{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":null,"value":72},{"name":null,"value":26},{"name":null,"value":40},{"name":null,"value":27},{"name":null,"value":80},{"name":null,"value":28},{"name":null,"value":35},{"name":null,"value":10},{"name":null,"value":134},{"name":null,"value":121},{"name":null,"value":78},{"name":null,"value":29},{"name":null,"value":32},{"name":null,"value":31},{"name":null,"value":33},{"name":null,"value":126},{"name":null,"value":36},{"name":null,"value":82},{"name":null,"value":37},{"name":null,"value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":null,"value":1},{"name":null,"value":6},{"name":null,"value":71},{"name":null,"value":21},{"name":null,"value":23},{"name":null,"value":116},{"name":null,"value":24},{"name":null,"value":135},{"name":null,"value":25},{"name":null,"value":110},{"name":null,"value":20},{"name":null,"value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":null,"value":129},{"name":null,"value":2},{"name":null,"value":38},{"name":null,"value":3},{"name":null,"value":5},{"name":null,"value":19},{"name":null,"value":7},{"name":null,"value":4},{"name":null,"value":136},{"name":null,"value":13},{"name":null,"value":14},{"name":null,"value":15},{"name":null,"value":17},{"name":null,"value":18},{"name":null,"value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":null,"value":133},{"name":null,"value":106},{"name":null,"value":124},{"name":null,"value":111},{"name":null,"value":132},{"name":null,"value":131},{"name":null,"value":102},{"name":null,"value":125},{"name":null,"value":127},{"name":null,"value":107},{"name":null,"value":112},{"name":null,"value":105},{"name":null,"value":109},{"name":null,"value":103},{"name":null,"value":128},{"name":null,"value":123},{"name":null,"value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"14","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"F","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":446385,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":1848,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy\u0026rsquo;s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called \u0026ldquo;windfall profits\u0026rdquo; taxes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"amy-frey","email":"afrey@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMoldovan nationals and their corporate entities\u003c/strong\u003e in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSwedish nationals and their food and beverage companies\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented more than a dozen \u003cstrong\u003eEuropean-based renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Dutch company\u003c/strong\u003e in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea water concessionaire\u003c/strong\u003e in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eLuxembourg and French renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUAE investors\u003c/strong\u003e in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. gas compression company\u003c/strong\u003e in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Indian company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean African telecom company\u003c/strong\u003e in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003erenewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Frey","nick_name":"Amy","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Amy","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAmy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy\u0026rsquo;s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called \u0026ldquo;windfall profits\u0026rdquo; taxes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eMoldovan nationals and their corporate entities\u003c/strong\u003e in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eSwedish nationals and their food and beverage companies\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented more than a dozen \u003cstrong\u003eEuropean-based renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea Dutch company\u003c/strong\u003e in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea water concessionaire\u003c/strong\u003e in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended \u003cstrong\u003eLuxembourg and French renewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea major U.S. energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean energy company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003eUAE investors\u003c/strong\u003e in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea U.S. gas compression company\u003c/strong\u003e in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean Indian company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ean African telecom company\u003c/strong\u003e in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised \u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003erenewable energy investors\u003c/strong\u003e on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12238}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-03-03T16:07:29.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-03T16:07:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Frey{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Moldovan nationals and their corporate entities in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Swedish nationals and their food and beverage companies in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law.{{ FIELD }}Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of a U.S. energy company against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes.{{ FIELD }}Represented more than a dozen European-based renewable energy investors with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain.{{ FIELD }}Represented a Dutch company in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended a water concessionaire in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor.{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended Luxembourg and French renewable energy investors from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major U.S. energy company in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system.{{ FIELD }}Represented an energy company in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented UAE investors in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims.{{ FIELD }}Represented a U.S. gas compression company in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented an Indian company in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide.{{ FIELD }}Advised an African telecom company in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations.{{ FIELD }}Advised renewable energy investors on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.{{ FIELD }}Amy Frey focuses on all types of cross-border disputes, including investment treaty and commercial arbitration, as well as public international law and human rights law. A partner in our International Arbitration practice, Amy’s experience ranges from representing corporates and investors from all over the world with claims against foreign states arising from bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty to contract and licensing disputes.\nAmy counsels clients in arbitration under the rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and the UN Commission on International Trade Law. She also advises clients on foreign investment structuring and planning, on domestic litigation proceedings involving challenges to and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and on EU disputes involving state aid and intra-EU arbitration. She has represented clients in claims against Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Italy, Kazakhstan, Romania, Spain and Venezuela. Amy is also experienced in handling requests for interim, injunctive relief and in ICSID annulment proceedings.\nRecent matters have concerned complex tax and tariff disputes, including the application of customs duties on imports, changes to corporate income tax regimes, taxes on the export of oil and gas, transport pricing, and so-called “windfall profits” taxes.\nIn addition, Amy takes on public interest law and pro bono projects, particularly involving human rights law, with matters covering domestic violence, child abuse, asylum, juvenile delinquent status and human trafficking. She has long been committed to seeking justice and assistance for refugees. Partner University of Mississippi University of Mississippi School of Law Tulane University Tulane University Law School Oxford University, UK  District of Columbia Texas Paris Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Moldovan nationals and their corporate entities in an Energy Charter Treaty dispute against Kazakhstan. Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of Swedish nationals and their food and beverage companies in an ICSID arbitration against an Eastern European state for breach of a BIT, which included challenges to European Union law. Obtained a multimillion-dollar award on behalf of a U.S. energy company against Ecuador in a treaty dispute involving purported windfall profits taxes. Represented more than a dozen European-based renewable energy investors with claims under the Energy Charter Treaty in disputes against Bulgaria, Italy and Spain. Represented a Dutch company in a BIT dispute against Algeria regarding unilateral modifications to agreed tax provisions. Successfully defended a water concessionaire in ICSID annulment proceedings in which Argentina challenged the award rendered in our client's favor. Successfully defended Luxembourg and French renewable energy investors from ICSID annulment proceedings initiated by Spain. Represented a major U.S. energy company in a dispute with a South American state involving denial of justice by the local court system. Represented an energy company in an ICSID arbitration against Ecuador for the unilateral modification of the participation formula in an oil and gas contract, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims. Represented UAE investors in bilateral investment treaty disputes involving land development contracts and licenses against the Arab Republic of Egypt, in an arbitration that also involved emergency measures for domestic relief connected with human rights claims. Represented a U.S. gas compression company in a bilateral investment treaty dispute against Venezuela in relation to unilateral amendments to a contract. Represented an Indian company in an ICC arbitration proceeding involving intellectual property disputes and breaches of licensing agreements in China, India and worldwide. Advised an African telecom company in relation to attempts of a state to expropriate and/or dissolve its operations. Advised renewable energy investors on potential Energy Charter Treaty disputes against Romania and Portugal.","searchable_name":"Amy Frey","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447578,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5711,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren Friedman is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group and co-leads\u0026nbsp;the firm\u0026rsquo;s energy transition disputes team. She has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record, including cases exceeding 1 billion dollars in dispute. She specializes in\u0026nbsp;energy, tech, and financial services industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBased in New York, Lauren regularly advises and represents clients in complex contractual disputes arising under New York law and international law, often involving major\u0026nbsp;projects and foreign investments. She also has significant experience representing clients in disputes involving other governing laws of the U.S. as well as the laws of Latin America. Lauren speaks Spanish fluently.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren draws praise in the leading industry publications as \u0026ldquo;a favorite among international commentators,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;the first person [to] call with a difficult question of law,\u0026rdquo; and she is\u0026nbsp;commended for her \u0026ldquo;outstanding capacity to generate and execute well defined and complex arguments,\u0026rdquo; her \u0026ldquo;great energy,\u0026rdquo; and her \u0026ldquo;very technical, thorough and professional\u0026rdquo; approach.\u0026nbsp;Chambers USA published that\u0026nbsp;she is \u0026ldquo;very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;she's done a great job getting key decisions for us as a company.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is ranked in \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 Latin America\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho's Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her work as counsel, Lauren is active in a variety of leadership positions and committees, including on the IBA Taskforce for Conflicts of Interest, the IBA Taskforce on Third Party Funding, and the CPR Steering Committee. She is on the panel of arbitrators of the ICDR and is a Member of the SIAC Reserve Panel.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a complement to her broad investor-state and commercial arbitration work, Lauren tracks the legal challenges that arise in response to the energy transition.\u0026nbsp;She has represented and advised clients on unique challenges in this context, including exit strategies and stranded assets.\u0026nbsp;She works actively with the Sabin Center for Climate Change at Columbia University to address the barriers to\u0026nbsp;the development of renewable energy within the United States.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author with D Bishop, \u0026ldquo;The Past, Present, and Future of Energy Disputes: How the Doctrines of Traditional Energy Arbitrations Will Guide Green Transition Cases,\u0026rdquo; GAR Energy (2025)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Reform to Mexican Electricity Law to Come into Effect, Texas Lawyer (March 2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContributor, \u0026ldquo;Hot Topic: Investor-Treaty Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Corporate Disputes (January 2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author with D Bishop, \u0026ldquo;Time after Time: Using Data to Inform the Decision to Disqualify an Arbitrator\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;6 BCDR International Arbitration Review, Issue 1, pp. 149-174 (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Supreme Court Rejects \u0026ldquo;Wholly Groundless\u0026rdquo; Exception to Contractual Delegation of Arbitrability Decisions to Arbitrators (January 2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, EU-Mexico Trade Agreement: What Lies Ahead for the Future of ISDS?, New York Law Journal (May 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Tariffs May Violate Investment Treaty Protections, Law 360 (April 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;The Top-5 News in International Arbitration in 2017,\u0026rdquo; CIAR Global (January 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Creditors\u0026rsquo; Options In Venezuela\u0026rsquo;s Disorderly Default,\u0026rdquo; Law360 (November 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Strategic Considerations in Selecting Emergency Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Law360 (October 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \"Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision Underscores the Importance of Planning to Protect Overseas Investments,\" Mondaq (May 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Towards a Resolution of Outstanding Nationalization Claims Against Cuba,\u0026rdquo; Transnational Dispute Management (April 2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSeminars\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, Bifurcation - Achieving Balance for the Efficient and Fair Resolution of Disputes, CPR Annual Meeting (2025)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, Navigating the Grey: Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, Canada Arbitration Week (2024)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, A Cross-Jurisdictional Review: Sovereign Immunity \u0026amp; Enforcement Actions, New York International Arbitration Center (2024)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFaculty, 2022 ABA International Arbitration Masterclass (2022)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSelecting and Challenging Arbitrators in Investor-State Arbitration, Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrategies for Early Resolution of Investor-State Disputes: Alternative Methods of Resolving Investor-State Disputes, co-hosted by Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment and Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuest Lecturer, \u0026ldquo;Introduction to Investment Treaty Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; University of Chicago Law School (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Appointing and Challenging Arbitrators\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-speaker, \u0026ldquo;Best Practices for Drafting Arbitration Clauses,\u0026rdquo; Ministries of Peru (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-speaker, \u0026ldquo;Strategic Responses to Third Party Funding\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eModerator, \"The Future of Environmental Claims in International Arbitration,\" New York State Bar Association (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Utilizing International Arbitration to Maximize the Effectiveness of Cross-border Investments,\u0026rdquo; Hong Kong Corporate Counsel Association Conference (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;The Call for Specialized Arbitrators, Forums and Procedures in Energy Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; 4th ITA-IEL-ICC Joint Conference on International Energy Arbitration (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Damages in International Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Columbia Law School (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Investment Arbitration: Lessons Learned for States and Investors\u0026rdquo; at the 16th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services, Panama City (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eModerator, The Politics of Investment Treaties: Discussion and Book Launch (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Navigating the Relationship Between Regulators and the Regulated\u0026rdquo; at the 15th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services in Argentina (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities\u0026rdquo; at New York University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities\u0026rdquo; at Harvard University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanel Member, \u0026ldquo;The Restoration of U.S.-Cuba Relations\u0026rdquo; at American University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"lauren-friedman","email":"lfriedman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a major dispute related to construction of LNG facilities in Nigeria, including successful oral argument leading to the early dismissal of two of three contract claims on jurisdictional grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully settled a CPR arbitration on behalf of a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute worth more than more than half a billion dollars related to the termination of a long-term hydrogen supply contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion dollar ICC arbitration against a state-owned oil company arising from a breach of a concession contract resulting in a $2 billion award in favor of the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an ICC arbitration related to the cost-sharing principles contained in a series of seven contracts following a corporate spin-off.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel to a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to its accounting systems, specifically the cost allocation methodology of indirect costs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully settled a dispute on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to the definition of the term EBITDA as used to define the Exercise Price in a Put/Call Agreement, including mediation of the dispute prior to the final hearing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel to a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethird party funder\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an LCIA arbitration arising out of an alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement, including parallel discovery issues in the US courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer of technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC dispute arising from the early termination of an M\u0026amp;A agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million-dollar ICDR arbitration arising from a breach of supply agreement in Brazil resulting in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multimillion-dollar ICC arbitration involving breach of a joint marketing contract, which ended in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two AAA Commercial Arbitration cases regarding violation of forum selection clauses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC arbitration arising out of termination of a merger agreement in response to a material adverse effect.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to a JAMS arbitration regarding violation of forum selection clauses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding enforcement of a $200 million arbitration award\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC mediation arising from the alleged termination of a distribution agreement resulting in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInvestment Treaty Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion dollar ICSID arbitration arising from the expropriation of hydrocarbon and refining assets in Venezuela resulting in an award of $8 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGDF Suez and Aguas de Barcelona\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Argentina resulting in a multi-million dollar award in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million dollar ICSID dispute arising from an expropriation of hydrocarbons resources in the Republic of Ecuador resulting in an award of over $300 million\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eRepublic of Guatemala\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration brought pursuant to the Spain-Guatemala BIT arising from a dispute regarding the calculation of electricity tariffs, resulting in outright dismissal of a $300 million claim\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational petrochemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against a Middle Eastern state arising out the imposition of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMexican shareholders and bondholders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration arising from the first ever resolution of a bank pursuant to the European Commissioner's regulations, which involved the fifth largest bank in Spain, as well as parallel proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and related discovery proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eRepublic of Guatemala\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration arising under the CAFTA-DR related to investments in the electricity sector\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eWestmoreland Coal Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a legacy NAFTA dispute applying the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving the unequal treatment of companies in the phase-out of coal-fired power plants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGDF Suez, AWG and Aguas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;de Barcelona in an arbitration against the Republic of Argentina conducted pursuant to the ICSID Convention and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules under three bilateral investment treaties in connection with investments in water concessions, resulting in a $400 million award in favor of the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSeraf\u0026iacute;n Garc\u0026iacute;a Armas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules arising from the expropriation of a food distribution company in Venezuela resulting in a sizable award in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedia\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecompany in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest oil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational energy company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a potential dispute against the State of Argentina\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest oil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor oil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a 70-million-dollar ICC arbitration arising out of a breach of a gas sales purchase agreement by a Middle Eastern state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational energy company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a potential dispute against the State of Argentina arising out of the development of gas fields.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1237,"guid":"1237.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":132,"guid":"132.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Friedman","nick_name":"Lauren","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Lauren","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2159,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Lauren is very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"Lauren provides smart advice, ready on demand.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"Lauren is an all-round great lawyer.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"I think very highly of her. She's really smart, focused, determined and serious about what she does.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"\"She's incredibly smart and she's just one of those lawyers who is a gifted advocate for her client.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"\"[A] favourite among international commentators\" “She is the first person I call with a difficult question of law\"","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2022"},{"title":"Recognized by","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America, 2020"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauren-friedman-2717783/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLauren Friedman is a partner in the firm\u0026rsquo;s International Disputes group and co-leads\u0026nbsp;the firm\u0026rsquo;s energy transition disputes team. She has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record, including cases exceeding 1 billion dollars in dispute. She specializes in\u0026nbsp;energy, tech, and financial services industries.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBased in New York, Lauren regularly advises and represents clients in complex contractual disputes arising under New York law and international law, often involving major\u0026nbsp;projects and foreign investments. She also has significant experience representing clients in disputes involving other governing laws of the U.S. as well as the laws of Latin America. Lauren speaks Spanish fluently.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLauren draws praise in the leading industry publications as \u0026ldquo;a favorite among international commentators,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;the first person [to] call with a difficult question of law,\u0026rdquo; and she is\u0026nbsp;commended for her \u0026ldquo;outstanding capacity to generate and execute well defined and complex arguments,\u0026rdquo; her \u0026ldquo;great energy,\u0026rdquo; and her \u0026ldquo;very technical, thorough and professional\u0026rdquo; approach.\u0026nbsp;Chambers USA published that\u0026nbsp;she is \u0026ldquo;very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;she's done a great job getting key decisions for us as a company.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShe is ranked in \u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eChambers Global\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eLegal 500 Latin America\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBenchmark Litigation\u003c/em\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eWho's Who Legal\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to her work as counsel, Lauren is active in a variety of leadership positions and committees, including on the IBA Taskforce for Conflicts of Interest, the IBA Taskforce on Third Party Funding, and the CPR Steering Committee. She is on the panel of arbitrators of the ICDR and is a Member of the SIAC Reserve Panel.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs a complement to her broad investor-state and commercial arbitration work, Lauren tracks the legal challenges that arise in response to the energy transition.\u0026nbsp;She has represented and advised clients on unique challenges in this context, including exit strategies and stranded assets.\u0026nbsp;She works actively with the Sabin Center for Climate Change at Columbia University to address the barriers to\u0026nbsp;the development of renewable energy within the United States.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author with D Bishop, \u0026ldquo;The Past, Present, and Future of Energy Disputes: How the Doctrines of Traditional Energy Arbitrations Will Guide Green Transition Cases,\u0026rdquo; GAR Energy (2025)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Reform to Mexican Electricity Law to Come into Effect, Texas Lawyer (March 2021)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContributor, \u0026ldquo;Hot Topic: Investor-Treaty Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Corporate Disputes (January 2020)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author with D Bishop, \u0026ldquo;Time after Time: Using Data to Inform the Decision to Disqualify an Arbitrator\u0026rdquo; \u0026nbsp;6 BCDR International Arbitration Review, Issue 1, pp. 149-174 (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Supreme Court Rejects \u0026ldquo;Wholly Groundless\u0026rdquo; Exception to Contractual Delegation of Arbitrability Decisions to Arbitrators (January 2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, EU-Mexico Trade Agreement: What Lies Ahead for the Future of ISDS?, New York Law Journal (May 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, Tariffs May Violate Investment Treaty Protections, Law 360 (April 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;The Top-5 News in International Arbitration in 2017,\u0026rdquo; CIAR Global (January 2018)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Creditors\u0026rsquo; Options In Venezuela\u0026rsquo;s Disorderly Default,\u0026rdquo; Law360 (November 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Strategic Considerations in Selecting Emergency Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Law360 (October 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \"Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision Underscores the Importance of Planning to Protect Overseas Investments,\" Mondaq (May 2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-author, \u0026ldquo;Towards a Resolution of Outstanding Nationalization Claims Against Cuba,\u0026rdquo; Transnational Dispute Management (April 2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSeminars\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, Bifurcation - Achieving Balance for the Efficient and Fair Resolution of Disputes, CPR Annual Meeting (2025)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, Navigating the Grey: Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, Canada Arbitration Week (2024)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, A Cross-Jurisdictional Review: Sovereign Immunity \u0026amp; Enforcement Actions, New York International Arbitration Center (2024)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFaculty, 2022 ABA International Arbitration Masterclass (2022)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSelecting and Challenging Arbitrators in Investor-State Arbitration, Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStrategies for Early Resolution of Investor-State Disputes: Alternative Methods of Resolving Investor-State Disputes, co-hosted by Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment and Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis (2019)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuest Lecturer, \u0026ldquo;Introduction to Investment Treaty Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; University of Chicago Law School (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Appointing and Challenging Arbitrators\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-speaker, \u0026ldquo;Best Practices for Drafting Arbitration Clauses,\u0026rdquo; Ministries of Peru (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCo-speaker, \u0026ldquo;Strategic Responses to Third Party Funding\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eModerator, \"The Future of Environmental Claims in International Arbitration,\" New York State Bar Association (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Utilizing International Arbitration to Maximize the Effectiveness of Cross-border Investments,\u0026rdquo; Hong Kong Corporate Counsel Association Conference (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;The Call for Specialized Arbitrators, Forums and Procedures in Energy Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; 4th ITA-IEL-ICC Joint Conference on International Energy Arbitration (2017)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Damages in International Arbitration,\u0026rdquo; Columbia Law School (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Investment Arbitration: Lessons Learned for States and Investors\u0026rdquo; at the 16th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services, Panama City (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eModerator, The Politics of Investment Treaties: Discussion and Book Launch (2016)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanelist, \u0026ldquo;Navigating the Relationship Between Regulators and the Regulated\u0026rdquo; at the 15th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services in Argentina (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties\u0026rdquo; at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities\u0026rdquo; at New York University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpeaker, \u0026ldquo;Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities\u0026rdquo; at Harvard University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePanel Member, \u0026ldquo;The Restoration of U.S.-Cuba Relations\u0026rdquo; at American University Law School (2015)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCommercial Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a major dispute related to construction of LNG facilities in Nigeria, including successful oral argument leading to the early dismissal of two of three contract claims on jurisdictional grounds.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully settled a CPR arbitration on behalf of a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a dispute worth more than more than half a billion dollars related to the termination of a long-term hydrogen supply contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented one of the world\u0026rsquo;s largest\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion dollar ICC arbitration against a state-owned oil company arising from a breach of a concession contract resulting in a $2 billion award in favor of the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein an ICC arbitration related to the cost-sharing principles contained in a series of seven contracts following a corporate spin-off.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel to a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epetrochemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to its accounting systems, specifically the cost allocation methodology of indirect costs.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully settled a dispute on behalf of a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate equity company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC arbitration related to the definition of the term EBITDA as used to define the Exercise Price in a Put/Call Agreement, including mediation of the dispute prior to the final hearing.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead counsel to a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ethird party funder\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an LCIA arbitration arising out of an alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement, including parallel discovery issues in the US courts.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer of technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC dispute arising from the early termination of an M\u0026amp;A agreement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million-dollar ICDR arbitration arising from a breach of supply agreement in Brazil resulting in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epublicly-traded pharmaceutical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multimillion-dollar ICC arbitration involving breach of a joint marketing contract, which ended in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounsel to a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in two AAA Commercial Arbitration cases regarding violation of forum selection clauses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a SIAC arbitration arising out of termination of a merger agreement in response to a material adverse effect.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvise a major\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003etechnology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to a JAMS arbitration regarding violation of forum selection clauses.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eglobal investor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;regarding enforcement of a $200 million arbitration award\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emanufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICC mediation arising from the alleged termination of a distribution agreement resulting in a settlement favorable to the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInvestment Treaty Arbitration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Successfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-billion dollar ICSID arbitration arising from the expropriation of hydrocarbon and refining assets in Venezuela resulting in an award of $8 billion\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGDF Suez and Aguas de Barcelona\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against Argentina resulting in a multi-million dollar award in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eConocoPhillips\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a multi-million dollar ICSID dispute arising from an expropriation of hydrocarbons resources in the Republic of Ecuador resulting in an award of over $300 million\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defended the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eRepublic of Guatemala\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration brought pursuant to the Spain-Guatemala BIT arising from a dispute regarding the calculation of electricity tariffs, resulting in outright dismissal of a $300 million claim\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational petrochemical company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration against a Middle Eastern state arising out the imposition of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eMexican shareholders and bondholders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an UNCITRAL arbitration arising from the first ever resolution of a bank pursuant to the European Commissioner's regulations, which involved the fifth largest bank in Spain, as well as parallel proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and related discovery proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eRepublic of Guatemala\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ICSID arbitration arising under the CAFTA-DR related to investments in the electricity sector\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eWestmoreland Coal Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a legacy NAFTA dispute applying the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving the unequal treatment of companies in the phase-out of coal-fired power plants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eGDF Suez, AWG and Aguas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;de Barcelona in an arbitration against the Republic of Argentina conducted pursuant to the ICSID Convention and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules under three bilateral investment treaties in connection with investments in water concessions, resulting in a $400 million award in favor of the client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully represented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSeraf\u0026iacute;n Garc\u0026iacute;a Armas\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules arising from the expropriation of a food distribution company in Venezuela resulting in a sizable award in favor of the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emedia\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecompany in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest oil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational energy company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a potential dispute against the State of Argentina\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising one of the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eworld\u0026rsquo;s largest oil companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emajor oil company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a 70-million-dollar ICC arbitration arising out of a breach of a gas sales purchase agreement by a Middle Eastern state.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvising an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational energy company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a potential dispute against the State of Argentina arising out of the development of gas fields.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Lauren is very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"Lauren provides smart advice, ready on demand.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"Lauren is an all-round great lawyer.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2025"},{"title":"\"I think very highly of her. She's really smart, focused, determined and serious about what she does.\"","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"\"She's incredibly smart and she's just one of those lawyers who is a gifted advocate for her client.\" ","detail":"Chambers USA 2023"},{"title":"\"[A] favourite among international commentators\" “She is the first person I call with a difficult question of law\"","detail":"Who's Who Legal, 2022"},{"title":"Recognized by","detail":"Legal 500 Latin America, 2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11911}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-15T21:20:02.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-15T21:20:02.000Z","searchable_text":"Friedman{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Lauren is very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Lauren provides smart advice, ready on demand.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Lauren is an all-round great lawyer.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"I think very highly of her. She's really smart, focused, determined and serious about what she does.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"She's incredibly smart and she's just one of those lawyers who is a gifted advocate for her client.\\\" \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"[A] favourite among international commentators\\\" “She is the first person I call with a difficult question of law\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Who's Who Legal, 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized by\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 Latin America, 2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Commercial Arbitration\nRepresenting a construction company in a major dispute related to construction of LNG facilities in Nigeria, including successful oral argument leading to the early dismissal of two of three contract claims on jurisdictional grounds.{{ FIELD }}Successfully settled a CPR arbitration on behalf of a major oil company in a dispute worth more than more than half a billion dollars related to the termination of a long-term hydrogen supply contract.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented one of the world’s largest oil companies in a multi-billion dollar ICC arbitration against a state-owned oil company arising from a breach of a concession contract resulting in a $2 billion award in favor of the client{{ FIELD }}Representing a major petrochemical company in an ICC arbitration related to the cost-sharing principles contained in a series of seven contracts following a corporate spin-off.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel to a major petrochemical company in an ICC arbitration related to its accounting systems, specifically the cost allocation methodology of indirect costs.{{ FIELD }}Successfully settled a dispute on behalf of a private equity company in an ICC arbitration related to the definition of the term EBITDA as used to define the Exercise Price in a Put/Call Agreement, including mediation of the dispute prior to the final hearing.{{ FIELD }}Lead counsel to a third party funder in an LCIA arbitration arising out of an alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement, including parallel discovery issues in the US courts.{{ FIELD }}Representing a manufacturer of technology in a SIAC dispute arising from the early termination of an M\u0026amp;A agreement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a publicly-traded medical device company in a multi-million-dollar ICDR arbitration arising from a breach of supply agreement in Brazil resulting in a settlement favorable to the client{{ FIELD }}Advising a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in a multimillion-dollar ICC arbitration involving breach of a joint marketing contract, which ended in a settlement favorable to the client{{ FIELD }}Counsel to a major technology company in two AAA Commercial Arbitration cases regarding violation of forum selection clauses.{{ FIELD }}Defended a technology company in a SIAC arbitration arising out of termination of a merger agreement in response to a material adverse effect.{{ FIELD }}Advise a major technology company in relation to a JAMS arbitration regarding violation of forum selection clauses.{{ FIELD }}Representing a global investor regarding enforcement of a $200 million arbitration award{{ FIELD }}Representing a manufacturer in an ICC mediation arising from the alleged termination of a distribution agreement resulting in a settlement favorable to the client{{ FIELD }}Investment Treaty Arbitration\n Successfully represented ConocoPhillips in a multi-billion dollar ICSID arbitration arising from the expropriation of hydrocarbon and refining assets in Venezuela resulting in an award of $8 billion{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented GDF Suez and Aguas de Barcelona in an ICSID arbitration against Argentina resulting in a multi-million dollar award in favor of the client.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented ConocoPhillips in a multi-million dollar ICSID dispute arising from an expropriation of hydrocarbons resources in the Republic of Ecuador resulting in an award of over $300 million{{ FIELD }}Successfully defended the Republic of Guatemala in an ICSID arbitration brought pursuant to the Spain-Guatemala BIT arising from a dispute regarding the calculation of electricity tariffs, resulting in outright dismissal of a $300 million claim{{ FIELD }}Representing an international petrochemical company in an ICSID arbitration against a Middle Eastern state arising out the imposition of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes.{{ FIELD }}Represented Mexican shareholders and bondholders in an UNCITRAL arbitration arising from the first ever resolution of a bank pursuant to the European Commissioner's regulations, which involved the fifth largest bank in Spain, as well as parallel proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and related discovery proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Defended the Republic of Guatemala in an ICSID arbitration arising under the CAFTA-DR related to investments in the electricity sector{{ FIELD }}Represented Westmoreland Coal Company in a legacy NAFTA dispute applying the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving the unequal treatment of companies in the phase-out of coal-fired power plants.{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented GDF Suez, AWG and Aguas de Barcelona in an arbitration against the Republic of Argentina conducted pursuant to the ICSID Convention and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules under three bilateral investment treaties in connection with investments in water concessions, resulting in a $400 million award in favor of the client{{ FIELD }}Successfully represented Serafín García Armas in an arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules arising from the expropriation of a food distribution company in Venezuela resulting in a sizable award in favor of the client.{{ FIELD }}Advised a media company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina{{ FIELD }}Advising one of the world’s largest oil companies in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract{{ FIELD }}Advised an international energy company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina{{ FIELD }}Advising one of the world’s largest oil companies in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract.{{ FIELD }}Advising a major oil company in a 70-million-dollar ICC arbitration arising out of a breach of a gas sales purchase agreement by a Middle Eastern state.{{ FIELD }}Advising an international energy company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina arising out of the development of gas fields.{{ FIELD }}Lauren Friedman is a partner in the firm’s International Disputes group and co-leads the firm’s energy transition disputes team. She has represented clients in several of the largest international commercial and investment arbitrations on record, including cases exceeding 1 billion dollars in dispute. She specializes in energy, tech, and financial services industries. \nBased in New York, Lauren regularly advises and represents clients in complex contractual disputes arising under New York law and international law, often involving major projects and foreign investments. She also has significant experience representing clients in disputes involving other governing laws of the U.S. as well as the laws of Latin America. Lauren speaks Spanish fluently. \nLauren draws praise in the leading industry publications as “a favorite among international commentators,” “the first person [to] call with a difficult question of law,” and she is commended for her “outstanding capacity to generate and execute well defined and complex arguments,” her “great energy,” and her “very technical, thorough and professional” approach. Chambers USA published that she is “very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate” and “she's done a great job getting key decisions for us as a company.” \nShe is ranked in Chambers USA, Chambers Global, Legal 500 Latin America, Benchmark Litigation, and Who's Who Legal. \nIn addition to her work as counsel, Lauren is active in a variety of leadership positions and committees, including on the IBA Taskforce for Conflicts of Interest, the IBA Taskforce on Third Party Funding, and the CPR Steering Committee. She is on the panel of arbitrators of the ICDR and is a Member of the SIAC Reserve Panel.    \nAs a complement to her broad investor-state and commercial arbitration work, Lauren tracks the legal challenges that arise in response to the energy transition. She has represented and advised clients on unique challenges in this context, including exit strategies and stranded assets. She works actively with the Sabin Center for Climate Change at Columbia University to address the barriers to the development of renewable energy within the United States. \nPublications\n\nCo-author with D Bishop, “The Past, Present, and Future of Energy Disputes: How the Doctrines of Traditional Energy Arbitrations Will Guide Green Transition Cases,” GAR Energy (2025)\nCo-author, Reform to Mexican Electricity Law to Come into Effect, Texas Lawyer (March 2021)\nContributor, “Hot Topic: Investor-Treaty Arbitration,” Corporate Disputes (January 2020)\nCo-author with D Bishop, “Time after Time: Using Data to Inform the Decision to Disqualify an Arbitrator”  6 BCDR International Arbitration Review, Issue 1, pp. 149-174 (2019)\nCo-author, Supreme Court Rejects “Wholly Groundless” Exception to Contractual Delegation of Arbitrability Decisions to Arbitrators (January 2019)\nCo-author, EU-Mexico Trade Agreement: What Lies Ahead for the Future of ISDS?, New York Law Journal (May 2018)\nCo-author, Tariffs May Violate Investment Treaty Protections, Law 360 (April 2018)\nCo-author, “The Top-5 News in International Arbitration in 2017,” CIAR Global (January 2018)\nCo-author, “Creditors’ Options In Venezuela’s Disorderly Default,” Law360 (November 2017)\nCo-author, “Strategic Considerations in Selecting Emergency Arbitration,” Law360 (October 2017)\nCo-author, \"Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decision Underscores the Importance of Planning to Protect Overseas Investments,\" Mondaq (May 2017)\nCo-author, “Towards a Resolution of Outstanding Nationalization Claims Against Cuba,” Transnational Dispute Management (April 2016)\n\nSeminars\n\nSpeaker, Bifurcation - Achieving Balance for the Efficient and Fair Resolution of Disputes, CPR Annual Meeting (2025)\nSpeaker, Navigating the Grey: Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration, Canada Arbitration Week (2024)\nSpeaker, A Cross-Jurisdictional Review: Sovereign Immunity \u0026amp; Enforcement Actions, New York International Arbitration Center (2024)\nFaculty, 2022 ABA International Arbitration Masterclass (2022)\nSelecting and Challenging Arbitrators in Investor-State Arbitration, Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2019)\nStrategies for Early Resolution of Investor-State Disputes: Alternative Methods of Resolving Investor-State Disputes, co-hosted by Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment and Kirkland \u0026amp; Ellis (2019)\nGuest Lecturer, “Introduction to Investment Treaty Arbitration,” University of Chicago Law School (2017)\nSpeaker, “Appointing and Challenging Arbitrators” at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\nCo-speaker, “Best Practices for Drafting Arbitration Clauses,” Ministries of Peru (2017)\nCo-speaker, “Strategic Responses to Third Party Funding” at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2017)\nModerator, \"The Future of Environmental Claims in International Arbitration,\" New York State Bar Association (2017)\nPanelist, “Utilizing International Arbitration to Maximize the Effectiveness of Cross-border Investments,” Hong Kong Corporate Counsel Association Conference (2017)\nPanelist, “The Call for Specialized Arbitrators, Forums and Procedures in Energy Arbitration,” 4th ITA-IEL-ICC Joint Conference on International Energy Arbitration (2017)\nPanelist, “Damages in International Arbitration,” Columbia Law School (2016)\nSpeaker, “Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties” at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2016)\nSpeaker, “Investment Arbitration: Lessons Learned for States and Investors” at the 16th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services, Panama City (2016)\nModerator, The Politics of Investment Treaties: Discussion and Book Launch (2016)\nPanelist, “Navigating the Relationship Between Regulators and the Regulated” at the 15th International Seminar on Regulation for Public Services in Argentina (2015)\nSpeaker, “Liability for Regulatory Conduct Under Investment Treaties” at Columbia University Institute for Sustainable Investment: Executive Training on Investment Arbitration for Government Officials (2015)\nSpeaker, “Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities” at New York University Law School (2015)\nSpeaker, “Settlement of Pending Claims Between the U.S. and Cuba: Outlook and Possibilities” at Harvard University Law School (2015)\nPanel Member, “The Restoration of U.S.-Cuba Relations” at American University Law School (2015)\n Partner \"Lauren is very quick on her feet and is a very good oral advocate.\" Chambers USA 2025 \"Lauren provides smart advice, ready on demand.\" Chambers USA 2025 \"Lauren is an all-round great lawyer.\" Chambers USA 2025 \"I think very highly of her. She's really smart, focused, determined and serious about what she does.\" Chambers USA 2023 \"She's incredibly smart and she's just one of those lawyers who is a gifted advocate for her client.\"  Chambers USA 2023 \"[A] favourite among international commentators\" “She is the first person I call with a difficult question of law\" Who's Who Legal, 2022 Recognized by Legal 500 Latin America, 2020 Cornell University Cornell Law School University of California, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley, School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Member, International Bar Association Sub-Committee on Investment Arbitration Lecturer, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (2015-2019) Peer Reviewer, Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy (2019-2020) Member, United States Council for International Business Member, ArbitralWomen Member, Task Force for the Revision of the 2014 Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration Commercial Arbitration\nRepresenting a construction company in a major dispute related to construction of LNG facilities in Nigeria, including successful oral argument leading to the early dismissal of two of three contract claims on jurisdictional grounds. Successfully settled a CPR arbitration on behalf of a major oil company in a dispute worth more than more than half a billion dollars related to the termination of a long-term hydrogen supply contract. Successfully represented one of the world’s largest oil companies in a multi-billion dollar ICC arbitration against a state-owned oil company arising from a breach of a concession contract resulting in a $2 billion award in favor of the client Representing a major petrochemical company in an ICC arbitration related to the cost-sharing principles contained in a series of seven contracts following a corporate spin-off. Lead counsel to a major petrochemical company in an ICC arbitration related to its accounting systems, specifically the cost allocation methodology of indirect costs. Successfully settled a dispute on behalf of a private equity company in an ICC arbitration related to the definition of the term EBITDA as used to define the Exercise Price in a Put/Call Agreement, including mediation of the dispute prior to the final hearing. Lead counsel to a third party funder in an LCIA arbitration arising out of an alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement, including parallel discovery issues in the US courts. Representing a manufacturer of technology in a SIAC dispute arising from the early termination of an M\u0026amp;A agreement. Representing a publicly-traded medical device company in a multi-million-dollar ICDR arbitration arising from a breach of supply agreement in Brazil resulting in a settlement favorable to the client Advising a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company in a multimillion-dollar ICC arbitration involving breach of a joint marketing contract, which ended in a settlement favorable to the client Counsel to a major technology company in two AAA Commercial Arbitration cases regarding violation of forum selection clauses. Defended a technology company in a SIAC arbitration arising out of termination of a merger agreement in response to a material adverse effect. Advise a major technology company in relation to a JAMS arbitration regarding violation of forum selection clauses. Representing a global investor regarding enforcement of a $200 million arbitration award Representing a manufacturer in an ICC mediation arising from the alleged termination of a distribution agreement resulting in a settlement favorable to the client Investment Treaty Arbitration\n Successfully represented ConocoPhillips in a multi-billion dollar ICSID arbitration arising from the expropriation of hydrocarbon and refining assets in Venezuela resulting in an award of $8 billion Successfully represented GDF Suez and Aguas de Barcelona in an ICSID arbitration against Argentina resulting in a multi-million dollar award in favor of the client. Successfully represented ConocoPhillips in a multi-million dollar ICSID dispute arising from an expropriation of hydrocarbons resources in the Republic of Ecuador resulting in an award of over $300 million Successfully defended the Republic of Guatemala in an ICSID arbitration brought pursuant to the Spain-Guatemala BIT arising from a dispute regarding the calculation of electricity tariffs, resulting in outright dismissal of a $300 million claim Representing an international petrochemical company in an ICSID arbitration against a Middle Eastern state arising out the imposition of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes. Represented Mexican shareholders and bondholders in an UNCITRAL arbitration arising from the first ever resolution of a bank pursuant to the European Commissioner's regulations, which involved the fifth largest bank in Spain, as well as parallel proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union and related discovery proceedings. Defended the Republic of Guatemala in an ICSID arbitration arising under the CAFTA-DR related to investments in the electricity sector Represented Westmoreland Coal Company in a legacy NAFTA dispute applying the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules involving the unequal treatment of companies in the phase-out of coal-fired power plants. Successfully represented GDF Suez, AWG and Aguas de Barcelona in an arbitration against the Republic of Argentina conducted pursuant to the ICSID Convention and the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules under three bilateral investment treaties in connection with investments in water concessions, resulting in a $400 million award in favor of the client Successfully represented Serafín García Armas in an arbitration pursuant to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules arising from the expropriation of a food distribution company in Venezuela resulting in a sizable award in favor of the client. Advised a media company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina Advising one of the world’s largest oil companies in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract Advised an international energy company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina Advising one of the world’s largest oil companies in a billion-dollar ICSID dispute against a foreign State regarding distribution of profits in a hydrocarbons contract. Advising a major oil company in a 70-million-dollar ICC arbitration arising out of a breach of a gas sales purchase agreement by a Middle Eastern state. Advising an international energy company in a potential dispute against the State of Argentina arising out of the development of gas fields.","searchable_name":"Lauren Friedman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442818,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5741,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeanne-fugate","email":"jfugate@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugate","nick_name":"Jeanne","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2003 - 2004"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2002 - 2003"}],"first_name":"Jeanne","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2001-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8078}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugate{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended for Trade Secret\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2018, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement{{ FIELD }}Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees{{ FIELD }}Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors{{ FIELD }}Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction{{ FIELD }}Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement{{ FIELD }}Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing{{ FIELD }}Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved{{ FIELD }}Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage{{ FIELD }}Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients{{ FIELD }}Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss{{ FIELD }}Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme{{ FIELD }}In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week{{ FIELD }}Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints{{ FIELD }}Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees.{{ FIELD }}Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions{{ FIELD }}Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident{{ FIELD }}Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed{{ FIELD }}Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings{{ FIELD }}Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection{{ FIELD }}Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute{{ FIELD }}Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs{{ FIELD }}Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro{{ FIELD }}Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term{{ FIELD }}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n {{ FIELD }}Jeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\nJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice. \nJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill’s daily newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel. Partner Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California Daily Journal 2023 Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the  Los Angeles Business Journal 2017 Recommended for Trade Secret Legal 500 US 2023 Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California Daily Journal 2018, 2019 Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment Law360 2024 Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024 Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list Los Angeles Business Journal 2023 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law New York University New York University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California New York President, Los Angeles Civil Service Commission Board Member and President-Elect, California ChangeLawyers Board Member and Dinner Committee Chair, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Member, Sedona Conference WG12 Model Defend Trade Secrets Act Jury Instructions Brainstorming Group (committee working to draft model jury instructions to be used in DTSA cases) Member, CJA/CLA Civility in the Legal Profession Task Force LA Board of Directors and Co-Chair Government Relations Committee, Federal Bar Association Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees. Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer. Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n ","searchable_name":"Jeanne A. Fugate","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444728,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6787,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jackie-fugitt","email":"jfugitt@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1166,"guid":"1166.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugitt","nick_name":"Jackie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jackie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2489,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12289}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugitt{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings{{ FIELD }}Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition{{ FIELD }}Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation{{ FIELD }}Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction{{ FIELD }}Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement{{ FIELD }}Jackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.  Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in litigation related to contract, securities, and antitrust matters.\nJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy, pharmaceutical and retail industries.  Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.   Partner Missouri State University  Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement","searchable_name":"Jackie Fugitt","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}