{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"5","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"D","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":447047,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3796,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIsrael Dahan focuses on high-stakes litigation matters. For over 25 years, Israel has represented public and private companies, financial institutions, corporate executives and other individuals involved in state and federal shareholder securities class actions and derivative actions, as well as in complex commercial litigation matters. He has extensive experience litigating cases involving the federal securities laws, the fiduciary obligations of corporate directors, fraud, tortious conduct and breach of contract.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Israel has defended debtors, secured lenders, and other creditors and individuals in bankruptcy litigation matters, including those involving claims for fraudulent conveyance, preferential transfers, equitable subordination, breach of fiduciary duty and corporate veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also has represented and advised companies involved in internal investigations, and investigations and regulatory proceedings pursued by U.S. and foreign regulators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIsrael has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eand Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for his work on high-profile litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"israel-dahan","email":"idahan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eShareholder and Securities Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFermi Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and the individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGAP Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and other individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in EDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss. Dismissal ruling is on appeal before the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoard of Directors of\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in a shareholder derivative action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoard of Directors of\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and corporate waste.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConduent Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and certain of its directors and officers in federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action and individual actions filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1993 and various state law claims. Obtained dismissal of the Section 10(b) and state law claims on a motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action, with prejudice, post motion to dismiss filing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM, Inc., its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss; affirmed by Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAlliance MMA, Inc. and its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer CEO of CTPartners\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims on a motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign individual\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSino Gas International Holdings, Inc.,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a class action filed in Utah state court alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty and seeking to enjoin\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSino Gas\u0026rsquo;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;going-private merger transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank Securities\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several private securities fraud actions involving naked short selling activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBear Stearns Companies, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state shareholder actions filed in NY and Delaware relating to its merger with JPMorgan Chase \u0026amp; Co.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eunderwriters of three offerings of securities,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;aggregating in excess of $3 billion, issued by The Williams Companies in a federal securities class action filed in ND Oklahoma alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMajesco Entertainment\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its officers and directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action and separate shareholder derivative action filed in DNJ.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGroup 1 Software\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its Board of Directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder class action filed in Maryland state court seeking to enjoin Group 1\u0026rsquo;s merger with Pitney Bowes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand certain subsidiaries\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein action filed by Peruvian citizens in Missouri federal court alleging claims of negligence, civil conspiracy, absolute and strict liability and veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank Securities Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed by a former investor in Texas federal court alleging claims of federal RICO violations, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge commercial real estate developer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several litigations in New Jersey and New York involving foreclosure and guaranty claims on commercial loans in excess of $300 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNitya Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a commercial real estate investment and management firm in a New York state action against a Special Servicer alleging claims of breach of contract and wrongful conversion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SDNY action against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements.\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eObtained $16 billion judgment post-trial against the Argentine Republic\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, the largest damages award issued in NY, and now representing clients in enforcement proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGEM Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a real estate investment and management firm, in litigations in Delaware and Pennsylvania involving distressed commercial properties and loans in excess of $50 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eStonerock Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a real estate investment and management firm, in a foreclosure and guaranty litigation filed in Florida state court involving distressed loans on two commercial office buildings in downtown Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNovo Nordisk Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in DNJ action filed against U.S Department of Health and Human Services, CMS and others challenging the constitutionality and application of the prescription drug program established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAppleby Apartments L.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of contract action filed in New Jersey State Court arising from failed real estate purchase transaction. Obtained favorable settlement for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ead-hoc group of non-participating term lenders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(including ICG, York Capital, Ellington, OFSI, Z Capital) of Boardriders, Inc. in breach of contract action against Boardriders and ad-hoc group of participating lenders filed in New York State Court. The action arose from defendants\u0026rsquo; engagement in a no-pro-rata uptier transaction. Defeated motion to dismiss and obtained favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCaptain Paul Watson Foundation, Captain Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd Origins\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trademark infringement and trade libel action filed in Vermont federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e, largest Medicaid application assistor company, in nationwide consumer class action filed in DNJ. Obtained dismissal of complaint with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThrivest Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trade secret and breach of contract action filed in New York State Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM Holdings LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in indemnification action filed in New York State Court. Obtained dismissal of action on summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eForex Capital Markets LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer class actions in SDNY alleging claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and consumer fraud. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer owners of Major Energy LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in fraudulent inducement and breach of contract action filed in SDNY.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTF Global\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in arbitration proceeding involving claims of breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePorsche AG and Porsche Cars North America, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, in action filed by NJ Attorney General alleging consumer fraud claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand other affiliated entities\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed by Fluor Corporation in Missouri state court alleging claims of breach of contract, tortious interference and veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edirector of public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SDNY action alleging claim for tortious interference with contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ereal estate investment companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SDNY declaratory judgment action against Bank of China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNY Giants quarterback, Eli Manning,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed in NJ state court alleging claims for violation of RICO and other torts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBank of America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several state and federal actions involving the repurchase of loans sold in mortgage-backed securitizations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eseveral foreign directors and officers of a U.S. public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud related to a corporate merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmbac\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of contract action concerning lease financing and credit default swap agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eValue Health Care,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an affiliate of Omnicare, Inc., in breach of contract action filed in Connecticut state court seeking to enforce a $5 million guaranty agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBankruptcy Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup Global Markets Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup Global Markets Limited\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding filed in the Thornburg Mortgage bankruptcy cases in Maryland seeking to avoid over $2 billion in transfers and other obligations that Thornburg made or assumed prior to bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of the federal and state constructive fraudulent transfer claims asserted by the Trustee, and favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitibank, N.A. and its affiliates\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as participants in a reserve-based first lien loan facility, in connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Sabine Oil \u0026amp; Gas Corp.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with litigation brought by foreign representative in the Oro Negro Chapter 15 filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its role as collateral agent for in excess of $4 billion in priority guaranty notes in In re iHeartMedia bankruptcy case filed in S.D. Tex.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and subsequent out-of-court restructuring in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eYeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court involving claims of fraudulent transfer of real property. Defeated motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eVertis Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, including various contested matters. Successfully enjoined a third party from tortiously interfering with the debtors\u0026rsquo; existing contractual and business relationships and obstructing the sale of the debtors\u0026rsquo; businesses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eLyondell Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Secured approval of the largest privately-financed debtor-in-possession financing package at the time, obtained an injunction against claims against non-debtor European affiliates who guaranteed claims of the debtors, and defended the debtors in numerous contested matters filed by the unsecured creditors\u0026rsquo; committee and other individual creditors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eApollo Health Street, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in contested involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against Apollo by certain of the company\u0026rsquo;s creditors and obtained dismissal of the case in just three weeks. Also, represented Apollo in a separate lawsuit against the petitioning creditors and obtained significant monetary recovery for Apollo.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUS Bank, N.A\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as indenture trustee of debt issued with respect to leveraged leases of two Dynegy power generation facilities in the Dynegy Holdings LLC bankruptcy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eseveral major creditors and trading counterparties\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases and provided advice concerning the liquidation of contracts and trades involving commodities, foreign exchange, interest rate, credit default swaps and other derivative products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIcahn Associates\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as secured lender defeating subordination and other claims in the Blockbuster chapter 11 cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBay Harbour and affiliated funds and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of fiduciary duty and veil piercing claims brought by the creditors committee in the Steve \u0026amp; Barry\u0026rsquo;s bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of all claims, which was affirmed by the District Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEnron Corp\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as debtor-plaintiff in more than 40 separate adversary proceedings in its Chapter 11 cases seeking to recover monies owed to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEnron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;estate under swaps, forwards, and other derivative contracts. Recovered $2 billion for, and eliminated several billion dollars of claims against, the estate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNorthwest Airlines\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as debtor in several adversary proceedings and contested matters related to its Chapter 11 cases, including defeating challenges to plan confirmation filed by official and ad hoc committees, achieving substantive consolidation of certain debtors, and obtaining seminal decision disallowing over $1.2 billion of claims filed by a flight attendant union on grounds that damage claims do not arise from rejection of collective bargaining agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Investigations and Regulatory Proceedings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor investment bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in FINRA action arising from research report disclosure issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in NJ AG investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in regulatory investigation by the CT AG. Secured dismissal of investigation without any finding of wrongdoing by client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in enforcement proceeding pursued by RI Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee. Secured post-hearing ruling of dismissal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in regulatory proceeding filed by the CFTC in SDNY.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations by the CFTC, NFA and FCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 500 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in accounting fraud investigation by the SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;individua\u003c/strong\u003el in postal fraud investigation by the DOJ.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eseveral companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal government investigations involving late trading, market timing and market manipulation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":71}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1231,"guid":"1231.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1165,"guid":"1165.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1064,"guid":"1064.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dahan","nick_name":"Israel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Israel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2705,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1997-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Securities Litigation Defense ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"High-stakes litigation ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/israel-dahan-08052717/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eIsrael Dahan focuses on high-stakes litigation matters. For over 25 years, Israel has represented public and private companies, financial institutions, corporate executives and other individuals involved in state and federal shareholder securities class actions and derivative actions, as well as in complex commercial litigation matters. He has extensive experience litigating cases involving the federal securities laws, the fiduciary obligations of corporate directors, fraud, tortious conduct and breach of contract.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Israel has defended debtors, secured lenders, and other creditors and individuals in bankruptcy litigation matters, including those involving claims for fraudulent conveyance, preferential transfers, equitable subordination, breach of fiduciary duty and corporate veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe also has represented and advised companies involved in internal investigations, and investigations and regulatory proceedings pursued by U.S. and foreign regulators.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIsrael has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eand Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for his work on high-profile litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eShareholder and Securities Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFermi Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and the individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGAP Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and other individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in EDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss. Dismissal ruling is on appeal before the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoard of Directors of\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc\u003c/strong\u003e. in a shareholder derivative action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBoard of Directors of\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and corporate waste.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConduent Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and certain of its directors and officers in federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action and individual actions filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1993 and various state law claims. Obtained dismissal of the Section 10(b) and state law claims on a motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action, with prejudice, post motion to dismiss filing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM, Inc., its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss; affirmed by Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAlliance MMA, Inc. and its CEO and CFO\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer CEO of CTPartners\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims on a motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign individual\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSino Gas International Holdings, Inc.,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a class action filed in Utah state court alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty and seeking to enjoin\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSino Gas\u0026rsquo;\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;going-private merger transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank Securities\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several private securities fraud actions involving naked short selling activities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBear Stearns Companies, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state shareholder actions filed in NY and Delaware relating to its merger with JPMorgan Chase \u0026amp; Co.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eunderwriters of three offerings of securities,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;aggregating in excess of $3 billion, issued by The Williams Companies in a federal securities class action filed in ND Oklahoma alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMajesco Entertainment\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its officers and directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal securities class action and separate shareholder derivative action filed in DNJ.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGroup 1 Software\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand its Board of Directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder class action filed in Maryland state court seeking to enjoin Group 1\u0026rsquo;s merger with Pitney Bowes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand certain subsidiaries\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein action filed by Peruvian citizens in Missouri federal court alleging claims of negligence, civil conspiracy, absolute and strict liability and veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank Securities Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed by a former investor in Texas federal court alleging claims of federal RICO violations, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge commercial real estate developer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several litigations in New Jersey and New York involving foreclosure and guaranty claims on commercial loans in excess of $300 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNitya Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a commercial real estate investment and management firm in a New York state action against a Special Servicer alleging claims of breach of contract and wrongful conversion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SDNY action against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements.\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eObtained $16 billion judgment post-trial against the Argentine Republic\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e, the largest damages award issued in NY, and now representing clients in enforcement proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGEM Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a real estate investment and management firm, in litigations in Delaware and Pennsylvania involving distressed commercial properties and loans in excess of $50 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eStonerock Capital LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a real estate investment and management firm, in a foreclosure and guaranty litigation filed in Florida state court involving distressed loans on two commercial office buildings in downtown Miami.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNovo Nordisk Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in DNJ action filed against U.S Department of Health and Human Services, CMS and others challenging the constitutionality and application of the prescription drug program established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAppleby Apartments L.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of contract action filed in New Jersey State Court arising from failed real estate purchase transaction. Obtained favorable settlement for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ead-hoc group of non-participating term lenders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(including ICG, York Capital, Ellington, OFSI, Z Capital) of Boardriders, Inc. in breach of contract action against Boardriders and ad-hoc group of participating lenders filed in New York State Court. The action arose from defendants\u0026rsquo; engagement in a no-pro-rata uptier transaction. Defeated motion to dismiss and obtained favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCaptain Paul Watson Foundation, Captain Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd Origins\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trademark infringement and trade libel action filed in Vermont federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e, largest Medicaid application assistor company, in nationwide consumer class action filed in DNJ. Obtained dismissal of complaint with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThrivest Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in trade secret and breach of contract action filed in New York State Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM Holdings LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in indemnification action filed in New York State Court. Obtained dismissal of action on summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eForex Capital Markets LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consumer class actions in SDNY alleging claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and consumer fraud. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer owners of Major Energy LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in fraudulent inducement and breach of contract action filed in SDNY.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTF Global\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in arbitration proceeding involving claims of breach of contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePorsche AG and Porsche Cars North America, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, in action filed by NJ Attorney General alleging consumer fraud claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Renco Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eand other affiliated entities\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed by Fluor Corporation in Missouri state court alleging claims of breach of contract, tortious interference and veil piercing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edirector of public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SDNY action alleging claim for tortious interference with contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ereal estate investment companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SDNY declaratory judgment action against Bank of China.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNY Giants quarterback, Eli Manning,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed in NJ state court alleging claims for violation of RICO and other torts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBank of America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in several state and federal actions involving the repurchase of loans sold in mortgage-backed securitizations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eseveral foreign directors and officers of a U.S. public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud related to a corporate merger.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmbac\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of contract action concerning lease financing and credit default swap agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eValue Health Care,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an affiliate of Omnicare, Inc., in breach of contract action filed in Connecticut state court seeking to enforce a $5 million guaranty agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBankruptcy Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup Global Markets Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitigroup Global Markets Limited\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding filed in the Thornburg Mortgage bankruptcy cases in Maryland seeking to avoid over $2 billion in transfers and other obligations that Thornburg made or assumed prior to bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of the federal and state constructive fraudulent transfer claims asserted by the Trustee, and favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCitibank, N.A. and its affiliates\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as participants in a reserve-based first lien loan facility, in connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Sabine Oil \u0026amp; Gas Corp.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with litigation brought by foreign representative in the Oro Negro Chapter 15 filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeutsche Bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its role as collateral agent for in excess of $4 billion in priority guaranty notes in In re iHeartMedia bankruptcy case filed in S.D. Tex.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Brokerage, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and subsequent out-of-court restructuring in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eYeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in adversary proceeding filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court involving claims of fraudulent transfer of real property. Defeated motion to dismiss.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eVertis Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, including various contested matters. Successfully enjoined a third party from tortiously interfering with the debtors\u0026rsquo; existing contractual and business relationships and obstructing the sale of the debtors\u0026rsquo; businesses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eLyondell Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Secured approval of the largest privately-financed debtor-in-possession financing package at the time, obtained an injunction against claims against non-debtor European affiliates who guaranteed claims of the debtors, and defended the debtors in numerous contested matters filed by the unsecured creditors\u0026rsquo; committee and other individual creditors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eApollo Health Street, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in contested involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against Apollo by certain of the company\u0026rsquo;s creditors and obtained dismissal of the case in just three weeks. Also, represented Apollo in a separate lawsuit against the petitioning creditors and obtained significant monetary recovery for Apollo.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUS Bank, N.A\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as indenture trustee of debt issued with respect to leveraged leases of two Dynegy power generation facilities in the Dynegy Holdings LLC bankruptcy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eseveral major creditors and trading counterparties\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases and provided advice concerning the liquidation of contracts and trades involving commodities, foreign exchange, interest rate, credit default swaps and other derivative products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIcahn Associates\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as secured lender defeating subordination and other claims in the Blockbuster chapter 11 cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBay Harbour and affiliated funds and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in breach of fiduciary duty and veil piercing claims brought by the creditors committee in the Steve \u0026amp; Barry\u0026rsquo;s bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of all claims, which was affirmed by the District Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEnron Corp\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as debtor-plaintiff in more than 40 separate adversary proceedings in its Chapter 11 cases seeking to recover monies owed to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEnron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;estate under swaps, forwards, and other derivative contracts. Recovered $2 billion for, and eliminated several billion dollars of claims against, the estate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eNorthwest Airlines\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as debtor in several adversary proceedings and contested matters related to its Chapter 11 cases, including defeating challenges to plan confirmation filed by official and ad hoc committees, achieving substantive consolidation of certain debtors, and obtaining seminal decision disallowing over $1.2 billion of claims filed by a flight attendant union on grounds that damage claims do not arise from rejection of collective bargaining agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGovernment Investigations and Regulatory Proceedings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor investment bank\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in FINRA action arising from research report disclosure issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in NJ AG investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in regulatory investigation by the CT AG. Secured dismissal of investigation without any finding of wrongdoing by client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSenior Planning Services\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in enforcement proceeding pursued by RI Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee. Secured post-hearing ruling of dismissal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFXCM LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in regulatory proceeding filed by the CFTC in SDNY.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations by the CFTC, NFA and FCA.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea Fortune 500 company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in accounting fraud investigation by the SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;individua\u003c/strong\u003el in postal fraud investigation by the DOJ.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eseveral companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in state and federal government investigations involving late trading, market timing and market manipulation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Securities Litigation Defense ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S."},{"title":"High-stakes litigation ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4203}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-26T20:46:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-26T20:46:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Dahan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Securities Litigation Defense \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S.\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"High-stakes litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}Shareholder and Securities Litigation\nDefending Fermi Inc. and the individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.{{ FIELD }}Defending GAP Inc. and other individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in EDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss. Dismissal ruling is on appeal before the Second Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Defending Board of Directors of Global Brokerage, Inc. in a shareholder derivative action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.{{ FIELD }}Defending Board of Directors of FXCM, Inc. in a shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and corporate waste.{{ FIELD }}Defended Global Brokerage, Inc. and its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.{{ FIELD }}Defended Conduent Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.{{ FIELD }}Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes in a federal securities class action and individual actions filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1993 and various state law claims. Obtained dismissal of the Section 10(b) and state law claims on a motion to dismiss.{{ FIELD }}Defended PricewaterhouseCoopers in shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action, with prejudice, post motion to dismiss filing.{{ FIELD }}Defended FXCM, Inc., its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss; affirmed by Second Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Defended Alliance MMA, Inc. and its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.{{ FIELD }}Defended former CEO of CTPartners in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims on a motion to dismiss.{{ FIELD }}Defended foreign individual in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.{{ FIELD }}Defended Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc., in a class action filed in Utah state court alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty and seeking to enjoin Sino Gas’ going-private merger transaction.{{ FIELD }}Defended Deutsche Bank Securities in several private securities fraud actions involving naked short selling activities.{{ FIELD }}Defended Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. in federal and state shareholder actions filed in NY and Delaware relating to its merger with JPMorgan Chase \u0026amp; Co.{{ FIELD }}Defended underwriters of three offerings of securities, aggregating in excess of $3 billion, issued by The Williams Companies in a federal securities class action filed in ND Oklahoma alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.{{ FIELD }}Defended Majesco Entertainment and its officers and directors in a federal securities class action and separate shareholder derivative action filed in DNJ.{{ FIELD }}Defended Group 1 Software and its Board of Directors in a shareholder class action filed in Maryland state court seeking to enjoin Group 1’s merger with Pitney Bowes.{{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation{{ FIELD }}Defending The Renco Group and certain subsidiaries in action filed by Peruvian citizens in Missouri federal court alleging claims of negligence, civil conspiracy, absolute and strict liability and veil piercing.{{ FIELD }}Defending Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in an action filed by a former investor in Texas federal court alleging claims of federal RICO violations, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment.{{ FIELD }}Defending a large commercial real estate developer in several litigations in New Jersey and New York involving foreclosure and guaranty claims on commercial loans in excess of $300 million.{{ FIELD }}Representing Nitya Capital LLC, a commercial real estate investment and management firm in a New York state action against a Special Servicer alleging claims of breach of contract and wrongful conversion.{{ FIELD }}Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U. and Petersen Energia, S.A.U. in a SDNY action against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements. Obtained $16 billion judgment post-trial against the Argentine Republic, the largest damages award issued in NY, and now representing clients in enforcement proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Represented GEM Capital LLC, a real estate investment and management firm, in litigations in Delaware and Pennsylvania involving distressed commercial properties and loans in excess of $50 million.{{ FIELD }}Represented Stonerock Capital LLC, a real estate investment and management firm, in a foreclosure and guaranty litigation filed in Florida state court involving distressed loans on two commercial office buildings in downtown Miami.{{ FIELD }}Represented Novo Nordisk Inc. in DNJ action filed against U.S Department of Health and Human Services, CMS and others challenging the constitutionality and application of the prescription drug program established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.{{ FIELD }}Represented Appleby Apartments L.P. in breach of contract action filed in New Jersey State Court arising from failed real estate purchase transaction. Obtained favorable settlement for client.{{ FIELD }}Represented ad-hoc group of non-participating term lenders (including ICG, York Capital, Ellington, OFSI, Z Capital) of Boardriders, Inc. in breach of contract action against Boardriders and ad-hoc group of participating lenders filed in New York State Court. The action arose from defendants’ engagement in a no-pro-rata uptier transaction. Defeated motion to dismiss and obtained favorable settlement.{{ FIELD }}Defended Captain Paul Watson Foundation, Captain Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd Origins in trademark infringement and trade libel action filed in Vermont federal court.{{ FIELD }}Defended Senior Planning Services, largest Medicaid application assistor company, in nationwide consumer class action filed in DNJ. Obtained dismissal of complaint with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Defended Thrivest Inc. in trade secret and breach of contract action filed in New York State Court.{{ FIELD }}Defended FXCM Holdings LLC in indemnification action filed in New York State Court. Obtained dismissal of action on summary judgment.{{ FIELD }}Defended Forex Capital Markets LLC in consumer class actions in SDNY alleging claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and consumer fraud. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Represented former owners of Major Energy LLC in fraudulent inducement and breach of contract action filed in SDNY.{{ FIELD }}Defended TF Global in arbitration proceeding involving claims of breach of contract.{{ FIELD }}Defended Porsche AG and Porsche Cars North America, Inc., in action filed by NJ Attorney General alleging consumer fraud claims.{{ FIELD }}Defended The Renco Group and other affiliated entities in action filed by Fluor Corporation in Missouri state court alleging claims of breach of contract, tortious interference and veil piercing.{{ FIELD }}Defended director of public company in SDNY action alleging claim for tortious interference with contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented real estate investment companies in SDNY declaratory judgment action against Bank of China.{{ FIELD }}Defended NY Giants quarterback, Eli Manning, in action filed in NJ state court alleging claims for violation of RICO and other torts.{{ FIELD }}Defended Bank of America in several state and federal actions involving the repurchase of loans sold in mortgage-backed securitizations.{{ FIELD }}Defended several foreign directors and officers of a U.S. public company in action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud related to a corporate merger.{{ FIELD }}Defended Ambac in breach of contract action concerning lease financing and credit default swap agreements.{{ FIELD }}Represented Value Health Care, an affiliate of Omnicare, Inc., in breach of contract action filed in Connecticut state court seeking to enforce a $5 million guaranty agreement.{{ FIELD }}Bankruptcy Litigation{{ FIELD }}Defended Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited in adversary proceeding filed in the Thornburg Mortgage bankruptcy cases in Maryland seeking to avoid over $2 billion in transfers and other obligations that Thornburg made or assumed prior to bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of the federal and state constructive fraudulent transfer claims asserted by the Trustee, and favorable settlement.{{ FIELD }}Defended Citibank, N.A. and its affiliates, as participants in a reserve-based first lien loan facility, in connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Sabine Oil \u0026amp; Gas Corp.{{ FIELD }}Defended Deutsche Bank in connection with litigation brought by foreign representative in the Oro Negro Chapter 15 filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented Deutsche Bank in connection with its role as collateral agent for in excess of $4 billion in priority guaranty notes in In re iHeartMedia bankruptcy case filed in S.D. Tex.{{ FIELD }}Represented Global Brokerage, Inc. in connection with its prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and subsequent out-of-court restructuring in SDNY Bankruptcy Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc. in adversary proceeding filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court involving claims of fraudulent transfer of real property. Defeated motion to dismiss.{{ FIELD }}Represented Vertis Inc. in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, including various contested matters. Successfully enjoined a third party from tortiously interfering with the debtors’ existing contractual and business relationships and obstructing the sale of the debtors’ businesses.{{ FIELD }}Represented Lyondell Chemical Company in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Secured approval of the largest privately-financed debtor-in-possession financing package at the time, obtained an injunction against claims against non-debtor European affiliates who guaranteed claims of the debtors, and defended the debtors in numerous contested matters filed by the unsecured creditors’ committee and other individual creditors.{{ FIELD }}Represented Apollo Health Street, Inc. in contested involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against Apollo by certain of the company’s creditors and obtained dismissal of the case in just three weeks. Also, represented Apollo in a separate lawsuit against the petitioning creditors and obtained significant monetary recovery for Apollo.{{ FIELD }}Represented US Bank, N.A. as indenture trustee of debt issued with respect to leveraged leases of two Dynegy power generation facilities in the Dynegy Holdings LLC bankruptcy.{{ FIELD }}Represented several major creditors and trading counterparties in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases and provided advice concerning the liquidation of contracts and trades involving commodities, foreign exchange, interest rate, credit default swaps and other derivative products.{{ FIELD }}Defended Icahn Associates as secured lender defeating subordination and other claims in the Blockbuster chapter 11 cases.{{ FIELD }}Defended Bay Harbour and affiliated funds and individuals in breach of fiduciary duty and veil piercing claims brought by the creditors committee in the Steve \u0026amp; Barry’s bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of all claims, which was affirmed by the District Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented Enron Corp. as debtor-plaintiff in more than 40 separate adversary proceedings in its Chapter 11 cases seeking to recover monies owed to the Enron estate under swaps, forwards, and other derivative contracts. Recovered $2 billion for, and eliminated several billion dollars of claims against, the estate.{{ FIELD }}Represented Northwest Airlines as debtor in several adversary proceedings and contested matters related to its Chapter 11 cases, including defeating challenges to plan confirmation filed by official and ad hoc committees, achieving substantive consolidation of certain debtors, and obtaining seminal decision disallowing over $1.2 billion of claims filed by a flight attendant union on grounds that damage claims do not arise from rejection of collective bargaining agreements.{{ FIELD }}Government Investigations and Regulatory Proceedings{{ FIELD }}Defending major investment bank in FINRA action arising from research report disclosure issues.{{ FIELD }}Defending private company in NJ AG investigation.{{ FIELD }}Defended Senior Planning Services in regulatory investigation by the CT AG. Secured dismissal of investigation without any finding of wrongdoing by client.{{ FIELD }}Defended Senior Planning Services in enforcement proceeding pursued by RI Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee. Secured post-hearing ruling of dismissal.{{ FIELD }}Defended FXCM LLC in regulatory proceeding filed by the CFTC in SDNY.{{ FIELD }}Defended a public company in investigations by the CFTC, NFA and FCA.{{ FIELD }}Defended a Fortune 500 company in accounting fraud investigation by the SEC.{{ FIELD }}Defended individual in postal fraud investigation by the DOJ.{{ FIELD }}Defended several companies in state and federal government investigations involving late trading, market timing and market manipulation.{{ FIELD }}Israel Dahan focuses on high-stakes litigation matters. For over 25 years, Israel has represented public and private companies, financial institutions, corporate executives and other individuals involved in state and federal shareholder securities class actions and derivative actions, as well as in complex commercial litigation matters. He has extensive experience litigating cases involving the federal securities laws, the fiduciary obligations of corporate directors, fraud, tortious conduct and breach of contract.\nIn addition, Israel has defended debtors, secured lenders, and other creditors and individuals in bankruptcy litigation matters, including those involving claims for fraudulent conveyance, preferential transfers, equitable subordination, breach of fiduciary duty and corporate veil piercing.\nHe also has represented and advised companies involved in internal investigations, and investigations and regulatory proceedings pursued by U.S. and foreign regulators.\nIsrael has been recognized by Benchmark Litigation and Legal 500 for his work on high-profile litigation matters. Israel Dahan Partner Securities Litigation Defense  Legal 500 U.S. High-stakes litigation  Benchmark Litigation Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center Brooklyn Law School Brooklyn Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey New Jersey New York Shareholder and Securities Litigation\nDefending Fermi Inc. and the individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Defending GAP Inc. and other individual named defendants in a federal securities class action filed in EDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss. Dismissal ruling is on appeal before the Second Circuit. Defending Board of Directors of Global Brokerage, Inc. in a shareholder derivative action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Defending Board of Directors of FXCM, Inc. in a shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breaches of fiduciary duty and corporate waste. Defended Global Brokerage, Inc. and its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Defended Conduent Inc. and certain of its directors and officers in federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes in a federal securities class action and individual actions filed in SDNY alleging claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1993 and various state law claims. Obtained dismissal of the Section 10(b) and state law claims on a motion to dismiss. Defended PricewaterhouseCoopers in shareholder derivative action filed in Delaware Court of Chancery alleging claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action, with prejudice, post motion to dismiss filing. Defended FXCM, Inc., its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims, with prejudice, on a motion to dismiss; affirmed by Second Circuit. Defended Alliance MMA, Inc. and its CEO and CFO in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Defended former CEO of CTPartners in a federal securities class action filed in SDNY alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Obtained dismissal of all claims on a motion to dismiss. Defended foreign individual in a federal securities class action filed in DNJ alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Defended Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc., in a class action filed in Utah state court alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty and seeking to enjoin Sino Gas’ going-private merger transaction. Defended Deutsche Bank Securities in several private securities fraud actions involving naked short selling activities. Defended Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. in federal and state shareholder actions filed in NY and Delaware relating to its merger with JPMorgan Chase \u0026amp; Co. Defended underwriters of three offerings of securities, aggregating in excess of $3 billion, issued by The Williams Companies in a federal securities class action filed in ND Oklahoma alleging claims under Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Defended Majesco Entertainment and its officers and directors in a federal securities class action and separate shareholder derivative action filed in DNJ. Defended Group 1 Software and its Board of Directors in a shareholder class action filed in Maryland state court seeking to enjoin Group 1’s merger with Pitney Bowes. Commercial Litigation Defending The Renco Group and certain subsidiaries in action filed by Peruvian citizens in Missouri federal court alleging claims of negligence, civil conspiracy, absolute and strict liability and veil piercing. Defending Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in an action filed by a former investor in Texas federal court alleging claims of federal RICO violations, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. Defending a large commercial real estate developer in several litigations in New Jersey and New York involving foreclosure and guaranty claims on commercial loans in excess of $300 million. Representing Nitya Capital LLC, a commercial real estate investment and management firm in a New York state action against a Special Servicer alleging claims of breach of contract and wrongful conversion. Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U. and Petersen Energia, S.A.U. in a SDNY action against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements. Obtained $16 billion judgment post-trial against the Argentine Republic, the largest damages award issued in NY, and now representing clients in enforcement proceedings. Represented GEM Capital LLC, a real estate investment and management firm, in litigations in Delaware and Pennsylvania involving distressed commercial properties and loans in excess of $50 million. Represented Stonerock Capital LLC, a real estate investment and management firm, in a foreclosure and guaranty litigation filed in Florida state court involving distressed loans on two commercial office buildings in downtown Miami. Represented Novo Nordisk Inc. in DNJ action filed against U.S Department of Health and Human Services, CMS and others challenging the constitutionality and application of the prescription drug program established by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Represented Appleby Apartments L.P. in breach of contract action filed in New Jersey State Court arising from failed real estate purchase transaction. Obtained favorable settlement for client. Represented ad-hoc group of non-participating term lenders (including ICG, York Capital, Ellington, OFSI, Z Capital) of Boardriders, Inc. in breach of contract action against Boardriders and ad-hoc group of participating lenders filed in New York State Court. The action arose from defendants’ engagement in a no-pro-rata uptier transaction. Defeated motion to dismiss and obtained favorable settlement. Defended Captain Paul Watson Foundation, Captain Paul Watson and Sea Shepherd Origins in trademark infringement and trade libel action filed in Vermont federal court. Defended Senior Planning Services, largest Medicaid application assistor company, in nationwide consumer class action filed in DNJ. Obtained dismissal of complaint with prejudice. Defended Thrivest Inc. in trade secret and breach of contract action filed in New York State Court. Defended FXCM Holdings LLC in indemnification action filed in New York State Court. Obtained dismissal of action on summary judgment. Defended Forex Capital Markets LLC in consumer class actions in SDNY alleging claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and consumer fraud. Obtained voluntary dismissal of action with prejudice. Represented former owners of Major Energy LLC in fraudulent inducement and breach of contract action filed in SDNY. Defended TF Global in arbitration proceeding involving claims of breach of contract. Defended Porsche AG and Porsche Cars North America, Inc., in action filed by NJ Attorney General alleging consumer fraud claims. Defended The Renco Group and other affiliated entities in action filed by Fluor Corporation in Missouri state court alleging claims of breach of contract, tortious interference and veil piercing. Defended director of public company in SDNY action alleging claim for tortious interference with contract. Represented real estate investment companies in SDNY declaratory judgment action against Bank of China. Defended NY Giants quarterback, Eli Manning, in action filed in NJ state court alleging claims for violation of RICO and other torts. Defended Bank of America in several state and federal actions involving the repurchase of loans sold in mortgage-backed securitizations. Defended several foreign directors and officers of a U.S. public company in action filed in Delaware Chancery Court alleging claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud related to a corporate merger. Defended Ambac in breach of contract action concerning lease financing and credit default swap agreements. Represented Value Health Care, an affiliate of Omnicare, Inc., in breach of contract action filed in Connecticut state court seeking to enforce a $5 million guaranty agreement. Bankruptcy Litigation Defended Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Limited in adversary proceeding filed in the Thornburg Mortgage bankruptcy cases in Maryland seeking to avoid over $2 billion in transfers and other obligations that Thornburg made or assumed prior to bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of the federal and state constructive fraudulent transfer claims asserted by the Trustee, and favorable settlement. Defended Citibank, N.A. and its affiliates, as participants in a reserve-based first lien loan facility, in connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Sabine Oil \u0026amp; Gas Corp. Defended Deutsche Bank in connection with litigation brought by foreign representative in the Oro Negro Chapter 15 filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court. Represented Deutsche Bank in connection with its role as collateral agent for in excess of $4 billion in priority guaranty notes in In re iHeartMedia bankruptcy case filed in S.D. Tex. Represented Global Brokerage, Inc. in connection with its prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and subsequent out-of-court restructuring in SDNY Bankruptcy Court. Represented Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc. in adversary proceeding filed in SDNY Bankruptcy Court involving claims of fraudulent transfer of real property. Defeated motion to dismiss. Represented Vertis Inc. in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, including various contested matters. Successfully enjoined a third party from tortiously interfering with the debtors’ existing contractual and business relationships and obstructing the sale of the debtors’ businesses. Represented Lyondell Chemical Company in its Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Secured approval of the largest privately-financed debtor-in-possession financing package at the time, obtained an injunction against claims against non-debtor European affiliates who guaranteed claims of the debtors, and defended the debtors in numerous contested matters filed by the unsecured creditors’ committee and other individual creditors. Represented Apollo Health Street, Inc. in contested involuntary bankruptcy petition filed against Apollo by certain of the company’s creditors and obtained dismissal of the case in just three weeks. Also, represented Apollo in a separate lawsuit against the petitioning creditors and obtained significant monetary recovery for Apollo. Represented US Bank, N.A. as indenture trustee of debt issued with respect to leveraged leases of two Dynegy power generation facilities in the Dynegy Holdings LLC bankruptcy. Represented several major creditors and trading counterparties in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases and provided advice concerning the liquidation of contracts and trades involving commodities, foreign exchange, interest rate, credit default swaps and other derivative products. Defended Icahn Associates as secured lender defeating subordination and other claims in the Blockbuster chapter 11 cases. Defended Bay Harbour and affiliated funds and individuals in breach of fiduciary duty and veil piercing claims brought by the creditors committee in the Steve \u0026amp; Barry’s bankruptcy. Obtained dismissal of all claims, which was affirmed by the District Court. Represented Enron Corp. as debtor-plaintiff in more than 40 separate adversary proceedings in its Chapter 11 cases seeking to recover monies owed to the Enron estate under swaps, forwards, and other derivative contracts. Recovered $2 billion for, and eliminated several billion dollars of claims against, the estate. Represented Northwest Airlines as debtor in several adversary proceedings and contested matters related to its Chapter 11 cases, including defeating challenges to plan confirmation filed by official and ad hoc committees, achieving substantive consolidation of certain debtors, and obtaining seminal decision disallowing over $1.2 billion of claims filed by a flight attendant union on grounds that damage claims do not arise from rejection of collective bargaining agreements. Government Investigations and Regulatory Proceedings Defending major investment bank in FINRA action arising from research report disclosure issues. Defending private company in NJ AG investigation. Defended Senior Planning Services in regulatory investigation by the CT AG. Secured dismissal of investigation without any finding of wrongdoing by client. Defended Senior Planning Services in enforcement proceeding pursued by RI Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee. Secured post-hearing ruling of dismissal. Defended FXCM LLC in regulatory proceeding filed by the CFTC in SDNY. Defended a public company in investigations by the CFTC, NFA and FCA. Defended a Fortune 500 company in accounting fraud investigation by the SEC. Defended individual in postal fraud investigation by the DOJ. Defended several companies in state and federal government investigations involving late trading, market timing and market manipulation.","searchable_name":"Israel Dahan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445859,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7310,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eIP litigation\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003espanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ahtoosa-dale","email":"adale@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePatent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;issues, the case settled days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFreshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSieler v. Atieva Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMatch Group v. Muzmatch Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd\u0026rsquo;s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRanieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dale","nick_name":"Ahtoosa","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas","years_held":"2016 - 2017"}],"first_name":"Ahtoosa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":181,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Intellectual Property Law","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2026"},{"title":"“Best Lawyers Under 40”","detail":"D Magazine, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized within the Top 250","detail":"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eIP litigation\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003espanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePatent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;issues, the case settled days before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFreshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSieler v. Atieva Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMatch Group v. Muzmatch Limited\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd\u0026rsquo;s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney\u0026rsquo;s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRanieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Intellectual Property Law","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Patent Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2026"},{"title":"“Best Lawyers Under 40”","detail":"D Magazine, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized within the Top 250","detail":"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13342}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-16T15:51:41.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-16T15:51:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Dale{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Patent Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property – Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Best Lawyers Under 40”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"D Magazine, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized within the Top 250\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Patent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\nTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. (W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement.{{ FIELD }}Hardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and Daubert issues, the case settled days before trial.{{ FIELD }}Freshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC (D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled.{{ FIELD }}Sieler v. Atieva Inc. (N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva.{{ FIELD }}Match Group v. Muzmatch Limited (W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution.{{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation and Other Matters\nUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al. (FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party’s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd’s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney’s fees to Unbnd for the appeal.{{ FIELD }}Ranieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al. (N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.{{ FIELD }}Ahtoosa Dale is a trial lawyer with a focus on patent litigation and complex disputes. She combines her technical and legal training to focus on IP litigation spanning multiple technologies and business disputes spanning various industries. \nAhtoosa focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation in various industries and IP litigation across differing technologies. She advises industry-leading clients on intricate business matters and IP-related issues across a broad spectrum of technologies, such as computer systems and architectures, virtual systems, mobile applications, networking, and medical devices. She also has experience representing corporations and individuals in business matters including intellectual property, employment and business disputes, class actions, consumer privacy, and product liability. \nAhtoosa has been a team member in several trials. Her courtroom and stand-up experience span multiple venues, as she has significant experience arguing hearings in both trial court and arbitration settings, taking and defending witnesses at depositions, preparing witnesses to give testimony at trials and hearings, drafting substantive briefs in both trial and appellate court, and putting on and cross-examining witnesses at trial. She also spent three months on loan as an assistant district attorney in Dallas County, where she tried numerous criminal jury trials to verdict. Early in her career, she served as second chair in a civil pro bono trial in federal court, representing and successfully obtaining all requested relief on behalf of an inmate in Texas state prison related to his ability to practice certain religious tenets while imprisoned.\nPrior to joining the firm, Ahtoosa served as a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson for the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas. She has undergraduate degrees in computer engineering and mathematics and has experience as a software developer for hospital e-documentation applications. Ahtoosa has a working knowledge of C++, Java, C#, and XML. Partner Intellectual Property Law Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 Patent Litigation Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 Intellectual Property – Litigation Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch®, 2026 40 \u0026amp; Under Benchmark Litigation, 2026 “Best Lawyers Under 40” D Magazine, 2025 Recognized within the Top 250 Patexia’s Patent Litigation Report, 2025 Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law Baylor University Baylor University School of Law Texas Member, Dallas Bar Association Programming Co-Chair, ChIPs USPTO Chapter Member, Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn American Inn of Court, 2022-2024 Member, Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Judicial Clerk, Honorable Kimberly Priest Johnson, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Patent, Trade Secret, and Other Intellectual Property Litigation\nTMT Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. (W.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for defendant Medtronic in a patent infringement suit relating to a patent on a design for an abdominal aortic aneurysm stent graft. The trial resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, but post-trial, Ahtoosa and her team at Winston were able to get a new favorable claim construction ruling that resulted in a stipulation of noninfringement. Hardin et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) Trial counsel for Ryan Hardin and Andrew Hill, inventors on a patent related to geofencing technology, in a patent infringement suit brought against Samsung. After prevailing for the inventors on key claim construction, summary judgment, and Daubert issues, the case settled days before trial. Freshworks v. LiveHelpNow, LLC (D. Del.) Counsel for Freshworks in a declaratory judgment action filed against LiveHelpNow, LLC involving patents related to chat software. After extensive disputes relating to venue, including a parallel action filed in the Western District of Texas, the case settled. Sieler v. Atieva Inc. (N.D. Cal.) Counsel for Atieva Inc. in a patent inventorship dispute with a former employee, which also included counterclaims for breach of contract, among others. Case settled shortly before trial after summary judgment motions filed by Atieva. Match Group v. Muzmatch Limited (W.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant in a case involving claims of trademark infringement, patent infringement, trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition. After extensive motion to dismiss briefing, the parties reached a resolution. Commercial Litigation and Other Matters\nUnbnd Group Pty Ltd. v. Park Lane, LLC et al. (FINRA Arbitration and S.D.N.Y.) Trial counsel in a FINRA arbitration involving contractual and business tort claims, where opposing party sought approximately US$3 million in damages from client Unbnd and sought significant equitable relief in the form of equity in the company. After a six-day evidentiary hearing, the FINRA arbitration panel rejected the opposing party’s request for more than US$3M and agreed with Unbnd’s position on equity in the company. The Southern District of New York confirmed the award on appeal, and awarded attorney’s fees to Unbnd for the appeal. Ranieri et al. v. AdvoCare International LP et al. (N.D. Tex.) Counsel for defendant AdvoCare in a class action lawsuit involving pyramid scheme allegations and claims of RICO violations, securities laws violations, and others. Hundreds of millions of dollars were at issue. Won multiple motions to dismiss, including getting the RICO claims dismissed. Class settlement was reached during class discovery.","searchable_name":"Ahtoosa A. Dale","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426320,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2435,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amina-dammann","email":"adammann@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1303,"guid":"1303.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dammann","nick_name":"Amina","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amina","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":196,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.\u0026nbsp; She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.\u0026nbsp; Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.\u0026nbsp; Amina \u0026nbsp;holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications and Awards\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eVacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact\u003c/em\u003e, 27 Review of Litigation 441\u0026ndash;512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026nbsp; Die Beschwerdekammern der europ\u0026auml;ischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eAmina Dammann\u0026rsquo;s experience includes the following matters:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"Base\"\u003eRepresented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eS3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eRepresentation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al.\u003c/em\u003e Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMicrochip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e(and related cases).\u0026nbsp; Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eJD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOccidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKing Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAlpharma Inc. v. Wyeth\u003c/em\u003e: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma\u0026rsquo;s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4206}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:54.000Z","searchable_text":"Dammann{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters:{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board;{{ FIELD }}Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards;{{ FIELD }}Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch;{{ FIELD }}S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware;{{ FIELD }}Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery;{{ FIELD }}Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia;{{ FIELD }}Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement;{{ FIELD }}Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas;{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana;{{ FIELD }}JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts.{{ FIELD }}Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana.{{ FIELD }}AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division).{{ FIELD }}King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware.{{ FIELD }}Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska.{{ FIELD }}Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.{{ FIELD }}Amina Dammann specializes in environmental law and litigation.  She has extensive experience representing multinational corporations in the automotive, energy and pharma sectors.  Her practice includes defending clients in governmental investigations and enforcement actions, as well as in federal and state court litigation.\nAmina has many years of experience representing German and U.S. blue chip companies in both U.S. and German proceedings, as well as in transnational matters. A particular focus of her practice is on advising German companies facing litigation or governmental investigations in the United States. This includes representing German clients before U.S. agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB); it also involves coordinating parallel proceedings in the United States and Germany.  Amina  holds U.S. degrees from Harvard and Texas and has also obtained the two German state exams in law as well as a doctorate in law from Frankfurt University. \nPublications and Awards\n•   Vacating Arbitration Awards for Mistake of Fact, 27 Review of Litigation 441–512 (2008); honored with the Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins LLP Outstanding Note Award\n•  Die Beschwerdekammern der europäischen Agenturen [The Boards of Appeal of the European Agencies], Peter Lang, 2004; honored with the Baker \u0026amp; McKenzie Award for best dissertation in the area of business law Partner Frankfurt University  The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School Texas Federal Republic of Germany Amina Dammann’s experience includes the following matters: Represented German car manufacturer in environmental enforcement action before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board; Represented German car manufacturer in litigation and governmental investigations regarding disputes over diesel emissions standards; Represented New General Motors in litigation relating to ignition switch; S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. v. ATI Technologies ULC, et al.  Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd., et al. Representation of AMD in patent ownership dispute, filed in the District of Delaware; Represented Chevron in litigation arising out of an explosion at a refinery; Represented oil refinery owner in arbitration dispute arising out of a refinery construction project in Colombia; Represented global wind farm developer in arbitration dispute arising out of a long-term turbine service agreement; Keranos, LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., et al. Representation of Microchip and other defendants in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, filed in the Eastern District of Texas; Microchip Technology Inc. et al. v. United Module Corp. et al.(and related cases).  Representation of Microchip, Silicon Storage Technology and other declaratory judgment plaintiffs in patent infringement suit involving memory cell technology, pending in the Eastern District of Texas; Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.: Representation of Occidental in litigation to assert rights of qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana; JD Wind et al. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al.: Representation of Occidental in state and federal litigation involving the appropriate electric rate that must be paid to wind-generating facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act and implementing regulations, filed in Texas state and federal courts. Occidental Chemical Corp. v. Entergy Louisiana LLC and the Louisiana Public Service Commission: Representation of Occidental involving the proper methodology for calculating avoided cost payments to qualifying facilities under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, filed in the Middle District of Louisiana. AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture et al. v. CEMEX Construction Material Florida, LLC: Representation of CEMEX in a lawsuit concerning a plant construction with multi-million dollar cost overrun and construction delays, filed in Florida state court (Business Court Division). King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Intelliject, Inc.: Representation of patent holder in a paragraph IV patent infringement lawsuit regarding auto-injector technology, filed in the District of Delaware. Pennfield Oil Company d/b/a Pennfield Animal Health v. Alpharma Inc.: Representation of Alpharma in a false advertising action arising from Alpharma advertisements that report the results of pharmaceutical research studies, filed in the District of Nebraska. Alpharma Inc. v. Wyeth: Representation of Alpharma in a lawsuit regarding the breach of a trademark license agreement and the infringement of Alpharma’s trademarks, filed in the Southern District of New York.","searchable_name":"Amina S. Dammann","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":196,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":431252,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3550,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMr. Dawson focuses on complex commercial litigation, including matters involving contract and technology licensing disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets, fraud, and related commercial torts.\u0026nbsp; He has substantial experience defending class actions and multi-plaintiff mass actions.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Dawson represents both early-stage ventures and Fortune 500 companies in the healthcare, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical-device industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Dawson served as law clerk to the Honorable John T. Copenhaver, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Intractable Obscenity Problem 2.0: The Emerging Circuit Split as to the Constitutionality of \"Local Community Standards\" Online, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 719 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"matthew-dawson","email":"mdawson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dawson","nick_name":"Matthew","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, The Honorable John T. Copenhaver, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia","years_held":"2012-2013"},{"name":"Intern, The Honorable Ricardo M. Urbina, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","years_held":"2011"}],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":350,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Editor in Chief, Volume 61","detail":"Catholic University Law Review"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMr. Dawson focuses on complex commercial litigation, including matters involving contract and technology licensing disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets, fraud, and related commercial torts.\u0026nbsp; He has substantial experience defending class actions and multi-plaintiff mass actions.\u0026nbsp; Mr. Dawson represents both early-stage ventures and Fortune 500 companies in the healthcare, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical-device industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Dawson served as law clerk to the Honorable John T. Copenhaver, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Intractable Obscenity Problem 2.0: The Emerging Circuit Split as to the Constitutionality of \"Local Community Standards\" Online, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 719 (2011).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Editor in Chief, Volume 61","detail":"Catholic University Law Review"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10342}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-07-03T04:53:44.000Z","updated_at":"2025-07-03T04:53:44.000Z","searchable_text":"Dawson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editor in Chief, Volume 61\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Catholic University Law Review\"}{{ FIELD }}Mr. Dawson focuses on complex commercial litigation, including matters involving contract and technology licensing disputes, misappropriation of trade secrets, fraud, and related commercial torts.  He has substantial experience defending class actions and multi-plaintiff mass actions.  Mr. Dawson represents both early-stage ventures and Fortune 500 companies in the healthcare, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical-device industries.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mr. Dawson served as law clerk to the Honorable John T. Copenhaver, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.\nPublications\n\nThe Intractable Obscenity Problem 2.0: The Emerging Circuit Split as to the Constitutionality of \"Local Community Standards\" Online, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 719 (2011).\n Partner Editor in Chief, Volume 61 Catholic University Law Review Davidson College  Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Maryland Judicial Clerk, The Honorable John T. Copenhaver, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Intern, The Honorable Ricardo M. Urbina, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia","searchable_name":"Matthew H. Dawson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426474,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3794,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam Diamant\u0026nbsp;represents\u0026nbsp;companies in high-stakes commercial disputes, including matters involving technology license disputes, false advertising, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty and various other business torts. \u0026nbsp;He has represented Fortune 500 and emerging companies alike in the technology, life sciences, financial services, and energy\u0026nbsp;industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Sam served as law clerk to United States Bankruptcy Judge William J. Lafferty in the Northern District of California. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"samuel-diamant","email":"sdiamant@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":502,"guid":"502.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Diamant","nick_name":"Sam","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, William J. Lafferty, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California","years_held":"2012-2014"}],"first_name":"Samuel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2266,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top 40 Under 40","detail":"Daily Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Northern California Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2021-2025"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam Diamant\u0026nbsp;represents\u0026nbsp;companies in high-stakes commercial disputes, including matters involving technology license disputes, false advertising, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty and various other business torts. \u0026nbsp;He has represented Fortune 500 and emerging companies alike in the technology, life sciences, financial services, and energy\u0026nbsp;industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Sam served as law clerk to United States Bankruptcy Judge William J. Lafferty in the Northern District of California. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Top 40 Under 40","detail":"Daily Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Northern California Rising Star","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2021-2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":819}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:36.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:36.000Z","searchable_text":"Diamant{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 40 Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Northern California Rising Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2021-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Sam Diamant represents companies in high-stakes commercial disputes, including matters involving technology license disputes, false advertising, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty and various other business torts.  He has represented Fortune 500 and emerging companies alike in the technology, life sciences, financial services, and energy industries.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Sam served as law clerk to United States Bankruptcy Judge William J. Lafferty in the Northern District of California.   Partner Top 40 Under 40 Daily Journal, 2024 Northern California Rising Star Super Lawyers, 2021-2025 Davidson College  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California Law Clerk, William J. Lafferty, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California","searchable_name":"Samuel R. Diamant (Sam)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445683,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7313,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAs a seasoned first-chair trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor, Tinos Diamantatos is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, one of the premier, invitation-only legal associations in North America. He is ranked in \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e and noted as \u0026ldquo;an outstanding trial lawyer\u0026rdquo; who is \u0026ldquo;a creative, forceful and tireless advocate\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;tremendous for clients and a good counselor.\u0026rdquo; He is listed in 2026 \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e 500 Leading Litigators in America, is listed in \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for White-Collar Criminal Defense, and is recognized and recommended for dispute resolution, corporate investigations, and white-collar defense by the \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eUS\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos is a premier courtroom advocate and trusted strategic advisor to corporations, boards, C-suites, senior executives, and individuals in their most consequential criminal, regulatory, and complex business litigation. This includes general litigation matters related to government investigations, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation, government and internal investigations, and securities enforcement proceedings. He is recognized for leading high-stakes white-collar government enforcement, and complex commercial matters where the margin for error is zero and the cost of failure is existential.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eListed as one of \u003cem\u003eCrain\u0026rsquo;s Chicago Business\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ldquo;Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys\u0026rdquo; for 2023, Tinos has tried more than 20 cases and achieved an outstanding record of success at trial. Tinos\u0026rsquo; trial representations span jurisdictions in both federal and state courts throughout the United States and have involved complex civil and criminal matters. Included among his trial successes are two separate trial wins for a Fortune 10 company.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos\u0026rsquo; representations span several industry sectors, including the retail, pharmaceutical, healthcare, pharmacy, medical device, and financial services industries. He has handled investigations, the defense, and prosecutions of matters involving alleged healthcare fraud, commodities fraud, mortgage fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and tax evasion. He has also handled other complex matters involving terrorism, racketeering, extortion, corruption, obstruction, and civil rights violations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos has been trusted by Fortune 500 companies, industry-leading pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, retail pharmacy chains, financial institutions, privately held businesses, and individuals in matters of utmost importance. He helps clients navigate government investigations, regulatory minefields, and related white collar litigation throughout the United States and around the world.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Tinos was a partner at an AmLaw 25 firm where he served as the Chicago office managing partner and as co-head of that firm\u0026rsquo;s global white collar and government investigations practice group. Before joining private practice, Tinos served as a federal prosecutor at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Chicago where he successfully handled high-profile cases and trials that received national and international media attention. He also successfully served as lead appellate counsel representing the government on nine appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second and Seventh Circuits. He served in a number of sections within the Chicago U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, including the Financial Crimes and Special Prosecutions Section, and the office\u0026rsquo;s Public Corruption and Organized Crime Section, where he completed his career as a prosecutor.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos is also a former federal judicial law clerk and a former president of the prestigious Chicago Inn of Court.\u0026nbsp;He maintains an active pro bono practice and is involved in multiple mentoring initiatives.\u0026nbsp;He is a former member of the John Marshall Law School Board of Trustees and has served as an adjunct trial advocacy professor for the law school, where he has coached many successful trial teams competing at the national level. He teaches, by invitation, law enforcement courses on trial techniques and investigative tactics to federal agents at their national training centers.\u0026nbsp;In 2025, the Hellenic Bar Association recognized him with its \u0026ldquo;Lawyer of the Year\u0026rdquo; Award.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"tinos-diamantatos","email":"tdiamantatos@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a major financial institution in a class action involving allegations related to purported violations of state statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a publicly traded corporation in the managed services industry against allegations of contract fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act/Qui Tam Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending pharmaceutical companies in federal district court and state court in an action brought by a government entity alleging improper marketing of opioids. Recently successfully obtained dismissal of action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending ongoing FCA litigation for a national healthcare provider in federal district court following Department of Justice intervention on allegations related to improper physician billing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended pharmaceutical companies in multiple government investigations involving allegations related to off-label promotion and marketing practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with a Department of Justice inquiry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting multiple individual physicians in connection with various federal investigations of alleged healthcare fraud and improper billing practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an individual in a Department of Justice investigation into allegations of fraud and corruption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities Fraud\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a medical device manufacturer in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement proceeding.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented individual under investigation for alleged insider trading. Matter recently closed by the Securities and Exchange Commission with no adverse action taken.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation for multi-national corporation stemming from alleged violations of money laundering, structuring, and related financial reporting requirements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a variety of internal investigations of potential abuse and procurement fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled clients on FCPA issues and compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1142,"guid":"1142.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1715,"guid":"1715.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Diamantatos","nick_name":"Tinos","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Northern District of Illinois","years_held":"2004 - 2005"}],"first_name":"Tinos","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":176,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Fellow","detail":"American College of Trial Lawyers"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Illinois Lawyer of the Year","detail":"Hellenic Bar Association, 2025"},{"title":"Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business (2023)"},{"title":"Recognized for Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Chicago","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, (2023–2025)"},{"title":"Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations – Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2021–2025)"},{"title":"Up and Coming, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations – Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2020)"},{"title":"Dispute resolution: Corporate investigations and white-collar criminal defense","detail":"The Legal 500 US (2016, 2018–2025)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAs a seasoned first-chair trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor, Tinos Diamantatos is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, one of the premier, invitation-only legal associations in North America. He is ranked in \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e and noted as \u0026ldquo;an outstanding trial lawyer\u0026rdquo; who is \u0026ldquo;a creative, forceful and tireless advocate\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;tremendous for clients and a good counselor.\u0026rdquo; He is listed in 2026 \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e 500 Leading Litigators in America, is listed in \u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e for White-Collar Criminal Defense, and is recognized and recommended for dispute resolution, corporate investigations, and white-collar defense by the \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eUS\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos is a premier courtroom advocate and trusted strategic advisor to corporations, boards, C-suites, senior executives, and individuals in their most consequential criminal, regulatory, and complex business litigation. This includes general litigation matters related to government investigations, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e litigation, government and internal investigations, and securities enforcement proceedings. He is recognized for leading high-stakes white-collar government enforcement, and complex commercial matters where the margin for error is zero and the cost of failure is existential.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eListed as one of \u003cem\u003eCrain\u0026rsquo;s Chicago Business\u003c/em\u003e \u0026ldquo;Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys\u0026rdquo; for 2023, Tinos has tried more than 20 cases and achieved an outstanding record of success at trial. Tinos\u0026rsquo; trial representations span jurisdictions in both federal and state courts throughout the United States and have involved complex civil and criminal matters. Included among his trial successes are two separate trial wins for a Fortune 10 company.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos\u0026rsquo; representations span several industry sectors, including the retail, pharmaceutical, healthcare, pharmacy, medical device, and financial services industries. He has handled investigations, the defense, and prosecutions of matters involving alleged healthcare fraud, commodities fraud, mortgage fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and tax evasion. He has also handled other complex matters involving terrorism, racketeering, extortion, corruption, obstruction, and civil rights violations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos has been trusted by Fortune 500 companies, industry-leading pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, retail pharmacy chains, financial institutions, privately held businesses, and individuals in matters of utmost importance. He helps clients navigate government investigations, regulatory minefields, and related white collar litigation throughout the United States and around the world.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Tinos was a partner at an AmLaw 25 firm where he served as the Chicago office managing partner and as co-head of that firm\u0026rsquo;s global white collar and government investigations practice group. Before joining private practice, Tinos served as a federal prosecutor at the U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office in Chicago where he successfully handled high-profile cases and trials that received national and international media attention. He also successfully served as lead appellate counsel representing the government on nine appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second and Seventh Circuits. He served in a number of sections within the Chicago U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office, including the Financial Crimes and Special Prosecutions Section, and the office\u0026rsquo;s Public Corruption and Organized Crime Section, where he completed his career as a prosecutor.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTinos is also a former federal judicial law clerk and a former president of the prestigious Chicago Inn of Court.\u0026nbsp;He maintains an active pro bono practice and is involved in multiple mentoring initiatives.\u0026nbsp;He is a former member of the John Marshall Law School Board of Trustees and has served as an adjunct trial advocacy professor for the law school, where he has coached many successful trial teams competing at the national level. He teaches, by invitation, law enforcement courses on trial techniques and investigative tactics to federal agents at their national training centers.\u0026nbsp;In 2025, the Hellenic Bar Association recognized him with its \u0026ldquo;Lawyer of the Year\u0026rdquo; Award.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a major financial institution in a class action involving allegations related to purported violations of state statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a publicly traded corporation in the managed services industry against allegations of contract fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act/Qui Tam Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending pharmaceutical companies in federal district court and state court in an action brought by a government entity alleging improper marketing of opioids. Recently successfully obtained dismissal of action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending ongoing FCA litigation for a national healthcare provider in federal district court following Department of Justice intervention on allegations related to improper physician billing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended pharmaceutical companies in multiple government investigations involving allegations related to off-label promotion and marketing practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large financial institution in connection with a Department of Justice inquiry.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting multiple individual physicians in connection with various federal investigations of alleged healthcare fraud and improper billing practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an individual in a Department of Justice investigation into allegations of fraud and corruption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities Fraud\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a medical device manufacturer in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement proceeding.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented individual under investigation for alleged insider trading. Matter recently closed by the Securities and Exchange Commission with no adverse action taken.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInternal Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation for multi-national corporation stemming from alleged violations of money laundering, structuring, and related financial reporting requirements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted a variety of internal investigations of potential abuse and procurement fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounseled clients on FCPA issues and compliance programs.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Fellow","detail":"American College of Trial Lawyers"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Illinois Lawyer of the Year","detail":"Hellenic Bar Association, 2025"},{"title":"Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys","detail":"Crain’s Chicago Business (2023)"},{"title":"Recognized for Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Chicago","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, (2023–2025)"},{"title":"Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations – Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2021–2025)"},{"title":"Up and Coming, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations – Illinois","detail":"Chambers USA (2020)"},{"title":"Dispute resolution: Corporate investigations and white-collar criminal defense","detail":"The Legal 500 US (2016, 2018–2025)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13354}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-09T16:03:46.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-09T16:03:46.000Z","searchable_text":"Diamantatos{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Fellow\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American College of Trial Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Illinois Lawyer of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Hellenic Bar Association, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain’s Chicago Business (2023)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Chicago\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, (2023–2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations – Illinois\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2021–2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Up and Coming, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations – Illinois\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2020)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Dispute resolution: Corporate investigations and white-collar criminal defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US (2016, 2018–2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation{{ FIELD }}Defending a major financial institution in a class action involving allegations related to purported violations of state statutes.{{ FIELD }}Defending a publicly traded corporation in the managed services industry against allegations of contract fraud.{{ FIELD }}False Claims Act/Qui Tam Litigation{{ FIELD }}Defending pharmaceutical companies in federal district court and state court in an action brought by a government entity alleging improper marketing of opioids. Recently successfully obtained dismissal of action.{{ FIELD }}Defending ongoing FCA litigation for a national healthcare provider in federal district court following Department of Justice intervention on allegations related to improper physician billing.{{ FIELD }}Defended pharmaceutical companies in multiple government investigations involving allegations related to off-label promotion and marketing practices.{{ FIELD }}Criminal Investigations{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with a Department of Justice inquiry.{{ FIELD }}Representing multiple individual physicians in connection with various federal investigations of alleged healthcare fraud and improper billing practices.{{ FIELD }}Representing an individual in a Department of Justice investigation into allegations of fraud and corruption.{{ FIELD }}Securities Fraud{{ FIELD }}Representing a medical device manufacturer in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement proceeding.{{ FIELD }}Represented individual under investigation for alleged insider trading. Matter recently closed by the Securities and Exchange Commission with no adverse action taken.{{ FIELD }}Internal Investigations{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal investigation for multi-national corporation stemming from alleged violations of money laundering, structuring, and related financial reporting requirements.{{ FIELD }}Conducted a variety of internal investigations of potential abuse and procurement fraud.{{ FIELD }}Counseled clients on FCPA issues and compliance programs.{{ FIELD }}As a seasoned first-chair trial lawyer and former federal prosecutor, Tinos Diamantatos is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, one of the premier, invitation-only legal associations in North America. He is ranked in Chambers USA and noted as “an outstanding trial lawyer” who is “a creative, forceful and tireless advocate” and “tremendous for clients and a good counselor.” He is listed in 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Litigators in America, is listed in The Best Lawyers in America for White-Collar Criminal Defense, and is recognized and recommended for dispute resolution, corporate investigations, and white-collar defense by the Legal 500 US.\nTinos is a premier courtroom advocate and trusted strategic advisor to corporations, boards, C-suites, senior executives, and individuals in their most consequential criminal, regulatory, and complex business litigation. This includes general litigation matters related to government investigations, qui tam litigation, government and internal investigations, and securities enforcement proceedings. He is recognized for leading high-stakes white-collar government enforcement, and complex commercial matters where the margin for error is zero and the cost of failure is existential. \nListed as one of Crain’s Chicago Business “Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys” for 2023, Tinos has tried more than 20 cases and achieved an outstanding record of success at trial. Tinos’ trial representations span jurisdictions in both federal and state courts throughout the United States and have involved complex civil and criminal matters. Included among his trial successes are two separate trial wins for a Fortune 10 company.\nTinos’ representations span several industry sectors, including the retail, pharmaceutical, healthcare, pharmacy, medical device, and financial services industries. He has handled investigations, the defense, and prosecutions of matters involving alleged healthcare fraud, commodities fraud, mortgage fraud, money laundering, bank fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and tax evasion. He has also handled other complex matters involving terrorism, racketeering, extortion, corruption, obstruction, and civil rights violations.\nTinos has been trusted by Fortune 500 companies, industry-leading pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, retail pharmacy chains, financial institutions, privately held businesses, and individuals in matters of utmost importance. He helps clients navigate government investigations, regulatory minefields, and related white collar litigation throughout the United States and around the world.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Tinos was a partner at an AmLaw 25 firm where he served as the Chicago office managing partner and as co-head of that firm’s global white collar and government investigations practice group. Before joining private practice, Tinos served as a federal prosecutor at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago where he successfully handled high-profile cases and trials that received national and international media attention. He also successfully served as lead appellate counsel representing the government on nine appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second and Seventh Circuits. He served in a number of sections within the Chicago U.S. Attorney’s Office, including the Financial Crimes and Special Prosecutions Section, and the office’s Public Corruption and Organized Crime Section, where he completed his career as a prosecutor.\nTinos is also a former federal judicial law clerk and a former president of the prestigious Chicago Inn of Court. He maintains an active pro bono practice and is involved in multiple mentoring initiatives. He is a former member of the John Marshall Law School Board of Trustees and has served as an adjunct trial advocacy professor for the law school, where he has coached many successful trial teams competing at the national level. He teaches, by invitation, law enforcement courses on trial techniques and investigative tactics to federal agents at their national training centers. In 2025, the Hellenic Bar Association recognized him with its “Lawyer of the Year” Award. Partner Fellow American College of Trial Lawyers 500 Leading Litigators in America Lawdragon, 2026 Illinois Lawyer of the Year Hellenic Bar Association, 2025 Notable Litigators and Trial Attorneys Crain’s Chicago Business (2023) Recognized for Criminal Defense: White-Collar, Chicago The Best Lawyers in America, (2023–2025) Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations – Illinois Chambers USA (2021–2025) Up and Coming, Litigation: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations – Illinois Chambers USA (2020) Dispute resolution: Corporate investigations and white-collar criminal defense The Legal 500 US (2016, 2018–2025) DePaul University DePaul University College of Law The John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Illinois Member, American Bar Association Member, Federal Bar Association Member, Chicago Bar Association President, Chicago Inn of Court (2017–2018) Member, Seventh Circuit Bar Association Member, Hellenic Bar Association Member, The John Marshall Law School Board of Trustees Member, Order of John Marshall Law Clerk, Judge Charles P. Kocoras, Northern District of Illinois Commercial Litigation Defending a major financial institution in a class action involving allegations related to purported violations of state statutes. Defending a publicly traded corporation in the managed services industry against allegations of contract fraud. False Claims Act/Qui Tam Litigation Defending pharmaceutical companies in federal district court and state court in an action brought by a government entity alleging improper marketing of opioids. Recently successfully obtained dismissal of action. Defending ongoing FCA litigation for a national healthcare provider in federal district court following Department of Justice intervention on allegations related to improper physician billing. Defended pharmaceutical companies in multiple government investigations involving allegations related to off-label promotion and marketing practices. Criminal Investigations Representing a large financial institution in connection with a Department of Justice inquiry. Representing multiple individual physicians in connection with various federal investigations of alleged healthcare fraud and improper billing practices. Representing an individual in a Department of Justice investigation into allegations of fraud and corruption. Securities Fraud Representing a medical device manufacturer in connection with a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement proceeding. Represented individual under investigation for alleged insider trading. Matter recently closed by the Securities and Exchange Commission with no adverse action taken. Internal Investigations Conducted an internal investigation for multi-national corporation stemming from alleged violations of money laundering, structuring, and related financial reporting requirements. Conducted a variety of internal investigations of potential abuse and procurement fraud. Counseled clients on FCPA issues and compliance programs.","searchable_name":"Tinos Diamantatos","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":176,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444013,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7224,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWith 15 years of experience, Amadou\u0026rsquo;s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou\u0026rsquo;s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amadou-diaw","email":"adiaw@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., \u003c/em\u003eCase No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al\u003c/em\u003e., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEasyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Diaw","nick_name":"Amadou","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amadou","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Kilkenny","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star in DC","detail":"National Law Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage ","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present"},{"title":"Outstanding Achievement Award","detail":"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/akd44/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eWith 15 years of experience, Amadou\u0026rsquo;s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou\u0026rsquo;s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou\u0026rsquo;s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., \u003c/em\u003eCase No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al\u003c/em\u003e., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWeb 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEasyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Rising Star in DC","detail":"National Law Journal, 2024"},{"title":"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage ","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2024"},{"title":"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present"},{"title":"Outstanding Achievement Award","detail":"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12964}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:42.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:42.000Z","searchable_text":"Diaw{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star in DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"National Law Journal, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2017-Present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Outstanding Achievement Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs\"}{{ FIELD }}PRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., Case No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation.{{ FIELD }}AudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd., Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology.{{ FIELD }}In the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology.{{ FIELD }}TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology.{{ FIELD }}Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.{{ FIELD }}Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration.{{ FIELD }}Easyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.{{ FIELD }}With 15 years of experience, Amadou’s practice focusses on patent and trade secret litigation matters for innovative technology companies. Amadou’s clients span numerous industries in the technology sector including data analytics, AI, cloud computing, cryptocurrency, search engine, web accessibility, wireless networking, finance, consumer products, and apparel. Amadou’s clients span the full spectrum of the corporate lifecycle from Fortune 100 companies to C-suite executives to individual founders and startups. Amadou is acutely aware of the unique needs of clients at different stages of their corporate trajectory and tailors his approach to each matter with this in mind. \nAmadou’s experience spans all stages of litigation, arbitration, and mediation through trial and other contested proceeding. He has extensive experience in numerous jurisdictions across the country including federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, the PTAB, and various arbitration tribunals. Amadou leverages his deep experience across numerous jurisdictions to develop holistic approaches for clients involved in complex multi-faceted litigations.\nFor startup and earlier stage clients, Amadou serves as a strategic advisor on key intellectual property issues like freedom to operate, brand protection, patent portfolio development, trade secret protection, and licensing matters.\nAmadou also counsels clients on a range of strategic IP dispute issues related to risk avoidance, mergers and acquisitions and other transactional matters.\nAmadou routinely presents continuing legal education programs to clients on a broad array of issues related to IP, equity and inclusion in the legal profession and welcomes the opportunity to interface with clients through this programming. He is committed to civic engagement and has over a decade of experience serving on non-profit boards.\nIn recognition of his dedication to client service, the National Law Journal recognized Amadou as a Rising Star in 2024. In 2024, Amadou was also recognized by the Legal 500 US as recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage. Super Lawyers has recognized Amadou as a Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Litigator each year since 2017. Partner Rising Star in DC National Law Journal, 2024 Recognized Amadou as a recommended Lawyer for his work in Patent Litigation: Full Coverage  Legal 500 US, 2024 Rising Star and Top-Rated Intellectual Property Attorney in DC Super Lawyers, 2017-Present Outstanding Achievement Award Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Georgetown University  University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Maryland State Bar Association National Bar Association Washington D.C. Bar Association Intellectual Property Owners Association Board of Strength in Numbers DC, Board Member Georgetown University’s Hoya Hoop Club, Secretary of the Board of Directors Hoyas Unlimited, At-Large Board Member University of Virginia School of Law Foundation, Class Agent PRCM Advisers LLC, et al. v. Two Harbors Investment Corp., Case No. 20-cv-5649 (S.D.N.Y.) Representing Two Harbors Investment Corporation in a multi-faceted dispute involving claims for trade secret misappropriation. AudioEye, Inc. v. accessiBe Ltd., Case No. 6:20-cv-997 (W.D. Tex.) Represented accessiBe in patent infringement litigation related to web accessibility technology. In the Matter of Certain Computing Devices Utilizing Indexed Search Systems and Components Thereof, case number 337-TA-1389 represented the complainant X1 Discovery in a patent infringement litigation related to the use of certain index-based search technology. TQ Delta, LLC v. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-310 (E.D. Tex.) Represented CommScope in patent infringement litigation related to certain signal impulse noise control and modulation technology. Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk Inc., Case No. 1:23-cv-00105 (D. Del.) Represented Zendesk in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration. Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. 37signals LLC., d/b/a Basecamp, Case No. 1:23-cv-230 (N.D. Ill.) Represented Basecamp in a patent infringement litigation related to cybersecurity techniques used in connection with online document collaboration. Easyweb Innovations LLC v. Bitpay Inc., Case No. 1:24-cv-8582 (S.D.N.Y.) Represented BitPay in patent infringement litigation related to two-factor authentication technology.","searchable_name":"Amadou Kilkenny Diaw","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426835,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5832,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Donovan litigates\u0026nbsp;complex commercial disputes principally on behalf of large financial institutions and insurers.\u0026nbsp; He has worked extensively on both the plaintiff and defense side\u0026nbsp;in state and federal court, with a focus on antitrust, market manipulation, and general commercial and contractual disputes.\u0026nbsp; Many of these disputes have been\u0026nbsp;the subject of large class actions and multidistrict litigation proceedings.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian also maintains an active government investigations practice\u0026nbsp;and has represented clients in the financial services sector in investigations by state and federal regulators, including the SEC, Federal Reserve Board, state financial services regulators, and state attorneys general.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-donovan","email":"bdonovan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged manipulation of gold, silver, and platinum/palladium benchmarks, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a government investigation into its ESG-related financing, investing, and advisory activity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econsultant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with bank failures caused by rising interest rates.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation arising out of the servicing of its residential mortgage loan portfolio.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einsurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a coverage-related dispute with a governmental agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einsurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation relating to cost of insurance (\u0026ldquo;COI\u0026rdquo;) rates.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emetals and chemical producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with mass tort litigation arising out of injuries allegedly caused by a smelter in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproperty and building owners\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation challenging the constitutionality of New York City emissions law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor entertainment venue\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute concerning access to the venue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor healthcare system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a contractual dispute with a healthcare provider.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Donovan","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Frank P. Geraci, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York","years_held":"2015 - 2016"}],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":512,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-donovan-823a4a86/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Donovan litigates\u0026nbsp;complex commercial disputes principally on behalf of large financial institutions and insurers.\u0026nbsp; He has worked extensively on both the plaintiff and defense side\u0026nbsp;in state and federal court, with a focus on antitrust, market manipulation, and general commercial and contractual disputes.\u0026nbsp; Many of these disputes have been\u0026nbsp;the subject of large class actions and multidistrict litigation proceedings.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian also maintains an active government investigations practice\u0026nbsp;and has represented clients in the financial services sector in investigations by state and federal regulators, including the SEC, Federal Reserve Board, state financial services regulators, and state attorneys general.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged manipulation of gold, silver, and platinum/palladium benchmarks, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a government investigation into its ESG-related financing, investing, and advisory activity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econsultant\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with bank failures caused by rising interest rates.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation arising out of the servicing of its residential mortgage loan portfolio.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einsurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a coverage-related dispute with a governmental agency.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einsurer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation relating to cost of insurance (\u0026ldquo;COI\u0026rdquo;) rates.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emetals and chemical producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with mass tort litigation arising out of injuries allegedly caused by a smelter in Peru.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproperty and building owners\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with civil litigation challenging the constitutionality of New York City emissions law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor entertainment venue\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute concerning access to the venue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor healthcare system\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a contractual dispute with a healthcare provider.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9363}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:17.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:17.000Z","searchable_text":"Donovan{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged manipulation of gold, silver, and platinum/palladium benchmarks, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with a government investigation into its ESG-related financing, investing, and advisory activity.{{ FIELD }}Representing a consultant in connection with bank failures caused by rising interest rates.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in connection with civil litigation arising out of the servicing of its residential mortgage loan portfolio.{{ FIELD }}Representing an insurer in connection with a coverage-related dispute with a governmental agency.{{ FIELD }}Representing an insurer in connection with civil litigation relating to cost of insurance (“COI”) rates.{{ FIELD }}Representing a metals and chemical producer in connection with mass tort litigation arising out of injuries allegedly caused by a smelter in Peru.{{ FIELD }}Representing property and building owners in connection with civil litigation challenging the constitutionality of New York City emissions law.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major entertainment venue in a dispute concerning access to the venue.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major healthcare system in connection with a contractual dispute with a healthcare provider.{{ FIELD }}Brian Donovan litigates complex commercial disputes principally on behalf of large financial institutions and insurers.  He has worked extensively on both the plaintiff and defense side in state and federal court, with a focus on antitrust, market manipulation, and general commercial and contractual disputes.  Many of these disputes have been the subject of large class actions and multidistrict litigation proceedings.\nBrian also maintains an active government investigations practice and has represented clients in the financial services sector in investigations by state and federal regulators, including the SEC, Federal Reserve Board, state financial services regulators, and state attorneys general.  Partner Cornell University Cornell Law School Cornell University Cornell Law School New York Law Clerk, Hon. Frank P. Geraci, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York Representing a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged LIBOR manipulation, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims. Representing a large financial institution in connection with all civil litigation arising out of alleged manipulation of gold, silver, and platinum/palladium benchmarks, alleging antitrust, commodities manipulation, and other claims. Representing a large financial institution in connection with a government investigation into its ESG-related financing, investing, and advisory activity. Representing a consultant in connection with bank failures caused by rising interest rates. Representing a large financial institution in connection with civil litigation arising out of the servicing of its residential mortgage loan portfolio. Representing an insurer in connection with a coverage-related dispute with a governmental agency. Representing an insurer in connection with civil litigation relating to cost of insurance (“COI”) rates. Representing a metals and chemical producer in connection with mass tort litigation arising out of injuries allegedly caused by a smelter in Peru. Representing property and building owners in connection with civil litigation challenging the constitutionality of New York City emissions law. Representing a major entertainment venue in a dispute concerning access to the venue. Representing a major healthcare system in connection with a contractual dispute with a healthcare provider.","searchable_name":"Brian Donovan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446917,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6695,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris represents clients in a broad range of litigation and regulatory matters, with an emphasis on representing financial institutions in courts and before international arbitration tribunals. He focuses on high value and highly sensitive and complex commercial trials, arbitrations, appeals, pre-litigation disputes, and government investigations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris is regularly recognized in leading industry publications such as \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e (included in \u0026ldquo;The 500 Leading Lawyers in America\u0026rdquo;), \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e (New York Litigation/General Commercial), where a commentator described him as \"an outstanding civil litigator who is able to distil complicated issues into simple and compelling themes\";\u0026nbsp;and \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e, where\u0026nbsp;commentators have called him \u0026ldquo;a star for international commercial litigation,\" \"a first-class legal mind,\" and a \"very strategic\" attorney who\u0026nbsp;\"excels at witness examination and argument.\"\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"christopher-duffy","email":"cduffy@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a major financial institution in an international arbitration seeking more than $400 million of damages against a contractual counterparty. Leading press coverage described the outcome of the case as a \"big win\" and \"windfall\" for the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a major financial institution in an ongoing international arbitration, including successful emergency arbitration proceedings, over control of digital infrastructure assets in South and Central America\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead defense counsel for an international financial institution in a jury trial in New York state court; obtained a jury verdict eliminating all of the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claims for more than $100 million in damages and interest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a publicly traded medical device company in defense of multiple ongoing federal securities lawsuits alleging misstatements in securities registration materials\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment bank in an expedited trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery, and a subsequent appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, in a closely watched indemnification dispute; prevailed at trial and on appeal in Delaware, and subsequently prevailed in a related federal court lawsuit, and in multiple appeals to the Third Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAmicus curiae counsel for the Society for Corporate Governance in multiple U.S. Supreme Court and Second Circuit appeals regarding high-profile securities law issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment firm in expedited multi-court litigation over the control of two publicly traded REITs; prevailed against a motion for preliminary injunction and successfully resolved all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment firm in proxy fight litigation over disputed board nominations; prevailed against multiple motions for injunctive relief and reached a successful settlement of all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a depositary institution in winning a ten-figure judgment in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a private equity consortium in an expedited bench trial in Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas; obtained a full defense judgment dismissing all claims by equity holders seeking more than $700 million in damages from the private equity lender group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an asset management firm in multi-forum litigation regarding five renewable energy projects\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for an investment bank in civil litigation brought by the New York Attorney General relating to the operation of the bank\u0026rsquo;s equity trading platform\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swaps\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a seed investor in Delaware Court of Chancery trial against a hedge fund; obtained a post-trial judgment that the hedge fund breached its fiduciary and contractual duties to the seed investor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel in federal court jury trial involving claims brought by a public company seeking control of a private investment firm\u0026rsquo;s board of directors and billions of dollars of its assets; obtained jury verdict dismissing all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for creditor in the Title III PROMESA restructuring of Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s Sales Tax Financing Corporation in pursuing and successfully settling claims arising from an ISDA-governed interest rate swap agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in multiple external investigations by the New York Attorney General, the SEC, FINRA, and other agencies\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a rare appellate reversal of a jury verdict in a multibillion dollar fraud trial arising from a public-to-private M\u0026amp;A deal\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a full dismissal of claims brought by a former top cable television executive asserting an ownership interest in a major cable network\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon the dismissal of all damages claims in a fiduciary duty lawsuit brought by a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee against a private equity firm and several of its principals, arising from the bankruptcy of one of the firm\u0026rsquo;s portfolio companies\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Duffy","nick_name":"Chris","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Christopher","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2001-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"E.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Lawyers in America ","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Described as an \"outstanding civil litigator,\" a \"great courtroom presence,\" and \"a great writer and trial lawyer\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, Litigation: General Commercial (New York), 2022-2025"},{"title":"Described as a \"stand-out\" with \"a first-class legal mind\" who \"excels at witness examination and argument\" ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution: General Commercial Disputes, 2022-2025"},{"title":"Recognized for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized for Financial Services Litigation","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025"},{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2023-2025"},{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Corporate Investigations \u0026 White-Collar Criminal Defense ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2021–2023"},{"title":"Selected to the New York Super Lawyers list ","detail":"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2013–2025"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eChris represents clients in a broad range of litigation and regulatory matters, with an emphasis on representing financial institutions in courts and before international arbitration tribunals. He focuses on high value and highly sensitive and complex commercial trials, arbitrations, appeals, pre-litigation disputes, and government investigations.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChris is regularly recognized in leading industry publications such as \u003cem\u003eLawdragon\u003c/em\u003e (included in \u0026ldquo;The 500 Leading Lawyers in America\u0026rdquo;), \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e (New York Litigation/General Commercial), where a commentator described him as \"an outstanding civil litigator who is able to distil complicated issues into simple and compelling themes\";\u0026nbsp;and \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500\u003c/em\u003e, where\u0026nbsp;commentators have called him \u0026ldquo;a star for international commercial litigation,\" \"a first-class legal mind,\" and a \"very strategic\" attorney who\u0026nbsp;\"excels at witness examination and argument.\"\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a major financial institution in an international arbitration seeking more than $400 million of damages against a contractual counterparty. Leading press coverage described the outcome of the case as a \"big win\" and \"windfall\" for the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a major financial institution in an ongoing international arbitration, including successful emergency arbitration proceedings, over control of digital infrastructure assets in South and Central America\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead defense counsel for an international financial institution in a jury trial in New York state court; obtained a jury verdict eliminating all of the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claims for more than $100 million in damages and interest\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a publicly traded medical device company in defense of multiple ongoing federal securities lawsuits alleging misstatements in securities registration materials\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment bank in an expedited trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery, and a subsequent appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, in a closely watched indemnification dispute; prevailed at trial and on appeal in Delaware, and subsequently prevailed in a related federal court lawsuit, and in multiple appeals to the Third Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAmicus curiae counsel for the Society for Corporate Governance in multiple U.S. Supreme Court and Second Circuit appeals regarding high-profile securities law issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment firm in expedited multi-court litigation over the control of two publicly traded REITs; prevailed against a motion for preliminary injunction and successfully resolved all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment firm in proxy fight litigation over disputed board nominations; prevailed against multiple motions for injunctive relief and reached a successful settlement of all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for a depositary institution in winning a ten-figure judgment in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a private equity consortium in an expedited bench trial in Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas; obtained a full defense judgment dismissing all claims by equity holders seeking more than $700 million in damages from the private equity lender group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an asset management firm in multi-forum litigation regarding five renewable energy projects\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for an investment bank in civil litigation brought by the New York Attorney General relating to the operation of the bank\u0026rsquo;s equity trading platform\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swaps\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for a seed investor in Delaware Court of Chancery trial against a hedge fund; obtained a post-trial judgment that the hedge fund breached its fiduciary and contractual duties to the seed investor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel in federal court jury trial involving claims brought by a public company seeking control of a private investment firm\u0026rsquo;s board of directors and billions of dollars of its assets; obtained jury verdict dismissing all claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for creditor in the Title III PROMESA restructuring of Puerto Rico\u0026rsquo;s Sales Tax Financing Corporation in pursuing and successfully settling claims arising from an ISDA-governed interest rate swap agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel in multiple external investigations by the New York Attorney General, the SEC, FINRA, and other agencies\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a rare appellate reversal of a jury verdict in a multibillion dollar fraud trial arising from a public-to-private M\u0026amp;A deal\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a full dismissal of claims brought by a former top cable television executive asserting an ownership interest in a major cable network\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon the dismissal of all damages claims in a fiduciary duty lawsuit brought by a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee against a private equity firm and several of its principals, arising from the bankruptcy of one of the firm\u0026rsquo;s portfolio companies\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Lawyers in America ","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Described as an \"outstanding civil litigator,\" a \"great courtroom presence,\" and \"a great writer and trial lawyer\" ","detail":"Chambers USA, Litigation: General Commercial (New York), 2022-2025"},{"title":"Described as a \"stand-out\" with \"a first-class legal mind\" who \"excels at witness examination and argument\" ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution: General Commercial Disputes, 2022-2025"},{"title":"Recognized for International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025"},{"title":"Recognized for Financial Services Litigation","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025"},{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2023-2025"},{"title":"Selected to the 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers in America","detail":"Lawdragon, 2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Corporate Investigations \u0026 White-Collar Criminal Defense ","detail":"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2021–2023"},{"title":"Selected to the New York Super Lawyers list ","detail":"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2013–2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11711}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-20T20:43:37.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-20T20:43:37.000Z","searchable_text":"Duffy{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the 500 Leading Lawyers in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2022–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Described as an \\\"outstanding civil litigator,\\\" a \\\"great courtroom presence,\\\" and \\\"a great writer and trial lawyer\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Litigation: General Commercial (New York), 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Described as a \\\"stand-out\\\" with \\\"a first-class legal mind\\\" who \\\"excels at witness examination and argument\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution: General Commercial Disputes, 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Financial Services Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the 500 Leading Litigators in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2023-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Corporate Investigations \u0026amp; White-Collar Criminal Defense \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2021–2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the New York Super Lawyers list \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2013–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for a major financial institution in an international arbitration seeking more than $400 million of damages against a contractual counterparty. Leading press coverage described the outcome of the case as a \"big win\" and \"windfall\" for the client{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for a major financial institution in an ongoing international arbitration, including successful emergency arbitration proceedings, over control of digital infrastructure assets in South and Central America{{ FIELD }}Co-lead defense counsel for an international financial institution in a jury trial in New York state court; obtained a jury verdict eliminating all of the plaintiff’s claims for more than $100 million in damages and interest{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for a publicly traded medical device company in defense of multiple ongoing federal securities lawsuits alleging misstatements in securities registration materials{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for an investment bank in an expedited trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery, and a subsequent appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, in a closely watched indemnification dispute; prevailed at trial and on appeal in Delaware, and subsequently prevailed in a related federal court lawsuit, and in multiple appeals to the Third Circuit{{ FIELD }}Amicus curiae counsel for the Society for Corporate Governance in multiple U.S. Supreme Court and Second Circuit appeals regarding high-profile securities law issues{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for an investment firm in expedited multi-court litigation over the control of two publicly traded REITs; prevailed against a motion for preliminary injunction and successfully resolved all claims{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for an investment firm in proxy fight litigation over disputed board nominations; prevailed against multiple motions for injunctive relief and reached a successful settlement of all claims{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for a depositary institution in winning a ten-figure judgment in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for a private equity consortium in an expedited bench trial in Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas; obtained a full defense judgment dismissing all claims by equity holders seeking more than $700 million in damages from the private equity lender group{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for an asset management firm in multi-forum litigation regarding five renewable energy projects{{ FIELD }}Counsel for an investment bank in civil litigation brought by the New York Attorney General relating to the operation of the bank’s equity trading platform{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swaps{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for a seed investor in Delaware Court of Chancery trial against a hedge fund; obtained a post-trial judgment that the hedge fund breached its fiduciary and contractual duties to the seed investor{{ FIELD }}Counsel in federal court jury trial involving claims brought by a public company seeking control of a private investment firm’s board of directors and billions of dollars of its assets; obtained jury verdict dismissing all claims{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for creditor in the Title III PROMESA restructuring of Puerto Rico’s Sales Tax Financing Corporation in pursuing and successfully settling claims arising from an ISDA-governed interest rate swap agreement{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel in multiple external investigations by the New York Attorney General, the SEC, FINRA, and other agencies{{ FIELD }}Won a rare appellate reversal of a jury verdict in a multibillion dollar fraud trial arising from a public-to-private M\u0026amp;A deal{{ FIELD }}Won a full dismissal of claims brought by a former top cable television executive asserting an ownership interest in a major cable network{{ FIELD }}Won the dismissal of all damages claims in a fiduciary duty lawsuit brought by a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee against a private equity firm and several of its principals, arising from the bankruptcy of one of the firm’s portfolio companies{{ FIELD }}Chris represents clients in a broad range of litigation and regulatory matters, with an emphasis on representing financial institutions in courts and before international arbitration tribunals. He focuses on high value and highly sensitive and complex commercial trials, arbitrations, appeals, pre-litigation disputes, and government investigations.\nChris is regularly recognized in leading industry publications such as Lawdragon (included in “The 500 Leading Lawyers in America”), Chambers USA (New York Litigation/General Commercial), where a commentator described him as \"an outstanding civil litigator who is able to distil complicated issues into simple and compelling themes\"; and The Legal 500, where commentators have called him “a star for international commercial litigation,\" \"a first-class legal mind,\" and a \"very strategic\" attorney who \"excels at witness examination and argument.\" Partner Selected to the 500 Leading Lawyers in America  Lawdragon, 2022–2026 Described as an \"outstanding civil litigator,\" a \"great courtroom presence,\" and \"a great writer and trial lawyer\"  Chambers USA, Litigation: General Commercial (New York), 2022-2025 Described as a \"stand-out\" with \"a first-class legal mind\" who \"excels at witness examination and argument\"  Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution: General Commercial Disputes, 2022-2025 Recognized for International Arbitration Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025 Recognized for Financial Services Litigation Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2025 Selected to the 500 Leading Litigators in America Lawdragon, 2023-2025 Selected to the 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers in America Lawdragon, 2026 Recognized for Corporate Investigations \u0026amp; White-Collar Criminal Defense  Legal 500 U.S., Dispute Resolution, 2021–2023 Selected to the New York Super Lawyers list  Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2013–2025 University of Virginia  Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin New York Texas New York Regional Board of the College Foundation of the University of Virginia Lead counsel for a major financial institution in an international arbitration seeking more than $400 million of damages against a contractual counterparty. Leading press coverage described the outcome of the case as a \"big win\" and \"windfall\" for the client Lead counsel for a major financial institution in an ongoing international arbitration, including successful emergency arbitration proceedings, over control of digital infrastructure assets in South and Central America Co-lead defense counsel for an international financial institution in a jury trial in New York state court; obtained a jury verdict eliminating all of the plaintiff’s claims for more than $100 million in damages and interest Co-lead counsel for a publicly traded medical device company in defense of multiple ongoing federal securities lawsuits alleging misstatements in securities registration materials Lead counsel for an investment bank in an expedited trial in the Delaware Court of Chancery, and a subsequent appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, in a closely watched indemnification dispute; prevailed at trial and on appeal in Delaware, and subsequently prevailed in a related federal court lawsuit, and in multiple appeals to the Third Circuit Amicus curiae counsel for the Society for Corporate Governance in multiple U.S. Supreme Court and Second Circuit appeals regarding high-profile securities law issues Lead counsel for an investment firm in expedited multi-court litigation over the control of two publicly traded REITs; prevailed against a motion for preliminary injunction and successfully resolved all claims Lead counsel for two hedge funds in an expedited nine-witness trial in Delaware Court of Chancery over a disputed multi-billion dollar stock authorization by a public company Lead counsel for an investment firm in proxy fight litigation over disputed board nominations; prevailed against multiple motions for injunctive relief and reached a successful settlement of all claims Lead counsel for a depositary institution in winning a ten-figure judgment in New York state court against a group of defaulted borrowers; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting the borrowers from transferring collateral intended to secure the disputed loans Co-lead counsel for a private equity consortium in an expedited bench trial in Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas; obtained a full defense judgment dismissing all claims by equity holders seeking more than $700 million in damages from the private equity lender group Lead counsel for an asset management firm in multi-forum litigation regarding five renewable energy projects Counsel for an investment bank in civil litigation brought by the New York Attorney General relating to the operation of the bank’s equity trading platform Lead counsel for an investment bank and several of its former employees in litigation and arbitration involving equity swaps Co-lead counsel for a seed investor in Delaware Court of Chancery trial against a hedge fund; obtained a post-trial judgment that the hedge fund breached its fiduciary and contractual duties to the seed investor Counsel in federal court jury trial involving claims brought by a public company seeking control of a private investment firm’s board of directors and billions of dollars of its assets; obtained jury verdict dismissing all claims Lead counsel for creditor in the Title III PROMESA restructuring of Puerto Rico’s Sales Tax Financing Corporation in pursuing and successfully settling claims arising from an ISDA-governed interest rate swap agreement Lead counsel in multiple external investigations by the New York Attorney General, the SEC, FINRA, and other agencies Won a rare appellate reversal of a jury verdict in a multibillion dollar fraud trial arising from a public-to-private M\u0026amp;A deal Won a full dismissal of claims brought by a former top cable television executive asserting an ownership interest in a major cable network Won the dismissal of all damages claims in a fiduciary duty lawsuit brought by a court-appointed bankruptcy trustee against a private equity firm and several of its principals, arising from the bankruptcy of one of the firm’s portfolio companies","searchable_name":"Christopher E. Duffy (Chris)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427139,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6375,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJamie Dycus represents financial institutions and other commercial clients in high-stakes litigation and enforcement matters. Jamie has handled numerous large class actions and other disputes for banks, broker-dealers, trading firms and other clients subject to claims under banking, antitrust, securities, and consumer protection laws.\u0026nbsp; In his regulatory practice, Jamie represents financial institutions facing supervisory, investigative, and enforcement action by the CFPB and other federal regulators.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his litigation practice, Jamie has represented clients in numerous complex class actions and other disputes in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under antitrust law, the securities laws, federal and state banking and consumer protection laws, and RICO, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJamie\u0026rsquo;s regulatory and enforcement practice involves the representation of financial institutions before federal financial regulators in public and non-public supervisory and enforcement matters. \u0026nbsp;In particular, he has represented clients in consequential CFPB matters since the very early days of the Bureau.\u0026nbsp; His expertise spans consumer deposits, overdraft services, remittances, prepaid cards, home lending, small-dollar lending, credit cards, and credit reporting.\u0026nbsp; He also frequently counsels financial institutions concerning compliance with consumer financial law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJamie has an active pro bono practice. He has represented individual clients in immigration matters involving claims for relief from removal and family reunification issues and has participated on behalf of amici in trial and appellate immigration-related matters addressing restrictions on asylum-seeking, pretrial detention and jurisdiction over habeas challenges. He has also participated on behalf of amici in criminal law matters, including matters in the US Supreme Court addressing police practices and the doctrine of qualified immunity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jamie clerked for the Honorable Reena Raggi of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Honorable Raymond J. Dearie of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Jamie was also previously a Liman Fellow in the Racial Justice Program of the American Civil Liberties Union.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jamie-dycus","email":"jdycus@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in multiple putative class actions alleging spoofing in the markets for precious metals futures and options\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully defended the dismissal before the Second Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Third Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR, Swiss franc LIBOR, Euribor and GBP LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large international financial institution in connection with multiple putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims based on alleged manipulation of USD LIBOR, Yen LIBOR, the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate, and the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims against an international financial institution arising out of alleged facilitation of a pyramid scheme, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Second Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large international financial institution in connection with FINRA arbitration alleging misconduct in relation to foreign exchange transactions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting federal and state law claims related to payroll cards and debit cards used for government payments\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting state statutory and common law claims based on alleged deficiencies in a retail coin-counting service\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in connection with a putative class action concerning overdraft fees and transaction posting order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting against a credit card issuer based on alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of federal and state securities law claims against a large broker-dealer in connection with alleged market-making of unregistered securities\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory and Enforcement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented financial institutions in enforcement actions related to consumer deposits, overdraft practices, credit card add-on products, credit reporting, small-dollar lending and prepaid cards\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssisted clients with responding to government subpoenas, civil investigative demands, 15-day letters, Proposed Action Response Requested (PARR) letters, and Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) letters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple national banks and credit card issuers concerning compliance with UDAP/UDAAP prohibitions and state consumer protection laws\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning compliance with the overdraft and error resolution requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning requirements governing international consumer remittances and wholesale wire transfers, including the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation E, the Uniform Commercial Code and network rules\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large national bank concerning regulatory requirements for prepaid cards and other similar consumer and commercial payment solutions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning branching and exportation of interest rates under the National Bank Act\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large international financial institution concerning the establishment of a commercial cash management business\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large participant in the Paycheck Protection Program concerning the development of applicable policies and procedures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePro Bono\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented individual clients in immigration and related proceedings in the New York, Newark and Los Angeles Immigration Courts and in US district court\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored multiple briefs to the US Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of challenges to the qualified immunity doctrine\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in a Suspension Clause challenge to a denial of habeas corpus review to a person in immigration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to the 2017 Executive Order banning entry to the United States by noncitizens from predominantly Muslim countries\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the Ninth Circuit on behalf of retired immigration judges acting as amici in support of a challenge to lengthy pretrial detention of persons in immigration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to family separation practices at the US-Mexico border\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief on behalf of members of Congress acting as amici in support of a challenge to arbitrary limitations on asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully argued to the Sixth Circuit and litigated on remand in US district court in a First Amendment lawsuit brought by a federal prison inmate\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of a cross-ideological group of non-profit organizations acting as amici in a Fourth Amendment challenge to police practices\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1179,"guid":"1179.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1243,"guid":"1243.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dycus","nick_name":"Jamie","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Hon. Reena Raggi, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit","years_held":"2009 - 2010"},{"name":"Law Clerk, The Hon. Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York","years_held":"2006 - 2007"}],"first_name":"Jamie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2605,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recommend by The Legal 500 United States in the category of “Financial Services Litigation”","detail":"The Legal 500 United States"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamie-dycus-148104169/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJamie Dycus represents financial institutions and other commercial clients in high-stakes litigation and enforcement matters. Jamie has handled numerous large class actions and other disputes for banks, broker-dealers, trading firms and other clients subject to claims under banking, antitrust, securities, and consumer protection laws.\u0026nbsp; In his regulatory practice, Jamie represents financial institutions facing supervisory, investigative, and enforcement action by the CFPB and other federal regulators.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn his litigation practice, Jamie has represented clients in numerous complex class actions and other disputes in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under antitrust law, the securities laws, federal and state banking and consumer protection laws, and RICO, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJamie\u0026rsquo;s regulatory and enforcement practice involves the representation of financial institutions before federal financial regulators in public and non-public supervisory and enforcement matters. \u0026nbsp;In particular, he has represented clients in consequential CFPB matters since the very early days of the Bureau.\u0026nbsp; His expertise spans consumer deposits, overdraft services, remittances, prepaid cards, home lending, small-dollar lending, credit cards, and credit reporting.\u0026nbsp; He also frequently counsels financial institutions concerning compliance with consumer financial law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJamie has an active pro bono practice. He has represented individual clients in immigration matters involving claims for relief from removal and family reunification issues and has participated on behalf of amici in trial and appellate immigration-related matters addressing restrictions on asylum-seeking, pretrial detention and jurisdiction over habeas challenges. He has also participated on behalf of amici in criminal law matters, including matters in the US Supreme Court addressing police practices and the doctrine of qualified immunity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jamie clerked for the Honorable Reena Raggi of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Honorable Raymond J. Dearie of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Jamie was also previously a Liman Fellow in the Racial Justice Program of the American Civil Liberties Union.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLitigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in multiple putative class actions alleging spoofing in the markets for precious metals futures and options\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully defended the dismissal before the Second Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Third Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR, Swiss franc LIBOR, Euribor and GBP LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large international financial institution in connection with multiple putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims based on alleged manipulation of USD LIBOR, Yen LIBOR, the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate, and the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of common law claims against an international financial institution arising out of alleged facilitation of a pyramid scheme, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Second Circuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large international financial institution in connection with FINRA arbitration alleging misconduct in relation to foreign exchange transactions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting federal and state law claims related to payroll cards and debit cards used for government payments\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting state statutory and common law claims based on alleged deficiencies in a retail coin-counting service\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in connection with a putative class action concerning overdraft fees and transaction posting order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting against a credit card issuer based on alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of federal and state securities law claims against a large broker-dealer in connection with alleged market-making of unregistered securities\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory and Enforcement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented financial institutions in enforcement actions related to consumer deposits, overdraft practices, credit card add-on products, credit reporting, small-dollar lending and prepaid cards\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssisted clients with responding to government subpoenas, civil investigative demands, 15-day letters, Proposed Action Response Requested (PARR) letters, and Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) letters\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple national banks and credit card issuers concerning compliance with UDAP/UDAAP prohibitions and state consumer protection laws\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning compliance with the overdraft and error resolution requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning requirements governing international consumer remittances and wholesale wire transfers, including the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation E, the Uniform Commercial Code and network rules\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large national bank concerning regulatory requirements for prepaid cards and other similar consumer and commercial payment solutions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning branching and exportation of interest rates under the National Bank Act\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large international financial institution concerning the establishment of a commercial cash management business\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCounseled a large participant in the Paycheck Protection Program concerning the development of applicable policies and procedures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePro Bono\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented individual clients in immigration and related proceedings in the New York, Newark and Los Angeles Immigration Courts and in US district court\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored multiple briefs to the US Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of challenges to the qualified immunity doctrine\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in a Suspension Clause challenge to a denial of habeas corpus review to a person in immigration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to the 2017 Executive Order banning entry to the United States by noncitizens from predominantly Muslim countries\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the Ninth Circuit on behalf of retired immigration judges acting as amici in support of a challenge to lengthy pretrial detention of persons in immigration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to family separation practices at the US-Mexico border\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief on behalf of members of Congress acting as amici in support of a challenge to arbitrary limitations on asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully argued to the Sixth Circuit and litigated on remand in US district court in a First Amendment lawsuit brought by a federal prison inmate\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of a cross-ideological group of non-profit organizations acting as amici in a Fourth Amendment challenge to police practices\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recommend by The Legal 500 United States in the category of “Financial Services Litigation”","detail":"The Legal 500 United States"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9840}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:52.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:52.000Z","searchable_text":"Dycus{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommend by The Legal 500 United States in the category of “Financial Services Litigation”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 United States\"}{{ FIELD }}Litigation\nRepresenting a large international financial institution in multiple putative class actions alleging spoofing in the markets for precious metals futures and options{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations{{ FIELD }}Representing a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully defended the dismissal before the Second Circuit{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Third Circuit{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR, Swiss franc LIBOR, Euribor and GBP LIBOR{{ FIELD }}Represented a large international financial institution in connection with multiple putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims based on alleged manipulation of USD LIBOR, Yen LIBOR, the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate, and the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of common law claims against an international financial institution arising out of alleged facilitation of a pyramid scheme, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Second Circuit{{ FIELD }}Represented a large international financial institution in connection with FINRA arbitration alleging misconduct in relation to foreign exchange transactions{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting federal and state law claims related to payroll cards and debit cards used for government payments{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting state statutory and common law claims based on alleged deficiencies in a retail coin-counting service{{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in connection with a putative class action concerning overdraft fees and transaction posting order{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting against a credit card issuer based on alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of federal and state securities law claims against a large broker-dealer in connection with alleged market-making of unregistered securities{{ FIELD }}Regulatory and Enforcement\nRepresented financial institutions in enforcement actions related to consumer deposits, overdraft practices, credit card add-on products, credit reporting, small-dollar lending and prepaid cards\nAssisted clients with responding to government subpoenas, civil investigative demands, 15-day letters, Proposed Action Response Requested (PARR) letters, and Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) letters\nCounseled multiple national banks and credit card issuers concerning compliance with UDAP/UDAAP prohibitions and state consumer protection laws\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning compliance with the overdraft and error resolution requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning requirements governing international consumer remittances and wholesale wire transfers, including the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation E, the Uniform Commercial Code and network rules\nCounseled a large national bank concerning regulatory requirements for prepaid cards and other similar consumer and commercial payment solutions\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning branching and exportation of interest rates under the National Bank Act\nCounseled a large international financial institution concerning the establishment of a commercial cash management business\nCounseled a large participant in the Paycheck Protection Program concerning the development of applicable policies and procedures{{ FIELD }}Pro Bono\nRepresented individual clients in immigration and related proceedings in the New York, Newark and Los Angeles Immigration Courts and in US district court\nCo-authored multiple briefs to the US Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of challenges to the qualified immunity doctrine\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in a Suspension Clause challenge to a denial of habeas corpus review to a person in immigration proceedings\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to the 2017 Executive Order banning entry to the United States by noncitizens from predominantly Muslim countries\nCo-authored a brief to the Ninth Circuit on behalf of retired immigration judges acting as amici in support of a challenge to lengthy pretrial detention of persons in immigration proceedings\nCo-authored a brief on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to family separation practices at the US-Mexico border\nCo-authored a brief on behalf of members of Congress acting as amici in support of a challenge to arbitrary limitations on asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border\nSuccessfully argued to the Sixth Circuit and litigated on remand in US district court in a First Amendment lawsuit brought by a federal prison inmate\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of a cross-ideological group of non-profit organizations acting as amici in a Fourth Amendment challenge to police practices{{ FIELD }}Jamie Dycus represents financial institutions and other commercial clients in high-stakes litigation and enforcement matters. Jamie has handled numerous large class actions and other disputes for banks, broker-dealers, trading firms and other clients subject to claims under banking, antitrust, securities, and consumer protection laws.  In his regulatory practice, Jamie represents financial institutions facing supervisory, investigative, and enforcement action by the CFPB and other federal regulators.\nIn his litigation practice, Jamie has represented clients in numerous complex class actions and other disputes in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate level.  He has successfully defended his clients against a broad array of legal claims, including under antitrust law, the securities laws, federal and state banking and consumer protection laws, and RICO, as well as state law contract and tort theories.\nJamie’s regulatory and enforcement practice involves the representation of financial institutions before federal financial regulators in public and non-public supervisory and enforcement matters.  In particular, he has represented clients in consequential CFPB matters since the very early days of the Bureau.  His expertise spans consumer deposits, overdraft services, remittances, prepaid cards, home lending, small-dollar lending, credit cards, and credit reporting.  He also frequently counsels financial institutions concerning compliance with consumer financial law.\nJamie has an active pro bono practice. He has represented individual clients in immigration matters involving claims for relief from removal and family reunification issues and has participated on behalf of amici in trial and appellate immigration-related matters addressing restrictions on asylum-seeking, pretrial detention and jurisdiction over habeas challenges. He has also participated on behalf of amici in criminal law matters, including matters in the US Supreme Court addressing police practices and the doctrine of qualified immunity.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Jamie clerked for the Honorable Reena Raggi of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Honorable Raymond J. Dearie of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Jamie was also previously a Liman Fellow in the Racial Justice Program of the American Civil Liberties Union. Partner Recommend by The Legal 500 United States in the category of “Financial Services Litigation” The Legal 500 United States Stanford University Stanford Law School Yale University Yale Law School University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law University of Iowa The University of Iowa College of Law New York Law Clerk, The Hon. Reena Raggi, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Law Clerk, The Hon. Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York Litigation\nRepresenting a large international financial institution in multiple putative class actions alleging spoofing in the markets for precious metals futures and options Representing a large international financial institution in a putative antitrust class action alleging anticompetitive activity affecting variable rate debt obligations Representing a large international financial institution in litigation alleging unlawful spoofing and naked short selling in the market for certain securities Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of the Canadian Dollar Offered Rate Obtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully defended the dismissal before the Second Circuit Obtained dismissal of common law claims asserted by commercial borrowers against an international financial institution and its national and state bank affiliates arising from alleged misrepresentations related to USD LIBOR, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Third Circuit Obtained dismissal of putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, and CEA claims against a large international financial institution based on alleged manipulation of ICE LIBOR, Swiss franc LIBOR, Euribor and GBP LIBOR Represented a large international financial institution in connection with multiple putative class actions asserting antitrust, RICO, CEA and common law claims based on alleged manipulation of USD LIBOR, Yen LIBOR, the Singapore Interbank Offered Rate, and the Australian Bank Bill Swap Rate Obtained dismissal of common law claims against an international financial institution arising out of alleged facilitation of a pyramid scheme, then successfully argued in defense of the dismissal to the Second Circuit Represented a large international financial institution in connection with FINRA arbitration alleging misconduct in relation to foreign exchange transactions Represented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting federal and state law claims related to payroll cards and debit cards used for government payments Represented a national bank in multiple putative class actions asserting state statutory and common law claims based on alleged deficiencies in a retail coin-counting service Represented a national bank in connection with a putative class action concerning overdraft fees and transaction posting order Obtained dismissal of a putative class action asserting against a credit card issuer based on alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act Obtained dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of federal securities law by a multinational commodity trading company Obtained dismissal of federal and state securities law claims against a large broker-dealer in connection with alleged market-making of unregistered securities Regulatory and Enforcement\nRepresented financial institutions in enforcement actions related to consumer deposits, overdraft practices, credit card add-on products, credit reporting, small-dollar lending and prepaid cards\nAssisted clients with responding to government subpoenas, civil investigative demands, 15-day letters, Proposed Action Response Requested (PARR) letters, and Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (NORA) letters\nCounseled multiple national banks and credit card issuers concerning compliance with UDAP/UDAAP prohibitions and state consumer protection laws\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning compliance with the overdraft and error resolution requirements of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning requirements governing international consumer remittances and wholesale wire transfers, including the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Regulation E, the Uniform Commercial Code and network rules\nCounseled a large national bank concerning regulatory requirements for prepaid cards and other similar consumer and commercial payment solutions\nCounseled multiple financial institutions concerning branching and exportation of interest rates under the National Bank Act\nCounseled a large international financial institution concerning the establishment of a commercial cash management business\nCounseled a large participant in the Paycheck Protection Program concerning the development of applicable policies and procedures Pro Bono\nRepresented individual clients in immigration and related proceedings in the New York, Newark and Los Angeles Immigration Courts and in US district court\nCo-authored multiple briefs to the US Supreme Court and the Tenth Circuit on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of challenges to the qualified immunity doctrine\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in a Suspension Clause challenge to a denial of habeas corpus review to a person in immigration proceedings\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to the 2017 Executive Order banning entry to the United States by noncitizens from predominantly Muslim countries\nCo-authored a brief to the Ninth Circuit on behalf of retired immigration judges acting as amici in support of a challenge to lengthy pretrial detention of persons in immigration proceedings\nCo-authored a brief on behalf of legal scholars acting as amici in support of a challenge to family separation practices at the US-Mexico border\nCo-authored a brief on behalf of members of Congress acting as amici in support of a challenge to arbitrary limitations on asylum seekers at the US-Mexico border\nSuccessfully argued to the Sixth Circuit and litigated on remand in US district court in a First Amendment lawsuit brought by a federal prison inmate\nCo-authored a brief to the US Supreme Court on behalf of a cross-ideological group of non-profit organizations acting as amici in a Fourth Amendment challenge to police practices","searchable_name":"Jamie Dycus","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443593,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3474,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEgishe Dzhazoyan is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s London office and specializes in international arbitration and litigation. A dual-qualified lawyer in common law and civil law, Egishe can handle matters in five different languages and is uniquely placed to provide strategic legal advice concerning large and complex disputes, often involving a cross-border element and enforcement issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring 25 years of practice, Egishe has advised and represented clients in more than 250 arbitration and litigation proceedings across a host of various jurisdictions and in a broad range of industries. Egishe also sits as arbitrator and has particular experience in this capacity with disputes involving sanctions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe is consistently recognised in all major legal rankings which describe him as \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003ebrilliant lawyer with a very sharp legal mind, immense intellectual curiosity and commercial awareness, which is matched by his impressive work ethic and client dedication\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; noting that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Egishe\u0026rsquo;s l\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eevels of commercial awareness and client service are exemplary, helped by his ability to perform tasks in five different languages\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026rdquo; \u003c/em\u003e(Chambers UK); \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ea truly extraordinary lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003esimply phenomenal and a dream lawyer for any client to have\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; (Legal 500 UK).\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe frequently advises clients in court proceedings and has particular experience in matters involving enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states, as well as complex offshore commercial fraud and asset recovery disputes. An example of this type of work was his role as lead global litigation counsel in helping to secure what is believed to be the largest ever court mandated asset attachment in legal history (US$22.6 billion) involving a freeze of the Republic of Kazakhstan\u0026rsquo;s National Fund assets in Belgium and the Netherlands in October 2017.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe has been ranked in International Arbitration by Chambers UK 2022-2026\u0026nbsp;editions and has been consistently recognized in International Arbitration by Legal 500 UK for 2012\u0026ndash;2024, as an expert by ExpertGuides Commercial Arbitration in the 2018-2021 editions, and has also featured in the inaugural Legal 500 International Arbitration Powerlist UK 2019. In addition, Egishe has been ranked as a Recommended lawyer by Legal 500 UK 2025 in the Public International Law and Civil Fraud categories and by Legal 500 UK 2024 in the Commercial Litigation: Premium category.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his law practice, Egishe frequently appears as a guest lecturer on various arbitration related topics at the American University of Armenia and has published a number of articles in leading arbitration journals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe is fluent in English, Russian and Armenian and has a working knowledge of German and French.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"egishe-dzhazoyan","email":"edzhazoyan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Arbitrator Appointments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in a Stockholm seated SCC arbitration (in the Russian language) involving Georgian parties under Georgian law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in an English law governed London seated LCIA arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a debt restructuring.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in a German law governed Munich seated ICC arbitration involving German and Russian parties concerning sanctions issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Arbitration Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a UK counterparty involving sanctions issues concerning delivery of the goods from an EU country. Value US$1+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in a series of related LCIA arbitrations with counterparties from the UK and Ireland involving sanctions issues. Value US$39 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a counterparty from Western Africa involving sanctions issues. Value US$12 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing an Armenian businessman in LCIA arbitration proceedings involving a claim under an option agreement relating to the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$40 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two corporate respondents from Vallex Group in LCIA arbitration proceedings against Russia\u0026rsquo;s VTB Bank relating to the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$300+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a U.S. investment adviser with respect to a potential investment arbitration claim against the government of an Eastern European country arising out of a concession operation in the mining sector. Value US$250+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for investors in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Italian Republic arising out of the Energy Charter Treaty. Value \u0026euro;200+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a state-owned oil company in an SCC arbitration against a U.S. oil and gas company regarding a failed joint venture project in Western Siberia involving complex issues of Swedish and Russian law. Value: US$200 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Cypriot investor in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Government of Montenegro. Value US$200+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a major commodity trading company. Value \u0026euro;28+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a Montenegrin aluminium smelter. Value \u0026euro;28 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing a Cyprus-based claimant company in LCIA proceedings with a Singapore counterparty arising out of the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture in a Russian coal mining project. The award obtained upheld the entirety of the claimant's claims, including legal costs and interest. Value US$8 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing an individual respondent in LCIA proceedings arising out of the parties\u0026rsquo; dispute in relation to a Russian cardboard mill. The claims were fully dismissed on jurisdictional grounds with costs awarded in the client\u0026rsquo;s favour. Value US$10 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a large Russian automobile manufacturer in a LCIA arbitration dispute against a major European investment bank involving a guarantee. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$100+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two Russian claimants in a SCC arbitration against the government of an Eastern European state relating to expropriation of the claimants' shares in a major local bank. Value US$8 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing three claimant companies against a Bermuda-based affiliate of a leading Russian investment bank following the market crisis of 2008 in three related LCIA arbitrations. The awards obtained upheld the entirety of the claimants' claims, including legal costs and interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSCC arbitration in Stockholm on behalf of a Swiss trading company arising from a shareholder dispute and consequent fraud under various agreements associated with the Russian aluminium industry. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$380 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Litigation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolkynneftegaz LLP et al v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd et al\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e2023/GSC/003 - successfully challenging the jurisdiction of the Gibraltar Court on behalf of Moldovan and BVI oil \u0026amp; gas investors. Value US$500+ million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a U.S. oil \u0026amp; gas company on the enforcement of an arbitral award against a South American sovereign state. Value US$11 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeith O\u0026rsquo;Loughlin v The Registrar of Companies and GCG Manager S.A. Luxco S.C.A.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;- successfully representing an individual claimant in an application to restore a dissolved company for the purposes of asserting a claim against the newly restored company.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eVTB Bank PJSC v Mejlumyan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2021] EWHC 1386 (Comm) - acting for the defendant to an anti-suit injunction claim concerning Armenian court proceedings arising out of the termination of a share pledge agreement between the parties governed by Armenian law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2020] EWHC 916 (Comm) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a complex award enforcement dispute arising out of related Belgian attachment proceedings involving the same parties. This dispute saw the first ever virtual trial in English legal history and was named in The Lawyer\u0026rsquo;s Top 20 Cases of 2020 list. Value US$545 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLeidos Inc v the Hellenic Republic\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[2019] EWHC 2738 (Comm) - successful enforcement of an \u0026euro;55 million ICC arbitral award arising out of a breach of contract claim relating to the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTsareva and others v Ananyev and others; Galagaev and others v Ananyev and other\u003c/em\u003es [2019] EWHC 2414 (Comm) - successful strike out of claims for fraud and conspiracy on behalf of the Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants concerning certain securities issued by an affiliate of a major Russian bank. Value US$79 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] All ER (D) 103 (Dec) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a jurisdictional challenge concerning a claim for declarations which arose out of related Belgian conservatory attachment proceedings involving the same parties. Value US$540 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Moldovan investors in enforcement proceedings in relation to an US$540 million Energy Charter Treaty arbitral award against the Republic of Kazakhstan\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e- Stati and others v Republic of Kazakhstan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] EWCA Civ 1896.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a subsidiary of the Libyan sovereign wealth fund in High Court proceedings with a Dubai-based counterparty involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCatalyst Management Services v Libya Africa Investment Portfolio\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] EWCA Civ 1676. Value US$500 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a private Russian client in a dispute arising out of a failed joint venture property development project in Morocco -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBaturina v Chistyakov\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[2017] EWHC 1049 (Comm). Value \u0026euro;74 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting defendants in freezing order and related proceedings in the English High Court brought by the liquidator of a BVI entity -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMontvale Invest Ltd (In Liquidation) v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2016] EWHC 1664 (Ch). Value US$24.7 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a private Russian client in High Court of Justice proceedings brought by a liquidator of a major Russian bank -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eJSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshelnniy Bank and another v Pugachev amd others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2015] EWHC 2623 (Ch). Value US$1.5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting VTB Bank (Austria) AG in High Court proceedings against a foreign liquidator under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRe Kombinat Aluminijuma Podgorica AD (in bankruptcy)\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2015] EWHC 750 (Ch).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing a Gibraltar-based company in High Court proceedings against a number of Kazakh defendants arising out of a loan agreement \u0026ndash;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eTerra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Aidar Assaubayev\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eand Ors\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2014] EWHC 4211 (Comm). Value US$7.3 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in worldwide freezing order proceedings in aid of a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrivy Council proceedings on behalf of a Kyrgyz telecom holding company on appeal from the Isle of Man concerning a dispute over a Kyrgyz mobile operator -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltimo Holdings and Investment Ltd and others v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2011] UKPC 7. Value US$600 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnti-suit proceedings in the High Court of Justice relating to an LCIA arbitration involving a large Russian automobile manufacturer and a major European investment bank -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBNP Paribas SA v Open Joint Stock Co Russian Machines and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2011] EWHC 308 (Comm).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a number of Russian parties in Bermuda court proceedings against a Bermuda-based investment fund in a dispute involving alleged breach of contract, fraud and tort arising out of the parties' joint venture in Russia. Value US$84 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two Cypriot entities in English court proceedings concerning breach of agreements about the transfer of shares in a Russian company and related proceedings in Cyprus for negative declarations -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eKolden Holdings Ltd v Rodette Commerce Ltd and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2008] EWCA Civ 10.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil in freezing order proceedings under section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against a Venezuelan state owned oil \u0026amp; gas company -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos De Venezuela SA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2008] EWHC 532 (Comm). Value US$12 billion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFraud and conspiracy proceedings before the High Court of Justice in London on behalf of France, Cyprus and Dubai based investors in the Tajik aluminum plant. Proceedings involving claims under six separate governing laws -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIntermet FZCO and others v Ansol Ltd and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2007] EWHC 226 (Comm). Value US$65 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBase Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2004] EWCA Civ 1316 - imposition of a tortious/equitable duty of care and a voluntary assumption of responsibility; director's duties to his company and related governing law issues.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":70}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Dzhazoyan","nick_name":"Egishe","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Egishe","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader","detail":"Lexology Index, 2026 Edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration ","detail":"Chambers UK, 2026 Edition"},{"title":"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader","detail":"Lexology Index, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: Public International Law","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: Civil Fraud ","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Named as an \"Arbitration Future Leader\"","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Named as a \"Recommended\" lawyer in the Commercial Litigation: Premium Tier 5 category","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2023 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2023 edition"},{"title":"Recognised Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2022 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2022 edition"},{"title":"Recognised lawyer in the International Arbitration and Commercial Litigation: Premium categories","detail":"Legal 500, 2021"},{"title":"Cited in Arbitration category","detail":"Legal 500, 2012–2020"},{"title":"Included in The Legal 500 Private Powerlist 2019","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2019"},{"title":"“Expert”: Commercial Arbitration","detail":"Euromoney's Expert Guide, 2018-2020"},{"title":"“Up and Coming” lawyer, International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2013"},{"title":"Leading Individual: Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2012 edition"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/egishe-dzhazoyan-40ab65194/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEgishe Dzhazoyan is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s London office and specializes in international arbitration and litigation. A dual-qualified lawyer in common law and civil law, Egishe can handle matters in five different languages and is uniquely placed to provide strategic legal advice concerning large and complex disputes, often involving a cross-border element and enforcement issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring 25 years of practice, Egishe has advised and represented clients in more than 250 arbitration and litigation proceedings across a host of various jurisdictions and in a broad range of industries. Egishe also sits as arbitrator and has particular experience in this capacity with disputes involving sanctions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe is consistently recognised in all major legal rankings which describe him as \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003ebrilliant lawyer with a very sharp legal mind, immense intellectual curiosity and commercial awareness, which is matched by his impressive work ethic and client dedication\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; noting that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;Egishe\u0026rsquo;s l\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eevels of commercial awareness and client service are exemplary, helped by his ability to perform tasks in five different languages\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026rdquo; \u003c/em\u003e(Chambers UK); \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003ea truly extraordinary lawyer\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;, \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003esimply phenomenal and a dream lawyer for any client to have\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; (Legal 500 UK).\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe frequently advises clients in court proceedings and has particular experience in matters involving enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states, as well as complex offshore commercial fraud and asset recovery disputes. An example of this type of work was his role as lead global litigation counsel in helping to secure what is believed to be the largest ever court mandated asset attachment in legal history (US$22.6 billion) involving a freeze of the Republic of Kazakhstan\u0026rsquo;s National Fund assets in Belgium and the Netherlands in October 2017.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe has been ranked in International Arbitration by Chambers UK 2022-2026\u0026nbsp;editions and has been consistently recognized in International Arbitration by Legal 500 UK for 2012\u0026ndash;2024, as an expert by ExpertGuides Commercial Arbitration in the 2018-2021 editions, and has also featured in the inaugural Legal 500 International Arbitration Powerlist UK 2019. In addition, Egishe has been ranked as a Recommended lawyer by Legal 500 UK 2025 in the Public International Law and Civil Fraud categories and by Legal 500 UK 2024 in the Commercial Litigation: Premium category.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his law practice, Egishe frequently appears as a guest lecturer on various arbitration related topics at the American University of Armenia and has published a number of articles in leading arbitration journals.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEgishe is fluent in English, Russian and Armenian and has a working knowledge of German and French.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Arbitrator Appointments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSole arbitrator in a Stockholm seated SCC arbitration (in the Russian language) involving Georgian parties under Georgian law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in an English law governed London seated LCIA arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a debt restructuring.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-arbitrator in a German law governed Munich seated ICC arbitration involving German and Russian parties concerning sanctions issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Arbitration Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a UK counterparty involving sanctions issues concerning delivery of the goods from an EU country. Value US$1+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in a series of related LCIA arbitrations with counterparties from the UK and Ireland involving sanctions issues. Value US$39 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a counterparty from Western Africa involving sanctions issues. Value US$12 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing an Armenian businessman in LCIA arbitration proceedings involving a claim under an option agreement relating to the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$40 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two corporate respondents from Vallex Group in LCIA arbitration proceedings against Russia\u0026rsquo;s VTB Bank relating to the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$300+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a U.S. investment adviser with respect to a potential investment arbitration claim against the government of an Eastern European country arising out of a concession operation in the mining sector. Value US$250+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for investors in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Italian Republic arising out of the Energy Charter Treaty. Value \u0026euro;200+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a state-owned oil company in an SCC arbitration against a U.S. oil and gas company regarding a failed joint venture project in Western Siberia involving complex issues of Swedish and Russian law. Value: US$200 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Cypriot investor in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Government of Montenegro. Value US$200+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a major commodity trading company. Value \u0026euro;28+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a Montenegrin aluminium smelter. Value \u0026euro;28 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing a Cyprus-based claimant company in LCIA proceedings with a Singapore counterparty arising out of the parties\u0026rsquo; failed joint venture in a Russian coal mining project. The award obtained upheld the entirety of the claimant's claims, including legal costs and interest. Value US$8 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing an individual respondent in LCIA proceedings arising out of the parties\u0026rsquo; dispute in relation to a Russian cardboard mill. The claims were fully dismissed on jurisdictional grounds with costs awarded in the client\u0026rsquo;s favour. Value US$10 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a large Russian automobile manufacturer in a LCIA arbitration dispute against a major European investment bank involving a guarantee. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$100+ million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two Russian claimants in a SCC arbitration against the government of an Eastern European state relating to expropriation of the claimants' shares in a major local bank. Value US$8 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing three claimant companies against a Bermuda-based affiliate of a leading Russian investment bank following the market crisis of 2008 in three related LCIA arbitrations. The awards obtained upheld the entirety of the claimants' claims, including legal costs and interest.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSCC arbitration in Stockholm on behalf of a Swiss trading company arising from a shareholder dispute and consequent fraud under various agreements associated with the Russian aluminium industry. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$380 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelected Litigation Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTolkynneftegaz LLP et al v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd et al\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e2023/GSC/003 - successfully challenging the jurisdiction of the Gibraltar Court on behalf of Moldovan and BVI oil \u0026amp; gas investors. Value US$500+ million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a U.S. oil \u0026amp; gas company on the enforcement of an arbitral award against a South American sovereign state. Value US$11 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKeith O\u0026rsquo;Loughlin v The Registrar of Companies and GCG Manager S.A. Luxco S.C.A.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;- successfully representing an individual claimant in an application to restore a dissolved company for the purposes of asserting a claim against the newly restored company.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eVTB Bank PJSC v Mejlumyan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2021] EWHC 1386 (Comm) - acting for the defendant to an anti-suit injunction claim concerning Armenian court proceedings arising out of the termination of a share pledge agreement between the parties governed by Armenian law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2020] EWHC 916 (Comm) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a complex award enforcement dispute arising out of related Belgian attachment proceedings involving the same parties. This dispute saw the first ever virtual trial in English legal history and was named in The Lawyer\u0026rsquo;s Top 20 Cases of 2020 list. Value US$545 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eLeidos Inc v the Hellenic Republic\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[2019] EWHC 2738 (Comm) - successful enforcement of an \u0026euro;55 million ICC arbitral award arising out of a breach of contract claim relating to the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTsareva and others v Ananyev and others; Galagaev and others v Ananyev and other\u003c/em\u003es [2019] EWHC 2414 (Comm) - successful strike out of claims for fraud and conspiracy on behalf of the Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants concerning certain securities issued by an affiliate of a major Russian bank. Value US$79 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] All ER (D) 103 (Dec) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a jurisdictional challenge concerning a claim for declarations which arose out of related Belgian conservatory attachment proceedings involving the same parties. Value US$540 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Moldovan investors in enforcement proceedings in relation to an US$540 million Energy Charter Treaty arbitral award against the Republic of Kazakhstan\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003e- Stati and others v Republic of Kazakhstan\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] EWCA Civ 1896.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a subsidiary of the Libyan sovereign wealth fund in High Court proceedings with a Dubai-based counterparty involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCatalyst Management Services v Libya Africa Investment Portfolio\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2018] EWCA Civ 1676. Value US$500 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a private Russian client in a dispute arising out of a failed joint venture property development project in Morocco -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBaturina v Chistyakov\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[2017] EWHC 1049 (Comm). Value \u0026euro;74 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting defendants in freezing order and related proceedings in the English High Court brought by the liquidator of a BVI entity -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMontvale Invest Ltd (In Liquidation) v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2016] EWHC 1664 (Ch). Value US$24.7 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a private Russian client in High Court of Justice proceedings brought by a liquidator of a major Russian bank -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eJSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshelnniy Bank and another v Pugachev amd others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2015] EWHC 2623 (Ch). Value US$1.5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting VTB Bank (Austria) AG in High Court proceedings against a foreign liquidator under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eRe Kombinat Aluminijuma Podgorica AD (in bankruptcy)\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2015] EWHC 750 (Ch).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully representing a Gibraltar-based company in High Court proceedings against a number of Kazakh defendants arising out of a loan agreement \u0026ndash;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eTerra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Aidar Assaubayev\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eand Ors\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2014] EWHC 4211 (Comm). Value US$7.3 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in worldwide freezing order proceedings in aid of a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrivy Council proceedings on behalf of a Kyrgyz telecom holding company on appeal from the Isle of Man concerning a dispute over a Kyrgyz mobile operator -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAltimo Holdings and Investment Ltd and others v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2011] UKPC 7. Value US$600 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnti-suit proceedings in the High Court of Justice relating to an LCIA arbitration involving a large Russian automobile manufacturer and a major European investment bank -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBNP Paribas SA v Open Joint Stock Co Russian Machines and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2011] EWHC 308 (Comm).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a number of Russian parties in Bermuda court proceedings against a Bermuda-based investment fund in a dispute involving alleged breach of contract, fraud and tort arising out of the parties' joint venture in Russia. Value US$84 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting two Cypriot entities in English court proceedings concerning breach of agreements about the transfer of shares in a Russian company and related proceedings in Cyprus for negative declarations -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eKolden Holdings Ltd v Rodette Commerce Ltd and another\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2008] EWCA Civ 10.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvising a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil in freezing order proceedings under section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against a Venezuelan state owned oil \u0026amp; gas company -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos De Venezuela SA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2008] EWHC 532 (Comm). Value US$12 billion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFraud and conspiracy proceedings before the High Court of Justice in London on behalf of France, Cyprus and Dubai based investors in the Tajik aluminum plant. Proceedings involving claims under six separate governing laws -\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIntermet FZCO and others v Ansol Ltd and others\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2007] EWHC 226 (Comm). Value US$65 million.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBase Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;[2004] EWCA Civ 1316 - imposition of a tortious/equitable duty of care and a voluntary assumption of responsibility; director's duties to his company and related governing law issues.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader","detail":"Lexology Index, 2026 Edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration ","detail":"Chambers UK, 2026 Edition"},{"title":"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader","detail":"Lexology Index, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: Public International Law","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: Civil Fraud ","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition"},{"title":"Named as an \"Arbitration Future Leader\"","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Named as a \"Recommended\" lawyer in the Commercial Litigation: Premium Tier 5 category","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2024 edition"},{"title":"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2023 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2023 edition"},{"title":"Recognised Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2022 edition"},{"title":"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2022 edition"},{"title":"Recognised lawyer in the International Arbitration and Commercial Litigation: Premium categories","detail":"Legal 500, 2021"},{"title":"Cited in Arbitration category","detail":"Legal 500, 2012–2020"},{"title":"Included in The Legal 500 Private Powerlist 2019","detail":"Legal 500 UK, 2019"},{"title":"“Expert”: Commercial Arbitration","detail":"Euromoney's Expert Guide, 2018-2020"},{"title":"“Up and Coming” lawyer, International Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2013"},{"title":"Leading Individual: Arbitration","detail":"Chambers UK, 2012 edition"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6819}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-01T17:12:31.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-01T17:12:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Dzhazoyan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lexology Index, 2026 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2026 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lexology Index, 2025 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2025 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer: Public International Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer: Civil Fraud \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named as an \\\"Arbitration Future Leader\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal, 2024 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named as a \\\"Recommended\\\" lawyer in the Commercial Litigation: Premium Tier 5 category\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2024 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2023 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2023 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognised Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2022 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2022 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognised lawyer in the International Arbitration and Commercial Litigation: Premium categories\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Cited in Arbitration category\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500, 2012–2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Included in The Legal 500 Private Powerlist 2019\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 UK, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Expert”: Commercial Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Euromoney's Expert Guide, 2018-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Up and Coming” lawyer, International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2013\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Individual: Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers UK, 2012 edition\"}{{ FIELD }}Selected Arbitrator Appointments{{ FIELD }}Sole arbitrator in a Stockholm seated SCC arbitration (in the Russian language) involving Georgian parties under Georgian law.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in an English law governed London seated LCIA arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a debt restructuring.{{ FIELD }}Co-arbitrator in a German law governed Munich seated ICC arbitration involving German and Russian parties concerning sanctions issues.{{ FIELD }}Selected Arbitration Matters\nAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a UK counterparty involving sanctions issues concerning delivery of the goods from an EU country. Value US$1+ million.{{ FIELD }}Advising a Swiss fertiliser company in a series of related LCIA arbitrations with counterparties from the UK and Ireland involving sanctions issues. Value US$39 million.{{ FIELD }}Advising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a counterparty from Western Africa involving sanctions issues. Value US$12 million.{{ FIELD }}Successfully representing an Armenian businessman in LCIA arbitration proceedings involving a claim under an option agreement relating to the parties’ failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$40 million.{{ FIELD }}Representing two corporate respondents from Vallex Group in LCIA arbitration proceedings against Russia’s VTB Bank relating to the parties’ failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$300+ million.{{ FIELD }}Advising a U.S. investment adviser with respect to a potential investment arbitration claim against the government of an Eastern European country arising out of a concession operation in the mining sector. Value US$250+ million.{{ FIELD }}Acting for investors in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Italian Republic arising out of the Energy Charter Treaty. Value €200+ million.{{ FIELD }}Advising a state-owned oil company in an SCC arbitration against a U.S. oil and gas company regarding a failed joint venture project in Western Siberia involving complex issues of Swedish and Russian law. Value: US$200 million.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Cypriot investor in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Government of Montenegro. Value US$200+ million.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a major commodity trading company. Value €28+ million.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a Montenegrin aluminium smelter. Value €28 million.{{ FIELD }}Successfully representing a Cyprus-based claimant company in LCIA proceedings with a Singapore counterparty arising out of the parties’ failed joint venture in a Russian coal mining project. The award obtained upheld the entirety of the claimant's claims, including legal costs and interest. Value US$8 million.{{ FIELD }}Successfully representing an individual respondent in LCIA proceedings arising out of the parties’ dispute in relation to a Russian cardboard mill. The claims were fully dismissed on jurisdictional grounds with costs awarded in the client’s favour. Value US$10 million.{{ FIELD }}Representing an Eastern European energy company in a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a large Russian automobile manufacturer in a LCIA arbitration dispute against a major European investment bank involving a guarantee. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$100+ million.{{ FIELD }}Representing two Russian claimants in a SCC arbitration against the government of an Eastern European state relating to expropriation of the claimants' shares in a major local bank. Value US$8 million.{{ FIELD }}Successfully representing three claimant companies against a Bermuda-based affiliate of a leading Russian investment bank following the market crisis of 2008 in three related LCIA arbitrations. The awards obtained upheld the entirety of the claimants' claims, including legal costs and interest.{{ FIELD }}SCC arbitration in Stockholm on behalf of a Swiss trading company arising from a shareholder dispute and consequent fraud under various agreements associated with the Russian aluminium industry. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$380 million.{{ FIELD }}Selected Litigation Matters\nTolkynneftegaz LLP et al v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd et al 2023/GSC/003 - successfully challenging the jurisdiction of the Gibraltar Court on behalf of Moldovan and BVI oil \u0026amp; gas investors. Value US$500+ million.\nAdvising a U.S. oil \u0026amp; gas company on the enforcement of an arbitral award against a South American sovereign state. Value US$11 million.\nKeith O’Loughlin v The Registrar of Companies and GCG Manager S.A. Luxco S.C.A. - successfully representing an individual claimant in an application to restore a dissolved company for the purposes of asserting a claim against the newly restored company.\nVTB Bank PJSC v Mejlumyan [2021] EWHC 1386 (Comm) - acting for the defendant to an anti-suit injunction claim concerning Armenian court proceedings arising out of the termination of a share pledge agreement between the parties governed by Armenian law.\nNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others [2020] EWHC 916 (Comm) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a complex award enforcement dispute arising out of related Belgian attachment proceedings involving the same parties. This dispute saw the first ever virtual trial in English legal history and was named in The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2020 list. Value US$545 million.\nLeidos Inc v the Hellenic Republic [2019] EWHC 2738 (Comm) - successful enforcement of an €55 million ICC arbitral award arising out of a breach of contract claim relating to the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens.\nTsareva and others v Ananyev and others; Galagaev and others v Ananyev and others [2019] EWHC 2414 (Comm) - successful strike out of claims for fraud and conspiracy on behalf of the Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants concerning certain securities issued by an affiliate of a major Russian bank. Value US$79 million.\nNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others [2018] All ER (D) 103 (Dec) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a jurisdictional challenge concerning a claim for declarations which arose out of related Belgian conservatory attachment proceedings involving the same parties. Value US$540 million.\nRepresenting Moldovan investors in enforcement proceedings in relation to an US$540 million Energy Charter Treaty arbitral award against the Republic of Kazakhstan - Stati and others v Republic of Kazakhstan [2018] EWCA Civ 1896.\nRepresenting a subsidiary of the Libyan sovereign wealth fund in High Court proceedings with a Dubai-based counterparty involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy - Catalyst Management Services v Libya Africa Investment Portfolio [2018] EWCA Civ 1676. Value US$500 million.\nAdvising a private Russian client in a dispute arising out of a failed joint venture property development project in Morocco - Baturina v Chistyakov [2017] EWHC 1049 (Comm). Value €74 million.\nRepresenting defendants in freezing order and related proceedings in the English High Court brought by the liquidator of a BVI entity - Montvale Invest Ltd (In Liquidation) v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd and another [2016] EWHC 1664 (Ch). Value US$24.7 million.\nAdvising a private Russian client in High Court of Justice proceedings brought by a liquidator of a major Russian bank - JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshelnniy Bank and another v Pugachev amd others [2015] EWHC 2623 (Ch). Value US$1.5 billion.\nRepresenting VTB Bank (Austria) AG in High Court proceedings against a foreign liquidator under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 - Re Kombinat Aluminijuma Podgorica AD (in bankruptcy) [2015] EWHC 750 (Ch).\nSuccessfully representing a Gibraltar-based company in High Court proceedings against a number of Kazakh defendants arising out of a loan agreement – Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Aidar Assaubayev and Ors [2014] EWHC 4211 (Comm). Value US$7.3 million.\nRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in worldwide freezing order proceedings in aid of a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\nPrivy Council proceedings on behalf of a Kyrgyz telecom holding company on appeal from the Isle of Man concerning a dispute over a Kyrgyz mobile operator - Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd and others v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd and others [2011] UKPC 7. Value US$600 million.\nAnti-suit proceedings in the High Court of Justice relating to an LCIA arbitration involving a large Russian automobile manufacturer and a major European investment bank - BNP Paribas SA v Open Joint Stock Co Russian Machines and another [2011] EWHC 308 (Comm).\nAdvising a number of Russian parties in Bermuda court proceedings against a Bermuda-based investment fund in a dispute involving alleged breach of contract, fraud and tort arising out of the parties' joint venture in Russia. Value US$84 million.\nRepresenting two Cypriot entities in English court proceedings concerning breach of agreements about the transfer of shares in a Russian company and related proceedings in Cyprus for negative declarations - Kolden Holdings Ltd v Rodette Commerce Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 10.\nAdvising a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil in freezing order proceedings under section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against a Venezuelan state owned oil \u0026amp; gas company - Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos De Venezuela SA [2008] EWHC 532 (Comm). Value US$12 billion.\nFraud and conspiracy proceedings before the High Court of Justice in London on behalf of France, Cyprus and Dubai based investors in the Tajik aluminum plant. Proceedings involving claims under six separate governing laws - Intermet FZCO and others v Ansol Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 226 (Comm). Value US$65 million.\nBase Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin [2004] EWCA Civ 1316 - imposition of a tortious/equitable duty of care and a voluntary assumption of responsibility; director's duties to his company and related governing law issues.{{ FIELD }}Egishe Dzhazoyan is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s London office and specializes in international arbitration and litigation. A dual-qualified lawyer in common law and civil law, Egishe can handle matters in five different languages and is uniquely placed to provide strategic legal advice concerning large and complex disputes, often involving a cross-border element and enforcement issues.\nDuring 25 years of practice, Egishe has advised and represented clients in more than 250 arbitration and litigation proceedings across a host of various jurisdictions and in a broad range of industries. Egishe also sits as arbitrator and has particular experience in this capacity with disputes involving sanctions.\nEgishe is consistently recognised in all major legal rankings which describe him as “a brilliant lawyer with a very sharp legal mind, immense intellectual curiosity and commercial awareness, which is matched by his impressive work ethic and client dedication” noting that “Egishe’s levels of commercial awareness and client service are exemplary, helped by his ability to perform tasks in five different languages” (Chambers UK); “a truly extraordinary lawyer”, “simply phenomenal and a dream lawyer for any client to have” (Legal 500 UK). \nEgishe frequently advises clients in court proceedings and has particular experience in matters involving enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states, as well as complex offshore commercial fraud and asset recovery disputes. An example of this type of work was his role as lead global litigation counsel in helping to secure what is believed to be the largest ever court mandated asset attachment in legal history (US$22.6 billion) involving a freeze of the Republic of Kazakhstan’s National Fund assets in Belgium and the Netherlands in October 2017.\nEgishe has been ranked in International Arbitration by Chambers UK 2022-2026 editions and has been consistently recognized in International Arbitration by Legal 500 UK for 2012–2024, as an expert by ExpertGuides Commercial Arbitration in the 2018-2021 editions, and has also featured in the inaugural Legal 500 International Arbitration Powerlist UK 2019. In addition, Egishe has been ranked as a Recommended lawyer by Legal 500 UK 2025 in the Public International Law and Civil Fraud categories and by Legal 500 UK 2024 in the Commercial Litigation: Premium category.\nIn addition to his law practice, Egishe frequently appears as a guest lecturer on various arbitration related topics at the American University of Armenia and has published a number of articles in leading arbitration journals.\nEgishe is fluent in English, Russian and Armenian and has a working knowledge of German and French. Egishe Dzhazoyan Partner Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader Lexology Index, 2026 Edition Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration  Chambers UK, 2026 Edition Recognized as an Arbitration Future Leader Lexology Index, 2025 Edition Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration Chambers UK, 2025 Edition Recommended Lawyer: Public International Law Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition Recommended Lawyer: Civil Fraud  Legal 500 UK, 2025 Edition Named as an \"Arbitration Future Leader\" Who's Who Legal, 2024 edition Named as a \"Recommended\" lawyer in the Commercial Litigation: Premium Tier 5 category Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration Legal 500 UK, 2024 edition Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration Chambers UK, 2024 edition Recommended Lawyer: International Arbitration Legal 500 UK, 2023 edition Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration Chambers UK, 2023 edition Recognised Lawyer: International Arbitration Legal 500 UK, 2022 edition Ranked Lawyer: International Arbitration Chambers UK, 2022 edition Recognised lawyer in the International Arbitration and Commercial Litigation: Premium categories Legal 500, 2021 Cited in Arbitration category Legal 500, 2012–2020 Included in The Legal 500 Private Powerlist 2019 Legal 500 UK, 2019 “Expert”: Commercial Arbitration Euromoney's Expert Guide, 2018-2020 “Up and Coming” lawyer, International Arbitration Chambers UK, 2013 Leading Individual: Arbitration Chambers UK, 2012 edition College of Law, London, UK  Moscow State University Moscow State University University of Cambridge, UK  Moscow State University Moscow State University England and Wales Russia Law Society of England and Wales Moscow City Bar, Russia Selected Arbitrator Appointments Sole arbitrator in a Stockholm seated SCC arbitration (in the Russian language) involving Georgian parties under Georgian law. Co-arbitrator in an English law governed London seated LCIA arbitration involving a dispute arising out of a debt restructuring. Co-arbitrator in a German law governed Munich seated ICC arbitration involving German and Russian parties concerning sanctions issues. Selected Arbitration Matters\nAdvising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a UK counterparty involving sanctions issues concerning delivery of the goods from an EU country. Value US$1+ million. Advising a Swiss fertiliser company in a series of related LCIA arbitrations with counterparties from the UK and Ireland involving sanctions issues. Value US$39 million. Advising a Swiss fertiliser company in an LCIA arbitration with a counterparty from Western Africa involving sanctions issues. Value US$12 million. Successfully representing an Armenian businessman in LCIA arbitration proceedings involving a claim under an option agreement relating to the parties’ failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$40 million. Representing two corporate respondents from Vallex Group in LCIA arbitration proceedings against Russia’s VTB Bank relating to the parties’ failed joint venture project to develop a copper and molybdenum mine in the Armenian province of Lori. Value US$300+ million. Advising a U.S. investment adviser with respect to a potential investment arbitration claim against the government of an Eastern European country arising out of a concession operation in the mining sector. Value US$250+ million. Acting for investors in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Italian Republic arising out of the Energy Charter Treaty. Value €200+ million. Advising a state-owned oil company in an SCC arbitration against a U.S. oil and gas company regarding a failed joint venture project in Western Siberia involving complex issues of Swedish and Russian law. Value: US$200 million. Representing a Cypriot investor in ICSID arbitration proceedings against the Government of Montenegro. Value US$200+ million. Acting for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a major commodity trading company. Value €28+ million. Acting for a European subsidiary of a major Russian bank in an LCIA arbitration against a Montenegrin aluminium smelter. Value €28 million. Successfully representing a Cyprus-based claimant company in LCIA proceedings with a Singapore counterparty arising out of the parties’ failed joint venture in a Russian coal mining project. The award obtained upheld the entirety of the claimant's claims, including legal costs and interest. Value US$8 million. Successfully representing an individual respondent in LCIA proceedings arising out of the parties’ dispute in relation to a Russian cardboard mill. The claims were fully dismissed on jurisdictional grounds with costs awarded in the client’s favour. Value US$10 million. Representing an Eastern European energy company in a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million. Acting for a large Russian automobile manufacturer in a LCIA arbitration dispute against a major European investment bank involving a guarantee. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$100+ million. Representing two Russian claimants in a SCC arbitration against the government of an Eastern European state relating to expropriation of the claimants' shares in a major local bank. Value US$8 million. Successfully representing three claimant companies against a Bermuda-based affiliate of a leading Russian investment bank following the market crisis of 2008 in three related LCIA arbitrations. The awards obtained upheld the entirety of the claimants' claims, including legal costs and interest. SCC arbitration in Stockholm on behalf of a Swiss trading company arising from a shareholder dispute and consequent fraud under various agreements associated with the Russian aluminium industry. Obtained a favourable settlement for the client. Value US$380 million. Selected Litigation Matters\nTolkynneftegaz LLP et al v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd et al 2023/GSC/003 - successfully challenging the jurisdiction of the Gibraltar Court on behalf of Moldovan and BVI oil \u0026amp; gas investors. Value US$500+ million.\nAdvising a U.S. oil \u0026amp; gas company on the enforcement of an arbitral award against a South American sovereign state. Value US$11 million.\nKeith O’Loughlin v The Registrar of Companies and GCG Manager S.A. Luxco S.C.A. - successfully representing an individual claimant in an application to restore a dissolved company for the purposes of asserting a claim against the newly restored company.\nVTB Bank PJSC v Mejlumyan [2021] EWHC 1386 (Comm) - acting for the defendant to an anti-suit injunction claim concerning Armenian court proceedings arising out of the termination of a share pledge agreement between the parties governed by Armenian law.\nNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others [2020] EWHC 916 (Comm) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a complex award enforcement dispute arising out of related Belgian attachment proceedings involving the same parties. This dispute saw the first ever virtual trial in English legal history and was named in The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2020 list. Value US$545 million.\nLeidos Inc v the Hellenic Republic [2019] EWHC 2738 (Comm) - successful enforcement of an €55 million ICC arbitral award arising out of a breach of contract claim relating to the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens.\nTsareva and others v Ananyev and others; Galagaev and others v Ananyev and others [2019] EWHC 2414 (Comm) - successful strike out of claims for fraud and conspiracy on behalf of the Third, Fourth and Fifth Defendants concerning certain securities issued by an affiliate of a major Russian bank. Value US$79 million.\nNational Bank of Kazakhstan and another v Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, London Branch and others [2018] All ER (D) 103 (Dec) - acting for the Second to Fifth Defendants in a jurisdictional challenge concerning a claim for declarations which arose out of related Belgian conservatory attachment proceedings involving the same parties. Value US$540 million.\nRepresenting Moldovan investors in enforcement proceedings in relation to an US$540 million Energy Charter Treaty arbitral award against the Republic of Kazakhstan - Stati and others v Republic of Kazakhstan [2018] EWCA Civ 1896.\nRepresenting a subsidiary of the Libyan sovereign wealth fund in High Court proceedings with a Dubai-based counterparty involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud and conspiracy - Catalyst Management Services v Libya Africa Investment Portfolio [2018] EWCA Civ 1676. Value US$500 million.\nAdvising a private Russian client in a dispute arising out of a failed joint venture property development project in Morocco - Baturina v Chistyakov [2017] EWHC 1049 (Comm). Value €74 million.\nRepresenting defendants in freezing order and related proceedings in the English High Court brought by the liquidator of a BVI entity - Montvale Invest Ltd (In Liquidation) v Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd and another [2016] EWHC 1664 (Ch). Value US$24.7 million.\nAdvising a private Russian client in High Court of Justice proceedings brought by a liquidator of a major Russian bank - JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshelnniy Bank and another v Pugachev amd others [2015] EWHC 2623 (Ch). Value US$1.5 billion.\nRepresenting VTB Bank (Austria) AG in High Court proceedings against a foreign liquidator under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 - Re Kombinat Aluminijuma Podgorica AD (in bankruptcy) [2015] EWHC 750 (Ch).\nSuccessfully representing a Gibraltar-based company in High Court proceedings against a number of Kazakh defendants arising out of a loan agreement – Terra Raf Trans Traiding Ltd v Aidar Assaubayev and Ors [2014] EWHC 4211 (Comm). Value US$7.3 million.\nRepresenting an Eastern European energy company in worldwide freezing order proceedings in aid of a London-based UNCITRAL arbitration with a major commodity trading company. Value US$100 million.\nPrivy Council proceedings on behalf of a Kyrgyz telecom holding company on appeal from the Isle of Man concerning a dispute over a Kyrgyz mobile operator - Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd and others v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd and others [2011] UKPC 7. Value US$600 million.\nAnti-suit proceedings in the High Court of Justice relating to an LCIA arbitration involving a large Russian automobile manufacturer and a major European investment bank - BNP Paribas SA v Open Joint Stock Co Russian Machines and another [2011] EWHC 308 (Comm).\nAdvising a number of Russian parties in Bermuda court proceedings against a Bermuda-based investment fund in a dispute involving alleged breach of contract, fraud and tort arising out of the parties' joint venture in Russia. Value US$84 million.\nRepresenting two Cypriot entities in English court proceedings concerning breach of agreements about the transfer of shares in a Russian company and related proceedings in Cyprus for negative declarations - Kolden Holdings Ltd v Rodette Commerce Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 10.\nAdvising a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil in freezing order proceedings under section 44 of the Arbitration Act 1996 against a Venezuelan state owned oil \u0026amp; gas company - Mobil Cerro Negro Ltd v Petroleos De Venezuela SA [2008] EWHC 532 (Comm). Value US$12 billion.\nFraud and conspiracy proceedings before the High Court of Justice in London on behalf of France, Cyprus and Dubai based investors in the Tajik aluminum plant. Proceedings involving claims under six separate governing laws - Intermet FZCO and others v Ansol Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 226 (Comm). Value US$65 million.\nBase Metal Trading Ltd v Shamurin [2004] EWCA Civ 1316 - imposition of a tortious/equitable duty of care and a voluntary assumption of responsibility; director's duties to his company and related governing law issues.","searchable_name":"Egishe Dzhazoyan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443116,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7201,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAkash\u0026nbsp;represents\u0026nbsp;companies in complex litigation and government investigations. He\u0026nbsp;possesses\u0026nbsp;a breadth\u0026nbsp;of litigation and enforcement experience informed by six years of service as both an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia and Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau\u0026nbsp;handling litigations and investigations\u0026nbsp;in the healthcare and financial sectors. Before his career\u0026nbsp;in government, Akash also spent\u0026nbsp;nearly eight years as a litigator at two global law firms.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia, Akash litigated\u0026nbsp;and investigated an array of False Claims Act matters, including those\u0026nbsp;involving kickbacks, medically unnecessary services, and violations of federal cybersecurity requirements. During his tenure, he\u0026nbsp;co-tried a case resulting in\u0026nbsp;a $27 million judgment\u0026nbsp;against a Georgia doctor and his medical practice for violating the False Claims Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Akash litigated and investigated violations of consumer financial law. His experience included investigating the data security practices of a large financial services provider that experienced a data breach and\u0026nbsp;litigating a complex action alongside several State Attorney General\u0026nbsp;Offices.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in private practice, Akash worked on complex commercial, financial, and intellectual property litigation in federal and state venues across the country.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAkash received his J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School, where he was on the editorial board of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law and a Moot Court Board member. He\u0026nbsp;also received his LL.M. in International Legal Studies from New York University School of Law and his\u0026nbsp;B.A. in Political Science with honors from the University of Rochester.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"akash-desai","email":"adesai@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":740,"guid":"740.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Desai","nick_name":"Akash","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Jon P. McCalla, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee","years_held":"2004 - 2005"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Aleta A. Trauger, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee","years_held":"2011 - 2013"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. S. Martin Teel, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia","years_held":"2011 - 2011"}],"first_name":"Akash","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2004-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null},{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"LL.M.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAkash\u0026nbsp;represents\u0026nbsp;companies in complex litigation and government investigations. He\u0026nbsp;possesses\u0026nbsp;a breadth\u0026nbsp;of litigation and enforcement experience informed by six years of service as both an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia and Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau\u0026nbsp;handling litigations and investigations\u0026nbsp;in the healthcare and financial sectors. Before his career\u0026nbsp;in government, Akash also spent\u0026nbsp;nearly eight years as a litigator at two global law firms.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia, Akash litigated\u0026nbsp;and investigated an array of False Claims Act matters, including those\u0026nbsp;involving kickbacks, medically unnecessary services, and violations of federal cybersecurity requirements. During his tenure, he\u0026nbsp;co-tried a case resulting in\u0026nbsp;a $27 million judgment\u0026nbsp;against a Georgia doctor and his medical practice for violating the False Claims Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Akash litigated and investigated violations of consumer financial law. His experience included investigating the data security practices of a large financial services provider that experienced a data breach and\u0026nbsp;litigating a complex action alongside several State Attorney General\u0026nbsp;Offices.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in private practice, Akash worked on complex commercial, financial, and intellectual property litigation in federal and state venues across the country.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAkash received his J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School, where he was on the editorial board of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law and a Moot Court Board member. He\u0026nbsp;also received his LL.M. in International Legal Studies from New York University School of Law and his\u0026nbsp;B.A. in Political Science with honors from the University of Rochester.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12899}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-19T16:33:25.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-19T16:33:25.000Z","searchable_text":"Desai{{ FIELD }}Akash represents companies in complex litigation and government investigations. He possesses a breadth of litigation and enforcement experience informed by six years of service as both an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia and Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau handling litigations and investigations in the healthcare and financial sectors. Before his career in government, Akash also spent nearly eight years as a litigator at two global law firms. \nAs an Assistant United States Attorney in the Northern District of Georgia, Akash litigated and investigated an array of False Claims Act matters, including those involving kickbacks, medically unnecessary services, and violations of federal cybersecurity requirements. During his tenure, he co-tried a case resulting in a $27 million judgment against a Georgia doctor and his medical practice for violating the False Claims Act.\nAs a Senior Litigation Counsel at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Akash litigated and investigated violations of consumer financial law. His experience included investigating the data security practices of a large financial services provider that experienced a data breach and litigating a complex action alongside several State Attorney General Offices. \nEarlier in private practice, Akash worked on complex commercial, financial, and intellectual property litigation in federal and state venues across the country. \nAkash received his J.D. from Vanderbilt University Law School, where he was on the editorial board of the Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law and a Moot Court Board member. He also received his LL.M. in International Legal Studies from New York University School of Law and his B.A. in Political Science with honors from the University of Rochester.     Counsel University of Rochester  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law New York University New York University School of Law Georgia New York Law Clerk, Hon. Jon P. McCalla, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Law Clerk, Hon. Aleta A. Trauger, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Law Clerk, Hon. S. Martin Teel, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia","searchable_name":"Akash Desai","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}