{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":"Immobilier","value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"7","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":427665,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1344,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"ehren-halse","email":"ehalse@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":0,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1168,"guid":"1168.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":19,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":20,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":21,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Halse","nick_name":"Ehren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Ehren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEhren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (\u0026ldquo;FCPA\u0026rdquo;) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eFinancial Fraud Law Report, \u003c/em\u003eGary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eThe Compliance Reporter\u0026rsquo;s \u0026lsquo;Adopting Best Practice In Compliance\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,\u0026rdquo; \u003cem\u003eBloomberg Law Reports\u003c/em\u003e, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003einternational corporations\u003c/strong\u003e in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea medical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted \u003cstrong\u003einternational pharmaceutical companies\u003c/strong\u003e with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea private Medicare and Medicaid provider\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e Relators, and States\u0026rsquo; Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003emultiple drug companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged \u0026ldquo;off-label\u0026rdquo; promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean individual\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ethe former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company\u003c/strong\u003e investigated by the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.\u0026nbsp; No charges were pursued against the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003edomestic and international banks\u003c/strong\u003e regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003evarious companies\u003c/strong\u003e in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSeven\u0026nbsp;years of \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e representation (over 45 clients) of \u003cstrong\u003edisabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans\u003c/strong\u003e regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran\u0026rsquo;s Affairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading virtual healthcare technology\u003c/strong\u003e company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ecompanies in the FinTech industry\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a \u003cstrong\u003eSpecial Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group\u003c/strong\u003e in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical client\u003c/strong\u003e concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company\u0026rsquo;s past promotion of opioids.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending \u003cstrong\u003ea leading financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans","detail":""},{"title":"King \u0026 Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5486}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:03:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Halse{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\\\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.{{ FIELD }}Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols.{{ FIELD }}Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities.{{ FIELD }}Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ).{{ FIELD }}Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion.{{ FIELD }}Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance.{{ FIELD }}Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs.{{ FIELD }}Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials.{{ FIELD }}Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids.{{ FIELD }}Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.{{ FIELD }}Ehren Halse is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters/Government Investigations Practice Group in San Francisco, CA. His practice focuses primarily on white-collar criminal litigation and corporate internal investigations, including defending individuals and companies in investigations by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, Congress, the Department of the Treasury, the Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, numerous State Attorneys General and other state regulatory agencies.\n\nIn addition, he has conducted various internal investigations relating to financial fraud and government enforcement, and has helped clients to develop comprehensive compliance and training programs. Recently, his practice has focused on substantive legal areas such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and anti-corruption/anti-bribery compliance, financial institutions fraud, FinTech and cryptocurrency/virtual asset regulation, U.S. economic sanctions and money laundering, cybersecurity and data privacy regulatory compliance and incident response, drug and medical device enforcement matters (e.g., healthcare fraud, anti-kickback, \"off-label\" promotion, and the False Claims Act), as well as e-discovery management and the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. He has a long history of pro bono work, including significant experience representing disabled Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans in their disability claims process.\nPublications\n\n“Courts Diverge on the Reach of Personal Jurisdiction in FCPA Cases against Foreign Defendants,” Financial Fraud Law Report, Gary Grindler, Russ Ryan and Ehren Halse (April 2013).\n“FCPA Demands Close Eye On Third Parties,” The Compliance Reporter’s ‘Adopting Best Practice In Compliance’, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (September 1, 2010).\n “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents,” Bloomberg Law Reports, Zachary Harmon and Ehren Halse (August 1, 2010).\n Partner Co-Recipient of a 2011 Burton Award for Legal Achievement for, “Recent Trends in FCPA Enforcement: Third-Party Agents\", which was published by Bloomberg Law Reports (July 30, 2010).  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  National Law Journal/Legal Times 2009 “Champion” award for pro bono efforts on behalf of disabled veterans  King \u0026amp; Spalding Pro Bono Service Award 2006 - 2013  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center California District of Columbia Maryland Representing international corporations in internal compliance reviews and criminal and civil investigations by the DOJ and SEC, regarding whether marketing, sales and business practices in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, South America and Europe implicated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Represented a medical device manufacturer in a market-wide criminal and civil inquiry into allegations of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Assisted international pharmaceutical companies with internal reviews of anti-kickback compliance protocols. Represented a private Medicare and Medicaid provider in criminal and civil investigations by the Tampa U.S. Attorney’s Office, DOJ, DHHS-OIG, qui tam Relators, and States’ Attorneys General into alleged health care and political contributions fraud. Represented multiple drug companies in criminal and civil investigations by the Boston U.S. Attorney’s Offices, DOJ, and DHHS-OIG, as well as internal compliance reviews regarding alleged “off-label” promotion and other allegedly fraudulent sales, marketing and development activities. Represented an individual investigated by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee for Investigations for alleged participation in an off-shore tax shelter.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented the former General Counsel of a Silicon Valley tech company investigated by the U.S. Attorney’s office for the Northern District of California and the SEC for involvement in an alleged scheme of stock options backdating.  No charges were pursued against the client. Represented domestic and international banks regarding alleged tax shelter schemes, price-fixing, bribery and competitor collusion (internal compliance reviews and criminal, tax and civil investigations by the SEC, IRS and DOJ). Represented various companies in criminal and civil antitrust investigations led by the DOJ and SEC regarding alleged price-fixing, bid-rigging and market collusion. Seven years of pro bono representation (over 45 clients) of disabled Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans regarding disability benefits claims with every branch of the military and the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. Representing a leading virtual healthcare technology company concerning domestic and international data security and privacy regulatory compliance. Representing companies in the FinTech industry with respect to economic sanctions compliance, including conducting internal investigations, OFAC subpoena response, and helping to design effective compliance programs. Secured successful declination to prosecute on behalf of a Special Board Committee of an Indonesian-based energy group in an investigation by the DOJ into anticorruption allegations of payments made to foreign government officials. Representing a publicly-traded pharmaceutical client concerning numerous DOJ and State Attorneys General investigations into the company’s past promotion of opioids. Defending a leading financial institution in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities, including matters involving the Presidential RMBS Task Force.","searchable_name":"Ehren Halse","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442344,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":664,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"s-stewart-haskins","email":"shaskins@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to compel arbitration in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enationwide class action\u003c/strong\u003e filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMissaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company\u003c/em\u003e, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea defendant health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e in a TCPA class action. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePhillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eXLHealth Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was \u0026ldquo;informational\u0026rdquo; and not an \u0026ldquo;advertisement\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGoldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment and mooted plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A.,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to dismiss for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNBC Universal\u003c/strong\u003e in a purported class action that contended the defendant\u0026rsquo;s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDeal or No Deal\u003c/em\u003e, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claim and the case was dismissed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Hardin v. NBC Universal\u003c/em\u003e, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative class action\u003c/strong\u003e reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher\u003c/em\u003e, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRickher v. Home Depot, Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an appeal that clarified \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe defendant's\u003c/strong\u003e burden in removing cases under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a case of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003efirst impression\u003c/strong\u003e in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSaab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in a case against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSchwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational consumer class action counsel for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFortune\u003c/em\u003e 50 company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":78}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Haskins","nick_name":"Stewart","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Sidney","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Stewart","name_suffix":"II","recognitions":[{"title":"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Class Action Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360, 2010 and 2012"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u003c/strong\u003e against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBerger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to compel arbitration in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enationwide class action\u003c/strong\u003e filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eMissaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company\u003c/em\u003e, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea defendant health insurer\u003c/strong\u003e in a TCPA class action. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003ePhillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v.\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eXLHealth Corp.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was \u0026ldquo;informational\u0026rdquo; and not an \u0026ldquo;advertisement\u0026rdquo;).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eGoldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment and mooted plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eHome Depot\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A.,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eInc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a motion to dismiss for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNBC Universal\u003c/strong\u003e in a purported class action that contended the defendant\u0026rsquo;s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDeal or No Deal\u003c/em\u003e, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claim and the case was dismissed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSee Hardin v. NBC Universal\u003c/em\u003e, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eputative class action\u003c/strong\u003e reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eThe Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher\u003c/em\u003e, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eRickher v. Home Depot, Inc\u003c/em\u003e., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon an appeal that clarified \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe defendant's\u003c/strong\u003e burden in removing cases under CAFA. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a case of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003efirst impression\u003c/strong\u003e in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSaab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in a case against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSchwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eNational consumer class action counsel for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFortune\u003c/em\u003e 50 company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Class Action Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360, 2010 and 2012"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":900}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Haskins{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Class Action Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2010 and 2012\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification).{{ FIELD }}Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO.{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment for a defendant health insurer in a TCPA class action. Phillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v. XLHealth Corp., Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was “informational” and not an “advertisement”).{{ FIELD }}Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009).{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment and mooted plaintiff’s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging Home Depot’s collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. See Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009).{{ FIELD }}Won a motion to dismiss for NBC Universal in a purported class action that contended the defendant’s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show Deal or No Deal, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff’s claim and the case was dismissed. See Hardin v. NBC Universal, 283 Ga. 477 (2008).{{ FIELD }}Obtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a putative class action reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. The Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Rickher v. Home Depot, Inc., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008).{{ FIELD }}Won an appeal that clarified the defendant's burden in removing cases under CAFA. Frederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss).{{ FIELD }}In a case of first impression in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006).{{ FIELD }}Defeated class certification in a case against an insurance company alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.Schwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co., 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington).{{ FIELD }}National consumer class action counsel for a Fortune 50 company.{{ FIELD }}Stewart Haskins specializes in defending class actions and other complex commercial litigation, particularly cases involving consumers and data privacy issues. As a partner in our nationally recognized Class Action practice, Stewart has successfully defended leading companies in hundreds of consumer class action suits across the country. He also regularly provides clients with counseling on privacy and consumer-related issues.\n\nStewart has extensive experience in all aspects of class action litigation, whether he is litigating complex jurisdictional issues, developing a winning case strategy or defeating class certification.\nThe removal of a case from state to federal court is the first step toward a successful resolution, and Stewart has litigated a wide variety of jurisdictional issues that arise in class actions. Stewart's primary goal in defending clients faced with class actions is the efficient disposition of the case, often by winning the early dismissal of the named plaintiff's claim. If a putative class action proceeds to the class certification stage, Stewart has substantial experience arguing class certification motions and defeating them in cases ranging from product liability claims to insurance services. And, if the case must be tried, Stewart has served as lead counsel in numerous jury trials of consumer and data privacy cases.\nAlso a member of our Data Security and Privacy practice, which Law360 selected as Privacy Practice Group of the Year 2016, Stewart has represented clients in high-profile class action litigation arising out of some of the largest data breach events in the country.\nFor nearly 20 years, Stewart also has defended a wide variety of class actions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, including claims arising from faxes, text messages, collection calls and mobile marketing efforts. He has litigated such claims in state and federal courts, and has won significant victories for his clients in numerous TCPA cases.\nIn addition to representing clients in class action litigation, Stewart regularly provides compliance and counseling advice to clients to help them try to avoid litigation under the TCPA, CAN-SPAM and other data privacy and consumer protection statutes. S Stewart Haskins Partner 2016 Privacy Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Class Action Group of the Year  Law360, 2010 and 2012 University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals Georgia Superior Court American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Represented Home Depot in dozens of putative consumer class actions filed against Home Depot arising out of its widely publicized payment card data breach in late 2014. Successfully defended Home Depot against consumer fraud claims under California law arising out of a charge for an optional damage waiver. Berger v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 741 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2014) (affirming denial of class certification). Won a motion to compel arbitration in a putative nationwide class action filed in California alleging claims under the TCPA. Missaghi v. The Coca-Cola Company, Central District of California (Los Angeles Division), Case No. 2:12-cv-07472-SJO. Won summary judgment for a defendant health insurer in a TCPA class action. Phillip Long Dang, D.C., P.C. v. XLHealth Corp., Case No. 1:09-cv-1076, 2011 WL 553826 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 7, 2011) (fax inviting doctors to a seminar was “informational” and not an “advertisement”). Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 609 F.Supp.2d 1340 (N.D. Ga. 2009). Won summary judgment and mooted plaintiff’s pending motion for class certification in a case challenging Home Depot’s collection of permit fees in connection with the installation of water heaters. See Willard v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-110/RS-MD, 2009 WL 4730644 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 7, 2009). Won a motion to dismiss for NBC Universal in a purported class action that contended the defendant’s promotional game, which aired in connection with the popular game show Deal or No Deal, constituted illegal gambling under Georgia law. The Georgia Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff’s claim and the case was dismissed. See Hardin v. NBC Universal, 283 Ga. 477 (2008). Obtained a landmark order from the Seventh Circuit in a putative class action reversing remand and adopting defendant's argument that injunctive relief should be considered to determine the amount in controversy under CAFA. The Home Depot, Inc. v. Rickher, 2006 WL 1727749, (7th Cir. May 22, 2006). Upon remand, the district court later granted defendant summary judgment and the Seventh Circuit affirmed. Rickher v. Home Depot, Inc., 535 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2008). Won an appeal that clarified the defendant's burden in removing cases under CAFA. Frederico v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 507 F.3d 188 (3rd Cir. 2007) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss). In a case of first impression in the Eighth Circuit, won an appeal which rejected the plaintiff's argument for expansion of a CAFA provision permitting interlocutory appeals from remand orders. Saab v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 469 F.3d 758 (8th Cir. 2006). Defeated class certification in a case against an insurance company alleging class action claims involving use of non-OEM parts.Schwendeman v. USAA Insurance Co., 65 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2003) (affirming denial of class certification and clarifying the standard regarding the admissibility of expert opinions in class actions within Washington). National consumer class action counsel for a Fortune 50 company.","searchable_name":"Sidney Stewart Haskins II (Stewart)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6966,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charly-helleputte","email":"chelleputte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1220,"guid":"1220.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Helleputte","nick_name":"Charly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-albert-charly-helleputte-a103931/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12700}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Helleputte{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *{{ FIELD }}Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. *{{ FIELD }}Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *{{ FIELD }}From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. *{{ FIELD }}Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *{{ FIELD }}Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *{{ FIELD }}Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *{{ FIELD }}Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *{{ FIELD }}Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *{{ FIELD }}Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *{{ FIELD }}Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *{{ FIELD }}Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *{{ FIELD }}Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. * {{ FIELD }}Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Charly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks—such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR—is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.\nCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\nBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus). Partner Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium 2019 Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Candidat en Droit  Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit  Solvay Business School  Paris Brussels European Advisory Board Member, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) ENISA, the European Union Cybersecurity Agency American Chamber in Europe (AmCham), EU chapter W@Privacy Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. * Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. * Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. * Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. * Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. * Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. * Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. * From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. * Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. * Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. * Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. * Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. * Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. * Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. * Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. * Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. * Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. * Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. * Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. * Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. * Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. * Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. * Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. * Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. * Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. * Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. * Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. * Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. * Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. * Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. * Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. * Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. * Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. * Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *  Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.","searchable_name":"Charly Helleputte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446870,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5554,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eScott Hiers is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice group. He focuses on cross-border investigations, government enforcement matters, and complex commercial disputes. He has represented corporations, financial institutions, and individuals in proceedings before the U.S. Department of Justice, SEC, OFAC, BIS, and other federal and\u0026nbsp;state agencies.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eScott regularly advises multinational companies navigating parallel proceedings before U.S. and foreign authorities. He has experience managing large-scale, multi-jurisdictional document reviews, supervising complex transactional and financial analyses, and counseling clients on compliance program enhancements and crisis management.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eScott previously served as a legal extern with the U.S. Department of State's Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Prior to law school, he worked as an economic consultant in Washington, D.C. Scott maintains an active pro bono practice and regularly represents clients seeking refugee protection.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"scott-hiers","email":"shiers@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCounseled a global manufacturer in connection with multiple regulatory investigations into alleged unlawful sales to China-based end users.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major European financial institution in a cross-border internal investigation involving potential civil and criminal exposure under U.S. sanctions laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a boutique investment bank in connection with an investigation by OFAC concerning potential sanctions violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled a major technology company in an investigation into, and subsequent federal court litigation against, the operators of criminal botnet.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality company in an internal investigation and related law enforcement referral concerning the theft of trade secrets by a former executive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented international investors in federal court litigation to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitral award against a Central Asian sovereign state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a major technology company on insider threat detection and response, including coordinating multiple law enforcement referrals related to the theft of trade secrets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a critical infrastructure company in its response to a significant cyberattack and resulting data breach.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global law firm in commercial litigation arising from a fee dispute with a former partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a real estate investment firm and its principals in connection with a large-scale criminal tax investigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hiers","nick_name":"Scott","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Scott","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2237,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2019-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eScott Hiers is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice group. He focuses on cross-border investigations, government enforcement matters, and complex commercial disputes. He has represented corporations, financial institutions, and individuals in proceedings before the U.S. Department of Justice, SEC, OFAC, BIS, and other federal and\u0026nbsp;state agencies.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eScott regularly advises multinational companies navigating parallel proceedings before U.S. and foreign authorities. He has experience managing large-scale, multi-jurisdictional document reviews, supervising complex transactional and financial analyses, and counseling clients on compliance program enhancements and crisis management.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eScott previously served as a legal extern with the U.S. Department of State's Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Prior to law school, he worked as an economic consultant in Washington, D.C. Scott maintains an active pro bono practice and regularly represents clients seeking refugee protection.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCounseled a global manufacturer in connection with multiple regulatory investigations into alleged unlawful sales to China-based end users.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major European financial institution in a cross-border internal investigation involving potential civil and criminal exposure under U.S. sanctions laws.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a boutique investment bank in connection with an investigation by OFAC concerning potential sanctions violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled a major technology company in an investigation into, and subsequent federal court litigation against, the operators of criminal botnet.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality company in an internal investigation and related law enforcement referral concerning the theft of trade secrets by a former executive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented international investors in federal court litigation to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitral award against a Central Asian sovereign state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a major technology company on insider threat detection and response, including coordinating multiple law enforcement referrals related to the theft of trade secrets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a critical infrastructure company in its response to a significant cyberattack and resulting data breach.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global law firm in commercial litigation arising from a fee dispute with a former partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a real estate investment firm and its principals in connection with a large-scale criminal tax investigation.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9971}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-03-19T18:50:10.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-19T18:50:10.000Z","searchable_text":"Hiers{{ FIELD }}Counseled a global manufacturer in connection with multiple regulatory investigations into alleged unlawful sales to China-based end users.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major European financial institution in a cross-border internal investigation involving potential civil and criminal exposure under U.S. sanctions laws.{{ FIELD }}Represented a boutique investment bank in connection with an investigation by OFAC concerning potential sanctions violations.{{ FIELD }}Counseled a major technology company in an investigation into, and subsequent federal court litigation against, the operators of criminal botnet.{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality company in an internal investigation and related law enforcement referral concerning the theft of trade secrets by a former executive.{{ FIELD }}Represented international investors in federal court litigation to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitral award against a Central Asian sovereign state.{{ FIELD }}Advised a major technology company on insider threat detection and response, including coordinating multiple law enforcement referrals related to the theft of trade secrets.{{ FIELD }}Advised a critical infrastructure company in its response to a significant cyberattack and resulting data breach.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global law firm in commercial litigation arising from a fee dispute with a former partner.{{ FIELD }}Represented a real estate investment firm and its principals in connection with a large-scale criminal tax investigation.{{ FIELD }}Scott Hiers is an associate in the Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice group. He focuses on cross-border investigations, government enforcement matters, and complex commercial disputes. He has represented corporations, financial institutions, and individuals in proceedings before the U.S. Department of Justice, SEC, OFAC, BIS, and other federal and state agencies.  \nScott regularly advises multinational companies navigating parallel proceedings before U.S. and foreign authorities. He has experience managing large-scale, multi-jurisdictional document reviews, supervising complex transactional and financial analyses, and counseling clients on compliance program enhancements and crisis management.\nScott previously served as a legal extern with the U.S. Department of State's Office of the Legal Adviser at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Prior to law school, he worked as an economic consultant in Washington, D.C. Scott maintains an active pro bono practice and regularly represents clients seeking refugee protection. Associate University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Counseled a global manufacturer in connection with multiple regulatory investigations into alleged unlawful sales to China-based end users. Represented a major European financial institution in a cross-border internal investigation involving potential civil and criminal exposure under U.S. sanctions laws. Represented a boutique investment bank in connection with an investigation by OFAC concerning potential sanctions violations. Counseled a major technology company in an investigation into, and subsequent federal court litigation against, the operators of criminal botnet. Represented a hospitality company in an internal investigation and related law enforcement referral concerning the theft of trade secrets by a former executive. Represented international investors in federal court litigation to confirm and enforce a foreign arbitral award against a Central Asian sovereign state. Advised a major technology company on insider threat detection and response, including coordinating multiple law enforcement referrals related to the theft of trade secrets. Advised a critical infrastructure company in its response to a significant cyberattack and resulting data breach. Represented a global law firm in commercial litigation arising from a fee dispute with a former partner. Represented a real estate investment firm and its principals in connection with a large-scale criminal tax investigation.","searchable_name":"Scott Hiers","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426293,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2197,"payload":{"bio":null,"slug":"emily-hogue","email":"ehogue@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hogue","nick_name":"Emily","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Judge J. L. Edmondson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2001 - 2002"}],"first_name":"Emily","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":109,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":76,"translated_fields":{"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":919}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Hogue{{ FIELD }} Senior Attorney Rhodes College  University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law Georgia Judicial Clerk, Judge J. L. Edmondson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"Emily Hogue","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":109,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":433076,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5179,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKimberlee M. Hillard is a Staff Attorney in King \u0026amp; Spalding's E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in mass tort litigation, data breach, copyright infringement; breach of contract; securities class action, and patent and trademark lawsuits in the healthcare, energy, insurance industries, as well as government investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kimberlee-hillard","email":"khillard@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hillard","nick_name":"Kimberlee","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Kimberlee","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":1910,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null},{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"LL.M.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":87,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKimberlee M. Hillard is a Staff Attorney in King \u0026amp; Spalding's E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in mass tort litigation, data breach, copyright infringement; breach of contract; securities class action, and patent and trademark lawsuits in the healthcare, energy, insurance industries, as well as government investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12882}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-08-05T18:15:04.000Z","updated_at":"2025-08-05T18:15:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Hillard{{ FIELD }}Kimberlee M. Hillard is a Staff Attorney in King \u0026amp; Spalding's E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on electronic discovery issues, particularly with respect to the representation of clients in mass tort litigation, data breach, copyright infringement; breach of contract; securities class action, and patent and trademark lawsuits in the healthcare, energy, insurance industries, as well as government investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ). Attorney University of South Florida  Stetson University Stetson University College of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Georgia","searchable_name":"Kimberlee Hillard","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}