{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":"2","capability_id":null,"extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"F","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426422,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3482,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Farber specializes in litigation, regulatory matters, and public policy, with a focus on healthcare, Medicare and Medicaid issues for pharmaceutical and medical device companies, hospitals and pharmacies. A member of our FDA, Life Sciences, and Healthcare, and Government Advocacy practices, David represents clients in healthcare litigation, False Claims Act cases and other commercial disputes, as well as in advocacy before Congress and federal agencies on coverage, coding, reimbursement and other issues. He is a recognized national expert on Medicare Secondary Payer issues.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCombining broad experience in litigation and public policy, David focuses on complex, multiparty litigation and government advocacy. As a lead litigator, he represents clients in a variety of healthcare and False Claims Act cases, and other disputes. He has also counseled clients in international arbitration, including matters before the International Court of Claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his advocacy practice, David focuses on advising clients in the healthcare and insurance industries. He often serves as a primary strategist and policy architect in a broad range of matters, navigating through Congress, executive branch agencies (with a focus on the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services and the Food and Drug Administration) and academia to influence the legislative and regulatory processes. Through his advocacy, he has drafted and helped pass legislation, and has prompted changes in agency policies in ways that benefit his clients. He is a national thought leader on Medicare Secondary Payer issues, having drafted the 2012 SMART Act enacted by Congress.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-farber","email":"dfarber@kslaw.com","phone":"+1-240-401-4800","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple parties, including several of the leading third-party administrators\u003c/strong\u003e, and served as lead counsel on MSP issues in U.S. ex rel. Takemoto v. Nationwide, et al, No. 16-365 (2nd Cir. January 18, 2017), dismissing first major national False Claims Act case under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted and led strategy on behalf of the \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMARC Coalition\u003c/strong\u003e on the SMART Act, H.R. 1845 (112th Congress), enacted by Congress in 2012 as the first major reform of the Medicare Secondary Payer laws in over a decade and the SPARC Act, H.R. 1122 (115th Congress), introduced in 2017 to further improve the statute .\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emajor pharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e to enact Medicare Part B drug reimbursement provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted legislation and led strategy to create federal early childhood mental health grant program.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":101}]},"expertise":[{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1193,"guid":"1193.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Farber","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1987-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Life Sciences Editorial Board ","detail":"Law360, 2014, 2017"},{"title":"President, Washington Region ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2011–2013"},{"title":"Member, National Board of Governors ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2013–present"},{"title":"Hyman Bookbinder Award ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2016"},{"title":"Bertelsmann Foundation Fellow ","detail":"German-Israel Young Leaders Exchange, 2007"},{"title":"Spirit of Community Action Award ","detail":"The United Planning Organization, 2005"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Farber specializes in litigation, regulatory matters, and public policy, with a focus on healthcare, Medicare and Medicaid issues for pharmaceutical and medical device companies, hospitals and pharmacies. A member of our FDA, Life Sciences, and Healthcare, and Government Advocacy practices, David represents clients in healthcare litigation, False Claims Act cases and other commercial disputes, as well as in advocacy before Congress and federal agencies on coverage, coding, reimbursement and other issues. He is a recognized national expert on Medicare Secondary Payer issues.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCombining broad experience in litigation and public policy, David focuses on complex, multiparty litigation and government advocacy. As a lead litigator, he represents clients in a variety of healthcare and False Claims Act cases, and other disputes. He has also counseled clients in international arbitration, including matters before the International Court of Claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his advocacy practice, David focuses on advising clients in the healthcare and insurance industries. He often serves as a primary strategist and policy architect in a broad range of matters, navigating through Congress, executive branch agencies (with a focus on the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services and the Food and Drug Administration) and academia to influence the legislative and regulatory processes. Through his advocacy, he has drafted and helped pass legislation, and has prompted changes in agency policies in ways that benefit his clients. He is a national thought leader on Medicare Secondary Payer issues, having drafted the 2012 SMART Act enacted by Congress.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emultiple parties, including several of the leading third-party administrators\u003c/strong\u003e, and served as lead counsel on MSP issues in U.S. ex rel. Takemoto v. Nationwide, et al, No. 16-365 (2nd Cir. January 18, 2017), dismissing first major national False Claims Act case under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted and led strategy on behalf of the \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMARC Coalition\u003c/strong\u003e on the SMART Act, H.R. 1845 (112th Congress), enacted by Congress in 2012 as the first major reform of the Medicare Secondary Payer laws in over a decade and the SPARC Act, H.R. 1122 (115th Congress), introduced in 2017 to further improve the statute .\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003emajor pharmaceutical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e to enact Medicare Part B drug reimbursement provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDrafted legislation and led strategy to create federal early childhood mental health grant program.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Life Sciences Editorial Board ","detail":"Law360, 2014, 2017"},{"title":"President, Washington Region ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2011–2013"},{"title":"Member, National Board of Governors ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2013–present"},{"title":"Hyman Bookbinder Award ","detail":"American Jewish Committee, 2016"},{"title":"Bertelsmann Foundation Fellow ","detail":"German-Israel Young Leaders Exchange, 2007"},{"title":"Spirit of Community Action Award ","detail":"The United Planning Organization, 2005"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9967}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:50.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:50.000Z","searchable_text":"Farber{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Life Sciences Editorial Board \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2014, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"President, Washington Region \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Jewish Committee, 2011–2013\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member, National Board of Governors \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Jewish Committee, 2013–present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Hyman Bookbinder Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Jewish Committee, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Bertelsmann Foundation Fellow \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"German-Israel Young Leaders Exchange, 2007\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Spirit of Community Action Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The United Planning Organization, 2005\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple parties, including several of the leading third-party administrators, and served as lead counsel on MSP issues in U.S. ex rel. Takemoto v. Nationwide, et al, No. 16-365 (2nd Cir. January 18, 2017), dismissing first major national False Claims Act case under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute.{{ FIELD }}Drafted and led strategy on behalf of the MARC Coalition on the SMART Act, H.R. 1845 (112th Congress), enacted by Congress in 2012 as the first major reform of the Medicare Secondary Payer laws in over a decade and the SPARC Act, H.R. 1122 (115th Congress), introduced in 2017 to further improve the statute .{{ FIELD }}Worked on behalf of major pharmaceutical manufacturer to enact Medicare Part B drug reimbursement provisions.{{ FIELD }}Drafted legislation and led strategy to create federal early childhood mental health grant program.{{ FIELD }}David Farber specializes in litigation, regulatory matters, and public policy, with a focus on healthcare, Medicare and Medicaid issues for pharmaceutical and medical device companies, hospitals and pharmacies. A member of our FDA, Life Sciences, and Healthcare, and Government Advocacy practices, David represents clients in healthcare litigation, False Claims Act cases and other commercial disputes, as well as in advocacy before Congress and federal agencies on coverage, coding, reimbursement and other issues. He is a recognized national expert on Medicare Secondary Payer issues.\nCombining broad experience in litigation and public policy, David focuses on complex, multiparty litigation and government advocacy. As a lead litigator, he represents clients in a variety of healthcare and False Claims Act cases, and other disputes. He has also counseled clients in international arbitration, including matters before the International Court of Claims.\nIn his advocacy practice, David focuses on advising clients in the healthcare and insurance industries. He often serves as a primary strategist and policy architect in a broad range of matters, navigating through Congress, executive branch agencies (with a focus on the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services and the Food and Drug Administration) and academia to influence the legislative and regulatory processes. Through his advocacy, he has drafted and helped pass legislation, and has prompted changes in agency policies in ways that benefit his clients. He is a national thought leader on Medicare Secondary Payer issues, having drafted the 2012 SMART Act enacted by Congress. David J. Farber Partner Life Sciences Editorial Board  Law360, 2014, 2017 President, Washington Region  American Jewish Committee, 2011–2013 Member, National Board of Governors  American Jewish Committee, 2013–present Hyman Bookbinder Award  American Jewish Committee, 2016 Bertelsmann Foundation Fellow  German-Israel Young Leaders Exchange, 2007 Spirit of Community Action Award  The United Planning Organization, 2005 New York University New York University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia New York Represented multiple parties, including several of the leading third-party administrators, and served as lead counsel on MSP issues in U.S. ex rel. Takemoto v. Nationwide, et al, No. 16-365 (2nd Cir. January 18, 2017), dismissing first major national False Claims Act case under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute. Drafted and led strategy on behalf of the MARC Coalition on the SMART Act, H.R. 1845 (112th Congress), enacted by Congress in 2012 as the first major reform of the Medicare Secondary Payer laws in over a decade and the SPARC Act, H.R. 1122 (115th Congress), introduced in 2017 to further improve the statute . Worked on behalf of major pharmaceutical manufacturer to enact Medicare Part B drug reimbursement provisions. Drafted legislation and led strategy to create federal early childhood mental health grant program.","searchable_name":"David J. Farber","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445605,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7311,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues\u0026mdash;the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB\u0026mdash;in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a \u0026ldquo;master technician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Working Group 10 on \u0026ldquo;Best Practices in Patent Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Patent Star\u0026rdquo; in Washington, D.C. by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eManaging Intellectual Property\u0026rsquo;s IP Stars.\u003c/em\u003e Since 2012, he has been named among the World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Patent Practitioners by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000\u003c/em\u003e, which recently stated that Brian\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has also called him a \u0026ldquo;veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s major technology companies,\u0026rdquo; and noted that he is a \u0026ldquo;master tactician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo; In 2012, he was recognized as a \u0026ldquo;BTI Client Service All-Star\u0026rdquo; by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the \u0026ldquo;Discovery and Privilege\u0026rdquo; chapter in the book\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePatent Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(PLI Press).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-ferguson","email":"bferguson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case against a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel in numerous \u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003e and post-grant review proceedings for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading oil and gas exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor\u0026rsquo;s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s top technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board\u0026rsquo;s invalidity finding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an \u003cstrong\u003einnovator medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in PTAB\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading marine technology provider\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to an \u003cstrong\u003einternational technology conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDozens of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of software systems for healthcare providers\u003c/strong\u003e in multi-front district court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading innovator sports equipment company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of nicotine delivery products\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003epioneering\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003espeech recognition technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1203,"guid":"1203.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ferguson","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2118,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1991-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"E.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026"},{"title":"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”","detail":"Patexia, 2024–2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area","detail":"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025"},{"title":"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-e-ferguson/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues\u0026mdash;the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB\u0026mdash;in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a \u0026ldquo;master technician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Working Group 10 on \u0026ldquo;Best Practices in Patent Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Patent Star\u0026rdquo; in Washington, D.C. by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eManaging Intellectual Property\u0026rsquo;s IP Stars.\u003c/em\u003e Since 2012, he has been named among the World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Patent Practitioners by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000\u003c/em\u003e, which recently stated that Brian\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has also called him a \u0026ldquo;veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s major technology companies,\u0026rdquo; and noted that he is a \u0026ldquo;master tactician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo; In 2012, he was recognized as a \u0026ldquo;BTI Client Service All-Star\u0026rdquo; by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the \u0026ldquo;Discovery and Privilege\u0026rdquo; chapter in the book\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePatent Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(PLI Press).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case against a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel in numerous \u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003e and post-grant review proceedings for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading oil and gas exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor\u0026rsquo;s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s top technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board\u0026rsquo;s invalidity finding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an \u003cstrong\u003einnovator medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in PTAB\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading marine technology provider\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to an \u003cstrong\u003einternational technology conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDozens of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of software systems for healthcare providers\u003c/strong\u003e in multi-front district court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading innovator sports equipment company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of nicotine delivery products\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003epioneering\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003espeech recognition technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026"},{"title":"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”","detail":"Patexia, 2024–2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area","detail":"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025"},{"title":"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13350}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-05T14:46:01.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-05T14:46:01.000Z","searchable_text":"Ferguson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Patexia, 2024–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2022–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Patents\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"WIPR Leaders, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics in a patent case against a competitor.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading medical device company in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel in numerous inter partes and post-grant review proceedings for a leading oil and gas exploration company. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor’s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to one of the world’s top technology companies in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\nDistrict court litigation, inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board’s invalidity finding.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\nDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\nDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\nDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\nA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\nMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.{{ FIELD }}Defending a leading international insurance company in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading manufacturing company in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading chemical company in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing an innovator medical device company in PTAB inter partesreview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading marine technology provider in district court and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to an international technology conglomerate and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\nDozens of inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\nDistrict court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\nDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading provider of software systems for healthcare providers in multi-front district court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading innovator sports equipment company in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading provider of nicotine delivery products in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a pioneering semiconductor company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a leading international insurance company and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a speech recognition technology company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.{{ FIELD }}Brian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues—the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB—in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a “master technician” who “calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.”\nBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150 inter partes review proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference’s Working Group 10 on “Best Practices in Patent Litigation.”\nBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\nBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by The Legal 500 US, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a “Patent Star” in Washington, D.C. by Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars. Since 2012, he has been named among the World’s Leading Patent Practitioners by the IAM Patent 1000, which recently stated that Brian’s “niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.” IAM has also called him a “veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world’s major technology companies,” and noted that he is a “master tactician” who “calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.” In 2012, he was recognized as a “BTI Client Service All-Star” by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® and Super Lawyers.\nBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the “Discovery and Privilege” chapter in the book Patent Litigation (PLI Press). Partner Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026 “Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings” Patexia, 2024–2025 “Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023 “Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal) The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024 “500 Leading Global IP Lawyers” Lawdragon, 2025 “500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent Lawdragon, 2022–2026 Recognized for Patents WIPR Leaders, 2025 Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025 “Patent Star” in Washington, DC Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025 Union College  Union College Albany Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office District of Columbia New York Member, International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association Chair of Working Group 10 for “Best Practices in Patent Litigation”, The Sedona Conference, 2024-present Member, PTAB Bar Association Former member, Board of Directors of Give an Hour, a non-profit organization devoted to providing mental health services to U.S. veterans and their families Serving as lead counsel to Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain. Serving as co-lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips. Serving as lead counsel to a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products. Serving as lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD. Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics in a patent case against a competitor. Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading medical device company in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial. Serving as lead counsel in numerous inter partes and post-grant review proceedings for a leading oil and gas exploration company. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor’s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter. Serving as lead counsel to one of the world’s top technology companies in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\nDistrict court litigation, inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board’s invalidity finding.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\nDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\nDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\nDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\nA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\nMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology. Defending a leading international insurance company in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion. Representing a leading manufacturing company in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles. Representing a leading chemical company in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology. Representing an innovator medical device company in PTAB inter partesreview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology. Representing a leading marine technology provider in district court and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating. Serving as lead counsel to an international technology conglomerate and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\nDozens of inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\nDistrict court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\nDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request. Representing a leading provider of software systems for healthcare providers in multi-front district court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology. Representing a leading innovator sports equipment company in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications. Representing a leading provider of nicotine delivery products in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products. Served as lead counsel for a pioneering semiconductor company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology. Served as lead counsel for a leading international insurance company and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology. Served as lead counsel for a speech recognition technology company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.","searchable_name":"Brian E. Ferguson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436392,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2917,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLuke\u0026nbsp;Fields is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke focuses his practice on white collar criminal litigation, government investigations, complex civil investigation, corporate internal investigations, and compliance counseling. Luke advises clients on several types of white collar matters, including: healthcare criminal and civil investigations; the False Claims Act; the Anti-Kickback Statute; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; and whistleblower cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke has experience defending companies and individuals in investigations conducted by the federal and state governments of the United States, including various U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s offices across the country, litigating divisions of the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and state Attorneys General. Luke has conducted domestic and international internal investigations for\u0026nbsp;companies across a range of industries, and has experience collaborating with forensic auditors, and preparing disclosures, written submissions, and presentations to government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, where he served on the editorial board of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and Sherman Minton Moot Court Board. While an undergraduate, Luke served as president of the student body.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in Spanish, Luke completed additional honors studies in literature at the Pontificia Universidad Cat\u0026oacute;lica del Per\u0026uacute; in Lima and in business law at the Escuela Superior de Administraci\u0026oacute;n y Direcci\u0026oacute;n de Empresas in Barcelona.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lucas-fields","email":"lfields@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fields","nick_name":"Luke","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lucas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":890,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLuke\u0026nbsp;Fields is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke focuses his practice on white collar criminal litigation, government investigations, complex civil investigation, corporate internal investigations, and compliance counseling. Luke advises clients on several types of white collar matters, including: healthcare criminal and civil investigations; the False Claims Act; the Anti-Kickback Statute; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; and whistleblower cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke has experience defending companies and individuals in investigations conducted by the federal and state governments of the United States, including various U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s offices across the country, litigating divisions of the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and state Attorneys General. Luke has conducted domestic and international internal investigations for\u0026nbsp;companies across a range of industries, and has experience collaborating with forensic auditors, and preparing disclosures, written submissions, and presentations to government agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLuke graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, where he served on the editorial board of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and Sherman Minton Moot Court Board. While an undergraduate, Luke served as president of the student body.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in Spanish, Luke completed additional honors studies in literature at the Pontificia Universidad Cat\u0026oacute;lica del Per\u0026uacute; in Lima and in business law at the Escuela Superior de Administraci\u0026oacute;n y Direcci\u0026oacute;n de Empresas in Barcelona.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5253}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:47.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:47.000Z","searchable_text":"Fields{{ FIELD }}Luke Fields is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice.\nLuke focuses his practice on white collar criminal litigation, government investigations, complex civil investigation, corporate internal investigations, and compliance counseling. Luke advises clients on several types of white collar matters, including: healthcare criminal and civil investigations; the False Claims Act; the Anti-Kickback Statute; the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; and whistleblower cases.\nLuke has experience defending companies and individuals in investigations conducted by the federal and state governments of the United States, including various U.S. Attorney’s offices across the country, litigating divisions of the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and state Attorneys General. Luke has conducted domestic and international internal investigations for companies across a range of industries, and has experience collaborating with forensic auditors, and preparing disclosures, written submissions, and presentations to government agencies.\nLuke graduated cum laude from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, where he served on the editorial board of the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies and Sherman Minton Moot Court Board. While an undergraduate, Luke served as president of the student body.\nFluent in Spanish, Luke completed additional honors studies in literature at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú in Lima and in business law at the Escuela Superior de Administración y Dirección de Empresas in Barcelona. Partner Indiana University Indiana University School of Law Indiana University Indiana University School of Law Indiana University-Bloomington Indiana University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana District of Columbia Indiana American Health Lawyers Association Indiana State Bar Association","searchable_name":"Lucas M. Fields (Luke)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442393,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1060,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas.\u0026nbsp;Jack has helped recover more than $3\u0026nbsp;billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those\u0026nbsp;liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties.\u0026nbsp;Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-fontham","email":"jfontham@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a world-scale methanol production facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyo Engineering\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHaven Midstream\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea professional sports stadium owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003erev. denied\u003c/em\u003e, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePneumo Abex LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFortune Global 500 public company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea New York-based hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFortress Investment Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an affiliate of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThird Point LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 50 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client\u0026rsquo;s captive insurance company.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":87},{"id":87}]},"expertise":[{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fontham","nick_name":"Jack","clerkships":[],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackfontham/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas.\u0026nbsp;Jack has helped recover more than $3\u0026nbsp;billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those\u0026nbsp;liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties.\u0026nbsp;Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owner of a world-scale methanol production facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eToyo Engineering\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHaven Midstream\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea professional sports stadium owner\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial and appellate counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al.\u003c/em\u003e, 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003erev. denied\u003c/em\u003e, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePneumo Abex LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChevron Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFortune Global 500 public company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea New York-based hedge fund\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFortress Investment Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an affiliate of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThird Point LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 50 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client\u0026rsquo;s captive insurance company.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12329}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Fontham{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a world-scale methanol production facility in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented Toyo Engineering in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented Haven Midstream in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented a professional sports stadium owner on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium.{{ FIELD }}Served as trial and appellate counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al., 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013), rev. denied, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time.{{ FIELD }}Represented Pneumo Abex LLC in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims.{{ FIELD }}Representing Chevron Corporation in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether.{{ FIELD }}Advised a Fortune Global 500 public company in its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States.{{ FIELD }}Advised a New York-based hedge fund in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm.{{ FIELD }}Advised Fortress Investment Group in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings.{{ FIELD }}Advised an affiliate of Third Point LLC in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 50 company in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage.{{ FIELD }}Advised a Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client’s captive insurance company.{{ FIELD }}Jack Fontham focuses on litigation and arbitration of insurance coverage disputes and related contractual indemnity claims. Jack exclusively represents insurance policyholders. Jack advises clients on the form and structure of their insurance programs and the insurance and indemnity provisions in their contracts, and litigates disputes arising in those areas. Jack has helped recover more than $3 billion for policyholder clients through prelitigation settlements, trials and arbitrations.\nJack regularly handles first- and third-party insurance coverage claims for leading companies in the construction, energy, life sciences and consumer products sectors. Jack has a proven track record of securing insurance recoveries for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and other mass tort liabilities, as well as for large business interruption and property damage losses incurred in connection with construction projects and in a variety of other venues. Jack is a Charter Fellow in the Construction Lawyers Society of America.\nJack advises public and private companies in connection with analyzing and structuring transactions to isolate legacy liabilities and the subsequent sale of those liabilities and associated insurance portfolios to third parties. Jack also advises clients on their fronting, captive and self-insurance programs, and on the allocation of insurance assets in corporate mergers and acquisitions. John H Fontham Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana District of Columbia Louisiana District of Columbia Bar Louisiana State Bar Association American Bar Association (sections: Litigation, Tort \u0026amp; Insurance Practice) Represented the owner of a several billion dollar LNG construction project in connection with claims under a construction all risk/delay in start up policy for property damage and delay-related losses arising out of catastrophic flood events. Represented the owner of a world-scale methanol production facility in connection with claims under a all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of the failure of a waste heat boiler system. Represented the owners of an 898-megawatt coal-fired power plant in connection with claims under a construction all-risk/delay-in-start-up policy for losses resulting from severe damage to a boiler during construction of the plant. Represented Toyo Engineering in connection with claims under a construction all-risk insurance policy for property damage losses arising out damage to a piping system during construction of an ethane cracker plant. Represented Haven Midstream in connection with claims under an all-risk insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses arising out of an explosion and fire at a gas plant. Represented a professional sports stadium owner on insurance coverage matters arising from engineering and design errors in the construction of a new stadium. Served as trial and appellate counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., et al. v. AIU Ins. Co., et al., 351 Wis.2d 643, 839 N.W.2d 882 (Wis. App. 2013), rev. denied, 846 N.W.2d 15 (Wis. 2014), successfully securing a judgment that jointly and severally liable insurers who sold their policies as part of a single block of coverage cannot insist upon prorating their liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims and cannot force the policyholder to choose only one policy to pay at a time. Represented Pneumo Abex LLC in insurance coverage litigation against numerous primary and excess general liability insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and related arbitration and mediation proceedings seeking coverage for underlying asbestos-related bodily injury claims. Representing Chevron Corporation in connection with insurance coverage matters arising from claims alleging injuries attributable to paraquat and methyl tert-butyl ether. Advised a Fortune Global 500 public company in its sale of all its asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets in the United States. Advised a New York-based hedge fund in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from a portfolio company of a prominent private equity firm. Advised Fortress Investment Group in its acquisition of asbestos liabilities and related insurance assets from Crane Holdings. Advised an affiliate of Third Point LLC in its acquisition of legacy asbestos liabilities and the related insurance assets held by certain affiliates of Ingersoll Rand Inc. Represented a Fortune 50 company in connection with various insurance coverage, indemnity and subrogation disputes relating to its use of captive insurance for certain layers of automobile and truckers' liability coverage. Advised a Fortune 10 multinational conglomerate on the restructuring of its domestic and international property insurance programs and, in particular, the drafting of reinsurance and retrocession agreements for the client’s captive insurance company.","searchable_name":"John H. Fontham (Jack)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426691,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5310,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor\u0026rsquo;s Energy Council.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"zori-ferkin","email":"zferkin@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOklahoma Wind Project\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCalifornia Solar Projects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWheatField Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBishop Hill I Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCity of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of InterGen N.V.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named \u0026ldquo;2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndia Business Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLost Creek Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEBG Holdings Merger\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of Wind and Geothermal Assets\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhite Creek Wind I Divesititure\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWaterbury CT Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMidway Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSandy Creek Coal Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":131,"guid":"131.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ferkin","nick_name":"Zori","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Zori","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1981-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"G.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor\u0026rsquo;s Energy Council.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOklahoma Wind Project\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCalifornia Solar Projects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWheatField Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBishop Hill I Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCity of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of InterGen N.V.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named \u0026ldquo;2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndia Business Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLost Creek Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEBG Holdings Merger\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of Wind and Geothermal Assets\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhite Creek Wind I Divesititure\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWaterbury CT Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMidway Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSandy Creek Coal Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6464}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:05.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Ferkin{{ FIELD }}Oklahoma Wind Project Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.{{ FIELD }}California Solar Projects Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.{{ FIELD }}WheatField Wind Farm Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.{{ FIELD }}Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.{{ FIELD }}Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.{{ FIELD }}Bishop Hill I Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.{{ FIELD }}City of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California{{ FIELD }}Sale of InterGen N.V. Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named “2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year” by India Business Law Journal.{{ FIELD }}Lost Creek Wind Farm Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.{{ FIELD }}EBG Holdings Merger Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.{{ FIELD }}U.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).{{ FIELD }}Sale of Wind and Geothermal Assets Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.{{ FIELD }}White Creek Wind I Divesititure Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.{{ FIELD }}Waterbury CT Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.{{ FIELD }}Midway Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.{{ FIELD }}Sandy Creek Coal Power Plant Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.{{ FIELD }}Zori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.\nZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\nZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by Legal 500 US 2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor’s Energy Council. Counsel Colgate University  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center District of Columbia Oklahoma Wind Project Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma. California Solar Projects Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California. WheatField Wind Farm Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America. Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas. Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas. Bishop Hill I Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois. City of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California Sale of InterGen N.V. Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named “2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year” by India Business Law Journal. Lost Creek Wind Farm Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri. EBG Holdings Merger Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion. U.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO). Sale of Wind and Geothermal Assets Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests. White Creek Wind I Divesititure Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC. Waterbury CT Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut. Midway Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California. Sandy Creek Coal Power Plant Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.","searchable_name":"Zori G. Ferkin","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443941,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6669,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGreg Fantin is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Healthcare practice. Greg specializes in advising hospitals and other healthcare providers in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement litigation\u0026nbsp;and regulatory compliance matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg's practice primarily focuses\u0026nbsp;on advising\u0026nbsp;academic medical systems, hospitals, and other providers\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;their appeals before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board. Greg has also advised nationwide hospital systems\u0026nbsp;regarding\u0026nbsp;their\u0026nbsp;participation in Medicaid directed payment programs, development of Medicaid managed care quality programs,\u0026nbsp;and contracts with local government entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg graduated from the University of Michigan Law School where he served as an executive editor for the Michigan Technology Law Review.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gregory-fantin","email":"gfantin@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fantin","nick_name":"Greg","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Gregory","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[{"id":2237,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"John","name_suffix":"Jr.","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGreg Fantin is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Healthcare practice. Greg specializes in advising hospitals and other healthcare providers in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement litigation\u0026nbsp;and regulatory compliance matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg's practice primarily focuses\u0026nbsp;on advising\u0026nbsp;academic medical systems, hospitals, and other providers\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;their appeals before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board. Greg has also advised nationwide hospital systems\u0026nbsp;regarding\u0026nbsp;their\u0026nbsp;participation in Medicaid directed payment programs, development of Medicaid managed care quality programs,\u0026nbsp;and contracts with local government entities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg graduated from the University of Michigan Law School where he served as an executive editor for the Michigan Technology Law Review.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11655}]},"capability_group_id":null},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Fantin{{ FIELD }}Greg Fantin is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Healthcare practice. Greg specializes in advising hospitals and other healthcare providers in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement litigation and regulatory compliance matters.\nGreg's practice primarily focuses on advising academic medical systems, hospitals, and other providers in their appeals before the Provider Reimbursement Review Board. Greg has also advised nationwide hospital systems regarding their participation in Medicaid directed payment programs, development of Medicaid managed care quality programs, and contracts with local government entities.\nGreg graduated from the University of Michigan Law School where he served as an executive editor for the Michigan Technology Law Review. Associate The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School District of Columbia Texas State Bar of Texas","searchable_name":"Gregory John Fantin, Jr. (Greg)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446341,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5989,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMarcia Foti is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Healthcare practice.\u0026nbsp; Marcia specializes in advising healthcare providers on a full range of litigation and regulatory matters.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Marcia served as a law clerk for the Honorable Robert J. Shelby on the United States District Court for the District of Utah and the Honorable Beth Robinson on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.\u0026nbsp; She graduated \u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and was inducted into the Order of the Coif.\u0026nbsp; During law school, she served as Philanthropy Editor of the \u003cem\u003eUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and the co-President of the Democracy Law Project.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore law school, Marcia worked as an analyst in health economics and policy for a medical device company, where she focused on reimbursement issues.\u0026nbsp; Marcia earned her undergraduate degree from Stanford University, where she majored in Political Science and minored in Economics.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"marcia-foti","email":"mfoti@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":740,"guid":"740.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Foti","nick_name":"Marcia","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Judge Robert J. Shelby, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah","years_held":"2023 - 2024"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Judge Beth Robinson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","years_held":"2024 - 2025"}],"first_name":"Marcia","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2282,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2023-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Jennifer","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMarcia Foti is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Healthcare practice.\u0026nbsp; Marcia specializes in advising healthcare providers on a full range of litigation and regulatory matters.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Marcia served as a law clerk for the Honorable Robert J. Shelby on the United States District Court for the District of Utah and the Honorable Beth Robinson on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.\u0026nbsp; She graduated \u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and was inducted into the Order of the Coif.\u0026nbsp; During law school, she served as Philanthropy Editor of the \u003cem\u003eUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and the co-President of the Democracy Law Project.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore law school, Marcia worked as an analyst in health economics and policy for a medical device company, where she focused on reimbursement issues.\u0026nbsp; Marcia earned her undergraduate degree from Stanford University, where she majored in Political Science and minored in Economics.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13238}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:53.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:53.000Z","searchable_text":"Foti{{ FIELD }}Marcia Foti is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm’s Healthcare practice.  Marcia specializes in advising healthcare providers on a full range of litigation and regulatory matters. \nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Marcia served as a law clerk for the Honorable Robert J. Shelby on the United States District Court for the District of Utah and the Honorable Beth Robinson on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  She graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and was inducted into the Order of the Coif.  During law school, she served as Philanthropy Editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review and the co-President of the Democracy Law Project.\nBefore law school, Marcia worked as an analyst in health economics and policy for a medical device company, where she focused on reimbursement issues.  Marcia earned her undergraduate degree from Stanford University, where she majored in Political Science and minored in Economics. Associate Stanford University Stanford Law School University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Law School District of Columbia Law Clerk, Judge Robert J. Shelby, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah Law Clerk, Judge Beth Robinson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","searchable_name":"Marcia Jennifer Foti","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426944,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6035,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCaroline is an associate in the Trial and Global Disputes practice and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team.\u0026nbsp;Caroline represents clients in complex, high-stakes litigation in a broad range of subject areas.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Caroline was a law clerk for Chief Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Caroline graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the University of Chicago Law School, where she was a David M. Rubenstein Scholar.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"emily-freeman","email":"cfreeman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Freeman","nick_name":"","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, The Honorable William H. Pryor Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2022 - 2023"}],"first_name":"Caroline","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2174,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with honors, David M. Rubenstein Scholar","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCaroline is an associate in the Trial and Global Disputes practice and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team.\u0026nbsp;Caroline represents clients in complex, high-stakes litigation in a broad range of subject areas.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Caroline was a law clerk for Chief Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Caroline graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the University of Chicago Law School, where she was a David M. Rubenstein Scholar.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11262}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:53.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:53.000Z","searchable_text":"Freeman{{ FIELD }}Caroline is an associate in the Trial and Global Disputes practice and a member of the firm's Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law team. Caroline represents clients in complex, high-stakes litigation in a broad range of subject areas.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Caroline was a law clerk for Chief Judge William H. Pryor Jr. of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Caroline graduated cum laude from the University of Chicago Law School, where she was a David M. Rubenstein Scholar. Associate University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit District of Columbia Judicial Clerk, The Honorable William H. Pryor Jr., U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"Caroline Freeman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}