{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"cg-3","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":444821,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3945,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStacy L. Hambleton is a partner\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices. Stacy\u0026nbsp;focuses her practice in the areas of complex civil litigation and products liability defense. Stacy has experience defending Fortune 500 corporations in multi-district litigation and state-wide coordinated proceedings.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School where she was a member of the Scott Moot Court Honors Board and served as a staff member on the \u003cem\u003eInternational \u0026amp; Comparative Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStacy served as a Judicial extern for the Honorable Fred Woods of the California Second District Court of Appeal. Prior to that, Stacy participated in a summer externship for the Honorable Geraldine Mund for the Central District of California Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"stacy-foster","email":"slhambleton@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the first bellwether trial in a major multi-district litigation following an eight-week jury trial, October 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its first talc/mesothelioma case to go to verdict, November 2017. This verdict was ranked No. 1 on CVN\u0026rsquo;s Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2017 and named one of the Top Verdicts in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFull dismissal for $0 for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case on eve of trial, February 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnanimous defense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, April 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, October 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMotion for summary judgment granted for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, January 2020.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3761}]},"expertise":[{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hambleton","nick_name":"Stacy","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Hon. Geraldine Mund, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California","years_held":"2010"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. Fred Woods, California","years_held":"2011"}],"first_name":"Stacy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2895,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Front Page Article: The Dot Com Boom Ignored Women: The AI Era Can Be Different","detail":"Daily Journal (Nov. 2025)"},{"title":"Front Page Article: Preparing Company Witnesses for Trial: Psychological Insights and Practical Strategies","detail":"Daily Journal (March 2025)"},{"title":"Pro Bono Service Award 2017, 2020-2025","detail":"King \u0026 Spalding"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Products Liability 2021-2025","detail":"Best Lawyers"},{"title":"Rising Star 2023, 2024, 2025","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week – Shout Out","detail":"The AmLaw Litigation Daily (April 25, 2025)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Stacy Hambleton is a lawyer of our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStacy L. Hambleton is a partner\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices. Stacy\u0026nbsp;focuses her practice in the areas of complex civil litigation and products liability defense. Stacy has experience defending Fortune 500 corporations in multi-district litigation and state-wide coordinated proceedings.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School where she was a member of the Scott Moot Court Honors Board and served as a staff member on the \u003cem\u003eInternational \u0026amp; Comparative Law Review\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStacy served as a Judicial extern for the Honorable Fred Woods of the California Second District Court of Appeal. Prior to that, Stacy participated in a summer externship for the Honorable Geraldine Mund for the Central District of California Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the first bellwether trial in a major multi-district litigation following an eight-week jury trial, October 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its first talc/mesothelioma case to go to verdict, November 2017. This verdict was ranked No. 1 on CVN\u0026rsquo;s Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2017 and named one of the Top Verdicts in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFull dismissal for $0 for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case on eve of trial, February 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnanimous defense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, April 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefense verdict for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, October 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMotion for summary judgment granted for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJohnson \u0026amp; Johnson\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in talc/mesothelioma case, January 2020.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Front Page Article: The Dot Com Boom Ignored Women: The AI Era Can Be Different","detail":"Daily Journal (Nov. 2025)"},{"title":"Front Page Article: Preparing Company Witnesses for Trial: Psychological Insights and Practical Strategies","detail":"Daily Journal (March 2025)"},{"title":"Pro Bono Service Award 2017, 2020-2025","detail":"King \u0026 Spalding"},{"title":"Ones to Watch, Products Liability 2021-2025","detail":"Best Lawyers"},{"title":"Rising Star 2023, 2024, 2025","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week – Shout Out","detail":"The AmLaw Litigation Daily (April 25, 2025)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5308}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-06T20:56:52.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-06T20:56:52.000Z","searchable_text":"Hambleton{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Front Page Article: The Dot Com Boom Ignored Women: The AI Era Can Be Different\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal (Nov. 2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Front Page Article: Preparing Company Witnesses for Trial: Psychological Insights and Practical Strategies\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal (March 2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Pro Bono Service Award 2017, 2020-2025\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"King \u0026amp; Spalding\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch, Products Liability 2021-2025\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star 2023, 2024, 2025\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week – Shout Out\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The AmLaw Litigation Daily (April 25, 2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}Defense verdict for global medical device manufacturer in the first bellwether trial in a major multi-district litigation following an eight-week jury trial, October 2014.{{ FIELD }}Defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in its first talc/mesothelioma case to go to verdict, November 2017. This verdict was ranked No. 1 on CVN’s Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2017 and named one of the Top Verdicts in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal.{{ FIELD }}Full dismissal for $0 for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case on eve of trial, February 2019.{{ FIELD }}Unanimous defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, April 2019.{{ FIELD }}Defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, October 2019.{{ FIELD }}Motion for summary judgment granted for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, January 2020.{{ FIELD }} \nStacy L. Hambleton is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Product Liability practices. Stacy focuses her practice in the areas of complex civil litigation and products liability defense. Stacy has experience defending Fortune 500 corporations in multi-district litigation and state-wide coordinated proceedings. \nShe earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School where she was a member of the Scott Moot Court Honors Board and served as a staff member on the International \u0026amp; Comparative Law Review.  \nStacy served as a Judicial extern for the Honorable Fred Woods of the California Second District Court of Appeal. Prior to that, Stacy participated in a summer externship for the Honorable Geraldine Mund for the Central District of California Bankruptcy Court.\n  Stacy Hambleton lawyer Partner Front Page Article: The Dot Com Boom Ignored Women: The AI Era Can Be Different Daily Journal (Nov. 2025) Front Page Article: Preparing Company Witnesses for Trial: Psychological Insights and Practical Strategies Daily Journal (March 2025) Pro Bono Service Award 2017, 2020-2025 King \u0026amp; Spalding Ones to Watch, Products Liability 2021-2025 Best Lawyers Rising Star 2023, 2024, 2025 Super Lawyers Litigator of the Week – Shout Out The AmLaw Litigation Daily (April 25, 2025) University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law Loyola Law School Loyola Law School U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Intern, Hon. Geraldine Mund, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California Intern, Hon. Fred Woods, California Defense verdict for global medical device manufacturer in the first bellwether trial in a major multi-district litigation following an eight-week jury trial, October 2014. Defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in its first talc/mesothelioma case to go to verdict, November 2017. This verdict was ranked No. 1 on CVN’s Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2017 and named one of the Top Verdicts in California in 2017 by the Daily Journal. Full dismissal for $0 for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case on eve of trial, February 2019. Unanimous defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, April 2019. Defense verdict for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, October 2019. Motion for summary judgment granted for Johnson \u0026amp; Johnson in talc/mesothelioma case, January 2020.","searchable_name":"Stacy Hambleton","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442820,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6081,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.\u0026nbsp; He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.\u0026nbsp; Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeffrey-hammer","email":"jhammer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1165,"guid":"1165.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hammer","nick_name":"Jeffrey","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Marc L. Goldman, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California","years_held":"2006 - 2007"}],"first_name":"Jeffrey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1135,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffrey-hammer-b581277/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.\u0026nbsp; He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.\u0026nbsp; Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13036}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:09.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Hammer{{ FIELD }}Obtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.{{ FIELD }}Defending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.{{ FIELD }}Represented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.{{ FIELD }}Defended the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.{{ FIELD }}Successfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.{{ FIELD }}Defended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.{{ FIELD }}Won early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.{{ FIELD }}Represented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Represented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.{{ FIELD }}Obtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.{{ FIELD }}In a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.{{ FIELD }}Jeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.  Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.  He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.  Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals. \nJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.  He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\nPrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects. Partner Wheaton College  Illinois Institute of Technology Kent College of Law Loyola University Chicago Loyola University Chicago School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Illinois Member, ABA Securities Litigation Committee Law Clerk, Honorable Marc L. Goldman, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Obtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety. Defending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training. Represented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships. Defended the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis. Successfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis. Defended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims. Won summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air. Won early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client. Represented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit. Represented major movie studios in numerous participation cases. Obtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project. In a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.","searchable_name":"Jeffrey Hammer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443875,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6207,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamaa Haridi is a civil and common law-trained, trilingual lawyer with over 20 years of experience representing clients from all over the world in international commercial and investment arbitration, under the rules of all major arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamaa has been singled out by clients for being \u0026ldquo;spectacular\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;outstanding,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;energetic and determined,\u0026rdquo; a \u0026ldquo;magnificent lawyer,\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;really, really phenomenal\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e). Sources also acknowledge her as being a \u0026ldquo;first-class arbitration lawyer; one of the best in the region\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e) and a \u0026ldquo;global leader\u0026rdquo; whose \u0026ldquo;reputation is sky rocketing\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e). She is one of fifteen international arbitration practitioners in North America singled out by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Global Elite Thought Leader \u0026ndash; Arbitration.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her work as counsel, Samaa frequently sits as an arbitrator in international commercial and investment disputes. She is also currently serving as an officer in a number of arbitral organizations, including as Vice President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, past Senior Co-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association, and a member of ICCA\u0026rsquo;s Governing Board.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamaa is a member of the New York, California, and England \u0026amp; Wales bars. She is fluent in French and Arabic, and conversant in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events in the Middle East and North Africa.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; MENA Leading Arbitrators\u0026rsquo; Guide to International Arbitration,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eJURIS\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Security for Costs and Claims in International Arbitration.\u0026rdquo; Provisional and Emergency Measures in International Arbitration,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEdward Elgar Publishing\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Arbitration as a Key Tool for Businesses in the MENA Region.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAfrican Business\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;COVID-19 and Energy Disputes.\u0026rdquo; International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eKluwer Law International\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Security for Costs and Claim Under the ICC Rules of Arbitration: Rare but Possible.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication, \u0026ldquo;The Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC),\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWorld Arbitration Reporter\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication, \u0026ldquo;Article 26 of the Convention on The Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States,\u0026rdquo; published in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe ICSID Convention, Regulation and Rules \u0026ndash; A Practical Commentary\u003c/em\u003e, Edward Elgar Publishing (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication \u0026ldquo;Enforcement of ICSID Awards\u0026rdquo; published in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Arbitration in the United States\u003c/em\u003e, Wolter\u0026rsquo;s Kluwer (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Public Policy: Can the Unruly Horse be Tamed?\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation, and Dispute Management\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Using New York Fora to Enforce Judgments After Motorola Credit Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank and Daimler AG v. Bauman.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNew York Dispute Resolution Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Towards Greater Gender and Ethnic Diversity in International Arbitration.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Arbitration Review of the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Public Policy Exception Under the New York Convention: The Unruly Arabian Horse in the Middle East Region.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eTransnational Dispute Management\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;New York Courts Revisit the Balance Between Debtors and Creditors in Enforcement Proceedings.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Bar Association Arbitration News\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"samaa-haridi","email":"sharidi@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCanadian and Lebanese investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Armenia, in connection with the expropriation of waste management contracts in the country's capital.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization in South Sudan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChina-based conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its affiliates in an AAA-ICDR arbitration under Delaware law (San Francisco seat) brought by former business partners in relation to a failed U.S.-based online travel agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSpanish contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Paris-based ICC arbitration under Greek law involving the upgrade of an oil refinery in Greece.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJapanese telecommunications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an ICC arbitration under English law with a voice termination services provider involving alleged breaches of an international voice service agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFrench disposable consumer products manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC arbitration under Indian law against an Indian former joint venture partner in relation to the French company's failed investment in India.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFrench car maker\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute governed by California law against a film production company in relation to the placement of the car's brand and logo in a major motion picture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmirati hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Mexican construction company in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Mexican law and administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of delay in the construction of a hotel in Mexico.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungarian energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of corruption and related efforts to terminate agreements to acquire shares of a large energy company in Croatia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Investment Commission of the Government of Liberia\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to a dispute arising out of a Concession Agreement for the rehabilitation and management of the Freeport of Monrovia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential ICSID arbitration against the Kingdom of Morocco in connection with the expropriation of a waste management contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration under Saudi and Yemeni laws involving allegations of unlawful termination of a distribution relationship in Yemen. Representation involves securing favorable interim relief remedies before the DIFC Courts in Dubai.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCanadian construction company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL construction arbitration under Saudi law, involving allegations of delay in the performance of a project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungary\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration under the Hungary-Portugal BIT in relation to the bankruptcy of the investor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePolish chemical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a London-based ICC arbitration under New York law relating to the termination of a supply agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungarian energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) involving the company's investments in Croatia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the government of Egypt under the U.S.-Egypt bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehotel management company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a London-based ICC arbitration under the laws of the United Arab Emirates relating to a hotel in the UAE.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules involving allegations of breach of contract by one of its global vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehotel management company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Paris-based ICC arbitration relating to a hospitality project in Lebanon under the laws of Lebanon.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eMalaysian joint venture\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute under the LCIA arbitration rules related to the supply of equipment to an offshore oil platform in Qatar.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eDjiboutian company\u003c/strong\u003e in ICDR arbitration proceedings governed by Texas law against a U.S. government contractor for breach of contract for the performance of personnel recruitment and management at a U.S. Navy base in Djibouti.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican aerospace, arms, defense and technology corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute with a Western Asian government\u0026rsquo;s military, involving the manufacture and supply of helicopters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican multinational aerospace and defense technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC dispute against the Armed Forces of a Middle Eastern government, involving the supply of helicopter acoustic warning technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization via helicopter in South Sudan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican multinational aerospace and defense technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding its obligations and remedies for delivery of aircraft fuselage parts to a European aircraft manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing as\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmergency Arbitrator\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an AAA/ICDR dispute (New York law, New York seat) between a Swiss electromechanical repair and consulting company operating in the aviation industry, and a US developer of Brain Fingerprinting technology relating to allegations of fraudulent inducement and IP right violations in connection with a partnership agreement between the parties.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1142,"guid":"1142.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1472,"guid":"1472.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Haridi","nick_name":"Samaa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Samaa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Global Elite Thought Leader (Arbitration)","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2022"},{"title":"International Arbitration (Counsel) ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2015-2022"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2015, 2017-2022"},{"title":"Advocate of the Year ","detail":"Muslim Bar Association of New York, 2020"},{"title":"Notable Women in Law for professional skills, exemplary leadership skills and impact on the local community","detail":"Crain’s New York Business, 2019"},{"title":"Thought Leader (Arbitration)","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2017-2019"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2015"},{"title":"Burton Award (Excellence in Legal Writing)","detail":"Burton Foundation, 2009"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/samaa-haridi-240282/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSamaa Haridi is a civil and common law-trained, trilingual lawyer with over 20 years of experience representing clients from all over the world in international commercial and investment arbitration, under the rules of all major arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamaa has been singled out by clients for being \u0026ldquo;spectacular\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;outstanding,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;energetic and determined,\u0026rdquo; a \u0026ldquo;magnificent lawyer,\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;really, really phenomenal\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e). Sources also acknowledge her as being a \u0026ldquo;first-class arbitration lawyer; one of the best in the region\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e) and a \u0026ldquo;global leader\u0026rdquo; whose \u0026ldquo;reputation is sky rocketing\u0026rdquo; (\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e). She is one of fifteen international arbitration practitioners in North America singled out by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Global Elite Thought Leader \u0026ndash; Arbitration.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her work as counsel, Samaa frequently sits as an arbitrator in international commercial and investment disputes. She is also currently serving as an officer in a number of arbitral organizations, including as Vice President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, past Senior Co-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association, and a member of ICCA\u0026rsquo;s Governing Board.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamaa is a member of the New York, California, and England \u0026amp; Wales bars. She is fluent in French and Arabic, and conversant in Spanish.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events in the Middle East and North Africa.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; MENA Leading Arbitrators\u0026rsquo; Guide to International Arbitration,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eJURIS\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Security for Costs and Claims in International Arbitration.\u0026rdquo; Provisional and Emergency Measures in International Arbitration,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEdward Elgar Publishing\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Arbitration as a Key Tool for Businesses in the MENA Region.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAfrican Business\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2023)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;COVID-19 and Energy Disputes.\u0026rdquo; International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eKluwer Law International\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Security for Costs and Claim Under the ICC Rules of Arbitration: Rare but Possible.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication, \u0026ldquo;The Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC),\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWorld Arbitration Reporter\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication, \u0026ldquo;Article 26 of the Convention on The Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States,\u0026rdquo; published in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe ICSID Convention, Regulation and Rules \u0026ndash; A Practical Commentary\u003c/em\u003e, Edward Elgar Publishing (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapter Publication \u0026ldquo;Enforcement of ICSID Awards\u0026rdquo; published in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Arbitration in the United States\u003c/em\u003e, Wolter\u0026rsquo;s Kluwer (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Public Policy: Can the Unruly Horse be Tamed?\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation, and Dispute Management\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Using New York Fora to Enforce Judgments After Motorola Credit Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank and Daimler AG v. Bauman.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNew York Dispute Resolution Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Towards Greater Gender and Ethnic Diversity in International Arbitration.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Arbitration Review of the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;The Public Policy Exception Under the New York Convention: The Unruly Arabian Horse in the Middle East Region.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eTransnational Dispute Management\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;New York Courts Revisit the Balance Between Debtors and Creditors in Enforcement Proceedings.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Bar Association Arbitration News\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(2014)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCanadian and Lebanese investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Armenia, in connection with the expropriation of waste management contracts in the country's capital.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization in South Sudan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a leading\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eChina-based conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its affiliates in an AAA-ICDR arbitration under Delaware law (San Francisco seat) brought by former business partners in relation to a failed U.S.-based online travel agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSpanish contractor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Paris-based ICC arbitration under Greek law involving the upgrade of an oil refinery in Greece.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eJapanese telecommunications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an ICC arbitration under English law with a voice termination services provider involving alleged breaches of an international voice service agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFrench disposable consumer products manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC arbitration under Indian law against an Indian former joint venture partner in relation to the French company's failed investment in India.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFrench car maker\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute governed by California law against a film production company in relation to the placement of the car's brand and logo in a major motion picture.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmirati hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Mexican construction company in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Mexican law and administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of delay in the construction of a hotel in Mexico.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungarian energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of corruption and related efforts to terminate agreements to acquire shares of a large energy company in Croatia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Investment Commission of the Government of Liberia\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to a dispute arising out of a Concession Agreement for the rehabilitation and management of the Freeport of Monrovia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential ICSID arbitration against the Kingdom of Morocco in connection with the expropriation of a waste management contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. retailer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration under Saudi and Yemeni laws involving allegations of unlawful termination of a distribution relationship in Yemen. Representation involves securing favorable interim relief remedies before the DIFC Courts in Dubai.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCanadian construction company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL construction arbitration under Saudi law, involving allegations of delay in the performance of a project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungary\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration under the Hungary-Portugal BIT in relation to the bankruptcy of the investor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePolish chemical manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a London-based ICC arbitration under New York law relating to the termination of a supply agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHungarian energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) involving the company's investments in Croatia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against the government of Egypt under the U.S.-Egypt bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehotel management company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a London-based ICC arbitration under the laws of the United Arab Emirates relating to a hotel in the UAE.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules involving allegations of breach of contract by one of its global vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehotel management company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Paris-based ICC arbitration relating to a hospitality project in Lebanon under the laws of Lebanon.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eMalaysian joint venture\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute under the LCIA arbitration rules related to the supply of equipment to an offshore oil platform in Qatar.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eDjiboutian company\u003c/strong\u003e in ICDR arbitration proceedings governed by Texas law against a U.S. government contractor for breach of contract for the performance of personnel recruitment and management at a U.S. Navy base in Djibouti.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican aerospace, arms, defense and technology corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute with a Western Asian government\u0026rsquo;s military, involving the manufacture and supply of helicopters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican multinational aerospace and defense technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC dispute against the Armed Forces of a Middle Eastern government, involving the supply of helicopter acoustic warning technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge international organization\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization via helicopter in South Sudan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican multinational aerospace and defense technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding its obligations and remedies for delivery of aircraft fuselage parts to a European aircraft manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing as\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmergency Arbitrator\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an AAA/ICDR dispute (New York law, New York seat) between a Swiss electromechanical repair and consulting company operating in the aviation industry, and a US developer of Brain Fingerprinting technology relating to allegations of fraudulent inducement and IP right violations in connection with a partnership agreement between the parties.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Global Elite Thought Leader (Arbitration)","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2022"},{"title":"International Arbitration (Counsel) ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2015-2022"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2015, 2017-2022"},{"title":"Advocate of the Year ","detail":"Muslim Bar Association of New York, 2020"},{"title":"Notable Women in Law for professional skills, exemplary leadership skills and impact on the local community","detail":"Crain’s New York Business, 2019"},{"title":"Thought Leader (Arbitration)","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2017-2019"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2015"},{"title":"Burton Award (Excellence in Legal Writing)","detail":"Burton Foundation, 2009"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9448}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T04:59:50.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T04:59:50.000Z","searchable_text":"Haridi{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Global Elite Thought Leader (Arbitration)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration (Counsel) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2015-2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2015, 2017-2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Advocate of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Muslim Bar Association of New York, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable Women in Law for professional skills, exemplary leadership skills and impact on the local community\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain’s New York Business, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Thought Leader (Arbitration)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal, 2017-2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Future Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Burton Award (Excellence in Legal Writing)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Burton Foundation, 2009\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing Canadian and Lebanese investors in an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Armenia, in connection with the expropriation of waste management contracts in the country's capital.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international organization in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization in South Sudan.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading China-based conglomerate and its affiliates in an AAA-ICDR arbitration under Delaware law (San Francisco seat) brought by former business partners in relation to a failed U.S.-based online travel agency.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Spanish contractor in a Paris-based ICC arbitration under Greek law involving the upgrade of an oil refinery in Greece.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large Japanese telecommunications company an ICC arbitration under English law with a voice termination services provider involving alleged breaches of an international voice service agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a French disposable consumer products manufacturer in a SIAC arbitration under Indian law against an Indian former joint venture partner in relation to the French company's failed investment in India.{{ FIELD }}Representing a French car maker in a dispute governed by California law against a film production company in relation to the placement of the car's brand and logo in a major motion picture.{{ FIELD }}Representing an Emirati hospitality company against a Mexican construction company in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Mexican law and administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of delay in the construction of a hotel in Mexico.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Hungarian energy company in an UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of corruption and related efforts to terminate agreements to acquire shares of a large energy company in Croatia.{{ FIELD }}Advising the National Investment Commission of the Government of Liberia in relation to a dispute arising out of a Concession Agreement for the rehabilitation and management of the Freeport of Monrovia.{{ FIELD }}Advising U.S. investors in a potential ICSID arbitration against the Kingdom of Morocco in connection with the expropriation of a waste management contract.{{ FIELD }}Representing a U.S. retailer in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration under Saudi and Yemeni laws involving allegations of unlawful termination of a distribution relationship in Yemen. Representation involves securing favorable interim relief remedies before the DIFC Courts in Dubai.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Canadian construction company in an UNCITRAL construction arbitration under Saudi law, involving allegations of delay in the performance of a project.{{ FIELD }}Representing Hungary in an ICSID arbitration under the Hungary-Portugal BIT in relation to the bankruptcy of the investor.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Polish chemical manufacturer in a London-based ICC arbitration under New York law relating to the termination of a supply agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Hungarian energy company in an ICSID arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) involving the company's investments in Croatia.{{ FIELD }}Advising an American investor in an ICSID arbitration against the government of Egypt under the U.S.-Egypt bilateral investment treaty.{{ FIELD }}Representing a hotel management company in a London-based ICC arbitration under the laws of the United Arab Emirates relating to a hotel in the UAE.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international organization in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules involving allegations of breach of contract by one of its global vendors.{{ FIELD }}Representing a hotel management company in a Paris-based ICC arbitration relating to a hospitality project in Lebanon under the laws of Lebanon.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Malaysian joint venture in a dispute under the LCIA arbitration rules related to the supply of equipment to an offshore oil platform in Qatar.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Djiboutian company in ICDR arbitration proceedings governed by Texas law against a U.S. government contractor for breach of contract for the performance of personnel recruitment and management at a U.S. Navy base in Djibouti.{{ FIELD }}Representing an American aerospace, arms, defense and technology corporation in a dispute with a Western Asian government’s military, involving the manufacture and supply of helicopters.{{ FIELD }}Representing an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company in an ICC dispute against the Armed Forces of a Middle Eastern government, involving the supply of helicopter acoustic warning technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international organization in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization via helicopter in South Sudan.{{ FIELD }}Advising an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company regarding its obligations and remedies for delivery of aircraft fuselage parts to a European aircraft manufacturer.{{ FIELD }}Acting as Emergency Arbitrator in an AAA/ICDR dispute (New York law, New York seat) between a Swiss electromechanical repair and consulting company operating in the aviation industry, and a US developer of Brain Fingerprinting technology relating to allegations of fraudulent inducement and IP right violations in connection with a partnership agreement between the parties.{{ FIELD }}Samaa Haridi is a civil and common law-trained, trilingual lawyer with over 20 years of experience representing clients from all over the world in international commercial and investment arbitration, under the rules of all major arbitral institutions.\nSamaa has been singled out by clients for being “spectacular”, “outstanding,” “energetic and determined,” a “magnificent lawyer,” and “really, really phenomenal” (Chambers USA). Sources also acknowledge her as being a “first-class arbitration lawyer; one of the best in the region” (Who’s Who Legal) and a “global leader” whose “reputation is sky rocketing” (Who’s Who Legal). She is one of fifteen international arbitration practitioners in North America singled out by Who’s Who Legal as a Global Elite Thought Leader – Arbitration.\nIn addition to her work as counsel, Samaa frequently sits as an arbitrator in international commercial and investment disputes. She is also currently serving as an officer in a number of arbitral organizations, including as Vice President of the ICC International Court of Arbitration, past Senior Co-Chair of the Arbitration Committee of the International Bar Association, and a member of ICCA’s Governing Board.\nSamaa is a member of the New York, California, and England \u0026amp; Wales bars. She is fluent in French and Arabic, and conversant in Spanish.\nPublications:\n\n“Force Majeure and Unforeseen Events in the Middle East and North Africa.”  MENA Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration, JURIS (2023)\n“Security for Costs and Claims in International Arbitration.” Provisional and Emergency Measures in International Arbitration, Edward Elgar Publishing (2023)\n “Arbitration as a Key Tool for Businesses in the MENA Region.” African Business (2023)\n“COVID-19 and Energy Disputes.” International Arbitration and the COVID-19 Revolution, Kluwer Law International (2020)\n“Security for Costs and Claim Under the ICC Rules of Arbitration: Rare but Possible.” ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin (2020)\nChapter Publication, “The Agreement on Promotion, Protection and Guarantee of Investments Among Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC),” World Arbitration Reporter (2019)\nChapter Publication, “Article 26 of the Convention on The Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States,” published in The ICSID Convention, Regulation and Rules – A Practical Commentary, Edward Elgar Publishing (2019)\nChapter Publication “Enforcement of ICSID Awards” published in International Arbitration in the United States, Wolter’s Kluwer (2017)\n“Public Policy: Can the Unruly Horse be Tamed?” The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation, and Dispute Management (2017)\n“Using New York Fora to Enforce Judgments After Motorola Credit Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank and Daimler AG v. Bauman.” New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer (2016)\n“Towards Greater Gender and Ethnic Diversity in International Arbitration.” International Arbitration Review of the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution (2016)\n“The Public Policy Exception Under the New York Convention: The Unruly Arabian Horse in the Middle East Region.” Transnational Dispute Management (2015)\n“New York Courts Revisit the Balance Between Debtors and Creditors in Enforcement Proceedings.” International Bar Association Arbitration News (2014)\n Partner Global Elite Thought Leader (Arbitration) Who's Who Legal, 2022 International Arbitration (Counsel)  Chambers USA, 2015-2022 International Arbitration Legal 500 US, 2015, 2017-2022 Advocate of the Year  Muslim Bar Association of New York, 2020 Notable Women in Law for professional skills, exemplary leadership skills and impact on the local community Crain’s New York Business, 2019 Thought Leader (Arbitration) Who's Who Legal, 2017-2019 Future Star Benchmark Litigation, 2015 Burton Award (Excellence in Legal Writing) Burton Foundation, 2009 University of Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne  University of San Diego University of San Diego School of Law University of Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne  U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York California New York England and Wales Vice President, ICC Court of Arbitration Member, Advisory Council of Africa Arbitration (AA) Member, Arbitral Women Member, New York International Arbitration Club Member, French-American Bar Association (FABA) Former Vice President, LCIA Arab Users' Council Former Co-Editor-in-Chief, ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin Former Editorial Board Member, Kluwer Journal of International Arbitration Panel of Arbitrators, Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) Panel of Arbitrators, International Centre for Dispute Resolution (AAA/ICDR) Panel of Arbitrators, Dubai International Arbitration Center (DIAC) Member, ICCA Governing Board Past Senior Co-Chair, Arbitration Committee, International Bar Association Executive Committee Member, Foundation for International Arbitration Advocacy (FIAA) Global Steering Committee Member, Equal Representation in Arbitration Pledge Advisory Committee Member, Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) Vice President of Arbitration Committee, Lagos Court of Arbitration Users Council Member, Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) Former Member (Egypt), ICC Court of Arbitration Representing Canadian and Lebanese investors in an ICSID arbitration against the Republic of Armenia, in connection with the expropriation of waste management contracts in the country's capital. Representing a large international organization in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization in South Sudan. Representing a leading China-based conglomerate and its affiliates in an AAA-ICDR arbitration under Delaware law (San Francisco seat) brought by former business partners in relation to a failed U.S.-based online travel agency. Representing a Spanish contractor in a Paris-based ICC arbitration under Greek law involving the upgrade of an oil refinery in Greece. Representing a large Japanese telecommunications company an ICC arbitration under English law with a voice termination services provider involving alleged breaches of an international voice service agreement. Representing a French disposable consumer products manufacturer in a SIAC arbitration under Indian law against an Indian former joint venture partner in relation to the French company's failed investment in India. Representing a French car maker in a dispute governed by California law against a film production company in relation to the placement of the car's brand and logo in a major motion picture. Representing an Emirati hospitality company against a Mexican construction company in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Mexican law and administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of delay in the construction of a hotel in Mexico. Representing a Hungarian energy company in an UNCITRAL arbitration administered by the PCA, in relation to allegations of corruption and related efforts to terminate agreements to acquire shares of a large energy company in Croatia. Advising the National Investment Commission of the Government of Liberia in relation to a dispute arising out of a Concession Agreement for the rehabilitation and management of the Freeport of Monrovia. Advising U.S. investors in a potential ICSID arbitration against the Kingdom of Morocco in connection with the expropriation of a waste management contract. Representing a U.S. retailer in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration under Saudi and Yemeni laws involving allegations of unlawful termination of a distribution relationship in Yemen. Representation involves securing favorable interim relief remedies before the DIFC Courts in Dubai. Representing a Canadian construction company in an UNCITRAL construction arbitration under Saudi law, involving allegations of delay in the performance of a project. Representing Hungary in an ICSID arbitration under the Hungary-Portugal BIT in relation to the bankruptcy of the investor. Representing a Polish chemical manufacturer in a London-based ICC arbitration under New York law relating to the termination of a supply agreement. Representing a Hungarian energy company in an ICSID arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) involving the company's investments in Croatia. Advising an American investor in an ICSID arbitration against the government of Egypt under the U.S.-Egypt bilateral investment treaty. Representing a hotel management company in a London-based ICC arbitration under the laws of the United Arab Emirates relating to a hotel in the UAE. Representing a large international organization in an ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL rules involving allegations of breach of contract by one of its global vendors. Representing a hotel management company in a Paris-based ICC arbitration relating to a hospitality project in Lebanon under the laws of Lebanon. Representing a Malaysian joint venture in a dispute under the LCIA arbitration rules related to the supply of equipment to an offshore oil platform in Qatar. Representing a Djiboutian company in ICDR arbitration proceedings governed by Texas law against a U.S. government contractor for breach of contract for the performance of personnel recruitment and management at a U.S. Navy base in Djibouti. Representing an American aerospace, arms, defense and technology corporation in a dispute with a Western Asian government’s military, involving the manufacture and supply of helicopters. Representing an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company in an ICC dispute against the Armed Forces of a Middle Eastern government, involving the supply of helicopter acoustic warning technology. Representing a large international organization in an international commercial arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL arbitration rules involving a contractual dispute with an aircraft vendor servicing the international organization via helicopter in South Sudan. Advising an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company regarding its obligations and remedies for delivery of aircraft fuselage parts to a European aircraft manufacturer. Acting as Emergency Arbitrator in an AAA/ICDR dispute (New York law, New York seat) between a Swiss electromechanical repair and consulting company operating in the aviation industry, and a US developer of Brain Fingerprinting technology relating to allegations of fraudulent inducement and IP right violations in connection with a partnership agreement between the parties.","searchable_name":"Samaa A. Haridi","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5780,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"laura-harris","email":"lharris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":113,"guid":"113.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Harris","nick_name":"Laura","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Laura","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1904,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9299}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Harris{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats{{ FIELD }}Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates{{ FIELD }}Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer{{ FIELD }}Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive{{ FIELD }}Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR{{ FIELD }}Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.{{ FIELD }}Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets{{ FIELD }}Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims{{ FIELD }}Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment{{ FIELD }}Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation{{ FIELD }}Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action{{ FIELD }}Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games{{ FIELD }}Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA{{ FIELD }}Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates{{ FIELD }}Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital{{ FIELD }}Laura Harris’s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.  She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation. \nHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.\nLaura’s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\nLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.  Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C. Partner Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars 2015-2020 Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Stanford University Stanford Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants. Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement. Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF. Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital","searchable_name":"Laura Harris","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436449,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4136,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTaCara Harris is a partner in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and serves as Chair of our Pharmaceutical \u0026amp; Medical Device Litigation practice. Her practice\u0026nbsp;concentrates on representing clients in the pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer products industries in nationwide product liability\u0026nbsp;litigation.\u0026nbsp;TaCara handles all aspects of large-scale, high-stakes mass tort litigation across the country in state court consolidated proceedings and in multidistrict litigation from early case assessment, through discovery, and on to summary judgment, trial, settlement, and appeal. Having obtained favorable results for clients in eight multi-week, product liability jury trials, TaCara handles each matter with a view toward trial, considering how to communicate effectively to a jury a host of complex scientific, technical, and regulatory issues.\u0026nbsp; In addition to her litigation practice, TaCara also conducts internal investigations and legal risk assessments, advising clients on liability avoidance and risk mitigation and management strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, TaCara is a zealous advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion.\u0026nbsp; She co-chairs King \u0026amp; Spalding's\u0026nbsp;Women\u0026rsquo;s Health Initiative,\u0026nbsp;African American Affinity Group,\u0026nbsp;and Pipeline, Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion Subcommittee of Diversity Committee.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTaCara earned her J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School with honors in 2013. While attending law school, TaCara was a law clerk at the Office of the General Counsel of Vanderbilt University, where she assisted the university and medical center with defense of claims, compliance research and policy drafting regarding Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, TaCara worked as an intern for the Office of the General Counsel of Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University. She\u0026nbsp;is also committed to \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e work, including assisting military veterans with meritorious claims seeking benefits and healthcare.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReport of the Independent Investigation to the U.S. Soccer Federation Concerning Allegations of Abusive Behavior and Sexual Misconduct in Women\u0026rsquo;s Professional Soccer (co-authored with Sally Q. Yates and an all-female King \u0026amp; Spalding team),\u0026nbsp;October 3, 2022\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTaking a \u0026ldquo;Hard Look\u0026rdquo; at Expert Witness Testimony Under Rule 702 | IADC\u0026rsquo;s Defense Counsel Journal,\u0026nbsp;January 26, 2022\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFDA Warns That Most Hair Smoothing or Straightening Products Release Formaldehyde Gas During the Hair Straightening or Smoothing Process, (March 31, 2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Establishment of the White House Gender Policy Council and Its Implications for FDA Initiatives and Priorities, March 15, 2021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Is Forum Shopping for Equal Rights on the Horizon?\u0026rdquo; Baker Donelson\u0026rsquo;s Labor and Employment News, May 2014\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Defending Against No-Injury Product Liability Litigation,\u0026rdquo; CLE Presentation \u0026ndash; Hot Topics for In-House Counsel, Nashville, November 2013\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEducation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVanderbilt University Law School, J.D., 2013\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Vanderbilt Scholastic Excellence Award for Highest Grade in Legal Writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Highest Grade in Pre-Trial Litigation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; McGuireWoods Diversity Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Diversity Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Lloyd M. Johnson (Arnold \u0026amp; Porter LLP) Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTeaching Assistant \u0026minus; Legal Research and Writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearch Assistant \u0026minus; Professor David Williams\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecruiting and Retention Chair \u0026minus; Black Law Students Association\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSemi-Finalist \u0026minus; 1L Mock Trial Competition\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"tacara-harris","email":"tharris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eMDL pending in the Northern District of California and the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Cases\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as a member of the trial team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Chicago in the matter of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Illinois 2017), for the first-ever tried \"innovator liability\" case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in Proton Pump Inhibitors Product Liability Litigation involving allegations of acute and chronic kidney disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational medical device company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein female pelvic mesh litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSEC university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSEC university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of the trial team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein numerous\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEngle\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eprogeny personal injury/wrongful death cases pending in Florida.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Harris","nick_name":"TaCara","clerkships":[],"first_name":"TaCara","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Dean's List","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star”","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Lawyers of Color Second Annual Hot List – Issue 2014 (recognizing early- to mid-career attorneys who are excelling in the legal profession)","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTaCara Harris is a partner in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and serves as Chair of our Pharmaceutical \u0026amp; Medical Device Litigation practice. Her practice\u0026nbsp;concentrates on representing clients in the pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer products industries in nationwide product liability\u0026nbsp;litigation.\u0026nbsp;TaCara handles all aspects of large-scale, high-stakes mass tort litigation across the country in state court consolidated proceedings and in multidistrict litigation from early case assessment, through discovery, and on to summary judgment, trial, settlement, and appeal. Having obtained favorable results for clients in eight multi-week, product liability jury trials, TaCara handles each matter with a view toward trial, considering how to communicate effectively to a jury a host of complex scientific, technical, and regulatory issues.\u0026nbsp; In addition to her litigation practice, TaCara also conducts internal investigations and legal risk assessments, advising clients on liability avoidance and risk mitigation and management strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, TaCara is a zealous advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion.\u0026nbsp; She co-chairs King \u0026amp; Spalding's\u0026nbsp;Women\u0026rsquo;s Health Initiative,\u0026nbsp;African American Affinity Group,\u0026nbsp;and Pipeline, Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion Subcommittee of Diversity Committee.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTaCara earned her J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School with honors in 2013. While attending law school, TaCara was a law clerk at the Office of the General Counsel of Vanderbilt University, where she assisted the university and medical center with defense of claims, compliance research and policy drafting regarding Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and other state and federal laws.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, TaCara worked as an intern for the Office of the General Counsel of Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University. She\u0026nbsp;is also committed to \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e work, including assisting military veterans with meritorious claims seeking benefits and healthcare.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReport of the Independent Investigation to the U.S. Soccer Federation Concerning Allegations of Abusive Behavior and Sexual Misconduct in Women\u0026rsquo;s Professional Soccer (co-authored with Sally Q. Yates and an all-female King \u0026amp; Spalding team),\u0026nbsp;October 3, 2022\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTaking a \u0026ldquo;Hard Look\u0026rdquo; at Expert Witness Testimony Under Rule 702 | IADC\u0026rsquo;s Defense Counsel Journal,\u0026nbsp;January 26, 2022\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFDA Warns That Most Hair Smoothing or Straightening Products Release Formaldehyde Gas During the Hair Straightening or Smoothing Process, (March 31, 2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Establishment of the White House Gender Policy Council and Its Implications for FDA Initiatives and Priorities, March 15, 2021\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Is Forum Shopping for Equal Rights on the Horizon?\u0026rdquo; Baker Donelson\u0026rsquo;s Labor and Employment News, May 2014\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Defending Against No-Injury Product Liability Litigation,\u0026rdquo; CLE Presentation \u0026ndash; Hot Topics for In-House Counsel, Nashville, November 2013\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEducation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVanderbilt University Law School, J.D., 2013\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Vanderbilt Scholastic Excellence Award for Highest Grade in Legal Writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Highest Grade in Pre-Trial Litigation\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; McGuireWoods Diversity Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Diversity Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecipient \u0026minus; Lloyd M. Johnson (Arnold \u0026amp; Porter LLP) Scholarship\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTeaching Assistant \u0026minus; Legal Research and Writing\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResearch Assistant \u0026minus; Professor David Williams\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRecruiting and Retention Chair \u0026minus; Black Law Students Association\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSemi-Finalist \u0026minus; 1L Mock Trial Competition\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTikTok\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eMDL pending in the Northern District of California and the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Cases\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as a member of the trial team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Chicago in the matter of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Illinois 2017), for the first-ever tried \"innovator liability\" case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in Proton Pump Inhibitors Product Liability Litigation involving allegations of acute and chronic kidney disease.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational medical device company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein female pelvic mesh litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSEC university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSEC university\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of the trial team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein numerous\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEngle\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eprogeny personal injury/wrongful death cases pending in Florida.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star”","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Lawyers of Color Second Annual Hot List – Issue 2014 (recognizing early- to mid-career attorneys who are excelling in the legal profession)","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4225}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Harris{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawyers of Color Second Annual Hot List – Issue 2014 (recognizing early- to mid-career attorneys who are excelling in the legal profession)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Co-Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation MDL pending in the Northern District of California and the In re Social Media Cases JCCP pending in Los Angeles County.{{ FIELD }}Served as a member of the trial team representing GlaxoSmithKline in federal court in Chicago in the matter of Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017), for the first-ever tried \"innovator liability\" case.{{ FIELD }}Member of team serving as national coordinating counsel for international pharmaceutical company in Proton Pump Inhibitors Product Liability Litigation involving allegations of acute and chronic kidney disease.{{ FIELD }}Member of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel for an international medical device company in female pelvic mesh litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing an SEC university in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.{{ FIELD }}Representing an SEC university in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries.{{ FIELD }}Member of the trial team representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in numerous Engle progeny personal injury/wrongful death cases pending in Florida.{{ FIELD }}TaCara Harris is a partner in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and serves as Chair of our Pharmaceutical \u0026amp; Medical Device Litigation practice. Her practice concentrates on representing clients in the pharmaceutical, medical device, and consumer products industries in nationwide product liability litigation. TaCara handles all aspects of large-scale, high-stakes mass tort litigation across the country in state court consolidated proceedings and in multidistrict litigation from early case assessment, through discovery, and on to summary judgment, trial, settlement, and appeal. Having obtained favorable results for clients in eight multi-week, product liability jury trials, TaCara handles each matter with a view toward trial, considering how to communicate effectively to a jury a host of complex scientific, technical, and regulatory issues.  In addition to her litigation practice, TaCara also conducts internal investigations and legal risk assessments, advising clients on liability avoidance and risk mitigation and management strategy.\nAdditionally, TaCara is a zealous advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion.  She co-chairs King \u0026amp; Spalding's Women’s Health Initiative, African American Affinity Group, and Pipeline, Recruitment, Retention, and Promotion Subcommittee of Diversity Committee.\nTaCara earned her J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School with honors in 2013. While attending law school, TaCara was a law clerk at the Office of the General Counsel of Vanderbilt University, where she assisted the university and medical center with defense of claims, compliance research and policy drafting regarding Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and other state and federal laws. \nPrior to law school, TaCara worked as an intern for the Office of the General Counsel of Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University. She is also committed to pro bono work, including assisting military veterans with meritorious claims seeking benefits and healthcare. \nPublications\n\nReport of the Independent Investigation to the U.S. Soccer Federation Concerning Allegations of Abusive Behavior and Sexual Misconduct in Women’s Professional Soccer (co-authored with Sally Q. Yates and an all-female King \u0026amp; Spalding team), October 3, 2022\nTaking a “Hard Look” at Expert Witness Testimony Under Rule 702 | IADC’s Defense Counsel Journal, January 26, 2022\nFDA Warns That Most Hair Smoothing or Straightening Products Release Formaldehyde Gas During the Hair Straightening or Smoothing Process, (March 31, 2021)\nThe Establishment of the White House Gender Policy Council and Its Implications for FDA Initiatives and Priorities, March 15, 2021\n“Is Forum Shopping for Equal Rights on the Horizon?” Baker Donelson’s Labor and Employment News, May 2014\n“Defending Against No-Injury Product Liability Litigation,” CLE Presentation – Hot Topics for In-House Counsel, Nashville, November 2013\n\nEducation\n\nVanderbilt University Law School, J.D., 2013\n\nRecipient − Vanderbilt Scholastic Excellence Award for Highest Grade in Legal Writing\nRecipient − Highest Grade in Pre-Trial Litigation\nRecipient − McGuireWoods Diversity Scholarship\nRecipient − Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Diversity Scholarship\nRecipient − Lloyd M. Johnson (Arnold \u0026amp; Porter LLP) Scholarship\nTeaching Assistant − Legal Research and Writing\nResearch Assistant − Professor David Williams\nRecruiting and Retention Chair − Black Law Students Association\nSemi-Finalist − 1L Mock Trial Competition\n\n\n Partner Selected by Super Lawyers as a “Rising Star” Super Lawyers Lawyers of Color Second Annual Hot List – Issue 2014 (recognizing early- to mid-career attorneys who are excelling in the legal profession)  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Georgia Tennessee Georgia Association of Black Women Lawyers Co-Counsel to TikTok in nationwide litigation in which individual plaintiffs allege personal injuries and school districts and other governmental entities allege economic damages arising from adolescent use of various online communications services, including in the In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation MDL pending in the Northern District of California and the In re Social Media Cases JCCP pending in Los Angeles County. Served as a member of the trial team representing GlaxoSmithKline in federal court in Chicago in the matter of Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017), for the first-ever tried \"innovator liability\" case. Member of team serving as national coordinating counsel for international pharmaceutical company in Proton Pump Inhibitors Product Liability Litigation involving allegations of acute and chronic kidney disease. Member of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel for an international medical device company in female pelvic mesh litigation. Representing an SEC university in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries. Representing an SEC university in a putative class action pending in an MDL before the Northern District of Illinois that alleges the university failed to protect football players from concussion-related injuries. Member of the trial team representing R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in numerous Engle progeny personal injury/wrongful death cases pending in Florida.","searchable_name":"TaCara Harris","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442344,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":664,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"s-stewart-haskins","email":"shaskins@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to compel arbitration in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enationwide class action\u003c/strong\u003e filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMissaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company\u003c/em\u003e, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea defendant health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e in a TCPA class action. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePhillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eXLHealth Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was \u0026ldquo;informational\u0026rdquo; and not an \u0026ldquo;advertisement\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGoldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment and mooted plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A.,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to dismiss for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNBC Universal\u003c/strong\u003e in a purported class action that contended the defendant\u0026rsquo;s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDeal or No Deal\u003c/em\u003e, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claim and the case was dismissed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Hardin v. NBC Universal\u003c/em\u003e, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative class action\u003c/strong\u003e reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher\u003c/em\u003e, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRickher v. Home Depot, Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an appeal that clarified \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe defendant's\u003c/strong\u003e burden in removing cases under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a case of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003efirst impression\u003c/strong\u003e in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSaab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in a case against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSchwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational consumer class action counsel for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFortune\u003c/em\u003e 50 company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":78}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Haskins","nick_name":"Stewart","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Sidney","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Stewart","name_suffix":"II","recognitions":[{"title":"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Class Action Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360, 2010 and 2012"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to compel arbitration in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enationwide class action\u003c/strong\u003e filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMissaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company\u003c/em\u003e, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea defendant health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e in a TCPA class action. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePhillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eXLHealth Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was \u0026ldquo;informational\u0026rdquo; and not an \u0026ldquo;advertisement\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGoldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment and mooted plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A.,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to dismiss for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNBC Universal\u003c/strong\u003e in a purported class action that contended the defendant\u0026rsquo;s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDeal or No Deal\u003c/em\u003e, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claim and the case was dismissed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Hardin v. NBC Universal\u003c/em\u003e, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative class action\u003c/strong\u003e reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher\u003c/em\u003e, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRickher v. Home Depot, Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an appeal that clarified \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe defendant's\u003c/strong\u003e burden in removing cases under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a case of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003efirst impression\u003c/strong\u003e in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSaab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in a case against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSchwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational consumer class action counsel for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFortune\u003c/em\u003e 50 company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Class Action Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360, 2010 and 2012"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":900}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Haskins{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Class Action Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2010 and 2012\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).{{ FIELD }}Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment for a defendant health insurer in a TCPA class action. Phillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v. XLHealth Corp., Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was “informational” and not an “advertisement”).{{ FIELD }}Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment and mooted plaintiff’s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging Home Depot’s collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. See Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).{{ FIELD }}Won a motion to dismiss for NBC Universal in a purported class action that contended the defendant’s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show Deal or No Deal, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff’s claim and the case was dismissed. See Hardin v. NBC Universal, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).{{ FIELD }}Obtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a putative class action reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. The Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Rickher v. Home Depot, Inc., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).{{ FIELD }}Won an appeal that clarified the defendant's burden in removing cases under CAFA. Frederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).{{ FIELD }}In a case of first impression in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).{{ FIELD }}Defeated class certification in a case against an insurance company alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.Schwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co., 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).{{ FIELD }}National consumer class action counsel for a Fortune 50 company.{{ FIELD }}Stewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\n\nStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\nThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\nAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which Law360 selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\nFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\nIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes. S Stewart Haskins Partner 2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Class Action Group of the Year  Law360, 2010 and 2012 University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals Georgia Superior Court American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014. Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification). Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO. Won summary judgment for a defendant health insurer in a TCPA class action. Phillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v. XLHealth Corp., Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was “informational” and not an “advertisement”). Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009). Won summary judgment and mooted plaintiff’s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging Home Depot’s collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. See Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009). Won a motion to dismiss for NBC Universal in a purported class action that contended the defendant’s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show Deal or No Deal, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff’s claim and the case was dismissed. See Hardin v. NBC Universal, 283 Ga. 477 (2008). Obtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a putative class action reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. The Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Rickher v. Home Depot, Inc., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008). Won an appeal that clarified the defendant's burden in removing cases under CAFA. Frederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss). In a case of first impression in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006). Defeated class certification in a case against an insurance company alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.Schwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co., 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington). National consumer class action counsel for a Fortune 50 company.","searchable_name":"Sidney Stewart Haskins II (Stewart)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445365,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7301,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJosh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries\u0026mdash;including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy\u0026mdash;providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D.,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMichigan Law Review\u003c/em\u003e. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joshua-hazan","email":"jhazan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMcKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRefinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWaste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hazan","nick_name":"Joshua","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","years_held":"2015 - 2016"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Joshua","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2237,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/josh-hazan-08322841/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJosh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries\u0026mdash;including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy\u0026mdash;providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D.,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMichigan Law Review\u003c/em\u003e. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMcKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRefinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWaste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13324}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-29T22:07:17.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-29T22:07:17.000Z","searchable_text":"Hazan{{ FIELD }}JPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis{{ FIELD }}HCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements{{ FIELD }}Sun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing{{ FIELD }}McKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation{{ FIELD }}Refinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group{{ FIELD }}Deutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds{{ FIELD }}Waste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems{{ FIELD }}HCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson{{ FIELD }}Tyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation{{ FIELD }}Josh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.\nJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries—including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy—providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\nPrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the Michigan Law Review. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan. Partner University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Law Clerk, Hon. Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Law Clerk, Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York JPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis HCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements Sun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing McKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation Refinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group Deutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds Waste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems HCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson Tyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation","searchable_name":"Joshua Hazan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443236,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5574,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDoug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation. \u0026nbsp;Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.\u0026nbsp; As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.\u0026nbsp; A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026). \u0026nbsp;Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"doug-henderson","email":"dhenderson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions\u0026mdash;the jury entered a \u0026ldquo;not\u0026rdquo; negligent verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts\u0026mdash;with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1184,"guid":"1184.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1205,"guid":"1205.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1236,"guid":"1236.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Henderson","nick_name":"Douglas","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Douglas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2210,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1993-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers","detail":"2014, 2018"},{"title":"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer","detail":"2015"},{"title":"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019"},{"title":"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026 Politics and Atlanta Magazine","detail":"2004-2017"},{"title":"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia","detail":"SuperLawyers"},{"title":"Georgia, Environment ","detail":"Chambers USA 2005-2018"},{"title":"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia","detail":"Daily Report"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDoug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation. \u0026nbsp;Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.\u0026nbsp; As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.\u0026nbsp; Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.\u0026nbsp; A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026). \u0026nbsp;Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions\u0026mdash;the jury entered a \u0026ldquo;not\u0026rdquo; negligent verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts\u0026mdash;with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnvironmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers","detail":"2014, 2018"},{"title":"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer","detail":"2015"},{"title":"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019"},{"title":"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026 Politics and Atlanta Magazine","detail":"2004-2017"},{"title":"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia","detail":"SuperLawyers"},{"title":"Georgia, Environment ","detail":"Chambers USA 2005-2018"},{"title":"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia","detail":"Daily Report"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13205}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-24T19:25:55.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-24T19:25:55.000Z","searchable_text":"Henderson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2014, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026amp; Politics and Atlanta Magazine\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2004-2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"SuperLawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia, Environment \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2005-2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Report\"}{{ FIELD }}First chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions—the jury entered a “not” negligent verdict.{{ FIELD }}First chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts—with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility.{{ FIELD }}First chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination.{{ FIELD }}First chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act.{{ FIELD }}Environmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization.{{ FIELD }}First chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA.{{ FIELD }}First chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation.{{ FIELD }}Represented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations.{{ FIELD }}Acted as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal.{{ FIELD }}Environmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.{{ FIELD }}Doug Henderson is a Trial and Global Disputes partner with a national practice in environmental litigation, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation.  Doug has tried numerous cases to verdict involving personal injury and property devaluation claims related to industrial emissions, groundwater contamination, wastewater discharges, stormwater runoff, endangered species, and transactional allocations of environmental liabilities.  Doug also has litigated cases involving water rights, reservoirs, mining, pipelines, and powerlines. \nDoug also provides counseling on a wide range of matters involving RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, CERCLA, TSCA, and SMCRA.  As appellate counsel, Doug has successfully argued several leading environmental and property rights cases.  Doug also has represented the Edison Electric Institute, the National Mining Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce, to name a few.  A Ph.D. scientist and attorney, Doug offers considerable experience in trying and litigating cases involving expert testimony on hydrogeology, air emissions, toxicology, stormwater, and epidemiology.\nDoug has been named \"Lawyer of the Year\" six times in Georgia, most recently as \"Environmental Lawyer of the Year\" (2026).  Doug also is listed in the Best Lawyers in America in three separate categories (environmental litigation, environmental law, and mass torts), in Chambers USA Band 1, in the Legal 500, and the Georgia Trend Legal Elite.  In addition, Doug has often been ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia by Atlanta Magazine Superlawyers.  Partner Named “Litigation – Environmental Atlanta Lawyer of the Year” by Best Lawyers 2014, 2018 Featured in Georgia Trend as a top vote – getting environmental lawyer 2015 Recognized in Environmental Law, Mass Tort Litigation/Class Actions - Defendants, Litigation - Environmental  The Best Lawyers in America 2006-2019 Selected as a Super Lawyer in Environmental by Law \u0026amp; Politics and Atlanta Magazine 2004-2017 Ranked as one of the Top 100 lawyers in the State of Georgia SuperLawyers Georgia, Environment  Chambers USA 2005-2018 Top Verdicts of 2009, State of Georgia Daily Report George Washington University George Washington University Law School University of Kentucky University of Kentucky College of Law Georgia Institute of Technology  University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia Member, Judicial Procedure Committee, State Bar of Georgia, 1997 – 2006 Chair, State Bar of Georgia, Environmental Law Section, 1999 – 2000 Chair, State Bar of Georgia, Agricultural Law Section, 2000 - 2005 First chair in six-week jury trial in Colorado state court for a major medical manufacturing company involving person injury claims allegedly associated with hazardous air pollutant emissions—the jury entered a “not” negligent verdict. First chair in a six-day jury trial in Georgia state court for a major automobile manufacturing company involving property devaluation claims associated with historical groundwater impacts—with settlement occurring prior to closing arguments. Lead counsel for a large New Jersey-based medical device manufacturer in successful defense against a lawsuit brought by the State to shut down two sterilization facilities for alleged unpermitted releases of ethylene oxide and related fugitive emissions. Lead counsel in negotiating a consent order and final agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency related to coal ash groundwater monitoring and emergency action plans. Lead counsel for electrical manufacturer in successful defense of class action involving claims of personal injury and property devaluation related to PCB and lead exposure in Anniston, Alabama. Lead counsel for team defending international medical device manufacturer in Denver, Colorado state court against several mass torts and individual lawsuits involving claims of breast cancer, leukemia and other diseases allegedly associated with emissions of ethylene oxide from major sterilization facility. First chair for plaintiff real estate partnership in winning week-long jury trial involving property devaluation of major commercial property caused by groundwater contamination. First chair for prevailing national REIT and development companies in seven-day federal jury trial under the Clean Water Act where the jury found the companies did not violate the Clean Water Act. Environmental counsel to U.S. subsidiary of international electronics corporation on OSHA investigation involving employee exposure to lead dust in assembly operation Lead counsel for several electric utilities defending early Clean Water Act, RCRA and SMCRA citizen suits filed by Sierra Club and others involving coal ash disposal Virginia, New Mexico, Utah and other states. Lead counsel for prevailing major electric utility in administrative challenge to surface water withdrawal permit issued for two new nuclear power generating units. Lead counsel for Utah electric utility in winning summary judgment defeating Clean Water Act citizen suit brought by national environmental organization. First chair in successful two-week jury trial involving endangered species in valuation of transmission line easement. Lead trial counsel for local government in toxic tort dispute involving personal injury and property damage associated with closed municipal landfill. Lead counsel for numerous companies in show cause hearings before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on CERCLA, RCRA and EPCRA. First chair in winning three-week jury trial involving negligent construction of 1,000 acre wastewater treatment facility. Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation. Acted as lead counsel for national food company in RCRA citizen suit involving claims of vapor intrusion and property devaluation. Represented national automobile parts manufacturer in defeating environmental tort class action involving industrial operations. Acted as lead counsel in numerous pipeline, transmission line, road and infrastructure condemnations, from special master hearings, to jury trial to final appeal. Environmental counsel in major real estate, lending, corporate, and brownfield transactions throughout the U.S.","searchable_name":"Douglas A. Henderson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426294,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2174,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eUrsula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.\u0026nbsp; A fellow of the\u0026nbsp;American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and\u0026nbsp; product liability matters. She has tried over 45\u0026nbsp;cases in her career\u0026nbsp;and is known for her ability to relate to juries.\u0026nbsp; In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.\u0026nbsp; Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.\u0026nbsp; Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation 2017,\u003c/em\u003e and has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026ndash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ursula-henninger","email":"uhenninger@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eReinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRobert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (M.D. Fla.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem\u003eHildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Escambia).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCharles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eStanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Illinois 2017).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Henninger","nick_name":"Ursula","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ursula","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"U.S. Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2017"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eUrsula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.\u0026nbsp; A fellow of the\u0026nbsp;American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and\u0026nbsp; product liability matters. She has tried over 45\u0026nbsp;cases in her career\u0026nbsp;and is known for her ability to relate to juries.\u0026nbsp; In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.\u0026nbsp; Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.\u0026nbsp; Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation 2017,\u003c/em\u003e and has been ranked by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026ndash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eReinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRobert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (M.D. Fla.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem\u003eHildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Escambia).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eCharles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Miami Dade).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eHazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eR.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/strong\u003e in \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEngle\u003c/em\u003e progeny case, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eStanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.\u003c/em\u003e (Broward).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGlaxoSmithKline\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline\u003c/em\u003e (N.D. Illinois 2017).\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"U.S. Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2017"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9870}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:21.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Henninger{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Litigation Star \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S.\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Reinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Robert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (M.D. Fla.).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Escambia).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Charles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward).{{ FIELD }}Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Stanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward).{{ FIELD }}Represented GlaxoSmithKline in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017).{{ FIELD }}Ursula Henninger is a first-chair trial lawyer specializing in defending product liability and consumer products claims. She has tried cases in numerous state and federal courts throughout the country, most often in recognized \"judicial hellholes.\" Her trials often involve allegations of corporate misconduct leading to claims for significant punitive damages.  A partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Ursula represents companies in consumer products including tobacco, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other industries.  A fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, she is recognized by her peers for her courtroom performance as well as her standards.\nUrsula represents well-known corporations, including pharmaceutical and tobacco companies, in high-profile consumer and  product liability matters. She has tried over 45 cases in her career and is known for her ability to relate to juries.  In addition, she is frequently asked to lead industry groups related to common litigation themes, trial presentation and interests.\nIn addition to being a first-chair trial attorney, Ursula coordinates defense team efforts, leading case management from the filing of the complaint to trial and through the appeals process. She often serves as lead case management lawyer for actions filed in multiple jurisdictions, and directs pretrial discovery and motion practice for the defense team in numerous cases.  \nUrsula's trial successes are well-recognized.  Ursula received Law 360's MVP Award in 2018 for the category \"Trials\" as well as Law 360's MVP for the category \"Product Liability\" 2019 as well as Courtroom View Network's \"Engle Defense Attorney of the Year\" in 2018.  Ursula is Chambers, Band 2 Litigation: Product Liability; named a U.S. Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation 2017, and has been ranked by Legal 500 US for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products. Partner U.S. Litigation Star  Benchmark Litigation, 2017 Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense – Consumer Products Legal 500 U.S.   Appalachian State University  Wake Forest University Wake Forest University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Florida North Carolina Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Reinaldo Ojeda v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Robert Denton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (M.D. Fla.). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hildegard Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Escambia). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Charles G. Wendel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Miami Dade). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Hazel Mathis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward). Represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. in Engle progeny case, Stanley Martin v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (Broward). Represented GlaxoSmithKline in a trial in federal court in Chicago in the matter Wendy Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline (N.D. Illinois 2017).","searchable_name":"Ursula M. Henninger","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":437597,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2163,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in\u0026nbsp;over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCory has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as one of America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished trial attorney.\u0026rdquo; He has also been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026mdash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"cory-hohnbaum","email":"chohnbaum@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national securities firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment banking firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":166}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":923,"guid":"923.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hohnbaum","nick_name":"Cory","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Cory","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"America’s Leading Business Lawyers ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"Business Litigation: North Carolina ","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte","detail":""},{"title":"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball","detail":"1987"},{"title":"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) ","detail":"2015"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in\u0026nbsp;over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCory has been recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as one of America\u0026rsquo;s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as \u0026ldquo;an extremely accomplished trial attorney.\u0026rdquo; He has also been ranked by \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense \u0026mdash; Consumer Products.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national securities firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment banking firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea national bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"America’s Leading Business Lawyers ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"Business Litigation: North Carolina ","detail":"Super Lawyers"},{"title":"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte","detail":""},{"title":"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball","detail":"1987"},{"title":"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) ","detail":"2015"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":920}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-22T18:50:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-22T18:50:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Hohnbaum{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"America’s Leading Business Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Commercial Litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Business Litigation: North Carolina \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S.\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"1987\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball) \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015\"}{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years.{{ FIELD }}Lead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami.{{ FIELD }}Defended a national securities firm in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international manufacturer in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger.{{ FIELD }}Defended a hedge fund in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading.{{ FIELD }}Defended an investment banking firm in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.{{ FIELD }}Cory Hohnbaum is a nationally recognized trial lawyer comfortable in courtrooms across the country. Cory has successfully tried cases in multiple jurisdictions in a wide variety of subject matters, including products liability, securities, construction, patent infringement and insurance coverage. As a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes practice, Cory has been the lead trial lawyer in over sixty-five cases in a variety of forums and has served as lead counsel in more than a dozen trials in the last six years alone.\nIn addition to his broad trial practice, Cory regularly represents clients in securities and other financial services litigation, as well as handling regulatory matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.\nIn addition to his trial experience, Cory has argued before the Second and Fourth Circuit Courts of Appeals, the Supreme Court of South Carolina and the Courts of Appeals of North Carolina, South Carolina and Texas.\nCory has been recognized by Chambers USA as one of America’s Leading Business Lawyers and described there as “an extremely accomplished trial attorney.” He has also been ranked by The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial and Bet the Company Litigation, by Super Lawyers for Business Litigation in North Carolina and by Legal 500 U.S. for Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense — Consumer Products. Cory Hohnbaum Partner America’s Leading Business Lawyers  Chambers USA Commercial Litigation  The Best Lawyers in America Business Litigation: North Carolina  Super Lawyers Litigation: Product Liability and Mass Tort Defense, Consumer Products  Legal 500 U.S. George Williams Award Recipient, YMCA of Greater Charlotte  NAIA Academic All-America, Basketball 1987 Westminster College Athletics Hall of Fame (Basketball)  2015 Westminster College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Florida Fellow, American Bar Foundation Lead trial counsel for Boehringer Ingelheim in multiple cases in Cook County, IL regarding the heartburn medication Zantac. Lead trial counsel in seventeen smoking and health cases for RJ Reynolds in the last eleven years. Lead trial counsel for Gol Airlines in a breach of contract action in state court in Miami. Defended a national securities firm in North Carolina state court class action alleging fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices by retirees of a Fortune 500 company. Represented an international manufacturer in an arbitration before the International Chamber of Commerce arising out of claims relating to allegedly defective windshield wiper motor systems in large trucks. Represented a national bank in federal court in Atlanta in claims of breach of contract and tortuous interference with contractual relationships arising out of a merger. Defended a hedge fund in federal court in North Carolina in claims brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission that alleged violation of various securities laws including claims of insider trading. Defended an investment banking firm in federal court in Cleveland related to fraud allegations arising from the sale of a technology company. Represented a national bank in defense of a RICO class action in federal court in Philadelphia.","searchable_name":"Cory Hohnbaum","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436467,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5002,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Hooper defends multinational companies in complex litigations, including a variety of commercial, product liability, financial services, false and misleading advertising and other consumer class actions where he has served as national, regional and/or strategic counsel.\u0026nbsp; He provides clients with all-inclusive strategic litigation management and counseling services to mitigate the reputational and financial risk associated with high exposure, viral and bet-the-company litigations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn's advises companies to create and execute litigation and strategic resolution options in some of the largest, most complex class actions, commercial litigations and mass torts in federal and state courts. Hooper's experience ranges from trials and arbitrations to mediations and settlements, and all stages of a case, from prelitigation to appeal.\u0026nbsp; John's clients include some of the world's largest manufacturers of automobiles, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, building materials, tires, sporting goods and apparel as well as retailers, railroads, hedge funds, life insurance companies, private equity firms, banks and other financial services institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChambers noted that John Hooper is \u0026ldquo;24/7 responsive and very strategic\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;he thinks of end-game solutions in a way that other attorneys do not.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The Legal 500 United States has noted that, \"John Hooper in New York is 'strongly recommended to anyone seeking a practical approach to managing complex litigation matters, particularly those with national scope.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;John has just been recognized by the National Law Journal as one of its \u0026ldquo;50 Litigation Trailblazers\u0026rdquo; for his practice of advising multi-national clients on creating and implementing end game strategies in \"Viral Litigations\".\u0026nbsp; The American Lawyer has recognized his skills in the management and resolution of \"bet the company\" litigation and as a \"great master strategist.\"\u0026nbsp; He has been nominated to the BTI \"Client Service All-Star Team\" for multiple years.\u0026nbsp; He is also recognized in the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2014 Value Champion award.\u0026nbsp; The New York Law Journal stated that John Hooper \u0026ldquo;has worked on some of the most high-profile litigation matters in the last decade.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe has also been appointed by the federal and state courts as a Special Master, Special Settlement Master and Special Arbitration Master. He has also been appointed as the Lead Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel in MDL and other federal and state class and mass actions.\u0026nbsp; He is a member of the Academy of Court Appointed Special Masters. John is a frequent speaker in the United States and Canada on topics related to class and mass actions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-hooper","email":"jhooper@kslaw.com","phone":"","matters":["\u003cp\u003eOn June 12 ,2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a class action settlement with Toyota and the class involving over 9 million class members in \u003cu\u003eIn re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 15-02599-MD-MORENO (S.D. Fla.). The Court also preliminarily approved class action settlements with three other defendant automobile manufacturers.\u0026nbsp; The settlements include a novel outreach program, out-of-pocket claims process, rental car/loaner program and a residual distribution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissals from over 20 putative class actions using a proffer strategy on behalf of herbal supplement manufacturer and retailer.\u0026nbsp; Plaintiffs alleged that certain herbal supplements did not contain the ingredients listed and asserted consumer fraud claims. Eight of the dismissals were obtained before the cases were consolidated.\u0026nbsp; After consolidation, the MDL Court created a separate track for the client to continue its efforts, which resulted in the omission of the client in the consolidated class action complaint in \u003cu\u003eIn re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 15-cv-05070 (N.D. Ill.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas National Coordinating Counsel to C. R. Bard, Inc., a Fortune 100 medical device manufacturer, in a complex product liability litigation arising out of an FDA recall with the cases filed in an MDL, a consolidated Rhode Island state court action and individual state courts across the country.\u0026nbsp; We successfully designed and implemented a strategy that tried two cases and resolved the great majority of the cases pending in the litigation.\u0026nbsp; We also implemented a Target Budget Fixed Fee arrangement that was narrowly tailored to meet the client\u0026rsquo;s needs and goals, and aimed at controlling costs across the board in this nationwide litigation.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, MDL Docket No. 07 1842-ML (D.R.I.), \u003cu\u003eIn re: All Individual Kugel Mesh Cases\u003c/u\u003e, Master Docket No.: PC-2008-9999 (Superior Court, Providence County, State of Rhode Island).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved nationwide economic loss class action involving over 23 million class members and nearly 200 class actions relating to certain Toyota vehicles in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.).\u0026nbsp; The settlement included installation of a Brake Override System, a customer support warranty program, an automobile safety and education program and two cash funds.\u0026nbsp; This was the largest settlement at that time in the automotive industry.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved hundreds of products liability personal injury matters using innovative two-phase Court-ordered settlement conferences and mediations in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.) and Toyota Motor Cases, No. 4621 (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding, Superior Court, Complex Part, Los Angeles, CA).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved hundreds of cases and claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom for injuries allegedly caused by taking a prescription medication.\u0026nbsp; After a jury found for plaintiff and while a second trial was underway, we partnered with the client and with the co-defendant to create a very successful end-game strategy that resolved over 95% of the cases in a four month period through negotiating large block settlements with various large plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; firms, which has also had the added benefit of minimizing the potential tail.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 0:07-md-01836- JMR-FLN (D. Minn.) and numerous state cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissals of numerous putative filed and unfiled class actions on behalf of a multinational consumer goods manufacturer where plaintiffs and claimants alleged consumer fraud and consumer protection claims.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved government complaint in the U.S. and five nationwide class actions in the U.S. and Canada in response to alleged violations of consumer fraud and consumer protection statutes relating to the marketing and advertising of Reebok\u0026rsquo;s EasyTone shoes and apparel.\u0026nbsp; The settlement also resolved the U.S. Federal Trade Commission\u0026rsquo;s (\u0026ldquo;FTC\u0026rdquo;) complaint making similar allegations.\u0026nbsp; The terms of the settlements were unique in that the $25 million paid to the FTC was allowed to be used to fund a consumer redress program for eligible class members.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Reebok agreed to certain conduct changes.\u0026nbsp; The FTC also provided extensive input and guidance in designing a consumer-friendly redress program.\u0026nbsp; Two Canadian class actions making similar allegations were resolved using a similar consumer-friendly process for less than $2 million.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re Reebok EasyTone Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 4:10-CV-11977-FDS (D. Mass.); \u003cu\u003eFederal Trade Commission v. Reebok International Ltd., d/b/a Reebok\u003c/u\u003e, 1:11-cv-02046-DCN (N.D. Ohio); \u003cu\u003eHeney v. Reebok Canada\u003c/u\u003e, Court File No. 5608/11 (Ontario Sup. Ct. of Justice); \u003cu\u003eMarkus v. Reebok Canada\u003c/u\u003e, Court File No. 500-06-000582-110 (Quebec Sup. Ct. of Justice).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved the third largest nationwide insurance sales practices class action valued at $800 million for MassMutual.\u0026nbsp; The settlement eliminated a potentially large liability in two states where certification of classes were granted and one of which was on the eve of trial in a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction with possible treble damages. The case was fully resolved after eight appeals were filed.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eVaracallo v. MassMutual\u003c/u\u003e, No. 04-2702 (JLL) (D.N.J.), 226 F.R.D. 207 (D.N.J. 2005).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppointed Special Master in \u003cu\u003eFox v. Cheminova\u003c/u\u003e, 00-CV-5145 (TCP) (ETB) (E.D.N.Y.) to resolve a class action that had been pending for nearly six years and was on the eve of trial.\u0026nbsp; Prior to being appointed by the court, we held a series of mediations between the parties to arrive at the settlement.\u0026nbsp; After the appointment by the court, we reviewed the objections, met and conferred telephonically with objectors, and had a number of follow-up calls with them.\u0026nbsp; We also drafted a 50-page Report and Recommendation regarding final approval, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and the award of attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs that was adopted in almost its entirety by the court in its final approval order.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTwice appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of \u0026nbsp;nearly $85 million in plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees arising from subsequent settlements in the Tank Car case.\u0026nbsp; Selected because of the substantial credibility amassed with the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorney from the first settlement, even though he was a defense attorney.\u0026nbsp; We set up an aggressive briefing schedule and hearing schedule and quickly issued a final Report and Recommendation regarding allocating the attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees, which otherwise would have resulted in needless litigation and uncertainty.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A\u0026rdquo;, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of approximately $4.5 million in plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorneys fees and costs arising from the third settlement in the Tank Car case.\u0026nbsp; John Hooper was selected because he had amassed additional credibility with the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorney from the first distribution of attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A\u0026rdquo;, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved numerous class actions pending in Canada, including Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Quebec.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and All Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A,\u0026rdquo; Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, class action, which had been pending for over 10 years and involved the second largest punitive damages awards of $3.3 billion, prior to our involvement.\u0026nbsp; As the Court-Appointed Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel, we resolved the claims for five of the nine defendants.\u0026nbsp; There was a subsequent settlement of a sixth defendant that used a substantially similar settlement agreement.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hooper","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"P.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized among “50 Litigation Trailblazers”","detail":"National Law Journal, 2015"},{"title":"Multiple nominations to “Client Services All-Star Team”","detail":"BTI Consulting Group"},{"title":"ACC Value Champion","detail":"Association of Corporate Counsel, 2014"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Hooper defends multinational companies in complex litigations, including a variety of commercial, product liability, financial services, false and misleading advertising and other consumer class actions where he has served as national, regional and/or strategic counsel.\u0026nbsp; He provides clients with all-inclusive strategic litigation management and counseling services to mitigate the reputational and financial risk associated with high exposure, viral and bet-the-company litigations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn's advises companies to create and execute litigation and strategic resolution options in some of the largest, most complex class actions, commercial litigations and mass torts in federal and state courts. Hooper's experience ranges from trials and arbitrations to mediations and settlements, and all stages of a case, from prelitigation to appeal.\u0026nbsp; John's clients include some of the world's largest manufacturers of automobiles, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, building materials, tires, sporting goods and apparel as well as retailers, railroads, hedge funds, life insurance companies, private equity firms, banks and other financial services institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChambers noted that John Hooper is \u0026ldquo;24/7 responsive and very strategic\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;he thinks of end-game solutions in a way that other attorneys do not.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp; The Legal 500 United States has noted that, \"John Hooper in New York is 'strongly recommended to anyone seeking a practical approach to managing complex litigation matters, particularly those with national scope.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;John has just been recognized by the National Law Journal as one of its \u0026ldquo;50 Litigation Trailblazers\u0026rdquo; for his practice of advising multi-national clients on creating and implementing end game strategies in \"Viral Litigations\".\u0026nbsp; The American Lawyer has recognized his skills in the management and resolution of \"bet the company\" litigation and as a \"great master strategist.\"\u0026nbsp; He has been nominated to the BTI \"Client Service All-Star Team\" for multiple years.\u0026nbsp; He is also recognized in the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2014 Value Champion award.\u0026nbsp; The New York Law Journal stated that John Hooper \u0026ldquo;has worked on some of the most high-profile litigation matters in the last decade.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe has also been appointed by the federal and state courts as a Special Master, Special Settlement Master and Special Arbitration Master. He has also been appointed as the Lead Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel in MDL and other federal and state class and mass actions.\u0026nbsp; He is a member of the Academy of Court Appointed Special Masters. John is a frequent speaker in the United States and Canada on topics related to class and mass actions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eOn June 12 ,2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a class action settlement with Toyota and the class involving over 9 million class members in \u003cu\u003eIn re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 15-02599-MD-MORENO (S.D. Fla.). The Court also preliminarily approved class action settlements with three other defendant automobile manufacturers.\u0026nbsp; The settlements include a novel outreach program, out-of-pocket claims process, rental car/loaner program and a residual distribution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissals from over 20 putative class actions using a proffer strategy on behalf of herbal supplement manufacturer and retailer.\u0026nbsp; Plaintiffs alleged that certain herbal supplements did not contain the ingredients listed and asserted consumer fraud claims. Eight of the dismissals were obtained before the cases were consolidated.\u0026nbsp; After consolidation, the MDL Court created a separate track for the client to continue its efforts, which resulted in the omission of the client in the consolidated class action complaint in \u003cu\u003eIn re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 15-cv-05070 (N.D. Ill.).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWas National Coordinating Counsel to C. R. Bard, Inc., a Fortune 100 medical device manufacturer, in a complex product liability litigation arising out of an FDA recall with the cases filed in an MDL, a consolidated Rhode Island state court action and individual state courts across the country.\u0026nbsp; We successfully designed and implemented a strategy that tried two cases and resolved the great majority of the cases pending in the litigation.\u0026nbsp; We also implemented a Target Budget Fixed Fee arrangement that was narrowly tailored to meet the client\u0026rsquo;s needs and goals, and aimed at controlling costs across the board in this nationwide litigation.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, MDL Docket No. 07 1842-ML (D.R.I.), \u003cu\u003eIn re: All Individual Kugel Mesh Cases\u003c/u\u003e, Master Docket No.: PC-2008-9999 (Superior Court, Providence County, State of Rhode Island).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved nationwide economic loss class action involving over 23 million class members and nearly 200 class actions relating to certain Toyota vehicles in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.).\u0026nbsp; The settlement included installation of a Brake Override System, a customer support warranty program, an automobile safety and education program and two cash funds.\u0026nbsp; This was the largest settlement at that time in the automotive industry.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved hundreds of products liability personal injury matters using innovative two-phase Court-ordered settlement conferences and mediations in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.) and Toyota Motor Cases, No. 4621 (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding, Superior Court, Complex Part, Los Angeles, CA).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved hundreds of cases and claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom for injuries allegedly caused by taking a prescription medication.\u0026nbsp; After a jury found for plaintiff and while a second trial was underway, we partnered with the client and with the co-defendant to create a very successful end-game strategy that resolved over 95% of the cases in a four month period through negotiating large block settlements with various large plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; firms, which has also had the added benefit of minimizing the potential tail.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 0:07-md-01836- JMR-FLN (D. Minn.) and numerous state cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissals of numerous putative filed and unfiled class actions on behalf of a multinational consumer goods manufacturer where plaintiffs and claimants alleged consumer fraud and consumer protection claims.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolved government complaint in the U.S. and five nationwide class actions in the U.S. and Canada in response to alleged violations of consumer fraud and consumer protection statutes relating to the marketing and advertising of Reebok\u0026rsquo;s EasyTone shoes and apparel.\u0026nbsp; The settlement also resolved the U.S. Federal Trade Commission\u0026rsquo;s (\u0026ldquo;FTC\u0026rdquo;) complaint making similar allegations.\u0026nbsp; The terms of the settlements were unique in that the $25 million paid to the FTC was allowed to be used to fund a consumer redress program for eligible class members.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Reebok agreed to certain conduct changes.\u0026nbsp; The FTC also provided extensive input and guidance in designing a consumer-friendly redress program.\u0026nbsp; Two Canadian class actions making similar allegations were resolved using a similar consumer-friendly process for less than $2 million.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re Reebok EasyTone Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, 4:10-CV-11977-FDS (D. Mass.); \u003cu\u003eFederal Trade Commission v. Reebok International Ltd., d/b/a Reebok\u003c/u\u003e, 1:11-cv-02046-DCN (N.D. Ohio); \u003cu\u003eHeney v. Reebok Canada\u003c/u\u003e, Court File No. 5608/11 (Ontario Sup. Ct. of Justice); \u003cu\u003eMarkus v. Reebok Canada\u003c/u\u003e, Court File No. 500-06-000582-110 (Quebec Sup. Ct. of Justice).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved the third largest nationwide insurance sales practices class action valued at $800 million for MassMutual.\u0026nbsp; The settlement eliminated a potentially large liability in two states where certification of classes were granted and one of which was on the eve of trial in a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction with possible treble damages. The case was fully resolved after eight appeals were filed.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eVaracallo v. MassMutual\u003c/u\u003e, No. 04-2702 (JLL) (D.N.J.), 226 F.R.D. 207 (D.N.J. 2005).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppointed Special Master in \u003cu\u003eFox v. Cheminova\u003c/u\u003e, 00-CV-5145 (TCP) (ETB) (E.D.N.Y.) to resolve a class action that had been pending for nearly six years and was on the eve of trial.\u0026nbsp; Prior to being appointed by the court, we held a series of mediations between the parties to arrive at the settlement.\u0026nbsp; After the appointment by the court, we reviewed the objections, met and conferred telephonically with objectors, and had a number of follow-up calls with them.\u0026nbsp; We also drafted a 50-page Report and Recommendation regarding final approval, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and the award of attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs that was adopted in almost its entirety by the court in its final approval order.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTwice appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of \u0026nbsp;nearly $85 million in plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees arising from subsequent settlements in the Tank Car case.\u0026nbsp; Selected because of the substantial credibility amassed with the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorney from the first settlement, even though he was a defense attorney.\u0026nbsp; We set up an aggressive briefing schedule and hearing schedule and quickly issued a final Report and Recommendation regarding allocating the attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees, which otherwise would have resulted in needless litigation and uncertainty.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A\u0026rdquo;, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of approximately $4.5 million in plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorneys fees and costs arising from the third settlement in the Tank Car case.\u0026nbsp; John Hooper was selected because he had amassed additional credibility with the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; attorney from the first distribution of attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u0026nbsp; \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A\u0026rdquo;, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved numerous class actions pending in Canada, including Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Quebec.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResolved \u003cu\u003eIn re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation\u003c/u\u003e, No. 87-16374 and All Related Cases on Exhibit \u0026ldquo;A,\u0026rdquo; Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, class action, which had been pending for over 10 years and involved the second largest punitive damages awards of $3.3 billion, prior to our involvement.\u0026nbsp; As the Court-Appointed Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel, we resolved the claims for five of the nine defendants.\u0026nbsp; There was a subsequent settlement of a sixth defendant that used a substantially similar settlement agreement.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized among “50 Litigation Trailblazers”","detail":"National Law Journal, 2015"},{"title":"Multiple nominations to “Client Services All-Star Team”","detail":"BTI Consulting Group"},{"title":"ACC Value Champion","detail":"Association of Corporate Counsel, 2014"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5156}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:15.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:15.000Z","searchable_text":"Hooper{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized among “50 Litigation Trailblazers”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Multiple nominations to “Client Services All-Star Team”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI Consulting Group\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"ACC Value Champion\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Association of Corporate Counsel, 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}On June 12 ,2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a class action settlement with Toyota and the class involving over 9 million class members in In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, 15-02599-MD-MORENO (S.D. Fla.). The Court also preliminarily approved class action settlements with three other defendant automobile manufacturers.  The settlements include a novel outreach program, out-of-pocket claims process, rental car/loaner program and a residual distribution.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissals from over 20 putative class actions using a proffer strategy on behalf of herbal supplement manufacturer and retailer.  Plaintiffs alleged that certain herbal supplements did not contain the ingredients listed and asserted consumer fraud claims. Eight of the dismissals were obtained before the cases were consolidated.  After consolidation, the MDL Court created a separate track for the client to continue its efforts, which resulted in the omission of the client in the consolidated class action complaint in In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 15-cv-05070 (N.D. Ill.).{{ FIELD }}Was National Coordinating Counsel to C. R. Bard, Inc., a Fortune 100 medical device manufacturer, in a complex product liability litigation arising out of an FDA recall with the cases filed in an MDL, a consolidated Rhode Island state court action and individual state courts across the country.  We successfully designed and implemented a strategy that tried two cases and resolved the great majority of the cases pending in the litigation.  We also implemented a Target Budget Fixed Fee arrangement that was narrowly tailored to meet the client’s needs and goals, and aimed at controlling costs across the board in this nationwide litigation.  In re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07 1842-ML (D.R.I.), In re: All Individual Kugel Mesh Cases, Master Docket No.: PC-2008-9999 (Superior Court, Providence County, State of Rhode Island).{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolved nationwide economic loss class action involving over 23 million class members and nearly 200 class actions relating to certain Toyota vehicles in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.).  The settlement included installation of a Brake Override System, a customer support warranty program, an automobile safety and education program and two cash funds.  This was the largest settlement at that time in the automotive industry. {{ FIELD }}Successfully resolved hundreds of products liability personal injury matters using innovative two-phase Court-ordered settlement conferences and mediations in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.) and Toyota Motor Cases, No. 4621 (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding, Superior Court, Complex Part, Los Angeles, CA).{{ FIELD }}Resolved hundreds of cases and claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom for injuries allegedly caused by taking a prescription medication.  After a jury found for plaintiff and while a second trial was underway, we partnered with the client and with the co-defendant to create a very successful end-game strategy that resolved over 95% of the cases in a four month period through negotiating large block settlements with various large plaintiffs’ firms, which has also had the added benefit of minimizing the potential tail.  In re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation, 0:07-md-01836- JMR-FLN (D. Minn.) and numerous state cases.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissals of numerous putative filed and unfiled class actions on behalf of a multinational consumer goods manufacturer where plaintiffs and claimants alleged consumer fraud and consumer protection claims. {{ FIELD }}Successfully resolved government complaint in the U.S. and five nationwide class actions in the U.S. and Canada in response to alleged violations of consumer fraud and consumer protection statutes relating to the marketing and advertising of Reebok’s EasyTone shoes and apparel.  The settlement also resolved the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) complaint making similar allegations.  The terms of the settlements were unique in that the $25 million paid to the FTC was allowed to be used to fund a consumer redress program for eligible class members.  In addition, Reebok agreed to certain conduct changes.  The FTC also provided extensive input and guidance in designing a consumer-friendly redress program.  Two Canadian class actions making similar allegations were resolved using a similar consumer-friendly process for less than $2 million.  In re Reebok EasyTone Litigation, 4:10-CV-11977-FDS (D. Mass.); Federal Trade Commission v. Reebok International Ltd., d/b/a Reebok, 1:11-cv-02046-DCN (N.D. Ohio); Heney v. Reebok Canada, Court File No. 5608/11 (Ontario Sup. Ct. of Justice); Markus v. Reebok Canada, Court File No. 500-06-000582-110 (Quebec Sup. Ct. of Justice).{{ FIELD }}Resolved the third largest nationwide insurance sales practices class action valued at $800 million for MassMutual.  The settlement eliminated a potentially large liability in two states where certification of classes were granted and one of which was on the eve of trial in a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction with possible treble damages. The case was fully resolved after eight appeals were filed.  Varacallo v. MassMutual, No. 04-2702 (JLL) (D.N.J.), 226 F.R.D. 207 (D.N.J. 2005).{{ FIELD }}Appointed Special Master in Fox v. Cheminova, 00-CV-5145 (TCP) (ETB) (E.D.N.Y.) to resolve a class action that had been pending for nearly six years and was on the eve of trial.  Prior to being appointed by the court, we held a series of mediations between the parties to arrive at the settlement.  After the appointment by the court, we reviewed the objections, met and conferred telephonically with objectors, and had a number of follow-up calls with them.  We also drafted a 50-page Report and Recommendation regarding final approval, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and the award of attorneys’ fees and costs that was adopted in almost its entirety by the court in its final approval order.{{ FIELD }}Twice appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of  nearly $85 million in plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees arising from subsequent settlements in the Tank Car case.  Selected because of the substantial credibility amassed with the plaintiffs’ attorney from the first settlement, even though he was a defense attorney.  We set up an aggressive briefing schedule and hearing schedule and quickly issued a final Report and Recommendation regarding allocating the attorneys’ fees, which otherwise would have resulted in needless litigation and uncertainty.  In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit “A”, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana. {{ FIELD }}Appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of approximately $4.5 million in plaintiffs’ attorneys fees and costs arising from the third settlement in the Tank Car case.  John Hooper was selected because he had amassed additional credibility with the plaintiffs’ attorney from the first distribution of attorneys’ fees.  In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit “A”, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.{{ FIELD }}Resolved numerous class actions pending in Canada, including Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Quebec.{{ FIELD }}Resolved In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and All Related Cases on Exhibit “A,” Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, class action, which had been pending for over 10 years and involved the second largest punitive damages awards of $3.3 billion, prior to our involvement.  As the Court-Appointed Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel, we resolved the claims for five of the nine defendants.  There was a subsequent settlement of a sixth defendant that used a substantially similar settlement agreement. {{ FIELD }}John Hooper defends multinational companies in complex litigations, including a variety of commercial, product liability, financial services, false and misleading advertising and other consumer class actions where he has served as national, regional and/or strategic counsel.  He provides clients with all-inclusive strategic litigation management and counseling services to mitigate the reputational and financial risk associated with high exposure, viral and bet-the-company litigations.\nJohn's advises companies to create and execute litigation and strategic resolution options in some of the largest, most complex class actions, commercial litigations and mass torts in federal and state courts. Hooper's experience ranges from trials and arbitrations to mediations and settlements, and all stages of a case, from prelitigation to appeal.  John's clients include some of the world's largest manufacturers of automobiles, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, building materials, tires, sporting goods and apparel as well as retailers, railroads, hedge funds, life insurance companies, private equity firms, banks and other financial services institutions.\nChambers noted that John Hooper is “24/7 responsive and very strategic” and “he thinks of end-game solutions in a way that other attorneys do not.”  The Legal 500 United States has noted that, \"John Hooper in New York is 'strongly recommended to anyone seeking a practical approach to managing complex litigation matters, particularly those with national scope.”  John has just been recognized by the National Law Journal as one of its “50 Litigation Trailblazers” for his practice of advising multi-national clients on creating and implementing end game strategies in \"Viral Litigations\".  The American Lawyer has recognized his skills in the management and resolution of \"bet the company\" litigation and as a \"great master strategist.\"  He has been nominated to the BTI \"Client Service All-Star Team\" for multiple years.  He is also recognized in the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2014 Value Champion award.  The New York Law Journal stated that John Hooper “has worked on some of the most high-profile litigation matters in the last decade.” \nHe has also been appointed by the federal and state courts as a Special Master, Special Settlement Master and Special Arbitration Master. He has also been appointed as the Lead Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel in MDL and other federal and state class and mass actions.  He is a member of the Academy of Court Appointed Special Masters. John is a frequent speaker in the United States and Canada on topics related to class and mass actions. Partner Recognized among “50 Litigation Trailblazers” National Law Journal, 2015 Multiple nominations to “Client Services All-Star Team” BTI Consulting Group ACC Value Champion Association of Corporate Counsel, 2014 U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit New York NY Southern District (#4262) NY Eastern District On June 12 ,2017, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida preliminarily approved a class action settlement with Toyota and the class involving over 9 million class members in In re: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, 15-02599-MD-MORENO (S.D. Fla.). The Court also preliminarily approved class action settlements with three other defendant automobile manufacturers.  The settlements include a novel outreach program, out-of-pocket claims process, rental car/loaner program and a residual distribution. Obtained dismissals from over 20 putative class actions using a proffer strategy on behalf of herbal supplement manufacturer and retailer.  Plaintiffs alleged that certain herbal supplements did not contain the ingredients listed and asserted consumer fraud claims. Eight of the dismissals were obtained before the cases were consolidated.  After consolidation, the MDL Court created a separate track for the client to continue its efforts, which resulted in the omission of the client in the consolidated class action complaint in In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation, 15-cv-05070 (N.D. Ill.). Was National Coordinating Counsel to C. R. Bard, Inc., a Fortune 100 medical device manufacturer, in a complex product liability litigation arising out of an FDA recall with the cases filed in an MDL, a consolidated Rhode Island state court action and individual state courts across the country.  We successfully designed and implemented a strategy that tried two cases and resolved the great majority of the cases pending in the litigation.  We also implemented a Target Budget Fixed Fee arrangement that was narrowly tailored to meet the client’s needs and goals, and aimed at controlling costs across the board in this nationwide litigation.  In re Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 07 1842-ML (D.R.I.), In re: All Individual Kugel Mesh Cases, Master Docket No.: PC-2008-9999 (Superior Court, Providence County, State of Rhode Island). Successfully resolved nationwide economic loss class action involving over 23 million class members and nearly 200 class actions relating to certain Toyota vehicles in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.).  The settlement included installation of a Brake Override System, a customer support warranty program, an automobile safety and education program and two cash funds.  This was the largest settlement at that time in the automotive industry.  Successfully resolved hundreds of products liability personal injury matters using innovative two-phase Court-ordered settlement conferences and mediations in In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, No. 8:10MD2151 (JVS) (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.) and Toyota Motor Cases, No. 4621 (Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding, Superior Court, Complex Part, Los Angeles, CA). Resolved hundreds of cases and claims pending in the United States and the United Kingdom for injuries allegedly caused by taking a prescription medication.  After a jury found for plaintiff and while a second trial was underway, we partnered with the client and with the co-defendant to create a very successful end-game strategy that resolved over 95% of the cases in a four month period through negotiating large block settlements with various large plaintiffs’ firms, which has also had the added benefit of minimizing the potential tail.  In re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation, 0:07-md-01836- JMR-FLN (D. Minn.) and numerous state cases. Obtained dismissals of numerous putative filed and unfiled class actions on behalf of a multinational consumer goods manufacturer where plaintiffs and claimants alleged consumer fraud and consumer protection claims.  Successfully resolved government complaint in the U.S. and five nationwide class actions in the U.S. and Canada in response to alleged violations of consumer fraud and consumer protection statutes relating to the marketing and advertising of Reebok’s EasyTone shoes and apparel.  The settlement also resolved the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) complaint making similar allegations.  The terms of the settlements were unique in that the $25 million paid to the FTC was allowed to be used to fund a consumer redress program for eligible class members.  In addition, Reebok agreed to certain conduct changes.  The FTC also provided extensive input and guidance in designing a consumer-friendly redress program.  Two Canadian class actions making similar allegations were resolved using a similar consumer-friendly process for less than $2 million.  In re Reebok EasyTone Litigation, 4:10-CV-11977-FDS (D. Mass.); Federal Trade Commission v. Reebok International Ltd., d/b/a Reebok, 1:11-cv-02046-DCN (N.D. Ohio); Heney v. Reebok Canada, Court File No. 5608/11 (Ontario Sup. Ct. of Justice); Markus v. Reebok Canada, Court File No. 500-06-000582-110 (Quebec Sup. Ct. of Justice). Resolved the third largest nationwide insurance sales practices class action valued at $800 million for MassMutual.  The settlement eliminated a potentially large liability in two states where certification of classes were granted and one of which was on the eve of trial in a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction with possible treble damages. The case was fully resolved after eight appeals were filed.  Varacallo v. MassMutual, No. 04-2702 (JLL) (D.N.J.), 226 F.R.D. 207 (D.N.J. 2005). Appointed Special Master in Fox v. Cheminova, 00-CV-5145 (TCP) (ETB) (E.D.N.Y.) to resolve a class action that had been pending for nearly six years and was on the eve of trial.  Prior to being appointed by the court, we held a series of mediations between the parties to arrive at the settlement.  After the appointment by the court, we reviewed the objections, met and conferred telephonically with objectors, and had a number of follow-up calls with them.  We also drafted a 50-page Report and Recommendation regarding final approval, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, and the award of attorneys’ fees and costs that was adopted in almost its entirety by the court in its final approval order. Twice appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of  nearly $85 million in plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees arising from subsequent settlements in the Tank Car case.  Selected because of the substantial credibility amassed with the plaintiffs’ attorney from the first settlement, even though he was a defense attorney.  We set up an aggressive briefing schedule and hearing schedule and quickly issued a final Report and Recommendation regarding allocating the attorneys’ fees, which otherwise would have resulted in needless litigation and uncertainty.  In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit “A”, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana.  Appointed Special Settlement Master to oversee the award of approximately $4.5 million in plaintiffs’ attorneys fees and costs arising from the third settlement in the Tank Car case.  John Hooper was selected because he had amassed additional credibility with the plaintiffs’ attorney from the first distribution of attorneys’ fees.  In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and all Related Cases on Exhibit “A”, Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana. Resolved numerous class actions pending in Canada, including Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Quebec. Resolved In re New Orleans Tank Car Leakage Fire Litigation, No. 87-16374 and All Related Cases on Exhibit “A,” Civil District Court, Ad Hoc Division, Parish of Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, class action, which had been pending for over 10 years and involved the second largest punitive damages awards of $3.3 billion, prior to our involvement.  As the Court-Appointed Defense Settlement Liaison Counsel, we resolved the claims for five of the nine defendants.  There was a subsequent settlement of a sixth defendant that used a substantially similar settlement agreement. ","searchable_name":"John P. Hooper","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436464,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4215,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSan Antonio Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lisa-shub","email":"lhorvath@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePharmaceutical / Medical Devices\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eToxic Exposure\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including: \u0026nbsp;primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eContract Disputes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Horvath","nick_name":"Lisa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lisa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Ann","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Outstanding Lawyer Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Women's Leadership Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Texas Super Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017"},{"title":"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026 Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort ","detail":"The Legal 500, 2015"},{"title":"Texas Top Rated Lawyer ","detail":"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present"},{"title":"Who's Who in Energy ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013"},{"title":"Texas Rising Star, energy law ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2005"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSan Antonio Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePharmaceutical / Medical Devices\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eToxic Exposure\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including: \u0026nbsp;primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eContract Disputes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Outstanding Lawyer Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Women's Leadership Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Texas Super Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017"},{"title":"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026 Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort ","detail":"The Legal 500, 2015"},{"title":"Texas Top Rated Lawyer ","detail":"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present"},{"title":"Who's Who in Energy ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013"},{"title":"Texas Rising Star, energy law ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2005"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7326}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:10.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:10.000Z","searchable_text":"Horvath{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Outstanding Lawyer Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Women's Leadership Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Super Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Top Rated Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who in Energy \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Rising Star, energy law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters, 2005\"}{{ FIELD }}Pharmaceutical / Medical Devices\nLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer{{ FIELD }}Participation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines{{ FIELD }}Participation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product{{ FIELD }}Toxic Exposure\nDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts{{ FIELD }}Participation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including:  primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.{{ FIELD }}Defending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"{{ FIELD }}Defending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs{{ FIELD }}Defending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites{{ FIELD }}Fiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\nRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts{{ FIELD }}Defending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance{{ FIELD }}Successfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers{{ FIELD }}Contract Disputes\nDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial{{ FIELD }}Defending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client{{ FIELD }}Representing companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract{{ FIELD }}Representing home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers{{ FIELD }}Lisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.\nShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\nLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas Super Lawyer, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the San Antonio Business Journal. Partner Outstanding Lawyer Award  San Antonio Business Journal, 2016 Women's Leadership Award  San Antonio Business Journal, 2016 Texas Super Lawyer  Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017 Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort  The Legal 500, 2015 Texas Top Rated Lawyer  LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present Who's Who in Energy  San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013 Texas Rising Star, energy law  Thomson Reuters, 2005 Texas American Bar Association Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas, Lifetime Membership: Lifetime Membership Endowment Fund San Antonio Bar Association Defense Research Institute, 2013–2016 American Bar Association (ABA), Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Session (TIPS) Leadership Class, 2006–2007 San Antonio Bar Foundation Texas Bar Foundation City Year San Antonio, Board of Directors, 2008–2010 Dress for Success San Antonio, Board Member, Officer, 2005–2006 United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County, Issues Council: Strengthening Families Pharmaceutical / Medical Devices\nLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer Participation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines Participation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product Toxic Exposure\nDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts Participation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including:  primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds. Defending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\" Defending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs Defending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites Fiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\nRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts Defending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance Successfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers Contract Disputes\nDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial Defending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client Representing companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract Representing home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers","searchable_name":"Lisa Ann Horvath","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}