{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":"2","capability_id":null,"extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"C","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5863,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christine-carletta","email":"ccarletta@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carletta","nick_name":"Christine","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","years_held":"2019 - 2020"},{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Christine","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9711}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Carletta{{ FIELD }}Christine M. Carletta is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As a member of the firm’s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients’ objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine’s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and class actions. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.   Partner Bowdoin College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois District of Columbia New York Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","searchable_name":"Christine Carletta","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442988,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2849,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Carroll is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Practice Group in the Washington, D.C. office. For over two decades, John\u0026rsquo;s practice has focused on civil and criminal antitrust matters, including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, strategic counseling and compliance, and global cartel investigations. He represents clients before the Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and international and state antitrust enforcement authorities. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, John was in the Mergers I Division of the Federal Trade Commission\u0026rsquo;s Bureau of Competition for several years. While with the FTC, he investigated, challenged, and negotiated settlements in a number of potentially anti-competitive business combinations in the aerospace, technology, consumer products, defense, healthcare, and pharmaceutical industries. He received an Award for Meritorious Service for work on merger litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has been recognized by leading publications such as \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and has held leadership positions in the American Bar Association and American Health Lawyer Association. He frequently speaks and writes on antitrust issues across industries.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-carroll","email":"jdcarroll@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHealthcare \u0026amp; Life Sciences\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eServed as lead antitrust counsel for health systems on dozens of transactions that cleared federal and state antitrust reviews.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed antitrust efforts for VillageMD in achieving antitrust clearance for its\u0026nbsp;$8.9 billion acquisition of Summit Health.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented clinically and financially integrated provider networks in nonpublic government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising private equity firms, health systems, and physician groups on a variety of antitrust issues, including potential transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising pharmaceutical and medical device companies on all aspects of competitor collaborations, including mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsumer Products \u0026amp; Entertainment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresents clients in the food \u0026amp; beverage, luxury, technology, retail, and fashion industries on antitrust issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvises entertainment and media companies on antitrust aspects of transactions and commercial activities, such as pricing and distribution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Energizer Holdings, Inc. on antitrust aspects of it $2 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Carmike Cinemas in the Department of Justice investigation of their sale to AMC theatres, creating the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest movie theatre chain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Fortune 500 public company in the energy industry on antitrust aspects of a joint venture with a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a number of energy companies on a range of antitrust issues related to infrastructure projects, teaming arrangements, and other collaborations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented leading gasoline retailer on achieving FTC clearance for its strategic transaction without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDevised and implemented antitrust compliance strategies for coalitions of energy industry competitors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eManufacturing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading chemical and building products companies in transactions and defended them in government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented WestRock Company on antitrust aspects of its $4.9 billion acquisition of KapStone Paper Packaging.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Cartel Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended multinational companies in criminal investigations alleging antitrust conspiracies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of international auto parts company in connection with a cartel investigation in that industry.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1147,"guid":"1147.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carroll","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Author","detail":"JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023-2024"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyers – Antitrust","detail":"Legal 500, 2022-2025"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer – Antitrust","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"},{"title":"Rising Star – Antitrust","detail":"Washington Super Lawyers, 2016"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-carroll-1384a022/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Carroll is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Practice Group in the Washington, D.C. office. For over two decades, John\u0026rsquo;s practice has focused on civil and criminal antitrust matters, including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, strategic counseling and compliance, and global cartel investigations. He represents clients before the Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and international and state antitrust enforcement authorities. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, John was in the Mergers I Division of the Federal Trade Commission\u0026rsquo;s Bureau of Competition for several years. While with the FTC, he investigated, challenged, and negotiated settlements in a number of potentially anti-competitive business combinations in the aerospace, technology, consumer products, defense, healthcare, and pharmaceutical industries. He received an Award for Meritorious Service for work on merger litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has been recognized by leading publications such as \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and has held leadership positions in the American Bar Association and American Health Lawyer Association. He frequently speaks and writes on antitrust issues across industries.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHealthcare \u0026amp; Life Sciences\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eServed as lead antitrust counsel for health systems on dozens of transactions that cleared federal and state antitrust reviews.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed antitrust efforts for VillageMD in achieving antitrust clearance for its\u0026nbsp;$8.9 billion acquisition of Summit Health.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented clinically and financially integrated provider networks in nonpublic government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising private equity firms, health systems, and physician groups on a variety of antitrust issues, including potential transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising pharmaceutical and medical device companies on all aspects of competitor collaborations, including mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsumer Products \u0026amp; Entertainment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresents clients in the food \u0026amp; beverage, luxury, technology, retail, and fashion industries on antitrust issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvises entertainment and media companies on antitrust aspects of transactions and commercial activities, such as pricing and distribution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Energizer Holdings, Inc. on antitrust aspects of it $2 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Carmike Cinemas in the Department of Justice investigation of their sale to AMC theatres, creating the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest movie theatre chain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Fortune 500 public company in the energy industry on antitrust aspects of a joint venture with a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a number of energy companies on a range of antitrust issues related to infrastructure projects, teaming arrangements, and other collaborations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented leading gasoline retailer on achieving FTC clearance for its strategic transaction without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDevised and implemented antitrust compliance strategies for coalitions of energy industry competitors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eManufacturing\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading chemical and building products companies in transactions and defended them in government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented WestRock Company on antitrust aspects of its $4.9 billion acquisition of KapStone Paper Packaging.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Cartel Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefended multinational companies in criminal investigations alleging antitrust conspiracies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an executive of international auto parts company in connection with a cartel investigation in that industry.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Top Author","detail":"JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2023-2024"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyers – Antitrust","detail":"Legal 500, 2022-2025"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer – Antitrust","detail":"Legal 500, 2020"},{"title":"Rising Star – Antitrust","detail":"Washington Super Lawyers, 2016"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13154}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-17T21:52:05.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-17T21:52:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Carroll{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Author\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2023-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyers – Antitrust\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer – Antitrust\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star – Antitrust\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Washington Super Lawyers, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}Healthcare \u0026amp; Life Sciences\nServed as lead antitrust counsel for health systems on dozens of transactions that cleared federal and state antitrust reviews.{{ FIELD }}Led antitrust efforts for VillageMD in achieving antitrust clearance for its $8.9 billion acquisition of Summit Health.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented clinically and financially integrated provider networks in nonpublic government investigations.{{ FIELD }}Advising private equity firms, health systems, and physician groups on a variety of antitrust issues, including potential transactions.{{ FIELD }}Advising pharmaceutical and medical device companies on all aspects of competitor collaborations, including mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures.{{ FIELD }}Consumer Products \u0026amp; Entertainment\nRepresents clients in the food \u0026amp; beverage, luxury, technology, retail, and fashion industries on antitrust issues.{{ FIELD }}Advises entertainment and media companies on antitrust aspects of transactions and commercial activities, such as pricing and distribution.{{ FIELD }}Represented Energizer Holdings, Inc. on antitrust aspects of it $2 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands.{{ FIELD }}Represented Carmike Cinemas in the Department of Justice investigation of their sale to AMC theatres, creating the nation’s largest movie theatre chain.{{ FIELD }}Energy\nRepresenting a Fortune 500 public company in the energy industry on antitrust aspects of a joint venture with a competitor.{{ FIELD }}Advising a number of energy companies on a range of antitrust issues related to infrastructure projects, teaming arrangements, and other collaborations.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented leading gasoline retailer on achieving FTC clearance for its strategic transaction without enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Devised and implemented antitrust compliance strategies for coalitions of energy industry competitors.{{ FIELD }}Manufacturing\nRepresented leading chemical and building products companies in transactions and defended them in government investigations.{{ FIELD }}Represented WestRock Company on antitrust aspects of its $4.9 billion acquisition of KapStone Paper Packaging.{{ FIELD }}Global Cartel Investigations\nDefended multinational companies in criminal investigations alleging antitrust conspiracies.{{ FIELD }}Represented an executive of international auto parts company in connection with a cartel investigation in that industry.{{ FIELD }}John Carroll is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Practice Group in the Washington, D.C. office. For over two decades, John’s practice has focused on civil and criminal antitrust matters, including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, strategic counseling and compliance, and global cartel investigations. He represents clients before the Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and international and state antitrust enforcement authorities. \nPrior to private practice, John was in the Mergers I Division of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition for several years. While with the FTC, he investigated, challenged, and negotiated settlements in a number of potentially anti-competitive business combinations in the aerospace, technology, consumer products, defense, healthcare, and pharmaceutical industries. He received an Award for Meritorious Service for work on merger litigation.\nJohn has been recognized by leading publications such as Legal 500 and Best Lawyers and has held leadership positions in the American Bar Association and American Health Lawyer Association. He frequently speaks and writes on antitrust issues across industries. Partner Top Author JD Supra Readers’ Choice Awards, 2025 Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch Best Lawyers, 2023-2024 Recommended Lawyers – Antitrust Legal 500, 2022-2025 Leading Lawyer – Antitrust Legal 500, 2020 Rising Star – Antitrust Washington Super Lawyers, 2016 University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School George Washington University George Washington University Law School Supreme Court of the United States District of Columbia Maryland ABA Antitrust Section, Vice-Chair of the Media \u0026amp; Technologies Committee (2021-2022, 2022-2023) Healthcare \u0026amp; Life Sciences\nServed as lead antitrust counsel for health systems on dozens of transactions that cleared federal and state antitrust reviews. Led antitrust efforts for VillageMD in achieving antitrust clearance for its $8.9 billion acquisition of Summit Health. Successfully represented clinically and financially integrated provider networks in nonpublic government investigations. Advising private equity firms, health systems, and physician groups on a variety of antitrust issues, including potential transactions. Advising pharmaceutical and medical device companies on all aspects of competitor collaborations, including mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures. Consumer Products \u0026amp; Entertainment\nRepresents clients in the food \u0026amp; beverage, luxury, technology, retail, and fashion industries on antitrust issues. Advises entertainment and media companies on antitrust aspects of transactions and commercial activities, such as pricing and distribution. Represented Energizer Holdings, Inc. on antitrust aspects of it $2 billion acquisition of Spectrum Brands. Represented Carmike Cinemas in the Department of Justice investigation of their sale to AMC theatres, creating the nation’s largest movie theatre chain. Energy\nRepresenting a Fortune 500 public company in the energy industry on antitrust aspects of a joint venture with a competitor. Advising a number of energy companies on a range of antitrust issues related to infrastructure projects, teaming arrangements, and other collaborations. Successfully represented leading gasoline retailer on achieving FTC clearance for its strategic transaction without enforcement action. Devised and implemented antitrust compliance strategies for coalitions of energy industry competitors. Manufacturing\nRepresented leading chemical and building products companies in transactions and defended them in government investigations. Represented WestRock Company on antitrust aspects of its $4.9 billion acquisition of KapStone Paper Packaging. Global Cartel Investigations\nDefended multinational companies in criminal investigations alleging antitrust conspiracies. Represented an executive of international auto parts company in connection with a cartel investigation in that industry.","searchable_name":"John Carroll","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426813,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5707,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSteve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.\u0026nbsp; Steve\u0026rsquo;s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.\u0026nbsp; Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.\u0026nbsp; As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.\u0026nbsp; Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"steven-cave","email":"scave@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.\u0026rsquo;s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA\u0026rsquo;s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy\u0026rsquo;s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented company in a \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in numerous \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor\u0026rsquo;s exempt information remained confidential.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":116,"guid":"116.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1142,"guid":"1142.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1178,"guid":"1178.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":19,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cave","nick_name":"Steve","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Steve","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":752,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\"","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSteve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.\u0026nbsp; Steve\u0026rsquo;s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.\u0026nbsp; Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.\u0026nbsp; As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.\u0026nbsp; Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.\u0026rsquo;s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA\u0026rsquo;s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy\u0026rsquo;s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented company in a \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in numerous \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor\u0026rsquo;s exempt information remained confidential.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\"","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7603}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:04.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Cave{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.’s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA’s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.{{ FIELD }}Represented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.{{ FIELD }}Represented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.{{ FIELD }}Represented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy’s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.{{ FIELD }}Represented company in a “reverse” Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in numerous “reverse” public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor’s exempt information remained confidential.{{ FIELD }}Steve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice.   He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.  Steve’s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.  Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors. \nSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.  He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.  As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\nSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.  He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\nSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\nSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.  Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities. Partner \"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\" Chambers USA (2022) Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University  George Mason University George Mason University School of Law U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia Represented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.’s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA’s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Represented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions. Represented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations. Represented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy’s improper award decision of a $46 million contract. Represented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm. Represented company in a “reverse” Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information. Represented a company in numerous “reverse” public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor’s exempt information remained confidential.","searchable_name":"Steve Cave","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443936,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6649,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg\u0026rsquo;s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the \u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School\u0026rsquo;s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gregory-chernack","email":"gchernack@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.\u0026nbsp; After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis\u0026rsquo; summary judgment victory in \u003cem\u003eJohnson v. Novartis Pharm.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eCorp.\u003c/em\u003e in the Western District of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in \u003cem\u003eHill v. Novartis Pharm Corp.\u003c/em\u003e before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chernack","nick_name":"Greg","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","years_held":"1998 - 1999"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York","years_held":"1999 - 2000"}],"first_name":"Gregory","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2605,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1998-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Scott","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/greg-chernack-3691b21/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg\u0026rsquo;s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the \u003cem\u003eYale Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School\u0026rsquo;s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.\u0026nbsp; After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis\u0026rsquo; summary judgment victory in \u003cem\u003eJohnson v. Novartis Pharm.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eCorp.\u003c/em\u003e in the Western District of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in \u003cem\u003eHill v. Novartis Pharm Corp.\u003c/em\u003e before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.\u0026rsquo;s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11491}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:36.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:36.000Z","searchable_text":"Chernack{{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.  After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs’ claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs’ causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis’ summary judgment victory in Johnson v. Novartis Pharm. Corp. in the Western District of Texas.{{ FIELD }}Obtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri. {{ FIELD }}Obtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Hill v. Novartis Pharm Corp. before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.). {{ FIELD }}Represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.{{ FIELD }}Gregory S. (Greg) Chernack has more than 20 years of practice focused on trial and appellate litigation involving complex legal issues with extensive experience handling pharmaceutical and mass tort litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country, including in California, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. This work has resulted in numerous victories before, at, and following trial. He has also worked on a number of international matters in Ecuador and Mexico. \nGreg’s work has concentrated on developing successful defenses to lawsuits around the country by, among other things, working with expert and company witnesses in preparation for trial and engaging in complex motions practice. This work has included the representation of pharmaceutical and vaccine manufacturers in defending products liability lawsuits.\nNotably, Greg represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation at numerous trials, including successfully arguing a motion for a directed verdict at the close of one, and has won a case on its behalf before the Sixth Circuit. Greg also represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. That case ultimately went to trial in federal court in the District of Columbia with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict.\nIn addition to his work involving product liability cases, Greg has experience before the U.S. Supreme Court involving issues ranging from patent law to immigration regulations and other complex civil litigation matters. Greg also represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act. \nGreg previously served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and to the Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He was an Articles Editor of the Yale Law Journal and has been repeatedly invited to serve as a judge for the semifinals of the George Washington University Law School’s Van Vleck Moot Court Competition. Greg received his JD from Yale Law School. Partner Harvard University Harvard Law School Oxford University, UK  Yale University Yale Law School Oxford University, UK  Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Arkansas District of Columbia New Jersey New York Chair, Town Council of Section 5 of the Village of Chevy Chase, Maryland Professorial Lecturer in Law, George Washington University Law School Former Chair, D.C. Public Library Foundation Law Clerk, Honorable Ralph K. Winter, Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Law Clerk, Honorable Jack B. Weinstein, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Obtained summary judgment on behalf of Monsanto in a case alleging that Roundup exposure caused the development of skin cancer in federal court in Louisiana.  After initially obtaining summary judgment on most of plaintiffs’ claims based upon the statute of limitations, his deposition of plaintiffs’ causation expert resulted in the exclusion of that expert and the entry of summary judgment on the entirety of the case. Successfully represented Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in a Tegretol Innovator Liability case in the Fifth Circuit, affirming Novartis’ summary judgment victory in Johnson v. Novartis Pharm. Corp. in the Western District of Texas. Obtained favorable outcomes for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in numerous product liability trials regarding the medications Aredia and Zometa in multiple states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, Kentucky, and Missouri.  Obtained a directed verdict at the end of a three week trial involving Zometa in the Eastern District of California representing Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Hill v. Novartis Pharm Corp. before the Honorable Jed Rakoff (visiting from S.D.N.Y.).  Represented DynCorp International in a lawsuit brought against it by more than a thousand Ecuadoreans alleging personal injuries and property damage in connection with a counternarcotics aerial herbicide spraying operations in Colombia. As many of the plaintiffs and witnesses were unable to travel to the US, he obtained their testimony in Ecuador. The case went to trial with six test plaintiffs and resulted in a complete defense verdict. Represented pro bono the first person to be released from prison pursuant to D.C.’s Incarceration Reduction Amendment Act.","searchable_name":"Gregory Scott Chernack (Greg)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442382,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":988,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-ciatti","email":"mciatti@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multinational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac\u0026rsquo;s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted data privacy internal investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eenergy company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea professional service firm\u003c/strong\u003e in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMylan Laboratories\u003c/strong\u003e in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea legal permanent resident\u003c/strong\u003e before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines \u0026ldquo;crimes of violence\u0026rdquo; and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major textile company\u003c/strong\u003e against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of claims against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual defendants\u003c/strong\u003e in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":56}]},"expertise":[{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ciatti","nick_name":"Mike","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multinational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac\u0026rsquo;s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted data privacy internal investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eenergy company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea professional service firm\u003c/strong\u003e in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMylan Laboratories\u003c/strong\u003e in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea legal permanent resident\u003c/strong\u003e before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines \u0026ldquo;crimes of violence\u0026rdquo; and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major textile company\u003c/strong\u003e against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of claims against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual defendants\u003c/strong\u003e in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":775}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:59.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:59.000Z","searchable_text":"Ciatti{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 100 financial institution in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a multinational pharmaceutical company in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing Freddie Mac in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac’s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Freddie Mac in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.{{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment for Freddie Mac in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.{{ FIELD }}Defeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against Freddie Mac in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.{{ FIELD }}Conducted data privacy internal investigation for energy company.{{ FIELD }}Defended a professional service firm in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.{{ FIELD }}Defended Mylan Laboratories in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.{{ FIELD }}Represented The Coca-Cola Company with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.{{ FIELD }}Represented a legal permanent resident before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines “crimes of violence” and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major textile company against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of claims against individual defendants in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.{{ FIELD }}Mike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office. Michael J Ciatti Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia American Bar Association Virginia State Bar Represented a Fortune 100 financial institution in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation. Successfully represented a multinational pharmaceutical company in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement. Representing Freddie Mac in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac’s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury. Successfully represented Freddie Mac in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption. Obtained summary judgment for Freddie Mac in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims. Defeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against Freddie Mac in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program. Conducted data privacy internal investigation for energy company. Defended a professional service firm in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations. Defended Mylan Laboratories in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers. Represented The Coca-Cola Company with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations. Represented a legal permanent resident before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines “crimes of violence” and provides a basis for removal from the U.S. Represented a major textile company against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe. Obtained dismissal of claims against individual defendants in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.","searchable_name":"Michael J. Ciatti (Mike)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445604,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7297,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Healthcare practice. John advises hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other healthcare industry organizations on reimbursement disputes with health plans and compliance obligations related to participation in government health programs.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn regularly represents hospitals and health systems in payment litigation, arbitrations, as well as in government investigation, including False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice. In particular, John handles claims against health insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial reimbursement disputes and other breach of contract claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his healthcare background, John has extensive experience handling complex litigations such as class and collective actions in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level. He has successfully prosecuted and defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under federal and state employment laws, trademark infringements, unfair trade practices, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John clerked for the Honorable Roger L. Couch of the 7th Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. He has also worked for the U.S. Department of State at the U.S. Consulate in Leipzig, Germany.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-connell","email":"jconnell@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 864 706 4466","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented South Carolina\u0026rsquo;s largest healthcare system in multiple arbitrations against health insurance plans concerning the 340B Drug Pricing Program. John is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of other healthcare systems across the country, with total amounts in controversy worth tens of millions of dollars.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large hospital system in Texas against a health insurance plan involving a contractual dispute over tens of millions of dollars\u0026rsquo; worth of commercial claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several businesses in complex class and collective action cases involving claims of violations of federal employment law and state law claims totaling millions of dollars in potential damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a \u0026ldquo;world-wide\u0026rdquo; injunction against the seller of a multi-million dollar business after it violated its non-competition provision with the buyer.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":740,"guid":"740.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Connell","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, The Honorable Roger L. Couch, South Carolina Circuit Court","years_held":"2014 - 2015"}],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"F.","name_suffix":"Jr.","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Rising Star,\" Civil Litigation","detail":"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"\"Rising Star,\" Employment \u0026 Labor","detail":"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"\"Legal Elite,\" Labor and Employment","detail":"Greenville Business Magazine, 2021, 2023"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-connell-12545463/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Healthcare practice. John advises hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other healthcare industry organizations on reimbursement disputes with health plans and compliance obligations related to participation in government health programs.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn regularly represents hospitals and health systems in payment litigation, arbitrations, as well as in government investigation, including False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice. In particular, John handles claims against health insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial reimbursement disputes and other breach of contract claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his healthcare background, John has extensive experience handling complex litigations such as class and collective actions in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level. He has successfully prosecuted and defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under federal and state employment laws, trademark infringements, unfair trade practices, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John clerked for the Honorable Roger L. Couch of the 7th Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. He has also worked for the U.S. Department of State at the U.S. Consulate in Leipzig, Germany.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented South Carolina\u0026rsquo;s largest healthcare system in multiple arbitrations against health insurance plans concerning the 340B Drug Pricing Program. John is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of other healthcare systems across the country, with total amounts in controversy worth tens of millions of dollars.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large hospital system in Texas against a health insurance plan involving a contractual dispute over tens of millions of dollars\u0026rsquo; worth of commercial claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several businesses in complex class and collective action cases involving claims of violations of federal employment law and state law claims totaling millions of dollars in potential damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a \u0026ldquo;world-wide\u0026rdquo; injunction against the seller of a multi-million dollar business after it violated its non-competition provision with the buyer.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Rising Star,\" Civil Litigation","detail":"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"\"Rising Star,\" Employment \u0026 Labor","detail":"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2024"},{"title":"\"Legal Elite,\" Labor and Employment","detail":"Greenville Business Magazine, 2021, 2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13316}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-05T14:43:20.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-05T14:43:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Connell{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Rising Star,\\\" Civil Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Rising Star,\\\" Employment \u0026amp; Labor\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Legal Elite,\\\" Labor and Employment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Greenville Business Magazine, 2021, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented South Carolina’s largest healthcare system in multiple arbitrations against health insurance plans concerning the 340B Drug Pricing Program. John is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of other healthcare systems across the country, with total amounts in controversy worth tens of millions of dollars.{{ FIELD }}Represented a large hospital system in Texas against a health insurance plan involving a contractual dispute over tens of millions of dollars’ worth of commercial claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented several businesses in complex class and collective action cases involving claims of violations of federal employment law and state law claims totaling millions of dollars in potential damages.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a “world-wide” injunction against the seller of a multi-million dollar business after it violated its non-competition provision with the buyer.{{ FIELD }}John is a partner in the firm’s Healthcare practice. John advises hospitals, health systems, academic medical centers, and other healthcare industry organizations on reimbursement disputes with health plans and compliance obligations related to participation in government health programs.\nJohn regularly represents hospitals and health systems in payment litigation, arbitrations, as well as in government investigation, including False Claims Act investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice. In particular, John handles claims against health insurance plans, including Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial reimbursement disputes and other breach of contract claims.\nIn addition to his healthcare background, John has extensive experience handling complex litigations such as class and collective actions in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level. He has successfully prosecuted and defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under federal and state employment laws, trademark infringements, unfair trade practices, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, John clerked for the Honorable Roger L. Couch of the 7th Judicial Circuit of South Carolina. He has also worked for the U.S. Department of State at the U.S. Consulate in Leipzig, Germany. Partner \"Rising Star,\" Civil Litigation South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2025 \"Rising Star,\" Employment \u0026amp; Labor South Carolina Super Lawyers, 2024 \"Legal Elite,\" Labor and Employment Greenville Business Magazine, 2021, 2023 University of South Carolina University of South Carolina School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina South Carolina American Bar Association South Carolina Bar Association House of Delegates for South Carolina Bar Judicial Clerk, The Honorable Roger L. Couch, South Carolina Circuit Court Represented South Carolina’s largest healthcare system in multiple arbitrations against health insurance plans concerning the 340B Drug Pricing Program. John is currently pursuing the same issue on behalf of other healthcare systems across the country, with total amounts in controversy worth tens of millions of dollars. Represented a large hospital system in Texas against a health insurance plan involving a contractual dispute over tens of millions of dollars’ worth of commercial claims. Represented several businesses in complex class and collective action cases involving claims of violations of federal employment law and state law claims totaling millions of dollars in potential damages. Obtained a “world-wide” injunction against the seller of a multi-million dollar business after it violated its non-competition provision with the buyer.","searchable_name":"John F. Connell, Jr.","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442826,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5831,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-cooper","email":"rcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Bob","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1994 - 1996"}],"first_name":"Robert","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with distinction","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-cooper-ba696910/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8262}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation{{ FIELD }}Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China{{ FIELD }}Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice{{ FIELD }}Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation{{ FIELD }}Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers{{ FIELD }}Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants){{ FIELD }}Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion){{ FIELD }}Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act{{ FIELD }}Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor{{ FIELD }}Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger{{ FIELD }}Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations{{ FIELD }}Bob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations, and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.\nBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General. Partner Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia American Bar Association The Economic Club of Washington D.C. Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement) Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement) Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants) Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion) Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations","searchable_name":"Robert M. Cooper (Bob)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":437180,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2749,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Crosby specializes in international trade, investment and matters related to public international law. A partner in our International Trade practice and the manager of our Geneva office, Daniel helps sovereign and business clients to achieve practical economic objectives around the world by applying and negotiating international agreements.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel represents major U.S. and European multinational corporations in a variety of trade and investment negotiations, and on the application of treaty-based rules to improve global market access for goods, services and e-commerce. He also advises clients regarding national trade remedy proceedings and World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMuch of Daniel\u0026rsquo;s client work centers on energy issues, from natural resource production to energy services and trade in petrochemicals. He has particular experience in the Middle East, Russia and the states of the former Soviet Union. Daniel also has broad experience in assisting industries with international and national regulations concerning health, environmental and labor issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in English, Russian, Hungarian and French, Daniel enjoys teaching, speaking and writing on international trade and investment issues. He also provides technical assistance and \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e legal services to Least Developed Countries and to countries negotiating accession to the WTO or implementing WTO obligations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel is listed as a leading practitioner in international trade by \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers Europe, Chambers Switzerland, Who\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal,\u003c/em\u003e the \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInternational Trade Expert Guide\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBest Lawyers/Switzerland.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-crosby","email":"dcrosby@kslaw.com","phone":"+41 78 863 7403","matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":8}]},"expertise":[{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1689,"guid":"1689.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Crosby","nick_name":"Daniel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 3, International Trade/WTO","detail":"Chambers Global, Europewide (2009-2022)"},{"title":"\"Understands business realities and doesn't stick to providing unusable legal analysis.\"","detail":"Chambers Global (2022)"},{"title":"\"Helps the client think of alternative strategies to solve issues.\"","detail":"Chambers Global (2022)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":51,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDaniel Crosby specializes in international trade, investment and matters related to public international law. A partner in our International Trade practice and the manager of our Geneva office, Daniel helps sovereign and business clients to achieve practical economic objectives around the world by applying and negotiating international agreements.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel represents major U.S. and European multinational corporations in a variety of trade and investment negotiations, and on the application of treaty-based rules to improve global market access for goods, services and e-commerce. He also advises clients regarding national trade remedy proceedings and World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMuch of Daniel\u0026rsquo;s client work centers on energy issues, from natural resource production to energy services and trade in petrochemicals. He has particular experience in the Middle East, Russia and the states of the former Soviet Union. Daniel also has broad experience in assisting industries with international and national regulations concerning health, environmental and labor issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in English, Russian, Hungarian and French, Daniel enjoys teaching, speaking and writing on international trade and investment issues. He also provides technical assistance and \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e legal services to Least Developed Countries and to countries negotiating accession to the WTO or implementing WTO obligations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel is listed as a leading practitioner in international trade by \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers Europe, Chambers Switzerland, Who\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal,\u003c/em\u003e the \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInternational Trade Expert Guide\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBest Lawyers/Switzerland.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 3, International Trade/WTO","detail":"Chambers Global, Europewide (2009-2022)"},{"title":"\"Understands business realities and doesn't stick to providing unusable legal analysis.\"","detail":"Chambers Global (2022)"},{"title":"\"Helps the client think of alternative strategies to solve issues.\"","detail":"Chambers Global (2022)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6625}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-09-15T16:54:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-15T16:54:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Crosby{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 3, International Trade/WTO\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global, Europewide (2009-2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Understands business realities and doesn't stick to providing unusable legal analysis.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Helps the client think of alternative strategies to solve issues.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}Daniel Crosby specializes in international trade, investment and matters related to public international law. A partner in our International Trade practice and the manager of our Geneva office, Daniel helps sovereign and business clients to achieve practical economic objectives around the world by applying and negotiating international agreements.\nDaniel represents major U.S. and European multinational corporations in a variety of trade and investment negotiations, and on the application of treaty-based rules to improve global market access for goods, services and e-commerce. He also advises clients regarding national trade remedy proceedings and World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes.\nMuch of Daniel’s client work centers on energy issues, from natural resource production to energy services and trade in petrochemicals. He has particular experience in the Middle East, Russia and the states of the former Soviet Union. Daniel also has broad experience in assisting industries with international and national regulations concerning health, environmental and labor issues.\nFluent in English, Russian, Hungarian and French, Daniel enjoys teaching, speaking and writing on international trade and investment issues. He also provides technical assistance and pro bono legal services to Least Developed Countries and to countries negotiating accession to the WTO or implementing WTO obligations.\nDaniel is listed as a leading practitioner in international trade by Chambers Global, Chambers Europe, Chambers Switzerland, Who’s Who Legal, the International Trade Expert Guide and Best Lawyers/Switzerland. Daniel C Crosby Partner Band 3, International Trade/WTO Chambers Global, Europewide (2009-2022) \"Understands business realities and doesn't stick to providing unusable legal analysis.\" Chambers Global (2022) \"Helps the client think of alternative strategies to solve issues.\" Chambers Global (2022) Union College Albany Law School Leningrad/St. Petersburg State University  College of Ripon and York St. John  American University, Washington College of Law  District of Columbia Massachusetts New York American Bar Association International Bar Association","searchable_name":"Daniel Crosby","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446557,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7277,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSabahat Chaudhary advises clients on complex customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, seizures, detentions, and admissibility issues relating to forced labor and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (\u0026ldquo;UFLPA\u0026rdquo;).\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining K\u0026amp;S, Sabahat served as a Senior Attorney focusing on customs and trade laws with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.\u0026nbsp; In this position, she advised the U.S. Customs operators, including within the Office of Trade, Office of Regulations and Rulings, and the Centers of Excellence and Expertise, on compliance with U.S. customs regulatory and statutory laws.\u0026nbsp; Sabahat also served as agency counsel in defensive litigation at the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.\u0026nbsp; While at U.S. Customs, Sabahat worked closely with officials from other federal bodies, including the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, on implementation of tariff and trade policies.\u0026nbsp; Sabahat also reviewed trade legislation proposed by members of the U.S. Congress.\u0026nbsp; In recognition of her expertise in U.S. customs and trade laws, Sabahat received a 2024 World Customs Organization Certificate of Merit, along with multiple Office of Chief Counsel and Special Act Awards during her government service.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her federal service, Sabahat was an international trade attorney in private practice, where she represented companies across a variety of sectors, including steel, solar products, and agricultural goods.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"sabahat-chaudhary","email":"schaudhary@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1689,"guid":"1689.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chaudhary","nick_name":"Sabahat","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Sabahat","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSabahat Chaudhary advises clients on complex customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, seizures, detentions, and admissibility issues relating to forced labor and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (\u0026ldquo;UFLPA\u0026rdquo;).\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining K\u0026amp;S, Sabahat served as a Senior Attorney focusing on customs and trade laws with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.\u0026nbsp; In this position, she advised the U.S. Customs operators, including within the Office of Trade, Office of Regulations and Rulings, and the Centers of Excellence and Expertise, on compliance with U.S. customs regulatory and statutory laws.\u0026nbsp; Sabahat also served as agency counsel in defensive litigation at the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.\u0026nbsp; While at U.S. Customs, Sabahat worked closely with officials from other federal bodies, including the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, on implementation of tariff and trade policies.\u0026nbsp; Sabahat also reviewed trade legislation proposed by members of the U.S. Congress.\u0026nbsp; In recognition of her expertise in U.S. customs and trade laws, Sabahat received a 2024 World Customs Organization Certificate of Merit, along with multiple Office of Chief Counsel and Special Act Awards during her government service.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her federal service, Sabahat was an international trade attorney in private practice, where she represented companies across a variety of sectors, including steel, solar products, and agricultural goods.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13293}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-03-06T21:57:40.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-06T21:57:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Chaudhary{{ FIELD }}Sabahat Chaudhary advises clients on complex customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, seizures, detentions, and admissibility issues relating to forced labor and the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (“UFLPA”). \nBefore joining K\u0026amp;S, Sabahat served as a Senior Attorney focusing on customs and trade laws with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.  In this position, she advised the U.S. Customs operators, including within the Office of Trade, Office of Regulations and Rulings, and the Centers of Excellence and Expertise, on compliance with U.S. customs regulatory and statutory laws.  Sabahat also served as agency counsel in defensive litigation at the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  While at U.S. Customs, Sabahat worked closely with officials from other federal bodies, including the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, on implementation of tariff and trade policies.  Sabahat also reviewed trade legislation proposed by members of the U.S. Congress.  In recognition of her expertise in U.S. customs and trade laws, Sabahat received a 2024 World Customs Organization Certificate of Merit, along with multiple Office of Chief Counsel and Special Act Awards during her government service.\nPrior to her federal service, Sabahat was an international trade attorney in private practice, where she represented companies across a variety of sectors, including steel, solar products, and agricultural goods. Counsel St. John's College  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Customs International Trade Bar Association Women In International Trade DC","searchable_name":"Sabahat Chaudhary","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426298,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2220,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam Clarkson is a counsel in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Advocacy practice in Washington, D.C.\u0026nbsp; His practice is focused on congressional and government investigations, and legislative and policy issues.\u0026nbsp; William advises clients on anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas,\u0026nbsp;and preparing for congressional oversight hearings.\u0026nbsp; He also advises clients in federal agency investigations and on compliance with environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2007, after working in the U.S. Senate for 7 years.\u0026nbsp; As a Legislative Assistant to Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), William advised the Senator on transportation appropriations and policy issues, including surface transportation and FAA reauthorization legislation. William also handled transportation-related homeland security issues for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"william-clarkson","email":"wclarkson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Clarkson","nick_name":"William","clerkships":[],"first_name":"William","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWilliam Clarkson is a counsel in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Government Advocacy practice in Washington, D.C.\u0026nbsp; His practice is focused on congressional and government investigations, and legislative and policy issues.\u0026nbsp; William advises clients on anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas,\u0026nbsp;and preparing for congressional oversight hearings.\u0026nbsp; He also advises clients in federal agency investigations and on compliance with environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWilliam joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2007, after working in the U.S. Senate for 7 years.\u0026nbsp; As a Legislative Assistant to Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), William advised the Senator on transportation appropriations and policy issues, including surface transportation and FAA reauthorization legislation. William also handled transportation-related homeland security issues for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":779}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Clarkson{{ FIELD }}William Clarkson is a counsel in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Government Advocacy practice in Washington, D.C.  His practice is focused on congressional and government investigations, and legislative and policy issues.  William advises clients on anticipating and responding to congressional committee requests and subpoenas, and preparing for congressional oversight hearings.  He also advises clients in federal agency investigations and on compliance with environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulations. \nWilliam joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2007, after working in the U.S. Senate for 7 years.  As a Legislative Assistant to Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), William advised the Senator on transportation appropriations and policy issues, including surface transportation and FAA reauthorization legislation. William also handled transportation-related homeland security issues for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Counsel Duke University Duke University School of Law Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law District of Columbia","searchable_name":"William Clarkson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7233,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Cooper\u0026nbsp;advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.\u0026nbsp; With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division,\u0026nbsp;Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.\u0026nbsp; Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.\u0026nbsp; She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.\u0026nbsp; Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a\u0026nbsp;Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the \u003cem\u003eMaryland Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"katherine-cooper","email":"kcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Katherine","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Katherine","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2224,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2007-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Cooper\u0026nbsp;advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.\u0026nbsp; With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division,\u0026nbsp;Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.\u0026nbsp; Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.\u0026nbsp; She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.\u0026nbsp; Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a\u0026nbsp;Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the \u003cem\u003eMaryland Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13165}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-17T22:20:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-17T22:20:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Katie Cooper advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.  With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division, Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment. \nKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.  Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.  She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.  Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\nPrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations. \nKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the Maryland Law Review and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\nAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar. Counsel University of Maryland-Baltimore University of Maryland School of Law Maryland","searchable_name":"Katherine Cooper","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444718,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6668,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMcKenzie Cato's expertise is\u0026nbsp;assisting\u0026nbsp;medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage\u0026nbsp;companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in\u0026nbsp;developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mckenzie-cato","email":"mcato@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 301 651 6631","matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cato","nick_name":"McKenzie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"McKenzie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[{"id":753,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"honors","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/mckenzie-cato-4832b413","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMcKenzie Cato's expertise is\u0026nbsp;assisting\u0026nbsp;medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage\u0026nbsp;companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in\u0026nbsp;developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11682}]},"capability_group_id":null},"created_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Cato{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}McKenzie Cato's expertise is assisting medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues. Senior Associate Ones to Watch Best Lawyers, 2025 Ones to Watch Best Lawyers, 2024 Georgetown University  George Washington University George Washington University Law School District of Columbia Pennsylvania","searchable_name":"McKenzie Cato","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}