individuals nationwide in a broad array of sensitive white-collar defense and investigations matters. He has built a reputation as a careful, discreet problem solver and an elite trial lawyer. A former United States Attorney, Zach has extensive experience on both sides of the table in bet-the-company civil and criminal trials and government and internal investigations. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2017, Zach served as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, leading one of the top prosecutor\u0026rsquo;s offices in the country and overseeing prosecutions in areas of corporate misconduct, healthcare and securities fraud, public corruption, gangs, terrorism and other criminal and civil matters. He has tried numerous cases, including the successful corruption trial of former Illinois Governor George Ryan. Zach served for over three years on the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Advisory Committee (AGAC) and co-chaired the AGAC\u0026rsquo;s White Collar Crimes Subcommittee, working closely with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) leadership, U.S. Attorneys across the country, and other enforcement officials. He also co-chaired the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group, which includes the DOJ, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other agencies. During his years of public service, Zach received numerous awards and recognition for outstanding service, including the Chicago Crime Commission Stars of Distinction Award, the Chicago Federal Bureau of Investigation Award in Recognition of Outstanding Service and Dedication, and U.S. Department of Justice Director\u0026rsquo;s Awards for Superior Performance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt King \u0026amp; Spalding, Zach represents clients in high-stakes government investigations, internal investigations, white-collar litigation, and crisis response matters. He has guided public companies, boards of directors, major universities, government officials, and high-ranking corporate executives through sensitive matters involving fraud, public corruption, bribery, #metoo improprieties, financial improprieties, workplace violence, and data breaches, among others. Legal 500 US named Zach a \u0026ldquo;Leading Lawyer for Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense: Advice to Corporates\u0026rdquo; in its 2018 edition, making him one of only 13 lawyers nationwide to receive that designation. In addition, Chambers USA has consistently ranked him as a top White-Collar Crime and Government Investigations lawyer.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZach is a committed advocate for the greater Chicago community and, in particular, for finding long-term solutions to Chicago\u0026rsquo;s gun violence epidemic. He has served on the not-for-profit Boards of Directors of A Better Chicago, Metropolitan Family Services of Chicago, and the Legal Aid Society of Chicago, which he Chaired. He is an Adjunct Professor at Northwestern\u0026rsquo;s Pritzker School of Law, where he teaches a seminar on Chicago\u0026rsquo;s gun violence epidemic, and he currently serves on the Board of Youth Guidance and the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Equifax in investigations by 47 state Attorneys General who formed a multi-state group to investigate the 2017 cybersecurity incident, which impacted approximately 145.5 million U.S. consumers, and in multiple related lawsuits brought by cities and states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Chairman of the CFTC, two CFTC Commissioners, the CFTC Chief of Enforcement, and other CFTC staff in successfully convincing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss contempt proceedings against the CFTC individuals alleging improper public statements regarding the CFTC\u0026rsquo;s settlement with Kraft-Mondelez in a market manipulation case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Board of Trustees of the Teachers Retirement System of Illinois in an internal investigation into potential misconduct by its Executive Director.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Board Independent Directors of Interface Inc., the world\u0026rsquo;s largest designer and manufacturer of carpet tiles, in an independent investigation of #metoo allegations made by a whistleblower.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an independent investigation for the Cook County State\u0026rsquo;s Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office into allegations of improper outsourcing of legal services at the CCSAO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major state university in multiple sensitive matters, including #metoo allegations, COVID-19 return-to-campus issues, and investigations of improprieties in one of its sports programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major U.S. corporations in internal investigations, coordination with law enforcement investigations, and crisis response and communications in the wake of tragic workplace violence incidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a major financial services institution in responding to inquiries from various state Attorney General offices and other state regulators relating to a data breach.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting multiple high-ranked corporate executives in federal criminal investigations and SEC, DOJ, and state AG investigations involving product recalls, financial improprieties, bribery, RICO allegations, FCPA violations, and Medicare fraud and kickbacks.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations ","detail":"Chambers USA, Illinois (2012 \u0026 2019-2022)"},{"title":"\"Zachary is a really good strategic thinker with compassion for his clients.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer - Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US 2018"},{"title":"Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers (2016)","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5230}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:34.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:34.000Z","searchable_text":"Fardon{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Ranked Lawyer, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Illinois (2012 \u0026amp; 2019-2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Zachary is a really good strategic thinker with compassion for his clients.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer - Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers (2016)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Equifax in investigations by 47 state Attorneys General who formed a multi-state group to investigate the 2017 cybersecurity incident, which impacted approximately 145.5 million U.S. consumers, and in multiple related lawsuits brought by cities and states.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Chairman of the CFTC, two CFTC Commissioners, the CFTC Chief of Enforcement, and other CFTC staff in successfully convincing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss contempt proceedings against the CFTC individuals alleging improper public statements regarding the CFTC’s settlement with Kraft-Mondelez in a market manipulation case.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Board of Trustees of the Teachers Retirement System of Illinois in an internal investigation into potential misconduct by its Executive Director.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Board Independent Directors of Interface Inc., the world’s largest designer and manufacturer of carpet tiles, in an independent investigation of #metoo allegations made by a whistleblower.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an independent investigation for the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office into allegations of improper outsourcing of legal services at the CCSAO.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major state university in multiple sensitive matters, including #metoo allegations, COVID-19 return-to-campus issues, and investigations of improprieties in one of its sports programs.{{ FIELD }}Represented major U.S. corporations in internal investigations, coordination with law enforcement investigations, and crisis response and communications in the wake of tragic workplace violence incidents.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial services institution in responding to inquiries from various state Attorney General offices and other state regulators relating to a data breach.{{ FIELD }}Representing multiple high-ranked corporate executives in federal criminal investigations and SEC, DOJ, and state AG investigations involving product recalls, financial improprieties, bribery, RICO allegations, FCPA violations, and Medicare fraud and kickbacks.{{ FIELD }}Zach Fardon leads King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Government Matters practice group, serves on the firm’s Policy Committee, and is Managing Partner of the firm’s Chicago office. As part of the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations team, Zach represents companies and individuals nationwide in a broad array of sensitive white-collar defense and investigations matters. He has built a reputation as a careful, discreet problem solver and an elite trial lawyer. A former United States Attorney, Zach has extensive experience on both sides of the table in bet-the-company civil and criminal trials and government and internal investigations. He is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers.\nPrior to rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2017, Zach served as U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, leading one of the top prosecutor’s offices in the country and overseeing prosecutions in areas of corporate misconduct, healthcare and securities fraud, public corruption, gangs, terrorism and other criminal and civil matters. He has tried numerous cases, including the successful corruption trial of former Illinois Governor George Ryan. Zach served for over three years on the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee (AGAC) and co-chaired the AGAC’s White Collar Crimes Subcommittee, working closely with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) leadership, U.S. Attorneys across the country, and other enforcement officials. He also co-chaired the Securities and Commodities Fraud Working Group, which includes the DOJ, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and other agencies. During his years of public service, Zach received numerous awards and recognition for outstanding service, including the Chicago Crime Commission Stars of Distinction Award, the Chicago Federal Bureau of Investigation Award in Recognition of Outstanding Service and Dedication, and U.S. Department of Justice Director’s Awards for Superior Performance.\nAt King \u0026amp; Spalding, Zach represents clients in high-stakes government investigations, internal investigations, white-collar litigation, and crisis response matters. He has guided public companies, boards of directors, major universities, government officials, and high-ranking corporate executives through sensitive matters involving fraud, public corruption, bribery, #metoo improprieties, financial improprieties, workplace violence, and data breaches, among others. Legal 500 US named Zach a “Leading Lawyer for Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense: Advice to Corporates” in its 2018 edition, making him one of only 13 lawyers nationwide to receive that designation. In addition, Chambers USA has consistently ranked him as a top White-Collar Crime and Government Investigations lawyer.\nZach is a committed advocate for the greater Chicago community and, in particular, for finding long-term solutions to Chicago’s gun violence epidemic. He has served on the not-for-profit Boards of Directors of A Better Chicago, Metropolitan Family Services of Chicago, and the Legal Aid Society of Chicago, which he Chaired. He is an Adjunct Professor at Northwestern’s Pritzker School of Law, where he teaches a seminar on Chicago’s gun violence epidemic, and he currently serves on the Board of Youth Guidance and the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt Law School. Partner Top Ranked Lawyer, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations  Chambers USA, Illinois (2012 \u0026amp; 2019-2022) \"Zachary is a really good strategic thinker with compassion for his clients.\"  Chambers USA (2022) Leading Lawyer - Corporate Investigations and White-Collar Criminal Defense Legal 500 US 2018 Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers (2016)  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Illinois Tennessee Represented Equifax in investigations by 47 state Attorneys General who formed a multi-state group to investigate the 2017 cybersecurity incident, which impacted approximately 145.5 million U.S. consumers, and in multiple related lawsuits brought by cities and states. Represented the Chairman of the CFTC, two CFTC Commissioners, the CFTC Chief of Enforcement, and other CFTC staff in successfully convincing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss contempt proceedings against the CFTC individuals alleging improper public statements regarding the CFTC’s settlement with Kraft-Mondelez in a market manipulation case. Represented the Board of Trustees of the Teachers Retirement System of Illinois in an internal investigation into potential misconduct by its Executive Director. Represented the Board Independent Directors of Interface Inc., the world’s largest designer and manufacturer of carpet tiles, in an independent investigation of #metoo allegations made by a whistleblower. Conducted an independent investigation for the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office into allegations of improper outsourcing of legal services at the CCSAO. Represented a major state university in multiple sensitive matters, including #metoo allegations, COVID-19 return-to-campus issues, and investigations of improprieties in one of its sports programs. Represented major U.S. corporations in internal investigations, coordination with law enforcement investigations, and crisis response and communications in the wake of tragic workplace violence incidents. Representing a major financial services institution in responding to inquiries from various state Attorney General offices and other state regulators relating to a data breach. Representing multiple high-ranked corporate executives in federal criminal investigations and SEC, DOJ, and state AG investigations involving product recalls, financial improprieties, bribery, RICO allegations, FCPA violations, and Medicare fraud and kickbacks.","searchable_name":"Zachary Fardon","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442393,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1060,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas.\u0026nbsp;Jack has helped recover more than $3\u0026nbsp;billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those\u0026nbsp;liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties.\u0026nbsp;Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-fontham","email":"jfontham@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a world-scale methanol production facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyo Engineering\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHaven Midstream\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea professional sports stadium owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003erev. denied\u003c/em\u003e, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePneumo Abex LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFortune Global 500 public company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea New York-based hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFortress Investment Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an affiliate of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThird Point LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 50 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client\u0026rsquo;s captive insurance company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":87},{"id":87}]},"expertise":[{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fontham","nick_name":"Jack","clerkships":[],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackfontham/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas.\u0026nbsp;Jack has helped recover more than $3\u0026nbsp;billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those\u0026nbsp;liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties.\u0026nbsp;Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a world-scale methanol production facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyo Engineering\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHaven Midstream\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea professional sports stadium owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003erev. denied\u003c/em\u003e, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePneumo Abex LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFortune Global 500 public company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea New York-based hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFortress Investment Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an affiliate of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThird Point LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 50 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client\u0026rsquo;s captive insurance company.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12329}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Fontham{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a world-scale methanol production facility in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented Toyo Engineering in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented Haven Midstream in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented a professional sports stadium owner on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.{{ FIELD }}Served as trial and appellate counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al., 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013), rev. denied, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.{{ FIELD }}Represented Pneumo Abex LLC in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.{{ FIELD }}Representing Chevron Corporation in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.{{ FIELD }}Advised a Fortune Global 500 public company in its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.{{ FIELD }}Advised a New York-based hedge fund in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.{{ FIELD }}Advised Fortress Investment Group in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.{{ FIELD }}Advised an affiliate of Third Point LLC in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 50 company in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.{{ FIELD }}Advised a Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client’s captive insurance company.{{ FIELD }}Jack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas. Jack has helped recover more than $3 billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.\nJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\nJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties. Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions. John H Fontham Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana District of Columbia Louisiana District of Columbia Bar Louisiana State Bar Association American Bar Association (sections: Litigation, Tort \u0026amp; Insurance Practice) Represented the owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events. Represented the owner of a world-scale methanol production facility in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system. Represented the owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant. Represented Toyo Engineering in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant. Represented Haven Midstream in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant. Represented a professional sports stadium owner on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium. Served as trial and appellate counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al., 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013), rev. denied, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time. Represented Pneumo Abex LLC in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims. Representing Chevron Corporation in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether. Advised a Fortune Global 500 public company in its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States. Advised a New York-based hedge fund in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm. Advised Fortress Investment Group in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings. Advised an affiliate of Third Point LLC in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc. Represented a Fortune 50 company in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage. Advised a Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client’s captive insurance company.","searchable_name":"John H. Fontham (Jack)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":438915,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3933,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKen is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.\u0026nbsp; Ken\u0026nbsp;advises clients in a variety\u0026nbsp;of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.\u0026nbsp; Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC\u0026nbsp;securities actions,\u0026nbsp;disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.\u0026nbsp; Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken\u0026nbsp;interned as a sports reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and as a news reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSouth Bend Tribune\u003c/em\u003e. He graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Duke Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClerkships\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"kenneth-fowler","email":"kfowler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fowler","nick_name":"Ken","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2014-2015"}],"first_name":"Kenneth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":613,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKen is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.\u0026nbsp; Ken\u0026nbsp;advises clients in a variety\u0026nbsp;of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.\u0026nbsp; Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC\u0026nbsp;securities actions,\u0026nbsp;disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.\u0026nbsp; Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken\u0026nbsp;interned as a sports reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and as a news reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSouth Bend Tribune\u003c/em\u003e. He graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Duke Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClerkships\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4214}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-10-01T20:55:48.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-01T20:55:48.000Z","searchable_text":"Fowler{{ FIELD }}Ken is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.  Ken advises clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.  Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC securities actions, disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.  \nKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.  Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\nPrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken interned as a sports reporter for the Los Angeles Times and as a news reporter for the South Bend Tribune. He graduated magna cum laude from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated magna cum laude from Duke Law.\nClerkships\n\nLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\n Partner University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Law School Duke University Duke University School of Law Georgia New York Law Clerk, Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"Kenneth Fowler (Ken)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446385,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1848,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy\u0026rsquo;s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called \u0026ldquo;windfall profits\u0026rdquo; taxes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amy-frey","email":"afrey@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMoldovan nationals and their corporate entities\u003c/strong\u003e in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSwedish nationals and their food and beverage companies\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented more than a dozen \u003cstrong\u003eEuropean-based renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Dutch company\u003c/strong\u003e in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea water concessionaire\u003c/strong\u003e in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eLuxembourg and French renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUAE investors\u003c/strong\u003e in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. gas compression company\u003c/strong\u003e in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Indian company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean African telecom company\u003c/strong\u003e in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003erenewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Frey","nick_name":"Amy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy\u0026rsquo;s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called \u0026ldquo;windfall profits\u0026rdquo; taxes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMoldovan nationals and their corporate entities\u003c/strong\u003e in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSwedish nationals and their food and beverage companies\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented more than a dozen \u003cstrong\u003eEuropean-based renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Dutch company\u003c/strong\u003e in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea water concessionaire\u003c/strong\u003e in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eLuxembourg and French renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUAE investors\u003c/strong\u003e in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. gas compression company\u003c/strong\u003e in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Indian company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean African telecom company\u003c/strong\u003e in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003erenewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12238}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-03T16:07:29.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-03T16:07:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Frey{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Moldovan nationals and their corporate entities in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Swedish nationals and their food and beverage companies in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of a U.S. energy company against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.{{ FIELD }}Represented more than a dozen European-based renewable energy investors with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Dutch company in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a water concessionaire in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Luxembourg and French renewable energy investors from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major U.S. energy company in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.{{ FIELD }}Represented an energy company in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented UAE investors in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented a U.S. gas compression company in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented an Indian company in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.{{ FIELD }}Advised an African telecom company in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.{{ FIELD }}Advised renewable energy investors on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.{{ FIELD }}Amy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy’s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.\nAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\nRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called “windfall profits” taxes.\nIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees. Partner University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law Tulane University Tulane University Law School Oxford University, UK  District of Columbia Texas Paris Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Moldovan nationals and their corporate entities in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan. Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Swedish nationals and their food and beverage companies in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law. Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of a U.S. energy company against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes. Represented more than a dozen European-based renewable energy investors with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain. Represented a Dutch company in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions. Successfully defended a water concessionaire in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor. Successfully defended Luxembourg and French renewable energy investors from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain. Represented a major U.S. energy company in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system. Represented an energy company in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims. Represented UAE investors in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims. Represented a U.S. gas compression company in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract. Represented an Indian company in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide. Advised an African telecom company in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations. Advised renewable energy investors on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.","searchable_name":"Amy Frey","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442818,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5741,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeanne-fugate","email":"jfugate@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugate","nick_name":"Jeanne","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2003 - 2004"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2002 - 2003"}],"first_name":"Jeanne","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2001-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8078}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugate{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended for Trade Secret\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2018, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement{{ FIELD }}Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees{{ FIELD }}Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors{{ FIELD }}Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction{{ FIELD }}Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement{{ FIELD }}Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing{{ FIELD }}Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved{{ FIELD }}Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage{{ FIELD }}Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients{{ FIELD }}Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss{{ FIELD }}Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme{{ FIELD }}In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week{{ FIELD }}Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints{{ FIELD }}Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees.{{ FIELD }}Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions{{ FIELD }}Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident{{ FIELD }}Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed{{ FIELD }}Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings{{ FIELD }}Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection{{ FIELD }}Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute{{ FIELD }}Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs{{ FIELD }}Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro{{ FIELD }}Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term{{ FIELD }}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n {{ FIELD }}Jeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\nJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice. \nJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill’s daily newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel. Partner Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California Daily Journal 2023 Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the  Los Angeles Business Journal 2017 Recommended for Trade Secret Legal 500 US 2023 Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California Daily Journal 2018, 2019 Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment Law360 2024 Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024 Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list Los Angeles Business Journal 2023 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law New York University New York University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California New York President, Los Angeles Civil Service Commission Board Member and President-Elect, California ChangeLawyers Board Member and Dinner Committee Chair, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Member, Sedona Conference WG12 Model Defend Trade Secrets Act Jury Instructions Brainstorming Group (committee working to draft model jury instructions to be used in DTSA cases) Member, CJA/CLA Civility in the Legal Profession Task Force LA Board of Directors and Co-Chair Government Relations Committee, Federal Bar Association Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees. Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer. Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n ","searchable_name":"Jeanne A. Fugate","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444728,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6787,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jackie-fugitt","email":"jfugitt@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1166,"guid":"1166.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugitt","nick_name":"Jackie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jackie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2489,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12289}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugitt{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings{{ FIELD }}Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition{{ FIELD }}Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation{{ FIELD }}Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction{{ FIELD }}Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement{{ FIELD }}Jackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.  Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in litigation related to contract, securities, and antitrust matters.\nJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy, pharmaceutical and retail industries.  Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.   Partner Missouri State University  Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement","searchable_name":"Jackie Fugitt","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446625,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5350,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElliott Foote is Counsel\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes group. \u0026nbsp;His practice focuses on complex commercial and appellate litigation.\u0026nbsp; Elliott\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in state and federal courts in matters involving class actions, data privacy,\u0026nbsp;employee benefits,\u0026nbsp;products liability, and securities and shareholder disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElliott graduated from Transylvania University in 2012 with a B.A. in Political Science and Spanish.\u0026nbsp; He earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law\u0026nbsp;in 2015.\u0026nbsp; While in law school,\u0026nbsp; Elliott served as an\u0026nbsp;Executive Managing Editor\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;the \u003cem\u003eEmory Law Journal.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp; He also worked as an extern\u0026nbsp;for the\u0026nbsp;in-house litigation department\u0026nbsp;at The Coca-Cola Company\u0026nbsp;and for the\u0026nbsp;Office of the Solicitor\u0026nbsp;at the United States Department of Labor.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter law school, Elliott clerked for the Honorable William C. O'Kelley of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and\u0026nbsp;the Honorable Frank\u0026nbsp;M. Hull\u0026nbsp;of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"elliott-foote","email":"efoote@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":502,"guid":"502.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Foote","nick_name":"Elliott","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2015 - 2017"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2017 - 2018"}],"first_name":"Elliott","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElliott Foote is Counsel\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes group. \u0026nbsp;His practice focuses on complex commercial and appellate litigation.\u0026nbsp; Elliott\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in state and federal courts in matters involving class actions, data privacy,\u0026nbsp;employee benefits,\u0026nbsp;products liability, and securities and shareholder disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElliott graduated from Transylvania University in 2012 with a B.A. in Political Science and Spanish.\u0026nbsp; He earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law\u0026nbsp;in 2015.\u0026nbsp; While in law school,\u0026nbsp; Elliott served as an\u0026nbsp;Executive Managing Editor\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;the \u003cem\u003eEmory Law Journal.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp; He also worked as an extern\u0026nbsp;for the\u0026nbsp;in-house litigation department\u0026nbsp;at The Coca-Cola Company\u0026nbsp;and for the\u0026nbsp;Office of the Solicitor\u0026nbsp;at the United States Department of Labor.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter law school, Elliott clerked for the Honorable William C. O'Kelley of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and\u0026nbsp;the Honorable Frank\u0026nbsp;M. Hull\u0026nbsp;of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6519},{"id":6519}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-09T21:46:29.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-09T21:46:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Foote{{ FIELD }}Elliott Foote is Counsel in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Trial and Global Disputes group.  His practice focuses on complex commercial and appellate litigation.  Elliott has represented clients in state and federal courts in matters involving class actions, data privacy, employee benefits, products liability, and securities and shareholder disputes.\nElliott graduated from Transylvania University in 2012 with a B.A. in Political Science and Spanish.  He earned his J.D. from Emory University School of Law in 2015.  While in law school,  Elliott served as an Executive Managing Editor of the Emory Law Journal.  He also worked as an extern for the in-house litigation department at The Coca-Cola Company and for the Office of the Solicitor at the United States Department of Labor. \nAfter law school, Elliott clerked for the Honorable William C. O'Kelley of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and the Honorable Frank M. Hull of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Counsel Transylvania University  Emory University Emory University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Kentucky Supreme Court of Georgia Georgia Superior Court Supreme Court of Kentucky Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Law Clerk, Hon. Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"Elliott Foote","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446875,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7338,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDylan focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, including breach of contract, business torts, and other high-stakes business disputes. His practice also includes a wide range of appellate matters in both state and federal court, with a focus on the Fifth Circuit and Texas Courts of Appeal.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDylan has experience handling a variety of trial and appellate matters, taking a lead role in researching and drafting motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, as well as briefing in the Texas Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court. In addition, Dylan has gained substantial experience in the law of qualified immunity, participating in several lawsuits against governmental entities and public officials.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Dylan clerked for Chief Judge Priscilla Richman of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. During his clerkship with Chief Judge Richman, he honed his skills as a legal writer and developed a careful eye for detail while being exposed to a wide variety of cutting-edge legal issues. After his clerkship, Dylan worked as a law fellow in the Special Litigation Unit at the Texas Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Office, assisting with investigation and strategy related to the landmark Google antitrust lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"dylan-french","email":"dfrench@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"French","nick_name":"Dylan","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Judge Priscilla Richman, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2019 - 2020"}],"first_name":"Dylan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"James","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDylan focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, including breach of contract, business torts, and other high-stakes business disputes. His practice also includes a wide range of appellate matters in both state and federal court, with a focus on the Fifth Circuit and Texas Courts of Appeal.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDylan has experience handling a variety of trial and appellate matters, taking a lead role in researching and drafting motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, as well as briefing in the Texas Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court. In addition, Dylan has gained substantial experience in the law of qualified immunity, participating in several lawsuits against governmental entities and public officials.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Dylan clerked for Chief Judge Priscilla Richman of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. During his clerkship with Chief Judge Richman, he honed his skills as a legal writer and developed a careful eye for detail while being exposed to a wide variety of cutting-edge legal issues. After his clerkship, Dylan worked as a law fellow in the Special Litigation Unit at the Texas Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Office, assisting with investigation and strategy related to the landmark Google antitrust lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13410}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-20T05:02:58.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-20T05:02:58.000Z","searchable_text":"French{{ FIELD }}Dylan focuses his practice on complex commercial litigation, including breach of contract, business torts, and other high-stakes business disputes. His practice also includes a wide range of appellate matters in both state and federal court, with a focus on the Fifth Circuit and Texas Courts of Appeal. \nDylan has experience handling a variety of trial and appellate matters, taking a lead role in researching and drafting motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, as well as briefing in the Texas Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court. In addition, Dylan has gained substantial experience in the law of qualified immunity, participating in several lawsuits against governmental entities and public officials.\nPrior to joining the firm, Dylan clerked for Chief Judge Priscilla Richman of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. During his clerkship with Chief Judge Richman, he honed his skills as a legal writer and developed a careful eye for detail while being exposed to a wide variety of cutting-edge legal issues. After his clerkship, Dylan worked as a law fellow in the Special Litigation Unit at the Texas Attorney General’s Office, assisting with investigation and strategy related to the landmark Google antitrust lawsuit. Senior Associate Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Texas Dallas Bar Association Judicial Clerk, Judge Priscilla Richman, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","searchable_name":"Dylan James French","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":441855,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6462,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRoy Falik is a trial litigator with a penchant for the complex. He has litigated various technologies ranging from computer games to medical devices to dashcams, all the way from pitch to trial.\u0026nbsp;Roy\u0026rsquo;s software engineering experience makes him a valuable asset to any patent and technology-related cases. Whether he's working with experts or arguing before a court, Roy's ability to simplify and streamline a technical argument is invaluable.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring law school Roy gained experience as a judicial intern for the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoy earned his degree with honors from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law, where he started honing his focus on intellectual property. As a student, Roy received a Dean's Achievement award in his patent law class and was recognized as a Strauss Center Cyber Fellow. Roy also received Dean's Achievement awards in space law and digital evidence classes. He served as the Managing Editor for the Texas IP Law Journal and as a student member of the Yeakel IP Inn of Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince then, Roy has taken an active role in his patent cases. He has argued dispositive motions and Markman hearings, taken and defended depositions, and even directed witnesses as trial. His experience at all points throughout the case lifecycle and passion for creativity are an important asset to any team.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"roy-falik","email":"rfalik@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Falik","nick_name":"Roy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Roy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/roy-falik/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRoy Falik is a trial litigator with a penchant for the complex. He has litigated various technologies ranging from computer games to medical devices to dashcams, all the way from pitch to trial.\u0026nbsp;Roy\u0026rsquo;s software engineering experience makes him a valuable asset to any patent and technology-related cases. Whether he's working with experts or arguing before a court, Roy's ability to simplify and streamline a technical argument is invaluable.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring law school Roy gained experience as a judicial intern for the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoy earned his degree with honors from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law, where he started honing his focus on intellectual property. As a student, Roy received a Dean's Achievement award in his patent law class and was recognized as a Strauss Center Cyber Fellow. Roy also received Dean's Achievement awards in space law and digital evidence classes. He served as the Managing Editor for the Texas IP Law Journal and as a student member of the Yeakel IP Inn of Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince then, Roy has taken an active role in his patent cases. He has argued dispositive motions and Markman hearings, taken and defended depositions, and even directed witnesses as trial. His experience at all points throughout the case lifecycle and passion for creativity are an important asset to any team.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10393}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-10-31T21:59:46.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-31T21:59:46.000Z","searchable_text":"Falik{{ FIELD }}Roy Falik is a trial litigator with a penchant for the complex. He has litigated various technologies ranging from computer games to medical devices to dashcams, all the way from pitch to trial. Roy’s software engineering experience makes him a valuable asset to any patent and technology-related cases. Whether he's working with experts or arguing before a court, Roy's ability to simplify and streamline a technical argument is invaluable. \nDuring law school Roy gained experience as a judicial intern for the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.\nRoy earned his degree with honors from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law, where he started honing his focus on intellectual property. As a student, Roy received a Dean's Achievement award in his patent law class and was recognized as a Strauss Center Cyber Fellow. Roy also received Dean's Achievement awards in space law and digital evidence classes. He served as the Managing Editor for the Texas IP Law Journal and as a student member of the Yeakel IP Inn of Court. \nSince then, Roy has taken an active role in his patent cases. He has argued dispositive motions and Markman hearings, taken and defended depositions, and even directed witnesses as trial. His experience at all points throughout the case lifecycle and passion for creativity are an important asset to any team. Associate The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado Colorado","searchable_name":"Roy Falik","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426970,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6057,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSt\u0026eacute;phanie Fillon is an associate in the Paris office's International Disputes team.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she gained litigation experience both in Parisian law firms and in the legal departments of several French companies operating in the banking, retail and leasing sectors, enabling her to intervene especially in business law, unfair competition and parasitism, commercial leases and contracts, product liability, construction and insurance law, and KYC-AML regulations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is a member of the Paris Bar.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"stephanie-fillon","email":"sfillon@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fillon","nick_name":"Stéphanie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Stéphanie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephanie-fillon/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSt\u0026eacute;phanie Fillon is an associate in the Paris office's International Disputes team.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she gained litigation experience both in Parisian law firms and in the legal departments of several French companies operating in the banking, retail and leasing sectors, enabling her to intervene especially in business law, unfair competition and parasitism, commercial leases and contracts, product liability, construction and insurance law, and KYC-AML regulations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is a member of the Paris Bar.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12217}]},"capability_group_id":null},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Fillon{{ FIELD }}Stéphanie Fillon is an associate in the Paris office's International Disputes team. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she gained litigation experience both in Parisian law firms and in the legal departments of several French companies operating in the banking, retail and leasing sectors, enabling her to intervene especially in business law, unfair competition and parasitism, commercial leases and contracts, product liability, construction and insurance law, and KYC-AML regulations.\nShe is a member of the Paris Bar. Associate East China Normal University of Shanghai  University of Rennes  EMlyon Business School  Paris","searchable_name":"Stéphanie Fillon","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436700,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7207,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAishling Fitzpatrick is a trial-focused litigator in the New York Office and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Aishling practices in the area of complex commercial litigation and has represented and advised clients in both federal and state courts and across a wide range of industries, including financial services, technology, real estate, and healthcare. Aishling also maintains an active pro bono practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAishling is currently an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy at Fordham University School of Law.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"aishling-fitzpatrick","email":"afitzpatrick@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fitzpatrick","nick_name":"Aishling","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Aishling","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":722,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2020-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Shachi","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAishling Fitzpatrick is a trial-focused litigator in the New York Office and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Aishling practices in the area of complex commercial litigation and has represented and advised clients in both federal and state courts and across a wide range of industries, including financial services, technology, real estate, and healthcare. Aishling also maintains an active pro bono practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAishling is currently an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy at Fordham University School of Law.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-05T18:27:32.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-05T18:27:32.000Z","searchable_text":"Fitzpatrick{{ FIELD }}Aishling Fitzpatrick is a trial-focused litigator in the New York Office and is a member of the firm’s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Aishling practices in the area of complex commercial litigation and has represented and advised clients in both federal and state courts and across a wide range of industries, including financial services, technology, real estate, and healthcare. Aishling also maintains an active pro bono practice.\nAishling is currently an Adjunct Professor of Trial Advocacy at Fordham University School of Law. Associate New York University New York University School of Law Fordham University Fordham University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York","searchable_name":"Aishling Shachi Fitzpatrick","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}