Close

People

Matt Sharrow is an attorney with the E-Discovery practice.  He has extensive experience in pre-trial discovery in mass tort litigation, including the representation of manufacturers of pharmaceutical and petrochemical products.  Additionally Matt also has a strong background representing major financial institutions with their e-discovery management.  He provides advice and counsel to clients to limit the scope and cost of the document review, including protocols/best practices, vendor selection and contract negotiations, as well as early case assessment, key word development and validation. Matt works closely with in-house counsel, outside counsel and the vendor to ensure consistency and quality in the document review process and work product by developing customized workflows, document organization and quality checks.

Matt has over seven years of E-Discovery experience.  Prior to joining King & Spalding, he was a Project Manager for one of the leading e-discovery vendors in the industry. Matt has experience over the entire spectrum of the e-discovery process, from document collection to production of privilege logs.  He has been an integral member of the senior staff overseeing  e-discovery cases at King & Spalding that utilize predictive coding. Matt has managed the E-Discovery process in a wide variety of matters, including pharmaceutical, environmental, product liability, mass tort, intellectual property, business litigation, and bankruptcy.  Additionally, he has overseen various internal and governmental investigations, including the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), various State Attorneys General, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

 

Full Bio

Credentials

Georgia

Matters

Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King & Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.

Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.

See more

Close

Matters

Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King & Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.

Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.

Managing 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.  Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company.

Supervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.  Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client.

Managing more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.  Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality.

Supervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.  750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Supervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility.

Managing and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document.  

Supervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company

Litigation Technology Experience

Supervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.  He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.

Matters

Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King & Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.

Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.

See more

Close

Matters

Managing over 80 attorneys in the review of 1,400,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in connection with an SEC investigation for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Managing team of 14 attorneys in the review of 150,000 documents and the preparation of a privilege log in a 2 month period.  The review was King & Spalding’s first utilization of Predictive Coding.  Documents were reviewed for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality in connection with a breach of contract claim.

Supervising over 30 attorneys in connection with 2 separate internal reviews of approximately 150,000 documents for a major pharmaceutical client.

Managing 19 attorneys in the review of approximately 30,000 documents in one week produced by opposing counsel.  Documents were reviewed for relevance issues and significance in connection with a patent infringement suit brought against our client, a leading pharmaceutical company.

Supervising 9 attorneys in connection with an internal investigation involving more than 110,000 documents over approximately a 2 month period.  Documents were reviewed for privilege, significance, and responsiveness in connection with civil litigation involving a Fortune 500 client.

Managing more than 15 attorneys in connection with the review of more than 100,000 documents for a Fortune 500 energy client defending environmental liability actions.  Reviews consisted of analysis of documents for responsiveness, issue coding, privilege and confidentiality.

Supervising over 75 attorneys in connection with an SEC investigation.  750,000 documents were reviewed in 2 months for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality for a Fortune 500 financial institution.

Supervising a team of 18 attorneys in connection with DOJ investigations. Over 1,500,000 documents were reviewed for relevance, significance and privilege for a large medical device manufacturer. Managing a team of 7 attorneys in the review of 250,000 documents in connection with a DOJ investigation involving a large private healthcare facility.

Managing and coordinating a predictive coding review of approximately 110,000 documents. After performing multiple training and quality control rounds the universe of documents that needed to be reviewed was cut down to approximately 20,000 document.  

Supervising a team of 15 attorneys in connection with a business litigation case involving the calculation of oil and gas royalties. Over 700,000 documents were reviewed for relevant issues and privilege for a Fortune 100 oil company

Litigation Technology Experience

Supervising and training attorney review teams and collecting, reviewing and producing documents. Matt has broad experience creating project plans and developing protocols for objective coding, privilege and confidentiality coding, imaging, scanning and printing.  He has extensive knowledge and experience of document review and litigation support systems including Relativity, Clearwell, Ringtail, IPro Eclipse, Attenex, Doc. Mapper, Concordance, IPro, and Microsoft Access.

Credentials

Georgia