{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"14","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"G","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":442774,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5431,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam \u0026ldquo;Bill\u0026rdquo; Gordon advises companies and executives on government investigations, regulatory enforcement, and risk-based compliance, with a focus on government contracts, national security, aviation and transportation, and U.S. consumer protection laws. A former senior executive, general counsel, and chief compliance officer at public and private equity\u0026ndash;backed companies, Bill brings pragmatic judgment to complex, business critical matters.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBill brings a wealth of private practice and in-house experience to achieve outstanding, expedient, and cost effective solutions to his clients\u0026rsquo; most challenging and complex legal and business needs.\u0026nbsp; His colleagues and clients praise him for his business acumen, and choose to work with him because of the significant legal and business value he provides as a trusted advisor to many of the largest global public and private entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBill defends clients in criminal and civil investigations involving alleged regulatory violations, such as fraud, false statements, obstruction, and internal controls failures, and guides matters from scoping and preservation through interviews, disclosures, strategy, and resolution. He coordinates closely with boards, audit committees, and senior leadership to protect privilege, mitigate collateral consequences, and preserve enterprise value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the counseling side, Bill advises on national security compliance (including classified contract and facility clearance obligations and sensitive technology controls) and government contracts issues (ethics and compliance programs, mandatory disclosures, procurement integrity, cost and pricing, False Claims Act risk, and suspension and debarment). He counsels aviation and aerospace clients on FAA, DOT, and TSA requirements, safety and operational compliance, economic licensing, consumer protection rules, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure obligations, security programs and directives, and incident response and regulator engagement. He also advises on anticorruption, sanctions, and export controls, including FCPA, U.S. sanctions, voluntary self-disclosures and licensing, and ITAR/EAR matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients rely on Bill for strategic, measured advocacy in sensitive matters with overlapping criminal, civil, and regulatory dimensions. He is known for clear communication with boards and C-suites, practical risk assessments, and the ability to coordinate complex, cross-border matters involving multiple agencies and legal regimes.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"william-gordon","email":"bgordon@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in the take private purchase of an amphibious warship manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a client in relation to an acquisition of a former U.S. Naval Base in the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted media companies obtain licenses for military grade protective equipment in Ukraine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a military contractor in relation to federal criminal charges stemming from actions in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a military contractor in relation to multiple regulatory issues relating to conduct in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised global consulting company on matters relating to data transformation, cyber security and privacy, and data integrity best practices\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed internal controls investigations and remediation projects for several private equity owned portfolio companies\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised large chemical manufacturer on US export control laws, including issues of self-disclosure, agency advocacy, ECCN classifications, and BIS licensing requirements/exceptions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation on behalf of a national consumer products company into compliance with U.S. consumer protection laws, including issues relating to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), American with Disabilities Act (ADA), bankruptcy, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP), data privacy, and anti-retaliation statutes. Defended client in US District Court in related litigation, including class action defense\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Bilfinger Westcon on matters related to FCPA and anti-corruption compliance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGuided Hercules Offshore, Inc. and HERO Liquidating Trust through two Chapter 11 reorganizations and its subsequent wind-down and liquidation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy, pharmaceutical and engineering companies before the DOJ and SEC in global FCPA and related anti-corruption investigations and voluntary disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multiple companies and individuals before the World Bank Sanctions Board in relation fraud and obstruction investigations by the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigations and negotiated settlements with the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency in relation to alleged violations of the World Bank Consultant and Procurement Guidelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted export controls investigation and related voluntary disclosures to the US Commerce Department and US Department of State on behalf of aerospace and defense company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Swiss Bank before US regulatory agencies in response to alleged AML violations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Crestron Electronics in anti-trust litigation in US Federal Court\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy company in arbitration before the ICC relating to a breach of contract claim with a foreign subsidiary and their agent\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":116,"guid":"116.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Gordon","nick_name":"Bill","clerkships":[],"first_name":"William","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":824,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2007-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"T.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Momentum Global Anti-Corruption Advisory Board","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/bill-gordon/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam \u0026ldquo;Bill\u0026rdquo; Gordon advises companies and executives on government investigations, regulatory enforcement, and risk-based compliance, with a focus on government contracts, national security, aviation and transportation, and U.S. consumer protection laws. A former senior executive, general counsel, and chief compliance officer at public and private equity\u0026ndash;backed companies, Bill brings pragmatic judgment to complex, business critical matters.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBill brings a wealth of private practice and in-house experience to achieve outstanding, expedient, and cost effective solutions to his clients\u0026rsquo; most challenging and complex legal and business needs.\u0026nbsp; His colleagues and clients praise him for his business acumen, and choose to work with him because of the significant legal and business value he provides as a trusted advisor to many of the largest global public and private entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBill defends clients in criminal and civil investigations involving alleged regulatory violations, such as fraud, false statements, obstruction, and internal controls failures, and guides matters from scoping and preservation through interviews, disclosures, strategy, and resolution. He coordinates closely with boards, audit committees, and senior leadership to protect privilege, mitigate collateral consequences, and preserve enterprise value.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the counseling side, Bill advises on national security compliance (including classified contract and facility clearance obligations and sensitive technology controls) and government contracts issues (ethics and compliance programs, mandatory disclosures, procurement integrity, cost and pricing, False Claims Act risk, and suspension and debarment). He counsels aviation and aerospace clients on FAA, DOT, and TSA requirements, safety and operational compliance, economic licensing, consumer protection rules, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure obligations, security programs and directives, and incident response and regulator engagement. He also advises on anticorruption, sanctions, and export controls, including FCPA, U.S. sanctions, voluntary self-disclosures and licensing, and ITAR/EAR matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClients rely on Bill for strategic, measured advocacy in sensitive matters with overlapping criminal, civil, and regulatory dimensions. He is known for clear communication with boards and C-suites, practical risk assessments, and the ability to coordinate complex, cross-border matters involving multiple agencies and legal regimes.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in the take private purchase of an amphibious warship manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a client in relation to an acquisition of a former U.S. Naval Base in the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted media companies obtain licenses for military grade protective equipment in Ukraine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a military contractor in relation to federal criminal charges stemming from actions in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a military contractor in relation to multiple regulatory issues relating to conduct in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised global consulting company on matters relating to data transformation, cyber security and privacy, and data integrity best practices\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed internal controls investigations and remediation projects for several private equity owned portfolio companies\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised large chemical manufacturer on US export control laws, including issues of self-disclosure, agency advocacy, ECCN classifications, and BIS licensing requirements/exceptions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation on behalf of a national consumer products company into compliance with U.S. consumer protection laws, including issues relating to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), American with Disabilities Act (ADA), bankruptcy, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP), data privacy, and anti-retaliation statutes. Defended client in US District Court in related litigation, including class action defense\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Bilfinger Westcon on matters related to FCPA and anti-corruption compliance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGuided Hercules Offshore, Inc. and HERO Liquidating Trust through two Chapter 11 reorganizations and its subsequent wind-down and liquidation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy, pharmaceutical and engineering companies before the DOJ and SEC in global FCPA and related anti-corruption investigations and voluntary disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multiple companies and individuals before the World Bank Sanctions Board in relation fraud and obstruction investigations by the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigations and negotiated settlements with the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency in relation to alleged violations of the World Bank Consultant and Procurement Guidelines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted export controls investigation and related voluntary disclosures to the US Commerce Department and US Department of State on behalf of aerospace and defense company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Swiss Bank before US regulatory agencies in response to alleged AML violations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Crestron Electronics in anti-trust litigation in US Federal Court\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy company in arbitration before the ICC relating to a breach of contract claim with a foreign subsidiary and their agent\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Momentum Global Anti-Corruption Advisory Board","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6549}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:53.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:53.000Z","searchable_text":"Gordon{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Momentum Global Anti-Corruption Advisory Board\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in the take private purchase of an amphibious warship manufacturer.{{ FIELD }}Advised a client in relation to an acquisition of a former U.S. Naval Base in the Philippines.{{ FIELD }}Assisted media companies obtain licenses for military grade protective equipment in Ukraine.{{ FIELD }}Defended a military contractor in relation to federal criminal charges stemming from actions in Iraq.{{ FIELD }}Represented a military contractor in relation to multiple regulatory issues relating to conduct in Iraq.{{ FIELD }}Advised global consulting company on matters relating to data transformation, cyber security and privacy, and data integrity best practices{{ FIELD }}Led internal controls investigations and remediation projects for several private equity owned portfolio companies{{ FIELD }}Advised large chemical manufacturer on US export control laws, including issues of self-disclosure, agency advocacy, ECCN classifications, and BIS licensing requirements/exceptions{{ FIELD }}Led investigation on behalf of a national consumer products company into compliance with U.S. consumer protection laws, including issues relating to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), American with Disabilities Act (ADA), bankruptcy, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP), data privacy, and anti-retaliation statutes. Defended client in US District Court in related litigation, including class action defense{{ FIELD }}Advised Bilfinger Westcon on matters related to FCPA and anti-corruption compliance{{ FIELD }}Guided Hercules Offshore, Inc. and HERO Liquidating Trust through two Chapter 11 reorganizations and its subsequent wind-down and liquidation{{ FIELD }}Represented energy, pharmaceutical and engineering companies before the DOJ and SEC in global FCPA and related anti-corruption investigations and voluntary disclosures{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple companies and individuals before the World Bank Sanctions Board in relation fraud and obstruction investigations by the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency{{ FIELD }}Conducted internal investigations and negotiated settlements with the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency in relation to alleged violations of the World Bank Consultant and Procurement Guidelines{{ FIELD }}Conducted export controls investigation and related voluntary disclosures to the US Commerce Department and US Department of State on behalf of aerospace and defense company{{ FIELD }}Represented Swiss Bank before US regulatory agencies in response to alleged AML violations{{ FIELD }}Represented Crestron Electronics in anti-trust litigation in US Federal Court{{ FIELD }}Represented energy company in arbitration before the ICC relating to a breach of contract claim with a foreign subsidiary and their agent{{ FIELD }}William “Bill” Gordon advises companies and executives on government investigations, regulatory enforcement, and risk-based compliance, with a focus on government contracts, national security, aviation and transportation, and U.S. consumer protection laws. A former senior executive, general counsel, and chief compliance officer at public and private equity–backed companies, Bill brings pragmatic judgment to complex, business critical matters. \nBill brings a wealth of private practice and in-house experience to achieve outstanding, expedient, and cost effective solutions to his clients’ most challenging and complex legal and business needs.  His colleagues and clients praise him for his business acumen, and choose to work with him because of the significant legal and business value he provides as a trusted advisor to many of the largest global public and private entities.\nBill defends clients in criminal and civil investigations involving alleged regulatory violations, such as fraud, false statements, obstruction, and internal controls failures, and guides matters from scoping and preservation through interviews, disclosures, strategy, and resolution. He coordinates closely with boards, audit committees, and senior leadership to protect privilege, mitigate collateral consequences, and preserve enterprise value.\nOn the counseling side, Bill advises on national security compliance (including classified contract and facility clearance obligations and sensitive technology controls) and government contracts issues (ethics and compliance programs, mandatory disclosures, procurement integrity, cost and pricing, False Claims Act risk, and suspension and debarment). He counsels aviation and aerospace clients on FAA, DOT, and TSA requirements, safety and operational compliance, economic licensing, consumer protection rules, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure obligations, security programs and directives, and incident response and regulator engagement. He also advises on anticorruption, sanctions, and export controls, including FCPA, U.S. sanctions, voluntary self-disclosures and licensing, and ITAR/EAR matters.\nClients rely on Bill for strategic, measured advocacy in sensitive matters with overlapping criminal, civil, and regulatory dimensions. He is known for clear communication with boards and C-suites, practical risk assessments, and the ability to coordinate complex, cross-border matters involving multiple agencies and legal regimes. Partner Momentum Global Anti-Corruption Advisory Board  Pomona College  Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Massachusetts Texas Children at Risk – Member of the Board of Directors Executive Service Corps – Member of the Board of Trustees and Executive Committee Momentum Anti-Corruption Advisory Board Assisted a client in the take private purchase of an amphibious warship manufacturer. Advised a client in relation to an acquisition of a former U.S. Naval Base in the Philippines. Assisted media companies obtain licenses for military grade protective equipment in Ukraine. Defended a military contractor in relation to federal criminal charges stemming from actions in Iraq. Represented a military contractor in relation to multiple regulatory issues relating to conduct in Iraq. Advised global consulting company on matters relating to data transformation, cyber security and privacy, and data integrity best practices Led internal controls investigations and remediation projects for several private equity owned portfolio companies Advised large chemical manufacturer on US export control laws, including issues of self-disclosure, agency advocacy, ECCN classifications, and BIS licensing requirements/exceptions Led investigation on behalf of a national consumer products company into compliance with U.S. consumer protection laws, including issues relating to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), American with Disabilities Act (ADA), bankruptcy, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices (UDAAP), data privacy, and anti-retaliation statutes. Defended client in US District Court in related litigation, including class action defense Advised Bilfinger Westcon on matters related to FCPA and anti-corruption compliance Guided Hercules Offshore, Inc. and HERO Liquidating Trust through two Chapter 11 reorganizations and its subsequent wind-down and liquidation Represented energy, pharmaceutical and engineering companies before the DOJ and SEC in global FCPA and related anti-corruption investigations and voluntary disclosures Represented multiple companies and individuals before the World Bank Sanctions Board in relation fraud and obstruction investigations by the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency Conducted internal investigations and negotiated settlements with the World Bank Integrity Vice Presidency in relation to alleged violations of the World Bank Consultant and Procurement Guidelines Conducted export controls investigation and related voluntary disclosures to the US Commerce Department and US Department of State on behalf of aerospace and defense company Represented Swiss Bank before US regulatory agencies in response to alleged AML violations Represented Crestron Electronics in anti-trust litigation in US Federal Court Represented energy company in arbitration before the ICC relating to a breach of contract claim with a foreign subsidiary and their agent","searchable_name":"William T. Gordon (Bill)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445931,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3473,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAdam Gray focuses on complex disputes and pre-dispute counseling around the globe.\u0026nbsp; As a partner in our\u0026nbsp;Construction Litigation and International Arbitration\u0026nbsp;practices, Adam represents clients in the\u0026nbsp;construction, energy, and technology sectors.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the construction sector, Adam represents clients in disputes and\u0026nbsp;counseling regarding the construction of power plants,\u0026nbsp;refineries, renewable energy projects, data centers, hotels, and other facilities. He has litigated claims regarding construction megaprojects\u0026nbsp;in the Middle East, South America and other areas of the world,\u0026nbsp;including disputes before the ICC, LCIA, and other arbitration institutions.\u0026nbsp; He focuses particularly on pre-dispute resolution to help clients avoid lengthy disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the energy sector, Adam represents companies in a wide variety of matters, including disputes over decommissioning obligations, regulatory requirements, power contracts, operating agreements, oil field technology, equipment failures and electricity pricing. He has represented industry leaders such as Weatherford International, Shell, Occidental, Halliburton, Chevron, and Calpine Corporation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam has been recognized by The Legal 500 and Chambers\u0026nbsp;for construction expertise since 2018 and 2020, respectively, and separately\u0026nbsp;by Chambers for general commercial disputes since 2022.\u0026nbsp; According to client comments provided to Chambers,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\"Adam\u0026nbsp;is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases\"\u003c/em\u003e;\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ea\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\"mastermind\"\u003c/em\u003e;\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\"down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\"\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"adam-gray","email":"agray@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical-facility owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration with contractor regarding project in Saudi Arabia\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econfidential client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the assessment of variation orders related to giga-projects in Saudi Arabia\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ewindfarm owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration against supplier of turbines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003estate-owned oil company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world -- secured a $1 billion+ award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a nine-figure dispute before the LCIA relating to the construction of oil production facilities in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eWeatherford International\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation regarding a contract for freight-forwarding and customs-clearance services in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eowner\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a power plant in a billion-dollar arbitration dispute involving construction delays and design disputes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eregarding the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms and related facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMicrosoft\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an arbitration regarding delays in the construction of a data center.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBass Pro\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in complex contract dispute in federal court and secured settlement involving $40+ million in payments and tens of millions in additional future revenue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHalliburton\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation involving fracking technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCalpine\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute regarding taxation of geothermal facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured complete dismissal for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFacebook\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute involving antitrust allegations.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":83}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1237,"guid":"1237.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Gray","nick_name":"Adam","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Emilio M. Garza, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2008-2009"}],"first_name":"Adam","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"high honors","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2008-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Foreign Expert: Construction","detail":"Chambers Global 2024 - United Arab Emirates"},{"title":"\"Adam is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases. He is the mastermind.\"","detail":"Chambers USA, 2023"},{"title":"\"[E]specially experienced in ... construction disputes in the U.S, Latin America, and the Middle East\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2022-2023"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is not just an extremely intelligent attorney, he brings unique insights that are invaluable[.]\"","detail":"Legal 500, 2021"},{"title":"\"He is down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021"},{"title":"Named by Benchmark Litigation to its 40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"\"Very smart and provides a high level of client service.\"","detail":"Legal 500 USA, 2020"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is described as a 'refined, very skilled and up-and-coming practitioner' by market sources\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as one of nine Next Generation Lawyers for Construction in the United States","detail":"Legal 500, 2019"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is a ‘rising star in the construction world’.\"","detail":"Legal 500, 2018"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAdam Gray focuses on complex disputes and pre-dispute counseling around the globe.\u0026nbsp; As a partner in our\u0026nbsp;Construction Litigation and International Arbitration\u0026nbsp;practices, Adam represents clients in the\u0026nbsp;construction, energy, and technology sectors.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the construction sector, Adam represents clients in disputes and\u0026nbsp;counseling regarding the construction of power plants,\u0026nbsp;refineries, renewable energy projects, data centers, hotels, and other facilities. He has litigated claims regarding construction megaprojects\u0026nbsp;in the Middle East, South America and other areas of the world,\u0026nbsp;including disputes before the ICC, LCIA, and other arbitration institutions.\u0026nbsp; He focuses particularly on pre-dispute resolution to help clients avoid lengthy disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the energy sector, Adam represents companies in a wide variety of matters, including disputes over decommissioning obligations, regulatory requirements, power contracts, operating agreements, oil field technology, equipment failures and electricity pricing. He has represented industry leaders such as Weatherford International, Shell, Occidental, Halliburton, Chevron, and Calpine Corporation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam has been recognized by The Legal 500 and Chambers\u0026nbsp;for construction expertise since 2018 and 2020, respectively, and separately\u0026nbsp;by Chambers for general commercial disputes since 2022.\u0026nbsp; According to client comments provided to Chambers,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\"Adam\u0026nbsp;is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases\"\u003c/em\u003e;\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ea\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\"mastermind\"\u003c/em\u003e;\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\"down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\"\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical-facility owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration with contractor regarding project in Saudi Arabia\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econfidential client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the assessment of variation orders related to giga-projects in Saudi Arabia\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ewindfarm owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration against supplier of turbines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003estate-owned oil company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world -- secured a $1 billion+ award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a nine-figure dispute before the LCIA relating to the construction of oil production facilities in Iraq.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eWeatherford International\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation regarding a contract for freight-forwarding and customs-clearance services in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eowner\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a power plant in a billion-dollar arbitration dispute involving construction delays and design disputes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eregarding the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms and related facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMicrosoft\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an arbitration regarding delays in the construction of a data center.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBass Pro\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in complex contract dispute in federal court and secured settlement involving $40+ million in payments and tens of millions in additional future revenue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHalliburton\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation involving fracking technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCalpine\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute regarding taxation of geothermal facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured complete dismissal for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFacebook\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute involving antitrust allegations.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Foreign Expert: Construction","detail":"Chambers Global 2024 - United Arab Emirates"},{"title":"\"Adam is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases. He is the mastermind.\"","detail":"Chambers USA, 2023"},{"title":"\"[E]specially experienced in ... construction disputes in the U.S, Latin America, and the Middle East\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2022-2023"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is not just an extremely intelligent attorney, he brings unique insights that are invaluable[.]\"","detail":"Legal 500, 2021"},{"title":"\"He is down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021"},{"title":"Named by Benchmark Litigation to its 40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"\"Very smart and provides a high level of client service.\"","detail":"Legal 500 USA, 2020"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is described as a 'refined, very skilled and up-and-coming practitioner' by market sources\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2020"},{"title":"Recognized as one of nine Next Generation Lawyers for Construction in the United States","detail":"Legal 500, 2019"},{"title":"\"Adam Gray is a ‘rising star in the construction world’.\"","detail":"Legal 500, 2018"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10609}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-17T21:53:55.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-17T21:53:55.000Z","searchable_text":"Gray{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Foreign Expert: Construction\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2024 - United Arab Emirates\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Adam is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases. He is the mastermind.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"[E]specially experienced in ... construction disputes in the U.S, Latin America, and the Middle East\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2022-2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Adam Gray is not just an extremely intelligent attorney, he brings unique insights that are invaluable[.]\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He is down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named by Benchmark Litigation to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Very smart and provides a high level of client service.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 USA, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Adam Gray is described as a 'refined, very skilled and up-and-coming practitioner' by market sources\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as one of nine Next Generation Lawyers for Construction in the United States\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Adam Gray is a ‘rising star in the construction world’.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing petrochemical-facility owner in ICC arbitration with contractor regarding project in Saudi Arabia{{ FIELD }}Representing confidential client in the assessment of variation orders related to giga-projects in Saudi Arabia{{ FIELD }}Representing windfarm owner in international arbitration against supplier of turbines{{ FIELD }}Represented state-owned oil company in an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world -- secured a $1 billion+ award.{{ FIELD }}Represented the contractor in a nine-figure dispute before the LCIA relating to the construction of oil production facilities in Iraq.{{ FIELD }}Represented Weatherford International in litigation regarding a contract for freight-forwarding and customs-clearance services in the Middle East.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a power plant in a billion-dollar arbitration dispute involving construction delays and design disputes.{{ FIELD }}Represented Chevron regarding the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms and related facilities.{{ FIELD }}Represented Microsoft in an arbitration regarding delays in the construction of a data center.{{ FIELD }}Represented Bass Pro in complex contract dispute in federal court and secured settlement involving $40+ million in payments and tens of millions in additional future revenue.{{ FIELD }}Represented Halliburton in litigation involving fracking technology.{{ FIELD }}Represented Calpine in a dispute regarding taxation of geothermal facilities.{{ FIELD }}Secured complete dismissal for Facebook in a dispute involving antitrust allegations.{{ FIELD }}Adam Gray focuses on complex disputes and pre-dispute counseling around the globe.  As a partner in our Construction Litigation and International Arbitration practices, Adam represents clients in the construction, energy, and technology sectors.\nIn the construction sector, Adam represents clients in disputes and counseling regarding the construction of power plants, refineries, renewable energy projects, data centers, hotels, and other facilities. He has litigated claims regarding construction megaprojects in the Middle East, South America and other areas of the world, including disputes before the ICC, LCIA, and other arbitration institutions.  He focuses particularly on pre-dispute resolution to help clients avoid lengthy disputes.  \nIn the energy sector, Adam represents companies in a wide variety of matters, including disputes over decommissioning obligations, regulatory requirements, power contracts, operating agreements, oil field technology, equipment failures and electricity pricing. He has represented industry leaders such as Weatherford International, Shell, Occidental, Halliburton, Chevron, and Calpine Corporation.\nAdam has been recognized by The Legal 500 and Chambers for construction expertise since 2018 and 2020, respectively, and separately by Chambers for general commercial disputes since 2022.  According to client comments provided to Chambers, \"Adam is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases\"; a \"mastermind\"; and \"down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\" Adam L. Gray Partner Foreign Expert: Construction Chambers Global 2024 - United Arab Emirates \"Adam is well versed in technical and difficult matters that arise in construction cases. He is the mastermind.\" Chambers USA, 2023 \"[E]specially experienced in ... construction disputes in the U.S, Latin America, and the Middle East\"  Chambers USA, 2022-2023 \"Adam Gray is not just an extremely intelligent attorney, he brings unique insights that are invaluable[.]\" Legal 500, 2021 \"He is down to earth and able to explain complex matters.\"  Chambers USA, 2021 Named by Benchmark Litigation to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List Benchmark Litigation, 2021 \"Very smart and provides a high level of client service.\" Legal 500 USA, 2020 \"Adam Gray is described as a 'refined, very skilled and up-and-coming practitioner' by market sources\"  Chambers USA, 2020 Recognized as one of nine Next Generation Lawyers for Construction in the United States Legal 500, 2019 \"Adam Gray is a ‘rising star in the construction world’.\" Legal 500, 2018 Duke University Duke University School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Texas Law Clerk, The Honorable Emilio M. Garza, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Representing petrochemical-facility owner in ICC arbitration with contractor regarding project in Saudi Arabia Representing confidential client in the assessment of variation orders related to giga-projects in Saudi Arabia Representing windfarm owner in international arbitration against supplier of turbines Represented state-owned oil company in an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world -- secured a $1 billion+ award. Represented the contractor in a nine-figure dispute before the LCIA relating to the construction of oil production facilities in Iraq. Represented Weatherford International in litigation regarding a contract for freight-forwarding and customs-clearance services in the Middle East. Represented the owner of a power plant in a billion-dollar arbitration dispute involving construction delays and design disputes. Represented Chevron regarding the decommissioning of offshore oil and gas platforms and related facilities. Represented Microsoft in an arbitration regarding delays in the construction of a data center. Represented Bass Pro in complex contract dispute in federal court and secured settlement involving $40+ million in payments and tens of millions in additional future revenue. Represented Halliburton in litigation involving fracking technology. Represented Calpine in a dispute regarding taxation of geothermal facilities. Secured complete dismissal for Facebook in a dispute involving antitrust allegations.","searchable_name":"Adam Gray","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445058,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5015,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAdam Gregory, a Partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value global construction and infrastructure disputes.\u0026nbsp; Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam Gregory, a Partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value construction and engineering disputes.\u0026nbsp; Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years, Adam has successfully represented clients in some of the largest and most significant infrastructure disputes globally, including most recently:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdvising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;Spanish contractor\u0026nbsp;in respect of several a\u0026nbsp;waste-to-energy plant\u0026nbsp;in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn representing such clients, Adam often appears as counsel before some of the most prestigious international arbitrators globally.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to being elevated to Partner, Adam was also lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies globally (as a JV) in an\u0026nbsp;ICC Arbitration\u0026nbsp;seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest new build petrochemical plant. The dispute spanned almost five years.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHaving formerly worked at two international firms in while based in Australia, Adam has been with King \u0026amp; Spalding for over eight years. Although based primarily in the Singapore office, Adam has worked across dozens of different offices and regions in that time and continues to manage several global matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam is a Fellow of CIArb, a member of the Society of Construction law, \u0026nbsp;and regularly writes on the topic of construction law.\u0026nbsp; Adam has also\u0026nbsp;been recently ranked by Lexology (formerly WWL) in its \u0026lsquo;Arbitration Future Leaders\u0026rsquo; category.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his construction practice, Adam assists several pro-bono clients and manages the firm\u0026rsquo;s pro-bono relationship with Justice Without Borders, who provide assistance and advice to foreign domestic workers who have been mistreated in Singapore.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"adam-gregory","email":"agregory@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eActing for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Spanish contractor on a gas project in Algeria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Spanish contractor in respect of a waste-to-energy plant in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a JV comprised of a Spanish and Italian contractor in respect of a dispute regarding a subway extension in Canada against the State entity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Korean contractor in respect of JV dispute with an American oil and gas company regarding a power plant in Malaysia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as project counsel for a large U.S. university regarding the construction of a new medical centre.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies in the World (as a JV) in an ICC Arbitration seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the World\u0026rsquo;s largest new build petrochemical plant. The claims relating to EPC contract claims, defective design and performance, and full range of commercial issues. The amount in dispute was more than USD 700 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a large U.S company in respect of its worldwide supply contract for the provision of satellites.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a windfarm in a dispute with a German supplier in respect of defects and other breaches of warranties including in respect of wind power generation availability and catestrophic failures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a large U.S. company in respect of the construction of a large data centre in Texas. The dispute involved various time and cost disputes, including critical delay and defects.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Danish company in the negotiations with an Italian contractor regarding the supply of specialist equipment for a large project in Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in an ICSID investor-state arbitration against the State of Kuwait on behalf of a Spanish contractor. The arbitration focused on common construction issues, such as delay, disruption and disputed variations, but also involved various breaches several Bilateral Investment Treaties. The amount in dispute was more than USD 300 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a joint venture comprising two large power companies as pre-litigation counsel regarding a power-plant dispute in the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a combined-cycle powerplant located in the United States in a claim by the Spanish contractor. The primary claims by both parties related to the early termination of the contractor and the amount in dispute was approximately USD 500 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Korean contractor on multiple UNICTRAL arbitrations arising out of disputes concerning the construction of a mine in Western Australia. The main arbitration was seated in Singapore with a governing law of Western Australia. Amount in dispute: over AUD 2 billion. Downstream arbitrations also had hundreds of millions in dispute and involve termination, misleading and deceptive conduct claims and breach of warranty claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in a large (over AUD 2 billion) off-shore LNG dispute involving repudiation and termination off the coast of northern Australia, including ancillary court-based urgent remedies. The dispute involved both domestic and foreign-owned consortia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an Australian contractor on a multinational dispute arising out of the construction of a process plant in Western Australia. The amount in dispute was over AUD 100 million and the dispute was under the ICC Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as pre-litigation counsel for a large off-shore contractor. The dispute was settled but concerned delay, disruption, claimed variations and allegations of poor performance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Dutch company on an urgent dispute involving a Chinese steel supplier and international shipping law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in a multinational pipeline dispute based in Queensland under the IAMA arbitration rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as Counsel in the first Security of Payment Act dispute that was brought before the Supreme Court of Tasmania.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a community group in a Federal Court dispute against Hydro Tasmania testing the law on \u0026lsquo;social licences\u0026rsquo; for large-scale projects.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.aofs","index":0,"source":"aofs"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.aofs","index":1,"source":"aofs"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Gregory","nick_name":"Adam","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Adam","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAdam Gregory, a Partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value global construction and infrastructure disputes.\u0026nbsp; Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam Gregory, a Partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value construction and engineering disputes.\u0026nbsp; Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years, Adam has successfully represented clients in some of the largest and most significant infrastructure disputes globally, including most recently:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdvising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a\u0026nbsp;Spanish contractor\u0026nbsp;in respect of several a\u0026nbsp;waste-to-energy plant\u0026nbsp;in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eActing for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn representing such clients, Adam often appears as counsel before some of the most prestigious international arbitrators globally.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to being elevated to Partner, Adam was also lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies globally (as a JV) in an\u0026nbsp;ICC Arbitration\u0026nbsp;seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest new build petrochemical plant. The dispute spanned almost five years.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHaving formerly worked at two international firms in while based in Australia, Adam has been with King \u0026amp; Spalding for over eight years. Although based primarily in the Singapore office, Adam has worked across dozens of different offices and regions in that time and continues to manage several global matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdam is a Fellow of CIArb, a member of the Society of Construction law, \u0026nbsp;and regularly writes on the topic of construction law.\u0026nbsp; Adam has also\u0026nbsp;been recently ranked by Lexology (formerly WWL) in its \u0026lsquo;Arbitration Future Leaders\u0026rsquo; category.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his construction practice, Adam assists several pro-bono clients and manages the firm\u0026rsquo;s pro-bono relationship with Justice Without Borders, who provide assistance and advice to foreign domestic workers who have been mistreated in Singapore.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eActing for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Spanish contractor on a gas project in Algeria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Spanish contractor in respect of a waste-to-energy plant in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a JV comprised of a Spanish and Italian contractor in respect of a dispute regarding a subway extension in Canada against the State entity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Korean contractor in respect of JV dispute with an American oil and gas company regarding a power plant in Malaysia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as project counsel for a large U.S. university regarding the construction of a new medical centre.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies in the World (as a JV) in an ICC Arbitration seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the World\u0026rsquo;s largest new build petrochemical plant. The claims relating to EPC contract claims, defective design and performance, and full range of commercial issues. The amount in dispute was more than USD 700 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a large U.S company in respect of its worldwide supply contract for the provision of satellites.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a windfarm in a dispute with a German supplier in respect of defects and other breaches of warranties including in respect of wind power generation availability and catestrophic failures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a large U.S. company in respect of the construction of a large data centre in Texas. The dispute involved various time and cost disputes, including critical delay and defects.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Danish company in the negotiations with an Italian contractor regarding the supply of specialist equipment for a large project in Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in an ICSID investor-state arbitration against the State of Kuwait on behalf of a Spanish contractor. The arbitration focused on common construction issues, such as delay, disruption and disputed variations, but also involved various breaches several Bilateral Investment Treaties. The amount in dispute was more than USD 300 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a joint venture comprising two large power companies as pre-litigation counsel regarding a power-plant dispute in the Philippines.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a combined-cycle powerplant located in the United States in a claim by the Spanish contractor. The primary claims by both parties related to the early termination of the contractor and the amount in dispute was approximately USD 500 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Korean contractor on multiple UNICTRAL arbitrations arising out of disputes concerning the construction of a mine in Western Australia. The main arbitration was seated in Singapore with a governing law of Western Australia. Amount in dispute: over AUD 2 billion. Downstream arbitrations also had hundreds of millions in dispute and involve termination, misleading and deceptive conduct claims and breach of warranty claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in a large (over AUD 2 billion) off-shore LNG dispute involving repudiation and termination off the coast of northern Australia, including ancillary court-based urgent remedies. The dispute involved both domestic and foreign-owned consortia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an Australian contractor on a multinational dispute arising out of the construction of a process plant in Western Australia. The amount in dispute was over AUD 100 million and the dispute was under the ICC Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as pre-litigation counsel for a large off-shore contractor. The dispute was settled but concerned delay, disruption, claimed variations and allegations of poor performance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a Dutch company on an urgent dispute involving a Chinese steel supplier and international shipping law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed in a multinational pipeline dispute based in Queensland under the IAMA arbitration rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as Counsel in the first Security of Payment Act dispute that was brought before the Supreme Court of Tasmania.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a community group in a Federal Court dispute against Hydro Tasmania testing the law on \u0026lsquo;social licences\u0026rsquo; for large-scale projects.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11327}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-15T21:32:37.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-15T21:32:37.000Z","searchable_text":"Gregory{{ FIELD }}Acting for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.{{ FIELD }}Advising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a Spanish contractor on a gas project in Algeria.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a Spanish contractor in respect of a waste-to-energy plant in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a JV comprised of a Spanish and Italian contractor in respect of a dispute regarding a subway extension in Canada against the State entity.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a Korean contractor in respect of JV dispute with an American oil and gas company regarding a power plant in Malaysia.{{ FIELD }}Acted as project counsel for a large U.S. university regarding the construction of a new medical centre.{{ FIELD }}Was lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies in the World (as a JV) in an ICC Arbitration seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the World’s largest new build petrochemical plant. The claims relating to EPC contract claims, defective design and performance, and full range of commercial issues. The amount in dispute was more than USD 700 million.{{ FIELD }}Advised a large U.S company in respect of its worldwide supply contract for the provision of satellites.{{ FIELD }}Acted for the owner of a windfarm in a dispute with a German supplier in respect of defects and other breaches of warranties including in respect of wind power generation availability and catestrophic failures.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a large U.S. company in respect of the construction of a large data centre in Texas. The dispute involved various time and cost disputes, including critical delay and defects.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a Danish company in the negotiations with an Italian contractor regarding the supply of specialist equipment for a large project in Australia.{{ FIELD }}Acted in an ICSID investor-state arbitration against the State of Kuwait on behalf of a Spanish contractor. The arbitration focused on common construction issues, such as delay, disruption and disputed variations, but also involved various breaches several Bilateral Investment Treaties. The amount in dispute was more than USD 300 million.{{ FIELD }}Advised a joint venture comprising two large power companies as pre-litigation counsel regarding a power-plant dispute in the Philippines.{{ FIELD }}Acted for the owner of a combined-cycle powerplant located in the United States in a claim by the Spanish contractor. The primary claims by both parties related to the early termination of the contractor and the amount in dispute was approximately USD 500 million.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a Korean contractor on multiple UNICTRAL arbitrations arising out of disputes concerning the construction of a mine in Western Australia. The main arbitration was seated in Singapore with a governing law of Western Australia. Amount in dispute: over AUD 2 billion. Downstream arbitrations also had hundreds of millions in dispute and involve termination, misleading and deceptive conduct claims and breach of warranty claims.{{ FIELD }}Acted in a large (over AUD 2 billion) off-shore LNG dispute involving repudiation and termination off the coast of northern Australia, including ancillary court-based urgent remedies. The dispute involved both domestic and foreign-owned consortia.{{ FIELD }}Acted for an Australian contractor on a multinational dispute arising out of the construction of a process plant in Western Australia. The amount in dispute was over AUD 100 million and the dispute was under the ICC Rules.{{ FIELD }}Acted as pre-litigation counsel for a large off-shore contractor. The dispute was settled but concerned delay, disruption, claimed variations and allegations of poor performance.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a Dutch company on an urgent dispute involving a Chinese steel supplier and international shipping law.{{ FIELD }}Acted in a multinational pipeline dispute based in Queensland under the IAMA arbitration rules.{{ FIELD }}Acted as Counsel in the first Security of Payment Act dispute that was brought before the Supreme Court of Tasmania.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a community group in a Federal Court dispute against Hydro Tasmania testing the law on ‘social licences’ for large-scale projects.{{ FIELD }}Adam Gregory, a Partner in the firm’s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value global construction and infrastructure disputes.  Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years. \nAdam Gregory, a Partner in the firm’s International Disputes group, specialises in complex and high-value construction and engineering disputes.  Having worked exclusively on international construction arbitration for over ten years, Adam has successfully represented clients in some of the largest and most significant infrastructure disputes globally, including most recently:\n\nActing for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia.\nAdvising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia.\nActing for a Spanish contractor in respect of several a waste-to-energy plant in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers.\nActing for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand.\n\nIn representing such clients, Adam often appears as counsel before some of the most prestigious international arbitrators globally. \nPrior to being elevated to Partner, Adam was also lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies globally (as a JV) in an ICC Arbitration seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the world’s largest new build petrochemical plant. The dispute spanned almost five years.\nHaving formerly worked at two international firms in while based in Australia, Adam has been with King \u0026amp; Spalding for over eight years. Although based primarily in the Singapore office, Adam has worked across dozens of different offices and regions in that time and continues to manage several global matters.\nAdam is a Fellow of CIArb, a member of the Society of Construction law,  and regularly writes on the topic of construction law.  Adam has also been recently ranked by Lexology (formerly WWL) in its ‘Arbitration Future Leaders’ category.\nIn addition to his construction practice, Adam assists several pro-bono clients and manages the firm’s pro-bono relationship with Justice Without Borders, who provide assistance and advice to foreign domestic workers who have been mistreated in Singapore.\n Partner University of Tasmania  University of Tasmania  University of Tasmania  High Court of Australia Tasmania Victoria Singapore International Commercial Court, Registered Foreign Lawyer Society of Construction Law (Singapore Chapter) Lighthouse Club (Construction Law) Australian Lawyers for Human Rights (former convenor) Acting for a Chinese SOE in respect of a refinery and petrochemical project in Malaysia. Acting for a Korean contractor in respect of a clean energy facility in Thailand. Advising a Korean contractor in respect of a large refinery project in Indonesia. Acting for a Spanish contractor on a gas project in Algeria. Acting for a Spanish contractor in respect of a waste-to-energy plant in the United Kingdom with disputes against the owner and several subcontractors and suppliers. Acting for a JV comprised of a Spanish and Italian contractor in respect of a dispute regarding a subway extension in Canada against the State entity. Acted for a Korean contractor in respect of JV dispute with an American oil and gas company regarding a power plant in Malaysia. Acted as project counsel for a large U.S. university regarding the construction of a new medical centre. Was lead associate for two of the largest construction / engineering companies in the World (as a JV) in an ICC Arbitration seated in London. The project was based in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and involved the construction of the World’s largest new build petrochemical plant. The claims relating to EPC contract claims, defective design and performance, and full range of commercial issues. The amount in dispute was more than USD 700 million. Advised a large U.S company in respect of its worldwide supply contract for the provision of satellites. Acted for the owner of a windfarm in a dispute with a German supplier in respect of defects and other breaches of warranties including in respect of wind power generation availability and catestrophic failures. Acted for a large U.S. company in respect of the construction of a large data centre in Texas. The dispute involved various time and cost disputes, including critical delay and defects. Acted for a Danish company in the negotiations with an Italian contractor regarding the supply of specialist equipment for a large project in Australia. Acted in an ICSID investor-state arbitration against the State of Kuwait on behalf of a Spanish contractor. The arbitration focused on common construction issues, such as delay, disruption and disputed variations, but also involved various breaches several Bilateral Investment Treaties. The amount in dispute was more than USD 300 million. Advised a joint venture comprising two large power companies as pre-litigation counsel regarding a power-plant dispute in the Philippines. Acted for the owner of a combined-cycle powerplant located in the United States in a claim by the Spanish contractor. The primary claims by both parties related to the early termination of the contractor and the amount in dispute was approximately USD 500 million. Acted for a Korean contractor on multiple UNICTRAL arbitrations arising out of disputes concerning the construction of a mine in Western Australia. The main arbitration was seated in Singapore with a governing law of Western Australia. Amount in dispute: over AUD 2 billion. Downstream arbitrations also had hundreds of millions in dispute and involve termination, misleading and deceptive conduct claims and breach of warranty claims. Acted in a large (over AUD 2 billion) off-shore LNG dispute involving repudiation and termination off the coast of northern Australia, including ancillary court-based urgent remedies. The dispute involved both domestic and foreign-owned consortia. Acted for an Australian contractor on a multinational dispute arising out of the construction of a process plant in Western Australia. The amount in dispute was over AUD 100 million and the dispute was under the ICC Rules. Acted as pre-litigation counsel for a large off-shore contractor. The dispute was settled but concerned delay, disruption, claimed variations and allegations of poor performance. Acted for a Dutch company on an urgent dispute involving a Chinese steel supplier and international shipping law. Acted in a multinational pipeline dispute based in Queensland under the IAMA arbitration rules. Acted as Counsel in the first Security of Payment Act dispute that was brought before the Supreme Court of Tasmania. Acted for a community group in a Federal Court dispute against Hydro Tasmania testing the law on ‘social licences’ for large-scale projects.","searchable_name":"Adam Gregory","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447780,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6782,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn represents clients in the financial services, sports, media, and entertainment industries in a broad range of complex business litigation. He has extensive experience with contract and securities claims, corporate governance and shareholder disputes, class actions, and regulatory investigations. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has litigated matters on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants\u0026nbsp;in state and federal court. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John worked in the New York offices of two other global law firms and clerked for the Hon. William F. Kuntz, II, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-goodwin","email":"jgoodwin@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 571 431 8178","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresents\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMadison Square Garden\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its defense of a widely-covered lawsuit filed by former Knicks player Charles Oakley in connection with his ejection from the Garden in 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresents \u003cstrong\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in a false advertising action against a competitor relating to the use of \u0026ldquo;bots\u0026rdquo; or algorithms in mobile games.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from a putative class action concerning the transfer of Capital One's individual retirement account portfolio to Inspira Financial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in arbitration proceedings, including a five-day trial, seeking more than $500 million of damages against a contractual counterparty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etwo hedge funds\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edepositary institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in winning an eight-figure judgement in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical technology company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a successful petition for pre-action discovery in New York state court into the identity of individuals waging an anonymous campaign of online defamation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einvestment bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Third Circuit appeal of a closely watched indemnification lawsuit; obtained affirmance of lower court victory\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational insurance provider\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal litigation against the California Department of Insurance contesting a conservation order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a set of antitrust class actions alleging manipulation of the price of precious metals\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a Delaware adversary bankruptcy proceeding and trial against a media company debtor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egroup of market insurers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in New York state court litigation stemming from the bankruptcy of a foreign oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean investment bank and several of its former employees\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation and arbitration involving equity swap transactions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporate boards and activist shareholders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on litigation strategy in connection with governance disputes and activism campaigns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003evarious clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in external investigations by the New York Attorney General, DOJ, FINRA, and other government agencies\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Goodwin","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. William F. Kuntz, II, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, James Kent Scholar","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Thomas","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Ones To Watch\"","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023-2026"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn represents clients in the financial services, sports, media, and entertainment industries in a broad range of complex business litigation. He has extensive experience with contract and securities claims, corporate governance and shareholder disputes, class actions, and regulatory investigations. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has litigated matters on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants\u0026nbsp;in state and federal court. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John worked in the New York offices of two other global law firms and clerked for the Hon. William F. Kuntz, II, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresents\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMadison Square Garden\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its defense of a widely-covered lawsuit filed by former Knicks player Charles Oakley in connection with his ejection from the Garden in 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresents \u003cstrong\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in a false advertising action against a competitor relating to the use of \u0026ldquo;bots\u0026rdquo; or algorithms in mobile games.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;from a putative class action concerning the transfer of Capital One's individual retirement account portfolio to Inspira Financial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in arbitration proceedings, including a five-day trial, seeking more than $500 million of damages against a contractual counterparty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etwo hedge funds\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edepositary institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in winning an eight-figure judgement in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical technology company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a successful petition for pre-action discovery in New York state court into the identity of individuals waging an anonymous campaign of online defamation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einvestment bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Third Circuit appeal of a closely watched indemnification lawsuit; obtained affirmance of lower court victory\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational insurance provider\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal litigation against the California Department of Insurance contesting a conservation order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a set of antitrust class actions alleging manipulation of the price of precious metals\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a Delaware adversary bankruptcy proceeding and trial against a media company debtor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egroup of market insurers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in New York state court litigation stemming from the bankruptcy of a foreign oil refinery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean investment bank and several of its former employees\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation and arbitration involving equity swap transactions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporate boards and activist shareholders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on litigation strategy in connection with governance disputes and activism campaigns\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003evarious clients\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in external investigations by the New York Attorney General, DOJ, FINRA, and other government agencies\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Ones To Watch\"","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023-2026"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12186}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-22T18:58:31.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-22T18:58:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Goodwin{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Ones To Watch\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2023-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}Represents Madison Square Garden in its defense of a widely-covered lawsuit filed by former Knicks player Charles Oakley in connection with his ejection from the Garden in 2017.{{ FIELD }}Represents Skillz Platform, Inc. in a false advertising action against a competitor relating to the use of “bots” or algorithms in mobile games.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Capital One from a putative class action concerning the transfer of Capital One's individual retirement account portfolio to Inspira Financial.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major financial institution in arbitration proceedings, including a five-day trial, seeking more than $500 million of damages against a contractual counterparty{{ FIELD }}Represented two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company{{ FIELD }}Represented a depositary institution in winning an eight-figure judgement in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical technology company in a successful petition for pre-action discovery in New York state court into the identity of individuals waging an anonymous campaign of online defamation{{ FIELD }}Represented an investment bank in a Third Circuit appeal of a closely watched indemnification lawsuit; obtained affirmance of lower court victory{{ FIELD }}Represented a national insurance provider in federal litigation against the California Department of Insurance contesting a conservation order{{ FIELD }}Represented a major financial institution in a set of antitrust class actions alleging manipulation of the price of precious metals{{ FIELD }}Represented a hedge fund in a Delaware adversary bankruptcy proceeding and trial against a media company debtor{{ FIELD }}Represented a group of market insurers in New York state court litigation stemming from the bankruptcy of a foreign oil refinery{{ FIELD }}Represented an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swap transactions{{ FIELD }}Advised corporate boards and activist shareholders on litigation strategy in connection with governance disputes and activism campaigns{{ FIELD }}Represented various clients in external investigations by the New York Attorney General, DOJ, FINRA, and other government agencies{{ FIELD }}John represents clients in the financial services, sports, media, and entertainment industries in a broad range of complex business litigation. He has extensive experience with contract and securities claims, corporate governance and shareholder disputes, class actions, and regulatory investigations. \nJohn has litigated matters on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John worked in the New York offices of two other global law firms and clerked for the Hon. William F. Kuntz, II, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Counsel \"Ones To Watch\" Best Lawyers, 2023-2026 Columbia University Columbia University Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Judicial Clerk, Hon. William F. Kuntz, II, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Represents Madison Square Garden in its defense of a widely-covered lawsuit filed by former Knicks player Charles Oakley in connection with his ejection from the Garden in 2017. Represents Skillz Platform, Inc. in a false advertising action against a competitor relating to the use of “bots” or algorithms in mobile games. Successfully defended Capital One from a putative class action concerning the transfer of Capital One's individual retirement account portfolio to Inspira Financial. Represented a major financial institution in arbitration proceedings, including a five-day trial, seeking more than $500 million of damages against a contractual counterparty Represented two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company Represented a depositary institution in winning an eight-figure judgement in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans Represented a medical technology company in a successful petition for pre-action discovery in New York state court into the identity of individuals waging an anonymous campaign of online defamation Represented an investment bank in a Third Circuit appeal of a closely watched indemnification lawsuit; obtained affirmance of lower court victory Represented a national insurance provider in federal litigation against the California Department of Insurance contesting a conservation order Represented a major financial institution in a set of antitrust class actions alleging manipulation of the price of precious metals Represented a hedge fund in a Delaware adversary bankruptcy proceeding and trial against a media company debtor Represented a group of market insurers in New York state court litigation stemming from the bankruptcy of a foreign oil refinery Represented an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swap transactions Advised corporate boards and activist shareholders on litigation strategy in connection with governance disputes and activism campaigns Represented various clients in external investigations by the New York Attorney General, DOJ, FINRA, and other government agencies","searchable_name":"John Thomas Goodwin","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444878,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5023,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLuisa focuses on commercial and construction disputes. Luisa\u0026nbsp;has\u0026nbsp;extensive experience representing\u0026nbsp;and counseling\u0026nbsp;multinational companies\u0026nbsp;in the construction, oil and gas, energy, and technology industries in high-stakes and complex litigations in courts throughout the world, as well as in commercial and state-investor international arbitration matters.\u0026nbsp;Luisa is\u0026nbsp;trained in both civil and common law and\u0026nbsp;is admitted to practice in Colombia,\u0026nbsp;Texas\u0026nbsp;and New York.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuisa has advised clients\u0026nbsp;in several commercial arbitrations under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), among other arbitration rules. In addition, she has represented clients in\u0026nbsp;investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), among other rules.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to international arbitration matters, Luisa also has experience\u0026nbsp;advising multinational corporations in high-stake and complex international litigations and regulatory\u0026nbsp;matters across EMEA and LATAM jurisdictions, working\u0026nbsp;on cases before some of the highest courts in those regions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"luisa-gutierrez-quintero","email":"lgutierrezquintero@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCounsel to an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to a venture capital firm in a dispute between LLC members regarding required deal contributions before the Delaware Court of Chancery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to an owner in dispute related to the design of a data center in Germany before the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresenting a Colombian oil State-owned company in an international ICC commercial arbitration against U.S. contractor concerning an EPC contract for the upgrade of an oil refinery in the port city of Cartagena. The ICC tribunal reached a unanimous decision in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor, ordering the contractor to pay more than $1 billion in damages, plus interest gains\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to one of the world's biggest technology multinationals, handling cutting-edge issues in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions in matters involving complex international contract disputes, compliance obligations in privacy and defamation, IA, consumer law, intermediary liability, hate speech, defamation, intellectual property, unfair competition, elections, and e-commerce.*\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to one of the biggest technology multinationals for the company\u0026rsquo;s global regulatory investigations before unfair competition, corporate, data protection authorities and other compliance matters in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions.*\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully advised British investors in a multi-billion-dollar ICSID arbitration pertaining to an iron ore project in Uruguay, arising under the UK-Uruguay Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a French investor in a case initiated according to the rules of the Paris Chamber of International Arbitration (PCIA) related to a concession contract for the construction and operation of a toll road in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Singapore-based investor, in a PCA international arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules arising out of a dispute involving a risk-service oil contract with Ecuador\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising U.S. oil company in PCA arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the company\u0026rsquo;s historical activities under oil concession contracts, under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a mining company in PCA contractual and treaty-based arbitrations against Peru, concerning a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation, brought under the U.S.-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Argentinian company in an ICSID arbitration concerning the construction and operation of an airport located in Peru, brought under the Argentina-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a Colombia-owned road concessionaire in a contractual ICSID arbitration against Peru related to an infrastructure toll project on a mountain road that was cancelled following the intervention by the State\u0026rsquo;s former president\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a confidential client in the defense industry to identify, assess, prevent, mitigate, and remedy actual and potential international U.S. policy and international public law impacts associated with high-risk products and services, including those in conflict-affected areas\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a confidential State client with respect to public international law implications and potential claims brought by a different State regarding the construction of a nuclear power facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Gutierrez Quintero","nick_name":"Luisa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Luisa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"LL.M.","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2017-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"F.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLuisa focuses on commercial and construction disputes. Luisa\u0026nbsp;has\u0026nbsp;extensive experience representing\u0026nbsp;and counseling\u0026nbsp;multinational companies\u0026nbsp;in the construction, oil and gas, energy, and technology industries in high-stakes and complex litigations in courts throughout the world, as well as in commercial and state-investor international arbitration matters.\u0026nbsp;Luisa is\u0026nbsp;trained in both civil and common law and\u0026nbsp;is admitted to practice in Colombia,\u0026nbsp;Texas\u0026nbsp;and New York.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuisa has advised clients\u0026nbsp;in several commercial arbitrations under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), among other arbitration rules. In addition, she has represented clients in\u0026nbsp;investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), among other rules.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to international arbitration matters, Luisa also has experience\u0026nbsp;advising multinational corporations in high-stake and complex international litigations and regulatory\u0026nbsp;matters across EMEA and LATAM jurisdictions, working\u0026nbsp;on cases before some of the highest courts in those regions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCounsel to an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to a venture capital firm in a dispute between LLC members regarding required deal contributions before the Delaware Court of Chancery\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to an owner in dispute related to the design of a data center in Germany before the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresenting a Colombian oil State-owned company in an international ICC commercial arbitration against U.S. contractor concerning an EPC contract for the upgrade of an oil refinery in the port city of Cartagena. The ICC tribunal reached a unanimous decision in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor, ordering the contractor to pay more than $1 billion in damages, plus interest gains\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to one of the world's biggest technology multinationals, handling cutting-edge issues in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions in matters involving complex international contract disputes, compliance obligations in privacy and defamation, IA, consumer law, intermediary liability, hate speech, defamation, intellectual property, unfair competition, elections, and e-commerce.*\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to one of the biggest technology multinationals for the company\u0026rsquo;s global regulatory investigations before unfair competition, corporate, data protection authorities and other compliance matters in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions.*\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully advised British investors in a multi-billion-dollar ICSID arbitration pertaining to an iron ore project in Uruguay, arising under the UK-Uruguay Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a French investor in a case initiated according to the rules of the Paris Chamber of International Arbitration (PCIA) related to a concession contract for the construction and operation of a toll road in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Singapore-based investor, in a PCA international arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules arising out of a dispute involving a risk-service oil contract with Ecuador\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising U.S. oil company in PCA arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the company\u0026rsquo;s historical activities under oil concession contracts, under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a mining company in PCA contractual and treaty-based arbitrations against Peru, concerning a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation, brought under the U.S.-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Argentinian company in an ICSID arbitration concerning the construction and operation of an airport located in Peru, brought under the Argentina-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a Colombia-owned road concessionaire in a contractual ICSID arbitration against Peru related to an infrastructure toll project on a mountain road that was cancelled following the intervention by the State\u0026rsquo;s former president\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a confidential client in the defense industry to identify, assess, prevent, mitigate, and remedy actual and potential international U.S. policy and international public law impacts associated with high-risk products and services, including those in conflict-affected areas\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a confidential State client with respect to public international law implications and potential claims brought by a different State regarding the construction of a nuclear power facility\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6369}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-08T21:03:23.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-08T21:03:23.000Z","searchable_text":"Gutierrez Quintero{{ FIELD }}Counsel to an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute{{ FIELD }}Counsel to a venture capital firm in a dispute between LLC members regarding required deal contributions before the Delaware Court of Chancery{{ FIELD }}Counsel to an owner in dispute related to the design of a data center in Germany before the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York{{ FIELD }}Representing a Colombian oil State-owned company in an international ICC commercial arbitration against U.S. contractor concerning an EPC contract for the upgrade of an oil refinery in the port city of Cartagena. The ICC tribunal reached a unanimous decision in the client’s favor, ordering the contractor to pay more than $1 billion in damages, plus interest gains{{ FIELD }}Counsel to one of the world's biggest technology multinationals, handling cutting-edge issues in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions in matters involving complex international contract disputes, compliance obligations in privacy and defamation, IA, consumer law, intermediary liability, hate speech, defamation, intellectual property, unfair competition, elections, and e-commerce.*{{ FIELD }}Counsel to one of the biggest technology multinationals for the company’s global regulatory investigations before unfair competition, corporate, data protection authorities and other compliance matters in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions.*{{ FIELD }}Successfully advised British investors in a multi-billion-dollar ICSID arbitration pertaining to an iron ore project in Uruguay, arising under the UK-Uruguay Bilateral Investment Treaty{{ FIELD }}Advised a French investor in a case initiated according to the rules of the Paris Chamber of International Arbitration (PCIA) related to a concession contract for the construction and operation of a toll road in Peru.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Singapore-based investor, in a PCA international arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules arising out of a dispute involving a risk-service oil contract with Ecuador{{ FIELD }}Advising U.S. oil company in PCA arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the company’s historical activities under oil concession contracts, under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty{{ FIELD }}Representing a mining company in PCA contractual and treaty-based arbitrations against Peru, concerning a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation, brought under the U.S.-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty{{ FIELD }}Representing Argentinian company in an ICSID arbitration concerning the construction and operation of an airport located in Peru, brought under the Argentina-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty{{ FIELD }}Advised a Colombia-owned road concessionaire in a contractual ICSID arbitration against Peru related to an infrastructure toll project on a mountain road that was cancelled following the intervention by the State’s former president{{ FIELD }}Advised a confidential client in the defense industry to identify, assess, prevent, mitigate, and remedy actual and potential international U.S. policy and international public law impacts associated with high-risk products and services, including those in conflict-affected areas{{ FIELD }}Advised a confidential State client with respect to public international law implications and potential claims brought by a different State regarding the construction of a nuclear power facility{{ FIELD }}Represented claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.{{ FIELD }}Luisa focuses on commercial and construction disputes. Luisa has extensive experience representing and counseling multinational companies in the construction, oil and gas, energy, and technology industries in high-stakes and complex litigations in courts throughout the world, as well as in commercial and state-investor international arbitration matters. Luisa is trained in both civil and common law and is admitted to practice in Colombia, Texas and New York. \nLuisa has advised clients in several commercial arbitrations under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), among other arbitration rules. In addition, she has represented clients in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), among other rules.\nIn addition to international arbitration matters, Luisa also has experience advising multinational corporations in high-stake and complex international litigations and regulatory matters across EMEA and LATAM jurisdictions, working on cases before some of the highest courts in those regions. Senior Associate Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá Colombia  Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law New York Texas Counsel to an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute Counsel to a venture capital firm in a dispute between LLC members regarding required deal contributions before the Delaware Court of Chancery Counsel to an owner in dispute related to the design of a data center in Germany before the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York Representing a Colombian oil State-owned company in an international ICC commercial arbitration against U.S. contractor concerning an EPC contract for the upgrade of an oil refinery in the port city of Cartagena. The ICC tribunal reached a unanimous decision in the client’s favor, ordering the contractor to pay more than $1 billion in damages, plus interest gains Counsel to one of the world's biggest technology multinationals, handling cutting-edge issues in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions in matters involving complex international contract disputes, compliance obligations in privacy and defamation, IA, consumer law, intermediary liability, hate speech, defamation, intellectual property, unfair competition, elections, and e-commerce.* Counsel to one of the biggest technology multinationals for the company’s global regulatory investigations before unfair competition, corporate, data protection authorities and other compliance matters in the Americas and EMEA jurisdictions.* Successfully advised British investors in a multi-billion-dollar ICSID arbitration pertaining to an iron ore project in Uruguay, arising under the UK-Uruguay Bilateral Investment Treaty Advised a French investor in a case initiated according to the rules of the Paris Chamber of International Arbitration (PCIA) related to a concession contract for the construction and operation of a toll road in Peru. Representing a Singapore-based investor, in a PCA international arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules arising out of a dispute involving a risk-service oil contract with Ecuador Advising U.S. oil company in PCA arbitration against Ecuador, arising out of the company’s historical activities under oil concession contracts, under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty Representing a mining company in PCA contractual and treaty-based arbitrations against Peru, concerning a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation, brought under the U.S.-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty Representing Argentinian company in an ICSID arbitration concerning the construction and operation of an airport located in Peru, brought under the Argentina-Peru Bilateral Investment Treaty Advised a Colombia-owned road concessionaire in a contractual ICSID arbitration against Peru related to an infrastructure toll project on a mountain road that was cancelled following the intervention by the State’s former president Advised a confidential client in the defense industry to identify, assess, prevent, mitigate, and remedy actual and potential international U.S. policy and international public law impacts associated with high-risk products and services, including those in conflict-affected areas Advised a confidential State client with respect to public international law implications and potential claims brought by a different State regarding the construction of a nuclear power facility Represented claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.","searchable_name":"Luisa F. Gutierrez Quintero","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427339,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6679,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIvan Gonzales joins the Washington, DC office as a Consultant within the International Trade team. Ivan brings over\u0026nbsp;fifteen years of experience in data analysis and economic research.\u0026nbsp;Most recently, Ivan was an Innovation Specialist \u0026amp; Senior Research Analyst at the International Monetary Fund. Prior to that, Ivan has had extensive experience in foreign affairs and the legal sector.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIvan received his\u0026nbsp;Master of Business Administration\u0026nbsp;from Boston University and a Master of Arts in International Economics \u0026amp; International Relations, with a specialization in International Law,\u0026nbsp;from Johns Hopkins University-SAIS. He earned a Bachelor of Science in International Relations, Asian Studies, and Modern Language from Seton Hall University.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ivan-gonzales","email":"igonzales@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Gonzales","nick_name":"Ivan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ivan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":11,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIvan Gonzales joins the Washington, DC office as a Consultant within the International Trade team. Ivan brings over\u0026nbsp;fifteen years of experience in data analysis and economic research.\u0026nbsp;Most recently, Ivan was an Innovation Specialist \u0026amp; Senior Research Analyst at the International Monetary Fund. Prior to that, Ivan has had extensive experience in foreign affairs and the legal sector.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIvan received his\u0026nbsp;Master of Business Administration\u0026nbsp;from Boston University and a Master of Arts in International Economics \u0026amp; International Relations, with a specialization in International Law,\u0026nbsp;from Johns Hopkins University-SAIS. He earned a Bachelor of Science in International Relations, Asian Studies, and Modern Language from Seton Hall University.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12637}]},"capability_group_id":null},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:50.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:50.000Z","searchable_text":"Gonzales{{ FIELD }}Ivan Gonzales joins the Washington, DC office as a Consultant within the International Trade team. Ivan brings over fifteen years of experience in data analysis and economic research. Most recently, Ivan was an Innovation Specialist \u0026amp; Senior Research Analyst at the International Monetary Fund. Prior to that, Ivan has had extensive experience in foreign affairs and the legal sector. \nIvan received his Master of Business Administration from Boston University and a Master of Arts in International Economics \u0026amp; International Relations, with a specialization in International Law, from Johns Hopkins University-SAIS. He earned a Bachelor of Science in International Relations, Asian Studies, and Modern Language from Seton Hall University. Consultant","searchable_name":"Ivan Gonzales","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}