{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Chair","value":"Chair"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":2839},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Atlanta's John Marshall Law School","value":2830},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Bond University","value":2841},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP Law School","value":3237},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Bucerius Law School, Germany","value":2898},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"Chicago-Kent College of Law","value":3050},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"College of Law, Guildford, UK","value":2646},{"name":"College of Law, London, UK","value":2647},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"Delhi University","value":3099},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Durham University","value":2708},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University","value":2936},{"name":"ELTE University Budapest","value":2969},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce School of Law","value":2259},{"name":"Free University Berlin","value":2903},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"Fudan University","value":2986},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Guildhall University, London","value":2863},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"Inns of Court School of Law, UK","value":2649},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany","value":2653},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"King Saud University College of Law \u0026 Political Sciences","value":2823},{"name":"King's College London","value":2987},{"name":"King's College, University of London, UK","value":2654},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Leiden University","value":2926},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"Liverpool University, UK","value":2657},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"London School of Economics and Political Science, UK","value":2658},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich","value":3105},{"name":"Lund University","value":3084},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":2660},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":3047},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":2715},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Oxford University, UK","value":2669},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queen's University Faculty of Law","value":2801},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":2725},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Sciences Po Paris","value":2925},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Manchester","value":2845},{"name":"The University of Melbourne","value":2836},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2752},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":3168},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá Colombia","value":2677},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Iberoamericana","value":2915},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit","value":3213},{"name":"Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium","value":2679},{"name":"Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne","value":2680},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University College London, UK","value":2760},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Augsburg","value":2779},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of Bonn, Germany","value":2682},{"name":"University of Bristol, UK","value":2761},{"name":"University of Buenos Aires, Argentina","value":2683},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Cambridge, UK","value":2684},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Cape Town, South Africa","value":2854},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Cologne, Germany","value":2885},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of Deusto, Spain","value":2685},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of East London","value":2963},{"name":"University of Exeter, UK","value":2770},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3112},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Hamburg, Germany","value":2688},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law","value":2202},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kent at Canterbury, UK","value":2690},{"name":"University of Kent","value":2849},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Law","value":2954},{"name":"University of Leeds School of Law","value":2850},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Lima","value":2859},{"name":"University of London","value":2692},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2739},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":3064},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of New South Wales","value":2871},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Nottingham, England","value":2881},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Otago, New Zealand","value":2694},{"name":"University of Paris II, Pantheon-Assas, France","value":2695},{"name":"University of Paris, Pantheon Sorbonne","value":3190},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of Sheffield","value":2805},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Sydney, Australia","value":2700},{"name":"University of Tasmania","value":2835},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Tokyo","value":3153},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Turku","value":3083},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Vienna School of Law","value":2701},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Warwick, UK","value":2771},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Western Australia","value":2949},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2755},{"name":"University of Wollongong, Australia","value":2873},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"University Toulouse Capitol","value":3109},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"118","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"H","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":442820,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6081,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.\u0026nbsp; He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.\u0026nbsp; Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeffrey-hammer","email":"jhammer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1165,"guid":"1165.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":699,"guid":"699.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1180,"guid":"1180.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hammer","nick_name":"Jeffrey","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Honorable Marc L. Goldman, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California","years_held":"2006 - 2007"}],"first_name":"Jeffrey","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1135,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Magna Cum Laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2006-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":2,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffrey-hammer-b581277/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.\u0026nbsp; Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.\u0026nbsp; He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.\u0026nbsp; Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.\u0026nbsp; He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eObtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended the former president and chief operating officer of America\u0026rsquo;s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWon early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13036}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:09.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:09.000Z","searchable_text":"Hammer{{ FIELD }}Obtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety.{{ FIELD }}Defending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training.{{ FIELD }}Represented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships.{{ FIELD }}Defended the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis.{{ FIELD }}Successfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis.{{ FIELD }}Defended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims.{{ FIELD }}Won summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air.{{ FIELD }}Won early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client.{{ FIELD }}Represented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Represented major movie studios in numerous participation cases.{{ FIELD }}Obtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project.{{ FIELD }}In a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.{{ FIELD }}Jeff Hammer is a partner in the Trial and Global Disputes Practice Group.  Jeff is an experienced litigator and counselor who focuses on complex commercial litigation matters.  He regularly represents clients in a broad spectrum of industries, including technology, financial services, real estate, consumer products, and insurance.  Jeff represents clients at all stages of litigation in state and federal courts across the country, from pre-suit counseling through trial and appeals. \nJeff has significant experience in wide range of substantive areas, including disputes involving securities claims, business torts, M\u0026amp;A disputes, trade secret claims, consumer fraud, and contract disputes.  He also represents clients in putative class and collective actions throughout the country.\nPrior to law school, Jeff worked as a civil engineer designing bridges, highways, water systems, and other infrastructure projects. Partner Wheaton College  Illinois Institute of Technology Kent College of Law Loyola University Chicago Loyola University Chicago School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California California Illinois Member, ABA Securities Litigation Committee Law Clerk, Honorable Marc L. Goldman, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Obtained a judgment in the Southern District of New York declaring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its enabling statute unconstitutional in their entirety. Defending an international insurance company in multiple class, collective, and representative actions in federal and state courts throughout the United States, which allege that insurance sales agents were misclassified as independent contractors and were not paid for training. Represented a group of former senior executives in a confidential arbitration against their former employer, which was found to have wrongfully withheld tens of millions of dollars owed to the executives in connection with their interests in hundreds of real estate partnerships. Defended the former president and chief operating officer of America’s largest home mortgage lender against more than two dozen lawsuits, and investigations by multiple state and federal agencies that followed the subprime mortgage crisis. Successfully compelled numerous putative class and collection actions to arbitration, resulting in early favorable settlements against the plaintiffs on an individual basis. Defended video streaming company in six-week arbitration against claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and fraud. Obtained award finding in favor of client on all claims. Won summary judgment for defendant in a case alleging misappropriation of trade secret, fraud, and other business torts in connection with a company that developed a cutting-edge technology to generate potable water out of the ambient humidity in the air. Won early dismissal with prejudice of a statewide class action by plaintiff landlords alleging unfair business practices against sharing economy tech client. Represented largest hospital in northern Nevada in legal malpractice lawsuit. Represented major movie studios in numerous participation cases. Obtained guilty verdict in numerous criminal trials while working temporarily for the Los Angeles City Attorney as part of the Trial Advocacy Project. In a pro bono matter, obtained settlements totaling more than $1 million and significant building-wide repairs for tenants in slum housing litigation with the Inner City Law Center.","searchable_name":"Jeffrey Hammer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445483,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3538,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries\u0026mdash;both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt served nearly three years with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department\u0026rsquo;s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore his government service, Matt had\u0026nbsp;over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt\u0026rsquo;s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s work for clients in the digital assets space.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"matthew-hanson","email":"mhanson@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 202 417 1883","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCompanies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCongressional Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to \u0026ldquo;Big Tech\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFinancial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSenior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Justice Programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResponded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities and White-Collar Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTurnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBroker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTelecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVariety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Assets and Emerging Technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":20,"guid":"20.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":687,"guid":"687.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":750,"guid":"750.smart_tags","index":12,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hanson","nick_name":"Matthew","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Matthew","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"B.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-hanson-1286b516","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eFormer Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries\u0026mdash;both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMatt served nearly three years with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department\u0026rsquo;s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore his government service, Matt had\u0026nbsp;over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt\u0026rsquo;s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm\u0026rsquo;s work for clients in the digital assets space.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eCompanies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCompanies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCongressional Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to \u0026ldquo;Big Tech\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFinancial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSenior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ\u0026rsquo;s Office of Justice Programs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eResponded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSecurities and White-Collar Investigations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePublicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTurnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMultinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBroker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eGlobal technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTelecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eVariety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDigital Assets and Emerging Technology\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDigital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eProvided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12886}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-02-02T20:11:14.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-02T20:11:14.000Z","searchable_text":"Hanson{{ FIELD }}Companies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement{{ FIELD }}Companies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations{{ FIELD }}Multiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests{{ FIELD }}Companies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations{{ FIELD }}Congressional Investigations{{ FIELD }}Global technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to “Big Tech”{{ FIELD }}Global technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee{{ FIELD }}Financial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce{{ FIELD }}Senior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees{{ FIELD }}Prepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ’s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs{{ FIELD }}Responded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement{{ FIELD }}DOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP{{ FIELD }}Securities and White-Collar Investigations{{ FIELD }}Publicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud{{ FIELD }}Turnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees{{ FIELD }}Multinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures{{ FIELD }}Conducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws{{ FIELD }}Advised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules{{ FIELD }}Broker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades{{ FIELD }}Global technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues{{ FIELD }}Telecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation{{ FIELD }}Variety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation{{ FIELD }}Digital Assets and Emerging Technology{{ FIELD }}Digital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation{{ FIELD }}Served as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function{{ FIELD }}Provided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk{{ FIELD }}Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Matt Hanson represents companies and individuals in government investigations by Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and other federal and state regulators. Matt also counsels clients on related disclosure and regulatory issues and helps conduct internal investigations to assess potential liability before the government becomes involved. He is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Special Matters \u0026amp; Government Investigations practice. \nMatt has particular experience with congressional inquiries—both responding to large-scale investigations and helping manage low-key initial requests. He has prepared senior executives for dozens of public hearings and managed responses to high-pressure House and Senate inquiries. Many high-profile congressional matters are accompanied by parallel investigations from other regulators, and Matt has deep experience representing clients in the tech, finance, and healthcare spaces, among other industries, facing such enterprise-threatening regulatory investigations. As a former reporter, Matt also helps clients manage broader impacts that investigations can have on their business.\nMatt served nearly three years with DOJ’s Office of Legislative Affairs, most recently as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. While in that role, Matt handled sensitive congressional requests and investigations directed at the Department and prepared senior leadership for testimony, including the Attorney General. He worked closely with other DOJ leadership offices and with DOJ’s National Security Division, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Administration, managing the Department’s engagement with Congress on issues, cases, and legislation affecting national security. He engaged regularly with House and Senate committees focused on the judiciary, financial services, intelligence, and healthcare, as well as with House and Senate leadership staff.\nBefore his government service, Matt had over a decade of private practice experience representing clients facing securities enforcement and other tech and white-collar investigations. Matt’s clients include public companies, social media platforms, emerging tech companies, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and financial institutions, as well as corporate officers and other individuals. He previously helped lead the firm’s work for clients in the digital assets space.\nBefore becoming a lawyer, Matt worked as a news reporter covering bonds, structured finance, and other financial markets. Partner University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia District of Columbia Virginia American Bar Association Companies, corporate executives, and senior government officials in congressional oversight investigations before House and Senate committees on a wide range of issues, including competition laws, online content moderation, national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement Companies and individuals before the SEC, DOJ, and state attorneys general in both discrete non-public matters, as well as high-profile parallel investigations Multiple blockchain-related start-ups and established companies in connection with SEC document and information requests Companies conducting internal reviews to assess their risk of liability and implement proactive remediation to help avoid costly government investigations Congressional Investigations Global technology company before House and Senate Judiciary Committees in investigations of competition issues relating to “Big Tech” Global technology company in responding to House January 6th Select Committee Financial services firms in government inquiries arising out of multiple large-scale cybersecurity incidents, including before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Senior DOJ officials in multiple transcribed witness interviews in connection with investigations by House and Senate committees Prepared many senior DOJ officials for public hearing testimony before a variety of congressional committees, including: the Attorney General; multiple senior FBI officials; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s National Security Division; multiple senior officials from DOJ’s Criminal Division; Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration; Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Director of the U.S. Marshals Service; Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; Director of DOJ’s COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force; and the acting head of DOJ’s Office of Justice Programs Responded to hundreds of congressional request letters to DOJ on a wide range of issues, including national security, criminal and civil investigations, data privacy, cybersecurity, digital assets, and federal drug enforcement DOJ subject matter experts in dozens of substantive briefings (in both classified and unclassified settings) to members of Congress and senior staff of various committees, including the House Select Committee on the CCP Securities and White-Collar Investigations Publicly traded healthcare company in an SEC investigation of possible accounting fraud Turnkey asset management platform in multiple SEC investigations of leveraged ETF trades and separate allegations by former employees Multinational financial institution in a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force investigation relating to residential mortgage-backed securities disclosures Conducted internal investigation for government-owned energy company regarding compliance with anti-bribery laws Advised Japanese affiliate of big-four international audit firm on U.S. auditor independence rules Broker-dealer in parallel SEC and FINRA investigations of possible layering and spoofing trades Global technology company before state attorneys general investigating content moderation issues Telecommunications company in state attorney general False Claims Act investigation Variety of other clients in responding to the SEC on issues including investigative testimony, post-merger insider trading questions, revolving-door ethics rules, and third-party witness testimony in SEC litigation Digital Assets and Emerging Technology Digital asset fund manager in connection with an SEC enforcement inquiry and as a witness in a separate SEC investigation Served as acting general counsel for client during transition of in-house legal function Provided guidance to start-up ventures on potential regulatory and enforcement risk","searchable_name":"Matthew B. Hanson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445829,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5780,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"laura-harris","email":"lharris@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":11,"guid":"11.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":766,"guid":"766.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":111,"guid":"111.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":113,"guid":"113.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Harris","nick_name":"Laura","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Laura","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":1904,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2011-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eLaura Harris\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.\u0026nbsp; She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura\u0026rsquo;s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.\u0026nbsp; Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efinancial technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eUnder former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eindependent investigation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational payment processor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emultinational power company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge auto manufacturer\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eConducted an investigation and cultural review at a\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;large multinational corporation\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003elarge technology company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea large financial institution\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U.\u003c/strong\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ePetersen Energia, S.A.U.,\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eEton Park Capital Management\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants\u0026rsquo; failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe RealReal\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eThe New York Times\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eHSBC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting and advising a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading hedge fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eDraftKings\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government\u0026rsquo;s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eNational Basketball Players Association\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eBarclays\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars","detail":"2015-2020"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":9299}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-02-13T21:09:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Harris{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2015-2020\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants.{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products{{ FIELD }}Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats{{ FIELD }}Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement.{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees{{ FIELD }}Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates{{ FIELD }}Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer{{ FIELD }}Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive{{ FIELD }}Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel{{ FIELD }}Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR{{ FIELD }}Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF.{{ FIELD }}Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets{{ FIELD }}Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims{{ FIELD }}Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment{{ FIELD }}Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation{{ FIELD }}Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action{{ FIELD }}Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games{{ FIELD }}Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA{{ FIELD }}Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates{{ FIELD }}Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital{{ FIELD }}Laura Harris’s practice focuses on the intersection between complex litigation and white-collar investigations.  She has litigated on behalf of both plaintiffs and defendants in the financial services, technology, and energy industries, with a particular focus on commercial, antitrust, market manipulation, and securities fraud litigation. \nHer investigations experience includes matters in a variety of industries and financial markets. She has represented corporate and individual clients before the Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, and state attorneys general.\nLaura’s practice also includes First Amendment and intellectual property litigation on behalf of media and fashion industry clients.\nLaura clerked for Judge Lewis A. Kaplan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In law school, she served as Managing Editor of the Stanford Law Review and was a semi-finalist in the Marion Rice Kirkwood Memorial Moot Court competition.  Before law school, she worked on foreign and defense policy in Washington, D.C. Partner Super Lawyers New York-Metro Rising Stars 2015-2020 Columbia University Columbia University School of Law Stanford University Stanford Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Law Clerk, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Represented financial technology company in purported multi-defendant class action asserting claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA). Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims against our client following the submission of the motion to dismiss, and continue to litigate against the remaining defendants. Representing a large technology company in putative class action alleging privacy violations in connection with AI functions in its consumer products Representing a large technology company in investigations and litigation to combat phishing and other cyber threats Under former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, led an all-women team in an independent investigation of allegations of sexual misconduct and verbal and emotional abuse in women's professional soccer, commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Federation. The year-long investigation culminated in a public report and recommendations for systemic reform, which the Federation has begun to implement. Representing a multinational payment processor in putative consumer fraud class actions alleging claims for treble damages arising out of transaction fees Representing a multinational power company in putative consumer class actions challenging the reasonableness of its rates Conducted investigation concerning allegations of executive bias and retaliation at a large auto manufacturer Conducted an investigation and cultural review at a large multinational corporation stemming from allegations of misconduct by a senior executive Represented a large technology company in litigation filed against Russian cybercriminals operating a botnet that employed blockchain technology. Following a year of litigation--in which the defendants appeared--won terminating and monetary sanctions that the Court applied jointly and severally against the defendants and their counsel Representing a large financial institution in purported class action litigations alleging antitrust and other claims in connection with LIBOR Representing Petersen Energia Inversora, S.A.U., Petersen Energia, S.A.U., and Eton Park Capital Management in litigation in the Southern District of New York against the Argentine Republic and YPF, S.A., alleging claims for breach of contract and promissory estoppel arising from defendants’ failure to comply with their tender offer requirements in connection with Argentina's expropriation of YPF. Representing HSBC in three multidistrict class action litigations in the Southern District of New York alleging claims under the Commodity Exchange Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act for purported manipulation of the precious metals markets Representing The RealReal in various matters in state and federal court, including in litigation brought by Chanel, Inc. in the Southern District of New York alleging counterfeiting and false advertising claims Represented The New York Times in a libel case dismissed on summary judgment Represented HSBC at trial in employment litigation brought by former executive alleging retaliation in connection with reports of alleged sexual harassment and other misconduct, winning a defense verdict after less than two hours of jury deliberation Representing and advising a leading hedge fund and its leadership in various regulatory investigations, including an SEC insider trading investigation that resulted in no action Represented DraftKings in litigation, regulatory, and state legislative challenges to the legality of its online fantasy sports games Represented a class of AIG shareholders in an $80 billion litigation against the United States government challenging the legality of the government’s takeover of AIG, from the filing of the complaint to a successful verdict following an eight-week trial Represented the National Basketball Players Association in an historic antitrust suit against the NBA Represented Barclays in various regulatory and litigation matters related to Libor and ISDAFIX benchmark rates Represented a privately held healthcare technology company in DOJ and SEC investigations of statements the company made while raising capital","searchable_name":"Laura Harris","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":445365,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7301,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJosh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries\u0026mdash;including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy\u0026mdash;providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D.,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMichigan Law Review\u003c/em\u003e. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"joshua-hazan","email":"jhazan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMcKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRefinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWaste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hazan","nick_name":"Joshua","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit","years_held":"2015 - 2016"},{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2013 - 2014"}],"first_name":"Joshua","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":2237,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2013-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/josh-hazan-08322841/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJosh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries\u0026mdash;including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy\u0026mdash;providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D.,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003emagna cum laude\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003efrom the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMichigan Law Review\u003c/em\u003e. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eJPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eMcKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRefinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWaste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eTyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the \u003cem\u003eIn re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13324}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-29T22:07:17.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-29T22:07:17.000Z","searchable_text":"Hazan{{ FIELD }}JPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis{{ FIELD }}HCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements{{ FIELD }}Sun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing{{ FIELD }}McKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation{{ FIELD }}Refinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group{{ FIELD }}Deutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds{{ FIELD }}Waste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems{{ FIELD }}HCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson{{ FIELD }}Tyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation{{ FIELD }}Josh Hazan focuses his practice on all types of antitrust matters, including antitrust civil litigation, merger reviews, and government investigations. He has secured favorable resolutions for clients in numerous high-stakes disputes and obtained antitrust clearance for a number of complex and high‑profile transactions both in the U.S. and internationally. Josh also helps clients avoid issues before they arise with his commercial approach to antitrust counseling and compliance.\nJosh represents companies across a broad spectrum of industries—including financial services, real estate, pharmaceuticals, software, healthcare and hospital systems, aerospace and defense, industrial manufacturing, waste management, and energy—providing strategic guidance for companies to minimize antitrust risk while advancing their business objectives.\nPrior to private practice, Josh completed a clerkship with the Honorable Douglas H. Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He also clerked for the Honorable Alvin K. Hellerstein of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He received his J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School, where he was elected to Order of the Coif and was a Contributing Editor on the Michigan Law Review. Josh also received his M.P.P. and B.A. from the University of Michigan. Partner University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan University of Michigan Law School U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Law Clerk, Hon. Douglas H. Ginsburg, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Law Clerk, Hon. Alvin K. Hellerstein, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York JPMorgan in winning summary judgment in the long-running antitrust litigation arising from alleging a conspiracy to suppress LIBOR during the Global Financial Crisis HCA Healthcare in obtaining summary judgment in an HSR enforcement action by FTC, resolving for the first time the question of whether state COPA laws can preempt HSR notification requirements Sun Communities in in connection with a antitrust class action regarding home lot rent pricing McKesson in winning dismissal three times from the generic drug pricing multi-district litigation Refinitiv in obtaining antitrust clearance in over a dozen jurisdictions worldwide in connection with its $27 billion acquisition by London Stock Exchange Group Deutsche Bank in securing dismissal of an antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the market for European government bonds, and in connection with a separate antitrust class action alleging price-fixing in the secondary market for UK Gilt bonds Waste Management in obtaining antitrust clearance for its $4.6 billion acquisition of Advanced Disposal Systems HCA Healthcare in securing antitrust clearance for a major oncology research joint venture with McKesson Tyson Foods in defending against and resolving claims in the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation","searchable_name":"Joshua Hazan","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448776,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6966,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"charly-helleputte","email":"chelleputte@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":6,"guid":"6.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":71,"guid":"71.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":21,"guid":"21.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":23,"guid":"23.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":110,"guid":"110.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":7,"guid":"7.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":762,"guid":"762.smart_tags","index":13,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1176,"guid":"1176.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1220,"guid":"1220.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1202,"guid":"1202.smart_tags","index":17,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":765,"guid":"765.smart_tags","index":18,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Helleputte","nick_name":"Charly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Charly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/charles-albert-charly-helleputte-a103931/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eCharly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks\u0026mdash;such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR\u0026mdash;is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eAssisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website\u0026rsquo;s privacy notice and cookies notice. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eWorked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eFrom a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eParticipated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called \u0026ldquo;Interlinkers\u0026rdquo;, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC \u0026ldquo;Click to Pay\u0026rdquo; standards. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eCounselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDeveloped a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eContributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company\u0026rsquo;s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG\u0026rsquo;s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePart of the team who represented Nestl\u0026eacute; S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAssisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e*Denotes previous firm experience.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026 IT, Belgium","detail":"2019"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12700}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-05-28T22:04:56.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T22:04:56.000Z","searchable_text":"Helleputte{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2019\"}{{ FIELD }}Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. *{{ FIELD }}Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. *{{ FIELD }}Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. *{{ FIELD }}From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. *{{ FIELD }}Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. *{{ FIELD }}Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. *{{ FIELD }}Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. *{{ FIELD }}Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. *{{ FIELD }}Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. *{{ FIELD }}Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. *{{ FIELD }}Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. *{{ FIELD }}Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. *{{ FIELD }}Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. *{{ FIELD }}Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. *{{ FIELD }}Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. *{{ FIELD }}Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. *{{ FIELD }}Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. *{{ FIELD }}Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. * {{ FIELD }}Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.{{ FIELD }}Charly has extensive experience advising clients on cybersecurity and privacy matters in complex cross-border contexts, where navigating multiple regulatory and enforcement frameworks—such as NIS, PSD2, and CTR—is critical. Charly provides strategic counsel to organizations facing heightened accountability requirements, including in the AI space, and helps them explore innovative compliance approaches, such as leveraging standards and certification mechanisms across the data lifecycle in both regulated and unregulated industries.\nCharly also represents clients before national and EU supervisory authorities and courts, including the European Data Protection Board (EDPB). He holds a Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification and has served as an appointed legal expert at the EU Cybersecurity Agency (ENISA). He is a former co-chair of the Brussels KnowledgeNet Chapter of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and served on the IAPP EU Advisory Board. He is also designated on the expert list for the EDPB.\nBeyond his advisory and litigation work, Charly is actively engaged in shaping digital policy. He is a founding member of the research group Data, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Law and Society (DRAILS). He plays a key role in the Digital Economy Committee at AmCham EU, representing the interests of U.S. businesses in Europe. A frequent speaker and author on AI, cybersecurity and privacy law, he lectures at UCLouvain and at the Catholic University of Lille (Paris campus). Partner Client Choice Award, IP \u0026amp; IT, Belgium 2019 Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, Candidat en Droit  Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit Solvay Business School  Paris Brussels European Advisory Board Member, International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) ENISA, the European Union Cybersecurity Agency American Chamber in Europe (AmCham), EU chapter W@Privacy Assisted a multinational organization primarily active in B2B to develop its AI governance framework and come up with an AI roadmap to foster the deployment of Responsible AI. * Assisted a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment in assessing the exposure of the EU AI Act on its AI uses across a range of Products. * Developed AI clauses in the context of the procurement of AI systems and the compliance with ethical AI principles and the EU AI Act. * Participated in the First AI Grand Challenge organized by the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland) on the EU AI Act in 2023. * Assisted a cryptocurrency player in the cybersecurity and privacy compliance aspects of its global operations and online platforms taking EU GDPR as a benchmark. * Assisted a podcast platform in dealing with information requirements under the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive, including drafting the website’s privacy notice and cookies notice. * Worked on the development and setup of an API used to facilitate acceptance by merchants of cryptocurrency as means of payment on their platforms. * From a privacy compliance point of view, the indirect collection of data and complexity of the supply chain made the representation particularly innovative. * Participated in the deployment of a cryptocurrency designed as digital cash on phones by reviewing privacy settings and disclosure language. * Counselled various clients with global operations in assessing the impact of the EU developments around personal data transfers post-Schrems II decision and in implementing supplementary measures for data transfers. A data transfer tool we developed was used for assessing and documenting the steps undertaken to authorize the data transfers to take place on the basis of standard contractual clauses. * Contributed (in a personal capacity) to the INTERLINK consortium, a Horizon 2020 project, aiming at developing a new collaborative governance model between administrations and private partners, including citizens. INTERLINK will provide a set of digital building blocks, called “Interlinkers”, with the view to implement the defined governance model and standardize the basic functionalities needed to enable private actors to cooperate in the delivery of a service. * Assisted a global insurance brokers group of companies in ensuring their readiness for uninterrupted personal data flows at the end of the Brexit transition period, taking into account the upcoming revision of standard contractual clauses and the post-Schrems II situation. * Assisted a client in developing a line of defense and arguments to challenge the request from a non-EEA-based enforcement to access the personal data of some of its EU-based customers, while preserving a good level of cooperation and constructive dialogue. * Counselled an international financial service institution in assessing roles of parties under GDPR and consequent compliance steps (including applicable contractual settings) in relation to the development of an e-wallet API. The representation included a determination of the likely GDPR nexus arising from the specifics of the EMV SRC “Click to Pay” standards. * Represented ILGA Europe on a pro bono basis in the privacy and cybersecurity aspects of the Hub, a resource-sharing tool for LGBTI activists in Europe and Central Asia. * Represented a major insurance group in its integration of EU operations from a cybersecurity and data privacy point of view. * Assisted a regulated institution in the management, follow-up and remediation of a data breach. The representation includes dealing with the cross-border regulatory context. * Counselled a chemical manufacturer in the privacy aspects of the deployment of a whistleblowing hotline solution. * Advised, on a pro bono basis, the Red Cross EU Office, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Medair and the International Lesbian, Gay, Trans \u0026amp; Intersex Association in the review of their data mapping, legal basis for processing, privacy notices and privacy policies, and in their vendor remediation exercise. * Represented clients in the cybersecurity and data privacy aspects of due diligence, SPA negotiation and integration. * Counselled a Chinese financial institution in relation to the technical standards, organizational measures and incident reporting under the PSD2 and the interplay with GDPR and national laws implementing the NIS Directive. * Assisted US B2B marketing companies, email service providers, payment services providers and an actor in the entertainment industry in assessing the impact of GDPR on their operations. * Represented a hospitality client in the management of a high-profile data breach of its booking platform. * Counselled an international financial service institution in designing and implementing a cloud-based SaaS monitoring tool aiming to protect the integrity of its systems and networks. * Advised the United Nations regarding international legal issues related to e-evidence and processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes. * Represented an Italian brand of shoes and clothing in its GDPR readiness exercise and in navigating the changes of the CCTV legislation post-GDPR in multiple countries. * Assisted a global company providing payment solutions for an e-commerce app in assessing its role (data controller/data processor) and related requirements under GDPR. * Advised clients in a number of industries, such as financial, marketing and insurance, in the drafting and negotiation of Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreements, representing both controllers and processors. * Represented a leading supplier of automotive parts in dealing with the data privacy aspects of its global HR management and operations. The representation includes the assessment of the role of various group entities and analyzing appropriate data transfer mechanisms to support the exchange of data necessary for staff appraisal. * Developed a structured approach to GDPR compliance for several trade associations in multiple EU countries. * Contributed to the HTNG Working Group on GDPR. The outcome is a White Paper and Self-Assessment Tool adopted in March 2018. The White Paper describes key considerations of GDPR for the hospitality industry. The assessment tool aims to help professionals in the industry to evaluate their company’s ability to comply with the new regulation. Over 50 companies (from hotel brands, to software companies) participated in HTNG’s GDPR for Hospitality Workgroup. * Part of the team who represented Nestlé S.A. in its agreement to acquire privately held Atrium Innovations, a Montreal-based global leader in nutritional health products, from a group of investors for US$2.3 billion. * Represented a US financial group active in the credit card business in its negotiations with a payment network in France. The representation includes negotiations with the French DPA. * Represented booking platforms in their challenge in front of the Working Party No. 29 of a new standard developed by the travel industry. *  Assisted a European actor in infusion therapy and clinical nutrition in dealing with the Belgian aspects of the acquisition of a US-headquartered group active in transfusion technology products for blood collection, separation and processing. *\n*Denotes previous firm experience.","searchable_name":"Charly Helleputte","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442846,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5950,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-hill","email":"bhill@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3189}]},"expertise":[{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":579,"guid":"579.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hill","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2224,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2012-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":"Brian is a partner in King \u0026 Spalding’s international trade group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.\u0026nbsp; By focusing on clients\u0026rsquo; key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.\u0026nbsp; Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Next Generation Partner\u0026rdquo; by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others.\u0026nbsp;In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.\u0026nbsp; Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.\u0026nbsp; Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCausam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSilicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRadio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEthanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eTaurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) \u0026ndash; Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eK2M, Inc.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003ev. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al.\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(DDE) \u0026mdash; Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing \u0026ldquo;JIMINY\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;CRICKET\u0026rdquo; products, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eCertain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAutomated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same\u003c/em\u003e, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eDiebold, Inc.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(DNJ) \u0026mdash; Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8877}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:38.000Z","searchable_text":"Hill{{ FIELD }}Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology{{ FIELD }}Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology{{ FIELD }}Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine{{ FIELD }}Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint{{ FIELD }}Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation{{ FIELD }}Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order{{ FIELD }}Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc.{{ FIELD }}K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement{{ FIELD }}Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint{{ FIELD }}Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung{{ FIELD }}Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity{{ FIELD }}Brian Hill handles litigation for innovative companies, with an emphasis on cross-border technology disputes.  By focusing on clients’ key objectives, Brian brings a strategic approach to resolving unfair competition and intellectual property cases. \nBrian is a technology litigator and partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's intellectual property group. He has achieved outstanding results in cases involving patent and trademark infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, and counterfeit goods.\nBrian focuses a significant portion of his practice on unfair import investigations at the U.S. International Trade Commission.  Brian has represented Complainants and Respondents in all phases of Section 337 disputes, from conception through enforcement proceedings and before U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Brian has been recognized as a “Next Generation Partner” by Legal 500 and is a regular speaker on issues involving Section 337.\nFor example, Brian has helped clients obtain general exclusion orders on three separate occasions and regularly helps clients defeat exclusion orders sought by others. In one instance, he helped a leading pharmaceutical company devise a strategy for curbing imports of counterfeit drugs. In district court, Brian argued and successfully avoided transfer of a consolidated group of patent cases, resulting in favorable settlements.\nBrian has a background in physics and routinely handles cases involving complex technology, including telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.  Brian was previously a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding's market leading International Trade group.  Before joining the firm, Brian was a patent examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He was also an attorney at the ITC. Brian Hill lawyer Partner University of Delaware  University of Maryland-Baltimore University of Maryland School of Law Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey District of Columbia New Jersey New York International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association Certain Smart Thermostat Hubs, Systems Containing the Same, and Components of the Same, 337-TA-1339 (ITC) — Counsel for iApartments in competitor case involving smart thermostats, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Causam Smart Thermostats, Load Control Switches and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1277 (ITC) — Representing Causam Enterprises, Inc. in actions related to demand response technology Certain Tunable Lenses and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1282 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Holochip against Swiss competitor in case involving liquid lens technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Certain Networking Devices, Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1275 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent F5 Networks, Inc. in case against Proven Networks involving computer networking technology, resulting in early favorable settlement Silicon Photovoltaic Cells and Modules with Nanostructures, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1271 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Advanced Silicon Group in case against manufacturers of solar panels in China related to silicon nanowire technology Radio Frequency Identification (\"RFID\") Products, Components Thereof, Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1234 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Amtech Systems, LLC in case against competitor involving RFID technology, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof, 337-TA-1208 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia in case involving H.264 video compression standard, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Streaming Players, Televisions, Set Top Boxes, Remote Controllers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1200 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. against Roku, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a limited exclusion order Certain Light-Emitting Diode Products, Systems, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1163/1164/1168 — Counsel for Respondent Signify in trifurcated LED patent infringement case brought by Lighting Science Group Corporation, resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Luxury Vinyl Tile and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1155 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Mohawk Industries in case against infringing flooring tiles from China, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Ethanol Boosting Systems, LLC et al v. Ford Motor Company (DDE) — Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company in multi-forum dispute over Ford EcoBoost engine Taurine (2-Aminoethanesulfonic Acid), Methods of Production and Processes for Making the Same, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-1146 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Fuchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. in case involving successful request for 100-day proceeding on Domestic Industry, resulting in withdrawal of the complaint Certain Programmable Logic Controller (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, 337-TA-1105 (ITC) – Counsel for Respondent Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving antitrust allegations under the Sherman Act, resulting in successful defense and withdrawal of the Complaint Certain Subsea Telecommunicaton Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1098 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Nokia in case brought by Xtera, Inc. resulting in a finding of no violation Certain Industrial Automation Systems and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1074 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Rockwell Automation, Inc. in case involving grey market goods, resulting in a finding of violation and entry of a general exclusion order Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1042 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Ford Motor Company in case against Paice LLC and the Abell Foundation, Inc. K2M, Inc. v. OrthoPediatrics Corp. et al. (DDE) — Counsel for K2M, Inc. (acquired by Stryker in 2018) in trademark case related to competing “JIMINY” and “CRICKET” products, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablet Computers, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1038/1039 (ITC) — Counsel for Complainant Nokia Technologies Oy in bifurcated patent cases, resulting in favorable settlement Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Products, 337-TA-1002 (ITC) — Counsel for Respondent Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. in case involving antitrust and unfair tariff evasion, resulting in successful defense and dismissal of Complaint Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-972/989 (ITC) — Counsel for Diebold Nixdorf in offensive and defensive cases against competitor Nautilus Hyosung Diebold, Inc. v. Content Extraction and Transmission LLC (DNJ) — Counsel for Diebold in declaratory judgment action involving tortious interference and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (\"RICO\") Act, resulting in finding of patent invalidity","searchable_name":"Brian Hill","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426901,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5853,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDominic Hodson is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. For over 20 years, Dominic has worked closely with some of the world\u0026rsquo;s best-known brands to provide strategic and commercial compliance solutions for their global personnel. \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDominic specializes in global employment law and has devoted his career to the development of this niche practice, guiding his clients to compliant and commercially practical resolutions to their needs. Dominic's practice covers all regions of the world\u0026nbsp;and encompasses not only the day-to-day issues which global employers face in managing their workforce in specific countries, but also the complex and\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003edetailed issues arising from the implementation and management of multijurisdictional HR projects and initiatives. He has a particular focus on the labor and employment aspects of international business transactions and his work includes:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResolving employment and labor issues arising out of international M\u0026amp;A, spin-offs, joint-ventures and outsourcings, such as global business transfer rules (e.g. TUPE and its European equivalents); employee and employee representative consultation and consent processes; termination and rehire requirements; and pre- and post-transaction rationalization and integration processes.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAddressing global employment compliance issues, such as data protection; workplace harassment and discrimination; equal opportunity; flexible work and working from home requirements; leave and absence entitlements; wage-hour compliance; and protections for specific classes of employees.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImplementing individual and collective terminations and reductions in force, including alignment to permitted reasons for termination; individual and collective (e.g. works council and trade union) consultation requirements; government and labor authority notification and approval processes; severance agreements and other termination documents.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDesigning cost-management processes, such as adjustments and withdrawal of compensation programs; forced vacation; furloughs, unpaid leave and other reductions in working time; and implementation of other non-standard working arrangements to achieve necessary cost reductions.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e","slug":"dominic-hodson","email":"dhodson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":28,"guid":"28.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":10,"guid":"10.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":27,"guid":"27.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":120,"guid":"120.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":126,"guid":"126.capabilities","index":11,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":128,"guid":"128.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hodson","nick_name":"Dominic","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Dominic","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":3031,"meta":{"degree":"LL.B.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1997-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDominic Hodson is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. For over 20 years, Dominic has worked closely with some of the world\u0026rsquo;s best-known brands to provide strategic and commercial compliance solutions for their global personnel. \u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDominic specializes in global employment law and has devoted his career to the development of this niche practice, guiding his clients to compliant and commercially practical resolutions to their needs. Dominic's practice covers all regions of the world\u0026nbsp;and encompasses not only the day-to-day issues which global employers face in managing their workforce in specific countries, but also the complex and\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003edetailed issues arising from the implementation and management of multijurisdictional HR projects and initiatives. He has a particular focus on the labor and employment aspects of international business transactions and his work includes:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eResolving employment and labor issues arising out of international M\u0026amp;A, spin-offs, joint-ventures and outsourcings, such as global business transfer rules (e.g. TUPE and its European equivalents); employee and employee representative consultation and consent processes; termination and rehire requirements; and pre- and post-transaction rationalization and integration processes.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAddressing global employment compliance issues, such as data protection; workplace harassment and discrimination; equal opportunity; flexible work and working from home requirements; leave and absence entitlements; wage-hour compliance; and protections for specific classes of employees.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eImplementing individual and collective terminations and reductions in force, including alignment to permitted reasons for termination; individual and collective (e.g. works council and trade union) consultation requirements; government and labor authority notification and approval processes; severance agreements and other termination documents.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDesigning cost-management processes, such as adjustments and withdrawal of compensation programs; forced vacation; furloughs, unpaid leave and other reductions in working time; and implementation of other non-standard working arrangements to achieve necessary cost reductions.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8193}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:40.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:57:40.000Z","searchable_text":"Hodson{{ FIELD }}Dominic Hodson is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. For over 20 years, Dominic has worked closely with some of the world’s best-known brands to provide strategic and commercial compliance solutions for their global personnel.  \nDominic specializes in global employment law and has devoted his career to the development of this niche practice, guiding his clients to compliant and commercially practical resolutions to their needs. Dominic's practice covers all regions of the world and encompasses not only the day-to-day issues which global employers face in managing their workforce in specific countries, but also the complex and\ndetailed issues arising from the implementation and management of multijurisdictional HR projects and initiatives. He has a particular focus on the labor and employment aspects of international business transactions and his work includes:\n\nResolving employment and labor issues arising out of international M\u0026amp;A, spin-offs, joint-ventures and outsourcings, such as global business transfer rules (e.g. TUPE and its European equivalents); employee and employee representative consultation and consent processes; termination and rehire requirements; and pre- and post-transaction rationalization and integration processes.\nAddressing global employment compliance issues, such as data protection; workplace harassment and discrimination; equal opportunity; flexible work and working from home requirements; leave and absence entitlements; wage-hour compliance; and protections for specific classes of employees.\nImplementing individual and collective terminations and reductions in force, including alignment to permitted reasons for termination; individual and collective (e.g. works council and trade union) consultation requirements; government and labor authority notification and approval processes; severance agreements and other termination documents.\nDesigning cost-management processes, such as adjustments and withdrawal of compensation programs; forced vacation; furloughs, unpaid leave and other reductions in working time; and implementation of other non-standard working arrangements to achieve necessary cost reductions.\n Partner University of Sydney, Australia  University of Sydney Law School University of Sydney Law School New South Wales","searchable_name":"Dominic Hodson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448869,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":974,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTodd Holleman is co-leader of the Finance and Restructuring Practice and a Partner in the New York office of King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp;Todd advises clients in deploying private capital, at all levels of the capital structure, whether it be senior debt or control equity, acquisition financing, growth or preferred equity, subordinated or mezzanine debt, fund liquidity solutions, and rescue financings. He represents a market leading group of private debt funds, private equity funds, and portfolio companies in leveraged finance, unitranche, first lien/second lien, mezzanine, and other secured and unsecured lending transactions, with a focus on complex finance transactions and credit arrangements.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd has advised the largest private credit funds in the industry on hundreds of transactions across a broad range of industries. In addition, he has extensive experience representing creditors and investors in restructurings, insolvency proceedings and special situations investments. Todd also provides special advice to boards and companies in connection with transformative debt raises and capital structures, including early-stage transactions, acquisitions and significant monetization events. His experience extends across a variety of industries, including retail, technology, pharmaceuticals, biotech, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, financial services, insurance, security, and real estate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd leads the Blackstone Credit client team which was recognized by the American Lawyer as Best Client-Law Firm Team of the Year in 2023.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, he is recognized by Chambers in Private Credit (2025) and has served on the firm's Policy Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"w-holleman","email":"tholleman@kslaw.com","phone":"+1 917 562 0937","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate credit fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $975 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a top-level TLD registry operator and provider.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea group of private credit funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $300 million unitranche credit facility, the proceeds of the which were used by a sponsor to acquire a leading provider of pavement marking and traffic control for both construction companies and municipalities in North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea private credit fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $430 million senior secured term loan facility and a $30 million super senior first out revolver to refinance and recapitalize debt of a leading independent provider of maintenance and service to aircraft engines and airframes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea group of private credit funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $175 million senior secure unitranche facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a vertically integrated manufacture, retailer and distributer in the home building space.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea business development company and related funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $120 million unitranche term loan to a SPAC, the proceeds of which were used to acquire a software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $250 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a private operator of a network of over 180 private schools nationwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea privately held REIT\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $250 million senior credit facility and a private placement note issuance in the principal amount of $350 million.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":287},{"id":288},{"id":289}]},"expertise":[{"id":73,"guid":"73.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":734,"guid":"734.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":716,"guid":"716.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":114,"guid":"114.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1140,"guid":"1140.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1141,"guid":"1141.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":13,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1261,"guid":"1261.smart_tags","index":14,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1270,"guid":"1270.smart_tags","index":15,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1434,"guid":"1434.smart_tags","index":16,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Holleman","nick_name":"Todd","clerkships":[{"name":"Law Clerk, Hon. Robert L. Vining Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia","years_held":"1997 - 1999"}],"first_name":"W.","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"Todd","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Individually Ranked in Band 2 for Private Credit","detail":"Chambers USA, 2025"},{"title":"Highly Regarded","detail":"IFLR 1000 - Banking \u0026 Finance"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/todd-holleman-0803ba8","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eTodd Holleman is co-leader of the Finance and Restructuring Practice and a Partner in the New York office of King \u0026amp; Spalding.\u0026nbsp;Todd advises clients in deploying private capital, at all levels of the capital structure, whether it be senior debt or control equity, acquisition financing, growth or preferred equity, subordinated or mezzanine debt, fund liquidity solutions, and rescue financings. He represents a market leading group of private debt funds, private equity funds, and portfolio companies in leveraged finance, unitranche, first lien/second lien, mezzanine, and other secured and unsecured lending transactions, with a focus on complex finance transactions and credit arrangements.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd has advised the largest private credit funds in the industry on hundreds of transactions across a broad range of industries. In addition, he has extensive experience representing creditors and investors in restructurings, insolvency proceedings and special situations investments. Todd also provides special advice to boards and companies in connection with transformative debt raises and capital structures, including early-stage transactions, acquisitions and significant monetization events. His experience extends across a variety of industries, including retail, technology, pharmaceuticals, biotech, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, financial services, insurance, security, and real estate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTodd leads the Blackstone Credit client team which was recognized by the American Lawyer as Best Client-Law Firm Team of the Year in 2023.\u0026nbsp;Additionally, he is recognized by Chambers in Private Credit (2025) and has served on the firm's Policy Committee.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eprivate credit fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $975 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a top-level TLD registry operator and provider.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea group of private credit funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $300 million unitranche credit facility, the proceeds of the which were used by a sponsor to acquire a leading provider of pavement marking and traffic control for both construction companies and municipalities in North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea private credit fund\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $430 million senior secured term loan facility and a $30 million super senior first out revolver to refinance and recapitalize debt of a leading independent provider of maintenance and service to aircraft engines and airframes.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea group of private credit funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $175 million senior secure unitranche facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a vertically integrated manufacture, retailer and distributer in the home building space.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ea business development company and related funds\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $120 million unitranche term loan to a SPAC, the proceeds of which were used to acquire a software company.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $250 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a private operator of a network of over 180 private schools nationwide.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea business development company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong data-redactor-tag=\"strong\"\u003ea privately held REIT\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in connection with a $250 million senior credit facility and a private placement note issuance in the principal amount of $350 million.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Individually Ranked in Band 2 for Private Credit","detail":"Chambers USA, 2025"},{"title":"Highly Regarded","detail":"IFLR 1000 - Banking \u0026 Finance"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":923}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-05-28T22:08:58.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T22:08:58.000Z","searchable_text":"Holleman{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Individually Ranked in Band 2 for Private Credit\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Highly Regarded\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IFLR 1000 - Banking \u0026amp; Finance\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented private credit fund in connection with a $975 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a top-level TLD registry operator and provider.{{ FIELD }}Represented a group of private credit funds in connection with a $300 million unitranche credit facility, the proceeds of the which were used by a sponsor to acquire a leading provider of pavement marking and traffic control for both construction companies and municipalities in North America.{{ FIELD }}Represented a private credit fund in connection with a $430 million senior secured term loan facility and a $30 million super senior first out revolver to refinance and recapitalize debt of a leading independent provider of maintenance and service to aircraft engines and airframes.{{ FIELD }}Represented a group of private credit funds in connection with a $175 million senior secure unitranche facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a vertically integrated manufacture, retailer and distributer in the home building space.{{ FIELD }}Represented a business development company as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.{{ FIELD }}Represented a business development company and related funds in connection with a $120 million unitranche term loan to a SPAC, the proceeds of which were used to acquire a software company.{{ FIELD }}Represented a business development company in connection with a $250 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a private operator of a network of over 180 private schools nationwide.{{ FIELD }}Represented a business development company as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems.{{ FIELD }}Represented a privately held REIT in connection with a $250 million senior credit facility and a private placement note issuance in the principal amount of $350 million.{{ FIELD }}Todd Holleman is co-leader of the Finance and Restructuring Practice and a Partner in the New York office of King \u0026amp; Spalding. Todd advises clients in deploying private capital, at all levels of the capital structure, whether it be senior debt or control equity, acquisition financing, growth or preferred equity, subordinated or mezzanine debt, fund liquidity solutions, and rescue financings. He represents a market leading group of private debt funds, private equity funds, and portfolio companies in leveraged finance, unitranche, first lien/second lien, mezzanine, and other secured and unsecured lending transactions, with a focus on complex finance transactions and credit arrangements. \nTodd has advised the largest private credit funds in the industry on hundreds of transactions across a broad range of industries. In addition, he has extensive experience representing creditors and investors in restructurings, insolvency proceedings and special situations investments. Todd also provides special advice to boards and companies in connection with transformative debt raises and capital structures, including early-stage transactions, acquisitions and significant monetization events. His experience extends across a variety of industries, including retail, technology, pharmaceuticals, biotech, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, financial services, insurance, security, and real estate.\nTodd leads the Blackstone Credit client team which was recognized by the American Lawyer as Best Client-Law Firm Team of the Year in 2023. Additionally, he is recognized by Chambers in Private Credit (2025) and has served on the firm's Policy Committee. todd holleman todd holleman lawyer todd holleman new york Partner Individually Ranked in Band 2 for Private Credit Chambers USA, 2025 Highly Regarded IFLR 1000 - Banking \u0026amp; Finance University of North Carolina  Wake Forest University Wake Forest University School of Law Georgia North Carolina New York State Bar of Georgia State Bar of New York State Bar of North Carolina Law Clerk, Hon. Robert L. Vining Jr., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Represented private credit fund in connection with a $975 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a top-level TLD registry operator and provider. Represented a group of private credit funds in connection with a $300 million unitranche credit facility, the proceeds of the which were used by a sponsor to acquire a leading provider of pavement marking and traffic control for both construction companies and municipalities in North America. Represented a private credit fund in connection with a $430 million senior secured term loan facility and a $30 million super senior first out revolver to refinance and recapitalize debt of a leading independent provider of maintenance and service to aircraft engines and airframes. Represented a group of private credit funds in connection with a $175 million senior secure unitranche facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a vertically integrated manufacture, retailer and distributer in the home building space. Represented a business development company as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems. Represented a business development company and related funds in connection with a $120 million unitranche term loan to a SPAC, the proceeds of which were used to acquire a software company. Represented a business development company in connection with a $250 million unitranche senior revolving and term loan credit facilities the proceeds of which were used to finance the acquisition of a private operator of a network of over 180 private schools nationwide. Represented a business development company as lead arranger and administrative agent in connection with a $72 million first lien/second lien working capital and term loan facility, the proceeds of which were used by a sponsor to acquire a highly diversified provider of parts, assemblies and components for commercial aircraft, military aircraft and missile systems. Represented a privately held REIT in connection with a $250 million senior credit facility and a private placement note issuance in the principal amount of $350 million.","searchable_name":"W. Todd Holleman (Todd)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448858,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":905,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Hyman is a partner in our Corporate, Finance and Investments practice. John represents public and private companies, as well as private equity firms, in a wide variety of corporate transactions, with a primary focus on mergers and acquisitions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has represented clients in acquisitions and divestitures of stock and assets; equity financing transactions; leverage buyouts; strategic and venture capital investments; joint ventures; recapitalizations; and other control and non-control transactions. He also handles general corporate and securities matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in a wide range of corporate transactions, John works with clients in a number of sectors, including consumer products, industrial distribution, logistics, healthcare, energy, restaurants and retail.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"john-hyman","email":"jhyman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":77}]},"expertise":[{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":6,"guid":"6.smart_tags","index":3,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hyman","nick_name":"John","clerkships":[],"first_name":"John","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJohn Hyman is a partner in our Corporate, Finance and Investments practice. John represents public and private companies, as well as private equity firms, in a wide variety of corporate transactions, with a primary focus on mergers and acquisitions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJohn has represented clients in acquisitions and divestitures of stock and assets; equity financing transactions; leverage buyouts; strategic and venture capital investments; joint ventures; recapitalizations; and other control and non-control transactions. He also handles general corporate and securities matters.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWith experience in a wide range of corporate transactions, John works with clients in a number of sectors, including consumer products, industrial distribution, logistics, healthcare, energy, restaurants and retail.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":934}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-05-28T22:08:31.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T22:08:31.000Z","searchable_text":"Hyman{{ FIELD }}John Hyman is a partner in our Corporate, Finance and Investments practice. John represents public and private companies, as well as private equity firms, in a wide variety of corporate transactions, with a primary focus on mergers and acquisitions.\nJohn has represented clients in acquisitions and divestitures of stock and assets; equity financing transactions; leverage buyouts; strategic and venture capital investments; joint ventures; recapitalizations; and other control and non-control transactions. He also handles general corporate and securities matters.\nWith experience in a wide range of corporate transactions, John works with clients in a number of sectors, including consumer products, industrial distribution, logistics, healthcare, energy, restaurants and retail. John M Hyman Partner Yale University Yale Law School University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Georgia Illinois","searchable_name":"John M. Hyman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447423,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7353,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eYuchen is a litigation associate in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Los Angeles office who focuses his practice on patent litigation. With a master\u0026rsquo;s degree in computer science, Yuchen combines his technical background and legal knowledge to advise clients on a variety of intellectual property matters across software, electrical, computing, semiconductor, and medical device sectors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYuchen\u0026rsquo;s previous research focuses on artificial intelligence and machine learning. He devotes his research experiences to helping high-tech companies in various patent litigation matters including federal district court litigation, ITC section 337 investigations, and PTAB proceedings. Being a native Mandarin speaker, Yuchen can also handle complex legal English-Mandarin communication.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"yuchen-han","email":"yhan@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ITC trial that settled on the last day of trial at my prior firm.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":133,"guid":"133.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":4,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Han","nick_name":"Yuchen","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Yuchen","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":613,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eYuchen is a litigation associate in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Los Angeles office who focuses his practice on patent litigation. With a master\u0026rsquo;s degree in computer science, Yuchen combines his technical background and legal knowledge to advise clients on a variety of intellectual property matters across software, electrical, computing, semiconductor, and medical device sectors.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYuchen\u0026rsquo;s previous research focuses on artificial intelligence and machine learning. He devotes his research experiences to helping high-tech companies in various patent litigation matters including federal district court litigation, ITC section 337 investigations, and PTAB proceedings. Being a native Mandarin speaker, Yuchen can also handle complex legal English-Mandarin communication.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in an ITC trial that settled on the last day of trial at my prior firm.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-04-08T14:17:44.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-08T14:17:44.000Z","searchable_text":"Han{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.{{ FIELD }}Representing Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading medical device company in an ITC trial that settled on the last day of trial at my prior firm.{{ FIELD }}Yuchen is a litigation associate in the firm’s Los Angeles office who focuses his practice on patent litigation. With a master’s degree in computer science, Yuchen combines his technical background and legal knowledge to advise clients on a variety of intellectual property matters across software, electrical, computing, semiconductor, and medical device sectors. \nYuchen’s previous research focuses on artificial intelligence and machine learning. He devotes his research experiences to helping high-tech companies in various patent litigation matters including federal district court litigation, ITC section 337 investigations, and PTAB proceedings. Being a native Mandarin speaker, Yuchen can also handle complex legal English-Mandarin communication. Associate Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law Duke University Duke University School of Law Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Central District of California California Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Los Angeles County Representing a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products. Representing Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain. Representing a leading medical device company in an ITC trial that settled on the last day of trial at my prior firm.","searchable_name":"Yuchen Han","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":427251,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6546,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMichael Hays is an associate\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate practice group. His practice\u0026nbsp;focuses primarily in the areas of\u0026nbsp;venture capital and private equity transactions, mergers and acquisitions,\u0026nbsp;and corporate governance matters. He is a member of the firm's Emerging Companies and Venture Capital, and Technology Transactions and Sourcing specialty teams.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael received his B.A. from the University of Virginia, and his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. While at Georgetown, Michael served as an editor on the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. During this time, he\u0026nbsp;also externed at Capital One's headquarters and worked with counsel on corporate legal matters.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"michael-hays","email":"mhays@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":80,"guid":"80.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hays","nick_name":"Michael","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Michael","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eMichael Hays is an associate\u0026nbsp;in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Corporate practice group. His practice\u0026nbsp;focuses primarily in the areas of\u0026nbsp;venture capital and private equity transactions, mergers and acquisitions,\u0026nbsp;and corporate governance matters. He is a member of the firm's Emerging Companies and Venture Capital, and Technology Transactions and Sourcing specialty teams.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMichael received his B.A. from the University of Virginia, and his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. While at Georgetown, Michael served as an editor on the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. During this time, he\u0026nbsp;also externed at Capital One's headquarters and worked with counsel on corporate legal matters.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12332}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:26.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:59:26.000Z","searchable_text":"Hays{{ FIELD }}Michael Hays is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Corporate practice group. His practice focuses primarily in the areas of venture capital and private equity transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate governance matters. He is a member of the firm's Emerging Companies and Venture Capital, and Technology Transactions and Sourcing specialty teams. \nMichael received his B.A. from the University of Virginia, and his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center. While at Georgetown, Michael served as an editor on the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics. During this time, he also externed at Capital One's headquarters and worked with counsel on corporate legal matters.  Associate University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center Virginia","searchable_name":"Michael Hays","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448766,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6776,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e, and oil and gas disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.\u0026nbsp; His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas. \u0026nbsp;In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn. \u0026nbsp;He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"robert-hill","email":"rhill@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoffshore drilling company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to a dispute involving an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ehydrocarbon project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emunicipal utility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esolar facility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein North Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer employee\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003edefrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ejury verdict\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof $15,618,873.47 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraud damages\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand, after\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebifurcated trial\u003c/strong\u003e, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epunitive damages\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erelator\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein multi-million-dollar settlement\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecase involving\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraudulent small business subcontracting\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon military bases.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":4,"guid":"4.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Hill","nick_name":"Bobby","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Patrick E. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit","years_held":"2022 - 2022"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Honorable Barbara Lynn, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas","years_held":"2023 - 2024"}],"first_name":"Bobby","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertmaddenhill/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, \u003cem\u003equi tam\u003c/em\u003e, and oil and gas disputes.\u0026nbsp; He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.\u0026nbsp; His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas. \u0026nbsp;In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.\u0026nbsp; He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn. \u0026nbsp;He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eoffshore drilling company\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003erelating to a dispute involving an\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003einternational\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ehydrocarbon project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003emunicipal utility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein a dispute relating to the\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003econstruction\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003esolar facility\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein North Texas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eformer employee\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003edefrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ejury verdict\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eof $15,618,873.47 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraud damages\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eand, after\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ebifurcated trial\u003c/strong\u003e, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003epunitive damages\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003erelator\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ein multi-million-dollar settlement\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFalse Claims Act\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003ecase involving\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003efraudulent small business subcontracting\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon military bases.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11939}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-05-28T22:04:23.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T22:04:23.000Z","searchable_text":"Hill{{ FIELD }}Representing an offshore drilling company relating to a dispute involving an international hydrocarbon project.{{ FIELD }}Representing a municipal utility in a dispute relating to the construction of a solar facility in North Texas.{{ FIELD }}Represented a former employee defrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a jury verdict of $15,618,873.47 in fraud damages and, after bifurcated trial, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in punitive damages.{{ FIELD }}Represented relator in multi-million-dollar settlement False Claims Act case involving fraudulent small business subcontracting on military bases.{{ FIELD }}Bobby Hill is a litigator with experience in business, contract, antitrust, qui tam, and oil and gas disputes.  He has successfully represented plaintiffs and defendants in state and federal court.  His time clerking on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Northern District of Texas imparts insight into how trial and appellate courts work and think. \nPrior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, Bobby clerked for the Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and for the Honorable Barbara M. G. Lynn of the Northern District of Texas.  In law school, he externed for the Honorable Catharina Haynes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.\nFor the past two years, Bobby has served on the committee that planned the Northern District of Texas Bench Bar Conference, which was attended by over 500 lawyers.  He was a Pupil before becoming an Associate of the Higginbotham Inn of Court, which awarded him the Sue Bliss Panda Award given to the outstanding Associate member of the Inn.  He is active in the alumni associations of the Dallas private school he attended growing up, the University of Texas, and SMU law.  \nBobby is a board member of the non-profit the Young Texans of the American Cancer Society. \nBefore going to law school, he worked in Belgium and Ukraine selling advertising space in The European Times, before spending over three years at a Dallas-based hedge fund.\nHe is a fifth-generation Texas lawyer, which imbues a deep, personal connection to the law.  Associate The University of Texas at Austin The University of Texas School of Law Southern Methodist University Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas Texas American Bar Association Federal Bar Association Dallas Bar Association Bar Association of the Fifth Federal Circuit Higginbotham Inn of Court, former Associate and Pupil NDTX Bench Bar Planning Committee Judicial Clerk, Patrick E. Higginbotham, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Honorable Barbara Lynn, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Representing an offshore drilling company relating to a dispute involving an international hydrocarbon project. Representing a municipal utility in a dispute relating to the construction of a solar facility in North Texas. Represented a former employee defrauded of compensation by his former employer whose claims, after I departed for a clerkship, resulted in a jury verdict of $15,618,873.47 in fraud damages and, after bifurcated trial, another verdict totaling $15,100,000.00 in punitive damages. Represented relator in multi-million-dollar settlement False Claims Act case involving fraudulent small business subcontracting on military bases.","searchable_name":"Bobby Hill","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}