People
Mark is an agile litigator experienced with all stages of the case, from threat assessment and pre-filing diligence through verdict and post-trial motion practice. He represents plaintiffs and defendants in courts across the country in high-stakes intellectual property and business disputes involving complex technologies, including security software, asset tracking systems, augmented reality military target acquisition systems, AI cameras and sensors, and oncolytic viruses.
Mark obtains decisive results for his clients through targeted discovery and motion practice. In a recent billion-dollar technology licensing dispute, Mark and his team excluded four witnesses from offering expert opinions and prevailed on a cross-motion for summary judgment regarding whether an oncolytic viral drug used his client's patented invention. The trial court granted summary judgment in Mark's client's favor and, from the bench, read into the record withering admissions from the opposing party's technical expert that Mark pried loose in deposition.
At trial, Mark and his team have secured complete defense verdicts against claims for hundreds of millions or billions of dollars in damages.
Mark's pro bono practice focuses on protecting the constitutional and civil rights of individuals and classes of disabled prisoners. Mark leverages his civil litigation skills to achieve significant systemic reforms and improve the conditions of confinement for this particularly vulnerable population.
Prior to joining King & Spalding, Mark served as a law clerk to the Honorable Philip A. Brimmer of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. During law school, Mark worked as a patent litigation intern at Google Inc. He also served as a senior articles editor for the Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
Before practicing law, Mark served as an infantry officer in the United States Army. His military assignments include leading a light infantry rifle platoon during a year-long deployment to a fiercely contested region in eastern Afghanistan. Mark's experience planning complex, multi-phase operations and then effectively communicating those plans to his platoon before leading them on combat missions honed the advocacy skills he deploys every day in his practice.
J.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
B.S., United States Military Academy
California
Colorado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Judicial Clerk, The Honorable Philip A. Brimmer, U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
English
Defendant Representations
Omnitracs, LLC et al. v. Motive Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal.) -- trial counsel for Motive in a patent dispute involving vehicle electronic logging device and AI-camera technology. After a two week jury trial, Motive prevailed with a complete defense verdict of non-infringement of all ten claims.
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. CG Oncology, Inc. (Del. Sup. Ct.) – trial counsel for CG Oncology in a patent assignment and trade secret dispute involving oncolytic virus technology. After a two week jury trial, CG Oncology prevailed with a complete defense verdict that it did not owe plaintiff damages under any of the asserted contract or unjust enrichment claims.
Ideal Innovations, Inc. et al. v. United States et al. (COFC) – counsel for General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc., Force Protection, Inc., and General Dynamics Land Systems – Force Protection, Inc. in a patent infringement suit involving wheeled armored vehicles. Obtained judgment for defense through motion practice.
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. LKQ Corporation (E.D. Tex.) – counsel for LKQ Corporation in a patent infringement suit involving fleet tracking and signal processing technologies.
Canopy Growth Corporation v. GW Pharmaceuticals PLC (W.D.Tex.) – counsel for GW Pharmaceuticals PLC in a patent infringement suit involving methods for extracting cannabinoids.
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Piriform, Inc. (E.D. Tex) – counsel for Piriform in a patent infringement suit involving license management software.
Kaldren LLC v. Kik US, Inc. (D. Del.) – counsel for Kik US, Inc. in a series of patent infringement suits involving QR code software.
Plaintiff Representations
Cox Automotive Inc. v. Super Dispatch Inc. (W.D. Mo.) counsel for Cox Automotive Inc. in trade secret and business tort suit involving logistics software.
Open Text S.A. v. Hyland (C.D. Cal) – counsel for Open Text in a series of patent infringement suits involving enterprise content management.
See moreDefendant Representations
Omnitracs, LLC et al. v. Motive Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal.) -- trial counsel for Motive in a patent dispute involving vehicle electronic logging device and AI-camera technology. After a two week jury trial, Motive prevailed with a complete defense verdict of non-infringement of all ten claims.
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. CG Oncology, Inc. (Del. Sup. Ct.) – trial counsel for CG Oncology in a patent assignment and trade secret dispute involving oncolytic virus technology. After a two week jury trial, CG Oncology prevailed with a complete defense verdict that it did not owe plaintiff damages under any of the asserted contract or unjust enrichment claims.
Ideal Innovations, Inc. et al. v. United States et al. (COFC) – counsel for General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc., Force Protection, Inc., and General Dynamics Land Systems – Force Protection, Inc. in a patent infringement suit involving wheeled armored vehicles. Obtained judgment for defense through motion practice.
Fleet Connect Solutions LLC v. LKQ Corporation (E.D. Tex.) – counsel for LKQ Corporation in a patent infringement suit involving fleet tracking and signal processing technologies.
Canopy Growth Corporation v. GW Pharmaceuticals PLC (W.D.Tex.) – counsel for GW Pharmaceuticals PLC in a patent infringement suit involving methods for extracting cannabinoids.
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al. v. Piriform, Inc. (E.D. Tex) – counsel for Piriform in a patent infringement suit involving license management software.
Kaldren LLC v. Kik US, Inc. (D. Del.) – counsel for Kik US, Inc. in a series of patent infringement suits involving QR code software.
Plaintiff Representations
Cox Automotive Inc. v. Super Dispatch Inc. (W.D. Mo.) counsel for Cox Automotive Inc. in trade secret and business tort suit involving logistics software.
Open Text S.A. v. Hyland (C.D. Cal) – counsel for Open Text in a series of patent infringement suits involving enterprise content management.
See moreJ.D., University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
B.S., United States Military Academy
California
Colorado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Judicial Clerk, The Honorable Philip A. Brimmer, U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
English