{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"17","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"L","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":426442,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3570,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBailey Langner is a skilled litigator with a focus on defending tech companies, product manufacturers, and energy sector clients in product liability and personal injury cases. She litigates in state and federal court, including multi-district litigation\u0026nbsp;(MDLs) and coordinated state proceedings, and represents clients in related government investigations. Bailey has significant trial, deposition, and case management experience and has helped secure important victories for clients at all stages of litigation. Bailey\u0026nbsp;recently completed a secondment at a San Francisco-based tech company and gained insight into the issues companies face. \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her legal practice, Bailey is active in the community.\u0026nbsp; She mentors students through the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity and previously served as a trustee on her local school board.\u0026nbsp; She has a robust pro bono practice, including assisting students obtain and renew their DACA status. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBailey received her law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where she co-founded a clinical program helping underserved populations access public benefits and worked as a teaching assistant in the first-year legal writing program. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"bailey-langner","email":"blangner@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Langner","nick_name":"Bailey","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Bailey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBailey Langner is a skilled litigator with a focus on defending tech companies, product manufacturers, and energy sector clients in product liability and personal injury cases. She litigates in state and federal court, including multi-district litigation\u0026nbsp;(MDLs) and coordinated state proceedings, and represents clients in related government investigations. Bailey has significant trial, deposition, and case management experience and has helped secure important victories for clients at all stages of litigation. Bailey\u0026nbsp;recently completed a secondment at a San Francisco-based tech company and gained insight into the issues companies face. \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her legal practice, Bailey is active in the community.\u0026nbsp; She mentors students through the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity and previously served as a trustee on her local school board.\u0026nbsp; She has a robust pro bono practice, including assisting students obtain and renew their DACA status. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBailey received her law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where she co-founded a clinical program helping underserved populations access public benefits and worked as a teaching assistant in the first-year legal writing program. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":984}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:06.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Langner{{ FIELD }}Bailey Langner is a skilled litigator with a focus on defending tech companies, product manufacturers, and energy sector clients in product liability and personal injury cases. She litigates in state and federal court, including multi-district litigation (MDLs) and coordinated state proceedings, and represents clients in related government investigations. Bailey has significant trial, deposition, and case management experience and has helped secure important victories for clients at all stages of litigation. Bailey recently completed a secondment at a San Francisco-based tech company and gained insight into the issues companies face.  \nIn addition to her legal practice, Bailey is active in the community.  She mentors students through the Leadership Council for Legal Diversity and previously served as a trustee on her local school board.  She has a robust pro bono practice, including assisting students obtain and renew their DACA status.  \nBailey received her law degree from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, where she co-founded a clinical program helping underserved populations access public benefits and worked as a teaching assistant in the first-year legal writing program.   Partner Brown University  University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California","searchable_name":"Bailey J. Langner","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426823,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5701,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlvin Lee\u0026nbsp;focuses on complex commercial disputes,\u0026nbsp;mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology\u0026nbsp;sectors, among others. \u0026nbsp;He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events\u0026nbsp;such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has been described as a \u0026ldquo;super litigator\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.\u0026nbsp; Alvin has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.\u0026nbsp; He served on \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e's\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.\u0026nbsp; In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by \u003cem\u003eCrain's New York Business\u003c/em\u003e as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022\u0026nbsp;and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers\u0026nbsp;of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.\u0026nbsp; He has also represented raw material\u0026nbsp;and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure\u0026nbsp;projects.\u0026nbsp; He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as\u0026nbsp;in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits. \u0026nbsp;He has defended companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product\u0026nbsp;liability dockets.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate\u0026nbsp;and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings\u0026nbsp;before various tribunals, including recent victories\u0026nbsp;in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.\u0026nbsp; He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alvin-lee","email":"alvin.lee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHemlock Semiconductor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Michigan Bar Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly traded medical technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Chinese solar panel manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMunicipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Union Carbide Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreviously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnion Carbide Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":18,"guid":"18.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1206,"guid":"1206.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lee","nick_name":"Alvin","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alvin","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":824,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Legal Lion of the Week","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)","detail":"The American Lawyer"},{"title":"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader","detail":"Crain's New York Business"},{"title":"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40","detail":"Bloomberg Law"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2024"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023"},{"title":"Editorial Board, Energy","detail":"Law360, 2022"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2022"},{"title":"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law","detail":"Crain's New York Business, 2022"},{"title":"Rising Star (Energy)","detail":"Law360, 2021"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlvin Lee\u0026nbsp;focuses on complex commercial disputes,\u0026nbsp;mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology\u0026nbsp;sectors, among others. \u0026nbsp;He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure,\u0026nbsp;and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events\u0026nbsp;such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.\u0026nbsp; In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has been described as a \u0026ldquo;super litigator\u0026rdquo; in \u003cem\u003eThe Legal 500 \u003c/em\u003eand was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.\u0026nbsp; Alvin has also been recognized by \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.\u0026nbsp; He served on \u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e's\u0026nbsp;Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.\u0026nbsp; In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by \u003cem\u003eCrain's New York Business\u003c/em\u003e as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022\u0026nbsp;and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers\u0026nbsp;of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.\u0026nbsp; He has also represented raw material\u0026nbsp;and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure\u0026nbsp;projects.\u0026nbsp; He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as\u0026nbsp;in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits. \u0026nbsp;He has defended companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product\u0026nbsp;liability dockets.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.\u0026nbsp; He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.\u0026nbsp; Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate\u0026nbsp;and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings\u0026nbsp;before various tribunals, including recent victories\u0026nbsp;in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.\u0026nbsp; He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHemlock Semiconductor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Michigan Bar Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as trial counsel for a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly traded medical technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBig Four accounting firm\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major Chinese solar panel manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMunicipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG)\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFirst-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea major U.S. manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eActed as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Union Carbide Corporation\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ealleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreviously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eUnion Carbide Corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePricewaterhouseCoopers\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Legal Lion of the Week","detail":"Law360"},{"title":"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)","detail":"The American Lawyer"},{"title":"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader","detail":"Crain's New York Business"},{"title":"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40","detail":"Bloomberg Law"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2024"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2023"},{"title":"Editorial Board, Energy","detail":"Law360, 2022"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2022"},{"title":"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law","detail":"Crain's New York Business, 2022"},{"title":"Rising Star (Energy)","detail":"Law360, 2021"},{"title":"40 \u0026 Under Hot List","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2021"},{"title":"Future Star","detail":"Benchmark Litigation, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7619}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:12.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Lee{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Legal Lion of the Week\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The American Lawyer\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's New York Business\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Bloomberg Law\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editorial Board, Energy\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Notable Diverse Leader in the Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Crain's New York Business, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rising Star (Energy)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2021\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Future Star\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution in a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements.{{ FIELD }}Represented Hemlock Semiconductor in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that The Michigan Bar Journal named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan.{{ FIELD }}Representing The Dow Chemical Company in a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a private equity fund and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant.{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR.{{ FIELD }}Served as trial counsel for a publicly traded medical technology company in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause.{{ FIELD }}Representing a Big Four accounting firm in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East.{{ FIELD }}First-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of a major Chinese solar panel manufacturer against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue.{{ FIELD }}Represented the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG) in a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia.{{ FIELD }}First-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of a major U.S. manufacturing company against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client.{{ FIELD }}Acted as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against Union Carbide Corporation alleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant.{{ FIELD }}Previously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for Union Carbide Corporation in relation to its substantial asbestos docket.{{ FIELD }}Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial.{{ FIELD }}Secured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against PricewaterhouseCoopers alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.{{ FIELD }}Alvin Lee focuses on complex commercial disputes, mass torts, and class action defense, most notably for clients in the energy, financial services, chemical, manufacturing, and technology sectors, among others.  He has significant experience in disputes relating to large-scale energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects and has litigated a number of high-profile disputes relating to supply chain disruptions and force majeure declarations, including those associated with events such as the U.S.-China solar trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic, and Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas power market in February 2021.  In addition to his trial practice, Alvin has significant experience in cross-border disputes and international arbitration.\nAlvin has been described as a “super litigator” in The Legal 500 and was recognized in Bloomberg Law's 2024 edition of \"They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40,\" which recognizes the best lawyers in the country under the age of 40.  Alvin has also been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a Future Star and was named to its 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List for four consecutive years, from 2021 to 2024.  He served on Law360's Editorial Board for the Energy sector in 2022 and was previously named a Law360 Rising Star in the Energy sector in 2021.  In recognition for his leadership on diversity and inclusion initiatives, he was named by Crain's New York Business as a Notable Diverse Leader in the Law in 2022 and as a Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader in 2024.\n\nAlvin has significant experience in the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries, where he has advised owners, developers, sponsors, and offtakers of large-scale manufacturing, solar, wind, and other power generation projects.  He has also represented raw material and component manufacturers and suppliers, and has significant experience advising clients in connection with complex financing vehicles for energy and infrastructure projects.  He has represented companies in litigation relating to all aspects of the development and construction of energy, infrastructure, and manufacturing projects as well as in litigation arising out of offtake, supply, and production agreements associated with such facilities.  \nAlvin also has significant experience in mass tort \u0026amp; products liability suits.  He has defended companies in a wide variety of toxic tort and environmental litigation, including class actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions.  Alvin also has experience serving as national coordinating and litigation counsel for companies in relation to substantial nationwide mass tort and product liability dockets. \nIn addition to his work for energy, chemical, and manufacturing companies, Alvin has considerable experience representing financial services institutions and accounting firms in both commercial and professional liability litigation.  He also has experience defending companies in data privacy litigation and consumer class actions.  Alvin is an experienced trial and appellate advocate and has first-chaired numerous arbitration hearings before various tribunals, including recent victories in confidential arbitrations involving the energy, chemical, and manufacturing industries that resulted in 9-figure arbitration awards.\nAlvin is highly active in diversity \u0026amp; inclusion initiatives throughout the legal profession.  He has held a number of D\u0026amp;I leadership positions both within the firm and in Asian American and LGBTQ+ bar organizations. Partner Legal Lion of the Week Law360 Litigator of the Week (Runner-Up) The American Lawyer Notable LGBTQIA+ Leader Crain's New York Business They've Got Next: The 40 Under 40 Bloomberg Law 40 \u0026amp; Under List Benchmark Litigation, 2024 40 \u0026amp; Under List Benchmark Litigation, 2023 Editorial Board, Energy Law360, 2022 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List Benchmark Litigation, 2022 Notable Diverse Leader in the Law Crain's New York Business, 2022 Rising Star (Energy) Law360, 2021 40 \u0026amp; Under Hot List Benchmark Litigation, 2021 Future Star Benchmark Litigation, 2020 Cornell University Cornell Law School Harvard University Harvard Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois New York Representing a major financial institution in a series of litigations arising out of Winter Storm Uri and its impacts on the Texas energy market in February 2021. The lawsuits have been filed in multiple state and federal courts across the country and involve force majeure declarations issued by wind farms relating to ISDA hedge agreements as well as pricing disputes arising out of such agreements. Represented Hemlock Semiconductor in a series of bet-the-company actions relating to take-or pay supply agreements in the solar energy industry. Coordinated global litigation strategy with counsel in Japan, Taiwan, China, and Germany, and obtained billions of dollars of precedent-setting judgments against entities in those countries. Obtained a $793 million summary judgment award against a European solar manufacturer, which was subsequently affirmed by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision that The Michigan Bar Journal named as one of the Top 10 Business Cases of the Decade (2010-2019) in the State of Michigan. Representing The Dow Chemical Company in a series of toxic tort and environmental litigations, including multiple class actions and mass actions alleging exposure to chemical releases and environmental emissions to chemicals such as ethylene oxide. Obtained a complete dismissal on behalf of a private equity fund and its directors in a lawsuit arising out of the development and construction of a 674-megawatt combined-cycle, natural gas-fired power plant. Representing a major financial institution in an antitrust action regarding the setting of LIBOR. Served as trial counsel for a publicly traded medical technology company in a $500 million M\u0026amp;A dispute in Delaware Chancery Court relating to a material adverse effect (MAE) clause. Representing a Big Four accounting firm in litigation relating to the demise of a publicly traded health services company operating in the Middle East. First-chaired a confidential arbitration on behalf of a major Chinese solar panel manufacturer against the developer of a utility-scale solar energy project in the U.S, resulting in a complete victory. The dispute arose out of an M\u0026amp;A agreement involving the project at issue. Represented the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia (MEAG) in a series of bet-the-company litigations against the City of Jacksonville, Florida arising out of the development of nuclear generating units at the Alvin W. Vogtle Electric Generating Plant in Burke County, Georgia. First-chaired a confidential international arbitration on behalf of a major U.S. manufacturing company against a Chinese state-owned enterprise, resulting in substantial recovery for client. Acted as a member of a team that obtained dismissal of a putative class action against Union Carbide Corporation alleging medical monitoring claims based on exposure to chemicals emitted from a metal alloying plant. Previously served as a member of a team of national coordinating and litigation counsel for Union Carbide Corporation in relation to its substantial asbestos docket. Represented PricewaterhouseCoopers in a series of actions alleging federal securities fraud and audit malpractice in connection with the dissolution of Lipper Convertibles, a New York hedge fund. Served as a member of PwC's trial team in a three-week jury trial. Secured a complete dismissal of a shareholder derivative action against PricewaterhouseCoopers alleging audit malpractice in connection with management malfeasance at a privately held health services corporation.","searchable_name":"Alvin Lee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426372,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3032,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathryn Lehman is a trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta office.\u0026nbsp; She is a member of the Tort Litigation and Environmental Group.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Lehman focuses her practice on high-risk cases involving punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; She has defended clients in the consumer products, medical device, professional services, food service and transportation industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Lehman divides her time between preparing cases for trial and trying cases.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Lehman is an expert at conducting goal-driven discovery, including fact and expert discovery.\u0026nbsp; She has spent significant time studying plaintiffs' trial strategies, so that she is able to employ those same strategies on behalf of her clients.\u0026nbsp; She leverages her trial experience to help clients achieve their goals, whether their goal is an advantageous settlement, dispositive motion or trial.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Lehman has worked on trial teams that have tried more than two dozen cases to verdict over the last decade.\u0026nbsp; She is skilled at developing trial strategy, including pre-trial motions practice, voir dire, opening statement, direct and cross examination, and closing argument.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kathryn-lehman","email":"klehman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGay v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Hillsborough County, Florida, March 2018, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKogan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company \u003c/em\u003e(three-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, May-June 2017, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHackimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, August-September 2016, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eShulman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (six-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, October-November 2015, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Escambia County, Florida, May 2015, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWebb v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (two-week re-trial of amount of compensatory and punitive damages only in Levy County, Florida, November 2014, original verdict amount reduced by 98%).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBanks v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (four-week trial in Broward County, Florida, February 2014, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eClark v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (two-week trial in Alachua County, Florida, June 2013, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn Re: Tobacco Litigation (Individual Personal Injury Cases)\u003c/em\u003e (five-week mass tort trial in West Virginia, April-May 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCumbess v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Suwanee County, Florida, November-December 2012, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":764,"guid":"764.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lehman","nick_name":"Kathryn","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Kathryn","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathryn Lehman is a trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta office.\u0026nbsp; She is a member of the Tort Litigation and Environmental Group.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Lehman focuses her practice on high-risk cases involving punitive damages.\u0026nbsp; She has defended clients in the consumer products, medical device, professional services, food service and transportation industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Lehman divides her time between preparing cases for trial and trying cases.\u0026nbsp; Ms. Lehman is an expert at conducting goal-driven discovery, including fact and expert discovery.\u0026nbsp; She has spent significant time studying plaintiffs' trial strategies, so that she is able to employ those same strategies on behalf of her clients.\u0026nbsp; She leverages her trial experience to help clients achieve their goals, whether their goal is an advantageous settlement, dispositive motion or trial.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMs. Lehman has worked on trial teams that have tried more than two dozen cases to verdict over the last decade.\u0026nbsp; She is skilled at developing trial strategy, including pre-trial motions practice, voir dire, opening statement, direct and cross examination, and closing argument.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGay v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Hillsborough County, Florida, March 2018, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eKogan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company \u003c/em\u003e(three-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, May-June 2017, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHackimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, August-September 2016, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eShulman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (six-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, October-November 2015, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Escambia County, Florida, May 2015, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWebb v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (two-week re-trial of amount of compensatory and punitive damages only in Levy County, Florida, November 2014, original verdict amount reduced by 98%).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBanks v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (four-week trial in Broward County, Florida, February 2014, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eClark v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (two-week trial in Alachua County, Florida, June 2013, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIn Re: Tobacco Litigation (Individual Personal Injury Cases)\u003c/em\u003e (five-week mass tort trial in West Virginia, April-May 2013).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCumbess v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company\u003c/em\u003e (three-week trial in Suwanee County, Florida, November-December 2012, defense verdict).\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":991}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:01.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:52:01.000Z","searchable_text":"Lehman{{ FIELD }}Gay v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Hillsborough County, Florida, March 2018, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Kogan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, May-June 2017, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Hackimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, August-September 2016, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Shulman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (six-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, October-November 2015, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Escambia County, Florida, May 2015, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Webb v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (two-week re-trial of amount of compensatory and punitive damages only in Levy County, Florida, November 2014, original verdict amount reduced by 98%).{{ FIELD }}Banks v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (four-week trial in Broward County, Florida, February 2014, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Clark v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (two-week trial in Alachua County, Florida, June 2013, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}In Re: Tobacco Litigation (Individual Personal Injury Cases) (five-week mass tort trial in West Virginia, April-May 2013).{{ FIELD }}Cumbess v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Suwanee County, Florida, November-December 2012, defense verdict).{{ FIELD }}Kathryn Lehman is a trial lawyer in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Atlanta office.  She is a member of the Tort Litigation and Environmental Group.  Ms. Lehman focuses her practice on high-risk cases involving punitive damages.  She has defended clients in the consumer products, medical device, professional services, food service and transportation industries.\nMs. Lehman divides her time between preparing cases for trial and trying cases.  Ms. Lehman is an expert at conducting goal-driven discovery, including fact and expert discovery.  She has spent significant time studying plaintiffs' trial strategies, so that she is able to employ those same strategies on behalf of her clients.  She leverages her trial experience to help clients achieve their goals, whether their goal is an advantageous settlement, dispositive motion or trial. \nMs. Lehman has worked on trial teams that have tried more than two dozen cases to verdict over the last decade.  She is skilled at developing trial strategy, including pre-trial motions practice, voir dire, opening statement, direct and cross examination, and closing argument. Partner North Carolina State University  University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Florida Georgia Massachusetts North Carolina Nevada Gay v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Hillsborough County, Florida, March 2018, defense verdict). Kogan v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, May-June 2017, defense verdict). Hackimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Palm Beach County, August-September 2016, defense verdict). Shulman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (six-week trial in Palm Beach County, Florida, October-November 2015, defense verdict). Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Escambia County, Florida, May 2015, defense verdict). Webb v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (two-week re-trial of amount of compensatory and punitive damages only in Levy County, Florida, November 2014, original verdict amount reduced by 98%). Banks v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (four-week trial in Broward County, Florida, February 2014, defense verdict). Clark v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (two-week trial in Alachua County, Florida, June 2013, defense verdict). In Re: Tobacco Litigation (Individual Personal Injury Cases) (five-week mass tort trial in West Virginia, April-May 2013). Cumbess v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (three-week trial in Suwanee County, Florida, November-December 2012, defense verdict).","searchable_name":"Kathryn S. Lehman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444841,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6195,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike is a trial lawyer in the Chicago office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Trial and Global Disputes Practice. His practice focuses on representing clients in a wide array of complex commercial disputes, including mass torts, partnership disputes, trust and estate litigation, franchise disputes, and breach of contract claims.\u0026nbsp; Mike also represents\u0026nbsp;clients in investigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-lombardo","email":"mlombardo@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lombardo","nick_name":"Mike","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2174,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Anthony","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMike is a trial lawyer in the Chicago office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Trial and Global Disputes Practice. His practice focuses on representing clients in a wide array of complex commercial disputes, including mass torts, partnership disputes, trust and estate litigation, franchise disputes, and breach of contract claims.\u0026nbsp; Mike also represents\u0026nbsp;clients in investigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9428}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-07T15:46:33.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-07T15:46:33.000Z","searchable_text":"Lombardo{{ FIELD }}Mike is a trial lawyer in the Chicago office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Trial and Global Disputes Practice. His practice focuses on representing clients in a wide array of complex commercial disputes, including mass torts, partnership disputes, trust and estate litigation, franchise disputes, and breach of contract claims.  Mike also represents clients in investigation matters. Partner Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Illinois","searchable_name":"Michael Anthony Lombardo (Mike)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426315,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":2380,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSeth Lundy represents prominent medical device and pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers, suppliers and distributors in complex legal and regulatory matters and investigations. As Deputy Chair of our FDA and Life Sciences practice, Seth is widely recognized as a leading national authority on compliance with federal and state fraud and abuse laws. His practical, business-oriented approach earns accolades as one of the industry's leading lawyers from sources including \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, LMG Life Sciences, Legal 500,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeth's in-depth understanding of the industry allows him to work seamlessly with boards of directors, C-suite management, legal departments, compliance offices and operational divisions. He designs compliance programs; helps client to ensure that operations meet changing standards; defends clients in government investigations; performs internal audits; conducts corporate due diligence; and engages in civil, criminal and administrative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeth is experienced in working with federal regulators and legislators to create, revise and interpret healthcare-related laws, regulations and policies. He also develops business and marketing strategies that respond to ever-changing federal regulatory schemes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker on healthcare compliance and investigations, Seth works to help clients to identify and predict burgeoning areas of enforcement. Seth has been recognized since 2008 as a top Washington, D.C. healthcare lawyer by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e. He has also received recognition as a leading healthcare lawyer from \u003cem\u003eExpert Guides, Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers,\u003c/em\u003e Super Lawyers Washington, D.C.\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eWashingtonian Magazine\u003c/em\u003e's Top Lawyers rankings.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"seth-lundy","email":"slundy@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":970,"guid":"970.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":109,"guid":"109.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1097,"guid":"1097.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":18,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":19,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1199,"guid":"1199.smart_tags","index":20,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1193,"guid":"1193.smart_tags","index":21,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":22,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1223,"guid":"1223.smart_tags","index":23,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":24,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lundy","nick_name":"Seth","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Seth","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"H.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Healthcare Lawyer: Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Leading Healthcare Lawyer","detail":"Expert Guides and Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers"},{"title":"Super Lawyers: Washington, D.C.","detail":""},{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America","detail":""},{"title":"Top Lawyers ","detail":"Washingtonian Magazine"},{"title":"Named to Best Lawyers in America for FDA Law","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSeth Lundy represents prominent medical device and pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers, suppliers and distributors in complex legal and regulatory matters and investigations. As Deputy Chair of our FDA and Life Sciences practice, Seth is widely recognized as a leading national authority on compliance with federal and state fraud and abuse laws. His practical, business-oriented approach earns accolades as one of the industry's leading lawyers from sources including \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, LMG Life Sciences, Legal 500,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers,\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeth's in-depth understanding of the industry allows him to work seamlessly with boards of directors, C-suite management, legal departments, compliance offices and operational divisions. He designs compliance programs; helps client to ensure that operations meet changing standards; defends clients in government investigations; performs internal audits; conducts corporate due diligence; and engages in civil, criminal and administrative litigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeth is experienced in working with federal regulators and legislators to create, revise and interpret healthcare-related laws, regulations and policies. He also develops business and marketing strategies that respond to ever-changing federal regulatory schemes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent author and speaker on healthcare compliance and investigations, Seth works to help clients to identify and predict burgeoning areas of enforcement. Seth has been recognized since 2008 as a top Washington, D.C. healthcare lawyer by \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e. He has also received recognition as a leading healthcare lawyer from \u003cem\u003eExpert Guides, Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers,\u003c/em\u003e Super Lawyers Washington, D.C.\u003cem\u003e,\u003c/em\u003e \u003cem\u003eBest Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eWashingtonian Magazine\u003c/em\u003e's Top Lawyers rankings.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Top Healthcare Lawyer: Washington, D.C. ","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Leading Healthcare Lawyer","detail":"Expert Guides and Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers"},{"title":"Super Lawyers: Washington, D.C.","detail":""},{"title":"The Best Lawyers in America","detail":""},{"title":"Top Lawyers ","detail":"Washingtonian Magazine"},{"title":"Named to Best Lawyers in America for FDA Law","detail":"Best Lawyers in America, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":1020}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:49.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:50:49.000Z","searchable_text":"Lundy{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Healthcare Lawyer: Washington, D.C. \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Healthcare Lawyer\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Expert Guides and Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers: Washington, D.C.\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Lawyers \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Washingtonian Magazine\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to Best Lawyers in America for FDA Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers in America, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Seth Lundy represents prominent medical device and pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers, suppliers and distributors in complex legal and regulatory matters and investigations. As Deputy Chair of our FDA and Life Sciences practice, Seth is widely recognized as a leading national authority on compliance with federal and state fraud and abuse laws. His practical, business-oriented approach earns accolades as one of the industry's leading lawyers from sources including Chambers USA, LMG Life Sciences, Legal 500, Best Lawyers, and Super Lawyers.\nSeth's in-depth understanding of the industry allows him to work seamlessly with boards of directors, C-suite management, legal departments, compliance offices and operational divisions. He designs compliance programs; helps client to ensure that operations meet changing standards; defends clients in government investigations; performs internal audits; conducts corporate due diligence; and engages in civil, criminal and administrative litigation.\nSeth is experienced in working with federal regulators and legislators to create, revise and interpret healthcare-related laws, regulations and policies. He also develops business and marketing strategies that respond to ever-changing federal regulatory schemes.\nA frequent author and speaker on healthcare compliance and investigations, Seth works to help clients to identify and predict burgeoning areas of enforcement. Seth has been recognized since 2008 as a top Washington, D.C. healthcare lawyer by Chambers USA. He has also received recognition as a leading healthcare lawyer from Expert Guides, Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers, Super Lawyers Washington, D.C., Best Lawyers, and Washingtonian Magazine's Top Lawyers rankings. Partner Top Healthcare Lawyer: Washington, D.C.  Chambers USA Leading Healthcare Lawyer Expert Guides and Guide to the Leading Healthcare Lawyers Super Lawyers: Washington, D.C.  The Best Lawyers in America  Top Lawyers  Washingtonian Magazine Named to Best Lawyers in America for FDA Law Best Lawyers in America, 2020 Amherst College  George Washington University George Washington University Law School District of Columbia Maryland","searchable_name":"Seth H. Lundy","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444976,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1066,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Ledet focuses on engineering and construction-related disputes, including design and construction defect, delay, disruption, scope of work, differing site conditions, force majeure, and major industrial casualty matters, including personal injury and property damage matters. He is a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group, and has appeared in state and federal courts across the country and in arbitrations around the world.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig worked as a professional engineer for more than seven years in the chemical manufacturing industry, where he was responsible for the design and construction of capital projects. With that energy industry background, Craig has focused most of his legal career on resolving engineering and construction disputes arising from energy-related infrastructure projects, including disputes involving refineries; gas plants; chemical plants; fossil-fuel, nuclear, solar and hydroelectric power plants; gas pipelines and compressor stations; and onshore and offshore oil and gas production facilities. He has also litigated construction matters involving sports stadiums, hospitals, and other facilities outside the energy industry. Craig has tried and arbitrated a variety of cases involving alleged engineering or construction defects that led to catastrophic industrial fires and explosions.\u0026nbsp; He has also tried and arbitrated numerous cases involving more traditional cost overrun, delay, disruption, scope change and similar construction-related claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig has been recognized as a leading construction disputes specialist by Chambers USA, Legal 500, The International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Construction Lawyers, The Benchmark Litigation Guide, and the Guide To The World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Construction Lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"craig-ledet","email":"cledet@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 713 206 0517","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eConstruction\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRecovered a nearly nine figure award for the owners of an 898 megawatt coal-fired power plant in central Texas after a month-long CPR arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia. During commissioning, the plant\u0026rsquo;s boiler overheated which caused substantial property damage and project delay. The contractors who designed and built the plant blamed the event on operator error. Owners proved that the primary causes of the incident were a defective boiler control logic design and contractors\u0026rsquo; failure to provide adequate supervision in the control room;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a natural gas pipeline company seeking damages from the designers and constructors of a natural gas pipeline in Georgia. The pipeline experienced severe external corrosion during construction which required that miles of the pipeline be replaced;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecovered $7.4 million in Atlanta federal court jury trial on behalf of a natural gas distribution company seeking damages from a weld inspection contractor who provided defective digital weld images during the construction of a natural gas pipeline.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"BulletList\"\u003eRepresented the owner of a 185 megawatt hydroelectric power plant under construction in Peru, defending against contractor claims for costs and time extensions. Hearings on several preliminary issues were held before a Dispute Adjudication Board in London, England, after which the owner prevailed on all issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of a power plant in Osceola, Arkansas in defense of force majeure claims brought by its EPC Contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a dispute with its general contractor arising from the expansion of a refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. After several days of hearings, the case settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of an LNG facility in Texas in a dispute with its general contractor over Hurricane Ike-related construction cost increases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a AAA arbitration against an engineering and construction firm that provided defective mooring components for an offshore production facility located in the Gulf of Mexico, with the result being a substantial delay in project completion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a dispute with the general contractor constructing the Topsides of an offshore production platform.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the general contractor in a delay and cost dispute against the owner arising from the construction of a Pulp and Paper mill in Colonia, Uruguay.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a lawsuit in Harris County, Texas against its general contractor over construction cost overruns arising from the construction of a new cement production facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the general contractor in the defense of delay and productivity damage claims brought by a subcontractor on a paper mill construction project in Big Island, Virginia. At the conclusion of the two week-long trial, the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an LNG terminal owner in the defense of Hurricane Ike-related force majeure claims brought by its general contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in a AAA arbitration in which the client sought to recover monies owed for the completion of a chloralkali plant construction project in Geismar, Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by the roofing subcontractor for the construction of Minute Maid Park who alleged that project delays and interferences resulted in increased construction costs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by a copper mine owner who sought reimbursement for cost overruns that it claimed were the result of construction inefficiencies on the cost reimbursable project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in the defense of construction damages claims brought by its general contractor and subcontractor in connection with the construction of an expansion to its aquatic feed manufacturing facility. At the conclusion of a two-week trial in Brazoria County, Texas, the jury returned a verdict rejecting the claims of the contractors and finding that our client was owed damages for construction delay and unfinished work.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering and construction contractor in a dispute with the owner of a gas processing plant in Bolivia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in a construction delay and cost dispute with the general contractor on a gas processing project in Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in a construction costs dispute with the owner of a gas processing facility in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in a construction dispute with a national oil company operating in Africa and arising from the construction of a large onshore oil and gas infrastructure project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEngineering Defects\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in two wrongful death lawsuits in Ohio County, West Virginia arising from a flash fire at a natural gas pipeline pig receiving and launching station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a chemical plant owner following the explosion of the owner\u0026rsquo;s phenol plant in Theodore, Alabama. The case was arbitrated for a week in London under ICC rules. Plaintiffs sought nearly $20 million. After the hearing, the case was settled with our client paying nothing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs who were severely burned in a plastics plant explosion and fire in Pasadena, Texas. The case was tried in Harris County, Texas for nearly six weeks. The Plaintiffs sought nearly $130 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs claiming to have suffered personal injuries during an ethylene plant explosion in Point Comfort, Texas. The case was tried in Calhoun County, Texas for four weeks. Plaintiffs sought nearly $4 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a valve manufacturer defending against allegations that a defective valve caused the rupture of a high pressure steam line in a power plant that resulted in two deaths, one serious burn injury and $15 million in property damage. The case was tried to a jury in Platte County, Missouri and resulted in a favorable verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMiscellaneous Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an oil company in the defense of a putative class action brought on behalf of more than 3000 putative class members who live, work or go to school in Bossier City, Louisiana and claim to have suffered personal injuries and property damage from alleged exposure to residual refinery contamination. The Court refused to certify a class.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of breach of fiduciary duty and theft of trade secret allegations made by an industrial turbine cleaning subcontractor. The case was tried to a jury for a week in Mobile, Alabama. Plaintiffs sought more than $23 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a general contractor in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the surviving family members of a United States Army soldier who was electrocuted while serving in Iraq. The plaintiffs alleged that our client failed to properly ground the electrical equipment at issue. The case was dismissed before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in the defense of a docket of more than forty legacy oilfield contamination cases pending throughout Louisiana involving claims of soil and groundwater contamination from historical oilfield operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an automotive service company in various personal injury and wrongful death matters pending in various jurisdictions around the country and related to accidents involving vehicles serviced by the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in defense of groundwater contamination cases brought in Hidalgo County, Texas by more than one hundred property owners. The case was settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ledet","nick_name":"Craig","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Craig","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"J.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as a U.S. \"Litigation Star\" ","detail":"2017 Benchmark Litigation guide, 2017"},{"title":"Ranked in construction litigation ","detail":"The Legal 500, Chambers USA, The International Who's Who of Construction Lawyers and the Guide to the World's Leading Construction Lawyers"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Texas Super Lawyer\" ","detail":"Super Lawyers"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/craig-ledet-6918659/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":77,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCraig Ledet focuses on engineering and construction-related disputes, including design and construction defect, delay, disruption, scope of work, differing site conditions, force majeure, and major industrial casualty matters, including personal injury and property damage matters. He is a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group, and has appeared in state and federal courts across the country and in arbitrations around the world.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig worked as a professional engineer for more than seven years in the chemical manufacturing industry, where he was responsible for the design and construction of capital projects. With that energy industry background, Craig has focused most of his legal career on resolving engineering and construction disputes arising from energy-related infrastructure projects, including disputes involving refineries; gas plants; chemical plants; fossil-fuel, nuclear, solar and hydroelectric power plants; gas pipelines and compressor stations; and onshore and offshore oil and gas production facilities. He has also litigated construction matters involving sports stadiums, hospitals, and other facilities outside the energy industry. Craig has tried and arbitrated a variety of cases involving alleged engineering or construction defects that led to catastrophic industrial fires and explosions.\u0026nbsp; He has also tried and arbitrated numerous cases involving more traditional cost overrun, delay, disruption, scope change and similar construction-related claims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCraig has been recognized as a leading construction disputes specialist by Chambers USA, Legal 500, The International Who\u0026rsquo;s Who of Construction Lawyers, The Benchmark Litigation Guide, and the Guide To The World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Construction Lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eConstruction\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRecovered a nearly nine figure award for the owners of an 898 megawatt coal-fired power plant in central Texas after a month-long CPR arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia. During commissioning, the plant\u0026rsquo;s boiler overheated which caused substantial property damage and project delay. The contractors who designed and built the plant blamed the event on operator error. Owners proved that the primary causes of the incident were a defective boiler control logic design and contractors\u0026rsquo; failure to provide adequate supervision in the control room;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a natural gas pipeline company seeking damages from the designers and constructors of a natural gas pipeline in Georgia. The pipeline experienced severe external corrosion during construction which required that miles of the pipeline be replaced;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRecovered $7.4 million in Atlanta federal court jury trial on behalf of a natural gas distribution company seeking damages from a weld inspection contractor who provided defective digital weld images during the construction of a natural gas pipeline.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp class=\"BulletList\"\u003eRepresented the owner of a 185 megawatt hydroelectric power plant under construction in Peru, defending against contractor claims for costs and time extensions. Hearings on several preliminary issues were held before a Dispute Adjudication Board in London, England, after which the owner prevailed on all issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of a power plant in Osceola, Arkansas in defense of force majeure claims brought by its EPC Contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a dispute with its general contractor arising from the expansion of a refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. After several days of hearings, the case settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner of an LNG facility in Texas in a dispute with its general contractor over Hurricane Ike-related construction cost increases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a AAA arbitration against an engineering and construction firm that provided defective mooring components for an offshore production facility located in the Gulf of Mexico, with the result being a substantial delay in project completion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a dispute with the general contractor constructing the Topsides of an offshore production platform.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the general contractor in a delay and cost dispute against the owner arising from the construction of a Pulp and Paper mill in Colonia, Uruguay.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in a lawsuit in Harris County, Texas against its general contractor over construction cost overruns arising from the construction of a new cement production facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the general contractor in the defense of delay and productivity damage claims brought by a subcontractor on a paper mill construction project in Big Island, Virginia. At the conclusion of the two week-long trial, the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an LNG terminal owner in the defense of Hurricane Ike-related force majeure claims brought by its general contractor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in a AAA arbitration in which the client sought to recover monies owed for the completion of a chloralkali plant construction project in Geismar, Louisiana.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by the roofing subcontractor for the construction of Minute Maid Park who alleged that project delays and interferences resulted in increased construction costs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by a copper mine owner who sought reimbursement for cost overruns that it claimed were the result of construction inefficiencies on the cost reimbursable project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the owner in the defense of construction damages claims brought by its general contractor and subcontractor in connection with the construction of an expansion to its aquatic feed manufacturing facility. At the conclusion of a two-week trial in Brazoria County, Texas, the jury returned a verdict rejecting the claims of the contractors and finding that our client was owed damages for construction delay and unfinished work.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering and construction contractor in a dispute with the owner of a gas processing plant in Bolivia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in a construction delay and cost dispute with the general contractor on a gas processing project in Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in a construction costs dispute with the owner of a gas processing facility in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in a construction dispute with a national oil company operating in Africa and arising from the construction of a large onshore oil and gas infrastructure project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eEngineering Defects\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in two wrongful death lawsuits in Ohio County, West Virginia arising from a flash fire at a natural gas pipeline pig receiving and launching station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an EPC contractor in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a chemical plant owner following the explosion of the owner\u0026rsquo;s phenol plant in Theodore, Alabama. The case was arbitrated for a week in London under ICC rules. Plaintiffs sought nearly $20 million. After the hearing, the case was settled with our client paying nothing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs who were severely burned in a plastics plant explosion and fire in Pasadena, Texas. The case was tried in Harris County, Texas for nearly six weeks. The Plaintiffs sought nearly $130 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs claiming to have suffered personal injuries during an ethylene plant explosion in Point Comfort, Texas. The case was tried in Calhoun County, Texas for four weeks. Plaintiffs sought nearly $4 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a valve manufacturer defending against allegations that a defective valve caused the rupture of a high pressure steam line in a power plant that resulted in two deaths, one serious burn injury and $15 million in property damage. The case was tried to a jury in Platte County, Missouri and resulted in a favorable verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMiscellaneous Torts\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented an oil company in the defense of a putative class action brought on behalf of more than 3000 putative class members who live, work or go to school in Bossier City, Louisiana and claim to have suffered personal injuries and property damage from alleged exposure to residual refinery contamination. The Court refused to certify a class.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an engineering company in the defense of breach of fiduciary duty and theft of trade secret allegations made by an industrial turbine cleaning subcontractor. The case was tried to a jury for a week in Mobile, Alabama. Plaintiffs sought more than $23 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a general contractor in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the surviving family members of a United States Army soldier who was electrocuted while serving in Iraq. The plaintiffs alleged that our client failed to properly ground the electrical equipment at issue. The case was dismissed before trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in the defense of a docket of more than forty legacy oilfield contamination cases pending throughout Louisiana involving claims of soil and groundwater contamination from historical oilfield operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an automotive service company in various personal injury and wrongful death matters pending in various jurisdictions around the country and related to accidents involving vehicles serviced by the company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major oil company in defense of groundwater contamination cases brought in Hidalgo County, Texas by more than one hundred property owners. The case was settled on favorable terms.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as a U.S. \"Litigation Star\" ","detail":"2017 Benchmark Litigation guide, 2017"},{"title":"Ranked in construction litigation ","detail":"The Legal 500, Chambers USA, The International Who's Who of Construction Lawyers and the Guide to the World's Leading Construction Lawyers"},{"title":"Recognized as a \"Texas Super Lawyer\" ","detail":"Super Lawyers"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":987}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-12T22:08:58.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-12T22:08:58.000Z","searchable_text":"Ledet{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a U.S. \\\"Litigation Star\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2017 Benchmark Litigation guide, 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked in construction litigation \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500, Chambers USA, The International Who's Who of Construction Lawyers and the Guide to the World's Leading Construction Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a \\\"Texas Super Lawyer\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}ConstructionRecovered a nearly nine figure award for the owners of an 898 megawatt coal-fired power plant in central Texas after a month-long CPR arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia. During commissioning, the plant’s boiler overheated which caused substantial property damage and project delay. The contractors who designed and built the plant blamed the event on operator error. Owners proved that the primary causes of the incident were a defective boiler control logic design and contractors’ failure to provide adequate supervision in the control room;{{ FIELD }}Representing a natural gas pipeline company seeking damages from the designers and constructors of a natural gas pipeline in Georgia. The pipeline experienced severe external corrosion during construction which required that miles of the pipeline be replaced;{{ FIELD }}Recovered $7.4 million in Atlanta federal court jury trial on behalf of a natural gas distribution company seeking damages from a weld inspection contractor who provided defective digital weld images during the construction of a natural gas pipeline.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a 185 megawatt hydroelectric power plant under construction in Peru, defending against contractor claims for costs and time extensions. Hearings on several preliminary issues were held before a Dispute Adjudication Board in London, England, after which the owner prevailed on all issues.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of a power plant in Osceola, Arkansas in defense of force majeure claims brought by its EPC Contractor.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner in a dispute with its general contractor arising from the expansion of a refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. After several days of hearings, the case settled on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner of an LNG facility in Texas in a dispute with its general contractor over Hurricane Ike-related construction cost increases.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner in a AAA arbitration against an engineering and construction firm that provided defective mooring components for an offshore production facility located in the Gulf of Mexico, with the result being a substantial delay in project completion{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner in a dispute with the general contractor constructing the Topsides of an offshore production platform.{{ FIELD }}Represented the general contractor in a delay and cost dispute against the owner arising from the construction of a Pulp and Paper mill in Colonia, Uruguay.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner in a lawsuit in Harris County, Texas against its general contractor over construction cost overruns arising from the construction of a new cement production facility.{{ FIELD }}Represented the general contractor in the defense of delay and productivity damage claims brought by a subcontractor on a paper mill construction project in Big Island, Virginia. At the conclusion of the two week-long trial, the jury returned a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented an LNG terminal owner in the defense of Hurricane Ike-related force majeure claims brought by its general contractor.{{ FIELD }}Represented the EPC contractor in a AAA arbitration in which the client sought to recover monies owed for the completion of a chloralkali plant construction project in Geismar, Louisiana.{{ FIELD }}Represented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by the roofing subcontractor for the construction of Minute Maid Park who alleged that project delays and interferences resulted in increased construction costs.{{ FIELD }}Represented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by a copper mine owner who sought reimbursement for cost overruns that it claimed were the result of construction inefficiencies on the cost reimbursable project.{{ FIELD }}Represented the owner in the defense of construction damages claims brought by its general contractor and subcontractor in connection with the construction of an expansion to its aquatic feed manufacturing facility. At the conclusion of a two-week trial in Brazoria County, Texas, the jury returned a verdict rejecting the claims of the contractors and finding that our client was owed damages for construction delay and unfinished work.{{ FIELD }}Represented an engineering and construction contractor in a dispute with the owner of a gas processing plant in Bolivia.{{ FIELD }}Represented an EPC contractor in a construction delay and cost dispute with the general contractor on a gas processing project in Kazakhstan.{{ FIELD }}Represented an EPC contractor in a construction costs dispute with the owner of a gas processing facility in Oklahoma.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in a construction dispute with a national oil company operating in Africa and arising from the construction of a large onshore oil and gas infrastructure project.{{ FIELD }}Engineering DefectsRepresented an EPC contractor in two wrongful death lawsuits in Ohio County, West Virginia arising from a flash fire at a natural gas pipeline pig receiving and launching station.{{ FIELD }}Represented an EPC contractor in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a chemical plant owner following the explosion of the owner’s phenol plant in Theodore, Alabama. The case was arbitrated for a week in London under ICC rules. Plaintiffs sought nearly $20 million. After the hearing, the case was settled with our client paying nothing.{{ FIELD }}Represented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs who were severely burned in a plastics plant explosion and fire in Pasadena, Texas. The case was tried in Harris County, Texas for nearly six weeks. The Plaintiffs sought nearly $130 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs claiming to have suffered personal injuries during an ethylene plant explosion in Point Comfort, Texas. The case was tried in Calhoun County, Texas for four weeks. Plaintiffs sought nearly $4 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented a valve manufacturer defending against allegations that a defective valve caused the rupture of a high pressure steam line in a power plant that resulted in two deaths, one serious burn injury and $15 million in property damage. The case was tried to a jury in Platte County, Missouri and resulted in a favorable verdict.{{ FIELD }}Miscellaneous Torts\nRepresented an oil company in the defense of a putative class action brought on behalf of more than 3000 putative class members who live, work or go to school in Bossier City, Louisiana and claim to have suffered personal injuries and property damage from alleged exposure to residual refinery contamination. The Court refused to certify a class.{{ FIELD }}Represented an engineering company in the defense of breach of fiduciary duty and theft of trade secret allegations made by an industrial turbine cleaning subcontractor. The case was tried to a jury for a week in Mobile, Alabama. Plaintiffs sought more than $23 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict.{{ FIELD }}Represented a general contractor in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the surviving family members of a United States Army soldier who was electrocuted while serving in Iraq. The plaintiffs alleged that our client failed to properly ground the electrical equipment at issue. The case was dismissed before trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in the defense of a docket of more than forty legacy oilfield contamination cases pending throughout Louisiana involving claims of soil and groundwater contamination from historical oilfield operations.{{ FIELD }}Represented an automotive service company in various personal injury and wrongful death matters pending in various jurisdictions around the country and related to accidents involving vehicles serviced by the company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major oil company in defense of groundwater contamination cases brought in Hidalgo County, Texas by more than one hundred property owners. The case was settled on favorable terms.{{ FIELD }}Craig Ledet focuses on engineering and construction-related disputes, including design and construction defect, delay, disruption, scope of work, differing site conditions, force majeure, and major industrial casualty matters, including personal injury and property damage matters. He is a partner in our Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group, and has appeared in state and federal courts across the country and in arbitrations around the world.\nCraig worked as a professional engineer for more than seven years in the chemical manufacturing industry, where he was responsible for the design and construction of capital projects. With that energy industry background, Craig has focused most of his legal career on resolving engineering and construction disputes arising from energy-related infrastructure projects, including disputes involving refineries; gas plants; chemical plants; fossil-fuel, nuclear, solar and hydroelectric power plants; gas pipelines and compressor stations; and onshore and offshore oil and gas production facilities. He has also litigated construction matters involving sports stadiums, hospitals, and other facilities outside the energy industry. Craig has tried and arbitrated a variety of cases involving alleged engineering or construction defects that led to catastrophic industrial fires and explosions.  He has also tried and arbitrated numerous cases involving more traditional cost overrun, delay, disruption, scope change and similar construction-related claims.\nCraig has been recognized as a leading construction disputes specialist by Chambers USA, Legal 500, The International Who’s Who of Construction Lawyers, The Benchmark Litigation Guide, and the Guide To The World’s Leading Construction Lawyers. Senior Counsel Recognized as a U.S. \"Litigation Star\"  2017 Benchmark Litigation guide, 2017 Ranked in construction litigation  The Legal 500, Chambers USA, The International Who's Who of Construction Lawyers and the Guide to the World's Leading Construction Lawyers Recognized as a \"Texas Super Lawyer\"  Super Lawyers Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center University of Houston University of Houston Law Center Texas State Bar of Texas, American Bar Association, Houston Bar Association, Houston Young Lawyers Association ConstructionRecovered a nearly nine figure award for the owners of an 898 megawatt coal-fired power plant in central Texas after a month-long CPR arbitration in Atlanta, Georgia. During commissioning, the plant’s boiler overheated which caused substantial property damage and project delay. The contractors who designed and built the plant blamed the event on operator error. Owners proved that the primary causes of the incident were a defective boiler control logic design and contractors’ failure to provide adequate supervision in the control room; Representing a natural gas pipeline company seeking damages from the designers and constructors of a natural gas pipeline in Georgia. The pipeline experienced severe external corrosion during construction which required that miles of the pipeline be replaced; Recovered $7.4 million in Atlanta federal court jury trial on behalf of a natural gas distribution company seeking damages from a weld inspection contractor who provided defective digital weld images during the construction of a natural gas pipeline. Represented the owner of a 185 megawatt hydroelectric power plant under construction in Peru, defending against contractor claims for costs and time extensions. Hearings on several preliminary issues were held before a Dispute Adjudication Board in London, England, after which the owner prevailed on all issues. Represented the owner of a power plant in Osceola, Arkansas in defense of force majeure claims brought by its EPC Contractor. Represented the owner in a dispute with its general contractor arising from the expansion of a refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. After several days of hearings, the case settled on favorable terms. Represented the owner of an LNG facility in Texas in a dispute with its general contractor over Hurricane Ike-related construction cost increases. Represented the owner in a AAA arbitration against an engineering and construction firm that provided defective mooring components for an offshore production facility located in the Gulf of Mexico, with the result being a substantial delay in project completion Represented the owner in a dispute with the general contractor constructing the Topsides of an offshore production platform. Represented the general contractor in a delay and cost dispute against the owner arising from the construction of a Pulp and Paper mill in Colonia, Uruguay. Represented the owner in a lawsuit in Harris County, Texas against its general contractor over construction cost overruns arising from the construction of a new cement production facility. Represented the general contractor in the defense of delay and productivity damage claims brought by a subcontractor on a paper mill construction project in Big Island, Virginia. At the conclusion of the two week-long trial, the jury returned a complete defense verdict. Represented an LNG terminal owner in the defense of Hurricane Ike-related force majeure claims brought by its general contractor. Represented the EPC contractor in a AAA arbitration in which the client sought to recover monies owed for the completion of a chloralkali plant construction project in Geismar, Louisiana. Represented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by the roofing subcontractor for the construction of Minute Maid Park who alleged that project delays and interferences resulted in increased construction costs. Represented the EPC contractor in the defense of claims by a copper mine owner who sought reimbursement for cost overruns that it claimed were the result of construction inefficiencies on the cost reimbursable project. Represented the owner in the defense of construction damages claims brought by its general contractor and subcontractor in connection with the construction of an expansion to its aquatic feed manufacturing facility. At the conclusion of a two-week trial in Brazoria County, Texas, the jury returned a verdict rejecting the claims of the contractors and finding that our client was owed damages for construction delay and unfinished work. Represented an engineering and construction contractor in a dispute with the owner of a gas processing plant in Bolivia. Represented an EPC contractor in a construction delay and cost dispute with the general contractor on a gas processing project in Kazakhstan. Represented an EPC contractor in a construction costs dispute with the owner of a gas processing facility in Oklahoma. Represented a major oil company in a construction dispute with a national oil company operating in Africa and arising from the construction of a large onshore oil and gas infrastructure project. Engineering DefectsRepresented an EPC contractor in two wrongful death lawsuits in Ohio County, West Virginia arising from a flash fire at a natural gas pipeline pig receiving and launching station. Represented an EPC contractor in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a chemical plant owner following the explosion of the owner’s phenol plant in Theodore, Alabama. The case was arbitrated for a week in London under ICC rules. Plaintiffs sought nearly $20 million. After the hearing, the case was settled with our client paying nothing. Represented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs who were severely burned in a plastics plant explosion and fire in Pasadena, Texas. The case was tried in Harris County, Texas for nearly six weeks. The Plaintiffs sought nearly $130 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict. Represented an engineering company in the defense of engineering defect claims brought by a group of plaintiffs claiming to have suffered personal injuries during an ethylene plant explosion in Point Comfort, Texas. The case was tried in Calhoun County, Texas for four weeks. Plaintiffs sought nearly $4 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict. Represented a valve manufacturer defending against allegations that a defective valve caused the rupture of a high pressure steam line in a power plant that resulted in two deaths, one serious burn injury and $15 million in property damage. The case was tried to a jury in Platte County, Missouri and resulted in a favorable verdict. Miscellaneous Torts\nRepresented an oil company in the defense of a putative class action brought on behalf of more than 3000 putative class members who live, work or go to school in Bossier City, Louisiana and claim to have suffered personal injuries and property damage from alleged exposure to residual refinery contamination. The Court refused to certify a class. Represented an engineering company in the defense of breach of fiduciary duty and theft of trade secret allegations made by an industrial turbine cleaning subcontractor. The case was tried to a jury for a week in Mobile, Alabama. Plaintiffs sought more than $23 million, but the jury returned a complete defense verdict. Represented a general contractor in a wrongful death lawsuit brought by the surviving family members of a United States Army soldier who was electrocuted while serving in Iraq. The plaintiffs alleged that our client failed to properly ground the electrical equipment at issue. The case was dismissed before trial. Represented a major oil company in the defense of a docket of more than forty legacy oilfield contamination cases pending throughout Louisiana involving claims of soil and groundwater contamination from historical oilfield operations. Represented an automotive service company in various personal injury and wrongful death matters pending in various jurisdictions around the country and related to accidents involving vehicles serviced by the company. Represented a major oil company in defense of groundwater contamination cases brought in Hidalgo County, Texas by more than one hundred property owners. The case was settled on favorable terms.","searchable_name":"Craig J. Ledet","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":428597,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6244,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Lancaster is a Senior Associate with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Jennifer has experience representing\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and medical device companies, as well as other consumer products manufacturers, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial\u0026nbsp;litigation, managing all aspects of case development.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jennifer-lancaster","email":"jlancaster@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3875}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lancaster","nick_name":"Jennifer","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jennifer","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Marie","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Jennifer Marie Lancaster is a lawyer of our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJennifer Lancaster is a Senior Associate with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Jennifer has experience representing\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and medical device companies, as well as other consumer products manufacturers, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial\u0026nbsp;litigation, managing all aspects of case development.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9684}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-06-03T18:36:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-06-03T18:36:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Lancaster{{ FIELD }}Jennifer Lancaster is a Senior Associate with King \u0026amp; Spalding's Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice group. Jennifer has experience representing pharmaceutical and medical device companies, as well as other consumer products manufacturers, in high-stakes mass tort and complex commercial litigation, managing all aspects of case development.\n  Jennifer Marie Lancaster lawyer Senior Associate U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Illinois Missouri Texas","searchable_name":"Jennifer Marie Lancaster","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447793,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6662,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrooks Land is a litigation\u0026nbsp;associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice group. Her practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes mass tort and product liability litigations, including large-scale multi district litigations and class actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brooks served as a law clerk to the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.\u0026nbsp;of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brooks-land","email":"bland@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3304}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1256,"guid":"1256.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Land","nick_name":"Brooks","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, The Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2019 - 2021"}],"first_name":"Brooks","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Brooks Land is a litigation associate in King \u0026 Spalding's New York office. Read more about her.","primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrooks Land is a litigation\u0026nbsp;associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice group. Her practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes mass tort and product liability litigations, including large-scale multi district litigations and class actions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brooks served as a law clerk to the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr.\u0026nbsp;of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12818}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-23T18:53:21.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-23T18:53:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Land{{ FIELD }}Brooks Land is a litigation associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's New York office and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice group. Her practice primarily focuses on representing businesses in high-stakes mass tort and product liability litigations, including large-scale multi district litigations and class actions.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Brooks served as a law clerk to the Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Brooks Land lawyer Senior Associate University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Law Clerk, The Honorable Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","searchable_name":"Brooks Land","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444673,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5637,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStephanie Le is an associate\u0026nbsp;in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice group.\u0026nbsp; She represents Fortune 100 and other large companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, including automotive, breach of contract, copyright infringement, data breach, patent infringement, toxic tort, pharmaceutical and other product liability cases, in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Stephanie served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and the Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStephanie received her Juris Doctor from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, where she served as editor-in-chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNorthwestern Journal of International Human Rights\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; During law school, Stephanie served as a judicial extern for the Honorable Beverly Reid O\u0026rsquo;Connell, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.\u0026nbsp; Stephanie received her Bachelor of Arts in International Relations and Philosophy, Politics, and Law from the University of Southern California, where she graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and with Renaissance Scholar Honors.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"stephanie-le","email":"sle@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Le","nick_name":"Stephanie","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Jay C. Gandhi, Central District of California","years_held":"2016 - 2018"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Autumn D. Spaeth, Central District of California","years_held":"2018 - 2018"}],"first_name":"Stephanie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":1451,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":null},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eStephanie Le is an associate\u0026nbsp;in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Trial and Global Disputes practice group.\u0026nbsp; She represents Fortune 100 and other large companies\u0026nbsp;in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, including automotive, breach of contract, copyright infringement, data breach, patent infringement, toxic tort, pharmaceutical and other product liability cases, in federal and state courts.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Stephanie served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and the Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStephanie received her Juris Doctor from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, where she served as editor-in-chief of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eNorthwestern Journal of International Human Rights\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp; During law school, Stephanie served as a judicial extern for the Honorable Beverly Reid O\u0026rsquo;Connell, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.\u0026nbsp; Stephanie received her Bachelor of Arts in International Relations and Philosophy, Politics, and Law from the University of Southern California, where she graduated\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and with Renaissance Scholar Honors.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7657}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T15:58:37.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T15:58:37.000Z","searchable_text":"Le{{ FIELD }}Stephanie Le is an associate in the Los Angeles office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm’s Trial and Global Disputes practice group.  She represents Fortune 100 and other large companies in a wide range of complex civil litigation matters, including automotive, breach of contract, copyright infringement, data breach, patent infringement, toxic tort, pharmaceutical and other product liability cases, in federal and state courts.\nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Stephanie served as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Jay C. Gandhi, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, and the Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. \nStephanie received her Juris Doctor from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, where she served as editor-in-chief of the Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights.  During law school, Stephanie served as a judicial extern for the Honorable Beverly Reid O’Connell, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  Stephanie received her Bachelor of Arts in International Relations and Philosophy, Politics, and Law from the University of Southern California, where she graduated magna cum laude and with Renaissance Scholar Honors. Senior Associate University of Southern California USC Gould School of Law Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California Judicial Clerk, Hon. Jay C. Gandhi, Central District of California Judicial Clerk, Hon. Autumn D. Spaeth, Central District of California","searchable_name":"Stephanie Le","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":443955,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6828,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren is a senior associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u0026nbsp;practice. Lauren\u0026nbsp;is a trial lawyer, and has been a member of over 10 jury trial teams in cases tried to verdict. Her significant products liability experience has given her\u0026nbsp;the opportunity to represent clients in a variety of arenas such as pharmaceutical products\u0026nbsp;and agricultural products.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren has represented clients in state \u0026amp; federal courts across the country, including Georgia, Illinois, California, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, New Mexico,\u0026nbsp;and the U.S. Virgin Islands. She has experience in all aspects of pre-trial investigation, discovery, taking depositions, motions practice,\u0026nbsp;witness preparation, and cross-examining witnesses during trial. She also has significant experience managing high-volume litigation for a variety of clients in multiple jurisdictions, including developing global, consistent\u0026nbsp;discovery strategies and managing costs by effectively and efficiently blending client teams to include non-lawyer staff and outside vendors when possible.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren maintains a pro-bono practice representing migrants seeking asylum in the United States. Recently, Lauren represented\u0026nbsp;an LGBTQ client from Honduras through her merits hearing, achieving a grant of asylum from the immigration court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren serves as an adjunct professor for the University of Georgia School of Law.\u0026nbsp;She is also actively involved in legal-advocacy training programs, including volunteering to work with moot court and mock trials teams at the high school, undergraduate, and law school levels.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"lauren-lutton","email":"llutton@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3884}]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lutton","nick_name":"Lauren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lauren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2018-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Lauren Lutton is a lawyer of our Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts Practice Group. Read more.","primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren is a senior associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u0026nbsp;practice. Lauren\u0026nbsp;is a trial lawyer, and has been a member of over 10 jury trial teams in cases tried to verdict. Her significant products liability experience has given her\u0026nbsp;the opportunity to represent clients in a variety of arenas such as pharmaceutical products\u0026nbsp;and agricultural products.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren has represented clients in state \u0026amp; federal courts across the country, including Georgia, Illinois, California, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, New Mexico,\u0026nbsp;and the U.S. Virgin Islands. She has experience in all aspects of pre-trial investigation, discovery, taking depositions, motions practice,\u0026nbsp;witness preparation, and cross-examining witnesses during trial. She also has significant experience managing high-volume litigation for a variety of clients in multiple jurisdictions, including developing global, consistent\u0026nbsp;discovery strategies and managing costs by effectively and efficiently blending client teams to include non-lawyer staff and outside vendors when possible.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren maintains a pro-bono practice representing migrants seeking asylum in the United States. Recently, Lauren represented\u0026nbsp;an LGBTQ client from Honduras through her merits hearing, achieving a grant of asylum from the immigration court.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren serves as an adjunct professor for the University of Georgia School of Law.\u0026nbsp;She is also actively involved in legal-advocacy training programs, including volunteering to work with moot court and mock trials teams at the high school, undergraduate, and law school levels.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12900}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:55.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-05T05:01:55.000Z","searchable_text":"Lutton{{ FIELD }}Lauren is a senior associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and a member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice. Lauren is a trial lawyer, and has been a member of over 10 jury trial teams in cases tried to verdict. Her significant products liability experience has given her the opportunity to represent clients in a variety of arenas such as pharmaceutical products and agricultural products.\nLauren has represented clients in state \u0026amp; federal courts across the country, including Georgia, Illinois, California, Connecticut, Florida, Massachusetts, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. She has experience in all aspects of pre-trial investigation, discovery, taking depositions, motions practice, witness preparation, and cross-examining witnesses during trial. She also has significant experience managing high-volume litigation for a variety of clients in multiple jurisdictions, including developing global, consistent discovery strategies and managing costs by effectively and efficiently blending client teams to include non-lawyer staff and outside vendors when possible.\nLauren maintains a pro-bono practice representing migrants seeking asylum in the United States. Recently, Lauren represented an LGBTQ client from Honduras through her merits hearing, achieving a grant of asylum from the immigration court. \nLauren serves as an adjunct professor for the University of Georgia School of Law. She is also actively involved in legal-advocacy training programs, including volunteering to work with moot court and mock trials teams at the high school, undergraduate, and law school levels. Lauren Lutton lawyer Senior Associate University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Clarke-Carley Inn of Court","searchable_name":"Lauren Lutton","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427224,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6536,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eErin Lee is an associate in the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u0026nbsp;practice group in the firm's Atlanta office. Her practice includes\u0026nbsp;complex litigation involving clients in the technology industry.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErin graduated from Duke University\u0026nbsp;in 2020, \u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy. She\u0026nbsp;received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in\u0026nbsp;2024.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"erin-lee","email":"elee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3548}]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Lee","nick_name":"Erin","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Erin","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Erin Lee is an associate in the Product Liability \u0026 Mass Torts practice group in the firm's Atlanta office. Read more about her.","primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eErin Lee is an associate in the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts\u0026nbsp;practice group in the firm's Atlanta office. Her practice includes\u0026nbsp;complex litigation involving clients in the technology industry.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eErin graduated from Duke University\u0026nbsp;in 2020, \u003cem\u003emagna\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ecum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u0026nbsp;with\u0026nbsp;a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy. She\u0026nbsp;received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in\u0026nbsp;2024.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12351}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:20.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:20.000Z","searchable_text":"Lee{{ FIELD }}Erin Lee is an associate in the Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice group in the firm's Atlanta office. Her practice includes complex litigation involving clients in the technology industry.\nErin graduated from Duke University in 2020, magna cum laude, with a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy. She received her J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2024.  Erin Lee lawyer Associate Duke University Duke University School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center","searchable_name":"Erin Lee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444345,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6755,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCaitlin Livingston defends companies in high-stakes products liability and mass tort litigation, with experience spanning\u0026nbsp;consumer\u0026nbsp;products, energy/mining industries, and technology sectors.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"caitlin-livingston","email":"clivingston@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Livingston","nick_name":"Caitlin","clerkships":[{"name":"Intern, Justice Shawn E. LaGrua, Georgia","years_held":"2023 - 2023"},{"name":"Intern, Hon. J. P. Boulee, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"2025 - 2025"}],"first_name":"Caitlin","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":761,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2025-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCaitlin Livingston defends companies in high-stakes products liability and mass tort litigation, with experience spanning\u0026nbsp;consumer\u0026nbsp;products, energy/mining industries, and technology sectors.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13209}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-12-16T20:30:00.000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-16T20:30:00.000Z","searchable_text":"Livingston{{ FIELD }}Caitlin Livingston defends companies in high-stakes products liability and mass tort litigation, with experience spanning consumer products, energy/mining industries, and technology sectors.  Associate Kennesaw State University  Georgia State University Georgia State University College of Law Kennesaw State University  Georgia Intern, Justice Shawn E. LaGrua, Georgia Intern, Hon. J. P. Boulee, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","searchable_name":"Caitlin Livingston","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}