{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Chairman","value":"Chairman"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Financial Officer","value":"Chief Financial Officer"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce Law Center","value":734},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Leeds School of Law","value":2850},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"133","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"C","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":446321,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5906,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice. Craig\u0026rsquo;s experience heading one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, co-chairing the litigation department of an AmLaw 50 law firm and as an SEC enforcement attorney helps him solve his clients\u0026rsquo; most complex and sensitive problems.\u0026nbsp; Bringing over two decades of experience as a litigator in private and public practice, Craig has a proven track record of success in counseling financial services and healthcare clients through government investigations and high-stakes litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eImmediately prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Craig served as the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, directing all federal criminal and civil matters in the state of New Jersey.\u0026nbsp; As U.S. Attorney, Craig made significant organizational changes, including creating the nation\u0026rsquo;s first standalone opioid enforcement unit and the District\u0026rsquo;s first cybercrimes unit.\u0026nbsp; Craig also expanded the\u0026nbsp; number of federal prosecutors in New Jersey addressing healthcare, government fraud and civil rights investigations and prosecutions.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;In August 2018, working with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Fraud Section, he announced the formation of the first Medicare Strike Force in New Jersey.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring his tenure as U.S. Attorney, Craig was personally engaged on a number of investigations and prosecutions, including oversite of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Consent Decree with the Newark Police Department and significant healthcare, accounting and financial fraud matters, as well as matters involving key federal enforcement statutes, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, False Claims Act, and Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.\u0026nbsp; In 2019, while he was U.S. Attorney, Craig successfully tried a case to verdict, convicting the leader of a drug trafficking organization and securing a 24-year prison term at sentencing.\u0026nbsp; Craig also brings extensive crisis management experience from his tenure, including notably chairing DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national COVID-19 Hoarding and Price Gouging Task Force, as well as directly overseeing investigations of two hate-based domestic terrorism attacks in New Jersey during his tenure.\u0026nbsp; He was a member of the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s advisory subcommittees on healthcare fraud and cyber security and cryptocurrencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his service as U.S. Attorney, Craig spent ten years as a partner at an AmLaw 50 law firm, where he was co-chair of the firm\u0026rsquo;s litigation and trial practice group and also led its white collar, government and internal investigations team.\u0026nbsp; Craig represented corporate and individual clients in domestic investigations by the DOJ, SEC, CFTC, HHS, OFAC, and IRS, as well as FINRA, BATS, ICE, CME and various states' attorneys general offices. He counseled companies and individuals in international investigations, including matters before the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Office of International Affairs and the UK\u0026rsquo;s Financial Conduct Authority and Serious Fraud Office.\u0026nbsp; Craig also represented clients in complex civil litigations and trials in federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, Craig served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Securities and Health Care Fraud Unit in New Jersey where he investigated and prosecuted numerous complex fraud cases, including the successful trial of Cendant Corp. CEO Walter Forbes.\u0026nbsp; Craig also served as a senior counsel in the New York Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission\u0026rsquo;s Division of Enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecent Publication:\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eCo-authored a chapter in PLI\u0026rsquo;s \u003cem\u003eSEC Compliance and Enforcement Answer Book on Multinational Aspects of SEC Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"craig-carpenito","email":"ccarpenito@kslaw.com","phone":"","matters":["\u003cp\u003eConducted high-stakes internal investigations for major financial services and healthcare companies involving the federal securities and commodities laws, broker-dealer and investment advisor regulations, and healthcare laws and regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational financial services company in parallel investigations by federal and state regulators relating to its RMBS practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a sitting Governor in a criminal investigation concerning allegations of official misconduct.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a key figure in the \u0026ldquo;Bridgegate\u0026rdquo; matter in parallel investigations by the New Jersey Legislative Select Committee on Investigations and the Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented high-level executives of global financial institutions in multinational investigations into the possible manipulation of key financial benchmarks, including LIBOR, EURIBOR and ISDAfix.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a senior health care executive in parallel investigations concerning alleged violations of federal and state False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former Dewey \u0026amp; Leboeuf employee in the New York County District Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u0026rsquo;s investigation of the downfall of the firm, successfully obtaining immunity for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multiple traders and sales personnel in investigations by the DOJ and SEC into the RMBS and CMBS trading practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation and represented a health care provider in parallel investigations concerning federal and state False Claims Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation on behalf of the Special Committee of an international corporation concerning potential financial improprieties resulting in a restatement, violations of the of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and potential insider trading by a key employee, and represented the Committee in resulting parallel investigations by the DOJ and SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a worldwide financial services provider in an internal investigation of potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and OFAC regulations by an employee who attempted to broker deals with the Iranian government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a registered investment advisor from the most serious fraud allegations being investigated by the SEC and CFTC stemming from its valuation of Level III assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented investment companies, broker-dealers, funds and numerous individuals in several high-profile insider trading investigations and prosecutions by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, CFTC and foreign regulators, including those stemming from the high-profile \u0026ldquo;expert networking\u0026rdquo; investigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":952,"guid":"952.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1188,"guid":"1188.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":803,"guid":"803.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carpenito","nick_name":"Craig","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Craig","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":1790,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2000-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked as a leading lawyer in two practice areas: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations and Healthcare","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Described as \"an outstanding attorney and seasoned white-collar adviser\" that is “extremely dedicated to his clients”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He brings great judgment in everything from legal strategy to public affairs to all the things that matter in a crisis\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Described by a healthcare client as having \"deep subject matter knowledge.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Ranked as a leading financial services lawyer \"with extensive governmental and regulatory expertise.\"","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in white-collar defense and government/internal investigations","detail":"Law360, 2012"},{"title":"Selected to New York Metro Super Lawyers from 2011 until his DOJ appointment in 2018","detail":"Super Lawyers"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/craig-carpenito-a3269612/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice. Craig\u0026rsquo;s experience heading one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest U.S. Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Offices, co-chairing the litigation department of an AmLaw 50 law firm and as an SEC enforcement attorney helps him solve his clients\u0026rsquo; most complex and sensitive problems.\u0026nbsp; Bringing over two decades of experience as a litigator in private and public practice, Craig has a proven track record of success in counseling financial services and healthcare clients through government investigations and high-stakes litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eImmediately prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Craig served as the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, directing all federal criminal and civil matters in the state of New Jersey.\u0026nbsp; As U.S. Attorney, Craig made significant organizational changes, including creating the nation\u0026rsquo;s first standalone opioid enforcement unit and the District\u0026rsquo;s first cybercrimes unit.\u0026nbsp; Craig also expanded the\u0026nbsp; number of federal prosecutors in New Jersey addressing healthcare, government fraud and civil rights investigations and prosecutions.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;In August 2018, working with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Fraud Section, he announced the formation of the first Medicare Strike Force in New Jersey.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring his tenure as U.S. Attorney, Craig was personally engaged on a number of investigations and prosecutions, including oversite of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Consent Decree with the Newark Police Department and significant healthcare, accounting and financial fraud matters, as well as matters involving key federal enforcement statutes, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, False Claims Act, and Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.\u0026nbsp; In 2019, while he was U.S. Attorney, Craig successfully tried a case to verdict, convicting the leader of a drug trafficking organization and securing a 24-year prison term at sentencing.\u0026nbsp; Craig also brings extensive crisis management experience from his tenure, including notably chairing DOJ\u0026rsquo;s national COVID-19 Hoarding and Price Gouging Task Force, as well as directly overseeing investigations of two hate-based domestic terrorism attacks in New Jersey during his tenure.\u0026nbsp; He was a member of the Attorney General\u0026rsquo;s advisory subcommittees on healthcare fraud and cyber security and cryptocurrencies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to his service as U.S. Attorney, Craig spent ten years as a partner at an AmLaw 50 law firm, where he was co-chair of the firm\u0026rsquo;s litigation and trial practice group and also led its white collar, government and internal investigations team.\u0026nbsp; Craig represented corporate and individual clients in domestic investigations by the DOJ, SEC, CFTC, HHS, OFAC, and IRS, as well as FINRA, BATS, ICE, CME and various states' attorneys general offices. He counseled companies and individuals in international investigations, including matters before the SEC\u0026rsquo;s Office of International Affairs and the UK\u0026rsquo;s Financial Conduct Authority and Serious Fraud Office.\u0026nbsp; Craig also represented clients in complex civil litigations and trials in federal and state courts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEarlier in his career, Craig served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Securities and Health Care Fraud Unit in New Jersey where he investigated and prosecuted numerous complex fraud cases, including the successful trial of Cendant Corp. CEO Walter Forbes.\u0026nbsp; Craig also served as a senior counsel in the New York Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission\u0026rsquo;s Division of Enforcement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecent Publication:\u003cbr /\u003e\u003c/strong\u003eCo-authored a chapter in PLI\u0026rsquo;s \u003cem\u003eSEC Compliance and Enforcement Answer Book on Multinational Aspects of SEC Investigations\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eConducted high-stakes internal investigations for major financial services and healthcare companies involving the federal securities and commodities laws, broker-dealer and investment advisor regulations, and healthcare laws and regulations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a multinational financial services company in parallel investigations by federal and state regulators relating to its RMBS practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a sitting Governor in a criminal investigation concerning allegations of official misconduct.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a key figure in the \u0026ldquo;Bridgegate\u0026rdquo; matter in parallel investigations by the New Jersey Legislative Select Committee on Investigations and the Department of Justice.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented high-level executives of global financial institutions in multinational investigations into the possible manipulation of key financial benchmarks, including LIBOR, EURIBOR and ISDAfix.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a senior health care executive in parallel investigations concerning alleged violations of federal and state False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statutes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a former Dewey \u0026amp; Leboeuf employee in the New York County District Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u0026rsquo;s investigation of the downfall of the firm, successfully obtaining immunity for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented multiple traders and sales personnel in investigations by the DOJ and SEC into the RMBS and CMBS trading practices.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation and represented a health care provider in parallel investigations concerning federal and state False Claims Act violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an internal investigation on behalf of the Special Committee of an international corporation concerning potential financial improprieties resulting in a restatement, violations of the of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and potential insider trading by a key employee, and represented the Committee in resulting parallel investigations by the DOJ and SEC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a worldwide financial services provider in an internal investigation of potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and OFAC regulations by an employee who attempted to broker deals with the Iranian government.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a registered investment advisor from the most serious fraud allegations being investigated by the SEC and CFTC stemming from its valuation of Level III assets.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented investment companies, broker-dealers, funds and numerous individuals in several high-profile insider trading investigations and prosecutions by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, CFTC and foreign regulators, including those stemming from the high-profile \u0026ldquo;expert networking\u0026rdquo; investigation.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ranked as a leading lawyer in two practice areas: White-Collar Crime \u0026 Government Investigations and Healthcare","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Described as \"an outstanding attorney and seasoned white-collar adviser\" that is “extremely dedicated to his clients”","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"\"He brings great judgment in everything from legal strategy to public affairs to all the things that matter in a crisis\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Described by a healthcare client as having \"deep subject matter knowledge.\"","detail":"Chambers USA"},{"title":"Ranked as a leading financial services lawyer \"with extensive governmental and regulatory expertise.\"","detail":"Legal 500"},{"title":"Named a Rising Star in white-collar defense and government/internal investigations","detail":"Law360, 2012"},{"title":"Selected to New York Metro Super Lawyers from 2011 until his DOJ appointment in 2018","detail":"Super Lawyers"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8527}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:43.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-02T21:59:43.000Z","searchable_text":"Carpenito{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked as a leading lawyer in two practice areas: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations and Healthcare\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Described as \\\"an outstanding attorney and seasoned white-collar adviser\\\" that is “extremely dedicated to his clients”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"He brings great judgment in everything from legal strategy to public affairs to all the things that matter in a crisis\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Described by a healthcare client as having \\\"deep subject matter knowledge.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ranked as a leading financial services lawyer \\\"with extensive governmental and regulatory expertise.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named a Rising Star in white-collar defense and government/internal investigations\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2012\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected to New York Metro Super Lawyers from 2011 until his DOJ appointment in 2018\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers\"}{{ FIELD }}Conducted high-stakes internal investigations for major financial services and healthcare companies involving the federal securities and commodities laws, broker-dealer and investment advisor regulations, and healthcare laws and regulations.{{ FIELD }}Represented a multinational financial services company in parallel investigations by federal and state regulators relating to its RMBS practices.{{ FIELD }}Represented a sitting Governor in a criminal investigation concerning allegations of official misconduct.{{ FIELD }}Represented a key figure in the “Bridgegate” matter in parallel investigations by the New Jersey Legislative Select Committee on Investigations and the Department of Justice.{{ FIELD }}Represented high-level executives of global financial institutions in multinational investigations into the possible manipulation of key financial benchmarks, including LIBOR, EURIBOR and ISDAfix.{{ FIELD }}Represented a senior health care executive in parallel investigations concerning alleged violations of federal and state False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statutes.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former Dewey \u0026amp; Leboeuf employee in the New York County District Attorney’s Office’s investigation of the downfall of the firm, successfully obtaining immunity for the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented multiple traders and sales personnel in investigations by the DOJ and SEC into the RMBS and CMBS trading practices.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal investigation and represented a health care provider in parallel investigations concerning federal and state False Claims Act violations.{{ FIELD }}Conducted an internal investigation on behalf of the Special Committee of an international corporation concerning potential financial improprieties resulting in a restatement, violations of the of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and potential insider trading by a key employee, and represented the Committee in resulting parallel investigations by the DOJ and SEC.{{ FIELD }}Represented a worldwide financial services provider in an internal investigation of potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and OFAC regulations by an employee who attempted to broker deals with the Iranian government.{{ FIELD }}Defended a registered investment advisor from the most serious fraud allegations being investigated by the SEC and CFTC stemming from its valuation of Level III assets.{{ FIELD }}Represented investment companies, broker-dealers, funds and numerous individuals in several high-profile insider trading investigations and prosecutions by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, CFTC and foreign regulators, including those stemming from the high-profile “expert networking” investigation.{{ FIELD }}Former U.S. Attorney Craig Carpenito is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice. Craig’s experience heading one of the nation’s largest U.S. Attorney’s Offices, co-chairing the litigation department of an AmLaw 50 law firm and as an SEC enforcement attorney helps him solve his clients’ most complex and sensitive problems.  Bringing over two decades of experience as a litigator in private and public practice, Craig has a proven track record of success in counseling financial services and healthcare clients through government investigations and high-stakes litigation.\nImmediately prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Craig served as the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, directing all federal criminal and civil matters in the state of New Jersey.  As U.S. Attorney, Craig made significant organizational changes, including creating the nation’s first standalone opioid enforcement unit and the District’s first cybercrimes unit.  Craig also expanded the  number of federal prosecutors in New Jersey addressing healthcare, government fraud and civil rights investigations and prosecutions.   In August 2018, working with DOJ’s Fraud Section, he announced the formation of the first Medicare Strike Force in New Jersey. \nDuring his tenure as U.S. Attorney, Craig was personally engaged on a number of investigations and prosecutions, including oversite of DOJ’s Consent Decree with the Newark Police Department and significant healthcare, accounting and financial fraud matters, as well as matters involving key federal enforcement statutes, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, False Claims Act, and Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.  In 2019, while he was U.S. Attorney, Craig successfully tried a case to verdict, convicting the leader of a drug trafficking organization and securing a 24-year prison term at sentencing.  Craig also brings extensive crisis management experience from his tenure, including notably chairing DOJ’s national COVID-19 Hoarding and Price Gouging Task Force, as well as directly overseeing investigations of two hate-based domestic terrorism attacks in New Jersey during his tenure.  He was a member of the Attorney General’s advisory subcommittees on healthcare fraud and cyber security and cryptocurrencies.\nPrior to his service as U.S. Attorney, Craig spent ten years as a partner at an AmLaw 50 law firm, where he was co-chair of the firm’s litigation and trial practice group and also led its white collar, government and internal investigations team.  Craig represented corporate and individual clients in domestic investigations by the DOJ, SEC, CFTC, HHS, OFAC, and IRS, as well as FINRA, BATS, ICE, CME and various states' attorneys general offices. He counseled companies and individuals in international investigations, including matters before the SEC’s Office of International Affairs and the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority and Serious Fraud Office.  Craig also represented clients in complex civil litigations and trials in federal and state courts.\nEarlier in his career, Craig served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Securities and Health Care Fraud Unit in New Jersey where he investigated and prosecuted numerous complex fraud cases, including the successful trial of Cendant Corp. CEO Walter Forbes.  Craig also served as a senior counsel in the New York Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement.\nRecent Publication:Co-authored a chapter in PLI’s SEC Compliance and Enforcement Answer Book on Multinational Aspects of SEC Investigations Partner Ranked as a leading lawyer in two practice areas: White-Collar Crime \u0026amp; Government Investigations and Healthcare Chambers USA Described as \"an outstanding attorney and seasoned white-collar adviser\" that is “extremely dedicated to his clients” Chambers USA \"He brings great judgment in everything from legal strategy to public affairs to all the things that matter in a crisis\" Chambers USA Described by a healthcare client as having \"deep subject matter knowledge.\" Chambers USA Ranked as a leading financial services lawyer \"with extensive governmental and regulatory expertise.\" Legal 500 Named a Rising Star in white-collar defense and government/internal investigations Law360, 2012 Selected to New York Metro Super Lawyers from 2011 until his DOJ appointment in 2018 Super Lawyers Rider University  Seton Hall University Seton Hall University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey New Jersey New York American Bar Association National Association of Former United States Attorneys (NAFUSA) The New York Council of Defense Lawyers (NYCDL) The Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers of New Jersey New Jersey Reentry Corporation Training Center Board of Trustees New York State Bar Association New Jersey State Bar Association Association of the Federal Bar of New Jersey (Advisory Committee Member) SIFMA, Legal and Compliance Division Association of Securities and Exchange Commission Alumni The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey Alumni Association United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Lawyer’s Advisory Committee Seton Hall University School of Law Board of Visitors Conducted high-stakes internal investigations for major financial services and healthcare companies involving the federal securities and commodities laws, broker-dealer and investment advisor regulations, and healthcare laws and regulations. Represented a multinational financial services company in parallel investigations by federal and state regulators relating to its RMBS practices. Represented a sitting Governor in a criminal investigation concerning allegations of official misconduct. Represented a key figure in the “Bridgegate” matter in parallel investigations by the New Jersey Legislative Select Committee on Investigations and the Department of Justice. Represented high-level executives of global financial institutions in multinational investigations into the possible manipulation of key financial benchmarks, including LIBOR, EURIBOR and ISDAfix. Represented a senior health care executive in parallel investigations concerning alleged violations of federal and state False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statutes. Represented a former Dewey \u0026amp; Leboeuf employee in the New York County District Attorney’s Office’s investigation of the downfall of the firm, successfully obtaining immunity for the client. Represented multiple traders and sales personnel in investigations by the DOJ and SEC into the RMBS and CMBS trading practices. Conducted an internal investigation and represented a health care provider in parallel investigations concerning federal and state False Claims Act violations. Conducted an internal investigation on behalf of the Special Committee of an international corporation concerning potential financial improprieties resulting in a restatement, violations of the of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and potential insider trading by a key employee, and represented the Committee in resulting parallel investigations by the DOJ and SEC. Represented a worldwide financial services provider in an internal investigation of potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and OFAC regulations by an employee who attempted to broker deals with the Iranian government. Defended a registered investment advisor from the most serious fraud allegations being investigated by the SEC and CFTC stemming from its valuation of Level III assets. Represented investment companies, broker-dealers, funds and numerous individuals in several high-profile insider trading investigations and prosecutions by the SEC, FINRA, DOJ, CFTC and foreign regulators, including those stemming from the high-profile “expert networking” investigation.","searchable_name":"Craig Carpenito","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426813,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5707,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSteve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.\u0026nbsp; Steve\u0026rsquo;s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.\u0026nbsp; Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.\u0026nbsp; As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.\u0026nbsp; Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"steven-cave","email":"scave@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.\u0026rsquo;s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA\u0026rsquo;s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy\u0026rsquo;s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented company in a \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in numerous \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor\u0026rsquo;s exempt information remained confidential.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":780,"guid":"780.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":116,"guid":"116.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1142,"guid":"1142.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1178,"guid":"1178.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":15,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":122,"guid":"122.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":124,"guid":"124.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":19,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cave","nick_name":"Steve","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Steve","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":752,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\"","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSteve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.\u0026nbsp; Steve\u0026rsquo;s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.\u0026nbsp; Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.\u0026nbsp; As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.\u0026nbsp; He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.\u0026nbsp; Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.\u0026rsquo;s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA\u0026rsquo;s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy\u0026rsquo;s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented company in a \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in numerous \u0026ldquo;reverse\u0026rdquo; public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor\u0026rsquo;s exempt information remained confidential.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\"","detail":"Chambers USA (2022)"},{"title":"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts","detail":"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7603}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:04.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:04.000Z","searchable_text":"Cave{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"\\\"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022)\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.’s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA’s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.{{ FIELD }}Represented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions.{{ FIELD }}Represented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations.{{ FIELD }}Represented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy’s improper award decision of a $46 million contract.{{ FIELD }}Represented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm.{{ FIELD }}Represented company in a “reverse” Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information.{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in numerous “reverse” public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor’s exempt information remained confidential.{{ FIELD }}Steve Cave is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters and Government Investigations practice.   He represents a wide variety of government contractors including those specializing in defense, consulting, and information technology.  Steve’s focus is on government contract counseling and compliance, and transactional support.  Steve has led numerous internal investigations and served as primary counsel during mergers and acquisitions involving government contractors. \nSteve regularly counsels contractors on risks arising under laws and regulations applicable to contracting with federal, state, and local government entities.  He has in-depth experience leading and managing internal investigations and risk reviews as both in-house counsel, and external counsel.  As a former in-house attorney for a leading consulting company, Steve has unique perspectives that help companies quickly dissect and assess relevant risks, and make informed decisions.\nSteve represents government contractors in all phases of government contracts including performance, compliance and dispute resolution. Steve serves as the primary government contracts counsel and transactional attorney representing industry leaders, private equity firms, and entrepreneurs that range from major public companies to start-ups.  He has in-depth experience in leading M\u0026amp;A transactions for defense sector clients and has represented clients ranging from start-ups to major public companies.\nSteve has extensive experience developing and negotiating complex agreements during acquisitions, and counseling on related issues including national security, intellectual property and data rights, business size, and anti-corruption.\nSteve also serves as counsel in high-stakes litigation, including pre- and post-award protests at the GAO, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and various state tribunals, and size protests and appeals.  Steve also has extensive experience handling litigation related to the Freedom of Information Act and various open records laws in states and localities. Partner \"Steve has the unique ability to distill issues in a meaningful and creative manner” and is “attentive to client needs.\" Chambers USA (2022) Top Ranked Lawyer, Government Contracts Chambers USA, Nationwide (2021-2022) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University  George Mason University George Mason University School of Law U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia Represented Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) in defeating Sierra Nevada Corp.’s bid protest filed at GAO challenging NASA’s $2.6 billion contract award for the development of a new spacecraft capable of replacing the Space Shuttle and transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station. Represented large defense contractors in numerous mergers and acquisitions. Represented numerous General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule contractors in investigating False Claims Act allegations and successfully resolving or settling the allegations. Represented Prism Maritime LLC in in a successful post-award bid protest at GAO challenging the Navy’s improper award decision of a $46 million contract. Represented small business in size protest successfully defending against a challenge to its small business size status due to an acquisition by private equity firm. Represented company in a “reverse” Freedom of Information Act case in federal court that resulted in favorable settlement of outstanding request for information. Represented a company in numerous “reverse” public records act cases at various state and local levels to ensure that the contractor’s exempt information remained confidential.","searchable_name":"Steve Cave","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448453,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7211,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.\u0026nbsp; He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the \u0026ldquo;Attorney of the Year\u0026rdquo; by the American Lawyer. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"neel-chatterjee","email":"nchatterjee@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":2,"guid":"2.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Chatterjee","nick_name":"","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, U.S. Magistrate Patricia v. Trumbull, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","years_held":"1995 - 1997"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Justice Mary Mullarkey, Colorado","years_held":"1994 - 1995"}],"first_name":"Neel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2442,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eNeel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.\u0026nbsp; He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the \u0026ldquo;Attorney of the Year\u0026rdquo; by the American Lawyer. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley\u0026rsquo;s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film \u0026ldquo;The Social Network.\u0026rdquo; He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being \u0026ldquo;singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,\u0026rdquo; with \u0026ldquo;the ability to think outside the box\u0026rdquo; as well as having \u0026ldquo;in depth knowledge of patent law.\u0026rdquo; In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being \u0026ldquo;knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,\u0026rdquo; with providing \u0026ldquo;practical, business-minded patent advice\u0026rdquo; and a sensitivity \u0026ldquo;to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being \u0026ldquo;sought-after\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.\u0026rdquo; Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, \u0026ldquo;He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.\u0026rdquo; Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who \u0026ldquo;gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,\u0026rdquo; also remarking that \u0026ldquo;he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.\u0026rdquo; Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News \u0026mdash; Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, \u0026ldquo;Best Lawyers\u0026rdquo; named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California\u0026rsquo;s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.\u0026nbsp; Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.\u0026nbsp; The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Litigators in America ","detail":"Lawdragon 500 (2025)"},{"title":"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law","detail":"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets","detail":"Chambers USA (2022-2025)"},{"title":"Intellectual Property – Nationwide ","detail":"Chambers USA (2025)"},{"title":"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)","detail":"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) "},{"title":"Intellectual Property: Patent","detail":"Global 2021 and 2022 "},{"title":"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property ","detail":"Benchmark Litigation"},{"title":"Top IP litigator and trailblazer ","detail":"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12909}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-05-22T22:04:07.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-22T22:04:07.000Z","searchable_text":"Chatterjee{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Litigators in America \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon 500 (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers (2022-2023)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2022-2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property – Nationwide \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA (2025)\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US (2021-2024) \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Property: Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Global 2021 and 2022 \"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Benchmark Litigation\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Top IP litigator and trailblazer \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide\"}{{ FIELD }}Neel Chatterjee is an internationally recognized technology litigator and trial lawyer. Neel also has extensive experience in crisis-communications in high profile disputes in the technology industry.  He has a proven track record handling hard-to-win technology cases for some of the world’s most exciting and disruptive technology companies. His cases often break new ground in undefined areas of the law or are existential disputes for product lines and new business models. Clients frequently turn to Neel shortly before trial to take over hard-to-win cases. Neel has substantial expertise handling disputes related to patents, trade secrets, copyrights, internet law, and complex commercial technology issues. In 2025, Neel was named the “Attorney of the Year” by the American Lawyer. \nNeel has led matters for some of Silicon Valley’s most legendary companies in their most significant technology disputes.  He has handled groundbreaking cases for Facebook, Oracle, eBay, NVIDIA, LinkedIn, Logitech, and many others. Notably, Neel defended Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook in the famed Winklevoss case that later served as the inspiration for the Academy Award winning film “The Social Network.” He helped develop and then later defended eBay with respect to its online transaction business model, creating important fundamental law that validated internet business models related to user generated content. He has prosecuted, defended, and tried cases involving global patent litigation for NVIDIA as part of the smartphone patent wars. He also represented Anthony Levandowski, the star engineer at the center of the complex intellectual property dispute between Google and Uber related to self-driving car technology.\nNeel previously clerked for the Honorable Patricia V. Trumbull in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and the Honorable Chief Justice Mary Mullarkey in the Colorado Supreme Court.\nNeel has been recognized as a top IP litigator and trailblazer by Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal, LawDragon and the IAM Global Leaders Guide. Chambers USA has described him as being “singled out for his abilities acting for hi-tech companies in patent infringement claims,” with “the ability to think outside the box” as well as having “in depth knowledge of patent law.” In addition, Chambers USA refers to him as being “knowledgeable, quick to learn, and truly innovative,” with providing “practical, business-minded patent advice” and a sensitivity “to the business objectives of patent litigation.\" Chambers Global recently recognized Neel as being “sought-after” and “valued for his strategic approach to contentious matters and his strong courtroom advocacy.” Chambers Global further stated that his peers say, “He is an outstanding lawyer who is beloved by his clients. He always puts in extra effort and really knows the law.” Most recently, IAM 1000 highlighted Neel as someone who “gives terrific legal advice and has seen a lot of success in court,” also remarking that “he exudes friendliness and confidence, and has the right personality to remain at the top.” Neel has also been recognized by U.S. News — Best Lawyers in the field of patent and intellectual property litigation. In 2019, “Best Lawyers” named Neel the Trade Secret Lawyer of the Year. He was also named to the 2020 Lawyers of Color Power List and recognized by the Minority Corporate Counsel Association as a 2019 MCCA Rainmaker. Neel has also been repeatedly recognized as one of California’s Top 100 lawyers by the Daily Journal, as one of the top 500 Cyberlawyers by Law Dragon, and has been repeatedly recognized as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation.  Neel has also been recognized for lifetime achievement by Narika, a Bay Area-based organization that promotes women's independence, economic empowerment, and well-being by helping domestic violence survivors with advocacy, support, and education.\nNeel serves or has served on numerous highly influential boards including serving as the President of the Board of Advisors of Vanderbilt University School of Law. For 23 years, he served on the Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley. He currently serves on the boards of the Asian Pacific Fund, the Humane Society of Silicon Valley, the South Asian American Justice Collective, and AccessLex. He has also served on the National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association. In addition to his board-level work, Neel has served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California. He is also active in the Sedona Conference Patent Litigation section. As a passionate proponent of diversity, Neel also founded the Bay Area Diversity Career Fair. Neel is a regularly invited speaker on the issues of intellectual property, internet law, litigating high-profile cases, diversity and inclusion, and mentorship.  The South Asian Bar Association of Northern California and the North American South Asian Bar Association have each recognized Neel for his strong leadership and mentorship of young lawyers. Partner Leading Litigators in America  Lawdragon 500 (2025) Litigation - Intellectual Property, Litigation - Patent and Trade Secrets Law Best Lawyers (2022-2023) Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation – California and Intellectual Property: Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secrets Chambers USA (2022-2025) Intellectual Property – Nationwide  Chambers USA (2025) United States Hall of Fame for Trade Secrets (Litigation and Non-Contentious Matters) Legal 500 US (2021-2024)  Intellectual Property: Patent Global 2021 and 2022  2021-2023 Litigation Star in California for his work in Intellectual Property  Benchmark Litigation Top IP litigator and trailblazer  Intellectual Asset Management, Managing IP, Chambers, Benchmark Litigation, National Law Journal, the Daily Journal and the IAM Global Leaders Guide Dartmouth College  Vanderbilt University Vanderbilt University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit California California Bar Association Board of Directors of the Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, Board Member Asia Pacific Fund, Board Member National Advisory Committee of the National South Asian Bar Association, Board Member Served on the Magistrate Selection Committee, the Patent Local Rules Committee, and the Federal Practice Program for the Northern District of California Bay Area Diversity Career Fair, Founder Judicial Clerk, U.S. Magistrate Patricia v. Trumbull, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Judicial Clerk, Justice Mary Mullarkey, Colorado","searchable_name":"Neel Chatterjee","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426459,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3690,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam advises on compensation and benefits matters\u0026nbsp;in a broad\u0026nbsp;range of situations, including private and public\u0026nbsp;company transactions.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam's practice is focused on compensation and benefits matters.\u0026nbsp; Sam's practice includes the design, implementation and disclosure of executive compensation programs.\u0026nbsp; Sam also advises on equity-based plans, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, qualified pension plans, health and welfare plans and ERISA matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe has deep experience with the compensation and benefits aspects of\u0026nbsp;mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructurings and financing transactions involving\u0026nbsp;Fortune 500 companies, private equity firms and their portfolio companies, and closely held companies in a wide range of industries.\u0026nbsp; Sam also has extensive experience with transactions involving employee stock ownership plans.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"samuel-choy","email":"schoy@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":57}]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":28,"guid":"28.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":502,"guid":"502.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Choy","nick_name":"Sam","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Samuel","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":1974,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1992-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null},{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"LL.M.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1993-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"S.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/samuelchoy/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSam advises on compensation and benefits matters\u0026nbsp;in a broad\u0026nbsp;range of situations, including private and public\u0026nbsp;company transactions.\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSam's practice is focused on compensation and benefits matters.\u0026nbsp; Sam's practice includes the design, implementation and disclosure of executive compensation programs.\u0026nbsp; Sam also advises on equity-based plans, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, qualified pension plans, health and welfare plans and ERISA matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe has deep experience with the compensation and benefits aspects of\u0026nbsp;mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructurings and financing transactions involving\u0026nbsp;Fortune 500 companies, private equity firms and their portfolio companies, and closely held companies in a wide range of industries.\u0026nbsp; Sam also has extensive experience with transactions involving employee stock ownership plans.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":4505}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:21.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:21.000Z","searchable_text":"Choy{{ FIELD }}Sam advises on compensation and benefits matters in a broad range of situations, including private and public company transactions.   \nSam's practice is focused on compensation and benefits matters.  Sam's practice includes the design, implementation and disclosure of executive compensation programs.  Sam also advises on equity-based plans, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, qualified pension plans, health and welfare plans and ERISA matters.\nHe has deep experience with the compensation and benefits aspects of mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructurings and financing transactions involving Fortune 500 companies, private equity firms and their portfolio companies, and closely held companies in a wide range of industries.  Sam also has extensive experience with transactions involving employee stock ownership plans. Samuel S Choy Partner Emory University Emory University School of Law Temple University Temple University Beasley School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Florida Georgia Tennessee Virginia","searchable_name":"Samuel S. Choy (Sam)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442826,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5831,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-cooper","email":"rcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":14,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":16,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":17,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Bob","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1994 - 1996"}],"first_name":"Robert","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"with distinction","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1994-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-cooper-ba696910/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations,\u0026nbsp;and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion)\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eLead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8262}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:16.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation{{ FIELD }}Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China{{ FIELD }}Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company{{ FIELD }}Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice{{ FIELD }}Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement){{ FIELD }}Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation{{ FIELD }}Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues{{ FIELD }}Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers{{ FIELD }}Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants){{ FIELD }}Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion){{ FIELD }}Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act{{ FIELD }}Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor{{ FIELD }}Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger{{ FIELD }}Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations{{ FIELD }}Bob Cooper's extensive experience includes representing clients in complex commercial litigation and governmental investigations, conducting internal investigations, and counseling global companies on their most challenging and significant business issues. His particular expertise in antitrust and competition matters leads clients to seek his judgment and strategic advice on mergers, acquisitions and other business transactions. Bob also regularly advises clients on dealings with competitors, suppliers and customers.\nBob has represented clients in a wide variety of industries, including airlines, agribusiness, banking, biotechnology, commercial real estate, healthcare, health insurance, healthcare technology, insurance/reinsurance, Internet, payment systems, private equity, sports media, telecommunications, and telehealth. He has served as lead counsel or co-lead counsel before a number of federal and state courts, in arbitration proceedings and mediations, and before the United States Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission and numerous state Attorneys General. Partner Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Emory University Emory University School of Law Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia District of Columbia American Bar Association The Economic Club of Washington D.C. Law Clerk, Hon. William C. O'Kelley, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented an international e-commerce company in a multijurisdictional consumer protection investigation Represented a technology company in defending predatory pricing claims by a competitor (confidential settlement) Represented a global automobile manufacturer in connection with competition issues and inquiries in the United States, EU and China Lead multiple internal investigations for a major biotechnology company Served as lead trial and appellate counsel in the FTC's challenge to a regional health system's proposed acquisition of a multi-specialty physician practice Lead defense of six companies in litigation alleging breach of licensing agreements and prosecution of antitrust counterclaims (confidential settlement) Obtained antitrust clearance for multiple transactions in various industries, including consumer goods manufacturing, healthcare, assisted living and commercial and private aviation Represented several integrated health systems in connection with competition and related issues Represented a major healthcare technology company in connection with numerous competition and strategic issues Represented a global Internet service provider on competition and regulatory issues in the U.S. and Europe, and before the DOJ and FCC in connection with several telecom and media mergers Served as co-lead trial counsel in defending a Fortune 100 company in a multi-hundred million-dollar arbitration alleging breach of a technology licensing agreement and tortious interference (no relief awarded to claimants) Represented a leading payment card network in antitrust litigation against its principal competitors (client obtained a settlement in excess of $4 billion) Defended a leading payment card network against claims by the Department of Justice and various merchants (both a class and opt outs) alleging violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act Represented a Chinese manufacturer in connection with U.S. antitrust issues associated with the acquisition of a competitor Represented an international private equity firm in an SEC investigation Defended a global airline in connection with private litigation challenging a merger with another global carrier, and represented that airline in connection with the DOJ's review of the merger Lead an internal investigation for a Bermuda-based reinsurer, and represented the non-executive members of the Board in connection with related governmental investigations","searchable_name":"Robert M. Cooper (Bob)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427497,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":252,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTanya K. Canup is an attorney with the firm\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on information governance, preservation, and collection issues for several Fortune 100 and Fortune 500 companies.\u0026nbsp; She regularly advises clients on developing and updating company policies; the defensible deletion of email and other sources; potential gaps within client's E-Discovery processes; best practices and technologies for the preservation and collection process; the legal hold process; training IT departments on the preservation and collection process; and identifying, preserving, and collecting responsive ESI in large-scale litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTanya has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow. This includes the 2017 Equifax data breach matters, the 2019 Capital One data breach matters, and the Toyota unintended acceleration matters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTanya is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Groups 1, 6, and 11. This past year, Tanya was a member of the Sedona Conference Unique eDiscovery Challenges in Multidistrict Litigation Brainstorming Group. The MDL Brainstorming Group is exploring the challenges and best practices regarding e-discovery in MDL. She also was a guest lecturer at Emory University School of Law Advanced Trial class regarding e-discovery best practices.\u0026nbsp; Tanya was also a panelist for a panel called \u0026ldquo;Legal Project Management\u0026rdquo; at The Master\u0026rsquo;s Conference held at King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta office in November.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"tanya-canup","email":"tcanup@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 60 attorneys in a review of over 6 million documents for an automotive manufacturer in connection with multiple governmental investigations, multi-jurisdictional, and individual product liability litigation. In addition, supervised and trained a large group of foreign language reviewers in multiple locations across the country.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in the development of an e-discovery litigation readiness protocol to be utilized by the litigation department in the event the client has a significant litigation event or crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in advising a large energy provider on the implementation of an e-mail automatic purge policy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaged the document preservation and collection process for a large medical technology company involved in a putative class action and various government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eImplemented and managed a client\u0026rsquo;s litigation hold process involving over 16,000 current and former employees.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":16,"guid":"16.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Canup","nick_name":"Tanya","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Tanya","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTanya K. Canup is an attorney with the firm\u0026rsquo;s E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on information governance, preservation, and collection issues for several Fortune 100 and Fortune 500 companies.\u0026nbsp; She regularly advises clients on developing and updating company policies; the defensible deletion of email and other sources; potential gaps within client's E-Discovery processes; best practices and technologies for the preservation and collection process; the legal hold process; training IT departments on the preservation and collection process; and identifying, preserving, and collecting responsive ESI in large-scale litigation.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTanya has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow. This includes the 2017 Equifax data breach matters, the 2019 Capital One data breach matters, and the Toyota unintended acceleration matters.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTanya is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Groups 1, 6, and 11. This past year, Tanya was a member of the Sedona Conference Unique eDiscovery Challenges in Multidistrict Litigation Brainstorming Group. The MDL Brainstorming Group is exploring the challenges and best practices regarding e-discovery in MDL. She also was a guest lecturer at Emory University School of Law Advanced Trial class regarding e-discovery best practices.\u0026nbsp; Tanya was also a panelist for a panel called \u0026ldquo;Legal Project Management\u0026rdquo; at The Master\u0026rsquo;s Conference held at King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Atlanta office in November.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 60 attorneys in a review of over 6 million documents for an automotive manufacturer in connection with multiple governmental investigations, multi-jurisdictional, and individual product liability litigation. In addition, supervised and trained a large group of foreign language reviewers in multiple locations across the country.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in the development of an e-discovery litigation readiness protocol to be utilized by the litigation department in the event the client has a significant litigation event or crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted in advising a large energy provider on the implementation of an e-mail automatic purge policy.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eManaged the document preservation and collection process for a large medical technology company involved in a putative class action and various government investigations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eImplemented and managed a client\u0026rsquo;s litigation hold process involving over 16,000 current and former employees.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":761}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T05:01:12.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T05:01:12.000Z","searchable_text":"Canup{{ FIELD }}Assisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 60 attorneys in a review of over 6 million documents for an automotive manufacturer in connection with multiple governmental investigations, multi-jurisdictional, and individual product liability litigation. In addition, supervised and trained a large group of foreign language reviewers in multiple locations across the country.{{ FIELD }}Assisted in the development of an e-discovery litigation readiness protocol to be utilized by the litigation department in the event the client has a significant litigation event or crisis.{{ FIELD }}Assisted in advising a large energy provider on the implementation of an e-mail automatic purge policy.{{ FIELD }}Managed the document preservation and collection process for a large medical technology company involved in a putative class action and various government investigations.{{ FIELD }}Implemented and managed a client’s litigation hold process involving over 16,000 current and former employees.{{ FIELD }}Tanya K. Canup is an attorney with the firm’s E-Discovery practice. Her practice focuses on information governance, preservation, and collection issues for several Fortune 100 and Fortune 500 companies.  She regularly advises clients on developing and updating company policies; the defensible deletion of email and other sources; potential gaps within client's E-Discovery processes; best practices and technologies for the preservation and collection process; the legal hold process; training IT departments on the preservation and collection process; and identifying, preserving, and collecting responsive ESI in large-scale litigation.\nTanya has significant experience managing e-discovery in crisis litigation that spans multiple regulatory, investigatory and civil matters and helping clients ensure that e-discovery does not become a costly sideshow. This includes the 2017 Equifax data breach matters, the 2019 Capital One data breach matters, and the Toyota unintended acceleration matters.    \nTanya is a member of the Sedona Conference Working Groups 1, 6, and 11. This past year, Tanya was a member of the Sedona Conference Unique eDiscovery Challenges in Multidistrict Litigation Brainstorming Group. The MDL Brainstorming Group is exploring the challenges and best practices regarding e-discovery in MDL. She also was a guest lecturer at Emory University School of Law Advanced Trial class regarding e-discovery best practices.  Tanya was also a panelist for a panel called “Legal Project Management” at The Master’s Conference held at King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Atlanta office in November. Counsel Tulane University Tulane University Law School The University of Alabama The University of Alabama School of Law The University of Alabama The University of Alabama School of Law Georgia Assisted in supervising, managing, and training more than 60 attorneys in a review of over 6 million documents for an automotive manufacturer in connection with multiple governmental investigations, multi-jurisdictional, and individual product liability litigation. In addition, supervised and trained a large group of foreign language reviewers in multiple locations across the country. Assisted in the development of an e-discovery litigation readiness protocol to be utilized by the litigation department in the event the client has a significant litigation event or crisis. Assisted in advising a large energy provider on the implementation of an e-mail automatic purge policy. Managed the document preservation and collection process for a large medical technology company involved in a putative class action and various government investigations. Implemented and managed a client’s litigation hold process involving over 16,000 current and former employees.","searchable_name":"Tanya Canup","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442995,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7233,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Cooper\u0026nbsp;advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.\u0026nbsp; With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division,\u0026nbsp;Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.\u0026nbsp; Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.\u0026nbsp; She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.\u0026nbsp; Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a\u0026nbsp;Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the \u003cem\u003eMaryland Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"katherine-cooper","email":"kcooper@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":24,"guid":"24.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cooper","nick_name":"Katherine","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Katherine","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2224,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2007-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":0,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKatie Cooper\u0026nbsp;advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.\u0026nbsp; With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division,\u0026nbsp;Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.\u0026nbsp; Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.\u0026nbsp; She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.\u0026nbsp; Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a\u0026nbsp;Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the \u003cem\u003eMaryland Law Review\u003c/em\u003e and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13165}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-17T22:20:39.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-17T22:20:39.000Z","searchable_text":"Cooper{{ FIELD }}Katie Cooper advises pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers and providers and suppliers on all aspects of the vast healthcare regulatory landscape.  With nearly 15 years of experience as a senior attorney for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of the General Counsel in its Centers for Medicare \u0026amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) Division, Katie leverages her extensive regulatory background and deep knowledge of the Medicare program to help clients navigate the complex arena of coverage, coding, and payment. \nKatie is a leading expert on Medicare reimbursement issues, with a particular focus on the Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) program.  Drawing on her years of experience, Katie uses her extensive knowledge to advise hospitals and life sciences companies affected by OPPS policies.  She has deep knowledge of Medicare Part B payment for all types of providers and suppliers, with expertise in reimbursement for developing technologies and novel therapies, including through her work on CMS Innovation Center alternative payment models.  Using her broad notice-and-comment rulemaking experience and substantive awareness, Katie gives clients unique insights into the often-opaque world of federal healthcare policy development and provides practical and actionable advice and advocacy.\nPrior to her role at HHS, Katie was an associate at a Washington, D.C. law firm where she defended pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers in products liability litigation and False Claims Act investigations. \nKatie earned her J.D. from the University of Maryland School of Law, where she was an Articles Editor for the Maryland Law Review and earned the Clinical Law Program Public Service Award.\nAdmitted in Maryland. Not Admitted in the District of Columbia. Work performed under the supervision of principals of the firm who are members of the District of Columbia Bar. Counsel University of Maryland-Baltimore University of Maryland School of Law Maryland","searchable_name":"Katherine Cooper","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444718,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6668,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMcKenzie Cato's expertise is\u0026nbsp;assisting\u0026nbsp;medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage\u0026nbsp;companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in\u0026nbsp;developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mckenzie-cato","email":"mcato@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 301 651 6631","matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":826,"guid":"826.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Cato","nick_name":"McKenzie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"McKenzie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":174,"law_schools":[{"id":753,"meta":{"degree":"Juris Doctor","honors":"honors","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/mckenzie-cato-4832b413","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":75,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMcKenzie Cato's expertise is\u0026nbsp;assisting\u0026nbsp;medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage\u0026nbsp;companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in\u0026nbsp;developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025"},{"title":"Ones to Watch","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2024"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11682}]},"capability_group_id":null},"created_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Cato{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}McKenzie Cato's expertise is assisting medical device, pharmaceutical, and food and beverage companies with pre- and post-market regulatory topics. McKenzie helps companies in developing their FDA regulatory strategy, preparing regulatory submissions, responding to FDA requests for information and data, drafting regulatory policies and procedures, and reviewing advertising and promotional materials. McKenzie also assists companies with FDA, DOJ, and DEA enforcement matters, regulatory due diligence, and state regulatory and licensing issues. Senior Associate Ones to Watch Best Lawyers, 2025 Ones to Watch Best Lawyers, 2024 Georgetown University  George Washington University George Washington University Law School District of Columbia Pennsylvania","searchable_name":"McKenzie Cato","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":174,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427095,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6296,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude \u003c/em\u003ewith an election to the Order of the Coif,\u0026nbsp;where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial.\u0026nbsp;Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to\u0026nbsp;torts in technological settings and\u0026nbsp;artificial intelligence.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"mary-carden","email":"lcarden@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":112,"guid":"112.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Carden","nick_name":"Larkin","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Mary","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2190,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"summa cum laude, Order of the Coif","is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Larkin","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, \u003cem\u003esumma cum laude \u003c/em\u003ewith an election to the Order of the Coif,\u0026nbsp;where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial.\u0026nbsp;Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to\u0026nbsp;torts in technological settings and\u0026nbsp;artificial intelligence.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12342}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:58:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Carden{{ FIELD }}Larkin Carden is an associate in the Atlanta office of King \u0026amp; Spalding and member of the firm's Product Liability \u0026amp; Mass Torts practice.\nLarkin Carden graduated from the University of Georgia School of Law, summa cum laude with an election to the Order of the Coif, where she was the Senior Managing Editor for the Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law and a member of the Moot Court team. Larkin has been published in legal journals and magazines such as Georgia Law Review, Georgia Journal of International \u0026amp; Comparative Law, and the State Bar of Georgia's YLD Review. While in law school, Larkin externed at the Georgia Western Circuit as a criminal defense clerk working on matters at all stages of litigation, from discovery through trial. Larkin served as a legal research assistant in law school, assisting on projects related to torts in technological settings and artificial intelligence. Associate Auburn University  University of Georgia University of Georgia School of Law Georgia Court of Appeals of Georgia","searchable_name":"Mary Larkin Carden (Larkin)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447857,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6417,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexa is an associate in the Technology Transactions and Sourcing group within King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate practice group. Her practice focuses on technology transactions and complex commercial contracts matters, including software licensing and software-as-a-service agreements; terms of service and professional services/consulting agreements; sourcing, resale, purchase and supply transactions; product integration and commercialization agreements; and maintenance, support and hosting agreements. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlexa also advises on the intellectual property aspects of merger, acquisition, asset sale and financing transactions. She has worked with companies in a broad range of industries, including cloud and infrastructure, enterprise software, financial services and fintech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, AI/ML,\u0026nbsp;logistics,\u0026nbsp;healthcare and biotech.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlexa recently seconded with a\u0026nbsp;leading cloud computing services provider, advising business teams primarily on inbound enterprise technology agreements for hosted services (software- and platform-as-a-service) and professional services, software licensing and procurement, and information technology hardware procurement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"alexa-christianson","email":"achristianson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1140,"guid":"1140.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Christianson","nick_name":"Alexa","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Alexa","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":659,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"honors","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2022-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAlexa is an associate in the Technology Transactions and Sourcing group within King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate practice group. Her practice focuses on technology transactions and complex commercial contracts matters, including software licensing and software-as-a-service agreements; terms of service and professional services/consulting agreements; sourcing, resale, purchase and supply transactions; product integration and commercialization agreements; and maintenance, support and hosting agreements. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlexa also advises on the intellectual property aspects of merger, acquisition, asset sale and financing transactions. She has worked with companies in a broad range of industries, including cloud and infrastructure, enterprise software, financial services and fintech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, AI/ML,\u0026nbsp;logistics,\u0026nbsp;healthcare and biotech.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlexa recently seconded with a\u0026nbsp;leading cloud computing services provider, advising business teams primarily on inbound enterprise technology agreements for hosted services (software- and platform-as-a-service) and professional services, software licensing and procurement, and information technology hardware procurement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9960}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-04-27T21:10:15.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-27T21:10:15.000Z","searchable_text":"Christianson{{ FIELD }}Alexa is an associate in the Technology Transactions and Sourcing group within King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Corporate practice group. Her practice focuses on technology transactions and complex commercial contracts matters, including software licensing and software-as-a-service agreements; terms of service and professional services/consulting agreements; sourcing, resale, purchase and supply transactions; product integration and commercialization agreements; and maintenance, support and hosting agreements. \nAlexa also advises on the intellectual property aspects of merger, acquisition, asset sale and financing transactions. She has worked with companies in a broad range of industries, including cloud and infrastructure, enterprise software, financial services and fintech, cybersecurity, e-commerce, AI/ML, logistics, healthcare and biotech.\nAlexa recently seconded with a leading cloud computing services provider, advising business teams primarily on inbound enterprise technology agreements for hosted services (software- and platform-as-a-service) and professional services, software licensing and procurement, and information technology hardware procurement.\n  Associate Tulane University Tulane University Law School Emory University Emory University School of Law Virginia","searchable_name":"Alexa Christianson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":441456,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7246,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew Connelly is an Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's International Disputes practice, based in the London office. Andrew qualified in 2021 and specialises in resolving international commercial disputes both in arbitration and English court litigation.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has a broad range of experience acting for clients in commercial litigations and international arbitrations. He has acted for clients at all levels of the English courts and\u0026nbsp;under many of the major international arbitration rules (LCIA, ICC, SIAC).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has frequently acted for clients across a range of sectors such as financial services, construction, energy and aviation. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew was a\u0026nbsp;Commercial Disputes Associate in the London office of another global law firm.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"andrew-connelly","email":"aconnelly@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Connelly","nick_name":"Andrew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Andrew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eAndrew Connelly is an Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's International Disputes practice, based in the London office. Andrew qualified in 2021 and specialises in resolving international commercial disputes both in arbitration and English court litigation.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has a broad range of experience acting for clients in commercial litigations and international arbitrations. He has acted for clients at all levels of the English courts and\u0026nbsp;under many of the major international arbitration rules (LCIA, ICC, SIAC).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAndrew has frequently acted for clients across a range of sectors such as financial services, construction, energy and aviation. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew was a\u0026nbsp;Commercial Disputes Associate in the London office of another global law firm.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13046}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-10-20T22:01:41.000Z","updated_at":"2025-10-20T22:01:41.000Z","searchable_text":"Connelly{{ FIELD }}Andrew Connelly is an Associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding's International Disputes practice, based in the London office. Andrew qualified in 2021 and specialises in resolving international commercial disputes both in arbitration and English court litigation. \nAndrew has a broad range of experience acting for clients in commercial litigations and international arbitrations. He has acted for clients at all levels of the English courts and under many of the major international arbitration rules (LCIA, ICC, SIAC).\nAndrew has frequently acted for clients across a range of sectors such as financial services, construction, energy and aviation. Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Andrew was a Commercial Disputes Associate in the London office of another global law firm.  Associate University of Leeds  University of Law, London University of Law, London University of Law, London University of Law, London England and Wales","searchable_name":"Andrew Connelly","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}