{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"2","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"M","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":443976,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6915,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Majerus is a Partner in the International Trade Team of King \u0026amp; Spalding. His practice covers trade remedies, trade policy and negotiations, trade agreement enforcement, import compliance, supply chains, and government procurement. \u0026nbsp;He has particular experience in the steel, aluminum, automotive, agricultural, and energy industries.\u0026nbsp; He recently performed the functions of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance\u0026nbsp;at the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for over a year, serving as the decisionmaker for every AD/CVD duty imposed by the U.S.\u0026nbsp; He also was the Senior Policy Advisor for Supply Chains at the White House National Economic Council under President Joe Biden, where he played a central role in U.S. industrial strategy.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Ryan has been regularly quoted and consulted by major media outlets, including Reuters, Bloomberg, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Barron\u0026rsquo;s, the Associated Press, AFP, the Detroit Free Press, Pitchbook, Agripulse, and Law360.\u0026nbsp; He has also made TV and radio appearances on the BBC, Street Signs Asia, and Bloomberg Radio.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his 4 years in political roles at Commerce and the White House, Ryan had a decade-long legal career in the federal government, serving as the Senior Counsel for Appellate And Supreme Court Litigation at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (\u0026ldquo;USDA\u0026rdquo;); as Assistant General Counsel at the Office of the USTR under the first Trump Administration, where he litigated several disputes before the WTO involving U.S. trade remedies and government subsidies and was a lead on agriculture trade policy. He also was a trial attorney in the Civil Division of the DOJ, where he represented Commerce as lead counsel in dozens of trade remedies cases before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and defended numerous agencies in government contracts and bid protest litigation before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Washington, D.C. and New York.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ryan-majerus","email":"rmajerus@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;manufacturing, technology, energy, consumer, and private equity clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the U.S. Administration\u0026rsquo;s trade and tariff policies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egovernment procurement, construction, contractual, and M\u0026amp;A issues\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to international trade, national security, and supply chain resiliency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturing clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on trade remedy investigations assessments and enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3314}]},"expertise":[{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1147,"guid":"1147.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":116,"guid":"116.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1330,"guid":"1330.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1689,"guid":"1689.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Majerus","nick_name":"Ryan","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Chief Judge McCalla, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee","years_held":"2010 - 2011"}],"first_name":"Ryan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2010-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recipient of the Department of Commerce gold medal for extraordinary efforts in the renegotiation of Section 232 agreements with the EU, UK, and Japan; and in the negotiation of new suspension agreements on a key agricultural product","detail":"Department of Commerce"},{"title":"Recipient of Harry S. Truman Scholarship","detail":"2006"}],"linked_in_url":"www.linkedin.com/in/ryan-majerus-bb114615","seodescription":"Ryan Majerus is a Partner in the International Trade Team of King \u0026 Spalding. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Majerus is a Partner in the International Trade Team of King \u0026amp; Spalding. His practice covers trade remedies, trade policy and negotiations, trade agreement enforcement, import compliance, supply chains, and government procurement. \u0026nbsp;He has particular experience in the steel, aluminum, automotive, agricultural, and energy industries.\u0026nbsp; He recently performed the functions of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance\u0026nbsp;at the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for over a year, serving as the decisionmaker for every AD/CVD duty imposed by the U.S.\u0026nbsp; He also was the Senior Policy Advisor for Supply Chains at the White House National Economic Council under President Joe Biden, where he played a central role in U.S. industrial strategy.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Ryan has been regularly quoted and consulted by major media outlets, including Reuters, Bloomberg, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Barron\u0026rsquo;s, the Associated Press, AFP, the Detroit Free Press, Pitchbook, Agripulse, and Law360.\u0026nbsp; He has also made TV and radio appearances on the BBC, Street Signs Asia, and Bloomberg Radio.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his 4 years in political roles at Commerce and the White House, Ryan had a decade-long legal career in the federal government, serving as the Senior Counsel for Appellate And Supreme Court Litigation at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (\u0026ldquo;USDA\u0026rdquo;); as Assistant General Counsel at the Office of the USTR under the first Trump Administration, where he litigated several disputes before the WTO involving U.S. trade remedies and government subsidies and was a lead on agriculture trade policy. He also was a trial attorney in the Civil Division of the DOJ, where he represented Commerce as lead counsel in dozens of trade remedies cases before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and defended numerous agencies in government contracts and bid protest litigation before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Washington, D.C. and New York.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;manufacturing, technology, energy, consumer, and private equity clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the U.S. Administration\u0026rsquo;s trade and tariff policies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egovernment procurement, construction, contractual, and M\u0026amp;A issues\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to international trade, national security, and supply chain resiliency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturing clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on trade remedy investigations assessments and enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recipient of the Department of Commerce gold medal for extraordinary efforts in the renegotiation of Section 232 agreements with the EU, UK, and Japan; and in the negotiation of new suspension agreements on a key agricultural product","detail":"Department of Commerce"},{"title":"Recipient of Harry S. Truman Scholarship","detail":"2006"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12430}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:15.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:15.000Z","searchable_text":"Majerus{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recipient of the Department of Commerce gold medal for extraordinary efforts in the renegotiation of Section 232 agreements with the EU, UK, and Japan; and in the negotiation of new suspension agreements on a key agricultural product\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Department of Commerce\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recipient of Harry S. Truman Scholarship\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2006\"}{{ FIELD }}Advised manufacturing, technology, energy, consumer, and private equity clients on the U.S. Administration’s trade and tariff policies.{{ FIELD }}Advised clients on government procurement, construction, contractual, and M\u0026amp;A issues related to international trade, national security, and supply chain resiliency.{{ FIELD }}Advised manufacturing clients on trade remedy investigations assessments and enforcement.{{ FIELD }}Ryan Majerus is a Partner in the International Trade Team of King \u0026amp; Spalding. His practice covers trade remedies, trade policy and negotiations, trade agreement enforcement, import compliance, supply chains, and government procurement.  He has particular experience in the steel, aluminum, automotive, agricultural, and energy industries.  He recently performed the functions of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance at the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for over a year, serving as the decisionmaker for every AD/CVD duty imposed by the U.S.  He also was the Senior Policy Advisor for Supply Chains at the White House National Economic Council under President Joe Biden, where he played a central role in U.S. industrial strategy.  Ryan has been regularly quoted and consulted by major media outlets, including Reuters, Bloomberg, the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, the Associated Press, AFP, the Detroit Free Press, Pitchbook, Agripulse, and Law360.  He has also made TV and radio appearances on the BBC, Street Signs Asia, and Bloomberg Radio.\nPrior to his 4 years in political roles at Commerce and the White House, Ryan had a decade-long legal career in the federal government, serving as the Senior Counsel for Appellate And Supreme Court Litigation at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”); as Assistant General Counsel at the Office of the USTR under the first Trump Administration, where he litigated several disputes before the WTO involving U.S. trade remedies and government subsidies and was a lead on agriculture trade policy. He also was a trial attorney in the Civil Division of the DOJ, where he represented Commerce as lead counsel in dozens of trade remedies cases before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and defended numerous agencies in government contracts and bid protest litigation before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and Federal Circuit.\nAdmitted in Washington, D.C. and New York.  Ryan Majerus lawyer Partner Recipient of the Department of Commerce gold medal for extraordinary efforts in the renegotiation of Section 232 agreements with the EU, UK, and Japan; and in the negotiation of new suspension agreements on a key agricultural product Department of Commerce Recipient of Harry S. Truman Scholarship 2006 Georgetown University  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center District of Columbia New York Washington International Trade Association Committee to Enforce the U.S. Trade Laws Editor-in-Chief of the Georgetown Journal of International Law Law Clerk, Chief Judge McCalla, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Advised manufacturing, technology, energy, consumer, and private equity clients on the U.S. Administration’s trade and tariff policies. Advised clients on government procurement, construction, contractual, and M\u0026amp;A issues related to international trade, national security, and supply chain resiliency. Advised manufacturing clients on trade remedy investigations assessments and enforcement.","searchable_name":"Ryan Majerus","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444226,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3179,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Mattern\u0026nbsp;is an experienced trial and appellate lawyer who represents technology, media, and entertainment companies in complex litigation and intellectual property matters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has substantial experience defending technology platforms and other companies in suits related to user content, including in copyright litigation, matters involving Section 230, the DMCA, and trademark and trade secret claims.\u0026nbsp; David has also litigated\u0026nbsp;consumer class actions, securities cases,\u0026nbsp;and constitutional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding, David was a law clerk to then-Chief Judge R. Guy Cole (Sixth Circuit). He received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a James Kent Scholar.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has represented clients at trial and appeal in courts across the country. David has particular expertise in copyright law and platform defenses, including representing platforms in copyright litigation and\u0026nbsp;rate court disputes, and in defending platforms in suits related to user content and content moderation under the DMCA and Section 230.\u0026nbsp;His experience extends to a wide range of subject areas, including False Claims Act litigation,\u0026nbsp;product liability litigation, professional liability litigation, and many other types of business litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes a significant amount of time to pro bono civil rights litigation. Recent successful representations include obtaining reversal of a grant of qualified immunity to prison officials in a suit brought under Section 1983 in a case he argued in the Ninth Circuit, and in obtaining a reversal of a grant of summary judgment to prison officials on exhaustion under the PLRA in a case he argued in the Seventh Circuit.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-mattern","email":"dmattern@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eTikTok \u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which personal injuries and school districts plaintiffs allege harms arising from adolescent use of social media and entertainment platforms, including in the Social Media MDL pending in N.D. Cal. and JCCP pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. Runner-up for Litigator of the Week for obtaining dismissal of school district suits in the JCCP proceeding.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to \u003cstrong\u003eActivision Blizzard\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with nationwide lawsuits alleging a variety of harms arising from the purported addiction to video games.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead Counsel to the \u003cstrong\u003eRadio Music License Committee \u003c/strong\u003ein a series of rate-setting proceedings involving the performing rights\u0026rsquo; organizations ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to \u003cstrong\u003eGoogle/YouTube\u003c/strong\u003e in a rate-setting proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board to determine the rates non-interactive streaming services pay record labels, including arguing on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eGoogle/YouTube \u003c/strong\u003ein the D.C. Circuit in support of affirming the rate determination\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDowntown v. Peloton\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2019).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represents Peloton Interactive, Inc. in suit brought by music publishers in SDNY\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhonorecords III\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2017).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented Google before the Copyright Royalty Board in a proceeding to set the royalty rates paid to publishers for interactive streaming.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePandora v. BMI\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2015).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eMember of trial team representing Pandora against Broadcast Music, Inc. in rate court proceeding under antitrust consent decree to determine public performance royalties for Pandora\u0026rsquo;s internet radio service.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mattern","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Chief Judge R. Guy Cole, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","years_held":"2017 - 2018"}],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"James Kent Scholar","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"P.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Mattern\u0026nbsp;is an experienced trial and appellate lawyer who represents technology, media, and entertainment companies in complex litigation and intellectual property matters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has substantial experience defending technology platforms and other companies in suits related to user content, including in copyright litigation, matters involving Section 230, the DMCA, and trademark and trade secret claims.\u0026nbsp; David has also litigated\u0026nbsp;consumer class actions, securities cases,\u0026nbsp;and constitutional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding, David was a law clerk to then-Chief Judge R. Guy Cole (Sixth Circuit). He received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a James Kent Scholar.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid has represented clients at trial and appeal in courts across the country. David has particular expertise in copyright law and platform defenses, including representing platforms in copyright litigation and\u0026nbsp;rate court disputes, and in defending platforms in suits related to user content and content moderation under the DMCA and Section 230.\u0026nbsp;His experience extends to a wide range of subject areas, including False Claims Act litigation,\u0026nbsp;product liability litigation, professional liability litigation, and many other types of business litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes a significant amount of time to pro bono civil rights litigation. Recent successful representations include obtaining reversal of a grant of qualified immunity to prison officials in a suit brought under Section 1983 in a case he argued in the Ninth Circuit, and in obtaining a reversal of a grant of summary judgment to prison officials on exhaustion under the PLRA in a case he argued in the Seventh Circuit.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eTikTok \u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which personal injuries and school districts plaintiffs allege harms arising from adolescent use of social media and entertainment platforms, including in the Social Media MDL pending in N.D. Cal. and JCCP pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. Runner-up for Litigator of the Week for obtaining dismissal of school district suits in the JCCP proceeding.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to \u003cstrong\u003eActivision Blizzard\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with nationwide lawsuits alleging a variety of harms arising from the purported addiction to video games.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead Counsel to the \u003cstrong\u003eRadio Music License Committee \u003c/strong\u003ein a series of rate-setting proceedings involving the performing rights\u0026rsquo; organizations ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to \u003cstrong\u003eGoogle/YouTube\u003c/strong\u003e in a rate-setting proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board to determine the rates non-interactive streaming services pay record labels, including arguing on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003eGoogle/YouTube \u003c/strong\u003ein the D.C. Circuit in support of affirming the rate determination\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDowntown v. Peloton\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2019).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represents Peloton Interactive, Inc. in suit brought by music publishers in SDNY\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhonorecords III\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2017).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented Google before the Copyright Royalty Board in a proceeding to set the royalty rates paid to publishers for interactive streaming.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003ePandora v. BMI\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2015).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eMember of trial team representing Pandora against Broadcast Music, Inc. in rate court proceeding under antitrust consent decree to determine public performance royalties for Pandora\u0026rsquo;s internet radio service.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9106}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-12T21:52:12.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-12T21:52:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Mattern{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which personal injuries and school districts plaintiffs allege harms arising from adolescent use of social media and entertainment platforms, including in the Social Media MDL pending in N.D. Cal. and JCCP pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. Runner-up for Litigator of the Week for obtaining dismissal of school district suits in the JCCP proceeding.{{ FIELD }}Counsel to Activision Blizzard in connection with nationwide lawsuits alleging a variety of harms arising from the purported addiction to video games.{{ FIELD }}Co-lead Counsel to the Radio Music License Committee in a series of rate-setting proceedings involving the performing rights’ organizations ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC{{ FIELD }}Counsel to Google/YouTube in a rate-setting proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board to determine the rates non-interactive streaming services pay record labels, including arguing on behalf of Google/YouTube in the D.C. Circuit in support of affirming the rate determination{{ FIELD }}Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology.{{ FIELD }}Downtown v. Peloton (2019). Represents Peloton Interactive, Inc. in suit brought by music publishers in SDNY{{ FIELD }}Phonorecords III (2017). Represented Google before the Copyright Royalty Board in a proceeding to set the royalty rates paid to publishers for interactive streaming.{{ FIELD }}Pandora v. BMI (2015). Member of trial team representing Pandora against Broadcast Music, Inc. in rate court proceeding under antitrust consent decree to determine public performance royalties for Pandora’s internet radio service.{{ FIELD }}David Mattern is an experienced trial and appellate lawyer who represents technology, media, and entertainment companies in complex litigation and intellectual property matters.  \nDavid has substantial experience defending technology platforms and other companies in suits related to user content, including in copyright litigation, matters involving Section 230, the DMCA, and trademark and trade secret claims.  David has also litigated consumer class actions, securities cases, and constitutional matters.\nBefore rejoining King \u0026amp; Spalding, David was a law clerk to then-Chief Judge R. Guy Cole (Sixth Circuit). He received his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a James Kent Scholar. \nDavid has represented clients at trial and appeal in courts across the country. David has particular expertise in copyright law and platform defenses, including representing platforms in copyright litigation and rate court disputes, and in defending platforms in suits related to user content and content moderation under the DMCA and Section 230. His experience extends to a wide range of subject areas, including False Claims Act litigation, product liability litigation, professional liability litigation, and many other types of business litigation.\nDavid devotes a significant amount of time to pro bono civil rights litigation. Recent successful representations include obtaining reversal of a grant of qualified immunity to prison officials in a suit brought under Section 1983 in a case he argued in the Ninth Circuit, and in obtaining a reversal of a grant of summary judgment to prison officials on exhaustion under the PLRA in a case he argued in the Seventh Circuit.  Partner Case Western Reserve University Case Western Reserve University School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia New York Judicial Clerk, Chief Judge R. Guy Cole, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Co-Lead Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which personal injuries and school districts plaintiffs allege harms arising from adolescent use of social media and entertainment platforms, including in the Social Media MDL pending in N.D. Cal. and JCCP pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. Runner-up for Litigator of the Week for obtaining dismissal of school district suits in the JCCP proceeding. Counsel to Activision Blizzard in connection with nationwide lawsuits alleging a variety of harms arising from the purported addiction to video games. Co-lead Counsel to the Radio Music License Committee in a series of rate-setting proceedings involving the performing rights’ organizations ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC Counsel to Google/YouTube in a rate-setting proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board to determine the rates non-interactive streaming services pay record labels, including arguing on behalf of Google/YouTube in the D.C. Circuit in support of affirming the rate determination Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Downtown v. Peloton (2019). Represents Peloton Interactive, Inc. in suit brought by music publishers in SDNY Phonorecords III (2017). Represented Google before the Copyright Royalty Board in a proceeding to set the royalty rates paid to publishers for interactive streaming. Pandora v. BMI (2015). Member of trial team representing Pandora against Broadcast Music, Inc. in rate court proceeding under antitrust consent decree to determine public performance royalties for Pandora’s internet radio service.","searchable_name":"David P. Mattern","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":437140,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7216,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatthew D. McGill is a leader in arbitral award and judgment enforcement and an accomplished appellate advocate who handles civil litigation appeals in the Supreme Court of the United States and courts of appeals around the country. Over the last 20+ years, Matt has argued five cases before the Supreme Court of the United States and participated in many more, including several high-profile triumphs over foreign sovereigns.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA three-time \u0026ldquo;Litigator of the Week\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003e(The AmLaw Litigation Daily\u003c/em\u003e), Matt is consistently ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA in Nationwide Appellate Law\u003c/em\u003e (2007-2025) and has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e as a 2020 \u0026ldquo;Litigation Trailblazer\u0026rdquo; for his pioneering work enforcing judgments against foreign sovereigns. Most recently, Matthew has been named to \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;500 Leading Litigators in America\u0026rdquo; guide (2024-2025) and was listed as a \u0026ldquo;Leading Global Litigator\u0026rdquo; for 2025.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong his many achievements, in 2020, Matthew successfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Previously, he successfully resolved NML Capital\u0026rsquo;s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the \u003cem\u003eFinancial Times \u003c/em\u003ecalled \u0026ldquo;the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.\u0026rdquo; His current case load includes public enforcement matters against the governments of Argentina, India, Iran, Spain, and Venezuela.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his arbitral award enforcement and appellate practice, Matthew is highly regarded for his work at the intersection of sport and gaming. He is featured in the 2024 edition of \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Gaming Law and, for his work toward legalizing sports wagering and confining the Wire Act to its intended scope, Matthew has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e as a 2019 Sports Law \u0026ldquo;MVP\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;2020 Sports \u0026amp; Entertainment Trailblazer\u0026rdquo; by The \u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior entering private practice, Matthew served as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He clerked for the Hon. Joseph M. McLaughlin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"matthew-mcgill","email":"matthew.mcgill@kslaw.com ","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eInternational Disputes\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved NML Capital\u0026rsquo;s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFinancial Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;called \u0026ldquo;the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained $1 billion judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran for victims of the 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeading U.S. enforcement against the Kingdom of Spain of several arbitral awards redressing violations of the Energy Charter Treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeading global enforcement of arbitral awards against the Government of India and the Republic of Argentina.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eSupreme Court\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCC/Devas v. Antrix Corp.\u003c/em\u003e (2025) \u0026ndash; Arguing this case before the Supreme Court, Matt persuaded the Court to reject a lower court ruling that had found no jurisdiction to hear an enforcement action against one of India\u0026rsquo;s state-owed entities.\u0026nbsp; Matt\u0026rsquo;s 9-0 victory safeguarded the ability of arbitral award holders to bring enforcement actions in the United States against foreign sovereigns and their state-owned entities. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOpati v. Republic of Sudan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020) \u0026ndash; Matt successfully argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of victims of the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and secured a ruling that \u0026ldquo;unanimously reinstated as much as $4.3 billion in punitive damages awarded against Sudan\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eNew York Times\u003c/em\u003e) setting the stage for the resolution of the Embassy bombing claims and the United States\u0026rsquo; delisting of Sudan as a state-sponsor of terrorism.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePuerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016) \u0026ndash; Arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of creditors that found themselves on the leading edge of Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s debt crisis, Matthew successfully defended an injunction invalidating Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s emergency municipal bankruptcy legislation. The ruling protected bondholders against the \u0026ldquo;chance that the territory could write its own bankruptcy plan\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWall Street Journal\u003c/em\u003e) and ensured that Congress would retain control over Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s fiscal rescue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBank Markazi v. Peterson\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016) \u0026ndash; In this important separation-of-powers case, Matthew represented victims of the 1983 Beirut Marine Corps Barracks Bombing who hold judgments against Iran. Ruling in favor of the Beirut Marines, the Supreme Court rejected arguments from Iran\u0026rsquo;s central bank that Congress had impermissibly invaded the province of the Judicial Branch by authorizing victims of terrorism to seize certain central bank assets. The ruling allowed nearly $2 billion to be distributed to Iran\u0026rsquo;s victims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArgentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014) \u0026ndash; The Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s decision in this case confirmed the availability of broad discovery to enforce judgments against foreign sovereigns, empowering creditors to seek information concerning the debtor nation\u0026rsquo;s assets anywhere in the world.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eSports and Gaming\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the effort of the Governor of New Jersey to legalize sports wagering in the State, culminating in the Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;historic decision\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eSports Illustrated\u003c/em\u003e) in \u003cem\u003eMurphy v. NCAA\u003c/em\u003e that struck down the federal law that had prohibited states other than Nevada from legalizing sports betting. By establishing that the federal government has no power to \u0026ldquo;dictate what a state legislature may and may not do,\u0026rdquo; this \u0026ldquo;landmark ruling\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eUSA Today\u003c/em\u003e) safeguards the power of States to govern themselves and cleared the path for States across the country to legalize sports wagering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the technology provider for the internet-based operations of the New Hampshire Lottery, and secured a judgment that the Wire Act covered only sports betting, and successfully defended that judgment on appeal. The ruling safeguarded \u0026ldquo;the entire online gambling industry as well as multi-state lotteries such as Powerball\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eAm Law Litigation Daily\u003c/em\u003e) from an arbitrary change in government policy.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":131,"guid":"131.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1166,"guid":"1166.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"McGill","nick_name":"Matt","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","years_held":"2003 - 2004"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Joseph M. McLaughlin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","years_held":"2000 - 2002"}],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1904,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2000-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked for Nationwide Appellate Law","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners, 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized for Work in Gaming Law","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2024"},{"title":"Litigation and Sports Trailblazer","detail":"The National Law Journal, 2020"},{"title":"Sports Law MVP","detail":"Law360, 2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-mcgill-7737564/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatthew D. McGill is a leader in arbitral award and judgment enforcement and an accomplished appellate advocate who handles civil litigation appeals in the Supreme Court of the United States and courts of appeals around the country. Over the last 20+ years, Matt has argued five cases before the Supreme Court of the United States and participated in many more, including several high-profile triumphs over foreign sovereigns.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA three-time \u0026ldquo;Litigator of the Week\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003e(The AmLaw Litigation Daily\u003c/em\u003e), Matt is consistently ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA in Nationwide Appellate Law\u003c/em\u003e (2007-2025) and has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e as a 2020 \u0026ldquo;Litigation Trailblazer\u0026rdquo; for his pioneering work enforcing judgments against foreign sovereigns. Most recently, Matthew has been named to \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;500 Leading Litigators in America\u0026rdquo; guide (2024-2025) and was listed as a \u0026ldquo;Leading Global Litigator\u0026rdquo; for 2025.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong his many achievements, in 2020, Matthew successfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Previously, he successfully resolved NML Capital\u0026rsquo;s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the \u003cem\u003eFinancial Times \u003c/em\u003ecalled \u0026ldquo;the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.\u0026rdquo; His current case load includes public enforcement matters against the governments of Argentina, India, Iran, Spain, and Venezuela.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his arbitral award enforcement and appellate practice, Matthew is highly regarded for his work at the intersection of sport and gaming. He is featured in the 2024 edition of \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Gaming Law and, for his work toward legalizing sports wagering and confining the Wire Act to its intended scope, Matthew has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e as a 2019 Sports Law \u0026ldquo;MVP\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;2020 Sports \u0026amp; Entertainment Trailblazer\u0026rdquo; by The \u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior entering private practice, Matthew served as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He clerked for the Hon. Joseph M. McLaughlin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eInternational Disputes\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved NML Capital\u0026rsquo;s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFinancial Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;called \u0026ldquo;the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained $1 billion judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran for victims of the 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeading U.S. enforcement against the Kingdom of Spain of several arbitral awards redressing violations of the Energy Charter Treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLeading global enforcement of arbitral awards against the Government of India and the Republic of Argentina.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eSupreme Court\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCC/Devas v. Antrix Corp.\u003c/em\u003e (2025) \u0026ndash; Arguing this case before the Supreme Court, Matt persuaded the Court to reject a lower court ruling that had found no jurisdiction to hear an enforcement action against one of India\u0026rsquo;s state-owed entities.\u0026nbsp; Matt\u0026rsquo;s 9-0 victory safeguarded the ability of arbitral award holders to bring enforcement actions in the United States against foreign sovereigns and their state-owned entities. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOpati v. Republic of Sudan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020) \u0026ndash; Matt successfully argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of victims of the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and secured a ruling that \u0026ldquo;unanimously reinstated as much as $4.3 billion in punitive damages awarded against Sudan\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eNew York Times\u003c/em\u003e) setting the stage for the resolution of the Embassy bombing claims and the United States\u0026rsquo; delisting of Sudan as a state-sponsor of terrorism.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePuerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016) \u0026ndash; Arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of creditors that found themselves on the leading edge of Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s debt crisis, Matthew successfully defended an injunction invalidating Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s emergency municipal bankruptcy legislation. The ruling protected bondholders against the \u0026ldquo;chance that the territory could write its own bankruptcy plan\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWall Street Journal\u003c/em\u003e) and ensured that Congress would retain control over Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s fiscal rescue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBank Markazi v. Peterson\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016) \u0026ndash; In this important separation-of-powers case, Matthew represented victims of the 1983 Beirut Marine Corps Barracks Bombing who hold judgments against Iran. Ruling in favor of the Beirut Marines, the Supreme Court rejected arguments from Iran\u0026rsquo;s central bank that Congress had impermissibly invaded the province of the Judicial Branch by authorizing victims of terrorism to seize certain central bank assets. The ruling allowed nearly $2 billion to be distributed to Iran\u0026rsquo;s victims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eArgentina v. NML Capital, Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014) \u0026ndash; The Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s decision in this case confirmed the availability of broad discovery to enforce judgments against foreign sovereigns, empowering creditors to seek information concerning the debtor nation\u0026rsquo;s assets anywhere in the world.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cu\u003eSports and Gaming\u003c/u\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the effort of the Governor of New Jersey to legalize sports wagering in the State, culminating in the Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;historic decision\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eSports Illustrated\u003c/em\u003e) in \u003cem\u003eMurphy v. NCAA\u003c/em\u003e that struck down the federal law that had prohibited states other than Nevada from legalizing sports betting. By establishing that the federal government has no power to \u0026ldquo;dictate what a state legislature may and may not do,\u0026rdquo; this \u0026ldquo;landmark ruling\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eUSA Today\u003c/em\u003e) safeguards the power of States to govern themselves and cleared the path for States across the country to legalize sports wagering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the technology provider for the internet-based operations of the New Hampshire Lottery, and secured a judgment that the Wire Act covered only sports betting, and successfully defended that judgment on appeal. The ruling safeguarded \u0026ldquo;the entire online gambling industry as well as multi-state lotteries such as Powerball\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eAm Law Litigation Daily\u003c/em\u003e) from an arbitrary change in government policy.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked for Nationwide Appellate Law","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners, 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized for Work in Gaming Law","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2024"},{"title":"Litigation and Sports Trailblazer","detail":"The National Law Journal, 2020"},{"title":"Sports Law MVP","detail":"Law360, 2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12931}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-11T18:32:36.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-11T18:32:36.000Z","searchable_text":"McGill{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked for Nationwide Appellate Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers \u0026amp; Partners, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Work in Gaming Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation and Sports Trailblazer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The National Law Journal, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Sports Law MVP\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}International Disputes{{ FIELD }}Successfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolved NML Capital’s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the Financial Times called “the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.{{ FIELD }}Obtained $1 billion judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran for victims of the 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole.{{ FIELD }}Leading U.S. enforcement against the Kingdom of Spain of several arbitral awards redressing violations of the Energy Charter Treaty.{{ FIELD }}Leading global enforcement of arbitral awards against the Government of India and the Republic of Argentina.{{ FIELD }}Supreme Court{{ FIELD }}CC/Devas v. Antrix Corp. (2025) – Arguing this case before the Supreme Court, Matt persuaded the Court to reject a lower court ruling that had found no jurisdiction to hear an enforcement action against one of India’s state-owed entities.  Matt’s 9-0 victory safeguarded the ability of arbitral award holders to bring enforcement actions in the United States against foreign sovereigns and their state-owned entities.  {{ FIELD }}Opati v. Republic of Sudan (2020) – Matt successfully argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of victims of the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and secured a ruling that “unanimously reinstated as much as $4.3 billion in punitive damages awarded against Sudan” (New York Times) setting the stage for the resolution of the Embassy bombing claims and the United States’ delisting of Sudan as a state-sponsor of terrorism.{{ FIELD }}Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust (2016) – Arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of creditors that found themselves on the leading edge of Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, Matthew successfully defended an injunction invalidating Puerto Rico’s emergency municipal bankruptcy legislation. The ruling protected bondholders against the “chance that the territory could write its own bankruptcy plan” (Wall Street Journal) and ensured that Congress would retain control over Puerto Rico’s fiscal rescue.{{ FIELD }}Bank Markazi v. Peterson (2016) – In this important separation-of-powers case, Matthew represented victims of the 1983 Beirut Marine Corps Barracks Bombing who hold judgments against Iran. Ruling in favor of the Beirut Marines, the Supreme Court rejected arguments from Iran’s central bank that Congress had impermissibly invaded the province of the Judicial Branch by authorizing victims of terrorism to seize certain central bank assets. The ruling allowed nearly $2 billion to be distributed to Iran’s victims.{{ FIELD }}Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (2014) – The Supreme Court’s decision in this case confirmed the availability of broad discovery to enforce judgments against foreign sovereigns, empowering creditors to seek information concerning the debtor nation’s assets anywhere in the world.{{ FIELD }}Sports and Gaming{{ FIELD }}Led the effort of the Governor of New Jersey to legalize sports wagering in the State, culminating in the Supreme Court’s “historic decision” (Sports Illustrated) in Murphy v. NCAA that struck down the federal law that had prohibited states other than Nevada from legalizing sports betting. By establishing that the federal government has no power to “dictate what a state legislature may and may not do,” this “landmark ruling” (USA Today) safeguards the power of States to govern themselves and cleared the path for States across the country to legalize sports wagering.{{ FIELD }}Represented the technology provider for the internet-based operations of the New Hampshire Lottery, and secured a judgment that the Wire Act covered only sports betting, and successfully defended that judgment on appeal. The ruling safeguarded “the entire online gambling industry as well as multi-state lotteries such as Powerball” (Am Law Litigation Daily) from an arbitrary change in government policy.{{ FIELD }}Matthew D. McGill is a leader in arbitral award and judgment enforcement and an accomplished appellate advocate who handles civil litigation appeals in the Supreme Court of the United States and courts of appeals around the country. Over the last 20+ years, Matt has argued five cases before the Supreme Court of the United States and participated in many more, including several high-profile triumphs over foreign sovereigns.\nA three-time “Litigator of the Week” (The AmLaw Litigation Daily), Matt is consistently ranked by Chambers USA in Nationwide Appellate Law (2007-2025) and has been recognized by The National Law Journal as a 2020 “Litigation Trailblazer” for his pioneering work enforcing judgments against foreign sovereigns. Most recently, Matthew has been named to Lawdragon’s “500 Leading Litigators in America” guide (2024-2025) and was listed as a “Leading Global Litigator” for 2025.\nAmong his many achievements, in 2020, Matthew successfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Previously, he successfully resolved NML Capital’s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the Financial Times called “the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring.” His current case load includes public enforcement matters against the governments of Argentina, India, Iran, Spain, and Venezuela.\nIn addition to his arbitral award enforcement and appellate practice, Matthew is highly regarded for his work at the intersection of sport and gaming. He is featured in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America for Gaming Law and, for his work toward legalizing sports wagering and confining the Wire Act to its intended scope, Matthew has been recognized by Law360 as a 2019 Sports Law “MVP” and “2020 Sports \u0026amp; Entertainment Trailblazer” by The National Law Journal.\nPrior entering private practice, Matthew served as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice. He clerked for the Hon. Joseph M. McLaughlin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Partner Ranked for Nationwide Appellate Law Chambers \u0026amp; Partners, 2025 500 Leading Litigators in America Lawdragon, 2025 Recognized for Work in Gaming Law Best Lawyers in America, 2024 Litigation and Sports Trailblazer The National Law Journal, 2020 Sports Law MVP Law360, 2019 Dartmouth College  Stanford University Stanford Law School District of Columbia New York Law Clerk, Hon. John G. Roberts, Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Law Clerk, Hon. Joseph M. McLaughlin, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit International Disputes Successfully negotiated a $335 million resolution of terrorism claims against the Republic of Sudan arising from the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Successfully resolved NML Capital’s multi-billion dollar claims against the Republic of Argentina after what the Financial Times called “the trial of the century in sovereign debt restructuring. Obtained $1 billion judgment against the Islamic Republic of Iran for victims of the 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. Leading U.S. enforcement against the Kingdom of Spain of several arbitral awards redressing violations of the Energy Charter Treaty. Leading global enforcement of arbitral awards against the Government of India and the Republic of Argentina. Supreme Court CC/Devas v. Antrix Corp. (2025) – Arguing this case before the Supreme Court, Matt persuaded the Court to reject a lower court ruling that had found no jurisdiction to hear an enforcement action against one of India’s state-owed entities.  Matt’s 9-0 victory safeguarded the ability of arbitral award holders to bring enforcement actions in the United States against foreign sovereigns and their state-owned entities.   Opati v. Republic of Sudan (2020) – Matt successfully argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of victims of the 1998 bombings of the U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and secured a ruling that “unanimously reinstated as much as $4.3 billion in punitive damages awarded against Sudan” (New York Times) setting the stage for the resolution of the Embassy bombing claims and the United States’ delisting of Sudan as a state-sponsor of terrorism. Puerto Rico v. Franklin California Tax-Free Trust (2016) – Arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of creditors that found themselves on the leading edge of Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, Matthew successfully defended an injunction invalidating Puerto Rico’s emergency municipal bankruptcy legislation. The ruling protected bondholders against the “chance that the territory could write its own bankruptcy plan” (Wall Street Journal) and ensured that Congress would retain control over Puerto Rico’s fiscal rescue. Bank Markazi v. Peterson (2016) – In this important separation-of-powers case, Matthew represented victims of the 1983 Beirut Marine Corps Barracks Bombing who hold judgments against Iran. Ruling in favor of the Beirut Marines, the Supreme Court rejected arguments from Iran’s central bank that Congress had impermissibly invaded the province of the Judicial Branch by authorizing victims of terrorism to seize certain central bank assets. The ruling allowed nearly $2 billion to be distributed to Iran’s victims. Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd. (2014) – The Supreme Court’s decision in this case confirmed the availability of broad discovery to enforce judgments against foreign sovereigns, empowering creditors to seek information concerning the debtor nation’s assets anywhere in the world. Sports and Gaming Led the effort of the Governor of New Jersey to legalize sports wagering in the State, culminating in the Supreme Court’s “historic decision” (Sports Illustrated) in Murphy v. NCAA that struck down the federal law that had prohibited states other than Nevada from legalizing sports betting. By establishing that the federal government has no power to “dictate what a state legislature may and may not do,” this “landmark ruling” (USA Today) safeguards the power of States to govern themselves and cleared the path for States across the country to legalize sports wagering. Represented the technology provider for the internet-based operations of the New Hampshire Lottery, and secured a judgment that the Wire Act covered only sports betting, and successfully defended that judgment on appeal. The ruling safeguarded “the entire online gambling industry as well as multi-state lotteries such as Powerball” (Am Law Litigation Daily) from an arbitrary change in government policy.","searchable_name":"Matthew D. McGill (Matt)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426536,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4090,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGary Messplay specializes in advising life science companies on regulatory, compliance and transactional matters. A partner in our nationally recognized FDA and Life Sciences practice, Gary has almost 30 years of experience representing large multinational pharmaceutical and medical-device companies, as well as emerging companies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGary advices clients in matters relating to the approval and commercialization of products that are regulated by the Food\u0026nbsp;and Drug Administration and other federal and state agencies.\u0026nbsp; Gary has substantial experience advising clients on all aspects of product approvals; product launches and commercialization including advertising and promotion; leading compliance-related investigations; developing and implementing regulatory and healthcare compliance programs; advising on patient support programs; and managing competitor disputes.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Gary regularly advises clients on matters relating to healthcare fraud and abuse, clinical trials, informed consent, drug safety issues, product liability, recalls, responding to 483s, warning letters and complete response letters, drug and device quality and manufacturing issues, and life cycle management.\u0026nbsp; Gary also represents companies in transactional matters including distribution and purchasing agreements, pharmacy agreements, clinical trial agreements, payor agreements, manufacturing and supply agreements, physician agreements, research agreements and co-promotion agreements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Gary was in-house counsel at Eli Lilly and Company, where he had global legal, regulatory and compliance responsibility for the company's top-selling pharmaceutical product at the time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker on regulatory and compliance matters, Gary has been recognized for multiple years by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers Washington, DC\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gary-messplay","email":"gmessplay@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 703 973 7500","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDeveloped customized, comprehensive healthcare compliance programs for numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and medical device companies.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as outside general counsel to \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003especialty pharmaceutical companies and emerging drug and device companies.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed significant multi-year investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e involving complex data integrity issues related to their bioanalytics laboratory.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e related to product commercialization, including advertising and promotion, First Amendment issues, interactions with payors and responding to FDA enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a significant number of compliance investigations on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies,\u003c/strong\u003e including large multinational investigations, involving off-label promotion, violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and FCPA, whistleblower reports, clinical trial noncompliance, cGMP violations, GLP violations and PDMA/drug sampling.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Board of Directors of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epublicly traded pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with an investigation involving the company's chief executive officer related to suspected violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e on all aspects of compliance with their corporate integrity agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e on drug-approval strategies involving NDAs, product life cycle management, Hatch-Waxman and Orange Book issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea specialty pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in response to a petition filed by a public citizen seeking FDA withdrawal of popular pain medication.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with FDA, OCI, Department of Justice, SEC and congressional investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e related to clinical trial regulatory and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e in developing and implementing specialty pharmacy programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with adverse FDA inspections, including responding to 483s and warning letters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in transactional matters involving clinical trial agreements, CRO agreements, distribution agreements, specialty pharmacy agreements and all types of services agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed numerous regulatory and compliance due diligence teams in \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug, device, tobacco and food transactions.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with competitor disputes, including serving as trial counsel in major Lanham Act litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug, biotechnology, device, food and tobacco companies\u003c/strong\u003e on legislative matters including drafting and commenting on legislation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1193,"guid":"1193.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Messplay","nick_name":"Gary","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Gary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2014, 2015 \u0026 2016"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-messplay-45599b61/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGary Messplay specializes in advising life science companies on regulatory, compliance and transactional matters. A partner in our nationally recognized FDA and Life Sciences practice, Gary has almost 30 years of experience representing large multinational pharmaceutical and medical-device companies, as well as emerging companies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGary advices clients in matters relating to the approval and commercialization of products that are regulated by the Food\u0026nbsp;and Drug Administration and other federal and state agencies.\u0026nbsp; Gary has substantial experience advising clients on all aspects of product approvals; product launches and commercialization including advertising and promotion; leading compliance-related investigations; developing and implementing regulatory and healthcare compliance programs; advising on patient support programs; and managing competitor disputes.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Gary regularly advises clients on matters relating to healthcare fraud and abuse, clinical trials, informed consent, drug safety issues, product liability, recalls, responding to 483s, warning letters and complete response letters, drug and device quality and manufacturing issues, and life cycle management.\u0026nbsp; Gary also represents companies in transactional matters including distribution and purchasing agreements, pharmacy agreements, clinical trial agreements, payor agreements, manufacturing and supply agreements, physician agreements, research agreements and co-promotion agreements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Gary was in-house counsel at Eli Lilly and Company, where he had global legal, regulatory and compliance responsibility for the company's top-selling pharmaceutical product at the time.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker on regulatory and compliance matters, Gary has been recognized for multiple years by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers Washington, DC\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDeveloped customized, comprehensive healthcare compliance programs for numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and medical device companies.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as outside general counsel to \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003especialty pharmaceutical companies and emerging drug and device companies.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed significant multi-year investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e involving complex data integrity issues related to their bioanalytics laboratory.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e related to product commercialization, including advertising and promotion, First Amendment issues, interactions with payors and responding to FDA enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a significant number of compliance investigations on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies,\u003c/strong\u003e including large multinational investigations, involving off-label promotion, violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and FCPA, whistleblower reports, clinical trial noncompliance, cGMP violations, GLP violations and PDMA/drug sampling.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Board of Directors of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epublicly traded pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with an investigation involving the company's chief executive officer related to suspected violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e on all aspects of compliance with their corporate integrity agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e on drug-approval strategies involving NDAs, product life cycle management, Hatch-Waxman and Orange Book issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea specialty pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in response to a petition filed by a public citizen seeking FDA withdrawal of popular pain medication.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with FDA, OCI, Department of Justice, SEC and congressional investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e related to clinical trial regulatory and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e in developing and implementing specialty pharmacy programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with adverse FDA inspections, including responding to 483s and warning letters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in transactional matters involving clinical trial agreements, CRO agreements, distribution agreements, specialty pharmacy agreements and all types of services agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed numerous regulatory and compliance due diligence teams in \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug, device, tobacco and food transactions.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug and device companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with competitor disputes, including serving as trial counsel in major Lanham Act litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003edrug, biotechnology, device, food and tobacco companies\u003c/strong\u003e on legislative matters including drafting and commenting on legislation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2014, 2015 \u0026 2016"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4357}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:54:29.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:54:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Messplay{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2014, 2015 \u0026amp; 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}Developed customized, comprehensive healthcare compliance programs for numerous drug and medical device companies.{{ FIELD }}Served as outside general counsel to specialty pharmaceutical companies and emerging drug and device companies.{{ FIELD }}Led significant multi-year investigation for a large pharmaceutical company involving complex data integrity issues related to their bioanalytics laboratory.{{ FIELD }}Advised numerous drug and device companies related to product commercialization, including advertising and promotion, First Amendment issues, interactions with payors and responding to FDA enforcement.{{ FIELD }}Conducted a significant number of compliance investigations on behalf of drug and device companies, including large multinational investigations, involving off-label promotion, violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and FCPA, whistleblower reports, clinical trial noncompliance, cGMP violations, GLP violations and PDMA/drug sampling.{{ FIELD }}Represented Board of Directors of publicly traded pharmaceutical company in connection with an investigation involving the company's chief executive officer related to suspected violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.{{ FIELD }}Advised drug and device companies on all aspects of compliance with their corporate integrity agreements.{{ FIELD }}Advised numerous pharmaceutical companies on drug-approval strategies involving NDAs, product life cycle management, Hatch-Waxman and Orange Book issues.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a specialty pharmaceutical company in response to a petition filed by a public citizen seeking FDA withdrawal of popular pain medication.{{ FIELD }}Represented drug and device companies in connection with FDA, OCI, Department of Justice, SEC and congressional investigations.{{ FIELD }}Advised drug and device companies related to clinical trial regulatory and compliance issues.{{ FIELD }}Assisted pharmaceutical companies in developing and implementing specialty pharmacy programs.{{ FIELD }}Represented drug and device companies in connection with adverse FDA inspections, including responding to 483s and warning letters.{{ FIELD }}Represented drug and device companies in transactional matters involving clinical trial agreements, CRO agreements, distribution agreements, specialty pharmacy agreements and all types of services agreements.{{ FIELD }}Led numerous regulatory and compliance due diligence teams in drug, device, tobacco and food transactions.{{ FIELD }}Represented drug and device companies in connection with competitor disputes, including serving as trial counsel in major Lanham Act litigation.{{ FIELD }}Advised drug, biotechnology, device, food and tobacco companies on legislative matters including drafting and commenting on legislation.{{ FIELD }}Gary Messplay specializes in advising life science companies on regulatory, compliance and transactional matters. A partner in our nationally recognized FDA and Life Sciences practice, Gary has almost 30 years of experience representing large multinational pharmaceutical and medical-device companies, as well as emerging companies.\nGary advices clients in matters relating to the approval and commercialization of products that are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and other federal and state agencies.  Gary has substantial experience advising clients on all aspects of product approvals; product launches and commercialization including advertising and promotion; leading compliance-related investigations; developing and implementing regulatory and healthcare compliance programs; advising on patient support programs; and managing competitor disputes.  In addition, Gary regularly advises clients on matters relating to healthcare fraud and abuse, clinical trials, informed consent, drug safety issues, product liability, recalls, responding to 483s, warning letters and complete response letters, drug and device quality and manufacturing issues, and life cycle management.  Gary also represents companies in transactional matters including distribution and purchasing agreements, pharmacy agreements, clinical trial agreements, payor agreements, manufacturing and supply agreements, physician agreements, research agreements and co-promotion agreements.\nPreviously, Gary was in-house counsel at Eli Lilly and Company, where he had global legal, regulatory and compliance responsibility for the company's top-selling pharmaceutical product at the time.\nA frequent author and speaker on regulatory and compliance matters, Gary has been recognized for multiple years by Super Lawyers Washington, DC. Partner  Super Lawyers, 2014, 2015 \u0026amp; 2016 District of Columbia Indiana Developed customized, comprehensive healthcare compliance programs for numerous drug and medical device companies. Served as outside general counsel to specialty pharmaceutical companies and emerging drug and device companies. Led significant multi-year investigation for a large pharmaceutical company involving complex data integrity issues related to their bioanalytics laboratory. Advised numerous drug and device companies related to product commercialization, including advertising and promotion, First Amendment issues, interactions with payors and responding to FDA enforcement. Conducted a significant number of compliance investigations on behalf of drug and device companies, including large multinational investigations, involving off-label promotion, violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and FCPA, whistleblower reports, clinical trial noncompliance, cGMP violations, GLP violations and PDMA/drug sampling. Represented Board of Directors of publicly traded pharmaceutical company in connection with an investigation involving the company's chief executive officer related to suspected violations of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Advised drug and device companies on all aspects of compliance with their corporate integrity agreements. Advised numerous pharmaceutical companies on drug-approval strategies involving NDAs, product life cycle management, Hatch-Waxman and Orange Book issues. Successfully represented a specialty pharmaceutical company in response to a petition filed by a public citizen seeking FDA withdrawal of popular pain medication. Represented drug and device companies in connection with FDA, OCI, Department of Justice, SEC and congressional investigations. Advised drug and device companies related to clinical trial regulatory and compliance issues. Assisted pharmaceutical companies in developing and implementing specialty pharmacy programs. Represented drug and device companies in connection with adverse FDA inspections, including responding to 483s and warning letters. Represented drug and device companies in transactional matters involving clinical trial agreements, CRO agreements, distribution agreements, specialty pharmacy agreements and all types of services agreements. Led numerous regulatory and compliance due diligence teams in drug, device, tobacco and food transactions. Represented drug and device companies in connection with competitor disputes, including serving as trial counsel in major Lanham Act litigation. Advised drug, biotechnology, device, food and tobacco companies on legislative matters including drafting and commenting on legislation.","searchable_name":"Gary C. Messplay","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426357,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2817,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAs a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul Mezzina focuses on appeals, critical motions and strategic counseling in connection with complex litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul represents clients in a variety of matters, including those involving the False Claims Act, intellectual property, class actions, medical drugs and devices, antitrust, and professional liability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul has authored briefs in numerous cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals and federal trial courts, and has presented oral argument in the Second, Fourth, Tenth, Eleventh, D.C. and Federal Circuits, as well as multiple state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul is one of few attorneys in the country to have clerked for three U.S. Supreme Court Justices.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"paul-mezzina","email":"pmezzina@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mezzina","nick_name":"Paul","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Justice Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court of the United States","years_held":"2013-2014"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","years_held":"2009-2010"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court of the United States","years_held":"2018 - 2019"}],"first_name":"Paul","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Alessio","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulmezzina/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAs a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul Mezzina focuses on appeals, critical motions and strategic counseling in connection with complex litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul represents clients in a variety of matters, including those involving the False Claims Act, intellectual property, class actions, medical drugs and devices, antitrust, and professional liability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul has authored briefs in numerous cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals and federal trial courts, and has presented oral argument in the Second, Fourth, Tenth, Eleventh, D.C. and Federal Circuits, as well as multiple state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul is one of few attorneys in the country to have clerked for three U.S. Supreme Court Justices.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":70}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:51:47.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:51:47.000Z","searchable_text":"Mezzina{{ FIELD }}As a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul Mezzina focuses on appeals, critical motions and strategic counseling in connection with complex litigation.\nPaul represents clients in a variety of matters, including those involving the False Claims Act, intellectual property, class actions, medical drugs and devices, antitrust, and professional liability.\nPaul has authored briefs in numerous cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals and federal trial courts, and has presented oral argument in the Second, Fourth, Tenth, Eleventh, D.C. and Federal Circuits, as well as multiple state courts.\nPaul is one of few attorneys in the country to have clerked for three U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Partner Harvard University Harvard Law School Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Law Clerk, Justice Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court of the United States Law Clerk, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Law Clerk, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court of the United States","searchable_name":"Paul Alessio Mezzina","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446637,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6485,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren Myers is a trial and appellate litigator who practices in the areas of high-stakes complex commercial litigation. She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad range of industries - including financial services, media and entertainment, real estate, and technology - in complex contract matters, First Amendment cases, and employment disputes, as well as in sensitive government investigations. She also has significant experience challenging government action in state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Myers received her Juris Doctor,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in 2017 from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, where she was elected Order of the Coif and a Notes Editors on the \u003cem\u003eCardozo Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; She received her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan in 2014.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lauren-myers","email":"lmyers@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Myers","nick_name":"Lauren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lauren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2619,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2017-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren Myers is a trial and appellate litigator who practices in the areas of high-stakes complex commercial litigation. She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad range of industries - including financial services, media and entertainment, real estate, and technology - in complex contract matters, First Amendment cases, and employment disputes, as well as in sensitive government investigations. She also has significant experience challenging government action in state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Myers received her Juris Doctor,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in 2017 from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, where she was elected Order of the Coif and a Notes Editors on the \u003cem\u003eCardozo Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; She received her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan in 2014.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13084}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-10T19:55:05.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-10T19:55:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Myers{{ FIELD }}Lauren Myers is a trial and appellate litigator who practices in the areas of high-stakes complex commercial litigation. She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad range of industries - including financial services, media and entertainment, real estate, and technology - in complex contract matters, First Amendment cases, and employment disputes, as well as in sensitive government investigations. She also has significant experience challenging government action in state and federal courts.\nMs. Myers received her Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, in 2017 from Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, where she was elected Order of the Coif and a Notes Editors on the Cardozo Law Review.  She received her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan in 2014.  Senior Associate University of Michigan-Ann Arbor  Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York","searchable_name":"Lauren Myers","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445970,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7221,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJacob Mathew\u0026nbsp;is a litigator who has represented clients in complex, high-stakes disputes across jurisdictions and industries. He has worked on cases involving intricate legal and procedural issues, with a particular focus on federal litigation.\u0026nbsp; He has experience in business and contract disputes, investigations, appeals, and arbitrations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jacob clerked for judges at both the trial and appellate levels, including Judge Michael J. Truncale of the Eastern District of Texas, Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court, and Judge John E. Steele of the Middle District of Florida.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOriginally from India, he lived in Mauritius, Dubai, Singapore, Seattle, and New Orleans, before settling in Dallas. He earned his law degree from SMU, where he held leadership roles in the\u0026nbsp;SMU Law Review Association and the Board of Advocates. While in law school, he also served as a research assistant to Professor Anthony J. Colangelo and as an extern to Magistrate Judge Renee H. Toliver of the Northern District of Texas. Jacob also has an undergraduate degree in classical music.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJacob currently serves as an associate editor for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Advocate\u003c/em\u003e, a publication of the Texas State Bar\u0026rsquo;s litigation section. He remains deeply involved with the Dallas Asian American Bar Association. He also coaches students as an adjunct professor of oral advocacy at SMU.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jacob-mathew","email":"jmathew@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mathew","nick_name":"Jacob","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Michael J. Truncale, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas","years_held":"2021 - 2022"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Nathan L. Hecht, Chief Justice, Texas","years_held":"2023 - 2024"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable John E. Steele, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida","years_held":"2024 - 2025"}],"first_name":"Jacob","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1852,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2021-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"George","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJacob Mathew\u0026nbsp;is a litigator who has represented clients in complex, high-stakes disputes across jurisdictions and industries. He has worked on cases involving intricate legal and procedural issues, with a particular focus on federal litigation.\u0026nbsp; He has experience in business and contract disputes, investigations, appeals, and arbitrations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jacob clerked for judges at both the trial and appellate levels, including Judge Michael J. Truncale of the Eastern District of Texas, Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court, and Judge John E. Steele of the Middle District of Florida.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOriginally from India, he lived in Mauritius, Dubai, Singapore, Seattle, and New Orleans, before settling in Dallas. He earned his law degree from SMU, where he held leadership roles in the\u0026nbsp;SMU Law Review Association and the Board of Advocates. While in law school, he also served as a research assistant to Professor Anthony J. Colangelo and as an extern to Magistrate Judge Renee H. Toliver of the Northern District of Texas. Jacob also has an undergraduate degree in classical music.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJacob currently serves as an associate editor for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Advocate\u003c/em\u003e, a publication of the Texas State Bar\u0026rsquo;s litigation section. He remains deeply involved with the Dallas Asian American Bar Association. He also coaches students as an adjunct professor of oral advocacy at SMU.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13005}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-18T22:04:16.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-18T22:04:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Mathew{{ FIELD }}Jacob Mathew is a litigator who has represented clients in complex, high-stakes disputes across jurisdictions and industries. He has worked on cases involving intricate legal and procedural issues, with a particular focus on federal litigation.  He has experience in business and contract disputes, investigations, appeals, and arbitrations. \nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jacob clerked for judges at both the trial and appellate levels, including Judge Michael J. Truncale of the Eastern District of Texas, Chief Justice Nathan L. Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court, and Judge John E. Steele of the Middle District of Florida.\nOriginally from India, he lived in Mauritius, Dubai, Singapore, Seattle, and New Orleans, before settling in Dallas. He earned his law degree from SMU, where he held leadership roles in the SMU Law Review Association and the Board of Advocates. While in law school, he also served as a research assistant to Professor Anthony J. Colangelo and as an extern to Magistrate Judge Renee H. Toliver of the Northern District of Texas. Jacob also has an undergraduate degree in classical music.\nJacob currently serves as an associate editor for The Advocate, a publication of the Texas State Bar’s litigation section. He remains deeply involved with the Dallas Asian American Bar Association. He also coaches students as an adjunct professor of oral advocacy at SMU.\n  Associate Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Texas Dallas Asian American Bar Association Judicial Clerk, Honorable Michael J. Truncale, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judicial Clerk, Honorable Nathan L. Hecht, Chief Justice, Texas Judicial Clerk, Honorable John E. Steele, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida","searchable_name":"Jacob George Mathew","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445958,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7239,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCourtney is an associate in the Business Litigation practice group and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Courtney\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable Daniel A. Bress and interned for the Honorable Richard J. Leon.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourtney earned her JD\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the Georgetown University Law Center, where she served as Editor in Chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFood \u0026amp; Drug\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"courtney-stone","email":"cstonemirski@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mirski","nick_name":"Courtney","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Daniel A. Bress, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2022 - 2023"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. Richard J. Leon, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","years_held":"2021 - 2021"}],"first_name":"Courtney","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Stone","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCourtney is an associate in the Business Litigation practice group and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Courtney\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable Daniel A. Bress and interned for the Honorable Richard J. Leon.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCourtney earned her JD\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the Georgetown University Law Center, where she served as Editor in Chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFood \u0026amp; Drug\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-18T20:26:04.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-18T20:26:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Mirski{{ FIELD }}Courtney is an associate in the Business Litigation practice group and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Courtney served as a law clerk for the Honorable Daniel A. Bress and interned for the Honorable Richard J. Leon.\nCourtney earned her JD magna cum laude from the Georgetown University Law Center, where she served as Editor in Chief of the Food \u0026amp; Drug Law Journal. Associate Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit District of Columbia Judicial Clerk, Hon. Daniel A. Bress, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Intern, Hon. Richard J. Leon, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","searchable_name":"Courtney Stone Mirski","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446878,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7327,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam prides himself on being both an attorney and a counselor, and he regularly establishes himself as the first point of contact for his clients with any issue they may be facing.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOver the course of his practice, William has worked on matters ranging from breaches of contract, business and personal torts, securities matters, class actions, school board disputes, government appropriations, city council disputes, real property disputes, religious liberties, racial discrimination, asset recovery, and more.\u0026nbsp; He has worked on matters across all levels of the judiciary from state trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp; And he has leveraged his skills on behalf of multiple billionaires, CEOs,\u0026nbsp;General Counsels, and Fortune 500 companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam recognizes that while all cases require great legal strategy, they also require painstaking attention to detail.\u0026nbsp; William works hard to know his cases better than anyone, and he has delivered over eight figures of value to his clients throughout his career.\u0026nbsp; More often than not, clients do not want to be involved in litigation of any kind.\u0026nbsp; But when that need arises, William aims to be the rare kind of attorney\u0026nbsp;clients like\u0026nbsp;to call.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"william-morris-2","email":"wrmorris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1142,"guid":"1142.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Morris","nick_name":"William","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Cory T. Wilson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2023 - 2024"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Reed C. O'Connor, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","years_held":"2022 - 2023"}],"first_name":"William","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1904,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Ronald","name_suffix":"III","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam prides himself on being both an attorney and a counselor, and he regularly establishes himself as the first point of contact for his clients with any issue they may be facing.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOver the course of his practice, William has worked on matters ranging from breaches of contract, business and personal torts, securities matters, class actions, school board disputes, government appropriations, city council disputes, real property disputes, religious liberties, racial discrimination, asset recovery, and more.\u0026nbsp; He has worked on matters across all levels of the judiciary from state trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp; And he has leveraged his skills on behalf of multiple billionaires, CEOs,\u0026nbsp;General Counsels, and Fortune 500 companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam recognizes that while all cases require great legal strategy, they also require painstaking attention to detail.\u0026nbsp; William works hard to know his cases better than anyone, and he has delivered over eight figures of value to his clients throughout his career.\u0026nbsp; More often than not, clients do not want to be involved in litigation of any kind.\u0026nbsp; But when that need arises, William aims to be the rare kind of attorney\u0026nbsp;clients like\u0026nbsp;to call.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13413}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-20T13:57:15.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-20T13:57:15.000Z","searchable_text":"Morris{{ FIELD }}William prides himself on being both an attorney and a counselor, and he regularly establishes himself as the first point of contact for his clients with any issue they may be facing. \nOver the course of his practice, William has worked on matters ranging from breaches of contract, business and personal torts, securities matters, class actions, school board disputes, government appropriations, city council disputes, real property disputes, religious liberties, racial discrimination, asset recovery, and more.  He has worked on matters across all levels of the judiciary from state trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court.  And he has leveraged his skills on behalf of multiple billionaires, CEOs, General Counsels, and Fortune 500 companies.\nWilliam recognizes that while all cases require great legal strategy, they also require painstaking attention to detail.  William works hard to know his cases better than anyone, and he has delivered over eight figures of value to his clients throughout his career.  More often than not, clients do not want to be involved in litigation of any kind.  But when that need arises, William aims to be the rare kind of attorney clients like to call. Associate Stanford University Stanford Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Texas Federalist Society Law Clerk, Cory T. Wilson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Law Clerk, Reed C. O'Connor, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","searchable_name":"William Ronald Morris III","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446626,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7336,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Business Litigation group based in the Washington D.C. office who focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, including patent and trade secret disputes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jack was most recently a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Todd Hughes of the\u0026nbsp;U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\u0026nbsp;and an associate at Winston \u0026amp; Strawn. Jack has significant federal litigation experience, including three patent infringement jury trials and work on appeals at the Federal Circuit. Jack draws on his prior engineering experience and his degree in electrical engineering to represent both patent owners and accused infringers on intellectual property matters that cover a wide variety of technologies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack obtained his J.D. from the University of Texas at Austin Law School in 2023 and holds a B.S. in Electrical\u0026nbsp;Engineering.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-myers","email":"jmyers@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Myers","nick_name":"","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Todd M. Hughes, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","years_held":"2024 - 2025"}],"first_name":"Jack","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Business Litigation group based in the Washington D.C. office who focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, including patent and trade secret disputes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jack was most recently a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Todd Hughes of the\u0026nbsp;U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit\u0026nbsp;and an associate at Winston \u0026amp; Strawn. Jack has significant federal litigation experience, including three patent infringement jury trials and work on appeals at the Federal Circuit. Jack draws on his prior engineering experience and his degree in electrical engineering to represent both patent owners and accused infringers on intellectual property matters that cover a wide variety of technologies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack obtained his J.D. from the University of Texas at Austin Law School in 2023 and holds a B.S. in Electrical\u0026nbsp;Engineering.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-09T22:04:12.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-09T22:04:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Myers{{ FIELD }}Jack is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Business Litigation group based in the Washington D.C. office who focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, including patent and trade secret disputes. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jack was most recently a judicial law clerk for the Honorable Todd Hughes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and an associate at Winston \u0026amp; Strawn. Jack has significant federal litigation experience, including three patent infringement jury trials and work on appeals at the Federal Circuit. Jack draws on his prior engineering experience and his degree in electrical engineering to represent both patent owners and accused infringers on intellectual property matters that cover a wide variety of technologies. \nJack obtained his J.D. from the University of Texas at Austin Law School in 2023 and holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering. Associate The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Judicial Clerk, Todd M. Hughes, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit","searchable_name":"Jack Myers","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}