{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":"Immobilier","value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"7","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"S","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426410,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3373,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Sale defends clients in high-stakes government and Congressional investigations, enforcement proceedings, and parallel civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Concentrating in complex criminal and civil litigation, Dan regularly represents life sciences companies, financial institutions, other highly-regulated companies, and their boards and senior executives in high-profile and sensitive investigations and litigation.\u0026nbsp; Dan has special experience in matters involving: life sciences criminal and civil investigations; Congressional investigations;\u0026nbsp;the False Claims Act; financial crimes, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA);\u0026nbsp; antitrust and market manipulation matters; the securities laws; whistleblower cases; and transnational tax investigations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has special experience in cases involving allegations of off-label promotion and kickbacks in the life sciences industry and represented clients in the three largest Anti-Kickback Statute investigations ever resolved with DOJ.\u0026nbsp; Dan also has special experience in state attorney general investigations, and has personally negotiated quiet resolutions with all 50 state AG offices and the District of Columbia.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Dan has considerable experience defending clients in multi-jurisdictional investigations and litigation conducted cooperatively by United States, European, Middle Eastern, Asian and African authorities\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group has been twice recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as the \u0026ldquo;White-Collar Group of the Year\u0026rdquo; and described as \u0026ldquo;the premier firm in this practice area\u0026rdquo; by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eU.S. News \u0026amp; World Report/Best Lawyers\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Best Law Firms\u0026rdquo; survey.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan began his legal career as a law clerk to the Honorable Richard D. Bennett of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. \u0026nbsp;He received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an Editorial Board Member of the Tax Lawyer law journal, and his B.A. in economics from Yale University, where he was a Division I All New England Scholar Athlete lacrosse player.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan holds Top Secret/SCI security clearances until their expiration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan is a regular contributor to the American Bar Association's Criminal Litigation Section's Practice Points publication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe US v. Vascular Solutions Acquittal: Three Lessons for Targets of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement\u003c/em\u003e, Washington Legal Foundation Legal Backgrounder (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecent Trends in Health Care Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, Inside the Minds: Health Care Law Enforcement and Compliance (Apastore 2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement in the Wake of Caronia \u0026mdash; Toward a First Amendment Safe Harbor\u003c/em\u003e, The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 14 (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eOff-Label Promotion: The Criminalization of Scientific Exchange\u003c/em\u003e, Pharma Magazine (UK) (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eFDA as Arbiter of Truth? The First Amendment, Caronia, and the Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement\u003c/em\u003e, ABA White Collar Crime (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eTenure Trap: Third Circuit Joins Sixth in Holding Tenure Buy-out Payments Subject to FICA Taxation in University of Pittsburgh v. United States\u003c/em\u003e, The Tax Lawyer, Volume 63 (2010)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"daniel-sale","email":"dsale@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;a former Army Ranger convicted by court martial of murder in Iraq, resulting in a full Presidential pardon.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an individual in connection with the Special Counsel investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide investigation regarding donations to charitable patient assistance foundations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a declination of all criminal and civil liability for a global medical device manufacturer in an investigation involving off-label promotion and fraud issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Vascular Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded medical device manufacturer that was indicted on federal criminal charges relating to off-label promotion and acquitted by a jury of all charges after a four week trial in February 2016.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting several individual witnesses and targets in connection with domestic and international investigations of foreign exchange (FX) trading, resulting in no charges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading pharmaceutical manufacturers into off-label promotion issues by the Department of Justice and multiple U.S. Attorneys\u0026rsquo; Offices, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and various state Attorneys General, as well as parallel federal False Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented current and former CEOs, high-level executives, and other individuals in FCPA investigations related to events throughout Latin America, the Middle East, China, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sale","nick_name":"Daniel","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Richard D. Bennett, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland","years_held":"2010-2012"}],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-sale-27063baa/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Sale defends clients in high-stakes government and Congressional investigations, enforcement proceedings, and parallel civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Concentrating in complex criminal and civil litigation, Dan regularly represents life sciences companies, financial institutions, other highly-regulated companies, and their boards and senior executives in high-profile and sensitive investigations and litigation.\u0026nbsp; Dan has special experience in matters involving: life sciences criminal and civil investigations; Congressional investigations;\u0026nbsp;the False Claims Act; financial crimes, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA);\u0026nbsp; antitrust and market manipulation matters; the securities laws; whistleblower cases; and transnational tax investigations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has special experience in cases involving allegations of off-label promotion and kickbacks in the life sciences industry and represented clients in the three largest Anti-Kickback Statute investigations ever resolved with DOJ.\u0026nbsp; Dan also has special experience in state attorney general investigations, and has personally negotiated quiet resolutions with all 50 state AG offices and the District of Columbia.\u0026nbsp; In addition, Dan has considerable experience defending clients in multi-jurisdictional investigations and litigation conducted cooperatively by United States, European, Middle Eastern, Asian and African authorities\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group has been twice recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as the \u0026ldquo;White-Collar Group of the Year\u0026rdquo; and described as \u0026ldquo;the premier firm in this practice area\u0026rdquo; by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eU.S. News \u0026amp; World Report/Best Lawyers\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Best Law Firms\u0026rdquo; survey.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan began his legal career as a law clerk to the Honorable Richard D. Bennett of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. \u0026nbsp;He received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an Editorial Board Member of the Tax Lawyer law journal, and his B.A. in economics from Yale University, where he was a Division I All New England Scholar Athlete lacrosse player.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan holds Top Secret/SCI security clearances until their expiration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDan is a regular contributor to the American Bar Association's Criminal Litigation Section's Practice Points publication\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe US v. Vascular Solutions Acquittal: Three Lessons for Targets of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement\u003c/em\u003e, Washington Legal Foundation Legal Backgrounder (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eRecent Trends in Health Care Enforcement and Compliance\u003c/em\u003e, Inside the Minds: Health Care Law Enforcement and Compliance (Apastore 2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement in the Wake of Caronia \u0026mdash; Toward a First Amendment Safe Harbor\u003c/em\u003e, The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 14 (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eOff-Label Promotion: The Criminalization of Scientific Exchange\u003c/em\u003e, Pharma Magazine (UK) (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eFDA as Arbiter of Truth? The First Amendment, Caronia, and the Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement\u003c/em\u003e, ABA White Collar Crime (2013)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u003cem\u003eTenure Trap: Third Circuit Joins Sixth in Holding Tenure Buy-out Payments Subject to FICA Taxation in University of Pittsburgh v. United States\u003c/em\u003e, The Tax Lawyer, Volume 63 (2010)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;a former Army Ranger convicted by court martial of murder in Iraq, resulting in a full Presidential pardon.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an individual in connection with the Special Counsel investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide investigation regarding donations to charitable patient assistance foundations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a declination of all criminal and civil liability for a global medical device manufacturer in an investigation involving off-label promotion and fraud issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Vascular Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded medical device manufacturer that was indicted on federal criminal charges relating to off-label promotion and acquitted by a jury of all charges after a four week trial in February 2016.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting several individual witnesses and targets in connection with domestic and international investigations of foreign exchange (FX) trading, resulting in no charges.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented leading pharmaceutical manufacturers into off-label promotion issues by the Department of Justice and multiple U.S. Attorneys\u0026rsquo; Offices, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and various state Attorneys General, as well as parallel federal False Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented current and former CEOs, high-level executives, and other individuals in FCPA investigations related to events throughout Latin America, the Middle East, China, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12360}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:35.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:35.000Z","searchable_text":"Sale{{ FIELD }}Representing pro bono a former Army Ranger convicted by court martial of murder in Iraq, resulting in a full Presidential pardon.{{ FIELD }}Representing an individual in connection with the Special Counsel investigation conducted by Robert Mueller.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide investigation regarding donations to charitable patient assistance foundations.{{ FIELD }}Secured a declination of all criminal and civil liability for a global medical device manufacturer in an investigation involving off-label promotion and fraud issues{{ FIELD }}Represented Vascular Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded medical device manufacturer that was indicted on federal criminal charges relating to off-label promotion and acquitted by a jury of all charges after a four week trial in February 2016.{{ FIELD }}Representing several individual witnesses and targets in connection with domestic and international investigations of foreign exchange (FX) trading, resulting in no charges.{{ FIELD }}Represented leading pharmaceutical manufacturers into off-label promotion issues by the Department of Justice and multiple U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and various state Attorneys General, as well as parallel federal False Claims Act qui tam litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented current and former CEOs, high-level executives, and other individuals in FCPA investigations related to events throughout Latin America, the Middle East, China, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.{{ FIELD }}Dan Sale defends clients in high-stakes government and Congressional investigations, enforcement proceedings, and parallel civil litigation.  Concentrating in complex criminal and civil litigation, Dan regularly represents life sciences companies, financial institutions, other highly-regulated companies, and their boards and senior executives in high-profile and sensitive investigations and litigation.  Dan has special experience in matters involving: life sciences criminal and civil investigations; Congressional investigations; the False Claims Act; financial crimes, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA);  antitrust and market manipulation matters; the securities laws; whistleblower cases; and transnational tax investigations. \nDan has special experience in cases involving allegations of off-label promotion and kickbacks in the life sciences industry and represented clients in the three largest Anti-Kickback Statute investigations ever resolved with DOJ.  Dan also has special experience in state attorney general investigations, and has personally negotiated quiet resolutions with all 50 state AG offices and the District of Columbia.  In addition, Dan has considerable experience defending clients in multi-jurisdictional investigations and litigation conducted cooperatively by United States, European, Middle Eastern, Asian and African authorities\nThe Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations group has been twice recognized by Law 360 as the “White-Collar Group of the Year” and described as “the premier firm in this practice area” by the U.S. News \u0026amp; World Report/Best Lawyers’ “Best Law Firms” survey.\nDan began his legal career as a law clerk to the Honorable Richard D. Bennett of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.  He received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an Editorial Board Member of the Tax Lawyer law journal, and his B.A. in economics from Yale University, where he was a Division I All New England Scholar Athlete lacrosse player. \nDan holds Top Secret/SCI security clearances until their expiration.\nPublications\n\nDan is a regular contributor to the American Bar Association's Criminal Litigation Section's Practice Points publication\nThe US v. Vascular Solutions Acquittal: Three Lessons for Targets of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement, Washington Legal Foundation Legal Backgrounder (2016)\nRecent Trends in Health Care Enforcement and Compliance, Inside the Minds: Health Care Law Enforcement and Compliance (Apastore 2013)\nThe Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement in the Wake of Caronia — Toward a First Amendment Safe Harbor, The Sedona Conference Journal, Volume 14 (2013)\nOff-Label Promotion: The Criminalization of Scientific Exchange, Pharma Magazine (UK) (2013)\nFDA as Arbiter of Truth? The First Amendment, Caronia, and the Future of Off-Label Promotion Enforcement, ABA White Collar Crime (2013)\nTenure Trap: Third Circuit Joins Sixth in Holding Tenure Buy-out Payments Subject to FICA Taxation in University of Pittsburgh v. United States, The Tax Lawyer, Volume 63 (2010)\n Partner Yale University Yale Law School Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland District of Columbia Maryland Law Clerk, Richard D. Bennett, U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland Representing pro bono a former Army Ranger convicted by court martial of murder in Iraq, resulting in a full Presidential pardon. Representing an individual in connection with the Special Counsel investigation conducted by Robert Mueller. Representing a global pharmaceutical company in an industry-wide investigation regarding donations to charitable patient assistance foundations. Secured a declination of all criminal and civil liability for a global medical device manufacturer in an investigation involving off-label promotion and fraud issues Represented Vascular Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded medical device manufacturer that was indicted on federal criminal charges relating to off-label promotion and acquitted by a jury of all charges after a four week trial in February 2016. Representing several individual witnesses and targets in connection with domestic and international investigations of foreign exchange (FX) trading, resulting in no charges. Represented leading pharmaceutical manufacturers into off-label promotion issues by the Department of Justice and multiple U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, the FDA, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, and various state Attorneys General, as well as parallel federal False Claims Act qui tam litigation. Represented current and former CEOs, high-level executives, and other individuals in FCPA investigations related to events throughout Latin America, the Middle East, China, Mexico, and Eastern Europe.","searchable_name":"Daniel C. Sale","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442925,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4147,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Sentenac is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Products Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts group. His practice focuses on defending life sciences, technology, social media, automotive, tobacco, and mining companies in all phases of mass tort, product liability, and cutting-edge \u0026ldquo;tech tort\u0026rdquo; litigation across the country. Mark has extensive experience helping companies navigate increasingly risky and complex discovery issues in mass tort litigation. This includes serving as lead discovery counsel to TikTok in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, Boehringer Ingelheim in the nationwide\u003cem\u003e Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, and General Motors in its California breach of warranty docket. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark has also been at the forefront of advising companies on the potential product liability risks of implementing AI and routinely engaged by clients and industry groups\u0026mdash;including AdvaMed, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest medical device association\u0026mdash;to share his insights. He is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s AI/ML Tactical Operations team and leads the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort group\u0026rsquo;s technology and innovation initiatives seeking to achieve better results and drive efficiencies for clients and the firm through implementation of new technologies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026nbsp;is also widely published on cutting edge litigation issues of significance to\u0026nbsp;the life sciences industry, including\u0026nbsp;M\u003cem\u003eitigating Risks of Developing Drugs and Devices with AI\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Jul.\u0026nbsp;2023)\u0026mdash;named\u0026nbsp;by Law360 as\u0026nbsp;a Top Guest Article for 2023\u0026mdash;\u003cem\u003eMedical Device Makers Must Review Approach After California Case\u003c/em\u003e, Bloomberg Law (Jul. 2024),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFDA\u0026rsquo;s Essure Order Affirms Role of Learned Intermediary\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Apr 2018),\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWill The Learned Intermediary Doctrine Survive A New Paradigm?\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Jan 2017).\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mark-sentenac","email":"msentenac@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel in nationwide product liability litigation involving a leading pharmaceutical company\u0026rsquo;s antidepressant medication.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience includes trial preparation and briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as national coordinating counsel for a multinational medical device manufacturer in claims related to its orthopedic products, including representing the manufacturer before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team advising multinational pharmaceutical company on recall of popular consumer health product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national trial counsel for medical device manufacturer in multidistrict litigation involving manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s surgical mesh products.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience included preparing manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s subject matter experts in device design for trial, taking percipient witness depositions throughout the country, briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions, and advising company during investigations by states\u0026rsquo; attorneys general.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team representing manufacturer in nationwide litigation involving its complex implantable neurological medical devices.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience includes working with company\u0026rsquo;s subject matter experts on complex scientific fields, briefing complex issues of federal preemption, including successfully defending favorable result before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and coordinating large-scale electronic discovery.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sentenac","nick_name":"Mark","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mark","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2378,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"www.linkedin.com/in/marksentenac","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMark Sentenac is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Products Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts group. His practice focuses on defending life sciences, technology, social media, automotive, tobacco, and mining companies in all phases of mass tort, product liability, and cutting-edge \u0026ldquo;tech tort\u0026rdquo; litigation across the country. Mark has extensive experience helping companies navigate increasingly risky and complex discovery issues in mass tort litigation. This includes serving as lead discovery counsel to TikTok in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, Boehringer Ingelheim in the nationwide\u003cem\u003e Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, and General Motors in its California breach of warranty docket. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark has also been at the forefront of advising companies on the potential product liability risks of implementing AI and routinely engaged by clients and industry groups\u0026mdash;including AdvaMed, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest medical device association\u0026mdash;to share his insights. He is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s AI/ML Tactical Operations team and leads the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort group\u0026rsquo;s technology and innovation initiatives seeking to achieve better results and drive efficiencies for clients and the firm through implementation of new technologies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026nbsp;is also widely published on cutting edge litigation issues of significance to\u0026nbsp;the life sciences industry, including\u0026nbsp;M\u003cem\u003eitigating Risks of Developing Drugs and Devices with AI\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Jul.\u0026nbsp;2023)\u0026mdash;named\u0026nbsp;by Law360 as\u0026nbsp;a Top Guest Article for 2023\u0026mdash;\u003cem\u003eMedical Device Makers Must Review Approach After California Case\u003c/em\u003e, Bloomberg Law (Jul. 2024),\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFDA\u0026rsquo;s Essure Order Affirms Role of Learned Intermediary\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Apr 2018),\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWill The Learned Intermediary Doctrine Survive A New Paradigm?\u003c/em\u003e, Law360 (Jan 2017).\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel in nationwide product liability litigation involving a leading pharmaceutical company\u0026rsquo;s antidepressant medication.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience includes trial preparation and briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as national coordinating counsel for a multinational medical device manufacturer in claims related to its orthopedic products, including representing the manufacturer before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team advising multinational pharmaceutical company on recall of popular consumer health product.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team serving as national trial counsel for medical device manufacturer in multidistrict litigation involving manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s surgical mesh products.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience included preparing manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s subject matter experts in device design for trial, taking percipient witness depositions throughout the country, briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions, and advising company during investigations by states\u0026rsquo; attorneys general.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMember of team representing manufacturer in nationwide litigation involving its complex implantable neurological medical devices.\u0026nbsp; Mark\u0026rsquo;s experience includes working with company\u0026rsquo;s subject matter experts on complex scientific fields, briefing complex issues of federal preemption, including successfully defending favorable result before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and coordinating large-scale electronic discovery.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1177}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-17T17:02:33.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-17T17:02:33.000Z","searchable_text":"Sentenac{{ FIELD }}Member of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel in nationwide product liability litigation involving a leading pharmaceutical company’s antidepressant medication.  Mark’s experience includes trial preparation and briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions. {{ FIELD }}Acted as national coordinating counsel for a multinational medical device manufacturer in claims related to its orthopedic products, including representing the manufacturer before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. {{ FIELD }}Member of team advising multinational pharmaceutical company on recall of popular consumer health product.{{ FIELD }}Member of team serving as national trial counsel for medical device manufacturer in multidistrict litigation involving manufacturer’s surgical mesh products.  Mark’s experience included preparing manufacturer’s subject matter experts in device design for trial, taking percipient witness depositions throughout the country, briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions, and advising company during investigations by states’ attorneys general. {{ FIELD }}Member of team representing manufacturer in nationwide litigation involving its complex implantable neurological medical devices.  Mark’s experience includes working with company’s subject matter experts on complex scientific fields, briefing complex issues of federal preemption, including successfully defending favorable result before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and coordinating large-scale electronic discovery. {{ FIELD }}Mark Sentenac is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Products Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts group. His practice focuses on defending life sciences, technology, social media, automotive, tobacco, and mining companies in all phases of mass tort, product liability, and cutting-edge “tech tort” litigation across the country. Mark has extensive experience helping companies navigate increasingly risky and complex discovery issues in mass tort litigation. This includes serving as lead discovery counsel to TikTok in the In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Litigation, Boehringer Ingelheim in the nationwide Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation, and General Motors in its California breach of warranty docket.  \nMark has also been at the forefront of advising companies on the potential product liability risks of implementing AI and routinely engaged by clients and industry groups—including AdvaMed, the world’s largest medical device association—to share his insights. He is a member of the firm’s AI/ML Tactical Operations team and leads the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort group’s technology and innovation initiatives seeking to achieve better results and drive efficiencies for clients and the firm through implementation of new technologies.\nMark is also widely published on cutting edge litigation issues of significance to the life sciences industry, including Mitigating Risks of Developing Drugs and Devices with AI, Law360 (Jul. 2023)—named by Law360 as a Top Guest Article for 2023—Medical Device Makers Must Review Approach After California Case, Bloomberg Law (Jul. 2024), FDA’s Essure Order Affirms Role of Learned Intermediary, Law360 (Apr 2018), and Will The Learned Intermediary Doctrine Survive A New Paradigm?, Law360 (Jan 2017).   Partner University of California-Santa Barbara  University of San Francisco University of San Francisco School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Georgia Member of team serving as national coordinating and trial counsel in nationwide product liability litigation involving a leading pharmaceutical company’s antidepressant medication.  Mark’s experience includes trial preparation and briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions.  Acted as national coordinating counsel for a multinational medical device manufacturer in claims related to its orthopedic products, including representing the manufacturer before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.  Member of team advising multinational pharmaceutical company on recall of popular consumer health product. Member of team serving as national trial counsel for medical device manufacturer in multidistrict litigation involving manufacturer’s surgical mesh products.  Mark’s experience included preparing manufacturer’s subject matter experts in device design for trial, taking percipient witness depositions throughout the country, briefing dispositive and pre-trial motions, and advising company during investigations by states’ attorneys general.  Member of team representing manufacturer in nationwide litigation involving its complex implantable neurological medical devices.  Mark’s experience includes working with company’s subject matter experts on complex scientific fields, briefing complex issues of federal preemption, including successfully defending favorable result before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and coordinating large-scale electronic discovery. ","searchable_name":"Mark Sentenac","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427685,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1522,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRonni Solomon co-leads our E-Discovery practice and focuses exclusively on e-discovery issues.\u0026nbsp; She has been ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efor over 10 years as one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top lawyers in e-discovery litigation practice.\u0026nbsp; According to\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e, Ronni \u0026ldquo;is a subject matter expert that knows how to put the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.\u0026rdquo; Chambers stated that \u0026ldquo;She is very responsive and very well known in the field.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;Further, Ronni \u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;maintains longstanding relationships as e-discovery counsel to a number of major clients across several industry sectors, and is frequently sought out to advise on significant litigation, including large class actions.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;indicates that \u0026ldquo;Ronni is a leading light in the e-discovery space since the sector was in its nonage, and continues to maintain long-term relationships with companies\u0026rdquo; and designated Ronni as a Leading Lawyer.\u0026nbsp; She was also recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Thought Leader Global Elite\u0026rdquo; in the e-discovery section of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal:\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Litigation, one of only three lawyers to receive that distinction.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho's Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;noted that Ronni is \"held in high esteem by sources, who consider her a top name for handling e-discovery proceedings . . . \"\u0026nbsp; Ronni is also an adjunct professor on e-discovery at the University of Georgia School of Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow.\u0026nbsp; A certified Project Management Professional (PMP), Ronni uses her experience and skills to ensure that e-discovery activities are run cost-efficiently, defensibly and consistently.\u0026nbsp; Ronni also serves as National E-Discovery Counsel for large corporations and works with clients on information governance and defensible deletion issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni is actively engaged in e-discovery thought leadership.\u0026nbsp; She was a member of the Steering Committee of Working Group 1 of The Sedona Conference on Best Practices for Electronic Discovery and Records Management.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; She sits on the Advisory Board of the Georgetown Law Advanced E-Discovery Institute.\u0026nbsp; She also is Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Legal Holds\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003epublished in August 2022 by Working Group 6 of the Sedona Conference, International Electronic Information Management, Discovery and Disclosure, which focuses on international issues relating to disclosure, cross-border discovery, and privacy.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni co-authored a chapter, \u0026ldquo;Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective:\u0026nbsp; Issues and Challenges,\u0026rdquo; for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner. She also co-authored a chapter of the Federal Judges\u0026rsquo; Guide to Discovery titled \u0026ldquo;The Roles of Rules 26(f) and 16(b) in Active Judicial Management of Discovery Challenges,\u0026rdquo; published by the Electronic Discovery Institute (EDI).\u0026nbsp; She was Co-Senior Editor of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Social Media Primer; the Steering Committee Liaison of the Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Commentary on BYOD: Principles and Guidance for Developing Policies and Meeting Discovery Obligations paper; and she assisted in drafting a model Rule 502(d) order that appeared in the Fordham Law Journal.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe was appointed by U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Batten to be on a committee to provide recommendations regarding amending local rules to address e-discovery issues, was co-chair of the Electronic Discovery Subcommittee of the Pretrial Practice and Discovery Committee of the Litigation Section of the American Bar Association and is the former Director of the Atlanta Chapter of Women in E-Discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Ronni was a corporate discovery specialist for one of the largest e-discovery companies in the industry. In that role, she advised in-house counsel of large corporations on electronic discovery strategies. She applies the knowledge she gained on the vendor side to help clients select the most efficient e-discovery tools and strategies, significantly reducing their total vendor and review costs.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ronni-solomon","email":"rsolomon@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead E-Discovery Partner defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the 2017 data breach matters\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead E-Discovery Partner defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Ignition Switch matters\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational E-Discovery Counsel for\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Progressive Insurance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHas served as National E-Discovery Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUPS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;since April 2009. Has saved UPS over 50% on its document review fees and over $750,000 by negotiating e discovery vendor contracts and reviewing vendor invoices. The cost-savings UPS achieved as a result of its partnership with King \u0026amp; Spalding was featured in Corporate Counsel magazine\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":176}]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Solomon","nick_name":"Ronni","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ronni","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":2619,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Among the foremost [US] e-discovery lawyers, with formidable experience handling a range of litigation proceedings.”","detail":"Who’s Who Legal: Global Elite Thought Leader, Commercial Litigation – E-Discovery (2023)"},{"title":"\"A subject matter expert that put[s] the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.” ","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/ronni-solomon-24b6671/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRonni Solomon co-leads our E-Discovery practice and focuses exclusively on e-discovery issues.\u0026nbsp; She has been ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efor over 10 years as one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top lawyers in e-discovery litigation practice.\u0026nbsp; According to\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers\u003c/em\u003e, Ronni \u0026ldquo;is a subject matter expert that knows how to put the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.\u0026rdquo; Chambers stated that \u0026ldquo;She is very responsive and very well known in the field.\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;Further, Ronni \u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;maintains longstanding relationships as e-discovery counsel to a number of major clients across several industry sectors, and is frequently sought out to advise on significant litigation, including large class actions.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;indicates that \u0026ldquo;Ronni is a leading light in the e-discovery space since the sector was in its nonage, and continues to maintain long-term relationships with companies\u0026rdquo; and designated Ronni as a Leading Lawyer.\u0026nbsp; She was also recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Thought Leader Global Elite\u0026rdquo; in the e-discovery section of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal:\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Litigation, one of only three lawyers to receive that distinction.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho's Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;noted that Ronni is \"held in high esteem by sources, who consider her a top name for handling e-discovery proceedings . . . \"\u0026nbsp; Ronni is also an adjunct professor on e-discovery at the University of Georgia School of Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow.\u0026nbsp; A certified Project Management Professional (PMP), Ronni uses her experience and skills to ensure that e-discovery activities are run cost-efficiently, defensibly and consistently.\u0026nbsp; Ronni also serves as National E-Discovery Counsel for large corporations and works with clients on information governance and defensible deletion issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni is actively engaged in e-discovery thought leadership.\u0026nbsp; She was a member of the Steering Committee of Working Group 1 of The Sedona Conference on Best Practices for Electronic Discovery and Records Management.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; She sits on the Advisory Board of the Georgetown Law Advanced E-Discovery Institute.\u0026nbsp; She also is Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eInternational Legal Holds\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003epublished in August 2022 by Working Group 6 of the Sedona Conference, International Electronic Information Management, Discovery and Disclosure, which focuses on international issues relating to disclosure, cross-border discovery, and privacy.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRonni co-authored a chapter, \u0026ldquo;Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective:\u0026nbsp; Issues and Challenges,\u0026rdquo; for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner. She also co-authored a chapter of the Federal Judges\u0026rsquo; Guide to Discovery titled \u0026ldquo;The Roles of Rules 26(f) and 16(b) in Active Judicial Management of Discovery Challenges,\u0026rdquo; published by the Electronic Discovery Institute (EDI).\u0026nbsp; She was Co-Senior Editor of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Social Media Primer; the Steering Committee Liaison of the Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Commentary on BYOD: Principles and Guidance for Developing Policies and Meeting Discovery Obligations paper; and she assisted in drafting a model Rule 502(d) order that appeared in the Fordham Law Journal.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe was appointed by U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Batten to be on a committee to provide recommendations regarding amending local rules to address e-discovery issues, was co-chair of the Electronic Discovery Subcommittee of the Pretrial Practice and Discovery Committee of the Litigation Section of the American Bar Association and is the former Director of the Atlanta Chapter of Women in E-Discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Ronni was a corporate discovery specialist for one of the largest e-discovery companies in the industry. In that role, she advised in-house counsel of large corporations on electronic discovery strategies. She applies the knowledge she gained on the vendor side to help clients select the most efficient e-discovery tools and strategies, significantly reducing their total vendor and review costs.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead E-Discovery Partner defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the 2017 data breach matters\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead E-Discovery Partner defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Ignition Switch matters\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational E-Discovery Counsel for\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Progressive Insurance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHas served as National E-Discovery Counsel to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUPS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;since April 2009. Has saved UPS over 50% on its document review fees and over $750,000 by negotiating e discovery vendor contracts and reviewing vendor invoices. The cost-savings UPS achieved as a result of its partnership with King \u0026amp; Spalding was featured in Corporate Counsel magazine\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Among the foremost [US] e-discovery lawyers, with formidable experience handling a range of litigation proceedings.”","detail":"Who’s Who Legal: Global Elite Thought Leader, Commercial Litigation – E-Discovery (2023)"},{"title":"\"A subject matter expert that put[s] the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.” ","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4297}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Solomon{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Among the foremost [US] e-discovery lawyers, with formidable experience handling a range of litigation proceedings.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Global Elite Thought Leader, Commercial Litigation – E-Discovery (2023)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"A subject matter expert that put[s] the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Individual\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead E-Discovery Partner defending Equifax in the 2017 data breach matters{{ FIELD }}Lead E-Discovery Partner defending General Motors in the Ignition Switch matters{{ FIELD }}National E-Discovery Counsel for Progressive Insurance{{ FIELD }}Has served as National E-Discovery Counsel to UPS since April 2009. Has saved UPS over 50% on its document review fees and over $750,000 by negotiating e discovery vendor contracts and reviewing vendor invoices. The cost-savings UPS achieved as a result of its partnership with King \u0026amp; Spalding was featured in Corporate Counsel magazine{{ FIELD }}Ronni Solomon co-leads our E-Discovery practice and focuses exclusively on e-discovery issues.  She has been ranked in Chambers USA and Chambers Global for over 10 years as one of the nation’s top lawyers in e-discovery litigation practice.  According to Chambers, Ronni “is a subject matter expert that knows how to put the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.” Chambers stated that “She is very responsive and very well known in the field.”  Further, Ronni  “maintains longstanding relationships as e-discovery counsel to a number of major clients across several industry sectors, and is frequently sought out to advise on significant litigation, including large class actions.”\nLegal 500 indicates that “Ronni is a leading light in the e-discovery space since the sector was in its nonage, and continues to maintain long-term relationships with companies” and designated Ronni as a Leading Lawyer.  She was also recognized as a “Thought Leader Global Elite” in the e-discovery section of Who’s Who Legal: Litigation, one of only three lawyers to receive that distinction. Who's Who Legal noted that Ronni is \"held in high esteem by sources, who consider her a top name for handling e-discovery proceedings . . . \"  Ronni is also an adjunct professor on e-discovery at the University of Georgia School of Law.\nRonni has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow.  A certified Project Management Professional (PMP), Ronni uses her experience and skills to ensure that e-discovery activities are run cost-efficiently, defensibly and consistently.  Ronni also serves as National E-Discovery Counsel for large corporations and works with clients on information governance and defensible deletion issues.\nRonni is actively engaged in e-discovery thought leadership.  She was a member of the Steering Committee of Working Group 1 of The Sedona Conference on Best Practices for Electronic Discovery and Records Management.   She sits on the Advisory Board of the Georgetown Law Advanced E-Discovery Institute.  She also is Editor-in-Chief of International Legal Holds published in August 2022 by Working Group 6 of the Sedona Conference, International Electronic Information Management, Discovery and Disclosure, which focuses on international issues relating to disclosure, cross-border discovery, and privacy.  \nRonni co-authored a chapter, “Predictive Coding from the Defense Perspective:  Issues and Challenges,” for a 2016 ABA book titled Perspectives on Predictive Coding and Other Advanced Search Methods for the Legal Practitioner. She also co-authored a chapter of the Federal Judges’ Guide to Discovery titled “The Roles of Rules 26(f) and 16(b) in Active Judicial Management of Discovery Challenges,” published by the Electronic Discovery Institute (EDI).  She was Co-Senior Editor of The Sedona Conference’s Social Media Primer; the Steering Committee Liaison of the Sedona Conference’s Commentary on BYOD: Principles and Guidance for Developing Policies and Meeting Discovery Obligations paper; and she assisted in drafting a model Rule 502(d) order that appeared in the Fordham Law Journal.\nShe was appointed by U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Batten to be on a committee to provide recommendations regarding amending local rules to address e-discovery issues, was co-chair of the Electronic Discovery Subcommittee of the Pretrial Practice and Discovery Committee of the Litigation Section of the American Bar Association and is the former Director of the Atlanta Chapter of Women in E-Discovery.\nPreviously, Ronni was a corporate discovery specialist for one of the largest e-discovery companies in the industry. In that role, she advised in-house counsel of large corporations on electronic discovery strategies. She applies the knowledge she gained on the vendor side to help clients select the most efficient e-discovery tools and strategies, significantly reducing their total vendor and review costs. Ronni D Solomon Partner Among the foremost [US] e-discovery lawyers, with formidable experience handling a range of litigation proceedings.” Who’s Who Legal: Global Elite Thought Leader, Commercial Litigation – E-Discovery (2023) \"A subject matter expert that put[s] the complexities of e-discovery into really practical terms for her clients.”  Chambers Global Leading Individual Legal 500 SUNY at Binghamton  Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Florida Georgia Co-Lead E-Discovery Partner defending Equifax in the 2017 data breach matters Lead E-Discovery Partner defending General Motors in the Ignition Switch matters National E-Discovery Counsel for Progressive Insurance Has served as National E-Discovery Counsel to UPS since April 2009. Has saved UPS over 50% on its document review fees and over $750,000 by negotiating e discovery vendor contracts and reviewing vendor invoices. The cost-savings UPS achieved as a result of its partnership with King \u0026amp; Spalding was featured in Corporate Counsel magazine","searchable_name":"Ronni D. Solomon","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426385,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3132,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathleen Sacks focuses on white-collar criminal defense including anti-corruption investigations and compliance counseling, complex commercial litigation, and cross-border investigations and disputes.\u0026nbsp; As counsel\u0026nbsp;based in the Washington, D.C. office, Kathleen has experience representing\u0026nbsp;clients facing investigations before the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other domestic and international authorities.\u0026nbsp; She also has handled cases for clients in high-stakes adversarial proceedings, including trial-level litigation, arbitrations, and government enforcement actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathleen represents companies across the globe in high-stakes matters.\u0026nbsp; She has handled investigations and enforcement actions in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.\u0026nbsp; Kathleen is experienced in all aspects of compliance counseling and investigations, including compliance assessment, remediation, and data privacy considerations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe also defends clients across industries before domestic and foreign government enforcement authorities and represents clients in complex civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Kathleen handles contract disputes, business tort claims, shareholder disputes, professional liability claims, and consumer class actions and is well-versed in all aspects of litigation, with extensive experience in motions practice, trial preparation and depositions, and appellate briefing.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom 2010 to 2012, Kathleen\u0026nbsp;served as the President of the Atlanta Chapter of the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kathleen-sacks","email":"ksacks@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eWon final summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea private equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its officers in long-running Georgia state court lawsuit in which plaintiff sought multi-million dollar punitive damages award arising from fund's $470 million acquisition of portfolio company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea financial services institution and broker\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of $100 million claim before a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel arising from sale of preferred securities to state chartered banks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients on a wide array of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational compliance matters,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;with specific expertise and focus on the design and implementation of anti-corruption compliance programs tailored specifically to an organization\u0026rsquo;s risk, industry, geographic, and operational profile.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international anti-corruption internal investigation and compliance counseling in multiple jurisdictions, including SE Asia, China, the Middle East, South America, and Africa. Representing company in response to multi-jurisdictional enforcement efforts by the U.S. DOJ and SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sacks","nick_name":"Kathleen","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Kathleen","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathleen Sacks focuses on white-collar criminal defense including anti-corruption investigations and compliance counseling, complex commercial litigation, and cross-border investigations and disputes.\u0026nbsp; As counsel\u0026nbsp;based in the Washington, D.C. office, Kathleen has experience representing\u0026nbsp;clients facing investigations before the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other domestic and international authorities.\u0026nbsp; She also has handled cases for clients in high-stakes adversarial proceedings, including trial-level litigation, arbitrations, and government enforcement actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathleen represents companies across the globe in high-stakes matters.\u0026nbsp; She has handled investigations and enforcement actions in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.\u0026nbsp; Kathleen is experienced in all aspects of compliance counseling and investigations, including compliance assessment, remediation, and data privacy considerations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe also defends clients across industries before domestic and foreign government enforcement authorities and represents clients in complex civil litigation.\u0026nbsp; Kathleen handles contract disputes, business tort claims, shareholder disputes, professional liability claims, and consumer class actions and is well-versed in all aspects of litigation, with extensive experience in motions practice, trial preparation and depositions, and appellate briefing.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom 2010 to 2012, Kathleen\u0026nbsp;served as the President of the Atlanta Chapter of the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWon final summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea private equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its officers in long-running Georgia state court lawsuit in which plaintiff sought multi-million dollar punitive damages award arising from fund's $470 million acquisition of portfolio company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea financial services institution and broker\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defense of $100 million claim before a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel arising from sale of preferred securities to state chartered banks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising clients on a wide array of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational compliance matters,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;with specific expertise and focus on the design and implementation of anti-corruption compliance programs tailored specifically to an organization\u0026rsquo;s risk, industry, geographic, and operational profile.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international anti-corruption internal investigation and compliance counseling in multiple jurisdictions, including SE Asia, China, the Middle East, South America, and Africa. Representing company in response to multi-jurisdictional enforcement efforts by the U.S. DOJ and SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1158}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:15.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:15.000Z","searchable_text":"Sacks{{ FIELD }}Won final summary judgment for a private equity fund and its officers in long-running Georgia state court lawsuit in which plaintiff sought multi-million dollar punitive damages award arising from fund's $470 million acquisition of portfolio company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a financial services institution and broker in defense of $100 million claim before a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel arising from sale of preferred securities to state chartered banks.{{ FIELD }}Advising clients on a wide array of international compliance matters, with specific expertise and focus on the design and implementation of anti-corruption compliance programs tailored specifically to an organization’s risk, industry, geographic, and operational profile.{{ FIELD }}Representing an international chemical company in international anti-corruption internal investigation and compliance counseling in multiple jurisdictions, including SE Asia, China, the Middle East, South America, and Africa. Representing company in response to multi-jurisdictional enforcement efforts by the U.S. DOJ and SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor.{{ FIELD }}Kathleen Sacks focuses on white-collar criminal defense including anti-corruption investigations and compliance counseling, complex commercial litigation, and cross-border investigations and disputes.  As counsel based in the Washington, D.C. office, Kathleen has experience representing clients facing investigations before the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as other domestic and international authorities.  She also has handled cases for clients in high-stakes adversarial proceedings, including trial-level litigation, arbitrations, and government enforcement actions.\nKathleen represents companies across the globe in high-stakes matters.  She has handled investigations and enforcement actions in North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.  Kathleen is experienced in all aspects of compliance counseling and investigations, including compliance assessment, remediation, and data privacy considerations. \nShe also defends clients across industries before domestic and foreign government enforcement authorities and represents clients in complex civil litigation.  Kathleen handles contract disputes, business tort claims, shareholder disputes, professional liability claims, and consumer class actions and is well-versed in all aspects of litigation, with extensive experience in motions practice, trial preparation and depositions, and appellate briefing. \nFrom 2010 to 2012, Kathleen served as the President of the Atlanta Chapter of the Georgia Association for Women Lawyers. Counsel University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia District of Columbia Georgia Missouri Won final summary judgment for a private equity fund and its officers in long-running Georgia state court lawsuit in which plaintiff sought multi-million dollar punitive damages award arising from fund's $470 million acquisition of portfolio company. Represented a financial services institution and broker in defense of $100 million claim before a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel arising from sale of preferred securities to state chartered banks. Advising clients on a wide array of international compliance matters, with specific expertise and focus on the design and implementation of anti-corruption compliance programs tailored specifically to an organization’s risk, industry, geographic, and operational profile. Representing an international chemical company in international anti-corruption internal investigation and compliance counseling in multiple jurisdictions, including SE Asia, China, the Middle East, South America, and Africa. Representing company in response to multi-jurisdictional enforcement efforts by the U.S. DOJ and SEC, and the Dutch Public Prosecutor.","searchable_name":"Kathleen A. Sacks","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446152,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":457,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Smith is Counsel in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice, where she focuses on strategic case management across all phases of complex litigation. She advises litigation teams and clients on designing and executing efficient, defensible discovery and information-management strategies, with particular experience supporting matters involving automotive, consumer products, pharmaceutical, medical device, and energy companies. Lisa partners closely with clients to streamline workflows, manage risk, and align discovery efforts with overall case strategy. She is especially experienced in leveraging technology\u0026mdash;including advanced analytics and generative AI\u0026mdash;to improve decision-making, control costs, and enhance outcomes in product liability matters, class actions, and government investigations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has also served as a member of the executive board of directors for VSA arts of Georgia, a non-profit arts organization affiliated with the Kennedy Center dedicated to providing arts opportunities for persons with disabilities.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lisa-smith","email":"lcsmith@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3301}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Smith","nick_name":"Lisa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lisa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/public-profile/settings?trk=d_flagship3_profile_self_view_public_profile","seodescription":"Lisa C. Smith is a Counsel in King \u0026 Spalding. Read more about her.","primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Smith is Counsel in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice, where she focuses on strategic case management across all phases of complex litigation. She advises litigation teams and clients on designing and executing efficient, defensible discovery and information-management strategies, with particular experience supporting matters involving automotive, consumer products, pharmaceutical, medical device, and energy companies. Lisa partners closely with clients to streamline workflows, manage risk, and align discovery efforts with overall case strategy. She is especially experienced in leveraging technology\u0026mdash;including advanced analytics and generative AI\u0026mdash;to improve decision-making, control costs, and enhance outcomes in product liability matters, class actions, and government investigations.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has also served as a member of the executive board of directors for VSA arts of Georgia, a non-profit arts organization affiliated with the Kennedy Center dedicated to providing arts opportunities for persons with disabilities.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11807}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-24T23:22:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-24T23:22:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Smith{{ FIELD }}Lisa Smith is Counsel in the firm’s Trial and Global Disputes practice, where she focuses on strategic case management across all phases of complex litigation. She advises litigation teams and clients on designing and executing efficient, defensible discovery and information-management strategies, with particular experience supporting matters involving automotive, consumer products, pharmaceutical, medical device, and energy companies. Lisa partners closely with clients to streamline workflows, manage risk, and align discovery efforts with overall case strategy. She is especially experienced in leveraging technology—including advanced analytics and generative AI—to improve decision-making, control costs, and enhance outcomes in product liability matters, class actions, and government investigations. \nLisa has also served as a member of the executive board of directors for VSA arts of Georgia, a non-profit arts organization affiliated with the Kennedy Center dedicated to providing arts opportunities for persons with disabilities. Lisa C. Smith Counsel Counsel Howard University Howard University School of Law Tulane University Tulane University Law School Georgia State Bar of Georgia American Bar Association; Atlanta Bar Association","searchable_name":"Lisa C. Smith","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426701,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5373,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCori C. Steinmann focuses her practice on the representation of various business clients in state and federal complex litigation matters involving products liability, toxic torts, business litigation, and construction cases.\u0026nbsp; As an active\u0026nbsp;trial lawyer, she has\u0026nbsp;successfully defended clients in\u0026nbsp;jury trials in Texas, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Arizona, Florida, Illinois, and California. Ms. Steinmann\u0026rsquo;s aggressive approach to the defense of her clients has resulted in the early dismissal of actions, favorable settlements, and defense verdicts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLicensed in both Texas and California, Cori\u0026nbsp;has represented\u0026nbsp;numerous Fortune 100 Companies across the country\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;product liability and\u0026nbsp;toxic tort litigation.\u0026nbsp;In addition to her courtroom experience,\u0026nbsp;she has effectively handled all phases of litigation, including discovery and e-discovery, taking and defending lay and expert depositions, preparing company witnesses for deposition and trial, and drafting and arguing a wide range of pre and post-trial motions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"cori-steinmann","email":"csteinmann@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Steinmann","nick_name":"Cori","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Cori","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":1852,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2004-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCori C. Steinmann focuses her practice on the representation of various business clients in state and federal complex litigation matters involving products liability, toxic torts, business litigation, and construction cases.\u0026nbsp; As an active\u0026nbsp;trial lawyer, she has\u0026nbsp;successfully defended clients in\u0026nbsp;jury trials in Texas, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Arizona, Florida, Illinois, and California. Ms. Steinmann\u0026rsquo;s aggressive approach to the defense of her clients has resulted in the early dismissal of actions, favorable settlements, and defense verdicts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLicensed in both Texas and California, Cori\u0026nbsp;has represented\u0026nbsp;numerous Fortune 100 Companies across the country\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;product liability and\u0026nbsp;toxic tort litigation.\u0026nbsp;In addition to her courtroom experience,\u0026nbsp;she has effectively handled all phases of litigation, including discovery and e-discovery, taking and defending lay and expert depositions, preparing company witnesses for deposition and trial, and drafting and arguing a wide range of pre and post-trial motions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6372}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:09.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Steinmann{{ FIELD }}Cori C. Steinmann focuses her practice on the representation of various business clients in state and federal complex litigation matters involving products liability, toxic torts, business litigation, and construction cases.  As an active trial lawyer, she has successfully defended clients in jury trials in Texas, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Arizona, Florida, Illinois, and California. Ms. Steinmann’s aggressive approach to the defense of her clients has resulted in the early dismissal of actions, favorable settlements, and defense verdicts.\nLicensed in both Texas and California, Cori has represented numerous Fortune 100 Companies across the country in product liability and toxic tort litigation. In addition to her courtroom experience, she has effectively handled all phases of litigation, including discovery and e-discovery, taking and defending lay and expert depositions, preparing company witnesses for deposition and trial, and drafting and arguing a wide range of pre and post-trial motions.  Counsel The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas California Texas","searchable_name":"Cori C. Steinmann","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436624,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7222,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTheresa is\u0026nbsp;a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Business Litigation Practice Group. Theresa specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration, and dispute resolution with a focus on trade secrets, contract disputes, and business torts (including fraud, interference, and negligence).Theresa brings a practical, results-oriented approach to legal challenges, combining deep legal knowledge with a clear understanding of business priorities and time-sensitive demands.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheresa has successfully litigated cases before Federal District Courts, California Superior Courts, and in arbitration forums including JAMS and the American Arbitration Association (AAA).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheresa is a seasoned eDiscovery attorney. With over 20 years of experience in complex commercial litigation and investigations, Theresa\u0026nbsp;specializes in managing electronically stored information (ESI) throughout the discovery lifecycle. Her practice includes leading meet-and-confer conferences, negotiating ESI protocols, and overseeing document review and production in federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Theresa\u0026nbsp;represented clients in complex commercial matters. Her experience also includes several years as an Employee Relations Consultant, advising corporate clients on internal investigations, compliance issues, and workplace disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"theresa-sutton","email":"tsutton@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sutton","nick_name":"Theresa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Theresa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1771,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2000-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTheresa is\u0026nbsp;a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Business Litigation Practice Group. Theresa specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration, and dispute resolution with a focus on trade secrets, contract disputes, and business torts (including fraud, interference, and negligence).Theresa brings a practical, results-oriented approach to legal challenges, combining deep legal knowledge with a clear understanding of business priorities and time-sensitive demands.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheresa has successfully litigated cases before Federal District Courts, California Superior Courts, and in arbitration forums including JAMS and the American Arbitration Association (AAA).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheresa is a seasoned eDiscovery attorney. With over 20 years of experience in complex commercial litigation and investigations, Theresa\u0026nbsp;specializes in managing electronically stored information (ESI) throughout the discovery lifecycle. Her practice includes leading meet-and-confer conferences, negotiating ESI protocols, and overseeing document review and production in federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Theresa\u0026nbsp;represented clients in complex commercial matters. Her experience also includes several years as an Employee Relations Consultant, advising corporate clients on internal investigations, compliance issues, and workplace disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T20:29:46.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T20:29:46.000Z","searchable_text":"Sutton{{ FIELD }}Theresa is a member of King \u0026amp; Spalding's Business Litigation Practice Group. Theresa specializes in complex business litigation, arbitration, and dispute resolution with a focus on trade secrets, contract disputes, and business torts (including fraud, interference, and negligence).Theresa brings a practical, results-oriented approach to legal challenges, combining deep legal knowledge with a clear understanding of business priorities and time-sensitive demands.\nTheresa has successfully litigated cases before Federal District Courts, California Superior Courts, and in arbitration forums including JAMS and the American Arbitration Association (AAA). \nTheresa is a seasoned eDiscovery attorney. With over 20 years of experience in complex commercial litigation and investigations, Theresa specializes in managing electronically stored information (ESI) throughout the discovery lifecycle. Her practice includes leading meet-and-confer conferences, negotiating ESI protocols, and overseeing document review and production in federal and state courts.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Theresa represented clients in complex commercial matters. Her experience also includes several years as an Employee Relations Consultant, advising corporate clients on internal investigations, compliance issues, and workplace disputes.\n  Counsel Santa Clara University Santa Clara University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Central District of California","searchable_name":"Theresa Sutton","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442786,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5482,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRobert is a\u0026nbsp;Senior Associate in the Houston office and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Disputes, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts Practice Group. His practice focuses on litigating toxic and environmental torts and environmental contamination cases, including air, water, and groundwater and soil contamination issues. Robert\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes litigating and arbitrating employment and healthcare matters, including restrictive covenant, harassment, discrimination, wrongful termination, FLSA collective action matters, and managed care litigation matters in federal and state courts\u0026nbsp;and before administrative agencies and arbitration panels.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Robert worked as an associate large international law firms in Houston, Texas and New Orleans, Louisiana, focusing on labor and employment issues and class and collective actions. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jackson, Mississippi, and while in law school, a judicial extern for the Honorable Albert Diaz of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Charlotte, North Carolina and the Honorable Neil P. Olack for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi in Jackson, Mississippi.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRobert graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the University of Mississippi School of Law, where he served as an Executive Articles Editor\u0026nbsp;of the Mississippi Law Journal.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"james-sheppard","email":"rsheppard@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented and obtained complete defense verdict as member of trial team for medical sterilization device company in bet-the-company litigation related to alleged exposure to air emissions from facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented various energy companies and manufacturers related to groundwater and soil contamination issues, including MTBE, PCE, and TCE.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Texas wood pellets facility in Clean Air Act citizen suit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented red light therapy manufacturing company in lawsuit alleging defamation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented numerous employers and employees in various lawsuits seeking emergency injunctive relief related to alleged violations of noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality contractual provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended employers in various employment matters, including whistleblower and discrimination claims for wrongful termination and other adverse actions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully counseled employers with respect to FMLA and FLSA compliance issues and defended employers in FLSA collective action matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented and obtained an $18 million verdict as part of trial team for energy company related to trademark and trade dress claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExtensive pro bono work, including arguing two Fifth Circuit appeals.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3553}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sheppard III","nick_name":"Robert","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Rhesa H. Barksdale, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2014 - 2015"},{"name":"Intern, Albert Diaz, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit","years_held":"2012 - 2013"},{"name":"Intern, Neil P. Olack, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi","years_held":"2012 - 2012"}],"first_name":"J.","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2244,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Robert","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Robert is an Senior Associate of the firm’s Trial Disputes, Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRobert is a\u0026nbsp;Senior Associate in the Houston office and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Disputes, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts Practice Group. His practice focuses on litigating toxic and environmental torts and environmental contamination cases, including air, water, and groundwater and soil contamination issues. Robert\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes litigating and arbitrating employment and healthcare matters, including restrictive covenant, harassment, discrimination, wrongful termination, FLSA collective action matters, and managed care litigation matters in federal and state courts\u0026nbsp;and before administrative agencies and arbitration panels.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Robert worked as an associate large international law firms in Houston, Texas and New Orleans, Louisiana, focusing on labor and employment issues and class and collective actions. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jackson, Mississippi, and while in law school, a judicial extern for the Honorable Albert Diaz of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Charlotte, North Carolina and the Honorable Neil P. Olack for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi in Jackson, Mississippi.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRobert graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003esumma cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from the University of Mississippi School of Law, where he served as an Executive Articles Editor\u0026nbsp;of the Mississippi Law Journal.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented and obtained complete defense verdict as member of trial team for medical sterilization device company in bet-the-company litigation related to alleged exposure to air emissions from facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented various energy companies and manufacturers related to groundwater and soil contamination issues, including MTBE, PCE, and TCE.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented Texas wood pellets facility in Clean Air Act citizen suit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented red light therapy manufacturing company in lawsuit alleging defamation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented numerous employers and employees in various lawsuits seeking emergency injunctive relief related to alleged violations of noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality contractual provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended employers in various employment matters, including whistleblower and discrimination claims for wrongful termination and other adverse actions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully counseled employers with respect to FMLA and FLSA compliance issues and defended employers in FLSA collective action matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented and obtained an $18 million verdict as part of trial team for energy company related to trademark and trade dress claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExtensive pro bono work, including arguing two Fifth Circuit appeals.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6936}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Sheppard III{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented and obtained complete defense verdict as member of trial team for medical sterilization device company in bet-the-company litigation related to alleged exposure to air emissions from facility.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented various energy companies and manufacturers related to groundwater and soil contamination issues, including MTBE, PCE, and TCE.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Texas wood pellets facility in Clean Air Act citizen suit.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented red light therapy manufacturing company in lawsuit alleging defamation.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented numerous employers and employees in various lawsuits seeking emergency injunctive relief related to alleged violations of noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality contractual provisions.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended employers in various employment matters, including whistleblower and discrimination claims for wrongful termination and other adverse actions.{{ FIELD }}Successfully counseled employers with respect to FMLA and FLSA compliance issues and defended employers in FLSA collective action matters.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented and obtained an $18 million verdict as part of trial team for energy company related to trademark and trade dress claims.{{ FIELD }}Extensive pro bono work, including arguing two Fifth Circuit appeals.{{ FIELD }}Robert is a Senior Associate in the Houston office and is a member of the firm’s Trial Disputes, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts Practice Group. His practice focuses on litigating toxic and environmental torts and environmental contamination cases, including air, water, and groundwater and soil contamination issues. Robert’s practice also includes litigating and arbitrating employment and healthcare matters, including restrictive covenant, harassment, discrimination, wrongful termination, FLSA collective action matters, and managed care litigation matters in federal and state courts and before administrative agencies and arbitration panels.\nPrior to joining the firm, Robert worked as an associate large international law firms in Houston, Texas and New Orleans, Louisiana, focusing on labor and employment issues and class and collective actions. Prior to entering private practice, he served as a law clerk to the Honorable Rhesa Hawkins Barksdale of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jackson, Mississippi, and while in law school, a judicial extern for the Honorable Albert Diaz of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Charlotte, North Carolina and the Honorable Neil P. Olack for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern and Southern Districts of Mississippi in Jackson, Mississippi.\nRobert graduated summa cum laude from the University of Mississippi School of Law, where he served as an Executive Articles Editor of the Mississippi Law Journal. Robert Sheppard lawyer Senior Associate University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Louisiana Texas American Bar Association Houston Bar Association State Bar of Texas Louisiana State Bar Association Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit (BAFFC) Judicial Clerk, Rhesa H. Barksdale, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Intern, Albert Diaz, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Intern, Neil P. Olack, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Successfully represented and obtained complete defense verdict as member of trial team for medical sterilization device company in bet-the-company litigation related to alleged exposure to air emissions from facility. Successfully represented various energy companies and manufacturers related to groundwater and soil contamination issues, including MTBE, PCE, and TCE. Successfully represented Texas wood pellets facility in Clean Air Act citizen suit. Successfully represented red light therapy manufacturing company in lawsuit alleging defamation. Successfully represented numerous employers and employees in various lawsuits seeking emergency injunctive relief related to alleged violations of noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality contractual provisions. Successfully defended employers in various employment matters, including whistleblower and discrimination claims for wrongful termination and other adverse actions. Successfully counseled employers with respect to FMLA and FLSA compliance issues and defended employers in FLSA collective action matters. Successfully represented and obtained an $18 million verdict as part of trial team for energy company related to trademark and trade dress claims. Extensive pro bono work, including arguing two Fifth Circuit appeals.","searchable_name":"J. Robert Sheppard III (Robert)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442857,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6070,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer is\u0026nbsp;a highly skilled litigator in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Houston office who represents leading energy, manufacturing, and retail clients in high-stakes, complex disputes. \u0026nbsp;She is well-known for her effective defense of Fortune 500 companies in mass environmental and toxic tort litigation, including claims for manufacturing defects, negligence, and natural resource damage. \u0026nbsp;Jennifer is frequently recognized by clients for her responsiveness, strategic counsel, and ability to achieve favorable outcomes in challenging matters.\u0026nbsp; She also has a proven track record of success in litigating challenging and often catastrophic personal injury or wrongful death cases, particularly those arising from industrial accidents, fires, and explosions at refineries and chemical plants.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer handles all types of environmental matters, with expertise in litigating groundwater contamination lawsuits alleging property damage or personal injury.\u0026nbsp; She has managed investigations and cases alleging contamination from a vast array of constituents, including contaminants like 1,2,3-trichlorapropane, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and PCBs.\u0026nbsp; Jennifer leverages her technical expertise to clearly explain complex scientific and legal issues associated with this complex type of work to judges and juries, ensuring persuasive advocacy in hearings, jury-research exercises, arbitrations, and trial. \u0026nbsp;With a background in leading cases at both a boutique litigation law firm and in big law, she brings a uniquely broad and deep wealth of experience to all aspects of litigation, skillfully handling and defending fact and expert depositions, resolving complex written discovery disputes, and successfully arguing discovery and dispositive motions in state and federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer earned her law degree from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, where she served as the Note and Comment Editor for the \u003cem\u003eOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution\u003c/em\u003e. She also earned the CALI Award for Excellence in International Dispute Resolution and received the second highest recognition of Public Service Fellow with Dean\u0026rsquo;s Special Recognition for her volunteer legal work in the community. Prior to attending law school, Jennifer graduated \u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e from The Ohio State University with a B.A. in Political Science and a B.A. in International Studies. She was also inducted into the National Political Science Honor Society, Pi Sigma Alpha.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jennifer-stuhldreher","email":"jstuhldreher@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Stuhldreher","nick_name":"Jennifer","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jennifer","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2990,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Public Service Fellow with Dean’s Special Recognition","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2018-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the 8th Leadership Class","detail":"Institute for Energy Law, 2025-2026"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jenniferstuhldreher/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer is\u0026nbsp;a highly skilled litigator in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Houston office who represents leading energy, manufacturing, and retail clients in high-stakes, complex disputes. \u0026nbsp;She is well-known for her effective defense of Fortune 500 companies in mass environmental and toxic tort litigation, including claims for manufacturing defects, negligence, and natural resource damage. \u0026nbsp;Jennifer is frequently recognized by clients for her responsiveness, strategic counsel, and ability to achieve favorable outcomes in challenging matters.\u0026nbsp; She also has a proven track record of success in litigating challenging and often catastrophic personal injury or wrongful death cases, particularly those arising from industrial accidents, fires, and explosions at refineries and chemical plants.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer handles all types of environmental matters, with expertise in litigating groundwater contamination lawsuits alleging property damage or personal injury.\u0026nbsp; She has managed investigations and cases alleging contamination from a vast array of constituents, including contaminants like 1,2,3-trichlorapropane, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and PCBs.\u0026nbsp; Jennifer leverages her technical expertise to clearly explain complex scientific and legal issues associated with this complex type of work to judges and juries, ensuring persuasive advocacy in hearings, jury-research exercises, arbitrations, and trial. \u0026nbsp;With a background in leading cases at both a boutique litigation law firm and in big law, she brings a uniquely broad and deep wealth of experience to all aspects of litigation, skillfully handling and defending fact and expert depositions, resolving complex written discovery disputes, and successfully arguing discovery and dispositive motions in state and federal court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer earned her law degree from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, where she served as the Note and Comment Editor for the \u003cem\u003eOhio State Journal on Dispute Resolution\u003c/em\u003e. She also earned the CALI Award for Excellence in International Dispute Resolution and received the second highest recognition of Public Service Fellow with Dean\u0026rsquo;s Special Recognition for her volunteer legal work in the community. Prior to attending law school, Jennifer graduated \u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e from The Ohio State University with a B.A. in Political Science and a B.A. in International Studies. She was also inducted into the National Political Science Honor Society, Pi Sigma Alpha.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the 8th Leadership Class","detail":"Institute for Energy Law, 2025-2026"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8974}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:55.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:55.000Z","searchable_text":"Stuhldreher{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the 8th Leadership Class\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Institute for Energy Law, 2025-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}Jennifer is a highly skilled litigator in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Houston office who represents leading energy, manufacturing, and retail clients in high-stakes, complex disputes.  She is well-known for her effective defense of Fortune 500 companies in mass environmental and toxic tort litigation, including claims for manufacturing defects, negligence, and natural resource damage.  Jennifer is frequently recognized by clients for her responsiveness, strategic counsel, and ability to achieve favorable outcomes in challenging matters.  She also has a proven track record of success in litigating challenging and often catastrophic personal injury or wrongful death cases, particularly those arising from industrial accidents, fires, and explosions at refineries and chemical plants.\nJennifer handles all types of environmental matters, with expertise in litigating groundwater contamination lawsuits alleging property damage or personal injury.  She has managed investigations and cases alleging contamination from a vast array of constituents, including contaminants like 1,2,3-trichlorapropane, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and PCBs.  Jennifer leverages her technical expertise to clearly explain complex scientific and legal issues associated with this complex type of work to judges and juries, ensuring persuasive advocacy in hearings, jury-research exercises, arbitrations, and trial.  With a background in leading cases at both a boutique litigation law firm and in big law, she brings a uniquely broad and deep wealth of experience to all aspects of litigation, skillfully handling and defending fact and expert depositions, resolving complex written discovery disputes, and successfully arguing discovery and dispositive motions in state and federal court.\nJennifer earned her law degree from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, where she served as the Note and Comment Editor for the Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution. She also earned the CALI Award for Excellence in International Dispute Resolution and received the second highest recognition of Public Service Fellow with Dean’s Special Recognition for her volunteer legal work in the community. Prior to attending law school, Jennifer graduated magna cum laude from The Ohio State University with a B.A. in Political Science and a B.A. in International Studies. She was also inducted into the National Political Science Honor Society, Pi Sigma Alpha. Senior Associate Selected to the 8th Leadership Class Institute for Energy Law, 2025-2026 The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Texas American Bar Association Houston Bar Association State Bar of Texas Institute for Energy Law","searchable_name":"Jennifer Stuhldreher","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426395,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3278,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Schnur focuses primarily on complex discovery issues, with clients in the automotive, health care, data privacy, and oil and gas industries. Her practice deals with client undergoing governmental investigations, including the U.S.\u0026nbsp;Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Highway\u0026nbsp;Traffic Safety Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as congressional subpoenas, the Department of Justice, and various State Attorneys General.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth has extensive experience in managing review teams and workflows in order to streamline\u0026nbsp;the costs associated with discovery. She has experience utilizing technology assisted review products while balancing the need for attorney review\u0026nbsp;throughout the review process. Elizabeth works closely with counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization, and quality checks.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"elizabeth-schnur","email":"eschnur@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003ePart of the management team for an international document review, spanning three countries with over 100 reviewers, responding to several governmental investigations while maintaining compliance with European Data Protection Regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervised and managed over 100 attorneys in a review of documents for a data security company responding to state and federal investigations as well as multi-district litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Schnur","nick_name":"Elizabeth","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Elizabeth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":2259,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":84,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth Schnur focuses primarily on complex discovery issues, with clients in the automotive, health care, data privacy, and oil and gas industries. Her practice deals with client undergoing governmental investigations, including the U.S.\u0026nbsp;Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Highway\u0026nbsp;Traffic Safety Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as congressional subpoenas, the Department of Justice, and various State Attorneys General.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth has extensive experience in managing review teams and workflows in order to streamline\u0026nbsp;the costs associated with discovery. She has experience utilizing technology assisted review products while balancing the need for attorney review\u0026nbsp;throughout the review process. Elizabeth works closely with counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization, and quality checks.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003ePart of the management team for an international document review, spanning three countries with over 100 reviewers, responding to several governmental investigations while maintaining compliance with European Data Protection Regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervised and managed over 100 attorneys in a review of documents for a data security company responding to state and federal investigations as well as multi-district litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1175}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:24.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:24.000Z","searchable_text":"Schnur{{ FIELD }}Part of the management team for an international document review, spanning three countries with over 100 reviewers, responding to several governmental investigations while maintaining compliance with European Data Protection Regulations.{{ FIELD }}Supervised and managed over 100 attorneys in a review of documents for a data security company responding to state and federal investigations as well as multi-district litigation.{{ FIELD }}Elizabeth Schnur focuses primarily on complex discovery issues, with clients in the automotive, health care, data privacy, and oil and gas industries. Her practice deals with client undergoing governmental investigations, including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as congressional subpoenas, the Department of Justice, and various State Attorneys General. \nElizabeth has extensive experience in managing review teams and workflows in order to streamline the costs associated with discovery. She has experience utilizing technology assisted review products while balancing the need for attorney review throughout the review process. Elizabeth works closely with counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization, and quality checks. Senior Attorney University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of New Hampshire  U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia Part of the management team for an international document review, spanning three countries with over 100 reviewers, responding to several governmental investigations while maintaining compliance with European Data Protection Regulations. Supervised and managed over 100 attorneys in a review of documents for a data security company responding to state and federal investigations as well as multi-district litigation.","searchable_name":"Elizabeth Schnur","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427688,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1584,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatt Sharrow is an attorney with the E-Discovery practice.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive experience in pre-trial discovery in mass tort litigation, including the representation of manufacturers of pharmaceutical and petrochemical products.\u0026nbsp; Additionally Matt also has a strong background representing major financial institutions with their e-discovery management.\u0026nbsp; He provides advice and counsel to clients to limit the scope and cost of the document review, including protocols/best practices, vendor selection and contract negotiations, as well as early case assessment, key word development and validation. Matt works closely with in-house counsel, outside counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization and quality checks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has over seven years of E-Discovery experience.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, he was a Project Manager for one of the leading e-discovery vendors in the industry. Matt has experience over the entire spectrum of the e-discovery process, from document collection to production of privilege logs.\u0026nbsp; He has been an integral member of the senior staff overseeing \u0026nbsp;e-discovery cases at King \u0026amp; Spalding that utilize predictive coding. Matt has managed the E-Discovery process in a wide variety of matters, including pharmaceutical, environmental, product liability, mass tort, intellectual property, business litigation, and bankruptcy.\u0026nbsp; Additionally, he has overseen various internal and governmental investigations, including the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), various State Attorneys General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"matthew-sharrow","email":"msharrow@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eManaging over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.\u0026nbsp; The review was King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s first utilization of Predictive Coding.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.\u0026nbsp; Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.\u0026nbsp; 750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Sharrow","nick_name":"Matthew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":76,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatt Sharrow is an attorney with the E-Discovery practice.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive experience in pre-trial discovery in mass tort litigation, including the representation of manufacturers of pharmaceutical and petrochemical products.\u0026nbsp; Additionally Matt also has a strong background representing major financial institutions with their e-discovery management.\u0026nbsp; He provides advice and counsel to clients to limit the scope and cost of the document review, including protocols/best practices, vendor selection and contract negotiations, as well as early case assessment, key word development and validation. Matt works closely with in-house counsel, outside counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization and quality checks.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has over seven years of E-Discovery experience.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, he was a Project Manager for one of the leading e-discovery vendors in the industry. Matt has experience over the entire spectrum of the e-discovery process, from document collection to production of privilege logs.\u0026nbsp; He has been an integral member of the senior staff overseeing \u0026nbsp;e-discovery cases at King \u0026amp; Spalding that utilize predictive coding. Matt has managed the E-Discovery process in a wide variety of matters, including pharmaceutical, environmental, product liability, mass tort, intellectual property, business litigation, and bankruptcy.\u0026nbsp; Additionally, he has overseen various internal and governmental investigations, including the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), various State Attorneys General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eManaging over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.\u0026nbsp; The review was King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s first utilization of Predictive Coding.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.\u0026nbsp; Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.\u0026nbsp; Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.\u0026nbsp; 750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSupervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4540}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:47.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:47.000Z","searchable_text":"Sharrow{{ FIELD }}Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.{{ FIELD }}Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King \u0026amp; Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.{{ FIELD }}Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.{{ FIELD }}Managing 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.  Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company.{{ FIELD }}Supervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.  Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client.{{ FIELD }}Managing more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.  Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality.{{ FIELD }}Supervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.  750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution.{{ FIELD }}Supervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility.{{ FIELD }}Managing and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document.  {{ FIELD }}Supervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company{{ FIELD }}Litigation Technology Experience\nSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.  He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.{{ FIELD }}Matt Sharrow is an attorney with the E-Discovery practice.  He has extensive experience in pre-trial discovery in mass tort litigation, including the representation of manufacturers of pharmaceutical and petrochemical products.  Additionally Matt also has a strong background representing major financial institutions with their e-discovery management.  He provides advice and counsel to clients to limit the scope and cost of the document review, including protocols/best practices, vendor selection and contract negotiations, as well as early case assessment, key word development and validation. Matt works closely with in-house counsel, outside counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization and quality checks.\n\nMatt has over seven years of E-Discovery experience.  Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, he was a Project Manager for one of the leading e-discovery vendors in the industry. Matt has experience over the entire spectrum of the e-discovery process, from document collection to production of privilege logs.  He has been an integral member of the senior staff overseeing  e-discovery cases at King \u0026amp; Spalding that utilize predictive coding. Matt has managed the E-Discovery process in a wide variety of matters, including pharmaceutical, environmental, product liability, mass tort, intellectual property, business litigation, and bankruptcy.  Additionally, he has overseen various internal and governmental investigations, including the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), various State Attorneys General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).\n  Senior Attorney Georgia Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution. Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King \u0026amp; Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim. Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client. Managing 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.  Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company. Supervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.  Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client. Managing more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.  Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality. Supervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.  750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution. Supervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility. Managing and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document.   Supervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company Litigation Technology Experience\nSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.  He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.","searchable_name":"Matthew Sharrow","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427525,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":315,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEric Smedley joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2000 as an attorney with the Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Environmental practice.\u0026nbsp; His practice focuses on managing large-scale document productions, including electronic discovery issues, with an emphasis on representing pharmaceutical clients in mass tort litigation. Eric is a senior member King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery Center.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"eric-smedley","email":"esmedley@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSupervising a core team of Discovery Center attorneys and paralegals for document production, privilege log, deposition/trial testimony preparation and defensive needs activities in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel in product liability and consumer fraud matters for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging large scale document collections (both hard copy and electronic) totaling over 900,000 documents (18,000,000 pages) in connection with product liability and consumer fraud litigation for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting in formulating document processing specifications used by vendors in connection with electronic and hard copy document collections.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging a document database platform vendor and other electronic processing vendors used in connection with on-going document collection and electronic document reviews for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMonitoring outsourced litigation support personnel for a pharmaceutical client in product liability and consumer fraud litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupervising an electronic production of over 33,000 documents requiring significant image redactions which was completed in 12 weeks.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom 2000-2004, being a member of a Discovery Team responsible for coordinating and drafting responses to discovery requests in tobacco products liability litigation in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel for a tobacco products manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents.\u0026nbsp; Due to Eric's involvement in these projects, he has experience coordinating and supervising the selection of vendors.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and printing. Eric has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Ringtail, Summation iBlaze, Discovery Radar, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Smedley","nick_name":"Eric","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Eric","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"V.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":84,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEric Smedley joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2000 as an attorney with the Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Environmental practice.\u0026nbsp; His practice focuses on managing large-scale document productions, including electronic discovery issues, with an emphasis on representing pharmaceutical clients in mass tort litigation. Eric is a senior member King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery Center.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSupervising a core team of Discovery Center attorneys and paralegals for document production, privilege log, deposition/trial testimony preparation and defensive needs activities in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel in product liability and consumer fraud matters for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging large scale document collections (both hard copy and electronic) totaling over 900,000 documents (18,000,000 pages) in connection with product liability and consumer fraud litigation for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisting in formulating document processing specifications used by vendors in connection with electronic and hard copy document collections.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaging a document database platform vendor and other electronic processing vendors used in connection with on-going document collection and electronic document reviews for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMonitoring outsourced litigation support personnel for a pharmaceutical client in product liability and consumer fraud litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSupervising an electronic production of over 33,000 documents requiring significant image redactions which was completed in 12 weeks.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom 2000-2004, being a member of a Discovery Team responsible for coordinating and drafting responses to discovery requests in tobacco products liability litigation in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel for a tobacco products manufacturer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation Technology Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents.\u0026nbsp; Due to Eric's involvement in these projects, he has experience coordinating and supervising the selection of vendors.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and printing. Eric has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Ringtail, Summation iBlaze, Discovery Radar, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1184}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:01:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:01:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Smedley{{ FIELD }}Supervising a core team of Discovery Center attorneys and paralegals for document production, privilege log, deposition/trial testimony preparation and defensive needs activities in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel in product liability and consumer fraud matters for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.{{ FIELD }}Managing large scale document collections (both hard copy and electronic) totaling over 900,000 documents (18,000,000 pages) in connection with product liability and consumer fraud litigation for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.{{ FIELD }}Assisting in formulating document processing specifications used by vendors in connection with electronic and hard copy document collections.{{ FIELD }}Managing a document database platform vendor and other electronic processing vendors used in connection with on-going document collection and electronic document reviews for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client.{{ FIELD }}Monitoring outsourced litigation support personnel for a pharmaceutical client in product liability and consumer fraud litigation.{{ FIELD }}\nSupervising an electronic production of over 33,000 documents requiring significant image redactions which was completed in 12 weeks.\n{{ FIELD }}From 2000-2004, being a member of a Discovery Team responsible for coordinating and drafting responses to discovery requests in tobacco products liability litigation in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel for a tobacco products manufacturer.{{ FIELD }}Litigation Technology Experience\nSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents.  Due to Eric's involvement in these projects, he has experience coordinating and supervising the selection of vendors.  He also has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and printing. Eric has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Ringtail, Summation iBlaze, Discovery Radar, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access{{ FIELD }}Eric Smedley joined King \u0026amp; Spalding in 2000 as an attorney with the Mass Tort and Toxic Tort and Environmental practice.  His practice focuses on managing large-scale document productions, including electronic discovery issues, with an emphasis on representing pharmaceutical clients in mass tort litigation. Eric is a senior member King \u0026amp; Spalding’s E-Discovery Center.\n  Senior Attorney Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law Duquesne University Duquesne University School of Law Georgia Pennsylvania Supervising a core team of Discovery Center attorneys and paralegals for document production, privilege log, deposition/trial testimony preparation and defensive needs activities in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel in product liability and consumer fraud matters for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client. Managing large scale document collections (both hard copy and electronic) totaling over 900,000 documents (18,000,000 pages) in connection with product liability and consumer fraud litigation for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client. Assisting in formulating document processing specifications used by vendors in connection with electronic and hard copy document collections. Managing a document database platform vendor and other electronic processing vendors used in connection with on-going document collection and electronic document reviews for a Fortune 50 pharmaceutical client. Monitoring outsourced litigation support personnel for a pharmaceutical client in product liability and consumer fraud litigation. \nSupervising an electronic production of over 33,000 documents requiring significant image redactions which was completed in 12 weeks.\n From 2000-2004, being a member of a Discovery Team responsible for coordinating and drafting responses to discovery requests in tobacco products liability litigation in connection with King \u0026amp; Spalding's role as national discovery counsel for a tobacco products manufacturer. Litigation Technology Experience\nSupervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents.  Due to Eric's involvement in these projects, he has experience coordinating and supervising the selection of vendors.  He also has experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, imaging, scanning and printing. Eric has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Ringtail, Summation iBlaze, Discovery Radar, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access","searchable_name":"Eric V. Smedley","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}