{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"6","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":null,"per_page":12,"people":[{"id":442316,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":217,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Data, Privacy\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises\u0026nbsp;clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving\u0026nbsp;privacy and security issues.\u0026nbsp;Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage\u0026nbsp;the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending\u0026nbsp;of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax.\u0026nbsp;Her defense of class actions includes\u0026nbsp;defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm\u0026rsquo;s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern\u0026nbsp;District\u0026nbsp;of Alabama\u0026nbsp;in Mobile, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"elizabeth-adler","email":"eadler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1143,"guid":"1143.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Adler","nick_name":"Elizabeth","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Kristi K. DuBose, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama","years_held":"2007-2008"}],"first_name":"Elizabeth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012","detail":"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Data, Privacy\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises\u0026nbsp;clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving\u0026nbsp;privacy and security issues.\u0026nbsp;Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage\u0026nbsp;the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending\u0026nbsp;of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax.\u0026nbsp;Her defense of class actions includes\u0026nbsp;defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm\u0026rsquo;s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern\u0026nbsp;District\u0026nbsp;of Alabama\u0026nbsp;in Mobile, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012","detail":"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6249}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:09.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Adler{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division\"}{{ FIELD }}Elizabeth D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).\nElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving privacy and security issues. Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax. Her defense of class actions includes defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract. \nA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm’s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\nPrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern District of Alabama in Mobile, Alabama.\nElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera. Partner Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012 State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division The University of Alabama The University of Alabama School of Law Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia American Bar Association International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Barrister, Lamar American Inn of Court Atlanta Bar Association, Litigation Section Board of Directors Member, Lawyers Club of Atlanta Member, State Bar of Georgia Law Clerk, Honorable Kristi K. DuBose, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama","searchable_name":"Elizabeth D. Adler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427026,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6134,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTom Ahlering is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s\u0026nbsp;Corporate, Finance and Investments and\u0026nbsp;Global Human Capital \u0026amp; Compliance Practices. Tom advises and represents\u0026nbsp;clients internationally on a wide range of complex privacy, employment and\u0026nbsp;consumer\u0026nbsp;issues through a creative and pragmatic approach\u0026mdash;including\u0026nbsp;developing multi-jurisdictional\u0026nbsp;transactional and compliance related strategies,\u0026nbsp;representing clients\u0026nbsp;in class action litigation, and advising clients relating\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;corporate transactions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom successfully navigates issues internationally\u0026nbsp;for clients relating to the ever-changing landscape of privacy laws in the workplace and consumer contexts\u0026mdash;including biometric privacy and data privacy matters\u0026mdash;in addition to traditional employment law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom has robust experience advising and representing clients\u0026nbsp;in cutting-edge\u0026nbsp;privacy matters and traditional labor and employment matters and\u0026nbsp;litigation,\u0026nbsp;including advising and representing companies\u0026nbsp;in biometric privacy issues and class actions, complex employment discrimination class actions, EEOC pattern-or-practice lawsuits, wage-and-hour class and collective actions, TCPA class actions, and single-plaintiff actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom has been on the forefront of biometric privacy and data privacy issues\u0026mdash;an exploding and cutting-edge area\u0026mdash;and has a deep knowledge of biometric and other\u0026nbsp;privacy laws. He has personally represented over 50 companies in\u0026nbsp;privacy class actions spanning a wide range of industries which involve bet-the-company damages. Tom has researched and developed comprehensive compliance and defense strategies, scored a landmark decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on behalf of a Fortune 500 client, obtained case dismissals, and negotiated favorable resolutions on behalf of clients in bet-the-company cases.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"thomas-ahlering","email":"tahlering@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":108,"guid":"108.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ahlering","nick_name":"Thomas","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Thomas","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2034,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2008-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"E.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Law360, 2023"},{"title":"Lawdragon's Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers of America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Rising Star in the areas of class actions and employment law","detail":"Super Lawyer"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-ahlering-82346941/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTom Ahlering is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s\u0026nbsp;Corporate, Finance and Investments and\u0026nbsp;Global Human Capital \u0026amp; Compliance Practices. Tom advises and represents\u0026nbsp;clients internationally on a wide range of complex privacy, employment and\u0026nbsp;consumer\u0026nbsp;issues through a creative and pragmatic approach\u0026mdash;including\u0026nbsp;developing multi-jurisdictional\u0026nbsp;transactional and compliance related strategies,\u0026nbsp;representing clients\u0026nbsp;in class action litigation, and advising clients relating\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;corporate transactions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom successfully navigates issues internationally\u0026nbsp;for clients relating to the ever-changing landscape of privacy laws in the workplace and consumer contexts\u0026mdash;including biometric privacy and data privacy matters\u0026mdash;in addition to traditional employment law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom has robust experience advising and representing clients\u0026nbsp;in cutting-edge\u0026nbsp;privacy matters and traditional labor and employment matters and\u0026nbsp;litigation,\u0026nbsp;including advising and representing companies\u0026nbsp;in biometric privacy issues and class actions, complex employment discrimination class actions, EEOC pattern-or-practice lawsuits, wage-and-hour class and collective actions, TCPA class actions, and single-plaintiff actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTom has been on the forefront of biometric privacy and data privacy issues\u0026mdash;an exploding and cutting-edge area\u0026mdash;and has a deep knowledge of biometric and other\u0026nbsp;privacy laws. He has personally represented over 50 companies in\u0026nbsp;privacy class actions spanning a wide range of industries which involve bet-the-company damages. Tom has researched and developed comprehensive compliance and defense strategies, scored a landmark decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on behalf of a Fortune 500 client, obtained case dismissals, and negotiated favorable resolutions on behalf of clients in bet-the-company cases.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Law360, 2023"},{"title":"Lawdragon's Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers of America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Rising Star in the areas of class actions and employment law","detail":"Super Lawyer"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9162}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:22.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:22.000Z","searchable_text":"Ahlering{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon's Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers of America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star in the areas of class actions and employment law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}Tom Ahlering is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Corporate, Finance and Investments and Global Human Capital \u0026amp; Compliance Practices. Tom advises and represents clients internationally on a wide range of complex privacy, employment and consumer issues through a creative and pragmatic approach—including developing multi-jurisdictional transactional and compliance related strategies, representing clients in class action litigation, and advising clients relating to corporate transactions.\nTom successfully navigates issues internationally for clients relating to the ever-changing landscape of privacy laws in the workplace and consumer contexts—including biometric privacy and data privacy matters—in addition to traditional employment law.\nTom has robust experience advising and representing clients in cutting-edge privacy matters and traditional labor and employment matters and litigation, including advising and representing companies in biometric privacy issues and class actions, complex employment discrimination class actions, EEOC pattern-or-practice lawsuits, wage-and-hour class and collective actions, TCPA class actions, and single-plaintiff actions.\nTom has been on the forefront of biometric privacy and data privacy issues—an exploding and cutting-edge area—and has a deep knowledge of biometric and other privacy laws. He has personally represented over 50 companies in privacy class actions spanning a wide range of industries which involve bet-the-company damages. Tom has researched and developed comprehensive compliance and defense strategies, scored a landmark decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on behalf of a Fortune 500 client, obtained case dismissals, and negotiated favorable resolutions on behalf of clients in bet-the-company cases. Partner Rising Star Law360, 2023 Lawdragon's Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers of America Lawdragon Rising Star in the areas of class actions and employment law Super Lawyer Marquette University Marquette University Law School The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Law School Illinois","searchable_name":"Thomas E. Ahlering","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444169,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4211,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJoe Akrotirianakis is a partner in the Business Litigation Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; He is an accomplished trial lawyer who has first-chaired or co-chaired 35\u0026nbsp;trials and arbitrations.\u0026nbsp; He has never lost a jury trial or bench trial.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Akrotirianakis represents both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, and international shipping, transportation and logistics, among others.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned commercial litigator, and a decorated former federal prosecutor, Mr. Akrotirianakis has litigated matters of the most complex and difficult caliber throughout his more than 25-year career.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Akrotirianakis regularly practices before federal and state courts throughout California and nationally in matters involving complex commercial litigation, unfair competition, business torts, intellectual property, and federal and state regulatory investigations and defense. His work prosecuting and defending matters involving cutting-edge legal theories in high-profile matters brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, the Lanham Act, the California Unfair Competition Law and similar laws in other states has been repeatedly recognized in the legal press and mainstream media.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Akrotirianakis is individually recommended by Chambers in the category of Litigation: General Commercial (California).\u0026nbsp; He has been named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\" (\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" nationally (\u003cem\u003eDaily Journal\u003c/em\u003e), \"Recommended\" in the category of General Commercial Disputes (\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), a \"Litigation Star\" in California and nationally (\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, 2023), an \"Innovative Practitioner\" (\u003cem\u003eFinancial Times\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), and an legal \"MVP\" in the transportation industry (\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e), in addition to other honors received from\u0026nbsp;the \u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe American Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe Recorder\u003c/em\u003e, and other publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California, investigating and prosecuting complex fraud and financial crimes, political and law enforcement corruption, civil rights matters, racketeering, and various other violations of federal law, including the CFAA.\u0026nbsp; Following law school, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as a Law Clerk to the late Judge Harry Pregerson, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Akrotirianakis was elected to the firm's Policy Committee in December 2021.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joseph-akrotirianakis","email":"jakro@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented global biopharmaceutical company Amgen Inc. against Lanham Act and California\u0026rsquo;s false advertising and unfair competition claims in a federal court lawsuit by generic drugs giant Sandoz Inc. The litigation addressed cutting edge issues relating to the use of RWE in pharmaceutical advertising. The matter resolved two days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs trial counsel, leading defense of an Israeli cyber-intelligence company against novel claims brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and analogous state law claims in five separate lawsuits filed by WhatsApp, Apple, and several individual plaintiffs in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, represented Everport Terminal Services Inc. in a matter with implications for much of the international trade on the Pacific Coast. In an appellate reversal of an NLRB decision, convinced the D.C. Circuit unanimously to recognize that the NLRB\u0026rsquo;s decision \u0026ldquo;would make the system of collective bargaining ... nonsensical and unworkable.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs co-lead counsel, represents American Kidney Fund (AKF) and other plaintiffs in a constitutional challenge to California AB 290. Secured a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of AB 290 on the eve of the statute\u0026rsquo;s effective date. The Court subsequently granted summary judgment in our clients\u0026rsquo; favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, achieved a total victory including a permanent injunction and an award of attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees in a first-of-its-kind unfair competition lawsuit on behalf of Hope Pharmaceuticals alleging violations of the unfair competition and trade practices laws of California, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina and Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented Americold Logistics, LLC, in a high-stakes commercial dispute against the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest publicly-traded grocery distributor, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI). This matter settled on confidential terms shortly before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented plaintiffs, in a corporate valuation dispute against a defense industry manufacturer of millimeter wave aircraft radar components. After a bench trial, the court awarded the plaintiffs 387.5% of the defendant's prelitigation valuation, plus attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees, court costs, and more than two years of prejudgment interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent an international cybersecurity technology company NSO Group in the defense of a groundbreaking lawsuit brought by Facebook, Inc., and WhatsApp Inc. under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and its California analogue. Obtained stay of district court proceedings while the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers the company\u0026rsquo;s claim that it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company, as plaintiff, in an unfair competition action against a purported compounding pharmacy promoting and selling competing \u0026ldquo;compounded\u0026rdquo; drugs on a national basis. Obtained partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act, California False Advertising Law, and California Unfair Competition Law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe action resolved shortly thereafter on confidential terms, and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty\u0026rsquo;s false advertising and unlawful business practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of North America\u0026rsquo;s largest grain companies in a fraudulent transfer action against a former customer. Obtained summary judgment as to liability and a multimillion-dollar award including an award of punitive damages and successfully defended the matter on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, represented a global pharmaceutical company in an action for unfair competition and false advertising against a competitor selling drugs not approved by FDA. After obtaining partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act and the California Unfair Competition Law, a jury awarded the client damages and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty\u0026rsquo;s unlawful business practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest international containerized freight shipping companies and its terminal operator subsidiary in a business \u0026ldquo;divorce\u0026rdquo; from a joint venture partner. Defeated motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of the matter and an award of costs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented a domestic subsidiary of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest international containerized shipping companies in defense of a federal court action for interim injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. Accomplished denial of the petition for injunction and dismissal of the action.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresents the U.S. West Coast\u0026rsquo;s largest marine terminal (by container lifts), responsible for over one million container moves per year in commercial and regulatory matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented a leading U.S. West Coast marine terminal operator in a labor relations action brought by a union representing mechanics previously employed at the terminal. After asserting a leading-edge position in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, obtained dismissal of the lawsuit and an award of costs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated class action lawsuit against largest marine container terminal on the U.S. West Coast. Plaintiffs had alleged unlawful collection of demurrage during the \u0026ldquo;West Coast Port Slowdown.\u0026rdquo; After demonstrating that a terminal cannot be \u0026ldquo;constructively\u0026rdquo; closed by labor activity not amounting to a strike, obtained dismissal of the action in its entirety.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePersuaded a federal agency to withdraw its notice of violation of anti-pollution regulations against a port terminal operator, avoiding approximately $9.2 million in potential penalties.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of marine terminal operator. After the union appealed, the NLRB\u0026rsquo;s Office of the General Counsel affirmed the declination decisions in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of international shipping line and its domestic agent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a marine terminal operator in an investigation by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, mitigating the penalty to just nine percent of the penalty sought.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel in a federal criminal investigation of a nationwide ground shipping company suspected of aiding and abetting the trafficking of millions of dollars of counterfeit high fashion goods. No charges were filed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the CEO of a Southern California-based manufacturer, packager, and distributor of health food, nutritional supplements, and cosmetic products in a federal court criminal action alleging import violations. Matter was resolved with a probationary sentence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented global network of YouTube content creators and brands in a trade secrets dispute with company\u0026rsquo;s former employees.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented president of Southern California-based construction company in state court criminal investigation concerning alleged theft of public monies. Client received a probationary sentence, and the conviction was expunged entirely shortly thereafter.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented associate general counsel of a Los Angeles-based investment fund in a state court criminal investigation. Investigation was dropped without the filing of any charges.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the CEO of China-based petroleum exploration, extraction, and production company in federal court securities action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the largest health plan in California in a 40-day trial arising out of an enforcement proceeding brought by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented California\u0026rsquo;s largest HMO in dozens of investigations and litigation conducted by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the world\u0026rsquo;s leading satellite television provider in a major contract dispute with one of its largest retailers.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":125,"guid":"125.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1205,"guid":"1205.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Akrotirianakis","nick_name":"Joe","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Harry Pregerson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"1998 - 1999"}],"first_name":"Joseph","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2895,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1998-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"“He is very thorough and very well experienced.”","detail":"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California"},{"title":"“Joe's most valuable attribute is his ability to anticipate potential issues or outcomes.”","detail":"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California"},{"title":"Named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\"","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Named among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" (nationally)","detail":"Daily Journal, 2024"},{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America, Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2024-present"},{"title":"Listed as \"Recommended\" in category of General Commercial Disputes","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., 2022-2025"},{"title":"Litigation Star (National)","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present"},{"title":"California Litigation Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present"},{"title":"Shortlisted as an \"Innovative Practitioner\"","detail":"Financial Times, 2022"},{"title":"Named as the only \"Plaintiff Trailblazer\" at a large law firm","detail":"National Law Journal, 2022"},{"title":"Named a \"Trailblazer: West\"","detail":"The American Lawyer, 2021"},{"title":"Named a \"California Trailblazer\"","detail":"The Recorder, 2020"},{"title":"Leaders of Influence: Litigators \u0026 Trial Lawyers","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2020"},{"title":"Named among \"Top 100 attorneys in Southern California,\" across all practice areas","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017"},{"title":"Law360 \"MVP,\" Transportation - Among nation’s top five attorneys serving clients in the transportation industry","detail":"Law360, 2016"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-akrotirianakis-78bb3269/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJoe Akrotirianakis is a partner in the Business Litigation Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; He is an accomplished trial lawyer who has first-chaired or co-chaired 35\u0026nbsp;trials and arbitrations.\u0026nbsp; He has never lost a jury trial or bench trial.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Akrotirianakis represents both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, and international shipping, transportation and logistics, among others.\u0026nbsp; A seasoned commercial litigator, and a decorated former federal prosecutor, Mr. Akrotirianakis has litigated matters of the most complex and difficult caliber throughout his more than 25-year career.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Akrotirianakis regularly practices before federal and state courts throughout California and nationally in matters involving complex commercial litigation, unfair competition, business torts, intellectual property, and federal and state regulatory investigations and defense. His work prosecuting and defending matters involving cutting-edge legal theories in high-profile matters brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, the Lanham Act, the California Unfair Competition Law and similar laws in other states has been repeatedly recognized in the legal press and mainstream media.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Akrotirianakis is individually recommended by Chambers in the category of Litigation: General Commercial (California).\u0026nbsp; He has been named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\" (\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" nationally (\u003cem\u003eDaily Journal\u003c/em\u003e), \"Recommended\" in the category of General Commercial Disputes (\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 U.S.\u003c/em\u003e, 2024), a \"Litigation Star\" in California and nationally (\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, 2023), an \"Innovative Practitioner\" (\u003cem\u003eFinancial Times\u003c/em\u003e, 2022), and an legal \"MVP\" in the transportation industry (\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e), in addition to other honors received from\u0026nbsp;the \u003cem\u003eNational Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe American Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe Recorder\u003c/em\u003e, and other publications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California, investigating and prosecuting complex fraud and financial crimes, political and law enforcement corruption, civil rights matters, racketeering, and various other violations of federal law, including the CFAA.\u0026nbsp; Following law school, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as a Law Clerk to the late Judge Harry Pregerson, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMr. Akrotirianakis was elected to the firm's Policy Committee in December 2021.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented global biopharmaceutical company Amgen Inc. against Lanham Act and California\u0026rsquo;s false advertising and unfair competition claims in a federal court lawsuit by generic drugs giant Sandoz Inc. The litigation addressed cutting edge issues relating to the use of RWE in pharmaceutical advertising. The matter resolved two days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs trial counsel, leading defense of an Israeli cyber-intelligence company against novel claims brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and analogous state law claims in five separate lawsuits filed by WhatsApp, Apple, and several individual plaintiffs in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, represented Everport Terminal Services Inc. in a matter with implications for much of the international trade on the Pacific Coast. In an appellate reversal of an NLRB decision, convinced the D.C. Circuit unanimously to recognize that the NLRB\u0026rsquo;s decision \u0026ldquo;would make the system of collective bargaining ... nonsensical and unworkable.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs co-lead counsel, represents American Kidney Fund (AKF) and other plaintiffs in a constitutional challenge to California AB 290. Secured a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of AB 290 on the eve of the statute\u0026rsquo;s effective date. The Court subsequently granted summary judgment in our clients\u0026rsquo; favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, achieved a total victory including a permanent injunction and an award of attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees in a first-of-its-kind unfair competition lawsuit on behalf of Hope Pharmaceuticals alleging violations of the unfair competition and trade practices laws of California, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina and Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented Americold Logistics, LLC, in a high-stakes commercial dispute against the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest publicly-traded grocery distributor, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI). This matter settled on confidential terms shortly before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented plaintiffs, in a corporate valuation dispute against a defense industry manufacturer of millimeter wave aircraft radar components. After a bench trial, the court awarded the plaintiffs 387.5% of the defendant's prelitigation valuation, plus attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees, court costs, and more than two years of prejudgment interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresent an international cybersecurity technology company NSO Group in the defense of a groundbreaking lawsuit brought by Facebook, Inc., and WhatsApp Inc. under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and its California analogue. Obtained stay of district court proceedings while the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers the company\u0026rsquo;s claim that it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global pharmaceutical company, as plaintiff, in an unfair competition action against a purported compounding pharmacy promoting and selling competing \u0026ldquo;compounded\u0026rdquo; drugs on a national basis. Obtained partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act, California False Advertising Law, and California Unfair Competition Law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eThe action resolved shortly thereafter on confidential terms, and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty\u0026rsquo;s false advertising and unlawful business practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of North America\u0026rsquo;s largest grain companies in a fraudulent transfer action against a former customer. Obtained summary judgment as to liability and a multimillion-dollar award including an award of punitive damages and successfully defended the matter on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead trial counsel, represented a global pharmaceutical company in an action for unfair competition and false advertising against a competitor selling drugs not approved by FDA. After obtaining partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act and the California Unfair Competition Law, a jury awarded the client damages and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty\u0026rsquo;s unlawful business practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest international containerized freight shipping companies and its terminal operator subsidiary in a business \u0026ldquo;divorce\u0026rdquo; from a joint venture partner. Defeated motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of the matter and an award of costs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented a domestic subsidiary of one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest international containerized shipping companies in defense of a federal court action for interim injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. Accomplished denial of the petition for injunction and dismissal of the action.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresents the U.S. West Coast\u0026rsquo;s largest marine terminal (by container lifts), responsible for over one million container moves per year in commercial and regulatory matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs lead counsel, represented a leading U.S. West Coast marine terminal operator in a labor relations action brought by a union representing mechanics previously employed at the terminal. After asserting a leading-edge position in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, obtained dismissal of the lawsuit and an award of costs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated class action lawsuit against largest marine container terminal on the U.S. West Coast. Plaintiffs had alleged unlawful collection of demurrage during the \u0026ldquo;West Coast Port Slowdown.\u0026rdquo; After demonstrating that a terminal cannot be \u0026ldquo;constructively\u0026rdquo; closed by labor activity not amounting to a strike, obtained dismissal of the action in its entirety.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePersuaded a federal agency to withdraw its notice of violation of anti-pollution regulations against a port terminal operator, avoiding approximately $9.2 million in potential penalties.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of marine terminal operator. After the union appealed, the NLRB\u0026rsquo;s Office of the General Counsel affirmed the declination decisions in the client\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of international shipping line and its domestic agent.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a marine terminal operator in an investigation by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, mitigating the penalty to just nine percent of the penalty sought.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel in a federal criminal investigation of a nationwide ground shipping company suspected of aiding and abetting the trafficking of millions of dollars of counterfeit high fashion goods. No charges were filed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the CEO of a Southern California-based manufacturer, packager, and distributor of health food, nutritional supplements, and cosmetic products in a federal court criminal action alleging import violations. Matter was resolved with a probationary sentence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented global network of YouTube content creators and brands in a trade secrets dispute with company\u0026rsquo;s former employees.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented president of Southern California-based construction company in state court criminal investigation concerning alleged theft of public monies. Client received a probationary sentence, and the conviction was expunged entirely shortly thereafter.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented associate general counsel of a Los Angeles-based investment fund in a state court criminal investigation. Investigation was dropped without the filing of any charges.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the CEO of China-based petroleum exploration, extraction, and production company in federal court securities action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the largest health plan in California in a 40-day trial arising out of an enforcement proceeding brought by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented California\u0026rsquo;s largest HMO in dozens of investigations and litigation conducted by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented the world\u0026rsquo;s leading satellite television provider in a major contract dispute with one of its largest retailers.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"“He is very thorough and very well experienced.”","detail":"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California"},{"title":"“Joe's most valuable attribute is his ability to anticipate potential issues or outcomes.”","detail":"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California"},{"title":"Named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\"","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Named among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" (nationally)","detail":"Daily Journal, 2024"},{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America, Commercial Litigation ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2024-present"},{"title":"Listed as \"Recommended\" in category of General Commercial Disputes","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., 2022-2025"},{"title":"Litigation Star (National)","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present"},{"title":"California Litigation Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present"},{"title":"Shortlisted as an \"Innovative Practitioner\"","detail":"Financial Times, 2022"},{"title":"Named as the only \"Plaintiff Trailblazer\" at a large law firm","detail":"National Law Journal, 2022"},{"title":"Named a \"Trailblazer: West\"","detail":"The American Lawyer, 2021"},{"title":"Named a \"California Trailblazer\"","detail":"The Recorder, 2020"},{"title":"Leaders of Influence: Litigators \u0026 Trial Lawyers","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2020"},{"title":"Named among \"Top 100 attorneys in Southern California,\" across all practice areas","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017"},{"title":"Law360 \"MVP,\" Transportation - Among nation’s top five attorneys serving clients in the transportation industry","detail":"Law360, 2016"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11424}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-11T16:50:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-11T16:50:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Akrotirianakis{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He is very thorough and very well experienced.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Joe's most valuable attribute is his ability to anticipate potential issues or outcomes.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among Los Angeles' \\\"Top 100 Lawyers\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among 50 \\\"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\\\" (nationally)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, Commercial Litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2024-present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Listed as \\\"Recommended\\\" in category of General Commercial Disputes\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S., 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation Star (National)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"California Litigation Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Shortlisted as an \\\"Innovative Practitioner\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Financial Times, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named as the only \\\"Plaintiff Trailblazer\\\" at a large law firm\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a \\\"Trailblazer: West\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a \\\"California Trailblazer\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Recorder, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leaders of Influence: Litigators \u0026amp; Trial Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among \\\"Top 100 attorneys in Southern California,\\\" across all practice areas\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Law360 \\\"MVP,\\\" Transportation - Among nation’s top five attorneys serving clients in the transportation industry\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}As lead counsel, represented global biopharmaceutical company Amgen Inc. against Lanham Act and California’s false advertising and unfair competition claims in a federal court lawsuit by generic drugs giant Sandoz Inc. The litigation addressed cutting edge issues relating to the use of RWE in pharmaceutical advertising. The matter resolved two days before trial.{{ FIELD }}As trial counsel, leading defense of an Israeli cyber-intelligence company against novel claims brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and analogous state law claims in five separate lawsuits filed by WhatsApp, Apple, and several individual plaintiffs in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Virginia.{{ FIELD }}As lead trial counsel, represented Everport Terminal Services Inc. in a matter with implications for much of the international trade on the Pacific Coast. In an appellate reversal of an NLRB decision, convinced the D.C. Circuit unanimously to recognize that the NLRB’s decision “would make the system of collective bargaining ... nonsensical and unworkable.”{{ FIELD }}As co-lead counsel, represents American Kidney Fund (AKF) and other plaintiffs in a constitutional challenge to California AB 290. Secured a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of AB 290 on the eve of the statute’s effective date. The Court subsequently granted summary judgment in our clients’ favor.{{ FIELD }}As lead trial counsel, achieved a total victory including a permanent injunction and an award of attorney’s fees in a first-of-its-kind unfair competition lawsuit on behalf of Hope Pharmaceuticals alleging violations of the unfair competition and trade practices laws of California, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina and Connecticut.{{ FIELD }}As lead counsel, represented Americold Logistics, LLC, in a high-stakes commercial dispute against the nation’s largest publicly-traded grocery distributor, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI). This matter settled on confidential terms shortly before trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented plaintiffs, in a corporate valuation dispute against a defense industry manufacturer of millimeter wave aircraft radar components. After a bench trial, the court awarded the plaintiffs 387.5% of the defendant's prelitigation valuation, plus attorney’s fees, court costs, and more than two years of prejudgment interest.{{ FIELD }}Represent an international cybersecurity technology company NSO Group in the defense of a groundbreaking lawsuit brought by Facebook, Inc., and WhatsApp Inc. under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and its California analogue. Obtained stay of district court proceedings while the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers the company’s claim that it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global pharmaceutical company, as plaintiff, in an unfair competition action against a purported compounding pharmacy promoting and selling competing “compounded” drugs on a national basis. Obtained partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act, California False Advertising Law, and California Unfair Competition Law.{{ FIELD }}The action resolved shortly thereafter on confidential terms, and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty’s false advertising and unlawful business practices.\nRepresented one of North America’s largest grain companies in a fraudulent transfer action against a former customer. Obtained summary judgment as to liability and a multimillion-dollar award including an award of punitive damages and successfully defended the matter on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\nAs lead trial counsel, represented a global pharmaceutical company in an action for unfair competition and false advertising against a competitor selling drugs not approved by FDA. After obtaining partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act and the California Unfair Competition Law, a jury awarded the client damages and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty’s unlawful business practices.\nAs lead counsel, represented one of the world’s largest international containerized freight shipping companies and its terminal operator subsidiary in a business “divorce” from a joint venture partner. Defeated motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of the matter and an award of costs.\nRepresented one of the nation’s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\nAs lead counsel, represented a domestic subsidiary of one of the world’s largest international containerized shipping companies in defense of a federal court action for interim injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. Accomplished denial of the petition for injunction and dismissal of the action.\nRepresents the U.S. West Coast’s largest marine terminal (by container lifts), responsible for over one million container moves per year in commercial and regulatory matters.\nAs lead counsel, represented a leading U.S. West Coast marine terminal operator in a labor relations action brought by a union representing mechanics previously employed at the terminal. After asserting a leading-edge position in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, obtained dismissal of the lawsuit and an award of costs.\nDefeated class action lawsuit against largest marine container terminal on the U.S. West Coast. Plaintiffs had alleged unlawful collection of demurrage during the “West Coast Port Slowdown.” After demonstrating that a terminal cannot be “constructively” closed by labor activity not amounting to a strike, obtained dismissal of the action in its entirety.\nPersuaded a federal agency to withdraw its notice of violation of anti-pollution regulations against a port terminal operator, avoiding approximately $9.2 million in potential penalties.\nPersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of marine terminal operator. After the union appealed, the NLRB’s Office of the General Counsel affirmed the declination decisions in the client’s favor.{{ FIELD }}Persuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of international shipping line and its domestic agent.\nRepresented a marine terminal operator in an investigation by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, mitigating the penalty to just nine percent of the penalty sought.\nServed as lead counsel in a federal criminal investigation of a nationwide ground shipping company suspected of aiding and abetting the trafficking of millions of dollars of counterfeit high fashion goods. No charges were filed.\nRepresented the CEO of a Southern California-based manufacturer, packager, and distributor of health food, nutritional supplements, and cosmetic products in a federal court criminal action alleging import violations. Matter was resolved with a probationary sentence.\nRepresented global network of YouTube content creators and brands in a trade secrets dispute with company’s former employees.\nRepresented president of Southern California-based construction company in state court criminal investigation concerning alleged theft of public monies. Client received a probationary sentence, and the conviction was expunged entirely shortly thereafter.\nRepresented associate general counsel of a Los Angeles-based investment fund in a state court criminal investigation. Investigation was dropped without the filing of any charges.\nRepresented the CEO of China-based petroleum exploration, extraction, and production company in federal court securities action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.\nRepresented one of the nation’s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\nRepresented the largest health plan in California in a 40-day trial arising out of an enforcement proceeding brought by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\nRepresented California’s largest HMO in dozens of investigations and litigation conducted by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\nRepresented the world’s leading satellite television provider in a major contract dispute with one of its largest retailers.{{ FIELD }}Joe Akrotirianakis is a partner in the Business Litigation Practice Group.  He is an accomplished trial lawyer who has first-chaired or co-chaired 35 trials and arbitrations.  He has never lost a jury trial or bench trial.  Mr. Akrotirianakis represents both plaintiffs and defendants across a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, and international shipping, transportation and logistics, among others.  A seasoned commercial litigator, and a decorated former federal prosecutor, Mr. Akrotirianakis has litigated matters of the most complex and difficult caliber throughout his more than 25-year career. \nMr. Akrotirianakis regularly practices before federal and state courts throughout California and nationally in matters involving complex commercial litigation, unfair competition, business torts, intellectual property, and federal and state regulatory investigations and defense. His work prosecuting and defending matters involving cutting-edge legal theories in high-profile matters brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, the Lanham Act, the California Unfair Competition Law and similar laws in other states has been repeatedly recognized in the legal press and mainstream media.  Mr. Akrotirianakis is individually recommended by Chambers in the category of Litigation: General Commercial (California).  He has been named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\" (Los Angeles Business Journal, 2024), among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" nationally (Daily Journal), \"Recommended\" in the category of General Commercial Disputes (Legal 500 U.S., 2024), a \"Litigation Star\" in California and nationally (Benchmark Litigation, 2023), an \"Innovative Practitioner\" (Financial Times, 2022), and an legal \"MVP\" in the transportation industry (Law360), in addition to other honors received from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, The Recorder, and other publications.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Central District of California, investigating and prosecuting complex fraud and financial crimes, political and law enforcement corruption, civil rights matters, racketeering, and various other violations of federal law, including the CFAA.  Following law school, Mr. Akrotirianakis served as a Law Clerk to the late Judge Harry Pregerson, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\nMr. Akrotirianakis was elected to the firm's Policy Committee in December 2021.  \n  Partner “He is very thorough and very well experienced.” Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California “Joe's most valuable attribute is his ability to anticipate potential issues or outcomes.” Chambers Guide to the USA, 2025, Litigation: General Commercial - California Named among Los Angeles' \"Top 100 Lawyers\" Los Angeles Business Journal, 2024 Named among 50 \"2024 Leading Commercial Litigators\" (nationally) Daily Journal, 2024 The Best Lawyers in America, Commercial Litigation  The Best Lawyers in America, 2024-present Listed as \"Recommended\" in category of General Commercial Disputes Legal 500 U.S., 2022-2025 Litigation Star (National) Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present California Litigation Star Benchmark Litigation, 2023 - present Shortlisted as an \"Innovative Practitioner\" Financial Times, 2022 Named as the only \"Plaintiff Trailblazer\" at a large law firm National Law Journal, 2022 Named a \"Trailblazer: West\" The American Lawyer, 2021 Named a \"California Trailblazer\" The Recorder, 2020 Leaders of Influence: Litigators \u0026amp; Trial Lawyers Los Angeles Business Journal, 2020 Named among \"Top 100 attorneys in Southern California,\" across all practice areas Super Lawyers, 2017 Law360 \"MVP,\" Transportation - Among nation’s top five attorneys serving clients in the transportation industry Law360, 2016 Whittier College Whittier Law School Loyola Law School Loyola Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida California Law Clerk, Harry Pregerson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit As lead counsel, represented global biopharmaceutical company Amgen Inc. against Lanham Act and California’s false advertising and unfair competition claims in a federal court lawsuit by generic drugs giant Sandoz Inc. The litigation addressed cutting edge issues relating to the use of RWE in pharmaceutical advertising. The matter resolved two days before trial. As trial counsel, leading defense of an Israeli cyber-intelligence company against novel claims brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and analogous state law claims in five separate lawsuits filed by WhatsApp, Apple, and several individual plaintiffs in the Northern District of California and the Eastern District of Virginia. As lead trial counsel, represented Everport Terminal Services Inc. in a matter with implications for much of the international trade on the Pacific Coast. In an appellate reversal of an NLRB decision, convinced the D.C. Circuit unanimously to recognize that the NLRB’s decision “would make the system of collective bargaining ... nonsensical and unworkable.” As co-lead counsel, represents American Kidney Fund (AKF) and other plaintiffs in a constitutional challenge to California AB 290. Secured a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of AB 290 on the eve of the statute’s effective date. The Court subsequently granted summary judgment in our clients’ favor. As lead trial counsel, achieved a total victory including a permanent injunction and an award of attorney’s fees in a first-of-its-kind unfair competition lawsuit on behalf of Hope Pharmaceuticals alleging violations of the unfair competition and trade practices laws of California, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina and Connecticut. As lead counsel, represented Americold Logistics, LLC, in a high-stakes commercial dispute against the nation’s largest publicly-traded grocery distributor, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI). This matter settled on confidential terms shortly before trial. Represented plaintiffs, in a corporate valuation dispute against a defense industry manufacturer of millimeter wave aircraft radar components. After a bench trial, the court awarded the plaintiffs 387.5% of the defendant's prelitigation valuation, plus attorney’s fees, court costs, and more than two years of prejudgment interest. Represent an international cybersecurity technology company NSO Group in the defense of a groundbreaking lawsuit brought by Facebook, Inc., and WhatsApp Inc. under the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and its California analogue. Obtained stay of district court proceedings while the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considers the company’s claim that it is entitled to derivative foreign sovereign immunity. Represented a global pharmaceutical company, as plaintiff, in an unfair competition action against a purported compounding pharmacy promoting and selling competing “compounded” drugs on a national basis. Obtained partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act, California False Advertising Law, and California Unfair Competition Law. The action resolved shortly thereafter on confidential terms, and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty’s false advertising and unlawful business practices.\nRepresented one of North America’s largest grain companies in a fraudulent transfer action against a former customer. Obtained summary judgment as to liability and a multimillion-dollar award including an award of punitive damages and successfully defended the matter on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.\nAs lead trial counsel, represented a global pharmaceutical company in an action for unfair competition and false advertising against a competitor selling drugs not approved by FDA. After obtaining partial summary judgment as to liability on claims under the federal Lanham Act and the California Unfair Competition Law, a jury awarded the client damages and the court imposed a permanent injunction against the counterparty’s unlawful business practices.\nAs lead counsel, represented one of the world’s largest international containerized freight shipping companies and its terminal operator subsidiary in a business “divorce” from a joint venture partner. Defeated motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of the matter and an award of costs.\nRepresented one of the nation’s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\nAs lead counsel, represented a domestic subsidiary of one of the world’s largest international containerized shipping companies in defense of a federal court action for interim injunctive relief pursuant to Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. Accomplished denial of the petition for injunction and dismissal of the action.\nRepresents the U.S. West Coast’s largest marine terminal (by container lifts), responsible for over one million container moves per year in commercial and regulatory matters.\nAs lead counsel, represented a leading U.S. West Coast marine terminal operator in a labor relations action brought by a union representing mechanics previously employed at the terminal. After asserting a leading-edge position in a motion for judgment on the pleadings, obtained dismissal of the lawsuit and an award of costs.\nDefeated class action lawsuit against largest marine container terminal on the U.S. West Coast. Plaintiffs had alleged unlawful collection of demurrage during the “West Coast Port Slowdown.” After demonstrating that a terminal cannot be “constructively” closed by labor activity not amounting to a strike, obtained dismissal of the action in its entirety.\nPersuaded a federal agency to withdraw its notice of violation of anti-pollution regulations against a port terminal operator, avoiding approximately $9.2 million in potential penalties.\nPersuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of marine terminal operator. After the union appealed, the NLRB’s Office of the General Counsel affirmed the declination decisions in the client’s favor. Persuaded the National Labor Relations Board to close investigations of international shipping line and its domestic agent.\nRepresented a marine terminal operator in an investigation by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, mitigating the penalty to just nine percent of the penalty sought.\nServed as lead counsel in a federal criminal investigation of a nationwide ground shipping company suspected of aiding and abetting the trafficking of millions of dollars of counterfeit high fashion goods. No charges were filed.\nRepresented the CEO of a Southern California-based manufacturer, packager, and distributor of health food, nutritional supplements, and cosmetic products in a federal court criminal action alleging import violations. Matter was resolved with a probationary sentence.\nRepresented global network of YouTube content creators and brands in a trade secrets dispute with company’s former employees.\nRepresented president of Southern California-based construction company in state court criminal investigation concerning alleged theft of public monies. Client received a probationary sentence, and the conviction was expunged entirely shortly thereafter.\nRepresented associate general counsel of a Los Angeles-based investment fund in a state court criminal investigation. Investigation was dropped without the filing of any charges.\nRepresented the CEO of China-based petroleum exploration, extraction, and production company in federal court securities action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.\nRepresented one of the nation’s largest engineering and construction companies and its subsidiaries in a federal court action brought under the False Claims Act alleging overcharging in federal government contracts.\nRepresented the largest health plan in California in a 40-day trial arising out of an enforcement proceeding brought by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\nRepresented California’s largest HMO in dozens of investigations and litigation conducted by the California Department of Managed Health Care.\nRepresented the world’s leading satellite television provider in a major contract dispute with one of its largest retailers.","searchable_name":"Joseph Akrotirianakis (Joe)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446166,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3202,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eA partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Government Advocacy and Public Policy group, J.C. helps companies and trade associations navigate legal, political and regulatory issues commonly associated with doing business in Europe and the United States. He is recognized by clients for his strong, bipartisan relationships with Members of Congress, State Attorneys General, congressional staff and senior government officials across key regulatory and executive branch agencies. He is trusted for his ability to rapidly synthesize complex information and communicate its strategic implications to policymakers and senior institutional stakeholders as well as his candid evaluation of options and potential for success.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs former counsel to the Senate Banking Committee, J.C has developed a deep expertise in financial services, fintech, and emerging technology policy. He has a proven track record of influencing federal legislation, regulatory frameworks, and agency rulemaking impacting digital assets, banking, payments, and technology platforms. J.C. regularly interfaces with financial regulators on a wide array of policy and institution-specific issues, and as co-chair of the firm\u0026rsquo;s State Attorneys General practice, delivers results on high-impact legal work at the intersection of law, policy and regulation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJ.C. is skilled in developing and executing comprehensive advocacy strategies, shaping legislative language, and positioning clients to successfully navigate complex and evolving policy environments at the federal, state and international levels. As President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, he has briefed policymakers throughout Europe, Africa, Latin America, and the Indo-Pacific. JC also advises international clients seeking to invest, expand, or operate in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePresident George W. Bush appointed J.C. to a six-year term as U.S. representative to the World Bank\u0026rsquo;s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Mayor Muriel Bowser also appointed J.C. to the District of Columbia; Board of Elections, in which capacity he also served on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board. He is currently chairman of the Board of Visitors of The Catholic University Columbus School of Law and President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, where he is a regular speaker on cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and critical minerals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, J.C. established the Boggs Scholarship for Public Service at the University of Delaware in honor of his grandfather and namesake, former U.S. Congressman, Senator and Governor of Delaware, J. Caleb Boggs. He has also served on numerous corporate and non-profit boards, including Jobs for Delaware Graduates (Chairman); The Reserve Trust Company (Vice Chairman), Global Center for Social Entrepreneurship Network (Secretary), Republican National Lawyers Association (President), Kimball Union Academy (Chairman of the Committee on Trustees), and AAA Mid-Atlantic.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJ.C. enjoys open-water swimming and is member of U.S. Masters Swimming and the historic Serpentine Swimming Club situated in London's Hyde Park. He has competed in swimming events across all 50 states, ten Canadian provinces and around the world.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"j-c-boggs","email":"jboggs@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":154},{"id":290}]},"expertise":[{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1568,"guid":"1568.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Boggs","nick_name":"J.C.","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Court of Chancery, Delaware","years_held":"1987-88"}],"first_name":"J.C.","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":3010,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1987-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eA partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Government Advocacy and Public Policy group, J.C. helps companies and trade associations navigate legal, political and regulatory issues commonly associated with doing business in Europe and the United States. He is recognized by clients for his strong, bipartisan relationships with Members of Congress, State Attorneys General, congressional staff and senior government officials across key regulatory and executive branch agencies. He is trusted for his ability to rapidly synthesize complex information and communicate its strategic implications to policymakers and senior institutional stakeholders as well as his candid evaluation of options and potential for success.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs former counsel to the Senate Banking Committee, J.C has developed a deep expertise in financial services, fintech, and emerging technology policy. He has a proven track record of influencing federal legislation, regulatory frameworks, and agency rulemaking impacting digital assets, banking, payments, and technology platforms. J.C. regularly interfaces with financial regulators on a wide array of policy and institution-specific issues, and as co-chair of the firm\u0026rsquo;s State Attorneys General practice, delivers results on high-impact legal work at the intersection of law, policy and regulation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJ.C. is skilled in developing and executing comprehensive advocacy strategies, shaping legislative language, and positioning clients to successfully navigate complex and evolving policy environments at the federal, state and international levels. As President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, he has briefed policymakers throughout Europe, Africa, Latin America, and the Indo-Pacific. JC also advises international clients seeking to invest, expand, or operate in the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePresident George W. Bush appointed J.C. to a six-year term as U.S. representative to the World Bank\u0026rsquo;s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Mayor Muriel Bowser also appointed J.C. to the District of Columbia; Board of Elections, in which capacity he also served on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board. He is currently chairman of the Board of Visitors of The Catholic University Columbus School of Law and President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, where he is a regular speaker on cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and critical minerals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, J.C. established the Boggs Scholarship for Public Service at the University of Delaware in honor of his grandfather and namesake, former U.S. Congressman, Senator and Governor of Delaware, J. Caleb Boggs. He has also served on numerous corporate and non-profit boards, including Jobs for Delaware Graduates (Chairman); The Reserve Trust Company (Vice Chairman), Global Center for Social Entrepreneurship Network (Secretary), Republican National Lawyers Association (President), Kimball Union Academy (Chairman of the Committee on Trustees), and AAA Mid-Atlantic.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJ.C. enjoys open-water swimming and is member of U.S. Masters Swimming and the historic Serpentine Swimming Club situated in London's Hyde Park. He has competed in swimming events across all 50 states, ten Canadian provinces and around the world.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9959}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-25T20:07:32.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-25T20:07:32.000Z","searchable_text":"Boggs{{ FIELD }}A partner in the firm’s Government Advocacy and Public Policy group, J.C. helps companies and trade associations navigate legal, political and regulatory issues commonly associated with doing business in Europe and the United States. He is recognized by clients for his strong, bipartisan relationships with Members of Congress, State Attorneys General, congressional staff and senior government officials across key regulatory and executive branch agencies. He is trusted for his ability to rapidly synthesize complex information and communicate its strategic implications to policymakers and senior institutional stakeholders as well as his candid evaluation of options and potential for success.\nAs former counsel to the Senate Banking Committee, J.C has developed a deep expertise in financial services, fintech, and emerging technology policy. He has a proven track record of influencing federal legislation, regulatory frameworks, and agency rulemaking impacting digital assets, banking, payments, and technology platforms. J.C. regularly interfaces with financial regulators on a wide array of policy and institution-specific issues, and as co-chair of the firm’s State Attorneys General practice, delivers results on high-impact legal work at the intersection of law, policy and regulation.\nJ.C. is skilled in developing and executing comprehensive advocacy strategies, shaping legislative language, and positioning clients to successfully navigate complex and evolving policy environments at the federal, state and international levels. As President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, he has briefed policymakers throughout Europe, Africa, Latin America, and the Indo-Pacific. JC also advises international clients seeking to invest, expand, or operate in the United States.\nPresident George W. Bush appointed J.C. to a six-year term as U.S. representative to the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Mayor Muriel Bowser also appointed J.C. to the District of Columbia; Board of Elections, in which capacity he also served on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board. He is currently chairman of the Board of Visitors of The Catholic University Columbus School of Law and President of the Parliamentary Intelligence-Security Forum, where he is a regular speaker on cryptocurrency, artificial intelligence and critical minerals.\nEarlier in his career, J.C. established the Boggs Scholarship for Public Service at the University of Delaware in honor of his grandfather and namesake, former U.S. Congressman, Senator and Governor of Delaware, J. Caleb Boggs. He has also served on numerous corporate and non-profit boards, including Jobs for Delaware Graduates (Chairman); The Reserve Trust Company (Vice Chairman), Global Center for Social Entrepreneurship Network (Secretary), Republican National Lawyers Association (President), Kimball Union Academy (Chairman of the Committee on Trustees), and AAA Mid-Atlantic.\nJ.C. enjoys open-water swimming and is member of U.S. Masters Swimming and the historic Serpentine Swimming Club situated in London's Hyde Park. He has competed in swimming events across all 50 states, ten Canadian provinces and around the world. J.C. Boggs fintech Partner University of Richmond University of Richmond School of Law Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware District of Columbia Delaware Law Clerk, Court of Chancery, Delaware","searchable_name":"J.C. Boggs","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436453,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4165,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatt Brigman is a business lawyer with experience litigating complex commercial disputes in state and federal courts across the country. Matt has particular experience defending companies against consumer class actions. This includes successfully defending multiple Fortune 500 companies against class actions alleging fraud, breach of contract, and violation of state and federal consumer protection laws.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has extensive expertise defending data breach class actions, having guided clients through the incident response process to defending ensuing class action lawsuits in some of the largest and most complex data breaches in the country\u0026rsquo;s history.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his class action work, Matt maintains a robust, traditional business litigation practice. Matt has successfully litigated numerous high-stakes business disputes on both the plaintiff and defendant side, including trying multiple cases to verdict. These cases have involved disputes over prominent real estate developments, claims of stolen intellectual property, and alleged professional malpractice. Matt is a co-author of a treatise on Georgia business litigation, and is regularly consulted for advice on litigating business tort claims under Georgia law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Matt was an associate with a boutique commercial litigation firm in Atlanta. Matt also served as a law clerk to the Honorable Harold L. Murphy of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt is on the board of directors of the Atlanta Chapter of the Federal Bar Association and Trees Atlanta, a local non-profit dedicated to preserving Atlanta\u0026rsquo;s urban forest.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"james-brigman","email":"mbrigman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong\u003e Lehigh Valley Health Network\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a 2023 ransomware attack.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently representing \u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e in nationwide class action litigation challenging Progressive's use of third-party software to value vehicles that were totaled as a result of an accident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently representing \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein multiple class action lawsuits alleging violation of the Federal Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eReproSource Fertility Solutions (a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics)\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in Massachusetts, Nevada, and California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eNational Western Life Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in California and Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide class action litigation filed against Equifax by financial institution plaintiffs stemming from its 2017 data breach. Achieved dismissal of the majority of the financial institutions' claims and subsequently resolved the case on a classwide basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation challenging its handling of salvage vehicles. Achieved victories on summary judgment in state and federal courts in Broward County, Florida.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eBrookfield Properties\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation over access and utility rights to the Grand Canal Shoppes at the Venetian resort in Las Vegas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eResia\u003c/strong\u003e, a Miami-based multi-family developer, in litigation over development rights to a mixed used development in Atlanta. The case settled after King \u0026amp; Spalding defeated the defendant's motion for summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein litigation against former vendor to recover costs incurred after vendor's software led to data security incident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AmLaw 100 law firm in legal malpractice case brought by a private equity fund former client. Achieved favorable verdict after two week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Brigman","nick_name":"Matt","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Harold L. Murphy, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2013-2014"}],"first_name":"James","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Matthew","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMatt Brigman is a business lawyer with experience litigating complex commercial disputes in state and federal courts across the country. Matt has particular experience defending companies against consumer class actions. This includes successfully defending multiple Fortune 500 companies against class actions alleging fraud, breach of contract, and violation of state and federal consumer protection laws.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has extensive expertise defending data breach class actions, having guided clients through the incident response process to defending ensuing class action lawsuits in some of the largest and most complex data breaches in the country\u0026rsquo;s history.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his class action work, Matt maintains a robust, traditional business litigation practice. Matt has successfully litigated numerous high-stakes business disputes on both the plaintiff and defendant side, including trying multiple cases to verdict. These cases have involved disputes over prominent real estate developments, claims of stolen intellectual property, and alleged professional malpractice. Matt is a co-author of a treatise on Georgia business litigation, and is regularly consulted for advice on litigating business tort claims under Georgia law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining the firm, Matt was an associate with a boutique commercial litigation firm in Atlanta. Matt also served as a law clerk to the Honorable Harold L. Murphy of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt is on the board of directors of the Atlanta Chapter of the Federal Bar Association and Trees Atlanta, a local non-profit dedicated to preserving Atlanta\u0026rsquo;s urban forest.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong\u003e Lehigh Valley Health Network\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a 2023 ransomware attack.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently representing \u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e in nationwide class action litigation challenging Progressive's use of third-party software to value vehicles that were totaled as a result of an accident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently representing \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein multiple class action lawsuits alleging violation of the Federal Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eReproSource Fertility Solutions (a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics)\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in Massachusetts, Nevada, and California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eNational Western Life Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in California and Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein nationwide class action litigation filed against Equifax by financial institution plaintiffs stemming from its 2017 data breach. Achieved dismissal of the majority of the financial institutions' claims and subsequently resolved the case on a classwide basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e in class action litigation challenging its handling of salvage vehicles. Achieved victories on summary judgment in state and federal courts in Broward County, Florida.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eBrookfield Properties\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation over access and utility rights to the Grand Canal Shoppes at the Venetian resort in Las Vegas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eResia\u003c/strong\u003e, a Miami-based multi-family developer, in litigation over development rights to a mixed used development in Atlanta. The case settled after King \u0026amp; Spalding defeated the defendant's motion for summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein litigation against former vendor to recover costs incurred after vendor's software led to data security incident.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented AmLaw 100 law firm in legal malpractice case brought by a private equity fund former client. Achieved favorable verdict after two week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5919}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:46.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:54:46.000Z","searchable_text":"Brigman{{ FIELD }}Represented Lehigh Valley Health Network in class action litigation stemming from a 2023 ransomware attack.{{ FIELD }}Currently representing Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates) in nationwide class action litigation challenging Progressive's use of third-party software to value vehicles that were totaled as a result of an accident.{{ FIELD }}Currently representing Equifax in multiple class action lawsuits alleging violation of the Federal Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).{{ FIELD }}Represented ReproSource Fertility Solutions (a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics) in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in Massachusetts, Nevada, and California.{{ FIELD }}Represented National Western Life Insurance Company in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in California and Missouri.{{ FIELD }}Represented Equifax in nationwide class action litigation filed against Equifax by financial institution plaintiffs stemming from its 2017 data breach. Achieved dismissal of the majority of the financial institutions' claims and subsequently resolved the case on a classwide basis.{{ FIELD }}Represented Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates) in class action litigation challenging its handling of salvage vehicles. Achieved victories on summary judgment in state and federal courts in Broward County, Florida.{{ FIELD }}Represented Brookfield Properties in litigation over access and utility rights to the Grand Canal Shoppes at the Venetian resort in Las Vegas.{{ FIELD }}Represented Resia, a Miami-based multi-family developer, in litigation over development rights to a mixed used development in Atlanta. The case settled after King \u0026amp; Spalding defeated the defendant's motion for summary judgment.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international airline in litigation against former vendor to recover costs incurred after vendor's software led to data security incident.{{ FIELD }}Represented AmLaw 100 law firm in legal malpractice case brought by a private equity fund former client. Achieved favorable verdict after two week jury trial.{{ FIELD }}Matt Brigman is a business lawyer with experience litigating complex commercial disputes in state and federal courts across the country. Matt has particular experience defending companies against consumer class actions. This includes successfully defending multiple Fortune 500 companies against class actions alleging fraud, breach of contract, and violation of state and federal consumer protection laws. \nMatt has extensive expertise defending data breach class actions, having guided clients through the incident response process to defending ensuing class action lawsuits in some of the largest and most complex data breaches in the country’s history. \nIn addition to his class action work, Matt maintains a robust, traditional business litigation practice. Matt has successfully litigated numerous high-stakes business disputes on both the plaintiff and defendant side, including trying multiple cases to verdict. These cases have involved disputes over prominent real estate developments, claims of stolen intellectual property, and alleged professional malpractice. Matt is a co-author of a treatise on Georgia business litigation, and is regularly consulted for advice on litigating business tort claims under Georgia law.\nBefore joining the firm, Matt was an associate with a boutique commercial litigation firm in Atlanta. Matt also served as a law clerk to the Honorable Harold L. Murphy of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\nMatt is on the board of directors of the Atlanta Chapter of the Federal Bar Association and Trees Atlanta, a local non-profit dedicated to preserving Atlanta’s urban forest. Partner University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association  (2014) Federal Bar Association  (2014) Law Clerk, Harold L. Murphy, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented Lehigh Valley Health Network in class action litigation stemming from a 2023 ransomware attack. Currently representing Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates) in nationwide class action litigation challenging Progressive's use of third-party software to value vehicles that were totaled as a result of an accident. Currently representing Equifax in multiple class action lawsuits alleging violation of the Federal Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Represented ReproSource Fertility Solutions (a subsidiary of Quest Diagnostics) in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in Massachusetts, Nevada, and California. Represented National Western Life Insurance Company in class action litigation stemming from a possible data breach. Successfully consolidated and resolved cases filed in state and federal courts in California and Missouri. Represented Equifax in nationwide class action litigation filed against Equifax by financial institution plaintiffs stemming from its 2017 data breach. Achieved dismissal of the majority of the financial institutions' claims and subsequently resolved the case on a classwide basis. Represented Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (and its affiliates) in class action litigation challenging its handling of salvage vehicles. Achieved victories on summary judgment in state and federal courts in Broward County, Florida. Represented Brookfield Properties in litigation over access and utility rights to the Grand Canal Shoppes at the Venetian resort in Las Vegas. Represented Resia, a Miami-based multi-family developer, in litigation over development rights to a mixed used development in Atlanta. The case settled after King \u0026amp; Spalding defeated the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Represented an international airline in litigation against former vendor to recover costs incurred after vendor's software led to data security incident. Represented AmLaw 100 law firm in legal malpractice case brought by a private equity fund former client. Achieved favorable verdict after two week jury trial.","searchable_name":"James Matthew Brigman (Matt)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436409,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3246,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHarry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHarry has been ranked in C\u003cem\u003ehambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u003cem\u003e Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e for International Arbitration\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e He has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration \u0026ndash; Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND\u0026nbsp;FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"henry-burnett","email":"hburnett@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 917 763 6098","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSouth American Silver Ltd.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBear Creek Mining Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Asian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state-owned entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Latin American pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ei\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enternational telecommunications provide\u003c/strong\u003er in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international telecommunications provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Argentine client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternational hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eKhan Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Asian electronics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multilateral, quasi-governmental entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained arbitral award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product distributor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian claiman\u003c/strong\u003et in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;commenced against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Eastern European governmental entity,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEastern European government\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea South American corporation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in between\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in arbitration under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe AAA Commercial Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCDR arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMediator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ereal estate dispute\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between North American- and Caribbean-based company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":72}]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Burnett","nick_name":"Harry","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Henry","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1989-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024","detail":"WWL"},{"title":"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®"},{"title":"Chambers Brazil","detail":"2022"},{"title":"A Global Perspective: M\u0026A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022","detail":"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022"},{"title":"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\"","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026 GAS","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Energy","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America 2022"},{"title":"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association","detail":"LACCA"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\"","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250"},{"title":"The Legal 500 Latin America","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026 Gas Lawyers","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/henry-g-harry-burnett-1952721b/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eHarry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.\u0026nbsp; He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHarry has been ranked in C\u003cem\u003ehambers Global,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eChambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u003cem\u003e Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e for International Arbitration\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e He has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eThe International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration \u0026ndash; Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND\u0026nbsp;FLORIDA\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSouth American Silver Ltd.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting claimant\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBear Creek Mining Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Asian mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state-owned entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Latin American pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ei\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enternational telecommunications provide\u003c/strong\u003er in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international telecommunications provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Argentine client\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003einternational hospitality company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eKhan Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Asian electronics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multilateral, quasi-governmental entity\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained arbitral award for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian product distributor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Brazilian claiman\u003c/strong\u003et in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;commenced against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Eastern European governmental entity,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEastern European government\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international voice and data communications company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea South American corporation,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePresident of arbitral tribunal in between\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean ICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICDR Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in arbitration under\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe AAA Commercial Rules\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eICC arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eI\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eCDR arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMediator in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ereal estate dispute\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;between North American- and Caribbean-based company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024","detail":"WWL"},{"title":"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®"},{"title":"Chambers Brazil","detail":"2022"},{"title":"A Global Perspective: M\u0026A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022","detail":"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022"},{"title":"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\"","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026 GAS","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Energy","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration","detail":"GAR"},{"title":"Leading Individual","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America 2022"},{"title":"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association","detail":"LACCA"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\"","detail":"Chambers Latin America"},{"title":"\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\"","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250"},{"title":"The Legal 500 Latin America","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026 Gas Lawyers","detail":""},{"title":"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8611}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:52:19.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:52:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Burnett{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"WWL\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Brazil\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"A Global Perspective: M\u0026amp;A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026amp; GAS\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Energy\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"GAR\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Individual\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Latin America 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LACCA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Latin America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"He has \\\"invaluable expertise,\\\" \\\"was really exceptional,\\\" and \\\"really led the way...\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Latin America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Latin Lawyer 250\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 Latin America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant South American Silver Ltd. in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation.{{ FIELD }}Representing claimant Bear Creek Mining Company in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Asian mining company in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a state-owned entity in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Latin American pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company.{{ FIELD }}Representing an international telecommunications provider in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international telecommunications provider in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Argentine client in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international hospitality company in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Khan Resources Inc. in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Asian electronics company in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a multilateral, quasi-governmental entity in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules.{{ FIELD }}Obtained arbitral award for a Brazilian product distributor in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a Brazilian claimant in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of an ICC arbitration commenced against client, an Eastern European governmental entity, seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an Eastern European government in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions.{{ FIELD }}Obtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of an international voice and data communications company in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules.{{ FIELD }}Representation of an international voice and data communications company in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client.{{ FIELD }}Representation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client, a South American corporation, seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America.{{ FIELD }}President of arbitral tribunal in an ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner.{{ FIELD }}President of arbitral tribunal in between an ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under the ICDR Rules concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under the ICDR Rules related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in arbitration under the AAA Commercial Rules between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment.{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in ICDR arbitration between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist.{{ FIELD }}Mediator in a real estate dispute between North American- and Caribbean-based company.{{ FIELD }}Sole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance){{ FIELD }}Harry Burnett focuses on international commercial and investor-state arbitration matters, along with general domestic and international litigation. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Harry represents clients in a broad array of international disputes and frequently serves as an arbitrator in international disputes.\nWith more than 25 years of litigation and arbitration experience, he represents clients in arbitration of international commercial disputes under rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), JAMS International and the CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention \u0026amp; Resolution, and in investor-state arbitrations under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the ICC related to claims under bilateral investment treaties, the Energy Charter Treaty, multilateral investment instruments and local investment laws.\nIn addition, Harry frequently serves as a mediator as well as arbitrator in international disputes, whether as sole arbitrator, party-appointed arbitrator or chair.  He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators.\nHarry has been ranked in Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Chambers Latin America and Legal 500 for International Arbitration. He has also been recognized by The International Who’s Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers and The International Who’s Who of Energy Lawyers and is an Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration – Latin American Corporate Counsel Association\nA frequent speaker and author, Harry is fluent in English, Spanish and Portuguese.\n \nADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, AND ILLINOIS; AND FLORIDA Henry Burnett Partner Who's Who Legal: Mining 2024 WWL Inclusion in the 30th edition of The Best Lawyers in America® in International Arbitration - Commercial The Best Lawyers in America® Chambers Brazil 2022 A Global Perspective: M\u0026amp;A Deals and Disputes Heading into 2022 Berkeley Research Group’s Publication, 2022 “He understands client service, how different cultures work, is always on top of the case and is easy to interact with.\" Chambers Global 2022 Who’s Who Legal: Oil \u0026amp; GAS GAR Who’s Who Legal: Energy GAR Who’s Who Legal: Thought Leaders – Arbitration GAR Leading Individual Legal 500 Latin America 2022 Named a leading lawyer for International Arbitration by The Latin American Corporate Counsel Association LACCA International Arbitration Chambers Global \"He is a tough negotiator and he helped us get a really great deal.\" Chambers USA \"He knows how to fight, how to analyze the case as a whole and how to go into detail.\" Chambers Latin America He has \"invaluable expertise,\" \"was really exceptional,\" and \"really led the way...\" Chambers Latin America \"Henry Burnett has a long experience and good reputation in the region.\" Latin Lawyer 250 The Legal 500 Latin America  The International Who's Who of Oil \u0026amp; Gas Lawyers  The International Who's Who of Energy Lawyers  University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Law School Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Florida Illinois New Jersey New York Approved Leading Private Practitioner in Arbitration – Latin American Corporate Counsel Association Director, Brazilian-American Chamber of Commerce, New York Visiting Professor, \"Investor-State Arbitration\", Vanderbilt Law School Director, Miami International Arbitration Society, 2023 Adjunct Professor, University of Miami School of Law Representing claimant South American Silver Ltd. in a UNCITRAL arbitration brought under the UK-Bolivia bilateral investment treaty. The dispute concerns a silver, indium and gallium mining project. Representing claimant The Renco Group in a UNCITRAL Arbitration against Peru brought under the U.S.-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. The dispute concerns a copper mining project and poly-metallic smelting operation. Representing claimant Bear Creek Mining Company in an ICSID arbitration against Peru in the first case brought under the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement. The dispute concerns a silver mining project. Representing a Asian mining company in a potential investor-state arbitration against a Latin American state concerning a large iron ore mining project. Representing a state-owned entity in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration in a construction dispute relating to expansion of an oil refinery. Representing a Latin American pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising out of the sale of the company to an international pharmaceutical company. Representing an international telecommunications provider in ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and fraud claims concerning a master services IT agreement. Representation of an international telecommunications provider in ad hoc arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules concerning breach of contract claims and counterclaims for monies allegedly owed for termination of international call traffic. Representation of an Argentine client in ICDR arbitration against South American gas distribution company. Representation of an international hospitality company in international disputes related to hotel properties in Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Korea and Guam. Representation of Khan Resources Inc. in the jurisdictional phase of an Energy Charter Treaty arbitration (including contract and investment law claims) against Mongolia concerning a Uranium mining project. Representation of an Asian electronics company in ICC arbitration against another Asian electronics company in dispute related to patent license agreement. Representation of a multilateral, quasi-governmental entity in ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in a dispute with an Asian supplier. Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. distributor in ICDR arbitration. Representation of a Brazilian product manufacturer against U.S. joint-venture party in arbitration under the JAMS International Arbitration Rules. Obtained arbitral award for a Brazilian product distributor in international arbitration (ICDR) after multiple hearing days, multiple expert witnesses and multiple languages in connection with complex claims, counterclaims and jurisdictional issues. Successfully represented a Brazilian claimant in enforcement action in the United States under the Panama Convention of an arbitral award rendered by a tribunal in an arbitration seated in Brazil. Obtained dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of an ICC arbitration commenced against client, an Eastern European governmental entity, seeking over $40 million in damages for breach of contract and related claims. Representation of an Eastern European government in parallel proceedings before two international arbitral institutions. Obtained separate arbitral awards against telecommunications companies in two West Africa countries on behalf of an international voice and data communications company in ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL Rules. Representation of an international voice and data communications company in two separate ICDR proceedings against South American telecommunications companies; obtained favorable settlements for client. Representation of investor in case under NAFTA against one of the member states for violations of NAFTA and international law in connection with a mining project. Successfully defeated anti-suit injunction action brought against client, a South American corporation, seeking to enjoin the client from proceeding with an action in South America. President of arbitral tribunal in an ICC arbitration involving breach of contract and related claims between two Caribbean-based companies and their North American joint venture partner. President of arbitral tribunal in between an ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of digital devices against North American reseller seeking amounts allegedly owed under supplier agreement. Co-arbitrator in multiparty dispute under the ICDR Rules concerning claims to respective interests in an online gaming business. Co-arbitrator in dispute between a South American party and an Australian party under the ICDR Rules related to breach of contract and related claims concerning shipments of coal. Sole arbitrator in arbitration under the AAA Commercial Rules between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims arising out of joint venture for the purchase and sale of pig iron. Sole arbitrator in ICC arbitration between Asian manufacturer of office supplies and North American purchaser involving claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. Sole arbitrator in ICDR arbitration between a South American company and a North American company concerning breach of contract and related claims for failure to procure multiple performances in South America by internationally renowned recording artist. Mediator in a real estate dispute between North American- and Caribbean-based company. Sole Arbitrator in a dispute under the AAA Commercial Rules, administered by the ICDR, related to alleged breach of contract related to commission payments under referral agreement for raising financing. (Finance)","searchable_name":"Henry Burnett (Harry)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427549,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":613,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Burris focuses on white-collar criminal defense, corporate internal investigations, regulatory enforcement action defense and complex litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Government Investigations practice, Chris defends corporations and individuals in a variety of criminal, regulatory, False Claims Act and other matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a defense lawyer, Chris represents leading corporations and individuals in criminal and regulatory enforcement matters. He has particular experience with defending clients in False Claims Act/\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;matters, handling dozens of cases concerning a variety of issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Chris counsels clients in matters concerning privacy, information security and related issues. He also conducts internal investigations on behalf of management, boards of directors and audit committees.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Chris served on active duty in the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General\u0026rsquo;s Corps for nearly six years, where he gained broad experience in trial prosecution and defense, appeals and internal investigations. As a Commander in the Naval Reserves, he currently serves as the Executive Officer of the Navy Reserve unit overseeing issues involving international and operational law, admiralty and maritime law, environmental law, and information operations and intelligence law.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christopher-burris","email":"cburris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major international financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of accusations of employee participation in an alleged Ponzi scheme.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large publicly traded manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of potential Bank Secrecy Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean elected state official\u003c/strong\u003e during a federal investigation of public corruption, which led to no charges being filed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean owner of a large privately held manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in the defense of a federal criminal tax investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean owner of a privately held national pharmaceutical distributor\u003c/strong\u003e in Section 2255 proceedings regarding his conviction on mail/wire fraud and RICO charges stemming from allegations of grey market recycling of drugs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enumerous national retail and specialty pharmacy chains\u003c/strong\u003e in multiple False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e matters focusing on a variety of issues, including allegations of the payment of kickbacks, improper submission of dosage quantities, the failure to timely refund credit balances, coordination of benefits issues, the submission of incorrect \u0026ldquo;usual and customary\u0026rdquo; prices to government payors and the dispensing of expired drugs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major national financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation involving allegations of charging borrowers unallowable fees under the Veteran Administration's Home Loan Guaranty Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major national skilled nursing facility chain\u003c/strong\u003e in False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation focusing on quality of care issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted independent internal investigations on various issues, including allegations of improper accounting, theft of corporate resources, backdated stock option, FCPA violations, and misconduct in the execution of government contracts and grant programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal review for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international nongovernmenta\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003el organization\u003c/strong\u003e regarding potential FCPA issues related to an ongoing cooperative project with a foreign government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large publicly traded corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in one of the first national investigations by a multi-state attorneys' general task force focusing on the loss of consumer information held by the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 500 financial services company\u003c/strong\u003e in a data breach response and in ensuing investigations by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which focused on Regulation S-P\u0026rsquo;s requirement to safeguard consumer financial and personal information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 healthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e in responding to a data security incident \u0026mdash; and an ensuing DHHS OCR investigation \u0026mdash; involving the theft of customers\u0026rsquo; personal and medical information. The internal investigation that was conducted led to DHHS OCR and customer disclosures pursuant to the requirements of HIPAA and various state data breach disclosure statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major international telecommunications company\u003c/strong\u003e in its response to the disclosure of the United States' Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), and issues and litigation arising from the company\u0026rsquo;s alleged cooperation with the TSP.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":24}]},"expertise":[{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Burris","nick_name":"Chris","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Christopher","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Burris focuses on white-collar criminal defense, corporate internal investigations, regulatory enforcement action defense and complex litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Government Investigations practice, Chris defends corporations and individuals in a variety of criminal, regulatory, False Claims Act and other matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a defense lawyer, Chris represents leading corporations and individuals in criminal and regulatory enforcement matters. He has particular experience with defending clients in False Claims Act/\u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;matters, handling dozens of cases concerning a variety of issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Chris counsels clients in matters concerning privacy, information security and related issues. He also conducts internal investigations on behalf of management, boards of directors and audit committees.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Chris served on active duty in the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General\u0026rsquo;s Corps for nearly six years, where he gained broad experience in trial prosecution and defense, appeals and internal investigations. As a Commander in the Naval Reserves, he currently serves as the Executive Officer of the Navy Reserve unit overseeing issues involving international and operational law, admiralty and maritime law, environmental law, and information operations and intelligence law.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major international financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of accusations of employee participation in an alleged Ponzi scheme.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large publicly traded manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of potential Bank Secrecy Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean elected state official\u003c/strong\u003e during a federal investigation of public corruption, which led to no charges being filed.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean owner of a large privately held manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in the defense of a federal criminal tax investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean owner of a privately held national pharmaceutical distributor\u003c/strong\u003e in Section 2255 proceedings regarding his conviction on mail/wire fraud and RICO charges stemming from allegations of grey market recycling of drugs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enumerous national retail and specialty pharmacy chains\u003c/strong\u003e in multiple False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e matters focusing on a variety of issues, including allegations of the payment of kickbacks, improper submission of dosage quantities, the failure to timely refund credit balances, coordination of benefits issues, the submission of incorrect \u0026ldquo;usual and customary\u0026rdquo; prices to government payors and the dispensing of expired drugs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major national financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation involving allegations of charging borrowers unallowable fees under the Veteran Administration's Home Loan Guaranty Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major national skilled nursing facility chain\u003c/strong\u003e in False Claims Act /\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation focusing on quality of care issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted independent internal investigations on various issues, including allegations of improper accounting, theft of corporate resources, backdated stock option, FCPA violations, and misconduct in the execution of government contracts and grant programs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal review for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean international nongovernmenta\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003el organization\u003c/strong\u003e regarding potential FCPA issues related to an ongoing cooperative project with a foreign government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea large publicly traded corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in one of the first national investigations by a multi-state attorneys' general task force focusing on the loss of consumer information held by the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 500 financial services company\u003c/strong\u003e in a data breach response and in ensuing investigations by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which focused on Regulation S-P\u0026rsquo;s requirement to safeguard consumer financial and personal information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 healthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e in responding to a data security incident \u0026mdash; and an ensuing DHHS OCR investigation \u0026mdash; involving the theft of customers\u0026rsquo; personal and medical information. The internal investigation that was conducted led to DHHS OCR and customer disclosures pursuant to the requirements of HIPAA and various state data breach disclosure statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major international telecommunications company\u003c/strong\u003e in its response to the disclosure of the United States' Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), and issues and litigation arising from the company\u0026rsquo;s alleged cooperation with the TSP.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4195}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:02:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Burris{{ FIELD }}Represented a major international financial institution in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of accusations of employee participation in an alleged Ponzi scheme.{{ FIELD }}Represented a large publicly traded manufacturing company in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of potential Bank Secrecy Act violations.{{ FIELD }}Represented an elected state official during a federal investigation of public corruption, which led to no charges being filed.{{ FIELD }}Represented an owner of a large privately held manufacturing company in the defense of a federal criminal tax investigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented an owner of a privately held national pharmaceutical distributor in Section 2255 proceedings regarding his conviction on mail/wire fraud and RICO charges stemming from allegations of grey market recycling of drugs.{{ FIELD }}Represented numerous national retail and specialty pharmacy chains in multiple False Claims Act /qui tam matters focusing on a variety of issues, including allegations of the payment of kickbacks, improper submission of dosage quantities, the failure to timely refund credit balances, coordination of benefits issues, the submission of incorrect “usual and customary” prices to government payors and the dispensing of expired drugs.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major national financial institution in False Claims Act /qui tam litigation involving allegations of charging borrowers unallowable fees under the Veteran Administration's Home Loan Guaranty Program.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major national skilled nursing facility chain in False Claims Act /qui tam litigation focusing on quality of care issues.{{ FIELD }}Conducted independent internal investigations on various issues, including allegations of improper accounting, theft of corporate resources, backdated stock option, FCPA violations, and misconduct in the execution of government contracts and grant programs.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal review for an international nongovernmental organization regarding potential FCPA issues related to an ongoing cooperative project with a foreign government.{{ FIELD }}Represented a large publicly traded corporation in one of the first national investigations by a multi-state attorneys' general task force focusing on the loss of consumer information held by the company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 500 financial services company in a data breach response and in ensuing investigations by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which focused on Regulation S-P’s requirement to safeguard consumer financial and personal information.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 100 healthcare company in responding to a data security incident — and an ensuing DHHS OCR investigation — involving the theft of customers’ personal and medical information. The internal investigation that was conducted led to DHHS OCR and customer disclosures pursuant to the requirements of HIPAA and various state data breach disclosure statutes.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major international telecommunications company in its response to the disclosure of the United States' Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), and issues and litigation arising from the company’s alleged cooperation with the TSP.{{ FIELD }}Chris Burris focuses on white-collar criminal defense, corporate internal investigations, regulatory enforcement action defense and complex litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Government Investigations practice, Chris defends corporations and individuals in a variety of criminal, regulatory, False Claims Act and other matters.\nAs a defense lawyer, Chris represents leading corporations and individuals in criminal and regulatory enforcement matters. He has particular experience with defending clients in False Claims Act/qui tam matters, handling dozens of cases concerning a variety of issues.\nIn addition, Chris counsels clients in matters concerning privacy, information security and related issues. He also conducts internal investigations on behalf of management, boards of directors and audit committees.\nPreviously, Chris served on active duty in the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps for nearly six years, where he gained broad experience in trial prosecution and defense, appeals and internal investigations. As a Commander in the Naval Reserves, he currently serves as the Executive Officer of the Navy Reserve unit overseeing issues involving international and operational law, admiralty and maritime law, environmental law, and information operations and intelligence law. Christopher C Burris Partner Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court of the United States U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina Georgia North Carolina Represented a major international financial institution in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of accusations of employee participation in an alleged Ponzi scheme. Represented a large publicly traded manufacturing company in the internal investigation and self-disclosure of potential Bank Secrecy Act violations. Represented an elected state official during a federal investigation of public corruption, which led to no charges being filed. Represented an owner of a large privately held manufacturing company in the defense of a federal criminal tax investigation. Represented an owner of a privately held national pharmaceutical distributor in Section 2255 proceedings regarding his conviction on mail/wire fraud and RICO charges stemming from allegations of grey market recycling of drugs. Represented numerous national retail and specialty pharmacy chains in multiple False Claims Act /qui tam matters focusing on a variety of issues, including allegations of the payment of kickbacks, improper submission of dosage quantities, the failure to timely refund credit balances, coordination of benefits issues, the submission of incorrect “usual and customary” prices to government payors and the dispensing of expired drugs. Represented a major national financial institution in False Claims Act /qui tam litigation involving allegations of charging borrowers unallowable fees under the Veteran Administration's Home Loan Guaranty Program. Represented a major national skilled nursing facility chain in False Claims Act /qui tam litigation focusing on quality of care issues. Conducted independent internal investigations on various issues, including allegations of improper accounting, theft of corporate resources, backdated stock option, FCPA violations, and misconduct in the execution of government contracts and grant programs. Conducted an internal review for an international nongovernmental organization regarding potential FCPA issues related to an ongoing cooperative project with a foreign government. Represented a large publicly traded corporation in one of the first national investigations by a multi-state attorneys' general task force focusing on the loss of consumer information held by the company. Represented a Fortune 500 financial services company in a data breach response and in ensuing investigations by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which focused on Regulation S-P’s requirement to safeguard consumer financial and personal information. Represented a Fortune 100 healthcare company in responding to a data security incident — and an ensuing DHHS OCR investigation — involving the theft of customers’ personal and medical information. The internal investigation that was conducted led to DHHS OCR and customer disclosures pursuant to the requirements of HIPAA and various state data breach disclosure statutes. Represented a major international telecommunications company in its response to the disclosure of the United States' Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), and issues and litigation arising from the company’s alleged cooperation with the TSP.","searchable_name":"Christopher C. Burris (Chris)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5863,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christine-carletta","email":"ccarletta@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carletta","nick_name":"Christine","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","years_held":"2019 - 2020"},{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Christine","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChristine M. Carletta is a\u0026nbsp;partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As\u0026nbsp;a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients\u0026rsquo; objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine\u0026rsquo;s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and\u0026nbsp;class actions.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of\u0026nbsp;the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9711}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Carletta{{ FIELD }}Christine M. Carletta is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. As a member of the firm’s Appellate, Constitutional, and Administrative Law practice group, Christine develops creative litigation strategies to best serve her clients’ objectives through all phases of litigation and appeal. Christine’s extensive experience covers a broad range of subjects including Medicare and Medicaid regulation, Food and Drug Administration regulation, the False Claims Act, fraud and abuse matters, state and federal privacy laws, securities regulations, contract disputes, consumer protection claims, and class actions. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Christine served as a law clerk to the Honorable Chad A Readler, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Court for the District of Nevada. She received her J.D. from Vanderbilt Law School, where she served as Editor-in-Chief of the Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law.   Partner Bowdoin College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois District of Columbia New York Law Clerk, The Honorable Chad A. Readler, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Law Clerk, The Honorable James C. Mahan, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada","searchable_name":"Christine Carletta","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444009,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7211,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading companies and newest disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes including groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair.\u0026nbsp;Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"neel-chatterjee","email":"nchatterjee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chatterjee","nick_name":"","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Neel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading companies and newest disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes including groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair.\u0026nbsp;Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12909}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Chatterjee{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Litigators in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property – Nationwide \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global 2021 and 2022 \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top IP litigator and trailblazer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}Neel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world’s leading companies and newest disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. \nNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley’s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes including groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film “The Social Network.” He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology. \nNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbell in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court. \nNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being “singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,” with “the ability to think outside the box” as well as having “in depth knowledge of patent law.” In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being “knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,” with providing “practical, business-minded patent advice” and a sensitivity “to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being “sought-after” and “valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.” Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, “He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.” Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who “gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,” also remarking that “he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.” Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News — Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, “Best Lawyers” named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California’s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.  Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education. \nNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.  The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers. Partner Leading Litigators in America  Lawdragon 500 (2025) Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law Best Lawyers (2022-2023) Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets Chambers USA (2022-2025) Intellectual Property – Nationwide  Chambers USA (2025) United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters) Legal 500 US (2021-2024)  Intellectual Property: Patent Global 2021 and 2022  2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property  Benchmark Litigation Top IP litigator and trailblazer  Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit California California Bar Association Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Board Member Asia Pacific Fund, Board Member National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association, Board Member Served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California Bay Area Diversity Career Fair, Founder","searchable_name":"Neel Chatterjee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444465,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":676,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"susan-clare","email":"sclare@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":165}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Clare","nick_name":"Susan","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia","years_held":"2005"}],"first_name":"Susan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":776}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Clare{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star for Transportation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Order of the Coif\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.{{ FIELD }}Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.{{ FIELD }}Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.{{ FIELD }}Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.{{ FIELD }}Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.{{ FIELD }}Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).{{ FIELD }}Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.{{ FIELD }}Susan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by Law 360. \nSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by The Legal 500, a Rising Star for Transportation by Law 360, a Georgia Rising Star by Super Lawyers and Atlanta Magazine, and was also named to Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List. \nWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\nShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\nIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies, consumer communications, and product recalls. Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\nSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions. Susan M Clare Partner Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South Benchmark Litigation, 2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Named a Rising Star for Transportation Law360, 2018 Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products Super Lawyers, 2013–2019 Order of the Coif  Georgia Institute of Technology  Emory University Emory University School of Law Georgia International Academy of Defense Counsel (IADC) Trial Academy, 2014 Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data. Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019. Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017. Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires. Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases. Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents. Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud. Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty. Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes. Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma. Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products. Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017). Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014). Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012). Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011). Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.","searchable_name":"Susan M. Clare","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445675,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5750,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam\u0026nbsp;primarily helps\u0026nbsp;tech\u0026nbsp;companies\u0026nbsp;navigate California class action lawsuits for privacy\u0026nbsp;claims (CIPA, CDAFA, Invasion of Privacy, CCPA, ECPA, Wiretap Act) and\u0026nbsp;marketing claims (TCPA, Do Not Call, CEMA, and CAN-SPAM).\u0026nbsp; He serves on Law360's Cybersecurity \u0026amp; Privacy\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board and previously worked\u0026nbsp;as an\u0026nbsp;in-house litigation attorney at\u0026nbsp;TikTok.\u0026nbsp; He has also advised\u0026nbsp;Fortune 100 companies\u0026nbsp;on their terms of service, consent disclosures, privacy policies, and website and marketing practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis notable matters include:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Daily Journal recognized Sam\u0026nbsp;for a \"Top Defense Verdict\" in securing dismissal\u0026nbsp;of a putative class action raising TCPA claims against his tech client.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFirst-of-its-kind summary judgment order in California\u0026nbsp;dismissing\u0026nbsp;a\u0026nbsp;potential multi-billion dollar class action\u0026nbsp;under the California Invasion of Privacy Act for alleged wiretapping in relation to a website chat function.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVoluntary\u0026nbsp;dismissal of all claims by a\u0026nbsp;competitor in the tech industry\u0026nbsp;after\u0026nbsp;motion practice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdvised a tech company on its marketing practices, and several years later, the\u0026nbsp;same company received a\u0026nbsp;demand letter that would have exposed them\u0026nbsp;to hundreds of millions of dollars of damages had they not previously implemented his advice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam is also\u0026nbsp;a member of the Mexican American Bar Association, and\u0026nbsp;he dedicates a large part of his practice to pro bono work, through which he has obtained an injunction to improve the conditions of detention in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona and\u0026nbsp;won asylum for an indigent youth\u0026nbsp;from Mexico.\u0026nbsp; He has won the Pro Bono Service Award every year he's\u0026nbsp;been at King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his tech work, Sam has broad experience in complex commercial matters, including partnership and breach of contract disputes,\u0026nbsp;trial, and arbitration (including enforcement of tens of millions of dollars of arbitration awards).\u0026nbsp; Clients especially value Sam's\u0026nbsp;attentiveness and dedication to their personal goals, as he does not rely on a one-size-fits-all strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam graduated from Harvard Law School in 2015, where he was a research assistant for Professor Laurence Tribe and Co-President of the Harvard Mediation Program.\u0026nbsp; He clerked for a federal district court and a federal circuit court before joining King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp; When not practicing law, Sam saves shelter dogs from the euthanasia list,\u0026nbsp;spends time with his own rescue dogs, Alvin and Dash, and surfs and hikes in Southern California.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"samuel-cortina","email":"scortina@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3561}]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cortina","nick_name":"Sam","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Bernice B. Donald, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit","years_held":"2018 - 2019"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Sheryl H. Lipman, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Samuel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":824,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Samuel Cortina is a lawyer of our Business Litigation Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam\u0026nbsp;primarily helps\u0026nbsp;tech\u0026nbsp;companies\u0026nbsp;navigate California class action lawsuits for privacy\u0026nbsp;claims (CIPA, CDAFA, Invasion of Privacy, CCPA, ECPA, Wiretap Act) and\u0026nbsp;marketing claims (TCPA, Do Not Call, CEMA, and CAN-SPAM).\u0026nbsp; He serves on Law360's Cybersecurity \u0026amp; Privacy\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board and previously worked\u0026nbsp;as an\u0026nbsp;in-house litigation attorney at\u0026nbsp;TikTok.\u0026nbsp; He has also advised\u0026nbsp;Fortune 100 companies\u0026nbsp;on their terms of service, consent disclosures, privacy policies, and website and marketing practices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis notable matters include:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Daily Journal recognized Sam\u0026nbsp;for a \"Top Defense Verdict\" in securing dismissal\u0026nbsp;of a putative class action raising TCPA claims against his tech client.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFirst-of-its-kind summary judgment order in California\u0026nbsp;dismissing\u0026nbsp;a\u0026nbsp;potential multi-billion dollar class action\u0026nbsp;under the California Invasion of Privacy Act for alleged wiretapping in relation to a website chat function.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVoluntary\u0026nbsp;dismissal of all claims by a\u0026nbsp;competitor in the tech industry\u0026nbsp;after\u0026nbsp;motion practice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdvised a tech company on its marketing practices, and several years later, the\u0026nbsp;same company received a\u0026nbsp;demand letter that would have exposed them\u0026nbsp;to hundreds of millions of dollars of damages had they not previously implemented his advice.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam is also\u0026nbsp;a member of the Mexican American Bar Association, and\u0026nbsp;he dedicates a large part of his practice to pro bono work, through which he has obtained an injunction to improve the conditions of detention in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona and\u0026nbsp;won asylum for an indigent youth\u0026nbsp;from Mexico.\u0026nbsp; He has won the Pro Bono Service Award every year he's\u0026nbsp;been at King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his tech work, Sam has broad experience in complex commercial matters, including partnership and breach of contract disputes,\u0026nbsp;trial, and arbitration (including enforcement of tens of millions of dollars of arbitration awards).\u0026nbsp; Clients especially value Sam's\u0026nbsp;attentiveness and dedication to their personal goals, as he does not rely on a one-size-fits-all strategy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam graduated from Harvard Law School in 2015, where he was a research assistant for Professor Laurence Tribe and Co-President of the Harvard Mediation Program.\u0026nbsp; He clerked for a federal district court and a federal circuit court before joining King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp; When not practicing law, Sam saves shelter dogs from the euthanasia list,\u0026nbsp;spends time with his own rescue dogs, Alvin and Dash, and surfs and hikes in Southern California.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13035}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-09T15:39:04.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-09T15:39:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Cortina{{ FIELD }}Sam primarily helps tech companies navigate California class action lawsuits for privacy claims (CIPA, CDAFA, Invasion of Privacy, CCPA, ECPA, Wiretap Act) and marketing claims (TCPA, Do Not Call, CEMA, and CAN-SPAM).  He serves on Law360's Cybersecurity \u0026amp; Privacy Editorial Board and previously worked as an in-house litigation attorney at TikTok.  He has also advised Fortune 100 companies on their terms of service, consent disclosures, privacy policies, and website and marketing practices.\nHis notable matters include:\n\nThe Daily Journal recognized Sam for a \"Top Defense Verdict\" in securing dismissal of a putative class action raising TCPA claims against his tech client.\nFirst-of-its-kind summary judgment order in California dismissing a potential multi-billion dollar class action under the California Invasion of Privacy Act for alleged wiretapping in relation to a website chat function.\nVoluntary dismissal of all claims by a competitor in the tech industry after motion practice.\nAdvised a tech company on its marketing practices, and several years later, the same company received a demand letter that would have exposed them to hundreds of millions of dollars of damages had they not previously implemented his advice.\n\nSam is also a member of the Mexican American Bar Association, and he dedicates a large part of his practice to pro bono work, through which he has obtained an injunction to improve the conditions of detention in Border Patrol facilities in Arizona and won asylum for an indigent youth from Mexico.  He has won the Pro Bono Service Award every year he's been at King \u0026amp; Spalding. \nBeyond his tech work, Sam has broad experience in complex commercial matters, including partnership and breach of contract disputes, trial, and arbitration (including enforcement of tens of millions of dollars of arbitration awards).  Clients especially value Sam's attentiveness and dedication to their personal goals, as he does not rely on a one-size-fits-all strategy.\nSam graduated from Harvard Law School in 2015, where he was a research assistant for Professor Laurence Tribe and Co-President of the Harvard Mediation Program.  He clerked for a federal district court and a federal circuit court before joining King \u0026amp; Spalding.  When not practicing law, Sam saves shelter dogs from the euthanasia list, spends time with his own rescue dogs, Alvin and Dash, and surfs and hikes in Southern California. Samuel Cortina lawyer Partner University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Judicial Clerk, Honorable Bernice B. Donald, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Honorable Sheryl H. Lipman, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee","searchable_name":"Samuel C. Cortina (Sam)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443991,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7075,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Costello advises clients on e-discovery and information governance matters, including litigation readiness, information management, data minimization, cross-border discovery issues, privacy, cybersecurity, and more.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris also handles all aspects of complex commercial litigation across a variety of disputes from inception through trial and resolution, including representations of large financial institutions in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) matters. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris is recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u003c/em\u003e (2022-2025) \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e (2021-2024), and \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003e(2023-2024) for his significant contributions to E-Discovery and Information Governance.\u0026nbsp; Chris is \u0026ldquo;highly regarded for his representation of high-profile companies\u0026rdquo; and is a \u0026ldquo;super-talented lawyer who provides a calm nature that helps his clients.\u0026rdquo; Chris works to understand his clients needs and helps them implement strategies and programs that solve both their immediate and long-term e-discovery needs. He is a frequent speaker and author on e-discovery, information governance and privacy related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christopher-costello","email":"ccostello@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Costello","nick_name":"Chris","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Chris","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2004-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"E-Discovery \u0026 Information ","detail":"Chambers Global, 2022-2025"},{"title":"E-Discovery \u0026 Information Governance ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021–2024"},{"title":"E-Discovery","detail":"The Legal 500, 2023–2024"},{"title":"Marquis Who’s Who Top Lawyers","detail":"2024-2025"},{"title":"CIPP/E Certification","detail":"International Association of Privacy Professionals, 2019"},{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2011–2015"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/christopher-costello-9a86b39/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris Costello advises clients on e-discovery and information governance matters, including litigation readiness, information management, data minimization, cross-border discovery issues, privacy, cybersecurity, and more.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris also handles all aspects of complex commercial litigation across a variety of disputes from inception through trial and resolution, including representations of large financial institutions in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) matters. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris is recognized by \u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u003c/em\u003e (2022-2025) \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e (2021-2024), and \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003e(2023-2024) for his significant contributions to E-Discovery and Information Governance.\u0026nbsp; Chris is \u0026ldquo;highly regarded for his representation of high-profile companies\u0026rdquo; and is a \u0026ldquo;super-talented lawyer who provides a calm nature that helps his clients.\u0026rdquo; Chris works to understand his clients needs and helps them implement strategies and programs that solve both their immediate and long-term e-discovery needs. He is a frequent speaker and author on e-discovery, information governance and privacy related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"E-Discovery \u0026 Information ","detail":"Chambers Global, 2022-2025"},{"title":"E-Discovery \u0026 Information Governance ","detail":"Chambers USA, 2021–2024"},{"title":"E-Discovery","detail":"The Legal 500, 2023–2024"},{"title":"Marquis Who’s Who Top Lawyers","detail":"2024-2025"},{"title":"CIPP/E Certification","detail":"International Association of Privacy Professionals, 2019"},{"title":"Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2011–2015"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12713}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:23.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:23.000Z","searchable_text":"Costello{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"E-Discovery \u0026amp; Information \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global, 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"E-Discovery \u0026amp; Information Governance \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2021–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"E-Discovery\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500, 2023–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Marquis Who’s Who Top Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2024-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"CIPP/E Certification\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"International Association of Privacy Professionals, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2011–2015\"}{{ FIELD }}Chris Costello advises clients on e-discovery and information governance matters, including litigation readiness, information management, data minimization, cross-border discovery issues, privacy, cybersecurity, and more.\nChris also handles all aspects of complex commercial litigation across a variety of disputes from inception through trial and resolution, including representations of large financial institutions in commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) matters. \nChris is recognized by Chambers Global (2022-2025) Chambers USA (2021-2024), and The Legal 500 (2023-2024) for his significant contributions to E-Discovery and Information Governance.  Chris is “highly regarded for his representation of high-profile companies” and is a “super-talented lawyer who provides a calm nature that helps his clients.” Chris works to understand his clients needs and helps them implement strategies and programs that solve both their immediate and long-term e-discovery needs. He is a frequent speaker and author on e-discovery, information governance and privacy related issues. Partner E-Discovery \u0026amp; Information  Chambers Global, 2022-2025 E-Discovery \u0026amp; Information Governance  Chambers USA, 2021–2024 E-Discovery The Legal 500, 2023–2024 Marquis Who’s Who Top Lawyers 2024-2025 CIPP/E Certification International Association of Privacy Professionals, 2019 Rising Star Super Lawyers, 2011–2015 St. John's University St. John's University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center American University Washington College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York California New York International Association of Privacy Professionals Lawyers for Civil Justice LA County Bar Association","searchable_name":"Chris Costello","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}