{"data":{"filter_options":{"titles":[{"name":"Partner","value":"Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops","value":"Partner / Dir. E-Discovery Ops"},{"name":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office","value":"Managing Partner Atlanta Office"},{"name":"Partner / General Counsel","value":"Partner / General Counsel"},{"name":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono","value":"Partner / Head of Pro Bono"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Operating Officer"},{"name":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice","value":"Partner / Chairman, Saudi Arabia Practice"},{"name":"K\u0026S Talent Partner","value":"K\u0026S Talent Partner"},{"name":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer","value":"Partner / Chief Human Resources Officer"},{"name":"Deputy General Counsel","value":"Deputy General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Counsel","value":"Senior Counsel"},{"name":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations","value":"Associate Director, E-Discovery Operations"},{"name":"Counsel","value":"Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Associate","value":"Senior Associate"},{"name":"Associate","value":"Associate"},{"name":"Senior Lawyer","value":"Senior Lawyer"},{"name":"Senior Attorney","value":"Senior Attorney"},{"name":"Attorney","value":"Attorney"},{"name":"Consultant","value":"Consultant"},{"name":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions","value":"Managing Director - Capital Solutions"},{"name":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor","value":"Senior Counsel and Policy Advisor"},{"name":"Government Relations Advisor","value":"Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Patent Agent","value":"Patent Agent"},{"name":"Senior Advisor","value":"Senior Advisor"},{"name":"Associate General Counsel","value":"Associate General Counsel"},{"name":"Senior Government Relations Advisor","value":"Senior Government Relations Advisor"},{"name":"Director of Operations","value":"Director of Operations"},{"name":"Chief Information Officer","value":"Chief Information Officer"},{"name":"Chief Marketing Officer","value":"Chief Marketing Officer"},{"name":"Director of Office Operations","value":"Director of Office Operations"},{"name":"Chief Revenue Officer","value":"Chief Revenue Officer"},{"name":"Chief Recruiting Officer","value":"Chief Recruiting Officer"},{"name":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer","value":"Chief Lawyer Talent Development Officer"},{"name":"Director of Community Affairs","value":"Director of Community Affairs"},{"name":"Tax Consultant","value":"Tax Consultant"},{"name":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations","value":"Director of Facilities \u0026 Admin Operations"},{"name":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration","value":"Chief of Lateral Partner Recruiting \u0026 Integration"},{"name":"Senior Office Manager","value":"Senior Office Manager"},{"name":"Director of Operations Europe","value":"Director of Operations Europe"},{"name":"Pro Bono Deputy","value":"Pro Bono Deputy"},{"name":"Law Clerk","value":"Law Clerk"},{"name":"Chair","value":"Chair"}],"schools":[{"name":"(Commercial Law), in front of Monash University, Australia","value":3045},{"name":"Aberystwyth University","value":3004},{"name":"Albany Law School","value":2118},{"name":"American University Washington College of Law","value":3042},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":2839},{"name":"American University, Washington College of Law","value":3024},{"name":"Appalachian School of Law","value":2891},{"name":"Ateneo de Manila University","value":2914},{"name":"Atlanta's John Marshall Law School","value":2830},{"name":"Ave Maria School of Law","value":2892},{"name":"Baylor University School of Law","value":181},{"name":"Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law","value":2619},{"name":"Binghamton University","value":3002},{"name":"Bond University","value":2841},{"name":"Boston College Law School","value":245},{"name":"Boston University School of Law","value":247},{"name":"BPP Law School Leeds","value":2642},{"name":"BPP Law School London","value":2782},{"name":"BPP Law School","value":3237},{"name":"BPP University","value":2984},{"name":"Brooklyn Law School","value":2705},{"name":"Bucerius Law School, Germany","value":2898},{"name":"Cairo University, Law School","value":2962},{"name":"California Western School of Law","value":315},{"name":"Capital University Law School","value":327},{"name":"Case Western Reserve University School of Law","value":345},{"name":"Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law","value":2235},{"name":"Chapman University School of Law","value":377},{"name":"Charleston School of Law","value":2910},{"name":"Chicago-Kent College of Law","value":3050},{"name":"City Law School, London","value":2998},{"name":"City Law School","value":2857},{"name":"Clark University","value":3006},{"name":"Cleveland-Marshall College of Law","value":426},{"name":"College of Law, Guildford, UK","value":2646},{"name":"College of Law, London, UK","value":2647},{"name":"Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs","value":3008},{"name":"Columbia University School of Law","value":485},{"name":"Columbia University","value":3126},{"name":"Columbus School of Law, Catholic University of America","value":3010},{"name":"Columbus School of Law","value":350},{"name":"Concord Law School of Kaplan University","value":1026},{"name":"Cornell Law School","value":512},{"name":"Creighton University School of Law","value":518},{"name":"Creighton University","value":3025},{"name":"Cumberland School of Law","value":1759},{"name":"CUNY School of Law","value":2893},{"name":"David A. Clarke School of Law","value":2399},{"name":"Deakin University School of Law","value":2907},{"name":"Delhi University","value":3099},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":3060},{"name":"DePaul University College of Law","value":565},{"name":"Dickinson School of Law","value":2719},{"name":"Drake University Law School","value":609},{"name":"Duke University School of Law","value":613},{"name":"Duquesne University School of Law","value":614},{"name":"Durham University","value":2708},{"name":"Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law","value":173},{"name":"Edinburgh Law School","value":3160},{"name":"Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University","value":2936},{"name":"ELTE University Budapest","value":2969},{"name":"Emory University School of Law","value":659},{"name":"ESADE Business and Law School – Universidad Ramon Llull","value":3215},{"name":"Fachseminare von Fürstenberg","value":2918},{"name":"Faculté Libre de Droit, Université Catholique de Lille","value":3055},{"name":"Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb","value":2983},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":3039},{"name":"Faculty of Law","value":2944},{"name":"Federal University of Rio de Janeiro","value":3022},{"name":"Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Law (Brazil)","value":3062},{"name":"Florida A\u0026M University College of Law","value":699},{"name":"Florida Coastal School of Law","value":2894},{"name":"Florida International College of Law","value":707},{"name":"Florida State University College of Law","value":720},{"name":"Fordham University School of Law","value":722},{"name":"Franklin Pierce School of Law","value":2259},{"name":"Free University Berlin","value":2903},{"name":"Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena","value":3015},{"name":"Fudan University","value":2986},{"name":"George Mason University School of Law","value":752},{"name":"George Washington University Law School","value":753},{"name":"Georgetown University Law Center","value":755},{"name":"Georgia State University College of Law","value":761},{"name":"Ghent Law School","value":2793},{"name":"Golden Gate University School of Law","value":770},{"name":"Gonzaga University School of Law","value":772},{"name":"Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva","value":2997},{"name":"Guildhall University, London","value":2863},{"name":"Hamline University School of Law","value":811},{"name":"Harvard Law School","value":824},{"name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law","value":2994},{"name":"Hofstra University School of Law","value":858},{"name":"Howard University School of Law","value":872},{"name":"Huazhong University of Science and Technology","value":3016},{"name":"Humboldt University of Berlin","value":3012},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":2711},{"name":"Indiana University School of Law","value":890},{"name":"Inns of Court School of Law, UK","value":2649},{"name":"International Association of Privacy Professionals","value":3009},{"name":"J. Reuben Clark Law School","value":262},{"name":"Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center","value":2084},{"name":"James Cook University of North Queensland","value":3034},{"name":"Jean Moulin University Lyon 3, France","value":2938},{"name":"Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany","value":2653},{"name":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health","value":2992},{"name":"Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Rechtswissenschaft (Germany)","value":3063},{"name":"Kansas City School of Law","value":2247},{"name":"Keio University","value":2968},{"name":"Kent College of Law","value":883},{"name":"King Saud University College of Law \u0026 Political Sciences","value":2823},{"name":"King's College London","value":2987},{"name":"King's College, University of London, UK","value":2654},{"name":"Kline School of Law","value":611},{"name":"KU Leuven","value":3007},{"name":"Leiden University","value":2926},{"name":"Levin College of Law","value":2189},{"name":"Lewis and Clark Law School","value":1089},{"name":"Liberty University School of Law","value":1094},{"name":"Lincoln College of Law","value":2253},{"name":"Liverpool University, UK","value":2657},{"name":"LL.M. in International Crime and Justice UNICRI","value":2937},{"name":"London School of Economics and Political Science, UK","value":2658},{"name":"Loyola Law School","value":2895},{"name":"Loyola University Chicago School of Law","value":1135},{"name":"Loyola University New Orleans College of Law","value":1136},{"name":"Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich","value":3105},{"name":"Lund University","value":3084},{"name":"Marquette University Law School","value":1176},{"name":"McGeorge School of Law","value":2402},{"name":"McGill University","value":2659},{"name":"Melbourne Law School","value":2899},{"name":"Mercer University Walter F. George School of Law","value":1221},{"name":"Mexico Autonomous Institute of Technology","value":2996},{"name":"Michael E. Moritz College of Law","value":2728},{"name":"Michigan State University College of Law","value":1245},{"name":"Mississippi College School of Law","value":1285},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":2660},{"name":"Monash University, Australia","value":3047},{"name":"Moscow State University","value":2815},{"name":"National and Kapodistrian University of Athens","value":3032},{"name":"National Law University Jodhpur","value":3020},{"name":"National University of Singapore, Faculty of Law","value":2662},{"name":"New England School of Law","value":2886},{"name":"New York Law School","value":1403},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":1406},{"name":"New York University School of Law","value":2715},{"name":"Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law","value":323},{"name":"North Carolina Central University School of Law","value":1417},{"name":"Northeastern University School of Law","value":1430},{"name":"Northern Illinois University College of Law","value":1432},{"name":"Northwestern Pritzker School of Law","value":1451},{"name":"Notre Dame Law School","value":2278},{"name":"Ohio Northern University Law School","value":3036},{"name":"Oklahoma City University School of Law","value":1487},{"name":"Osgoode Hall Law School","value":3124},{"name":"Oxford University, UK","value":2669},{"name":"Pace University School of Law","value":1516},{"name":"Panteion University","value":3033},{"name":"Paul M. Hebert Law Center","value":2713},{"name":"Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson School of Law","value":1562},{"name":"Pepperdine University School of Law","value":1570},{"name":"Pettit College of Law","value":1473},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile","value":3203},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru","value":3011},{"name":"Pontificia Universidad Javeriana","value":3013},{"name":"Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo","value":3095},{"name":"Prince Sultan University College of Law","value":3167},{"name":"Queen's University Faculty of Law","value":2801},{"name":"Queens College, Cambridge","value":3003},{"name":"Quinnipiac University School of Law","value":1626},{"name":"Ralph R. Papitto School of Law","value":1686},{"name":"Regent University School of Law","value":1649},{"name":"Rice University","value":3043},{"name":"Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg","value":3049},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law-Newark","value":1699},{"name":"Rutgers University School of Law","value":1697},{"name":"S.J. Quinney College of Law","value":2408},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":2725},{"name":"Saint Louis University School of Law","value":1732},{"name":"Salmon P. Chase College of Law","value":1433},{"name":"Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law","value":103},{"name":"Santa Clara University School of Law","value":1771},{"name":"Sciences Po Paris","value":2925},{"name":"Seattle University School of Law","value":1787},{"name":"Seton Hall University School of Law","value":1790},{"name":"Shepard Broad Law Center","value":1460},{"name":"South Texas College of Law","value":2721},{"name":"Southern Illinois University School of Law","value":1849},{"name":"Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law","value":1852},{"name":"Southern University Law Center","value":1857},{"name":"Southwestern Law School","value":1876},{"name":"St. John's University School of Law","value":2724},{"name":"St. Mary's University School of Law","value":1896},{"name":"St. Thomas University School of Law","value":1746},{"name":"Stanford Law School","value":1904},{"name":"Stetson University College of Law","value":1910},{"name":"Sturm College of Law","value":2184},{"name":"Suffolk University Law School","value":1921},{"name":"Syracuse University College of Law","value":1956},{"name":"Temple University Beasley School of Law","value":1974},{"name":"Texas A\u0026M School of Law","value":1980},{"name":"Texas Tech University School of Law","value":1994},{"name":"Texas Wesleyan University School of Law","value":1996},{"name":"The College of Law Australia","value":3091},{"name":"The College of Law, London","value":2935},{"name":"The John Marshall Law School","value":2034},{"name":"The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center and School","value":2896},{"name":"The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law","value":2990},{"name":"The University of Akron School of Law","value":2143},{"name":"The University of Alabama School of Law","value":2045},{"name":"The University of Birmingham, U.K.","value":2796},{"name":"The University of Iowa College of Law","value":2206},{"name":"The University of Manchester","value":2845},{"name":"The University of Melbourne","value":2836},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2055},{"name":"The University of Texas School of Law","value":2752},{"name":"The University of Tulsa College of Law","value":2407},{"name":"Thomas Jefferson School of Law","value":685},{"name":"Thomas M. Cooley Law School","value":2729},{"name":"Thurgood Marshall School of Law","value":1992},{"name":"Tianjin University of Commerce","value":2995},{"name":"Tulane University Law School","value":2113},{"name":"UC Davis School of Law","value":2160},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":3168},{"name":"UCLA School of Law","value":2162},{"name":"Universidad Católica de Honduras","value":2916},{"name":"Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá Colombia","value":2677},{"name":"Universidad Francisco Marroquin","value":3090},{"name":"Universidad Iberoamericana","value":2915},{"name":"Universidad Panamericana","value":2904},{"name":"Universidad Torcuato di Tella","value":3035},{"name":"Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Direito","value":3028},{"name":"Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie","value":2977},{"name":"Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi","value":3135},{"name":"Université Catholique de Louvain, Licencie en Droit","value":3213},{"name":"Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium","value":2679},{"name":"Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne","value":2680},{"name":"University at Buffalo Law School","value":1928},{"name":"University College Dublin Law School","value":2900},{"name":"University College London, UK","value":2760},{"name":"University of Alberta Faculty of Law","value":3088},{"name":"University of Amsterdam","value":2980},{"name":"University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law","value":2149},{"name":"University of Arkansas School of Law","value":2154},{"name":"University of Augsburg","value":2779},{"name":"University of Baltimore School of Law","value":2156},{"name":"University of Bonn, Germany","value":2682},{"name":"University of Bristol, UK","value":2761},{"name":"University of Buenos Aires, Argentina","value":2683},{"name":"University of California College of the Law","value":3196},{"name":"University of California Hastings College of Law","value":2158},{"name":"University of California Irvine School of Law","value":2161},{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, School of Law","value":2159},{"name":"University of California, Davis","value":3019},{"name":"University of Cambridge, U.K","value":2991},{"name":"University of Cambridge, UK","value":2684},{"name":"University of Canterbury","value":2981},{"name":"University of Cape Town, South Africa","value":2854},{"name":"University of Central Florida","value":3027},{"name":"University of Chester Law School","value":3005},{"name":"University of Chicago Law School","value":2174},{"name":"University of Chicago","value":3038},{"name":"University of Cincinnati College of Law","value":2175},{"name":"University of Cologne, Germany","value":2885},{"name":"University of Colorado School of Law","value":2177},{"name":"University of Connecticut School of Law","value":2180},{"name":"University of Dayton School of Law","value":2182},{"name":"University of Detroit Mercy School of Law","value":2185},{"name":"University of Deusto, Spain","value":2685},{"name":"University of East Anglia","value":3000},{"name":"University of East London","value":2963},{"name":"University of Exeter, UK","value":2770},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3112},{"name":"University of Florida, Levin College of Law","value":3188},{"name":"University of Georgia School of Law","value":2190},{"name":"University of Hamburg, Germany","value":2688},{"name":"University of Houston Law Center","value":2197},{"name":"University of Hull","value":3040},{"name":"University of Idaho College of Law","value":2201},{"name":"University of Illinois at Chicago School of Law","value":2202},{"name":"University of Illinois College of Law","value":2204},{"name":"University of Kansas School of Law","value":2208},{"name":"University of Kent at Canterbury, UK","value":2690},{"name":"University of Kent","value":2849},{"name":"University of Kentucky College of Law","value":2210},{"name":"University of La Verne College of Law","value":2211},{"name":"University of Law, London","value":2999},{"name":"University of Law","value":2954},{"name":"University of Leeds School of Law","value":2850},{"name":"University of Lethbridge","value":3030},{"name":"University of Lima","value":2859},{"name":"University of London","value":2692},{"name":"University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law","value":2214},{"name":"University of Maine School of Law","value":2391},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2224},{"name":"University of Maryland School of Law","value":2739},{"name":"University of Miami School of Law","value":2236},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":2237},{"name":"University of Michigan Law School","value":3064},{"name":"University of Minnesota Law School","value":2243},{"name":"University of Mississippi School of Law","value":2244},{"name":"University of Missouri School of Law","value":2246},{"name":"University of Montana School of Law","value":2048},{"name":"University of Nebraska College of Law","value":2744},{"name":"University of New Mexico School of Law","value":2262},{"name":"University of New South Wales","value":2871},{"name":"University of North Carolina School of Law","value":2266},{"name":"University of North Dakota School of Law","value":2271},{"name":"University of Nottingham, England","value":2881},{"name":"University of Oklahoma Law Center","value":2747},{"name":"University of Oregon School of Law","value":2281},{"name":"University of Otago, New Zealand","value":2694},{"name":"University of Paris II, Pantheon-Assas, France","value":2695},{"name":"University of Paris, Pantheon Sorbonne","value":3190},{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Law School","value":2282},{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law","value":2354},{"name":"University of Richmond School of Law","value":2370},{"name":"University of San Diego School of Law","value":2377},{"name":"University of San Francisco School of Law","value":2378},{"name":"University of Sheffield","value":2805},{"name":"University of South Carolina School of Law","value":2750},{"name":"University of South Dakota School of Law","value":2387},{"name":"University of Southern California Gould School of Law","value":3051},{"name":"University of St. Thomas School of Law","value":2751},{"name":"University of Sydney Law School","value":3031},{"name":"University of Sydney, Australia","value":2700},{"name":"University of Tasmania","value":2835},{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law","value":2051},{"name":"University of the West of England, Bristol","value":3001},{"name":"University of Tokyo","value":3153},{"name":"University of Toledo College of Law","value":2406},{"name":"University of Toronto","value":2912},{"name":"University of Turku","value":3083},{"name":"University of Utah","value":3026},{"name":"University of Vienna School of Law","value":2701},{"name":"University of Virginia School of Law","value":2410},{"name":"University of Warwick, UK","value":2771},{"name":"University of Washington School of Law","value":2412},{"name":"University of Western Australia","value":2949},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2419},{"name":"University of Wisconsin Law School","value":2755},{"name":"University of Wollongong, Australia","value":2873},{"name":"University of Wyoming College of Law","value":2429},{"name":"University of Zürich","value":3037},{"name":"University Paris Dauphine","value":2976},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":2975},{"name":"University Paris II Assas","value":3052},{"name":"University Toulouse Capitol","value":3109},{"name":"USC Gould School of Law","value":2389},{"name":"Utrecht University","value":3085},{"name":"Valparaiso University School of Law","value":2441},{"name":"Vanderbilt University School of Law","value":2442},{"name":"Vermont Law School","value":2451},{"name":"Villanova University School of Law","value":2454},{"name":"Wake Forest University School of Law","value":2471},{"name":"Washburn University School of Law","value":2482},{"name":"Washington and Lee University School of Law","value":2484},{"name":"Washington College of Law","value":61},{"name":"Washington University in St. Louis School of Law","value":2489},{"name":"Wayne State University Law School","value":2493},{"name":"West Virginia University College of Law","value":2517},{"name":"Western New England College School of Law","value":2528},{"name":"Western State College of Law","value":2897},{"name":"Wharton School of Business","value":3044},{"name":"Whittier Law School","value":2564},{"name":"Widener University Delaware Law School","value":2569},{"name":"Willamette University College of Law","value":2573},{"name":"William \u0026 Mary Law School","value":462},{"name":"William H. Bowen School of Law","value":2150},{"name":"William Mitchell College of Law","value":2758},{"name":"William S. Boyd School of Law","value":2256},{"name":"William S. Richardson School of Law","value":2195},{"name":"Wilmington University","value":2993},{"name":"Yale Law School","value":2605}],"offices":[{"name":"Abu Dhabi","value":13},{"name":"Atlanta","value":1},{"name":"Austin","value":12},{"name":"Brussels","value":23},{"name":"Charlotte","value":8},{"name":"Chicago","value":21},{"name":"Dallas","value":28},{"name":"Denver","value":22},{"name":"Dubai","value":6},{"name":"Frankfurt","value":9},{"name":"Geneva","value":15},{"name":"Houston","value":4},{"name":"London","value":5},{"name":"Los Angeles","value":19},{"name":"Miami","value":25},{"name":"New York","value":3},{"name":"Northern Virginia","value":24},{"name":"Paris","value":14},{"name":"Riyadh","value":27},{"name":"Sacramento","value":20},{"name":"San Francisco","value":10},{"name":"Silicon Valley","value":11},{"name":"Singapore","value":16},{"name":"Sydney","value":26},{"name":"Tokyo","value":18},{"name":"Washington, D.C.","value":2}],"capabilities":[{"name":"Corporate, Finance and Investments","value":"cg-1"},{"name":"Activist Defense","value":72},{"name":"Capital Markets","value":26},{"name":"Construction and Procurement","value":40},{"name":"Corporate Governance","value":27},{"name":"Emerging Companies and Venture Capital","value":80},{"name":"Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation","value":28},{"name":"Energy and Infrastructure Projects","value":35},{"name":"Financial Restructuring","value":10},{"name":"Fund Finance","value":134},{"name":"Global Human Capital and Compliance ","value":121},{"name":"Investment Funds and Asset Management","value":78},{"name":"Leveraged Finance","value":29},{"name":"Mergers and Acquisitions (M\u0026A)","value":32},{"name":"Middle East and Islamic Finance and Investment","value":31},{"name":"Private Equity","value":33},{"name":"Public Companies","value":126},{"name":"Real Estate","value":36},{"name":"Structured Finance and Securitization","value":82},{"name":"Tax","value":37},{"name":"Technology Transactions","value":115},{"name":"Government Matters","value":"cg-2"},{"name":"Antitrust","value":1},{"name":"Data, Privacy and Security","value":6},{"name":"Environmental, Health and Safety","value":71},{"name":"FDA and Life Sciences","value":21},{"name":"Government Advocacy and Public Policy","value":23},{"name":"Government Contracts","value":116},{"name":"Healthcare","value":24},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":135},{"name":"International Trade","value":25},{"name":"National Security and Corporate Espionage","value":110},{"name":"Securities Enforcement and Regulation","value":20},{"name":"Special Matters and Government Investigations","value":11},{"name":"Trial and Global Disputes","value":"cg-3"},{"name":"Antitrust ","value":129},{"name":"Appellate, Constitutional and Administrative Law","value":2},{"name":"Bankruptcy and Insolvency Litigation","value":38},{"name":"Class Action Defense","value":3},{"name":"Commercial Litigation","value":5},{"name":"Corporate and Securities Litigation","value":19},{"name":"E-Discovery","value":7},{"name":"Global Construction and Infrastructure Disputes","value":4},{"name":"Innovation Protection","value":136},{"name":"Intellectual Property","value":13},{"name":"International Arbitration and Litigation","value":14},{"name":"Labor and Employment","value":15},{"name":"Product Liability","value":17},{"name":"Professional Liability","value":18},{"name":"Toxic \u0026 Environmental Torts","value":16},{"name":"Industries / Issues","value":"cg-4"},{"name":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning","value":133},{"name":"Automotive, Transportation and Mobility","value":106},{"name":"Buy American","value":124},{"name":"Crisis Management","value":111},{"name":"Doing Business in Latin America","value":132},{"name":"Energy Transition","value":131},{"name":"Energy","value":102},{"name":"Environmental Agenda","value":125},{"name":"Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)","value":127},{"name":"Financial Services","value":107},{"name":"Focus on Women's Health","value":112},{"name":"Food and Beverage","value":105},{"name":"Higher Education","value":109},{"name":"Life Sciences and Healthcare","value":103},{"name":"Russia/Ukraine","value":128},{"name":"Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs)","value":123},{"name":"Technology","value":118}]},"title_id":null,"school_id":null,"office_id":null,"capability_id":"107","extra_filter_id":null,"extra_filter_type":null,"q":null,"starts_with":"F","per_page":12,"people":[{"id":448045,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7374,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJade-Alexandra Fearns is a partner in the London office of King and Spalding. Jade focuses her practice on antitrust and competition law along with international sanctions and other regulatory and compliance-related advice across a number of sectors, including technology, pharmaceutical and healthcare, financial services and banking, sports, automotive, media, manufacturing, consumer goods and telecommunications.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has advised on hundreds of\u0026nbsp;merger filings in the UK, EU and internationally and has secured\u0026nbsp;many phase 1 and phase 2 clearances. Jade also advises on and\u0026nbsp;prepares foreign investment and national security-related filings. In\u0026nbsp;addition, Jade advises clients on UK and EU sports-related\u0026nbsp;regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade is recommended in The Legal 500 for the following practice\u0026nbsp;areas: EU and Competition, Trade, WTO Anti-Dumping and Customs\u0026nbsp;and Sport. According to The Legal 500, \"competition expert Jade-\u0026nbsp;Alexandra Fearns is \u0026hellip; recommended for [sports-related] regulatory\u0026nbsp;and disciplinary matters.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade also\u0026nbsp;frequently advises pro bono clients on a various of issues,\u0026nbsp;including athlete representations.\u0026nbsp;Jade is heavily involved in community and pro-bono projects\u0026nbsp;providing assistance to individual clients and nonprofit organisations\u0026nbsp;in litigation and transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jade-alexandra-fearns","email":"jfearns@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eTransactional:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has advised on hundreds of transactions in relation to merger\u0026nbsp;and FDI filing analysis and resulting clearances. Some recent\u0026nbsp;representative matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised CWT, a leading global business travel technology\u0026nbsp;company, in relation to merger filings with respect to the\u0026nbsp;proposed acquisition by Amex GBT. In a move described as almost\u0026nbsp;unprecedented, Jade obtained unconditional clearance after an\u0026nbsp;in-depth phase 2 CMA merger review, despite the CMA\u0026nbsp;provisionally deciding to prohibit the transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised G42 in relation to its strategic partnership with Microsoft\u0026nbsp;and related antitrust and merger control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised G42, and its majority-owned subsidiary Khazna Data Centers, in relation to the sale by e\u0026amp; of its stake in Khazna for $2.2\u0026nbsp;billion and minority investments in Khazna by MGX and Silver\u0026nbsp;Lake, and related antitrust and merger control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised VINCI Airports, the world\u0026rsquo;s leading private airports\u0026nbsp;operator, in relation to the merger control and FDI analysis with\u0026nbsp;respect to its acquisition of Edinburgh Airport for \u0026pound;1.27 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised ABRY in relation to merger control and FDI analysis and\u0026nbsp;filings with respect to various technology-related transactions\u0026nbsp;securing both merger and FDI clearances in numerous\u0026nbsp;jurisdictions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised STG, a private equity partner to market-leading\u0026nbsp;companies in software, data and analytics, in relation to\u0026nbsp;numerous transactions. Jade has secured merger and FDI\u0026nbsp;clearances for many STG technology-related transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Francisco Partners on numerous transactions with\u0026nbsp;respect to merger clearance and FDI-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised one of the UK\u0026rsquo;s leading technology companies in relation\u0026nbsp;to CMA and international merger clearance, ultimately resulting in\u0026nbsp;an unconditional phase 2 UK clearance decision.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a leading sovereign wealth fund on global merger control\u0026nbsp;and foreign investment filings in relation to a number of infrastructure- and energy-related projects, including EU filings,\u0026nbsp;national merger filings, national foreign investment filings and\u0026nbsp;notifications to applicable energy regulators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBehavioural:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has extensive experience advising clients across a wide range\u0026nbsp;of sectors on behavioural competition litigation and international sanctions-\u0026nbsp;related matters. Representative matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global manufacturer in relation to the European\u0026nbsp;Commission\u0026rsquo;s power cables cartel investigation and a number of\u0026nbsp;follow-on litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global auto-parts manufacturer in relation to\u0026nbsp;investigations by the European Commission.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Russia\u0026rsquo;s largest retail bank before the European Courts with\u0026nbsp;respect to its inclusion in EU sanctions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global manufacturer in relation to simultaneous civil\u0026nbsp;and criminal investigation for alleged cartel activities in multiple\u0026nbsp;jurisdictions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a pharmaceutical company on abuse of dominance and\u0026nbsp;product denigration proceedings before the English courts and\u0026nbsp;subsequent settlement proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global leisure goods manufacturer on EU competition\u0026nbsp;compliance matters and EU distribution arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a luxury global clothing brand in relation to European and\u0026nbsp;UK competition compliance matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised on state aid aspects of the groundbreaking Malta\u0026nbsp;LNG-to-Power project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSports Regulatory:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade routinely advises businesses in the sports sectors on\u0026nbsp;competition and wider regulatory-related issues. Representative\u0026nbsp;matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous private equity and other investors in relation to\u0026nbsp;the regulatory issues connected to potential investments in UK and other European sports teams.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous governing bodies in relation to the application\u0026nbsp;of EU and UK competition law to their procedural rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono capacity, Jade also advises individual athletes on\u0026nbsp;various behaviour- and conduct-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a leading football club in relation to EU and UK\u0026nbsp;competition law compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King and Spalding, Jade was seconded to a leading global\u0026nbsp;bank to provide strategic competition law advice. She was also\u0026nbsp;seconded to a leading global insurance company to provide\u0026nbsp;competition and sanctions advice. Additionally, during an in-depth\u0026nbsp;CMA merger review, Jade was seconded to a leading technology company\u0026nbsp;which resulted in an unconditional phase 2 clearance.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":81,"guid":"81.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":25,"guid":"25.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1327,"guid":"1327.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fearns","nick_name":"Jade-Alexandra","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jade-Alexandra","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recommended: Foreign Investment Control","detail":"Lexology Index"},{"title":"GCR Merger Control Matter of the Year ","detail":"Europe, 2026: advised CWT Holdings on its $570m sale to American Express Global Business Travel."}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJade-Alexandra Fearns is a partner in the London office of King and Spalding. Jade focuses her practice on antitrust and competition law along with international sanctions and other regulatory and compliance-related advice across a number of sectors, including technology, pharmaceutical and healthcare, financial services and banking, sports, automotive, media, manufacturing, consumer goods and telecommunications.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has advised on hundreds of\u0026nbsp;merger filings in the UK, EU and internationally and has secured\u0026nbsp;many phase 1 and phase 2 clearances. Jade also advises on and\u0026nbsp;prepares foreign investment and national security-related filings. In\u0026nbsp;addition, Jade advises clients on UK and EU sports-related\u0026nbsp;regulatory issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade is recommended in The Legal 500 for the following practice\u0026nbsp;areas: EU and Competition, Trade, WTO Anti-Dumping and Customs\u0026nbsp;and Sport. According to The Legal 500, \"competition expert Jade-\u0026nbsp;Alexandra Fearns is \u0026hellip; recommended for [sports-related] regulatory\u0026nbsp;and disciplinary matters.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade also\u0026nbsp;frequently advises pro bono clients on a various of issues,\u0026nbsp;including athlete representations.\u0026nbsp;Jade is heavily involved in community and pro-bono projects\u0026nbsp;providing assistance to individual clients and nonprofit organisations\u0026nbsp;in litigation and transactional matters.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eTransactional:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has advised on hundreds of transactions in relation to merger\u0026nbsp;and FDI filing analysis and resulting clearances. Some recent\u0026nbsp;representative matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised CWT, a leading global business travel technology\u0026nbsp;company, in relation to merger filings with respect to the\u0026nbsp;proposed acquisition by Amex GBT. In a move described as almost\u0026nbsp;unprecedented, Jade obtained unconditional clearance after an\u0026nbsp;in-depth phase 2 CMA merger review, despite the CMA\u0026nbsp;provisionally deciding to prohibit the transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised G42 in relation to its strategic partnership with Microsoft\u0026nbsp;and related antitrust and merger control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised G42, and its majority-owned subsidiary Khazna Data Centers, in relation to the sale by e\u0026amp; of its stake in Khazna for $2.2\u0026nbsp;billion and minority investments in Khazna by MGX and Silver\u0026nbsp;Lake, and related antitrust and merger control issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised VINCI Airports, the world\u0026rsquo;s leading private airports\u0026nbsp;operator, in relation to the merger control and FDI analysis with\u0026nbsp;respect to its acquisition of Edinburgh Airport for \u0026pound;1.27 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised ABRY in relation to merger control and FDI analysis and\u0026nbsp;filings with respect to various technology-related transactions\u0026nbsp;securing both merger and FDI clearances in numerous\u0026nbsp;jurisdictions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised STG, a private equity partner to market-leading\u0026nbsp;companies in software, data and analytics, in relation to\u0026nbsp;numerous transactions. Jade has secured merger and FDI\u0026nbsp;clearances for many STG technology-related transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Francisco Partners on numerous transactions with\u0026nbsp;respect to merger clearance and FDI-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised one of the UK\u0026rsquo;s leading technology companies in relation\u0026nbsp;to CMA and international merger clearance, ultimately resulting in\u0026nbsp;an unconditional phase 2 UK clearance decision.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a leading sovereign wealth fund on global merger control\u0026nbsp;and foreign investment filings in relation to a number of infrastructure- and energy-related projects, including EU filings,\u0026nbsp;national merger filings, national foreign investment filings and\u0026nbsp;notifications to applicable energy regulators.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eBehavioural:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade has extensive experience advising clients across a wide range\u0026nbsp;of sectors on behavioural competition litigation and international sanctions-\u0026nbsp;related matters. Representative matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global manufacturer in relation to the European\u0026nbsp;Commission\u0026rsquo;s power cables cartel investigation and a number of\u0026nbsp;follow-on litigation matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global auto-parts manufacturer in relation to\u0026nbsp;investigations by the European Commission.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised Russia\u0026rsquo;s largest retail bank before the European Courts with\u0026nbsp;respect to its inclusion in EU sanctions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global manufacturer in relation to simultaneous civil\u0026nbsp;and criminal investigation for alleged cartel activities in multiple\u0026nbsp;jurisdictions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a pharmaceutical company on abuse of dominance and\u0026nbsp;product denigration proceedings before the English courts and\u0026nbsp;subsequent settlement proceedings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a global leisure goods manufacturer on EU competition\u0026nbsp;compliance matters and EU distribution arrangements.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a luxury global clothing brand in relation to European and\u0026nbsp;UK competition compliance matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised on state aid aspects of the groundbreaking Malta\u0026nbsp;LNG-to-Power project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSports Regulatory:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJade routinely advises businesses in the sports sectors on\u0026nbsp;competition and wider regulatory-related issues. Representative\u0026nbsp;matters include:\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous private equity and other investors in relation to\u0026nbsp;the regulatory issues connected to potential investments in UK and other European sports teams.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised numerous governing bodies in relation to the application\u0026nbsp;of EU and UK competition law to their procedural rules.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a pro bono capacity, Jade also advises individual athletes on\u0026nbsp;various behaviour- and conduct-related issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAdvised a leading football club in relation to EU and UK\u0026nbsp;competition law compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePrior to joining King and Spalding, Jade was seconded to a leading global\u0026nbsp;bank to provide strategic competition law advice. She was also\u0026nbsp;seconded to a leading global insurance company to provide\u0026nbsp;competition and sanctions advice. Additionally, during an in-depth\u0026nbsp;CMA merger review, Jade was seconded to a leading technology company\u0026nbsp;which resulted in an unconditional phase 2 clearance.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recommended: Foreign Investment Control","detail":"Lexology Index"},{"title":"GCR Merger Control Matter of the Year ","detail":"Europe, 2026: advised CWT Holdings on its $570m sale to American Express Global Business Travel."}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13491}]},"capability_group_id":2},"created_at":"2026-05-06T12:50:05.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-06T12:50:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Fearns{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended: Foreign Investment Control\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lexology Index\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"GCR Merger Control Matter of the Year \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Europe, 2026: advised CWT Holdings on its $570m sale to American Express Global Business Travel.\"}{{ FIELD }}Transactional:\nJade has advised on hundreds of transactions in relation to merger and FDI filing analysis and resulting clearances. Some recent representative matters include:{{ FIELD }}Advised CWT, a leading global business travel technology company, in relation to merger filings with respect to the proposed acquisition by Amex GBT. In a move described as almost unprecedented, Jade obtained unconditional clearance after an in-depth phase 2 CMA merger review, despite the CMA provisionally deciding to prohibit the transaction.{{ FIELD }}Advised G42 in relation to its strategic partnership with Microsoft and related antitrust and merger control issues.{{ FIELD }}Advised G42, and its majority-owned subsidiary Khazna Data Centers, in relation to the sale by e\u0026amp; of its stake in Khazna for $2.2 billion and minority investments in Khazna by MGX and Silver Lake, and related antitrust and merger control issues.{{ FIELD }}Advised VINCI Airports, the world’s leading private airports operator, in relation to the merger control and FDI analysis with respect to its acquisition of Edinburgh Airport for £1.27 billion.{{ FIELD }}Advised ABRY in relation to merger control and FDI analysis and filings with respect to various technology-related transactions securing both merger and FDI clearances in numerous jurisdictions.{{ FIELD }}Advised STG, a private equity partner to market-leading companies in software, data and analytics, in relation to numerous transactions. Jade has secured merger and FDI clearances for many STG technology-related transactions.{{ FIELD }}Advised Francisco Partners on numerous transactions with respect to merger clearance and FDI-related issues.{{ FIELD }}Advised one of the UK’s leading technology companies in relation to CMA and international merger clearance, ultimately resulting in an unconditional phase 2 UK clearance decision.{{ FIELD }}Advised a leading sovereign wealth fund on global merger control and foreign investment filings in relation to a number of infrastructure- and energy-related projects, including EU filings, national merger filings, national foreign investment filings and notifications to applicable energy regulators.{{ FIELD }}Behavioural:\nJade has extensive experience advising clients across a wide range of sectors on behavioural competition litigation and international sanctions- related matters. Representative matters include:{{ FIELD }}Advised a global manufacturer in relation to the European Commission’s power cables cartel investigation and a number of follow-on litigation matters.{{ FIELD }}Advised a global auto-parts manufacturer in relation to investigations by the European Commission.{{ FIELD }}Advised Russia’s largest retail bank before the European Courts with respect to its inclusion in EU sanctions.{{ FIELD }}Advised a global manufacturer in relation to simultaneous civil and criminal investigation for alleged cartel activities in multiple jurisdictions.{{ FIELD }}Advised a pharmaceutical company on abuse of dominance and product denigration proceedings before the English courts and subsequent settlement proceedings.{{ FIELD }}Advised a global leisure goods manufacturer on EU competition compliance matters and EU distribution arrangements.{{ FIELD }}Advised a luxury global clothing brand in relation to European and UK competition compliance matters.{{ FIELD }}Advised on state aid aspects of the groundbreaking Malta LNG-to-Power project.{{ FIELD }}Sports Regulatory:\nJade routinely advises businesses in the sports sectors on competition and wider regulatory-related issues. Representative matters include:{{ FIELD }}Advised numerous private equity and other investors in relation to the regulatory issues connected to potential investments in UK and other European sports teams.{{ FIELD }}Advised numerous governing bodies in relation to the application of EU and UK competition law to their procedural rules.{{ FIELD }}In a pro bono capacity, Jade also advises individual athletes on various behaviour- and conduct-related issues.{{ FIELD }}Advised a leading football club in relation to EU and UK competition law compliance issues.{{ FIELD }}Prior to joining King and Spalding, Jade was seconded to a leading global bank to provide strategic competition law advice. She was also seconded to a leading global insurance company to provide competition and sanctions advice. Additionally, during an in-depth CMA merger review, Jade was seconded to a leading technology company which resulted in an unconditional phase 2 clearance.{{ FIELD }}Jade-Alexandra Fearns is a partner in the London office of King and Spalding. Jade focuses her practice on antitrust and competition law along with international sanctions and other regulatory and compliance-related advice across a number of sectors, including technology, pharmaceutical and healthcare, financial services and banking, sports, automotive, media, manufacturing, consumer goods and telecommunications.\nJade has advised on hundreds of merger filings in the UK, EU and internationally and has secured many phase 1 and phase 2 clearances. Jade also advises on and prepares foreign investment and national security-related filings. In addition, Jade advises clients on UK and EU sports-related regulatory issues.\nJade is recommended in The Legal 500 for the following practice areas: EU and Competition, Trade, WTO Anti-Dumping and Customs and Sport. According to The Legal 500, \"competition expert Jade- Alexandra Fearns is … recommended for [sports-related] regulatory and disciplinary matters.\"\nJade also frequently advises pro bono clients on a various of issues, including athlete representations. Jade is heavily involved in community and pro-bono projects providing assistance to individual clients and nonprofit organisations in litigation and transactional matters. Partner Recommended: Foreign Investment Control Lexology Index GCR Merger Control Matter of the Year  Europe, 2026: advised CWT Holdings on its $570m sale to American Express Global Business Travel. BPP Law School, UK BPP Law School Leeds University of Cambridge, UK  England and Wales Transactional:\nJade has advised on hundreds of transactions in relation to merger and FDI filing analysis and resulting clearances. Some recent representative matters include: Advised CWT, a leading global business travel technology company, in relation to merger filings with respect to the proposed acquisition by Amex GBT. In a move described as almost unprecedented, Jade obtained unconditional clearance after an in-depth phase 2 CMA merger review, despite the CMA provisionally deciding to prohibit the transaction. Advised G42 in relation to its strategic partnership with Microsoft and related antitrust and merger control issues. Advised G42, and its majority-owned subsidiary Khazna Data Centers, in relation to the sale by e\u0026amp; of its stake in Khazna for $2.2 billion and minority investments in Khazna by MGX and Silver Lake, and related antitrust and merger control issues. Advised VINCI Airports, the world’s leading private airports operator, in relation to the merger control and FDI analysis with respect to its acquisition of Edinburgh Airport for £1.27 billion. Advised ABRY in relation to merger control and FDI analysis and filings with respect to various technology-related transactions securing both merger and FDI clearances in numerous jurisdictions. Advised STG, a private equity partner to market-leading companies in software, data and analytics, in relation to numerous transactions. Jade has secured merger and FDI clearances for many STG technology-related transactions. Advised Francisco Partners on numerous transactions with respect to merger clearance and FDI-related issues. Advised one of the UK’s leading technology companies in relation to CMA and international merger clearance, ultimately resulting in an unconditional phase 2 UK clearance decision. Advised a leading sovereign wealth fund on global merger control and foreign investment filings in relation to a number of infrastructure- and energy-related projects, including EU filings, national merger filings, national foreign investment filings and notifications to applicable energy regulators. Behavioural:\nJade has extensive experience advising clients across a wide range of sectors on behavioural competition litigation and international sanctions- related matters. Representative matters include: Advised a global manufacturer in relation to the European Commission’s power cables cartel investigation and a number of follow-on litigation matters. Advised a global auto-parts manufacturer in relation to investigations by the European Commission. Advised Russia’s largest retail bank before the European Courts with respect to its inclusion in EU sanctions. Advised a global manufacturer in relation to simultaneous civil and criminal investigation for alleged cartel activities in multiple jurisdictions. Advised a pharmaceutical company on abuse of dominance and product denigration proceedings before the English courts and subsequent settlement proceedings. Advised a global leisure goods manufacturer on EU competition compliance matters and EU distribution arrangements. Advised a luxury global clothing brand in relation to European and UK competition compliance matters. Advised on state aid aspects of the groundbreaking Malta LNG-to-Power project. Sports Regulatory:\nJade routinely advises businesses in the sports sectors on competition and wider regulatory-related issues. Representative matters include: Advised numerous private equity and other investors in relation to the regulatory issues connected to potential investments in UK and other European sports teams. Advised numerous governing bodies in relation to the application of EU and UK competition law to their procedural rules. In a pro bono capacity, Jade also advises individual athletes on various behaviour- and conduct-related issues. Advised a leading football club in relation to EU and UK competition law compliance issues. Prior to joining King and Spalding, Jade was seconded to a leading global bank to provide strategic competition law advice. She was also seconded to a leading global insurance company to provide competition and sanctions advice. Additionally, during an in-depth CMA merger review, Jade was seconded to a leading technology company which resulted in an unconditional phase 2 clearance.","searchable_name":"Jade-Alexandra Fearns","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447616,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6465,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Feldman leads King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s energy industry team, which comprises over 300 lawyers worldwide. Dan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on energy across the value chain, including\u0026nbsp;oil and gas (upstream, midstream and downstream),\u0026nbsp;low-carbon energy (renewables, hydrogen and its derivatives, carbon capture and storage, battery systems and green industry), power, infrastructure and mining megaprojects around the world.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has 23 years of experience and has represented corporations, government entities and institutions globally, including\u0026nbsp;Chevron, ADNOC, XRG, Woodside, PETRONAS, JERA ,\u0026nbsp;Masdar, Engie, NEOM, Fertiglobe, Reliance Industries Limited, ACWA Power, Emirates Global Aluminium, Fortescue,\u0026nbsp;Moeve / CEPSA, JBIC, Dow Chemical,\u0026nbsp;Air Liquide, Sembcorp, Keppel, Sojitz, KEPCO, OCP, Tree Energy Solutions, Raizen, Casa dos Ventos, Air Liquide, EverWind, Uniper and more. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has been recognized by Chambers Global, Legal500, IFLR1000, Who\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal and Law360 as a leading lawyer. In 2025 he was named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMVP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for energy, one of five in the world, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw Middle East\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026ldquo;Rainmaker of the Year\u0026rdquo;. He has previously been named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;MVP for project finance. He advised\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eProject Finance International\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Deals of the Year\u0026rdquo; in 2023 (the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, on which Dan advised NEOM), 2021 (the U.S.$12.5 billion Jazan IGCC, on which Dan advised the lenders) and 2020 (the U.S.$2 billion Guinea Alumina Project, on which Dan advised the sponsors).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"daniel-feldman","email":"dfeldman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADNOC / XRG\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of its multi-billion dollar investment into ExxonMobil\u0026rsquo;s U.S.$7 billion Baytown low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia production facility in Texas\u003cstrong\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNEOM\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects, from initial MOU to financial close, of the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, the world\u0026rsquo;s first green ammonia export megaproject to take FID and sign definitive offtake and financing agreements. The project involves the world\u0026rsquo;s largest single-phase renewables project (4GW in total) as well as a ground-breaking green ammonia / green hydrogen project, including 2.2GW of alkaline electrolysers supplied by Thyssenkrupp Nucera.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of its U.S.$20 billion Sadara petrochemicals joint venture with Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePETRONAS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its U.S.$28 billion RAPID integrated refinery and petrochemicals project in Pengerang, Malaysia, including the U.S.$7 billion acquisition of an interest by Saudi Aramco in parts of the project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmirates Global Aluminium\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the Guinea Alumina Project, a U.S.$1.6 billion bauxite mining project in Guinea, West Africa. This was the largest mining project financing ever in West Africa and was awarded Global Multilateral Deal of the Year 2019 by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePFI\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJERA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its joint venture with CF Industries to develop the U.S.$4 billion \u0026ldquo;Blue Point\u0026rdquo; low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia export facility in Louisiana, U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its development of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia projects on the U.S. Gulf Coast.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMoeve\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(formerly known as CEPSA), one of Spain's largest energy companies, on one of the country\u0026rsquo;s leading green hydrogen projects, which will help decarbonize Moeve\u0026rsquo;s refinery at Huelva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJBIC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the financing of the U.S.$3.5 billion Facility D IWPP in Qatar, from bid stage to financial close.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJERA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its program to import clean ammonia to Japan for co-firing in thermal power plants to decarbonize the Japanese electricity system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReliance Industries Limited\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon Saudi Aramco\u0026rsquo;s acquisition of an interest in its oil-to-chemicals business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverWind Fuels\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of a U.S.$6 billion green hydrogen and ammonia export megaproject, in Nova Scotia, Canada.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndia\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon green methanol and green ammonia export projects in the country.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading global supermajor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on regulatory matters relating to low-carbon business and projects in South Korea (including the CHPS programme), Japan (including the hydrogen CfD programme), Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, the U.S, and Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe lenders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the U.S.$12.5 billion joint venture for the Jazan IGCC / ASU project, the largest grey hydrogen project in the world. Awarded Global Deal of the Year by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePFI Awards, 2021\u003c/em\u003e; and MENA Hybrid Energy Deal of the Year at the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIJGlobal Awards 2021\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSingapore\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies and two of Japan\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a joint venture to develop a green ammonia export project in India.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSingapore\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its programme to import clean ammonia into Japan for decarbonization of its power sector.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOCP\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a green ammonia pilot project with Shell in Morocco.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUniper\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on offtake from the Hyport Duqm Green Ammonia Project in Oman.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCasa Dos Ventos\u003c/strong\u003e, Brazil\u0026rsquo;s largest renewable energy company,\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon a joint venture with TotalEnergies to produce and market green hydrogen hydrogen and ammonia in the Port of Pecem, Ceara, Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArdian\u003c/strong\u003e, one of France\u0026rsquo;s leading investment companies, on hydrogen investment and incentive strategic matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACWA Power\u003c/strong\u003e, Saudi Arabia\u0026rsquo;s leading renewable energy company, on its green hydrogen project in Uzbekistan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScatec\u003c/strong\u003e, one of Europe\u0026rsquo;s leading renewable energy companies, in joint venture with\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFertiglobe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOrascom\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon the Egypt Green Hydrogen Project, which in 2024 won the first competitive public tender for import of green ammonia into Europe under the H2Global / Hint.co programe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEngie, Fertiglobe and Masdar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a joint venture to develop the UAE\u0026rsquo;s first green hydrogen and ammonia project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSpain\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a green hydrogen and ammonia export project in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA supermajor international integrated energy company\u003c/strong\u003e, on the world\u0026rsquo;s largest offshore carbon capture and storage exploration and development projects, offshore Western and Northern Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMasdar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on multi-hundred megawatt renewables (solar and wind) projects in the UAE, Serbia and Azerbaijan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTree Energy Solutions\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on various green hydrogen e-methane / e-NG projects globally.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRaizen\u003c/strong\u003e, one of Brazil\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies, on global regulatory matters relating to its biofuels business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmirates Waste to Energy\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the GCC\u0026rsquo;s first waste-to energy project, which was commissioned in 2022.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[{"id":3671}]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":31,"guid":"31.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":40,"guid":"40.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1149,"guid":"1149.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1143,"guid":"1143.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1219,"guid":"1219.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":607,"guid":"607.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Feldman","nick_name":"Dan","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Dan","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Oil, gas and natural resources","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026"},{"title":"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Infrastructure and projects (including project finance)","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026"},{"title":"Highly Regarded (Project Development and Project Finance), UAE","detail":"IFLR1000 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"MVP for Energy ","detail":"Law360, 2025"},{"title":"Rainmaker of the Year","detail":"Law Middle East Awards 2025"},{"title":"Leading Partner, Infrastructure and projects (including project finance) - United Arab Emirates","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"Leading Partner, Oil, gas and natural resources - United Arab Emirates","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"''Dan is one of the real stars; we trust Dan completely. He's very reliable, and knowledgeable about the region''","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025"},{"title":"''Dan is knowledgeable about the region and about the law. He is also highly commercial and is top of the list for us''","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025"},{"title":"“Dan has developed a leading profile in the hydrogen and energy transition space and is today a true expert.”","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2023"},{"title":"“He is energetic, commercial and extremely knowledgeable.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global, 2023"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, Energy Oil \u0026 gas Industry, 2023","detail":"IFLR1000"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, 2023","detail":"Legal500"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, Chambers Ranked in Global, Projects \u0026 Energy, 2023","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"MVP for Project Finance","detail":"Law360 2022"},{"title":"Named by Chambers Global: Projects and Energy","detail":"Chambers Global 2021-2025"},{"title":"Named as a “Leading Individual”","detail":"Legal500 for UAE Oil, Gas and Natural Resources in 2022-2025"},{"title":"“Emerging as a go-to lawyer for Middle Eastern energy and infrastructure projects”","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Is known for his work advising on the full life cycle of power deals”","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Dan is great, he's really user-friendly and very responsive. He's a real pleasure to deal with.\"","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Dan is impressive, thoughtful and organized.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“He's a great problem solver who is extremely knowledgeable about us and the Middle East region.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“They make you feel as if you are the only client!\"","detail":"Client Feedback, Legal500 2022"},{"title":"“Extensive experience advising on largescale oil and gas, green energy, power and infrastructure projects.\"","detail":"Legal500 2022"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/dan-feldman-b5356776/","seodescription":"Dan Feldman is a lawyer of our Corporate Practice Group. Read more about him.","primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eDan Feldman leads King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s energy industry team, which comprises over 300 lawyers worldwide. Dan\u0026rsquo;s practice focuses on energy across the value chain, including\u0026nbsp;oil and gas (upstream, midstream and downstream),\u0026nbsp;low-carbon energy (renewables, hydrogen and its derivatives, carbon capture and storage, battery systems and green industry), power, infrastructure and mining megaprojects around the world.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has 23 years of experience and has represented corporations, government entities and institutions globally, including\u0026nbsp;Chevron, ADNOC, XRG, Woodside, PETRONAS, JERA ,\u0026nbsp;Masdar, Engie, NEOM, Fertiglobe, Reliance Industries Limited, ACWA Power, Emirates Global Aluminium, Fortescue,\u0026nbsp;Moeve / CEPSA, JBIC, Dow Chemical,\u0026nbsp;Air Liquide, Sembcorp, Keppel, Sojitz, KEPCO, OCP, Tree Energy Solutions, Raizen, Casa dos Ventos, Air Liquide, EverWind, Uniper and more. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDan has been recognized by Chambers Global, Legal500, IFLR1000, Who\u0026rsquo;s Who Legal and Law360 as a leading lawyer. In 2025 he was named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMVP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for energy, one of five in the world, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw Middle East\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp; \u0026ldquo;Rainmaker of the Year\u0026rdquo;. He has previously been named a\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLaw360\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;MVP for project finance. He advised\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eProject Finance International\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u0026ldquo;Deals of the Year\u0026rdquo; in 2023 (the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, on which Dan advised NEOM), 2021 (the U.S.$12.5 billion Jazan IGCC, on which Dan advised the lenders) and 2020 (the U.S.$2 billion Guinea Alumina Project, on which Dan advised the sponsors).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eADNOC / XRG\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of its multi-billion dollar investment into ExxonMobil\u0026rsquo;s U.S.$7 billion Baytown low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia production facility in Texas\u003cstrong\u003e.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eNEOM\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects, from initial MOU to financial close, of the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, the world\u0026rsquo;s first green ammonia export megaproject to take FID and sign definitive offtake and financing agreements. The project involves the world\u0026rsquo;s largest single-phase renewables project (4GW in total) as well as a ground-breaking green ammonia / green hydrogen project, including 2.2GW of alkaline electrolysers supplied by Thyssenkrupp Nucera.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dow Chemical Company\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of its U.S.$20 billion Sadara petrochemicals joint venture with Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePETRONAS\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in relation to its U.S.$28 billion RAPID integrated refinery and petrochemicals project in Pengerang, Malaysia, including the U.S.$7 billion acquisition of an interest by Saudi Aramco in parts of the project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmirates Global Aluminium\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the Guinea Alumina Project, a U.S.$1.6 billion bauxite mining project in Guinea, West Africa. This was the largest mining project financing ever in West Africa and was awarded Global Multilateral Deal of the Year 2019 by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePFI\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJERA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its joint venture with CF Industries to develop the U.S.$4 billion \u0026ldquo;Blue Point\u0026rdquo; low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia export facility in Louisiana, U.S.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eChevron\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its development of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia projects on the U.S. Gulf Coast.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMoeve\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;(formerly known as CEPSA), one of Spain's largest energy companies, on one of the country\u0026rsquo;s leading green hydrogen projects, which will help decarbonize Moeve\u0026rsquo;s refinery at Huelva.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJBIC\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the financing of the U.S.$3.5 billion Facility D IWPP in Qatar, from bid stage to financial close.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJERA\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its program to import clean ammonia to Japan for co-firing in thermal power plants to decarbonize the Japanese electricity system.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eReliance Industries Limited\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon Saudi Aramco\u0026rsquo;s acquisition of an interest in its oil-to-chemicals business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEverWind Fuels\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on all aspects of a U.S.$6 billion green hydrogen and ammonia export megaproject, in Nova Scotia, Canada.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eIndia\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon green methanol and green ammonia export projects in the country.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eA\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eleading global supermajor\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on regulatory matters relating to low-carbon business and projects in South Korea (including the CHPS programme), Japan (including the hydrogen CfD programme), Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, the U.S, and Kazakhstan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe lenders\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the U.S.$12.5 billion joint venture for the Jazan IGCC / ASU project, the largest grey hydrogen project in the world. Awarded Global Deal of the Year by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePFI Awards, 2021\u003c/em\u003e; and MENA Hybrid Energy Deal of the Year at the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIJGlobal Awards 2021\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSingapore\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies and two of Japan\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in a joint venture to develop a green ammonia export project in India.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSingapore\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on its programme to import clean ammonia into Japan for decarbonization of its power sector.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOCP\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a green ammonia pilot project with Shell in Morocco.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUniper\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on offtake from the Hyport Duqm Green Ammonia Project in Oman.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCasa Dos Ventos\u003c/strong\u003e, Brazil\u0026rsquo;s largest renewable energy company,\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon a joint venture with TotalEnergies to produce and market green hydrogen hydrogen and ammonia in the Port of Pecem, Ceara, Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eArdian\u003c/strong\u003e, one of France\u0026rsquo;s leading investment companies, on hydrogen investment and incentive strategic matters.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACWA Power\u003c/strong\u003e, Saudi Arabia\u0026rsquo;s leading renewable energy company, on its green hydrogen project in Uzbekistan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eScatec\u003c/strong\u003e, one of Europe\u0026rsquo;s leading renewable energy companies, in joint venture with\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eFertiglobe\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eOrascom\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eon the Egypt Green Hydrogen Project, which in 2024 won the first competitive public tender for import of green ammonia into Europe under the H2Global / Hint.co programe.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEngie, Fertiglobe and Masdar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a joint venture to develop the UAE\u0026rsquo;s first green hydrogen and ammonia project.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eOne of\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eSpain\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on a green hydrogen and ammonia export project in Brazil.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA supermajor international integrated energy company\u003c/strong\u003e, on the world\u0026rsquo;s largest offshore carbon capture and storage exploration and development projects, offshore Western and Northern Australia.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMasdar\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on multi-hundred megawatt renewables (solar and wind) projects in the UAE, Serbia and Azerbaijan.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTree Energy Solutions\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on various green hydrogen e-methane / e-NG projects globally.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRaizen\u003c/strong\u003e, one of Brazil\u0026rsquo;s largest energy companies, on global regulatory matters relating to its biofuels business.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmirates Waste to Energy\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;on the GCC\u0026rsquo;s first waste-to energy project, which was commissioned in 2022.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Oil, gas and natural resources","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026"},{"title":"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Infrastructure and projects (including project finance)","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026"},{"title":"Highly Regarded (Project Development and Project Finance), UAE","detail":"IFLR1000 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"MVP for Energy ","detail":"Law360, 2025"},{"title":"Rainmaker of the Year","detail":"Law Middle East Awards 2025"},{"title":"Leading Partner, Infrastructure and projects (including project finance) - United Arab Emirates","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"Leading Partner, Oil, gas and natural resources - United Arab Emirates","detail":"Legal 500 EMEA 2025"},{"title":"''Dan is one of the real stars; we trust Dan completely. He's very reliable, and knowledgeable about the region''","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025"},{"title":"''Dan is knowledgeable about the region and about the law. He is also highly commercial and is top of the list for us''","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025"},{"title":"“Dan has developed a leading profile in the hydrogen and energy transition space and is today a true expert.”","detail":"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2023"},{"title":"“He is energetic, commercial and extremely knowledgeable.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global, 2023"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, Energy Oil \u0026 gas Industry, 2023","detail":"IFLR1000"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, 2023","detail":"Legal500"},{"title":"Leading Lawyer, Chambers Ranked in Global, Projects \u0026 Energy, 2023","detail":"Chambers Global"},{"title":"MVP for Project Finance","detail":"Law360 2022"},{"title":"Named by Chambers Global: Projects and Energy","detail":"Chambers Global 2021-2025"},{"title":"Named as a “Leading Individual”","detail":"Legal500 for UAE Oil, Gas and Natural Resources in 2022-2025"},{"title":"“Emerging as a go-to lawyer for Middle Eastern energy and infrastructure projects”","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Is known for his work advising on the full life cycle of power deals”","detail":"Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Dan is great, he's really user-friendly and very responsive. He's a real pleasure to deal with.\"","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“Dan is impressive, thoughtful and organized.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“He's a great problem solver who is extremely knowledgeable about us and the Middle East region.”","detail":"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022"},{"title":"“They make you feel as if you are the only client!\"","detail":"Client Feedback, Legal500 2022"},{"title":"“Extensive experience advising on largescale oil and gas, green energy, power and infrastructure projects.\"","detail":"Legal500 2022"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10275}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-04-17T18:47:03.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-17T18:47:03.000Z","searchable_text":"Feldman{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Oil, gas and natural resources\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Infrastructure and projects (including project finance)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 EMEA, 2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Highly Regarded (Project Development and Project Finance), UAE\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IFLR1000 EMEA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"MVP for Energy \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Rainmaker of the Year\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law Middle East Awards 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Partner, Infrastructure and projects (including project finance) - United Arab Emirates\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 EMEA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Partner, Oil, gas and natural resources - United Arab Emirates\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 EMEA 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"''Dan is one of the real stars; we trust Dan completely. He's very reliable, and knowledgeable about the region''\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"''Dan is knowledgeable about the region and about the law. He is also highly commercial and is top of the list for us''\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Dan has developed a leading profile in the hydrogen and energy transition space and is today a true expert.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He is energetic, commercial and extremely knowledgeable.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Client Feedback, Chambers Global, 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer, Energy Oil \u0026amp; gas Industry, 2023\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IFLR1000\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer, 2023\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal500\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Leading Lawyer, Chambers Ranked in Global, Projects \u0026amp; Energy, 2023\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"MVP for Project Finance\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named by Chambers Global: Projects and Energy\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2021-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named as a “Leading Individual”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal500 for UAE Oil, Gas and Natural Resources in 2022-2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Emerging as a go-to lawyer for Middle Eastern energy and infrastructure projects”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Is known for his work advising on the full life cycle of power deals”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Dan is great, he's really user-friendly and very responsive. He's a real pleasure to deal with.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Dan is impressive, thoughtful and organized.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“He's a great problem solver who is extremely knowledgeable about us and the Middle East region.”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“They make you feel as if you are the only client!\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Client Feedback, Legal500 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Extensive experience advising on largescale oil and gas, green energy, power and infrastructure projects.\\\"\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal500 2022\"}{{ FIELD }}ADNOC / XRG on all aspects of its multi-billion dollar investment into ExxonMobil’s U.S.$7 billion Baytown low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia production facility in Texas.{{ FIELD }}NEOM on all aspects, from initial MOU to financial close, of the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, the world’s first green ammonia export megaproject to take FID and sign definitive offtake and financing agreements. The project involves the world’s largest single-phase renewables project (4GW in total) as well as a ground-breaking green ammonia / green hydrogen project, including 2.2GW of alkaline electrolysers supplied by Thyssenkrupp Nucera.{{ FIELD }}The Dow Chemical Company on all aspects of its U.S.$20 billion Sadara petrochemicals joint venture with Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia.{{ FIELD }}PETRONAS in relation to its U.S.$28 billion RAPID integrated refinery and petrochemicals project in Pengerang, Malaysia, including the U.S.$7 billion acquisition of an interest by Saudi Aramco in parts of the project.{{ FIELD }}Emirates Global Aluminium on the Guinea Alumina Project, a U.S.$1.6 billion bauxite mining project in Guinea, West Africa. This was the largest mining project financing ever in West Africa and was awarded Global Multilateral Deal of the Year 2019 by PFI.{{ FIELD }}JERA on its joint venture with CF Industries to develop the U.S.$4 billion “Blue Point” low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia export facility in Louisiana, U.S.{{ FIELD }}Chevron on its development of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia projects on the U.S. Gulf Coast.{{ FIELD }}Moeve (formerly known as CEPSA), one of Spain's largest energy companies, on one of the country’s leading green hydrogen projects, which will help decarbonize Moeve’s refinery at Huelva.{{ FIELD }}JBIC on the financing of the U.S.$3.5 billion Facility D IWPP in Qatar, from bid stage to financial close.{{ FIELD }}JERA on its program to import clean ammonia to Japan for co-firing in thermal power plants to decarbonize the Japanese electricity system.{{ FIELD }}Reliance Industries Limited on Saudi Aramco’s acquisition of an interest in its oil-to-chemicals business.{{ FIELD }}EverWind Fuels on all aspects of a U.S.$6 billion green hydrogen and ammonia export megaproject, in Nova Scotia, Canada.{{ FIELD }}One of India’s largest energy companies on green methanol and green ammonia export projects in the country.{{ FIELD }}A leading global supermajor on regulatory matters relating to low-carbon business and projects in South Korea (including the CHPS programme), Japan (including the hydrogen CfD programme), Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, the U.S, and Kazakhstan.{{ FIELD }}The lenders on the U.S.$12.5 billion joint venture for the Jazan IGCC / ASU project, the largest grey hydrogen project in the world. Awarded Global Deal of the Year by the PFI Awards, 2021; and MENA Hybrid Energy Deal of the Year at the IJGlobal Awards 2021.{{ FIELD }}One of Singapore’s largest energy companies and two of Japan’s largest energy companies in a joint venture to develop a green ammonia export project in India.{{ FIELD }}One of Singapore’s largest energy companies on its programme to import clean ammonia into Japan for decarbonization of its power sector.{{ FIELD }}OCP on a green ammonia pilot project with Shell in Morocco.{{ FIELD }}Uniper on offtake from the Hyport Duqm Green Ammonia Project in Oman.{{ FIELD }}Casa Dos Ventos, Brazil’s largest renewable energy company, on a joint venture with TotalEnergies to produce and market green hydrogen hydrogen and ammonia in the Port of Pecem, Ceara, Brazil.{{ FIELD }}Ardian, one of France’s leading investment companies, on hydrogen investment and incentive strategic matters.{{ FIELD }}ACWA Power, Saudi Arabia’s leading renewable energy company, on its green hydrogen project in Uzbekistan.{{ FIELD }}Scatec, one of Europe’s leading renewable energy companies, in joint venture with Fertiglobe and Orascom on the Egypt Green Hydrogen Project, which in 2024 won the first competitive public tender for import of green ammonia into Europe under the H2Global / Hint.co programe.{{ FIELD }}Engie, Fertiglobe and Masdar on a joint venture to develop the UAE’s first green hydrogen and ammonia project.{{ FIELD }}One of Spain’s largest energy companies on a green hydrogen and ammonia export project in Brazil.{{ FIELD }}A supermajor international integrated energy company, on the world’s largest offshore carbon capture and storage exploration and development projects, offshore Western and Northern Australia.{{ FIELD }}Masdar on multi-hundred megawatt renewables (solar and wind) projects in the UAE, Serbia and Azerbaijan.{{ FIELD }}Tree Energy Solutions on various green hydrogen e-methane / e-NG projects globally.{{ FIELD }}Raizen, one of Brazil’s largest energy companies, on global regulatory matters relating to its biofuels business.{{ FIELD }}Emirates Waste to Energy on the GCC’s first waste-to energy project, which was commissioned in 2022.{{ FIELD }}Dan Feldman leads King \u0026amp; Spalding’s energy industry team, which comprises over 300 lawyers worldwide. Dan’s practice focuses on energy across the value chain, including oil and gas (upstream, midstream and downstream), low-carbon energy (renewables, hydrogen and its derivatives, carbon capture and storage, battery systems and green industry), power, infrastructure and mining megaprojects around the world.\nDan has 23 years of experience and has represented corporations, government entities and institutions globally, including Chevron, ADNOC, XRG, Woodside, PETRONAS, JERA , Masdar, Engie, NEOM, Fertiglobe, Reliance Industries Limited, ACWA Power, Emirates Global Aluminium, Fortescue, Moeve / CEPSA, JBIC, Dow Chemical, Air Liquide, Sembcorp, Keppel, Sojitz, KEPCO, OCP, Tree Energy Solutions, Raizen, Casa dos Ventos, Air Liquide, EverWind, Uniper and more. \nDan has been recognized by Chambers Global, Legal500, IFLR1000, Who’s Who Legal and Law360 as a leading lawyer. In 2025 he was named a Law360 MVP for energy, one of five in the world, and Law Middle East’s  “Rainmaker of the Year”. He has previously been named a Law360 MVP for project finance. He advised Project Finance International “Deals of the Year” in 2023 (the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, on which Dan advised NEOM), 2021 (the U.S.$12.5 billion Jazan IGCC, on which Dan advised the lenders) and 2020 (the U.S.$2 billion Guinea Alumina Project, on which Dan advised the sponsors). Dan Feldman lawyer Partner Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Oil, gas and natural resources Legal 500 EMEA, 2026 Leading Partner, United Arab Emirates - Infrastructure and projects (including project finance) Legal 500 EMEA, 2026 Highly Regarded (Project Development and Project Finance), UAE IFLR1000 EMEA 2025 MVP for Energy  Law360, 2025 Rainmaker of the Year Law Middle East Awards 2025 Leading Partner, Infrastructure and projects (including project finance) - United Arab Emirates Legal 500 EMEA 2025 Leading Partner, Oil, gas and natural resources - United Arab Emirates Legal 500 EMEA 2025 ''Dan is one of the real stars; we trust Dan completely. He's very reliable, and knowledgeable about the region'' CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025 ''Dan is knowledgeable about the region and about the law. He is also highly commercial and is top of the list for us'' CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2025 “Dan has developed a leading profile in the hydrogen and energy transition space and is today a true expert.” CLIENT FEEDBACK, CHAMBERS GLOBAL 2023 “He is energetic, commercial and extremely knowledgeable.” Client Feedback, Chambers Global, 2023 Leading Lawyer, Energy Oil \u0026amp; gas Industry, 2023 IFLR1000 Leading Lawyer, 2023 Legal500 Leading Lawyer, Chambers Ranked in Global, Projects \u0026amp; Energy, 2023 Chambers Global MVP for Project Finance Law360 2022 Named by Chambers Global: Projects and Energy Chambers Global 2021-2025 Named as a “Leading Individual” Legal500 for UAE Oil, Gas and Natural Resources in 2022-2025 “Emerging as a go-to lawyer for Middle Eastern energy and infrastructure projects” Chambers Global 2022 “Is known for his work advising on the full life cycle of power deals” Chambers Global 2022 “Dan is great, he's really user-friendly and very responsive. He's a real pleasure to deal with.\" Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022 “Dan is impressive, thoughtful and organized.” Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022 “He's a great problem solver who is extremely knowledgeable about us and the Middle East region.” Client Feedback, Chambers Global 2022 “They make you feel as if you are the only client!\" Client Feedback, Legal500 2022 “Extensive experience advising on largescale oil and gas, green energy, power and infrastructure projects.\" Legal500 2022 Monash University, Australia  England and Wales Victoria ADNOC / XRG on all aspects of its multi-billion dollar investment into ExxonMobil’s U.S.$7 billion Baytown low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia production facility in Texas. NEOM on all aspects, from initial MOU to financial close, of the U.S.$8.4 billion NEOM Green Hydrogen Project, the world’s first green ammonia export megaproject to take FID and sign definitive offtake and financing agreements. The project involves the world’s largest single-phase renewables project (4GW in total) as well as a ground-breaking green ammonia / green hydrogen project, including 2.2GW of alkaline electrolysers supplied by Thyssenkrupp Nucera. The Dow Chemical Company on all aspects of its U.S.$20 billion Sadara petrochemicals joint venture with Saudi Aramco in Saudi Arabia. PETRONAS in relation to its U.S.$28 billion RAPID integrated refinery and petrochemicals project in Pengerang, Malaysia, including the U.S.$7 billion acquisition of an interest by Saudi Aramco in parts of the project. Emirates Global Aluminium on the Guinea Alumina Project, a U.S.$1.6 billion bauxite mining project in Guinea, West Africa. This was the largest mining project financing ever in West Africa and was awarded Global Multilateral Deal of the Year 2019 by PFI. JERA on its joint venture with CF Industries to develop the U.S.$4 billion “Blue Point” low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia export facility in Louisiana, U.S. Chevron on its development of low-carbon hydrogen and ammonia projects on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Moeve (formerly known as CEPSA), one of Spain's largest energy companies, on one of the country’s leading green hydrogen projects, which will help decarbonize Moeve’s refinery at Huelva. JBIC on the financing of the U.S.$3.5 billion Facility D IWPP in Qatar, from bid stage to financial close. JERA on its program to import clean ammonia to Japan for co-firing in thermal power plants to decarbonize the Japanese electricity system. Reliance Industries Limited on Saudi Aramco’s acquisition of an interest in its oil-to-chemicals business. EverWind Fuels on all aspects of a U.S.$6 billion green hydrogen and ammonia export megaproject, in Nova Scotia, Canada. One of India’s largest energy companies on green methanol and green ammonia export projects in the country. A leading global supermajor on regulatory matters relating to low-carbon business and projects in South Korea (including the CHPS programme), Japan (including the hydrogen CfD programme), Singapore, Indonesia, Australia, the U.S, and Kazakhstan. The lenders on the U.S.$12.5 billion joint venture for the Jazan IGCC / ASU project, the largest grey hydrogen project in the world. Awarded Global Deal of the Year by the PFI Awards, 2021; and MENA Hybrid Energy Deal of the Year at the IJGlobal Awards 2021. One of Singapore’s largest energy companies and two of Japan’s largest energy companies in a joint venture to develop a green ammonia export project in India. One of Singapore’s largest energy companies on its programme to import clean ammonia into Japan for decarbonization of its power sector. OCP on a green ammonia pilot project with Shell in Morocco. Uniper on offtake from the Hyport Duqm Green Ammonia Project in Oman. Casa Dos Ventos, Brazil’s largest renewable energy company, on a joint venture with TotalEnergies to produce and market green hydrogen hydrogen and ammonia in the Port of Pecem, Ceara, Brazil. Ardian, one of France’s leading investment companies, on hydrogen investment and incentive strategic matters. ACWA Power, Saudi Arabia’s leading renewable energy company, on its green hydrogen project in Uzbekistan. Scatec, one of Europe’s leading renewable energy companies, in joint venture with Fertiglobe and Orascom on the Egypt Green Hydrogen Project, which in 2024 won the first competitive public tender for import of green ammonia into Europe under the H2Global / Hint.co programe. Engie, Fertiglobe and Masdar on a joint venture to develop the UAE’s first green hydrogen and ammonia project. One of Spain’s largest energy companies on a green hydrogen and ammonia export project in Brazil. A supermajor international integrated energy company, on the world’s largest offshore carbon capture and storage exploration and development projects, offshore Western and Northern Australia. Masdar on multi-hundred megawatt renewables (solar and wind) projects in the UAE, Serbia and Azerbaijan. Tree Energy Solutions on various green hydrogen e-methane / e-NG projects globally. Raizen, one of Brazil’s largest energy companies, on global regulatory matters relating to its biofuels business. Emirates Waste to Energy on the GCC’s first waste-to energy project, which was commissioned in 2022.","searchable_name":"Dan Feldman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447984,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7311,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues\u0026mdash;the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB\u0026mdash;in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a \u0026ldquo;master technician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Working Group 10 on \u0026ldquo;Best Practices in Patent Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Patent Star\u0026rdquo; in Washington, D.C. by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eManaging Intellectual Property\u0026rsquo;s IP Stars.\u003c/em\u003e Since 2012, he has been named among the World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Patent Practitioners by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000\u003c/em\u003e, which recently stated that Brian\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has also called him a \u0026ldquo;veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s major technology companies,\u0026rdquo; and noted that he is a \u0026ldquo;master tactician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo; In 2012, he was recognized as a \u0026ldquo;BTI Client Service All-Star\u0026rdquo; by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the \u0026ldquo;Discovery and Privilege\u0026rdquo; chapter in the book\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePatent Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(PLI Press).\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"brian-ferguson","email":"bferguson@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case against a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel in numerous \u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003e and post-grant review proceedings for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading oil and gas exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor\u0026rsquo;s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s top technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board\u0026rsquo;s invalidity finding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an \u003cstrong\u003einnovator medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in PTAB\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading marine technology provider\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to an \u003cstrong\u003einternational technology conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDozens of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of software systems for healthcare providers\u003c/strong\u003e in multi-front district court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading innovator sports equipment company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of nicotine delivery products\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003epioneering\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003espeech recognition technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":13,"guid":"13.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":103,"guid":"103.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1240,"guid":"1240.smart_tags","index":5,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":763,"guid":"763.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":7,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1203,"guid":"1203.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":761,"guid":"761.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ferguson","nick_name":"Brian","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Brian","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":2118,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"1991-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"E.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026"},{"title":"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”","detail":"Patexia, 2024–2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area","detail":"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025"},{"title":"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-e-ferguson/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eBrian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues\u0026mdash;the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB\u0026mdash;in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a \u0026ldquo;master technician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference\u0026rsquo;s Working Group 10 on \u0026ldquo;Best Practices in Patent Litigation.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a \u0026ldquo;Patent Star\u0026rdquo; in Washington, D.C. by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eManaging Intellectual Property\u0026rsquo;s IP Stars.\u003c/em\u003e Since 2012, he has been named among the World\u0026rsquo;s Leading Patent Practitioners by the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM Patent 1000\u003c/em\u003e, which recently stated that Brian\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.\u0026rdquo;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIAM\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;has also called him a \u0026ldquo;veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world\u0026rsquo;s major technology companies,\u0026rdquo; and noted that he is a \u0026ldquo;master tactician\u0026rdquo; who \u0026ldquo;calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.\u0026rdquo; In 2012, he was recognized as a \u0026ldquo;BTI Client Service All-Star\u0026rdquo; by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u0026reg;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eSuper Lawyers\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the \u0026ldquo;Discovery and Privilege\u0026rdquo; chapter in the book\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003ePatent Litigation\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;(PLI Press).\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eCore Scientific\u003c/strong\u003e in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading U.S. home goods supplier\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eAdvanced Micro Devices\u003c/strong\u003e in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics\u003c/strong\u003e in a patent case against a competitor.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as co-lead counsel to a \u003cstrong\u003eleading medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel in numerous \u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003e and post-grant review proceedings for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading oil and gas exploration company\u003c/strong\u003e. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor\u0026rsquo;s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to \u003cstrong\u003eone of the world\u0026rsquo;s top technology companies\u003c/strong\u003e in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board\u0026rsquo;s invalidity finding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefending a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading manufacturing company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading chemical company\u003c/strong\u003e in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting an \u003cstrong\u003einnovator medical device company\u003c/strong\u003e in PTAB\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading marine technology provider\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServing as lead counsel to an \u003cstrong\u003einternational technology conglomerate\u003c/strong\u003e and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDozens of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"\u003eDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of software systems for healthcare providers\u003c/strong\u003e in multi-front district court litigation and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003einter partes\u003c/em\u003ereview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading innovator sports equipment company\u003c/strong\u003e in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003eleading provider of nicotine delivery products\u003c/strong\u003e in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003epioneering\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003eleading international insurance company\u003c/strong\u003e and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eServed as lead counsel for a \u003cstrong\u003espeech recognition technology company\u003c/strong\u003e in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026"},{"title":"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”","detail":"Patexia, 2024–2025"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023"},{"title":"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)","detail":"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024"},{"title":"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”","detail":"Lawdragon, 2025"},{"title":"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent","detail":"Lawdragon, 2022–2026"},{"title":"Recognized for Patents","detail":"WIPR Leaders, 2025"},{"title":"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area","detail":"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025"},{"title":"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC","detail":"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13350}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-05-01T19:59:13.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-01T19:59:13.000Z","searchable_text":"Ferguson{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Patexia, 2024–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal)\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Global IP Lawyers”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Lawdragon, 2022–2026\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized for Patents\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"WIPR Leaders, 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"“Patent Star” in Washington, DC\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025\"}{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics in a patent case against a competitor.{{ FIELD }}Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading medical device company in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel in numerous inter partes and post-grant review proceedings for a leading oil and gas exploration company. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor’s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to one of the world’s top technology companies in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\nDistrict court litigation, inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board’s invalidity finding.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\nDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\nDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\nDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\nA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\nMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology.{{ FIELD }}Defending a leading international insurance company in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading manufacturing company in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading chemical company in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing an innovator medical device company in PTAB inter partesreview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading marine technology provider in district court and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating.{{ FIELD }}Serving as lead counsel to an international technology conglomerate and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\nDozens of inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\nDistrict court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\nDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading provider of software systems for healthcare providers in multi-front district court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading innovator sports equipment company in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications.{{ FIELD }}Representing a leading provider of nicotine delivery products in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a pioneering semiconductor company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a leading international insurance company and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology.{{ FIELD }}Served as lead counsel for a speech recognition technology company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.{{ FIELD }}Brian Ferguson is recognized among the leading patent lawyers in the United States. He has 35 years of experience representing Fortune 100 innovator companies before all of the major patent law venues—the ITC, district courts, the Federal Circuit, and the PTAB—in high-stakes IP disputes involving an array of technologies. A leading publication described him as a “master technician” who “calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.”\nBrian represents clients in all phases of patent infringement and validity disputes before U.S. district courts, Section 337 investigations before the ITC, and adversarial matters before the PTAB, which includes successfully representing clients in nearly 150 inter partes review proceedings. He also has substantial experience litigating patent-related appellate proceedings, including dozens of appeals before the Federal Circuit, where he has argued over 20 times. Additionally, Brian has a broad range of first-chair trial and pre-trial experience in both U.S. district courts and at the ITC. In addition to his patent work, Brian has experience handling other intellectual property disputes, including trade secret, trademark, and copyright litigations. Among his pro bono activities, he has assisted inventors with preparing and filing patent and trademark applications. In 2024, Brian was named Chair of The Sedona Conference’s Working Group 10 on “Best Practices in Patent Litigation.”\nBrian has a degree in electrical engineering and is regularly called upon to litigate cases involving sophisticated technologies, including analog and digital integrated circuit designs, computer source code and software design, wearable fitness technology, semiconductor processes, medical technology such as heart valve and annuloplasty devices, injection devices, magnetic image resonance technology, airplane engine design, internet technology, the Internet of Things (IOT), telecommunications hardware and software, digital printing technology, digital cameras, predictive text, and speech recognition technology. He also has handled numerous matters in the chemical space, including batteries and herbicides.\nBrian is regularly recognized by international business and industry publications as a leader in patent law. Since 2013, he has been a recommended lawyer nationwide by The Legal 500 US, including in the areas of patent litigation and ITC proceedings and recognized as a “Patent Star” in Washington, D.C. by Managing Intellectual Property’s IP Stars. Since 2012, he has been named among the World’s Leading Patent Practitioners by the IAM Patent 1000, which recently stated that Brian’s “niche lies in cases involving sophisticated technologies, as he leverages his engineering background to offer tailored insight.” IAM has also called him a “veteran enforcer and protector for some of the world’s major technology companies,” and noted that he is a “master tactician” who “calls the right play at every stage of a case, whatever the forum.” In 2012, he was recognized as a “BTI Client Service All-Star” by BTI Consulting Group. He also has been repeatedly recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® and Super Lawyers.\nBrian is a respected thought leader in the technology sector and in academia. For several years, he taught a course on patent litigation as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University School of Law. He also regularly authors articles on patent litigation and technology topics, including the “Discovery and Privilege” chapter in the book Patent Litigation (PLI Press). Partner Litigation—Intellectual Property and Litigation—Patent The Best Lawyers in America®, 2011–2026 “Top 250 Leading Attorney for PTAB Proceedings” Patexia, 2024–2025 “Key Lawyer” for Patents: Litigation The Legal 500 US, 2022–2023 “Key Lawyer” for Dispute Resolution: Appellate: Courts of Appeals/Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal) The Legal 500 US, 2022–2024 “500 Leading Global IP Lawyers” Lawdragon, 2025 “500 Leading Litigators in America” for IP Litigation, Including Patent Lawdragon, 2022–2026 Recognized for Patents WIPR Leaders, 2025 Honored with a silver ranking for Patent Litigation in the DC metro area IAM Patent 1000, 2012–2025 “Patent Star” in Washington, DC Managing Intellectual Property “IP Stars,” 2016–2022; 2025 Union College  Union College Albany Law School U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Supreme Court of the United States U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Patent and Trademark Office District of Columbia New York Member, International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association Chair of Working Group 10 for “Best Practices in Patent Litigation”, The Sedona Conference, 2024-present Member, PTAB Bar Association Former member, Board of Directors of Give an Hour, a non-profit organization devoted to providing mental health services to U.S. veterans and their families Serving as lead counsel to Core Scientific in ongoing litigation concerning high performance computing and bitcoin mining. This case is one of the first involving patent assertions against the cryptocurrency blockchain. Serving as co-lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a patent case concerning cluster computing and AI chips. Serving as lead counsel to a leading U.S. home goods supplier in a Section 337 ITC investigation involving combination microwave/vent hood products. Serving as lead counsel to Advanced Micro Devices in a Section 337 trial in the ITC, where the administrative law judge invalidated all patents asserted against AMD. Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading provider of sample and assay technologies for molecular diagnostics in a patent case against a competitor. Serving as co-lead counsel to a leading medical device company in a trial in the ITC, with the matter settling on the last day of trial. Serving as lead counsel in numerous inter partes and post-grant review proceedings for a leading oil and gas exploration company. One successful result included arguing to the PTAB in a PGR proceeding that a competitor’s patent was invalid for failing to claim patentable subject matter. Serving as lead counsel to one of the world’s top technology companies in connection with important patent disputes in courts around the United States, including:\nDistrict court litigation, inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a dispute relating to remote display technology. The PTAB invalidated the challenged claims after oral argument, and the Federal Circuit later affirmed the Board’s invalidity finding.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation, district court litigation, and a Federal Circuit appeal in a series of disputes relating to certain IOT devices.\nAn ITC Section 337 investigation and district court litigation involving radio frequency chipsets.\nDistrict court litigation in a dispute relating to error-protection coding used in cellular service protocols.\nDistrict court litigation involving five patents relating to battery monitoring technology.\nDistrict court litigation involving a patent directed to radio frequency transceivers.\nA series of cases in district court, the Federal Circuit, and the ITC involving claims of infringement of more than 40 patents and including cutting-edge issues such as FRAND licensing rates, the appropriateness of injunctive relief, and the role of experts in calculating damages.\nMultiple district court and ITC actions regarding digital camera technology. Defending a leading international insurance company in a trademark infringement lawsuit asserting damages worth in excess of US$1 billion. Representing a leading manufacturing company in district court litigation involving patents directed to adjustable suspension systems for vehicles. Representing a leading chemical company in a declaratory judgment district court proceeding brought by a competitor involving herbicide technology. Representing an innovator medical device company in PTAB inter partesreview proceedings and Federal Circuit appeal against a competitor relating to surgical stapling technology. Representing a leading marine technology provider in district court and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving navigation systems for recreational boating. Serving as lead counsel to an international technology conglomerate and a number of its principal divisions in significant patent disputes, including:\nDozens of inter partesreview proceedings before the PTAB involving turbine engines used in airliners, as well as numerous appeals before the Federal Circuit.\nDistrict court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings against a competitor involving patents relating to wind turbine technology.\nDistrict court litigation against a competitor seeking a preliminary injunction concerning hand-hygiene monitoring systems for hospitals. The Court denied the preliminary injunction request. Representing a leading provider of software systems for healthcare providers in multi-front district court litigation and inter partesreview proceedings adverse to a competitor, related to speech recognition, computer-assisted physician documentation and transcription technology. Representing a leading innovator sports equipment company in district court litigation and PTAB proceedings brought by a competitor involving accusations of infringement of 13 patents related to wearable technology and mobile fitness applications. Representing a leading provider of nicotine delivery products in district court and IPR proceedings against a competitor involving e-vapor and smokeless tobacco-derived products. Served as lead counsel for a pioneering semiconductor company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving semiconductor processing technology. Served as lead counsel for a leading international insurance company and 17 subsidiaries in a patent case involving interactive voice processing technology. Served as lead counsel for a speech recognition technology company in an ITC Section 337 investigation involving soft keyboard input technology. The investigation was terminated after the respondent agreed to redesign the keyboards accused of infringement.","searchable_name":"Brian E. Ferguson","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442799,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5621,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEd is an experienced trial lawyer and is a partner in our Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice and is located in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Austin office. He has been recognized nationally for representing clients in a range of litigation issues, including complex business litigation, energy disputes, professional liability, securities litigation, patent litigation and trade secrets. Ed has experience trying high-stakes cases in both state and federal courts throughout the United States.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis representation of clients has awarded him several national and local distinctions from leading publications like\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAustin Black Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"edward-fernandes","email":"efernandes@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest specialty chemical companies in a six-week trade secret jury trial against a competitor resulting in a $152 million jury verdict for the client. The verdict was identified by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as one of the 10 largest verdicts in the U.S. in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major U.S. Bank in a $400 million fraud case brought by a Mexican pharmaceutical company resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client after a multi-week jury trial and awarding the client $2 million in attorneys' fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major manufacturer in a $270 million antitrust lawsuit resulting in a directed verdict for the client after seven weeks of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major venture capital firm in a $300 million breach of contract case by a Spanish language television station resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a river authority in a federal bench trial defending claims that water diversions caused the death of whooping cranes in violation of the Endangered Species Act. After the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the 5th Circuit reversed and rendered, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish proximate cause and foreseeability as a matter of law. Law360 named the case one of the top five environmental cases of the year.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major U.S. bank in a four-week trial successfully defending an action by the FDIC seeking $1.2 billion in damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major international software company in connection with a $1.3 billion patent infringement and trade secret dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest accounting firms in connection with a $500 million negligence/malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest utility companies in the defense of a $200 million class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major law firm in an $80 million class action involving claims of aiding and abetting securities violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest medical devices manufacturers in connection with a $1 billion patent infringement and trade secrets case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest banks in a suit by 54 foreign investors alleging fraud and aiding and abetting securities violations and seeking more than $27 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a bankruptcy trustee in a highly publicized bankruptcy case involving one of the nation's largest mortgage fraud cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international telecommunications provider in a $15 million fraud claim.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":17,"guid":"17.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fernandes","nick_name":"Ed","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Edward","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":485,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1983-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"F.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Selected as one of the 2019 “Top 10 Central Texas Super Lawyers”","detail":"Austin Black Business Journal"},{"title":"Selected as a “Best Lawyer for Commercial Litigation” and “Litigation – Environmental” in Texas","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2012 – 2019"},{"title":"Recognized by The National Law Journal in its feature “Winning” ranking that profiles that nation’s top 10 litigators ","detail":"2004"},{"title":"Recognized as one of “The 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America”","detail":"The National Law Journal, 2008"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eEd is an experienced trial lawyer and is a partner in our Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice and is located in the firm\u0026rsquo;s Austin office. He has been recognized nationally for representing clients in a range of litigation issues, including complex business litigation, energy disputes, professional liability, securities litigation, patent litigation and trade secrets. Ed has experience trying high-stakes cases in both state and federal courts throughout the United States.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHis representation of clients has awarded him several national and local distinctions from leading publications like\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eAustin Black Business Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest specialty chemical companies in a six-week trade secret jury trial against a competitor resulting in a $152 million jury verdict for the client. The verdict was identified by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe National Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as one of the 10 largest verdicts in the U.S. in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major U.S. Bank in a $400 million fraud case brought by a Mexican pharmaceutical company resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client after a multi-week jury trial and awarding the client $2 million in attorneys' fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major manufacturer in a $270 million antitrust lawsuit resulting in a directed verdict for the client after seven weeks of trial.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major venture capital firm in a $300 million breach of contract case by a Spanish language television station resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a river authority in a federal bench trial defending claims that water diversions caused the death of whooping cranes in violation of the Endangered Species Act. After the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the 5th Circuit reversed and rendered, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish proximate cause and foreseeability as a matter of law. Law360 named the case one of the top five environmental cases of the year.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major U.S. bank in a four-week trial successfully defending an action by the FDIC seeking $1.2 billion in damages.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major international software company in connection with a $1.3 billion patent infringement and trade secret dispute.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest accounting firms in connection with a $500 million negligence/malpractice lawsuit.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest utility companies in the defense of a $200 million class action.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major law firm in an $80 million class action involving claims of aiding and abetting securities violations.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest medical devices manufacturers in connection with a $1 billion patent infringement and trade secrets case.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented one of the nation's largest banks in a suit by 54 foreign investors alleging fraud and aiding and abetting securities violations and seeking more than $27 million.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a bankruptcy trustee in a highly publicized bankruptcy case involving one of the nation's largest mortgage fraud cases.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an international telecommunications provider in a $15 million fraud claim.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Selected as one of the 2019 “Top 10 Central Texas Super Lawyers”","detail":"Austin Black Business Journal"},{"title":"Selected as a “Best Lawyer for Commercial Litigation” and “Litigation – Environmental” in Texas","detail":"The Best Lawyers in America, 2012 – 2019"},{"title":"Recognized by The National Law Journal in its feature “Winning” ranking that profiles that nation’s top 10 litigators ","detail":"2004"},{"title":"Recognized as one of “The 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America”","detail":"The National Law Journal, 2008"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":7212}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:36.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:57:36.000Z","searchable_text":"Fernandes{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected as one of the 2019 “Top 10 Central Texas Super Lawyers”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Austin Black Business Journal\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Selected as a “Best Lawyer for Commercial Litigation” and “Litigation – Environmental” in Texas\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The Best Lawyers in America, 2012 – 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized by The National Law Journal in its feature “Winning” ranking that profiles that nation’s top 10 litigators \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"2004\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as one of “The 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America”\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"The National Law Journal, 2008\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the nation's largest specialty chemical companies in a six-week trade secret jury trial against a competitor resulting in a $152 million jury verdict for the client. The verdict was identified by The National Law Journal as one of the 10 largest verdicts in the U.S. in 2006.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major U.S. Bank in a $400 million fraud case brought by a Mexican pharmaceutical company resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client after a multi-week jury trial and awarding the client $2 million in attorneys' fees.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major manufacturer in a $270 million antitrust lawsuit resulting in a directed verdict for the client after seven weeks of trial.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major venture capital firm in a $300 million breach of contract case by a Spanish language television station resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client.{{ FIELD }}Represented a river authority in a federal bench trial defending claims that water diversions caused the death of whooping cranes in violation of the Endangered Species Act. After the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the 5th Circuit reversed and rendered, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish proximate cause and foreseeability as a matter of law. Law360 named the case one of the top five environmental cases of the year.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major U.S. bank in a four-week trial successfully defending an action by the FDIC seeking $1.2 billion in damages.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major international software company in connection with a $1.3 billion patent infringement and trade secret dispute.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the nation's largest accounting firms in connection with a $500 million negligence/malpractice lawsuit.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the nation's largest utility companies in the defense of a $200 million class action.{{ FIELD }}Represented a major law firm in an $80 million class action involving claims of aiding and abetting securities violations.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the nation's largest medical devices manufacturers in connection with a $1 billion patent infringement and trade secrets case.{{ FIELD }}Represented one of the nation's largest banks in a suit by 54 foreign investors alleging fraud and aiding and abetting securities violations and seeking more than $27 million.{{ FIELD }}Represented a bankruptcy trustee in a highly publicized bankruptcy case involving one of the nation's largest mortgage fraud cases.{{ FIELD }}Represented an international telecommunications provider in a $15 million fraud claim.{{ FIELD }}Ed is an experienced trial lawyer and is a partner in our Trial \u0026amp; Global Disputes practice and is located in the firm’s Austin office. He has been recognized nationally for representing clients in a range of litigation issues, including complex business litigation, energy disputes, professional liability, securities litigation, patent litigation and trade secrets. Ed has experience trying high-stakes cases in both state and federal courts throughout the United States.\nHis representation of clients has awarded him several national and local distinctions from leading publications like The National Law Journal, The Best Lawyers in America, and Austin Black Business Journal. Partner Selected as one of the 2019 “Top 10 Central Texas Super Lawyers” Austin Black Business Journal Selected as a “Best Lawyer for Commercial Litigation” and “Litigation – Environmental” in Texas The Best Lawyers in America, 2012 – 2019 Recognized by The National Law Journal in its feature “Winning” ranking that profiles that nation’s top 10 litigators  2004 Recognized as one of “The 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America” The National Law Journal, 2008 Dartmouth College  Columbia University Columbia University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado Massachusetts Texas Member, American Board of Trial Advocates, 2016 – Present Volunteer Legal Services of Central Texas, Advisory Board, 2012 – Present Director, Texas Appleseed, 2007 – 2016 Chair, Board of Trustees, Texas Bar Foundation, 2010 – 2011 LeadershipSBOT Steering Committee, State Bar of Texas, 2010 – 2011 Director, State Bar of Texas, 2005 – 2008 Director, Houston Bar Association, 1996 – 2000 Advisory Council, Texas A\u0026amp;M Transportation Institute, 2019 - Present Director, Catholic Foundation - Diocese of Austin, 2022 - Present Represented one of the nation's largest specialty chemical companies in a six-week trade secret jury trial against a competitor resulting in a $152 million jury verdict for the client. The verdict was identified by The National Law Journal as one of the 10 largest verdicts in the U.S. in 2006. Represented a major U.S. Bank in a $400 million fraud case brought by a Mexican pharmaceutical company resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client after a multi-week jury trial and awarding the client $2 million in attorneys' fees. Represented a major manufacturer in a $270 million antitrust lawsuit resulting in a directed verdict for the client after seven weeks of trial. Represented a major venture capital firm in a $300 million breach of contract case by a Spanish language television station resulting in a defense jury verdict for the client. Represented a river authority in a federal bench trial defending claims that water diversions caused the death of whooping cranes in violation of the Endangered Species Act. After the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the 5th Circuit reversed and rendered, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish proximate cause and foreseeability as a matter of law. Law360 named the case one of the top five environmental cases of the year. Represented a major U.S. bank in a four-week trial successfully defending an action by the FDIC seeking $1.2 billion in damages. Represented a major international software company in connection with a $1.3 billion patent infringement and trade secret dispute. Represented one of the nation's largest accounting firms in connection with a $500 million negligence/malpractice lawsuit. Represented one of the nation's largest utility companies in the defense of a $200 million class action. Represented a major law firm in an $80 million class action involving claims of aiding and abetting securities violations. Represented one of the nation's largest medical devices manufacturers in connection with a $1 billion patent infringement and trade secrets case. Represented one of the nation's largest banks in a suit by 54 foreign investors alleging fraud and aiding and abetting securities violations and seeking more than $27 million. Represented a bankruptcy trustee in a highly publicized bankruptcy case involving one of the nation's largest mortgage fraud cases. Represented an international telecommunications provider in a $15 million fraud claim.","searchable_name":"Edward F. Fernandes (Ed)","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":447313,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7360,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePhilip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Real Estate and Funds practice.\u0026nbsp;He advises clients including owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions in complex commercial real estate transactions spanning the full asset life cycle and across diverse asset classes. Clients rely on Philip\u0026rsquo;s expertise in matters including acquisitions and dispositions, financing, joint ventures, development, leasing and asset management.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner whose practice centers on guiding clients through complex real estate transactions across the full life cycle of a real asset. He advises owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions on sophisticated debt and equity matters spanning a broad range of asset classes, including office, multifamily, industrial, hospitality, and mixed‑use properties.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip has significant experience negotiating complex mortgage and mezzanine financings, including construction loans, securitized financing arrangements and other highly structured debt transactions. Clients rely on his ability to navigate multifaceted capital stacks while keeping transactions moving efficiently toward execution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his financing practice, Philip regularly represents buyers and sellers in acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic property transactions, as well as sponsors and investors in the negotiation of complex joint ventures. In addition, Philip represents owners and operators in various asset and property management matters, including the negotiation of property management, hotel management, and related operational agreements that are critical to long‑term value creation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip also maintains an active leasing practice, representing landlords and tenants in office, retail, industrial, and other commercial leases. Across all matters, he is known for delivering practical, business‑minded advice that helps clients manage risk and achieve their commercial objectives.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"philip-fitzpatrick","email":"pfitzpatrick@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRFR Holding \u003c/strong\u003ein connection with a $1.2 billion mortgage financing of the Seagram Building in Manhattan, one of New York City\u0026rsquo;s most iconic office towers, involving a large CMBS securitization and complex structuring considerations for a marquee asset.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eSL Green Realty Corp \u003c/strong\u003ein various transactions related to 100 Park Avenue in New York, including a $430 million mortgage financing and an interest sale and joint venture transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRFR Holding\u003c/strong\u003e in the disposition of the office and retail condominium units located at 522 Fifth Avenue in New York, to one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest public companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eIan Schrager Company \u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in connection with a $350+ million financing of the Public Hotel in Manhattan\u0026rsquo;s Lower East Side, including a mortgage securitization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fitzpatrick","nick_name":"Philip","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Philip","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2017-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch in America, Real Estate Law","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025-2026"}],"linked_in_url":"https://www.linkedin.com/in/philipmfitzpatrick/","seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003ePhilip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Real Estate and Funds practice.\u0026nbsp;He advises clients including owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions in complex commercial real estate transactions spanning the full asset life cycle and across diverse asset classes. Clients rely on Philip\u0026rsquo;s expertise in matters including acquisitions and dispositions, financing, joint ventures, development, leasing and asset management.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner whose practice centers on guiding clients through complex real estate transactions across the full life cycle of a real asset. He advises owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions on sophisticated debt and equity matters spanning a broad range of asset classes, including office, multifamily, industrial, hospitality, and mixed‑use properties.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip has significant experience negotiating complex mortgage and mezzanine financings, including construction loans, securitized financing arrangements and other highly structured debt transactions. Clients rely on his ability to navigate multifaceted capital stacks while keeping transactions moving efficiently toward execution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn addition to his financing practice, Philip regularly represents buyers and sellers in acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic property transactions, as well as sponsors and investors in the negotiation of complex joint ventures. In addition, Philip represents owners and operators in various asset and property management matters, including the negotiation of property management, hotel management, and related operational agreements that are critical to long‑term value creation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePhilip also maintains an active leasing practice, representing landlords and tenants in office, retail, industrial, and other commercial leases. Across all matters, he is known for delivering practical, business‑minded advice that helps clients manage risk and achieve their commercial objectives.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRFR Holding \u003c/strong\u003ein connection with a $1.2 billion mortgage financing of the Seagram Building in Manhattan, one of New York City\u0026rsquo;s most iconic office towers, involving a large CMBS securitization and complex structuring considerations for a marquee asset.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eSL Green Realty Corp \u003c/strong\u003ein various transactions related to 100 Park Avenue in New York, including a $430 million mortgage financing and an interest sale and joint venture transaction.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eRFR Holding\u003c/strong\u003e in the disposition of the office and retail condominium units located at 522 Fifth Avenue in New York, to one of the nation\u0026rsquo;s largest public companies.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented \u003cstrong\u003eIan Schrager Company \u003c/strong\u003eand affiliates in connection with a $350+ million financing of the Public Hotel in Manhattan\u0026rsquo;s Lower East Side, including a mortgage securitization.\u003c/p\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Ones to Watch in America, Real Estate Law","detail":"Best Lawyers, 2025-2026"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13450}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-04-06T16:06:51.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-06T16:06:51.000Z","searchable_text":"Fitzpatrick{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Ones to Watch in America, Real Estate Law\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Best Lawyers, 2025-2026\"}{{ FIELD }}Represented RFR Holding in connection with a $1.2 billion mortgage financing of the Seagram Building in Manhattan, one of New York City’s most iconic office towers, involving a large CMBS securitization and complex structuring considerations for a marquee asset.{{ FIELD }}Represented SL Green Realty Corp in various transactions related to 100 Park Avenue in New York, including a $430 million mortgage financing and an interest sale and joint venture transaction.{{ FIELD }}Represented RFR Holding in the disposition of the office and retail condominium units located at 522 Fifth Avenue in New York, to one of the nation’s largest public companies.{{ FIELD }}Represented Ian Schrager Company and affiliates in connection with a $350+ million financing of the Public Hotel in Manhattan’s Lower East Side, including a mortgage securitization.{{ FIELD }}Philip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Real Estate and Funds practice. He advises clients including owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions in complex commercial real estate transactions spanning the full asset life cycle and across diverse asset classes. Clients rely on Philip’s expertise in matters including acquisitions and dispositions, financing, joint ventures, development, leasing and asset management.\nPhilip M. Fitzpatrick is a partner whose practice centers on guiding clients through complex real estate transactions across the full life cycle of a real asset. He advises owners, developers, REITs, investors and other institutions on sophisticated debt and equity matters spanning a broad range of asset classes, including office, multifamily, industrial, hospitality, and mixed‑use properties.\nPhilip has significant experience negotiating complex mortgage and mezzanine financings, including construction loans, securitized financing arrangements and other highly structured debt transactions. Clients rely on his ability to navigate multifaceted capital stacks while keeping transactions moving efficiently toward execution.\nIn addition to his financing practice, Philip regularly represents buyers and sellers in acquisitions, dispositions, and other strategic property transactions, as well as sponsors and investors in the negotiation of complex joint ventures. In addition, Philip represents owners and operators in various asset and property management matters, including the negotiation of property management, hotel management, and related operational agreements that are critical to long‑term value creation. \nPhilip also maintains an active leasing practice, representing landlords and tenants in office, retail, industrial, and other commercial leases. Across all matters, he is known for delivering practical, business‑minded advice that helps clients manage risk and achieve their commercial objectives. Partner Ones to Watch in America, Real Estate Law Best Lawyers, 2025-2026 University of Miami University of Miami School of Law New York University New York University School of Law New York Represented RFR Holding in connection with a $1.2 billion mortgage financing of the Seagram Building in Manhattan, one of New York City’s most iconic office towers, involving a large CMBS securitization and complex structuring considerations for a marquee asset. Represented SL Green Realty Corp in various transactions related to 100 Park Avenue in New York, including a $430 million mortgage financing and an interest sale and joint venture transaction. Represented RFR Holding in the disposition of the office and retail condominium units located at 522 Fifth Avenue in New York, to one of the nation’s largest public companies. Represented Ian Schrager Company and affiliates in connection with a $350+ million financing of the Public Hotel in Manhattan’s Lower East Side, including a mortgage securitization.","searchable_name":"Philip M. Fitzpatrick","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426436,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":3533,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGibbs Fryer is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Real Estate and Private Funds practices. His practice focuses on real estate capital markets, including representations of real estate operating companies, real estate investment trusts, and private equity sponsors and institutional lenders. Gibbs advises clients on a wide array of corporate real estate matters, including fund formations and offerings, joint venture formations, debt financings, and negotiations of secondary transactions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGibbs has experience in a broad range of private equity, leverage finance, and real estate transactions and related areas including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, joint ventures, equity offerings, financings and fund formations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to returning to King \u0026amp; Spalding, Gibbs was a founding partner of Evergreen Medical Properties, a real estate company focused on the ownership and operation of healthcare real estate assets across the United States, and a partner of Iron Tree Capital Partners, a boutique real estate private equity firmed focused on corporate investments in real estate operating companies. He also worked in the New York City office of Simpson Thacher \u0026amp; Bartlett LLP and spent time seconded to J.P. Morgan Chase \u0026amp; Co. in New York, working in their global investment bank primarily on syndicated leverage finance related matters.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"gibbs-fryer","email":"gfryer@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its initial public offering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Prologis in connection with the restructuring and growth of their open end U.S. Logistics Fund\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Clarion Partners, LLC, in connection with the formation of Clarion Gables Multifamily Trust, L.P., a multibillion dollar open-end core-plus multifamily fund.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its incurrence of a $860 million secured credit facility, which consisted of a $710 million term loan facility and a $150 million revolving credit facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Jamestown Properties in connection with various financing and acquisition transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of The Carroll Organization in connection with multifamily fund offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Deka Bank in connection with various mortgage financing transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in connection with various mortgage financings.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":36,"guid":"36.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":78,"guid":"78.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fryer","nick_name":"Gibbs","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Gibbs","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[{"id":2410,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"2009-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"Patton","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eGibbs Fryer is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Real Estate and Private Funds practices. His practice focuses on real estate capital markets, including representations of real estate operating companies, real estate investment trusts, and private equity sponsors and institutional lenders. Gibbs advises clients on a wide array of corporate real estate matters, including fund formations and offerings, joint venture formations, debt financings, and negotiations of secondary transactions.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGibbs has experience in a broad range of private equity, leverage finance, and real estate transactions and related areas including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, joint ventures, equity offerings, financings and fund formations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePrior to returning to King \u0026amp; Spalding, Gibbs was a founding partner of Evergreen Medical Properties, a real estate company focused on the ownership and operation of healthcare real estate assets across the United States, and a partner of Iron Tree Capital Partners, a boutique real estate private equity firmed focused on corporate investments in real estate operating companies. He also worked in the New York City office of Simpson Thacher \u0026amp; Bartlett LLP and spent time seconded to J.P. Morgan Chase \u0026amp; Co. in New York, working in their global investment bank primarily on syndicated leverage finance related matters.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its initial public offering.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Prologis in connection with the restructuring and growth of their open end U.S. Logistics Fund\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Clarion Partners, LLC, in connection with the formation of Clarion Gables Multifamily Trust, L.P., a multibillion dollar open-end core-plus multifamily fund.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its incurrence of a $860 million secured credit facility, which consisted of a $710 million term loan facility and a $150 million revolving credit facility.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Jamestown Properties in connection with various financing and acquisition transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of The Carroll Organization in connection with multifamily fund offerings.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Deka Bank in connection with various mortgage financing transactions.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresentation of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in connection with various mortgage financings.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":10352}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:02.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:53:02.000Z","searchable_text":"Fryer{{ FIELD }}Representation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its initial public offering.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Prologis in connection with the restructuring and growth of their open end U.S. Logistics Fund{{ FIELD }}Representation of Clarion Partners, LLC, in connection with the formation of Clarion Gables Multifamily Trust, L.P., a multibillion dollar open-end core-plus multifamily fund.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its incurrence of a $860 million secured credit facility, which consisted of a $710 million term loan facility and a $150 million revolving credit facility.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Jamestown Properties in connection with various financing and acquisition transactions.{{ FIELD }}Representation of The Carroll Organization in connection with multifamily fund offerings.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Deka Bank in connection with various mortgage financing transactions.{{ FIELD }}Representation of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in connection with various mortgage financings.{{ FIELD }}Gibbs Fryer is a partner in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Real Estate and Private Funds practices. His practice focuses on real estate capital markets, including representations of real estate operating companies, real estate investment trusts, and private equity sponsors and institutional lenders. Gibbs advises clients on a wide array of corporate real estate matters, including fund formations and offerings, joint venture formations, debt financings, and negotiations of secondary transactions.\nGibbs has experience in a broad range of private equity, leverage finance, and real estate transactions and related areas including mergers \u0026amp; acquisitions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, joint ventures, equity offerings, financings and fund formations.\nPrior to returning to King \u0026amp; Spalding, Gibbs was a founding partner of Evergreen Medical Properties, a real estate company focused on the ownership and operation of healthcare real estate assets across the United States, and a partner of Iron Tree Capital Partners, a boutique real estate private equity firmed focused on corporate investments in real estate operating companies. He also worked in the New York City office of Simpson Thacher \u0026amp; Bartlett LLP and spent time seconded to J.P. Morgan Chase \u0026amp; Co. in New York, working in their global investment bank primarily on syndicated leverage finance related matters. Partner University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law University of Virginia University of Virginia School of Law Georgia New York Representation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its initial public offering. Representation of Prologis in connection with the restructuring and growth of their open end U.S. Logistics Fund Representation of Clarion Partners, LLC, in connection with the formation of Clarion Gables Multifamily Trust, L.P., a multibillion dollar open-end core-plus multifamily fund. Representation of Americold Realty Trust in connection with its incurrence of a $860 million secured credit facility, which consisted of a $710 million term loan facility and a $150 million revolving credit facility. Representation of Jamestown Properties in connection with various financing and acquisition transactions. Representation of The Carroll Organization in connection with multifamily fund offerings. Representation of Deka Bank in connection with various mortgage financing transactions. Representation of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company in connection with various mortgage financings.","searchable_name":"Gibbs Patton Fryer","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":442818,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5741,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jeanne-fugate","email":"jfugate@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":115,"guid":"115.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1233,"guid":"1233.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1409,"guid":"1409.smart_tags","index":8,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":9,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":135,"guid":"135.capabilities","index":10,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugate","nick_name":"Jeanne","clerkships":[{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","years_held":"2003 - 2004"},{"name":"Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York","years_held":"2002 - 2003"}],"first_name":"Jeanne","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":32,"law_schools":[{"id":1406,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2001-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"A.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice.\u0026nbsp;[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill\u0026rsquo;s daily newspaper, \u003cem\u003eThe Daily Tar Heel\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTrade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive\u0026rsquo;s employment agreement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company\u0026rsquo;s employees\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBusiness and Securities Disputes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented health care company in founders\u0026rsquo; dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders\u0026rsquo; TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eHandled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eIn a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmployment Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women\u0026rsquo;s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003ePreserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSecured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eSuccessfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFamily Law\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRepresented client in novel action brought under\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMarvin v. Marvin\u003c/em\u003e, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEntertainment and Intellectual Property\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne\u0026rsquo;s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs\u0026rsquo; marks were entitled only to limited protection\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eDefeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey\u0026rsquo;s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys\u0026rsquo; fees and costs\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eAchieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman\u0026rsquo;s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCriminal Matters\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons\u0026mdash;a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi\u0026rsquo;s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cdiv id=\"mySiteMain\" data-name=\"ContentPlaceHolderMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_PageContentSection\" class=\"pageContentSection\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"fixedWidthMain\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003ctable id=\"MSO_ContentTable\" class=\"ms-core-tableNoSpace ms-fillBox\"\u003e\n\u003ctbody\u003e\n\u003ctr id=\"BottomRow\"\u003e\n\u003ctd id=\"BottomCell\" colspan=\"3\" valign=\"top\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-zone ms-fullWidth\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"MSOZoneCell_WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"s4-wpcell-plain ms-webpartzone-cell ms-webpart-cell-vertical ms-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-webpart-chrome ms-webpart-chrome-vertical ms-webpart-chrome-fullWidth \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"WebPartctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\" class=\"ms-WPBody noindex \"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"ctl00_SPWebPartManager1_g_6347bc54_42ef_41e7_b052_45cf0d1581a8_profileBody\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientsMatters\" class=\"pagePanel\"\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"pnlClientMattersText\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney\u0026rsquo;s Office\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"ms-clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/td\u003e\n\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"clear\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"pageFooterSection noindex\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/div\u003e"],"recognitions":[{"title":"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the ","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017"},{"title":"Recommended for Trade Secret","detail":"Legal 500 US 2023"},{"title":"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California","detail":"Daily Journal 2018, 2019"},{"title":"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026 Entertainment","detail":"Law360 2024"},{"title":"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024"},{"title":"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list","detail":"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":8078}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","updated_at":"2025-11-13T04:58:08.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugate{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the \", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recommended for Trade Secret\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Legal 500 US 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Daily Journal 2018, 2019\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Law360 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Los Angeles Business Journal 2023\"}{{ FIELD }}Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client{{ FIELD }}Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement{{ FIELD }}Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees{{ FIELD }}Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors{{ FIELD }}Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction{{ FIELD }}Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement{{ FIELD }}Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing{{ FIELD }}Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved{{ FIELD }}Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage{{ FIELD }}Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients{{ FIELD }}Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss{{ FIELD }}Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme{{ FIELD }}In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week{{ FIELD }}Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints{{ FIELD }}Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees.{{ FIELD }}Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions{{ FIELD }}Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer.{{ FIELD }}Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced{{ FIELD }}Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident{{ FIELD }}Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed{{ FIELD }}Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings{{ FIELD }}Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection{{ FIELD }}Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute{{ FIELD }}Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs{{ FIELD }}Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro{{ FIELD }}Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term{{ FIELD }}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n {{ FIELD }}Jeanne Fugate has a wide-ranging practice, focusing primarily on trade secrets issues, employment litigation, complex civil litigation, and securities litigation. She handles all phases of litigation in state and federal courts across various fields, including employment, contract, real estate, and general business disputes. Jeanne also advises clients regarding employment and compliance issues.\nJeanne Fugate is a go-to partner on trade secrets issues, including all issues surrounding employee mobility, ranging from drafting enforceable employment agreements, to advising clients as to appropriate on-boarding and off-boarding practices, and ultimately to litigating any disputes that may arise from the termination of an employer/employee relationship. In order to litigate trade secrets, non-competes, and other employee mobility claims, lawyers are often called upon to respond quickly to demand letters and to immediately move to draft and/or defend against requests for TROs and preliminary injunctions. Jeanne, a journalist before law school, excels at this fast-paced practice. \nJeanne served as the editor-in-chief of UNC-Chapel Hill’s daily newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel. Partner Recognized as Top Trade Secrets Lawyer in California Daily Journal 2023 Recognized as Top Labor and Employment Lawyer in California by the  Los Angeles Business Journal 2017 Recommended for Trade Secret Legal 500 US 2023 Recognized as Top 100 Women Lawyers in California Daily Journal 2018, 2019 Editorial Board Member – Media \u0026amp; Entertainment Law360 2024 Recognized as a Woman of Influence: Attorney Los Angeles Business Journal 2017, 2024 Named to the “Thriving in Their 40s” list Los Angeles Business Journal 2023 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University of North Carolina School of Law New York University New York University School of Law U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of California U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California California New York President, Los Angeles Civil Service Commission Board Member and President-Elect, California ChangeLawyers Board Member and Dinner Committee Chair, Association of Business Trial Lawyers Member, Sedona Conference WG12 Model Defend Trade Secrets Act Jury Instructions Brainstorming Group (committee working to draft model jury instructions to be used in DTSA cases) Member, CJA/CLA Civility in the Legal Profession Task Force LA Board of Directors and Co-Chair Government Relations Committee, Federal Bar Association Judicial Clerk, Hon. Raymond C. Fisher, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judicial Clerk, Hon. Robert W. Sweet, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Trade Secrets and Non-Compete Matters\nDefeated an application for preliminary injunction to prohibit an executive from competing against a former employer for a health care client Defeated an application for a TRO based on theft of trade secret claim for a health care client Obtained a TRO to require defendant to honor choice-of-law and forum-selection provisions in a former executive’s employment agreement Defeated a preliminary injunction to prevent competitor company from recruiting, soliciting and hiring plaintiff company’s employees Obtained a $6.15 million jury verdict for a leading aircraft supply company after a three-week trial on trade secret misappropriation and other tort claims against a former employee and other competitors Successfully defending a former pharmaceutical executive from claims of trade secret misappropriation, defeating a preliminary injunction Defended former employees against an internet affiliate company seeking to enforce noncompete agreement. Obtained a writ of supersedeas blocking enforcement of preliminary injunction, motivating settlement Business and Securities Disputes\nRepresented start-up technology company in lawsuit against component manufacturer alleging $200 million in damages; after serving as lead trial counsel in a two-week trial, obtained a favorable resolution on the eve of post-trial motion briefing Represented health care company in founders’ dispute; after defeating plaintiff-founders’ TRO application and successfully moving the case into arbitration, the case resolved Represented former Countrywide president in multidistrict litigation arising from mortgage-backed securities. Obtained the dismissal, with prejudice, of a number of lawsuits at the motion-to-dismiss stage Successfully recovered nearly 100 percent of the losses suffered by 23 victims of a Ponzi scheme run through a brokerage firm. Since 2009, Jeanne has represented a group of 23 plaintiffs who were victims of a Ponzi scheme. In 2015, she obtained a favorable settlement from a national brokerage firm in the days before trial. Most recently, she sought and obtained default judgments of more than $3 million for our clients Obtained a directed verdict for a registered financial company after a five-day jury trial on a fraud claim arising out of an investment loss Handled a class action on behalf of investors who lost money in a complex Ponzi scheme, obtaining more than $17 million in settlements with two major financial institutions and an accounting firm that were alleged to have aided the operators of the financial scheme In a corporate embezzlement case against a former employee, successfully recovered approximately $1 million for the client in less than one week Employment Matters\nOn the team that conducted an independent investigation into allegations of abuse and sexual misconduct in the National Women’s Soccer League, as commissioned by the U.S. Soccer Foundation. The report concluded that owners and coaches at all levels of the NWSL had turned a blind eye toward years of reports of abuse from players. Jeanne led the team investigating the role of SafeSport, the group tasked with handling certain player complaints Represented six individual defendants in a lawsuit alleging breach of employment obligations and breach of the duty to act fairly and honestly under Russian employment law, seeking $670 million. The court granted dismissal with prejudice. Jeanne’s clients were awarded almost $600,000 in attorneys’ fees. Preserved a settlement agreement in a suitable seating PAGA action against a major retailer, defeating a motion for sanctions Secured the dismissal of a suitable seating action against major retailer. Successfully resolving multiple wrongful termination cases for media clients before trial or arbitration commenced Represented a company in an investigation of fatality at work and resolved OSHA investigation into the incident Defended employment discrimination claims for an outdoor advertising company, resulting in settlements before any litigation was filed Family Law\nRepresented client in novel action brought under Marvin v. Marvin, 18 Cal. 3d 660 (1976); case resolved on eve of trial after favorable pretrial rulings Entertainment and Intellectual Property\nObtained summary judgment in a trademark matter in the Middle District of Florida that was affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit. The court agreed with Jeanne’s argument that the \"Elimidate Ironman Challenge\" did not infringe the Ironman Triathlon trademarks because the term \"ironman\" is commonly used to describe persons of unusual endurance and thus the plaintiffs’ marks were entitled only to limited protection Defeated summary judgment brought by the Associated Press in litigation relating to Shepard Fairey’s 2008 campaign poster of Barack Obama on behalf of Fairey's exclusive licensee, Obey Clothing, leading to successful resolution of the dispute Obtained the affirmance of a judgment after a ten-day bench trial for an outdoor advertising company, allowing the company to continue to operate a billboard and including an award of almost $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs Achieved a complete defense judgment on behalf of Academy Award-winning actor Robert De Niro. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., which insured the film Hide and Seek in 2003, accused Mr. De Niro of intentionally withholding information about his cancer diagnosis during a cast medical examination. The case was dismissed in favor of Mr. De Niro Criminal Matters\nSecured the release of an Orthodox Jewish rabbi who had been incarcerated after refusing to testify before the grand jury against other Jewish persons—a case that drew international attention. The rabbi cited the rule of mesira, which imposes on the ultra-Orthodox the religious obligation to refrain from testifying against other Jews. The government eventually agreed to the rabbi’s release seven months after he was incarcerated, a fraction of the maximum eighteen-month term \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWon a complete dismissal of all charges in a groundbreaking and published decision against the client, who was charged in federal court with \"harboring\" her fugitive husband. The court ruled that federal prosecutors had arrested the client without probable cause to believe a crime had been committed. The client was released and all charges were dismissed seven days after the case was filed by the United States Attorney’s Office\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n ","searchable_name":"Jeanne A. Fugate","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":32,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444728,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6787,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"jackie-fugitt","email":"jfugitt@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":74,"guid":"74.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":5,"guid":"5.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1,"guid":"1.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":3,"guid":"3.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":19,"guid":"19.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":14,"guid":"14.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":106,"guid":"106.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":8,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":9,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1166,"guid":"1166.smart_tags","index":10,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":1248,"guid":"1248.smart_tags","index":11,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":129,"guid":"129.capabilities","index":12,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fugitt","nick_name":"Jackie","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Jackie","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":35,"law_schools":[{"id":2489,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"magna cum laude \u0026 Order of the Coif","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2016-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eJackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.\u0026nbsp; Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in\u0026nbsp;litigation\u0026nbsp;related to\u0026nbsp;contract, securities, and antitrust matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy,\u0026nbsp;pharmaceutical and retail industries.\u0026nbsp; Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at\u0026nbsp;Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003eDefending\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003eCapital One\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresenting a \u003cstrong\u003emajor financial institution\u003c/strong\u003e seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eObtained a total trial victory for a \u003cstrong\u003edirector defendant\u003c/strong\u003e and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a major \u003cstrong\u003esemiconductor company\u003c/strong\u003e in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented the \u003cstrong\u003eboard of directors\u003c/strong\u003e of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented an \u003cstrong\u003easset management firm\u003c/strong\u003e in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003eRepresented a \u003cstrong\u003epharmaceutical \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ecompany\u003c/strong\u003e in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":12289}]},"capability_group_id":3},"created_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-02T16:02:51.000Z","searchable_text":"Fugitt{{ FIELD }}Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products{{ FIELD }}Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings{{ FIELD }}Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition{{ FIELD }}Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company{{ FIELD }}Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation{{ FIELD }}Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction{{ FIELD }}Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement{{ FIELD }}Jackie is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a range of complex commercial disputes.  Her experience includes defending clients against derivative claims for breach of fiduciary duty and representing clients in litigation related to contract, securities, and antitrust matters.\nJackie has represented clients in the tech, financial, energy, pharmaceutical and retail industries.  Prior to joining King \u0026amp; Spalding, she was a litigator in New York at Cravath, Swaine \u0026amp; Moore and Vinson \u0026amp; Elkins.   Partner Missouri State University  Washington University in St. Louis Washington University in St. Louis School of Law U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York New York Defending Capital One in MDL litigation alleging breach of contract and violation of consumer protection laws in connection with interest rates paid on savings account products Representing a major financial institution seeking more than $400 million in damages from a contractual counterparty in ongoing arbitration proceedings Obtained a total trial victory for a director defendant and alleged controlling stockholder in a derivative action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a strategic acquisition Represented a major semiconductor company in antitrust and breach of contract litigation that resulted in a favorable settlement at the outset of trial Represented the board of directors of a SPAC in litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary duty related to a merger with a solar financing company Represented the board of directors of an energy and technology company in derivative actions regarding executive and board compensation Represented an asset management firm in in litigation regarding alleged breach of contract and tortious interference claims related to a spin-off transaction Represented a pharmaceutical company in expedited litigation and trial regarding the termination of a merger agreement","searchable_name":"Jackie Fugitt","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":35,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":448850,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":877,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathryn Furman focuses on fund formation and offerings, joint venture formation and negotiation, and secondary transactions. She is the head of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Private Funds and Alternative Capital practice. Kathryn advises fund sponsors, investment advisers and others on a variety of related matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathryn works with established and new fund sponsors, as well as investment advisers, in structuring and formation of investment funds, joint ventures, separate accounts, and other investment vehicles. Kathryn advises investors on reviewing and negotiating the terms of their investments, and counsels them on exemptions and compliance matters under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as well as under the Volcker Rule.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathryn also has experience with merger and acquisition (M\u0026amp;A) transactions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, going-private transactions and strategic investments. She counsels clients in a number of industries, including real estate, energy, healthcare and restaurants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker on M\u0026amp;A and fund formation topics, Kathryn is fluent in English and German.\u0026nbsp; She is ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for REITs and ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIFLR1000\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for Investment Funds as well as for Mergers \u0026amp; Acquisitions.\u0026nbsp;She has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a leading lawyer for M\u0026amp;A and investment funds. Also, the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFulton County Daily Report\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named Kathryn as one of 14 young Atlanta lawyers \u0026ldquo;On the Rise\u0026rdquo; in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kathryn-furman","email":"kfurman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":104,"guid":"104.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":78,"guid":"78.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":33,"guid":"33.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1255,"guid":"1255.smart_tags","index":6,"source":"smartTags"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Furman","nick_name":"Kathryn","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Kathryn","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":101,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":"M.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":[{"title":"Kathryn is Highly Regarded in Investment Funds and M\u0026A","detail":"IFLR1000"},{"title":"Kathryn is ranked in REITs","detail":"Chambers USA Nationwide"}],"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":15,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKathryn Furman focuses on fund formation and offerings, joint venture formation and negotiation, and secondary transactions. She is the head of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Private Funds and Alternative Capital practice. Kathryn advises fund sponsors, investment advisers and others on a variety of related matters.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathryn works with established and new fund sponsors, as well as investment advisers, in structuring and formation of investment funds, joint ventures, separate accounts, and other investment vehicles. Kathryn advises investors on reviewing and negotiating the terms of their investments, and counsels them on exemptions and compliance matters under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as well as under the Volcker Rule.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKathryn also has experience with merger and acquisition (M\u0026amp;A) transactions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, going-private transactions and strategic investments. She counsels clients in a number of industries, including real estate, energy, healthcare and restaurants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA frequent speaker on M\u0026amp;A and fund formation topics, Kathryn is fluent in English and German.\u0026nbsp; She is ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eChambers USA\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for REITs and ranked in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIFLR1000\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;for Investment Funds as well as for Mergers \u0026amp; Acquisitions.\u0026nbsp;She has been recognized by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eThe Best Lawyers in America\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;as a leading lawyer for M\u0026amp;A and investment funds. Also, the\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eFulton County Daily Report\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;named Kathryn as one of 14 young Atlanta lawyers \u0026ldquo;On the Rise\u0026rdquo; in 2006.\u003c/p\u003e","recognitions":[{"title":"Kathryn is Highly Regarded in Investment Funds and M\u0026A","detail":"IFLR1000"},{"title":"Kathryn is ranked in REITs","detail":"Chambers USA Nationwide"}]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":861}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-05-28T22:07:23.000Z","updated_at":"2026-05-28T22:07:23.000Z","searchable_text":"Furman{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Kathryn is Highly Regarded in Investment Funds and M\u0026amp;A\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"IFLR1000\"}{{ FIELD }}{:title=\u0026gt;\"Kathryn is ranked in REITs\", :detail=\u0026gt;\"Chambers USA Nationwide\"}{{ FIELD }}Kathryn Furman focuses on fund formation and offerings, joint venture formation and negotiation, and secondary transactions. She is the head of the firm’s Private Funds and Alternative Capital practice. Kathryn advises fund sponsors, investment advisers and others on a variety of related matters.\nKathryn works with established and new fund sponsors, as well as investment advisers, in structuring and formation of investment funds, joint ventures, separate accounts, and other investment vehicles. Kathryn advises investors on reviewing and negotiating the terms of their investments, and counsels them on exemptions and compliance matters under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as well as under the Volcker Rule.\nKathryn also has experience with merger and acquisition (M\u0026amp;A) transactions, including public and private company mergers, leveraged buyouts, going-private transactions and strategic investments. She counsels clients in a number of industries, including real estate, energy, healthcare and restaurants.\nA frequent speaker on M\u0026amp;A and fund formation topics, Kathryn is fluent in English and German.  She is ranked in Chambers USA for REITs and ranked in IFLR1000 for Investment Funds as well as for Mergers \u0026amp; Acquisitions. She has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America as a leading lawyer for M\u0026amp;A and investment funds. Also, the Fulton County Daily Report named Kathryn as one of 14 young Atlanta lawyers “On the Rise” in 2006. Partner Kathryn is Highly Regarded in Investment Funds and M\u0026amp;A IFLR1000 Kathryn is ranked in REITs Chambers USA Nationwide Davidson College  Harvard University Harvard Law School Georgia State Bar of Georgia","searchable_name":"Kathryn M. Furman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":101,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":426691,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":5310,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor\u0026rsquo;s Energy Council.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"zori-ferkin","email":"zferkin@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOklahoma Wind Project\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCalifornia Solar Projects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWheatField Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBishop Hill I Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCity of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of InterGen N.V.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named \u0026ldquo;2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndia Business Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLost Creek Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEBG Holdings Merger\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of Wind and Geothermal Assets\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhite Creek Wind I Divesititure\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWaterbury CT Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMidway Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSandy Creek Coal Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e"],"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":1114,"guid":"1114.smart_tags","index":1,"source":"smartTags"},{"id":35,"guid":"35.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":102,"guid":"102.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":131,"guid":"131.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Ferkin","nick_name":"Zori","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Zori","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":34,"law_schools":[{"id":755,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":null,"is_law_school":1,"graduation_date":"1981-01-01 00:00:00 UTC"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":"G.","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":14,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eZori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.[[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eLegal 500 US\u003c/em\u003e\u0026nbsp;2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor\u0026rsquo;s Energy Council.\u003c/p\u003e","matters":["\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOklahoma Wind Project\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCalifornia Solar Projects\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWheatField Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePost Rock Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBishop Hill I Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCity of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of InterGen N.V.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named \u0026ldquo;2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year\u0026rdquo; by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eIndia Business Law Journal\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLost Creek Wind Farm\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEBG Holdings Merger\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eU.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSale of Wind and Geothermal Assets\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWhite Creek Wind I Divesititure\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eWaterbury CT Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMidway Gas Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.\u003c/p\u003e","\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSandy Creek Coal Power Plant\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.\u003c/p\u003e"]},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":6464}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:05.000Z","updated_at":"2025-05-26T04:56:05.000Z","searchable_text":"Ferkin{{ FIELD }}Oklahoma Wind Project Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma.{{ FIELD }}California Solar Projects Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California.{{ FIELD }}WheatField Wind Farm Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America.{{ FIELD }}Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.{{ FIELD }}Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas.{{ FIELD }}Bishop Hill I Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois.{{ FIELD }}City of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California{{ FIELD }}Sale of InterGen N.V. Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named “2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year” by India Business Law Journal.{{ FIELD }}Lost Creek Wind Farm Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri.{{ FIELD }}EBG Holdings Merger Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion.{{ FIELD }}U.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO).{{ FIELD }}Sale of Wind and Geothermal Assets Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests.{{ FIELD }}White Creek Wind I Divesititure Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC.{{ FIELD }}Waterbury CT Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut.{{ FIELD }}Midway Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California.{{ FIELD }}Sandy Creek Coal Power Plant Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.{{ FIELD }}Zori has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on federal and state energy laws, regulations and policies and representing clients in transactional and commercial matters and in litigation before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the U.S. Department of Energy, state public service commissions, and state and federal courts. She advises clients on organized energy markets and transmission and interconnection arrangements with regional transmission organizations, independent system operators and transmission owning utilities. Zori assists clients in obtaining regulatory authorizations and approvals and in complying with regulatory requirements. She has extensive experience conducting due diligence and in managing the regulatory approval process.\nZori represents project sponsors, equity investors, financial institutions, industrial and institutional energy consumers, project hosts, electric and gas utilities, marketers, and energy services providers in mergers, acquisitions, asset sales, corporate financings, restructurings and energy outsourcing arrangements as well as project development and financings for wind, solar, geothermal, hydroelectric, biomass, natural gas and coal fired energy projects; transmission and interconnection facilities; LNG export projects; and energy storage. She has extensive experience drafting and negotiating power purchase and sale agreements, renewable energy credit sales agreements, transmission services and interconnection agreements, thermal energy sales and service agreements and other energy-related commercial and transaction documents.\nZori has also been recognized for her expertise in energy regulatory law by Legal 500 US 2014. Prior to entering private practice, Zori was an attorney advisor with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and served as chief counsel to the Pennsylvania Governor’s Energy Council. Counsel Colgate University  Georgetown University Georgetown University Law Center District of Columbia Oklahoma Wind Project Represented a utility-scale wind energy developer in connection with the development of 300 MW wind power project in Oklahoma. California Solar Projects Represented an acquirer in connection with the proposed acquisition of three solar projects under development in California. WheatField Wind Farm Represented Fiera Axium Infrastructure in connection with an acquisition of a 49% private equity interest in wind farm located in Oregon State from EDP Renewables North America. Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas. Post Rock Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Post Rock project, a 201 MW wind farm in Kansas. Bishop Hill I Wind Farm Represented a consortium of lenders in the financing of the Bishop Hill I project, a 211 MW wind farm in Illinois. City of Hayward Natural Gas Power Generation Facility Represented Russell City Energy Company, LLC in the $845 million project financing of an approximately 620 MW natural gas-fired, combined-cycle power generation facility in the City of Hayward, California Sale of InterGen N.V. Represented GMR Group on federal energy regulatory matters in the sale of its 50 percent stake in InterGen N.V. for an equity value in excess of $1.2 billion. The sale transaction was the largest cross-border M\u0026amp;A transaction between India and China to date and was named “2010 Infrastructure Deal of the Year” by India Business Law Journal. Lost Creek Wind Farm Represented BayernLB, Nord/LB, UBOC, Rabobank, and Banco Santander in the $352 million project financing of the 150 MW Lost Creek wind farm in DeKalb County, Missouri. EBG Holdings Merger Represented EBG Holdings in obtaining FERC and state regulatory approvals for its merger with Astoria Generating Company in a transaction valued at $5 billion. U.S. Power Generating Company FERC Proceeding Represented U.S. Power Generating Company (the successor of EBG Holdings and Astoria Generating Company) in a proceeding before FERC regarding market power mitigation rules for sales of electric capacity in the New York City market operated by the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO). Sale of Wind and Geothermal Assets Represented a tax equity owner of wind and geothermal assets on energy regulatory issues in connection with the sale of its ownership interests. White Creek Wind I Divesititure Represented a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers on state and federal regulatory issues and approvals related to the sale of all of its interest in a 204 MW wind farm owned by White Creek Wind I LLC. Waterbury CT Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsors Energy Capital Partners and FirstLight Power Resources in the project financing of a gas-fired peaking power plant in Waterbury, Connecticut. Midway Gas Power Plant Represented project sponsor Starwood Energy Group in the project financing of the Midway gas-fired peaking power plant in California. Sandy Creek Coal Power Plant Represented LS Power, Dynegy, and other sponsors in the $1 billion financing of the 900 MW coal-fired Sandy Creek power plant in Texas.","searchable_name":"Zori G. Ferkin","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":34,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":444882,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":6801,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSylvia is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. She offers strategic advice on all workplace matters for employers across multiple jurisdictions. Her expertise includes workforce strategy and compliance, employee disputes, industrial relations, employee entitlements, and investigating workplace misconduct. Sylvia also provides employers with guidance on workplace health and safety, including incident responses. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSylvia has experience acting as a trusted advisor for private sector clients across multiple industries and for Australia\u0026rsquo;s federal and state government employers. Sylvia\u0026rsquo;s focus is to deliver business critical advice for employers whether operating in a single jurisdiction or across borders.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"sylvia-fadel","email":"sfadel@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":15,"guid":"15.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":28,"guid":"28.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":32,"guid":"32.capabilities","index":3,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":4,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":105,"guid":"105.capabilities","index":5,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":118,"guid":"118.capabilities","index":6,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":121,"guid":"121.capabilities","index":7,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fadel","nick_name":"Sylvia","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Sylvia","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eSylvia is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. She offers strategic advice on all workplace matters for employers across multiple jurisdictions. Her expertise includes workforce strategy and compliance, employee disputes, industrial relations, employee entitlements, and investigating workplace misconduct. Sylvia also provides employers with guidance on workplace health and safety, including incident responses. [[--readmore--]]\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSylvia has experience acting as a trusted advisor for private sector clients across multiple industries and for Australia\u0026rsquo;s federal and state government employers. Sylvia\u0026rsquo;s focus is to deliver business critical advice for employers whether operating in a single jurisdiction or across borders.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":11973}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-01-08T21:52:29.000Z","updated_at":"2026-01-08T21:52:29.000Z","searchable_text":"Fadel{{ FIELD }}Sylvia is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s Global Human Capital and Compliance practice. She offers strategic advice on all workplace matters for employers across multiple jurisdictions. Her expertise includes workforce strategy and compliance, employee disputes, industrial relations, employee entitlements, and investigating workplace misconduct. Sylvia also provides employers with guidance on workplace health and safety, including incident responses. \nSylvia has experience acting as a trusted advisor for private sector clients across multiple industries and for Australia’s federal and state government employers. Sylvia’s focus is to deliver business critical advice for employers whether operating in a single jurisdiction or across borders. Associate Macquarie University  Macquarie University  New South Wales","searchable_name":"Sylvia Fadel","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null},{"id":446571,"version":1,"owner_type":"Person","owner_id":7333,"payload":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKimberly Fishman\u0026nbsp;is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Finance and Restructuring practice group. Kimberly's practice focuses on leveraged financial transactions where\u0026nbsp;she represents financial institutions, private equity sponsors, issuers, and corporate borrowers.\u003c/p\u003e","slug":"kimberly-fishman","email":"kfishman@kslaw.com","phone":null,"matters":null,"taggings":{"tags":[],"meta_tags":[]},"expertise":[{"id":29,"guid":"29.capabilities","index":0,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":75,"guid":"75.capabilities","index":1,"source":"capabilities"},{"id":107,"guid":"107.capabilities","index":2,"source":"capabilities"}],"is_active":true,"last_name":"Fishman","nick_name":"Kimberly","clerkships":[],"first_name":"Kimberly","title_rank":9999,"updated_by":202,"law_schools":[{"id":722,"meta":{"degree":"J.D.","honors":"cum laude","is_law_school":"1","graduation_date":"2023-01-01 00:00:00"},"order":1,"pin_order":null,"pin_expiration":null}],"middle_name":" ","name_suffix":"","recognitions":null,"linked_in_url":null,"seodescription":null,"primary_title_id":2,"translated_fields":{"en":{"bio":"\u003cp\u003eKimberly Fishman\u0026nbsp;is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding\u0026rsquo;s New York office and a member of the firm\u0026rsquo;s Finance and Restructuring practice group. Kimberly's practice focuses on leveraged financial transactions where\u0026nbsp;she represents financial institutions, private equity sponsors, issuers, and corporate borrowers.\u003c/p\u003e"},"locales":["en"]},"secondary_title_id":null,"upload_assignments":{"headshot":[{"id":13394}]},"capability_group_id":1},"created_at":"2026-03-09T15:36:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-03-09T15:36:06.000Z","searchable_text":"Fishman{{ FIELD }}Kimberly Fishman is an associate in King \u0026amp; Spalding’s New York office and a member of the firm’s Finance and Restructuring practice group. Kimberly's practice focuses on leveraged financial transactions where she represents financial institutions, private equity sponsors, issuers, and corporate borrowers. Associate Northwestern University Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Fordham University Fordham University School of Law New York","searchable_name":"Kimberly Fishman","is_active":true,"featured":null,"publish_date":null,"expiration_date":null,"blog_featured":null,"published_by":202,"capability_group_featured":null,"home_page_featured":null}]}}