{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Chair","value":"Chair"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":2839},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Atlanta's John Marshall Law School","value":2830},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Bond University","value":2841},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP Law School","value":3237},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Bucerius Law School, Germany","value":2898},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"Chicago-Kent College of Law","value":3050},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"College of Law, Guildford, UK","value":2646},{"name":"College of Law, London, UK","value":2647},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"Delhi University","value":3099},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Durham University","value":2708},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University","value":2936},{"name":"ELTE University Budapest","value":2969},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce School of Law","value":2259},{"name":"Free University Berlin","value":2903},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"Fudan University","value":2986},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Guildhall University, London","value":2863},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"Inns of Court School of Law, UK","value":2649},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany","value":2653},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"King Saud University College of Law \u0026 Political Sciences","value":2823},{"name":"King's College London","value":2987},{"name":"King's College, University of London, UK","value":2654},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Leiden University","value":2926},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"Liverpool University, UK","value":2657},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"London School of Economics and Political Science, UK","value":2658},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich","value":3105},{"name":"Lund University","value":3084},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":2660},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":3047},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":2715},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Oxford University, UK","value":2669},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queen's University Faculty of Law","value":2801},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":2725},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Sciences Po Paris","value":2925},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Manchester","value":2845},{"name":"The University of Melbourne","value":2836},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2752},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":3168},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá Colombia","value":2677},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Iberoamericana","value":2915},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit","value":3213},{"name":"Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium","value":2679},{"name":"Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne","value":2680},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University College London, UK","value":2760},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Augsburg","value":2779},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of Bonn, Germany","value":2682},{"name":"University of Bristol, UK","value":2761},{"name":"University of Buenos Aires, Argentina","value":2683},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Cambridge, UK","value":2684},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Cape Town, South Africa","value":2854},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Cologne, Germany","value":2885},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of Deusto, Spain","value":2685},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of East London","value":2963},{"name":"University of Exeter, UK","value":2770},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3112},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Hamburg, Germany","value":2688},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law","value":2202},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kent at Canterbury, UK","value":2690},{"name":"University of Kent","value":2849},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Law","value":2954},{"name":"University of Leeds School of Law","value":2850},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Lima","value":2859},{"name":"University of London","value":2692},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2739},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":3064},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of New South Wales","value":2871},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Nottingham, England","value":2881},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Otago, New Zealand","value":2694},{"name":"University of Paris II, Pantheon-Assas, France","value":2695},{"name":"University of Paris, Pantheon Sorbonne","value":3190},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of Sheffield","value":2805},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Sydney, Australia","value":2700},{"name":"University of Tasmania","value":2835},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Tokyo","value":3153},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Turku","value":3083},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Vienna School of Law","value":2701},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Warwick, UK","value":2771},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Western Australia","value":2949},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2755},{"name":"University of Wollongong, Australia","value":2873},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"University Toulouse Capitol","value":3109},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"23","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"T","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":449197,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7475,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Tansey, former Chief of the DOJ Antitrust Division\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. Criminal Section, is an antitrust expert and seasoned litigator and trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office. Whether representing clients in high-stakes criminal investigations, parallel class actions, or helping them proactively manage risk, Ryan leverages his substantial first-chair trial experience and a decade at the Department of Justice shaping national antitrust enforcement priorities and leading some of the Department\u0026rsquo;s most complex matters across multiple components and four presidential administrations.[[--readmore--]]\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on guiding clients through every phase of criminal and civil antitrust matters, as well as broader commercial disputes. He represents clients in federal and state investigations, litigates civil class actions, and counsels on antitrust compliance and proactive risk management. As a true first-chair trial lawyer, Ryan is one of very few antitrust experts who also has the skill and experience to lead the most complex cases from inception through to trial and successful jury verdict. He is known for his strategic vision and helping clients formulate a strategy that balances legal risks, collateral consequences, and reputational concerns.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Ryan was Chief of the Antitrust Division\u0026rsquo;s largest section in Washington, D.C., supervising hundreds of grand jury investigations and dozens of charges, plea agreements, and trials nationwide. He oversaw a groundbreaking criminal deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Teva Pharmaceuticals, levying a $225 million criminal fine\u0026mdash;the largest penalty ever imposed in a domestic antitrust cartel case\u0026mdash;and requiring unprecedented criminal divestitures to address liability in the generic pharmaceuticals price-fixing case. His team of 90 federal prosecutors and professional staff handled matters across industries like technology and AI, telecommunications, healthcare, financial services, energy, defense contracting, and consumer products. Ryan also played a key role in shaping national antitrust enforcement strategies and policy initiatives, such as implementing the Division\u0026rsquo;s inaugural Whistleblower Rewards Program and overseeing its first $1 million payout. Throughout this time, Ryan forged relationships and worked closely with foreign competition authorities, state attorneys general, and numerous U.S. agencies and DOJ components on parallel investigations and enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, Ryan was a top federal prosecutor in multiple DOJ components. As a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division he led numerous cases, including one of the decade\u0026rsquo;s most significant international cartel prosecutions\u0026mdash;Korea Fuel Supply\u0026mdash;which resulted in five corporate convictions and over $363 million in penalties. His work earned him the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Award for Distinguished Service and the U.S. Army\u0026rsquo;s Patriotic Civilian Service Award. Ryan also served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Alaska where he led its northern office and successfully prosecuted complex cases ranging from securities fraud and bribery schemes to wildlife poaching, murder-for-hires, and the state\u0026rsquo;s largest pill mill prosecution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThroughout his tenure at DOJ, Ryan was tapped as a first-chair trial expert. He has led many complex, multi-month trials to favorable verdicts and received numerous DOJ accolades for his trial work, including the EOUSA Director\u0026rsquo;s Award and selection as a returning instructor at DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Trial Advocacy class, where he trained hundreds of federal prosecutors in trial skills.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his DOJ service, Ryan practiced at a leading international law firm, defending clients in complex civil and criminal antitrust matters, including MDLs, class actions, and investigations concerning LIBOR, Forex, interchange fees, and global shipping.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and his B.A. from the University of Connecticut. He is admitted to practice in New York and Massachusetts.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"ryan-tansey","email":"rtansey@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Tansey","nick_name":"Ryan","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Carl J. Schuman, Connecticut Judicial Branch","years_held":"2010 - 2010"}],"first_name":"Ryan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Director’s Award for Superior Performance by a Litigative Team","detail":"Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 2024"},{"title":"Award for Distinguished Service","detail":"United States Attorney General, 2019"},{"title":"Award for Patriotic Civilian Service","detail":"United States Army, 2019"},{"title":"Investigation Award for Excellence","detail":"Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 2019"},{"title":"Antitrust Assistant Attorney General’s Award","detail":"2018"},{"title":"U.S. Department of Defense Joint Procurement Fraud Task Force Award","detail":"United States Department of Justice, 2018"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryan-d-tansey-5447a522/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRyan Tansey, former Chief of the DOJ Antitrust Division\u0026rsquo;s Washington, D.C. Criminal Section, is an antitrust expert and seasoned litigator and trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office. Whether representing clients in high-stakes criminal investigations, parallel class actions, or helping them proactively manage risk, Ryan leverages his substantial first-chair trial experience and a decade at the Department of Justice shaping national antitrust enforcement priorities and leading some of the Department\u0026rsquo;s most complex matters across multiple components and four presidential administrations.[[--readmore--]]\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on guiding clients through every phase of criminal and civil antitrust matters, as well as broader commercial disputes. He represents clients in federal and state investigations, litigates civil class actions, and counsels on antitrust compliance and proactive risk management. As a true first-chair trial lawyer, Ryan is one of very few antitrust experts who also has the skill and experience to lead the most complex cases from inception through to trial and successful jury verdict. He is known for his strategic vision and helping clients formulate a strategy that balances legal risks, collateral consequences, and reputational concerns.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Ryan was Chief of the Antitrust Division\u0026rsquo;s largest section in Washington, D.C., supervising hundreds of grand jury investigations and dozens of charges, plea agreements, and trials nationwide. He oversaw a groundbreaking criminal deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Teva Pharmaceuticals, levying a $225 million criminal fine\u0026mdash;the largest penalty ever imposed in a domestic antitrust cartel case\u0026mdash;and requiring unprecedented criminal divestitures to address liability in the generic pharmaceuticals price-fixing case. His team of 90 federal prosecutors and professional staff handled matters across industries like technology and AI, telecommunications, healthcare, financial services, energy, defense contracting, and consumer products. Ryan also played a key role in shaping national antitrust enforcement strategies and policy initiatives, such as implementing the Division\u0026rsquo;s inaugural Whistleblower Rewards Program and overseeing its first $1 million payout. Throughout this time, Ryan forged relationships and worked closely with foreign competition authorities, state attorneys general, and numerous U.S. agencies and DOJ components on parallel investigations and enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, Ryan was a top federal prosecutor in multiple DOJ components. As a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division he led numerous cases, including one of the decade\u0026rsquo;s most significant international cartel prosecutions\u0026mdash;Korea Fuel Supply\u0026mdash;which resulted in five corporate convictions and over $363 million in penalties. His work earned him the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s Award for Distinguished Service and the U.S. Army\u0026rsquo;s Patriotic Civilian Service Award. Ryan also served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Alaska where he led its northern office and successfully prosecuted complex cases ranging from securities fraud and bribery schemes to wildlife poaching, murder-for-hires, and the state\u0026rsquo;s largest pill mill prosecution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThroughout his tenure at DOJ, Ryan was tapped as a first-chair trial expert. He has led many complex, multi-month trials to favorable verdicts and received numerous DOJ accolades for his trial work, including the EOUSA Director\u0026rsquo;s Award and selection as a returning instructor at DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Trial Advocacy class, where he trained hundreds of federal prosecutors in trial skills.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his DOJ service, Ryan practiced at a leading international law firm, defending clients in complex civil and criminal antitrust matters, including MDLs, class actions, and investigations concerning LIBOR, Forex, interchange fees, and global shipping.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRyan earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and his B.A. from the University of Connecticut. He is admitted to practice in New York and Massachusetts.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Director’s Award for Superior Performance by a Litigative Team","detail":"Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 2024"},{"title":"Award for Distinguished Service","detail":"United States Attorney General, 2019"},{"title":"Award for Patriotic Civilian Service","detail":"United States Army, 2019"},{"title":"Investigation Award for Excellence","detail":"Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 2019"},{"title":"Antitrust Assistant Attorney General’s Award","detail":"2018"},{"title":"U.S. Department of Defense Joint Procurement Fraud Task Force Award","detail":"United States Department of Justice, 2018"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13529}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-06-09T16:00:40.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-09T16:00:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Tansey{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Director’s Award for Superior Performance by a Litigative Team\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Award for Distinguished Service\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"United States Attorney General, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Award for Patriotic Civilian Service\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"United States Army, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Investigation Award for Excellence\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Antitrust Assistant Attorney General’s Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"U.S. Department of Defense Joint Procurement Fraud Task Force Award\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"United States Department of Justice, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}Ryan Tansey, former Chief of the DOJ Antitrust Division’s Washington, D.C. Criminal Section, is an antitrust expert and seasoned litigator and trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s New York office. Whether representing clients in high-stakes criminal investigations, parallel class actions, or helping them proactively manage risk, Ryan leverages his substantial first-chair trial experience and a decade at the Department of Justice shaping national antitrust enforcement priorities and leading some of the Department’s most complex matters across multiple components and four presidential administrations. \nRyan’s practice focuses on guiding clients through every phase of criminal and civil antitrust matters, as well as broader commercial disputes. He represents clients in federal and state investigations, litigates civil class actions, and counsels on antitrust compliance and proactive risk management. As a true first-chair trial lawyer, Ryan is one of very few antitrust experts who also has the skill and experience to lead the most complex cases from inception through to trial and successful jury verdict. He is known for his strategic vision and helping clients formulate a strategy that balances legal risks, collateral consequences, and reputational concerns.\nBefore joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Ryan was Chief of the Antitrust Division’s largest section in Washington, D.C., supervising hundreds of grand jury investigations and dozens of charges, plea agreements, and trials nationwide. He oversaw a groundbreaking criminal deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Teva Pharmaceuticals, levying a $225 million criminal fine—the largest penalty ever imposed in a domestic antitrust cartel case—and requiring unprecedented criminal divestitures to address liability in the generic pharmaceuticals price-fixing case. His team of 90 federal prosecutors and professional staff handled matters across industries like technology and AI, telecommunications, healthcare, financial services, energy, defense contracting, and consumer products. Ryan also played a key role in shaping national antitrust enforcement strategies and policy initiatives, such as implementing the Division’s inaugural Whistleblower Rewards Program and overseeing its first $1 million payout. Throughout this time, Ryan forged relationships and worked closely with foreign competition authorities, state attorneys general, and numerous U.S. agencies and DOJ components on parallel investigations and enforcement.\nEarlier in his career, Ryan was a top federal prosecutor in multiple DOJ components. As a Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division he led numerous cases, including one of the decade’s most significant international cartel prosecutions—Korea Fuel Supply—which resulted in five corporate convictions and over $363 million in penalties. His work earned him the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service and the U.S. Army’s Patriotic Civilian Service Award. Ryan also served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in Alaska where he led its northern office and successfully prosecuted complex cases ranging from securities fraud and bribery schemes to wildlife poaching, murder-for-hires, and the state’s largest pill mill prosecution.\nThroughout his tenure at DOJ, Ryan was tapped as a first-chair trial expert. He has led many complex, multi-month trials to favorable verdicts and received numerous DOJ accolades for his trial work, including the EOUSA Director’s Award and selection as a returning instructor at DOJ’s Criminal Trial Advocacy class, where he trained hundreds of federal prosecutors in trial skills.\nPrior to his DOJ service, Ryan practiced at a leading international law firm, defending clients in complex civil and criminal antitrust matters, including MDLs, class actions, and investigations concerning LIBOR, Forex, interchange fees, and global shipping.\nRyan earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and his B.A. from the University of Connecticut. He is admitted to practice in New York and Massachusetts. Partner Director’s Award for Superior Performance by a Litigative Team Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, 2024 Award for Distinguished Service United States Attorney General, 2019 Award for Patriotic Civilian Service United States Army, 2019 Investigation Award for Excellence Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, 2019 Antitrust Assistant Attorney General’s Award 2018 U.S. Department of Defense Joint Procurement Fraud Task Force Award United States Department of Justice, 2018 University of Connecticut University of Connecticut School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Massachusetts New York Judicial Clerk, Honorable Carl J. Schuman, Connecticut Judicial Branch","searchable_name":"Ryan D. Tansey","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448652,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2259,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePatrick Togni is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Trade practice. He represents clients in customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, and admissibility issues relating to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (\u0026ldquo;UFLPA\u0026rdquo;).\u0026nbsp; Patrick has extensive experience in trade remedy proceedings and related appeals.\u0026nbsp; Patrick also has worked with clients on a variety of projects in connection with international trade policy, including China tariffs (Section 301) and Miscellaneous Tariff Bill legislation.\u0026nbsp; Patrick also has represented clients in legislative and policy matters relating to unmanned aerial vehicles (\u0026ldquo;UAV\u0026rdquo;)/drones. Patrick is resident in both the Washington, D.C. and Charlotte offices.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick has argued cases before administrative agencies, the U.S. Court of International Trade, and he has appeared in NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel reviews. Patrick\u0026rsquo;s export controls practice includes regulatory counsel and frequent collaborations with the firm\u0026rsquo;s Government and Internal Investigations practice on internal investigations and responses to government information requests (\u003cem\u003ee.g.\u003c/em\u003e, summons). He also has litigated cases in state and federal courts around the country, and has appeared in several intellectual property litigation proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. Patrick\u0026rsquo;s practice also involves the provision of counsel to clients on legislative and policy matters, where he draws upon his time as a legislative aide on Capitol Hill. He is recognized as a Leading Lawyer in the International Trade: Customs, Export Controls and Economic Sanctions category by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"patrick-togni","email":"ptogni@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvising importers and suppliers in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUFLPA customs entry, admissibility, and supply chain tracing matters\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclients in focused assessments (audits) and targeted risk assessments conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecustoms-related investigations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Justice\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etariff classification-related appeals before the United States Court of International Trade\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational skincare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding customs entry and admissibility issues relating to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency export rules for personal protective equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients before U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eimports that are used to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled protests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003equalification for preferential duty treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and tariff classification of imports relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSection 301 China tariffs\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMiscellaneous Tariff Bill and Section 301 China tariff exclusion processes\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;international\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;adoption client in North Carolina state court motions practice regarding a determination of probable chronological age in the absence of an official birth certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting healthcare and technology clients in Federal Supply Schedule and Trade Agreements Act compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eagricultural trade association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in customs and tariff matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArgued appeals in China subsidy proceedings on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edomestic citric acid industry\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational oil and gas company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on UAV procurement matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePerformed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;research on behalf of the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1689,"guid":"1689.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Togni","nick_name":"Patrick","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Patrick","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePatrick Togni is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Trade practice. He represents clients in customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, and admissibility issues relating to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (\u0026ldquo;UFLPA\u0026rdquo;).\u0026nbsp; Patrick has extensive experience in trade remedy proceedings and related appeals.\u0026nbsp; Patrick also has worked with clients on a variety of projects in connection with international trade policy, including China tariffs (Section 301) and Miscellaneous Tariff Bill legislation.\u0026nbsp; Patrick also has represented clients in legislative and policy matters relating to unmanned aerial vehicles (\u0026ldquo;UAV\u0026rdquo;)/drones. Patrick is resident in both the Washington, D.C. and Charlotte offices.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatrick has argued cases before administrative agencies, the U.S. Court of International Trade, and he has appeared in NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel reviews. Patrick\u0026rsquo;s export controls practice includes regulatory counsel and frequent collaborations with the firm\u0026rsquo;s Government and Internal Investigations practice on internal investigations and responses to government information requests (\u003cem\u003ee.g.\u003c/em\u003e, summons). He also has litigated cases in state and federal courts around the country, and has appeared in several intellectual property litigation proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. Patrick\u0026rsquo;s practice also involves the provision of counsel to clients on legislative and policy matters, where he draws upon his time as a legislative aide on Capitol Hill. He is recognized as a Leading Lawyer in the International Trade: Customs, Export Controls and Economic Sanctions category by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US.\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e \u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAdvising importers and suppliers in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUFLPA customs entry, admissibility, and supply chain tracing matters\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclients in focused assessments (audits) and targeted risk assessments conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ecustoms-related investigations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Justice\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting clients in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etariff classification-related appeals before the United States Court of International Trade\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational skincare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding customs entry and admissibility issues relating to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency export rules for personal protective equipment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients before U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eimports that are used to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFiled protests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003equalification for preferential duty treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and tariff classification of imports relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSection 301 China tariffs\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients regarding\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMiscellaneous Tariff Bill and Section 301 China tariff exclusion processes\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;international\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;adoption client in North Carolina state court motions practice regarding a determination of probable chronological age in the absence of an official birth certificate.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting healthcare and technology clients in Federal Supply Schedule and Trade Agreements Act compliance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eagricultural trade association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in customs and tariff matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eArgued appeals in China subsidy proceedings on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003edomestic citric acid industry\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational oil and gas company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on UAV procurement matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePerformed\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;research on behalf of the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1235}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-05-28T21:50:35.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T21:50:35.000Z","searchable_text":"Togni{{ FIELD }}Advising importers and suppliers in UFLPA customs entry, admissibility, and supply chain tracing matters.{{ FIELD }}Representing clients in focused assessments (audits) and targeted risk assessments conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.{{ FIELD }}Representing clients in customs-related investigations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Justice.{{ FIELD }}Representing clients in tariff classification-related appeals before the United States Court of International Trade.{{ FIELD }}Advising multinational skincare company regarding customs entry and admissibility issues relating to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.{{ FIELD }}Represented medical device manufacturers regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency export rules for personal protective equipment.{{ FIELD }}Represented clients before U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding imports that are used to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.{{ FIELD }}Filed protests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding qualification for preferential duty treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement and tariff classification of imports relating to the Section 301 China tariffs.{{ FIELD }}Advised clients regarding Miscellaneous Tariff Bill and Section 301 China tariff exclusion processes.{{ FIELD }}Represented pro bono international adoption client in North Carolina state court motions practice regarding a determination of probable chronological age in the absence of an official birth certificate.{{ FIELD }}Representing healthcare and technology clients in Federal Supply Schedule and Trade Agreements Act compliance.{{ FIELD }}Represented agricultural trade association in customs and tariff matters.{{ FIELD }}Argued appeals in China subsidy proceedings on behalf of the domestic citric acid industry.{{ FIELD }}Advised international oil and gas company on UAV procurement matters.{{ FIELD }}Performed pro bono research on behalf of the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission.{{ FIELD }}Patrick Togni is a partner in the firm’s International Trade practice. He represents clients in customs and import compliance matters, including civil and criminal investigations, audits, rulings, prior disclosures, protests, and admissibility issues relating to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (“UFLPA”).  Patrick has extensive experience in trade remedy proceedings and related appeals.  Patrick also has worked with clients on a variety of projects in connection with international trade policy, including China tariffs (Section 301) and Miscellaneous Tariff Bill legislation.  Patrick also has represented clients in legislative and policy matters relating to unmanned aerial vehicles (“UAV”)/drones. Patrick is resident in both the Washington, D.C. and Charlotte offices. \nPatrick has argued cases before administrative agencies, the U.S. Court of International Trade, and he has appeared in NAFTA Chapter 19 binational panel reviews. Patrick’s export controls practice includes regulatory counsel and frequent collaborations with the firm’s Government and Internal Investigations practice on internal investigations and responses to government information requests (e.g., summons). He also has litigated cases in state and federal courts around the country, and has appeared in several intellectual property litigation proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission. Patrick’s practice also involves the provision of counsel to clients on legislative and policy matters, where he draws upon his time as a legislative aide on Capitol Hill. He is recognized as a Leading Lawyer in the International Trade: Customs, Export Controls and Economic Sanctions category by Legal 500 US.   Partner Binghamton University  American University Washington College of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia North Carolina Virginia Advising importers and suppliers in UFLPA customs entry, admissibility, and supply chain tracing matters. Representing clients in focused assessments (audits) and targeted risk assessments conducted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Representing clients in customs-related investigations by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Department of Justice. Representing clients in tariff classification-related appeals before the United States Court of International Trade. Advising multinational skincare company regarding customs entry and admissibility issues relating to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. Represented medical device manufacturers regarding Federal Emergency Management Agency export rules for personal protective equipment. Represented clients before U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding imports that are used to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Filed protests with U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding qualification for preferential duty treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement and tariff classification of imports relating to the Section 301 China tariffs. Advised clients regarding Miscellaneous Tariff Bill and Section 301 China tariff exclusion processes. Represented pro bono international adoption client in North Carolina state court motions practice regarding a determination of probable chronological age in the absence of an official birth certificate. Representing healthcare and technology clients in Federal Supply Schedule and Trade Agreements Act compliance. Represented agricultural trade association in customs and tariff matters. Argued appeals in China subsidy proceedings on behalf of the domestic citric acid industry. Advised international oil and gas company on UAV procurement matters. Performed pro bono research on behalf of the Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission.","searchable_name":"Patrick J. Togni","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":449216,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7370,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTodd Tuten has spent his career helping clients navigate the complex landscape of healthcare policy and regulation, promoting quality care and access to innovative treatments. A senior advisor on our FDA and Life Sciences, Healthcare, and Government Advocacy and Public Policy teams, he leverages more than three decades of experience \u0026ndash; both inside Congress in the House and the Senate, and as a senior advisor in the private sector \u0026ndash; to assist clients on matters involving legislation, regulation, and government oversight. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Todd most recently served as chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), where he\u0026nbsp;was responsible for\u0026nbsp;advising\u0026nbsp;the Chair on oversight and investigative activities, executive branch nominations, and legal and regulatory compliance issues. Well-regarded for his bipartisan, solutions-oriented approach, Todd successfully liaised with other committees and\u0026nbsp;leadership\u0026nbsp;staff, federal\u0026nbsp;and state\u0026nbsp;officials,\u0026nbsp;industry\u0026nbsp;stakeholders, and\u0026nbsp;advocacy\u0026nbsp;groups.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd\u0026rsquo;s work in policy analysis and advocacy has paved the way for advancements in public health initiatives,\u0026nbsp;promoted quality healthcare, ensured\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid coverage and payment for\u0026nbsp;essential treatments, and preserved access to innovations in care\u0026nbsp;and breakthrough technologies.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd has deep experience providing life sciences,\u0026nbsp;healthcare\u0026nbsp;and technology clients with tailored, strategic guidance to\u0026nbsp;navigate\u0026nbsp;the journey from concept to commercialization,\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;secure\u0026nbsp;federal funding for business priorities, and\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;strengthen supply chain resilience to meet critical needs. His work for the HELP Committee included\u0026nbsp;serving\u0026nbsp;as chief counsel\u0026nbsp;to the majority, where he\u0026nbsp;advanced\u0026nbsp;an\u0026nbsp;effective\u0026nbsp;oversight agenda to support the Chair\u0026rsquo;s legislative and regulatory priorities on healthcare, education, labor, and pensions policies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"todd-tuten","email":"ttuten@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eBuilt and led diverse stakeholder coalitions to implement major payment and delivery system reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance markets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvanced pandemic response initiatives to strengthen supply chain resilience and improve preparedness.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved favorable Medicare coverage and payment policies for cutting-edge treatments and innovations in care.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained federal appropriations and agency support for groundbreaking pediatric disease research initiative.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnacted coalition legislative proposal to ensure timely settlement payments to Medicare beneficiaries and the Trust Fund.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExpanded Medicare assessment of cognitive impairment and improved resources and services for dementia patients and caregivers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncreased veterans\u0026rsquo; access to community-based healthcare.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAligned agency guidance with pharmacy best practices for long-term care.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured enactment of provisions to leverage industry-leading data analytics and information technology to improve program integrity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAuthored provisions enacted into law to protect vulnerable nursing home residents from eviction.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1193,"guid":"1193.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Tuten","nick_name":"Todd","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Todd","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1990-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/todd-tuten-7a88422b6/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":74,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTodd Tuten has spent his career helping clients navigate the complex landscape of healthcare policy and regulation, promoting quality care and access to innovative treatments. A senior advisor on our FDA and Life Sciences, Healthcare, and Government Advocacy and Public Policy teams, he leverages more than three decades of experience \u0026ndash; both inside Congress in the House and the Senate, and as a senior advisor in the private sector \u0026ndash; to assist clients on matters involving legislation, regulation, and government oversight. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Todd most recently served as chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), where he\u0026nbsp;was responsible for\u0026nbsp;advising\u0026nbsp;the Chair on oversight and investigative activities, executive branch nominations, and legal and regulatory compliance issues. Well-regarded for his bipartisan, solutions-oriented approach, Todd successfully liaised with other committees and\u0026nbsp;leadership\u0026nbsp;staff, federal\u0026nbsp;and state\u0026nbsp;officials,\u0026nbsp;industry\u0026nbsp;stakeholders, and\u0026nbsp;advocacy\u0026nbsp;groups.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd\u0026rsquo;s work in policy analysis and advocacy has paved the way for advancements in public health initiatives,\u0026nbsp;promoted quality healthcare, ensured\u0026nbsp;Medicare and Medicaid coverage and payment for\u0026nbsp;essential treatments, and preserved access to innovations in care\u0026nbsp;and breakthrough technologies.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd has deep experience providing life sciences,\u0026nbsp;healthcare\u0026nbsp;and technology clients with tailored, strategic guidance to\u0026nbsp;navigate\u0026nbsp;the journey from concept to commercialization,\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;secure\u0026nbsp;federal funding for business priorities, and\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;strengthen supply chain resilience to meet critical needs. His work for the HELP Committee included\u0026nbsp;serving\u0026nbsp;as chief counsel\u0026nbsp;to the majority, where he\u0026nbsp;advanced\u0026nbsp;an\u0026nbsp;effective\u0026nbsp;oversight agenda to support the Chair\u0026rsquo;s legislative and regulatory priorities on healthcare, education, labor, and pensions policies.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eBuilt and led diverse stakeholder coalitions to implement major payment and delivery system reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance markets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvanced pandemic response initiatives to strengthen supply chain resilience and improve preparedness.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved favorable Medicare coverage and payment policies for cutting-edge treatments and innovations in care.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained federal appropriations and agency support for groundbreaking pediatric disease research initiative.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eEnacted coalition legislative proposal to ensure timely settlement payments to Medicare beneficiaries and the Trust Fund.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eExpanded Medicare assessment of cognitive impairment and improved resources and services for dementia patients and caregivers.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIncreased veterans\u0026rsquo; access to community-based healthcare.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAligned agency guidance with pharmacy best practices for long-term care.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured enactment of provisions to leverage industry-leading data analytics and information technology to improve program integrity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAuthored provisions enacted into law to protect vulnerable nursing home residents from eviction.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13515}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-06-09T18:58:47.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-09T18:58:47.000Z","searchable_text":"Tuten{{ FIELD }}Built and led diverse stakeholder coalitions to implement major payment and delivery system reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance markets.{{ FIELD }}Advanced pandemic response initiatives to strengthen supply chain resilience and improve preparedness.{{ FIELD }}Achieved favorable Medicare coverage and payment policies for cutting-edge treatments and innovations in care.{{ FIELD }}Obtained federal appropriations and agency support for groundbreaking pediatric disease research initiative.{{ FIELD }}Enacted coalition legislative proposal to ensure timely settlement payments to Medicare beneficiaries and the Trust Fund.{{ FIELD }}Expanded Medicare assessment of cognitive impairment and improved resources and services for dementia patients and caregivers.{{ FIELD }}Increased veterans’ access to community-based healthcare.{{ FIELD }}Aligned agency guidance with pharmacy best practices for long-term care.{{ FIELD }}Secured enactment of provisions to leverage industry-leading data analytics and information technology to improve program integrity.{{ FIELD }}Authored provisions enacted into law to protect vulnerable nursing home residents from eviction.{{ FIELD }}Todd Tuten has spent his career helping clients navigate the complex landscape of healthcare policy and regulation, promoting quality care and access to innovative treatments. A senior advisor on our FDA and Life Sciences, Healthcare, and Government Advocacy and Public Policy teams, he leverages more than three decades of experience – both inside Congress in the House and the Senate, and as a senior advisor in the private sector – to assist clients on matters involving legislation, regulation, and government oversight. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Todd most recently served as chief counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), where he was responsible for advising the Chair on oversight and investigative activities, executive branch nominations, and legal and regulatory compliance issues. Well-regarded for his bipartisan, solutions-oriented approach, Todd successfully liaised with other committees and leadership staff, federal and state officials, industry stakeholders, and advocacy groups. \nTodd’s work in policy analysis and advocacy has paved the way for advancements in public health initiatives, promoted quality healthcare, ensured Medicare and Medicaid coverage and payment for essential treatments, and preserved access to innovations in care and breakthrough technologies.  \nTodd has deep experience providing life sciences, healthcare and technology clients with tailored, strategic guidance to navigate the journey from concept to commercialization, to secure federal funding for business priorities, and to strengthen supply chain resilience to meet critical needs. His work for the HELP Committee included serving as chief counsel to the majority, where he advanced an effective oversight agenda to support the Chair’s legislative and regulatory priorities on healthcare, education, labor, and pensions policies.  Senior Advisor The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law Member, American Health Lawyers Association Member, AcademyHealth Member, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) Board Member, Alliance for Aging Research, 2024 Built and led diverse stakeholder coalitions to implement major payment and delivery system reforms to Medicare, Medicaid, and health insurance markets. Advanced pandemic response initiatives to strengthen supply chain resilience and improve preparedness. Achieved favorable Medicare coverage and payment policies for cutting-edge treatments and innovations in care. Obtained federal appropriations and agency support for groundbreaking pediatric disease research initiative. Enacted coalition legislative proposal to ensure timely settlement payments to Medicare beneficiaries and the Trust Fund. Expanded Medicare assessment of cognitive impairment and improved resources and services for dementia patients and caregivers. Increased veterans’ access to community-based healthcare. Aligned agency guidance with pharmacy best practices for long-term care. Secured enactment of provisions to leverage industry-leading data analytics and information technology to improve program integrity. Authored provisions enacted into law to protect vulnerable nursing home residents from eviction.","searchable_name":"Todd Tuten","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}