{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"cg-3","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"P","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426340,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2677,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAshley Parrish is one of the partners that leads the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice.\u0026nbsp;He focuses his practice on appellate, administrative, and constitutional law, and on strategic, complex litigation.\u0026nbsp;He\u0026nbsp; has significant experience handling administrative law cases in litigation against federal and state government agencies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAshley regularly advises clients in strategic litigation matters, as well as in federal administrative law and practice. He is experienced in numerous areas, including energy, life sciences, healthcare, labor, products liability, international trade, environmental, and bankruptcy. Ashley has handled appeals and complex litigation matters in courts across the country, including significant matters before the U.S. Supreme Court, almost all of the federal courts of appeal, and a variety of state appellate courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker, Ashley has been recognized for his skill as an appellate lawyer. He has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u003c/em\u003e recommended by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e, listed as a Washington D.C. Super Lawyer, and selected by Lawdragon as one of the nation's leading litigators. In 2012, he was one of only five appellate lawyers nationwide to be recognized as a \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e Rising Star. And in 2014, he was identified by Reuters as one of \u0026ldquo;the top handful of lawyers in America\u0026rdquo; who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ashley-parrish","email":"aparrish@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Supreme Court Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDoe v. Snap, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully opposed petition for certiorari in major litigation relating to internet service provider liability for third party conduct under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, preserving victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrustees of the United Mine Workers of Am. Combined Benefit Fund v. United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. \u003c/em\u003e(2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully defeated petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in major bankruptcy litigation relating to claims filed under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1993.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSEC v. Jarkesy\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Filed significant \u003cem\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e brief on behalf of the Pioneer Public Interest Law Center in major litigation involving constitutionality of the SEC's enforcement process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eStirling v. Stokes\u003c/em\u003e (2023). \u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving judgment in favor of habeas corpus in high-profile capital case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eHedican v. Walmart Stores East \u003c/em\u003e(2022). \u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in significant litigation involving the EEOC and attempts by a charging party to belatedly intervene in litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBecerra v. Empire Health Foundation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eRepresenting hospitals in significant healthcare dispute relating to calculation of payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of low-income and indigent patients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWolfe v. Commonwealth of Virginia\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2019)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained summary reversal and remand to Virginia courts in connection with high-profile death penalty matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eElectric Power Supply Association v. FERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented the Electric Power Supply Association in major litigation challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\u0026rsquo;s regulation of \u0026ldquo;demand response.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAshley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully opposed petition for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;filed in major trade remedy case involving First Amendment challenge to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBond. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Secured victory in case addressing the federal government\u0026rsquo;s authority to prosecute a local offense under the Chemical Weapons Convention.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eUtility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Filed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;brief by a group of law professors, cited favorably by the Supreme Court for its \"felicitous\" explanation of arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ePPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2013)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Obtain unanimous decision finding that a UK windfall tax was creditable for U.S. tax purposes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePPL Montana v. Montana\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2012)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Obtained unanimous decision reversing the Montana Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s ruling that riverbed lands under the Upper Missouri, Clark Fork and Madison rivers are state-owned because they were purportedly navigable in 1889 when Montana joined the Union.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePublic Citizen, Inc. et al. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2012)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented industry association in successfully opposing petition for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;filed by public interest groups and states challenging favorable decision upholding the federal market-based rate regime.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBond v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2011)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Secured successful reversal in case confirming private-party standing to challenge federal prosecutions that exceed the treaty power under the Tenth Amendment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePlata v. Coleman\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2011)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented a class of inmates suffering from mental illness and successfully defended order of three-judge panel requiring California to address its prison overcrowding crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHorne\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ev. Flores\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2009)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented Arizona legislative leaders in education reform litigation, obtaining\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and successful reversal of a Ninth Circuit decision addressing the standards for modifying an injunction and the interplay between the Equal Education Opportunity Act and the No Child Left Behind Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMassachusetts\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ev. EPA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2007\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Prepared merits brief on behalf of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers addressing the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eElk Grove School District v. Newdow\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2004)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented the mother of the minor child identified as the plaintiff in a successful defense of a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther Appellate Matters and Strategic Ligitation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIberdola Energy Projects v. Oaktree Capital Management (N.Y. Supreme Court 2024)\u003c/em\u003e. \u003c/strong\u003ePrevailed in appeal dismissing complaint filed by contractor seeking to overcome non-recourse provision and re-litigate claims previously resolved through arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAmericans for Beneficiary Choice v. HHS\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(N.D. Tex. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Part of team obtaining emergency stay of effective date challenging agency regulations seeking to change payment structure for administrative services provided in connection with Medicare Advantage enrollment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D.C. Cir. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Part of successful team representing 9REN Holding in major international arbitration matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMosaic Health Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (W.D.N.Y 2024)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eSuccessfully represented Novo Nordisk in obtaining dismissal of antitrust complaint challenging manufacturer policies regarding use of contract pharmacies under the federal 340B statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States ex rel. Adventist Health System / West v. AbbVie, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(C.D. Cal. 2024).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully obtained dismissal of False Claims Act case brought against manufacturers in connection with pricing under the federal 340B statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRedes Andinas de Comunicaciones S.R.L. v. Republic of Peru\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.D.C. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully obtained enforcement of arbitral awards under New York Convention and entry of default judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDoe v. Becerra\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(C.D. Cal. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Represented the American Kidney Foundation in successful First Amendment challenge to California law (AB 290) seeking to interfere with charitable services provided to patients suffering from end-stage renal disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSanofi Aventis U.S. LLC v. HHS\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(3d Cir. 2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Represented Novo Nordisk in successful appeal in major litigation under federal 340B statute relating to manufacturers' rights to impose reasonable conditions on when discounted drugs will be transferred to contract pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDoe v. Snap, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2023).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ePrevailed in appeal affirming dismissal of claims seeking to hold Snap liable for third-party conduct based on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eKhashoggi v. NSO Group Techologies Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Va. 2023).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained successful dismissal on personal jurisdiction grounds of litigation challenging use of cybersecurity software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican Clinical Laboratory Association v. Becerra\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully represented trade association for the nation's laboratories regarding agency decision to exclude hospital-based outreach laboratories from reporting requirements under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEverport Terminal Services, Inc. v. NLRB\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successful appeal challenging agency determinations over which union was entitled to represent mechanic workforce at terminal in Oakland, California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully represented debtor in significant bankruptcy litigation addressing definition of \"claim\" under Bankruptcy Code and whether claims under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act were discharged in Chapter 11 cas\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Estate of Konzelman\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Fla. Ct. App, 4th Dist. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successful appeal obtaining reversal and remand of punitive damages award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eThomas \u0026amp; Betts Corp. v. Trinity Meyer Utility Structures, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2d Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable decision reversing trial court in significant construction contract dispute and allowing breach-of-contract claims to move forward.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBethesda Health, Inc. v. Azar\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully represented the Florida Hospital Association and ten of its member hospitals in challenge to how CMS calculates Medicare reimbursement rates, paving the way for hospitals to gain millions of dollars in additional Medicare reimbursements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBasic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2021).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully defended district court judgment, reaffirming important principles of res judicata law and preventing plaintiffs from reviving their time-barred lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCallinan v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(5th Cir. 2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable appellate court ruling dismissing major securities class action for failure to meet pleading requires under the securities law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Triangle Corp. Securities Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(4th Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtain appellate decision dismissing securities fraud class action against Triangle Capital Corporation and certain of its officers and directors, reaffirming principle that speculative, hindsight pleadings are not permissible in cases alleging violations of the federal securities laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eStokes v. Stirling\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(4th Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable ruling reversing district court, granting habeas petition, and remanding for issuance of a writ or resentencing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNawai Wardak Transp. Co. v. RMA Group Afghanistan Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Mich. Ct. App. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained reversal of a trial court order dismissing claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, permitting case to proceed on merits in Michigan trial court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWojcicki v. SCANA/SCE\u0026amp;G\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(4th Cir. 2020).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable decision affirming that relators cannot proceed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro se\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewhen bringing a False Claims Act lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAmerican Clinical Laboratory Association v. Azar\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D.C. Cir. 2019).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable jurisdictional ruling, reversing district court and holding that judicial review bar does not apply to challenge to CMS's failure to comply with the data collection requirements of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eKapila v. Grant Thornton, LLP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2019)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable decision affirming district court's decision granting judgment in Grant Thornton's favor based on common law\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ein pari delicto\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003edoctrine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlvarez v. The Johns Hopkins University, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D. Md. 2019)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate lawyer and brief writer in major litigation seeking to hold Bristol Myers Squibb and other defendants liable for medical research experiments conducted in Guatemala between 1946 and 1948. Successful obtained voluntary dismissal with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMalek v. Blackmer Pump\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e(Cal. Ct. App. 2019).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable ruling affirming grant of summary judgment in litigation arising out of Iranian refinery workers' exposure to asbestos in the 1950s through the 1970s.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBoard of Comm\u0026rsquo;rs of the Southeast La. Flood Prot. Auth., et al. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2017)\u003c/strong\u003e. Served as lead appellate lawyer representing Chevron Corporation on appeal, defending dismissal of litigation brought by a local levee board seeking to hold the oil and gas industry liable for coastal land loss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRozema v. U.S. Dept. of Health \u0026amp; Human Servs.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2d Cir. 2017).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate lawyer representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in successful defense of decision dismissing action seeking to compel the release of confidential and trade secret information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBenton County Wind Farm LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(7th Cir. 2016)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented wind farm in successful appeal reversing district court decision concerning contractual obligation of utility to purchase wind farm's output under long-term contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDelaware Dept. of Natural Res. \u0026amp; Envtl Control v. EPA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2015)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as counsel of record for the Electric Power Supply Association in a successful challenge to the EPA\u0026rsquo;s final rule exempting backup, diesel-fueled generators from emissions controls.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrank v. Fuhrer Wholesale Co. v. MillerCoors LLC, et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(3d Cir. 2015)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate counsel in successful appeal defending district court judgment in a contract dispute between MillerCoors and one of its largest distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eU.S. ex rel. Michael Keeler v. Eisai Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented pharmaceutical manufacturer in appeal defending dismissal of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eExelon Wind 1, LLC v. Nelson\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented major energy company in successful appeal challenging order striking down the Texas Public Utilities Commission\u0026rsquo;s interpretation of statutory scheme governing the purchase of energy between public utilities and qualifying facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWest Deptford Energy, LLC v. FERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented petitioner in appeal challenging agency orders that failed to comply with file rate doctrine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSouth Carolina Public Service Authority v\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented LS Power in successful defense of agency decision regarding rights of first refusal in Order 1000 rulemaking.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":182}]},"expertise":[{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":984,"guid":"984.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Parrish","nick_name":"Ashley","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Emilio M. Garza, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"1998-1999"}],"first_name":"Ashley","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Nationwide Appellate Law","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"Supreme Court \u0026 Appellate","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Washington D.C. Super Lawyer","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"One of “the top handful of lawyers in America” who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court.","detail":"Reuters, 2014"},{"title":"A Rising Star (one of five appellate lawyers nationwide) ","detail":"Law360, 2012"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleycparrish/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAshley Parrish is one of the partners that leads the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice.\u0026nbsp;He focuses his practice on appellate, administrative, and constitutional law, and on strategic, complex litigation.\u0026nbsp;He\u0026nbsp; has significant experience handling administrative law cases in litigation against federal and state government agencies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAshley regularly advises clients in strategic litigation matters, as well as in federal administrative law and practice. He is experienced in numerous areas, including energy, life sciences, healthcare, labor, products liability, international trade, environmental, and bankruptcy. Ashley has handled appeals and complex litigation matters in courts across the country, including significant matters before the U.S. Supreme Court, almost all of the federal courts of appeal, and a variety of state appellate courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker, Ashley has been recognized for his skill as an appellate lawyer. He has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u003c/em\u003e recommended by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e, listed as a Washington D.C. Super Lawyer, and selected by Lawdragon as one of the nation's leading litigators. In 2012, he was one of only five appellate lawyers nationwide to be recognized as a \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e Rising Star. And in 2014, he was identified by Reuters as one of \u0026ldquo;the top handful of lawyers in America\u0026rdquo; who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Supreme Court Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDoe v. Snap, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully opposed petition for certiorari in major litigation relating to internet service provider liability for third party conduct under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, preserving victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eTrustees of the United Mine Workers of Am. Combined Benefit Fund v. United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. \u003c/em\u003e(2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully defeated petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in major bankruptcy litigation relating to claims filed under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1993.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSEC v. Jarkesy\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003e(2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Filed significant \u003cem\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e brief on behalf of the Pioneer Public Interest Law Center in major litigation involving constitutionality of the SEC's enforcement process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eStirling v. Stokes\u003c/em\u003e (2023). \u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving judgment in favor of habeas corpus in high-profile capital case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eHedican v. Walmart Stores East \u003c/em\u003e(2022). \u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in significant litigation involving the EEOC and attempts by a charging party to belatedly intervene in litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBecerra v. Empire Health Foundation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eRepresenting hospitals in significant healthcare dispute relating to calculation of payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of low-income and indigent patients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eWolfe v. Commonwealth of Virginia\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2019)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained summary reversal and remand to Virginia courts in connection with high-profile death penalty matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eElectric Power Supply Association v. FERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented the Electric Power Supply Association in major litigation challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\u0026rsquo;s regulation of \u0026ldquo;demand response.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAshley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully opposed petition for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;filed in major trade remedy case involving First Amendment challenge to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBond. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Secured victory in case addressing the federal government\u0026rsquo;s authority to prosecute a local offense under the Chemical Weapons Convention.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eUtility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Filed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eamicus curiae\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;brief by a group of law professors, cited favorably by the Supreme Court for its \"felicitous\" explanation of arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ePPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2013)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Obtain unanimous decision finding that a UK windfall tax was creditable for U.S. tax purposes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePPL Montana v. Montana\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2012)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Obtained unanimous decision reversing the Montana Supreme Court\u0026rsquo;s ruling that riverbed lands under the Upper Missouri, Clark Fork and Madison rivers are state-owned because they were purportedly navigable in 1889 when Montana joined the Union.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePublic Citizen, Inc. et al. v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2012)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented industry association in successfully opposing petition for\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;filed by public interest groups and states challenging favorable decision upholding the federal market-based rate regime.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBond v. United States\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2011)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Secured successful reversal in case confirming private-party standing to challenge federal prosecutions that exceed the treaty power under the Tenth Amendment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePlata v. Coleman\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2011)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented a class of inmates suffering from mental illness and successfully defended order of three-judge panel requiring California to address its prison overcrowding crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHorne\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ev. Flores\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2009)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented Arizona legislative leaders in education reform litigation, obtaining\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ecertiorari\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and successful reversal of a Ninth Circuit decision addressing the standards for modifying an injunction and the interplay between the Equal Education Opportunity Act and the No Child Left Behind Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMassachusetts\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ev. EPA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e(2007\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Prepared merits brief on behalf of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers addressing the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eElk Grove School District v. Newdow\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2004)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented the mother of the minor child identified as the plaintiff in a successful defense of a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOther Appellate Matters and Strategic Ligitation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIberdola Energy Projects v. Oaktree Capital Management (N.Y. Supreme Court 2024)\u003c/em\u003e. \u003c/strong\u003ePrevailed in appeal dismissing complaint filed by contractor seeking to overcome non-recourse provision and re-litigate claims previously resolved through arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAmericans for Beneficiary Choice v. HHS\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(N.D. Tex. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Part of team obtaining emergency stay of effective date challenging agency regulations seeking to change payment structure for administrative services provided in connection with Medicare Advantage enrollment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D.C. Cir. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Part of successful team representing 9REN Holding in major international arbitration matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMosaic Health Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (W.D.N.Y 2024)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eSuccessfully represented Novo Nordisk in obtaining dismissal of antitrust complaint challenging manufacturer policies regarding use of contract pharmacies under the federal 340B statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnited States ex rel. Adventist Health System / West v. AbbVie, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(C.D. Cal. 2024).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully obtained dismissal of False Claims Act case brought against manufacturers in connection with pricing under the federal 340B statute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRedes Andinas de Comunicaciones S.R.L. v. Republic of Peru\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.D.C. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully obtained enforcement of arbitral awards under New York Convention and entry of default judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDoe v. Becerra\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(C.D. Cal. 2024)\u003c/strong\u003e. Represented the American Kidney Foundation in successful First Amendment challenge to California law (AB 290) seeking to interfere with charitable services provided to patients suffering from end-stage renal disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eSanofi Aventis U.S. LLC v. HHS\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(3d Cir. 2023)\u003c/strong\u003e. Represented Novo Nordisk in successful appeal in major litigation under federal 340B statute relating to manufacturers' rights to impose reasonable conditions on when discounted drugs will be transferred to contract pharmacies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDoe v. Snap, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2023).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ePrevailed in appeal affirming dismissal of claims seeking to hold Snap liable for third-party conduct based on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eKhashoggi v. NSO Group Techologies Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Va. 2023).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained successful dismissal on personal jurisdiction grounds of litigation challenging use of cybersecurity software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican Clinical Laboratory Association v. Becerra\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully represented trade association for the nation's laboratories regarding agency decision to exclude hospital-based outreach laboratories from reporting requirements under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEverport Terminal Services, Inc. v. NLRB\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successful appeal challenging agency determinations over which union was entitled to represent mechanic workforce at terminal in Oakland, California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successfully represented debtor in significant bankruptcy litigation addressing definition of \"claim\" under Bankruptcy Code and whether claims under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act were discharged in Chapter 11 cas\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Estate of Konzelman\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Fla. Ct. App, 4th Dist. 2022)\u003c/strong\u003e. Successful appeal obtaining reversal and remand of punitive damages award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eThomas \u0026amp; Betts Corp. v. Trinity Meyer Utility Structures, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2d Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable decision reversing trial court in significant construction contract dispute and allowing breach-of-contract claims to move forward.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBethesda Health, Inc. v. Azar\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eSuccessfully represented the Florida Hospital Association and ten of its member hospitals in challenge to how CMS calculates Medicare reimbursement rates, paving the way for hospitals to gain millions of dollars in additional Medicare reimbursements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eBasic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2021).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully defended district court judgment, reaffirming important principles of res judicata law and preventing plaintiffs from reviving their time-barred lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCallinan v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(5th Cir. 2021).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable appellate court ruling dismissing major securities class action for failure to meet pleading requires under the securities law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn re Triangle Corp. Securities Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(4th Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtain appellate decision dismissing securities fraud class action against Triangle Capital Corporation and certain of its officers and directors, reaffirming principle that speculative, hindsight pleadings are not permissible in cases alleging violations of the federal securities laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eStokes v. Stirling\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(4th Cir. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable ruling reversing district court, granting habeas petition, and remanding for issuance of a writ or resentencing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eNawai Wardak Transp. Co. v. RMA Group Afghanistan Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Mich. Ct. App. 2021)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained reversal of a trial court order dismissing claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, permitting case to proceed on merits in Michigan trial court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWojcicki v. SCANA/SCE\u0026amp;G\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e(4th Cir. 2020).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable decision affirming that relators cannot proceed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro se\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewhen bringing a False Claims Act lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAmerican Clinical Laboratory Association v. Azar\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D.C. Cir. 2019).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable jurisdictional ruling, reversing district court and holding that judicial review bar does not apply to challenge to CMS's failure to comply with the data collection requirements of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eKapila v. Grant Thornton, LLP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2019)\u003c/strong\u003e. Obtained favorable decision affirming district court's decision granting judgment in Grant Thornton's favor based on common law\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ein pari delicto\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003edoctrine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlvarez v. The Johns Hopkins University, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(D. Md. 2019)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate lawyer and brief writer in major litigation seeking to hold Bristol Myers Squibb and other defendants liable for medical research experiments conducted in Guatemala between 1946 and 1948. Successful obtained voluntary dismissal with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eMalek v. Blackmer Pump\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e(Cal. Ct. App. 2019).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eObtained favorable ruling affirming grant of summary judgment in litigation arising out of Iranian refinery workers' exposure to asbestos in the 1950s through the 1970s.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBoard of Comm\u0026rsquo;rs of the Southeast La. Flood Prot. Auth., et al. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2017)\u003c/strong\u003e. Served as lead appellate lawyer representing Chevron Corporation on appeal, defending dismissal of litigation brought by a local levee board seeking to hold the oil and gas industry liable for coastal land loss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRozema v. U.S. Dept. of Health \u0026amp; Human Servs.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2d Cir. 2017).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate lawyer representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in successful defense of decision dismissing action seeking to compel the release of confidential and trade secret information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBenton County Wind Farm LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(7th Cir. 2016)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented wind farm in successful appeal reversing district court decision concerning contractual obligation of utility to purchase wind farm's output under long-term contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDelaware Dept. of Natural Res. \u0026amp; Envtl Control v. EPA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2015)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as counsel of record for the Electric Power Supply Association in a successful challenge to the EPA\u0026rsquo;s final rule exempting backup, diesel-fueled generators from emissions controls.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrank v. Fuhrer Wholesale Co. v. MillerCoors LLC, et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(3d Cir. 2015)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Served as lead appellate counsel in successful appeal defending district court judgment in a contract dispute between MillerCoors and one of its largest distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eU.S. ex rel. Michael Keeler v. Eisai Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(11th Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented pharmaceutical manufacturer in appeal defending dismissal of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eExelon Wind 1, LLC v. Nelson\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(5th Cir. 2014).\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented major energy company in successful appeal challenging order striking down the Texas Public Utilities Commission\u0026rsquo;s interpretation of statutory scheme governing the purchase of energy between public utilities and qualifying facilities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWest Deptford Energy, LLC v. FERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented petitioner in appeal challenging agency orders that failed to comply with file rate doctrine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSouth Carolina Public Service Authority v\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFERC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D.C. Cir. 2014)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Represented LS Power in successful defense of agency decision regarding rights of first refusal in Order 1000 rulemaking.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Nationwide Appellate Law","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"Supreme Court \u0026 Appellate","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Washington D.C. Super Lawyer","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"One of “the top handful of lawyers in America” who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court.","detail":"Reuters, 2014"},{"title":"A Rising Star (one of five appellate lawyers nationwide) ","detail":"Law360, 2012"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7427}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:51:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:51:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Parrish{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Nationwide Appellate Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers \u0026amp; Partners\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Supreme Court \u0026amp; Appellate\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Washington D.C. Super Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One of “the top handful of lawyers in America” who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court.\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Reuters, 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Rising Star (one of five appellate lawyers nationwide) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2012\"}{{ FIELD }}U.S. Supreme Court Matters\nDoe v. Snap, Inc. (2024). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari in major litigation relating to internet service provider liability for third party conduct under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, preserving victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Trustees of the United Mine Workers of Am. Combined Benefit Fund v. United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. (2023). Successfully defeated petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in major bankruptcy litigation relating to claims filed under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1993.{{ FIELD }}SEC v. Jarkesy (2023). Filed significant amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Pioneer Public Interest Law Center in major litigation involving constitutionality of the SEC's enforcement process.{{ FIELD }}Stirling v. Stokes (2023). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving judgment in favor of habeas corpus in high-profile capital case.{{ FIELD }}Hedican v. Walmart Stores East (2022). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in significant litigation involving the EEOC and attempts by a charging party to belatedly intervene in litigation.{{ FIELD }}Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation (2021). Representing hospitals in significant healthcare dispute relating to calculation of payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of low-income and indigent patients{{ FIELD }}Wolfe v. Commonwealth of Virginia (2019). Obtained summary reversal and remand to Virginia courts in connection with high-profile death penalty matter.{{ FIELD }}Electric Power Supply Association v. FERC (2016). Represented the Electric Power Supply Association in major litigation challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s regulation of “demand response.”{{ FIELD }}Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States (2014). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari filed in major trade remedy case involving First Amendment challenge to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act.{{ FIELD }}Bond. v. United States (2014). Secured victory in case addressing the federal government’s authority to prosecute a local offense under the Chemical Weapons Convention.{{ FIELD }}Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (2014). Filed amicus curiae brief by a group of law professors, cited favorably by the Supreme Court for its \"felicitous\" explanation of arguments.{{ FIELD }}PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2013). Obtain unanimous decision finding that a UK windfall tax was creditable for U.S. tax purposes.{{ FIELD }}PPL Montana v. Montana (2012). Obtained unanimous decision reversing the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling that riverbed lands under the Upper Missouri, Clark Fork and Madison rivers are state-owned because they were purportedly navigable in 1889 when Montana joined the Union.{{ FIELD }}Public Citizen, Inc. et al. v. United States (2012). Represented industry association in successfully opposing petition for certiorari filed by public interest groups and states challenging favorable decision upholding the federal market-based rate regime.{{ FIELD }}Bond v. United States (2011). Secured successful reversal in case confirming private-party standing to challenge federal prosecutions that exceed the treaty power under the Tenth Amendment.{{ FIELD }}Plata v. Coleman (2011). Represented a class of inmates suffering from mental illness and successfully defended order of three-judge panel requiring California to address its prison overcrowding crisis.{{ FIELD }}Horne v. Flores (2009). Represented Arizona legislative leaders in education reform litigation, obtaining certiorari and successful reversal of a Ninth Circuit decision addressing the standards for modifying an injunction and the interplay between the Equal Education Opportunity Act and the No Child Left Behind Act.{{ FIELD }}Massachusetts v. EPA (2007). Prepared merits brief on behalf of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers addressing the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.{{ FIELD }}Elk Grove School District v. Newdow (2004). Represented the mother of the minor child identified as the plaintiff in a successful defense of a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance.{{ FIELD }}Other Appellate Matters and Strategic Ligitation Matters\nIberdola Energy Projects v. Oaktree Capital Management (N.Y. Supreme Court 2024). Prevailed in appeal dismissing complaint filed by contractor seeking to overcome non-recourse provision and re-litigate claims previously resolved through arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Americans for Beneficiary Choice v. HHS (N.D. Tex. 2024). Part of team obtaining emergency stay of effective date challenging agency regulations seeking to change payment structure for administrative services provided in connection with Medicare Advantage enrollment.{{ FIELD }}NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain (D.C. Cir. 2024). Part of successful team representing 9REN Holding in major international arbitration matter.{{ FIELD }}Mosaic Health Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (W.D.N.Y 2024). Successfully represented Novo Nordisk in obtaining dismissal of antitrust complaint challenging manufacturer policies regarding use of contract pharmacies under the federal 340B statute.{{ FIELD }}United States ex rel. Adventist Health System / West v. AbbVie, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2024). Successfully obtained dismissal of False Claims Act case brought against manufacturers in connection with pricing under the federal 340B statute.{{ FIELD }}Redes Andinas de Comunicaciones S.R.L. v. Republic of Peru (D.D.C. 2024). Successfully obtained enforcement of arbitral awards under New York Convention and entry of default judgment.{{ FIELD }}Doe v. Becerra (C.D. Cal. 2024). Represented the American Kidney Foundation in successful First Amendment challenge to California law (AB 290) seeking to interfere with charitable services provided to patients suffering from end-stage renal disease.{{ FIELD }}Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC v. HHS (3d Cir. 2023). Represented Novo Nordisk in successful appeal in major litigation under federal 340B statute relating to manufacturers' rights to impose reasonable conditions on when discounted drugs will be transferred to contract pharmacies.{{ FIELD }}Doe v. Snap, Inc. (5th Cir. 2023). Prevailed in appeal affirming dismissal of claims seeking to hold Snap liable for third-party conduct based on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.{{ FIELD }}Khashoggi v. NSO Group Techologies Limited (E.D. Va. 2023). Obtained successful dismissal on personal jurisdiction grounds of litigation challenging use of cybersecurity software.{{ FIELD }}American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Becerra (D.C. Cir. 2022). Successfully represented trade association for the nation's laboratories regarding agency decision to exclude hospital-based outreach laboratories from reporting requirements under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.{{ FIELD }}Everport Terminal Services, Inc. v. NLRB (D.C. Cir. 2022). Successful appeal challenging agency determinations over which union was entitled to represent mechanic workforce at terminal in Oakland, California.{{ FIELD }}In re United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. (11th Cir. 2022). Successfully represented debtor in significant bankruptcy litigation addressing definition of \"claim\" under Bankruptcy Code and whether claims under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act were discharged in Chapter 11 cas{{ FIELD }}R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Estate of Konzelman (Fla. Ct. App, 4th Dist. 2022). Successful appeal obtaining reversal and remand of punitive damages award.{{ FIELD }}Thomas \u0026amp; Betts Corp. v. Trinity Meyer Utility Structures, LLC (2d Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable decision reversing trial court in significant construction contract dispute and allowing breach-of-contract claims to move forward.{{ FIELD }}Bethesda Health, Inc. v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2021). Successfully represented the Florida Hospital Association and ten of its member hospitals in challenge to how CMS calculates Medicare reimbursement rates, paving the way for hospitals to gain millions of dollars in additional Medicare reimbursements.{{ FIELD }}Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc. (5th Cir. 2021). Successfully defended district court judgment, reaffirming important principles of res judicata law and preventing plaintiffs from reviving their time-barred lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Callinan v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (5th Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable appellate court ruling dismissing major securities class action for failure to meet pleading requires under the securities law.{{ FIELD }}In re Triangle Corp. Securities Litigation (4th Cir. 2021). Obtain appellate decision dismissing securities fraud class action against Triangle Capital Corporation and certain of its officers and directors, reaffirming principle that speculative, hindsight pleadings are not permissible in cases alleging violations of the federal securities laws.{{ FIELD }}Stokes v. Stirling (4th Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable ruling reversing district court, granting habeas petition, and remanding for issuance of a writ or resentencing.{{ FIELD }}Nawai Wardak Transp. Co. v. RMA Group Afghanistan Limited (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). Obtained reversal of a trial court order dismissing claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, permitting case to proceed on merits in Michigan trial court.{{ FIELD }}Wojcicki v. SCANA/SCE\u0026amp;G (4th Cir. 2020). Obtained favorable decision affirming that relators cannot proceed pro se when bringing a False Claims Act lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2019). Obtained favorable jurisdictional ruling, reversing district court and holding that judicial review bar does not apply to challenge to CMS's failure to comply with the data collection requirements of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act.{{ FIELD }}Kapila v. Grant Thornton, LLP (11th Cir. 2019). Obtained favorable decision affirming district court's decision granting judgment in Grant Thornton's favor based on common law in pari delicto doctrine.{{ FIELD }}Alvarez v. The Johns Hopkins University, et al. (D. Md. 2019) Served as lead appellate lawyer and brief writer in major litigation seeking to hold Bristol Myers Squibb and other defendants liable for medical research experiments conducted in Guatemala between 1946 and 1948. Successful obtained voluntary dismissal with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Malek v. Blackmer Pump (Cal. Ct. App. 2019). Obtained favorable ruling affirming grant of summary judgment in litigation arising out of Iranian refinery workers' exposure to asbestos in the 1950s through the 1970s.{{ FIELD }}Board of Comm’rs of the Southeast La. Flood Prot. Auth., et al. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (5th Cir. 2017). Served as lead appellate lawyer representing Chevron Corporation on appeal, defending dismissal of litigation brought by a local levee board seeking to hold the oil and gas industry liable for coastal land loss.{{ FIELD }}Rozema v. U.S. Dept. of Health \u0026amp; Human Servs. (2d Cir. 2017). Served as lead appellate lawyer representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in successful defense of decision dismissing action seeking to compel the release of confidential and trade secret information.{{ FIELD }}Benton County Wind Farm LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (7th Cir. 2016). Represented wind farm in successful appeal reversing district court decision concerning contractual obligation of utility to purchase wind farm's output under long-term contract.{{ FIELD }}Delaware Dept. of Natural Res. \u0026amp; Envtl Control v. EPA (D.C. Cir. 2015). Served as counsel of record for the Electric Power Supply Association in a successful challenge to the EPA’s final rule exempting backup, diesel-fueled generators from emissions controls.{{ FIELD }}Frank v. Fuhrer Wholesale Co. v. MillerCoors LLC, et al. (3d Cir. 2015). Served as lead appellate counsel in successful appeal defending district court judgment in a contract dispute between MillerCoors and one of its largest distributors.{{ FIELD }}U.S. ex rel. Michael Keeler v. Eisai Inc. (11th Cir. 2014). Successfully represented pharmaceutical manufacturer in appeal defending dismissal of qui tam lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Exelon Wind 1, LLC v. Nelson (5th Cir. 2014). Represented major energy company in successful appeal challenging order striking down the Texas Public Utilities Commission’s interpretation of statutory scheme governing the purchase of energy between public utilities and qualifying facilities.{{ FIELD }}West Deptford Energy, LLC v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2014). Successfully represented petitioner in appeal challenging agency orders that failed to comply with file rate doctrine.{{ FIELD }}South Carolina Public Service Authority v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2014). Represented LS Power in successful defense of agency decision regarding rights of first refusal in Order 1000 rulemaking.{{ FIELD }}Ashley Parrish is one of the partners that leads the firm’s Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law practice. He focuses his practice on appellate, administrative, and constitutional law, and on strategic, complex litigation. He  has significant experience handling administrative law cases in litigation against federal and state government agencies.\nAshley regularly advises clients in strategic litigation matters, as well as in federal administrative law and practice. He is experienced in numerous areas, including energy, life sciences, healthcare, labor, products liability, international trade, environmental, and bankruptcy. Ashley has handled appeals and complex litigation matters in courts across the country, including significant matters before the U.S. Supreme Court, almost all of the federal courts of appeal, and a variety of state appellate courts.\nA frequent author and speaker, Ashley has been recognized for his skill as an appellate lawyer. He has been ranked by Chambers USA, recommended by Legal 500, listed as a Washington D.C. Super Lawyer, and selected by Lawdragon as one of the nation's leading litigators. In 2012, he was one of only five appellate lawyers nationwide to be recognized as a Law360 Rising Star. And in 2014, he was identified by Reuters as one of “the top handful of lawyers in America” who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court. Ashley C Parrish Partner Nationwide Appellate Law Chambers \u0026amp; Partners Supreme Court \u0026amp; Appellate Legal 500 500 Leading Litigators Lawdragon Washington D.C. Super Lawyer Super Lawyers One of “the top handful of lawyers in America” who have had remarkable success before the U.S. Supreme Court. Reuters, 2014 A Rising Star (one of five appellate lawyers nationwide)  Law360, 2012 University of Washington-Seattle Campus University of Washington School of Law University of Washington-Seattle Campus University of Washington School of Law University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Virginia Law Clerk, Hon. Emilio M. Garza, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Supreme Court Matters\nDoe v. Snap, Inc. (2024). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari in major litigation relating to internet service provider liability for third party conduct under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, preserving victory before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Trustees of the United Mine Workers of Am. Combined Benefit Fund v. United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. (2023). Successfully defeated petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in major bankruptcy litigation relating to claims filed under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1993. SEC v. Jarkesy (2023). Filed significant amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Pioneer Public Interest Law Center in major litigation involving constitutionality of the SEC's enforcement process. Stirling v. Stokes (2023). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving judgment in favor of habeas corpus in high-profile capital case. Hedican v. Walmart Stores East (2022). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari, preserving victory in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in significant litigation involving the EEOC and attempts by a charging party to belatedly intervene in litigation. Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation (2021). Representing hospitals in significant healthcare dispute relating to calculation of payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of low-income and indigent patients Wolfe v. Commonwealth of Virginia (2019). Obtained summary reversal and remand to Virginia courts in connection with high-profile death penalty matter. Electric Power Supply Association v. FERC (2016). Represented the Electric Power Supply Association in major litigation challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s regulation of “demand response.” Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States (2014). Successfully opposed petition for certiorari filed in major trade remedy case involving First Amendment challenge to the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act. Bond. v. United States (2014). Secured victory in case addressing the federal government’s authority to prosecute a local offense under the Chemical Weapons Convention. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA (2014). Filed amicus curiae brief by a group of law professors, cited favorably by the Supreme Court for its \"felicitous\" explanation of arguments. PPL Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2013). Obtain unanimous decision finding that a UK windfall tax was creditable for U.S. tax purposes. PPL Montana v. Montana (2012). Obtained unanimous decision reversing the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling that riverbed lands under the Upper Missouri, Clark Fork and Madison rivers are state-owned because they were purportedly navigable in 1889 when Montana joined the Union. Public Citizen, Inc. et al. v. United States (2012). Represented industry association in successfully opposing petition for certiorari filed by public interest groups and states challenging favorable decision upholding the federal market-based rate regime. Bond v. United States (2011). Secured successful reversal in case confirming private-party standing to challenge federal prosecutions that exceed the treaty power under the Tenth Amendment. Plata v. Coleman (2011). Represented a class of inmates suffering from mental illness and successfully defended order of three-judge panel requiring California to address its prison overcrowding crisis. Horne v. Flores (2009). Represented Arizona legislative leaders in education reform litigation, obtaining certiorari and successful reversal of a Ninth Circuit decision addressing the standards for modifying an injunction and the interplay between the Equal Education Opportunity Act and the No Child Left Behind Act. Massachusetts v. EPA (2007). Prepared merits brief on behalf of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers addressing the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Elk Grove School District v. Newdow (2004). Represented the mother of the minor child identified as the plaintiff in a successful defense of a challenge to the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance. Other Appellate Matters and Strategic Ligitation Matters\nIberdola Energy Projects v. Oaktree Capital Management (N.Y. Supreme Court 2024). Prevailed in appeal dismissing complaint filed by contractor seeking to overcome non-recourse provision and re-litigate claims previously resolved through arbitration. Americans for Beneficiary Choice v. HHS (N.D. Tex. 2024). Part of team obtaining emergency stay of effective date challenging agency regulations seeking to change payment structure for administrative services provided in connection with Medicare Advantage enrollment. NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain (D.C. Cir. 2024). Part of successful team representing 9REN Holding in major international arbitration matter. Mosaic Health Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC (W.D.N.Y 2024). Successfully represented Novo Nordisk in obtaining dismissal of antitrust complaint challenging manufacturer policies regarding use of contract pharmacies under the federal 340B statute. United States ex rel. Adventist Health System / West v. AbbVie, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2024). Successfully obtained dismissal of False Claims Act case brought against manufacturers in connection with pricing under the federal 340B statute. Redes Andinas de Comunicaciones S.R.L. v. Republic of Peru (D.D.C. 2024). Successfully obtained enforcement of arbitral awards under New York Convention and entry of default judgment. Doe v. Becerra (C.D. Cal. 2024). Represented the American Kidney Foundation in successful First Amendment challenge to California law (AB 290) seeking to interfere with charitable services provided to patients suffering from end-stage renal disease. Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC v. HHS (3d Cir. 2023). Represented Novo Nordisk in successful appeal in major litigation under federal 340B statute relating to manufacturers' rights to impose reasonable conditions on when discounted drugs will be transferred to contract pharmacies. Doe v. Snap, Inc. (5th Cir. 2023). Prevailed in appeal affirming dismissal of claims seeking to hold Snap liable for third-party conduct based on section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Khashoggi v. NSO Group Techologies Limited (E.D. Va. 2023). Obtained successful dismissal on personal jurisdiction grounds of litigation challenging use of cybersecurity software. American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Becerra (D.C. Cir. 2022). Successfully represented trade association for the nation's laboratories regarding agency decision to exclude hospital-based outreach laboratories from reporting requirements under the Protecting Access to Medicare Act. Everport Terminal Services, Inc. v. NLRB (D.C. Cir. 2022). Successful appeal challenging agency determinations over which union was entitled to represent mechanic workforce at terminal in Oakland, California. In re United States Pipe \u0026amp; Foundry Co. (11th Cir. 2022). Successfully represented debtor in significant bankruptcy litigation addressing definition of \"claim\" under Bankruptcy Code and whether claims under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act were discharged in Chapter 11 cas R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Estate of Konzelman (Fla. Ct. App, 4th Dist. 2022). Successful appeal obtaining reversal and remand of punitive damages award. Thomas \u0026amp; Betts Corp. v. Trinity Meyer Utility Structures, LLC (2d Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable decision reversing trial court in significant construction contract dispute and allowing breach-of-contract claims to move forward. Bethesda Health, Inc. v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2021). Successfully represented the Florida Hospital Association and ten of its member hospitals in challenge to how CMS calculates Medicare reimbursement rates, paving the way for hospitals to gain millions of dollars in additional Medicare reimbursements. Basic Capital Management, Inc. v. Dynex Capital, Inc. (5th Cir. 2021). Successfully defended district court judgment, reaffirming important principles of res judicata law and preventing plaintiffs from reviving their time-barred lawsuit. Callinan v. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (5th Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable appellate court ruling dismissing major securities class action for failure to meet pleading requires under the securities law. In re Triangle Corp. Securities Litigation (4th Cir. 2021). Obtain appellate decision dismissing securities fraud class action against Triangle Capital Corporation and certain of its officers and directors, reaffirming principle that speculative, hindsight pleadings are not permissible in cases alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Stokes v. Stirling (4th Cir. 2021). Obtained favorable ruling reversing district court, granting habeas petition, and remanding for issuance of a writ or resentencing. Nawai Wardak Transp. Co. v. RMA Group Afghanistan Limited (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). Obtained reversal of a trial court order dismissing claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, permitting case to proceed on merits in Michigan trial court. Wojcicki v. SCANA/SCE\u0026amp;G (4th Cir. 2020). Obtained favorable decision affirming that relators cannot proceed pro se when bringing a False Claims Act lawsuit. American Clinical Laboratory Association v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2019). Obtained favorable jurisdictional ruling, reversing district court and holding that judicial review bar does not apply to challenge to CMS's failure to comply with the data collection requirements of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act. Kapila v. Grant Thornton, LLP (11th Cir. 2019). Obtained favorable decision affirming district court's decision granting judgment in Grant Thornton's favor based on common law in pari delicto doctrine. Alvarez v. The Johns Hopkins University, et al. (D. Md. 2019) Served as lead appellate lawyer and brief writer in major litigation seeking to hold Bristol Myers Squibb and other defendants liable for medical research experiments conducted in Guatemala between 1946 and 1948. Successful obtained voluntary dismissal with prejudice. Malek v. Blackmer Pump (Cal. Ct. App. 2019). Obtained favorable ruling affirming grant of summary judgment in litigation arising out of Iranian refinery workers' exposure to asbestos in the 1950s through the 1970s. Board of Comm’rs of the Southeast La. Flood Prot. Auth., et al. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. (5th Cir. 2017). Served as lead appellate lawyer representing Chevron Corporation on appeal, defending dismissal of litigation brought by a local levee board seeking to hold the oil and gas industry liable for coastal land loss. Rozema v. U.S. Dept. of Health \u0026amp; Human Servs. (2d Cir. 2017). Served as lead appellate lawyer representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in successful defense of decision dismissing action seeking to compel the release of confidential and trade secret information. Benton County Wind Farm LLC v. Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. (7th Cir. 2016). Represented wind farm in successful appeal reversing district court decision concerning contractual obligation of utility to purchase wind farm's output under long-term contract. Delaware Dept. of Natural Res. \u0026amp; Envtl Control v. EPA (D.C. Cir. 2015). Served as counsel of record for the Electric Power Supply Association in a successful challenge to the EPA’s final rule exempting backup, diesel-fueled generators from emissions controls. Frank v. Fuhrer Wholesale Co. v. MillerCoors LLC, et al. (3d Cir. 2015). Served as lead appellate counsel in successful appeal defending district court judgment in a contract dispute between MillerCoors and one of its largest distributors. U.S. ex rel. Michael Keeler v. Eisai Inc. (11th Cir. 2014). Successfully represented pharmaceutical manufacturer in appeal defending dismissal of qui tam lawsuit. Exelon Wind 1, LLC v. Nelson (5th Cir. 2014). Represented major energy company in successful appeal challenging order striking down the Texas Public Utilities Commission’s interpretation of statutory scheme governing the purchase of energy between public utilities and qualifying facilities. West Deptford Energy, LLC v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2014). Successfully represented petitioner in appeal challenging agency orders that failed to comply with file rate doctrine. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2014). Represented LS Power in successful defense of agency decision regarding rights of first refusal in Order 1000 rulemaking.","searchable_name":"Ashley C. Parrish","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445991,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6371,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJenny Pelaez focuses her practice on complex commercial and class action litigation at the trial and appellate levels. She has extensive experience representing a diverse group of clients in high-stakes matters involving claims under antitrust, securities and consumer protection laws, as well as a variety of contract and tort claims. She also regularly represents public companies and\u0026nbsp;individuals in a wide range of industries in securities class action and derivative litigation.\u0026nbsp;Her clients include companies in the financial services, accounting, technology, and entertainment industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJenny also\u0026nbsp;maintains a robust pro bono practice, including in the areas of reproductive rights, immigration law, public benefits, criminal procedure and prisoner\u0026rsquo;s rights.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Jenny clerked\u0026nbsp;with the Honorable Pamela K. Chen of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. She worked for two years as a fellow at the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, where she litigated class actions seeking to reform policies and practices affecting low-income populations, including claims under the federal Due Process Clause, Food Stamp Act, Medicaid Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Previously, she was a law clerk for the Honorable Frank Maas of the US District for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jenny-pelaez","email":"jpelaez@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecent Litigation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all merchant and consumer antitrust litigation concerning the setting of payment card interchange fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in putative class action asserting federal and state law claims related to debit cards used for government payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting accounting firm in putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions arising from alleged collusion to conceal accounting misstatement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions against technology company arising from the company\u0026rsquo;s financial projection statements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial software company in shareholder demand to inspect books and records related to participation in federal tax initiative.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting owner of prominent structure in action to enforcement construction warranties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting medical device company in responding to a Department of Justice civil investigative demand related to compliance with Anti-Kickback Statute.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting accounting firm in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inquiry related to client\u0026rsquo;s litigation liability estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting payment card services company in responding to Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand related to alleged disparate treatment of consumers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting media platform responding to inquiries from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding advertising practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCorporate Counseling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising hedge fund on managing litigation exposure risk related to new venture.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising general contractor on subcontractor disputes in large commercial construction projects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising cannabis company regarding enforcing duties in purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising entertainment corporation in addressing harassment of executive officer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePro Bono\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting health care providers in challenging abortion restrictions in Indiana and Ohio.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored amicus brief before New York Court of Appeal in case that altered rules for instructing juries on cross-racial identification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully obtained religious and health accommodations on behalf of incarcerated client.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting trafficking victim in prosecution of trafficker and successfully obtaining T-Visa.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising public defender office regarding protections for criminal defendants during COVID-19 pandemic.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1179,"guid":"1179.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Pelaez","nick_name":"Jenny","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Frank Maas, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2011 - 2012"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Pamela K. Chen, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Jenny","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2619,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Honored with Above \u0026 Beyond Award for Outstanding Pro Bono Work ","detail":"Sanctuary for Families, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJenny Pelaez focuses her practice on complex commercial and class action litigation at the trial and appellate levels. She has extensive experience representing a diverse group of clients in high-stakes matters involving claims under antitrust, securities and consumer protection laws, as well as a variety of contract and tort claims. She also regularly represents public companies and\u0026nbsp;individuals in a wide range of industries in securities class action and derivative litigation.\u0026nbsp;Her clients include companies in the financial services, accounting, technology, and entertainment industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJenny also\u0026nbsp;maintains a robust pro bono practice, including in the areas of reproductive rights, immigration law, public benefits, criminal procedure and prisoner\u0026rsquo;s rights.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Jenny clerked\u0026nbsp;with the Honorable Pamela K. Chen of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. She worked for two years as a fellow at the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, where she litigated class actions seeking to reform policies and practices affecting low-income populations, including claims under the federal Due Process Clause, Food Stamp Act, Medicaid Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Previously, she was a law clerk for the Honorable Frank Maas of the US District for the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecent Litigation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all merchant and consumer antitrust litigation concerning the setting of payment card interchange fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in putative class action asserting federal and state law claims related to debit cards used for government payments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting accounting firm in putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions arising from alleged collusion to conceal accounting misstatement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions against technology company arising from the company\u0026rsquo;s financial projection statements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial software company in shareholder demand to inspect books and records related to participation in federal tax initiative.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting owner of prominent structure in action to enforcement construction warranties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting medical device company in responding to a Department of Justice civil investigative demand related to compliance with Anti-Kickback Statute.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting accounting firm in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inquiry related to client\u0026rsquo;s litigation liability estimates.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting payment card services company in responding to Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand related to alleged disparate treatment of consumers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting media platform responding to inquiries from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding advertising practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCorporate Counseling\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising hedge fund on managing litigation exposure risk related to new venture.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising general contractor on subcontractor disputes in large commercial construction projects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising cannabis company regarding enforcing duties in purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising entertainment corporation in addressing harassment of executive officer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePro Bono\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting health care providers in challenging abortion restrictions in Indiana and Ohio.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored amicus brief before New York Court of Appeal in case that altered rules for instructing juries on cross-racial identification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully obtained religious and health accommodations on behalf of incarcerated client.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting trafficking victim in prosecution of trafficker and successfully obtaining T-Visa.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising public defender office regarding protections for criminal defendants during COVID-19 pandemic.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Honored with Above \u0026 Beyond Award for Outstanding Pro Bono Work ","detail":"Sanctuary for Families, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12513}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-19T22:03:31.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-19T22:03:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Pelaez{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Honored with Above \u0026amp; Beyond Award for Outstanding Pro Bono Work \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Sanctuary for Families, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Recent Litigation Matters\nRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation and other claims.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with all merchant and consumer antitrust litigation concerning the setting of payment card interchange fees.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in putative class action asserting federal and state law claims related to debit cards used for government payments.{{ FIELD }}Representing accounting firm in putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions arising from alleged collusion to conceal accounting misstatement.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions against technology company arising from the company’s financial projection statements.{{ FIELD }}Representing financial software company in shareholder demand to inspect books and records related to participation in federal tax initiative.{{ FIELD }}Representing owner of prominent structure in action to enforcement construction warranties.{{ FIELD }}Regulatory Matters\nRepresenting medical device company in responding to a Department of Justice civil investigative demand related to compliance with Anti-Kickback Statute.\nRepresenting accounting firm in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inquiry related to client’s litigation liability estimates.\nRepresenting payment card services company in responding to Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand related to alleged disparate treatment of consumers.\nRepresenting media platform responding to inquiries from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding advertising practices.{{ FIELD }}Corporate Counseling\nAdvising hedge fund on managing litigation exposure risk related to new venture.\nAdvising general contractor on subcontractor disputes in large commercial construction projects.\nAdvising cannabis company regarding enforcing duties in purchase agreement.\nAdvising entertainment corporation in addressing harassment of executive officer.{{ FIELD }}Pro Bono\nRepresenting health care providers in challenging abortion restrictions in Indiana and Ohio.\nCo-authored amicus brief before New York Court of Appeal in case that altered rules for instructing juries on cross-racial identification.\nSuccessfully obtained religious and health accommodations on behalf of incarcerated client.\nRepresenting trafficking victim in prosecution of trafficker and successfully obtaining T-Visa.\nAdvising public defender office regarding protections for criminal defendants during COVID-19 pandemic.{{ FIELD }}Jenny Pelaez focuses her practice on complex commercial and class action litigation at the trial and appellate levels. She has extensive experience representing a diverse group of clients in high-stakes matters involving claims under antitrust, securities and consumer protection laws, as well as a variety of contract and tort claims. She also regularly represents public companies and individuals in a wide range of industries in securities class action and derivative litigation. Her clients include companies in the financial services, accounting, technology, and entertainment industries.\nJenny also maintains a robust pro bono practice, including in the areas of reproductive rights, immigration law, public benefits, criminal procedure and prisoner’s rights.\nPrior to joining the firm, Jenny clerked with the Honorable Pamela K. Chen of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. She worked for two years as a fellow at the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, where she litigated class actions seeking to reform policies and practices affecting low-income populations, including claims under the federal Due Process Clause, Food Stamp Act, Medicaid Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. Previously, she was a law clerk for the Honorable Frank Maas of the US District for the Southern District of New York. Partner Honored with Above \u0026amp; Beyond Award for Outstanding Pro Bono Work  Sanctuary for Families, 2020 University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Law School Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California New York Law Clerk, Frank Maas, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Law Clerk, Pamela K. Chen, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Recent Litigation Matters\nRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation and other claims. Obtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR. Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate. Representing a large financial institution in connection with all merchant and consumer antitrust litigation concerning the setting of payment card interchange fees. Representing a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities. Representing a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations. Represented a national bank in putative class action asserting federal and state law claims related to debit cards used for government payments. Representing accounting firm in putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions arising from alleged collusion to conceal accounting misstatement. Obtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company. Obtained dismissal of putative securities fraud and derivative shareholder class actions against technology company arising from the company’s financial projection statements. Representing financial software company in shareholder demand to inspect books and records related to participation in federal tax initiative. Representing owner of prominent structure in action to enforcement construction warranties. Regulatory Matters\nRepresenting medical device company in responding to a Department of Justice civil investigative demand related to compliance with Anti-Kickback Statute.\nRepresenting accounting firm in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inquiry related to client’s litigation liability estimates.\nRepresenting payment card services company in responding to Attorney General Civil Investigative Demand related to alleged disparate treatment of consumers.\nRepresenting media platform responding to inquiries from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding advertising practices. Corporate Counseling\nAdvising hedge fund on managing litigation exposure risk related to new venture.\nAdvising general contractor on subcontractor disputes in large commercial construction projects.\nAdvising cannabis company regarding enforcing duties in purchase agreement.\nAdvising entertainment corporation in addressing harassment of executive officer. Pro Bono\nRepresenting health care providers in challenging abortion restrictions in Indiana and Ohio.\nCo-authored amicus brief before New York Court of Appeal in case that altered rules for instructing juries on cross-racial identification.\nSuccessfully obtained religious and health accommodations on behalf of incarcerated client.\nRepresenting trafficking victim in prosecution of trafficker and successfully obtaining T-Visa.\nAdvising public defender office regarding protections for criminal defendants during COVID-19 pandemic.","searchable_name":"Jenny Pelaez","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442824,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5743,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKelly Perigoe focuses on appeals and critical motions in state and federal appellate courts, and advises trial teams on key issues and in pre-trial and post-trial motion practice.\u0026nbsp; Kelly\u0026rsquo;s practice covers a wide variety of substantive areas, including complex commercial litigation, intellectual property law, and class actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA former Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judicial clerk, Kelly has over a decade in federal and state courts, throughout the United States and internationally, and from the pre-litigation to appellate phases.\u0026nbsp; She is regularly tapped to draft dispositive motions involving thorny issues, and leads appellate strategy in clients\u0026rsquo; most critical and impactful matters.\u0026nbsp; In addition to litigating, Kelly counsels clients on novel and complex legal issues affecting their businesses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKelly has been recognized as one of the Best Lawyers Under 40 by the LGBT Bar Association in 2018, a Southern California Top 50 Women Rising Star in 2018 and 2019, and a Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2016 to 2019.\u0026nbsp; Kelly is also a member of the Los Angeles Leadership Committee of Lambda Legal, a national legal organization whose mission is to achieve full recognition of the civil rights of LGBT people and people with HIV.\u0026nbsp; She was a 2019 fellow in the Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity program, where she continues to serve as a mentor.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kelly-perigoe","email":"kperigoe@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eDrafted the brief and argued before the California Courts of Appeal on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean entertainment media company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an appeal from the confirmation of an arbitration award, resulting in a published decision in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled an amicus brief in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e, on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egeneral partner and investment manager of two hedge funds that invest in legal financing\u003c/strong\u003e, regarding the constitutionality of the appointment of SEC administrative law judges under the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled an amicus brief in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePHH Corporation, et. al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e, on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding the constitutionality of the CFPB\u0026rsquo;s structure\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor clothing retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;that had lost an insurance dispute in trial court, obtaining a complete reversal in a published decision by the California Court of Appeal regarding an insurer\u0026rsquo;s duty to defend where there is potential for coverage for disparagement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eStepped in as appellate counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enationwide health club\u003c/strong\u003e, obtaining an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of a class action, persuading the Court of Appeal that the plaintiffs had failed to prove class-wide consumer confusion under California\u0026rsquo;s Unfair Competition Law\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas an integral part of the appellate team that secured an affirmance of the trial court ruling the team obtained in favor of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFox Searchlight Pictures\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on breach of contract claims brought by the producers of the film Napoleon Dynamite\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etransgender woman\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking an amendment to the gender marker on her Kansas birth certificate in a petition for review of an adverse agency ruling before the Kansas district court\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained withholding of removal for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etransgender woman\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;who had been severely persecuted in her home country of Belize\u0026ndash;including being threatened with death by her family and detention by local police\u0026ndash;because of her sexual orientation and gender identity\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn partnership with Inner City Law Center, represented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclass of low-income, Spanish-speaking tenants living in uninhabitable conditions\u003c/strong\u003e, obtaining a settlement that included a $400,000 payment to the clients, and required repairs to the apartments, ongoing control of pest infestation problems, and numerous other improvements to the building\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1243,"guid":"1243.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Perigoe","nick_name":"Kelly","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. A. Wallace Tashima, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2009 - 2010"}],"first_name":"Kelly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2162,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Best Lawyers Under 40, LGBT Bar Association ","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Top 50 Women Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers ","detail":"2018- 2019"},{"title":"Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers ","detail":"2016-2019"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKelly Perigoe focuses on appeals and critical motions in state and federal appellate courts, and advises trial teams on key issues and in pre-trial and post-trial motion practice.\u0026nbsp; Kelly\u0026rsquo;s practice covers a wide variety of substantive areas, including complex commercial litigation, intellectual property law, and class actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA former Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judicial clerk, Kelly has over a decade in federal and state courts, throughout the United States and internationally, and from the pre-litigation to appellate phases.\u0026nbsp; She is regularly tapped to draft dispositive motions involving thorny issues, and leads appellate strategy in clients\u0026rsquo; most critical and impactful matters.\u0026nbsp; In addition to litigating, Kelly counsels clients on novel and complex legal issues affecting their businesses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKelly has been recognized as one of the Best Lawyers Under 40 by the LGBT Bar Association in 2018, a Southern California Top 50 Women Rising Star in 2018 and 2019, and a Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2016 to 2019.\u0026nbsp; Kelly is also a member of the Los Angeles Leadership Committee of Lambda Legal, a national legal organization whose mission is to achieve full recognition of the civil rights of LGBT people and people with HIV.\u0026nbsp; She was a 2019 fellow in the Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity program, where she continues to serve as a mentor.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDrafted the brief and argued before the California Courts of Appeal on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean entertainment media company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an appeal from the confirmation of an arbitration award, resulting in a published decision in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled an amicus brief in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e, on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egeneral partner and investment manager of two hedge funds that invest in legal financing\u003c/strong\u003e, regarding the constitutionality of the appointment of SEC administrative law judges under the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled an amicus brief in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePHH Corporation, et. al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003een banc\u003c/em\u003e, on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding the constitutionality of the CFPB\u0026rsquo;s structure\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor clothing retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;that had lost an insurance dispute in trial court, obtaining a complete reversal in a published decision by the California Court of Appeal regarding an insurer\u0026rsquo;s duty to defend where there is potential for coverage for disparagement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eStepped in as appellate counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enationwide health club\u003c/strong\u003e, obtaining an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s dismissal of a class action, persuading the Court of Appeal that the plaintiffs had failed to prove class-wide consumer confusion under California\u0026rsquo;s Unfair Competition Law\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas an integral part of the appellate team that secured an affirmance of the trial court ruling the team obtained in favor of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFox Searchlight Pictures\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on breach of contract claims brought by the producers of the film Napoleon Dynamite\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etransgender woman\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking an amendment to the gender marker on her Kansas birth certificate in a petition for review of an adverse agency ruling before the Kansas district court\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained withholding of removal for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etransgender woman\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;who had been severely persecuted in her home country of Belize\u0026ndash;including being threatened with death by her family and detention by local police\u0026ndash;because of her sexual orientation and gender identity\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn partnership with Inner City Law Center, represented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclass of low-income, Spanish-speaking tenants living in uninhabitable conditions\u003c/strong\u003e, obtaining a settlement that included a $400,000 payment to the clients, and required repairs to the apartments, ongoing control of pest infestation problems, and numerous other improvements to the building\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Best Lawyers Under 40, LGBT Bar Association ","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Top 50 Women Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers ","detail":"2018- 2019"},{"title":"Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers ","detail":"2016-2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8126}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:13.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:13.000Z","searchable_text":"Perigoe{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers Under 40, LGBT Bar Association \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 50 Women Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2018- 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2016-2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Drafted the brief and argued before the California Courts of Appeal on behalf of an entertainment media company in an appeal from the confirmation of an arbitration award, resulting in a published decision in the client’s favor{{ FIELD }}Filed an amicus brief in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, on behalf of the general partner and investment manager of two hedge funds that invest in legal financing, regarding the constitutionality of the appointment of SEC administrative law judges under the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution{{ FIELD }}Filed an amicus brief in PHH Corporation, et. al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, on behalf of a hedge fund regarding the constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure{{ FIELD }}Represented a major clothing retailer that had lost an insurance dispute in trial court, obtaining a complete reversal in a published decision by the California Court of Appeal regarding an insurer’s duty to defend where there is potential for coverage for disparagement{{ FIELD }}Stepped in as appellate counsel for a nationwide health club, obtaining an affirmance of the trial court’s dismissal of a class action, persuading the Court of Appeal that the plaintiffs had failed to prove class-wide consumer confusion under California’s Unfair Competition Law{{ FIELD }}Was an integral part of the appellate team that secured an affirmance of the trial court ruling the team obtained in favor of Fox Searchlight Pictures on breach of contract claims brought by the producers of the film Napoleon Dynamite{{ FIELD }}Represented a transgender woman seeking an amendment to the gender marker on her Kansas birth certificate in a petition for review of an adverse agency ruling before the Kansas district court{{ FIELD }}Obtained withholding of removal for a transgender woman who had been severely persecuted in her home country of Belize–including being threatened with death by her family and detention by local police–because of her sexual orientation and gender identity{{ FIELD }}In partnership with Inner City Law Center, represented a class of low-income, Spanish-speaking tenants living in uninhabitable conditions, obtaining a settlement that included a $400,000 payment to the clients, and required repairs to the apartments, ongoing control of pest infestation problems, and numerous other improvements to the building{{ FIELD }}Kelly Perigoe focuses on appeals and critical motions in state and federal appellate courts, and advises trial teams on key issues and in pre-trial and post-trial motion practice.  Kelly’s practice covers a wide variety of substantive areas, including complex commercial litigation, intellectual property law, and class actions.\nA former Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judicial clerk, Kelly has over a decade in federal and state courts, throughout the United States and internationally, and from the pre-litigation to appellate phases.  She is regularly tapped to draft dispositive motions involving thorny issues, and leads appellate strategy in clients’ most critical and impactful matters.  In addition to litigating, Kelly counsels clients on novel and complex legal issues affecting their businesses.\nKelly has been recognized as one of the Best Lawyers Under 40 by the LGBT Bar Association in 2018, a Southern California Top 50 Women Rising Star in 2018 and 2019, and a Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2016 to 2019.  Kelly is also a member of the Los Angeles Leadership Committee of Lambda Legal, a national legal organization whose mission is to achieve full recognition of the civil rights of LGBT people and people with HIV.  She was a 2019 fellow in the Leadership Counsel on Legal Diversity program, where she continues to serve as a mentor. Partner Best Lawyers Under 40, LGBT Bar Association  2018 Top 50 Women Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers  2018- 2019 Rising Star, Southern California Super Lawyers  2016-2019 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law California LGBT Bar Association of Los Angeles Judicial Clerk, Hon. A. Wallace Tashima, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Drafted the brief and argued before the California Courts of Appeal on behalf of an entertainment media company in an appeal from the confirmation of an arbitration award, resulting in a published decision in the client’s favor Filed an amicus brief in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, on behalf of the general partner and investment manager of two hedge funds that invest in legal financing, regarding the constitutionality of the appointment of SEC administrative law judges under the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution Filed an amicus brief in PHH Corporation, et. al v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting en banc, on behalf of a hedge fund regarding the constitutionality of the CFPB’s structure Represented a major clothing retailer that had lost an insurance dispute in trial court, obtaining a complete reversal in a published decision by the California Court of Appeal regarding an insurer’s duty to defend where there is potential for coverage for disparagement Stepped in as appellate counsel for a nationwide health club, obtaining an affirmance of the trial court’s dismissal of a class action, persuading the Court of Appeal that the plaintiffs had failed to prove class-wide consumer confusion under California’s Unfair Competition Law Was an integral part of the appellate team that secured an affirmance of the trial court ruling the team obtained in favor of Fox Searchlight Pictures on breach of contract claims brought by the producers of the film Napoleon Dynamite Represented a transgender woman seeking an amendment to the gender marker on her Kansas birth certificate in a petition for review of an adverse agency ruling before the Kansas district court Obtained withholding of removal for a transgender woman who had been severely persecuted in her home country of Belize–including being threatened with death by her family and detention by local police–because of her sexual orientation and gender identity In partnership with Inner City Law Center, represented a class of low-income, Spanish-speaking tenants living in uninhabitable conditions, obtaining a settlement that included a $400,000 payment to the clients, and required repairs to the apartments, ongoing control of pest infestation problems, and numerous other improvements to the building","searchable_name":"Kelly Perigoe","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442343,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":685,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWarren Pope defends companies and their directors and officers against a broad range of shareholder claims and advises on related investigatory and regulatory matters. Warren is a partner in the firm's Securities and Shareholder Litigation practice, which has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e as a Securities Group of the Year and by \u003cem\u003eU.S. News \u0026amp; World Report\u003c/em\u003e as a National Tier 1 practice. \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e has recognized Warren as a \"leading lawyer\" and a \"standout\" in securities litigation defense.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWarren represents clients in class actions and shareholder derivative litigation involving federal and state securities laws, directors' and officers' fiduciary duties, and other corporate governance and transactional litigation matters. He also represents corporations, directors, and officers in internal and government investigations and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWarren has been recognized as a recommended M\u0026amp;A and Securities litigator by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand \u003cem\u003eChambers (Band 1)\u003c/em\u003e, and named as a Georgia Super Lawyer.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"b-warren-pope","email":"wpope@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 404 421 9328","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefended Newell Brands and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action arising out of stock price drops following disappointing financial results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Floor \u0026amp; Decor and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal. Derivative litigation ongoing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended National Vision Inc. and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended ADTRAN and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Triangle Capital Corporation in securities class action arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal. Defended M\u0026amp;A litigation against TCAP challenging $1 billion in transactions with Benefit Street Partners and Barings. Defeated attempt to stop transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Aaron's, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of quarterly earnings miss and revised financial guidance. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Progressive Holdings, Inc. and Aaron\u0026rsquo;s Inc. and certain of their officers in securities litigation following announcement of settlement with Federal Trade Commission. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Equifax, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation arising out of 2017 data breach incident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Capitala Finance Corp. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Special Committee of Books-A-Million Board in an action challenging a going-private transaction in Delaware Chancery Court; obtained dismissal of all claims, affirmed on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending FleetCor Technologies, Inc. and its officers in derivative litigation arising out of short-seller reports criticizing Company's business practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in various 10b-5 securities class actions in the Middle District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Commscope and its officers in 10b-5 litigation in the Western District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative action, obtaining dismissal of all claims at district court level. Successfully argued appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed dismissal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented TransEnterix in 10b-5 securities class action in the Eastern District of North Carolina and certain of its officers and directors in related derivative litigation. Won dismissal of class action which led to voluntary dismissal of derivative action. No appeals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the Carmike Cinemas Board of Directors in the Middle District of Georgia against securities and fiduciary duty claims arising out of its proposed merger with AMC; obtained denial of TRO motion to enjoin shareholder vote. Case later dismissed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Eclipsys Corporation and its directors in shareholder class actions challenging the $1.3 billion merger of Eclipsys and Allscripts in the Georgia state courts; obtained a full dismissal with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Caremark Rx, Inc. and its directors and officers in class action and shareholder derivative litigation in both Delaware and Tennessee regarding the Company's $26 billion merger with CVS Corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":198},{"id":282}]},"expertise":[{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Pope","nick_name":"Warren","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. R. Lanier Anderson III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"1998 - 1999"}],"first_name":"B.  Warren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"He’s an excellent litigator with clear, strong depth of knowledge in securities. He’s always available and responsive.\"","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in Securities Litigation Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Georgia Super Lawyer","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWarren Pope defends companies and their directors and officers against a broad range of shareholder claims and advises on related investigatory and regulatory matters. Warren is a partner in the firm's Securities and Shareholder Litigation practice, which has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e as a Securities Group of the Year and by \u003cem\u003eU.S. News \u0026amp; World Report\u003c/em\u003e as a National Tier 1 practice. \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e has recognized Warren as a \"leading lawyer\" and a \"standout\" in securities litigation defense.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWarren represents clients in class actions and shareholder derivative litigation involving federal and state securities laws, directors' and officers' fiduciary duties, and other corporate governance and transactional litigation matters. He also represents corporations, directors, and officers in internal and government investigations and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWarren has been recognized as a recommended M\u0026amp;A and Securities litigator by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand \u003cem\u003eChambers (Band 1)\u003c/em\u003e, and named as a Georgia Super Lawyer.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefended Newell Brands and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action arising out of stock price drops following disappointing financial results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Floor \u0026amp; Decor and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal. Derivative litigation ongoing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended National Vision Inc. and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended ADTRAN and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Triangle Capital Corporation in securities class action arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal. Defended M\u0026amp;A litigation against TCAP challenging $1 billion in transactions with Benefit Street Partners and Barings. Defeated attempt to stop transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Aaron's, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of quarterly earnings miss and revised financial guidance. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Progressive Holdings, Inc. and Aaron\u0026rsquo;s Inc. and certain of their officers in securities litigation following announcement of settlement with Federal Trade Commission. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Equifax, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation arising out of 2017 data breach incident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Capitala Finance Corp. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Special Committee of Books-A-Million Board in an action challenging a going-private transaction in Delaware Chancery Court; obtained dismissal of all claims, affirmed on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending FleetCor Technologies, Inc. and its officers in derivative litigation arising out of short-seller reports criticizing Company's business practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in various 10b-5 securities class actions in the Middle District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Commscope and its officers in 10b-5 litigation in the Western District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims. No appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative action, obtaining dismissal of all claims at district court level. Successfully argued appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed dismissal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented TransEnterix in 10b-5 securities class action in the Eastern District of North Carolina and certain of its officers and directors in related derivative litigation. Won dismissal of class action which led to voluntary dismissal of derivative action. No appeals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the Carmike Cinemas Board of Directors in the Middle District of Georgia against securities and fiduciary duty claims arising out of its proposed merger with AMC; obtained denial of TRO motion to enjoin shareholder vote. Case later dismissed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Eclipsys Corporation and its directors in shareholder class actions challenging the $1.3 billion merger of Eclipsys and Allscripts in the Georgia state courts; obtained a full dismissal with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Caremark Rx, Inc. and its directors and officers in class action and shareholder derivative litigation in both Delaware and Tennessee regarding the Company's $26 billion merger with CVS Corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"He’s an excellent litigator with clear, strong depth of knowledge in securities. He’s always available and responsive.\"","detail":"Chambers"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer in Securities Litigation Defense","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Georgia Super Lawyer","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1118}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Pope{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He’s an excellent litigator with clear, strong depth of knowledge in securities. He’s always available and responsive.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer in Securities Litigation Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia Super Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Defended Newell Brands and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action arising out of stock price drops following disappointing financial results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defended Floor \u0026amp; Decor and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal. Derivative litigation ongoing.{{ FIELD }}Defended National Vision Inc. and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss.{{ FIELD }}Defended ADTRAN and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal.{{ FIELD }}Represented Triangle Capital Corporation in securities class action arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal. Defended M\u0026amp;A litigation against TCAP challenging $1 billion in transactions with Benefit Street Partners and Barings. Defeated attempt to stop transactions.{{ FIELD }}Defended Aaron's, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of quarterly earnings miss and revised financial guidance. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defended Progressive Holdings, Inc. and Aaron’s Inc. and certain of their officers in securities litigation following announcement of settlement with Federal Trade Commission. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defended Equifax, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation arising out of 2017 data breach incident.{{ FIELD }}Defended Capitala Finance Corp. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defended Special Committee of Books-A-Million Board in an action challenging a going-private transaction in Delaware Chancery Court; obtained dismissal of all claims, affirmed on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court.{{ FIELD }}Defending FleetCor Technologies, Inc. and its officers in derivative litigation arising out of short-seller reports criticizing Company's business practices.{{ FIELD }}Defended Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in various 10b-5 securities class actions in the Middle District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims.{{ FIELD }}Defended Commscope and its officers in 10b-5 litigation in the Western District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims. No appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defended Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative action, obtaining dismissal of all claims at district court level. Successfully argued appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed dismissal.{{ FIELD }}Represented TransEnterix in 10b-5 securities class action in the Eastern District of North Carolina and certain of its officers and directors in related derivative litigation. Won dismissal of class action which led to voluntary dismissal of derivative action. No appeals.{{ FIELD }}Defended the Carmike Cinemas Board of Directors in the Middle District of Georgia against securities and fiduciary duty claims arising out of its proposed merger with AMC; obtained denial of TRO motion to enjoin shareholder vote. Case later dismissed.{{ FIELD }}Represented Eclipsys Corporation and its directors in shareholder class actions challenging the $1.3 billion merger of Eclipsys and Allscripts in the Georgia state courts; obtained a full dismissal with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Defended Caremark Rx, Inc. and its directors and officers in class action and shareholder derivative litigation in both Delaware and Tennessee regarding the Company's $26 billion merger with CVS Corporation.{{ FIELD }}Warren Pope defends companies and their directors and officers against a broad range of shareholder claims and advises on related investigatory and regulatory matters. Warren is a partner in the firm's Securities and Shareholder Litigation practice, which has been recognized by Law360 as a Securities Group of the Year and by U.S. News \u0026amp; World Report as a National Tier 1 practice. Legal 500 has recognized Warren as a \"leading lawyer\" and a \"standout\" in securities litigation defense.\nWarren represents clients in class actions and shareholder derivative litigation involving federal and state securities laws, directors' and officers' fiduciary duties, and other corporate governance and transactional litigation matters. He also represents corporations, directors, and officers in internal and government investigations and related litigation.\nWarren has been recognized as a recommended M\u0026amp;A and Securities litigator by Legal 500 and Chambers (Band 1), and named as a Georgia Super Lawyer. B Warren Pope securities litigation Partner \"He’s an excellent litigator with clear, strong depth of knowledge in securities. He’s always available and responsive.\" Chambers Leading Lawyer in Securities Litigation Defense Legal 500 Georgia Super Lawyer  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Law Clerk, Hon. R. Lanier Anderson III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Defended Newell Brands and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action arising out of stock price drops following disappointing financial results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal. Defended Floor \u0026amp; Decor and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal. Derivative litigation ongoing. Defended National Vision Inc. and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss. Defended ADTRAN and its officers in securities litigation following stock price drop. Won motion to dismiss; no appeal. Represented Triangle Capital Corporation in securities class action arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss; affirmed on appeal. Defended M\u0026amp;A litigation against TCAP challenging $1 billion in transactions with Benefit Street Partners and Barings. Defeated attempt to stop transactions. Defended Aaron's, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of quarterly earnings miss and revised financial guidance. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal. Defended Progressive Holdings, Inc. and Aaron’s Inc. and certain of their officers in securities litigation following announcement of settlement with Federal Trade Commission. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal. Defended Equifax, Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation arising out of 2017 data breach incident. Defended Capitala Finance Corp. and certain of its directors and officers in securities class action litigation arising out of disappointing quarterly results. Won motion to dismiss. No appeal. Defended Special Committee of Books-A-Million Board in an action challenging a going-private transaction in Delaware Chancery Court; obtained dismissal of all claims, affirmed on appeal by Delaware Supreme Court. Defending FleetCor Technologies, Inc. and its officers in derivative litigation arising out of short-seller reports criticizing Company's business practices. Defended Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in various 10b-5 securities class actions in the Middle District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims. Defended Commscope and its officers in 10b-5 litigation in the Western District of North Carolina, obtaining dismissal of all claims. No appeal. Defended Galectin Therapeutics, Inc. and its directors and officers in securities class action and derivative action, obtaining dismissal of all claims at district court level. Successfully argued appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed dismissal. Represented TransEnterix in 10b-5 securities class action in the Eastern District of North Carolina and certain of its officers and directors in related derivative litigation. Won dismissal of class action which led to voluntary dismissal of derivative action. No appeals. Defended the Carmike Cinemas Board of Directors in the Middle District of Georgia against securities and fiduciary duty claims arising out of its proposed merger with AMC; obtained denial of TRO motion to enjoin shareholder vote. Case later dismissed. Represented Eclipsys Corporation and its directors in shareholder class actions challenging the $1.3 billion merger of Eclipsys and Allscripts in the Georgia state courts; obtained a full dismissal with prejudice. Defended Caremark Rx, Inc. and its directors and officers in class action and shareholder derivative litigation in both Delaware and Tennessee regarding the Company's $26 billion merger with CVS Corporation.","searchable_name":"B.  Warren Pope (Warren)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436387,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2847,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndy Pratt is an experienced disputes lawyer who represents corporate defendants in significant matters that affect their businesses.\u0026nbsp; Andy's practice focuses on consumer class actions and commercial disputes that involve a variety of complex transactional, financial, and economic issues, and he represents clients in disputes in state and federal courts as well as specialized dispute resolution forums.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndy represents clients in a variety of matters, including the defense of consumer class actions, complex business disputes, and professional negligence matters.\u0026nbsp; He represents companies in many different industries, including\u0026nbsp; a number of prominent Fortune 500 companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andy\u0026nbsp;worked in the restructuring practice group at or Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis LLP where he advised clients on a number of transactional and litigation issues affecting distressed companies. Prior to entering private practice, he\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable Joel F. Dubina, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndy\u0026nbsp;graduated from the Columbia University School of Law, where he received recognition as a James Kent Scholar. While in law school, he\u0026nbsp;served as a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eColumbia Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"j-pratt","email":"apratt@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Pratt","nick_name":"Andy","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Chief Judge Joel F. Dubina, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2008-2009"}],"first_name":"J.","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Andrew","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndy Pratt is an experienced disputes lawyer who represents corporate defendants in significant matters that affect their businesses.\u0026nbsp; Andy's practice focuses on consumer class actions and commercial disputes that involve a variety of complex transactional, financial, and economic issues, and he represents clients in disputes in state and federal courts as well as specialized dispute resolution forums.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndy represents clients in a variety of matters, including the defense of consumer class actions, complex business disputes, and professional negligence matters.\u0026nbsp; He represents companies in many different industries, including\u0026nbsp; a number of prominent Fortune 500 companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andy\u0026nbsp;worked in the restructuring practice group at or Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis LLP where he advised clients on a number of transactional and litigation issues affecting distressed companies. Prior to entering private practice, he\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable Joel F. Dubina, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndy\u0026nbsp;graduated from the Columbia University School of Law, where he received recognition as a James Kent Scholar. While in law school, he\u0026nbsp;served as a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eColumbia Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1122}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:51:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Pratt{{ FIELD }}Andy Pratt is an experienced disputes lawyer who represents corporate defendants in significant matters that affect their businesses.  Andy's practice focuses on consumer class actions and commercial disputes that involve a variety of complex transactional, financial, and economic issues, and he represents clients in disputes in state and federal courts as well as specialized dispute resolution forums.\nAndy represents clients in a variety of matters, including the defense of consumer class actions, complex business disputes, and professional negligence matters.  He represents companies in many different industries, including  a number of prominent Fortune 500 companies.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andy worked in the restructuring practice group at or Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis LLP where he advised clients on a number of transactional and litigation issues affecting distressed companies. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a law clerk for the Honorable Joel F. Dubina, the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.\nAndy graduated from the Columbia University School of Law, where he received recognition as a James Kent Scholar. While in law school, he served as a member of the Columbia Law Review.  Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Alabama Georgia New York American Bar Association (2008) Member # 01632099 New York State Bar Association (2010) Member # 791350 Judicial Clerk, Chief Judge Joel F. Dubina, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"J. Andrew Pratt (Andy)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426424,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3445,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePatrick Price\u0026nbsp;is a trial lawyer that has represented clients in tobacco, consumer products, and other industries in high stakes litigation in the most hostile state and federal jurisdictions across the country.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick\u0026nbsp;has significant trial and litigation management experience representing clients including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson, Monsanto, Boehringer Ingelheim,\u0026nbsp;and Coloplast in product liability cases throughout the United States. He has also represented clients including TikTok, Dow Chemical, and U-Haul in tort cases, as well as technology and pharmaceutical companies in intellectual property infringement actions, contractors and suppliers in construction disputes, and employers in nationwide class and collective actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick is frequently found in the courtroom, zealously advocating for his clients before judges and juries alike. He approaches each matter with an eye toward best positioning his clients for a favorable verdict or resolution before trial.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"patrick-price","email":"pprice@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3204}]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Price","nick_name":"Patrick","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Patrick","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2055,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with honors","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/pprice88/","seodescription":"Patrick Price is a trial lawyer specializing in product liability defense. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePatrick Price\u0026nbsp;is a trial lawyer that has represented clients in tobacco, consumer products, and other industries in high stakes litigation in the most hostile state and federal jurisdictions across the country.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick\u0026nbsp;has significant trial and litigation management experience representing clients including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson, Monsanto, Boehringer Ingelheim,\u0026nbsp;and Coloplast in product liability cases throughout the United States. He has also represented clients including TikTok, Dow Chemical, and U-Haul in tort cases, as well as technology and pharmaceutical companies in intellectual property infringement actions, contractors and suppliers in construction disputes, and employers in nationwide class and collective actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick is frequently found in the courtroom, zealously advocating for his clients before judges and juries alike. He approaches each matter with an eye toward best positioning his clients for a favorable verdict or resolution before trial.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7421}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:51.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:51.000Z","searchable_text":"Price{{ FIELD }}Patrick Price is a trial lawyer that has represented clients in tobacco, consumer products, and other industries in high stakes litigation in the most hostile state and federal jurisdictions across the country. \nPatrick has significant trial and litigation management experience representing clients including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson, Monsanto, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Coloplast in product liability cases throughout the United States. He has also represented clients including TikTok, Dow Chemical, and U-Haul in tort cases, as well as technology and pharmaceutical companies in intellectual property infringement actions, contractors and suppliers in construction disputes, and employers in nationwide class and collective actions.\nPatrick is frequently found in the courtroom, zealously advocating for his clients before judges and juries alike. He approaches each matter with an eye toward best positioning his clients for a favorable verdict or resolution before trial.   Patrick Price lawyer Partner University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Florida Georgia Texas","searchable_name":"Patrick Price","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436439,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3934,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBillie Pritchard is\u0026nbsp;a partner with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial Practice and Global Disputes group.\u0026nbsp;Her practice focuses on defending\u0026nbsp;businesses\u0026nbsp;in complex\u0026nbsp;litigation at the trial and appellate level. Billie has litigated a wide range of contract and business tort cases in state and federal courts, including consumer class actions, data privacy and security matters, and professional negligence actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Billie\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable R. Lanier Anderson III in the Eleventh Circuit and the Honorable C. Ashley Royal in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBillie\u0026nbsp;graduated first in her class from the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMercer Law Review\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom 2011-2012. Upon graduation, Billie was inducted into the Brainerd Currie Honor Society, the National Order of the Barristers, and the National Order of Scribes.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"billie-pritchard","email":"bpritchard@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Pritchard","nick_name":"Billie","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, R. Lanier Anderson III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2014-2015"},{"name":"Law Clerk, C. Ashley Royal, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia","years_held":"2012-2014"}],"first_name":"Billie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1221,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Member of 2024 \u0026 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Ones to Watch (Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Corporate Law)","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch (Commercial Litigation) ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2022"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBillie Pritchard is\u0026nbsp;a partner with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial Practice and Global Disputes group.\u0026nbsp;Her practice focuses on defending\u0026nbsp;businesses\u0026nbsp;in complex\u0026nbsp;litigation at the trial and appellate level. Billie has litigated a wide range of contract and business tort cases in state and federal courts, including consumer class actions, data privacy and security matters, and professional negligence actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Billie\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable R. Lanier Anderson III in the Eleventh Circuit and the Honorable C. Ashley Royal in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBillie\u0026nbsp;graduated first in her class from the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMercer Law Review\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom 2011-2012. Upon graduation, Billie was inducted into the Brainerd Currie Honor Society, the National Order of the Barristers, and the National Order of Scribes.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Member of 2024 \u0026 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Ones to Watch (Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Corporate Law)","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026"},{"title":"Ones to Watch (Commercial Litigation) ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2022"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5849}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:02.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:02.000Z","searchable_text":"Pritchard{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of 2024 \u0026amp; 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch (Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Corporate Law)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch (Commercial Litigation) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}Billie Pritchard is a partner with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice focuses on defending businesses in complex litigation at the trial and appellate level. Billie has litigated a wide range of contract and business tort cases in state and federal courts, including consumer class actions, data privacy and security matters, and professional negligence actions. \nPrior to joining the firm, Billie served as a law clerk for the Honorable R. Lanier Anderson III in the Eleventh Circuit and the Honorable C. Ashley Royal in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.\nBillie graduated first in her class from the Walter F. George School of Law at Mercer University, summa cum laude, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Mercer Law Review from 2011-2012. Upon graduation, Billie was inducted into the Brainerd Currie Honor Society, the National Order of the Barristers, and the National Order of Scribes.  Partner Member of 2024 \u0026amp; 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Cyber Lawyers Lawdragon Ones to Watch (Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Corporate Law) The Best Lawyers in America, 2023-2026 Ones to Watch (Commercial Litigation)  The Best Lawyers in America, 2022 Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals Supreme Court of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Law Clerk, R. Lanier Anderson III, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Law Clerk, C. Ashley Royal, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia","searchable_name":"Billie Pritchard","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446853,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7337,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyuk Park is Counsel on the Intellectual Property team.\u0026nbsp; Leveraging his educational and engineering experience, Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductors, computer architecture, video processing, telecommunications, and consumer electronics.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyuk brings his experience at the intersection of technology and intellectual property law.\u0026nbsp; Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductor design and fabrication, computer and microprocessor architecture, video processing, telecommunications technology, consumer electronics, and software, with a particular focus on litigation before federal district courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Ryuk also served as in-house counsel at a global video gaming company, where he managed various intellectual property (IP) issues and led litigation strategy.\u0026nbsp; Ryuk also brings technical depth as a former engineer with industry experience in semiconductor design as well as educational background in electrical engineering and computer science.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ryuk-park","email":"rpark@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Park","nick_name":"Ryuk","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ryuk","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":512,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyuk Park is Counsel on the Intellectual Property team.\u0026nbsp; Leveraging his educational and engineering experience, Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductors, computer architecture, video processing, telecommunications, and consumer electronics.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyuk brings his experience at the intersection of technology and intellectual property law.\u0026nbsp; Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductor design and fabrication, computer and microprocessor architecture, video processing, telecommunications technology, consumer electronics, and software, with a particular focus on litigation before federal district courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Ryuk also served as in-house counsel at a global video gaming company, where he managed various intellectual property (IP) issues and led litigation strategy.\u0026nbsp; Ryuk also brings technical depth as a former engineer with industry experience in semiconductor design as well as educational background in electrical engineering and computer science.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13423}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-18T22:05:40.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-18T22:05:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Park{{ FIELD }}Ryuk Park is Counsel on the Intellectual Property team.  Leveraging his educational and engineering experience, Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductors, computer architecture, video processing, telecommunications, and consumer electronics. \nRyuk brings his experience at the intersection of technology and intellectual property law.  Ryuk advises clients on complex patent disputes involving semiconductor design and fabrication, computer and microprocessor architecture, video processing, telecommunications technology, consumer electronics, and software, with a particular focus on litigation before federal district courts.\nBefore joining the firm, Ryuk also served as in-house counsel at a global video gaming company, where he managed various intellectual property (IP) issues and led litigation strategy.  Ryuk also brings technical depth as a former engineer with industry experience in semiconductor design as well as educational background in electrical engineering and computer science. Counsel Seoul National University  Cornell University Cornell Law School Seoul National University  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit California","searchable_name":"Ryuk Park","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442412,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1402,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChad Peterson is a counsel with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. He has represented a wide range of clients in the pharmaceutical, tobacco, beverage, automotive, abrasive blasting, and package delivery industries. Chad\u0026nbsp;has experience in large-scale, class actions and multidistrict litigation, as well as in individual product liability and personal injury cases.\u0026nbsp; Chad joined King \u0026amp; Spalding after law school and practiced here until going in-house at Mercedes-Benz USA in 2021.\u0026nbsp; He rejoined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2024.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-author of \u0026ldquo;Battles Over Trial Plans in Tobacco and Other Class Actions,\u0026rdquo; Fall 2007 ABA Section of Litigation \u003cem\u003eClass Action and Derivative Suit Committee Newsletter\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"chad-peterson","email":"cpeterson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Peterson","nick_name":"Chad","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Chad","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChad Peterson is a counsel with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. He has represented a wide range of clients in the pharmaceutical, tobacco, beverage, automotive, abrasive blasting, and package delivery industries. Chad\u0026nbsp;has experience in large-scale, class actions and multidistrict litigation, as well as in individual product liability and personal injury cases.\u0026nbsp; Chad joined King \u0026amp; Spalding after law school and practiced here until going in-house at Mercedes-Benz USA in 2021.\u0026nbsp; He rejoined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2024.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-author of \u0026ldquo;Battles Over Trial Plans in Tobacco and Other Class Actions,\u0026rdquo; Fall 2007 ABA Section of Litigation \u003cem\u003eClass Action and Derivative Suit Committee Newsletter\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1113}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:04:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Peterson{{ FIELD }}Chad Peterson is a counsel with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Mass Tort and Toxic Tort practice. He has represented a wide range of clients in the pharmaceutical, tobacco, beverage, automotive, abrasive blasting, and package delivery industries. Chad has experience in large-scale, class actions and multidistrict litigation, as well as in individual product liability and personal injury cases.  Chad joined King \u0026amp; Spalding after law school and practiced here until going in-house at Mercedes-Benz USA in 2021.  He rejoined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2024.Publication\n\n\nCo-author of “Battles Over Trial Plans in Tobacco and Other Class Actions,” Fall 2007 ABA Section of Litigation Class Action and Derivative Suit Committee Newsletter.\n\n Counsel Yale University Yale Law School University of Iowa The University of Iowa College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida Georgia State Bar of Georgia","searchable_name":"Chad A. Peterson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442363,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":869,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike\u0026nbsp;Powers serves as\u0026nbsp;counsel\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith 19\u0026nbsp;years of experience, Mike successfully defends clients in complex toxic tort, mass tort, product liability and class action litigation that raise cutting-edge legal, scientific and medical issues. He also has extensive experience in dealing with expert witnesses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMike's\u0026nbsp;cases have involved a variety of chemicals and substances, including mercury, arsenic, asbestos, lead, chlorine, benzene, plutonium and uranium, insecticides and solvents.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-powers","email":"mpowers@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in more than thirty actions brought by parents who allege that the Thimerosal preservative in childhood vaccines caused their children to develop autism.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eHoneywell International Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e in actions brought by 65 former employees of a chlor-alkali plant in North Carolina who allege neurological and respiratory injuries from workplace exposure to mercury and chlorine. The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s grant of summary judgment in Honeywell\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e in actions brought by 19 employees of a Montana paper mill who allege respiratory disease and severe allergic reactions from workplace exposure to chemicals used in the paper making process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eHercules Incorporated\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation involving alleged neurological injuries from exposure to arsenic in pesticides.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eCEMEX, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e against claims in state and federal courts involving alleged exposure to naturally-occurring asbestos from a New Jersey quarry. Following hard-fought litigation over whether quarry emissions contained harmful asbestos, the claims were dismissed due to lack of evidence.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003ea chemical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in insurance coverage litigation. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s grant of summary judgment in the insurance company\u0026rsquo;s favor, holding that the \u0026ldquo;absolute\u0026rdquo; pollution exclusion clause in the insurance policy did not bar coverage for personal injury claims from chemical releases not caused by the insured.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eMotorola\u003c/strong\u003e in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that exposure to electromagnetic radiation from using Motorola\u0026rsquo;s cell phone had caused his brain tumor. On an interlocutory appeal brought by Motorola, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s denial of Motorola\u0026rsquo;s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was insufficient scientific evidence that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones can cause harm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eNokia Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that his use of Nokia cell phones caused his brain tumor. The case was dismissed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eBrown and Williamson\u003c/strong\u003e in class actions brought by smokers and Medicaid cost recovery actions brought by state attorney generals.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003ethe operators of two nuclear weapons production facilities\u003c/strong\u003e in class actions brought by employees of the facilities and nearby residents who alleged exposure to plutonium and uranium.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Powers","nick_name":"Mike","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike\u0026nbsp;Powers serves as\u0026nbsp;counsel\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith 19\u0026nbsp;years of experience, Mike successfully defends clients in complex toxic tort, mass tort, product liability and class action litigation that raise cutting-edge legal, scientific and medical issues. He also has extensive experience in dealing with expert witnesses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMike's\u0026nbsp;cases have involved a variety of chemicals and substances, including mercury, arsenic, asbestos, lead, chlorine, benzene, plutonium and uranium, insecticides and solvents.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in more than thirty actions brought by parents who allege that the Thimerosal preservative in childhood vaccines caused their children to develop autism.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eHoneywell International Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e in actions brought by 65 former employees of a chlor-alkali plant in North Carolina who allege neurological and respiratory injuries from workplace exposure to mercury and chlorine. The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s grant of summary judgment in Honeywell\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e in actions brought by 19 employees of a Montana paper mill who allege respiratory disease and severe allergic reactions from workplace exposure to chemicals used in the paper making process.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eHercules Incorporated\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation involving alleged neurological injuries from exposure to arsenic in pesticides.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eCEMEX, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e against claims in state and federal courts involving alleged exposure to naturally-occurring asbestos from a New Jersey quarry. Following hard-fought litigation over whether quarry emissions contained harmful asbestos, the claims were dismissed due to lack of evidence.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003ea chemical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in insurance coverage litigation. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s grant of summary judgment in the insurance company\u0026rsquo;s favor, holding that the \u0026ldquo;absolute\u0026rdquo; pollution exclusion clause in the insurance policy did not bar coverage for personal injury claims from chemical releases not caused by the insured.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eMotorola\u003c/strong\u003e in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that exposure to electromagnetic radiation from using Motorola\u0026rsquo;s cell phone had caused his brain tumor. On an interlocutory appeal brought by Motorola, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court\u0026rsquo;s denial of Motorola\u0026rsquo;s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was insufficient scientific evidence that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones can cause harm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eNokia Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that his use of Nokia cell phones caused his brain tumor. The case was dismissed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003eBrown and Williamson\u003c/strong\u003e in class actions brought by smokers and Medicaid cost recovery actions brought by state attorney generals.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of \u003cstrong\u003ethe operators of two nuclear weapons production facilities\u003c/strong\u003e in class actions brought by employees of the facilities and nearby residents who alleged exposure to plutonium and uranium.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:31.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Powers{{ FIELD }}Representation of GlaxoSmithKline in more than thirty actions brought by parents who allege that the Thimerosal preservative in childhood vaccines caused their children to develop autism.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Honeywell International Inc. in actions brought by 65 former employees of a chlor-alkali plant in North Carolina who allege neurological and respiratory injuries from workplace exposure to mercury and chlorine. The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in Honeywell’s favor.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Kemira Chemicals Inc. in actions brought by 19 employees of a Montana paper mill who allege respiratory disease and severe allergic reactions from workplace exposure to chemicals used in the paper making process.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Hercules Incorporated in litigation involving alleged neurological injuries from exposure to arsenic in pesticides. {{ FIELD }}Representation of CEMEX, Inc. against claims in state and federal courts involving alleged exposure to naturally-occurring asbestos from a New Jersey quarry. Following hard-fought litigation over whether quarry emissions contained harmful asbestos, the claims were dismissed due to lack of evidence.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a chemical manufacturer in insurance coverage litigation. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in the insurance company’s favor, holding that the “absolute” pollution exclusion clause in the insurance policy did not bar coverage for personal injury claims from chemical releases not caused by the insured.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Motorola in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that exposure to electromagnetic radiation from using Motorola’s cell phone had caused his brain tumor. On an interlocutory appeal brought by Motorola, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of Motorola’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was insufficient scientific evidence that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones can cause harm.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Nokia Corporation in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that his use of Nokia cell phones caused his brain tumor. The case was dismissed.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Brown and Williamson in class actions brought by smokers and Medicaid cost recovery actions brought by state attorney generals. {{ FIELD }}Representation of the operators of two nuclear weapons production facilities in class actions brought by employees of the facilities and nearby residents who alleged exposure to plutonium and uranium.{{ FIELD }}Mike Powers serves as counsel in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices.\nWith 19 years of experience, Mike successfully defends clients in complex toxic tort, mass tort, product liability and class action litigation that raise cutting-edge legal, scientific and medical issues. He also has extensive experience in dealing with expert witnesses.\nMike's cases have involved a variety of chemicals and substances, including mercury, arsenic, asbestos, lead, chlorine, benzene, plutonium and uranium, insecticides and solvents. Counsel University of Missouri-Columbia University of Missouri School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Georgia Illinois American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Representation of GlaxoSmithKline in more than thirty actions brought by parents who allege that the Thimerosal preservative in childhood vaccines caused their children to develop autism. Representation of Honeywell International Inc. in actions brought by 65 former employees of a chlor-alkali plant in North Carolina who allege neurological and respiratory injuries from workplace exposure to mercury and chlorine. The North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in Honeywell’s favor. Representation of Kemira Chemicals Inc. in actions brought by 19 employees of a Montana paper mill who allege respiratory disease and severe allergic reactions from workplace exposure to chemicals used in the paper making process. Representation of Hercules Incorporated in litigation involving alleged neurological injuries from exposure to arsenic in pesticides.  Representation of CEMEX, Inc. against claims in state and federal courts involving alleged exposure to naturally-occurring asbestos from a New Jersey quarry. Following hard-fought litigation over whether quarry emissions contained harmful asbestos, the claims were dismissed due to lack of evidence. Representation of a chemical manufacturer in insurance coverage litigation. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in the insurance company’s favor, holding that the “absolute” pollution exclusion clause in the insurance policy did not bar coverage for personal injury claims from chemical releases not caused by the insured. Representation of Motorola in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that exposure to electromagnetic radiation from using Motorola’s cell phone had caused his brain tumor. On an interlocutory appeal brought by Motorola, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of Motorola’s motion for summary judgment, holding that there was insufficient scientific evidence that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones can cause harm. Representation of Nokia Corporation in an action brought by a businessman who alleged that his use of Nokia cell phones caused his brain tumor. The case was dismissed. Representation of Brown and Williamson in class actions brought by smokers and Medicaid cost recovery actions brought by state attorney generals.  Representation of the operators of two nuclear weapons production facilities in class actions brought by employees of the facilities and nearby residents who alleged exposure to plutonium and uranium.","searchable_name":"Michael R. Powers (Mike)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426479,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3832,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAaron Parks is a senior\u0026nbsp;associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice. His practice focuses on defending product manufacturers in high-profile product-liability and mass-tort litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAaron graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;magna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, where he was a member of the moot court team, an Online Editor for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Law Review\u003c/em\u003e, and elected to the Order of the Coif.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"aaron-parks","email":"aparks@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eBoehringer Ingelheim\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Zantac\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;MDL and in multiple class actions arising from allegations concerning Zantac and other ranitidine-containing products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global chemical company in personal injury cases arising from alleged water contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting medical device company in nationwide product-liability litigation related to injuries allegedly caused by the company's female pelvic-mesh devices.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Parks","nick_name":"Aaron","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Aaron","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaron-parks-a8813787/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAaron Parks is a senior\u0026nbsp;associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice. His practice focuses on defending product manufacturers in high-profile product-liability and mass-tort litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAaron graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;magna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e, where he was a member of the moot court team, an Online Editor for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Law Review\u003c/em\u003e, and elected to the Order of the Coif.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eBoehringer Ingelheim\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Zantac\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;MDL and in multiple class actions arising from allegations concerning Zantac and other ranitidine-containing products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global chemical company in personal injury cases arising from alleged water contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting medical device company in nationwide product-liability litigation related to injuries allegedly caused by the company's female pelvic-mesh devices.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1102}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Parks{{ FIELD }}Representing Boehringer Ingelheim in the In re Zantac MDL and in multiple class actions arising from allegations concerning Zantac and other ranitidine-containing products{{ FIELD }}Representing TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global chemical company in personal injury cases arising from alleged water contamination.{{ FIELD }}Representing medical device company in nationwide product-liability litigation related to injuries allegedly caused by the company's female pelvic-mesh devices.{{ FIELD }}Aaron Parks is a senior associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice. His practice focuses on defending product manufacturers in high-profile product-liability and mass-tort litigation.\nAaron graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, magna cum laude, where he was a member of the moot court team, an Online Editor for the Georgia Law Review, and elected to the Order of the Coif. Senior Associate University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Representing Boehringer Ingelheim in the In re Zantac MDL and in multiple class actions arising from allegations concerning Zantac and other ranitidine-containing products Representing TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services. Representing a global chemical company in personal injury cases arising from alleged water contamination. Representing medical device company in nationwide product-liability litigation related to injuries allegedly caused by the company's female pelvic-mesh devices.","searchable_name":"Aaron Parks","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427201,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6488,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cdiv id=\"pnlProfileSummary\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlProfileSummaryShort\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel Phillips defends multinational companies in complex product liability and mass tort litigations pending in both state and federal court and across multiple industries. His particular focus is on the development and implementation of strategic litigation management and resolution strategies for the pharmaceutical, medical device, and healthcare industries in large-scale bet-the-company litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e","slug":"daniel-phillips","email":"daniel.phillips@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Phillips","nick_name":"Daniel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cdiv id=\"pnlProfileSummary\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlProfileSummaryShort\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDaniel Phillips defends multinational companies in complex product liability and mass tort litigations pending in both state and federal court and across multiple industries. His particular focus is on the development and implementation of strategic litigation management and resolution strategies for the pharmaceutical, medical device, and healthcare industries in large-scale bet-the-company litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:14.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Phillips{{ FIELD }}\n\nDaniel Phillips defends multinational companies in complex product liability and mass tort litigations pending in both state and federal court and across multiple industries. His particular focus is on the development and implementation of strategic litigation management and resolution strategies for the pharmaceutical, medical device, and healthcare industries in large-scale bet-the-company litigation.\n\n Senior Associate Michigan State University Michigan State University College of Law George Mason University George Mason University School of Law Virginia","searchable_name":"Daniel Phillips","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}