{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":"21","capability_id":null,"extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"K","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":442758,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5296,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLiv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.\u0026nbsp; Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.\u0026nbsp; Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.\u0026nbsp; Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"\u0026nbsp; Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv\u0026rsquo;s practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing\u0026nbsp;claims asserted under the laws of California\u0026nbsp;(including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).\u0026nbsp; She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp; She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.\u0026nbsp; She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.\u0026nbsp; Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"livia-kiser","email":"lkiser@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ede minimis\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;amount after recall implemented.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of Ford.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide \u0026ldquo;enhanced\u0026rdquo; notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3191}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1015,"guid":"1015.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kiser","nick_name":"Liv","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Livia","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers ","detail":"Leading Lawyers"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u003eRail and Road: Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Stand-Out Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters 2024"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law ","detail":"Chicago Lawyer"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law","detail":"Best Lawyers In America"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\"","detail":"Leading Lawyers Network"},{"title":"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026 Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law","detail":"Illinois Super Lawyer"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/livia-kiser-9a1b675/","seodescription":"Livia M. Kiser (Liv) is a lawyer of our Business Litigation Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLiv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.\u0026nbsp; Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.\u0026nbsp; Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.\u0026nbsp; Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"\u0026nbsp; Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv\u0026rsquo;s practice.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing\u0026nbsp;claims asserted under the laws of California\u0026nbsp;(including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).\u0026nbsp; She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp; She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\"\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.\u0026nbsp; She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.\u0026nbsp; Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ede minimis\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;amount after recall implemented.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of Ford.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide \u0026ldquo;enhanced\u0026rdquo; notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers ","detail":"Leading Lawyers"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u003eRail and Road: Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u003eProduct Liability, Mass Tort \u0026 Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Stand-Out Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters 2024"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law ","detail":"Chicago Lawyer"},{"title":"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law","detail":"Crain's Chicago Business"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law","detail":"Best Lawyers In America"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\"","detail":"Leading Lawyers Network"},{"title":"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026 Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law","detail":"Illinois Super Lawyer"}]},"ja":{"matters":[""]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6111}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:56:28.000Z","searchable_text":"Kiser{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u0026gt;Rail and Road: Litigation and Regulation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Stand-Out Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's Chicago Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chicago Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's Chicago Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers In America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a \\\"Leading Lawyer\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyers Network\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026amp; Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Illinois Super Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for de minimis amount after recall implemented.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading.{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota.{{ FIELD }}In a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court’s dismissal of Ford.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide “enhanced” notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.{{ FIELD }}Liv Kiser, a member of the federal trial bar, defends companies in high-stakes civil disputes arising from dangerous or toxic products or substances, consumer fraud, false advertising, breach of warranty, privacy violations, unfair competition and other torts.  A seasoned and vigorous advocate both in and outside of the courtroom, Liv's innovative approaches to complex legal questions have resulted in the development of new law favorable to her clients and entire industries.\nLiv proactively works with companies in the supply chain of highly-regulated, consumer-facing industries -- from automotive to food, financial services, healthcare, personal care products, real estate, telecommunications, utilities, and others -- to identify and manage their legal risks, developing creative and cost-effective strategies for furthering their business interests, protecting brands and preserving consumer goodwill.  Liv regularly resolves cases at the earliest stages of litigation through creative strategies that (for example) operate to moot a class action or render the case uncertifiable. Liv has persuaded opposing counsel to dismiss cases without compensation by persuasively explaining applicable law.  Liv has successfully defeated class certification in cases that prior counsel believed to be unwinnable.\nLiv has defended some of the world's largest multi-national companies in high-stakes commercial, viral and multidistrict litigation, managing crisis situations in which simultaneous inquiries by state and federal regulators, international and local law enforcement and Congress are taking place. Liv has appeared in state and federal courts across the nation, and understands how courts are likely to apply the consumer protection laws in any given dispute.  Her clients consider her predictive skills as to how matters are likely to unfold and resolve as \"uncanny.\"  Protecting company reputations and preserving trust is a central focus of Liv’s practice.\nLiv routinely and successfully defends companies facing claims asserted under the laws of California (including Cal. Bus. \u0026amp; Prof. Code 17200 (UCL), 17500, CLRA, CCPA, Prop 65) and other states (including the Illinois Biometric Privacy Act (BIPA)).  She has defeated numerous claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the Americans with Disabilities' Act (ADA) and other state and federal laws.  She has substantial experience successfully defeating cases where plaintiffs seek recovery for alleged \"price premiums\" and/or \"overpayments.\" \nLiv also has a very active pro bono practice, obtaining asylum for persecuted individuals and ensuring children with disabilities obtain necessary services.  She also represents incarcerated defendants in Constitutional cases.  Liv serves on the firm's Diversity Committee, and on committees within the Chicago office.   Livia Kiser lawyer Partner Named to 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers Lawdragon Named to 2025 Leading Lawyers  Leading Lawyers Named to Chambers 2024 Leading Lawyers in America Chambers Tier 2 - Leading Lawyer in 2024 for Transport\u0026gt;Rail and Road: Litigation and Regulation Legal 500 Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Consumer Products Legal 500 Tier 1-Key Lawyer in 2024 for Dispute Resolution\u0026gt;Product Liability, Mass Tort \u0026amp; Class Actions-Defense: Auto/Transport Legal 500 Named to Chambers 2024 General Commercial Litigation List Chambers Member of 2024 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers Lawdragon Stand-Out Lawyer  Thomson Reuters 2024 Leading Lawyer in 2023 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2023 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense  Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Consumer Products: Defense Legal 500 Recommended Lawyer in 2022 in Product Liability, Mass Tort, and Class Actions: Auto/Transport: Defense Legal 500 Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2023 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys List Crain's Chicago Business Named to Chicago Lawyer's 2021 Top 50 Women in Law  Chicago Lawyer Named to Crain's Chicago Business's 2020 Notable Women in Law Crain's Chicago Business Leading Lawyer in 2022 in Transport: Rail and Road, Litigation and Regulatory  Legal 500 Named to The Best Lawyers in America for Consumer Law Best Lawyers In America Recognized as a \"Leading Lawyer\" Leading Lawyers Network Named among the “Top Lawyers in Illinois” in Advertising \u0026amp; Media Law and Class Action Mass Tort Defense Law Illinois Super Lawyer University of Illinois  Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Illinois Member, American Bar Association, Litigation Section Member, Illinois State Bar Association Member, The State Bar of California Lead counsel is a proposed class action alleging arsenic in spices caused harm to consumers who purchased the products. Case resolved for de minimis amount after recall implemented. Lead counsel in a series of Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (California's \"Proposition 65\") relating to a variety of allegedly carcinogenic and toxic substances in food and other consumer products. Cases resolved on very favorable terms through informal negotiations. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging the engine compartments of certain model vehicles emit noxious and toxic substances into the vehicles' passenger cabins, allegedly rendering the vehicles undrivable and causing vehicle occupants to require medical treatment. Lead counsel in a proposed class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) seeking more than $600 million in damages as a result of defendant allegedly having sent facsimiles to recipients that purportedly lacked legally-sufficient opt-out notices. Successfully defeated class certification on predominance grounds. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging vehicle transmissions are defective; persuaded Court to dismiss the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act claim for failing to name at least 100 named plaintiffs; Court rejected the notion it had jurisdiction over the MMWA claim based on diversity. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations of state and federal warranty laws brought on behalf of a Wisconsin resident. Liv successfully obtained dismissal of the case on grounds that Illinois lacked sufficient contacts to confer general personal jurisdiction over American Honda. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging violations to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) that was successfully resolved on very favorable terms prior to the filing of a responsive pleading. Co-lead counsel in a proposed class action against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. alleging excessive oil consumption in certain Toyota vehicles; successfully argued Plaintiff lacked standing; case was dismissed, with costs awarded to Toyota. In a proposed class action brought by Oregon and Washington residents against Ford Motor Co., Inc. in California, successfully argued that the State of California lacked sufficient contacts to assert general personal jurisdiction over Ford. Plaintiffs declined to appeal the district court’s dismissal of Ford. Lead counsel in an MDL consolidating nine consumer class actions filed throughout the U.S. alleging 2015 Honda CR-Vs vibrate excessively. Resolved favorably through a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement where the remedy is to provide “enhanced” notice of pre-existing, effective countermeasures to the relatively few consumers who complained. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging an internet advertising service provider breached its service agreements by invoicing allegedly misleading charges; successfully resolved after preliminary motion practice and targeted discovery of plaintiff. Lead counsel in a proposed class action against U.S. automotive distributor and foreign parent alleging the pedal bracket assembly in certain vehicles was defective; Plaintiffs sought to certify classes and subclasses in more than ten states. Resolved on favorable terms after a favorable ruling on a motion to dismiss and targeted discovery of plaintiffs. Lead counsel in a proposed class action alleging Defendants sent unwanted facsimile advertisements to Plaintiff and members of the proposed classes. Defeated class certification by successfully proving Plaintiff and all of its counsel (more than 10 lawyers and 3 law firms) were inadequate.","searchable_name":"Livia M. Kiser (Liv)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447177,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7355,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatthew Kita is a partner in the Finance and Restructuring practice group based in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Charlotte office. He focuses on leveraged finance transactions representing financial institutions and private equity sponsors.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on leveraged finance, with a particular focus on representing institutional lenders, financial institutions, private equity sponsors and corporate borrowers in connection with acquisition financings, refinancings, recapitalizations and working capital facilities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew is a highly capable, market-savvy finance lawyer known for building strong, long-term relationships with institutional lenders, private equity sponsors and portfolio companies and for delivering responsive, business-focused counsel through the lifecycle of a deal. His extensive borrower-side experience representing private equity sponsors and their portfolio companies gives him a well-rounded perspective on deal dynamics and counterparty expectations which allows him to anticipate borrower positions, negotiate effectively from the lender\u0026rsquo;s perspective and work seamlessly alongside the firm\u0026rsquo;s private equity and corporate practices to support broader client needs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew is admitted to practice in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"matthew-kita","email":"mkita@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":10,"guid":"10.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kita","nick_name":"Matthew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthew-kita/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatthew Kita is a partner in the Finance and Restructuring practice group based in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Charlotte office. He focuses on leveraged finance transactions representing financial institutions and private equity sponsors.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on leveraged finance, with a particular focus on representing institutional lenders, financial institutions, private equity sponsors and corporate borrowers in connection with acquisition financings, refinancings, recapitalizations and working capital facilities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew is a highly capable, market-savvy finance lawyer known for building strong, long-term relationships with institutional lenders, private equity sponsors and portfolio companies and for delivering responsive, business-focused counsel through the lifecycle of a deal. His extensive borrower-side experience representing private equity sponsors and their portfolio companies gives him a well-rounded perspective on deal dynamics and counterparty expectations which allows him to anticipate borrower positions, negotiate effectively from the lender\u0026rsquo;s perspective and work seamlessly alongside the firm\u0026rsquo;s private equity and corporate practices to support broader client needs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatthew is admitted to practice in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13440}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-03-31T16:05:47.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-31T16:05:47.000Z","searchable_text":"Kita{{ FIELD }}Matthew Kita is a partner in the Finance and Restructuring practice group based in the firm’s Charlotte office. He focuses on leveraged finance transactions representing financial institutions and private equity sponsors.\nMatthew’s practice centers on leveraged finance, with a particular focus on representing institutional lenders, financial institutions, private equity sponsors and corporate borrowers in connection with acquisition financings, refinancings, recapitalizations and working capital facilities.\nMatthew is a highly capable, market-savvy finance lawyer known for building strong, long-term relationships with institutional lenders, private equity sponsors and portfolio companies and for delivering responsive, business-focused counsel through the lifecycle of a deal. His extensive borrower-side experience representing private equity sponsors and their portfolio companies gives him a well-rounded perspective on deal dynamics and counterparty expectations which allows him to anticipate borrower positions, negotiate effectively from the lender’s perspective and work seamlessly alongside the firm’s private equity and corporate practices to support broader client needs.\nMatthew is admitted to practice in Illinois. Partner Lewis University  Illinois Institute of Technology Kent College of Law Illinois","searchable_name":"Matthew Kita","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":440298,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2100,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmanda Klingler is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. and Chicago offices with extensive experience advising life science clients.\u0026nbsp; As a partner in the firm's FDA and Life Sciences practice, Amanda advises pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies and pharmacies, on a wide range of regulatory matters, enforcement actions, civil litigation, investigations, product liability litigation, and compliance counseling.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda counsels clients on pre- and post-marketing regulatory activities and strategies, including obtaining FDA approval and clearance for medical products.\u0026nbsp; Amanda also regularly advises clients on product labeling, adverse event reporting, product safety issues, recalls/field corrections, import detention, and advertising and promotion issues.\u0026nbsp; She counsels clients on quality system and manufacturing practices for drugs and medical devices and factory inspections, including conducting mock inspections and working closely with and providing advice to clients during the inspection, and provide guidance in responding to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Amanda, as a co-leader of the firm\u0026rsquo;s AI/ML Tactical Operations team, also frequently advises clients on the use of AI/ML during the life cycle of drugs and medical devices, including digital health products.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda advises clients during internal and government investigations.\u0026nbsp; She also assists in the negotiation and management of several consent decrees of injunction for pharmaceutical, medical device, food companies and compounding pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda works closely with the firm's product liability team and is experienced in handling FDA issues in product liability litigation, including the development of supporting evidence, writing briefs, and preparing expert witnesses to testify.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda also has significant experience and expertise in FDA's regulation of tobacco products.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amanda-klingler","email":"aklingler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhillips Morris USA v. FDA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e202 F.Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2016). Represented one of the plaintiffs in a successful legal challenge to an FDA guidance governing the Substantial Equivalence Review process for tobacco products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team serving as national coordinating counsel and trial counsel in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eproduct liability litigation\u003c/strong\u003einvolving GlaxoSmithKline\u0026rsquo;s antidepressant Paxil\u0026reg;, including in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Mass Tort Program. Experience includes preparing fact and expert witnesses on FDA issues and briefing motions\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ein limine\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003echallenges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer of FDA-cleared surgical gowns\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation concerning the design, labeling, advertising and manufacture of the devices, including: a federal class action trial, the verdict from which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit; a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esuit brought under the Federal False Claims Act in which the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss; and a federal Lanham Act lawsuit concerning allegations of false marketing. Experience includes working extensively with the Company's regulatory expert witness on the FDA-related issues in the litigation, leading the development of the Company's expert report and preparing the witness for his trial testimony.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ecompanies in preparing for FDA inspections,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;developing responses to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical and medical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under investigation by FDA and the U.S. Department of Justice Office for alleged violations of the FDCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternal investigations of pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;into potential quality systems and advertising and promotion violations to develop a risk profile and recommendation for reducing potential liability and risk exposure.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFDA regulatory due diligence reviews\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of target medical device, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and compounding pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled companies on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eradiation-emitting product requirements\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under the FDCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled companies on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elabeling and promotion requirements\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;for FDA-regulated products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eUnited States v. Franck\u0026rsquo;s Lab\u003c/em\u003e, 2011 WL 4031102 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 12, 2011). Lead associate for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFranck\u0026rsquo;s Lab\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in successful defense of FDA enforcement action contending that traditional, state-licensed pharmacy compounding of veterinary medications violates FDA\u0026rsquo;s statute. Also served as the lead associate for Franck\u0026rsquo;s Lab in other FDA regulatory and state board of pharmacy matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;FDA, No. 1:11-cv-01950 (D.D.C.). Lead associate representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einnovator drug manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation seeking to require FDA to withdraw its approval of purported generic formulations of manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s brand name products.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":174}]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1223,"guid":"1223.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Klingler","nick_name":"Amanda","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amanda","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmanda Klingler is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. and Chicago offices with extensive experience advising life science clients.\u0026nbsp; As a partner in the firm's FDA and Life Sciences practice, Amanda advises pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies and pharmacies, on a wide range of regulatory matters, enforcement actions, civil litigation, investigations, product liability litigation, and compliance counseling.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda counsels clients on pre- and post-marketing regulatory activities and strategies, including obtaining FDA approval and clearance for medical products.\u0026nbsp; Amanda also regularly advises clients on product labeling, adverse event reporting, product safety issues, recalls/field corrections, import detention, and advertising and promotion issues.\u0026nbsp; She counsels clients on quality system and manufacturing practices for drugs and medical devices and factory inspections, including conducting mock inspections and working closely with and providing advice to clients during the inspection, and provide guidance in responding to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Amanda, as a co-leader of the firm\u0026rsquo;s AI/ML Tactical Operations team, also frequently advises clients on the use of AI/ML during the life cycle of drugs and medical devices, including digital health products.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda advises clients during internal and government investigations.\u0026nbsp; She also assists in the negotiation and management of several consent decrees of injunction for pharmaceutical, medical device, food companies and compounding pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda works closely with the firm's product liability team and is experienced in handling FDA issues in product liability litigation, including the development of supporting evidence, writing briefs, and preparing expert witnesses to testify.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmanda also has significant experience and expertise in FDA's regulation of tobacco products.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePhillips Morris USA v. FDA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e202 F.Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2016). Represented one of the plaintiffs in a successful legal challenge to an FDA guidance governing the Substantial Equivalence Review process for tobacco products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team serving as national coordinating counsel and trial counsel in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eproduct liability litigation\u003c/strong\u003einvolving GlaxoSmithKline\u0026rsquo;s antidepressant Paxil\u0026reg;, including in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Mass Tort Program. Experience includes preparing fact and expert witnesses on FDA issues and briefing motions\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ein limine\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003echallenges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer of FDA-cleared surgical gowns\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation concerning the design, labeling, advertising and manufacture of the devices, including: a federal class action trial, the verdict from which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit; a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003esuit brought under the Federal False Claims Act in which the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss; and a federal Lanham Act lawsuit concerning allegations of false marketing. Experience includes working extensively with the Company's regulatory expert witness on the FDA-related issues in the litigation, leading the development of the Company's expert report and preparing the witness for his trial testimony.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ecompanies in preparing for FDA inspections,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;developing responses to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003epharmaceutical and medical device companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under investigation by FDA and the U.S. Department of Justice Office for alleged violations of the FDCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternal investigations of pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;into potential quality systems and advertising and promotion violations to develop a risk profile and recommendation for reducing potential liability and risk exposure.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFDA regulatory due diligence reviews\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of target medical device, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and compounding pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled companies on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eradiation-emitting product requirements\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;under the FDCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled companies on\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elabeling and promotion requirements\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;for FDA-regulated products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eUnited States v. Franck\u0026rsquo;s Lab\u003c/em\u003e, 2011 WL 4031102 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 12, 2011). Lead associate for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFranck\u0026rsquo;s Lab\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in successful defense of FDA enforcement action contending that traditional, state-licensed pharmacy compounding of veterinary medications violates FDA\u0026rsquo;s statute. Also served as the lead associate for Franck\u0026rsquo;s Lab in other FDA regulatory and state board of pharmacy matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;FDA, No. 1:11-cv-01950 (D.D.C.). Lead associate representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einnovator drug manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation seeking to require FDA to withdraw its approval of purported generic formulations of manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s brand name products.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4350}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-10-08T19:11:18.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-08T19:11:18.000Z","searchable_text":"Klingler{{ FIELD }}Phillips Morris USA v. FDA, 202 F.Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2016). Represented one of the plaintiffs in a successful legal challenge to an FDA guidance governing the Substantial Equivalence Review process for tobacco products.{{ FIELD }}Member of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team serving as national coordinating counsel and trial counsel in product liability litigationinvolving GlaxoSmithKline’s antidepressant Paxil®, including in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Mass Tort Program. Experience includes preparing fact and expert witnesses on FDA issues and briefing motions in limine and Daubertchallenges.{{ FIELD }}Member of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing the manufacturer of FDA-cleared surgical gowns in nationwide litigation concerning the design, labeling, advertising and manufacture of the devices, including: a federal class action trial, the verdict from which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit; a qui tam suit brought under the Federal False Claims Act in which the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss; and a federal Lanham Act lawsuit concerning allegations of false marketing. Experience includes working extensively with the Company's regulatory expert witness on the FDA-related issues in the litigation, leading the development of the Company's expert report and preparing the witness for his trial testimony.{{ FIELD }}Assisted companies in preparing for FDA inspections, developing responses to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.{{ FIELD }}Assisted pharmaceutical and medical device companies under investigation by FDA and the U.S. Department of Justice Office for alleged violations of the FDCA.{{ FIELD }}Conducted internal investigations of pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers into potential quality systems and advertising and promotion violations to develop a risk profile and recommendation for reducing potential liability and risk exposure.{{ FIELD }}Conducted FDA regulatory due diligence reviews of target medical device, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and compounding pharmacies.{{ FIELD }}Counseled companies on radiation-emitting product requirements under the FDCA.{{ FIELD }}Counseled companies on labeling and promotion requirements for FDA-regulated products.{{ FIELD }}United States v. Franck’s Lab, 2011 WL 4031102 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 12, 2011). Lead associate for Franck’s Lab in successful defense of FDA enforcement action contending that traditional, state-licensed pharmacy compounding of veterinary medications violates FDA’s statute. Also served as the lead associate for Franck’s Lab in other FDA regulatory and state board of pharmacy matters.{{ FIELD }}Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, No. 1:11-cv-01950 (D.D.C.). Lead associate representing innovator drug manufacturer in litigation seeking to require FDA to withdraw its approval of purported generic formulations of manufacturer’s brand name products.{{ FIELD }}Amanda Klingler is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. and Chicago offices with extensive experience advising life science clients.  As a partner in the firm's FDA and Life Sciences practice, Amanda advises pharmaceutical, medical device and biotech companies and pharmacies, on a wide range of regulatory matters, enforcement actions, civil litigation, investigations, product liability litigation, and compliance counseling. \nAmanda counsels clients on pre- and post-marketing regulatory activities and strategies, including obtaining FDA approval and clearance for medical products.  Amanda also regularly advises clients on product labeling, adverse event reporting, product safety issues, recalls/field corrections, import detention, and advertising and promotion issues.  She counsels clients on quality system and manufacturing practices for drugs and medical devices and factory inspections, including conducting mock inspections and working closely with and providing advice to clients during the inspection, and provide guidance in responding to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters.  Amanda, as a co-leader of the firm’s AI/ML Tactical Operations team, also frequently advises clients on the use of AI/ML during the life cycle of drugs and medical devices, including digital health products. \nAmanda advises clients during internal and government investigations.  She also assists in the negotiation and management of several consent decrees of injunction for pharmaceutical, medical device, food companies and compounding pharmacies.\nAmanda works closely with the firm's product liability team and is experienced in handling FDA issues in product liability litigation, including the development of supporting evidence, writing briefs, and preparing expert witnesses to testify.\nAmanda also has significant experience and expertise in FDA's regulation of tobacco products. Amanda J Klingler Partner University of Richmond University of Richmond School of Law Saint Louis University Saint Louis University School of Law Loyola University Chicago Loyola University Chicago School of Law District of Columbia Illinois Phillips Morris USA v. FDA, 202 F.Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2016). Represented one of the plaintiffs in a successful legal challenge to an FDA guidance governing the Substantial Equivalence Review process for tobacco products. Member of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team serving as national coordinating counsel and trial counsel in product liability litigationinvolving GlaxoSmithKline’s antidepressant Paxil®, including in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Mass Tort Program. Experience includes preparing fact and expert witnesses on FDA issues and briefing motions in limine and Daubertchallenges. Member of a King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing the manufacturer of FDA-cleared surgical gowns in nationwide litigation concerning the design, labeling, advertising and manufacture of the devices, including: a federal class action trial, the verdict from which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit; a qui tam suit brought under the Federal False Claims Act in which the court granted defendants' motion to dismiss; and a federal Lanham Act lawsuit concerning allegations of false marketing. Experience includes working extensively with the Company's regulatory expert witness on the FDA-related issues in the litigation, leading the development of the Company's expert report and preparing the witness for his trial testimony. Assisted companies in preparing for FDA inspections, developing responses to FDA investigational observations (FDA-483 forms), and warning letters. Assisted pharmaceutical and medical device companies under investigation by FDA and the U.S. Department of Justice Office for alleged violations of the FDCA. Conducted internal investigations of pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers into potential quality systems and advertising and promotion violations to develop a risk profile and recommendation for reducing potential liability and risk exposure. Conducted FDA regulatory due diligence reviews of target medical device, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and compounding pharmacies. Counseled companies on radiation-emitting product requirements under the FDCA. Counseled companies on labeling and promotion requirements for FDA-regulated products. United States v. Franck’s Lab, 2011 WL 4031102 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 12, 2011). Lead associate for Franck’s Lab in successful defense of FDA enforcement action contending that traditional, state-licensed pharmacy compounding of veterinary medications violates FDA’s statute. Also served as the lead associate for Franck’s Lab in other FDA regulatory and state board of pharmacy matters. Hill Dermaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, No. 1:11-cv-01950 (D.D.C.). Lead associate representing innovator drug manufacturer in litigation seeking to require FDA to withdraw its approval of purported generic formulations of manufacturer’s brand name products.","searchable_name":"Amanda J. Klingler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427420,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6890,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMary is an associate\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Matters \u0026amp; Regulation practice. Mary\u0026nbsp;advises employers on a wide variety of\u0026nbsp;employee benefit and executive compensation matters.\u0026nbsp;Mary has\u0026nbsp;experience drafting plan documents and participant communications for retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Mary\u0026nbsp;also has experience helping clients identify and resolve various compliance issues related to\u0026nbsp;plan qualification.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mary-kennedy-2","email":"mary.kennedy@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":28,"guid":"28.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Kennedy","nick_name":"Mary","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2489,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Chief Articles Editor, Washington University Journal of Law and Policy","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMary is an associate\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Matters \u0026amp; Regulation practice. Mary\u0026nbsp;advises employers on a wide variety of\u0026nbsp;employee benefit and executive compensation matters.\u0026nbsp;Mary has\u0026nbsp;experience drafting plan documents and participant communications for retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Mary\u0026nbsp;also has experience helping clients identify and resolve various compliance issues related to\u0026nbsp;plan qualification.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12325}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:00:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:00:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Kennedy{{ FIELD }}Mary is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Government Matters \u0026amp; Regulation practice. Mary advises employers on a wide variety of employee benefit and executive compensation matters. Mary has experience drafting plan documents and participant communications for retirement plans, health and welfare plans, and nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Mary also has experience helping clients identify and resolve various compliance issues related to plan qualification. Associate University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign University of Illinois College of Law Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law Illinois","searchable_name":"Mary Kennedy","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427259,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6562,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIsabel is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Chicago office. Her practice focuses on government investigations, white-collar criminal defense, and related civil litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"isabel-king","email":"iking@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"King","nick_name":"Isabel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Isabel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIsabel is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Chicago office. Her practice focuses on government investigations, white-collar criminal defense, and related civil litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12254}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:28.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:28.000Z","searchable_text":"King{{ FIELD }}Isabel is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Chicago office. Her practice focuses on government investigations, white-collar criminal defense, and related civil litigation.  Associate University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Wisconsin Law School Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","searchable_name":"Isabel King","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}