{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"3","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"C","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":447424,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5470,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous\u0026nbsp;dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, she has experience handling\u0026nbsp;fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing\u0026nbsp;witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, \u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mandie-cash","email":"mcash@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cash","nick_name":"Mandie","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, The Honorable James J. Brady, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana","years_held":"2013 - 2013"}],"first_name":"Mandie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2713,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2014-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie\u0026nbsp;has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous\u0026nbsp;dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, she has experience handling\u0026nbsp;fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing\u0026nbsp;witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, \u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7220}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-08T14:30:49.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-08T14:30:49.000Z","searchable_text":"Cash{{ FIELD }}Mandie M. Cash is a Partner in the Houston office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and is a member of the firm’s Trial Practice and Global Disputes group. Her practice encompasses a diverse range of complex civil litigation, including class action, mass tort, consumer fraud, product liability, construction, and commercial business disputes. She has also appeared before state and federal courts as well as alternative dispute resolution tribunals throughout Texas and Louisiana. \nMandie has represented clients in the automotive, pharmaceutical, construction, oil and gas, and hazardous chemical industries. She has successfully briefed numerous dispositive and discovery motions in state and federal courts throughout the United States. Additionally, she has experience handling fact development and case investigation including drafting and responding to written discovery, preparing witnesses for depositions, and resolving various discovery disputes.\nMandie earned her Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law from Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, cum laude. During law school, she served as an Issues Editor and Senior Associate for the Louisiana Law Review. She received her Bachelor of Arts from Louisiana State University, with honors, in 2011. Partner Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Louisiana Texas Houston Bar Association Houston Young Lawyers Association Intern, The Honorable James J. Brady, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana","searchable_name":"Mandie M. Cash","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447624,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":889,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Cashdan is widely regarded as\u0026nbsp;one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries.\u0026nbsp;Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003e(and other publications)\u0026nbsp;and is listed by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.\u0026nbsp; In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.\u0026nbsp; Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and\u0026nbsp;has presented oral argument\u0026nbsp;in eight\u0026nbsp;federal appellate circuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is active in legal \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is a past Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeffrey-cashdan","email":"jcashdan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRepresentative Matters:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSmurfit Westrock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eECI Management, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Snapshot\u0026rdquo; device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s motion for class certification.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Oyj\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Canada\u003c/strong\u003e, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClearwater Paper Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Electric Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMichelin North America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSonangol, E.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSprint Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Speedway Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporations and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":161}]},"expertise":[{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cashdan","nick_name":"Jeff","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Gerald B. Tjoflat, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"1990 - 1991"}],"first_name":"Jeffrey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Antitrust","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026 securities litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"American Lawyer, August 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers","detail":"LawDragon"},{"title":"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers","detail":"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026 Economists"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"Global Competition Review, February 2014"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Cashdan is widely regarded as\u0026nbsp;one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries.\u0026nbsp;Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of \u003cem\u003eChambers USA \u003c/em\u003e(and other publications)\u0026nbsp;and is listed by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.\u0026nbsp; In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.\u0026nbsp; Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and\u0026nbsp;has presented oral argument\u0026nbsp;in eight\u0026nbsp;federal appellate circuits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff is active in legal \u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is a past Chair\u0026nbsp;of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm\u0026rsquo;s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRepresentative Matters:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSmurfit Westrock\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eECI Management, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInterContinental Hotels Group\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB S.A.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUCB, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Snapshot\u0026rdquo; device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s motion for class certification.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Oyj\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKemira Chemicals Canada\u003c/strong\u003e, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eClearwater Paper Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eProgressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates)\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Electric Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMichelin North America\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSonangol, E.P.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSprint Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCo-Lead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Speedway Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTexaco, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead Counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecorporations and individuals\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1 Antitrust","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026 securities litigation","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"500 Leading Litigators in America","detail":"Lawdragon"},{"title":"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"American Lawyer, August 2025"},{"title":"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026 Competition Lawyers","detail":"LawDragon"},{"title":"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers","detail":"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026 Economists"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week","detail":"Global Competition Review, February 2014"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12830}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-17T19:19:21.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-17T19:19:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Cashdan{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 1 Antitrust\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026amp; securities litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Litigators in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Lawyer, August 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LawDragon\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026amp; Economists\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global Competition Review, February 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}Representative Matters:{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance and affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Smurfit Westrock in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for ECI Management, LLC in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for UCB S.A. and UCB, Inc. in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Kemira Chemicals Inc. in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to Progressive’s “Snapshot” device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Kemira Oyj, Kemira Chemicals Inc., and Kemira Chemicals Canada, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Clearwater Paper Corporation in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for the General Electric Company in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Michelin North America in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Sonangol, E.P. in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for Sprint Corporation and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services.{{ FIELD }}Co-Lead Counsel for International Speedway Corporation in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races.{{ FIELD }}Counsel for Texaco, Inc. in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties.{{ FIELD }}Lead Counsel for corporations and individuals in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.{{ FIELD }}Jeff Cashdan is widely regarded as one of the leading high-stakes business litigators in the United States. Jeff has decades of experience handling complex antitrust matters, sophisticated business disputes and purported class actions in a variety of industries. Jeff has been ranked in the top tier of antitrust lawyers in every edition of Chambers USA (and other publications) and is listed by The Best Lawyers in America as a leading lawyer for bet- the-company litigation, as well as antitrust and commercial trial matters.  In August 2025, the American Lawyer selected Jeff as \"Litigator of the Week\" in recognition of defeating class certification in four different federal circuit courts of appeal. \nJeff has extensive experience in antitrust litigation and counseling for clients in various industries, including food and beverages, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, energy, financial products, telecommunications, hospitality and healthcare. Jeff has represented firms and individuals in several purported class actions alleging business torts, consumer fraud, RICO violations and other substantive claims. Jeff also represents businesses as plaintiffs and defendants in complex commercial litigation and appellate matters.  Jeff has appeared in every federal appellate court, and has presented oral argument in eight federal appellate circuits.\nJeff is a graduate of the University of Chicago Law School, where he served on the law review. Jeff clerked for The Honorable Gerald Bard Tjoflat, then Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Jeff earned his undergraduate degree from Claremont McKenna College, and studied at the London School of Economics and Political Science prior to attending law school.\nJeff is active in legal pro bono and community activities. Among his civic activities, Jeff currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Alliance Theatre and served on the Board of Trustees for the Woodruff Arts Center, participated in Leadership Atlanta (Class of 2008), served on the Board of Directors (Past President) of the Atlanta Volunteer Lawyers Foundation, served on the Board of Directors of Special Olympics Georgia and served on the Board of Directors for Hosea Feed the Hungry-Homeless.  Jeff is a past Chair of the Antitrust Section of the State Bar of Georgia and served in various leadership positions for the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association.\nJeff has held various positions of law firm leadership, including Practice Group Leader for the Business Litigation Practice Group, Hiring Partner and service on the firm’s Associate Evaluation and Pro Bono Committees. Jeffrey S Cashdan Partner Band 1 Antitrust Chambers USA \"Bet the company” litigation, antitrust law, antitrust litigation, commercial litigation, \u0026amp; securities litigation The Best Lawyers in America 500 Leading Litigators in America Lawdragon Atlanta Antitrust Lawyer of the Year The Best Lawyers in America, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2018, 2022, 2024, 2026 Litigator of the Week American Lawyer, August 2025 500 Leading Global Antitrust \u0026amp; Competition Lawyers LawDragon Named among the world's leading antitrust and competition lawyers Global Competition Review: Who’s Who of Competition Lawyers \u0026amp; Economists Litigator of the Week Global Competition Review, February 2014 Claremont McKenna College  University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Illinois State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association Illinois State Bar Chair of Board of Directors, State Bar of Georgia, Antitrust Section, 2002-2003 Fellow, Litigation Counsel of American (an invitation-only trial lawyer honorary society) American Bar Association, Antitrust and Litigation Sections (Vice-Chair of Sherman Act Section 2 (Monopolization) Committee; Member, task force on international cartel enforcement issues; Editor, Antitrust Law Journal) Law Clerk, Hon. Gerald B. Tjoflat, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Representative Matters: Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance and affiliates in dozens of purported consumer class actions concerning valuation methodology for total losses to automobiles. Representation includes winning favorable class certification decisions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Third, Fourth, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits -- leading to selection as AmLaw Litigators of the Week. Lead Counsel for Smurfit Westrock in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy among manufacturers to fix prices in the containerboard products business. Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in an action filed in New York by its chief rival PepsiCo, Inc., alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the purported market for fountain syrup distributed by certain independent food service distributors. Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in antitrust class actions in Chicago and Seattle federal courts alleging conspiracies with hotel companies in setting room rates by sharing information through third-party vendors. Lead Counsel for ECI Management, LLC in antitrust class action alleging that owners and managers of multifamily rental housing conspired to fix prices through the use of RealPage's algorithmic revenue management software. Lead Counsel for InterContinental Hotels Group (Six Continents) in consolidated MDL proceeding alleging federal and state antitrust violations relating to online booking of hotel rooms (In re: On Line Travel Company (OTC)/Hotel Booking Antitrust Litigation). Prevailed on motion to dismiss, and recognized by Global Competition Review as co-litigator of the week. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in dozens of antitrust actions and a RICO class action consolidated in an MDL proceeding in Orlando alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to labor rates for automobile repairs. Co-Lead Counsel for UCB S.A. and UCB, Inc. in federal and state actions, both class and non-class, filed throughout the country alleging a global cartel in the sale of vitamins. Lead Counsel for Kemira Chemicals Inc. in MDL proceeding in Newark, New Jersey, alleging conspiracy to fix prices in sale of liquid aluminum sulfate. Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in defeating a claim for over $100 million worth of company stock based on tender of antiquated stock certificate. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in purported class action filed in Miami federal court alleging unfair and deceptive trade practices, misrepresentations, and product liability related to Progressive’s “Snapshot” device for usage-based insurance; court denied plaintiff’s motion for class certification. Co-Lead Counsel for The Coca-Cola Company in consolidated class actions alleging federal securities fraud. Lead Counsel for Kemira Oyj, Kemira Chemicals Inc., and Kemira Chemicals Canada, Inc. in federal and state actions alleging a cartel in the sale of hydrogen peroxide. Lead Counsel for Clearwater Paper Corporation in defeating, after trial on the merits, an attempt by a competitor to impede an approximately $300 million project by enjoining delivery of key machinery based on restrictive covenant. Lead Counsel for Progressive Casualty Insurance Corp. (and related affiliates) in an antitrust and RICO action alleging a conspiracy among insurance companies related to denial of no-fault insurance claims in New York. Counsel for the General Electric Company in antitrust class action alleging conspiracy to restrain trade in purported markets for parts and service for certain medical equipment. Lead Counsel for Michelin North America in an action alleging Sherman Act and Robinson-Patman Act violations in the sale of tires. Lead Counsel for Sonangol, E.P. in a federal antitrust action alleging an international conspiracy to fix oil production levels and international sales of oil for the purpose of fixing and stabilizing the price of oil and refined oil products. Lead Counsel for Sprint Corporation and its subsidiaries in antitrust actions alleging monopolization and attempted monopolization of the markets for high-speed Internet access services. Co-Lead Counsel for International Speedway Corporation in antitrust class action alleging price- fixing of souvenirs sold at NASCAR races. Counsel for Texaco, Inc. in antitrust class actions alleging industry-wide conspiracy to fix prices for crude oil royalties. Lead Counsel for corporations and individuals in non-public investigations by the Antitrust Division and FTC.","searchable_name":"Jeffrey S. Cashdan (Jeff)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446377,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6888,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members\u0026rsquo; schemes of arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients \u0026nbsp;with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and\u0026nbsp;advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and\u0026nbsp;investigations, including workplace misconduct,\u0026nbsp;incidents and fatalities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jennifer-chambers","email":"jchambers@kslaw.com","phone":"+61 403 788 969","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003ca name=\"_GoBack\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial litigation and arbitration \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director\u0026rsquo;s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ammonia plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003ePepper Group Limited\u003c/strong\u003e on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members\u0026rsquo; scheme of arrangement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eGetSwift Limited\u003c/strong\u003e in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Investigations and Proceedings \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator\u0026rsquo;s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy Transition and Sustainability \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHuman Capital and Compliance \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelect Experience at the Bar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eTabet v Gett \u003c/em\u003e(2010) 240 CLR 537.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eRadio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 238 CLR 460.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); \u003cem\u003eWong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 236 CLR 573.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3317}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chambers","nick_name":"Jennifer","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jennifer","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended","detail":"Doyles Guide 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jennifer--chambers","seodescription":"Jennifer Chambers is a partner in our International Disputes Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members\u0026rsquo; schemes of arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients \u0026nbsp;with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and\u0026nbsp;advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and\u0026nbsp;investigations, including workplace misconduct,\u0026nbsp;incidents and fatalities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003ca name=\"_GoBack\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial litigation and arbitration \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director\u0026rsquo;s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world\u0026rsquo;s largest ammonia plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003ePepper Group Limited\u003c/strong\u003e on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members\u0026rsquo; scheme of arrangement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eGetSwift Limited\u003c/strong\u003e in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRegulatory Investigations and Proceedings \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator\u0026rsquo;s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy Transition and Sustainability \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHuman Capital and Compliance \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelect Experience at the Bar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eTabet v Gett \u003c/em\u003e(2010) 240 CLR 537.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAppeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); \u003cem\u003eRadio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 238 CLR 460.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); \u003cem\u003eWong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele \u003c/em\u003e(2009) 236 CLR 573.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended","detail":"Doyles Guide 2025"},{"title":"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12320}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-03T05:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-03T05:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Chambers{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Doyles Guide 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024\"}{{ FIELD }}Commercial litigation and arbitration \nRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director’s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets.{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute.{{ FIELD }}Advised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements.{{ FIELD }}Acted for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world’s largest ammonia plant.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Pepper Group Limited on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members’ scheme of arrangement.{{ FIELD }}Represented GetSwift Limited in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC.{{ FIELD }}Regulatory Investigations and Proceedings \nRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator.{{ FIELD }}Represented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties.{{ FIELD }}Acted for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator’s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking.{{ FIELD }}Class Actions\nRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria.{{ FIELD }}Advised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive.{{ FIELD }}Energy Transition and Sustainability \nAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC.{{ FIELD }}As part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing.{{ FIELD }}Human Capital and Compliance \nActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court.{{ FIELD }}Represented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality.{{ FIELD }}Advised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace.{{ FIELD }}Select Experience at the Bar \nAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537.{{ FIELD }}Appeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460.{{ FIELD }}Represented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); Wong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele (2009) 236 CLR 573.{{ FIELD }}Jennifer Chambers is a strategic commercial litigator with extensive experience advising multinational and major Australian corporations and boards across a wide variety of commercial matters. Her practice spans both complex domestic and cross-border disputes, as well as high-stakes regulatory investigations and proceedings, particularly in the energy, resources, and financial services sectors. Jennifer is also a trusted adviser to boards and individual company officers in respect of director and officer duties and corporate governance issues. \nJennifer has significant experience both in private practice and at the commercial bar, representing major corporates and directors in high stakes commercial arbitration and litigation matters throughout the superior courts of Australia (including the High Court). Such matters include multibillion-dollar claims alleging misleading or deceptive conduct, breach of director and trustee duties, complex cross-border disputes, class action defence, and contentious members’ schemes of arrangements.\nAdditionally, Jennifer advises global energy, resources, and financial services clients  with respect to regulatory developments and associated litigation risks. Jennifer handles high-profile regulatory investigations and advises clients with respect to corporate and director liability, including civil penalties and criminal liability arising out of corporate crises and investigations, including workplace misconduct, incidents and fatalities.\nJennifer is a driver of Diversity, Equality and Inclusion initiatives and, over the course of her career, has provided pro bono legal services to a diverse client base, including asylum seekers and First Nations people. Jennifer Chambers lawyer Partner Doyles Guide 2025: Leading Arbitration Lawyers, Australia – Recommended Doyles Guide 2025 Best Lawyers in Australia: Recognized in Litigation Best Lawyers in Australia, 2020-2024 University of Technology Sydney  University of New South Wales  High Court of Australia Supreme Court of New South Wales Federal Court of Australia Corporations Law Committee, Business Law Section of the Law Council of Australia Graduate of the Yale School of Management Executive Education Program Graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration - South Pacific Taskforce Commercial litigation and arbitration \nRepresenting a prominent oil and gas company in a significant ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration relating to the recovery of project costs under a production sharing contract. Represented the board of a major resources company in defense of multibillion-dollar claims in the Supreme Court of NSW and Court of Appeal alleging breach of director’s duties, trustee duties and oppression of the minority shareholders. Represented the Western Australian government in Supreme Court of WA proceedings concerning the distribution to creditors of over $1.8 billion in the liquidations of the Bell Group. The matter raised complex issues concerning the rights of bond holders and the proper construction of funding agreements and trust deeds. Represented a global telecommunications company in connection with significant national security and cybersecurity matters. Represented a former State Solicitor in Federal Court proceedings in which it was alleged that the State engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct to deprive the applicant of multimillion-dollar iron ore assets. Represented the board of a major resources company in a commercial arbitration concerning a multibillion-dollar dividend dispute. Advised an oil and gas major in relation to matters relevant to its participation in the Australian retail fuel market including long term fuel supply agreements, licensing and assignment agreements. Acted for a director and shareholder in complex litigation before the Victorian Supreme Court regarding the receivership and multibillion-dollar sale by a major Australian bank of Burrup Fertilisers, the world’s largest ammonia plant. Represented the Pepper Group Limited on the $675M acquisition by KKR of a controlling interest in Pepper by way of a members’ scheme of arrangement. Represented GetSwift Limited in its \"top hat\" scheme of arrangement to create a new holding company and re-domicile to Canada which was opposed by the corporate regulator, ASIC. Regulatory Investigations and Proceedings \nRepresented a global professional services firm in connection with its participation in a Commonwealth investigation into government procurement and probity issues and work health and safety matters on a multimillion-dollar project. Represented a former banking executive in connection with a case brought by the corporate regulator in which it was alleged that a major Australian bank had engaged in insider trading and unconscionable conduct in executing a $12 billion interest rate swap transaction. Represented a global financial services client in connection with potential exposure in ASIC, AUSTRAC and gaming regulator AML/CTF investigations into a major casino operator. Represented a significant investment manager in investigating allegations of fraud, bribery and corruption claims involving the Queensland Crime and Corruption Commission and successfully resolved subsequent court proceedings involving the same parties. Acted for an executive director of a property developer in connection with the corporate regulator’s investigation into alleged unfair lending practices, including the negotiation of an enforceable undertaking. Class Actions\nRepresented a global ride sharing company in its defense of a class action brought on behalf of taxi, hire-car, limousine, and charter vehicle industry participants in the Supreme Court of Victoria. Advised the Australian board of a public company in connection with the settlement of multibillion-dollar litigation, including a securities class action, relating to statements in a project prospectus which were alleged to be misleading or deceptive. Energy Transition and Sustainability \nAdvised a superannuation fund in respect of a greenwashing investigation conducted by the corporate regulator ASIC. As part of a global team, advised major energy companies and other clients in relation to Australian and global ESG regulatory frameworks, laws, policies and trends, including litigation and reputational risks such as greenwashing. Human Capital and Compliance \nActed for the board of directors of an ASX-listed entity in connection with multiple fatalities at an Australian theme park, including representation at a high-profile coronial inquest and related investigations conducted by the work health and safety regulator. Represented a multinational manufacturing company in defending claims of unlawful discrimination and sexual harassment before the Australian Human Rights Commission and subsequent proceedings before the Federal Circuit Court. Represented an agricultural asset manager in regulatory investigations and a criminal prosecution in connection with a workplace fatality. Advised a global payments company in relation to allegations of workplace bullying and harassment and psychosocial hazards in the workplace. Select Experience at the Bar \nAppeared in a landmark case before the High Court of Australia concerning the loss of a chance and damages claim for loss of opportunity (led by B Walker AO SC and J Lonergan (as her Honour then was)); Tabet v Gett (2010) 240 CLR 537. Appeared for Radio 2UE in a case in which the High Court clarified that the common law test for defamation applies to an imputation concerning any aspect of a person's reputation, including the person's professional or business reputation (led by R McHugh SC (as his Honour then was)); Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460. Represented several medical practitioners who challenged the Constitutional validity of the Medicare scheme (led by David Jackson AM KC and Mark Robinson); Wong v Commonwealth of Australia; Selim v Lele (2009) 236 CLR 573.","searchable_name":"Jennifer Chambers","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442382,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":988,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-ciatti","email":"mciatti@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multinational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac\u0026rsquo;s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted data privacy internal investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eenergy company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea professional service firm\u003c/strong\u003e in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMylan Laboratories\u003c/strong\u003e in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea legal permanent resident\u003c/strong\u003e before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines \u0026ldquo;crimes of violence\u0026rdquo; and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major textile company\u003c/strong\u003e against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of claims against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual defendants\u003c/strong\u003e in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":56}]},"expertise":[{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ciatti","nick_name":"Mike","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Fortune 100 financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea multinational pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac\u0026rsquo;s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFreddie Mac\u003c/strong\u003e in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted data privacy internal investigation for \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eenergy company.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea professional service firm\u003c/strong\u003e in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMylan Laboratories\u003c/strong\u003e in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eThe Coca-Cola Company\u003c/strong\u003e with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea legal permanent resident\u003c/strong\u003e before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines \u0026ldquo;crimes of violence\u0026rdquo; and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major textile company\u003c/strong\u003e against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of claims against \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eindividual defendants\u003c/strong\u003e in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":775}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:59.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:03:59.000Z","searchable_text":"Ciatti{{ FIELD }}Represented a Fortune 100 financial institution in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented a multinational pharmaceutical company in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing Freddie Mac in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac’s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Freddie Mac in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption.{{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment for Freddie Mac in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims.{{ FIELD }}Defeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against Freddie Mac in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program.{{ FIELD }}Conducted data privacy internal investigation for energy company.{{ FIELD }}Defended a professional service firm in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations.{{ FIELD }}Defended Mylan Laboratories in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers.{{ FIELD }}Represented The Coca-Cola Company with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations.{{ FIELD }}Represented a legal permanent resident before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines “crimes of violence” and provides a basis for removal from the U.S.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major textile company against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of claims against individual defendants in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.{{ FIELD }}Mike Ciatti specializes in civil litigation and investigations involving a broad range of administrative, constitutional, statutory and common law issues. As a partner in our Contracts and Business Torts practice, Mike represents clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, automotive, pharmaceuticals and healthcare. Mike is also the Deputy Office Managing Partner for our Washington, D.C., office. Michael J Ciatti Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia American Bar Association Virginia State Bar Represented a Fortune 100 financial institution in parallel investigations by the Department of Justice and other agencies, such as the SEC, IRS, OCC and various State Attorneys General, as well as parallel class action litigation. Successfully represented a multinational pharmaceutical company in an indemnification claim related to breached representations and warranties in a stock purchase agreement. Representing Freddie Mac in litigation in various federal courts over the Third Amendment to Freddie Mac’s Stock Purchase Agreement with the Department of Treasury. Successfully represented Freddie Mac in more than 40 state-wide class actions in federal courts around the country regarding the constitutionality and scope of its Congressionally mandated tax exemption. Obtained summary judgment for Freddie Mac in suit by mortgage brokers in United States District Court for the Central District of California that included antitrust and defamation claims. Obtained dismissal of suit by mortgage brokers against Freddie Mac in United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that included defamation, intentional interference with contract and conspiracy claims. Defeated motion for preliminary injunction and obtained dismissal of complaint in suit brought against Freddie Mac in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota alleging violations of the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution related to the Home Affordable Modification Program. Conducted data privacy internal investigation for energy company. Defended a professional service firm in lawsuits brought in various federal and state courts alleging, among other things, fraud, malpractice and RICO violations. Defended Mylan Laboratories in a four-week jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia involving antitrust claims arising from exclusive supply agreements with API producers. Represented The Coca-Cola Company with respect to government investigations related to whistleblower allegations. Represented a legal permanent resident before the United States Supreme Court and lower courts in his successful appeal regarding the scope of a federal criminal statute that defines “crimes of violence” and provides a basis for removal from the U.S. Represented a major textile company against its insurer in a $1.1 billion property loss and business interruption claim resulting from an industrial catastrophe. Obtained dismissal of claims against individual defendants in a lawsuit brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York alleging breach of contract, fraud and RICO violations, arising out of partnership disputes related to shopping mall management.","searchable_name":"Michael J. Ciatti (Mike)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444465,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":676,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"susan-clare","email":"sclare@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":165}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Clare","nick_name":"Susan","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia","years_held":"2005"}],"first_name":"Susan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSusan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by \u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eLegal 500, \u003c/em\u003ea Rising Star for Transportation by \u003cem\u003eLaw 360\u003c/em\u003e, a Georgia Rising Star by \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAtlanta\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eMagazine\u003c/em\u003e, and was also named to\u003cem\u003e Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies,\u0026nbsp;consumer communications, and product recalls.\u0026nbsp;Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCo-lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeneral Motors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOnStar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eKey member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading automobile manufacturers\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-national trial counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest shipping and logistics companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal pharmaceutical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003enational flooring retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBeazer Homes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eas national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etop private university\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehigh-growth specialty retailer\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGM Canada\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAllergan USA, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in South Carolina federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eWells v. Allergan USA, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e, No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eAtlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eDaubert\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;grounds.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eAnderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.\u003c/em\u003e, 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eEx Parte General Motors of Canada Limited,\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGM Canada\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eKing v. GMC\u003c/em\u003e, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eGeneral Motors Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law.\u0026nbsp;\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eFrye v. Smith\u003c/em\u003e, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSuzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed \u0026ldquo;a significant win to business\u0026rdquo; in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s comparative fault under Georgia\u0026rsquo;s 2005 tort reform statute.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense","detail":"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Member of K\u0026S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year ","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star for Transportation","detail":"Law360, 2018"},{"title":"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products","detail":"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019"},{"title":"Order of the Coif","detail":""}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":776}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-19T16:18:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Clare{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, 2019-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star for Transportation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers, 2013–2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Order of the Coif\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data.{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019.{{ FIELD }}Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires.{{ FIELD }}Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud.{{ FIELD }}Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty.{{ FIELD }}Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes.{{ FIELD }}Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma.{{ FIELD }}Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products.{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013).{{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012).{{ FIELD }}Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011).{{ FIELD }}Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.{{ FIELD }}Susan Clare is a partner in our worldwide Trial and Global Disputes Practice and the former Chair of the Firm's Automotive and Transportation Litigation Team, twice named a Practice Group of the Year by Law 360. \nSusan represents clients in the automotive/transportation, life sciences, consumer products, and financial services industries in high-exposure class action, mass tort, and other complex litigation. Susan has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in automotive and transportation litigation by The Legal 500, a Rising Star for Transportation by Law 360, a Georgia Rising Star by Super Lawyers and Atlanta Magazine, and was also named to Benchmark Litigation's 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List. \nWith experience in all phases of complex litigation, Susan represents companies in individual, class action and multi-district proceedings in federal and state courts across the country.\nShe is skilled at handling the types of issues that frequently accompany the highest-exposure matters, such as cases involving recalled products, data breaches and consumer privacy, media attention, government investigations, allegations of consumer fraud, whistleblowers, jurisdictional challenges, insurance disputes, and extensive expert discovery.\nIn addition to litigation, Susan frequently advises clients on risk assessment and mitigation strategies, consumer communications, and product recalls. Susan has also achieved numerous appellate victories for her clients and regularly counsels clients on e-discovery issues that include litigation preparedness, discovery strategy in mass litigation, and defending against allegations of evidence spoliation.\nSusan is a member of the Board of Directors of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra and has an active pro bono practice, including partnering with the Georgia Innocence Project to fight wrongful convictions. Susan M Clare Partner Named to 40 Under 40 Hot List - South Benchmark Litigation, 2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Transport: Rail and Road - Litigation and Regulation Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Named a Next Generation Partner in Product Liability, Mass Tort And Class Actions: Automotive/Transport - Defense Legal 500 US, 2019-2020 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2018 Automotive Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Member of K\u0026amp;S team named 2013-2018 Product Liability Practice Group of the Year  Law360 Named a Rising Star for Transportation Law360, 2018 Georgia Rising Star, Personal Injury Defense: Products Super Lawyers, 2013–2019 Order of the Coif  Georgia Institute of Technology  Emory University Emory University School of Law Georgia International Academy of Defense Counsel (IADC) Trial Academy, 2014 Intern, Justice Hugh P. Thompson, Georgia Co-lead counsel for General Motors and OnStar in MDL proceeding involving more than 30 consumer class actions related to alleged data privacy claims related to connected vehicle data. Defending Capital One in MDL proceeding involving more than 60 consumer class actions related to data security incident announced in July of 2019. Key member of King \u0026amp; Spalding team representing Equifax, Inc. in more than 250 consumer and financial institution class actions in an MDL proceeding arising from the data breach announced by Equifax in September of 2017. Representing leading domestic and foreign automotive manufacturers in class actions, catastrophic injury, and wrongful death cases, including claims alleging manufacturing, design, and failure to warn defects, breach of warranty, violations of consumer protection statutes, consumer fraud, and entitlement to punitive damages. Technical specialties include vehicle rollovers, alleged powertrain defects, advanced occupant restraint systems, infotainment systems, and vehicular fires. Representing leading automobile manufacturers as strategic counsel in connection with hundreds of consumer fraud and breach of warranty cases. Serving as co-national trial counsel for one of the world’s largest shipping and logistics companies in serious injury cases arising out of tractor trailer and package delivery motor vehicle accidents. Representing a global pharmaceutical company in medical device and biologic cases across the country involving allegations of personal injury, off-label promotion, and fraud. Representing a national flooring retailer in federal class action proceeding involving allegations of consumer fraud, false labeling, and breach of warranty. Representing Beazer Homes as national counsel in its Chinese drywall docket, including individual and putative class actions in state court and a federal MDL proceeding alleging product defects, breach of warranty, and violations of consumer protection statutes. Representing a top private university in putative class action in federal MDL proceeding brought by former student athletes alleging injuries resulting from concussions and head trauma. Representing a high-growth specialty retailer in burn injury cases resulting from the use of recalled gel fuel and firepot products. Summary judgment for GM Canada on lack of personal jurisdiction grounds in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case. Hinrichs v. GM of Canada, Ltd., 2016 Ala. LEXIS 81 (Ala., June 24, 2016), cert denied, 582 U.S. _ (U.S. June 26, 2017). Dismissal on preemption grounds of medical device case brought against Allergan USA, Inc. in South Carolina federal court. Wells v. Allergan USA, Inc., No. 6:12-3509-TMC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3735 (D.S.C. Jan. 13, 2014). Summary judgment for Atlanta Gas Light Co. in multi-plaintiff burn injury case after excluding plaintiffs' standard of care expert on Daubert grounds. Anderson v. Atlanta Gas Light Co., 324 Ga. App. 801 (2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada in quadriplegia injury, automotive product liability case on a writ of mandamus to the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex Parte General Motors of Canada Limited, 144 So. 3d 236 (Ala. 2013). Summary judgment for GM Canada based on the expiration of the statute of limitations in a wrongful death, automotive product liability case filed in Alabama federal court. King v. GMC, No. 5:11-cv-2269-AKK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54439 (N.D. Ala. April 18, 2012). Dismissal of product liability claims brought against former officers and directors of General Motors Corporation by plaintiffs attempting to circumvent bankruptcy law. Frye v. Smith, 67 So. 3d 882 (Ala. 2011). Representing Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor of America, Inc. in the Georgia Supreme Court to secure a decision deemed “a significant win to business” in local press reports, in which the court held strict liability claims are subject to apportionment for a plaintiff’s comparative fault under Georgia’s 2005 tort reform statute.","searchable_name":"Susan M. Clare","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442826,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5831,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-cooper","email":"rcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Bob","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1994 - 1996"}],"first_name":"Robert","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with distinction","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-cooper-ba696910/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8262}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation{{ FIELD }}Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China{{ FIELD }}Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice{{ FIELD }}Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation{{ FIELD }}Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers{{ FIELD }}Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants){{ FIELD }}Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion){{ FIELD }}Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act{{ FIELD }}Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor{{ FIELD }}Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger{{ FIELD }}Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations{{ FIELD }}Bob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations, and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.\nBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General. Partner Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia American Bar Association The Economic Club of Washington D.C. Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement) Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement) Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants) Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion) Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations","searchable_name":"Robert M. Cooper (Bob)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447858,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5117,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJessica Corley is the Co-Chair of the firm's global Business Litigation group.\u0026nbsp;She concentrates her practice on securities and complex commercial litigation, including securities class actions, derivative suits, and M\u0026amp;A litigation. She also counsels companies and their directors and officers on regulatory investigations, disclosure issues, fiduciary duties in the deal context, and director and officer insurance coverage. Jessica also provides clients with proactive counseling to avoid the pitfalls of securities litigation before they arise.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompanies and their officers and directors count on Jessica\u0026rsquo;s recognized client service skills and business savvy to handle securities litigation and regulatory investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJessica is Chambers USA ranked Band 1, a Legal 500 Leading Partner,\u0026nbsp;and has been named a BTI Client Service All-Star and a BTI Client Service All-Star MVP in the area of Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation. She has also been listed in Super Lawyers magazine many times. She was honored with the Burton Award for Legal Achievement for co-authoring \u0026ldquo;Cybersecurity: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJessica has written and spoken on a variety of commercial litigation topics, particularly in the areas of securities and M\u0026amp;A litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jessica-corley","email":"jpcorley@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 404 277 3585","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKKR \u0026amp; Co, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading global investment firm, in multi-jurisdictional litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eVeradigm Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a healthcare technology company, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMethode Electronics, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global supplier of mechatronic products, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNet Power Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a developer and owner of power plants, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eLuna Innovations\u003c/strong\u003e, a leader in optical technology, in a putative shareholder class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSharecare\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading digital health company, and its officers in a putative shareholder class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAcadia Healthcare Company, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its former directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTivity Health, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeloitte\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a putative shareholder class action. The case was dismissed with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented board of directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTractor Supply Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder derivative case. The case was dismissed in its entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eADTRAN, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global provider of networking and communications equipment, and its officers in securities litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers, in securities litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eQuorum Health Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e, operator of acute care hospitals, and its directors and officers, in securities class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican Addiction Centers\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePsychiatric Solutions, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of psychiatric hospitals, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action, derivative lawsuits and merger litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmTrust Financial Services, Inc.,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an international insurance company, and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation. In the securities class action, the motion to dismiss was granted and affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented portfolio companies of private equity funds in various post-closing disputes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented management and boards of directors on disclosure duties and shareholder litigation in the cybersecurity breach situations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented both target and acquiring companies and their boards of directors in merger litigation throughout the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors and officers of a failed bank holding company and a failed car dealership business in adversary proceedings asserting breach of fiduciary duty and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international power company and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large marketer, seller and distributor of well-recognized, branded consumer products and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading online advertising network company and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":123,"guid":"123.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1204,"guid":"1204.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1715,"guid":"1715.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Corley","nick_name":"Jessica","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Charles R. Simpson, III, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky","years_held":"1999-2000"}],"first_name":"Jessica","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2214,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1999-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Perry","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Her rise has been meteoric and that's a compliment to her talents.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"\"Her presentation and advocacy are phenomenal; she handles the boardroom with a seriousness which sets her apart.\" ","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"Recognized by Chambers USA for Litigation: Securities Georgia","detail":"CHAMBERS USA, 2021-2025"},{"title":"\"She gets into the meat of the issue, knows the facts, thinks outside the box and is pragmatic.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"“Jessica Corley is passionate about her work and takes cases personally while not losing perspective.” ","detail":"LEGAL 500 US 2025"},{"title":"Recognized as a Leading Partner in Securities Litigation: Defense","detail":"LEGAL 500 2025"},{"title":"\"She is very upfront, analytical and timely.\"","detail":"Chambers 2021, Band 2"},{"title":"Jessica Corley is regularly sought out by companies and their executives for representation in securities litigation. ","detail":"Chambers 2021, Band 2"},{"title":"Noted: \"one of the best securities lawyers (male or female); she is the hardest working attorney I know and very smart.\"","detail":"Legal 500 US Guide, 2020"},{"title":"Named Client Service All-Star MVP for Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation","detail":"BTI Consulting, 2015"},{"title":"Named a Client Service All-Star","detail":"BTI Consulting, 2014"},{"title":"Recognized for co-authoring \"Cybersecuritiy: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny\"","detail":"2015 Burton Award for Legal Achievement Recipient"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJessica Corley is the Co-Chair of the firm's global Business Litigation group.\u0026nbsp;She concentrates her practice on securities and complex commercial litigation, including securities class actions, derivative suits, and M\u0026amp;A litigation. She also counsels companies and their directors and officers on regulatory investigations, disclosure issues, fiduciary duties in the deal context, and director and officer insurance coverage. Jessica also provides clients with proactive counseling to avoid the pitfalls of securities litigation before they arise.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCompanies and their officers and directors count on Jessica\u0026rsquo;s recognized client service skills and business savvy to handle securities litigation and regulatory investigations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJessica is Chambers USA ranked Band 1, a Legal 500 Leading Partner,\u0026nbsp;and has been named a BTI Client Service All-Star and a BTI Client Service All-Star MVP in the area of Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation. She has also been listed in Super Lawyers magazine many times. She was honored with the Burton Award for Legal Achievement for co-authoring \u0026ldquo;Cybersecurity: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJessica has written and spoken on a variety of commercial litigation topics, particularly in the areas of securities and M\u0026amp;A litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eKKR \u0026amp; Co, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading global investment firm, in multi-jurisdictional litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eVeradigm Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a healthcare technology company, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMethode Electronics, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global supplier of mechatronic products, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNet Power Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a developer and owner of power plants, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eLuna Innovations\u003c/strong\u003e, a leader in optical technology, in a putative shareholder class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSharecare\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading digital health company, and its officers in a putative shareholder class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAcadia Healthcare Company, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its former directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTivity Health, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDeloitte\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a putative shareholder class action. The case was dismissed with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented board of directors of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTractor Supply Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a shareholder derivative case. The case was dismissed in its entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eADTRAN, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global provider of networking and communications equipment, and its officers in securities litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers, in securities litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eQuorum Health Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e, operator of acute care hospitals, and its directors and officers, in securities class action litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmerican Addiction Centers\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePsychiatric Solutions, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, owner and operator of psychiatric hospitals, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action, derivative lawsuits and merger litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmTrust Financial Services, Inc.,\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;an international insurance company, and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation. In the securities class action, the motion to dismiss was granted and affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented portfolio companies of private equity funds in various post-closing disputes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented management and boards of directors on disclosure duties and shareholder litigation in the cybersecurity breach situations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented both target and acquiring companies and their boards of directors in merger litigation throughout the United States.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented directors and officers of a failed bank holding company and a failed car dealership business in adversary proceedings asserting breach of fiduciary duty and other claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international power company and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a large marketer, seller and distributor of well-recognized, branded consumer products and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading online advertising network company and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Her rise has been meteoric and that's a compliment to her talents.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"\"Her presentation and advocacy are phenomenal; she handles the boardroom with a seriousness which sets her apart.\" ","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"Recognized by Chambers USA for Litigation: Securities Georgia","detail":"CHAMBERS USA, 2021-2025"},{"title":"\"She gets into the meat of the issue, knows the facts, thinks outside the box and is pragmatic.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1"},{"title":"“Jessica Corley is passionate about her work and takes cases personally while not losing perspective.” ","detail":"LEGAL 500 US 2025"},{"title":"Recognized as a Leading Partner in Securities Litigation: Defense","detail":"LEGAL 500 2025"},{"title":"\"She is very upfront, analytical and timely.\"","detail":"Chambers 2021, Band 2"},{"title":"Jessica Corley is regularly sought out by companies and their executives for representation in securities litigation. ","detail":"Chambers 2021, Band 2"},{"title":"Noted: \"one of the best securities lawyers (male or female); she is the hardest working attorney I know and very smart.\"","detail":"Legal 500 US Guide, 2020"},{"title":"Named Client Service All-Star MVP for Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation","detail":"BTI Consulting, 2015"},{"title":"Named a Client Service All-Star","detail":"BTI Consulting, 2014"},{"title":"Recognized for co-authoring \"Cybersecuritiy: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny\"","detail":"2015 Burton Award for Legal Achievement Recipient"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":5693}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-27T21:59:21.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-27T21:59:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Corley{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Her rise has been meteoric and that's a compliment to her talents.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Her presentation and advocacy are phenomenal; she handles the boardroom with a seriousness which sets her apart.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS USA 2025, BAND 1\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized by Chambers USA for Litigation: Securities Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS USA, 2021-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"She gets into the meat of the issue, knows the facts, thinks outside the box and is pragmatic.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Jessica Corley is passionate about her work and takes cases personally while not losing perspective.” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LEGAL 500 US 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Leading Partner in Securities Litigation: Defense\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LEGAL 500 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"She is very upfront, analytical and timely.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers 2021, Band 2\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Jessica Corley is regularly sought out by companies and their executives for representation in securities litigation. \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers 2021, Band 2\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Noted: \\\"one of the best securities lawyers (male or female); she is the hardest working attorney I know and very smart.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US Guide, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named Client Service All-Star MVP for Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI Consulting, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Client Service All-Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI Consulting, 2014\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for co-authoring \\\"Cybersecuritiy: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015 Burton Award for Legal Achievement Recipient\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing KKR \u0026amp; Co, Inc., a leading global investment firm, in multi-jurisdictional litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Veradigm Inc., a healthcare technology company, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Methode Electronics, Inc., a global supplier of mechatronic products, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Net Power Inc., a developer and owner of power plants, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Luna Innovations, a leader in optical technology, in a putative shareholder class action.{{ FIELD }}Representing Sharecare, a leading digital health company, and its officers in a putative shareholder class action.{{ FIELD }}Representing Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., owner and operator of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its former directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Tivity Health, Inc., a leading provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented Deloitte in a putative shareholder class action. The case was dismissed with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Represented board of directors of Tractor Supply Company in a shareholder derivative case. The case was dismissed in its entirety.{{ FIELD }}Representing ADTRAN, Inc., a global provider of networking and communications equipment, and its officers in securities litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers, in securities litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing Quorum Health Corporation, operator of acute care hospitals, and its directors and officers, in securities class action litigation.{{ FIELD }}Representing American Addiction Centers, owner and operator of drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., owner and operator of psychiatric hospitals, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action, derivative lawsuits and merger litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., an international insurance company, and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation. In the securities class action, the motion to dismiss was granted and affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.{{ FIELD }}Represented portfolio companies of private equity funds in various post-closing disputes.{{ FIELD }}Represented management and boards of directors on disclosure duties and shareholder litigation in the cybersecurity breach situations.{{ FIELD }}Represented both target and acquiring companies and their boards of directors in merger litigation throughout the United States.{{ FIELD }}Represented directors and officers of a failed bank holding company and a failed car dealership business in adversary proceedings asserting breach of fiduciary duty and other claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international power company and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented a large marketer, seller and distributor of well-recognized, branded consumer products and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading online advertising network company and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.{{ FIELD }}Jessica Corley is the Co-Chair of the firm's global Business Litigation group. She concentrates her practice on securities and complex commercial litigation, including securities class actions, derivative suits, and M\u0026amp;A litigation. She also counsels companies and their directors and officers on regulatory investigations, disclosure issues, fiduciary duties in the deal context, and director and officer insurance coverage. Jessica also provides clients with proactive counseling to avoid the pitfalls of securities litigation before they arise.\nCompanies and their officers and directors count on Jessica’s recognized client service skills and business savvy to handle securities litigation and regulatory investigations.\nJessica is Chambers USA ranked Band 1, a Legal 500 Leading Partner, and has been named a BTI Client Service All-Star and a BTI Client Service All-Star MVP in the area of Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation. She has also been listed in Super Lawyers magazine many times. She was honored with the Burton Award for Legal Achievement for co-authoring “Cybersecurity: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny.”\nJessica has written and spoken on a variety of commercial litigation topics, particularly in the areas of securities and M\u0026amp;A litigation. Partner \"Her rise has been meteoric and that's a compliment to her talents.\" CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1 \"Her presentation and advocacy are phenomenal; she handles the boardroom with a seriousness which sets her apart.\"  CHAMBERS USA 2025, BAND 1 Recognized by Chambers USA for Litigation: Securities Georgia CHAMBERS USA, 2021-2025 \"She gets into the meat of the issue, knows the facts, thinks outside the box and is pragmatic.\" CHAMBERS 2025, BAND 1 “Jessica Corley is passionate about her work and takes cases personally while not losing perspective.”  LEGAL 500 US 2025 Recognized as a Leading Partner in Securities Litigation: Defense LEGAL 500 2025 \"She is very upfront, analytical and timely.\" Chambers 2021, Band 2 Jessica Corley is regularly sought out by companies and their executives for representation in securities litigation.  Chambers 2021, Band 2 Noted: \"one of the best securities lawyers (male or female); she is the hardest working attorney I know and very smart.\" Legal 500 US Guide, 2020 Named Client Service All-Star MVP for Securities and Complex Commercial Litigation BTI Consulting, 2015 Named a Client Service All-Star BTI Consulting, 2014 Recognized for co-authoring \"Cybersecuritiy: What Directors Need to Know in an Era of Increased Scrutiny\" 2015 Burton Award for Legal Achievement Recipient University of Louisville University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law University of Louisville University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Kentucky New York Supreme Court of Georgia American Bar Association State Bar of Georgia Atlanta Bar Association State Bar of New York State Bar of Kentucky Board of the United Way of Greater Atlanta Judicial Clerk, Honorable Charles R. Simpson, III, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Representing KKR \u0026amp; Co, Inc., a leading global investment firm, in multi-jurisdictional litigation. Representing Veradigm Inc., a healthcare technology company, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation. Representing Methode Electronics, Inc., a global supplier of mechatronic products, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation. Representing Net Power Inc., a developer and owner of power plants, in a putative shareholder class action and derivative litigation. Representing Luna Innovations, a leader in optical technology, in a putative shareholder class action. Representing Sharecare, a leading digital health company, and its officers in a putative shareholder class action. Representing Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc., owner and operator of behavioral healthcare facilities, and its former directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation. Representing Tivity Health, Inc., a leading provider of health and fitness improvement programs, and its directors and officers, in securities and derivative litigation. Represented Deloitte in a putative shareholder class action. The case was dismissed with prejudice. Represented board of directors of Tractor Supply Company in a shareholder derivative case. The case was dismissed in its entirety. Representing ADTRAN, Inc., a global provider of networking and communications equipment, and its officers in securities litigation. Representing U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., a large truckload carrier, and its directors and officers, in securities litigation. Representing Quorum Health Corporation, operator of acute care hospitals, and its directors and officers, in securities class action litigation. Representing American Addiction Centers, owner and operator of drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action and derivative litigation. Represented Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., owner and operator of psychiatric hospitals, and its directors and officers, in a securities class action, derivative lawsuits and merger litigation. Represented AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., an international insurance company, and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation. In the securities class action, the motion to dismiss was granted and affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Represented portfolio companies of private equity funds in various post-closing disputes. Represented management and boards of directors on disclosure duties and shareholder litigation in the cybersecurity breach situations. Represented both target and acquiring companies and their boards of directors in merger litigation throughout the United States. Represented directors and officers of a failed bank holding company and a failed car dealership business in adversary proceedings asserting breach of fiduciary duty and other claims. Represented an international power company and its directors and officers in securities, derivative and other commercial litigation. Represented a large marketer, seller and distributor of well-recognized, branded consumer products and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation. Represented a leading online advertising network company and its directors and officers in securities and derivative litigation.","searchable_name":"Jessica Perry Corley","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446841,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1047,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharles Correll is a partner in the San Francisco and Houston offices with over twenty years of courtroom and arbitration experience. He is a member of our Contracts and Business Torts, Energy, Class Action, and International Arbitration practices. Charles \u0026nbsp;pursues and defends his clients\u0026rsquo; interests in complex commercial, mass tort and environmental litigation in both domestic and international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn an era of over-specialization, Charles has maintained a broad and diverse practice, bringing strategic judgment, tested courtroom skills, and dedication to his clients in \u0026nbsp;a wide variety of matters in federal and state courts, and before international and domestic arbitration panels. These include class actions; breaches of contract; construction; oil and gas exploration and royalty disputes; environmental issues (statutory and tort); business torts; personal injury matters; investment disputes; antitrust claims; patent infringement; trade secrets; and enforcement of international arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith significant experience in the energy industry, Charles represents large oil companies, independent exploration, and production companies and service providers in all types of disputes, including upstream, midstream and downstream matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Charles was an officer in the U.S. Army, where he served as a tank platoon leader for the Second Armored Cavalry Regiment in Operation Desert Storm. He currently serves on the national board of directors for the West Point Association of Graduates.\u0026nbsp; Beat Navy!\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharles is ranked as \u0026ldquo;Tier 1\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e in energy litigation, and in product liability and mass tort defense. He has also been named a \u0026ldquo;Texas Super Lawyer\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eTexas Monthly Magazine.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charles-correll","email":"ccorrell@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy, Commercial, Class Action, Construction and Environmental Litigation in Federal and State Courts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor oil company\u003c/strong\u003e as national litigation counsel in numerous MTBE cases in which private water companies, public water utilities and state agencies allege that MTBE is a defective and unreasonably dangerous product that has contaminated public drinking water supplies in California, New York and numerous other states.\u0026nbsp; He has tried one case to verdict thus far, obtaining a complete win at one station and defeating the large damages claims on the others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous cases brought by residents and the local municipal government relating to a refinery fire.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a putative royalty class action in California. The case involves all private leases held by the company in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein a statewide unfair completion law (UCL) case in state court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major non-U.S. auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in an antitrust class action in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a state court action to recover money arising out of a brownfield development project.\u0026nbsp; Successfully defended company against claims to pierce the corporate veil brought by a lender seeking to recover over $50 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a three-state class oil and gas royalty class action with claims over $2 billion.\u0026nbsp; Obtained a favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous gas royalty disputes and gross production severance tax suits, including class actions, brought in Oklahoma by private royalty owners and the Oklahoma Tax Commission alleging that the company underpaid royalties and taxes due to affiliate sales and improper deductions of post-production costs. Obtained favorable settlements in all cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean international contractor\u003c/strong\u003e concerning delay, disruption and change order claims arising out of an underwater demolition and construction project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a billion-dollar putative class action in federal court in which plaintiffs sought to certify a class of all persons damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Obtained a dismissal of all claims with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a $600 million preferential rights dispute. Arbitration panel awarded a take-nothing award in favor of the oil company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in an environmental lawsuit in federal court in which a state attorney general sought over four billion dollars in damages. Obtained summary judgment on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major offshore drilling company\u003c/strong\u003e in a class-action antitrust case in federal court in which the plaintiffs sought $15 billion in damages. While most defendants settled for millions of dollars, King\u0026nbsp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s client settled for a nominal amount after aggressively defending the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; class certification efforts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea wealthy investor\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous disputes related to investments in privately held companies in the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Claims included breach of fiduciary duty, breach of various contracts and investment agreements, and statutory violations. Ultimately negotiated a favorable cross-border settlement and restructuring agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea professional services corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute concerning the sale of an affiliated company. After a two-week trial in Houston, Texas, the company obtained a defense verdict on the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claims and recovered damages and enforcement of the relevant contracts pursuant to the company\u0026rsquo;s counter-claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean inventor\u003c/strong\u003e in a two-week patent trial in federal court in Houston, Texas, obtaining a multi-million-dollar verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea Wall Street brokerage firm\u003c/strong\u003e in a securities fraud case in state court in Dallas, Texas. The case settled for a nominal amount after a Dallas jury in a court-ordered summary jury trial returned a defense verdict on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in companion trade secret/patent infringement cases in state courts in California and Texas in which the plaintiff sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages under a joint development agreement. The case settled for a nominal amount after extensive expert analysis disproved the worth of the technology at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained an award in excess of $350 million on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003ean international EPC contractor\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration against a national oil company involving claims of delay, disruption and additional costs incurred in the design and construction of large offshore oil and gas production platforms in Latin America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTried a case in federal court to enforce an annulled ICC award, obtaining a judgment enforcing the award and requiring the defendant to post significant security while the appeal was pending.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean independent exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration against a drilling subcontractor. The matter settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean independent exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e in an International AAA arbitration in a dispute over a development agreement and associated confidentiality agreements. The dispute settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international construction company\u003c/strong\u003e on the enforcement and collection of an $80 million ICC Award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e on several matters governed by international arbitration provisions for construction and development of facilities in Africa that were resolved favorably without having to file for arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international exploration and development company\u003c/strong\u003e concerning an AMI dispute in Africa that settled favorably without having to file for arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":29}]},"expertise":[{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Correll","nick_name":"Charles","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charles","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"C.","name_suffix":"Jr.","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-correll-22637a5/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":58,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharles Correll is a partner in the San Francisco and Houston offices with over twenty years of courtroom and arbitration experience. He is a member of our Contracts and Business Torts, Energy, Class Action, and International Arbitration practices. Charles \u0026nbsp;pursues and defends his clients\u0026rsquo; interests in complex commercial, mass tort and environmental litigation in both domestic and international disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn an era of over-specialization, Charles has maintained a broad and diverse practice, bringing strategic judgment, tested courtroom skills, and dedication to his clients in \u0026nbsp;a wide variety of matters in federal and state courts, and before international and domestic arbitration panels. These include class actions; breaches of contract; construction; oil and gas exploration and royalty disputes; environmental issues (statutory and tort); business torts; personal injury matters; investment disputes; antitrust claims; patent infringement; trade secrets; and enforcement of international arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith significant experience in the energy industry, Charles represents large oil companies, independent exploration, and production companies and service providers in all types of disputes, including upstream, midstream and downstream matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Charles was an officer in the U.S. Army, where he served as a tank platoon leader for the Second Armored Cavalry Regiment in Operation Desert Storm. He currently serves on the national board of directors for the West Point Association of Graduates.\u0026nbsp; Beat Navy!\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharles is ranked as \u0026ldquo;Tier 1\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e in energy litigation, and in product liability and mass tort defense. He has also been named a \u0026ldquo;Texas Super Lawyer\u0026rdquo; by \u003cem\u003eTexas Monthly Magazine.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnergy, Commercial, Class Action, Construction and Environmental Litigation in Federal and State Courts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor oil company\u003c/strong\u003e as national litigation counsel in numerous MTBE cases in which private water companies, public water utilities and state agencies allege that MTBE is a defective and unreasonably dangerous product that has contaminated public drinking water supplies in California, New York and numerous other states.\u0026nbsp; He has tried one case to verdict thus far, obtaining a complete win at one station and defeating the large damages claims on the others.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous cases brought by residents and the local municipal government relating to a refinery fire.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a putative royalty class action in California. The case involves all private leases held by the company in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eEquifax \u003c/strong\u003ein a statewide unfair completion law (UCL) case in state court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major non-U.S. auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e in an antitrust class action in federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003ea major pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a state court action to recover money arising out of a brownfield development project.\u0026nbsp; Successfully defended company against claims to pierce the corporate veil brought by a lender seeking to recover over $50 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a three-state class oil and gas royalty class action with claims over $2 billion.\u0026nbsp; Obtained a favorable settlement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous gas royalty disputes and gross production severance tax suits, including class actions, brought in Oklahoma by private royalty owners and the Oklahoma Tax Commission alleging that the company underpaid royalties and taxes due to affiliate sales and improper deductions of post-production costs. Obtained favorable settlements in all cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean international contractor\u003c/strong\u003e concerning delay, disruption and change order claims arising out of an underwater demolition and construction project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a billion-dollar putative class action in federal court in which plaintiffs sought to certify a class of all persons damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Obtained a dismissal of all claims with prejudice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in a $600 million preferential rights dispute. Arbitration panel awarded a take-nothing award in favor of the oil company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in an environmental lawsuit in federal court in which a state attorney general sought over four billion dollars in damages. Obtained summary judgment on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major offshore drilling company\u003c/strong\u003e in a class-action antitrust case in federal court in which the plaintiffs sought $15 billion in damages. While most defendants settled for millions of dollars, King\u0026nbsp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s client settled for a nominal amount after aggressively defending the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; class certification efforts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea wealthy investor\u003c/strong\u003e in numerous disputes related to investments in privately held companies in the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Claims included breach of fiduciary duty, breach of various contracts and investment agreements, and statutory violations. Ultimately negotiated a favorable cross-border settlement and restructuring agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea professional services corporation\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute concerning the sale of an affiliated company. After a two-week trial in Houston, Texas, the company obtained a defense verdict on the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s claims and recovered damages and enforcement of the relevant contracts pursuant to the company\u0026rsquo;s counter-claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean inventor\u003c/strong\u003e in a two-week patent trial in federal court in Houston, Texas, obtaining a multi-million-dollar verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea Wall Street brokerage firm\u003c/strong\u003e in a securities fraud case in state court in Dallas, Texas. The case settled for a nominal amount after a Dallas jury in a court-ordered summary jury trial returned a defense verdict on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ea major oil company\u003c/strong\u003e in companion trade secret/patent infringement cases in state courts in California and Texas in which the plaintiff sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages under a joint development agreement. The case settled for a nominal amount after extensive expert analysis disproved the worth of the technology at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInternational Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained an award in excess of $350 million on behalf of \u003cstrong\u003ean international EPC contractor\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration against a national oil company involving claims of delay, disruption and additional costs incurred in the design and construction of large offshore oil and gas production platforms in Latin America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTried a case in federal court to enforce an annulled ICC award, obtaining a judgment enforcing the award and requiring the defendant to post significant security while the appeal was pending.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean independent exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration against a drilling subcontractor. The matter settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003ean independent exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e in an International AAA arbitration in a dispute over a development agreement and associated confidentiality agreements. The dispute settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international construction company\u003c/strong\u003e on the enforcement and collection of an $80 million ICC Award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e on several matters governed by international arbitration provisions for construction and development of facilities in Africa that were resolved favorably without having to file for arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong\u003ean international exploration and development company\u003c/strong\u003e concerning an AMI dispute in Africa that settled favorably without having to file for arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7976}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-18T16:05:44.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-18T16:05:44.000Z","searchable_text":"Correll{{ FIELD }}Energy, Commercial, Class Action, Construction and Environmental Litigation in Federal and State Courts{{ FIELD }}Representing a major oil company as national litigation counsel in numerous MTBE cases in which private water companies, public water utilities and state agencies allege that MTBE is a defective and unreasonably dangerous product that has contaminated public drinking water supplies in California, New York and numerous other states.  He has tried one case to verdict thus far, obtaining a complete win at one station and defeating the large damages claims on the others.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major oil company in numerous cases brought by residents and the local municipal government relating to a refinery fire.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major oil company in a putative royalty class action in California. The case involves all private leases held by the company in California.{{ FIELD }}Representing Equifax in a statewide unfair completion law (UCL) case in state court.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major non-U.S. auto manufacturer in an antitrust class action in federal court.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major pharmaceutical company in a state court action to recover money arising out of a brownfield development project.  Successfully defended company against claims to pierce the corporate veil brought by a lender seeking to recover over $50 million.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in a three-state class oil and gas royalty class action with claims over $2 billion.  Obtained a favorable settlement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in numerous gas royalty disputes and gross production severance tax suits, including class actions, brought in Oklahoma by private royalty owners and the Oklahoma Tax Commission alleging that the company underpaid royalties and taxes due to affiliate sales and improper deductions of post-production costs. Obtained favorable settlements in all cases.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international contractor concerning delay, disruption and change order claims arising out of an underwater demolition and construction project.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in a billion-dollar putative class action in federal court in which plaintiffs sought to certify a class of all persons damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Obtained a dismissal of all claims with prejudice.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in a $600 million preferential rights dispute. Arbitration panel awarded a take-nothing award in favor of the oil company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in an environmental lawsuit in federal court in which a state attorney general sought over four billion dollars in damages. Obtained summary judgment on all claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major offshore drilling company in a class-action antitrust case in federal court in which the plaintiffs sought $15 billion in damages. While most defendants settled for millions of dollars, King  Spalding’s client settled for a nominal amount after aggressively defending the plaintiffs’ class certification efforts.{{ FIELD }}Represented a wealthy investor in numerous disputes related to investments in privately held companies in the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Claims included breach of fiduciary duty, breach of various contracts and investment agreements, and statutory violations. Ultimately negotiated a favorable cross-border settlement and restructuring agreement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a professional services corporation in a dispute concerning the sale of an affiliated company. After a two-week trial in Houston, Texas, the company obtained a defense verdict on the plaintiff’s claims and recovered damages and enforcement of the relevant contracts pursuant to the company’s counter-claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented an inventor in a two-week patent trial in federal court in Houston, Texas, obtaining a multi-million-dollar verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Wall Street brokerage firm in a securities fraud case in state court in Dallas, Texas. The case settled for a nominal amount after a Dallas jury in a court-ordered summary jury trial returned a defense verdict on all claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in companion trade secret/patent infringement cases in state courts in California and Texas in which the plaintiff sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages under a joint development agreement. The case settled for a nominal amount after extensive expert analysis disproved the worth of the technology at issue.{{ FIELD }}International Arbitration{{ FIELD }}Obtained an award in excess of $350 million on behalf of an international EPC contractor in an ICC arbitration against a national oil company involving claims of delay, disruption and additional costs incurred in the design and construction of large offshore oil and gas production platforms in Latin America.{{ FIELD }}Tried a case in federal court to enforce an annulled ICC award, obtaining a judgment enforcing the award and requiring the defendant to post significant security while the appeal was pending.{{ FIELD }}Represented an independent exploration company in an ICC arbitration against a drilling subcontractor. The matter settled on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented an independent exploration company in an International AAA arbitration in a dispute over a development agreement and associated confidentiality agreements. The dispute settled on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Advised an international construction company on the enforcement and collection of an $80 million ICC Award.{{ FIELD }}Advised an international exploration company on several matters governed by international arbitration provisions for construction and development of facilities in Africa that were resolved favorably without having to file for arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Advised an international exploration and development company concerning an AMI dispute in Africa that settled favorably without having to file for arbitration.{{ FIELD }}Charles Correll is a partner in the San Francisco and Houston offices with over twenty years of courtroom and arbitration experience. He is a member of our Contracts and Business Torts, Energy, Class Action, and International Arbitration practices. Charles  pursues and defends his clients’ interests in complex commercial, mass tort and environmental litigation in both domestic and international disputes.\nIn an era of over-specialization, Charles has maintained a broad and diverse practice, bringing strategic judgment, tested courtroom skills, and dedication to his clients in  a wide variety of matters in federal and state courts, and before international and domestic arbitration panels. These include class actions; breaches of contract; construction; oil and gas exploration and royalty disputes; environmental issues (statutory and tort); business torts; personal injury matters; investment disputes; antitrust claims; patent infringement; trade secrets; and enforcement of international arbitration awards.\nWith significant experience in the energy industry, Charles represents large oil companies, independent exploration, and production companies and service providers in all types of disputes, including upstream, midstream and downstream matters.\nPreviously, Charles was an officer in the U.S. Army, where he served as a tank platoon leader for the Second Armored Cavalry Regiment in Operation Desert Storm. He currently serves on the national board of directors for the West Point Association of Graduates.  Beat Navy!\nCharles is ranked as “Tier 1” by Legal 500 in energy litigation, and in product liability and mass tort defense. He has also been named a “Texas Super Lawyer” by Texas Monthly Magazine. Charles C Correll Partner United States Military Academy  Yale University Yale Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Oklahoma Texas Houston Bar Association Texas Bar Association California Bar Association Energy, Commercial, Class Action, Construction and Environmental Litigation in Federal and State Courts Representing a major oil company as national litigation counsel in numerous MTBE cases in which private water companies, public water utilities and state agencies allege that MTBE is a defective and unreasonably dangerous product that has contaminated public drinking water supplies in California, New York and numerous other states.  He has tried one case to verdict thus far, obtaining a complete win at one station and defeating the large damages claims on the others. Representing a major oil company in numerous cases brought by residents and the local municipal government relating to a refinery fire. Representing a major oil company in a putative royalty class action in California. The case involves all private leases held by the company in California. Representing Equifax in a statewide unfair completion law (UCL) case in state court. Representing a major non-U.S. auto manufacturer in an antitrust class action in federal court. Representing a major pharmaceutical company in a state court action to recover money arising out of a brownfield development project.  Successfully defended company against claims to pierce the corporate veil brought by a lender seeking to recover over $50 million. Represented a major oil company in a three-state class oil and gas royalty class action with claims over $2 billion.  Obtained a favorable settlement. Represented a major oil company in numerous gas royalty disputes and gross production severance tax suits, including class actions, brought in Oklahoma by private royalty owners and the Oklahoma Tax Commission alleging that the company underpaid royalties and taxes due to affiliate sales and improper deductions of post-production costs. Obtained favorable settlements in all cases. Represented an international contractor concerning delay, disruption and change order claims arising out of an underwater demolition and construction project. Represented a major oil company in a billion-dollar putative class action in federal court in which plaintiffs sought to certify a class of all persons damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Obtained a dismissal of all claims with prejudice. Represented a major oil company in a $600 million preferential rights dispute. Arbitration panel awarded a take-nothing award in favor of the oil company. Represented a major oil company in an environmental lawsuit in federal court in which a state attorney general sought over four billion dollars in damages. Obtained summary judgment on all claims. Represented a major offshore drilling company in a class-action antitrust case in federal court in which the plaintiffs sought $15 billion in damages. While most defendants settled for millions of dollars, King  Spalding’s client settled for a nominal amount after aggressively defending the plaintiffs’ class certification efforts. Represented a wealthy investor in numerous disputes related to investments in privately held companies in the United States, Europe and the Middle East. Claims included breach of fiduciary duty, breach of various contracts and investment agreements, and statutory violations. Ultimately negotiated a favorable cross-border settlement and restructuring agreement. Represented a professional services corporation in a dispute concerning the sale of an affiliated company. After a two-week trial in Houston, Texas, the company obtained a defense verdict on the plaintiff’s claims and recovered damages and enforcement of the relevant contracts pursuant to the company’s counter-claims. Represented an inventor in a two-week patent trial in federal court in Houston, Texas, obtaining a multi-million-dollar verdict. Represented a Wall Street brokerage firm in a securities fraud case in state court in Dallas, Texas. The case settled for a nominal amount after a Dallas jury in a court-ordered summary jury trial returned a defense verdict on all claims. Represented a major oil company in companion trade secret/patent infringement cases in state courts in California and Texas in which the plaintiff sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages under a joint development agreement. The case settled for a nominal amount after extensive expert analysis disproved the worth of the technology at issue. International Arbitration Obtained an award in excess of $350 million on behalf of an international EPC contractor in an ICC arbitration against a national oil company involving claims of delay, disruption and additional costs incurred in the design and construction of large offshore oil and gas production platforms in Latin America. Tried a case in federal court to enforce an annulled ICC award, obtaining a judgment enforcing the award and requiring the defendant to post significant security while the appeal was pending. Represented an independent exploration company in an ICC arbitration against a drilling subcontractor. The matter settled on favorable terms. Represented an independent exploration company in an International AAA arbitration in a dispute over a development agreement and associated confidentiality agreements. The dispute settled on favorable terms. Advised an international construction company on the enforcement and collection of an $80 million ICC Award. Advised an international exploration company on several matters governed by international arbitration provisions for construction and development of facilities in Africa that were resolved favorably without having to file for arbitration. Advised an international exploration and development company concerning an AMI dispute in Africa that settled favorably without having to file for arbitration.","searchable_name":"Charles C. Correll, Jr.","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443167,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6205,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew is a thoughtful advisor and tenacious advocate with experience that spans all the way from working with employers to mitigate risk through effective policies, to representing clients in high-profile, bet-the-company cases. For him, no tried-and-true method is above re-examination, and he develops creative and efficient strategies for each issue his clients face.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew advises and defends clients of various industries across the country, including franchisors, restaurants, logistics, international couriers, big-box retailers, pharmaceutical manufactures, and news and media content providers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has wide-ranging litigation experience having represented clients in both single plaintiff and complex class and collective actions, including alleged wage and hour and wage payment violations brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act and similar state laws, claims under various biometric privacy statutes including Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act as well as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission-initiated multi-plaintiff actions alleging claims of age, sex, race, national origin, and disability discrimination and retaliation. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew is an experienced oral advocate having argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and numerous other federal and state courts on the way to securing favorable resolutions for his clients.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"andrew-cockroft","email":"acockroft@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cockroft","nick_name":"Andrew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Andrew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2015-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"One to Watch: Litigation - Labor and Employment","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2022-2026"},{"title":"Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Service","detail":"Northern District of Illinois and the Federal Bar Association, 2018"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew is a thoughtful advisor and tenacious advocate with experience that spans all the way from working with employers to mitigate risk through effective policies, to representing clients in high-profile, bet-the-company cases. For him, no tried-and-true method is above re-examination, and he develops creative and efficient strategies for each issue his clients face.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew advises and defends clients of various industries across the country, including franchisors, restaurants, logistics, international couriers, big-box retailers, pharmaceutical manufactures, and news and media content providers.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has wide-ranging litigation experience having represented clients in both single plaintiff and complex class and collective actions, including alleged wage and hour and wage payment violations brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act and similar state laws, claims under various biometric privacy statutes including Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act as well as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission-initiated multi-plaintiff actions alleging claims of age, sex, race, national origin, and disability discrimination and retaliation. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew is an experienced oral advocate having argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and numerous other federal and state courts on the way to securing favorable resolutions for his clients.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"One to Watch: Litigation - Labor and Employment","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2022-2026"},{"title":"Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Service","detail":"Northern District of Illinois and the Federal Bar Association, 2018"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9507}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-11-21T15:07:35.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-21T15:07:35.000Z","searchable_text":"Cockroft{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"One to Watch: Litigation - Labor and Employment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2022-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Service\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Northern District of Illinois and the Federal Bar Association, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}Andrew is a thoughtful advisor and tenacious advocate with experience that spans all the way from working with employers to mitigate risk through effective policies, to representing clients in high-profile, bet-the-company cases. For him, no tried-and-true method is above re-examination, and he develops creative and efficient strategies for each issue his clients face. \nAndrew advises and defends clients of various industries across the country, including franchisors, restaurants, logistics, international couriers, big-box retailers, pharmaceutical manufactures, and news and media content providers. \nAndrew has wide-ranging litigation experience having represented clients in both single plaintiff and complex class and collective actions, including alleged wage and hour and wage payment violations brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act and similar state laws, claims under various biometric privacy statutes including Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act as well as Equal Employment Opportunity Commission-initiated multi-plaintiff actions alleging claims of age, sex, race, national origin, and disability discrimination and retaliation.     \nAndrew is an experienced oral advocate having argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and numerous other federal and state courts on the way to securing favorable resolutions for his clients.  Senior Associate One to Watch: Litigation - Labor and Employment Best Lawyers, 2022-2026 Award for Excellence in Pro Bono Service Northern District of Illinois and the Federal Bar Association, 2018 The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Illinois","searchable_name":"Andrew Cockroft","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427095,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6296,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude \u003c/em\u003ewith an election to the Order of the Coif,\u0026nbsp;where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial.\u0026nbsp;Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to\u0026nbsp;torts in technological settings and\u0026nbsp;artificial intelligence.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mary-carden","email":"lcarden@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carden","nick_name":"Larkin","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Larkin","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude \u003c/em\u003ewith an election to the Order of the Coif,\u0026nbsp;where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial.\u0026nbsp;Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to\u0026nbsp;torts in technological settings and\u0026nbsp;artificial intelligence.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12342}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Carden{{ FIELD }}Larkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.\nLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, summa cum laude with an election to the Order of the Coif, where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial. Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to torts in technological settings and artificial intelligence. Associate Auburn University  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia","searchable_name":"Mary Larkin Carden (Larkin)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":440773,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6298,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKasey Clark is an\u0026nbsp;Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is part of the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group. His practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, including\u0026nbsp;class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Kasey\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable William M. Ray, II on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKasey graduated \u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;cum laude\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom his\u0026nbsp;class at the University of Georgia School of Law, where he\u0026nbsp;served as a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Law Review's \u003c/em\u003eManaging\u0026nbsp;Board and the Clarke-Carley\u0026nbsp;Inn of Court. Upon graduation, Kasey\u0026nbsp;was inducted into the Order of the Coif.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kasey-clark","email":"kclark@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Clark","nick_name":"Kasey","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William M. Ray, II, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2023 - 2024"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. William M. Ray, II, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2023 - 2023"}],"first_name":"Kasey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKasey Clark is an\u0026nbsp;Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is part of the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group. His practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, including\u0026nbsp;class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Kasey\u0026nbsp;served as a law clerk for the Honorable William M. Ray, II on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKasey graduated \u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;cum laude\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom his\u0026nbsp;class at the University of Georgia School of Law, where he\u0026nbsp;served as a member of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGeorgia Law Review's \u003c/em\u003eManaging\u0026nbsp;Board and the Clarke-Carley\u0026nbsp;Inn of Court. Upon graduation, Kasey\u0026nbsp;was inducted into the Order of the Coif.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12343}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-10-12T04:59:19.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-12T04:59:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Clark{{ FIELD }}Kasey Clark is an Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's Atlanta office and is part of the firm's Business Litigation Practice Group. His practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes commercial litigation, including class actions, breach of contract cases, and other complex business disputes. \nPrior to joining the firm, Kasey served as a law clerk for the Honorable William M. Ray, II on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\nKasey graduated magna cum laude from his class at the University of Georgia School of Law, where he served as a member of the Georgia Law Review's Managing Board and the Clarke-Carley Inn of Court. Upon graduation, Kasey was inducted into the Order of the Coif.  Associate University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Clerk, Hon. William M. Ray, II, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Intern, Hon. William M. Ray, II, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","searchable_name":"Kasey Clark","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427103,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6322,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRachel Corella is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Chicago office and a member of the Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents a variety of industry-leading corporations in a range of complex civil matters concerning product liability, consumer fraud, false advertising, unfair competition and other torts. Rachel also maintains an active pro bono practice, with matters ranging from prisoner rights claims to nonprofit investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"rachel-corella","email":"rcorella@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3363}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Corella","nick_name":"Rachel","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Rachel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Rachel is an associate in the Chicago office and a member of the firm’s Trial and Global Disputes team. Read more about her.","primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRachel Corella is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Chicago office and a member of the Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents a variety of industry-leading corporations in a range of complex civil matters concerning product liability, consumer fraud, false advertising, unfair competition and other torts. Rachel also maintains an active pro bono practice, with matters ranging from prisoner rights claims to nonprofit investigations.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11296}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:42.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:42.000Z","searchable_text":"Corella{{ FIELD }}Rachel Corella is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Chicago office and a member of the Product Liability and Mass Torts practice group. She represents a variety of industry-leading corporations in a range of complex civil matters concerning product liability, consumer fraud, false advertising, unfair competition and other torts. Rachel also maintains an active pro bono practice, with matters ranging from prisoner rights claims to nonprofit investigations. Rachel Corella lawyer Associate University of Washington  Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","searchable_name":"Rachel Corella","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}