{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"2","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"J","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":427563,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":672,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Jensen is Co-Chair of the firm-wide Special Matters and Government Investigations practice group and Managing Partner of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. office. He specializes in high-profile investigations, white-collar litigation for companies and individuals, regulatory enforcement actions, internal reviews and compliance counseling. Mark\u0026rsquo;s practice has been nationally acclaimed, and he has been widely recognized for the positive results he obtains for an array of clients in criminal and civil cases, including governmental investigations, prosecutions and False Claims Act civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e has described him as \u0026ldquo;one of the most sought-after corporate defenders in the country\u0026rdquo; and the \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 \u003c/em\u003eas \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished lawyer.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; Clients selected him for the prestigious \u003cem\u003eBTI Client Service All-Stars Award\u003c/em\u003e, commending his judgment, \u0026ldquo;practical approach\u0026rdquo; and knowing \u0026ldquo;what to fight for.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; He also has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America 2025 \u003c/em\u003eand named a \u003cem\u003e2025\u0026nbsp;Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigator in America\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark defends leading companies and senior executives in litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in prosecutions and investigations by U.S. Attorneys, multiple divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Congress.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026rsquo;s litigation experience includes criminal and civil issues relating to pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, laboratory testing and medical devices; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters; tax and accounting-related fraud; environmental and wildlife prosecutions; and federal contracting and procurement fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his current role as Managing Partner, Mark has served in numerous other firm leadership roles.\u0026nbsp; Elected by his partners to the firm\u0026rsquo;s managing Policy Committee, he also has served on the firm-wide Lateral Partner Committee and the Performance Management and Compensation Committee.\u0026nbsp; He also served as Lateral Partner Hiring Lead for the firm-wide Government Matters Practice Group, and previously was the Hiring Partner and Deputy Managing Partner for the D.C. office.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e recommended Mark for white-collar criminal defense in 2024 and previous years, describing him as \u0026ldquo;brilliant and creative\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;an excellent track record.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star\u0026rdquo; in its 2023 and previous editions.\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp; LMG Life Sciences\u003c/em\u003e named Mark a Life Sciences Star for White Collar/Government Investigations in its 2023 and previous editions, including shortlisting him multiple times as one of six lawyers nationwide for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mark-jensen","email":"mjensen@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a variety of \u003cstrong\u003elife science and health care companies,\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eas well as individual employees, officers, consultants and medical professionals,\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil litigation by multiple U.S. Attorneys Offices, DOJ, HHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, state attorneys general and national Medicaid fraud control units, regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion, unlawful inducements and other sales, marketing, pricing and development activities. Successfully represented a variety of clients in these investigations, including prevailing on motions to dismiss False Claims Act lawsuits in federal district court and resolving successfully the largest U.S. False Claims Act matter involving a medical device and kickback allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson and related companies\u003c/strong\u003e in a 2013 global resolution of multiple DOJ investigations, including the negotiation and settlement of False Claims Act; Food, Drug \u0026amp; Cosmetic Act; and related allegations. The False Claims Act component of the resolution included seven \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e complaints venued in the E.D.Pa., D.Mass. and N.D.Ca. Also led the related resolution of administrative claims by HHS-OIG through the company\u0026rsquo;s Corporate Integrity Agreement. In parallel state litigation, led the resolution of multi-state and individual state consumer protection claims and lawsuits, as well as state claims alleged by Medicaid Fraud Control Units and similar attorneys general and state representatives.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCoach Joe Paterno and his Estate and Family\u003c/strong\u003e in matters pertaining to the NCAA and Pennsylvania State University.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Special Committee of independent directors of a major company\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil accounting-related investigations by a U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office and the SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented successfully \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean officer\u003c/strong\u003e in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act criminal investigation; also counseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major company\u003c/strong\u003e in FCPA matters in connection with a potential acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAlong with Judge Griffin Bell and King \u0026amp; Spalding partner Wick Sollers, led publicly disclosed \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternal investigations into the FBI\u0026rsquo;s Office of Professional Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e (OPR) at FBI Director Mueller\u0026rsquo;s request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual targets\u003c/strong\u003e in an EPA and DOJ RCRA and Clean Water Act grand jury investigation in Montana, resulting in a declination of all criminal charges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 company\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ criminal investigation of its environmental practices, resulting in a full declination by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Maine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented successfully over 20 \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emanagerial and sales employees\u003c/strong\u003e in a federal grand jury investigation in San Francisco regarding Genentech\u0026rsquo;s marketing and promotional practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ebond underwriters, hedge funds and other equity interests\u003c/strong\u003e regarding a variety of compliance matters involving existing and potential investments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe Audit Committee of a major publicly traded company\u003c/strong\u003e in a criminal investigation by DOJ and the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Philadelphia into drug pricing and accounting practices. A favorable civil resolution was obtained from DOJ after a full investigation and negotiations with multiple government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented in Virginia state court \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea regional manager of a recycling facility\u003c/strong\u003e accused of health and safety violations, resulting in a full dismissal at trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean individual defendant\u003c/strong\u003e in the then-largest-ever international antitrust conspiracy trial, including authoring a prevailing appellate brief against the \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eNew York Times\u003c/em\u003e and Dow Jones regarding a First Amendment issue before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea company\u003c/strong\u003e in a criminal investigation of alleged illegal seafood importation under the Lacey Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple companies and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal investigations regarding government contracting fraud and tax evasion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ecompanies\u003c/strong\u003e in developing, reviewing or enhancing their corporate compliance programs pursuant to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines, OIG Guidelines and various industry ethics guidance, such as the PhRMA and AdvaMed Codes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e on forensic and electronic discovery matters, including Electronically Stored Information practices, document retention policies, restoration of backup tapes and forensic data mining.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Jensen","nick_name":"Mark","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana","years_held":"1998 - 2000"}],"first_name":"Mark","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Mark is the best in the business. The combination of experience, education and demeanor is outstanding.\"","detail":" 2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"\"I thank him and his team every day. I can't say anything stronger than that.\" ","detail":"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"\"few firms that can match the experience or success rate that Mark and the K\u0026S team bring...the first call we make.\"","detail":"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"Litigation Star: White Collar and Civil Litigation","detail":"BENCHMARK LITIGATION (2023 and previous editions)"},{"title":"One of six lawyers nationwide shortlisted for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year","detail":"LMG Life Sciences (2023 \u0026 2022)"},{"title":"White-Collar Criminal Defense, Leading Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 U.S. (2024 and previous editions)"},{"title":"LMG Life Sciences Star: White Collar/Government Investigations ","detail":"LMG Life Sciences (2023 and previous editions)"},{"title":"What Clients Say: “Mark has an ingrained understanding of the practical approach we favor.” “He knows what to fight for.\"","detail":"BTI Consulting Group (2020)"},{"title":"BTI Client Service All-Star ","detail":"BTI Consulting Group (2020)"},{"title":"“Quickly Made a Name for Himself as an Extremely Accomplished Lawyer”...“An Excellent Track Record”...“Creative”","detail":"Legal 500 U.S. (2011)"},{"title":"“One of Five U.S. White-Collar Lawyers to Watch”","detail":"Law360 (2011)"},{"title":"“One of the Most Sought-After Corporate Defenders in the Country”","detail":"Law360 (2011)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":63,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Jensen is Co-Chair of the firm-wide Special Matters and Government Investigations practice group and Managing Partner of King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. office. He specializes in high-profile investigations, white-collar litigation for companies and individuals, regulatory enforcement actions, internal reviews and compliance counseling. Mark\u0026rsquo;s practice has been nationally acclaimed, and he has been widely recognized for the positive results he obtains for an array of clients in criminal and civil cases, including governmental investigations, prosecutions and False Claims Act civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e has described him as \u0026ldquo;one of the most sought-after corporate defenders in the country\u0026rdquo; and the \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 \u003c/em\u003eas \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished lawyer.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; Clients selected him for the prestigious \u003cem\u003eBTI Client Service All-Stars Award\u003c/em\u003e, commending his judgment, \u0026ldquo;practical approach\u0026rdquo; and knowing \u0026ldquo;what to fight for.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; He also has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America 2025 \u003c/em\u003eand named a \u003cem\u003e2025\u0026nbsp;Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigator in America\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark defends leading companies and senior executives in litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in prosecutions and investigations by U.S. Attorneys, multiple divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Congress.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026rsquo;s litigation experience includes criminal and civil issues relating to pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, laboratory testing and medical devices; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters; tax and accounting-related fraud; environmental and wildlife prosecutions; and federal contracting and procurement fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his current role as Managing Partner, Mark has served in numerous other firm leadership roles.\u0026nbsp; Elected by his partners to the firm\u0026rsquo;s managing Policy Committee, he also has served on the firm-wide Lateral Partner Committee and the Performance Management and Compensation Committee.\u0026nbsp; He also served as Lateral Partner Hiring Lead for the firm-wide Government Matters Practice Group, and previously was the Hiring Partner and Deputy Managing Partner for the D.C. office.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e recommended Mark for white-collar criminal defense in 2024 and previous years, describing him as \u0026ldquo;brilliant and creative\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;an excellent track record.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e recognized him as a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star\u0026rdquo; in its 2023 and previous editions.\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp; LMG Life Sciences\u003c/em\u003e named Mark a Life Sciences Star for White Collar/Government Investigations in its 2023 and previous editions, including shortlisting him multiple times as one of six lawyers nationwide for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented a variety of \u003cstrong\u003elife science and health care companies,\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eas well as individual employees, officers, consultants and medical professionals,\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil litigation by multiple U.S. Attorneys Offices, DOJ, HHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, state attorneys general and national Medicaid fraud control units, regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion, unlawful inducements and other sales, marketing, pricing and development activities. Successfully represented a variety of clients in these investigations, including prevailing on motions to dismiss False Claims Act lawsuits in federal district court and resolving successfully the largest U.S. False Claims Act matter involving a medical device and kickback allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eJanssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson and related companies\u003c/strong\u003e in a 2013 global resolution of multiple DOJ investigations, including the negotiation and settlement of False Claims Act; Food, Drug \u0026amp; Cosmetic Act; and related allegations. The False Claims Act component of the resolution included seven \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e complaints venued in the E.D.Pa., D.Mass. and N.D.Ca. Also led the related resolution of administrative claims by HHS-OIG through the company\u0026rsquo;s Corporate Integrity Agreement. In parallel state litigation, led the resolution of multi-state and individual state consumer protection claims and lawsuits, as well as state claims alleged by Medicaid Fraud Control Units and similar attorneys general and state representatives.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCoach Joe Paterno and his Estate and Family\u003c/strong\u003e in matters pertaining to the NCAA and Pennsylvania State University.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Special Committee of independent directors of a major company\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil accounting-related investigations by a U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office and the SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented successfully \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean officer\u003c/strong\u003e in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act criminal investigation; also counseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major company\u003c/strong\u003e in FCPA matters in connection with a potential acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAlong with Judge Griffin Bell and King \u0026amp; Spalding partner Wick Sollers, led publicly disclosed \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternal investigations into the FBI\u0026rsquo;s Office of Professional Responsibility\u003c/strong\u003e (OPR) at FBI Director Mueller\u0026rsquo;s request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual targets\u003c/strong\u003e in an EPA and DOJ RCRA and Clean Water Act grand jury investigation in Montana, resulting in a declination of all criminal charges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 company\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ criminal investigation of its environmental practices, resulting in a full declination by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Maine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented successfully over 20 \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emanagerial and sales employees\u003c/strong\u003e in a federal grand jury investigation in San Francisco regarding Genentech\u0026rsquo;s marketing and promotional practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ebond underwriters, hedge funds and other equity interests\u003c/strong\u003e regarding a variety of compliance matters involving existing and potential investments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe Audit Committee of a major publicly traded company\u003c/strong\u003e in a criminal investigation by DOJ and the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Philadelphia into drug pricing and accounting practices. A favorable civil resolution was obtained from DOJ after a full investigation and negotiations with multiple government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented in Virginia state court \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea regional manager of a recycling facility\u003c/strong\u003e accused of health and safety violations, resulting in a full dismissal at trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean individual defendant\u003c/strong\u003e in the then-largest-ever international antitrust conspiracy trial, including authoring a prevailing appellate brief against the \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eNew York Times\u003c/em\u003e and Dow Jones regarding a First Amendment issue before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea company\u003c/strong\u003e in a criminal investigation of alleged illegal seafood importation under the Lacey Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple companies and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal investigations regarding government contracting fraud and tax evasion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ecompanies\u003c/strong\u003e in developing, reviewing or enhancing their corporate compliance programs pursuant to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines, OIG Guidelines and various industry ethics guidance, such as the PhRMA and AdvaMed Codes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple clients\u003c/strong\u003e on forensic and electronic discovery matters, including Electronically Stored Information practices, document retention policies, restoration of backup tapes and forensic data mining.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Mark is the best in the business. The combination of experience, education and demeanor is outstanding.\"","detail":" 2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"\"I thank him and his team every day. I can't say anything stronger than that.\" ","detail":"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"\"few firms that can match the experience or success rate that Mark and the K\u0026S team bring...the first call we make.\"","detail":"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide"},{"title":"Litigation Star: White Collar and Civil Litigation","detail":"BENCHMARK LITIGATION (2023 and previous editions)"},{"title":"One of six lawyers nationwide shortlisted for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year","detail":"LMG Life Sciences (2023 \u0026 2022)"},{"title":"White-Collar Criminal Defense, Leading Lawyer","detail":"Legal 500 U.S. (2024 and previous editions)"},{"title":"LMG Life Sciences Star: White Collar/Government Investigations ","detail":"LMG Life Sciences (2023 and previous editions)"},{"title":"What Clients Say: “Mark has an ingrained understanding of the practical approach we favor.” “He knows what to fight for.\"","detail":"BTI Consulting Group (2020)"},{"title":"BTI Client Service All-Star ","detail":"BTI Consulting Group (2020)"},{"title":"“Quickly Made a Name for Himself as an Extremely Accomplished Lawyer”...“An Excellent Track Record”...“Creative”","detail":"Legal 500 U.S. (2011)"},{"title":"“One of Five U.S. White-Collar Lawyers to Watch”","detail":"Law360 (2011)"},{"title":"“One of the Most Sought-After Corporate Defenders in the Country”","detail":"Law360 (2011)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":941},{"id":941},{"id":941},{"id":941}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Jensen{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Mark is the best in the business. The combination of experience, education and demeanor is outstanding.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" 2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"I thank him and his team every day. I can't say anything stronger than that.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"few firms that can match the experience or success rate that Mark and the K\u0026amp;S team bring...the first call we make.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation Star: White Collar and Civil Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BENCHMARK LITIGATION (2023 and previous editions)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of six lawyers nationwide shortlisted for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LMG Life Sciences (2023 \u0026amp; 2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"White-Collar Criminal Defense, Leading Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S. (2024 and previous editions)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"LMG Life Sciences Star: White Collar/Government Investigations \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LMG Life Sciences (2023 and previous editions)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"What Clients Say: “Mark has an ingrained understanding of the practical approach we favor.” “He knows what to fight for.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI Consulting Group (2020)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"BTI Client Service All-Star \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI Consulting Group (2020)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Quickly Made a Name for Himself as an Extremely Accomplished Lawyer”...“An Excellent Track Record”...“Creative”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S. (2011)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“One of Five U.S. White-Collar Lawyers to Watch”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 (2011)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“One of the Most Sought-After Corporate Defenders in the Country”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 (2011)\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented a variety of life science and health care companies, as well as individual employees, officers, consultants and medical professionals, in criminal and civil litigation by multiple U.S. Attorneys Offices, DOJ, HHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, state attorneys general and national Medicaid fraud control units, regarding alleged “off-label” promotion, unlawful inducements and other sales, marketing, pricing and development activities. Successfully represented a variety of clients in these investigations, including prevailing on motions to dismiss False Claims Act lawsuits in federal district court and resolving successfully the largest U.S. False Claims Act matter involving a medical device and kickback allegations.{{ FIELD }}Represented Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson and related companies in a 2013 global resolution of multiple DOJ investigations, including the negotiation and settlement of False Claims Act; Food, Drug \u0026amp; Cosmetic Act; and related allegations. The False Claims Act component of the resolution included seven qui tam complaints venued in the E.D.Pa., D.Mass. and N.D.Ca. Also led the related resolution of administrative claims by HHS-OIG through the company’s Corporate Integrity Agreement. In parallel state litigation, led the resolution of multi-state and individual state consumer protection claims and lawsuits, as well as state claims alleged by Medicaid Fraud Control Units and similar attorneys general and state representatives.{{ FIELD }}Represented Coach Joe Paterno and his Estate and Family in matters pertaining to the NCAA and Pennsylvania State University.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Special Committee of independent directors of a major company in criminal and civil accounting-related investigations by a U.S. Attorney’s Office and the SEC.{{ FIELD }}Represented successfully an officer in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act criminal investigation; also counseled a major company in FCPA matters in connection with a potential acquisition.{{ FIELD }}Along with Judge Griffin Bell and King \u0026amp; Spalding partner Wick Sollers, led publicly disclosed internal investigations into the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) at FBI Director Mueller’s request.{{ FIELD }}Represented individual targets in an EPA and DOJ RCRA and Clean Water Act grand jury investigation in Montana, resulting in a declination of all criminal charges.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 100 company in a DOJ criminal investigation of its environmental practices, resulting in a full declination by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maine.{{ FIELD }}Represented successfully over 20 managerial and sales employees in a federal grand jury investigation in San Francisco regarding Genentech’s marketing and promotional practices.{{ FIELD }}Counseled bond underwriters, hedge funds and other equity interests regarding a variety of compliance matters involving existing and potential investments.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Audit Committee of a major publicly traded company in a criminal investigation by DOJ and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia into drug pricing and accounting practices. A favorable civil resolution was obtained from DOJ after a full investigation and negotiations with multiple government agencies.{{ FIELD }}Represented in Virginia state court a regional manager of a recycling facility accused of health and safety violations, resulting in a full dismissal at trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented an individual defendant in the then-largest-ever international antitrust conspiracy trial, including authoring a prevailing appellate brief against the New York Times and Dow Jones regarding a First Amendment issue before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago.{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in a criminal investigation of alleged illegal seafood importation under the Lacey Act.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple companies and individuals in criminal investigations regarding government contracting fraud and tax evasion.{{ FIELD }}Counseled companies in developing, reviewing or enhancing their corporate compliance programs pursuant to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines, OIG Guidelines and various industry ethics guidance, such as the PhRMA and AdvaMed Codes.{{ FIELD }}Advised multiple clients on forensic and electronic discovery matters, including Electronically Stored Information practices, document retention policies, restoration of backup tapes and forensic data mining.{{ FIELD }}Mark Jensen is Co-Chair of the firm-wide Special Matters and Government Investigations practice group and Managing Partner of King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Washington, D.C. office. He specializes in high-profile investigations, white-collar litigation for companies and individuals, regulatory enforcement actions, internal reviews and compliance counseling. Mark’s practice has been nationally acclaimed, and he has been widely recognized for the positive results he obtains for an array of clients in criminal and civil cases, including governmental investigations, prosecutions and False Claims Act civil litigation.  Law360 has described him as “one of the most sought-after corporate defenders in the country” and the Legal 500 as “an extremely accomplished lawyer.”  Clients selected him for the prestigious BTI Client Service All-Stars Award, commending his judgment, “practical approach” and knowing “what to fight for.”  He also has been ranked by The Best Lawyers in America 2025 and named a 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigator in America.\nMark defends leading companies and senior executives in litigation in federal and state courts, as well as in prosecutions and investigations by U.S. Attorneys, multiple divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and Congress.\nMark’s litigation experience includes criminal and civil issues relating to pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, laboratory testing and medical devices; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters; tax and accounting-related fraud; environmental and wildlife prosecutions; and federal contracting and procurement fraud.\nIn addition to his current role as Managing Partner, Mark has served in numerous other firm leadership roles.  Elected by his partners to the firm’s managing Policy Committee, he also has served on the firm-wide Lateral Partner Committee and the Performance Management and Compensation Committee.  He also served as Lateral Partner Hiring Lead for the firm-wide Government Matters Practice Group, and previously was the Hiring Partner and Deputy Managing Partner for the D.C. office.\nLegal 500 U.S. recommended Mark for white-collar criminal defense in 2024 and previous years, describing him as “brilliant and creative” with “an excellent track record.”  Benchmark Litigation recognized him as a “Litigation Star” in its 2023 and previous editions.  LMG Life Sciences named Mark a Life Sciences Star for White Collar/Government Investigations in its 2023 and previous editions, including shortlisting him multiple times as one of six lawyers nationwide for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year.\n Partner \"Mark is the best in the business. The combination of experience, education and demeanor is outstanding.\"  2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide \"I thank him and his team every day. I can't say anything stronger than that.\"  2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide \"few firms that can match the experience or success rate that Mark and the K\u0026amp;S team bring...the first call we make.\" 2024 Client Feedback to Ranking Guide Litigation Star: White Collar and Civil Litigation BENCHMARK LITIGATION (2023 and previous editions) One of six lawyers nationwide shortlisted for Government Investigations Attorney of the Year LMG Life Sciences (2023 \u0026amp; 2022) White-Collar Criminal Defense, Leading Lawyer Legal 500 U.S. (2024 and previous editions) LMG Life Sciences Star: White Collar/Government Investigations  LMG Life Sciences (2023 and previous editions) What Clients Say: “Mark has an ingrained understanding of the practical approach we favor.” “He knows what to fight for.\" BTI Consulting Group (2020) BTI Client Service All-Star  BTI Consulting Group (2020) “Quickly Made a Name for Himself as an Extremely Accomplished Lawyer”...“An Excellent Track Record”...“Creative” Legal 500 U.S. (2011) “One of Five U.S. White-Collar Lawyers to Watch” Law360 (2011) “One of the Most Sought-After Corporate Defenders in the Country” Law360 (2011) Indiana University Indiana University School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana District of Columbia Law Clerk, Hon. Sarah Evans Barker, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Represented a variety of life science and health care companies, as well as individual employees, officers, consultants and medical professionals, in criminal and civil litigation by multiple U.S. Attorneys Offices, DOJ, HHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, state attorneys general and national Medicaid fraud control units, regarding alleged “off-label” promotion, unlawful inducements and other sales, marketing, pricing and development activities. Successfully represented a variety of clients in these investigations, including prevailing on motions to dismiss False Claims Act lawsuits in federal district court and resolving successfully the largest U.S. False Claims Act matter involving a medical device and kickback allegations. Represented Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson and related companies in a 2013 global resolution of multiple DOJ investigations, including the negotiation and settlement of False Claims Act; Food, Drug \u0026amp; Cosmetic Act; and related allegations. The False Claims Act component of the resolution included seven qui tam complaints venued in the E.D.Pa., D.Mass. and N.D.Ca. Also led the related resolution of administrative claims by HHS-OIG through the company’s Corporate Integrity Agreement. In parallel state litigation, led the resolution of multi-state and individual state consumer protection claims and lawsuits, as well as state claims alleged by Medicaid Fraud Control Units and similar attorneys general and state representatives. Represented Coach Joe Paterno and his Estate and Family in matters pertaining to the NCAA and Pennsylvania State University. Represented a Special Committee of independent directors of a major company in criminal and civil accounting-related investigations by a U.S. Attorney’s Office and the SEC. Represented successfully an officer in a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act criminal investigation; also counseled a major company in FCPA matters in connection with a potential acquisition. Along with Judge Griffin Bell and King \u0026amp; Spalding partner Wick Sollers, led publicly disclosed internal investigations into the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) at FBI Director Mueller’s request. Represented individual targets in an EPA and DOJ RCRA and Clean Water Act grand jury investigation in Montana, resulting in a declination of all criminal charges. Represented a Fortune 100 company in a DOJ criminal investigation of its environmental practices, resulting in a full declination by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Maine. Represented successfully over 20 managerial and sales employees in a federal grand jury investigation in San Francisco regarding Genentech’s marketing and promotional practices. Counseled bond underwriters, hedge funds and other equity interests regarding a variety of compliance matters involving existing and potential investments. Represented the Audit Committee of a major publicly traded company in a criminal investigation by DOJ and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia into drug pricing and accounting practices. A favorable civil resolution was obtained from DOJ after a full investigation and negotiations with multiple government agencies. Represented in Virginia state court a regional manager of a recycling facility accused of health and safety violations, resulting in a full dismissal at trial. Represented an individual defendant in the then-largest-ever international antitrust conspiracy trial, including authoring a prevailing appellate brief against the New York Times and Dow Jones regarding a First Amendment issue before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago. Represented a company in a criminal investigation of alleged illegal seafood importation under the Lacey Act. Represented multiple companies and individuals in criminal investigations regarding government contracting fraud and tax evasion. Counseled companies in developing, reviewing or enhancing their corporate compliance programs pursuant to the U.S. Sentencing Commission Guidelines, OIG Guidelines and various industry ethics guidance, such as the PhRMA and AdvaMed Codes. Advised multiple clients on forensic and electronic discovery matters, including Electronically Stored Information practices, document retention policies, restoration of backup tapes and forensic data mining.","searchable_name":"Mark A. Jensen","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436432,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3740,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNikesh Jindal has a wide-ranging practice that covers many industries, including most prominently the energy sector.\u0026nbsp; Having served\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;senior roles in the federal government, Nikesh uses that experience to represent clients that have complex litigation and regulatory\u0026nbsp;issues involving the government.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh has litigated cases ranging from False Claims Act suits with billions of dollars in dispute to intricate appellate matters before the Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh is equally skilled at devising and implementing strategies to help clients achieve their regulatory objectives before the federal government.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh serves as a leader in the firm's Energy Transition initiative, helping clients with their\u0026nbsp;clean and renewable energy projects.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh assists clients across the entire spectrum of clean energy technologies---carbon capture, hydrogen, wind, nuclear, advanced batteries, renewable fuels, and others.\u0026nbsp; In particular, Nikesh advises clients on how to take advantage\u0026nbsp;of funding opportunities created by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act and advocates\u0026nbsp;for their interests before the Department of Energy and other agencies with responsibility for implementing these programs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh previously served as senior counsel at the Department of Energy, where he was actively involved in several key Department initiatives, including the drafting of guidelines implementing a multi-billion dollar loan guarantee program for innovative technologies authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.\u0026nbsp; Drawing upon that experience, Nikesh\u0026nbsp;is well-versed in how the government sets energy policy and administers its regulatory authority in this area, and he uses that expertise to help clients with their full range of regulatory and litigation needs before the government.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh also has extensive experience representing oil and gas companies in a broad cross-section\u0026nbsp;of matters, including royalty disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents oil and companies in challenges to their leases, drilling permits, and other activities critical to their onshore and offshore operations.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh also advises them on critical rulemakings and other regulatory measures and enforcement activities before\u0026nbsp;the Department of Interior other federal agencies with oversight in this area.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh also maintains an active general appellate and administrative-law based practice.\u0026nbsp; He has litigated cases in the Supreme Court and circuit courts\u0026nbsp;across the county, coordinated and led efforts to challenge several agency regulations, and has represented clients in investigations before Congress and various Executive Branch agencies. He has defended clients in several\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e-related lawsuits and government audits involving government funding programs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh joined the firm in 2014 after having worked at another large multinational law firm.\u0026nbsp; Prior to that, he was Associate General Counsel at the Office of Management and Budget within the Executive Office of the President. In that capacity, he provided counsel to senior policy officials on legal and regulatory issues arising from several federal agencies, including the Departments of Interior, Energy, Health and Human Services, and Transportation.\u0026nbsp; As part of his responsibilities, Nikesh reviewed significant rulemakings and worked directly with the relevant agencies to resolve any legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh served as a law clerk to the Honorable Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Portland, Oregon. He received his law degree from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e, and graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in 1999 with an A.B. in Economics from Dartmouth College.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"nikesh-jindal","email":"njindal@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1143,"guid":"1143.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Jindal","nick_name":"Nikesh","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Diarmuid O'Scannlain, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2002 - 2003"}],"first_name":"Nikesh","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":2605,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2002-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNikesh Jindal has a wide-ranging practice that covers many industries, including most prominently the energy sector.\u0026nbsp; Having served\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;senior roles in the federal government, Nikesh uses that experience to represent clients that have complex litigation and regulatory\u0026nbsp;issues involving the government.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh has litigated cases ranging from False Claims Act suits with billions of dollars in dispute to intricate appellate matters before the Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh is equally skilled at devising and implementing strategies to help clients achieve their regulatory objectives before the federal government.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh serves as a leader in the firm's Energy Transition initiative, helping clients with their\u0026nbsp;clean and renewable energy projects.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh assists clients across the entire spectrum of clean energy technologies---carbon capture, hydrogen, wind, nuclear, advanced batteries, renewable fuels, and others.\u0026nbsp; In particular, Nikesh advises clients on how to take advantage\u0026nbsp;of funding opportunities created by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act and advocates\u0026nbsp;for their interests before the Department of Energy and other agencies with responsibility for implementing these programs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh previously served as senior counsel at the Department of Energy, where he was actively involved in several key Department initiatives, including the drafting of guidelines implementing a multi-billion dollar loan guarantee program for innovative technologies authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.\u0026nbsp; Drawing upon that experience, Nikesh\u0026nbsp;is well-versed in how the government sets energy policy and administers its regulatory authority in this area, and he uses that expertise to help clients with their full range of regulatory and litigation needs before the government.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh also has extensive experience representing oil and gas companies in a broad cross-section\u0026nbsp;of matters, including royalty disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents oil and companies in challenges to their leases, drilling permits, and other activities critical to their onshore and offshore operations.\u0026nbsp; Nikesh also advises them on critical rulemakings and other regulatory measures and enforcement activities before\u0026nbsp;the Department of Interior other federal agencies with oversight in this area.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh also maintains an active general appellate and administrative-law based practice.\u0026nbsp; He has litigated cases in the Supreme Court and circuit courts\u0026nbsp;across the county, coordinated and led efforts to challenge several agency regulations, and has represented clients in investigations before Congress and various Executive Branch agencies. He has defended clients in several\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e-related lawsuits and government audits involving government funding programs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh joined the firm in 2014 after having worked at another large multinational law firm.\u0026nbsp; Prior to that, he was Associate General Counsel at the Office of Management and Budget within the Executive Office of the President. In that capacity, he provided counsel to senior policy officials on legal and regulatory issues arising from several federal agencies, including the Departments of Interior, Energy, Health and Human Services, and Transportation.\u0026nbsp; As part of his responsibilities, Nikesh reviewed significant rulemakings and worked directly with the relevant agencies to resolve any legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNikesh served as a law clerk to the Honorable Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Portland, Oregon. He received his law degree from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e, and graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in 1999 with an A.B. in Economics from Dartmouth College.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9972}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:53:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:53:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Jindal{{ FIELD }}Nikesh Jindal has a wide-ranging practice that covers many industries, including most prominently the energy sector.  Having served in senior roles in the federal government, Nikesh uses that experience to represent clients that have complex litigation and regulatory issues involving the government.  Nikesh has litigated cases ranging from False Claims Act suits with billions of dollars in dispute to intricate appellate matters before the Courts of Appeals and the Supreme Court.  Nikesh is equally skilled at devising and implementing strategies to help clients achieve their regulatory objectives before the federal government.\nNikesh serves as a leader in the firm's Energy Transition initiative, helping clients with their clean and renewable energy projects.  Nikesh assists clients across the entire spectrum of clean energy technologies---carbon capture, hydrogen, wind, nuclear, advanced batteries, renewable fuels, and others.  In particular, Nikesh advises clients on how to take advantage of funding opportunities created by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act and advocates for their interests before the Department of Energy and other agencies with responsibility for implementing these programs.   \nNikesh previously served as senior counsel at the Department of Energy, where he was actively involved in several key Department initiatives, including the drafting of guidelines implementing a multi-billion dollar loan guarantee program for innovative technologies authorized under the Energy Policy Act of 2005.  Drawing upon that experience, Nikesh is well-versed in how the government sets energy policy and administers its regulatory authority in this area, and he uses that expertise to help clients with their full range of regulatory and litigation needs before the government.    \nNikesh also has extensive experience representing oil and gas companies in a broad cross-section of matters, including royalty disputes.  He also represents oil and companies in challenges to their leases, drilling permits, and other activities critical to their onshore and offshore operations.  Nikesh also advises them on critical rulemakings and other regulatory measures and enforcement activities before the Department of Interior other federal agencies with oversight in this area.    \nNikesh also maintains an active general appellate and administrative-law based practice.  He has litigated cases in the Supreme Court and circuit courts across the county, coordinated and led efforts to challenge several agency regulations, and has represented clients in investigations before Congress and various Executive Branch agencies. He has defended clients in several qui tam-related lawsuits and government audits involving government funding programs.\nNikesh joined the firm in 2014 after having worked at another large multinational law firm.  Prior to that, he was Associate General Counsel at the Office of Management and Budget within the Executive Office of the President. In that capacity, he provided counsel to senior policy officials on legal and regulatory issues arising from several federal agencies, including the Departments of Interior, Energy, Health and Human Services, and Transportation.  As part of his responsibilities, Nikesh reviewed significant rulemakings and worked directly with the relevant agencies to resolve any legal issues.\nNikesh served as a law clerk to the Honorable Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in Portland, Oregon. He received his law degree from Yale Law School, where he served as an editor on the Yale Law Journal, and graduated summa cum laude in 1999 with an A.B. in Economics from Dartmouth College. Partner Dartmouth College  Yale University Yale Law School District of Columbia New York Council Member, ABA Section on Administrative Law Law Clerk, Diarmuid O'Scannlain, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","searchable_name":"Nikesh Jindal","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436388,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2857,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Johnson litigates large, complex cases in California state and federal courts. As a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul represents clients in appellate proceedings. Paul's work for clients in trial courts often involves unsettled legal issues or complex civil procedure.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's litigation experience\u0026mdash;over 30 years\u0026mdash;includes all phases of appellate-court and trial-court proceedings. Certified by the State Bar of California's Board of Legal Specialization as a specialist in appellate law, Paul has argued before state and federal appellate courts inside and outside California. Paul previously chaired the Committee on Appellate Courts of the State Bar of California and has presented on appellate law and practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's experience as lead trial counsel (both bench and jury) informs his work as an appellate advisor on trial teams. At the trial court level, Paul also consults on strategy and handles procedural matters such as personal jurisdiction, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e, state-vs.-federal jurisdiction, and choice of law, often in mass litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's broad substantive-law experience includes administrative review, antitrust, arbitration review, employment, energy, environmental, infrastructure, intellectual property, land use, mass torts, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, other product liability, punitive damages, reputation, securities and constitutional issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"paul-johnson","email":"pjohnson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBrown v. McKesson Corporation\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B266990, Jan. 26, 2017) (affirming judgment against dozens of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eOrrell v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP\u003c/em\u003e (9th Cir. No. 14-56845, Oct. 28, 2016) (affirming judgment against hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eNon-California-Resident Plaintiffs v. AstraZeneca LP\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. B260895, July 15, 2016) (obtaining dismissal of appeal by hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs who challenged \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e dismissal).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSuffolk County Water Authority v. The Dow Chemical Company\u003c/em\u003e, 991 N.Y.S.2d 613, 121 A.D.3d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept., 2014) (dismissing numerous well-water contamination claims by a major public water supplier).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMacasa v. Dole Food Company, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B245138, 2014) (rejecting assertion of longer, foreign limitations period by several thousand plaintiffs who alleged toxic exposures in the Philippines; affirming dismissal of claims as untimely).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaguna v. Dole Food Company, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B233497, 2014) (affirming decision to vacate judgment for plaintiffs upon finding fraudulent scheme to assert toxic exposures at Nicaraguan banana farms).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBombardier Recreational Products, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Canada ULC\u003c/em\u003e, 216 Cal. App. 4th 591, 157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66 (2013) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHH, LLC\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ev.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWestLB AG\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. D060531, 2012) (holding that cross-complaint in real estate financing litigation was not a SLAPP suit).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEnayati v. UOP, LLC\u003c/em\u003e (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC430304, 2012) (nonsuit judgment based on legal standard of care for engineering professionals).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePacific Rim Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Aon Risk Insurances Services West, Inc.,\u003c/em\u003e 203 Cal. App. 4th 1278, 183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294(2012) (holding that insurance broker did not have ongoing duty to additional insured).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCity of Modesto etc. et al. v. The Dow Chemical Company et al.\u003c/em\u003e (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. 999345, 999643; Cal. Ct. App. No. A134419 \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e) (post-trial motions; appellate matters); \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. A125426, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; partial judgment following mistrial).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDow Chemical Canada ULC v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e, 202 Cal. App. 4th 170, 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 597 (2011) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDow Chemical Canada ULC v. Fandino\u003c/em\u003e, 131 S. Ct. 3088 (June 28, 2011, No. 10-250) (GVR: granting certiorari petition challenging personal jurisdiction, vacating judgment, and remanding for further consideration in light of \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJ. McIntyre\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJ. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro\u003c/em\u003e, 131 S. Ct. 2780 (2011) (amicus brief for Dow Chemical Canada ULC, asserting due process insufficiency of stream-of-commerce test for personal jurisdiction).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJones v. ConocoPhillips\u003c/em\u003e, 198 Cal. App. 4th 1187, 130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 571 (2011) (addressing pleading standards for toxic-tort actions).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAbrego v. The Dow Chemical Company\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B222612, 2010) (affirming forum non conveniens dismissals).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGCM Air Group LLC v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (9th Cir. No. 09-15825, 2010) (defending property contamination claims).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSafeway Inc. v. Pivotal Sales Company\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. A116637, 2010) (commercial and antitrust issues; judgment for client affirmed).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eClayworth v. Pfizer Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 49 Cal. 4th 758, 233 P.2d 1066, 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 (2010) (industry-wide pharmaceutical antitrust litigation; blocking \"pass-on\" evidence), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A131804, 2012) (affirming summary judgment on merits for defendants), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A132527, 2014) (affirming award of costs to defendants).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eTexaco Inc. v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B216264, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; dismissal of asbestos action based on construction of California borrowing statute).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eI\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003en re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)\u003c/em\u003e (E.D. Pa., MDL Docket No. 875) (litigation of federal jurisdiction, government contractor defense).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLongs Drug Stores California, Inc. v. Shea\u003c/em\u003e, 2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 414, 2005 WL 91682 (2005) (overcoming anti-SLAPP opposition to business defamation claim).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDrolla v. ChevronTexaco Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11025, 2004 WL 2750328 (2004) (defense of maritime employment claim alleging disability discrimination).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerry, et al. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Cal., No. C 00-1353 SBA, 2002) (dismissal of class action claims alleging employment discrimination), 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920, 2003 WL 23098426 (9th Cir. 2003) (defense of individual discrimination claims).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":90}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Johnson","nick_name":"Paul","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Paul","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Fellow ","detail":"American Bar Foundation"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulrichardjohnson/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePaul Johnson litigates large, complex cases in California state and federal courts. As a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul represents clients in appellate proceedings. Paul's work for clients in trial courts often involves unsettled legal issues or complex civil procedure.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's litigation experience\u0026mdash;over 30 years\u0026mdash;includes all phases of appellate-court and trial-court proceedings. Certified by the State Bar of California's Board of Legal Specialization as a specialist in appellate law, Paul has argued before state and federal appellate courts inside and outside California. Paul previously chaired the Committee on Appellate Courts of the State Bar of California and has presented on appellate law and practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's experience as lead trial counsel (both bench and jury) informs his work as an appellate advisor on trial teams. At the trial court level, Paul also consults on strategy and handles procedural matters such as personal jurisdiction, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e, state-vs.-federal jurisdiction, and choice of law, often in mass litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul's broad substantive-law experience includes administrative review, antitrust, arbitration review, employment, energy, environmental, infrastructure, intellectual property, land use, mass torts, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, other product liability, punitive damages, reputation, securities and constitutional issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaul is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBrown v. McKesson Corporation\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B266990, Jan. 26, 2017) (affirming judgment against dozens of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eOrrell v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP\u003c/em\u003e (9th Cir. No. 14-56845, Oct. 28, 2016) (affirming judgment against hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eNon-California-Resident Plaintiffs v. AstraZeneca LP\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. B260895, July 15, 2016) (obtaining dismissal of appeal by hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs who challenged \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eforum non conveniens\u003c/em\u003e dismissal).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSuffolk County Water Authority v. The Dow Chemical Company\u003c/em\u003e, 991 N.Y.S.2d 613, 121 A.D.3d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept., 2014) (dismissing numerous well-water contamination claims by a major public water supplier).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMacasa v. Dole Food Company, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B245138, 2014) (rejecting assertion of longer, foreign limitations period by several thousand plaintiffs who alleged toxic exposures in the Philippines; affirming dismissal of claims as untimely).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaguna v. Dole Food Company, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B233497, 2014) (affirming decision to vacate judgment for plaintiffs upon finding fraudulent scheme to assert toxic exposures at Nicaraguan banana farms).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBombardier Recreational Products, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Canada ULC\u003c/em\u003e, 216 Cal. App. 4th 591, 157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66 (2013) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHH, LLC\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ev.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWestLB AG\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. D060531, 2012) (holding that cross-complaint in real estate financing litigation was not a SLAPP suit).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEnayati v. UOP, LLC\u003c/em\u003e (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC430304, 2012) (nonsuit judgment based on legal standard of care for engineering professionals).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePacific Rim Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Aon Risk Insurances Services West, Inc.,\u003c/em\u003e 203 Cal. App. 4th 1278, 183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294(2012) (holding that insurance broker did not have ongoing duty to additional insured).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCity of Modesto etc. et al. v. The Dow Chemical Company et al.\u003c/em\u003e (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. 999345, 999643; Cal. Ct. App. No. A134419 \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e) (post-trial motions; appellate matters); \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. A125426, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; partial judgment following mistrial).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDow Chemical Canada ULC v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e, 202 Cal. App. 4th 170, 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 597 (2011) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDow Chemical Canada ULC v. Fandino\u003c/em\u003e, 131 S. Ct. 3088 (June 28, 2011, No. 10-250) (GVR: granting certiorari petition challenging personal jurisdiction, vacating judgment, and remanding for further consideration in light of \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJ. McIntyre\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJ. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro\u003c/em\u003e, 131 S. Ct. 2780 (2011) (amicus brief for Dow Chemical Canada ULC, asserting due process insufficiency of stream-of-commerce test for personal jurisdiction).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eJones v. ConocoPhillips\u003c/em\u003e, 198 Cal. App. 4th 1187, 130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 571 (2011) (addressing pleading standards for toxic-tort actions).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAbrego v. The Dow Chemical Company\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B222612, 2010) (affirming forum non conveniens dismissals).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGCM Air Group LLC v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (9th Cir. No. 09-15825, 2010) (defending property contamination claims).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSafeway Inc. v. Pivotal Sales Company\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. A116637, 2010) (commercial and antitrust issues; judgment for client affirmed).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eClayworth v. Pfizer Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 49 Cal. 4th 758, 233 P.2d 1066, 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 (2010) (industry-wide pharmaceutical antitrust litigation; blocking \"pass-on\" evidence), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A131804, 2012) (affirming summary judgment on merits for defendants), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A132527, 2014) (affirming award of costs to defendants).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eTexaco Inc. v. Superior Court\u003c/em\u003e (Cal. Ct. App. No. B216264, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; dismissal of asbestos action based on construction of California borrowing statute).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eI\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003en re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)\u003c/em\u003e (E.D. Pa., MDL Docket No. 875) (litigation of federal jurisdiction, government contractor defense).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLongs Drug Stores California, Inc. v. Shea\u003c/em\u003e, 2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 414, 2005 WL 91682 (2005) (overcoming anti-SLAPP opposition to business defamation claim).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDrolla v. ChevronTexaco Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11025, 2004 WL 2750328 (2004) (defense of maritime employment claim alleging disability discrimination).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerry, et al. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Cal., No. C 00-1353 SBA, 2002) (dismissal of class action claims alleging employment discrimination), 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920, 2003 WL 23098426 (9th Cir. 2003) (defense of individual discrimination claims).\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Fellow ","detail":"American Bar Foundation"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4233}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Johnson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Fellow \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Bar Foundation\"}{{ FIELD }}Brown v. McKesson Corporation (Cal. Ct. App. No. B266990, Jan. 26, 2017) (affirming judgment against dozens of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).{{ FIELD }}Orrell v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (9th Cir. No. 14-56845, Oct. 28, 2016) (affirming judgment against hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation).{{ FIELD }}Non-California-Resident Plaintiffs v. AstraZeneca LP (Cal. Ct. App. B260895, July 15, 2016) (obtaining dismissal of appeal by hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs who challenged forum non conveniens dismissal).{{ FIELD }}Suffolk County Water Authority v. The Dow Chemical Company, 991 N.Y.S.2d 613, 121 A.D.3d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept., 2014) (dismissing numerous well-water contamination claims by a major public water supplier).{{ FIELD }}Macasa v. Dole Food Company, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. No. B245138, 2014) (rejecting assertion of longer, foreign limitations period by several thousand plaintiffs who alleged toxic exposures in the Philippines; affirming dismissal of claims as untimely).{{ FIELD }}Laguna v. Dole Food Company, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. No. B233497, 2014) (affirming decision to vacate judgment for plaintiffs upon finding fraudulent scheme to assert toxic exposures at Nicaraguan banana farms).{{ FIELD }}Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Canada ULC, 216 Cal. App. 4th 591, 157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66 (2013) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).{{ FIELD }}HH, LLC v. WestLB AG (Cal. Ct. App. No. D060531, 2012) (holding that cross-complaint in real estate financing litigation was not a SLAPP suit).{{ FIELD }}Enayati v. UOP, LLC (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC430304, 2012) (nonsuit judgment based on legal standard of care for engineering professionals).{{ FIELD }}Pacific Rim Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Aon Risk Insurances Services West, Inc., 203 Cal. App. 4th 1278, 183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294(2012) (holding that insurance broker did not have ongoing duty to additional insured).{{ FIELD }}City of Modesto etc. et al. v. The Dow Chemical Company et al. (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. 999345, 999643; Cal. Ct. App. No. A134419 et al.) (post-trial motions; appellate matters); The Dow Chemical Company v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. No. A125426, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; partial judgment following mistrial).{{ FIELD }}Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. App. 4th 170, 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 597 (2011) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action).{{ FIELD }}Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Fandino, 131 S. Ct. 3088 (June 28, 2011, No. 10-250) (GVR: granting certiorari petition challenging personal jurisdiction, vacating judgment, and remanding for further consideration in light of J. McIntyre).{{ FIELD }}J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 131 S. Ct. 2780 (2011) (amicus brief for Dow Chemical Canada ULC, asserting due process insufficiency of stream-of-commerce test for personal jurisdiction).{{ FIELD }}Jones v. ConocoPhillips, 198 Cal. App. 4th 1187, 130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 571 (2011) (addressing pleading standards for toxic-tort actions).{{ FIELD }}Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Company (Cal. Ct. App. No. B222612, 2010) (affirming forum non conveniens dismissals).{{ FIELD }}GCM Air Group LLC v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (9th Cir. No. 09-15825, 2010) (defending property contamination claims).{{ FIELD }}Safeway Inc. v. Pivotal Sales Company (Cal. Ct. App. No. A116637, 2010) (commercial and antitrust issues; judgment for client affirmed).{{ FIELD }}Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc., 49 Cal. 4th 758, 233 P.2d 1066, 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 (2010) (industry-wide pharmaceutical antitrust litigation; blocking \"pass-on\" evidence), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A131804, 2012) (affirming summary judgment on merits for defendants), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A132527, 2014) (affirming award of costs to defendants).{{ FIELD }}Texaco Inc. v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. No. B216264, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; dismissal of asbestos action based on construction of California borrowing statute).{{ FIELD }}In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI) (E.D. Pa., MDL Docket No. 875) (litigation of federal jurisdiction, government contractor defense).{{ FIELD }}Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. v. Shea, 2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 414, 2005 WL 91682 (2005) (overcoming anti-SLAPP opposition to business defamation claim).{{ FIELD }}Drolla v. ChevronTexaco Corp., 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11025, 2004 WL 2750328 (2004) (defense of maritime employment claim alleging disability discrimination).{{ FIELD }}Berry, et al. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (N.D. Cal., No. C 00-1353 SBA, 2002) (dismissal of class action claims alleging employment discrimination), 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920, 2003 WL 23098426 (9th Cir. 2003) (defense of individual discrimination claims).{{ FIELD }}Paul Johnson litigates large, complex cases in California state and federal courts. As a partner in our Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice, Paul represents clients in appellate proceedings. Paul's work for clients in trial courts often involves unsettled legal issues or complex civil procedure.\n\nPaul's litigation experience—over 30 years—includes all phases of appellate-court and trial-court proceedings. Certified by the State Bar of California's Board of Legal Specialization as a specialist in appellate law, Paul has argued before state and federal appellate courts inside and outside California. Paul previously chaired the Committee on Appellate Courts of the State Bar of California and has presented on appellate law and practice.\nPaul's experience as lead trial counsel (both bench and jury) informs his work as an appellate advisor on trial teams. At the trial court level, Paul also consults on strategy and handles procedural matters such as personal jurisdiction, forum non conveniens, state-vs.-federal jurisdiction, and choice of law, often in mass litigation.\nPaul's broad substantive-law experience includes administrative review, antitrust, arbitration review, employment, energy, environmental, infrastructure, intellectual property, land use, mass torts, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, other product liability, punitive damages, reputation, securities and constitutional issues.\nPaul is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation. Paul R. Johnson Partner Fellow  American Bar Foundation Yale University Yale Law School University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California State Bar of California Certified Specialist, Appellate Law (State Bar of California, Board of Legal Specialization) Brown v. McKesson Corporation (Cal. Ct. App. No. B266990, Jan. 26, 2017) (affirming judgment against dozens of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation). Orrell v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (9th Cir. No. 14-56845, Oct. 28, 2016) (affirming judgment against hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs based on exclusion of medical expert opinion on general causation). Non-California-Resident Plaintiffs v. AstraZeneca LP (Cal. Ct. App. B260895, July 15, 2016) (obtaining dismissal of appeal by hundreds of pharmaceutical-product-liability plaintiffs who challenged forum non conveniens dismissal). Suffolk County Water Authority v. The Dow Chemical Company, 991 N.Y.S.2d 613, 121 A.D.3d 50 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept., 2014) (dismissing numerous well-water contamination claims by a major public water supplier). Macasa v. Dole Food Company, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. No. B245138, 2014) (rejecting assertion of longer, foreign limitations period by several thousand plaintiffs who alleged toxic exposures in the Philippines; affirming dismissal of claims as untimely). Laguna v. Dole Food Company, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. No. B233497, 2014) (affirming decision to vacate judgment for plaintiffs upon finding fraudulent scheme to assert toxic exposures at Nicaraguan banana farms). Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Canada ULC, 216 Cal. App. 4th 591, 157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 66 (2013) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action). HH, LLC v. WestLB AG (Cal. Ct. App. No. D060531, 2012) (holding that cross-complaint in real estate financing litigation was not a SLAPP suit). Enayati v. UOP, LLC (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC430304, 2012) (nonsuit judgment based on legal standard of care for engineering professionals). Pacific Rim Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Aon Risk Insurances Services West, Inc., 203 Cal. App. 4th 1278, 183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294(2012) (holding that insurance broker did not have ongoing duty to additional insured). City of Modesto etc. et al. v. The Dow Chemical Company et al. (San Francisco County Super. Ct. Nos. 999345, 999643; Cal. Ct. App. No. A134419 et al.) (post-trial motions; appellate matters); The Dow Chemical Company v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. No. A125426, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; partial judgment following mistrial). Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. App. 4th 170, 134 Cal. Rptr. 3d 597 (2011) (holding successor to Canadian component manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction in California product liability action). Dow Chemical Canada ULC v. Fandino, 131 S. Ct. 3088 (June 28, 2011, No. 10-250) (GVR: granting certiorari petition challenging personal jurisdiction, vacating judgment, and remanding for further consideration in light of J. McIntyre). J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 131 S. Ct. 2780 (2011) (amicus brief for Dow Chemical Canada ULC, asserting due process insufficiency of stream-of-commerce test for personal jurisdiction). Jones v. ConocoPhillips, 198 Cal. App. 4th 1187, 130 Cal. Rptr. 3d 571 (2011) (addressing pleading standards for toxic-tort actions). Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Company (Cal. Ct. App. No. B222612, 2010) (affirming forum non conveniens dismissals). GCM Air Group LLC v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (9th Cir. No. 09-15825, 2010) (defending property contamination claims). Safeway Inc. v. Pivotal Sales Company (Cal. Ct. App. No. A116637, 2010) (commercial and antitrust issues; judgment for client affirmed). Clayworth v. Pfizer Inc., 49 Cal. 4th 758, 233 P.2d 1066, 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 (2010) (industry-wide pharmaceutical antitrust litigation; blocking \"pass-on\" evidence), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A131804, 2012) (affirming summary judgment on merits for defendants), (Cal. Ct. App. No. A132527, 2014) (affirming award of costs to defendants). Texaco Inc. v. Superior Court (Cal. Ct. App. No. B216264, 2009) (alternative writ granted and followed by trial court; dismissal of asbestos action based on construction of California borrowing statute). In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI) (E.D. Pa., MDL Docket No. 875) (litigation of federal jurisdiction, government contractor defense). Longs Drug Stores California, Inc. v. Shea, 2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 414, 2005 WL 91682 (2005) (overcoming anti-SLAPP opposition to business defamation claim). Drolla v. ChevronTexaco Corp., 2004 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11025, 2004 WL 2750328 (2004) (defense of maritime employment claim alleging disability discrimination). Berry, et al. v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (N.D. Cal., No. C 00-1353 SBA, 2002) (dismissal of class action claims alleging employment discrimination), 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920, 2003 WL 23098426 (9th Cir. 2003) (defense of individual discrimination claims).","searchable_name":"Paul R. Johnson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}