News & Insights
June 15, 2026 McGregor Scott’s representation of Dana Williamson, former chief of staff to Gov. Gavin Newsom, is noted in a profile examining a Justice Department investigation into Gov. Newsom and his wife
June 4, 2026 King & Spalding Earns 230 Lawyer Rankings, 106 Practice Group Rankings in Chambers USA Guide
May 14, 2026 McGregor Scott represents Dana Williamson in a campaign fund theft case
April 18, 2026 K&S obtains a favorable ruling on behalf of DirecTV before a California federal court, which issued a preliminary injunction barring the $6.2B merger of Nexstar and Tegna
April 17, 2026 King & Spalding Is Representing DIRECTV in Its Federal Antitrust Lawsuit to Block Nexstar-TEGNA Merger Securing a Preliminary Injunction
March 30, 2026 K&S counsels DirecTV before a California federal court, which blocked Nexstar and Tegna from combining operations in their $6.2B merger while a legal challenge from DirecTV moves forward
March 21, 2026 K&S’s client alert is referenced in a profile discussing Walmart customers' concerns regarding the implementation of AI-driven digital price labels and recent pricing adjustments
March 20, 2026 McGregor Scott, Olivier Antoine, Sean Royall, Emily Blackburn, Laura Harris, Joshua Hazan, Sean Murray and Arthur Schoen counsel DirecTV before a California federal court in an antitrust dispute against Nexstar Media Group and affiliates
March 6, 2026 McGregor Scott, who was appointed as fraud special counsel by California Gov. Gavin Newsome in 2021, explains how he helped recover billions of dollars for the state's EDD
March 2, 2026 McGregor Scott is quoted in a profile questioning the appointment of Stephen Sherrill to District 2 supervisor in San Francisco by former Mayor London Breed
February 27, 2026 K&S counsels Equifax before a California federal court in a proposed class action alleging that the company violated antitrust law by excluding medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports
January 23, 2026 McGregor Scott, Chris Yook and Zoe Beiner counsel Equifax before a California federal court in a proposed class action alleging that the company violated antitrust law by excluding medical debt under $500 from consumer credit reports