{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"16","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"M","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":436475,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5092,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTroy McMahan has more than 30 years of experience defending Fortune 500 companies in cases involving premises and products liability claims, toxic tort claims, maritime claims and business disputes involving the improper use of proprietary information. He serves as counsel for multiple corporations and organizations across a broad range of industries including Chevron, Texaco, and Dow.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy often acts as jointly retained counsel for multiple industry defendants and has years of experience in structuring and managing such joint defenses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy has extensive experience litigating product and premises liability dockets throughout the U.S. including California. He specializes in toxic tort cases involving claims of contaminants exposure from the workplace or through consumer goods. Troy also has special expertise in product liability defense for automobile manufacturers in cases involving automotive design and manufacture. He has tried jury cases to verdict involving asbestos-containing brake products, and has\u0026nbsp;secured defense verdicts for automobile manufacturers in cases alleging that a defective ignition switch\u0026nbsp;caused a vehicle fire and subsequent property damage, as well as a case alleging violations of the California\u0026nbsp;Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy has received recognition as a top rated products liability attorney on numerous occasions by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e, and he has been invited to be a guest instructor for\u0026nbsp;a course entitled \"Depositions - Witness Preparation\"\u0026nbsp;at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Feb. 2024).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"troy-mcmahan","email":"tmcmahan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFood and Beverage\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eegg producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with commercial claims arising from a 2010 salmonella outbreak and recall (the largest egg salmonella outbreak in history) and related FDA investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eToxic Tort\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecrude oil refiners\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;manufacturers of industrial commercial and consumer grade chemical products\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in personal injury and wrongful death cases involving cancer, systemic diseases and immune system dysfunction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMaritime\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003evessel owners and operators\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in matters involving wrongful death and personal injury cases filed by seaman, longshoreman and shipyard contractors under federal maritime law \u0026mdash; Jones Act, Longshoreman and Harbor Workers\u0026rsquo; Compensation Act and federal maritime common law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured summary judgment for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eshipping client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a case of first impression \u0026mdash; whether federal maritime law imposes a duty upon a ship owner to protect offshore third parties from injuries occurring as a result of activities performed aboard ship. Specifically, plaintiff claimed exposure to toxins used aboard the vessel, and which his father \u0026mdash; an officer aboard the vessel \u0026mdash; allegedly brought home on his uniform.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAsbestos\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trial asbestos product and premises liability dockets throughout the State of California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAutomotive\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured a defense verdict at trial on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFord Motor Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon insurance subrogation claim brought by an insurance company against Ford based on claims of a defective ignition switch.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFord Motor Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s product liability claim based on allegations that a defective seatbelt caused plaintiff to sustain injuries during an automobile accident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a defense judgment on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign gas tank manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a personal injury case brought by several plaintiffs who sustained personal injuries when their personal watercraft exploded causing several of the plaintiffs to claim brain damage, partial blindness and severe emotional distress.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Tort Liability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various personal injury and property damage claims arising from construction activities occurring during the BART extension projects.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"McMahan","nick_name":"Troy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Troy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":196,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to Super Lawyers (2006, 2010-2015, 2020)","detail":"Super Lawyers"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTroy McMahan has more than 30 years of experience defending Fortune 500 companies in cases involving premises and products liability claims, toxic tort claims, maritime claims and business disputes involving the improper use of proprietary information. He serves as counsel for multiple corporations and organizations across a broad range of industries including Chevron, Texaco, and Dow.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy often acts as jointly retained counsel for multiple industry defendants and has years of experience in structuring and managing such joint defenses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy has extensive experience litigating product and premises liability dockets throughout the U.S. including California. He specializes in toxic tort cases involving claims of contaminants exposure from the workplace or through consumer goods. Troy also has special expertise in product liability defense for automobile manufacturers in cases involving automotive design and manufacture. He has tried jury cases to verdict involving asbestos-containing brake products, and has\u0026nbsp;secured defense verdicts for automobile manufacturers in cases alleging that a defective ignition switch\u0026nbsp;caused a vehicle fire and subsequent property damage, as well as a case alleging violations of the California\u0026nbsp;Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTroy has received recognition as a top rated products liability attorney on numerous occasions by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e, and he has been invited to be a guest instructor for\u0026nbsp;a course entitled \"Depositions - Witness Preparation\"\u0026nbsp;at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Feb. 2024).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFood and Beverage\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eegg producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with commercial claims arising from a 2010 salmonella outbreak and recall (the largest egg salmonella outbreak in history) and related FDA investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eToxic Tort\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecrude oil refiners\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;manufacturers of industrial commercial and consumer grade chemical products\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in personal injury and wrongful death cases involving cancer, systemic diseases and immune system dysfunction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMaritime\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003evessel owners and operators\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in matters involving wrongful death and personal injury cases filed by seaman, longshoreman and shipyard contractors under federal maritime law \u0026mdash; Jones Act, Longshoreman and Harbor Workers\u0026rsquo; Compensation Act and federal maritime common law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured summary judgment for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eshipping client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a case of first impression \u0026mdash; whether federal maritime law imposes a duty upon a ship owner to protect offshore third parties from injuries occurring as a result of activities performed aboard ship. Specifically, plaintiff claimed exposure to toxins used aboard the vessel, and which his father \u0026mdash; an officer aboard the vessel \u0026mdash; allegedly brought home on his uniform.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAsbestos\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresent\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron U.S.A. Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trial asbestos product and premises liability dockets throughout the State of California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAutomotive\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured a defense verdict at trial on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFord Motor Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon insurance subrogation claim brought by an insurance company against Ford based on claims of a defective ignition switch.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFord Motor Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s product liability claim based on allegations that a defective seatbelt caused plaintiff to sustain injuries during an automobile accident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a defense judgment on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign gas tank manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a personal injury case brought by several plaintiffs who sustained personal injuries when their personal watercraft exploded causing several of the plaintiffs to claim brain damage, partial blindness and severe emotional distress.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Tort Liability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various personal injury and property damage claims arising from construction activities occurring during the BART extension projects.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to Super Lawyers (2006, 2010-2015, 2020)","detail":"Super Lawyers"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5912}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:26.000Z","searchable_text":"McMahan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to Super Lawyers (2006, 2010-2015, 2020)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}Food and Beverage\nRepresented an egg producer in connection with commercial claims arising from a 2010 salmonella outbreak and recall (the largest egg salmonella outbreak in history) and related FDA investigation.{{ FIELD }}Toxic Tort\nCounsel for crude oil refiners and manufacturers of industrial commercial and consumer grade chemical products in personal injury and wrongful death cases involving cancer, systemic diseases and immune system dysfunction.{{ FIELD }}Maritime\nRepresent vessel owners and operators in matters involving wrongful death and personal injury cases filed by seaman, longshoreman and shipyard contractors under federal maritime law — Jones Act, Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and federal maritime common law.{{ FIELD }}Secured summary judgment for a shipping client in a case of first impression — whether federal maritime law imposes a duty upon a ship owner to protect offshore third parties from injuries occurring as a result of activities performed aboard ship. Specifically, plaintiff claimed exposure to toxins used aboard the vessel, and which his father — an officer aboard the vessel — allegedly brought home on his uniform.{{ FIELD }}Asbestos\nRepresent Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Texaco Inc., and The Dow Chemical Company in trial asbestos product and premises liability dockets throughout the State of California.{{ FIELD }}Automotive\nSecured a defense verdict at trial on behalf of the Ford Motor Company on insurance subrogation claim brought by an insurance company against Ford based on claims of a defective ignition switch.{{ FIELD }}Secured summary judgment for Ford Motor Company against plaintiff’s product liability claim based on allegations that a defective seatbelt caused plaintiff to sustain injuries during an automobile accident.{{ FIELD }}Secured a defense judgment on behalf of a foreign gas tank manufacturer in a personal injury case brought by several plaintiffs who sustained personal injuries when their personal watercraft exploded causing several of the plaintiffs to claim brain damage, partial blindness and severe emotional distress.{{ FIELD }}Government Tort Liability\nRepresented the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) in various personal injury and property damage claims arising from construction activities occurring during the BART extension projects.{{ FIELD }}Troy McMahan has more than 30 years of experience defending Fortune 500 companies in cases involving premises and products liability claims, toxic tort claims, maritime claims and business disputes involving the improper use of proprietary information. He serves as counsel for multiple corporations and organizations across a broad range of industries including Chevron, Texaco, and Dow.\nTroy often acts as jointly retained counsel for multiple industry defendants and has years of experience in structuring and managing such joint defenses.\nTroy has extensive experience litigating product and premises liability dockets throughout the U.S. including California. He specializes in toxic tort cases involving claims of contaminants exposure from the workplace or through consumer goods. Troy also has special expertise in product liability defense for automobile manufacturers in cases involving automotive design and manufacture. He has tried jury cases to verdict involving asbestos-containing brake products, and has secured defense verdicts for automobile manufacturers in cases alleging that a defective ignition switch caused a vehicle fire and subsequent property damage, as well as a case alleging violations of the California Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. \nTroy has received recognition as a top rated products liability attorney on numerous occasions by Super Lawyers, and he has been invited to be a guest instructor for a course entitled \"Depositions - Witness Preparation\" at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Feb. 2024). Counsel Selected to Super Lawyers (2006, 2010-2015, 2020) Super Lawyers University of Idaho University of Idaho College of Law University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Bar Association of San Francisco Alameda County Bar Association Association of Defense Counsel American Bar Association — Environmental, Product Liability and Mass Tort Sections member Defense Research Institute — Drug and Medical Device, Product Liability and Toxic Tort Committees member Food and Beverage\nRepresented an egg producer in connection with commercial claims arising from a 2010 salmonella outbreak and recall (the largest egg salmonella outbreak in history) and related FDA investigation. Toxic Tort\nCounsel for crude oil refiners and manufacturers of industrial commercial and consumer grade chemical products in personal injury and wrongful death cases involving cancer, systemic diseases and immune system dysfunction. Maritime\nRepresent vessel owners and operators in matters involving wrongful death and personal injury cases filed by seaman, longshoreman and shipyard contractors under federal maritime law — Jones Act, Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and federal maritime common law. Secured summary judgment for a shipping client in a case of first impression — whether federal maritime law imposes a duty upon a ship owner to protect offshore third parties from injuries occurring as a result of activities performed aboard ship. Specifically, plaintiff claimed exposure to toxins used aboard the vessel, and which his father — an officer aboard the vessel — allegedly brought home on his uniform. Asbestos\nRepresent Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Texaco Inc., and The Dow Chemical Company in trial asbestos product and premises liability dockets throughout the State of California. Automotive\nSecured a defense verdict at trial on behalf of the Ford Motor Company on insurance subrogation claim brought by an insurance company against Ford based on claims of a defective ignition switch. Secured summary judgment for Ford Motor Company against plaintiff’s product liability claim based on allegations that a defective seatbelt caused plaintiff to sustain injuries during an automobile accident. Secured a defense judgment on behalf of a foreign gas tank manufacturer in a personal injury case brought by several plaintiffs who sustained personal injuries when their personal watercraft exploded causing several of the plaintiffs to claim brain damage, partial blindness and severe emotional distress. Government Tort Liability\nRepresented the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) in various personal injury and property damage claims arising from construction activities occurring during the BART extension projects.","searchable_name":"Troy D. McMahan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":196,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442406,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1253,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMegan Michelsen is a lawyer with King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. Her practice focuses mainly on the representation of clients in the pharmaceutical industry and other FDA-regulated clients. She has experience with large-scale, multidistrict litigations as well as individual product liability actions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"megan-michelsen","email":"mmichelsen@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Michelsen","nick_name":"Megan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Megan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMegan Michelsen is a lawyer with King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. Her practice focuses mainly on the representation of clients in the pharmaceutical industry and other FDA-regulated clients. She has experience with large-scale, multidistrict litigations as well as individual product liability actions.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1062}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:28.000Z","searchable_text":"Michelsen{{ FIELD }}Megan Michelsen is a lawyer with King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. Her practice focuses mainly on the representation of clients in the pharmaceutical industry and other FDA-regulated clients. She has experience with large-scale, multidistrict litigations as well as individual product liability actions. Associate McDaniel College  University of Maryland  Georgia State Bar of Georgia","searchable_name":"Megan M. Michelsen","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446355,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5992,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSimran is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is a member of the Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Simran's practice focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, complex business disputes, and product liability litigation. She is a team member on several matters, including representation for Fortune 500 companies such as Coca-Cola, R.J. Reynolds, and Boehringer Ingelheim.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSimran graduated with honors from the Emory University School of Law, where she also served on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEmory Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Prior to law school, she received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology and a certificate in Legal Studies\u0026nbsp;from the University of Georgia, where she graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ec\u003cem\u003eum laude\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"simran-modi","email":"smodi@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Modi","nick_name":"Simran","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Simran","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with honors","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSimran is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is a member of the Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Simran's practice focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, complex business disputes, and product liability litigation. She is a team member on several matters, including representation for Fortune 500 companies such as Coca-Cola, R.J. Reynolds, and Boehringer Ingelheim.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSimran graduated with honors from the Emory University School of Law, where she also served on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEmory Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e. Prior to law school, she received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology and a certificate in Legal Studies\u0026nbsp;from the University of Georgia, where she graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ec\u003cem\u003eum laude\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11797}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:57.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:57.000Z","searchable_text":"Modi{{ FIELD }}Simran is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is a member of the Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Simran's practice focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, complex business disputes, and product liability litigation. She is a team member on several matters, including representation for Fortune 500 companies such as Coca-Cola, R.J. Reynolds, and Boehringer Ingelheim. \nSimran graduated with honors from the Emory University School of Law, where she also served on the Emory Law Journal. Prior to law school, she received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology and a certificate in Legal Studies from the University of Georgia, where she graduated summa cum laude.  Associate University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia DeKalb County Superior Court Board of Directors, Atlanta Bar Association Women in the Profession Section Board of Directors, Atlanta Council for Younger Lawyers Board of Directors, South Asian Bar Association of Georgia","searchable_name":"Simran Modi","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427255,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6548,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMichael Mosher represents Fortune 100 and other large companies in a diverse range of complex matters, including toxic and environmental torts, products liability, and consumer litigation. He has experience in high-stakes litigation and his cases frequently include novel medical, scientific and legal issues. As part of his practice, Michael has drafted dispositive and discovery motions, assisted in developing litigation and trial strategy, spearheaded fact investigations, and helped secure both favorable settlements and dismissals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael joined the firm after graduating from Loyola Law School. While in school, he externed for the Honorable R. Gary Klausner at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, as well as the Honorable Sheri Bluebond at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Michael also served as a Senior Production Editor for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLoyola of Los Angeles Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his last semester, Michael competed in the Scott Moot Court Competition, where he wrote a U.S. Supreme Court brief and argued complex Second and Fourth Amendment issues. He won the award for Best Brief and was a finalist in the oral argument portion of the competition.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-mosher","email":"mmosher@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3570}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mosher","nick_name":"Michael","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Michael Mosher is an  associate of our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMichael Mosher represents Fortune 100 and other large companies in a diverse range of complex matters, including toxic and environmental torts, products liability, and consumer litigation. He has experience in high-stakes litigation and his cases frequently include novel medical, scientific and legal issues. As part of his practice, Michael has drafted dispositive and discovery motions, assisted in developing litigation and trial strategy, spearheaded fact investigations, and helped secure both favorable settlements and dismissals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael joined the firm after graduating from Loyola Law School. While in school, he externed for the Honorable R. Gary Klausner at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, as well as the Honorable Sheri Bluebond at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Michael also served as a Senior Production Editor for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLoyola of Los Angeles Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his last semester, Michael competed in the Scott Moot Court Competition, where he wrote a U.S. Supreme Court brief and argued complex Second and Fourth Amendment issues. He won the award for Best Brief and was a finalist in the oral argument portion of the competition.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12420}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Mosher{{ FIELD }}Michael Mosher represents Fortune 100 and other large companies in a diverse range of complex matters, including toxic and environmental torts, products liability, and consumer litigation. He has experience in high-stakes litigation and his cases frequently include novel medical, scientific and legal issues. As part of his practice, Michael has drafted dispositive and discovery motions, assisted in developing litigation and trial strategy, spearheaded fact investigations, and helped secure both favorable settlements and dismissals. \nMichael joined the firm after graduating from Loyola Law School. While in school, he externed for the Honorable R. Gary Klausner at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, as well as the Honorable Sheri Bluebond at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Michael also served as a Senior Production Editor for the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review.\nIn his last semester, Michael competed in the Scott Moot Court Competition, where he wrote a U.S. Supreme Court brief and argued complex Second and Fourth Amendment issues. He won the award for Best Brief and was a finalist in the oral argument portion of the competition. Michael Mosher lawyer Associate Loyola Law School Loyola Law School Central District of California California","searchable_name":"Michael Mosher","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442328,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":319,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLori Maryscuk joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 1998 as an attorney with the Discovery Center, King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s solution to providing cost-effective and centralized discovery services. Ms. Maryscuk primarily represents medical device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, health systems, physician practices and other companies that service the health care industry.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe assists clients in responding to government investigations relating to the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, False Claims Act and CMS regulations, as well as, claims of off-label marketing. She frequently represents companies under investigation by the Department of Justice, the Inspector General of Health and Human Services, the United States Senate and other government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Maryscuk earned a Master\u0026rsquo;s Certificate in Health Care Corporate Compliance from the George Washington University of Professional Studies in 2014 and is Certified in Healthcare Compliance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Maryscuk received her J.D. from George Mason University in 1996. She graduated from James Madison University with a B.S. in Political Science in 1993. She is admitted to practice in Georgia, and is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lori-maryscuk","email":"lmaryscuk@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 16 attorneys in a review of over 500,000 documents for a medical device manufacturer in response to a governmental investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in managing a document review and drafting privilege logs in response to civil and criminal DOJ investigations involving a university hospital system.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the review and analysis of documents and the drafting of privilege log entries for a major international financial institution in response to informational and investigative requests from various U.S. authorities, including the DOJ, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the Permanent Subcommittee of Investigations (\u0026ldquo;PSI\u0026rdquo;), and the New York Department of Financial Services (\u0026ldquo;DFS\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising and managing more than 20 attorneys in a privilege review of over 100,000 documents for a major international financial institution in responding to requests from a Monitor appointed by the New York Department of Financial Services and drafting a privilege log for the documents withheld or redacted from the production.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a pharmaceutical client against a challenge to privilege assertions made on 1,000 documents, including directing the preparation of the documents for in-camera review by court and providing assistance to local counsel at court hearing.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; The Court upheld the privilege assertions on the majority of the documents at issue at the hearing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaged more than 10 attorneys and 5 support staff in connection with the drafting of privilege log entries, reviewing documents for privilege, redacting documents for privilege and maintaining records of privilege and redacted documents for a pharmaceutical client.\u0026nbsp; Developed a master privilege log of more than 14,000 entries for a pharmaceutical client involved in multi-jurisdictional litigation. The master log served as a foundation for quickly and efficiently developing privilege logs for individual matters and as a searchable index for privileged documents for a document depository.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted affidavits for client witnesses, prepared briefs, and performed legal research regarding attorney-client and work product privilege issues in defense of privilege challenges for a pharmaceutical client.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervised more than 25 attorneys in connection with the preparation of a privilege log of more than 13,000 documents for a pharmaceutical client in defense of a product liability action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDue to Ms. Maryscuk\u0026rsquo;s involvement in these projects, she has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and privilege logs.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Maryscuk has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, FTI\u0026rsquo;s Ringtail, Case Central, Ernst \u0026amp; Young\u0026rsquo;s Tree, Concordance, IPro and Microsoft Access.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Maryscuk","nick_name":"Lori","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lori","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":109,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Pro Bono Service Award","detail":"2007 and 2009 "},{"title":"Officer","detail":"Phi Alpha Delta Legal Fraternity"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":84,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLori Maryscuk joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 1998 as an attorney with the Discovery Center, King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s solution to providing cost-effective and centralized discovery services. Ms. Maryscuk primarily represents medical device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, health systems, physician practices and other companies that service the health care industry.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe assists clients in responding to government investigations relating to the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, False Claims Act and CMS regulations, as well as, claims of off-label marketing. She frequently represents companies under investigation by the Department of Justice, the Inspector General of Health and Human Services, the United States Senate and other government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Maryscuk earned a Master\u0026rsquo;s Certificate in Health Care Corporate Compliance from the George Washington University of Professional Studies in 2014 and is Certified in Healthcare Compliance.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Maryscuk received her J.D. from George Mason University in 1996. She graduated from James Madison University with a B.S. in Political Science in 1993. She is admitted to practice in Georgia, and is a member of the State Bar of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 16 attorneys in a review of over 500,000 documents for a medical device manufacturer in response to a governmental investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in managing a document review and drafting privilege logs in response to civil and criminal DOJ investigations involving a university hospital system.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the review and analysis of documents and the drafting of privilege log entries for a major international financial institution in response to informational and investigative requests from various U.S. authorities, including the DOJ, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the Permanent Subcommittee of Investigations (\u0026ldquo;PSI\u0026rdquo;), and the New York Department of Financial Services (\u0026ldquo;DFS\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising and managing more than 20 attorneys in a privilege review of over 100,000 documents for a major international financial institution in responding to requests from a Monitor appointed by the New York Department of Financial Services and drafting a privilege log for the documents withheld or redacted from the production.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a pharmaceutical client against a challenge to privilege assertions made on 1,000 documents, including directing the preparation of the documents for in-camera review by court and providing assistance to local counsel at court hearing.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; The Court upheld the privilege assertions on the majority of the documents at issue at the hearing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaged more than 10 attorneys and 5 support staff in connection with the drafting of privilege log entries, reviewing documents for privilege, redacting documents for privilege and maintaining records of privilege and redacted documents for a pharmaceutical client.\u0026nbsp; Developed a master privilege log of more than 14,000 entries for a pharmaceutical client involved in multi-jurisdictional litigation. The master log served as a foundation for quickly and efficiently developing privilege logs for individual matters and as a searchable index for privileged documents for a document depository.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted affidavits for client witnesses, prepared briefs, and performed legal research regarding attorney-client and work product privilege issues in defense of privilege challenges for a pharmaceutical client.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervised more than 25 attorneys in connection with the preparation of a privilege log of more than 13,000 documents for a pharmaceutical client in defense of a product liability action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDue to Ms. Maryscuk\u0026rsquo;s involvement in these projects, she has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and privilege logs.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Maryscuk has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, FTI\u0026rsquo;s Ringtail, Case Central, Ernst \u0026amp; Young\u0026rsquo;s Tree, Concordance, IPro and Microsoft Access.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Pro Bono Service Award","detail":"2007 and 2009 "},{"title":"Officer","detail":"Phi Alpha Delta Legal Fraternity"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1036}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:28.000Z","searchable_text":"Maryscuk{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Pro Bono Service Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2007 and 2009 \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Officer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Phi Alpha Delta Legal Fraternity\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 16 attorneys in a review of over 500,000 documents for a medical device manufacturer in response to a governmental investigation.{{ FIELD }}Assisted in managing a document review and drafting privilege logs in response to civil and criminal DOJ investigations involving a university hospital system. {{ FIELD }}Participated in the review and analysis of documents and the drafting of privilege log entries for a major international financial institution in response to informational and investigative requests from various U.S. authorities, including the DOJ, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the Permanent Subcommittee of Investigations (“PSI”), and the New York Department of Financial Services (“DFS”).{{ FIELD }}Assisted in supervising and managing more than 20 attorneys in a privilege review of over 100,000 documents for a major international financial institution in responding to requests from a Monitor appointed by the New York Department of Financial Services and drafting a privilege log for the documents withheld or redacted from the production.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a pharmaceutical client against a challenge to privilege assertions made on 1,000 documents, including directing the preparation of the documents for in-camera review by court and providing assistance to local counsel at court hearing.   The Court upheld the privilege assertions on the majority of the documents at issue at the hearing.{{ FIELD }}Managed more than 10 attorneys and 5 support staff in connection with the drafting of privilege log entries, reviewing documents for privilege, redacting documents for privilege and maintaining records of privilege and redacted documents for a pharmaceutical client.  Developed a master privilege log of more than 14,000 entries for a pharmaceutical client involved in multi-jurisdictional litigation. The master log served as a foundation for quickly and efficiently developing privilege logs for individual matters and as a searchable index for privileged documents for a document depository.  {{ FIELD }}Drafted affidavits for client witnesses, prepared briefs, and performed legal research regarding attorney-client and work product privilege issues in defense of privilege challenges for a pharmaceutical client. {{ FIELD }}Supervised more than 25 attorneys in connection with the preparation of a privilege log of more than 13,000 documents for a pharmaceutical client in defense of a product liability action.{{ FIELD }}Litigation Technology Experience\nDue to Ms. Maryscuk’s involvement in these projects, she has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and privilege logs.  Ms. Maryscuk has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, FTI’s Ringtail, Case Central, Ernst \u0026amp; Young’s Tree, Concordance, IPro and Microsoft Access.{{ FIELD }}Lori Maryscuk joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 1998 as an attorney with the Discovery Center, King \u0026amp; Spalding’s solution to providing cost-effective and centralized discovery services. Ms. Maryscuk primarily represents medical device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, health systems, physician practices and other companies that service the health care industry.\nShe assists clients in responding to government investigations relating to the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, False Claims Act and CMS regulations, as well as, claims of off-label marketing. She frequently represents companies under investigation by the Department of Justice, the Inspector General of Health and Human Services, the United States Senate and other government agencies.\nMs. Maryscuk earned a Master’s Certificate in Health Care Corporate Compliance from the George Washington University of Professional Studies in 2014 and is Certified in Healthcare Compliance.\nMs. Maryscuk received her J.D. from George Mason University in 1996. She graduated from James Madison University with a B.S. in Political Science in 1993. She is admitted to practice in Georgia, and is a member of the State Bar of Georgia. Senior Attorney Pro Bono Service Award 2007 and 2009  Officer Phi Alpha Delta Legal Fraternity James Madison University  George Mason University George Mason University School of Law Georgia Virginia American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Assisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 16 attorneys in a review of over 500,000 documents for a medical device manufacturer in response to a governmental investigation. Assisted in managing a document review and drafting privilege logs in response to civil and criminal DOJ investigations involving a university hospital system.  Participated in the review and analysis of documents and the drafting of privilege log entries for a major international financial institution in response to informational and investigative requests from various U.S. authorities, including the DOJ, the SEC, the Federal Reserve, the Permanent Subcommittee of Investigations (“PSI”), and the New York Department of Financial Services (“DFS”). Assisted in supervising and managing more than 20 attorneys in a privilege review of over 100,000 documents for a major international financial institution in responding to requests from a Monitor appointed by the New York Department of Financial Services and drafting a privilege log for the documents withheld or redacted from the production. Successfully defended a pharmaceutical client against a challenge to privilege assertions made on 1,000 documents, including directing the preparation of the documents for in-camera review by court and providing assistance to local counsel at court hearing.   The Court upheld the privilege assertions on the majority of the documents at issue at the hearing. Managed more than 10 attorneys and 5 support staff in connection with the drafting of privilege log entries, reviewing documents for privilege, redacting documents for privilege and maintaining records of privilege and redacted documents for a pharmaceutical client.  Developed a master privilege log of more than 14,000 entries for a pharmaceutical client involved in multi-jurisdictional litigation. The master log served as a foundation for quickly and efficiently developing privilege logs for individual matters and as a searchable index for privileged documents for a document depository.   Drafted affidavits for client witnesses, prepared briefs, and performed legal research regarding attorney-client and work product privilege issues in defense of privilege challenges for a pharmaceutical client.  Supervised more than 25 attorneys in connection with the preparation of a privilege log of more than 13,000 documents for a pharmaceutical client in defense of a product liability action. Litigation Technology Experience\nDue to Ms. Maryscuk’s involvement in these projects, she has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and privilege logs.  Ms. Maryscuk has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, FTI’s Ringtail, Case Central, Ernst \u0026amp; Young’s Tree, Concordance, IPro and Microsoft Access.","searchable_name":"Lori A. Maryscuk","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":109,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442329,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":331,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJason Mattox is a Senior Attorney with King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery practice. He has experience in pre-trial discovery in regulatory proceedings and mass tort litigation, including the representation of companies in various sectors including: financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, energy and tobacco.\u0026nbsp; As part of the E-Discovery Practice\u0026nbsp;since 2003, he currently supervises document review projects for and provides e-discovery forensic consultation assistance to financial services and healthcare clients.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jason-mattox","email":"jmattox@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mattox","nick_name":"Jason","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jason","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":76,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJason Mattox is a Senior Attorney with King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery practice. He has experience in pre-trial discovery in regulatory proceedings and mass tort litigation, including the representation of companies in various sectors including: financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, energy and tobacco.\u0026nbsp; As part of the E-Discovery Practice\u0026nbsp;since 2003, he currently supervises document review projects for and provides e-discovery forensic consultation assistance to financial services and healthcare clients.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1040}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:29.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Mattox{{ FIELD }}Jason Mattox is a Senior Attorney with King \u0026amp; Spalding’s E-Discovery practice. He has experience in pre-trial discovery in regulatory proceedings and mass tort litigation, including the representation of companies in various sectors including: financial services, healthcare, pharmaceutical, energy and tobacco.  As part of the E-Discovery Practice since 2003, he currently supervises document review projects for and provides e-discovery forensic consultation assistance to financial services and healthcare clients.  Senior Attorney University of San Diego University of San Diego School of Law Santa Clara University Santa Clara University School of Law Georgia State Bar of Georgia","searchable_name":"Jason R. Mattox","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442331,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":323,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Mencken is a Senior Staff Attorney with the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes group. Her practice focuses electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in matters of white-collar criminal defense, internal and government investigations, and complex civil litigation including litigation of complex shareholder derivative actions and False Claims Act cases. Jennifer has experience defending companies in investigations by various government entities, including Congress, DOJ, SEC, EPA, and State Attorneys General, and in development of compliance guidelines and corresponding management training programs.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn her role, Jennifer works closely with clients and vendors to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve performance and defensibility across the entire EDRM spectrum.\u0026nbsp; She provides advice and counsel regarding the vendor selection process, helping with the design, development, and implementation of new discovery tools and best practice procedures.\u0026nbsp; She has over two decades of experience in managing discovery issues for the firm\u0026rsquo;s clients, with particular expertise regarding privilege and work product issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer co-authored a chapter, \u0026ldquo;Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective: Issues and Challenges,\u0026rdquo; for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner. \u0026nbsp;In 2014, she also co-authored an article, \u0026ldquo;How to Develop and Test a Filter to Avoid Producing Privileged Documents,\u0026rdquo; for the Fulton County Daily Report.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jennifer-mencken","email":"jmencken@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Mencken","nick_name":"Jennifer","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jennifer","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":76,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Mencken is a Senior Staff Attorney with the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes group. Her practice focuses electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in matters of white-collar criminal defense, internal and government investigations, and complex civil litigation including litigation of complex shareholder derivative actions and False Claims Act cases. Jennifer has experience defending companies in investigations by various government entities, including Congress, DOJ, SEC, EPA, and State Attorneys General, and in development of compliance guidelines and corresponding management training programs.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn her role, Jennifer works closely with clients and vendors to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve performance and defensibility across the entire EDRM spectrum.\u0026nbsp; She provides advice and counsel regarding the vendor selection process, helping with the design, development, and implementation of new discovery tools and best practice procedures.\u0026nbsp; She has over two decades of experience in managing discovery issues for the firm\u0026rsquo;s clients, with particular expertise regarding privilege and work product issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer co-authored a chapter, \u0026ldquo;Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective: Issues and Challenges,\u0026rdquo; for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner. \u0026nbsp;In 2014, she also co-authored an article, \u0026ldquo;How to Develop and Test a Filter to Avoid Producing Privileged Documents,\u0026rdquo; for the Fulton County Daily Report.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1060}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:31.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Mencken{{ FIELD }}Jennifer Mencken is a Senior Staff Attorney with the firm’s Trial and Global Disputes group. Her practice focuses electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in matters of white-collar criminal defense, internal and government investigations, and complex civil litigation including litigation of complex shareholder derivative actions and False Claims Act cases. Jennifer has experience defending companies in investigations by various government entities, including Congress, DOJ, SEC, EPA, and State Attorneys General, and in development of compliance guidelines and corresponding management training programs.\nIn her role, Jennifer works closely with clients and vendors to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and improve performance and defensibility across the entire EDRM spectrum.  She provides advice and counsel regarding the vendor selection process, helping with the design, development, and implementation of new discovery tools and best practice procedures.  She has over two decades of experience in managing discovery issues for the firm’s clients, with particular expertise regarding privilege and work product issues.\nJennifer co-authored a chapter, “Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective: Issues and Challenges,” for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner.  In 2014, she also co-authored an article, “How to Develop and Test a Filter to Avoid Producing Privileged Documents,” for the Fulton County Daily Report. Senior Attorney California State University-Fullerton  Boston College Boston College Law School Georgia American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia","searchable_name":"Jennifer A. Mencken","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}