{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":"25","capability_id":null,"extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":null,"per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426768,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5603,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJonathan Arkins represents major domestic and international financial institutions, private equity funds, and other institutional investors in private placement offerings, revolving and static-pool warehouse facilities, bankruptcy safe harbored financing transactions and structures, domestic and foreign asset-backed securitizations of a diverse range of asset types, supply chain and trade financing and related trade receivable financing and securitization, mortgage and related asset repurchase transactions, fund finance and subscription lines, standby and trade letters of credit, and various other types of secured lending.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Mr. Arkins has extensive experience in short and long term international and domestic monetization transactions, as well as the representation of institutional investors in corporate and asset-backed private placement transactions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Arkins started his career as a commercial litigator, before moving into the transactional side of practice.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jonathan-arkins","email":"jarkins@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":82,"guid":"82.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1165,"guid":"1165.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Arkins","nick_name":"Jonathan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jonathan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Global – Capital Markets: Securitization (USA)","detail":"2011-2012"},{"title":"Chambers USA – Capital Markets: Securitization (Nationwide) ","detail":"2010-2011"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJonathan Arkins represents major domestic and international financial institutions, private equity funds, and other institutional investors in private placement offerings, revolving and static-pool warehouse facilities, bankruptcy safe harbored financing transactions and structures, domestic and foreign asset-backed securitizations of a diverse range of asset types, supply chain and trade financing and related trade receivable financing and securitization, mortgage and related asset repurchase transactions, fund finance and subscription lines, standby and trade letters of credit, and various other types of secured lending.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Mr. Arkins has extensive experience in short and long term international and domestic monetization transactions, as well as the representation of institutional investors in corporate and asset-backed private placement transactions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Arkins started his career as a commercial litigator, before moving into the transactional side of practice.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Global – Capital Markets: Securitization (USA)","detail":"2011-2012"},{"title":"Chambers USA – Capital Markets: Securitization (Nationwide) ","detail":"2010-2011"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7197}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Arkins{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global – Capital Markets: Securitization (USA)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2011-2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA – Capital Markets: Securitization (Nationwide) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2010-2011\"}{{ FIELD }}Jonathan Arkins represents major domestic and international financial institutions, private equity funds, and other institutional investors in private placement offerings, revolving and static-pool warehouse facilities, bankruptcy safe harbored financing transactions and structures, domestic and foreign asset-backed securitizations of a diverse range of asset types, supply chain and trade financing and related trade receivable financing and securitization, mortgage and related asset repurchase transactions, fund finance and subscription lines, standby and trade letters of credit, and various other types of secured lending.\nIn addition, Mr. Arkins has extensive experience in short and long term international and domestic monetization transactions, as well as the representation of institutional investors in corporate and asset-backed private placement transactions\nMr. Arkins started his career as a commercial litigator, before moving into the transactional side of practice. Partner Chambers Global – Capital Markets: Securitization (USA) 2011-2012 Chambers USA – Capital Markets: Securitization (Nationwide)  2010-2011 Monash University, Australia  Monash University, Australia  Monash University, Australia  Florida New York High Court of Australia Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia","searchable_name":"Jonathan Arkins","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442360,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":852,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRandy Bassett is a first chair trial lawyer, who has tried 40 cases to juries.\u0026nbsp; Randy has represented both foreign and domestic companies in federal and state courts across the United States in individual cases, multidistrict proceedings, and class actions. He focuses on the trial of high exposure cases on behalf of corporate defendants in difficult jurisdictions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has represented companies in a range of industries, including consumer products, pharmaceutical, transportation, technology. His clients include: \u003cstrong\u003eBrown-Forman Corporation, General Motors, Gilead Sciences,\u0026nbsp;Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A., Imetric 4D, Logitech, Purdue Pharma LP, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnited Parcel Service, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has handled cases throughout the United States with particular emphasis in jurisdictions designated \"judicial hellholes\" by the American Tort Reform Association. He has tried cases in the state courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Texas and North Carolina and in the U.S. district courts for the Northern District of Georgia and Middle District of Florida. He also has handled appeals on behalf of clients in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits, and has appeared in the state appellate courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecently, Randy relocated his practice to Miami, Florida, to establish King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s office in Miami.\u0026nbsp; He serves as Managing Partner of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Miami office.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"w-randall-bassett","email":"rbassett@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnited Parcel Service\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits in Alabama, Florida and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eR.J. Reynolds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of Engle progeny lawsuits in South Florida achieving results far below demands made by plaintiffs, including complete defense verdicts in Miami-Dade and Broward counties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, SA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a three-day virtual trial in Miami-Dade Circuit Court defending Gol from a breach of contract claim involving the sale of six 737 jet aircraft. The court entered judgment in favor of Gol on all claims, which was affirmed by the 3rd DCA in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eZGA Aircraft Leasing, Inc. v. Webjet Linhas Aereas, SA\u003c/em\u003e, No. 3D22-0320.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":5}]},"expertise":[{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Bassett","nick_name":"Randy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"W. Randall","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Best Lawyers in America","detail":"2010–2016"},{"title":"Chambers USA","detail":"2010–2015"},{"title":"Legal 500","detail":"2010–2016"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/wrandallbassett/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":126,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRandy Bassett is a first chair trial lawyer, who has tried 40 cases to juries.\u0026nbsp; Randy has represented both foreign and domestic companies in federal and state courts across the United States in individual cases, multidistrict proceedings, and class actions. He focuses on the trial of high exposure cases on behalf of corporate defendants in difficult jurisdictions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has represented companies in a range of industries, including consumer products, pharmaceutical, transportation, technology. His clients include: \u003cstrong\u003eBrown-Forman Corporation, General Motors, Gilead Sciences,\u0026nbsp;Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A., Imetric 4D, Logitech, Purdue Pharma LP, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnited Parcel Service, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRandy has handled cases throughout the United States with particular emphasis in jurisdictions designated \"judicial hellholes\" by the American Tort Reform Association. He has tried cases in the state courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Texas and North Carolina and in the U.S. district courts for the Northern District of Georgia and Middle District of Florida. He also has handled appeals on behalf of clients in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits, and has appeared in the state appellate courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecently, Randy relocated his practice to Miami, Florida, to establish King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s office in Miami.\u0026nbsp; He serves as Managing Partner of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Miami office.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnited Parcel Service\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multiple wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits in Alabama, Florida and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eR.J. Reynolds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of Engle progeny lawsuits in South Florida achieving results far below demands made by plaintiffs, including complete defense verdicts in Miami-Dade and Broward counties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, SA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a three-day virtual trial in Miami-Dade Circuit Court defending Gol from a breach of contract claim involving the sale of six 737 jet aircraft. The court entered judgment in favor of Gol on all claims, which was affirmed by the 3rd DCA in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eZGA Aircraft Leasing, Inc. v. Webjet Linhas Aereas, SA\u003c/em\u003e, No. 3D22-0320.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Best Lawyers in America","detail":"2010–2016"},{"title":"Chambers USA","detail":"2010–2015"},{"title":"Legal 500","detail":"2010–2016"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5463}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:28.000Z","searchable_text":"Bassett{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2010–2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2010–2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2010–2016\"}{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for United Parcel Service in multiple wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits in Alabama, Florida and Texas.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for R.J. Reynolds in dozens of Engle progeny lawsuits in South Florida achieving results far below demands made by plaintiffs, including complete defense verdicts in Miami-Dade and Broward counties.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, SA in a three-day virtual trial in Miami-Dade Circuit Court defending Gol from a breach of contract claim involving the sale of six 737 jet aircraft. The court entered judgment in favor of Gol on all claims, which was affirmed by the 3rd DCA in ZGA Aircraft Leasing, Inc. v. Webjet Linhas Aereas, SA, No. 3D22-0320.{{ FIELD }}Randy Bassett is a first chair trial lawyer, who has tried 40 cases to juries.  Randy has represented both foreign and domestic companies in federal and state courts across the United States in individual cases, multidistrict proceedings, and class actions. He focuses on the trial of high exposure cases on behalf of corporate defendants in difficult jurisdictions.\nRandy has represented companies in a range of industries, including consumer products, pharmaceutical, transportation, technology. His clients include: Brown-Forman Corporation, General Motors, Gilead Sciences, Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes S.A., Imetric 4D, Logitech, Purdue Pharma LP, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and United Parcel Service, Inc.\nRandy has handled cases throughout the United States with particular emphasis in jurisdictions designated \"judicial hellholes\" by the American Tort Reform Association. He has tried cases in the state courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Texas and North Carolina and in the U.S. district courts for the Northern District of Georgia and Middle District of Florida. He also has handled appeals on behalf of clients in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth and Eleventh Circuits, and has appeared in the state appellate courts of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee.\nRecently, Randy relocated his practice to Miami, Florida, to establish King \u0026amp; Spalding’s office in Miami.  He serves as Managing Partner of the firm’s Miami office. W Randall Bassett Partner Best Lawyers in America 2010–2016 Chambers USA 2010–2015 Legal 500 2010–2016 The Citadel  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida Georgia Hawaii American Bar Association Litigation Counsel of America American Bar Fellow State Bar of Georgia Lawyers Club of Atlanta Defense Research Institute State Bar of Florida Georgia Defense Lawyers Association International Association of Defense Counsel International Society of Barristers Product Liability Advisory Council Served as lead trial counsel for United Parcel Service in multiple wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits in Alabama, Florida and Texas. Served as lead trial counsel for R.J. Reynolds in dozens of Engle progeny lawsuits in South Florida achieving results far below demands made by plaintiffs, including complete defense verdicts in Miami-Dade and Broward counties. Served as lead trial counsel for Gol Linhas Aereas Inteligentes, SA in a three-day virtual trial in Miami-Dade Circuit Court defending Gol from a breach of contract claim involving the sale of six 737 jet aircraft. The court entered judgment in favor of Gol on all claims, which was affirmed by the 3rd DCA in ZGA Aircraft Leasing, Inc. v. Webjet Linhas Aereas, SA, No. 3D22-0320.","searchable_name":"W. Randall Bassett (Randy)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436409,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3246,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHarry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHarry has been ranked in C\u003cem\u003ehambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u003cem\u003e Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e for International Arbitration\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e He has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration \u0026ndash; Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND\u0026nbsp;FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"henry-burnett","email":"hburnett@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 917 763 6098","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSouth American Silver Ltd.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBear Creek Mining Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Asian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state-owned entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Latin American pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ei\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enternational telecommunications provide\u003c/strong\u003er in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international telecommunications provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Argentine client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternational hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eKhan Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Asian electronics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multilateral, quasi-governmental entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained arbitral award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product distributor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian claiman\u003c/strong\u003et in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;commenced against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Eastern European governmental entity,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEastern European government\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea South American corporation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in between\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in arbitration under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe AAA Commercial Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCDR arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMediator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ereal estate dispute\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between North American- and Caribbean-based company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":72}]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Burnett","nick_name":"Harry","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Henry","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1989-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024","detail":"WWL"},{"title":"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®"},{"title":"Chambers Brazil","detail":"2022"},{"title":"A Global Perspective: M\u0026A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022","detail":"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022"},{"title":"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\"","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026 GAS","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Energy","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America 2022"},{"title":"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association","detail":"LACCA"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\"","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250"},{"title":"The Legal 500 Latin America","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026 Gas Lawyers","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/henry-g-harry-burnett-1952721b/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHarry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHarry has been ranked in C\u003cem\u003ehambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u003cem\u003e Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e for International Arbitration\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e He has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration \u0026ndash; Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND\u0026nbsp;FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSouth American Silver Ltd.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBear Creek Mining Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Asian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state-owned entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Latin American pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ei\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enternational telecommunications provide\u003c/strong\u003er in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international telecommunications provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Argentine client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternational hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eKhan Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Asian electronics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multilateral, quasi-governmental entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained arbitral award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product distributor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian claiman\u003c/strong\u003et in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;commenced against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Eastern European governmental entity,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEastern European government\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea South American corporation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in between\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in arbitration under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe AAA Commercial Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCDR arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMediator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ereal estate dispute\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between North American- and Caribbean-based company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024","detail":"WWL"},{"title":"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®"},{"title":"Chambers Brazil","detail":"2022"},{"title":"A Global Perspective: M\u0026A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022","detail":"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022"},{"title":"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\"","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026 GAS","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Energy","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America 2022"},{"title":"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association","detail":"LACCA"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\"","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250"},{"title":"The Legal 500 Latin America","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026 Gas Lawyers","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8611}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:52:19.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:52:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Burnett{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"WWL\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Brazil\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Global Perspective: M\u0026amp;A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026amp; GAS\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Energy\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Individual\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Latin America 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LACCA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Latin America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"He has \\\"invaluable expertise,\\\" \\\"was really exceptional,\\\" and \\\"really led the way...\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Latin America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Latin Lawyer 250\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 Latin America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant South American Silver Ltd. in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant Bear Creek Mining Company in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Asian mining company in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a state-owned entity in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Latin American pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.{{ FIELD }}Representing an international telecommunications provider in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international telecommunications provider in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Argentine client in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international hospitality company in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Khan Resources Inc. in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Asian electronics company in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a multilateral, quasi-governmental entity in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.{{ FIELD }}Obtained arbitral award for a Brazilian product distributor in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a Brazilian claimant in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of an ICC arbitration commenced against client, an Eastern European governmental entity, seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Eastern European government in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.{{ FIELD }}Obtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of an international voice and data communications company in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international voice and data communications company in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.{{ FIELD }}Representation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client, a South American corporation, seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.{{ FIELD }}President of arbitral tribunal in an ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.{{ FIELD }}President of arbitral tribunal in between an ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under the ICDR Rules concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under the ICDR Rules related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in arbitration under the AAA Commercial Rules between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in ICDR arbitration between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.{{ FIELD }}Mediator in a real estate dispute between North American- and Caribbean-based company.{{ FIELD }}Sole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance){{ FIELD }}Harry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.\nWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\nIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.  He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\nHarry has been ranked in Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Chambers Latin America and Legal 500 for International Arbitration. He has also been recognized by The International Who’s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers and The International Who’s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration – Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\nA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\n \nADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND FLORIDA Henry Burnett Partner Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024 WWL Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial The Best Lawyers in America® Chambers Brazil 2022 A Global Perspective: M\u0026amp;A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022 Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022 “He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\" Chambers Global 2022 Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026amp; GAS GAR Who’s Who Legal: Energy GAR Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration GAR Leading Individual Legal 500 Latin America 2022 Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association LACCA International Arbitration Chambers Global \"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\" Chambers USA \"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\" Chambers Latin America He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\" Chambers Latin America \"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\" Latin Lawyer 250 The Legal 500 Latin America  The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers  The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers  University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Law School Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Florida Illinois New Jersey New York Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration – Latin American Corporate Counsel Association Director, Brazilian-American Chamber of Commerce, New York Visiting Professor, \"Investor-State Arbitration\", Vanderbilt Law School Director, Miami International Arbitration Society, 2023 Adjunct Professor, University of Miami School of Law Representing claimant South American Silver Ltd. in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project. Representing claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation. Representing claimant Bear Creek Mining Company in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project. Representing a Asian mining company in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project. Representing a state-owned entity in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery. Representing a Latin American pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company. Representing an international telecommunications provider in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement. Representation of an international telecommunications provider in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic. Representation of an Argentine client in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company. Representation of an international hospitality company in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam. Representation of Khan Resources Inc. in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project. Representation of an Asian electronics company in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement. Representation of a multilateral, quasi-governmental entity in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier. Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration. Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules. Obtained arbitral award for a Brazilian product distributor in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues. Successfully represented a Brazilian claimant in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil. Obtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of an ICC arbitration commenced against client, an Eastern European governmental entity, seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims. Representation of an Eastern European government in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions. Obtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of an international voice and data communications company in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules. Representation of an international voice and data communications company in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client. Representation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project. Successfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client, a South American corporation, seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America. President of arbitral tribunal in an ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner. President of arbitral tribunal in between an ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement. Co-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under the ICDR Rules concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business. Co-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under the ICDR Rules related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal. Sole arbitrator in arbitration under the AAA Commercial Rules between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron. Sole arbitrator in ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. Sole arbitrator in ICDR arbitration between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist. Mediator in a real estate dispute between North American- and Caribbean-based company. Sole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)","searchable_name":"Henry Burnett (Harry)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442808,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5734,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEva Canaan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.\u0026nbsp; Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.\u0026nbsp; She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.\u0026nbsp; Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts.\u0026nbsp; She has deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts and drafted\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFrye\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.\u0026nbsp; Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients\u0026rsquo; products \u0026ndash; both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"eva-canaan","email":"ecanaan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion relating to Plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main epidemiology expert.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;challenges to exclude the experts\u0026rsquo; opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion excluding plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; general and specific causation experts\u003cem\u003e. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp\u003c/em\u003e., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":607,"guid":"607.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Canaan","nick_name":"Eva","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Eva","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2619,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2003-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®","detail":"Rising Star, 2014"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEva Canaan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.\u0026nbsp; Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.\u0026nbsp; She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.\u0026nbsp; Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts.\u0026nbsp; She has deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts and drafted\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFrye\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.\u0026nbsp; Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients\u0026rsquo; products \u0026ndash; both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion relating to Plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main epidemiology expert.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;challenges to exclude the experts\u0026rsquo; opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; counsel.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;motion excluding plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; general and specific causation experts\u003cem\u003e. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp\u003c/em\u003e., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®","detail":"Rising Star, 2014"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7829}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:52.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:52.000Z","searchable_text":"Canaan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named New York Metro Super Lawyers®\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star, 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued Daubert motion relating to Plaintiffs’ main epidemiology expert. In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig., 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending Daubert challenges to exclude the experts’ opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs’ experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs’ counsel. In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019), In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed Daubert motion excluding plaintiffs’ general and specific causation experts. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012).{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major pharmaceutical company in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.{{ FIELD }}Eva Canaan’s practice focuses on the strategic development and coordination of the scientific defense in pharmaceutical and medical device products liability litigation. In addition to her law degree, Eva holds a Masters in Epidemiology from Columbia University.  Eva is adept at challenging expert witness testimony in depositions and Daubert briefs in federal and state courts.\nEva focuses on making complex scientific concepts accessible to judges and juries.  She routinely works with experts in a variety of scientific disciplines, including epidemiology, toxicology, teratology, and clinical medicine.  Going beyond bottom-line conclusions, Eva aggressively interrogates the data and methodology of studies and reports, often exposing flaws and weaknesses glossed over by the authors and plaintiffs’ experts.  She has deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts and drafted Daubert and Frye briefs in high-stakes litigations affecting hundreds of cases.  Eva follows the epidemiological literature related to her clients’ products – both in and outside of the litigation context -- and provides real-time analyses and risk-assessments to her clients.   Partner Named New York Metro Super Lawyers® Rising Star, 2014 New York University New York University School of Law Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York New York State Bar Association - Torts, Insurance and Compensation Law Section Representing major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict and state court litigation relating to allegations of cancer from a heartburn medication. Leading all science and expert work, encompassing epidemiology, toxicology, oncology, gastroenterology, pharmacology and analytical chemistry. Successfully deposed, briefed, and argued Daubert motion relating to Plaintiffs’ main epidemiology expert. In re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. Liab. Litig., 20-MD-2924, 2022 WL 17480906 (S.D. Fla., December 6, 2022). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-emetic medication. Deposed plaintiffs’ main causation experts to obtain key admissions to support pending Daubert challenges to exclude the experts’ opinions. Successfully briefed motions related to an epidemiological study relied upon by plaintiffs’ experts, revealing undisclosed conflicts of interest, including funding of the study by plaintiffs’ counsel. In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., 392 F.Supp.3d 179 (D. Mass. 2019), In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 1:15-md-2657, 2020 WL 1550563 (D. Mass. Apr. 1, 2020). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in federal and state litigation relating to allegations of birth defects from an anti-depressant medication. Successfully briefed Daubert motion excluding plaintiffs’ general and specific causation experts. Frischhertz v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., No. CIV.A.10-2125, 2012 WL 6697124 (E.D. La. Dec. 21, 2012). Represented a major pharmaceutical company in state and federal litigation relating to allegations of neurological injuries from a denture adhesive product. Represented a major pharmaceutical company in multidistrict litigation relating to allegations of heart attack and stroke from an anti-diabetic medication.","searchable_name":"Eva Canaan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445676,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3030,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePhilip Green is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and a core member of the firm's nationally recognized Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group\u0026mdash;an eight-time \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e Practice Group of the Year. Philip is an accomplished trial lawyer who has built his career on the defense of high-exposure product liability cases in some of the most challenging venues in the United States. With dozens of jury trials to verdict under his belt, he brings extensive courtroom experience, strategic acumen, and an unwavering commitment to achieving favorable outcomes for his clients.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProfessional Experience and Trial Capabilities\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip's practice is defined by his ability to manage and try complex, high-stakes litigation from inception through trial and appeal. He has represented clients across a range of industries, including consumer products, transportation, real estate, pharmaceutical, medical device, and technology sectors. His trial experience spans both federal and state courts, where he has consistently delivered results in jurisdictions often deemed unfavorable to corporate defendants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip regularly tries multi-week jury cases involving complex liability issues, sympathetic plaintiffs, and challenging facts. King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Tort practice\u0026nbsp;tries\u0026nbsp;as many cases each year as any other group in the country, and Philip has been at the forefront of this effort.\u0026nbsp; Philip's extensive trial experience and deep knowledge of plaintiff strategies inform every aspect of his approach to case management and discovery. He excels at coordinating defense team efforts, leading case management from complaint through trial and appeal, and developing innovative litigation strategies tailored to each matter's unique challenges. When cases require resolution at trial, Philip delivers the kind of courtroom performance that is increasingly rare among lawyers at firms of King \u0026amp; Spalding's caliber.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip's trial work has been recognized by Courtroom View Network (CVN), which has featured his closing arguments and trial performances in its archive of notable trial recordings. CVN has highlighted Philip as one of King \u0026amp; Spalding's \"top partners in action in front of a jury.\"\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"philip-green","email":"pgreen@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Green","nick_name":"Philip","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Philip","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePhilip Green is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and a core member of the firm's nationally recognized Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group\u0026mdash;an eight-time \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e Practice Group of the Year. Philip is an accomplished trial lawyer who has built his career on the defense of high-exposure product liability cases in some of the most challenging venues in the United States. With dozens of jury trials to verdict under his belt, he brings extensive courtroom experience, strategic acumen, and an unwavering commitment to achieving favorable outcomes for his clients.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProfessional Experience and Trial Capabilities\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip's practice is defined by his ability to manage and try complex, high-stakes litigation from inception through trial and appeal. He has represented clients across a range of industries, including consumer products, transportation, real estate, pharmaceutical, medical device, and technology sectors. His trial experience spans both federal and state courts, where he has consistently delivered results in jurisdictions often deemed unfavorable to corporate defendants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip regularly tries multi-week jury cases involving complex liability issues, sympathetic plaintiffs, and challenging facts. King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Tort practice\u0026nbsp;tries\u0026nbsp;as many cases each year as any other group in the country, and Philip has been at the forefront of this effort.\u0026nbsp; Philip's extensive trial experience and deep knowledge of plaintiff strategies inform every aspect of his approach to case management and discovery. He excels at coordinating defense team efforts, leading case management from complaint through trial and appeal, and developing innovative litigation strategies tailored to each matter's unique challenges. When cases require resolution at trial, Philip delivers the kind of courtroom performance that is increasingly rare among lawyers at firms of King \u0026amp; Spalding's caliber.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip's trial work has been recognized by Courtroom View Network (CVN), which has featured his closing arguments and trial performances in its archive of notable trial recordings. CVN has highlighted Philip as one of King \u0026amp; Spalding's \"top partners in action in front of a jury.\"\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11793}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-09T15:41:46.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-09T15:41:46.000Z","searchable_text":"Green{{ FIELD }}Philip Green is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and a core member of the firm's nationally recognized Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group—an eight-time Law360 Practice Group of the Year. Philip is an accomplished trial lawyer who has built his career on the defense of high-exposure product liability cases in some of the most challenging venues in the United States. With dozens of jury trials to verdict under his belt, he brings extensive courtroom experience, strategic acumen, and an unwavering commitment to achieving favorable outcomes for his clients. \nProfessional Experience and Trial Capabilities\nPhilip's practice is defined by his ability to manage and try complex, high-stakes litigation from inception through trial and appeal. He has represented clients across a range of industries, including consumer products, transportation, real estate, pharmaceutical, medical device, and technology sectors. His trial experience spans both federal and state courts, where he has consistently delivered results in jurisdictions often deemed unfavorable to corporate defendants.\nPhilip regularly tries multi-week jury cases involving complex liability issues, sympathetic plaintiffs, and challenging facts. King \u0026amp; Spalding's Products Liability and Mass Tort practice tries as many cases each year as any other group in the country, and Philip has been at the forefront of this effort.  Philip's extensive trial experience and deep knowledge of plaintiff strategies inform every aspect of his approach to case management and discovery. He excels at coordinating defense team efforts, leading case management from complaint through trial and appeal, and developing innovative litigation strategies tailored to each matter's unique challenges. When cases require resolution at trial, Philip delivers the kind of courtroom performance that is increasingly rare among lawyers at firms of King \u0026amp; Spalding's caliber.\nPhilip's trial work has been recognized by Courtroom View Network (CVN), which has featured his closing arguments and trial performances in its archive of notable trial recordings. CVN has highlighted Philip as one of King \u0026amp; Spalding's \"top partners in action in front of a jury.\" Partner University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida Georgia Hawaii Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia","searchable_name":"Philip R. Green","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426294,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2174,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eUrsula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.\u0026nbsp; A fellow of the\u0026nbsp;American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and\u0026nbsp; product liability matters. She has tried over 45\u0026nbsp;cases in her career\u0026nbsp;and is known for her ability to relate to juries.\u0026nbsp; In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.\u0026nbsp; Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.\u0026nbsp; Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation 2017,\u003c/em\u003e and has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026ndash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ursula-henninger","email":"uhenninger@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eReinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRobert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (M.D. Fla.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem\u003eHildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Escambia).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCharles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eStanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Illinois 2017).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Henninger","nick_name":"Ursula","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ursula","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"U.S. Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2017"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eUrsula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.\u0026nbsp; A fellow of the\u0026nbsp;American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and\u0026nbsp; product liability matters. She has tried over 45\u0026nbsp;cases in her career\u0026nbsp;and is known for her ability to relate to juries.\u0026nbsp; In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.\u0026nbsp; Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.\u0026nbsp; Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation 2017,\u003c/em\u003e and has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026ndash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eReinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRobert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (M.D. Fla.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem\u003eHildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Escambia).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCharles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eStanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Illinois 2017).\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"U.S. Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2017"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9870}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:21.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Henninger{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Litigation Star \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S.\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Reinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Robert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (M.D. Fla.).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Escambia).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Charles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Stanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward).{{ FIELD }}Represented GlaxoSmithKline in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017).{{ FIELD }}Ursula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.  A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.  A fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.\nUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and  product liability matters. She has tried over 45 cases in her career and is known for her ability to relate to juries.  In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\nIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases.  \nUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.  Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.  Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation 2017, and has been ranked by Legal 500 US for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products. Partner U.S. Litigation Star  Benchmark Litigation, 2017 Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products Legal 500 U.S.   Appalachian State University  Wake Forest University Wake Forest University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Florida North Carolina Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Reinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Robert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (M.D. Fla.). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Escambia). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Charles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Stanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward). Represented GlaxoSmithKline in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017).","searchable_name":"Ursula M. Henninger","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":437597,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2163,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in\u0026nbsp;over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCory has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as one of America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished trial attorney.\u0026rdquo; He has also been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026mdash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"cory-hohnbaum","email":"chohnbaum@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national securities firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment banking firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":166}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":923,"guid":"923.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hohnbaum","nick_name":"Cory","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Cory","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"America’s Leading Business Lawyers ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"Business Litigation: North Carolina ","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte","detail":""},{"title":"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball","detail":"1987"},{"title":"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) ","detail":"2015"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in\u0026nbsp;over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCory has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as one of America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished trial attorney.\u0026rdquo; He has also been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026mdash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national securities firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment banking firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"America’s Leading Business Lawyers ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"Business Litigation: North Carolina ","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte","detail":""},{"title":"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball","detail":"1987"},{"title":"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) ","detail":"2015"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":920}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-22T18:50:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-22T18:50:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Hohnbaum{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"America’s Leading Business Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Commercial Litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Business Litigation: North Carolina \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S.\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"1987\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015\"}{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.{{ FIELD }}Defended a national securities firm in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international manufacturer in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.{{ FIELD }}Defended a hedge fund in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.{{ FIELD }}Defended an investment banking firm in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.{{ FIELD }}Cory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.\nIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\nIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\nCory has been recognized by Chambers USA as one of America’s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as “an extremely accomplished trial attorney.” He has also been ranked by The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by Super Lawyers for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by Legal 500 U.S. for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense — Consumer Products. Cory Hohnbaum Partner America’s Leading Business Lawyers  Chambers USA Commercial Litigation  The Best Lawyers in America Business Litigation: North Carolina  Super Lawyers Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products  Legal 500 U.S. George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte  NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball 1987 Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball)  2015 Westminster College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Florida Fellow, American Bar Foundation Lead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac. Lead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years. Lead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami. Defended a national securities firm in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company. Represented an international manufacturer in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks. Represented a national bank in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger. Defended a hedge fund in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading. Defended an investment banking firm in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company. Represented a national bank in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.","searchable_name":"Cory Hohnbaum","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":441006,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5652,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Kahan is partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate, Finance and Investments Practice and co-leads both the firm\u0026rsquo;s Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Group and Fintech Group. His corporate transactional practice focuses on private equity and venture capital investments, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and spin-offs, debt and equity offerings, digital asset transactions, and corporate governance matters. Daniel also regularly advises clients in strategic technology and commercial transactions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel has worked with companies, entrepreneurs, private equity investors, venture capital investors, and strategic corporate investors and acquirers across a range of sectors, including enterprise software, artificial intelligence, fintech, blockchain, insurtech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, hardware, life sciences, healthcare, and travel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel is a frequent writer and speaker on startup, fintech, and digital asset topics.\u0026nbsp; He has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Venture Capital and Emerging Companies category, with clients describing him as a \u0026ldquo;best-in-class attorney\u0026rdquo; who is\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;extremely knowledgeable, responsive, and efficient.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-kahan","email":"dkahan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1192,"guid":"1192.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kahan","nick_name":"Daniel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Circle of Excellence","detail":"Miami-Dade Bar, 2025"},{"title":"M\u0026A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026 Emerging Companies","detail":"Legal 500, 2025"},{"title":"M\u0026A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026 Emerging Companies","detail":"Legal 500, 2024"},{"title":"Florida Editorial Board","detail":"Law360, 2024"},{"title":"On the Rise Honoree","detail":"Daily Business Review Florida Legal Awards, 2024"},{"title":"40 Under 40 ","detail":"South Florida Business Journal, 2023"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/dankahan/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Kahan is partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate, Finance and Investments Practice and co-leads both the firm\u0026rsquo;s Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Group and Fintech Group. His corporate transactional practice focuses on private equity and venture capital investments, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and spin-offs, debt and equity offerings, digital asset transactions, and corporate governance matters. Daniel also regularly advises clients in strategic technology and commercial transactions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel has worked with companies, entrepreneurs, private equity investors, venture capital investors, and strategic corporate investors and acquirers across a range of sectors, including enterprise software, artificial intelligence, fintech, blockchain, insurtech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, hardware, life sciences, healthcare, and travel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel is a frequent writer and speaker on startup, fintech, and digital asset topics.\u0026nbsp; He has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Venture Capital and Emerging Companies category, with clients describing him as a \u0026ldquo;best-in-class attorney\u0026rdquo; who is\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;extremely knowledgeable, responsive, and efficient.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Circle of Excellence","detail":"Miami-Dade Bar, 2025"},{"title":"M\u0026A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026 Emerging Companies","detail":"Legal 500, 2025"},{"title":"M\u0026A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026 Emerging Companies","detail":"Legal 500, 2024"},{"title":"Florida Editorial Board","detail":"Law360, 2024"},{"title":"On the Rise Honoree","detail":"Daily Business Review Florida Legal Awards, 2024"},{"title":"40 Under 40 ","detail":"South Florida Business Journal, 2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7443}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-10-16T20:42:34.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-16T20:42:34.000Z","searchable_text":"Kahan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Circle of Excellence\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Miami-Dade Bar, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"M\u0026amp;A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026amp; Emerging Companies\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"M\u0026amp;A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026amp; Emerging Companies\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Florida Editorial Board\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"On the Rise Honoree\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Business Review Florida Legal Awards, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 Under 40 \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"South Florida Business Journal, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Daniel Kahan is partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Corporate, Finance and Investments Practice and co-leads both the firm’s Emerging Companies and Venture Capital Group and Fintech Group. His corporate transactional practice focuses on private equity and venture capital investments, mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and spin-offs, debt and equity offerings, digital asset transactions, and corporate governance matters. Daniel also regularly advises clients in strategic technology and commercial transactions. \nDaniel has worked with companies, entrepreneurs, private equity investors, venture capital investors, and strategic corporate investors and acquirers across a range of sectors, including enterprise software, artificial intelligence, fintech, blockchain, insurtech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, hardware, life sciences, healthcare, and travel.\nDaniel is a frequent writer and speaker on startup, fintech, and digital asset topics.  He has been recognized by Legal 500 in its Venture Capital and Emerging Companies category, with clients describing him as a “best-in-class attorney” who is “extremely knowledgeable, responsive, and efficient.”\n Partner Circle of Excellence Miami-Dade Bar, 2025 M\u0026amp;A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026amp; Emerging Companies Legal 500, 2025 M\u0026amp;A/Corporate and Commercial - Venture Capital \u0026amp; Emerging Companies Legal 500, 2024 Florida Editorial Board Law360, 2024 On the Rise Honoree Daily Business Review Florida Legal Awards, 2024 40 Under 40  South Florida Business Journal, 2023 Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center District of Columbia Florida Virginia","searchable_name":"Daniel R. Kahan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443946,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6689,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBarry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC\u0026rsquo;s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a\u0026nbsp;variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"barry-kamar","email":"bkamar@kslaw.com ","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eProject44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent national financial services company in DOJ investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eerinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRetractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary\u0026rsquo;s conduct.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kamar","nick_name":"Barry","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Barry","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America ","detail":"2024 "}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBarry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC\u0026rsquo;s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a\u0026nbsp;variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eProject44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSkillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent national financial services company in DOJ investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eerinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRetractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary\u0026rsquo;s conduct.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America ","detail":"2024 "}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11683}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Kamar{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024 \"}{{ FIELD }}Project44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute{{ FIELD }}Skillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor{{ FIELD }}Advise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation{{ FIELD }}Represent national financial services company in DOJ investigation{{ FIELD }}Represent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter{{ FIELD }}Represent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls{{ FIELD }}IRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency.{{ FIELD }}erinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings.{{ FIELD }}Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices.{{ FIELD }}Representation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary’s conduct.{{ FIELD }}Barry Kamar draws on his background as a federal prosecutor and investment banker to represent global companies in government investigations and complex commercial litigation. He focuses his practice on representing companies, boards and individuals on a wide range of criminal, regulatory and civil matters, including matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and other domestic and international regulatory agencies, as well as on civil matters involving high stakes business disputes.\nA skilled trial lawyer, Barry is often called upon for his courtroom advocacy and business-minded approach. He served for over a decade at DOJ and the SEC where he held various senior positions including Chief of the Public Protection Unit at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and Senior Counsel at the SEC’s New York office. In these roles, Barry oversaw significant public investigations and prosecutions involving financial fraud and federal securities law violations, spending much of his time conducting jury trials in federal court.\nPrior to his government service, Barry was a litigator at Paul Weiss in New York, where he successfully defended financial services, pharmaceutical and media clients in multi-million dollar securities, antitrust and FCPA matters, as well as in commercial disputes involving cutting-edge legal issues.\nBarry also is a former investment banker at Morgan Stanley \u0026amp; Co. and former economist at PricewaterhouseCoopers, where he advised energy, construction and technology clients on a variety of strategic corporate transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, corporate financing and transfer pricing.\nA native Arabic speaker, Barry lived for more than 17 years in the Middle East, including Cairo, Egypt, Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Barry also lived for several years in Mexico City, Mexico, and is proficient in Spanish. Partner The Best Lawyers in America  2024  University of Texas  The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Florida New York Federal Bar Association Vice-Chair, Federal Committee, Miami-Dade Bar Association Trial Lawyers, Criminal Law, and Business Law Sections, The Florida Bar Economic Club of Miami Project44, Inc. v. MyCarrier, LLC: represent SaaS freight logistics provider in commercial dispute Skillz Platform, Inc. v. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., No. 24-1646 (S.D.N.Y.): represent online gaming platform in Lanham Act false advertising matter against competitor Advise multinational life sciences company in connection with internal investigation Represent national financial services company in DOJ investigation Represent multinational OEM in SEC FCPA matter Represent multinational semiconductor manufacturer in DOJ and SEC inquiries regarding export controls IRA Financial Trust v. Gemini Trust, LLC, 22-cv-4672 (S.D.N.Y.): Bet-the-company litigation concerning data breach and theft of cryptocurrency. erinMedia, LLC v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc., 05-cv-1123 (M.D. Fla.): Antitrust matter involving television media ratings. Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. Becton Dickinson \u0026amp; Co., 01-cv-36 (E.D. Tex.): Antitrust matter involving medical devices. Representation of multi-national corporation in connection with a DOJ FCPA investigation of a Latin American subsidiary’s conduct.","searchable_name":"Barry Kamar","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443889,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6259,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamantha\u0026rsquo;s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.\u0026nbsp; She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.\u0026nbsp; Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.\u0026nbsp; Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"samantha-kavanaugh","email":"skavanaugh@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSecurities Class Action Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an investment bank.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kavanaugh","nick_name":"Samantha","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Samantha","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1996-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 1","detail":"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/samantha-kavanaugh-2377114/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamantha\u0026rsquo;s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.\u0026nbsp; She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.\u0026nbsp; Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.\u0026nbsp; Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSecurities Class Action Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an investment bank.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eOther Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked Band 1","detail":"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9670}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:00:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:00:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Kavanaugh{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Band 1\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida\"}{{ FIELD }}Securities Class Action Defense\nDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against global technology distributor.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry.{{ FIELD }}Defended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against an investment bank.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors.{{ FIELD }}Defended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors.{{ FIELD }}Other Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\nRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\nRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations.{{ FIELD }}Other Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\nRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers.{{ FIELD }}Internal Investigations\nRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\nRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\nRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\nRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee.{{ FIELD }}Other Litigation\nRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\nRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\nRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\nRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\nRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\nRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\nRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\nRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.{{ FIELD }}Samantha Kavanaugh defends corporate entities and individuals in federal and state courts around the country.  She has extensive experience litigating securities class actions, and other complex litigation, including private equity matters, business torts and contract disputes.\nSamantha’s practice concentrates on defending clients in securities class actions alleging securities fraud, accounting fraud and breach of fiduciary duties.  She has defended many securities class actions collectively seeking damages in the billions of dollars.  Her defense of these cases often involves multiple related lawsuits and derivative claims.  Samantha also has experience conducting internal investigations for both public and private companies. Partner Ranked Band 1 Chambers USA in Litigation: Securities – Florida George Mason University George Mason University School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida The Florida Bar, Member Dade County Bar Association, Member Securities Class Action Defense\nDefended federal and state securities class actions against officers and directors of a medical supply company. Defended federal securities class action against global technology distributor. Defended federal securities class action against a VOIP telecommunications company. Defended federal and state securities class actions against an officer of a bankrupt entertainment company. Defended federal securities class action against a pharmaceutical company related to the status of new product development. Defended federal securities class action against a company in the education industry. Defended federal securities class action against a company providing software and services to the healthcare industry. Defended multi-district federal securities class actions against the former CEO of a bankrupt software company. Defended federal securities class action against the former controller of a bankrupt time-share company. Defended federal securities class action against an investment bank. Defended federal securities class action against a software development company and certain of its officers and directors. Defended federal securities class action against an aviation services company and certain of its officers and directors. Other Shareholder Derivative Litigation Defense\nRepresented directors of a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in defense of derivative claims asserted in more than one jurisdiction.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund in defending derivative claims brought in federal court by a lender alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented an executive of a private equity fund at multi-week jury trial in defense of derivative claims brought by a fund investor related to M\u0026amp;A transactions.\nRepresented a public company in the education industry in defending derivative claims arising from parallel criminal and SEC investigations. Other Accounting and Financial Fraud Litigation\nRepresented a private equity fund in multiple lawsuits in New York federal and state courts alleging fraudulent accounts receivable.\nRepresented officers of a company in connection with an alleged misrepresentation and omission action brought by former and current shareholders of the company regarding on-site vehicle fluid analyzers. Internal Investigations\nRepresented a NYSE-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by senior financial personnel.\nRepresented a private company in the investigation of alleged dishonest conduct by a senior vice president.\nRepresented the audit committee of a NASDAQ-traded telecommunications company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating.\nRepresented a NASDAQ-traded brokerage company in the investigation of alleged stock-option backdating on behalf of the audit committee. Other Litigation\nRepresented buyer of historic cooperative building in various actions asserting claims by unit owners.\nRepresented builders and contractors against multimillion dollar claims of defective Chinese drywall in federal multi-district and state court litigation.\nRepresented a watch manufacturer in an action seeking damages for purported breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and fraud.\nRepresented a company, its subsidiary, and an individual defendant in an action seeking damages for breach of contract, theft of trade secrets, and unfair competition.\nRepresented a healthcare receivables financing company in an action asserting breach of contract and fraudulent inducement claims.\nRepresented an alarm services company in a federal lawsuit involving a dispute over an asset purchase agreement.\nRepresented the developer of a senior living facility in a specific performance action to obtain a $10 million parcel of land.\nRepresented a developer with respect to claims involving an alleged contract to purchase luxury condominium units located on Fisher Island.","searchable_name":"Samantha Kavanaugh","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445387,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2473,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Kenny is a partner in our Healthcare practice and specializes in providing strategic payment and compliance advice to hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other organizations participating in Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurance plans.\u0026nbsp; For the past nine years, Chris has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a leading healthcare lawyer and in 2020 was named a Top Attorney Under 40 by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith in-depth knowledge of payment systems and regulations, Chris\u0026nbsp;regularly advises in-house lawyers and C-suite executives on the payment implications of major business decisions including facility construction/acquisition,\u0026nbsp;medical staff relations, the operation\u0026nbsp;and expansion of graduate medical education and allied health training programs,\u0026nbsp;organ acquisition program management, participation in the 340B Drug Pricing Program,\u0026nbsp;and telehealth expansion.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eApplying his regulatory and reimbursement experience, Chris represents hospitals in Medicare payment litigation\u0026nbsp;and before Congress and the administrative branch, as well as in\u0026nbsp;False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe strives to provide creative, proactive advice in an ever-changing healthcare regulatory environment, and to vigorously defend his clients\u0026rsquo; positions in payment disputes and government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA member of the Healthcare Financial Management Association and the American Health Lawyers Association, Chris regularly speaks and writes on reimbursement and compliance issues. He is the co-editor of the \u003cem\u003eReimbursement Advisor,\u003c/em\u003e the leading national healthcare reimbursement publication, and serves as co-editor of our firm\u0026rsquo;s award-winning \u003cem\u003eHealth Headlines\u003c/em\u003e, a weekly newsletter summarizing healthcare law and policy developments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND; NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christopher-kenny","email":"ckenny@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Florida Hospital Association and 12 of its members in a precedent-setting challenge to CMS's exclusion of section 1115 waiver days from the Medicare DSH payment adjustment, resulting in a multi-million dollar victory.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSee Bethesda Health v. Azar\u003c/em\u003e, 980 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 2020). Mr. Kenny is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of dozens more hospitals in Florida, Texas, California, Tennessee and elsewhere, with total amounts in controversy worth hundreds of millions of dollars.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented 34 hospitals in overturning CMS's unlawful policy understating the so-called \"rural floor,\" generating hundreds of millions of dollars in additional wage-related payments for providers in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, and elsewhere.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCitrus HMA v. Azar\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 20-00707, 2022 WL 1062990 (D.D.C. 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented five major health systems in overturning CMS's disallowance of millions of dollars in financial support for the hospitals' nursing and other training programs. The court noted \"the hosptials are right, and it is not even close.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMercy Health-St. Vincent Medical Center v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 22-3578 (D.D.C. 2024).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRegularly provides day-to-day counseling to more than a dozen major health systems in the establishment and operation of large outpatient provider-based facilities and rural health clinics. Issues involved include the structuring of complex management agreements, joint ventures, 340B considerations, service line collaborations, and hospital-physician relationships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented a Medicaid managed care organization in multiple False Claims Act investigations by local U.S. Attorneys' Offices resulting in declinations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecovered millions of dollars in additional cost reimbursement for an organ procurement organization's clinical laboratory activities.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":116}]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kenny","nick_name":"Chris","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Christopher","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"P.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Top Attorneys Under 40 - Healthcare","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Ranked in Chambers USA for Healthcare 2017-2021","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare","detail":"SUPER LAWYERS, 2018"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Kenny is a partner in our Healthcare practice and specializes in providing strategic payment and compliance advice to hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other organizations participating in Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurance plans.\u0026nbsp; For the past nine years, Chris has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a leading healthcare lawyer and in 2020 was named a Top Attorney Under 40 by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith in-depth knowledge of payment systems and regulations, Chris\u0026nbsp;regularly advises in-house lawyers and C-suite executives on the payment implications of major business decisions including facility construction/acquisition,\u0026nbsp;medical staff relations, the operation\u0026nbsp;and expansion of graduate medical education and allied health training programs,\u0026nbsp;organ acquisition program management, participation in the 340B Drug Pricing Program,\u0026nbsp;and telehealth expansion.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eApplying his regulatory and reimbursement experience, Chris represents hospitals in Medicare payment litigation\u0026nbsp;and before Congress and the administrative branch, as well as in\u0026nbsp;False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe strives to provide creative, proactive advice in an ever-changing healthcare regulatory environment, and to vigorously defend his clients\u0026rsquo; positions in payment disputes and government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA member of the Healthcare Financial Management Association and the American Health Lawyers Association, Chris regularly speaks and writes on reimbursement and compliance issues. He is the co-editor of the \u003cem\u003eReimbursement Advisor,\u003c/em\u003e the leading national healthcare reimbursement publication, and serves as co-editor of our firm\u0026rsquo;s award-winning \u003cem\u003eHealth Headlines\u003c/em\u003e, a weekly newsletter summarizing healthcare law and policy developments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND; NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Florida Hospital Association and 12 of its members in a precedent-setting challenge to CMS's exclusion of section 1115 waiver days from the Medicare DSH payment adjustment, resulting in a multi-million dollar victory.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSee Bethesda Health v. Azar\u003c/em\u003e, 980 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 2020). Mr. Kenny is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of dozens more hospitals in Florida, Texas, California, Tennessee and elsewhere, with total amounts in controversy worth hundreds of millions of dollars.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented 34 hospitals in overturning CMS's unlawful policy understating the so-called \"rural floor,\" generating hundreds of millions of dollars in additional wage-related payments for providers in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, and elsewhere.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCitrus HMA v. Azar\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 20-00707, 2022 WL 1062990 (D.D.C. 2022).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented five major health systems in overturning CMS's disallowance of millions of dollars in financial support for the hospitals' nursing and other training programs. The court noted \"the hosptials are right, and it is not even close.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMercy Health-St. Vincent Medical Center v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 22-3578 (D.D.C. 2024).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRegularly provides day-to-day counseling to more than a dozen major health systems in the establishment and operation of large outpatient provider-based facilities and rural health clinics. Issues involved include the structuring of complex management agreements, joint ventures, 340B considerations, service line collaborations, and hospital-physician relationships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented a Medicaid managed care organization in multiple False Claims Act investigations by local U.S. Attorneys' Offices resulting in declinations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecovered millions of dollars in additional cost reimbursement for an organ procurement organization's clinical laboratory activities.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"2020 Top Attorneys Under 40 - Healthcare","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Ranked in Chambers USA for Healthcare 2017-2021","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare","detail":"SUPER LAWYERS, 2018"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10000}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-01-30T19:46:10.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-30T19:46:10.000Z","searchable_text":"Kenny{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2020 Top Attorneys Under 40 - Healthcare\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in Chambers USA for Healthcare 2017-2021\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"SUPER LAWYERS, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star in Healthcare\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented the Florida Hospital Association and 12 of its members in a precedent-setting challenge to CMS's exclusion of section 1115 waiver days from the Medicare DSH payment adjustment, resulting in a multi-million dollar victory. See Bethesda Health v. Azar, 980 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 2020). Mr. Kenny is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of dozens more hospitals in Florida, Texas, California, Tennessee and elsewhere, with total amounts in controversy worth hundreds of millions of dollars.{{ FIELD }}Represented 34 hospitals in overturning CMS's unlawful policy understating the so-called \"rural floor,\" generating hundreds of millions of dollars in additional wage-related payments for providers in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, and elsewhere. Citrus HMA v. Azar, Case No. 20-00707, 2022 WL 1062990 (D.D.C. 2022).{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented five major health systems in overturning CMS's disallowance of millions of dollars in financial support for the hospitals' nursing and other training programs. The court noted \"the hosptials are right, and it is not even close.\" Mercy Health-St. Vincent Medical Center v. Becerra, Case No. 22-3578 (D.D.C. 2024).{{ FIELD }}Regularly provides day-to-day counseling to more than a dozen major health systems in the establishment and operation of large outpatient provider-based facilities and rural health clinics. Issues involved include the structuring of complex management agreements, joint ventures, 340B considerations, service line collaborations, and hospital-physician relationships.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a Medicaid managed care organization in multiple False Claims Act investigations by local U.S. Attorneys' Offices resulting in declinations.{{ FIELD }}Recovered millions of dollars in additional cost reimbursement for an organ procurement organization's clinical laboratory activities.{{ FIELD }}Chris Kenny is a partner in our Healthcare practice and specializes in providing strategic payment and compliance advice to hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other organizations participating in Medicare, Medicaid and commercial insurance plans.  For the past nine years, Chris has been recognized by Chambers USA as a leading healthcare lawyer and in 2020 was named a Top Attorney Under 40 by Law 360.\nWith in-depth knowledge of payment systems and regulations, Chris regularly advises in-house lawyers and C-suite executives on the payment implications of major business decisions including facility construction/acquisition, medical staff relations, the operation and expansion of graduate medical education and allied health training programs, organ acquisition program management, participation in the 340B Drug Pricing Program, and telehealth expansion.  \nApplying his regulatory and reimbursement experience, Chris represents hospitals in Medicare payment litigation and before Congress and the administrative branch, as well as in False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice.\nHe strives to provide creative, proactive advice in an ever-changing healthcare regulatory environment, and to vigorously defend his clients’ positions in payment disputes and government investigations.\nA member of the Healthcare Financial Management Association and the American Health Lawyers Association, Chris regularly speaks and writes on reimbursement and compliance issues. He is the co-editor of the Reimbursement Advisor, the leading national healthcare reimbursement publication, and serves as co-editor of our firm’s award-winning Health Headlines, a weekly newsletter summarizing healthcare law and policy developments.\nADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND; NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA Christopher P Kenny Partner 2020 Top Attorneys Under 40 - Healthcare Law360 Ranked in Chambers USA for Healthcare 2017-2021 Chambers USA Named a Rising Star in Healthcare SUPER LAWYERS, 2018 Named a Rising Star in Healthcare Super Lawyers, 2017 Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law George Washington University George Washington University Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Maryland American Health Lawyers Association Healthcare Financial Management Association Represented the Florida Hospital Association and 12 of its members in a precedent-setting challenge to CMS's exclusion of section 1115 waiver days from the Medicare DSH payment adjustment, resulting in a multi-million dollar victory. See Bethesda Health v. Azar, 980 F.3d 121 (D.C. Cir. 2020). Mr. Kenny is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of dozens more hospitals in Florida, Texas, California, Tennessee and elsewhere, with total amounts in controversy worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Represented 34 hospitals in overturning CMS's unlawful policy understating the so-called \"rural floor,\" generating hundreds of millions of dollars in additional wage-related payments for providers in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, and elsewhere. Citrus HMA v. Azar, Case No. 20-00707, 2022 WL 1062990 (D.D.C. 2022). Successfully represented five major health systems in overturning CMS's disallowance of millions of dollars in financial support for the hospitals' nursing and other training programs. The court noted \"the hosptials are right, and it is not even close.\" Mercy Health-St. Vincent Medical Center v. Becerra, Case No. 22-3578 (D.D.C. 2024). Regularly provides day-to-day counseling to more than a dozen major health systems in the establishment and operation of large outpatient provider-based facilities and rural health clinics. Issues involved include the structuring of complex management agreements, joint ventures, 340B considerations, service line collaborations, and hospital-physician relationships. Successfully represented a Medicaid managed care organization in multiple False Claims Act investigations by local U.S. Attorneys' Offices resulting in declinations. Recovered millions of dollars in additional cost reimbursement for an organ procurement organization's clinical laboratory activities.","searchable_name":"Christopher P. Kenny (Chris)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443942,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6678,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire\u0026rsquo;s.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-kupfer","email":"dkupfer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others \u0026ldquo;determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross\u0026rsquo;s flagship private equity funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Moody\u0026rsquo;s in a Department of Justice investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Fidelity National Financial\u0026rsquo;s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire\u0026rsquo;s.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1064,"guid":"1064.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kupfer","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2011 - 2012"}],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":722,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named a Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-kupfer-08710134/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire\u0026rsquo;s.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others \u0026ldquo;determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross\u0026rsquo;s flagship private equity funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Moody\u0026rsquo;s in a Department of Justice investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Fidelity National Financial\u0026rsquo;s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire\u0026rsquo;s.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named a Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11629}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:42.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:42.000Z","searchable_text":"Kupfer{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2020-2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others “determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.”{{ FIELD }}Represented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross’s flagship private equity funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities.{{ FIELD }}Represented Moody’s in a Department of Justice investigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented Fidelity National Financial’s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices.{{ FIELD }}Represented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney.{{ FIELD }}Represented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire’s.{{ FIELD }}David H. Kupfer is a trial lawyer with extensive experience litigating complex commercial disputes and representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil and criminal matters and regulatory investigations. David has represented real estate and hospitality developers, lenders, and operators, financial institutions, life sciences, and technology firms, and venture and private equity funds in bankruptcy, state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. He has also represented creditors in complex restructuring proceedings including the restructurings of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, JCPenney, and Claire’s.\nDavid devotes significant time to pro bono work, and regularly represents low-income clients in fair housing and felony criminal matters.\nDavid clerked for the Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Partner Named a Rising Star Super Lawyers, 2020-2023 Touro College  Fordham University Fordham University School of Law Florida New Jersey New York New York City Bar Association UJA Young Leadership Committee Law Clerk, Honorable Henry B. Pitman, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Representing Bath Club Entertainment and developer R. Donahue Peebles in actions against members of a neighboring condominium association and others “determined to interfere with the successful management of the historic Bath Club on Miami Beach.” Represented private-equity magnate David Storper in several actions against Wilbur Ross and WL Ross \u0026amp; Co. involving breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duties related to WL Ross’s flagship private equity funds. Represented AIB Group in an action against its prime broker, related to a five-year, $700 million foreign-exchange fraud. Represented JPMorgan Chase in numerous actions in state and federal court related to mortgage-backed securities. Represented Moody’s in a Department of Justice investigation. Represented Fidelity National Financial’s Black Knight Unit in a securities opt-out action brought by Maverick Funds. Represented Newlink Genetics in a 10b-5 class action related to a failed drug trial. Represented ChromaDex in multiple actions in federal court against Elysium Health, related to false advertising, trade libel, and deceptive practices. Represented Olo in a contract dispute with DoorDash. Represented the Official Committee of Talc Creditors II in bankruptcy proceedings of LTL Management related to mass torts by Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of pharmaceutical giant Mallinckrodt. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of JCPenney. Represented liquidating trustee in fiduciary duty action against founders of Fuhu. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Videology. Represented the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in bankruptcy proceeding of Claire’s.","searchable_name":"David Kupfer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}