{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"21","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":443995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6966,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charly-helleputte","email":"chelleputte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1220,"guid":"1220.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Helleputte","nick_name":"Charly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-albert-charly-helleputte-a103931/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12700}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:02:27.000Z","searchable_text":"Helleputte{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *{{ FIELD }}Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. *{{ FIELD }}Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *{{ FIELD }}From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. *{{ FIELD }}Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *{{ FIELD }}Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *{{ FIELD }}Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *{{ FIELD }}Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *{{ FIELD }}Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *{{ FIELD }}Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *{{ FIELD }}Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *{{ FIELD }}Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *{{ FIELD }}Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. * {{ FIELD }}Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Charly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks—such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR—is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.\nCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\nBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus). Partner Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium 2019 Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Candidat en Droit  Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit  Solvay Business School  Paris Brussels European Advisory Board Member, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) ENISA, the European Union Cybersecurity Agency American Chamber in Europe (AmCham), EU chapter W@Privacy Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. * Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. * Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. * Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. * Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. * Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. * Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. * From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. * Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. * Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. * Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. * Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. * Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. * Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. * Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. * Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. * Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. * Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. * Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. * Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. * Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. * Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. * Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. * Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. * Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. * Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. * Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. * Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. * Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. * Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. * Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. * Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. * Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. * Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *  Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.","searchable_name":"Charly Helleputte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436370,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2445,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Hettich is a\u0026nbsp;partner\u0026nbsp; with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.\u0026nbsp; He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims \u0026ndash; with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in\u0026nbsp;Federal court under standards created by the APA.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in \u003cem\u003eEmpire Health v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients. \u0026nbsp;In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan completed his six-year term\u0026nbsp;as \u0026nbsp;Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-hettich","email":"dhettich@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hettich","nick_name":"Dan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Daniel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Band 3","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"ABA Fellows","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"The Legal500 NextGeneration","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40","detail":"Law360, 2016 and 2015"},{"title":"Top Litigator under 40 ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018"},{"title":"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law ","detail":"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Hettich is a\u0026nbsp;partner\u0026nbsp; with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.\u0026nbsp; He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims \u0026ndash; with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in\u0026nbsp;Federal court under standards created by the APA.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in \u003cem\u003eEmpire Health v. Becerra\u003c/em\u003e where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients. \u0026nbsp;In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit\u0026rsquo;s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan completed his six-year term\u0026nbsp;as \u0026nbsp;Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Chambers Band 3","detail":"Chambers \u0026 Partners"},{"title":"ABA Fellows","detail":"American Bar Association"},{"title":"The Legal500 NextGeneration","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40","detail":"Law360, 2016 and 2015"},{"title":"Top Litigator under 40 ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018"},{"title":"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law ","detail":"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":912}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:50:56.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:50:56.000Z","searchable_text":"Hettich{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Band 3\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers \u0026amp; Partners\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"ABA Fellows\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Bar Association\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Legal500 NextGeneration\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top U.S. Lawyers under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2016 and 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Litigator under 40 \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Pro Bono Champion: Health Law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013\"}{{ FIELD }}Dan Hettich is a partner  with a national practice focused on Medicare reimbursement issues affecting hospitals and health systems.  He provides comprehensive services within the area of Medicare reimbursement -- from advising clients on agency requirements, to lobbying Congress when a change in statute is necessary, to defending clients against Medicare related FCA claims – with a special focus on litigating agency errors or misinterpretations in Federal court under standards created by the APA.\nDan recently led briefing and did oral argument before the Ninth Circuit in Empire Health v. Becerra where the Ninth Circuit vacated a CMS policy that almost universally decreased payments to hospitals that treat a disproportionate share of indigent patients.  In November of 2021, he defended the Ninth Circuit’s decision in oral argument before the Supreme Court of the United States.\nIn prior years, Dan has won final, favorable decisions overturning national CMS policy governing the reimbursement of Medicare bad debts, as well as agency denials of new residency program status (worth tens of millions of dollars to both of the hospitals); provider-based status (also worth many millions of dollars to the hospital); critical access hospital status; and volume decrease adjustments. In addition, he recently settled a False Claims Act case for about one-tenth of the alleged treble damages amount, in an issue of first impression in which the Department of Justice's underlying cause of action stemmed from the hospital's reporting of wage data affecting its wage-index.\nDan completed his six-year term as  Vice Chair of the American Health Lawyers Association's Regulation, Accreditation and Payment practice group. He is also a frequent speaker at the AHLA's annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment, as well as a speaker for the AHLA's Annual Meeting, HFMA's Annual Meeting, and the American Bar Association Health Law Summit.\nDan is ranked by Chambers for DC Healthcare; listed as a Top-Rated Health Care Attorney in Washington, DC by Super Lawyers; named a Legal500 Next Generation Partner in 2024; and named one of the nation’s top litigators 40 or under each year from 2016-2020 by Benchmark Litigation.\nDan earned his J.D. from Georgetown University, where he also earned an M.A. in philosophy with a concentration in bioethics. Partner Chambers Band 3 Chambers \u0026amp; Partners ABA Fellows American Bar Association The Legal500 NextGeneration Legal 500 Top U.S. Lawyers under 40 Law360, 2016 and 2015 Top Litigator under 40  Benchmark Litigation, 2016, 2017 and 2018 Pro Bono Champion: Health Law  American Health Lawyers Association, 2010–2013 Fordham University Fordham University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia New Jersey New York American Bar Association, Health Law Section American Health Lawyers Association Georgetown University Hospital's Ethics Committee Fellow, American Bar Foundation, 2017","searchable_name":"Daniel J. Hettich (Dan)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436464,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":4215,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSan Antonio Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lisa-shub","email":"lhorvath@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePharmaceutical / Medical Devices\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eToxic Exposure\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including: \u0026nbsp;primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eContract Disputes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Horvath","nick_name":"Lisa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lisa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Ann","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Outstanding Lawyer Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Women's Leadership Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Texas Super Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017"},{"title":"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026 Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort ","detail":"The Legal 500, 2015"},{"title":"Texas Top Rated Lawyer ","detail":"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present"},{"title":"Who's Who in Energy ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013"},{"title":"Texas Rising Star, energy law ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2005"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyer\u003c/em\u003e, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSan Antonio Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePharmaceutical / Medical Devices\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eToxic Exposure\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including: \u0026nbsp;primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eContract Disputes\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Outstanding Lawyer Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Women's Leadership Award ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016"},{"title":"Texas Super Lawyer ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017"},{"title":"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026 Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort ","detail":"The Legal 500, 2015"},{"title":"Texas Top Rated Lawyer ","detail":"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present"},{"title":"Who's Who in Energy ","detail":"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013"},{"title":"Texas Rising Star, energy law ","detail":"Thomson Reuters, 2005"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7326}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:10.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:55:10.000Z","searchable_text":"Horvath{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Outstanding Lawyer Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Women's Leadership Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2016\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Super Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Top Rated Lawyer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who in Energy \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Texas Rising Star, energy law \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Thomson Reuters, 2005\"}{{ FIELD }}Pharmaceutical / Medical Devices\nLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer{{ FIELD }}Participation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines{{ FIELD }}Participation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product{{ FIELD }}Toxic Exposure\nDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts{{ FIELD }}Participation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including:  primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds.{{ FIELD }}Defending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\"{{ FIELD }}Defending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs{{ FIELD }}Defending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites{{ FIELD }}Fiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\nRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts{{ FIELD }}Defending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance{{ FIELD }}Successfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers{{ FIELD }}Contract Disputes\nDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial{{ FIELD }}Defending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client{{ FIELD }}Representing companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract{{ FIELD }}Representing home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers{{ FIELD }}Lisa Horvath has significant experience representing clients in mass torts, with an emphasis on pharmaceutical, medical device and toxic exposure claims. Lisa also has significant experience in complex commercial litigation matters, representing financial institutions, energy companies and engineering entities in lawsuits alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and professional malfeasance.\nShe has appeared in courts throughout the country, including Texas, Minnesota, Illinois, and Delaware. She has handled every aspect of a case, from pleadings and motion practice; written and document discovery; depositions of plaintiffs, third party fact witnesses, corporate representatives, and expert witnesses; pretrial motions, and resolution through mediation, arbitration and trial. She also has been involved in appeals, and argued before the Supreme Court of Texas.\nLisa has led teams in the identification, development and presentation of expert witnesses in national dockets. She works diligently to identify the best expert witnesses so that complex scientific concepts can be conveyed simply and persuasively to the court and the jury. She has worked with numerous clients and experts to investigate and challenge the scientific reliability of claims. She has served as a guest lecturer at the St. Mary's University School of Law on the subject of deposing expert witnesses. She has received numerous recognitions and awards including being named a Texas Super Lawyer, and is a recipient of the Outstanding Lawyer Award and the Women's Leadership Award from the San Antonio Business Journal. Partner Outstanding Lawyer Award  San Antonio Business Journal, 2016 Women's Leadership Award  San Antonio Business Journal, 2016 Texas Super Lawyer  Thomson Reuters, 2013–2017 Legal 500 US, recommended lawyer, Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Tort Defense: Toxic Tort  The Legal 500, 2015 Texas Top Rated Lawyer  LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, 2013–Present Who's Who in Energy  San Antonio Business Journal, 2012–2013 Texas Rising Star, energy law  Thomson Reuters, 2005 Texas American Bar Association Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas, Lifetime Membership: Lifetime Membership Endowment Fund San Antonio Bar Association Defense Research Institute, 2013–2016 American Bar Association (ABA), Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Session (TIPS) Leadership Class, 2006–2007 San Antonio Bar Foundation Texas Bar Foundation City Year San Antonio, Board of Directors, 2008–2010 Dress for Success San Antonio, Board Member, Officer, 2005–2006 United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County, Issues Council: Strengthening Families Pharmaceutical / Medical Devices\nLeading expert witness team in national litigation against medical device manufacturer Participation in the identification, retention and presentation of expert witnesses in cases brought by thousands of plaintiffs against a pharmaceutical manufacturer of over-the-counter medicines Participation in the case development of the first case to go to trial nationally involving pharmaceutical product Toxic Exposure\nDefending employers against claims that workplace exposures caused employees' offspring to have birth defects, including identification, presentation and cross examination of medical and epidemiology experts and leading successful Daubert challenges to plaintiffs' causation experts Participation in defense of multiple pesticide manufacturers in mass tort case involving allegations that pesticide contamination caused personal injuries and property damage, including:  primary contact with defense expert witnesses on issues of pesticide fate and transport, exposure calculations, toxicology and epidemiology; and obtaining early summary judgment and claims resolution of defendant on no evidence grounds. Defending chemical distributors against claims brought by over 400 former employees of an o-ring manufacturing facility alleging exposure to \"toxic soup\" Defending product manufacturers against claims brought by over 2,000 construction workers and 8,000 family members alleging toxic exposure during construction of the South Texas Nuclear Power Plant and Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant resulting in defense summary judgments against all plaintiffs Defending premises owners/operators/employers against claims of chemical exposure on work sites Fiduciary Duty / Professional Malfeasance\nRepresenting financial institutions in claims regarding allegations of mismanagement of mineral interests and investment accounts Defending estate executors and trustees in claims for loss of inheritance Successfully defending engineers accused of improper engineering practices and ethics violations before Texas Board of Professional Engineers Contract Disputes\nDefending premises owners/operators against claims of negligence over theft of resident belongings, resulting in defense verdict at trial Defending against commercial claims between parties to art auction resulting in favorable outcome for client Representing companies in claims brought by competing business owners against allegations of tortious interference with a contract Representing home realty company in litigation brought by subsequent home purchasers","searchable_name":"Lisa Ann Horvath","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":435804,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7225,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience\u0026mdash;including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)\u0026mdash;David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government\u0026rsquo;s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers\u0026mdash;turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-hoskins","email":"dhoskins@kslaw.com ","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hoskins","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":176,"law_schools":[{"id":3042,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1999-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). ","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)","detail":" 2007"},{"title":"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award ","detail":"multiple awards"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience\u0026mdash;including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)\u0026mdash;David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government\u0026rsquo;s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers\u0026mdash;turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). ","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team","detail":"2012"},{"title":"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)","detail":" 2007"},{"title":"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award ","detail":"multiple awards"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12973}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-08-27T16:01:45.000Z","updated_at":"2025-08-27T16:01:45.000Z","searchable_text":"Hoskins{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.). \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\" 2007\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"multiple awards\"}{{ FIELD }}David Hoskins is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s healthcare practice and specializes in advising healthcare and life sciences companies on maximizing reimbursement strategies under Medicare and Medicaid. With more than 20 years of experience—including as Chief Litigation Counsel for the Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS)—David draws upon his deep institutional insight and expansive litigation background to help clients navigate, challenge and influence complex federal healthcare policies.\nDavid’s practice centers on affirmative litigation, where he represents healthcare providers in challenging CMS and state Medicaid agencies over payment policies that directly impact revenue. During his time at the Department of Health and Human Services, David defended hundreds of these cases and helped mold the federal government’s legal strategy in major disputes, including several with billions of dollars at stake. He now brings that same knowledge and strategic foresight to advocate for providers—turning complex administrative legal challenges into powerful tools for financial recovery. Clients count on David to identify policy vulnerabilities, evaluate high-value opportunities for litigation, and lead the charge in federal courts under the Administrative Procedure Act.\nIn addition to litigation, David maintains a robust regulatory counseling practice. He works with providers, pharmaceutical companies, and medical device manufacturers on engagements involving payment policy strategy, Medicaid demonstration projects, participation in value-based payment models, and navigating CMS coverage and rate-setting decisions. Clients value his ability to cut through the regulatory fog and deliver actionable, revenue-focused guidance backed by decades of agency experience.\nDavid also plays a pivotal role in supporting clients facing fraud and enforcement matters, particularly False Claims Act investigations arising from alleged Medicare or Medicaid violations. He partners with investigations teams to help healthcare entities mount sophisticated defenses informed by his rare knowledge of CMS reimbursement frameworks and enforcement priorities. His insider understanding of how federal agencies develop and pursue enforcement theories gives clients a crucial advantage.\nBeyond litigation and counseling, David also advises clients in developing advocacy strategies before CMS and HHS. Many healthcare companies rely on David to guide them through the policy development process, shape coalitions, and engage with federal leadership to advance their strategic objectives.\nDavid earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law and clerked for the Honorable John P. Wiese at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and before the D.C. Circuit. A respected speaker and thought leader, David is uniquely positioned to not only help clients understand federal healthcare regulations, but to also use them to their advantage. Partner Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. (S. Ct.).  2012 Superior Achievement in Litigation for work on the Medicare Disproportionate Share Litigation Team 2012 Office of Inspector General Cooperative Achievement Award (“In recognition of the contribution to the successful civil and administrative resolution with Tenet Healthcare Corporation”)  2007 Inspector General’s Exceptional Achievement Award  multiple awards University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law District of Columbia","searchable_name":"David Hoskins","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":176,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}