{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"4","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"M","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":447807,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1056,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Miles specializes in domestic and international arbitration of investment disputes and commercial matters. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Craig represents clients before arbitral tribunals worldwide.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig represents foreign investors in disputes with host governments, primarily before the World Bank\u0026rsquo;s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and private parties in commercial disputes before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and other domestic and international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig has first- or second-chaired dozens of arbitration hearings involving disputes throughout North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East, with particularly strong experience in bilateral investment treaty (BIT) disputes in the oil and gas, mining and infrastructure sectors, as well as in Latin America. He is regularly called upon to handle the quantum aspects of clients\u0026rsquo; most significant disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong Craig's recent cases are some of the largest BIT awards and settlements ever obtained by foreign investors against the governments of Argentina, Algeria, Bolivia, Ecuador, Egypt, Romania, Venezuela and Vietnam, among others. He also acts as lead external counsel to the Arbitration Committee of the USA Rice Millers Association, a trade group that has administered dozens of arbitrations involving the rice industry worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2011, Craig was named to the \u003cem\u003eGlobal Arbitration Review\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;45 Under 45\u0026rdquo; list of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading international arbitration practitioners under the age of 45. Also, he has been frequently recognized in \u003cem\u003eChambers Global, Chambers\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eUSA, Chambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers in America, The Legal 500,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLatin Lawyer, and Law Dragon.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native English speaker who is also proficient in Spanish, French and Portuguese, Craig frequently speaks and writes on international arbitration issues.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"craig-miles","email":"cmiles@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean Indonesian pulp company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion-dollar ICC arbitration in Brazil arising from a share purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major integrated oil \u0026amp; gas producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion-dollar UNCITRAL arbitration against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from fraudulent judgments issued against the client in Ecuadorian courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea global oilfield services company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration relating to compression agreements in a major oilfield in Mexico, leading to a US$ 40 million settlement for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOdyssey Marine Exploration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a NAFTA UNCITRAL arbitration relating to a halted mining project, obtaining a US$ 37 million award for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting The Williams Companies in an ICSID (AF) arbitration against Venezuela arising from the nationalization of multiple state-of-the-art gas compression plants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global infrastructure developer in an ICSID arbitration against Peru and three related commercial arbitrations arising from canceled concessions to build and operate fiber-optic networks in remote areas of the country. The commercial arbitrations resulted in an award of US$ 177 million in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egroup of Kuwaiti investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Egypt in a dispute arising from a revoked concession to develop an agricultural project and potential new city outside of Cairo, obtaining an award of US$ 18.5 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration against another international pharmaceutical company in a dispute relating to the sale of certain Mexican subsidiaries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDutch investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an award (including moral damages) in an UNCITRAL BIT arbitration against a Southeast Asian State, in a dispute alleging unlawful confiscation of real estate and other assets without compensation. See press article \u003ca href=\"https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/award-04122019161649.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea global mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a BIT dispute against a South American State arising from the closure of a producing mine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSalini Impregilo\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(n/k/a WeBuild) in its ICSID claim against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a bridge and tollway concession. In February 2018, the Tribunal upheld its jurisdiction over the claim, see Decision on Jurisdiction \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9546.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e, and later issues a Decision on Liability in favor of the client with a final damages award pending.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. refining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) arbitration arising from the multi-billion-dollar construction of a refinery expansion project on the U.S. Gulf Coast.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea U.S. integrated energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining a complete declaratory victory in an Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC) arbitration against a South American State-owned oil company relating to the royalty-adjustment clauses in a concession agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBear Creek Mining Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Peru in an arbitration under the Canada-Peru FTA arising from Peru\u0026rsquo;s revocation of one of the company\u0026rsquo;s mining concessions. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9381.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSouth American Silver Corp.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an award in its UNCITRAL arbitration against Bolivia under the UK-Bolivia BIT arising from Bolivia\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of the company\u0026rsquo;s mining concession. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10361.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBurlington Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID arbitration award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT arising from Ecuador\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of two of the company\u0026rsquo;s producing blocks. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw8208_0.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of Grupo Marsans\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in their successful ICSID claim against Argentina under the Spain-Argentina BIT, arising from Argentina\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of the clients\u0026rsquo; investments in the Argentine airlines\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAerol\u0026iacute;neas Argentinas\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAustral\u003c/em\u003e. See Decision on Jurisdiction here. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9235.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Decision on Annulment \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10552.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMurphy Oil\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an UNCITRAL award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from Ecuador\u0026rsquo;s unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil production contract. The Tribunal had previously upheld its jurisdiction over the claim in 2013. See Partial Final Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7489_0.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Partial Award on Jurisdiction\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw8636.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of ExxonMobil\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining a (non-published) award in 2016 against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the clients\u0026rsquo; investments in the oil \u0026amp; gas sector. The Tribunal previously issued a (non-published) Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability in 2013.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe principals of European Food and Drinks Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Romania under the Sweden-Romania BIT, arising from Romania\u0026rsquo;s revocation of certain customs-tax exemptions that underlay the investment in substantial food and beverage manufacturing facilities in an economically-disadvantaged region of northwestern Romania. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3036.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean affiliate of Exterran Holdings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its ICSID claim against Venezuela under the Spain-Venezuela BIT, arising from Venezuela\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of substantially all of the company\u0026rsquo;s assets, operations and facilities in Venezuela. After the hearing on the merits took place in July 2012, the case settled for a reported US $442 million. See press release\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=113213\u0026amp;p=irol-newsArticle\u0026amp;ID=1723334\u0026amp;highlight=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEl Paso\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the regulatory frameworks governing the electricity and oil \u0026amp; gas sectors. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://italaw.com/documents/El_Paso_v._Argentina_Award_ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Decision on Jurisdiction\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/elpasoEN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eImpregilo S.p.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a water concession in the Province of Buenos Aires. An ICSID annulment committee subsequently upheld the award in full. See Decision on Annulment\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3044.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0418.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Miles","nick_name":"Craig","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Craig","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"500 Leading Global Litigators","detail":"LAW DRAGON, 2023-2024"},{"title":"Named to “45 Under 45” list","detail":"Global Arbitration Review, 2011"},{"title":"International Commercial Arbitration","detail":"Who’s Who Legal, 2009–2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide","detail":"Chambers Latin America, 2011–2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Commercial and Governmental","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2010–2024"},{"title":"Lawyer of the Year, Houston, International Arbitration and Commercial","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2019"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America, 2013–2020, 2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Nationwide","detail":"Chambers USA, 2010–2020"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250, 2008–2020"},{"title":"GAR 100","detail":"Global Arbitration Review, 2009–2020"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Global","detail":"Chambers Global, 2007, 2019-2024"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Miles specializes in domestic and international arbitration of investment disputes and commercial matters. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Craig represents clients before arbitral tribunals worldwide.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig represents foreign investors in disputes with host governments, primarily before the World Bank\u0026rsquo;s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and private parties in commercial disputes before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and other domestic and international arbitral institutions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig has first- or second-chaired dozens of arbitration hearings involving disputes throughout North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East, with particularly strong experience in bilateral investment treaty (BIT) disputes in the oil and gas, mining and infrastructure sectors, as well as in Latin America. He is regularly called upon to handle the quantum aspects of clients\u0026rsquo; most significant disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmong Craig's recent cases are some of the largest BIT awards and settlements ever obtained by foreign investors against the governments of Argentina, Algeria, Bolivia, Ecuador, Egypt, Romania, Venezuela and Vietnam, among others. He also acts as lead external counsel to the Arbitration Committee of the USA Rice Millers Association, a trade group that has administered dozens of arbitrations involving the rice industry worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2011, Craig was named to the \u003cem\u003eGlobal Arbitration Review\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;45 Under 45\u0026rdquo; list of the world\u0026rsquo;s leading international arbitration practitioners under the age of 45. Also, he has been frequently recognized in \u003cem\u003eChambers Global, Chambers\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eUSA, Chambers Latin America\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eWho\u0026rsquo;s Who\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers in America, The Legal 500,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLatin Lawyer, and Law Dragon.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA native English speaker who is also proficient in Spanish, French and Portuguese, Craig frequently speaks and writes on international arbitration issues.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean Indonesian pulp company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion-dollar ICC arbitration in Brazil arising from a share purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major integrated oil \u0026amp; gas producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion-dollar UNCITRAL arbitration against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from fraudulent judgments issued against the client in Ecuadorian courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea global oilfield services company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration relating to compression agreements in a major oilfield in Mexico, leading to a US$ 40 million settlement for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOdyssey Marine Exploration\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a NAFTA UNCITRAL arbitration relating to a halted mining project, obtaining a US$ 37 million award for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting The Williams Companies in an ICSID (AF) arbitration against Venezuela arising from the nationalization of multiple state-of-the-art gas compression plants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a global infrastructure developer in an ICSID arbitration against Peru and three related commercial arbitrations arising from canceled concessions to build and operate fiber-optic networks in remote areas of the country. The commercial arbitrations resulted in an award of US$ 177 million in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003egroup of Kuwaiti investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Egypt in a dispute arising from a revoked concession to develop an agricultural project and potential new city outside of Cairo, obtaining an award of US$ 18.5 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration against another international pharmaceutical company in a dispute relating to the sale of certain Mexican subsidiaries.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDutch investors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an award (including moral damages) in an UNCITRAL BIT arbitration against a Southeast Asian State, in a dispute alleging unlawful confiscation of real estate and other assets without compensation. See press article \u003ca href=\"https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/award-04122019161649.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea global mining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a BIT dispute against a South American State arising from the closure of a producing mine.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSalini Impregilo\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(n/k/a WeBuild) in its ICSID claim against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a bridge and tollway concession. In February 2018, the Tribunal upheld its jurisdiction over the claim, see Decision on Jurisdiction \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9546.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e, and later issues a Decision on Liability in favor of the client with a final damages award pending.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. refining company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) arbitration arising from the multi-billion-dollar construction of a refinery expansion project on the U.S. Gulf Coast.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea U.S. integrated energy company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining a complete declaratory victory in an Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC) arbitration against a South American State-owned oil company relating to the royalty-adjustment clauses in a concession agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBear Creek Mining Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Peru in an arbitration under the Canada-Peru FTA arising from Peru\u0026rsquo;s revocation of one of the company\u0026rsquo;s mining concessions. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9381.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSouth American Silver Corp.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an award in its UNCITRAL arbitration against Bolivia under the UK-Bolivia BIT arising from Bolivia\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of the company\u0026rsquo;s mining concession. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10361.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBurlington Resources Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID arbitration award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT arising from Ecuador\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of two of the company\u0026rsquo;s producing blocks. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw8208_0.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of Grupo Marsans\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in their successful ICSID claim against Argentina under the Spain-Argentina BIT, arising from Argentina\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of the clients\u0026rsquo; investments in the Argentine airlines\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAerol\u0026iacute;neas Argentinas\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAustral\u003c/em\u003e. See Decision on Jurisdiction here. See Award \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw9235.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Decision on Annulment \u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10552.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMurphy Oil\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an UNCITRAL award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from Ecuador\u0026rsquo;s unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil production contract. The Tribunal had previously upheld its jurisdiction over the claim in 2013. See Partial Final Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw7489_0.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Partial Award on Jurisdiction\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw8636.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of ExxonMobil\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining a (non-published) award in 2016 against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the clients\u0026rsquo; investments in the oil \u0026amp; gas sector. The Tribunal previously issued a (non-published) Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability in 2013.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe principals of European Food and Drinks Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Romania under the Sweden-Romania BIT, arising from Romania\u0026rsquo;s revocation of certain customs-tax exemptions that underlay the investment in substantial food and beverage manufacturing facilities in an economically-disadvantaged region of northwestern Romania. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3036.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean affiliate of Exterran Holdings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in its ICSID claim against Venezuela under the Spain-Venezuela BIT, arising from Venezuela\u0026rsquo;s nationalization of substantially all of the company\u0026rsquo;s assets, operations and facilities in Venezuela. After the hearing on the merits took place in July 2012, the case settled for a reported US $442 million. See press release\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=113213\u0026amp;p=irol-newsArticle\u0026amp;ID=1723334\u0026amp;highlight=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEl Paso\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the regulatory frameworks governing the electricity and oil \u0026amp; gas sectors. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://italaw.com/documents/El_Paso_v._Argentina_Award_ENG.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Decision on Jurisdiction\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/elpasoEN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eImpregilo S.p.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a water concession in the Province of Buenos Aires. An ICSID annulment committee subsequently upheld the award in full. See Decision on Annulment\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw3044.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e. See Award\u0026nbsp;\u003ca href=\"http://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0418.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"\u003ehere\u003c/a\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"500 Leading Global Litigators","detail":"LAW DRAGON, 2023-2024"},{"title":"Named to “45 Under 45” list","detail":"Global Arbitration Review, 2011"},{"title":"International Commercial Arbitration","detail":"Who’s Who Legal, 2009–2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide","detail":"Chambers Latin America, 2011–2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Commercial and Governmental","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2010–2024"},{"title":"Lawyer of the Year, Houston, International Arbitration and Commercial","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2019"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America, 2013–2020, 2024"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Nationwide","detail":"Chambers USA, 2010–2020"},{"title":"International Arbitration","detail":"Latin Lawyer 250, 2008–2020"},{"title":"GAR 100","detail":"Global Arbitration Review, 2009–2020"},{"title":"International Arbitration: Global","detail":"Chambers Global, 2007, 2019-2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6724}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-24T14:35:05.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-24T14:35:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Miles{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Global Litigators\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LAW DRAGON, 2023-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to “45 Under 45” list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Arbitration Review, 2011\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Commercial Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who’s Who Legal, 2009–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Latin America, 2011–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration: Commercial and Governmental\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2010–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Lawyer of the Year, Houston, International Arbitration and Commercial\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration: Latin America-wide\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Latin America, 2013–2020, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration: Nationwide\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2010–2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Latin Lawyer 250, 2008–2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"GAR 100\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Arbitration Review, 2009–2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"International Arbitration: Global\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global, 2007, 2019-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing an Indonesian pulp company in a multi-billion-dollar ICC arbitration in Brazil arising from a share purchase agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major integrated oil \u0026amp; gas producer in a multi-billion-dollar UNCITRAL arbitration against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from fraudulent judgments issued against the client in Ecuadorian courts.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global oilfield services company in an ICC arbitration relating to compression agreements in a major oilfield in Mexico, leading to a US$ 40 million settlement for the client.{{ FIELD }}Representing Odyssey Marine Exploration in a NAFTA UNCITRAL arbitration relating to a halted mining project, obtaining a US$ 37 million award for the client.{{ FIELD }}Representing The Williams Companies in an ICSID (AF) arbitration against Venezuela arising from the nationalization of multiple state-of-the-art gas compression plants.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global infrastructure developer in an ICSID arbitration against Peru and three related commercial arbitrations arising from canceled concessions to build and operate fiber-optic networks in remote areas of the country. The commercial arbitrations resulted in an award of US$ 177 million in favor of the client.{{ FIELD }}Representing a group of Kuwaiti investors in an ICSID arbitration against Egypt in a dispute arising from a revoked concession to develop an agricultural project and potential new city outside of Cairo, obtaining an award of US$ 18.5 million.{{ FIELD }}Representing an international pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration against another international pharmaceutical company in a dispute relating to the sale of certain Mexican subsidiaries.{{ FIELD }}Representing Dutch investors in obtaining an award (including moral damages) in an UNCITRAL BIT arbitration against a Southeast Asian State, in a dispute alleging unlawful confiscation of real estate and other assets without compensation. See press article here.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global mining company in a BIT dispute against a South American State arising from the closure of a producing mine.{{ FIELD }}Representing Salini Impregilo (n/k/a WeBuild) in its ICSID claim against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a bridge and tollway concession. In February 2018, the Tribunal upheld its jurisdiction over the claim, see Decision on Jurisdiction here, and later issues a Decision on Liability in favor of the client with a final damages award pending.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major U.S. refining company in an International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) arbitration arising from the multi-billion-dollar construction of a refinery expansion project on the U.S. Gulf Coast.{{ FIELD }}Representing a U.S. integrated energy company in obtaining a complete declaratory victory in an Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC) arbitration against a South American State-owned oil company relating to the royalty-adjustment clauses in a concession agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing Bear Creek Mining Co. in obtaining an ICSID award against Peru in an arbitration under the Canada-Peru FTA arising from Peru’s revocation of one of the company’s mining concessions. See Award here.{{ FIELD }}Representing South American Silver Corp. in obtaining an award in its UNCITRAL arbitration against Bolivia under the UK-Bolivia BIT arising from Bolivia’s nationalization of the company’s mining concession. See Award here.{{ FIELD }}Representing Burlington Resources Inc. in obtaining an ICSID arbitration award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT arising from Ecuador’s nationalization of two of the company’s producing blocks. See Award here.{{ FIELD }}Representing affiliates of Grupo Marsans in their successful ICSID claim against Argentina under the Spain-Argentina BIT, arising from Argentina’s nationalization of the clients’ investments in the Argentine airlines Aerolíneas Argentinas and Austral. See Decision on Jurisdiction here. See Award here. See Decision on Annulment here.{{ FIELD }}Representing Murphy Oil in obtaining an UNCITRAL award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from Ecuador’s unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil production contract. The Tribunal had previously upheld its jurisdiction over the claim in 2013. See Partial Final Award here. See Partial Award on Jurisdiction here.{{ FIELD }}Representing affiliates of ExxonMobil in obtaining a (non-published) award in 2016 against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the clients’ investments in the oil \u0026amp; gas sector. The Tribunal previously issued a (non-published) Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability in 2013.{{ FIELD }}Representing the principals of European Food and Drinks Group in obtaining an ICSID award against Romania under the Sweden-Romania BIT, arising from Romania’s revocation of certain customs-tax exemptions that underlay the investment in substantial food and beverage manufacturing facilities in an economically-disadvantaged region of northwestern Romania. See Award here.{{ FIELD }}Representing an affiliate of Exterran Holdings in its ICSID claim against Venezuela under the Spain-Venezuela BIT, arising from Venezuela’s nationalization of substantially all of the company’s assets, operations and facilities in Venezuela. After the hearing on the merits took place in July 2012, the case settled for a reported US $442 million. See press release here.{{ FIELD }}Representing El Paso in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the regulatory frameworks governing the electricity and oil \u0026amp; gas sectors. See Award here. See Decision on Jurisdiction here.{{ FIELD }}Representing Impregilo S.p.A. in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a water concession in the Province of Buenos Aires. An ICSID annulment committee subsequently upheld the award in full. See Decision on Annulment here. See Award here.{{ FIELD }}Craig Miles specializes in domestic and international arbitration of investment disputes and commercial matters. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Craig represents clients before arbitral tribunals worldwide.\nCraig represents foreign investors in disputes with host governments, primarily before the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and private parties in commercial disputes before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and other domestic and international arbitral institutions.\nCraig has first- or second-chaired dozens of arbitration hearings involving disputes throughout North and South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and the Middle East, with particularly strong experience in bilateral investment treaty (BIT) disputes in the oil and gas, mining and infrastructure sectors, as well as in Latin America. He is regularly called upon to handle the quantum aspects of clients’ most significant disputes.\nAmong Craig's recent cases are some of the largest BIT awards and settlements ever obtained by foreign investors against the governments of Argentina, Algeria, Bolivia, Ecuador, Egypt, Romania, Venezuela and Vietnam, among others. He also acts as lead external counsel to the Arbitration Committee of the USA Rice Millers Association, a trade group that has administered dozens of arbitrations involving the rice industry worldwide.\nIn 2011, Craig was named to the Global Arbitration Review’s “45 Under 45” list of the world’s leading international arbitration practitioners under the age of 45. Also, he has been frequently recognized in Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Chambers Latin America, Who’s Who, The Best Lawyers in America, The Legal 500, Latin Lawyer, and Law Dragon.\nA native English speaker who is also proficient in Spanish, French and Portuguese, Craig frequently speaks and writes on international arbitration issues. Partner 500 Leading Global Litigators LAW DRAGON, 2023-2024 Named to “45 Under 45” list Global Arbitration Review, 2011 International Commercial Arbitration Who’s Who Legal, 2009–2024 International Arbitration: Latin America-wide Chambers Latin America, 2011–2024 International Arbitration: Commercial and Governmental Best Lawyers in America, 2010–2024 Lawyer of the Year, Houston, International Arbitration and Commercial Best Lawyers in America, 2019 International Arbitration: Latin America-wide Legal 500 Latin America, 2013–2020, 2024 International Arbitration: Nationwide Chambers USA, 2010–2020 International Arbitration Latin Lawyer 250, 2008–2020 GAR 100 Global Arbitration Review, 2009–2020 International Arbitration: Global Chambers Global, 2007, 2019-2024 Cornell University Cornell Law School University of Houston University of Houston Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Florida Texas American Bar Association Houston Bar Association International Bar Association ICCA Foundation Brazil Texas Chamber of Commerce Representing an Indonesian pulp company in a multi-billion-dollar ICC arbitration in Brazil arising from a share purchase agreement. Representing a major integrated oil \u0026amp; gas producer in a multi-billion-dollar UNCITRAL arbitration against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from fraudulent judgments issued against the client in Ecuadorian courts. Representing a global oilfield services company in an ICC arbitration relating to compression agreements in a major oilfield in Mexico, leading to a US$ 40 million settlement for the client. Representing Odyssey Marine Exploration in a NAFTA UNCITRAL arbitration relating to a halted mining project, obtaining a US$ 37 million award for the client. Representing The Williams Companies in an ICSID (AF) arbitration against Venezuela arising from the nationalization of multiple state-of-the-art gas compression plants. Representing a global infrastructure developer in an ICSID arbitration against Peru and three related commercial arbitrations arising from canceled concessions to build and operate fiber-optic networks in remote areas of the country. The commercial arbitrations resulted in an award of US$ 177 million in favor of the client. Representing a group of Kuwaiti investors in an ICSID arbitration against Egypt in a dispute arising from a revoked concession to develop an agricultural project and potential new city outside of Cairo, obtaining an award of US$ 18.5 million. Representing an international pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration against another international pharmaceutical company in a dispute relating to the sale of certain Mexican subsidiaries. Representing Dutch investors in obtaining an award (including moral damages) in an UNCITRAL BIT arbitration against a Southeast Asian State, in a dispute alleging unlawful confiscation of real estate and other assets without compensation. See press article here. Representing a global mining company in a BIT dispute against a South American State arising from the closure of a producing mine. Representing Salini Impregilo (n/k/a WeBuild) in its ICSID claim against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a bridge and tollway concession. In February 2018, the Tribunal upheld its jurisdiction over the claim, see Decision on Jurisdiction here, and later issues a Decision on Liability in favor of the client with a final damages award pending. Representing a major U.S. refining company in an International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) arbitration arising from the multi-billion-dollar construction of a refinery expansion project on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Representing a U.S. integrated energy company in obtaining a complete declaratory victory in an Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC) arbitration against a South American State-owned oil company relating to the royalty-adjustment clauses in a concession agreement. Representing Bear Creek Mining Co. in obtaining an ICSID award against Peru in an arbitration under the Canada-Peru FTA arising from Peru’s revocation of one of the company’s mining concessions. See Award here. Representing South American Silver Corp. in obtaining an award in its UNCITRAL arbitration against Bolivia under the UK-Bolivia BIT arising from Bolivia’s nationalization of the company’s mining concession. See Award here. Representing Burlington Resources Inc. in obtaining an ICSID arbitration award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT arising from Ecuador’s nationalization of two of the company’s producing blocks. See Award here. Representing affiliates of Grupo Marsans in their successful ICSID claim against Argentina under the Spain-Argentina BIT, arising from Argentina’s nationalization of the clients’ investments in the Argentine airlines Aerolíneas Argentinas and Austral. See Decision on Jurisdiction here. See Award here. See Decision on Annulment here. Representing Murphy Oil in obtaining an UNCITRAL award against Ecuador under the U.S.-Ecuador BIT, arising from Ecuador’s unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil production contract. The Tribunal had previously upheld its jurisdiction over the claim in 2013. See Partial Final Award here. See Partial Award on Jurisdiction here. Representing affiliates of ExxonMobil in obtaining a (non-published) award in 2016 against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the clients’ investments in the oil \u0026amp; gas sector. The Tribunal previously issued a (non-published) Decision on Jurisdiction and Liability in 2013. Representing the principals of European Food and Drinks Group in obtaining an ICSID award against Romania under the Sweden-Romania BIT, arising from Romania’s revocation of certain customs-tax exemptions that underlay the investment in substantial food and beverage manufacturing facilities in an economically-disadvantaged region of northwestern Romania. See Award here. Representing an affiliate of Exterran Holdings in its ICSID claim against Venezuela under the Spain-Venezuela BIT, arising from Venezuela’s nationalization of substantially all of the company’s assets, operations and facilities in Venezuela. After the hearing on the merits took place in July 2012, the case settled for a reported US $442 million. See press release here. Representing El Paso in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the U.S.-Argentina BIT for imposing measures affecting the regulatory frameworks governing the electricity and oil \u0026amp; gas sectors. See Award here. See Decision on Jurisdiction here. Representing Impregilo S.p.A. in obtaining an ICSID award against Argentina under the Italy-Argentina BIT, arising from the termination of a water concession in the Province of Buenos Aires. An ICSID annulment committee subsequently upheld the award in full. See Decision on Annulment here. See Award here.","searchable_name":"Craig S. Miles","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444292,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6227,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKyle Maury represents clients in complex construction and commercial disputes in arbitration (AAA, ICDR, CPR) and federal and state courts.\u0026nbsp; His practice focuses on high-stakes disputes involving energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and mission-critical projects, such as data centers and semiconductor manufacturing facilities.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive experience in key aspects of litigation, including taking and defending depositions, working with expert witnesses, arguing motions, and writing case dispositive motions and appellate briefs.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Kyle was a business litigation associate at another prominent international law firm, and before that served as a law clerk to the Honorable Federico A. Moreno of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle earned his J.D. (\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e) from Notre Dame Law School, where he served\u0026nbsp;on both the Law Review and the Moot Court Board (Seventh Circuit Team).\u0026nbsp; While in law school, Kyle also served as an extern in the criminal division of the United States Attorneys' Office in the Central District of California.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle is admitted to practice law in Texas, Florida, and California.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kyle-maury","email":"kmaury@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prime contractor in AAA arbitration concerning a hundred-million-dollar dispute over construction delays and defects on multi-billion-dollar semiconductor manufacturing facility in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the owner of a German data center in the Southern District of New York in a multi-million-dollar dispute involving design delays, errors, and omissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising the owners of Texas wind farms in contract disputes with EPC contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMicrosoft\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in AAA arbitration regarding multi-million-dollar dispute over delays to construction of Texas data centers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a developer in contract dispute concerning water diversion channel infrastructure project in South Dakota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a Texas wind farm in AAA arbitration involving hundred-million-dollar dispute and claims of gross negligence.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of Texas petrochemical facility in AAA arbitration involving commercial dispute with a contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of a Pennsylvania natural gas power plant in CPR arbitration concerning electrical capacity contract dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented manufacturers in ICDR arbitration in contract dispute concerning custom electro-mechanical products for battery energy storage systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a contractor in lien dispute involving over $40 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a contractor in federal court involving contract and tort claims concerning transmission line energy project in Mississippi.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an ocean freight contractor in South Carolina federal court involving a commercial dispute with a general contractor.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Maury","nick_name":"Kyle","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Federico A. Moreno, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida","years_held":"2018 - 2020"}],"first_name":"Kyle","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2278,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2017-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKyle Maury represents clients in complex construction and commercial disputes in arbitration (AAA, ICDR, CPR) and federal and state courts.\u0026nbsp; His practice focuses on high-stakes disputes involving energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and mission-critical projects, such as data centers and semiconductor manufacturing facilities.\u0026nbsp; He has extensive experience in key aspects of litigation, including taking and defending depositions, working with expert witnesses, arguing motions, and writing case dispositive motions and appellate briefs.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Kyle was a business litigation associate at another prominent international law firm, and before that served as a law clerk to the Honorable Federico A. Moreno of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle earned his J.D. (\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e) from Notre Dame Law School, where he served\u0026nbsp;on both the Law Review and the Moot Court Board (Seventh Circuit Team).\u0026nbsp; While in law school, Kyle also served as an extern in the criminal division of the United States Attorneys' Office in the Central District of California.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKyle is admitted to practice law in Texas, Florida, and California.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prime contractor in AAA arbitration concerning a hundred-million-dollar dispute over construction delays and defects on multi-billion-dollar semiconductor manufacturing facility in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the owner of a German data center in the Southern District of New York in a multi-million-dollar dispute involving design delays, errors, and omissions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising the owners of Texas wind farms in contract disputes with EPC contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMicrosoft\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in AAA arbitration regarding multi-million-dollar dispute over delays to construction of Texas data centers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a developer in contract dispute concerning water diversion channel infrastructure project in South Dakota.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for the owner of a Texas wind farm in AAA arbitration involving hundred-million-dollar dispute and claims of gross negligence.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of Texas petrochemical facility in AAA arbitration involving commercial dispute with a contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of a Pennsylvania natural gas power plant in CPR arbitration concerning electrical capacity contract dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented manufacturers in ICDR arbitration in contract dispute concerning custom electro-mechanical products for battery energy storage systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a contractor in lien dispute involving over $40 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a contractor in federal court involving contract and tort claims concerning transmission line energy project in Mississippi.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an ocean freight contractor in South Carolina federal court involving a commercial dispute with a general contractor.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9627}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-15T18:54:40.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-15T18:54:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Maury{{ FIELD }}Representing a prime contractor in AAA arbitration concerning a hundred-million-dollar dispute over construction delays and defects on multi-billion-dollar semiconductor manufacturing facility in Texas.{{ FIELD }}Representing the owner of a German data center in the Southern District of New York in a multi-million-dollar dispute involving design delays, errors, and omissions.{{ FIELD }}Advising the owners of Texas wind farms in contract disputes with EPC contractor.{{ FIELD }}Represented Microsoft in AAA arbitration regarding multi-million-dollar dispute over delays to construction of Texas data centers.{{ FIELD }}Advised a developer in contract dispute concerning water diversion channel infrastructure project in South Dakota.{{ FIELD }}Acted for the owner of a Texas wind farm in AAA arbitration involving hundred-million-dollar dispute and claims of gross negligence.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of Texas petrochemical facility in AAA arbitration involving commercial dispute with a contractor.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a Pennsylvania natural gas power plant in CPR arbitration concerning electrical capacity contract dispute.{{ FIELD }}Represented manufacturers in ICDR arbitration in contract dispute concerning custom electro-mechanical products for battery energy storage systems.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a contractor in lien dispute involving over $40 million.{{ FIELD }}Represented a contractor in federal court involving contract and tort claims concerning transmission line energy project in Mississippi.{{ FIELD }}Represented an ocean freight contractor in South Carolina federal court involving a commercial dispute with a general contractor.{{ FIELD }}Kyle Maury represents clients in complex construction and commercial disputes in arbitration (AAA, ICDR, CPR) and federal and state courts.  His practice focuses on high-stakes disputes involving energy, infrastructure, and mission-critical projects, such as data centers and semiconductor manufacturing facilities.  He has extensive experience in key aspects of litigation, including taking and defending depositions, working with expert witnesses, arguing motions, and writing case dispositive motions and appellate briefs. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Kyle was a business litigation associate at another prominent international law firm, and before that served as a law clerk to the Honorable Federico A. Moreno of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. \nKyle earned his J.D. (cum laude) from Notre Dame Law School, where he served on both the Law Review and the Moot Court Board (Seventh Circuit Team).  While in law school, Kyle also served as an extern in the criminal division of the United States Attorneys' Office in the Central District of California.\nKyle is admitted to practice law in Texas, Florida, and California. Senior Associate California State University-Long Beach  University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Law School U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida California Florida Texas Law Clerk, Federico A. Moreno, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Representing a prime contractor in AAA arbitration concerning a hundred-million-dollar dispute over construction delays and defects on multi-billion-dollar semiconductor manufacturing facility in Texas. Representing the owner of a German data center in the Southern District of New York in a multi-million-dollar dispute involving design delays, errors, and omissions. Advising the owners of Texas wind farms in contract disputes with EPC contractor. Represented Microsoft in AAA arbitration regarding multi-million-dollar dispute over delays to construction of Texas data centers. Advised a developer in contract dispute concerning water diversion channel infrastructure project in South Dakota. Acted for the owner of a Texas wind farm in AAA arbitration involving hundred-million-dollar dispute and claims of gross negligence. Represented the owner of Texas petrochemical facility in AAA arbitration involving commercial dispute with a contractor. Represented the owner of a Pennsylvania natural gas power plant in CPR arbitration concerning electrical capacity contract dispute. Represented manufacturers in ICDR arbitration in contract dispute concerning custom electro-mechanical products for battery energy storage systems. Acted for a contractor in lien dispute involving over $40 million. Represented a contractor in federal court involving contract and tort claims concerning transmission line energy project in Mississippi. Represented an ocean freight contractor in South Carolina federal court involving a commercial dispute with a general contractor.","searchable_name":"Kyle J. Maury","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444916,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6361,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark McLennan maintains an international arbitration\u0026nbsp;practice\u0026nbsp;with particular expertise in high-stakes commercial, investment, construction, and global award enforcement disputes.\u0026nbsp;Mark regularly acts for investors, owners, states, and contractors in\u0026nbsp;proceedings arising from major energy, aviation, infrastructure, and natural-resources projects across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026rsquo;s work often centers on disputes defined by factual and contractual complexity, sovereign involvement, and overlapping legal regimes. His experience includes contested terminations, joint-venture disputes, and cross-border infrastructure claims with public and private dimensions. He has represented clients in arbitrations conducted under all major institutional rules including the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and AAA, as well as ICSID and ad hoc proceedings. Mark is experienced in all phases of international arbitration and enforcement\u0026nbsp;proceedings, including\u0026nbsp;advising\u0026nbsp;clients in award recognition and enforcement efforts\u0026nbsp;under the New York Convention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mark practiced with leading international arbitration teams in New York and London, training under several of the field\u0026rsquo;s foremost practitioners. He holds a J.D. and B.A. from the University of Sydney and an LL.M. from the London School of Economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark is admitted in New York, Texas, and New South Wales.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mark-mclennan","email":"mmclennan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Canadian energy company in an LCIA arbitration concerning the construction of a Middle Eastern refinery governed by English law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Indian airline in a SIAC arbitration against an engine manufacturer with billions of dollars in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Air Canada enforcing a $24m ICSID award in federal court proceedings against Venezuela.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a financial institution bringing claims arising under various BITs against a Middle Eastern state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a dual-national German citizen pursuing an expropriation claim against a South American state under a bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a major international construction and project management company in regards to multibillion dollar ICC claims arising out of an oil refinery in South Asia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a state-owned oil company\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eenforcing a billion dollar award from an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world, including concurrent multinational insolvency proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an owner in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising from the construction of a major desalination plant in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an engineering and commissioning contractor in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration seated in Singapore concerning the disputed termination of an EPC subcontract to build and commission a combined-cycle power plant at an Australian LNG facility.*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatter from prior firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Middle Eastern government in LCIA arbitration proceedings in relation to a dispute worth tens of billions of dollars regarding the development of two gas fields.*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatter from prior firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"McLennan","nick_name":"Mark","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mark","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark McLennan maintains an international arbitration\u0026nbsp;practice\u0026nbsp;with particular expertise in high-stakes commercial, investment, construction, and global award enforcement disputes.\u0026nbsp;Mark regularly acts for investors, owners, states, and contractors in\u0026nbsp;proceedings arising from major energy, aviation, infrastructure, and natural-resources projects across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark\u0026rsquo;s work often centers on disputes defined by factual and contractual complexity, sovereign involvement, and overlapping legal regimes. His experience includes contested terminations, joint-venture disputes, and cross-border infrastructure claims with public and private dimensions. He has represented clients in arbitrations conducted under all major institutional rules including the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and AAA, as well as ICSID and ad hoc proceedings. Mark is experienced in all phases of international arbitration and enforcement\u0026nbsp;proceedings, including\u0026nbsp;advising\u0026nbsp;clients in award recognition and enforcement efforts\u0026nbsp;under the New York Convention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mark practiced with leading international arbitration teams in New York and London, training under several of the field\u0026rsquo;s foremost practitioners. He holds a J.D. and B.A. from the University of Sydney and an LL.M. from the London School of Economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMark is admitted in New York, Texas, and New South Wales.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a Canadian energy company in an LCIA arbitration concerning the construction of a Middle Eastern refinery governed by English law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an Indian airline in a SIAC arbitration against an engine manufacturer with billions of dollars in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting Air Canada enforcing a $24m ICSID award in federal court proceedings against Venezuela.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a financial institution bringing claims arising under various BITs against a Middle Eastern state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a dual-national German citizen pursuing an expropriation claim against a South American state under a bilateral investment treaty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a major international construction and project management company in regards to multibillion dollar ICC claims arising out of an oil refinery in South Asia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a state-owned oil company\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eenforcing a billion dollar award from an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world, including concurrent multinational insolvency proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an owner in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising from the construction of a major desalination plant in South America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an engineering and commissioning contractor in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration seated in Singapore concerning the disputed termination of an EPC subcontract to build and commission a combined-cycle power plant at an Australian LNG facility.*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatter from prior firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActing for a Middle Eastern government in LCIA arbitration proceedings in relation to a dispute worth tens of billions of dollars regarding the development of two gas fields.*\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatter from prior firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9808}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-09T22:29:32.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-09T22:29:32.000Z","searchable_text":"McLennan{{ FIELD }}Representing a Canadian energy company in an LCIA arbitration concerning the construction of a Middle Eastern refinery governed by English law.{{ FIELD }}Representing an Indian airline in a SIAC arbitration against an engine manufacturer with billions of dollars in dispute.{{ FIELD }}Representing Air Canada enforcing a $24m ICSID award in federal court proceedings against Venezuela.{{ FIELD }}Advising a financial institution bringing claims arising under various BITs against a Middle Eastern state.{{ FIELD }}Advising a dual-national German citizen pursuing an expropriation claim against a South American state under a bilateral investment treaty.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a major international construction and project management company in regards to multibillion dollar ICC claims arising out of an oil refinery in South Asia.{{ FIELD }}Representing an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a state-owned oil company enforcing a billion dollar award from an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world, including concurrent multinational insolvency proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Representing an owner in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising from the construction of a major desalination plant in South America.{{ FIELD }}Representing an engineering and commissioning contractor in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration seated in Singapore concerning the disputed termination of an EPC subcontract to build and commission a combined-cycle power plant at an Australian LNG facility.*\nMatter from prior firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Acting for a Middle Eastern government in LCIA arbitration proceedings in relation to a dispute worth tens of billions of dollars regarding the development of two gas fields.*\nMatter from prior firm experience.{{ FIELD }} \nMark McLennan maintains an international arbitration practice with particular expertise in high-stakes commercial, investment, construction, and global award enforcement disputes. Mark regularly acts for investors, owners, states, and contractors in proceedings arising from major energy, aviation, infrastructure, and natural-resources projects across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas. \nMark’s work often centers on disputes defined by factual and contractual complexity, sovereign involvement, and overlapping legal regimes. His experience includes contested terminations, joint-venture disputes, and cross-border infrastructure claims with public and private dimensions. He has represented clients in arbitrations conducted under all major institutional rules including the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and AAA, as well as ICSID and ad hoc proceedings. Mark is experienced in all phases of international arbitration and enforcement proceedings, including advising clients in award recognition and enforcement efforts under the New York Convention.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Mark practiced with leading international arbitration teams in New York and London, training under several of the field’s foremost practitioners. He holds a J.D. and B.A. from the University of Sydney and an LL.M. from the London School of Economics.\nMark is admitted in New York, Texas, and New South Wales.\n  Senior Associate University of Sydney, Australia  University of Sydney Law School University of Sydney Law School London School of Economics and Political Science, UK  New York Texas New South Wales Representing a Canadian energy company in an LCIA arbitration concerning the construction of a Middle Eastern refinery governed by English law. Representing an Indian airline in a SIAC arbitration against an engine manufacturer with billions of dollars in dispute. Representing Air Canada enforcing a $24m ICSID award in federal court proceedings against Venezuela. Advising a financial institution bringing claims arising under various BITs against a Middle Eastern state. Advising a dual-national German citizen pursuing an expropriation claim against a South American state under a bilateral investment treaty. Acting for a major international construction and project management company in regards to multibillion dollar ICC claims arising out of an oil refinery in South Asia. Representing an owner in a AAA arbitration arising out of the operation of a wind farm in West Texas involving claims of gross negligence and hundreds of millions in dispute. Acting for a state-owned oil company enforcing a billion dollar award from an ICC dispute arising out of the construction of one of the largest refineries in the world, including concurrent multinational insolvency proceedings. Representing an owner in an ICC arbitration related to claims arising from the construction of a major desalination plant in South America. Representing an engineering and commissioning contractor in a multibillion dollar ICC arbitration seated in Singapore concerning the disputed termination of an EPC subcontract to build and commission a combined-cycle power plant at an Australian LNG facility.*\nMatter from prior firm experience. Acting for a Middle Eastern government in LCIA arbitration proceedings in relation to a dispute worth tens of billions of dollars regarding the development of two gas fields.*\nMatter from prior firm experience.","searchable_name":"Mark McLennan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}