{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"18","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":null,"per_page":12,"people":[{"id":445969,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6173,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGary Adamson represents clients in regulatory proceedings, investigations and complex commercial litigation. He frequently represents accounting firms and individual accountants in litigation, arbitration, and regulatory investigations by the US Securities \u0026amp; Exchange Commission (SEC), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and state authorities. Gary also represents clients in complex disputes about items such as fiduciary relationships, breach of contract, civil RICO, and fraud-related matters. He has sophisticated experience representing clients before investigative agencies and in the federal, state, and appeals cases.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in Spanish, Gary also has unique experience in Latin American investigations and enforcement actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in New York and Washington, D.C.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gary-adamson","email":"gadamson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented major US public audit firms and individual professionals in connection with investigations by the Divisions of Enforcement of the SEC and PCAOB.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented foreign public audit firms and their professionals in England, Mexico and Brazil in connection with litigation and regulatory matters, including investigations by the SEC and PCAOB Division of Enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a generic pharmaceutical company in a contract dispute concerning the scope of an exclusive license; obtained an order from the Third Circuit reversing a decision granting summary judgment in favor of the opposing party, and subsequently obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict at trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a favorable settlement on behalf of an international investment company in a suit against an international financial institution concerning unauthorized withdrawals of funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a government agency in an international arbitration in London concerning breach of a multimillion Euro construction contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Canadian citizen in cross-border litigation seeking to set aside the fraudulent conveyance of various artworks; secured order of attachment and successfully defended multiple attempts to dismiss the cause of action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an individual defendant in a civil RICO matter involving construction contracts with the New York Department of Environmental Protection; secured early dismissal of all claims, including the successful defense of an appeal to the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international oil refinery in a contract dispute concerning a counterparty\u0026rsquo;s fraudulent attempt to draw on a letter of credit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international financial institution in Mexico in an SEC investigation and other internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international financial institution in an internal investigation related to a shareholder demand.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3616}]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1241,"guid":"1241.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":108,"guid":"108.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":688,"guid":"688.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Adamson","nick_name":"Gary","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Gary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":512,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-adamson-9b11545/","seodescription":"Gary Adamson is a lawyer of our Special Matters \u0026 Government Investigations Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGary Adamson represents clients in regulatory proceedings, investigations and complex commercial litigation. He frequently represents accounting firms and individual accountants in litigation, arbitration, and regulatory investigations by the US Securities \u0026amp; Exchange Commission (SEC), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and state authorities. Gary also represents clients in complex disputes about items such as fiduciary relationships, breach of contract, civil RICO, and fraud-related matters. He has sophisticated experience representing clients before investigative agencies and in the federal, state, and appeals cases.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFluent in Spanish, Gary also has unique experience in Latin American investigations and enforcement actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in New York and Washington, D.C.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr data-cke-eol=\"1\" /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented major US public audit firms and individual professionals in connection with investigations by the Divisions of Enforcement of the SEC and PCAOB.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented foreign public audit firms and their professionals in England, Mexico and Brazil in connection with litigation and regulatory matters, including investigations by the SEC and PCAOB Division of Enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a generic pharmaceutical company in a contract dispute concerning the scope of an exclusive license; obtained an order from the Third Circuit reversing a decision granting summary judgment in favor of the opposing party, and subsequently obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict at trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a favorable settlement on behalf of an international investment company in a suit against an international financial institution concerning unauthorized withdrawals of funds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a government agency in an international arbitration in London concerning breach of a multimillion Euro construction contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Canadian citizen in cross-border litigation seeking to set aside the fraudulent conveyance of various artworks; secured order of attachment and successfully defended multiple attempts to dismiss the cause of action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an individual defendant in a civil RICO matter involving construction contracts with the New York Department of Environmental Protection; secured early dismissal of all claims, including the successful defense of an appeal to the Second Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international oil refinery in a contract dispute concerning a counterparty\u0026rsquo;s fraudulent attempt to draw on a letter of credit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international financial institution in Mexico in an SEC investigation and other internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international financial institution in an internal investigation related to a shareholder demand.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9331}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-18T22:01:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-18T22:01:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Adamson{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented major US public audit firms and individual professionals in connection with investigations by the Divisions of Enforcement of the SEC and PCAOB.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented foreign public audit firms and their professionals in England, Mexico and Brazil in connection with litigation and regulatory matters, including investigations by the SEC and PCAOB Division of Enforcement.{{ FIELD }}Represented a generic pharmaceutical company in a contract dispute concerning the scope of an exclusive license; obtained an order from the Third Circuit reversing a decision granting summary judgment in favor of the opposing party, and subsequently obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict at trial.{{ FIELD }}Secured a favorable settlement on behalf of an international investment company in a suit against an international financial institution concerning unauthorized withdrawals of funds.{{ FIELD }}Represented a government agency in an international arbitration in London concerning breach of a multimillion Euro construction contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Canadian citizen in cross-border litigation seeking to set aside the fraudulent conveyance of various artworks; secured order of attachment and successfully defended multiple attempts to dismiss the cause of action.{{ FIELD }}Represented an individual defendant in a civil RICO matter involving construction contracts with the New York Department of Environmental Protection; secured early dismissal of all claims, including the successful defense of an appeal to the Second Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international oil refinery in a contract dispute concerning a counterparty’s fraudulent attempt to draw on a letter of credit.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international financial institution in Mexico in an SEC investigation and other internal investigations.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international financial institution in an internal investigation related to a shareholder demand.{{ FIELD }} \nGary Adamson represents clients in regulatory proceedings, investigations and complex commercial litigation. He frequently represents accounting firms and individual accountants in litigation, arbitration, and regulatory investigations by the US Securities \u0026amp; Exchange Commission (SEC), Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and state authorities. Gary also represents clients in complex disputes about items such as fiduciary relationships, breach of contract, civil RICO, and fraud-related matters. He has sophisticated experience representing clients before investigative agencies and in the federal, state, and appeals cases.\nFluent in Spanish, Gary also has unique experience in Latin American investigations and enforcement actions.\n*Admitted in New York and Washington, D.C.\n Gary Adamson lawyer Partner Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School Cornell University Cornell Law School District of Columbia New York Utah Successfully represented major US public audit firms and individual professionals in connection with investigations by the Divisions of Enforcement of the SEC and PCAOB. Successfully represented foreign public audit firms and their professionals in England, Mexico and Brazil in connection with litigation and regulatory matters, including investigations by the SEC and PCAOB Division of Enforcement. Represented a generic pharmaceutical company in a contract dispute concerning the scope of an exclusive license; obtained an order from the Third Circuit reversing a decision granting summary judgment in favor of the opposing party, and subsequently obtained a multimillion-dollar jury verdict at trial. Secured a favorable settlement on behalf of an international investment company in a suit against an international financial institution concerning unauthorized withdrawals of funds. Represented a government agency in an international arbitration in London concerning breach of a multimillion Euro construction contract. Represented a Canadian citizen in cross-border litigation seeking to set aside the fraudulent conveyance of various artworks; secured order of attachment and successfully defended multiple attempts to dismiss the cause of action. Represented an individual defendant in a civil RICO matter involving construction contracts with the New York Department of Environmental Protection; secured early dismissal of all claims, including the successful defense of an appeal to the Second Circuit. Represented an international oil refinery in a contract dispute concerning a counterparty’s fraudulent attempt to draw on a letter of credit. Represented an international financial institution in Mexico in an SEC investigation and other internal investigations. Represented an international financial institution in an internal investigation related to a shareholder demand.","searchable_name":"Gary Adamson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442316,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":217,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Data, Privacy\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises\u0026nbsp;clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving\u0026nbsp;privacy and security issues.\u0026nbsp;Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage\u0026nbsp;the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending\u0026nbsp;of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax.\u0026nbsp;Her defense of class actions includes\u0026nbsp;defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm\u0026rsquo;s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern\u0026nbsp;District\u0026nbsp;of Alabama\u0026nbsp;in Mobile, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"elizabeth-adler","email":"eadler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1143,"guid":"1143.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Adler","nick_name":"Elizabeth","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Kristi K. DuBose, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama","years_held":"2007-2008"}],"first_name":"Elizabeth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"D.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012","detail":"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eElizabeth\u0026nbsp;D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Data, Privacy\u0026nbsp;\u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises\u0026nbsp;clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving\u0026nbsp;privacy and security issues.\u0026nbsp;Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage\u0026nbsp;the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending\u0026nbsp;of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax.\u0026nbsp;Her defense of class actions includes\u0026nbsp;defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm\u0026rsquo;s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern\u0026nbsp;District\u0026nbsp;of Alabama\u0026nbsp;in Mobile, Alabama.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012","detail":"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6249}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:09.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-05T05:02:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Adler{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division\"}{{ FIELD }}Elizabeth D. Adler is a Partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security practice based in Atlanta GA. Elizabeth advises clients in responding to and managing data security incidents of all types and sizes, including crisis management and public relations efforts, investigations, notifications, and government inquiries. She also represents clients in privacy and data breach class action and other complex litigation in state and federal courts across the country, and has extensive experience successfully defending large, multi-district class action litigation arising out of some of the most prominent data security incidents. Elizabeth has prepared witnesses to testify before Congress and has briefed Congressional staffers on data breach issues. Law360 recognized her as a \"Rising Star\" in Privacy and Cybersecurity in 2019 (one of five attorneys named worldwide).\nElizabeth's representation of clients spans a variety of industries and regularly involve significant corporate risk and financial impact to global companies, are at the cutting-edge of U.S. and international law, and require innovative solutions to constantly evolving privacy and security issues. Clients consistently turn to Elizabeth as a key advisor to lead and manage the many workstreams that an organization faces during data security incidents, and her work includes extensive experience defending of some of the most prominent data security incidents in U.S. history, including Capital One and Equifax. Her defense of class actions includes defeating class claims alleging violations of data protection and privacy laws, violations of state and federal consumer protection statutes, fraud, and breaches of contract. \nA regular author and speaker on data privacy and cybersecurity, Elizabeth also serves as the Editor for the Firm’s publication, the King \u0026amp; Spalding Data, Privacy \u0026amp; Security Practice Report.\nPrior to joining the firm, Elizabeth served as a law clerk for United States District Judge Kristi K. DuBose in the Southern District of Alabama in Mobile, Alabama.\nElizabeth is active in the Atlanta community and serves on the Board of Directors of The Atlanta Opera. Partner Recognized in Leadership Academy Class of 2012 State Bar of Georgia, Young Lawyers Division The University of Alabama The University of Alabama School of Law Mercer University Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia Supreme Court of Georgia American Bar Association International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) Barrister, Lamar American Inn of Court Atlanta Bar Association, Litigation Section Board of Directors Member, Lawyers Club of Atlanta Member, State Bar of Georgia Law Clerk, Honorable Kristi K. DuBose, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama","searchable_name":"Elizabeth D. Adler","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":437134,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3123,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Balser tries high-stakes cases on behalf of Fortune 500 companies and other leading businesses in the financial services, telecommunications, energy, transportation, professional services, and private equity sectors. David is often called upon to handle clients\u0026rsquo; most sensitive, complex, and enterprise-threatening matters. A Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, David focuses on contract disputes, business torts, class actions and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRanked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a \u0026ldquo;Star Individual\u0026rdquo; for Commercial Litigation, David is praised by his peers and clients for his command of the courtroom and his leadership in bet-the-company cases:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe is the preeminent class action lawyer in town. On his feet he's amazing, he's every bit as good as the best\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe has a mastery of law, a commanding presence and a real strategic approach to litigation\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe can be tough as nails, but has great manner with clients. He's extraordinarily impressive\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe is a bet-the-company litigator and a go-to. He might be the top bet-the-company litigator I've ever met\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe's a trusted adviser through and through. David is a rockstar of a lawyer.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s creativity and collaborative style have earned him accolades such as\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDistinguished Leader\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaily Report \u003c/em\u003ein 2022, which praised his \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eproven track record of creativity and collaboration [that] sets him apart from the competition.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; He has also been named a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e and honored as a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBTI Client Service All-Star\u003c/em\u003e. David\u0026rsquo;s reputation, built on excellence, strategy, and client trust, makes him a go-to lawyer for the most complex and consequential litigation challenges.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid leads the firm\u0026rsquo;s nationwide class action practice and has defended more than 200 class actions, including many filed in the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions in the country. At the forefront of developing and\u0026nbsp;litigating novel theories, David has been a trailblazer in shaping the evolving landscape\u0026nbsp;of complex data breaches and has served as lead counsel on some of the most notable cases in U.S. history, including high-profile matters for Equifax and Capital One.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"david-balser","email":"dbalser@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel consumer class action and regulatory actions alleging deceptive marketing and unfair practices related to interest rates on the bank\u0026rsquo;s 360 Savings and 360 Performance Savings products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead counsel in over 60 consumer class actions relating to a data security incident announced in July 2019 involving approximately 100 million U.S. consumers. The firm obtained dismissal with prejudice of the alleged RICO claims and led the defense of the litigation through fact and expert discovery, class certification, Daubert briefing, and summary judgment briefing. Our work included litigating numerous privilege disputes, including successfully protecting a privileged root cause investigation report. Most recently, the firm negotiated a $190 million class action settlement, which was approved and resolved all of the consumer claims against Capital One and codefendant Amazon Web Services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead counsel in the MDL involving hundreds of consumer and financial institutions class actions filed in the wake of a high-profile 2017 data breach. After more than a year and a half of contentious litigation, David led the negotiation of a class action settlement to resolve the claims of approximately 147 million U.S. consumers. David successfully defended the settlement on appeal to the 11th Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of consumer class actions that were filed following the 2018 announcement of a cybersecurity incident involving a third-party vendor. Two of the cases were dismissed with prejudice, and the plaintiff in the third case discontinued the lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDaVita Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a consolidated class actions arising from an April 2024 ransomware attack and data breach in Colorado federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a class action lawsuit in the Central District of California involving allegations of greenwashing and misrepresentation regarding the total environmental impact of its business operations and claims of carbon neutrality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable settlement in securities class action for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTivity Health, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and certain current and former directors and officers regarding its $1.3B acquisition of Nutrisystem. As lead trial counsel, David successfully excluded Plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s key expert in a Daubert hearing, significantly weakening the case and securing a highly favorable settlement on the eve of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured dismissal of a putative nationwide class action in the District of New Jersey against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHeartland Payment Systems\u003c/strong\u003e, a subsidiary of Global Payments, over alleged excessive merchant fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConvinced the Ninth Circuit to vacate the certification of two nationwide classes in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBenefytt Technologies Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, an insurance technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of consumer class actions for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNovant Health, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging failure to adequately safeguard patients\u0026rsquo; personally identifiable information and personal health information and allowed the improper and unauthorized transmission of PII and PHI to Meta (formerly known as Facebook) as a result of Novant\u0026rsquo;s use of the Meta tracking pixel on Novant\u0026rsquo;s website.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eShutterfly, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;arising from a ransomware attack bringing several claims, including under California\u0026rsquo;s Unfair Competition Laws and cause of action under the relatively new California Consumer Privacy Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefend\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmory University\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a COVID-19 related class action seeking tuition refunds and obtained dismissal of the plaintiff's claims for breach of express contract and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eReached a favorable settlement for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a COVID-19 related class action seeking ticket refunds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification and obtained summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a class action in the Southern District of Florida alleging RICO and breach of contract claims relating to trip insurance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in $300 million consumer class action on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of The Southern Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a long-running, high-stakes putative class action in Cook County (Ill.) Chancery Court asserting purported violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and several senior executives in a lawsuit seeking $1 billion in damages for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSea Island Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein \u0026ldquo;bet-the-company\u0026rdquo; challenging Sea Island\u0026rsquo;s private ownership of the roads on Sea Island, Georgia, including the causeway connecting Sea Island, Georgia to St. Simons Island.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large nuclear power provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in alleged antitrust price-fixing class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of \u0026ldquo;bet-the-company\u0026rdquo; litigation for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSCANA Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to the abandonment of SCANA\u0026rsquo;s new nuclear development at the V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina. David led multiple teams of King \u0026amp; Spalding lawyers in the defense of ratepayer class actions, derivative claims, federal securities class actions, and state and federal governmental investigations, as well as an expedited federal court injunction proceeding seeking to block implementation of confiscatory legislation targeting SCANA. David served as lead counsel for SCANA in a 15-day evidentiary proceeding before the South Carolina Public Service Commission in which multiple parties sought to block SCANA\u0026rsquo;s proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy. SCANA achieved a complete victory in that matter, leading to the closing of the Dominion merger in January of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Power\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a contract dispute involving alleged obligations to cover certain construction costs associated with the Plant Vogtle nuclear power units per the terms of certain agreements that govern the co-owners\u0026rsquo; rights and obligations with respect to the project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrevailed on appeal on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Payments Direct, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global financial technology services company, in the reversal of a $135 million verdict awarded by a jury in DeKalb County, Georgia, to Frontline Processing Corporation, an independent sales organization. King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s comprehensive challenge of the jury\u0026rsquo;s verdict staved off a \u0026ldquo;windfall\u0026rdquo; recovery under an unprecedented damages theory and reaffirmed the limits on consequential damages awards under Georgia law and represents a rare and important reversal of a jury verdict in Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAHS Residential, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a Miami-based company that builds and operates multi-family housing across the U.S., in a breach of contract dispute involving an agreement to purchase 8.9 acres of land out of a larger tract in suburban Atlanta called \u0026ldquo;Assembly Yards.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAT\u0026amp;T\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international arbitration seeking to block enforcement of a multi-million dollar judgment obtained by a former executive in Argentina. In a complete victory, the arbitration panel, after an extensive evidentiary hearing, issued a world-wide injunction preventing the former executive from seeking to enforce his judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNew York based hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a jury trial in Superior Court of Fulton County. The client\u0026rsquo;s entire $85 million investment in a real estate joint venture was at stake. David obtained a complete defense verdict and a verdict in his client\u0026rsquo;s favor on its counterclaims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliate of Roark Capital\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading private equity fund, in a trial in Delaware Chancery Court involving a post-acquisition tax dispute. David obtained a judgment in his client\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended more than a dozen\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmLaw 200 firms\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against claims of legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":18}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1157,"guid":"1157.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1243,"guid":"1243.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Balser","nick_name":"David","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Charles A. Moye, Jr., Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1987-1989"}],"first_name":"David","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"L.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1: Georgia: Commercial Litigation","detail":"Chambers USA, 2006 - PRESENT"},{"title":"“His proven track record of creativity and collaboration sets him apart from the competition.” ","detail":"DISTINGUISHED LEADER, DAILY REPORT, 2022"},{"title":"\"He is an excellent lawyer and a true workhorse. He is a go-to first chair trial lawyer.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"“He is top in class action litigation\"","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"\"He's very strategic and thoughtful, but aggressive when necessary - he's not afraid of a fight.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"\"He's very solid in class actions, there's nobody better.”","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"Recommend in Cyber Law (including Data Privacy and Data Protection)","detail":"THE LEGAL 500 UNITED STATES, 2022"},{"title":"“Bet the Company” Litigation, Commercial Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"U.S. “Litigation Star” ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2018 - PRESENT"},{"title":"Top 100 Lawyers in Georgia","detail":"Georgia Super Lawyers, 2012–Present"},{"title":"2018 BTI Client Service All-Star","detail":"BTI, 2018"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDavid Balser tries high-stakes cases on behalf of Fortune 500 companies and other leading businesses in the financial services, telecommunications, energy, transportation, professional services, and private equity sectors. David is often called upon to handle clients\u0026rsquo; most sensitive, complex, and enterprise-threatening matters. A Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, David focuses on contract disputes, business torts, class actions and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRanked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a \u0026ldquo;Star Individual\u0026rdquo; for Commercial Litigation, David is praised by his peers and clients for his command of the courtroom and his leadership in bet-the-company cases:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe is the preeminent class action lawyer in town. On his feet he's amazing, he's every bit as good as the best\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe has a mastery of law, a commanding presence and a real strategic approach to litigation\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe can be tough as nails, but has great manner with clients. He's extraordinarily impressive\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe is a bet-the-company litigator and a go-to. He might be the top bet-the-company litigator I've ever met\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eHe's a trusted adviser through and through. David is a rockstar of a lawyer.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid\u0026rsquo;s creativity and collaborative style have earned him accolades such as\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDistinguished Leader\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eDaily Report \u003c/em\u003ein 2022, which praised his \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eproven track record of creativity and collaboration [that] sets him apart from the competition.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026rdquo; He has also been named a \u0026ldquo;Litigation Star\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e and honored as a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBTI Client Service All-Star\u003c/em\u003e. David\u0026rsquo;s reputation, built on excellence, strategy, and client trust, makes him a go-to lawyer for the most complex and consequential litigation challenges.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDavid leads the firm\u0026rsquo;s nationwide class action practice and has defended more than 200 class actions, including many filed in the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions in the country. At the forefront of developing and\u0026nbsp;litigating novel theories, David has been a trailblazer in shaping the evolving landscape\u0026nbsp;of complex data breaches and has served as lead counsel on some of the most notable cases in U.S. history, including high-profile matters for Equifax and Capital One.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClass Actions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCurrently defending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in parallel consumer class action and regulatory actions alleging deceptive marketing and unfair practices related to interest rates on the bank\u0026rsquo;s 360 Savings and 360 Performance Savings products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead counsel in over 60 consumer class actions relating to a data security incident announced in July 2019 involving approximately 100 million U.S. consumers. The firm obtained dismissal with prejudice of the alleged RICO claims and led the defense of the litigation through fact and expert discovery, class certification, Daubert briefing, and summary judgment briefing. Our work included litigating numerous privilege disputes, including successfully protecting a privileged root cause investigation report. Most recently, the firm negotiated a $190 million class action settlement, which was approved and resolved all of the consumer claims against Capital One and codefendant Amazon Web Services.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEquifax\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead counsel in the MDL involving hundreds of consumer and financial institutions class actions filed in the wake of a high-profile 2017 data breach. After more than a year and a half of contentious litigation, David led the negotiation of a class action settlement to resolve the claims of approximately 147 million U.S. consumers. David successfully defended the settlement on appeal to the 11th Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of consumer class actions that were filed following the 2018 announcement of a cybersecurity incident involving a third-party vendor. Two of the cases were dismissed with prejudice, and the plaintiff in the third case discontinued the lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDaVita Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a consolidated class actions arising from an April 2024 ransomware attack and data breach in Colorado federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a class action lawsuit in the Central District of California involving allegations of greenwashing and misrepresentation regarding the total environmental impact of its business operations and claims of carbon neutrality.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained favorable settlement in securities class action for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eTivity Health, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and certain current and former directors and officers regarding its $1.3B acquisition of Nutrisystem. As lead trial counsel, David successfully excluded Plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s key expert in a Daubert hearing, significantly weakening the case and securing a highly favorable settlement on the eve of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured dismissal of a putative nationwide class action in the District of New Jersey against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHeartland Payment Systems\u003c/strong\u003e, a subsidiary of Global Payments, over alleged excessive merchant fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConvinced the Ninth Circuit to vacate the certification of two nationwide classes in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBenefytt Technologies Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, an insurance technology company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of consumer class actions for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNovant Health, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging failure to adequately safeguard patients\u0026rsquo; personally identifiable information and personal health information and allowed the improper and unauthorized transmission of PII and PHI to Meta (formerly known as Facebook) as a result of Novant\u0026rsquo;s use of the Meta tracking pixel on Novant\u0026rsquo;s website.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained dismissal of putative class action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eShutterfly, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;arising from a ransomware attack bringing several claims, including under California\u0026rsquo;s Unfair Competition Laws and cause of action under the relatively new California Consumer Privacy Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefend\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEmory University\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a COVID-19 related class action seeking tuition refunds and obtained dismissal of the plaintiff's claims for breach of express contract and unjust enrichment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eReached a favorable settlement for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a COVID-19 related class action seeking ticket refunds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification and obtained summary judgment for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a class action in the Southern District of Florida alleging RICO and breach of contract claims relating to trip insurance.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated class certification in $300 million consumer class action on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliates of The Southern Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a long-running, high-stakes putative class action in Cook County (Ill.) Chancery Court asserting purported violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation and Other Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ean international airline\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and several senior executives in a lawsuit seeking $1 billion in damages for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSea Island Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein \u0026ldquo;bet-the-company\u0026rdquo; challenging Sea Island\u0026rsquo;s private ownership of the roads on Sea Island, Georgia, including the causeway connecting Sea Island, Georgia to St. Simons Island.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large nuclear power provider\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in alleged antitrust price-fixing class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the defense of \u0026ldquo;bet-the-company\u0026rdquo; litigation for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSCANA Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to the abandonment of SCANA\u0026rsquo;s new nuclear development at the V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina. David led multiple teams of King \u0026amp; Spalding lawyers in the defense of ratepayer class actions, derivative claims, federal securities class actions, and state and federal governmental investigations, as well as an expedited federal court injunction proceeding seeking to block implementation of confiscatory legislation targeting SCANA. David served as lead counsel for SCANA in a 15-day evidentiary proceeding before the South Carolina Public Service Commission in which multiple parties sought to block SCANA\u0026rsquo;s proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy. SCANA achieved a complete victory in that matter, leading to the closing of the Dominion merger in January of 2019.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGeorgia Power\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a contract dispute involving alleged obligations to cover certain construction costs associated with the Plant Vogtle nuclear power units per the terms of certain agreements that govern the co-owners\u0026rsquo; rights and obligations with respect to the project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrevailed on appeal on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGlobal Payments Direct, Inc.\u003c/strong\u003e, a global financial technology services company, in the reversal of a $135 million verdict awarded by a jury in DeKalb County, Georgia, to Frontline Processing Corporation, an independent sales organization. King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s comprehensive challenge of the jury\u0026rsquo;s verdict staved off a \u0026ldquo;windfall\u0026rdquo; recovery under an unprecedented damages theory and reaffirmed the limits on consequential damages awards under Georgia law and represents a rare and important reversal of a jury verdict in Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAHS Residential, LLC\u003c/strong\u003e, a Miami-based company that builds and operates multi-family housing across the U.S., in a breach of contract dispute involving an agreement to purchase 8.9 acres of land out of a larger tract in suburban Atlanta called \u0026ldquo;Assembly Yards.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAT\u0026amp;T\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an international arbitration seeking to block enforcement of a multi-million dollar judgment obtained by a former executive in Argentina. In a complete victory, the arbitration panel, after an extensive evidentiary hearing, issued a world-wide injunction preventing the former executive from seeking to enforce his judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNew York based hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a jury trial in Superior Court of Fulton County. The client\u0026rsquo;s entire $85 million investment in a real estate joint venture was at stake. David obtained a complete defense verdict and a verdict in his client\u0026rsquo;s favor on its counterclaims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel for an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaffiliate of Roark Capital\u003c/strong\u003e, a leading private equity fund, in a trial in Delaware Chancery Court involving a post-acquisition tax dispute. David obtained a judgment in his client\u0026rsquo;s favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended more than a dozen\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eAmLaw 200 firms\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against claims of legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and related claims.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Band 1: Georgia: Commercial Litigation","detail":"Chambers USA, 2006 - PRESENT"},{"title":"“His proven track record of creativity and collaboration sets him apart from the competition.” ","detail":"DISTINGUISHED LEADER, DAILY REPORT, 2022"},{"title":"\"He is an excellent lawyer and a true workhorse. He is a go-to first chair trial lawyer.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"“He is top in class action litigation\"","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"\"He's very strategic and thoughtful, but aggressive when necessary - he's not afraid of a fight.\"","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"\"He's very solid in class actions, there's nobody better.”","detail":"CHAMBERS USA 2023"},{"title":"Recommend in Cyber Law (including Data Privacy and Data Protection)","detail":"THE LEGAL 500 UNITED STATES, 2022"},{"title":"“Bet the Company” Litigation, Commercial Litigation","detail":"Best Lawyers in America"},{"title":"U.S. “Litigation Star” ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2018 - PRESENT"},{"title":"Top 100 Lawyers in Georgia","detail":"Georgia Super Lawyers, 2012–Present"},{"title":"2018 BTI Client Service All-Star","detail":"BTI, 2018"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11778}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-09-11T18:21:37.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-11T18:21:37.000Z","searchable_text":"Balser{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Band 1: Georgia: Commercial Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2006 - PRESENT\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“His proven track record of creativity and collaboration sets him apart from the competition.” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"DISTINGUISHED LEADER, DAILY REPORT, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He is an excellent lawyer and a true workhorse. He is a go-to first chair trial lawyer.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He is top in class action litigation\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He's very strategic and thoughtful, but aggressive when necessary - he's not afraid of a fight.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He's very solid in class actions, there's nobody better.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CHAMBERS USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommend in Cyber Law (including Data Privacy and Data Protection)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"THE LEGAL 500 UNITED STATES, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Bet the Company” Litigation, Commercial Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"U.S. “Litigation Star” \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2018 - PRESENT\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 100 Lawyers in Georgia\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Georgia Super Lawyers, 2012–Present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2018 BTI Client Service All-Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"BTI, 2018\"}{{ FIELD }}Class Actions{{ FIELD }}Currently defending Capital One in parallel consumer class action and regulatory actions alleging deceptive marketing and unfair practices related to interest rates on the bank’s 360 Savings and 360 Performance Savings products.{{ FIELD }}Defended Capital One as lead counsel in over 60 consumer class actions relating to a data security incident announced in July 2019 involving approximately 100 million U.S. consumers. The firm obtained dismissal with prejudice of the alleged RICO claims and led the defense of the litigation through fact and expert discovery, class certification, Daubert briefing, and summary judgment briefing. Our work included litigating numerous privilege disputes, including successfully protecting a privileged root cause investigation report. Most recently, the firm negotiated a $190 million class action settlement, which was approved and resolved all of the consumer claims against Capital One and codefendant Amazon Web Services.{{ FIELD }}Defended Equifax as lead counsel in the MDL involving hundreds of consumer and financial institutions class actions filed in the wake of a high-profile 2017 data breach. After more than a year and a half of contentious litigation, David led the negotiation of a class action settlement to resolve the claims of approximately 147 million U.S. consumers. David successfully defended the settlement on appeal to the 11th Circuit.{{ FIELD }}Defended an international airline in a series of consumer class actions that were filed following the 2018 announcement of a cybersecurity incident involving a third-party vendor. Two of the cases were dismissed with prejudice, and the plaintiff in the third case discontinued the lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Representing DaVita Inc. in a consolidated class actions arising from an April 2024 ransomware attack and data breach in Colorado federal court.{{ FIELD }}Defending an international airline in a class action lawsuit in the Central District of California involving allegations of greenwashing and misrepresentation regarding the total environmental impact of its business operations and claims of carbon neutrality.{{ FIELD }}Obtained favorable settlement in securities class action for Tivity Health, Inc. and certain current and former directors and officers regarding its $1.3B acquisition of Nutrisystem. As lead trial counsel, David successfully excluded Plaintiff’s key expert in a Daubert hearing, significantly weakening the case and securing a highly favorable settlement on the eve of trial.{{ FIELD }}Secured dismissal of a putative nationwide class action in the District of New Jersey against Heartland Payment Systems, a subsidiary of Global Payments, over alleged excessive merchant fees.{{ FIELD }}Convinced the Ninth Circuit to vacate the certification of two nationwide classes in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case against Benefytt Technologies Inc., an insurance technology company.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of consumer class actions for Novant Health, Inc. alleging failure to adequately safeguard patients’ personally identifiable information and personal health information and allowed the improper and unauthorized transmission of PII and PHI to Meta (formerly known as Facebook) as a result of Novant’s use of the Meta tracking pixel on Novant’s website.{{ FIELD }}Obtained dismissal of putative class action against Shutterfly, LLC arising from a ransomware attack bringing several claims, including under California’s Unfair Competition Laws and cause of action under the relatively new California Consumer Privacy Act.{{ FIELD }}Defend Emory University in a COVID-19 related class action seeking tuition refunds and obtained dismissal of the plaintiff's claims for breach of express contract and unjust enrichment.{{ FIELD }}Reached a favorable settlement for an international airline in a COVID-19 related class action seeking ticket refunds.{{ FIELD }}Defeated class certification and obtained summary judgment for an international airline in a class action in the Southern District of Florida alleging RICO and breach of contract claims relating to trip insurance.{{ FIELD }}Defeated class certification in $300 million consumer class action on behalf of affiliates of The Southern Company in a long-running, high-stakes putative class action in Cook County (Ill.) Chancery Court asserting purported violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act.{{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation and Other Disputes{{ FIELD }}Representing an international airline and several senior executives in a lawsuit seeking $1 billion in damages for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets{{ FIELD }}Representing Sea Island Company in “bet-the-company” challenging Sea Island’s private ownership of the roads on Sea Island, Georgia, including the causeway connecting Sea Island, Georgia to St. Simons Island.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large nuclear power provider in alleged antitrust price-fixing class action.{{ FIELD }}Led the defense of “bet-the-company” litigation for SCANA Corporation relating to the abandonment of SCANA’s new nuclear development at the V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina. David led multiple teams of King \u0026amp; Spalding lawyers in the defense of ratepayer class actions, derivative claims, federal securities class actions, and state and federal governmental investigations, as well as an expedited federal court injunction proceeding seeking to block implementation of confiscatory legislation targeting SCANA. David served as lead counsel for SCANA in a 15-day evidentiary proceeding before the South Carolina Public Service Commission in which multiple parties sought to block SCANA’s proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy. SCANA achieved a complete victory in that matter, leading to the closing of the Dominion merger in January of 2019.{{ FIELD }}Defended Georgia Power in a contract dispute involving alleged obligations to cover certain construction costs associated with the Plant Vogtle nuclear power units per the terms of certain agreements that govern the co-owners’ rights and obligations with respect to the project.{{ FIELD }}Prevailed on appeal on behalf of Global Payments Direct, Inc., a global financial technology services company, in the reversal of a $135 million verdict awarded by a jury in DeKalb County, Georgia, to Frontline Processing Corporation, an independent sales organization. King \u0026amp; Spalding’s comprehensive challenge of the jury’s verdict staved off a “windfall” recovery under an unprecedented damages theory and reaffirmed the limits on consequential damages awards under Georgia law and represents a rare and important reversal of a jury verdict in Georgia.{{ FIELD }}Represented AHS Residential, LLC, a Miami-based company that builds and operates multi-family housing across the U.S., in a breach of contract dispute involving an agreement to purchase 8.9 acres of land out of a larger tract in suburban Atlanta called “Assembly Yards.”{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for AT\u0026amp;T in an international arbitration seeking to block enforcement of a multi-million dollar judgment obtained by a former executive in Argentina. In a complete victory, the arbitration panel, after an extensive evidentiary hearing, issued a world-wide injunction preventing the former executive from seeking to enforce his judgment.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for a New York based hedge fund in a jury trial in Superior Court of Fulton County. The client’s entire $85 million investment in a real estate joint venture was at stake. David obtained a complete defense verdict and a verdict in his client’s favor on its counterclaims.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel for an affiliate of Roark Capital, a leading private equity fund, in a trial in Delaware Chancery Court involving a post-acquisition tax dispute. David obtained a judgment in his client’s favor.{{ FIELD }}Defended more than a dozen AmLaw 200 firms against claims of legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and related claims.{{ FIELD }}David Balser tries high-stakes cases on behalf of Fortune 500 companies and other leading businesses in the financial services, telecommunications, energy, transportation, professional services, and private equity sectors. David is often called upon to handle clients’ most sensitive, complex, and enterprise-threatening matters. A Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers, David focuses on contract disputes, business torts, class actions and professional liability litigation. \nRanked by Chambers USA as a “Star Individual” for Commercial Litigation, David is praised by his peers and clients for his command of the courtroom and his leadership in bet-the-company cases:\n\n “He is the preeminent class action lawyer in town. On his feet he's amazing, he's every bit as good as the best.”\n“He has a mastery of law, a commanding presence and a real strategic approach to litigation.”\n“He can be tough as nails, but has great manner with clients. He's extraordinarily impressive.”\n“He is a bet-the-company litigator and a go-to. He might be the top bet-the-company litigator I've ever met.”\n“He's a trusted adviser through and through. David is a rockstar of a lawyer.”\n\nDavid’s creativity and collaborative style have earned him accolades such as Distinguished Leader by the Daily Report in 2022, which praised his “proven track record of creativity and collaboration [that] sets him apart from the competition.” He has also been named a “Litigation Star” by Benchmark Litigation and honored as a BTI Client Service All-Star. David’s reputation, built on excellence, strategy, and client trust, makes him a go-to lawyer for the most complex and consequential litigation challenges. \nDavid leads the firm’s nationwide class action practice and has defended more than 200 class actions, including many filed in the most plaintiff-friendly jurisdictions in the country. At the forefront of developing and litigating novel theories, David has been a trailblazer in shaping the evolving landscape of complex data breaches and has served as lead counsel on some of the most notable cases in U.S. history, including high-profile matters for Equifax and Capital One.\n  David L Balser Partner Band 1: Georgia: Commercial Litigation Chambers USA, 2006 - PRESENT “His proven track record of creativity and collaboration sets him apart from the competition.”  DISTINGUISHED LEADER, DAILY REPORT, 2022 \"He is an excellent lawyer and a true workhorse. He is a go-to first chair trial lawyer.\"  Chambers USA 2023 “He is top in class action litigation\" CHAMBERS USA 2023 \"He's very strategic and thoughtful, but aggressive when necessary - he's not afraid of a fight.\" CHAMBERS USA 2023 \"He's very solid in class actions, there's nobody better.” CHAMBERS USA 2023 Recommend in Cyber Law (including Data Privacy and Data Protection) THE LEGAL 500 UNITED STATES, 2022 “Bet the Company” Litigation, Commercial Litigation Best Lawyers in America U.S. “Litigation Star”  Benchmark Litigation, 2018 - PRESENT Top 100 Lawyers in Georgia Georgia Super Lawyers, 2012–Present 2018 BTI Client Service All-Star BTI, 2018 University of Pennsylvania University of Pennsylvania Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School Georgia Law Clerk, Honorable Charles A. Moye, Jr., Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Class Actions Currently defending Capital One in parallel consumer class action and regulatory actions alleging deceptive marketing and unfair practices related to interest rates on the bank’s 360 Savings and 360 Performance Savings products. Defended Capital One as lead counsel in over 60 consumer class actions relating to a data security incident announced in July 2019 involving approximately 100 million U.S. consumers. The firm obtained dismissal with prejudice of the alleged RICO claims and led the defense of the litigation through fact and expert discovery, class certification, Daubert briefing, and summary judgment briefing. Our work included litigating numerous privilege disputes, including successfully protecting a privileged root cause investigation report. Most recently, the firm negotiated a $190 million class action settlement, which was approved and resolved all of the consumer claims against Capital One and codefendant Amazon Web Services. Defended Equifax as lead counsel in the MDL involving hundreds of consumer and financial institutions class actions filed in the wake of a high-profile 2017 data breach. After more than a year and a half of contentious litigation, David led the negotiation of a class action settlement to resolve the claims of approximately 147 million U.S. consumers. David successfully defended the settlement on appeal to the 11th Circuit. Defended an international airline in a series of consumer class actions that were filed following the 2018 announcement of a cybersecurity incident involving a third-party vendor. Two of the cases were dismissed with prejudice, and the plaintiff in the third case discontinued the lawsuit. Representing DaVita Inc. in a consolidated class actions arising from an April 2024 ransomware attack and data breach in Colorado federal court. Defending an international airline in a class action lawsuit in the Central District of California involving allegations of greenwashing and misrepresentation regarding the total environmental impact of its business operations and claims of carbon neutrality. Obtained favorable settlement in securities class action for Tivity Health, Inc. and certain current and former directors and officers regarding its $1.3B acquisition of Nutrisystem. As lead trial counsel, David successfully excluded Plaintiff’s key expert in a Daubert hearing, significantly weakening the case and securing a highly favorable settlement on the eve of trial. Secured dismissal of a putative nationwide class action in the District of New Jersey against Heartland Payment Systems, a subsidiary of Global Payments, over alleged excessive merchant fees. Convinced the Ninth Circuit to vacate the certification of two nationwide classes in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act case against Benefytt Technologies Inc., an insurance technology company. Obtained dismissal of consumer class actions for Novant Health, Inc. alleging failure to adequately safeguard patients’ personally identifiable information and personal health information and allowed the improper and unauthorized transmission of PII and PHI to Meta (formerly known as Facebook) as a result of Novant’s use of the Meta tracking pixel on Novant’s website. Obtained dismissal of putative class action against Shutterfly, LLC arising from a ransomware attack bringing several claims, including under California’s Unfair Competition Laws and cause of action under the relatively new California Consumer Privacy Act. Defend Emory University in a COVID-19 related class action seeking tuition refunds and obtained dismissal of the plaintiff's claims for breach of express contract and unjust enrichment. Reached a favorable settlement for an international airline in a COVID-19 related class action seeking ticket refunds. Defeated class certification and obtained summary judgment for an international airline in a class action in the Southern District of Florida alleging RICO and breach of contract claims relating to trip insurance. Defeated class certification in $300 million consumer class action on behalf of affiliates of The Southern Company in a long-running, high-stakes putative class action in Cook County (Ill.) Chancery Court asserting purported violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act. Commercial Litigation and Other Disputes Representing an international airline and several senior executives in a lawsuit seeking $1 billion in damages for alleged misappropriation of trade secrets Representing Sea Island Company in “bet-the-company” challenging Sea Island’s private ownership of the roads on Sea Island, Georgia, including the causeway connecting Sea Island, Georgia to St. Simons Island. Representing a large nuclear power provider in alleged antitrust price-fixing class action. Led the defense of “bet-the-company” litigation for SCANA Corporation relating to the abandonment of SCANA’s new nuclear development at the V.C. Summer plant in South Carolina. David led multiple teams of King \u0026amp; Spalding lawyers in the defense of ratepayer class actions, derivative claims, federal securities class actions, and state and federal governmental investigations, as well as an expedited federal court injunction proceeding seeking to block implementation of confiscatory legislation targeting SCANA. David served as lead counsel for SCANA in a 15-day evidentiary proceeding before the South Carolina Public Service Commission in which multiple parties sought to block SCANA’s proposed $14.6 billion merger with Dominion Energy. SCANA achieved a complete victory in that matter, leading to the closing of the Dominion merger in January of 2019. Defended Georgia Power in a contract dispute involving alleged obligations to cover certain construction costs associated with the Plant Vogtle nuclear power units per the terms of certain agreements that govern the co-owners’ rights and obligations with respect to the project. Prevailed on appeal on behalf of Global Payments Direct, Inc., a global financial technology services company, in the reversal of a $135 million verdict awarded by a jury in DeKalb County, Georgia, to Frontline Processing Corporation, an independent sales organization. King \u0026amp; Spalding’s comprehensive challenge of the jury’s verdict staved off a “windfall” recovery under an unprecedented damages theory and reaffirmed the limits on consequential damages awards under Georgia law and represents a rare and important reversal of a jury verdict in Georgia. Represented AHS Residential, LLC, a Miami-based company that builds and operates multi-family housing across the U.S., in a breach of contract dispute involving an agreement to purchase 8.9 acres of land out of a larger tract in suburban Atlanta called “Assembly Yards.” Served as lead counsel for AT\u0026amp;T in an international arbitration seeking to block enforcement of a multi-million dollar judgment obtained by a former executive in Argentina. In a complete victory, the arbitration panel, after an extensive evidentiary hearing, issued a world-wide injunction preventing the former executive from seeking to enforce his judgment. Served as lead trial counsel for a New York based hedge fund in a jury trial in Superior Court of Fulton County. The client’s entire $85 million investment in a real estate joint venture was at stake. David obtained a complete defense verdict and a verdict in his client’s favor on its counterclaims. Served as lead trial counsel for an affiliate of Roark Capital, a leading private equity fund, in a trial in Delaware Chancery Court involving a post-acquisition tax dispute. David obtained a judgment in his client’s favor. Defended more than a dozen AmLaw 200 firms against claims of legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and related claims.","searchable_name":"David L. Balser","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426841,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5738,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Bessenger focuses on complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense. His clients include Fortune 200 companies, entertainment companies, healthcare providers, and financial institutions. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in federal and state courts. Craig has litigated business, partnership, and contractual disputes, professional liability, banking and mortgage cases, and intellectual property matters. His white-collar experience spans various areas, including securities, antitrust, healthcare, and environmental violations, complex fraud and money laundering schemes, and internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"craig-bessenger","email":"cbessenger@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emovie studio, directors, and producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involved in the creation of a multibillion-dollar movie franchise in a copyright infringement case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor movie studio\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against claims relating to the collection of foreign revenue, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s ruling on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an anti-SLAPP motion brought against a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor media company\u003c/strong\u003e, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s ruling on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a multimillion-dollar settlement in a professional liability action brought on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclosely held corporation\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented publicly-traded\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in numerous class actions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign national\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal criminal investigation into an allegedly fraudulent scheme to circumvent state and federal environmental regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebank directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in civil enforcement actions brought by federal regulatory authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation by state regulatory authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproducer of high-quality automotive images\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a copyright infringement action against an online tech company arising from the unauthorized use of its photographs. A confidential settlement agreement was reached on the eve of trial.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Bessenger","nick_name":"Craig","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California","years_held":"2010 - 2011"}],"first_name":"Craig","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":2158,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Bessenger focuses on complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense. His clients include Fortune 200 companies, entertainment companies, healthcare providers, and financial institutions. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in federal and state courts. Craig has litigated business, partnership, and contractual disputes, professional liability, banking and mortgage cases, and intellectual property matters. His white-collar experience spans various areas, including securities, antitrust, healthcare, and environmental violations, complex fraud and money laundering schemes, and internal investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment on behalf of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emovie studio, directors, and producer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;involved in the creation of a multibillion-dollar movie franchise in a copyright infringement case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor movie studio\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against claims relating to the collection of foreign revenue, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s ruling on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an anti-SLAPP motion brought against a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor media company\u003c/strong\u003e, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court\u0026rsquo;s ruling on appeal.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a multimillion-dollar settlement in a professional liability action brought on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eclosely held corporation\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented publicly-traded\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ehealthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in numerous class actions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eforeign national\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a federal criminal investigation into an allegedly fraudulent scheme to circumvent state and federal environmental regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebank directors\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in civil enforcement actions brought by federal regulatory authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedical device manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation by state regulatory authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eproducer of high-quality automotive images\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a copyright infringement action against an online tech company arising from the unauthorized use of its photographs. A confidential settlement agreement was reached on the eve of trial.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8096}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:19.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:19.000Z","searchable_text":"Bessenger{{ FIELD }}Obtained summary judgment on behalf of the movie studio, directors, and producer involved in the creation of a multibillion-dollar movie franchise in a copyright infringement case.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a major movie studio against claims relating to the collection of foreign revenue, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court’s ruling on appeal.{{ FIELD }}Defeated an anti-SLAPP motion brought against a major media company, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court’s ruling on appeal.{{ FIELD }}Achieved a multimillion-dollar settlement in a professional liability action brought on behalf of a closely held corporation.{{ FIELD }}Represented publicly-traded healthcare company in numerous class actions.{{ FIELD }}Represented a foreign national in a federal criminal investigation into an allegedly fraudulent scheme to circumvent state and federal environmental regulations.{{ FIELD }}Represented bank directors in civil enforcement actions brought by federal regulatory authorities.{{ FIELD }}Represented a medical device manufacturer in an investigation by state regulatory authorities.{{ FIELD }}Represented a producer of high-quality automotive images in a copyright infringement action against an online tech company arising from the unauthorized use of its photographs. A confidential settlement agreement was reached on the eve of trial.{{ FIELD }}Craig Bessenger focuses on complex civil litigation and white-collar criminal defense. His clients include Fortune 200 companies, entertainment companies, healthcare providers, and financial institutions. He represents both plaintiffs and defendants in federal and state courts. Craig has litigated business, partnership, and contractual disputes, professional liability, banking and mortgage cases, and intellectual property matters. His white-collar experience spans various areas, including securities, antitrust, healthcare, and environmental violations, complex fraud and money laundering schemes, and internal investigations. Partner Brown University  University of California Hastings College of Law University of California Hastings College of Law U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California District of Columbia Judicial Clerk, Hon. A. Howard Matz, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Obtained summary judgment on behalf of the movie studio, directors, and producer involved in the creation of a multibillion-dollar movie franchise in a copyright infringement case. Successfully defended a major movie studio against claims relating to the collection of foreign revenue, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court’s ruling on appeal. Defeated an anti-SLAPP motion brought against a major media company, and obtained an affirmance of the trial court’s ruling on appeal. Achieved a multimillion-dollar settlement in a professional liability action brought on behalf of a closely held corporation. Represented publicly-traded healthcare company in numerous class actions. Represented a foreign national in a federal criminal investigation into an allegedly fraudulent scheme to circumvent state and federal environmental regulations. Represented bank directors in civil enforcement actions brought by federal regulatory authorities. Represented a medical device manufacturer in an investigation by state regulatory authorities. Represented a producer of high-quality automotive images in a copyright infringement action against an online tech company arising from the unauthorized use of its photographs. A confidential settlement agreement was reached on the eve of trial.","searchable_name":"Craig H. Bessenger","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445658,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":679,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePat Brumbaugh represents attorneys and accountants when their most valuable asset is on the line: their reputation. Pat\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the representation of other professionals and their firms in all manner of litigation and in regulatory investigations and proceedings. A partner in our Professional Liability and Securities Enforcement and Regulation practices, Pat is both a seasoned litigator and a trusted counselor.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePat has represented issuers, accounting firms and underwriters in all manner of class action securities and shareholder derivative litigation. In addition, he has conducted internal investigations and represented clients before the Securities and Exchange Commission. In professional liability matters, Pat has represented other \u0026ldquo;Big Law\u0026rdquo; law firms and Big Four accounting firms in professional malpractice and related litigation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePat also serves as King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Co-General Counsel.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-p-brumbaugh","email":"pbrumbaugh@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 404 664 2726","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefended a l\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003earge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e in legal malpractice lawsuit arising from a commercial real estate transaction. Most of the case against the firm was dismissed on summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elarge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e against legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from the sale of a company and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFlorida law firm\u003c/strong\u003e against allegations of fraud stemming from the firm\u0026rsquo;s representation of a client in bankruptcy proceedings. The court dismissed the law firm from the case for lack of personal jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elarge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e in a legal malpractice action relating to the firm\u0026rsquo;s patent prosecution practice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBig 4\u003c/strong\u003e accounting firm in multi-year SEC investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel in\u0026nbsp;the Delaware Court of Chancery of a dispute concerning the winding up of a Delaware limited liability company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a Fortune 50 company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in securities class action litigation and related shareholder derivative litigation filed in state and federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended an Atlanta-based health care company and the former members of its board of directors in class action litigation challenging the company\u0026rsquo;s acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an underwriting syndicate of major investment banks in securities class action litigation in federal court stemming from a secondary offering underwritten by the banks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e client\u003c/strong\u003e on appeal from the denial of the client's federal habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, overturning the client's conviction for kidnapping, on the ground that his appellate counsel on direct appeal was constitutionally ineffective.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":10}]},"expertise":[{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":684,"guid":"684.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":685,"guid":"685.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":686,"guid":"686.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Brumbaugh","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Peter T. Fay, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"1997 - 1998"}],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"P.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":119,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePat Brumbaugh represents attorneys and accountants when their most valuable asset is on the line: their reputation. Pat\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the representation of other professionals and their firms in all manner of litigation and in regulatory investigations and proceedings. A partner in our Professional Liability and Securities Enforcement and Regulation practices, Pat is both a seasoned litigator and a trusted counselor.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePat has represented issuers, accounting firms and underwriters in all manner of class action securities and shareholder derivative litigation. In addition, he has conducted internal investigations and represented clients before the Securities and Exchange Commission. In professional liability matters, Pat has represented other \u0026ldquo;Big Law\u0026rdquo; law firms and Big Four accounting firms in professional malpractice and related litigation\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePat also serves as King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Co-General Counsel.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefended a l\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003earge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e in legal malpractice lawsuit arising from a commercial real estate transaction. Most of the case against the firm was dismissed on summary judgment.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u0026nbsp;a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elarge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e against legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from the sale of a company and related litigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eFlorida law firm\u003c/strong\u003e against allegations of fraud stemming from the firm\u0026rsquo;s representation of a client in bankruptcy proceedings. The court dismissed the law firm from the case for lack of personal jurisdiction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003elarge Southeastern law firm\u003c/strong\u003e in a legal malpractice action relating to the firm\u0026rsquo;s patent prosecution practice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eBig 4\u003c/strong\u003e accounting firm in multi-year SEC investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial counsel in\u0026nbsp;the Delaware Court of Chancery of a dispute concerning the winding up of a Delaware limited liability company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a Fortune 50 company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in securities class action litigation and related shareholder derivative litigation filed in state and federal court.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended an Atlanta-based health care company and the former members of its board of directors in class action litigation challenging the company\u0026rsquo;s acquisition.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an underwriting syndicate of major investment banks in securities class action litigation in federal court stemming from a secondary offering underwritten by the banks.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003e\u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003epro bono\u003c/em\u003e client\u003c/strong\u003e on appeal from the denial of the client's federal habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, overturning the client's conviction for kidnapping, on the ground that his appellate counsel on direct appeal was constitutionally ineffective.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4193}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-06T22:06:07.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-06T22:06:07.000Z","searchable_text":"Brumbaugh{{ FIELD }}Defended a large Southeastern law firm in legal malpractice lawsuit arising from a commercial real estate transaction. Most of the case against the firm was dismissed on summary judgment.{{ FIELD }}Defended a large Southeastern law firm against legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from the sale of a company and related litigation.{{ FIELD }}Defended a Florida law firm against allegations of fraud stemming from the firm’s representation of a client in bankruptcy proceedings. The court dismissed the law firm from the case for lack of personal jurisdiction.{{ FIELD }}Defended a large Southeastern law firm in a legal malpractice action relating to the firm’s patent prosecution practice.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Big 4 accounting firm in multi-year SEC investigation.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial counsel in the Delaware Court of Chancery of a dispute concerning the winding up of a Delaware limited liability company.{{ FIELD }}Defended a Fortune 50 company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in securities class action litigation and related shareholder derivative litigation filed in state and federal court.{{ FIELD }}Defended an Atlanta-based health care company and the former members of its board of directors in class action litigation challenging the company’s acquisition.{{ FIELD }}Represented an underwriting syndicate of major investment banks in securities class action litigation in federal court stemming from a secondary offering underwritten by the banks.{{ FIELD }}Represented a pro bono client on appeal from the denial of the client's federal habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, overturning the client's conviction for kidnapping, on the ground that his appellate counsel on direct appeal was constitutionally ineffective.{{ FIELD }}Pat Brumbaugh represents attorneys and accountants when their most valuable asset is on the line: their reputation. Pat’s practice focuses on the representation of other professionals and their firms in all manner of litigation and in regulatory investigations and proceedings. A partner in our Professional Liability and Securities Enforcement and Regulation practices, Pat is both a seasoned litigator and a trusted counselor.\nPat has represented issuers, accounting firms and underwriters in all manner of class action securities and shareholder derivative litigation. In addition, he has conducted internal investigations and represented clients before the Securities and Exchange Commission. In professional liability matters, Pat has represented other “Big Law” law firms and Big Four accounting firms in professional malpractice and related litigation\nPat also serves as King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Co-General Counsel. John Pat Brumbaugh Partner / General Counsel Dartmouth College  University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Florida Georgia State Bar of Georgia The Florida Bar Law Clerk, Hon. Peter T. Fay, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Defended a large Southeastern law firm in legal malpractice lawsuit arising from a commercial real estate transaction. Most of the case against the firm was dismissed on summary judgment. Defended a large Southeastern law firm against legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from the sale of a company and related litigation. Defended a Florida law firm against allegations of fraud stemming from the firm’s representation of a client in bankruptcy proceedings. The court dismissed the law firm from the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defended a large Southeastern law firm in a legal malpractice action relating to the firm’s patent prosecution practice. Represented a Big 4 accounting firm in multi-year SEC investigation. Served as lead trial counsel in the Delaware Court of Chancery of a dispute concerning the winding up of a Delaware limited liability company. Defended a Fortune 50 company and certain of its current and former officers and directors in securities class action litigation and related shareholder derivative litigation filed in state and federal court. Defended an Atlanta-based health care company and the former members of its board of directors in class action litigation challenging the company’s acquisition. Represented an underwriting syndicate of major investment banks in securities class action litigation in federal court stemming from a secondary offering underwritten by the banks. Represented a pro bono client on appeal from the denial of the client's federal habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed, overturning the client's conviction for kidnapping, on the ground that his appellate counsel on direct appeal was constitutionally ineffective.","searchable_name":"John P. Brumbaugh","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":438915,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3933,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKen is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.\u0026nbsp; Ken\u0026nbsp;advises clients in a variety\u0026nbsp;of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.\u0026nbsp; Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC\u0026nbsp;securities actions,\u0026nbsp;disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.\u0026nbsp; Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken\u0026nbsp;interned as a sports reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and as a news reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSouth Bend Tribune\u003c/em\u003e. He graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Duke Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClerkships\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"kenneth-fowler","email":"kfowler@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1185,"guid":"1185.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":12,"guid":"12.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fowler","nick_name":"Ken","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","years_held":"2014-2015"}],"first_name":"Kenneth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":613,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKen is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.\u0026nbsp; Ken\u0026nbsp;advises clients in a variety\u0026nbsp;of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.\u0026nbsp; Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC\u0026nbsp;securities actions,\u0026nbsp;disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.\u0026nbsp; Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken\u0026nbsp;interned as a sports reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLos Angeles Times\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and as a news reporter for the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSouth Bend Tribune\u003c/em\u003e. He graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;from Duke Law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClerkships\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4214}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-10-01T20:55:48.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-01T20:55:48.000Z","searchable_text":"Fowler{{ FIELD }}Ken is a business-oriented litigator who represents clients in M\u0026amp;A, contract, and securities disputes.  Ken advises clients in a variety of industries, including financial services, real estate, technology, telecommunications, transportation, and healthcare.  Ken has helped clients navigate deal litigation, private and SEC securities actions, disputes with joint venture partners, syndicated loan defaults, and other commercial contract disputes.  \nKen is active in the community and with pro bono work.  Among other things, he served for three years as a member of Legal Services NYC's Pro Bono Associate Advisory Board, and he counseled a local nonprofit through incorporation and its first several years of existence.\nPrior to law school, Ken was an elementary school special education teacher. While an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame, Ken interned as a sports reporter for the Los Angeles Times and as a news reporter for the South Bend Tribune. He graduated magna cum laude from Notre Dame with a B.A. in political science, and he graduated magna cum laude from Duke Law.\nClerkships\n\nLaw Clerk, The Honorable Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit\n Partner University of Notre Dame Notre Dame Law School Duke University Duke University School of Law Georgia New York Law Clerk, Frank M. Hull, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit","searchable_name":"Kenneth Fowler (Ken)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444346,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5737,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eArwen Johnson is a trial lawyer\u0026nbsp;who delivers results in high-stakes cases and regularly wins dispositive motions.\u0026nbsp; Arwen specializes in intellectual property, employment, and class action disputes for entertainment, tech, and healthcare companies. Arwen\u0026rsquo;s clients rely on her expertise in trade secrets, employee mobility, partnership disputes, copyright infringement and idea theft,\u0026nbsp;defamation and high net worth litigation.\u0026nbsp; They also count on her extensive knowledge of emergency and provisional remedies, the anti-SLAPP statute, class action procedures, and trial motion practice and appeals.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Arwen also serves as the Managing Partner of the firm's Los Angeles office.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArwen's publications and presentations include:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Powerful Women in the Courtroom,\u0026rdquo; Daily Journal\u0026rsquo;s Women Leadership in Law Forum, May 2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eEpic Systems Corp. v. Lewis\u003c/em\u003e and Its Aftermath and Impact on Class Action Waivers,\u0026rdquo; Bridgeport Continuing Education, January 2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Launching Your Career: Keys to Success in a Law Firm,\u0026rdquo; UCLA Law Women LEAD Summit, February 2017\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;Navigating California\u0026rsquo;s Parental Leave Laws,\u0026rdquo; California Minority Counsel Program, June 2018 (with Noah Perez-Silverman)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;California's No Aid Clause and Religious Endorsement: Davies v. County of Los Angeles,\u0026rdquo; California Minority Counsel Program, July 2016 (with Kimberly M. Singer)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;Overpriced Security? A Review of the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Proposed Rulemaking on \u0026lsquo;Pay-to-Play,\u0026rsquo;\u0026rdquo; American Bar Association\u0026rsquo;s Fourth Annual National Institute on Securities Fraud, October 2009 (with David K. Willingham and Jeffrey H. Rutherford)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"arwen-johnson","email":"arwen.johnson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eWon motion to compel arbitration on behalf of tech client of putative class action alleging misclassification of couriers and raising novel legal theories relates to COVID-19\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon nearly all claims tried to the jury in fraud, interference, and trade secret dispute between tech startup and government contractor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon bench trial on claims involving an employee\u0026rsquo;s entitlement to Labor Code penalties by securing a nonsuit after the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s opening statement\u0026mdash;including the client\u0026rsquo;s attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees, a rare employer win\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment in multi-million-dollar partnership dispute. The court\u0026rsquo;s order specifically complimented the \u0026ldquo;excellent briefing,\u0026rdquo; which ultimately led to a $350,000 fee award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment on behalf of the film studio and filmmakers behind the blockbuster film trilogy\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Matrix\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a copyright infringement lawsuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a permanent injunction against the County of Los Angeles in federal court, thereby preventing an attempt to include an overtly religious symbol on the County Seal. This case was highlighted as a signature matter by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated wage-and-hour and disability discrimination class action allegations in a twenty-count action brought by a former employee of a film studio client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment in a major case brought against a large energy company by a real estate developer alleging $50-100 million in lost sales\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated all claims at the pleading stage in multiple trust and estates litigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully prosecuted and defended multiple anti-SLAPP motions, at both the trial and appellate levels, resulting in complete victories\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFavorably resolved multiple partnership dissolution actions and employment disputes on behalf of major corporations and small businesses\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Johnson","nick_name":"Arwen","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Dean D. Pregerson, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California","years_held":"2006 - 2007"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Harry Pregerson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2007 - 2008"}],"first_name":"Arwen","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2162,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"R.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"First Amendment Award, ACLU Foundation of Southern California","detail":"2017"},{"title":"Daily Journal, Top 40 Under 40","detail":"2017"},{"title":"Fellow of the Legal Council on Legal Diversity","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star in Business Litigation","detail":"2013–present"},{"title":"Up-and-Coming 50 – Women Southern California Rising Stars ","detail":"2015–present"},{"title":"Up-and-Coming 100 – Southern California Rising Stars ","detail":"2015–present"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/arwen-johnson-713283119/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":95,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eArwen Johnson is a trial lawyer\u0026nbsp;who delivers results in high-stakes cases and regularly wins dispositive motions.\u0026nbsp; Arwen specializes in intellectual property, employment, and class action disputes for entertainment, tech, and healthcare companies. Arwen\u0026rsquo;s clients rely on her expertise in trade secrets, employee mobility, partnership disputes, copyright infringement and idea theft,\u0026nbsp;defamation and high net worth litigation.\u0026nbsp; They also count on her extensive knowledge of emergency and provisional remedies, the anti-SLAPP statute, class action procedures, and trial motion practice and appeals.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Arwen also serves as the Managing Partner of the firm's Los Angeles office.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArwen's publications and presentations include:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Powerful Women in the Courtroom,\u0026rdquo; Daily Journal\u0026rsquo;s Women Leadership in Law Forum, May 2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;\u003cem\u003eEpic Systems Corp. v. Lewis\u003c/em\u003e and Its Aftermath and Impact on Class Action Waivers,\u0026rdquo; Bridgeport Continuing Education, January 2019\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Launching Your Career: Keys to Success in a Law Firm,\u0026rdquo; UCLA Law Women LEAD Summit, February 2017\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;Navigating California\u0026rsquo;s Parental Leave Laws,\u0026rdquo; California Minority Counsel Program, June 2018 (with Noah Perez-Silverman)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;California's No Aid Clause and Religious Endorsement: Davies v. County of Los Angeles,\u0026rdquo; California Minority Counsel Program, July 2016 (with Kimberly M. Singer)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAuthor, \u0026ldquo;Overpriced Security? A Review of the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Proposed Rulemaking on \u0026lsquo;Pay-to-Play,\u0026rsquo;\u0026rdquo; American Bar Association\u0026rsquo;s Fourth Annual National Institute on Securities Fraud, October 2009 (with David K. Willingham and Jeffrey H. Rutherford)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eWon motion to compel arbitration on behalf of tech client of putative class action alleging misclassification of couriers and raising novel legal theories relates to COVID-19\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon nearly all claims tried to the jury in fraud, interference, and trade secret dispute between tech startup and government contractor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon bench trial on claims involving an employee\u0026rsquo;s entitlement to Labor Code penalties by securing a nonsuit after the plaintiff\u0026rsquo;s opening statement\u0026mdash;including the client\u0026rsquo;s attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees, a rare employer win\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment in multi-million-dollar partnership dispute. The court\u0026rsquo;s order specifically complimented the \u0026ldquo;excellent briefing,\u0026rdquo; which ultimately led to a $350,000 fee award.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment on behalf of the film studio and filmmakers behind the blockbuster film trilogy\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Matrix\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a copyright infringement lawsuit\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon a permanent injunction against the County of Los Angeles in federal court, thereby preventing an attempt to include an overtly religious symbol on the County Seal. This case was highlighted as a signature matter by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated wage-and-hour and disability discrimination class action allegations in a twenty-count action brought by a former employee of a film studio client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment in a major case brought against a large energy company by a real estate developer alleging $50-100 million in lost sales\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated all claims at the pleading stage in multiple trust and estates litigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully prosecuted and defended multiple anti-SLAPP motions, at both the trial and appellate levels, resulting in complete victories\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFavorably resolved multiple partnership dissolution actions and employment disputes on behalf of major corporations and small businesses\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"First Amendment Award, ACLU Foundation of Southern California","detail":"2017"},{"title":"Daily Journal, Top 40 Under 40","detail":"2017"},{"title":"Fellow of the Legal Council on Legal Diversity","detail":"2018"},{"title":"Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star in Business Litigation","detail":"2013–present"},{"title":"Up-and-Coming 50 – Women Southern California Rising Stars ","detail":"2015–present"},{"title":"Up-and-Coming 100 – Southern California Rising Stars ","detail":"2015–present"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8091}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-16T20:31:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-16T20:31:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Johnson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"First Amendment Award, ACLU Foundation of Southern California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal, Top 40 Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Fellow of the Legal Council on Legal Diversity\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2018\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star in Business Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2013–present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Up-and-Coming 50 – Women Southern California Rising Stars \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015–present\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Up-and-Coming 100 – Southern California Rising Stars \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015–present\"}{{ FIELD }}Won motion to compel arbitration on behalf of tech client of putative class action alleging misclassification of couriers and raising novel legal theories relates to COVID-19{{ FIELD }}Won nearly all claims tried to the jury in fraud, interference, and trade secret dispute between tech startup and government contractor{{ FIELD }}Won bench trial on claims involving an employee’s entitlement to Labor Code penalties by securing a nonsuit after the plaintiff’s opening statement—including the client’s attorneys’ fees, a rare employer win{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment in multi-million-dollar partnership dispute. The court’s order specifically complimented the “excellent briefing,” which ultimately led to a $350,000 fee award.{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment on behalf of the film studio and filmmakers behind the blockbuster film trilogy The Matrix in a copyright infringement lawsuit{{ FIELD }}Won a permanent injunction against the County of Los Angeles in federal court, thereby preventing an attempt to include an overtly religious symbol on the County Seal. This case was highlighted as a signature matter by Law360{{ FIELD }}Defeated wage-and-hour and disability discrimination class action allegations in a twenty-count action brought by a former employee of a film studio client{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment in a major case brought against a large energy company by a real estate developer alleging $50-100 million in lost sales{{ FIELD }}Defeated all claims at the pleading stage in multiple trust and estates litigations{{ FIELD }}Successfully prosecuted and defended multiple anti-SLAPP motions, at both the trial and appellate levels, resulting in complete victories{{ FIELD }}Favorably resolved multiple partnership dissolution actions and employment disputes on behalf of major corporations and small businesses{{ FIELD }}Arwen Johnson is a trial lawyer who delivers results in high-stakes cases and regularly wins dispositive motions.  Arwen specializes in intellectual property, employment, and class action disputes for entertainment, tech, and healthcare companies. Arwen’s clients rely on her expertise in trade secrets, employee mobility, partnership disputes, copyright infringement and idea theft, defamation and high net worth litigation.  They also count on her extensive knowledge of emergency and provisional remedies, the anti-SLAPP statute, class action procedures, and trial motion practice and appeals.  Arwen also serves as the Managing Partner of the firm's Los Angeles office. \nArwen's publications and presentations include:\n\nSpeaker, “Powerful Women in the Courtroom,” Daily Journal’s Women Leadership in Law Forum, May 2019\nSpeaker, “Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis and Its Aftermath and Impact on Class Action Waivers,” Bridgeport Continuing Education, January 2019\nSpeaker, “Launching Your Career: Keys to Success in a Law Firm,” UCLA Law Women LEAD Summit, February 2017\nAuthor, “Navigating California’s Parental Leave Laws,” California Minority Counsel Program, June 2018 (with Noah Perez-Silverman)\nAuthor, “California's No Aid Clause and Religious Endorsement: Davies v. County of Los Angeles,” California Minority Counsel Program, July 2016 (with Kimberly M. Singer)\nAuthor, “Overpriced Security? A Review of the SEC’s Proposed Rulemaking on ‘Pay-to-Play,’” American Bar Association’s Fourth Annual National Institute on Securities Fraud, October 2009 (with David K. Willingham and Jeffrey H. Rutherford)\n Partner First Amendment Award, ACLU Foundation of Southern California 2017 Daily Journal, Top 40 Under 40 2017 Fellow of the Legal Council on Legal Diversity 2018 Southern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star in Business Litigation 2013–present Up-and-Coming 50 – Women Southern California Rising Stars  2015–present Up-and-Coming 100 – Southern California Rising Stars  2015–present Rice University  University of California-Los Angeles UCLA School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles California JNE Commission ABA Leadership, Judicial Intern Opportunity Program (JIOP), Regional Co-Chair for Los Angeles Delegate, LACBA California Conference of Bar Associations Vice President, Advisory Board of the Western Center on Law and Poverty (2013–2016) California Women Lawyers Law Clerk, Hon. Dean D. Pregerson, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Law Clerk, Hon. Harry Pregerson, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Won motion to compel arbitration on behalf of tech client of putative class action alleging misclassification of couriers and raising novel legal theories relates to COVID-19 Won nearly all claims tried to the jury in fraud, interference, and trade secret dispute between tech startup and government contractor Won bench trial on claims involving an employee’s entitlement to Labor Code penalties by securing a nonsuit after the plaintiff’s opening statement—including the client’s attorneys’ fees, a rare employer win Won summary judgment in multi-million-dollar partnership dispute. The court’s order specifically complimented the “excellent briefing,” which ultimately led to a $350,000 fee award. Won summary judgment on behalf of the film studio and filmmakers behind the blockbuster film trilogy The Matrix in a copyright infringement lawsuit Won a permanent injunction against the County of Los Angeles in federal court, thereby preventing an attempt to include an overtly religious symbol on the County Seal. This case was highlighted as a signature matter by Law360 Defeated wage-and-hour and disability discrimination class action allegations in a twenty-count action brought by a former employee of a film studio client Won summary judgment in a major case brought against a large energy company by a real estate developer alleging $50-100 million in lost sales Defeated all claims at the pleading stage in multiple trust and estates litigations Successfully prosecuted and defended multiple anti-SLAPP motions, at both the trial and appellate levels, resulting in complete victories Favorably resolved multiple partnership dissolution actions and employment disputes on behalf of major corporations and small businesses","searchable_name":"Arwen R. Johnson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":441625,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":673,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlec Koch is a co-leader of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice and a former Assistant Director with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement.\u0026nbsp; He represents public companies, financial institutions, boards of directors, and individuals in securities enforcement and anti-corruption investigations before the SEC, DOJ, PCAOB, and other regulatory authorities.\u0026nbsp; Nationally ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, Alec is described as having \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Alec also regularly conducts internal investigations on behalf of companies and board committees, often involving multiple jurisdictions,\u0026nbsp;and advises clients on regulatory compliance and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt the SEC, Alec supervised investigations of all types, including matters involving public company accounting and disclosure; The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; insider trading; regulated entities such as broker-dealers,\u0026nbsp;investment advisers,\u0026nbsp;and credit rating agencies; market manipulation; and securities offerings.\u0026nbsp; He served in multiple leadership roles, including as a member of the Division of Enforcement\u0026rsquo;s Broker-Dealer Task Force, as the co-chair of the Division's\u0026nbsp;Priorities and Resources Subcommittee, and as a liaison\u0026nbsp;between the Division of Enforcement and the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Office of Credit Ratings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlec\u0026nbsp;serves\u0026nbsp;on the board of directors of Legal Aid D.C.\u0026nbsp;and the Ethics Research Center, a\u0026nbsp;non-profit organization that works to assist public companies and other institutions with building strong ethics and compliance\u0026nbsp;programs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to working at the\u0026nbsp;SEC, Alec was an associate at King \u0026amp; Spalding from 1997-2002. He rejoined the firm in 2016.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alec-koch","email":"akoch@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 202 740 4863","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprovider and operator of compression infrastructure used in the production and transfer of oil and natural gas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation related to payments potentially made to Mexican cartels designated as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a global non-clinical global drug development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation related to potential FCPA and disclosure violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and securities litigation resulting from the sudden closure of several banks for which the firm acted as external auditor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCISO of a software development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a first-of-its-kind SEC enforcement action relating to the company's disclosures concerning cybersecurity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprovider of life and health insurance\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SEC and DOJ investigations related to allegations made by short sellers regarding the company's financial performance and independent agents. The investigations were closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as the Independent Compliance Consultant for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eregistered clearing agency\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its SEC settlement relating to liquidity arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational healthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its continuing self-reporting obligations under an FCPA settlement with the DOJ and SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of potential FCPA violations in South America that was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the Audit Committee of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea space infrastructure development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an independent investigation of accounting and employment allegations raised by a former employee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation concerning air emissions-related issues that was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational chemical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a negotiated resolution of anti-corruption investigations conducted by U.S. and Dutch authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a public biopharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation and related government investigations into allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic company provider of services to the healthcare industry\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures that was resolved on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of potential selective disclosures and Reg FD violations that was resolved on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;independent directors of a commercial flooring company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent directors of a public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe CEO of a healthcare logistics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SEC and DOJ investigations of the company's disclosures concerning PPE transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic electrical utility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of the utility\u0026rsquo;s historical bond offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest banks\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities during the years leading up to the financial crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a public media analytics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation and related government investigations into more than 20 separate allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;a major U.S. law firm and several of its partners and employees\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation concerning the activities of the firm\u0026rsquo;s former client, an asset manager. The matter was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":175}]},"expertise":[{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":2,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":127,"guid":"127.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1184,"guid":"1184.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1241,"guid":"1241.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Koch","nick_name":"Alec","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alec","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1997-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Securities: Regulation: Enforcement ","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2019-PRESENT)"},{"title":"Recognized for \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice\" and described as \"an extraordinary lawyer.\"","detail":"Chambers USA, Securities Regulation: Enforcement - USA - Nationwide"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/alec-koch-75a5412b/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlec Koch is a co-leader of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice and a former Assistant Director with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement.\u0026nbsp; He represents public companies, financial institutions, boards of directors, and individuals in securities enforcement and anti-corruption investigations before the SEC, DOJ, PCAOB, and other regulatory authorities.\u0026nbsp; Nationally ranked by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, Alec is described as having \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Alec also regularly conducts internal investigations on behalf of companies and board committees, often involving multiple jurisdictions,\u0026nbsp;and advises clients on regulatory compliance and corporate governance issues.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAt the SEC, Alec supervised investigations of all types, including matters involving public company accounting and disclosure; The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; insider trading; regulated entities such as broker-dealers,\u0026nbsp;investment advisers,\u0026nbsp;and credit rating agencies; market manipulation; and securities offerings.\u0026nbsp; He served in multiple leadership roles, including as a member of the Division of Enforcement\u0026rsquo;s Broker-Dealer Task Force, as the co-chair of the Division's\u0026nbsp;Priorities and Resources Subcommittee, and as a liaison\u0026nbsp;between the Division of Enforcement and the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Office of Credit Ratings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlec\u0026nbsp;serves\u0026nbsp;on the board of directors of Legal Aid D.C.\u0026nbsp;and the Ethics Research Center, a\u0026nbsp;non-profit organization that works to assist public companies and other institutions with building strong ethics and compliance\u0026nbsp;programs.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to working at the\u0026nbsp;SEC, Alec was an associate at King \u0026amp; Spalding from 1997-2002. He rejoined the firm in 2016.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprovider and operator of compression infrastructure used in the production and transfer of oil and natural gas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an investigation related to payments potentially made to Mexican cartels designated as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a global non-clinical global drug development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation related to potential FCPA and disclosure violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and securities litigation resulting from the sudden closure of several banks for which the firm acted as external auditor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCISO of a software development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a first-of-its-kind SEC enforcement action relating to the company's disclosures concerning cybersecurity.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprovider of life and health insurance\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SEC and DOJ investigations related to allegations made by short sellers regarding the company's financial performance and independent agents. The investigations were closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as the Independent Compliance Consultant for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eregistered clearing agency\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its SEC settlement relating to liquidity arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational healthcare company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with its continuing self-reporting obligations under an FCPA settlement with the DOJ and SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of potential FCPA violations in South America that was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting the Audit Committee of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea space infrastructure development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an independent investigation of accounting and employment allegations raised by a former employee.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation concerning air emissions-related issues that was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational chemical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a negotiated resolution of anti-corruption investigations conducted by U.S. and Dutch authorities.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a public biopharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation and related government investigations into allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic company provider of services to the healthcare industry\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures that was resolved on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of potential selective disclosures and Reg FD violations that was resolved on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;independent directors of a commercial flooring company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent directors of a public company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethe CEO of a healthcare logistics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in SEC and DOJ investigations of the company's disclosures concerning PPE transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublic electrical utility\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation of the utility\u0026rsquo;s historical bond offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest banks\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities during the years leading up to the financial crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eaudit committee of a public media analytics company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an internal investigation and related government investigations into more than 20 separate allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;a major U.S. law firm and several of its partners and employees\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an SEC investigation concerning the activities of the firm\u0026rsquo;s former client, an asset manager. The matter was closed without enforcement action.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Securities: Regulation: Enforcement ","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2019-PRESENT)"},{"title":"Recognized for \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice\" and described as \"an extraordinary lawyer.\"","detail":"Chambers USA, Securities Regulation: Enforcement - USA - Nationwide"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9976}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-10-21T18:47:33.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-21T18:47:33.000Z","searchable_text":"Koch{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Ranked Lawyer, Securities: Regulation: Enforcement \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2019-PRESENT)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for \\\"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice\\\" and described as \\\"an extraordinary lawyer.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Securities Regulation: Enforcement - USA - Nationwide\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing a provider and operator of compression infrastructure used in the production and transfer of oil and natural gas in an investigation related to payments potentially made to Mexican cartels designated as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs).{{ FIELD }}Representing the audit committee of a global non-clinical global drug development company in an internal investigation related to potential FCPA and disclosure violations.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Big Four accounting firm in investigations and securities litigation resulting from the sudden closure of several banks for which the firm acted as external auditor.{{ FIELD }}Representing the CISO of a software development company in a first-of-its-kind SEC enforcement action relating to the company's disclosures concerning cybersecurity.{{ FIELD }}Represented a provider of life and health insurance in SEC and DOJ investigations related to allegations made by short sellers regarding the company's financial performance and independent agents. The investigations were closed without enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Served as the Independent Compliance Consultant for a registered clearing agency in connection with its SEC settlement relating to liquidity arrangements.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational healthcare company in connection with its continuing self-reporting obligations under an FCPA settlement with the DOJ and SEC.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global manufacturing company in an SEC investigation of potential FCPA violations in South America that was closed without enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Representing the Audit Committee of a space infrastructure development company in an independent investigation of accounting and employment allegations raised by a former employee.{{ FIELD }}Represented a global manufacturing company in an SEC investigation concerning air emissions-related issues that was closed without enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international chemical company in a negotiated resolution of anti-corruption investigations conducted by U.S. and Dutch authorities.{{ FIELD }}Represented the audit committee of a public biopharmaceutical company in an internal investigation and related government investigations into allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.{{ FIELD }}Represented a public company provider of services to the healthcare industry in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures that was resolved on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented a public pharmaceutical company in an SEC investigation of potential selective disclosures and Reg FD violations that was resolved on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented the independent directors of a commercial flooring company in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.{{ FIELD }}Represented the independent directors of a public company in connection with an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures.{{ FIELD }}Represented the CEO of a healthcare logistics company in SEC and DOJ investigations of the company's disclosures concerning PPE transactions.{{ FIELD }}Represented a public electrical utility in an SEC investigation of the utility’s historical bond offerings.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the world’s largest banks in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities during the years leading up to the financial crisis.{{ FIELD }}Represented the audit committee of a public media analytics company in an internal investigation and related government investigations into more than 20 separate allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation.{{ FIELD }}Defended a major U.S. law firm and several of its partners and employees in an SEC investigation concerning the activities of the firm’s former client, an asset manager. The matter was closed without enforcement action.{{ FIELD }}Alec Koch is a co-leader of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice and a former Assistant Director with the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement.  He represents public companies, financial institutions, boards of directors, and individuals in securities enforcement and anti-corruption investigations before the SEC, DOJ, PCAOB, and other regulatory authorities.  Nationally ranked by Chambers USA, Alec is described as having \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice.\"\n Alec also regularly conducts internal investigations on behalf of companies and board committees, often involving multiple jurisdictions, and advises clients on regulatory compliance and corporate governance issues. \nAt the SEC, Alec supervised investigations of all types, including matters involving public company accounting and disclosure; The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; insider trading; regulated entities such as broker-dealers, investment advisers, and credit rating agencies; market manipulation; and securities offerings.  He served in multiple leadership roles, including as a member of the Division of Enforcement’s Broker-Dealer Task Force, as the co-chair of the Division's Priorities and Resources Subcommittee, and as a liaison between the Division of Enforcement and the SEC’s Office of Credit Ratings.\nAlec serves on the board of directors of Legal Aid D.C. and the Ethics Research Center, a non-profit organization that works to assist public companies and other institutions with building strong ethics and compliance programs.  \nPrior to working at the SEC, Alec was an associate at King \u0026amp; Spalding from 1997-2002. He rejoined the firm in 2016. M Alexander Koch Partner Top Ranked Lawyer, Securities: Regulation: Enforcement  Chambers USA, Nationwide (2019-PRESENT) Recognized for \"broad market approval for his enforcement-side practice\" and described as \"an extraordinary lawyer.\" Chambers USA, Securities Regulation: Enforcement - USA - Nationwide University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center District of Columbia Representing a provider and operator of compression infrastructure used in the production and transfer of oil and natural gas in an investigation related to payments potentially made to Mexican cartels designated as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). Representing the audit committee of a global non-clinical global drug development company in an internal investigation related to potential FCPA and disclosure violations. Representing a Big Four accounting firm in investigations and securities litigation resulting from the sudden closure of several banks for which the firm acted as external auditor. Representing the CISO of a software development company in a first-of-its-kind SEC enforcement action relating to the company's disclosures concerning cybersecurity. Represented a provider of life and health insurance in SEC and DOJ investigations related to allegations made by short sellers regarding the company's financial performance and independent agents. The investigations were closed without enforcement action. Served as the Independent Compliance Consultant for a registered clearing agency in connection with its SEC settlement relating to liquidity arrangements. Represented a multinational healthcare company in connection with its continuing self-reporting obligations under an FCPA settlement with the DOJ and SEC. Represented a global manufacturing company in an SEC investigation of potential FCPA violations in South America that was closed without enforcement action. Representing the Audit Committee of a space infrastructure development company in an independent investigation of accounting and employment allegations raised by a former employee. Represented a global manufacturing company in an SEC investigation concerning air emissions-related issues that was closed without enforcement action. Represented an international chemical company in a negotiated resolution of anti-corruption investigations conducted by U.S. and Dutch authorities. Represented the audit committee of a public biopharmaceutical company in an internal investigation and related government investigations into allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation. Represented a public company provider of services to the healthcare industry in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures that was resolved on favorable terms. Represented a public pharmaceutical company in an SEC investigation of potential selective disclosures and Reg FD violations that was resolved on favorable terms. Represented the independent directors of a commercial flooring company in an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures. Represented the independent directors of a public company in connection with an SEC investigation of earnings-related disclosures. Represented the CEO of a healthcare logistics company in SEC and DOJ investigations of the company's disclosures concerning PPE transactions. Represented a public electrical utility in an SEC investigation of the utility’s historical bond offerings. Represented one of the world’s largest banks in a DOJ investigation concerning the origination and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities during the years leading up to the financial crisis. Represented the audit committee of a public media analytics company in an internal investigation and related government investigations into more than 20 separate allegations of accounting fraud and whistleblower retaliation. Defended a major U.S. law firm and several of its partners and employees in an SEC investigation concerning the activities of the firm’s former client, an asset manager. The matter was closed without enforcement action.","searchable_name":"Alec Koch","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427027,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6179,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRaphael Larson represents major accounting firms and individual accountants before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and other governing entities. Raphael has substantial experience representing these firms and accountants on regulatory and enforcement matters, and in federal and state court litigation. He is experienced in both commercial and civil litigation, corporate governance, securities regulation, and due diligence and fraud matters. In addition, he advises companies in financial statement and securities matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaphael spent over 12 years of his career with the PCAOB\u0026rsquo;s Division of Enforcement \u0026amp; Investigations, most recently serving as Associate Director. While with the PCAOB, he handled numerous enforcement investigations and disciplinary proceedings against accounting firms and auditors, including matters involving Big Four US accounting firms and their global affiliates.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"raphael-larson","email":"rlarson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented audit partner of global accounting firm in PCAOB investigation and subsequent litigated disciplinary proceeding. Achieved complete defense victory before PCAOB hearing officer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended global accounting firm and one of its senior audit partners in formal PCAOB investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Big Four international affiliate partners in PCAOB investigation concerning potential independence violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended audit partners of a regional accounting firm in PCAOB investigation of multiple audits.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended national accounting firm and an associated international affiliate in PCAOB investigation concerning independence matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation of Big Four international affiliate\u0026rsquo;s audits of a major Indonesian cellular company that resulted in charges and sanctions against the international affiliate, the engagement partner and the global firm\u0026rsquo;s Asia-Pacific Professional Practice Director.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully litigated and ultimately settled matter involving Big Four audit firm and four of its partners for audit violations in connection with audits of a pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the investigation of a Las Vegas-based audit firm that resulted in the first ever Rule 10b-5 charge brought by the PCAOB against an audit firm and audit partner for fraudulently issued audit reports.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation and subsequent litigation concerning an audit of water treatment company and its use of transactions with special purpose entities to improperly boost reported revenue resulting in significant sanctions against the audit engagement partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation of global audit firm\u0026rsquo;s audit of a software company\u0026rsquo;s revenue recognition practices resulting in sanctions against the engagement partner and audit manager.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1241,"guid":"1241.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Larson","nick_name":"Raphael","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Raphael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1999-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/larson-raphael-2a50315/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eRaphael Larson represents major accounting firms and individual accountants before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and other governing entities. Raphael has substantial experience representing these firms and accountants on regulatory and enforcement matters, and in federal and state court litigation. He is experienced in both commercial and civil litigation, corporate governance, securities regulation, and due diligence and fraud matters. In addition, he advises companies in financial statement and securities matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaphael spent over 12 years of his career with the PCAOB\u0026rsquo;s Division of Enforcement \u0026amp; Investigations, most recently serving as Associate Director. While with the PCAOB, he handled numerous enforcement investigations and disciplinary proceedings against accounting firms and auditors, including matters involving Big Four US accounting firms and their global affiliates.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented audit partner of global accounting firm in PCAOB investigation and subsequent litigated disciplinary proceeding. Achieved complete defense victory before PCAOB hearing officer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended global accounting firm and one of its senior audit partners in formal PCAOB investigation.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended Big Four international affiliate partners in PCAOB investigation concerning potential independence violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended audit partners of a regional accounting firm in PCAOB investigation of multiple audits.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended national accounting firm and an associated international affiliate in PCAOB investigation concerning independence matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation of Big Four international affiliate\u0026rsquo;s audits of a major Indonesian cellular company that resulted in charges and sanctions against the international affiliate, the engagement partner and the global firm\u0026rsquo;s Asia-Pacific Professional Practice Director.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully litigated and ultimately settled matter involving Big Four audit firm and four of its partners for audit violations in connection with audits of a pharmaceutical company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed the investigation of a Las Vegas-based audit firm that resulted in the first ever Rule 10b-5 charge brought by the PCAOB against an audit firm and audit partner for fraudulently issued audit reports.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation and subsequent litigation concerning an audit of water treatment company and its use of transactions with special purpose entities to improperly boost reported revenue resulting in significant sanctions against the audit engagement partner.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLed investigation of global audit firm\u0026rsquo;s audit of a software company\u0026rsquo;s revenue recognition practices resulting in sanctions against the engagement partner and audit manager.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9329}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:22.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:22.000Z","searchable_text":"Larson{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented audit partner of global accounting firm in PCAOB investigation and subsequent litigated disciplinary proceeding. Achieved complete defense victory before PCAOB hearing officer.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended global accounting firm and one of its senior audit partners in formal PCAOB investigation.{{ FIELD }}Defended Big Four international affiliate partners in PCAOB investigation concerning potential independence violations.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended audit partners of a regional accounting firm in PCAOB investigation of multiple audits.{{ FIELD }}Defended national accounting firm and an associated international affiliate in PCAOB investigation concerning independence matters.{{ FIELD }}Led investigation of Big Four international affiliate’s audits of a major Indonesian cellular company that resulted in charges and sanctions against the international affiliate, the engagement partner and the global firm’s Asia-Pacific Professional Practice Director.{{ FIELD }}Successfully litigated and ultimately settled matter involving Big Four audit firm and four of its partners for audit violations in connection with audits of a pharmaceutical company.{{ FIELD }}Led the investigation of a Las Vegas-based audit firm that resulted in the first ever Rule 10b-5 charge brought by the PCAOB against an audit firm and audit partner for fraudulently issued audit reports.{{ FIELD }}Led investigation and subsequent litigation concerning an audit of water treatment company and its use of transactions with special purpose entities to improperly boost reported revenue resulting in significant sanctions against the audit engagement partner.{{ FIELD }}Led investigation of global audit firm’s audit of a software company’s revenue recognition practices resulting in sanctions against the engagement partner and audit manager.{{ FIELD }}Raphael Larson represents major accounting firms and individual accountants before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and other governing entities. Raphael has substantial experience representing these firms and accountants on regulatory and enforcement matters, and in federal and state court litigation. He is experienced in both commercial and civil litigation, corporate governance, securities regulation, and due diligence and fraud matters. In addition, he advises companies in financial statement and securities matters.\nRaphael spent over 12 years of his career with the PCAOB’s Division of Enforcement \u0026amp; Investigations, most recently serving as Associate Director. While with the PCAOB, he handled numerous enforcement investigations and disciplinary proceedings against accounting firms and auditors, including matters involving Big Four US accounting firms and their global affiliates. Partner Portland State University  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Maryland Successfully represented audit partner of global accounting firm in PCAOB investigation and subsequent litigated disciplinary proceeding. Achieved complete defense victory before PCAOB hearing officer. Successfully defended global accounting firm and one of its senior audit partners in formal PCAOB investigation. Defended Big Four international affiliate partners in PCAOB investigation concerning potential independence violations. Successfully defended audit partners of a regional accounting firm in PCAOB investigation of multiple audits. Defended national accounting firm and an associated international affiliate in PCAOB investigation concerning independence matters. Led investigation of Big Four international affiliate’s audits of a major Indonesian cellular company that resulted in charges and sanctions against the international affiliate, the engagement partner and the global firm’s Asia-Pacific Professional Practice Director. Successfully litigated and ultimately settled matter involving Big Four audit firm and four of its partners for audit violations in connection with audits of a pharmaceutical company. Led the investigation of a Las Vegas-based audit firm that resulted in the first ever Rule 10b-5 charge brought by the PCAOB against an audit firm and audit partner for fraudulently issued audit reports. Led investigation and subsequent litigation concerning an audit of water treatment company and its use of transactions with special purpose entities to improperly boost reported revenue resulting in significant sanctions against the audit engagement partner. Led investigation of global audit firm’s audit of a software company’s revenue recognition practices resulting in sanctions against the engagement partner and audit manager.","searchable_name":"Raphael Larson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":436425,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3546,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarmen Lawrence focuses on securities-related government investigations and litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Investigations practice and co-lead of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice, Carmen represents public and private companies in a range of securities-related regulatory and business matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarmen represents parties in investigations and litigation conducted primarily by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as self-regulatory organizations and state securities regulators. She conducts internal investigations, provides crisis management advice, and counsels companies and regulated entities (broker-dealers and investment advisers) on their obligations under the federal securities law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Carmen was Regional Director for the SEC's Northeast Regional Office, the agency's largest region covering 14 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. In this role, she oversaw all enforcement and regulatory operations in the region, bringing some of the SEC's most significant cases. Prior to that, she was Senior Associate Regional Director, heading up the Northeast Regional Office's Enforcement Division after serving in senior and staff roles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarmen is a frequent speaker and lecturer in continuing legal education programs on federal securities matters. She has received consistent recognition from \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a Leading Individual for Securities Regulation and for Litigation\u0026mdash;White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations, as well as for Financial Services Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2016, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e ranked Carmen for Securities Litigation\u0026mdash;Defense. She has also been recognized by \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e as a New York Litigation Star, and was named to \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSecurities Docket'\u003c/em\u003es inaugural Enforcement 40 list of top SEC enforcement lawyers in 2013.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"carmen-lawrence","email":"clawrence@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a multiyear investigation by the SEC and foreign regulators involving credit derivatives trading, risk management and valuation practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment advisor and its CEO and fund manager\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with stock manipulation and insider trading investigations by the SEC, the DOJ, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and the Japan Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean SEC-registered credit rating agency\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with industry-wide investigations being conducted by the SEC and the New York Attorney General concerning potential ratings shopping.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe audit committee of a public company\u003c/strong\u003e in a sweeping internal investigation involving complex accounting and internal control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state's Department of the Treasury\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with an SEC investigation involving disclosures in the state's municipal bond offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enumerous senior executives\u003c/strong\u003e in SEC and/or DOJ investigations involving insider trading, financial fraud, FCPA, and broker-dealer or investment advisor regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":684,"guid":"684.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":923,"guid":"923.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":973,"guid":"973.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":113,"guid":"113.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":19,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1165,"guid":"1165.smart_tags","index":20,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":21,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1184,"guid":"1184.smart_tags","index":22,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":23,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1204,"guid":"1204.smart_tags","index":24,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":25,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1241,"guid":"1241.smart_tags","index":26,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lawrence","nick_name":"Carmen","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Carmen","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer - Securities: Regulation: Enforcement","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2008-2022)"},{"title":"Top 250 Women in Litigation and a Local Litigation Star, NY ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"National White-Collar Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2015"},{"title":"Top 40 SEC Enforcement Defense Lawyers ","detail":"Securities Docket"},{"title":"Financial Services: Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Administrative/Regulatory Law and Criminal Defense: White Collar ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2014–2015"},{"title":"Equal Employment Opportunity Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998"},{"title":"Presidential Distinguished Executive Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1995"},{"title":"Stanley Sporkin Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1993"},{"title":"Irving M. Pollack Award, for leadership, integrity and intellect ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1990"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCarmen Lawrence focuses on securities-related government investigations and litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Investigations practice and co-lead of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice, Carmen represents public and private companies in a range of securities-related regulatory and business matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarmen represents parties in investigations and litigation conducted primarily by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as self-regulatory organizations and state securities regulators. She conducts internal investigations, provides crisis management advice, and counsels companies and regulated entities (broker-dealers and investment advisers) on their obligations under the federal securities law.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreviously, Carmen was Regional Director for the SEC's Northeast Regional Office, the agency's largest region covering 14 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. In this role, she oversaw all enforcement and regulatory operations in the region, bringing some of the SEC's most significant cases. Prior to that, she was Senior Associate Regional Director, heading up the Northeast Regional Office's Enforcement Division after serving in senior and staff roles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCarmen is a frequent speaker and lecturer in continuing legal education programs on federal securities matters. She has received consistent recognition from \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e as a Leading Individual for Securities Regulation and for Litigation\u0026mdash;White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations, as well as for Financial Services Litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn 2016, \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eLegal 500\u003c/em\u003e ranked Carmen for Securities Litigation\u0026mdash;Defense. She has also been recognized by \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e as a New York Litigation Star, and was named to \u003cem data-redactor-tag=\"em\"\u003eSecurities Docket'\u003c/em\u003es inaugural Enforcement 40 list of top SEC enforcement lawyers in 2013.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e in a multiyear investigation by the SEC and foreign regulators involving credit derivatives trading, risk management and valuation practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean investment advisor and its CEO and fund manager\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with stock manipulation and insider trading investigations by the SEC, the DOJ, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and the Japan Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean SEC-registered credit rating agency\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with industry-wide investigations being conducted by the SEC and the New York Attorney General concerning potential ratings shopping.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ethe audit committee of a public company\u003c/strong\u003e in a sweeping internal investigation involving complex accounting and internal control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea state's Department of the Treasury\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with an SEC investigation involving disclosures in the state's municipal bond offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003enumerous senior executives\u003c/strong\u003e in SEC and/or DOJ investigations involving insider trading, financial fraud, FCPA, and broker-dealer or investment advisor regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer - Securities: Regulation: Enforcement","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2008-2022)"},{"title":"Top 250 Women in Litigation and a Local Litigation Star, NY ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"National White-Collar Litigation Star ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2015"},{"title":"Top 40 SEC Enforcement Defense Lawyers ","detail":"Securities Docket"},{"title":"Financial Services: Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense ","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Administrative/Regulatory Law and Criminal Defense: White Collar ","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2014–2015"},{"title":"Equal Employment Opportunity Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998"},{"title":"Presidential Distinguished Executive Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1995"},{"title":"Stanley Sporkin Award ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1993"},{"title":"Irving M. Pollack Award, for leadership, integrity and intellect ","detail":"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1990"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":59}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-09-02T04:53:04.000Z","updated_at":"2025-09-02T04:53:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Lawrence{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Ranked Lawyer - Securities: Regulation: Enforcement\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2008-2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 250 Women in Litigation and a Local Litigation Star, NY \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"National White-Collar Litigation Star \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top 40 SEC Enforcement Defense Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Securities Docket\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Financial Services: Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Administrative/Regulatory Law and Criminal Defense: White Collar \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2014–2015\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Equal Employment Opportunity Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Presidential Distinguished Executive Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1995\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Stanley Sporkin Award \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1993\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Irving M. Pollack Award, for leadership, integrity and intellect \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1990\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented a major financial institution in a multiyear investigation by the SEC and foreign regulators involving credit derivatives trading, risk management and valuation practices.{{ FIELD }}Represented an investment advisor and its CEO and fund manager in connection with stock manipulation and insider trading investigations by the SEC, the DOJ, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and the Japan Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission.{{ FIELD }}Represented an SEC-registered credit rating agency in connection with industry-wide investigations being conducted by the SEC and the New York Attorney General concerning potential ratings shopping.{{ FIELD }}Represented the audit committee of a public company in a sweeping internal investigation involving complex accounting and internal control issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented a state's Department of the Treasury in connection with an SEC investigation involving disclosures in the state's municipal bond offerings.{{ FIELD }}Represented numerous senior executives in SEC and/or DOJ investigations involving insider trading, financial fraud, FCPA, and broker-dealer or investment advisor regulatory issues.{{ FIELD }}Carmen Lawrence focuses on securities-related government investigations and litigation. As a partner in our Special Matters and Investigations practice and co-lead of our Securities Enforcement and Regulation practice, Carmen represents public and private companies in a range of securities-related regulatory and business matters.\nCarmen represents parties in investigations and litigation conducted primarily by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as self-regulatory organizations and state securities regulators. She conducts internal investigations, provides crisis management advice, and counsels companies and regulated entities (broker-dealers and investment advisers) on their obligations under the federal securities law.\nPreviously, Carmen was Regional Director for the SEC's Northeast Regional Office, the agency's largest region covering 14 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. In this role, she oversaw all enforcement and regulatory operations in the region, bringing some of the SEC's most significant cases. Prior to that, she was Senior Associate Regional Director, heading up the Northeast Regional Office's Enforcement Division after serving in senior and staff roles.\nCarmen is a frequent speaker and lecturer in continuing legal education programs on federal securities matters. She has received consistent recognition from Chambers USA as a Leading Individual for Securities Regulation and for Litigation—White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations, as well as for Financial Services Litigation.\nIn 2016, Legal 500 ranked Carmen for Securities Litigation—Defense. She has also been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a New York Litigation Star, and was named to Securities Docket's inaugural Enforcement 40 list of top SEC enforcement lawyers in 2013. Partner Top Ranked Lawyer - Securities: Regulation: Enforcement Chambers USA, Nationwide (2008-2022) Top 250 Women in Litigation and a Local Litigation Star, NY  Benchmark Litigation National White-Collar Litigation Star  Benchmark Litigation, 2015 Top 40 SEC Enforcement Defense Lawyers  Securities Docket Financial Services: Litigation and White-Collar Criminal Defense  Legal 500 Administrative/Regulatory Law and Criminal Defense: White Collar  The Best Lawyers in America, 2014–2015 Equal Employment Opportunity Award  The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998 Presidential Distinguished Executive Award  The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1995 Stanley Sporkin Award  The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1993 Irving M. Pollack Award, for leadership, integrity and intellect  The Securities and Exchange Commission, 1990 New York Co-chair, Subcommittee on SEC Enforcement and Civil Litigation, American Bar Association, Business Law Section Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America, The Trial Lawyer Honorary Society Represented a major financial institution in a multiyear investigation by the SEC and foreign regulators involving credit derivatives trading, risk management and valuation practices. Represented an investment advisor and its CEO and fund manager in connection with stock manipulation and insider trading investigations by the SEC, the DOJ, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and the Japan Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission. Represented an SEC-registered credit rating agency in connection with industry-wide investigations being conducted by the SEC and the New York Attorney General concerning potential ratings shopping. Represented the audit committee of a public company in a sweeping internal investigation involving complex accounting and internal control issues. Represented a state's Department of the Treasury in connection with an SEC investigation involving disclosures in the state's municipal bond offerings. Represented numerous senior executives in SEC and/or DOJ investigations involving insider trading, financial fraud, FCPA, and broker-dealer or investment advisor regulatory issues.","searchable_name":"Carmen Lawrence","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426823,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5701,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlvin Lee\u0026nbsp;focuses on complex commercial disputes,\u0026nbsp;mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology\u0026nbsp;sectors, among others. \u0026nbsp;He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events\u0026nbsp;such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has been described as a \u0026ldquo;super litigator\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.\u0026nbsp; Alvin has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.\u0026nbsp; He served on \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e's\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.\u0026nbsp; In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by \u003cem\u003eCrain's New York Business\u003c/em\u003e as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022\u0026nbsp;and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers\u0026nbsp;of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.\u0026nbsp; He has also represented raw material\u0026nbsp;and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure\u0026nbsp;projects.\u0026nbsp; He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as\u0026nbsp;in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits. \u0026nbsp;He has defended companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product\u0026nbsp;liability dockets.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate\u0026nbsp;and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings\u0026nbsp;before various tribunals, including recent victories\u0026nbsp;in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.\u0026nbsp; He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alvin-lee","email":"alvin.lee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHemlock Semiconductor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Michigan Bar Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly traded medical technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Chinese solar panel manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMunicipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Union Carbide Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreviously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnion Carbide Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lee","nick_name":"Alvin","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alvin","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":824,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Legal Lion of the Week","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)","detail":"The American Lawyer"},{"title":"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader","detail":"Crain's New York Business"},{"title":"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40","detail":"Bloomberg Law"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2024"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023"},{"title":"Editorial Board, Energy","detail":"Law360, 2022"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2022"},{"title":"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law","detail":"Crain's New York Business, 2022"},{"title":"Rising Star (Energy)","detail":"Law360, 2021"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlvin Lee\u0026nbsp;focuses on complex commercial disputes,\u0026nbsp;mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology\u0026nbsp;sectors, among others. \u0026nbsp;He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events\u0026nbsp;such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has been described as a \u0026ldquo;super litigator\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.\u0026nbsp; Alvin has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.\u0026nbsp; He served on \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e's\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.\u0026nbsp; In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by \u003cem\u003eCrain's New York Business\u003c/em\u003e as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022\u0026nbsp;and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers\u0026nbsp;of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.\u0026nbsp; He has also represented raw material\u0026nbsp;and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure\u0026nbsp;projects.\u0026nbsp; He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as\u0026nbsp;in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits. \u0026nbsp;He has defended companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product\u0026nbsp;liability dockets.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate\u0026nbsp;and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings\u0026nbsp;before various tribunals, including recent victories\u0026nbsp;in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.\u0026nbsp; He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHemlock Semiconductor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Michigan Bar Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly traded medical technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Chinese solar panel manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMunicipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Union Carbide Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreviously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnion Carbide Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Legal Lion of the Week","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)","detail":"The American Lawyer"},{"title":"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader","detail":"Crain's New York Business"},{"title":"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40","detail":"Bloomberg Law"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2024"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023"},{"title":"Editorial Board, Energy","detail":"Law360, 2022"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2022"},{"title":"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law","detail":"Crain's New York Business, 2022"},{"title":"Rising Star (Energy)","detail":"Law360, 2021"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7619}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:12.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Lee{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal Lion of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's New York Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Bloomberg Law\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editorial Board, Energy\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's New York Business, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star (Energy)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Future Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution in a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.{{ FIELD }}Represented Hemlock Semiconductor in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that The Michigan Bar Journal named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.{{ FIELD }}Representing The Dow Chemical Company in a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a private equity fund and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.{{ FIELD }}Served as trial counsel for a publicly traded medical technology company in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Big Four accounting firm in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.{{ FIELD }}First-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of a major Chinese solar panel manufacturer against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG) in a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.{{ FIELD }}First-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of a major U.S. manufacturing company against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.{{ FIELD }}Acted as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against Union Carbide Corporation alleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.{{ FIELD }}Previously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for Union Carbide Corporation in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.{{ FIELD }}Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.{{ FIELD }}Secured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against PricewaterhouseCoopers alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.{{ FIELD }}Alvin Lee focuses on complex commercial disputes, mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology sectors, among others.  He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.  In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\nAlvin has been described as a “super litigator” in The Legal 500 and was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.  Alvin has also been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.  He served on Law360's Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a Law360 Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.  In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by Crain's New York Business as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022 and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\n\nAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.  He has also represented raw material and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure projects.  He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.  \nAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits.  He has defended companies in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.  Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product liability dockets. \nIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.  He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.  Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings before various tribunals, including recent victories in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\nAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.  He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations. Partner Legal Lion of the Week Law360 Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up) The American Lawyer Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader Crain's New York Business They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40 Bloomberg Law 40 \u0026amp; Under List Benchmark Litigation, 2024 40 \u0026amp; Under List Benchmark Litigation, 2023 Editorial Board, Energy Law360, 2022 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List Benchmark Litigation, 2022 Notable Diverse Leader in the Law Crain's New York Business, 2022 Rising Star (Energy) Law360, 2021 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List Benchmark Litigation, 2021 Future Star Benchmark Litigation, 2020 Cornell University Cornell Law School Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois New York Representing a major financial institution in a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements. Represented Hemlock Semiconductor in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that The Michigan Bar Journal named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan. Representing The Dow Chemical Company in a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide. Obtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a private equity fund and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant. Representing a major financial institution in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR. Served as trial counsel for a publicly traded medical technology company in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause. Representing a Big Four accounting firm in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East. First-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of a major Chinese solar panel manufacturer against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue. Represented the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG) in a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia. First-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of a major U.S. manufacturing company against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client. Acted as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against Union Carbide Corporation alleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant. Previously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for Union Carbide Corporation in relation to its substantial asbestos docket. Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial. Secured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against PricewaterhouseCoopers alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.","searchable_name":"Alvin Lee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446145,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6835,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJordan is a versatile and experienced litigator who regularly is called on to handle complex commercial and bankruptcy disputes. Jordan consistently thinks outside the box\u0026mdash;both before litigation is filed and also when advocating in court or arbitration. His wide range of experience includes representing energy companies, private equity firms, and financial institutions in a variety of commercial disputes, defending prominent companies in litigation brought by state attorneys general, and representing debtors, creditors, sponsors, and other stakeholders in litigated and consensual restructuring processes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJordan\u0026rsquo;s commercial litigation experience includes, among other things, contract disputes, business torts, oil and gas disputes, fraud and misrepresentation claims, lender liability, collections, claims under state deceptive trade practices acts, antitrust claims, price-gouging claims, and real-estate litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has spent a significant amount of time defending lawyers and law firms in professional liability cases and advising on ethical issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJordan has significant experience presenting and cross-examining witnesses, attacking and defending complex valuations and damage models, and navigating difficult fiduciary and attorney-client privilege issues. \u0026nbsp;He also routinely advises clients on risk and performance issues involving existing and potential contracts, including with respect to mergers, acquisitions, payments, and other significant transactions.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his client work, Jordan regularly speaks on matters ranging from legal ethics to the unique aspects of litigating in bankruptcy court.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jordan-leu","email":"jleu@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHighlights\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of a private equity fund in an arbitration dispute over the enforceability of joint operating agreement (JOA) provisions; obtained summary disposition of the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s primary defense; case thereafter resolved by agreement (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs first-chair attorney, obtained judgment on partial findings in favor of lender-clients during trial of equity owner\u0026rsquo;s claims under the Uniform Commercial Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs one of the lead attorneys, successfully defended manufacturer against antitrust claims in an eight-day jury trial (D. Del.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs first-chair attorney, obtained $19 million arbitration award in favor of bank on defaulted loans (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an integrated oil and gas company as debtor in chapter 11 cases where the confirmed plan deleveraged more than $650 million in a debt-for-equity transaction and two significant royalty and working interest owner class actions were certified and settled post-confirmation (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eJudgment rendered for law firm under Rule 12(b)(6) in suit brought by client\u0026rsquo;s insurer; Court of Appeals held that law firm was immune from suit (5th Cir.; E.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRestructuring Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDelivered closing argument at confirmation hearing on behalf of industrial ceramics and oilfield products manufacturers as chapter 11 debtors; pre-negotiated chapter 11 plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an agricultural holding company and a breed registry throughout their heavily litigated chapter 11 cases; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an ad hoc group of member-owner electric power cooperatives in an electric power company\u0026rsquo;s bankruptcy case caused by Winter Storm Uri (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented purchaser of liquidating energy company\u0026rsquo;s assets; lead litigator post-sale in settling widespread royalty litigation (Bankr. W.D. Pa.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for physician association and management services organization in cure and related disputes in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eProspect Medical Holdings\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting secured creditor and contract counterparty in sale, cure, and related disputes in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGenesis Healthcare\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigation counsel for foreign affiliate of chapter 11 debtor in settling trust-fund and other claims related to customer payments (D. Del.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in representation of equity sponsor and certain officers and directors of upstream company in connection with its chapter 11 cases, which resulted in a $1.3 billion credit-bid asset sale, a global settlement with key stakeholders, and confirmation of a chapter 11 plan (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented sponsor and direct parent of chapter 11 debtors in contested chapter 11 cases which involved key settlements that paved the way for a consensual reorganization of a legacy power generation business and the continued operation of new data center and crypto mining growth initiatives (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented offshore-focused upstream company as debtor in heavily litigated bankruptcy; plan confirmed, eliminating approximately $3.5 billion in debt (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ad hoc group of lenders in prepackaged chapter 11 cases of oilfield services company (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private equity firms as equity owners of oil and gas company; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLead attorney defending oilfield water solutions provider against contractual and tort claims brought by mineral interest owner (S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for national bank on 30 of 31 lender liability counterclaims; bank prevailed on the remaining counterclaim at trial (E.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTake-nothing summary disposition for national bank in lender liability case based on alleged wire fraud against bank\u0026rsquo;s customer (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major automotive manufacturer and its affiliate in multiple lawsuits filed by state attorneys general under deceptive trade practices statutes (Multiple Courts)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented agricultural company in litigation filed by Texas attorney general under deceptive trade practices statute; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist.\u0026mdash;Harris Cnty.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigation counsel for seller in settling contractual and tort claims arising out of business sale\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMulti-year representation of non-bank lender in class action and various related suits arising from the failure of a home-healthcare program; class settlement approved (Multiple Courts)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended private equity fund and affiliates against tortious interference and breach of contract claims; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former president and CEO of a South Texas bank in an OCC regulatory investigation; after responding to numerous subpoenas and the client\u0026rsquo;s deposition, the OCC decided not to assess a civil money penalty (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented non-operator in marketing fee dispute with operator; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy company in operatorship dispute and subsequent bankruptcy litigation (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n; Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented lender in simultaneously pending Bankruptcy Court and District Court cases involving lender liability and fraudulent transfer claims (N.D. Tex.; Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in a lender liability case based on embezzlement by bank customer\u0026rsquo;s employee; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Fort Bend County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former directors and officers of a South Texas bank in litigation brought by bank shareholders based on private placement memorandum (Tex. Dist. - Hidalgo County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended current and former bank directors in a variety of matters involving allegations of unsafe or unsound practices, gross negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, false entry, and other violations of law and regulation (Office of Financial Institution Adjudication)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProfessional Liability Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDismissal with prejudice of all claims brought against court-appointed receiver and receiver\u0026rsquo;s law firm; affirmed by Court of Appeals (5th Cir.; N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for law firm in legal malpractice suit arising from foreclosure; affirmed by Court of Appeals (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Dallas County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePartial summary judgment for law firm in professional liability suit by bankruptcy trustee alleging malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting (Bankr. N.D. Tex.; N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented law firm in professional responsibility litigation brought by physician and affiliated company; district court upheld privilege assertions and was affirmed by Court of Appeals; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Harris County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of all claims brought against law firm on theories including successor liability, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraudulent transfer (S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":38,"guid":"38.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1231,"guid":"1231.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1715,"guid":"1715.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Leu","nick_name":"Jordan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jordan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":824,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"W.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the Texas Rising Stars list","detail":"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2019−2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-leu-4033427/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJordan is a versatile and experienced litigator who regularly is called on to handle complex commercial and bankruptcy disputes. Jordan consistently thinks outside the box\u0026mdash;both before litigation is filed and also when advocating in court or arbitration. His wide range of experience includes representing energy companies, private equity firms, and financial institutions in a variety of commercial disputes, defending prominent companies in litigation brought by state attorneys general, and representing debtors, creditors, sponsors, and other stakeholders in litigated and consensual restructuring processes.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJordan\u0026rsquo;s commercial litigation experience includes, among other things, contract disputes, business torts, oil and gas disputes, fraud and misrepresentation claims, lender liability, collections, claims under state deceptive trade practices acts, antitrust claims, price-gouging claims, and real-estate litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has spent a significant amount of time defending lawyers and law firms in professional liability cases and advising on ethical issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJordan has significant experience presenting and cross-examining witnesses, attacking and defending complex valuations and damage models, and navigating difficult fiduciary and attorney-client privilege issues. \u0026nbsp;He also routinely advises clients on risk and performance issues involving existing and potential contracts, including with respect to mergers, acquisitions, payments, and other significant transactions.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his client work, Jordan regularly speaks on matters ranging from legal ethics to the unique aspects of litigating in bankruptcy court.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHighlights\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of a private equity fund in an arbitration dispute over the enforceability of joint operating agreement (JOA) provisions; obtained summary disposition of the opposing party\u0026rsquo;s primary defense; case thereafter resolved by agreement (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs first-chair attorney, obtained judgment on partial findings in favor of lender-clients during trial of equity owner\u0026rsquo;s claims under the Uniform Commercial Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs one of the lead attorneys, successfully defended manufacturer against antitrust claims in an eight-day jury trial (D. Del.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAs first-chair attorney, obtained $19 million arbitration award in favor of bank on defaulted loans (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an integrated oil and gas company as debtor in chapter 11 cases where the confirmed plan deleveraged more than $650 million in a debt-for-equity transaction and two significant royalty and working interest owner class actions were certified and settled post-confirmation (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eJudgment rendered for law firm under Rule 12(b)(6) in suit brought by client\u0026rsquo;s insurer; Court of Appeals held that law firm was immune from suit (5th Cir.; E.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRestructuring Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDelivered closing argument at confirmation hearing on behalf of industrial ceramics and oilfield products manufacturers as chapter 11 debtors; pre-negotiated chapter 11 plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an agricultural holding company and a breed registry throughout their heavily litigated chapter 11 cases; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in the representation of an ad hoc group of member-owner electric power cooperatives in an electric power company\u0026rsquo;s bankruptcy case caused by Winter Storm Uri (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented purchaser of liquidating energy company\u0026rsquo;s assets; lead litigator post-sale in settling widespread royalty litigation (Bankr. W.D. Pa.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel for physician association and management services organization in cure and related disputes in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eProspect Medical Holdings\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting secured creditor and contract counterparty in sale, cure, and related disputes in the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGenesis Healthcare\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigation counsel for foreign affiliate of chapter 11 debtor in settling trust-fund and other claims related to customer payments (D. Del.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigator in representation of equity sponsor and certain officers and directors of upstream company in connection with its chapter 11 cases, which resulted in a $1.3 billion credit-bid asset sale, a global settlement with key stakeholders, and confirmation of a chapter 11 plan (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented sponsor and direct parent of chapter 11 debtors in contested chapter 11 cases which involved key settlements that paved the way for a consensual reorganization of a legacy power generation business and the continued operation of new data center and crypto mining growth initiatives (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented offshore-focused upstream company as debtor in heavily litigated bankruptcy; plan confirmed, eliminating approximately $3.5 billion in debt (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ad hoc group of lenders in prepackaged chapter 11 cases of oilfield services company (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented private equity firms as equity owners of oil and gas company; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLead attorney defending oilfield water solutions provider against contractual and tort claims brought by mineral interest owner (S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for national bank on 30 of 31 lender liability counterclaims; bank prevailed on the remaining counterclaim at trial (E.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTake-nothing summary disposition for national bank in lender liability case based on alleged wire fraud against bank\u0026rsquo;s customer (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting major automotive manufacturer and its affiliate in multiple lawsuits filed by state attorneys general under deceptive trade practices statutes (Multiple Courts)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented agricultural company in litigation filed by Texas attorney general under deceptive trade practices statute; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist.\u0026mdash;Harris Cnty.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead litigation counsel for seller in settling contractual and tort claims arising out of business sale\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMulti-year representation of non-bank lender in class action and various related suits arising from the failure of a home-healthcare program; class settlement approved (Multiple Courts)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended private equity fund and affiliates against tortious interference and breach of contract claims; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former president and CEO of a South Texas bank in an OCC regulatory investigation; after responding to numerous subpoenas and the client\u0026rsquo;s deposition, the OCC decided not to assess a civil money penalty (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented non-operator in marketing fee dispute with operator; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented energy company in operatorship dispute and subsequent bankruptcy litigation (Am. Arb. Ass\u0026rsquo;n; Bankr. S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented lender in simultaneously pending Bankruptcy Court and District Court cases involving lender liability and fraudulent transfer claims (N.D. Tex.; Bankr. N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a national bank in a lender liability case based on embezzlement by bank customer\u0026rsquo;s employee; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Fort Bend County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former directors and officers of a South Texas bank in litigation brought by bank shareholders based on private placement memorandum (Tex. Dist. - Hidalgo County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended current and former bank directors in a variety of matters involving allegations of unsafe or unsound practices, gross negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, false entry, and other violations of law and regulation (Office of Financial Institution Adjudication)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eProfessional Liability Litigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDismissal with prejudice of all claims brought against court-appointed receiver and receiver\u0026rsquo;s law firm; affirmed by Court of Appeals (5th Cir.; N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSummary judgment for law firm in legal malpractice suit arising from foreclosure; affirmed by Court of Appeals (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Dallas County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePartial summary judgment for law firm in professional liability suit by bankruptcy trustee alleging malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting (Bankr. N.D. Tex.; N.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented law firm in professional responsibility litigation brought by physician and affiliated company; district court upheld privilege assertions and was affirmed by Court of Appeals; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. \u0026ndash; Harris County.)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDismissal of all claims brought against law firm on theories including successor liability, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraudulent transfer (S.D. Tex.)\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Selected to the Texas Rising Stars list","detail":"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2019−2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12080}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-24T22:41:32.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-24T22:41:32.000Z","searchable_text":"Leu{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to the Texas Rising Stars list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2019−2024\"}{{ FIELD }}Highlights\nLead litigator in the representation of a private equity fund in an arbitration dispute over the enforceability of joint operating agreement (JOA) provisions; obtained summary disposition of the opposing party’s primary defense; case thereafter resolved by agreement (Am. Arb. Ass’n){{ FIELD }}As first-chair attorney, obtained judgment on partial findings in favor of lender-clients during trial of equity owner’s claims under the Uniform Commercial Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}As one of the lead attorneys, successfully defended manufacturer against antitrust claims in an eight-day jury trial (D. Del.){{ FIELD }}As first-chair attorney, obtained $19 million arbitration award in favor of bank on defaulted loans (Am. Arb. Ass’n){{ FIELD }}Lead litigator in the representation of an integrated oil and gas company as debtor in chapter 11 cases where the confirmed plan deleveraged more than $650 million in a debt-for-equity transaction and two significant royalty and working interest owner class actions were certified and settled post-confirmation (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Judgment rendered for law firm under Rule 12(b)(6) in suit brought by client’s insurer; Court of Appeals held that law firm was immune from suit (5th Cir.; E.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Restructuring Litigation{{ FIELD }}Delivered closing argument at confirmation hearing on behalf of industrial ceramics and oilfield products manufacturers as chapter 11 debtors; pre-negotiated chapter 11 plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Lead litigator in the representation of an agricultural holding company and a breed registry throughout their heavily litigated chapter 11 cases; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Lead litigator in the representation of an ad hoc group of member-owner electric power cooperatives in an electric power company’s bankruptcy case caused by Winter Storm Uri (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented purchaser of liquidating energy company’s assets; lead litigator post-sale in settling widespread royalty litigation (Bankr. W.D. Pa.){{ FIELD }}Lead counsel for physician association and management services organization in cure and related disputes in the Prospect Medical Holdings chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Representing secured creditor and contract counterparty in sale, cure, and related disputes in the Genesis Healthcare chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Lead litigation counsel for foreign affiliate of chapter 11 debtor in settling trust-fund and other claims related to customer payments (D. Del.){{ FIELD }}Lead litigator in representation of equity sponsor and certain officers and directors of upstream company in connection with its chapter 11 cases, which resulted in a $1.3 billion credit-bid asset sale, a global settlement with key stakeholders, and confirmation of a chapter 11 plan (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented sponsor and direct parent of chapter 11 debtors in contested chapter 11 cases which involved key settlements that paved the way for a consensual reorganization of a legacy power generation business and the continued operation of new data center and crypto mining growth initiatives (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented offshore-focused upstream company as debtor in heavily litigated bankruptcy; plan confirmed, eliminating approximately $3.5 billion in debt (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented ad hoc group of lenders in prepackaged chapter 11 cases of oilfield services company (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented private equity firms as equity owners of oil and gas company; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Commercial Litigation\nLead attorney defending oilfield water solutions provider against contractual and tort claims brought by mineral interest owner (S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for national bank on 30 of 31 lender liability counterclaims; bank prevailed on the remaining counterclaim at trial (E.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Take-nothing summary disposition for national bank in lender liability case based on alleged wire fraud against bank’s customer (Am. Arb. Ass’n){{ FIELD }}Representing major automotive manufacturer and its affiliate in multiple lawsuits filed by state attorneys general under deceptive trade practices statutes (Multiple Courts){{ FIELD }}Represented agricultural company in litigation filed by Texas attorney general under deceptive trade practices statute; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist.—Harris Cnty.){{ FIELD }}Lead litigation counsel for seller in settling contractual and tort claims arising out of business sale{{ FIELD }}Multi-year representation of non-bank lender in class action and various related suits arising from the failure of a home-healthcare program; class settlement approved (Multiple Courts){{ FIELD }}Defended private equity fund and affiliates against tortious interference and breach of contract claims; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Defended former president and CEO of a South Texas bank in an OCC regulatory investigation; after responding to numerous subpoenas and the client’s deposition, the OCC decided not to assess a civil money penalty (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency){{ FIELD }}Represented non-operator in marketing fee dispute with operator; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented energy company in operatorship dispute and subsequent bankruptcy litigation (Am. Arb. Ass’n; Bankr. S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented lender in simultaneously pending Bankruptcy Court and District Court cases involving lender liability and fraudulent transfer claims (N.D. Tex.; Bankr. N.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented a national bank in a lender liability case based on embezzlement by bank customer’s employee; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. – Fort Bend County.){{ FIELD }}Represented former directors and officers of a South Texas bank in litigation brought by bank shareholders based on private placement memorandum (Tex. Dist. - Hidalgo County.){{ FIELD }}Defended current and former bank directors in a variety of matters involving allegations of unsafe or unsound practices, gross negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, false entry, and other violations of law and regulation (Office of Financial Institution Adjudication){{ FIELD }}Professional Liability Litigation\nDismissal with prejudice of all claims brought against court-appointed receiver and receiver’s law firm; affirmed by Court of Appeals (5th Cir.; N.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Summary judgment for law firm in legal malpractice suit arising from foreclosure; affirmed by Court of Appeals (Tex. Dist. – Dallas County.){{ FIELD }}Partial summary judgment for law firm in professional liability suit by bankruptcy trustee alleging malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting (Bankr. N.D. Tex.; N.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Represented law firm in professional responsibility litigation brought by physician and affiliated company; district court upheld privilege assertions and was affirmed by Court of Appeals; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. – Harris County.){{ FIELD }}Dismissal of all claims brought against law firm on theories including successor liability, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraudulent transfer (S.D. Tex.){{ FIELD }}Jordan is a versatile and experienced litigator who regularly is called on to handle complex commercial and bankruptcy disputes. Jordan consistently thinks outside the box—both before litigation is filed and also when advocating in court or arbitration. His wide range of experience includes representing energy companies, private equity firms, and financial institutions in a variety of commercial disputes, defending prominent companies in litigation brought by state attorneys general, and representing debtors, creditors, sponsors, and other stakeholders in litigated and consensual restructuring processes. \nJordan’s commercial litigation experience includes, among other things, contract disputes, business torts, oil and gas disputes, fraud and misrepresentation claims, lender liability, collections, claims under state deceptive trade practices acts, antitrust claims, price-gouging claims, and real-estate litigation.  He also has spent a significant amount of time defending lawyers and law firms in professional liability cases and advising on ethical issues.\nJordan has significant experience presenting and cross-examining witnesses, attacking and defending complex valuations and damage models, and navigating difficult fiduciary and attorney-client privilege issues.  He also routinely advises clients on risk and performance issues involving existing and potential contracts, including with respect to mergers, acquisitions, payments, and other significant transactions.  In addition to his client work, Jordan regularly speaks on matters ranging from legal ethics to the unique aspects of litigating in bankruptcy court. Partner Selected to the Texas Rising Stars list Super Lawyers (Thomson Reuters), 2019−2024 The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Texas American Bankruptcy Institute Dallas Bar Association Harvard Club of Dallas Highlights\nLead litigator in the representation of a private equity fund in an arbitration dispute over the enforceability of joint operating agreement (JOA) provisions; obtained summary disposition of the opposing party’s primary defense; case thereafter resolved by agreement (Am. Arb. Ass’n) As first-chair attorney, obtained judgment on partial findings in favor of lender-clients during trial of equity owner’s claims under the Uniform Commercial Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) As one of the lead attorneys, successfully defended manufacturer against antitrust claims in an eight-day jury trial (D. Del.) As first-chair attorney, obtained $19 million arbitration award in favor of bank on defaulted loans (Am. Arb. Ass’n) Lead litigator in the representation of an integrated oil and gas company as debtor in chapter 11 cases where the confirmed plan deleveraged more than $650 million in a debt-for-equity transaction and two significant royalty and working interest owner class actions were certified and settled post-confirmation (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Judgment rendered for law firm under Rule 12(b)(6) in suit brought by client’s insurer; Court of Appeals held that law firm was immune from suit (5th Cir.; E.D. Tex.) Restructuring Litigation Delivered closing argument at confirmation hearing on behalf of industrial ceramics and oilfield products manufacturers as chapter 11 debtors; pre-negotiated chapter 11 plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Lead litigator in the representation of an agricultural holding company and a breed registry throughout their heavily litigated chapter 11 cases; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Lead litigator in the representation of an ad hoc group of member-owner electric power cooperatives in an electric power company’s bankruptcy case caused by Winter Storm Uri (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented purchaser of liquidating energy company’s assets; lead litigator post-sale in settling widespread royalty litigation (Bankr. W.D. Pa.) Lead counsel for physician association and management services organization in cure and related disputes in the Prospect Medical Holdings chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.) Representing secured creditor and contract counterparty in sale, cure, and related disputes in the Genesis Healthcare chapter 11 cases (Bankr. N.D. Tex.) Lead litigation counsel for foreign affiliate of chapter 11 debtor in settling trust-fund and other claims related to customer payments (D. Del.) Lead litigator in representation of equity sponsor and certain officers and directors of upstream company in connection with its chapter 11 cases, which resulted in a $1.3 billion credit-bid asset sale, a global settlement with key stakeholders, and confirmation of a chapter 11 plan (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented sponsor and direct parent of chapter 11 debtors in contested chapter 11 cases which involved key settlements that paved the way for a consensual reorganization of a legacy power generation business and the continued operation of new data center and crypto mining growth initiatives (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented offshore-focused upstream company as debtor in heavily litigated bankruptcy; plan confirmed, eliminating approximately $3.5 billion in debt (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented ad hoc group of lenders in prepackaged chapter 11 cases of oilfield services company (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented private equity firms as equity owners of oil and gas company; plan confirmed (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Commercial Litigation\nLead attorney defending oilfield water solutions provider against contractual and tort claims brought by mineral interest owner (S.D. Tex.) Summary judgment for national bank on 30 of 31 lender liability counterclaims; bank prevailed on the remaining counterclaim at trial (E.D. Tex.) Take-nothing summary disposition for national bank in lender liability case based on alleged wire fraud against bank’s customer (Am. Arb. Ass’n) Representing major automotive manufacturer and its affiliate in multiple lawsuits filed by state attorneys general under deceptive trade practices statutes (Multiple Courts) Represented agricultural company in litigation filed by Texas attorney general under deceptive trade practices statute; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist.—Harris Cnty.) Lead litigation counsel for seller in settling contractual and tort claims arising out of business sale Multi-year representation of non-bank lender in class action and various related suits arising from the failure of a home-healthcare program; class settlement approved (Multiple Courts) Defended private equity fund and affiliates against tortious interference and breach of contract claims; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Defended former president and CEO of a South Texas bank in an OCC regulatory investigation; after responding to numerous subpoenas and the client’s deposition, the OCC decided not to assess a civil money penalty (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) Represented non-operator in marketing fee dispute with operator; matter resolved by agreement (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented energy company in operatorship dispute and subsequent bankruptcy litigation (Am. Arb. Ass’n; Bankr. S.D. Tex.) Represented lender in simultaneously pending Bankruptcy Court and District Court cases involving lender liability and fraudulent transfer claims (N.D. Tex.; Bankr. N.D. Tex.) Represented a national bank in a lender liability case based on embezzlement by bank customer’s employee; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. – Fort Bend County.) Represented former directors and officers of a South Texas bank in litigation brought by bank shareholders based on private placement memorandum (Tex. Dist. - Hidalgo County.) Defended current and former bank directors in a variety of matters involving allegations of unsafe or unsound practices, gross negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, false entry, and other violations of law and regulation (Office of Financial Institution Adjudication) Professional Liability Litigation\nDismissal with prejudice of all claims brought against court-appointed receiver and receiver’s law firm; affirmed by Court of Appeals (5th Cir.; N.D. Tex.) Summary judgment for law firm in legal malpractice suit arising from foreclosure; affirmed by Court of Appeals (Tex. Dist. – Dallas County.) Partial summary judgment for law firm in professional liability suit by bankruptcy trustee alleging malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and aiding and abetting (Bankr. N.D. Tex.; N.D. Tex.) Represented law firm in professional responsibility litigation brought by physician and affiliated company; district court upheld privilege assertions and was affirmed by Court of Appeals; matter resolved by agreement (Tex. Dist. – Harris County.) Dismissal of all claims brought against law firm on theories including successor liability, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraudulent transfer (S.D. Tex.)","searchable_name":"Jordan W. Leu","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}